WEBVTT - Building Performance, Next Asset Value

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Financial markets can no longer ignore the impacts of climate change,

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>shifting consumer expectations and increasing regulatory scrutiny. These forces are

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>reshaping industries, redefining risk, and creating new opportunities for long

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>term value creation. Through conversations with industry leaders, investors, and

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>subject matter experts, we explore where sustainability is translating into

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>measurable financial outcomes. Welcome to Sustainability Currents, brought to you

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>by Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Commercial real say is facing growing pressure from rising insurance costs,

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>more frequent extreme weather, and increasingly stringent building performance standards.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 2>As these pressures affect operating costs, financing, and asset values,

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 2>investors are paying closer attention to how buildings perform their

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 2>full life cycle, not just energy efficiency, but also resilience

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>and long term asset performance. Today we'll discuss how building

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 2>performance is measured, which metrics matter most to investors, and

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 2>where resilience investment is reshaping the economics of the built environment.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Joining me today is Brando Wheeler, director of operations for

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>bram USA. Briannau. Welcome to the show.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much for having me our pleasure.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 2>So perhaps we can kick off with setting the stage

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 2>for listeners who may be less familiar with BRAM, could

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 2>you briefly explain what it is and the role that

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 2>plays in today's commercial real estate market.

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sure so. So BRIHAM was the very first green

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 3>building certification program we launched in nineteen ninety and we

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 3>are completely about building science, right, So the certification initially

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 3>was about understanding how buildings were performing against you know,

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of the star of sustainable development. But ultimately what

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 3>brand certification does now is provide transparency on sustainability risks

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 3>and opportunities at the asset. So developers or owners measure

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 3>their asset or project's performance against the standard and certification

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>provides the transparency to their stakeholders about that performance. So,

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>in development, it reflects the developer's decisions made during the

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 3>design process and during construction of the asset that ultimately

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 3>set the performance trajectory of that asset. In operations, for

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 3>existing assets, it reflects the asset as built and how

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 3>it's being operated. And for renovations or fit outs, it

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>reflects the extent to which the work is optimizing the

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 3>asset to continue to perform or improve performance over time.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>So Bram's ratings really allow a wide performance spectrum anywhere

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 3>from the highest performance achievable in a building for our

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 3>current time to projects that have incorporated sustainability maybe on

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 3>a smaller scale. All those projects represent risk and opportunity,

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and the certification can inform investors, owners, and future buyers

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 3>about the asset itself.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. That's helpful to hear, and perhaps a bit

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 2>telling too, would be to talk a little bit on

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 2>market evolution. So one trend we've been following is that

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>resilience is showing up in many different conversations, from insurance

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and financing to building performance standards and physical climate risk.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious how that compares with what you're seeing directly

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 2>from clients. You know, what are the biggest changes maybe

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you've seen in the conversations you're having over the past

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>few years.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, resilience has been a really interesting topic and one

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>which even maybe six five, six years ago was seen

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>as quite niche. And so the focus has really changed.

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean operational energy efficiency and buildings. You know, that's

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>been that conversation has been going on since the nineteen seventies,

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 3>and even with that understanding, over all this time, it's

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>really been a slow adoption right. The importance on operational

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>energy efficiency really has varied depending on where we've been

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>in the energy cycle. Basically, it was a tolerable waste

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 3>as long as energy prices were acceptable. You know, Assessing

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>physical climate risk has gone from that niche practice to

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 3>mainstream really in just the last five years. It's been

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 3>an incredible adoption rate. It's been helped by the accessibility

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 3>of tools that help interpret those complex concepts like climate

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>scenarios and asset level exposure to hazards. But really it's

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 3>because the last five years has seen the realities of

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 3>climate change with extreme weather events hitting asset value. Real

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 3>estate is ultimately a risk management business, right, Understanding what's

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 3>going to impact the income over the whole period and

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 3>ultimately that determines asset value at exit. Climate risk is

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 3>really something that can be understood and acted on to

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>protect that assets value over time. So the last three years,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 3>you know where the hottest on record, and the summer

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty four, some eighty percent of Americans experienced

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>a climate change enhanced emergency, so extreme heat, extreme cold,

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 3>wind events, and wildfires, and we're really seeing that that

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 3>widely shared lived experience has helped real estate owners and

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 3>investors understand that this is having and will continue to

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>have real impacts, and they need to prepare to protect

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>their assets value for the longer term.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, you touched on I think some

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>of the key economics here where physical risk is you know,

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 2>hitting asset value. I'm sure too though that when it

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>comes to economics like those, changing priorities even ultimately influence

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>where owners choose to invest. So for investors, the important

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 2>question is you know whether those investments produce measurable financial

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>benefits risks. So where are building owners seeing that you know,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the strongest financial return from improving building performance and resilience.

