WEBVTT - Commodities, Instacart, 3M, and Hawaiian Electric (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day, we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm reading speaking of Bloomberg Intelligence, I'm reading

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>some research here. It says most commodities are melting except

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for gold. What stops it? Let's go right to the

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>person who wrote this stuff. Mike mcclooney covers all the

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>commodity stuff. He's a senior macro strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike,

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>what are you thinking about these days in terms of

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the commodity space? What are you telling your clients? What

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>are the conversations you're having with your clients about commodities?

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, hello, Paul, I appreciate you reading that headline because

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 3>it's something I like to re iterate periodically, particularly when

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>it's relevant. Is typically historically over time, gold is the

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 3>best performing commodity now, basically because it's not really a commodity.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 3>It's it's a store of value. It's a metal. I mean,

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>you can store it on your body in terms of jewelry.

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 3>But certainly lately it's been the key case. It's the

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 3>best performing command this year. It's up ten percent, and

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the average, the Bloomberg Commodi Index this year is down

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>sixteen percent. And the key thing I like to ask

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 3>myself is those are bodies in motion. And as a strategist,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 3>I say, okay, is it going to stay the same

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 3>reverse or accelerate. I think it's more likely accelerate, particularly

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 3>at some point if we get to a point where

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 3>the FED pivots, it's going to happen. But that's the

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 3>bottom line is we had this massive pump and commandis

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>last year and they're proving what they always do. Elastic

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>supply demand makes commandies their worst enemy. It's the higher

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 3>priced cure. As a farmers say, well, that's.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, though, I feel like we're a far bit away

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 4>at least if you listen to J Powell on Friday

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 4>from when we see the FED reverse course, I mean,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 4>talk me through the timeline there. When would you expect

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 4>goal to start showing some outporfore? I mean, I guess

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 4>it is showing out performance.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, that's the point. Goal's looking ahead, and that's a

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 3>key point. They will probably not be cutting rates anytime soon,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>particularly in my view, until the stock market tells them to.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>And that's part of the lose lose for risk ads.

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>There's then a high high connection and correlation between stock

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>market bouncing this year, all this massive fiscal stimus and

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the FED hiking another one hundred basis points. They are

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 3>still on that hiking trajectory. Despite then you look over

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 3>a commodities, what's the number one source of demand historically

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 3>at least the last twenty years or so, is China

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 3>demand estimate revisions heading lower in China are just getting started,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 3>so their key customers, their key export customers Europe, US

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 3>and Europe are in these early days of just getting

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>showing signs of what you expect from high interest rates jumping.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 3>And then of course the leader of China, President z

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 3>cozing up with Putin right before the war, so we

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 3>see that tilt just get us out, and so that

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 3>to me is this is early days. So I look

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>at this is what's normally is potentially a very bear

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>scenario for commodities, and you look at yourself so what's

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>going to change is typically also you need a week dollar,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 3>and for the dollar to get week, we have a

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 3>major issue there. It's the hardest, you know, most expensive

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 3>to short commodity currency in the planet, particularly if you

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 3>look very compared versus the top top top commodities and

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry economies in the planet China, Japan, and Germany,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 3>US is just a much higher rate. So that to

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 3>me is basically a train wreck heading for commodities and

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 3>for deflation.

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So, Mike, I know you come from the land of

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the great American farmer. I wonder how the American farmers

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>doing here. I'm looking at corn down thirty percent year

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to date, soybeans down eight percent year to date, wheat

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>down twenty six percent year to date. How is the

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>farmer doing these days?

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 3>They are crushing it, so it will price us down

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 3>so much, oh well down from where they were. So

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 3>corn right now the number one, as I'm going back

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 3>next to next week and lesson I learned going and

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>raised and having owned the farm in the corn belt,

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>we plant soybe so we can plant corn. We plant

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 3>corn because that's what we do and that's where we

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 3>make our Money's world's most significant commoditybeans the plant corn

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 3>that fit. It's a rotation because soybeans add nitrogen and

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 3>fertilizer to the soil and they're a legome. Corn takes

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 3>it away. It's very nitro and expensive. It's a grass.

