WEBVTT - Mega April Q&A: Part 1

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hull that for me, I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>be happy. You want to be happy for a day

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>at a steak?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that woof?

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Woof?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And don and tie.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.159
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the solid verbal boys and girls. My

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 3>name is ty Hildebrand. That fine gentleman over there has

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 3>always the monster of the midweight An Rubinstein, sir.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how are you not bad?

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Had a bit of a saga, saga saga with catching

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 2>a mouse this morning in our basement who was on

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>its last little legs Okay, walked through a thunderstorm because

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I had to pick up the car getting an oil

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>change and a tire rotation. You're supposed to rotate your tires?

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Is that a thing? It is?

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I just okay, no, No, that's that's definitely a very

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 2>real thing, rotating the tires have been rotated. Mix some

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>well I didn't mix some dough. I made some dough

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 2>ball from some previously resting cold fermenting dough. And so

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 2>that'll happen later in the week pizza wise. So it's

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>been an active morning. I was just on a PAC

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 2>twelve radio with Guy Haberman and Evan Moore. Okay, great,

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 2>they do a great job. So it's it's been an

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 2>excitable morning. And I worked out ty. I even got

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 2>a workout in because I couldn't get one in last night,

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 2>and I did. And its appropriate for this show because

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a Q and A show that we're just hitting

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 2>different topics.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Boom boom, boom boom.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>It was an interval workout, a high intensity interval workout.

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've done one of those.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Sam, dude, settle down. I had two cups of black

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 3>tea and two eggs and that's what I did this morning.

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I didn't. I couldn't get through the entire workout. I

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 2>looked like Patrick Ewing in the fourth quarter after merely

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>fifteen or sixteen minutes. And I'm feeling good though, you know,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>good good.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>It's good to have you at full capacity.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna need your energy because this is a monster

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 3>recording session that we're set to embark on here. Thank

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 3>you to one and all for stopping on, buy, downloading, listening, subscribing,

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 3>what have you. The show is always driven by our

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 3>good friends over at Geico. If you have not hit

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the subscribe button, yet please feel free to do so.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 3>It's free, it's easy. Tell all your friends, don't forget

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 3>to go to forballers dot com if you want interesting

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 3>perks like a full video version of this show, all

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 3>of our shows given to you a little bit early.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 3>You get access to the Patreon community, the discord, the

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>bonus content, extra nuggets, all the good stuff we've been

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 3>telling you about. You can find it for Ballers dot

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 3>com and last, but certainly not least, going out to

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 3>solid Giveaway dot Com. You've got until April the twenty third,

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 3>at which point we're gonna draw a name that is

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 3>going to win that AJ Brown signed Ole Miss Minnie helmet,

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>at which point we will do it all over again.

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I got another helmet in the queue, Dan, But today's show,

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>today's show is a long one. We did it last month.

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>We're going to do it again now. Throughout the course

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of any given month, any given week, any given off season. Frankly,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 3>we are inundated with questions from the esteemed verboller hood

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 3>folks who write in via email, They write in via Instagram, Twitter, Facebook,

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 3>even on Patreon. Now we've got questions coming out the wazoo,

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 3>and we're doing our best to try and get through

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 3>all of them in as orderly a fashion as humanly possible.

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 3>So show that many of y'all are going to hear

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>today is our mega April Q and A Part one.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Part two will be a Patreon exclusive. Normally we do

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 3>a brunet on Fridays. Part two of this show is

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>going to be the brune that gets released to the

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Patreon community. So as I've advertised it a little bit

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>here in our Patreon world, the more scandalous type stuff

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 3>will save for the premium content that goes up.

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>A yeah, but.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Just an incredible amount of slew of great questions that

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>came through that I am excited to discuss with you today, Dan, as.

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Part of part one, I am as well. Should we

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 2>just spare no more filler and just get to it?

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations Skippy, you've got mail. You've got mail on the

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Solid Ruble as often as we can, Dan, we like to.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Pay Solid whoa whoa whoa whoa.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Homage to those of you who write in solblegmail dot com,

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 3>all of our social channels, snail mails, Messenger, pigeon.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, We'll take.

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Questions however we can get them. Do you want to

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>start off the show.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Sure we have questions. Yeah, we have questions from the verballers,

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 2>from Discord, we have questions from our Patreon page, we

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 2>have questions from Twitter, we have questions from Instagram, and

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I think we had some emailers too, So it's all

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>over the place. I am ready, ty.

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the question, okay that some people just tend

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.799
<v Speaker 2>to ask. It's the who is this year's blankety blank?

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like, who is this year's IOWA the team that

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 2>comes out of nowhere to go undefeated? Who is this

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 2>year's LSU to have firepower out of nowhere? Who is

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>this year's Kenny Pickett Kenneth Pickett and or Joe Burrow

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 2>tie Let's define what we believe that to mean? Okay,

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and twenty twenty two looking at quarterbacks who have been

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 2>around but have been sort of a late bloomer to

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 2>be Heisman adjacent or ensconced for that Heisman ensconced quarterback caliber.

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Can I give you some names please? I'd love to

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 2>just like, just quarterbacks who are bathing in that jacuzzi

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 2>of mediocrity, who are ready to make that leap. Okay,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>here we go. We got bo Nix at Oregon Fresh start.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Whatever we've got Max Johnson Texas A and M fresh Start.

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Whatever you got Will Levis who popped last year? Who

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Nate Tye on the show this week mentioned I can't.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Tell you how many messages I got about the Nate

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Tice conversation with a specific regard to Will Levis.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Sure continue.

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 2>I have Adrian Martinez at Kansas State who has a

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 2>stellar running back next to him to take away some

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>of that attention. Maybe that helped you have Similarly, Casey

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Thompson at at Nebraska who's been around but hasn't popped

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 2>as a top flight showed certain flashes last year, was

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Xavier worthy and you're one of the sark offense at Texas.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>So maybe another guy fresh Start about Jordan Travis Florida State,

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>somebody who dual threadability And we're going to talk about

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Florida State in a little while as well on an

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>upcoming show. Let me let me see where else I

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 2>can go with this.

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>M no pro pro probe?

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>What about Keen Slovice, Dan Keaton Slovas at pitt What

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 3>about Keaton Slovas.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a JT.

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 3>Daniels at West Virginia who just committed JT. Daniels is

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be throwing nothing but three yard hitch routes

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>all right now, Yeah, all year. His average depth of

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 3>target's going to be like four and a half. Now,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 3>I I'm very interested.

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>In Keten Slovas.

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in that situation for a number of reasons.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 3>I guess there is a bit of overlap between can

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 3>you pick it at Pitt and now Keaton slova is

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 3>transferring to Pitt. But I love the fact that he's

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>got a game breaking wide out in Jordan Addison. I

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 3>understand the offense a little bit different now Mark Whipple

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>goes to Nebraska, So you know to what extent that's

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 3>going to factor in remains to be seen. But I

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 3>think Peten Slovas is a really interesting bounce back candidate,

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 3>if only because he burst onto the scene in a

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 3>big way when he became the starting quarterback at USC

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 3>last year was nicked up and there was the whole

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Jackson Dart thing, the whole coaching changed thing. It didn't

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>quite work out. I think this could be a fresh

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 3>start for him in a place that has at least

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 3>had some recent success at the quarterback position. So I'm

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>he's a name that I'm interested in. I'm interested less

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 3>so in Casey Thompson, though that is a situation I'm

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 3>going to follow because it's hard for me to gauge.