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's an interesting time, right. So energy efficiency,

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 3>operational energy efficiency was always you know, it always paid

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 3>on some level. The question was how long would it take? Right?

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 3>And so now the combination of energy affordability and availability

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 3>has come to the to the forefront. And that also

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 3>is twinned with resilience as a whole. So the resilience

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 3>of our grids, the ability to you know, protect our asset,

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 3>and these these things are all intertwined. Right, So the

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 3>energy availability and affordability question really has brought this to

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 3>a critical point, and it means that operational energy efficiency

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 3>is you know, coming much more to the force. So

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, whereas once getting access to energy was considered routine,

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 3>we now have many markets where demand well outstripped supply

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 3>and that's leading to long wait times to get connection

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 3>for development that costs money. Right, Utilities are just not

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 3>ready to support that demand that's coming through. So on

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of places, prices arising and that's really improving

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 3>the payback calculation on energy efficiency and energy costs are

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 3>starting to hit tenants hard and they're starting to look

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>for spaces that reduce their operating costs. Real estate owners

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>can offer at least building level operational energy efficiency, whether

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 3>they're triple at least or managing the asset directly as

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>a way of attracting and retaining tenants. In many ways,

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 3>operational if energy efficiency actually is becoming a resilience issue,

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 3>because when you have an efficient building, you're also building

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 3>resilience into that asset. You're hardening that asset against extreme

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 3>weather events. You are also being able to create environments

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>in which when we have extreme weather events, the people

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>inside those buildings can stay safe. Right. So it's it's

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.119
<v Speaker 3>interesting to see that the intersection of these two things

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 3>happening and actually seeing that operational energy efficiency plus the

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 3>more traditional things we think about resilience are actually pulling

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>together to say. When we're talking about kind of looking

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 3>at the bigger picture of how can we make buildings

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 3>more resilient, they're intertwined, they're all together, and when you

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 3>do those different projects together, Really we're talking about from

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 3>a cost perspective. A lot of this is focused on

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>insurance costs. We know insurance premiums have gone up in

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 3>a lot of cases that has really impacted NI and

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 3>asset value. How do we manage that in a changing climate.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Focusing on the energy efficiency the asset plus the additional

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 3>resiliency elements that can protect that asset can help manage

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 3>those insurance costs over the longer term. Again, this is

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>a risk management business, right, and insurance is ultimately a

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 3>risk management project. It's all about understanding those risks and

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 3>taking the calculated steps forward. Some of the bigger players,

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, where you have large assets, so you can

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.599
<v Speaker 3>actually spread risk in different ways. You can be strategic.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 3>That's going to be good, they're going to be okay.

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 3>But really the insurance costs come to folks who can't

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 3>spread that risk in different ways. They're exposed to hazards

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 3>that they can't they can't mitigate, So how are they

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 3>going to manage that over the longer term. That's a

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 3>really big part of it. But you know, it's interesting

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 3>that the answer that we've had for forty years continues

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to be a really critical one. When you create energy

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 3>efficient buildings, you also create more resilient buildings along with that.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>That's helpful to hear, and I think you know clear

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of how it's impacting not just operating costs, but the

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 2>insurance element. I think we tend to discuss these topics

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 2>though at a market level, but they could be easier

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to understand through real world examples so much more specific.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Can you perhaps share an example where the BREAM framework

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 2>meaningfully influence perhaps a client's investment decision or even the

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>long term performance of an asset. Yeah. Sure.