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 3>It's just that rotation that the corn belt has crushed.

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 3>But the bottom line is, partly because of this war

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 3>in Europe, you've had prices well above their cost of

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 3>productions and the cost of costs of production. For instance,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 3>anhydrous ammonia is collapsing, and so we're making a lot

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 3>of money. It's just called profits. What a profits mean

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 3>for farmers production. So this year is probably gonna be

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 3>close to the biggest production year ever for corn, just

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 3>in the weather is not so great. And also what

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 3>did they do with corn and soybeans in Argentina and

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry in South America, but most noted in Brazil

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 3>record production I mean off the charts. So this is

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 3>just a normal lasticity of supplying demand in the area

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>of the commodites. We can bring on that supplying one

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>year and the bottom line is are making a lot

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 3>of money, and that means more supply, more production, and

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 3>it means typically lower prices. But I'll just end with this.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 3>September is the worst monthly year for grains, typically buys

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 3>a harvest, and that's how futures came about because it

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 3>needed to start hedging, most knownly when they all try

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>to sell at the same time.

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 4>And I've been looking at it. I've been I've been

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 4>pulling out, pulling back a little bit our our commodity

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>price for corn, and we're levels where we were in

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 4>late twenty twenty, but those are substantially higher than where

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 4>we were in previous to that. Talk me through, Mike's

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 4>what's happening in wheat, because you know we have all

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 4>this stuff with a grain deal in Turkey. Very interesting

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 4>to see where you think this is going.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Also, so the significance of wheat is that was at

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 3>the epicenter of what happened with Russia's I'm sorry, President

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Putin's invasion of Ukraine. But it's been in a straight

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 3>downward trajectory since reaching that high last year, right around

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 3>thirteen dollars a bushel. But typically what we does now

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>it's back to a level that was kind of en

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 3>during before. Because what happens is you can bring on

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 3>rate supply rapidly, and it's the most widely grown agricultural

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 3>crop on almost every country will can grow wheat. Now,

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine was a big exporter US we explored over fifty

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 3>five percent of our week. We grow less of it

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>every day because it's so much easier to produce. It's

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 3>basically considered a weed, and it's one commodity you never

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 3>want to be long after it goes up. It's just

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 3>the way it works because you're bringing on so we

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>it's been a good indicator. Right now it's around six

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 3>dollars a bushel, and I view it's all going to

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 3>continue to trend lower unless we get some kind of

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 3>surprise out of that war, which means hopefully not but

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 3>something nuclear could do. But there's this is a situation

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 3>similar to World War two for the grain, for the

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 3>grain belt, corn belt which where I'm from, and that

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 3>is prices and the war in Europe kept prices rather high,

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>which meant US did very well, created more and more

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 3>production and profited, and then it all collapsed when the

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 3>war ended and we had way too much supply. That

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 3>is the risk, and that's markets are looking ahead to.

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 5>That so real quick.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>WTI crude oil going to switch gears here eighty dollars

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or barrel seems to found a little bit of a

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>home here for a while.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's happy, it's consolidating. Well, it's the same prices.

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll put this back into history. This price here was

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>first traded in two thousand and seven. Imagine we said

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 3>that about the stock market. Yet over that time period

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 3>the PPIs of fifty percent. In terms of gold, here's

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 3>one for you. It takes point zero four to two

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>ounces of gold to buy one barrel of cruel. That's

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the same price as nineteen thirty one. Cruel is the

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 3>world's most auto correlated acid and has a lot of

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>reason to continue trade lower after that big pump last year.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Fifteen percent of all sales of evs and the world

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>our automobiles are evs. And then course that supply out

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 3>of the US. The biggest thing that's pressured crude all

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the last at least almost fifteen years is the US.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 3>We just create much more than we need, and with