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Casey Thompson coming to Texas to begin with was kind

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 3>of a story, right he was. He was a guy

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of folks were really excited about, and

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>it worked out in spots. It obviously wasn't consistent the

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>whole way throughout. Otherwise he still would have had a

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>firm grasp on that starting quarterback spot. So what Scott

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Frost can do with him at Nebraska, if he can

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 3>give that offense something of a lift, definitely a better

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 3>passer than what Nebraska has had recently. I'm interested in

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Casey Thompson. What can he do? And if only because

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Nate Tice brought up Will Levis. Now, I guess I'm

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna have to be in on Will Levis. He's a guy,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Nate's a guy who knows what he's talking about.

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I am not.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm just an idiot with a microphone. So Will Levis,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>we'll see.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I am open to.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Being convinced on that front, but it will be hard

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 3>for me to forget some of Will Levis's early work

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 3>at Penn State. All Right, I've got some other names

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 3>who are sort of off of the Heisman adjacent or

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 3>ensconsing radar, but have shown enough promise that have either

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>bathed in the jacuzzi of mediocrity or have bathed in the.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Jacuzzie of pretty good. I don't know.

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Brendan Armstrong been around, been shown improvement, right, probably needs

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 2>to cut down on the picks to to really have

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 2>that chance to vault. I mean, same goes for Will Levis. Obviously,

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 2>dtr Ty been around. Okay, right, what about and this

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 2>is more this is directly in line with the Joe

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Burrow part of this. Whoever wins that job at LSU.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Both those guys have hung around, not in a starting

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 2>role for Miles Brennan, but Jayden Daniels has shown that

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 2>promise and will be surrounded by talent presumably, But it's

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 2>year one. I don't know if Mike Denbrock is the

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 2>most explosive offensive mine to to sort of vault one

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 2>of those guys up. But there's actually there's a lot

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 2>of example. Like Devin Leary. I wouldn't say he's.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Devin Leary had a pretty good year last year. No, no, no,

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 3>but he's definitely pretty good already. Oh yeah, definitely, but

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 3>he is.

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 2>He It would it would be a vault to get

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to the Heisman, Jacuzzi, Would it not?

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>For sure? For sure?

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm the the player that I'm looking for. It is

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>somebody who does not qualify as this, but somebody who

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>is to me too far beneath the radar in talking

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 2>about this conversation about these quarterbacks, and that's kJ Jefferson.

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I am.

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>The chips are to the center of the table for me.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 2>With kJ Jefferson physically the dual threat, the arm, you know,

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 2>no more Trailon Burks. But you know, the transfer situation

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 2>is very good for Arkansas. The coordinator is there for

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>an explosive offense. It's I think the line should be

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.719
<v Speaker 2>good once again. So that's the guy to me who

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 2>will vault himself into household status because of the stage

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>on which he plays. To me, my best bet for

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 2>that is kJ Jefferson.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Keaton Slovis, I sort of evaluate in

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 3>an entirely different vein than kJ Jefferson. I think I

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 3>saw the riding on the wall for sure with kJ

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Jefferson last year and especially in that bowl game. I

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 3>know so many people who weren't familiar with kJ Jefferson

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 3>saw him in the bowl game, and just the skill

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 3>set that he has able to take over a game

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 3>is something that is really special in college football, sure,

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>and I'm excited to see more of him this coming season.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 3>For sure, Arkansas is definitely in a good place. Sam

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Pittman's done an awesome job with that program, and to

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 3>be frank, the athletics program at Arkansas as a whole

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 3>isn't a really good place between the basketball and football

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 3>program and other sports. So it's a great time to

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 3>be a Hog right now. And I think we'll see

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 3>much more of what kJ has this coming season.

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 2>Can I give you I'm gonna give you the deepest

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>of sleepers for an answer for this, because Kenny Pickett

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 2>was pretty deep as a sleeper to get into that

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Heisman and now he's, you know, in the conversation for

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the first quarterback taken in the NFL draft because of

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>what I believe to be a good amount of natural talent,

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 2>what I believe to be a good offensive line in

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 2>front of him, and much in the way that you know,

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Joe Brady opened things up or helped to open things

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>up for LSU with a new coordinator. My deep sleeper

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>answer for this is grammertz mm because Bobby Ingram comes

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>in because he has a good running back next him

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 2>who should provide for play action opportunities. Now, I don't

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 2>think they have Winter Wonders at receiver. I don't think

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 2>they have those guys that scare deep safeties.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That to me is the issue.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of a guy who's like going from

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 2>ten touchdowns and eleven picks to eighteen and three with

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>a really solid offseason, and he's healthy, and I have

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>to squint. I have to squint, and I have to

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 2>put on some pretty strong lenses. But I'm just saying,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 2>if I'm going to select somebody deep in the cavern

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 2>of mediocrity, that's my pick.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Such odd construction.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I love it, Thank you, I thank you. I really

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>love it.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, you know we commit. Okay, are you

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>ready for the next quest?

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Please? Thank you very much. By the way, to uh,

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to get this right. It was Gordon.

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>You don't hear from a lot of Gordons anymore, and

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 2>so I'm glad we could we could get that on

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 2>that same vein Finalytics picks for long heisman, and this

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 2>person has suggested Jermaine Burton Alabama transfer from Georgia at

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty thousand plus thirty thousand.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Three hundred to one hundred to one.

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good path on the fly. Yeah, I'm used to it.

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 3>That's a problem. Yeah, so you know this is my thing.

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I hate the heisman, but I love long shot heisman picks.

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's value, there's.

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Value, and the problem is that you're never really going

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>to cash in that value. It's just interesting to look

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 3>at who feels like they are too low in any

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 3>given moment to that point. As I went through, as

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I looked at some of these names. kJ Jefferson's pretty low. Yeah,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 3>he's a name that I think is interesting. Jackson Smith

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 3>and Jigba is pretty low at eighty to one. We

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>had a recent wide receiver Heisman winner and DeVante Smith.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I think I think the guy for me is probably

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 3>JSN at eighty to one. I like that one a lot,

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 3>at least on the list here that I am looking at.

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 3>He is equal to kJ Jefferson, who is also eighty

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 3>to one. He is equal to Jordan at well no

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 3>excuse me, Jordan Addison is one hundred to one. HM.

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 3>If perhaps Keaton Slovis pops off the way I expect,

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the way I hope, he could be an interesting name

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 3>to keep tabs on. Traveon Henderson at sixty to one

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>is not bad, depending on how Ryan Dade chooses to

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 3>use him, given the other artillery he's got in that offense.

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Sean Clifford at sixty to one is not a good pick.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Do not pick him, don't. Don't waste our time.

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, don't don't go there. Those are some names that

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>jump out. Quinn Ewers at forty to one is.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a joke. We haven't seen anything from quinn

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Ewers yet.

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>But that's I mean, look, if he pops, who do

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>they have early on? They have Alabama early?

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Don't just don't don't do that, Okay, don't. I don't

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>think that's bad value. I don't think that's bad value.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 2>If he is the general rational quarterback that he has

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 2>been labeled to be, that's not terrible value. Another one

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that's not as close of offense I'm gonna get. I

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>have a couple, but continue another one.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 3>If my deep sleeper here would be Will Shipley, Will

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Shipley at Clemson is one hundred and seventy to one.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 3>This is per the Action Network. I don't know how

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>up to date this is, but yeah, I'm looking at

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 3>a different one. But my hunch is that it hasn't

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 3>changed all that much. It's still probably really low for

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Will Shipley. But you know, it was hurt last year,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 3>but I think established himself as sort of a jack

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 3>of all trade, someone who could go into that offense

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 3>and really really makes them. Hey, if DJ you or

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 3>my boy kde club Nick can get their act together

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 3>at quarterback, provided that the coaching situation doesn't fully implode.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Now that it's a bunch of new names, Clemson clearly

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 3>is talent.