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>So many of our clients are using brand certification as

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 3>a process for kind of getting their house in order right,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 3>to position the assets, and really to understand where these

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 3>assets are starting from today, right, getting the understanding of

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the sustainability risks and opportunities that are there, and for

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of buildings, shocking. I know, lots of owners

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 3>don't have a lot of information about it, right. They

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 3>have some basics that come from a property condition assessment

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that's conducted in a two week due diligence period, right,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you can learn a lot of information

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 3>from that, but ultimately you have to understand what you

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 3>own and what the reality of that is on the ground.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 3>So we've worked with a lot of clients who are

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of kind of starting from the basics of filling

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>in data gaps that they should have just for everyday performance,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 3>let alone for sustainability. Right. So this process can provide

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 3>really a structured way to gather documentation. It needs to

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 3>be gathered, validated, and submitted as part of our process,

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 3>and it really helps them get those assets into position

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 3>to be able to manage going forward, right, really understanding

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 3>what the what the basics are, and then to be

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 3>able to bring in improvement plans. So our process requires

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>not only documentation, but we have a really rigorous certification

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 3>process which includes an assessor trained and licensed by vary

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to verify that performance on site. So you know, getting

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 3>all that together, that initial certification for many of our

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 3>clients is about you know, understanding, okay, where we now,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 3>let's go get that building building and improvement plans, let's say,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 3>on top of verified data and information. And that's really critical.

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 3>So in the last couple of years we've published case

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 3>studies with Newvene EQT real Estate and axi im Alts

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>which is now BMP Pariba, where they've described how BRIM

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 3>has really helped them understand the performance and set their

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 3>improvement pathway for the future to deliver value. And I

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 3>think one of the most exciting things about this is

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 3>that we are not talking super high performing assets right now,

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 3>right like, this isn't about the super shiny things. These

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 3>are about really buildings that reflect a lot of our

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>current building stock, which is that they may be on

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 3>the lower performance scale, but there are absolutely ways that

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 3>they can move forward, that they can improve and actually

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>drive value through that process. So sustainability, I think for

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 3>a long time was thought about is something that you know,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 3>we do for high performance assets already. You know, it's

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of like given the high five to but that's

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 3>not where the risk sits. So for those clients, I think,

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 3>particularly in those case studies, it was a great demonstration

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>of how they were looking at this as you know,

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>how sustainability can really help drive that value wherever this

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 3>asset's performance sits.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Exactly what I wanted to kind of dive in next.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, one challenge the industry faces is that most

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of like tomorrow's building stock has already been built, but

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 2>new constructions only part of the equation. And you know

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 2>you spoke already a ton on this, But what are

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 2>clients prioritizing I guess when deciding how to retrofit existing assets.

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 3>So the two things I think that are the most

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 3>immediate or kind of what I mentioned before, so cost

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>you know that certainly is sharpening pencils on the efficiency side, right.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 3>The other eye is to regulation for existing buildings. So

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, you know, around building performance standards. So we've

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 3>seen retrofits to reduce energy usage. It's been particularly active

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 3>in those jurisdictions with building performance standards. But we're also

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 3>seeing particularly national owners really looking at where building performance

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 3>standards may emerge, or even using building performance standards as

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 3>a framework for all of their assets to think if

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 3>a building performance standard came in, how would this asset perform?

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, as of twenty twenty four, about

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent of all buildings in the US were

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>covered by a building performance standard, and there's many jurisdictions

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 3>that are still considering rolling them out. So for clients

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 3>who are thinking about that regulation, they're thinking about also

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 3>resilience and the hazard exposure that they have and needing

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>to mitigate or manage that risk. What we're seeing with

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 3>retrofits is actually bringing those two things together. What are

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 3>interventions or changes that can be made where energy and

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 3>resilience intersect. So high efficiency buildings, you know, cutting cutting

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 3>energy use that can also need that mean that you know,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>backup solar or solar powered battery systems can be smaller, cheaper,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>and run longer during extreme events. Those all provide value

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 3>in the asset and in aggregate. When buildings reduce energy

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 3>demand and participate in demand management programs, it decreases stress

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 3>on the grid and helps avoid blackouts which have those

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>wider economic consequences. So we're really seeing the twinning there

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 3>thinking about how can solutions do more things? What are

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the co benefits? I mean, find me a solution that

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 3>reduces energy usage, you know, delivers additional resilience and protects

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 3>occupant health and well being, and you've got a business

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 3>case winner, so really looking for the solutions that do

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 3>all of those things. And I think you know, certainly,

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 3>given with the acute events, there's been a focus rightly

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 3>so around life safety and comfort that has come in.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, for real estate, ultimately we're a building's business,

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 3>but we're also about people, right, It's really about occupants

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of it. How do we ensure that

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 3>people stay safe during these events? You know, efficient buildings

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>that can maintain reasonable internal temperatures mean that occupants can

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>shelter in place right as long as the building structural

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 3>integrity is maintained. And I mean this is really critically

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 3>important for multifamily but also for commercial properties too. Right,