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Canada are surplus every day. It's about four million barrels

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 3>a day of lick with fuels. So we can spell

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 3>up the spr that's cheating Pasolium reserve in just a

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 3>few months.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, all right, Mike always learned something with you. You put

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in soybeans the ducorn I learned that at That's new

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcglohone's senior macro strategist and Bloomberg's resident a farmer

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 6>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 6>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>The I field market looks like it might be heating

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit. Had a couple of filings late

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>last week arm Holdings, the chip maker, and then the

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>grocery delivery company Instacart.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 5>So we want to talk about that deal.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Brian Lynch joints as she's head of market insight at

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Equity Zen. She joins us here, so brand talked to

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>us about Instacart here. What do we learn from their

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>IPO filing last week?

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, thanks for having me. I think Instacart really painted

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 7>a picture in that file of what companies are going

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 7>to need to show if they want to have potentially

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 7>a successful IPO. So this is a company that is growing.

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 7>They grew transaction revenue thirty nine percent year over year.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 7>They're profitable with fifteen percent operating margins, which a lot

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 7>of other players in the gig economy space that are public,

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 7>like uber lyft Dash, you know, they all are not

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 7>presenting profitability yet. And this is both a brand that

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 7>people recognize and a business model that people know, so

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 7>definitely a strong one that could potentially open up the

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 7>IPO market for others.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 4>The interesting bit as well to me, and we were

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 4>talking with this about this with our equity reporter Bailey

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 4>Lipshits earlier, is that this company had been valued much

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 4>much higher as of twenty twenty one, I believe thirty

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 4>nine billion dollars according to pitchbook, And now you know

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 4>the valuation here is going to be maybe seventy percent less.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Talk to me about how investors can I get comfortable

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 4>allowing this company or going along with the company's plans

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to ibo here. How does this change the dialogue between

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.119
<v Speaker 4>the company and its existing investors.

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 7>Sure so, Instacart has already been priming its investors about this.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 7>So while they did raise that thirty nine billion dollar

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 7>round in twenty twenty one, their internal valuations have gone

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 7>as low as ten billion dollars now closer to thirteen billion.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 7>So this is for the equity that they're issuing to

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 7>new employees or you know, new stock grants. That's the

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 7>valuation that they've given themselves. So internally at least they've

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 7>accepted that haircut, and I think that's ultimately the tough

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 7>pill that a lot of these venture backed companies are

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 7>going to have to swallow. As we raised money at

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 7>a crazy valuation in twenty twenty one, it's not where

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 7>the market is anymore. And if we're going to raise

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 7>capital and either the private or public markets, it's most

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 7>likely going to be at a discount. And I think

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 7>investors understand that as well, just given where multiples are.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 7>With a case of instacart, you have Dash as a

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 7>public market competitor. That's a pretty good comp that helps

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 7>from a valuation perspective.

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So speaking of DoorDash brand, I mean this has become

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a crowded space really since the pandemic, as this market's

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>really developed and evolved. Where does instacart kind of position

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>itself in terms of its competition, whether it is DoorDash

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>or Uber Eats or Amazon and all the type of thing.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so they're by far the market leader. Both uber

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 7>and DoorDash have less than one percent of the grocery market,

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 7>and it's a market that they're aggressively pursuing, but they

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 7>still are not big players in it. When you look

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 7>at all of the grocery players, instackcart has partnerships with

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 7>over eighty five percent of them, and this is a

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 7>one point one trillion dollar market. Largest retail market is grocery,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 7>so it's a huge market where they are already the leaders.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 7>So there is a lot of competition, but they are

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 7>one foot ahead. But to your point, it's not just

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 7>these other kind of gig economy players they're up against.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 7>They're up against Amazon Fresh, They're up against Walmart, Grocery

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 7>and other players that you have a lot more resources

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 7>just from being bigger companies. So there is a lot

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 7>of competition.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, does that competition scare would be investors in this