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>It's an acc schedule.

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Will Shipley is going to be, I think, kind of

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the go to playmaker on that offense. He's an interesting

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>name for me at once seventy to one. Okay, Jamiir

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Gibbs at Alabama, I think Heisman voters will not be

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>thrilled even if Bryce Young shows himself to be even

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 3>better than he was last year, much in the way

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 3>that Lamar Jackson had a better follow up year than

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 3>he did his Heisman year. In a lot of cases,

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 3>especially statistically, he was a better quarterback, He was more developed,

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 3>he was better at reading defenses. He was just clearly

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>better and didn't win it the following year. Jamiir Gibbs

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a big beneficiary of defensive coordinators.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>King in on Bryce Young the passing him and Jermaine

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Burton is a decent answer as well.

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Who could be the.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Number one guy for Alabama out wide? Jamiir Gibbs was

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>crazy impressive for a nothing offense. What is he going

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to do behind Obama offensive line? What is he going

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>to do split out wide? What is he going to

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>look like when used creatively? When Heisman voters do not

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 2>love a back to back winner. I think that's interesting.

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 2>And currently his odds are at ten thousand, so it's,

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah, whatever it is, or it opened at that

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 2>and it you know, depending on where you're looking. But

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 2>there's value, whether it's one hundred to one or forty

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to one, whatever decent value there outside of like, that's

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 2>that's the deep one, right, that's you're you're looking pretty

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>deep into the uh, the annals. You know, Malie Hunningham,

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna need to see a step forward. I mentioned

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 2>Brendan Armstrong on that that conversation in terms of guys

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 2>making leaps vaults. But man, he put up some huge

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 2>games and I don't believe Brendan Armstrong will necessarily win.

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 2>But we could have another year, didn't did we not?

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 2>In like mid November say to ourselves, I don't know.

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>It's still kind of wide open, and Bryce Young kind

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 2>of won it by default because he just it's true.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 2>It is strong like it could be another year where

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 2>they don't want to give it to Bryce Young, like

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I again, Will Shipley's not a bad bet when you

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>look at some of the odds here, Jackson Dart at

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>what is that fifty to one? Yeah, something like that

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 2>five thousand or five to one.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me throw.

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Out two other names. Yeah, Henon Hooker at sixty to

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 3>one on the on the sheet that I've got here,

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 3>this looks like it was updated in January, So yeah,

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 3>it's probably moved down, maybe not that much. But Hendon

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Hooker's not a bad pick. Sixty to one. He's gonna

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 3>throw it a ton. He had a good year last year.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>He's another guy could be interesting. The problem with the

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 3>Heisman is your team has.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>To be really good.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 3>In order to really have a shot. Yeah, and I

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know where you know, hopefully Tennessee takes a step forward.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see the other name here.

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I noticed that you haven't mentioned Will Anderson.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Dan, that's true. That's a it's a name worth discussing.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 3>I was hoping you could do the Will Anderson voice. Well,

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 3>thank you, the exasperated national mediaker.

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 2>He's Willers.

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Dan.

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that, no problem. He's at thirty to one. Yeah,

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I've got forty on mine. But yeah, still pretty good

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 3>odds for a defensive player.

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Ye'll be that high up.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, somebody else who I mean, every single offensive line

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and offensive game plan will be keyed on him, and

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>so it's hard to quantify times run away from or

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>double teams that open things up for teammates. It's hard

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>to do that in the way that Jordan Davis was

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 2>one of the most dominant players last year in college football.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 2>But like, how do you quantify those types of numbers? No,

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Will Anderson's interesting, but it would take a complete absence

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of offensive firepower in the sports individual firepower be a

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>running back, receiver, or quarterback for him to really really

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 2>get there. Though, Will Anderson has the advantage that not

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of players do of being clearly Heisman caliber

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 2>as a defensive player and being back for the following season.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>So the name recognition happens to be excellent for Will Anderson.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 3>My actual bet. Yeah, and this is not based on odds,

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 3>by the way. I love Jackson Smith and Jigba at

0:19:59.280 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 3>those odds.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's pretty good. Yeah, those are incredible odds.

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>So that would probably be if I put money down.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 3>That's why I put money down on the guy who

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I think is going to win.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>It will be CJ.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Stroud. It's tough to repeat if you'rre Bryce's young, really

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 3>tough to repeat as a Heisman Trophy winner.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 2>The good news if you like Jackson Smith and Jigba

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>is he has already put up cartoonish number in big games.

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Saw. I think it was.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Nebraska, he put up two three hundred yards. Obviously the

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Rose Bowl. He just went wild. And he can be

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 2>forgiven for having a four catch sixty three yard game

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 2>because it's position dependent, right, he could be double teamed.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>He could just c J.

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Stroud miss something open or whatever, whereas CJ. Stroud if

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 2>he just has a clunker of a game to open

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the season against Notre Dame or Michigan State or something

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 2>like that, but otherwise has a great year that'll be

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 2>used against him in a way that a low statistical

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>game won't be used against Jackson Smith and JIGBA. So

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 2>if JSN is fully unguardable and is putting up cartoonish

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 2>numbers knowing that he's the number one option against and

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>what they have Notre Dame, I think the schedule is

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 2>really good for just like the stage that he will

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>be playing in big games sprinkled throughout.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Pick from you, all right, It's not a deep sleeper,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 2>but I like the pick. Next next topic, Dan Michael,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 2>How screwed is Georgia Tech for the foreseeable future?

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Pretty screw Pretty screwed?

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're pretty pretty screwed. I think we're in agreement

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 3>on that front. You just talked about Jamior Gibbs, who

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 3>left the program.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>YEP.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Problem with Georgia Tech is that it's not first off,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the talent situation. Installing a new system in the wake

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 3>of that triple option.

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That's all news.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Paul Johnson's system. We're years into the I know we're

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 3>years into it, but I still feel like we never.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Got over that. Yeah.

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 3>The problem that I have is the schedule. It's still brutal, right,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 3>it's still brutal, and so there's just not a whole

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of wiggle room. If for Georgia Tech, if you're

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 3>looking to take this thing next level and you've got

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 3>just killers in your schedule, you know, there's just no

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 3>net It makes it so much harder.

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I agree, is Tennessee dot dot dot back Nett wants

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to know? Yeah, okay, so defined back. So it's basically

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 2>clearly competing for the SEC East, which is where they

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 2>were when they were there. If they're back, yeah, I

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Back is relative, right, back in terms of

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Texas may not necessarily be back.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me for other teams, but Tennessee for what the

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>last five.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Years to some extent, mm hmm. Maybe it's harsh to

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 3>say they've been a punchline, but a lot's gone wrong there. Yep,

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot's gone wrong there, especially with the way that

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 3>Jeremy Pruett left. The program just hasn't been in a

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 3>good spot. And then the end of the previous this

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 3>regime wasn't in a good spot either. So I feel

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 3>like in a very short period of time, Josh Hipel's

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 3>gotten them to a level of respectability that if you're

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 3>a Vols fan, you got to be pretty pumped about

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 3>the fact that they've got Hendon Hooker coming back, the

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 3>fact that recruiting I think has been pretty strong. There's

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot to like there, and at least directionally, it

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 3>feels like they are headed towards back. Whatever that may

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 3>mean for you. It seems as if they are in

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the car, they've got the breeze and the hair, and

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>they are going towards that destination. So even if they're

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 3>not there, they're getting there. I feel pretty confident in

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 3>saying that it seems like they're in a good spot. Yeah,

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the good news for Tennessee is the turnover at george

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Now obviously Georgia is stacked, the turnover at Florida quarterback coach,

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 3>everything is significant. South Carolina is frisky but has a

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>ways to go. Kentucky is a good team, but one

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 3>that's limited in terms of I mean, they have a

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 3>new offensive coordinator this year, limited in terms of of

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, how many games they you know, they're not

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 3>a ten to eleven annual win programs, but we're talking

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 3>about the Will Levis led excuse me, Yeah, Kentucky Lotcats.