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 3>people's productivity is damaged, particularly by extreme heat, so it

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 3>increases fatigue, gets so those reaction times, and it raises

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>the rate of mistakes. That's a business issue. So you know,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 3>bringing all of those two things together, we need to

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 3>we need to start fortifying our buildings for the climate

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 3>that we have in the future and really the one

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>we're facing right now, just for it to maintain the

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 3>value over that time. And there's a lot of building

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 3>stock that really needs that help. So, you know, the

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>way we look at it is like it needs to

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 3>be about all buildings everywhere. How do we move those

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 3>all forward? How do we you know, keep them uh,

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, keep them focused or the ownership focused to

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 3>keep moving those forward? And how do we provide a

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 3>means of measuring that that is really you know, science

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 3>based and delivers value over the longer term.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>And I guess that would just again stem from the

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 2>growing importance of consistent, comparable data like uh, you know,

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 2>obviously investors increasingly rely on that building performance information when

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 2>they're evaluating assets, but not all data is created equal.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 2>And you mentioned the bit on the importance behind having

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, some kind of data to derive insights. You

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>can't manage what you don't measure, the famous saying that

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 2>everyone likes to be used the you know, obviously brain

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 2>emphasizes third party verification. But like, why is independent building

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>performance data so valuable for building owners and for investors?

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a great question. You know, we start at kind

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 3>of the basis of building science, right, So our organization,

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 3>be Area, is a one hundred plus year old building

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.239
<v Speaker 3>science research organization, and you know, we're the first to

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>say there are a million different ways that you can

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 3>measure performance, But ultimately what is meaningful What can you

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 3>not only understand but influence and change as an outcome.

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 3>We often talk about this in the difference like when

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 3>you have an existing building, most people can't change the

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 3>walls unless you're going to do a major you know, retrofit. Right.

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 3>So you got the asset that you have, how can

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>you optimize within it? Within that? Right? So for us,

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 3>the first thing is establishing what are the what are

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 3>the data points that matter? How does it have impact?

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 3>So you know, for example, you know we've talked about

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>energy efficiency. Really energy efficiency is important, but ultimately from

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 3>an impact perspective, it's about how much carbon is produced

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 3>from the from the energy that goes with that, right.

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 3>So you know operational energy FREEMS recognized operational carbon emissions

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 3>in our standards right from the beginning because science told

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 3>us that's where the impact was going to be. So

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 3>we focus on looking at the metrics that really matter

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 3>and that are measurable and end can be and can

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>be changed or influenced right through through changes in management. Okay,

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 3>so real estate is ultimately about managing risks, right in

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 3>order to manage those risks. One, you have to understand

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 3>what the risk is and the data that underpins that

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 3>that's going to tell you. So again narrowing it down

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 3>from the billion and one things that you can measure

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 3>down to the things that really matter. But the independence

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 3>of that data, right, Like you said, not all data

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 3>is the same, and it's really important for investors to

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 3>be able to trust the information that they're being given. Right,

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 3>do they trust that the risks are being managed and

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 3>that the performance is as they are being told? And

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we're in very much a trust but verify

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of society, right that comes behind this. So Briham's

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 3>process is really building on that. We take it a

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 3>step further through requiring the on site visit, right because

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's not just what's shown on paper but

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>actually backed up what's seeing on site. And you know,

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean any owner can tell you, you know, when they've

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 3>purchased something, and they may walk in and there's always

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 3>a surprise, right. I don't think there's any real estate

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 3>owner and manager in the business who hasn't had at

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 3>least one of those in their career. So the independence

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 3>of the assessor from the owner and even from bre

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 3>really makes them the independent third part verifying the performance achieved,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 3>so you know, it's not just what's set on paper,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 3>but it's actually what's going on in the assets. And

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 3>it's important to note right, most assets in the building stock,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 3>like I said, are not high performance buildings. That adds

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 3>risk to the asset, but that doesn't make it uninvestable,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 3>and in fact, one could argue that actually the more

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>you know brown quote unquote a building is the more

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 3>desperately it needs that investment. Right. The key is providing

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the transparency of the extent of the risks and opportunities

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>and allow the investor to make an informed decision. Being

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 3>really clear on the critical metrics to measure is part

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 3>of that, and that's where we come at this from

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 3>a science base. Trust the science to define those metrics.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha, And I'd love to touch on AI now if

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 2>that's okay. You know, on our side, we've spent quite

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 2>a bit of time just researching AI infrastructure, particularly around

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the how water, power and cooling all play in this space.