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no more Liam Cohen, no more Wandale Robinson. But

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>they've recruited really well. I think they just fielded a

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 2>top fifteen class Kentucky did. Things are great in Lexington,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 2>so the SEC East is tricky. The problem with Tennessee

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to me is they're not back until they're much deeper

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 2>on defense. The pass rush was okay, they got beat

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 2>deep too much and there was just there's too many

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 2>questions on defense. I think they're going to continue to

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 2>get better. They were decent, I believe, decent against the run,

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 2>but too many big passes allowed last year. So when

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 2>they are balancing how explosive that offense can be with

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 2>how limiting in terms of explosive if that that defense

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 2>gets to and I think a lot of that is

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 2>pass rush and havoc. The defense, especially the line, just

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 2>wasn't getting home enough to make me feel like they're

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 2>on the this fall verge.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 3>We say this, Why don't we say this? Why don't

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 3>we agree that we're on the highway. We're in the

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee car. We see a road sign that says, what

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty five miles to back.

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're like, I can hold I can hold my

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 2>bladder that long exactly. Yeah, I can do forty minutes

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 2>whatever it takes to a wide open road.

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Fifty five miles. I think that's about the right number.

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, fair enough, you can hold out.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You're not You're not.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 2>It's not indistinguishably far. It's horizon ish, that's correct. Okay,

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay with that.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I you know what I think Tennessee is. I don't

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 2>think Tennessee is ready to win in a number of ways,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>but I think Tennessee is good enough to beat beatable teams,

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 2>be it because of injury or internal drama or you know,

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a screwy turnover in a big game, like Tennessee is

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>good enough to pick up a win that falls off

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the truck right That's where they are right now, which

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 2>is a great place to be and growing. A lot

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of programs should take that spot.

0:25:59.760 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Wow, there are NC DOUBLEA ramifications also on said highway

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 2>freeway that are TBD, and so that might throw a

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 2>bit of a winning wrench into things, or losing wrench,

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 2>as it were, into things. We'll see, but that is

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 2>a part of the concoction, the volunteer concoction here barring

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 2>a spike strip, yes, set down by the authorities. I

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>think we're about fifty five miles from back.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the next question.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I think with what Tennessee can currently control. Yeah, they're

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 2>in the direction. Okay, Matt says Notre Dame plus ten

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 2>and a half versus Ohio State, do.

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>We hammer.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Wow plus ten and a half?

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 3>First off, I don't is that a real line. I

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know if that's a real line.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But it feels about right to me.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I would No, I wouldn't take that. I would

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 3>not take those points. There's just too much of an

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>unknown going into that game. I think that Notre Dame

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 3>be amped up, but the quarterback situation is still a

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 3>bit up.

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>In the air.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 3>I expect it'll be Tyler Buckner, but there's probably something

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 3>of an open competition the spring later this fall between

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 3>him and Drew Pine, So there's uncertainty on that front.

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 3>There is turnover elsewhere on this Notre Dame squad.

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know what it's like in year one.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 3>First, like, let's say, real regular season game under Marcus Freeman,

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Tommy Reese unfettered. There's just too many unknowns and we

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 3>know a lot about Ohio State already. We just talked

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 3>about c. J. Stroud and JSN and Traveon Henderson. That

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 3>three heads you'll have in your head as a degenerate,

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 3>of which that's the tribe you belong to. There is

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 3>a number like if you said it at plus nineteen

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 3>and a half, you're like.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I am.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 3>I am worried that that game gets out of hand

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 3>because I feel like on paper, Ohio State is going

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 3>to be the monster. Better. That doesn't mean it won't

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 3>be close. It's week one, and weird things happen in

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 3>week one, But I just have far more questions about

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Notre Dame that I do Ohio State. If you gave

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 3>me fourteen and a half, I maybe consider that, but

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 3>that to me feels like a stay away game. I

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 3>would stay well away from that game. I do think

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 3>that there will be a lot of steam on Notre

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Dame as the game gets closer, because they're first off,

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 3>a team that people love to bet for or against,

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and especially in a case like Week one against Ohio State,

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Marcus Freeman's first game. This weird set of events that

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 3>we had last year with Brian Kelly leaving actually turned

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people into Notre Dame fans, and there

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 3>will be call me crazy, I think there will be

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 3>a percentage of the population out there that wants to

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 3>root for them, especially against another hated team Micha Ohio State.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know where you're getting your data points. I

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's true.

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:54.959
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I think people will want to root for Notre Dame

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 3>in that game, and I think that line will come down.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Notre Dame hatred perhaps has softened a bit,

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>but I think the feelings that people have about Notre

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.479
<v Speaker 2>Dame are larger than any one coach.

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying. I'm just saying, Okay, you will have

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 3>You will have Michigan people who want to root for

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Notre Dame, want to bet for Notre Dame because they're

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 3>playing Ohio State. You have other people in the Big Ten.

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I will want Ohio State to lose that game.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 2>They you have, you have the un You have the

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 2>known of Ohio State's offense, which I think is going

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to continue to approve, especially new offensive line coach.

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But the known of we know what these receivers are,

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we know who CJ.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Stroud is whatever, and obviously you know what Ryan Day

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>does as an architect of that offense now brand new

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State defense. There's an unknown and a very interesting

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>way for the Buckeyes that Notre Dame has to contend with,

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 2>as is the unknown of everything about what Notre Dame

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 2>looks like moving forward, even with you know, the return

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 2>of the both coordinators. We don't know what Marcus Freeman's

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 2>long term vision is for this offen or quarterback, and

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 2>you know what the defense is going to look like

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 2>now that he's fully in charge. Jim Knowles against a

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 2>first time, full time starting quarterback for Notre Dame, so

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>blitz a lot, Daddy, send them, man, it could be

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 2>very very my prediction and somebody in the discord, yeah,

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 2>can jot this down and if you've got enough patience

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 2>to actually see this one through to September, my prediction

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 2>is that in the morning of the few hours before kickoff,

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 2>that that line moves in favor Notre Dame. Right, I

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 2>think there will be late stem on Notre Dame. Okay,

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that's fine, call me crazy, No, I think it's an

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 2>interesting I won't be betting Notre Dame, but I think

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 2>people will next question, I love this question, and we're

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>actually going to get into the art of the question. Okay,

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>but bah bah bah. Disregarding all things related to football,

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Sam wants to know which former college football greats life

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 2>would you most want to have? Okay, so the current

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>post football so they can't be a current NFL star

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 2>like you can't select I want to be Lamar Jackson,

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 2>who's unquestionably a college football grade and all time college

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 2>football grade. Sure which college football greats current life is

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the most desirable for you to your your soul, to

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 2>escape your body and and land in this person in

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 2>their in their brain.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, like, okay, what constitutes a great because the first

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 3>thing that comes to mind is the guys who have

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 3>played college football who have been very, very good at

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 3>their position. Yeah, I've definitely had an NFL future and

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 3>then decided I'm gonna play baseball.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So you're answering, Jeff Samarja, is that what you're doing.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not answering Jeff Samarsha. But Jeff Samarja made one.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Hundred and twenty two million dollars playing baseball. He was

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 3>an average pitcher and he was not a bad avenue

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 3>to go. If that's okay the framework for this question,

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Samarja is not a college football great. You can

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 3>tell the story of mid two thousands college football without

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>leaning heavily on Jeff Samarsha, Brady Quinn, Quinn, No, so

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 3>who is who is the person that, like from across

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the country you mentioned their name.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And they say, oh, yeah, man, he was something else.

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Samarja is not that, Brady Quinn's not that, but

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 2>like Matt Lionard is.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, Bush has brought Reggie Busch. Go ahead, who

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 3>are your answers?

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious.

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Number One Desmond Howard, unquestionably iconic college football player, lives

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>in Miami, works the hardest for four months a year.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Is not physically unwell to me. I know, he came

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 2>on the show and he talks about how he bikes

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and he does all these workouts or whatever, and he's

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 2>beloved still beloved of course by Michigan fans and alumni,

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know. He seems like a happy dude

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 2>who has it together. I think that's a decent answer.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what Jerry Rice is up to now?

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>All time unquestioned college football I'm not talking about forty

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 2>nine ers.

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 3>He's not doing He's not doing those men's vitality commercials

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 3>with Frank Thomas. Is he might be Okay, what's wrong

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 3>with that? I'm Jude's out not a sponsor. I guess

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 3>could be go ahead, kichinue.

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Rice, his kid just transferred from Colorado to USC

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>so he gets to be a proud college football dad.

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I believe he lives in California, has made a very

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 2>handsome living. The last in public story that I read

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 2>about Jerry Rice is he just has a great time

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 2>crashing weddings in northern California. He is super recognizable, gets

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>onto the dance floor, and everybody loves to have a

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Rice surprise. Counterpoint.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Counterpoint, Yeah, Yeah, he played for Mississippi Valley State. Yeah,

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 3>is that a big enough school to qualify him as

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 3>a college football grade. He was clearly great in college,

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 3>but well it was more of an NFL great than

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:23.959
<v Speaker 3>he was a college grade.

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I went on ESPN's one hundred and fifty Greatest College

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Football Players Ever. There was Jerry Rice like number, you know,

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty four.

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So we'll take that.

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll accept that he had set a number of records.

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 2>He was unguardable. He just happened to play at a

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 2>smaller level. But he is considered to be a college

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 2>football grade. I think did he win the Walter Payton Award,

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the the equivalent like the FCS Heisman.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Probably probably, you can look it up.

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 3>As as I'm discussed, there is there is one easy

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 3>answer here that I'm curious to see.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>A few through the Okay, I have my number three. Yeah,

0:34:57.960 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck.

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Andrew Luck retired, made a ton of money, is

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 2>a new dad, loves reading, loves traveling, and once again

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 2>retired early with a ton of money, and no longer

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 2>plays football, and just seems like a bright dude who

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 2>has his life together. Has a Stanford education, which certainly

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 2>is something of value. Man, I don't know. I look

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 2>at his life as being roughly, I think he's a

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 2>little bit younger than we are. I mean a lot

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>younger than you. But I don't think in terms of

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 2>living a college football great life. Who also appears on

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 2>that list?

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's my answer.

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a good answer. How's the answer not Peyton Manning.

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Peyton Manning's a great answer. He's an all time college

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 2>football great played in at least one Citrus Bowl, if

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 2>I correctly what the old Steve Spury, you can't.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not crazy about the neck pain, but right, you know,

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about removing all things football from this equation

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and so we can kind of lump that together with it.

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 3>But Peyton Manning is sort of like a budding media star.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 3>He's funny, he's funny. He's definitely going to have limitless

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 3>opportunities to grow his footprint as it relates to all

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 3>things media and just be out there and you know,

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty much have his pickets away when there comes to

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 3>anything in the entertainment or media world.

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 2>The only my primary concern with some of these guys

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 2>and looking at their life now, is how's Peyton Manning's

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 2>neck doing?

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 2>That's the concern to me. That they's end of his career.

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 2>That's related to football, no I know, but that's also

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 2>related to his life. Like there are guys there, there

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.760
<v Speaker 2>are former players where like the game has clearly taken

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 2>its toll on them physically, where I just I hope

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 2>that they can heal from but it does not look

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 2>like a pleasant experience. That's the worry for me. But

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 2>it seems like he's doing all right.

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 3>But the question was outside of football, removing all things football. Yeah,

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 3>and neck is because of football. So in this parallel universe,

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 3>Peyton Manning's got our good strong neck. He's my answer what.

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 2>College football storyline Taylor wants to know outside of the playoff?

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Are you sick of hearing about?

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:24.959
<v Speaker 3>Do you have an answer for this sort of Yeah,

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.399
<v Speaker 3>my answer isn't really an answer. It's complicated. It's sort

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 3>of a punt. But if I'm being honest, the answer

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:38.439
<v Speaker 3>for me is Dabo Sweeney. Now, OK, he's not really

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 3>a storyline firebrand, but yes, thank you.

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It has been a journey.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 3>For us as college football fans, as Dabo has walked

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 3>this long path of being an opinion haver m eighty

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 3>percent of the time, he pretty much sucks at it. Yeah,

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and it's hard to listen to him unless you're a

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 3>full throated Clemson blo, just a full throated Dabbo apologist. Yeah,

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Clemson's been a juggernaut for the better part of the

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 3>last decade. I don't want to hear it about these

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 3>ways that college football and the rules and the transfer

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 3>port and all these things are making it harder for

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 3>him as a coach.

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't care.

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 3>They've been pretty good at it in the old world,

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 3>in the way the system's been And I didn't hear

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 3>him barking then, so that to me rings pretty hollow. Okay,

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 3>then twenty percent of the time, frankly, like his most

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 3>recent comments, I don't know if you saw those about

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 3>college football may need a full on blow up. I

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 3>just got a nuke it because of the way things

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 3>have gone. It's gotten a little bit out of control.

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Priorities are messed up. Twenty percent of the time, I'm like,

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 3>all right, I'm with you.

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 2>In defense of Dabosweeney, he's asked these questions. This is

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 2>not him calling for a press conference to say I

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 2>need to get things off my chest. He's asked verific questions.

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Things can be taken out of context, right that, like

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 2>we don't hear the question being asked, or we don't

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 2>hear what he said before and after that. That is

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 2>a part of things with coaching comments. I am not

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a huge fan of the top of the sport amassing

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.760
<v Speaker 2>talent in the manner in which they are. There's nothing

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 2>there's no solution to it, and I don't know if

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 2>that's really a storyline. But the the centralization of like

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 2>these crazy deep rosters and the top of the sport

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 2>being sort of unchanged, there's nothing that can realistically be

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>done to encourage parody.

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But whatever that's I.

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Think the big thing of recruiting, recruiting, recruiting, recruiting, recruiting,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and then the recruiting industry is saying, look, stars matter,

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Stars make a huge difference. We know, we all know

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.919
<v Speaker 2>that the teams with the best players. We all know that,

0:39:57.000 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, the people with the most money when it

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 2>comes to luxury homes and luxury yachts have an advantage.

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I think there are huge fan bases that are the

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 2>beneficiaries of those and that's why we talk about it,

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 2>and I get that, but I just I don't know.