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 2>And as data centers become larger, more resource intensive, they're

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 2>introducing a different set of design and operational challenges that

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I would say traditional well compared with traditional commercial buildings,

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and so would be great to hear from conversations you've had,

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 2>even perhaps some of the certificates you guys were able

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to issue using BREAM, Like, how are those trends changing

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the way clients maybe think about designing and just overall

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 2>operating data centers.

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a great one. I mean, it wouldn't be

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 3>a conversation if we didn't bring up AI at this point, right.

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 3>It's a really I mean, it's a really exciting space,

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 3>and this is interestingly presenting us some really incredible challenges

0:22:55.640 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 3>in thinking about resource management and availability. I mean, there

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 3>was always the theoretical, you know, reaching a limit of

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 3>what we have available, and data centers have kind of

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 3>brought that into into reality. Certainly on energy, we're already

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 3>experiencing it, and I think the fears around energy limitations

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 3>of energy availability are coming kind of into the water

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 3>sphere now. You know, let's start with water though, because

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a really big one. You know,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 3>there's been some pretty wild estimates out in the media

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>about how much water data centers consume. Ye as if

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 3>that consumption would be uniform no matter where the data

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 3>centers are built. So you know, I mean I've been

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 3>I've been working in the data center sector for at

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 3>least two years now. I'm helping develop our standards and

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>updata standards around data centers and you know, and I

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 3>work with a number of operators we have, we've issued

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 3>certificates for data centers for over ten years. And I

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 3>think what's interesting there is, like the miss that's being

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 3>made is that really, when I comes to water, the

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 3>critical thing to consider is the cooling strategy that's being

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 3>used because that's where the water consumption comes in. And

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 3>that cooling strategy is very different climactically. Right. This isn't

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 3>a one size fits all where we're throwing up the

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 3>same building whether we're building in Phoenix or you're building

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 3>in the Great Lakes area, Right, So there is absolutely

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 3>a potential to be consuming millions of gallons of water.

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely possible. But practically speaking, most data center developers

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 3>are now installing closed loop systems which do not use that.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 3>And that's not just in water stressed areas. That's in

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different areas. There is a challenge around refrigerants.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 3>We can't be blind to the fact that refrigerants aren't

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 3>necessarily benign as their impact, but it is not necessarily

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 3>the water stress that's there. And I think I think

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 3>a lot of data center operators are very conscious of

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 3>partly because the energy the energy limitations that are now

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 3>being hit, really conscious of what happens if you don't

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 3>have that. Those are critical material, uh significant issues, right,

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 3>So what transparency is not not present at the moment,

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's stirring a lot of fears about

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 3>what does this mean? And we should be concerned. I mean,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 3>water is really critical. There is no life without water,

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 3>and so for me, it's even more critical than the

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 3>energy conversation. We need to be able to manage that.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Just to make the matter a little bit more complicated

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>to you, I would just throw in there that a

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of these you know, closed loops zero water cooling designs,

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of it is also announced for the new

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>build out, which kind of goes back to what we

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 2>touched on earlier, the importance of retrofitting existing you know assets,

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and at least to your point, having disclosure so insight

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>into you know, what is there cooling strategy And though

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 2>that is like a huge part of their consumption, really

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 2>their water footprint largely anchors in how they're sourcing their electricity,

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>because if it's powered by water intensive fuel types like coal,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>natural gas, nuclear, that's a whole other issue that makes

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 2>it even more you know, important for.

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Those who are in the in the GHG inventory or

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 3>calculation business. I started talking about Scope three water not

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 3>that long ago, and people shuddered, you know, it was

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 3>that idea about yeah, like, I mean, it's not it's

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 3>not in the protocol yet, nobody needs to worry. But

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 3>but that's essentially what we're talking about. We're talking about

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.479
<v Speaker 3>the impacts from from that generation. And yes, that is

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 3>absolutely hidden at this point. We don't have a method

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 3>for calculating. And but it's interesting, right, Like you know,

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 3>the GHD protocol came about where people were like, you know,

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 3>there's two things that we care about. Really the core

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 3>things is what are we generating on site? What you know,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 3>emissions we're generating on site, and then what power are

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 3>we purchasing? Scope three for GHD emissions came later, right,

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 3>This idea about actually there's a lot of different things.