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 2>That's sort of is not my favorite thing. And also

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 2>discussions about conference strength, I understand it's a very popular

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 2>thing to talk about and like, is the SEC deeper

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 2>than any other conference? Is the Big ten blah blah

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 2>blah a CEC versus Big ten ACC big? Like, I

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I understand that they're like, I think you should take

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 2>pride in your team, but taking pride in your conference,

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 2>to me, is and maybe this is just me a

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 2>disappointed and sad PAC twelve fan. And I'll explain the

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:47.959
<v Speaker 2>whole idea of conferences to you on another show.

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Sure, but it's it's.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Sort of like the the old like, uh, the old

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>boy meets world scene, where you know, you have the

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:59.839
<v Speaker 2>tiny little bully hanging behind the big bully, like, yeah,

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 2>tell him Franky. You're just like, I'm an Arkansas fan

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 2>sec sec is like, what are you?

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Just go eight and four? Like who cares?

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 2>So that, to me is the thing that I am.

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a huge fan of conference pride. I think

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a way to feel good about yourself without

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 2>having your team do a ton to contribute to top

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 2>level success.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't love that. Okay, that's a good answer. I

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. Let's go next question, next question.

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 2>On a more serious note, Oh this is shock, He

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 2>asked another question about Will Levis, which we've already gotten into.

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 2>When you think of your schools that you root for,

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.839
<v Speaker 2>who is the one that got away in the way

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 2>that Georgia fans think about Justin Fields perhaps, or maybe

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State fans think about Joe Burrow, who is the coach,

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 2>who is the player. We are like, oh, if we

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 2>just got two more years, what.

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Could have been? Who is the one?

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 2>And I'll open this up a little bit more as

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 2>an Oregon fan because the what if is not necessarily

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 2>about transfers. I was trying to think of a high

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 2>level transfer who went somewhere else and just destroyed. Like

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Lake Seastronk had a very good career at Baylor, didn't

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.439
<v Speaker 2>work out at Oregon. But I don't think Oregon fans

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 2>are like, oh, if only Lake Seestronk had stuck there.

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Oregon fans are always gonna be wistful about Chip Kelly.

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 2>But look, four years, four BCS Bowls, it made sense

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 2>like he was in a huge place. He's not from

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 2>the West Coast, he had this opportunity in Philly. I

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 2>think Oregon fans understood that the what if is a

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 2>season that got away. It's Dennis Dixon's knee that's gonna

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 2>be the one that got away. Answer is Dennis Dixon's

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 2>acl That's the one. And now this was an Oregon

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 2>team that was besieged by injury that year as well

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 2>around Dennis Dixon. You know, the receiving corps was beat up,

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 2>but defense was beat up. But that's the one where

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 2>he was so special in Chip Kelly's first year as

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 2>a coordinator. That that acl in two thousand and seven,

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the very topsy turvy season. That's the one that Oregon

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.479
<v Speaker 2>fans are nodding along with saying, yeah, that's the one.

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I have always been very curious what Notre Dame would

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.399
<v Speaker 3>have looked like in the mid to late nineties if

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:11.879
<v Speaker 3>Randy Moss did go to South Bend.

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So we never got away because he was never there,

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but that was a what if.

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he signed a letter of intent to go to

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 3>to go to Notre Dame and ended up obviously at Marshall,

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 3>becoming one of the all time grades in college football,

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 3>going on to great things in the NFL as well.

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 3>But you know, those were decent enough Notre Dame football

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 3>teams that if you had a little bit more pop

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:40.720
<v Speaker 3>on offense, obviously a game breaking talent like Randy Moss

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 3>is gonna take you places. It took that Marshall team places, right,

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 3>That to me would have been interesting. The one that

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 3>got away, I don't know. There are probably plenty of

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 3>instances where you could break down injuries. You could talk

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 3>about things like that that maybe.

0:43:58.239 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>The real well on.

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:01.399
<v Speaker 3>But for me, for I maybe the curiosity at least

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 3>has always been Randy Moss.

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>What year was?

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 2>What signing class?

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Here was that?

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, ninety five was Notre Dame around that time built

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 2>to win big short of a game changing receiver if

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 2>you remember.

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean they they had enough talent. I mean,

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to go through my brain here, remember who

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:22.839
<v Speaker 3>they had on that team.

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But they had like.

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 3>Their own version of a game breaking wide out in

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 3>Derek Mays, who was pretty good back then. Those are

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the Sean Wooden years when he was playing

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 3>defensive back. He obviously went on.

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 1>To a pro career as well.

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 3>Throughout the course of the late nineties, this was basically

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:49.359
<v Speaker 3>an eight to nine win team. Sure, Okay, so it

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.399
<v Speaker 3>wasn't It wasn't a bad team by any stretch. Now,

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Bob Davey took over I think in what ninety seven,

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 3>and that's when came a little bit off the swivel.

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 3>But for sure, having Randy Moss in that off fence

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 3>would have elevated things in the passing game for sure.

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to a couple of non college football questions

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 2>for the universe. Listening at large, and then we're gonna

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 2>hammer a bunch of good college strong college football questions,

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and strong non college football questions for the extended Verballer

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 2>verballers dot com only.

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Show Boom Matreon only, Okay.

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Boom outside of college football. Tie Joe wants to know

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 2>how do you find passion and enjoy outside of college football?

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 2>What makes you the happiest? What is the most fulfilling

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 2>part of your life? Will We'll leave family and friends

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 2>out of this because the best of your family, the

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 2>best of your friends is true for everybody. But in

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 2>terms of attention, yeah, I mean.

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Being out in the golf course is pretty great.

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Right, it's good answer, good answer, good answer.

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I went out and the golf course is pretty great.

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that's a little hanging fruit, and I

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 3>hate to give an uncreative answer, but let's be real.

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 3>I'll say this. When I'm out on the golf course

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 3>and there's nobody in front of you and you can

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 3>play at your own pace, You're not looking at a

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 3>five and a half hour loop, That to me is

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 3>a certain paradise that I don't often get to experience.

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Sure, what else anything else walks with the dog.

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I sort of consider the dog family.

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 3>That's true, fair enough, but for sure, if not, walks

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 3>with the pup are pretty great, how about you.

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So obviously the pizza baking brings me a good

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 2>amount of passion and joy. The other day I launched

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 2>a pie and it was a great launch. That's the

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 2>big thing that separates the amateurs from the pros launching

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 2>being you gotta flower your peel, you gotta you gotta

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 2>judg it, shimmey it into the oven the surface yea,

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 2>and people will have you know, you get some weird

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.359
<v Speaker 2>amiebas and weird shapes because people don't know what they're

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 2>doing all the time in terms of shaping and launching.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Get a good launch. I had one the.

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Other day and I yelled and pumped my fist. I

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.760
<v Speaker 2>was like, let's go, and Jody with an I screamed

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 2>from upstairs.

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Everything okay, what happened? What happened? Yeah? I was like, nope,

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just yelling over the entry points.

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, jeez, just yelling it out.

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, jeets, Pizza baking is a big one for me.

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Love tennis, look forward to tennis, been fully back into

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the sport, played out a ton as a kid and

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 2>needed an indoor, outdoor sport to you know, workout situation

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:30.879
<v Speaker 2>with cold winters here, Tennis brings me a ton of joy.

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I like tennis people, I like pizza people, I like

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff. Otherwise, outside of family and friends and

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm hanging with the kids, is great.

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But those are the two biggies.

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a big gamer. I don't watch a ton

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 2>of TV. Like, I'm not super into like a mystery

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 2>show right now or something like that. I like good

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.399
<v Speaker 2>stand up comedy and going to a couple shows coming

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.839
<v Speaker 2>up here in the Chicago area which I'm pretty excited about.