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 3>When you look at Scope three of the GHD protocol,

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 3>there's fifteen different categories. There's a lot of different ways.

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we'll come to water in the same way. Right,

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 3>we need to focus on you know, what are we

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 3>using on site, the efficiency of that, and really I

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 3>think from a data center perspective, it's around site selection

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 3>where you know, I mean, we've got the twinning of

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 3>like I think energy is the bigger thing at the moment.

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 3>You know, water you can solve, you can have. I

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't call it waterless data centers, but again there's alternatives

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 3>that are not water that actually would not be then

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a barrier to citing a data center. I think the

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 3>power aspect, though, I mean, that's going to come down

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 3>the line. At this point, we're just talking about, you know,

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 3>what can be transmitted down the way line even I

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 3>mean for a lot of folks, it's like can it

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 3>be transmitted down the line?

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Availability rather than even an affordability in some level. I

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 3>think the thing that's interesting about data centers is like,

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, in the standard real estate world, you know,

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 3>a small efficiency gain, you you know, the the you know,

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 3>the being counters would say, well, you know, it's kind

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 3>of a small gain. It's not really a big deal.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't move the needle, whereas even like a five

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 3>percent efficiency gain at a data center could mean millions

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 3>of dollars, and so there's real you know, drive to

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>make that work, uh and actually to drive those efficiencies. So,

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, just like everything else we see, you know,

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 3>AI infrastructure is basically turning into you know, everything else

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 3>on steroids. I think it's been a really good learning

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>case for the rest of real estate to say, actually,

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, in a world of limitations of limited resources,

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 3>how do we choose what's important? How do we choose

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 3>who gets energy and who doesn't. Why do we choose that?

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Water is another really great way. I mean, that's another

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 3>very interesting facet and you know what's going on in

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the Colorado River right now with that system that is

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 3>again it's a mirror to what we're doing in energy.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately, you know, we need to think about all

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 3>of those different aspects. How do we work together as

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 3>an economy to be able to access that in that energy?

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think a lot of power is more difficult,

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 3>right because ultimately the power demand is being driven by

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the equipment and the building and that's out of the

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 3>control of data center developers and operators. It just is right,

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, Navidia and others are making determinations about how

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 3>energy intensive or energy efficient their equipment is going to

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 3>be and the data but the data center developers and

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 3>operators are the face of it right to the communities.

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 3>So you know, I mean think about it this way, right,

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Industry buildings can be used from everything from logistics warehouses

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 3>to advanced manufacturing. The energy usage in those use types

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 3>is totally different, but that's driven by tenant use, you know,

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 3>not the building itself. So how do you manage that?

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, for data center developers and operators, a lot

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of that is going to be about figuring out what

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 3>is within their responsibility and control and making sure that

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 3>that is as efficient as possible, while also you know,

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 3>working with their their occupiers, their digital occupiers. You know,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting in the office sector, you know, many owners

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>have requirements on the energy efficiency of the equipment that

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 3>can be installed in the building, you know, to ensure

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the design or actual energy load provided is maintained. Right,

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 3>there's only so much power they can do. With data centers,

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 3>there's no such limitation. And there's a good reason for that,

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 3>and that is because the equipment is changing so quickly

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 3>at this point. How how to manage that is very

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 3>very difficult. Ultimately it becomes about power allocation. You know,

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 3>is as a digital tenant you go into a data center,

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 3>you're paying for a certain amount of power allocation. There's

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 3>penalties for going over that allocation, right, But ultimately, so

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 3>if you're installing equipment that is more intensive there, it is, right,

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 3>but ultimately that is something that's being made, the decisions

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 3>being made by the tenants to put in that particular equipment.

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the biggest you know, this is

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 3>a multi faceted challenge. Data center developers and operators need

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to focus on how they create buildings that are really

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 3>energy efficient from a building systems perspective to and resilient

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 3>as well to go with that. But it's also up

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to the digital tenants, the occupiers of this, and the

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 3>equipment manufacturers, the IT folks to really think about their equipment.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 3>It's energy efficiency, it's processing and ultimately I think, I

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 3>mean the big one that's kind of hidden is the

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 3>e waste that's coming out of this. The refresh rate

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 3>is just incredible, and again another sneaker, we're all busy

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 3>looking at power, what's that going to be just to

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 3>get this dang thing online, and really, what's going to

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 3>happen in five years time when they need to refresh

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 3>all the equipment. Where's it all going to go. What's

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 3>going to happen to it is going into a local landfill? Gosh,

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I hope not. But we need a circular economy and

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 3>we need it fast.