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 2>But by the way, big recommendation is Jared Jared Carter,

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Jared Carmichael really good on HBO. Rothaniel is special. Those

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 2>are the two biggies I think.

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll also say with with summer coming up, Dan, yeah,

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and travel and travel that'sl sure, yeah.

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>For sure.

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 3>This is my last answer on this one.

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Then we got to move on. Please.

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 3>But in the summertime, as you're out and about, friends

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:31.799
<v Speaker 3>invite you over to picnics or barbecues, whatever you want

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 3>to call it.

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Oftentimes you will find yourself in a situation where you

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 3>get unexpectedly tipsy. Sure you weren't expecting to well, drunks,

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:49.240
<v Speaker 3>little buzz, not getting crazy. Yeah, just in a good mood.

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 3>You're with good people, you have a libation. Mm hmm,

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 3>so much of its mood. You know this, of course,

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:59.760
<v Speaker 3>just in good spirits and it just sort of happens.

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Take a couple of SIPs and okay, I'm feeling I'm

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 3>feeling pretty good. Is this Are you saying making out

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 3>with strangers not making out with strangers?

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>That's different.

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:13.359
<v Speaker 3>That's a different answer. But okay, when you're in those situations,

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 3>you're not expecting that you're going to end up there,

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:19.799
<v Speaker 3>and it is fleeting. It never lasts. It's sort of

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 3>like a solar eclipse. But those key moments in the summertime,

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 3>surprise buzz, a surprise.

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Your answer is an answer that you have here? Yeah,

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what's what's your sweet spot to get

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 2>the surprise buzz, It's got to be the people around you. Well,

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more than people around you. Honestly, you

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:42.880
<v Speaker 2>can get buzz on something that's like four percent if

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you've got good people around you and you're just in

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 2>good spirits, you start feeling a little.

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Whitehead, a little tipsy.

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 2>So what like is there like so two beers beer

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and a half like a little cocksipping on a cocktail.

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know I can hold my liquor. You've

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 3>been around, No, you can. Sometimes it only takes. It's

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 3>just like one very weak drink and you're in good

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 3>company and you're just feeling on top of the world.

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Does Mama hs drink poorly? What does that mean? Like

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 3>she gets a little sloppy after a single glass of

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 3>wine or something you could dilute a single glass of

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:20.279
<v Speaker 3>a single half glass of a very weak wine and

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 3>a couple SIPs in she's like, this is really strong?

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 3>What is this?

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Yep, yep, same g Sambo's from Mama Rubinstein. And it's

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:32.799
<v Speaker 2>like only Thanksgiving, you know, it's only like where she's

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 2>stressed out and we're like, why don't you just have

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 2>a drink? You know, she's running around, why don't you

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 2>have a drink? And she'll have like a glass of

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 2>wine or something like that, and she'll have six and

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 2>a half SIPs of you know, chardonnay or something like that,

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:49.280
<v Speaker 2>and she will sit in a chair throw her hand

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 2>onto her forehead and say.

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm so high.

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a thing. It's it's a mom's drinking thing.

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's I don't have a Yeah, the surprise

0:50:58.920 --> 0:51:01.319
<v Speaker 2>buzz is not a passion or joy for me as

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 2>a I don't really drink that much, but I can

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 2>appreciate the right mood. You're sitting around a fire, you know,

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:08.880
<v Speaker 2>you're hanging out at a picnic, you're doing something.

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:12.800
<v Speaker 1>You're outside. Yeah, surprise jerk.

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 2>This is this is what jerk Martin is what this

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:20.320
<v Speaker 2>person labeled themselves as alternatives to ketchup, honey mustard, barbecue sauce,

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. For French fries.

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:25.319
<v Speaker 1>This is your music, Dan, No, no, no, Ty, you're

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a fry guy. I am a fry guy. Yeah.

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:34.319
<v Speaker 2>So if you get away from ketchup family, ketchup barbecue sauce,

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:36.879
<v Speaker 2>things that are very similar to that, and you get

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 2>away from honey mustard, yeah, which I don't. I don't

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:42.480
<v Speaker 2>associate honey mustard with fries.

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:44.919
<v Speaker 3>I've done the dip with honey mustard in fries.

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's fine. I think it's totally tasty.

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 2>I associate honey mustard more with like chicken tenders chicken nuggets.

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's the natural pairing. But do you

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 2>have any wild card sauces for dipping a fry? Where

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 2>are we with like cheese whiz? I mean, you don't

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 2>need to say we. If that's your answer, you can

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 2>just stand by it.

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:11.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that counts, But some sort of

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 3>cheese situation for the fries I think is okay, and

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 3>cheese whiz is as about as close as you get

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 3>to like the so like, have you.

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Dip the fry into like queso, like caso dip, because

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 2>that's sort of.

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's not bad, that that's dub but I don't

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:29.320
<v Speaker 3>know if it's a substitute. Yeah, I'd like to agree

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 3>as a podcast that Mayo is not the answer here.

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, I don't know if I can stand with you there.

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't see.

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a Mayo guy. I'm not a Mayo guy.

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I So I make a burger sauce. I'm given out

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the recipe to listeners, happy to do it even more.

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 2>And it's a Mayo bas but a lot gets added

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 2>to it. There's barbecue sauce, there's lemon juice, there's seasonings.

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:55.279
<v Speaker 2>There's saracha, and so it's that you know that catch

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 2>all pinkish yellow sauce. You've seen it, sure, almost like

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a big Max sauce, like a better verse a big

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Mac or in and out, you know the Burger sauce

0:53:02.120 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 2>thousand islandy that with fries, I think to me, because

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 2>you get the creamy and the crunchy. My other wild

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 2>card would be chimmy churry like oil and herbs and.

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Spices together is very good. Okay, That's all I know.

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>People like their uh.

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 2>People in the comments are mentioned vinegar, salt and vinegar,

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 2>you know that kind of thing with your fish and chips.

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 2>They like that malted vinegar. But no, that's my answer,

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.479
<v Speaker 2>final question, and then we're going to go to everybody else.

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I suppose, yeah, our Patreon only portion of this. Colonel

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 2>ag long time for baller. What is the greatest achievement

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 2>you have witnessed live? He or she does not indicate

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 2>sports achievement, does not indicate, you know, a physical achievement

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of some kind. What is the greatest achievement that you've

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:53.919
<v Speaker 2>witnessed but not taken place necessarily in a starring role.

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 2>So I guess if like you were on a basketball team,

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:57.759
<v Speaker 2>it's somebody dropped eighty three points or something like. That's

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty great achievement. But what what is something you've witnessed

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 2>physical or not in person?

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw the Bush.

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Push and you know, I don't know if that was

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 3>any great achievement per se, but it was a legendary

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 3>moment in college football.

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but not an achievement, I don't think, not in it.

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean achievement.

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Like even from that game, I would say Matt Lionert hitting.

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Who did he hit?

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Was it Dwayne Jarrett?

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Jarrett? Yeah?

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:29.319
<v Speaker 2>On fourth and long up the sideline down the side.

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Was I think more of a degree of difficulty achievement

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 2>than a you know, one yard run that you were

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 2>pushed into the end zone game.

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 3>So that that moment obviously I saw. But in terms

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 3>of it achievement, Wow, what a great question. Do you

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 3>have an answer?

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple. I don't.

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think if there's a sports one like

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I saw Kobe hit essentially two game winners in person.

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I went to a Lakers Blazers game in college and

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 2>like the row of the then Rose Garden, it's called

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 2>like the modus center now, and I think he hit

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a buzzer beater to send it to overtime, and he

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:10.280
<v Speaker 2>hit another like game winner buzzer beater. That was awesome.