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Right And I think that goes back to the cascading

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 2>effects of the supply chain, where it's you know, we're

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 2>looking at waste, we're looking at energy, there's water, so

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 2>very complex. But hopefully as time goes on, we're getting

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 2>more answers, or at least there's more companies that are

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of showing leading by example and showing the way

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 2>for others to move forward.

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think the biggest thing here is the

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 3>transparency piece. There's a lot of fear going on right

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 3>now about what's happening because there just isn't the transparency

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 3>that we expect or we've had from other industries. Bring

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 3>the transparency and we will ease the concerns and the fears.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that's going to be the first step. And ultimately,

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 3>like I've said about Braham, that's kind of why we're

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 3>here in the first place, but also you know, being

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 3>able to be clear about those impacts and the you know,

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 3>the cost and the benefits.

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha. And maybe on that note we can end more

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 2>on a question that's forward looking, so, you know, looking

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 2>beyond today's market, investors are trying to understand which performance

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 2>metrics are likely to become more important over the next decade,

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 2>as the regulations evolve and as the physical risks continue

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 2>to change. Perhaps looking ahead of just five years, what

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 2>building performance metrics do you think investors and property owners

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.959
<v Speaker 2>will pay much closer attention to than they do today.

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 3>I think in the US it's going to be about

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 3>energy use intensity EUI for a segment of the market,

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 3>and certainly from a global investor perspective, they will continue

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 3>also to focus on carbon use intensity. But I think

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 3>EUY is going to be the core metric, partly because

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of guys sits for the regulation, and I

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 3>think we're going to see those building performance standards start

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>to be implemented much more broadly. You know, the the

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 3>withdrawal of the federal government from looking at these issues

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 3>has not stopped, and effect probably is accelerated state and

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 3>local action to bring in UH, regulations that will manage

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 3>carbon emissions, so I think I think EUY though, will

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 3>be even more important. That's the regulation side, that's the

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 3>energy affordability and availability, and I think ultimately certainly on

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 3>the development side UH for non data centers, I think

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the the ask for development, you know, the energy asks

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 3>that's going to come from developments, is going to be

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 3>heavily questioned as there's so much pressure on the grid.

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't see that changing for the next five years.

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 3>I think some of this is also going to come

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 3>in with on site generation and battery storage, right, so

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, twinning those things about how do we continue operating,

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 3>how can we reduce our reliance on the grid, and

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 3>then how do we go through blackouts which are more

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 3>likely or they feel more likely at this point because

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 3>of the strain on the energy consumption we even have

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 3>today as utilities move forward. So I think that's going

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 3>to be the next thing is not just you know,

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 3>are you getting enough energy where are you getting it from?

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 3>But how are you going to maintain that operation, whether

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 3>for residential, for multifamily, or for a commercial business through

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 3>periods of extreme weather, heat or cold and other events.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:00.879
<v Speaker 3>And then I think the other one is going to be,

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, the movement. Right now, I think most investors

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 3>are asking questions about physical climate risk. Have you assessed?

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you understand? I think the next five years is

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 3>going to be about and what are you doing about it?

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Are you doing anything? And actually and not to I mean,

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 3>obviously I always make a plug for we should be

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 3>doing something about it, right, but there is also a

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 3>decision of not acting right and but that also has

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 3>to be transparent. There is a case in some ways

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.439
<v Speaker 3>where people would not invest in those things, but it's

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 3>just as important to ask why not as much as why.

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like.

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 3>You know that the real move is going to be

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 3>from you now understand the risk? How are you applying this?

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 3>And that's going to be a big change, particularly you know,

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 3>this is an al Ninio year, right it is building

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 3>and the more events we have, the wildfires in particular,

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 3>the more I think this is really praying on people's

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 3>minds about how we're going to continue to adapt to

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 3>the world that's really changing quite quickly around us.

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Wonderful, Brianna, Thank you so much for joining us today

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 2>and for sharing your perspective, and thank you to everyone

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 2>for listening, so if you're interested in learning more, you

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 2>can explore Bloomberg Intelligences Prepare and Repair theme and other

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 2>physical environment themes by going to BI space theme on

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, or you could read additional research from

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Intelligence Sustainable Finance team by going to bi

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Space ESG. Thanks for listening, and we hope you'll join

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 2>us again for next episode.