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 2>That was just like, especially as a Laker fan in

0:55:12.840 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Portland in like enemy territory, that was a great like

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how many you maybe scored thirty some

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 2>odd points whatever, that was just like an awesome You know,

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I've seen game winning plays at football stadiums, I've seen

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 2>all of that, but of people I know, I am

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 2>first of all, I destroyed on a game show. That's

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 2>my best personal achievement. I was nine years old and

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:37.399
<v Speaker 2>I also hit a game winning three pointer myself. Freshman year,

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:42.759
<v Speaker 2>my then roommate and friends down the hall decided to

0:55:42.800 --> 0:55:46.399
<v Speaker 2>do the milk challenge. Oh no, the gallon of milk

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:46.879
<v Speaker 2>in an hour.

0:55:47.120 --> 0:55:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, oh no.

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 2>And I can, with honesty, with confidence say that it's

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the only time I've ever seen somebody drink a gallon

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 2>of milk in an hour and puke up a gallon

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.479
<v Speaker 2>of milk at once, Like you know when you watch

0:56:04.640 --> 0:56:07.399
<v Speaker 2>SNL and they do like the cartoonish like they put

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:09.319
<v Speaker 2>their hand which is connected to a tube next to

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 2>their mouths and they throw up cartoonishly. Yeah, I got

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to see that. I got to see the most violently

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 2>robust vomiting experience that I'll probably ever see. The other one,

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 2>it's it's hard to say personal achievement, but it was.

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes you just.

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Come across somebody who's very specifically talented at something.

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, see, this is where I'm going with my answer.

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Continue.

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I saw as like a twelve year old or

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 2>fourteen year old. This is not the most talented thing

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:42.239
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen. It's not the best achievement I've ever seen.

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 2>It's just something that came up in my mind that

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:47.799
<v Speaker 2>like sometimes you just you watch somebody do like a

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 2>miracle run, like you know, so you watch a clip

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 2>of like an Olympic skier, Like nobody's ever done a

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 2>run this perfectly. Nobody has ever been like Simone Biles

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:57.680
<v Speaker 2>and gotten a ninety nine point ninety nine nine whatever.

0:56:57.600 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Like whatever.

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:03.759
<v Speaker 2>This is nowhere near that. But I saw my longtime

0:57:03.840 --> 0:57:09.400
<v Speaker 2>lifelong friend Josh Hit like twelve or fourteen on a

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 2>round of taboo where.

0:57:11.400 --> 0:57:12.440
<v Speaker 1>He was just.

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 2>In the zone. He was in the zone. I don't

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 2>know if he was a spec like I don't know

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 2>if the clues just perfectly aligned with his personal strengths

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 2>on giving those clues in taboo. But at one point

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 2>he got handcuffs. That you understand the game of taboo, right,

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:33.920
<v Speaker 2>You're given a word and you have to describe the

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 2>word without using five or so keywords that are given.

0:57:38.280 --> 0:57:42.440
<v Speaker 2>And it was handcuffs. And he said twin bracelets of crime.

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 2>And I said, without a flippin' hesitation, I said to myself,

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 2>this is a man, twelve year old in his element. Yeah,

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think a good round of taboo is like

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 2>six or seven you get a minute, right, six, seven,

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 2>eight or something like that. He was well into double digits,

0:58:02.000 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and it was just watching a man again boy do

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 2>what he was meant to do.

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Amazing.

0:58:09.040 --> 0:58:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I have two answers here, okay, kind of in a

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 3>similar vein. The first is my nine year old nephew

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 3>who can do a Rubik's cube in about forty five seconds.

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:17.360
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty great.

0:58:17.480 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you can do a Rubik's cube.

0:58:19.160 --> 0:58:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I can't.

0:58:20.120 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm, can you have you? No? No, no, no,

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not.

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 3>He can do it in forty five seconds. Now he's

0:58:25.720 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 3>got one of the speed cubes.

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Because he can can do it this quickly.

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:33.360
<v Speaker 3>But you know, you see clips on YouTube of people

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 3>doing it of all ages. To see it up close

0:58:36.840 --> 0:58:39.960
<v Speaker 3>and personal is sort of like sorcery. Yeah, so that

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe doesn't rise to the greatest achievement ever, but I've

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 3>it's amazing. The second thing is actually in the flip

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 3>side of the equation. You're familiar with cornhole, you're familiar

0:58:49.240 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 3>with bean bags of course.

0:58:50.320 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, bags. Yeah.

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 3>When I was in college, I was at a picnic

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:59.400
<v Speaker 3>thrown by a friend and another friend of his was

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 3>playing around onto bean bags and wasn't drunk, was perfectly

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:06.760
<v Speaker 3>able bodied, and when I'm not kidding, an entire game

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:08.920
<v Speaker 3>of bean bags without even hitting the board.

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, that's amazing.

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:14.000
<v Speaker 3>It was almost impossible. It was a case of the yips.

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:16.800
<v Speaker 3>He was sweating because of this, and he was very embarrassed.

0:59:16.840 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Everybody at the party was laughing. He was trying his

0:59:20.560 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 3>best to get the bean bag into the hole. He

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 3>could not do it. He could not hit the board.

0:59:27.360 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 3>It was the all time greatest display of yips I've

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 3>ever seen in my life, up close and personal. And

0:59:34.160 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I just don't know how that's even possible, even the

0:59:37.200 --> 0:59:39.200
<v Speaker 3>worst person at that game can find a way to

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 3>hit the board. He couldn't even nick it. Incredible, that's good.

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've I've seen so many different sporting events in

0:59:46.720 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 2>person and so many athletes at the top of their games.

0:59:49.920 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I've been to the Olympic Trials, I've been to the

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:55.000
<v Speaker 2>US Open. I've been to major golf tournaments. I've been

0:59:55.040 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 2>to NASCAR, I've been to Football base you name it.

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I've seen the best of the best on big, huge stages.

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:06.920
<v Speaker 2>But man, shout out to Jared for just annihilating that milk.

1:00:08.880 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, Oh man, well, look, thank you to one

1:00:12.200 --> 1:00:14.280
<v Speaker 3>in all for all of your questions. We're going to

1:00:14.360 --> 1:00:18.080
<v Speaker 3>keep the party going here over adver ballers dot com.

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Part two of this conversation, as we advertise it, the

1:00:22.080 --> 1:00:25.600
<v Speaker 3>more scandalous version m HM of our Q and A

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:28.440
<v Speaker 3>is it mors into the bruin A. You can go

1:00:28.520 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 3>on out to our Patreon and find Part two of this.

1:00:31.760 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 3>We had so many questions, We're going to try and

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 3>get through as many of them as humanly possible. Don't

1:00:37.080 --> 1:00:41.360
<v Speaker 3>forget again, hit subscribe, hit follow, hit whatever it lets

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 3>you hit on your podcasting app of choice. For Ballers

1:00:44.680 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 3>dot com. Finally, final mention, I Promise is where you

1:00:48.520 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 3>can go for Patreon to get the bonus features and

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>part two of this episode. So Giveaway dot Com is

1:00:53.880 --> 1:00:55.919
<v Speaker 3>where you can enter to win that signed ag Brown

1:00:55.960 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>mini helmet. And last, but certainly not least for don't

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>forget to follow us on social media. We're all over

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the place. Just look for the sOliver Well, Dan agree.

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to everybody for listening, but let's keep this show

1:01:06.080 --> 1:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>going with even spicier questions.