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 4>space at all? Because you know, you think of Amazon

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 4>coming into any space and it's just sort of you know,

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 4>that has the potential to be transformative, even if they've

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>struggled a little bit with their with expanding their grocery footprint.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so they got a strong vote of confidence by Pepsi,

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 7>who's investing one hundred and seventy five million in this

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 7>IPO and a lot of the thesis or you know,

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 7>the bulk that they see is around the advertising piece

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 7>of instacarts business. So about thirty percent of their revenue

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 7>comes from advertising. So when they highlight different products you know,

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 7>on their marketplace to users, and this actually helps diversify

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 7>their revenue stream in ways that you know, some of

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 7>these other players haven't done yet. And it's also the

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 7>piece of their business that is driving their profitability. So

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 7>that's kind of a unique or you know, a strong

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 7>point that they have now that investors have found compelling.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Growth has slowed a little bit for this company. Is

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that just a post pandemic kind of evening out of

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this marketplace in terms of number of subscribers in terms

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of that metric.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, in terms of I would say they haven't saturated

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 7>the market fully, but you know, they did see such

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 7>growth during the pandemic that it's probably more about activation.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 7>So of these customers you have who have used instacart,

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 7>how do you get people, you know, more captive on

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 7>the platform. They haven't admitted and understand that it's not

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 7>going to be onlinely for every customer. People will still

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 7>be going to stores. So it's more about you know,

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 7>activating those customers and then just improving their margins. You know,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 7>amongst those who are transacting, so they have grown revenue,

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 7>They've grown grown average cart size over the same period,

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 7>So even if their customer base isn't growing, you know,

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 7>their revenue is growing.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 4>We saw as well, filing by ARM for its megalistic

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 4>I believe it was a filing, but we uh, what

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 4>threads are there here for you that you're starting to

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 4>see evolve in the the IPO space, because I think

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 4>there was a bit, a fair bit of hesitancy for

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 4>a while, just given what had happened to IPOs in

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one, and now maybe we were turning around.

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 7>It looks like we're starting to turn around. This year

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 7>has been the worst year for IPOs since two thousand

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 7>and nine. We really haven't seen that many blockbuster names

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 7>hit the market, and Instacart and ARM those will be

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 7>the largest IPOs in the US since Rivian in twenty

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 7>twenty one, So definitely starting to signify this turning tide,

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 7>and ultimately you have over fourteen hundred unicorn tech companies

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 7>sitting in the private markets, many of who have been

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 7>waiting for the right opportunity to have an exit. Their

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 7>investors are ready for an exit. Their employees who maybe

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 7>have got in some liquidity but are looking for you know,

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 7>broader liquidity, are looking for an exit. And I think

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 7>the fact that you know, while there's been some recent

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 7>market volatility, you have the nastac up thirty percent, You've

0:15:56.040 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 7>seen a few successful IPOs though not tech ipo is

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 7>like Kava oddity and can you hit the market. People

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 7>are feeling a little bit more comfortable, like this may

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 7>be the time if they're looking to exit this year.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I think for a lot of investers, I think for me,

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing that jumped out of me is, as Simone

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was mentioning earlier, the dramatic reduction in valuation. I think

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of been kind of a gating issue for

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these companies not tapping the public markets

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't want to take that big write down

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>on valuation. Is the expectation that maybe Instacartal maybe opened

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the way for more companies to kind of bite the

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>bullet if you will.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, I think Instacart doing this and kind of taking

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 7>it on the chin is going to open the door

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 7>for others who realize it will become less taboo. Essentially, as

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 7>more companies accept these valuation right downs, it becomes less

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 7>of you know, a negative and just more reflection of

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 7>how multiples have cracked. So I do think that they

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 7>will make it easier for other companies doing this as well.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 7>You know, Klavio is another company, a marketing automation platform

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 7>that also filed their S one on Friday. Got a

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 7>little lost in the Instacart news, but this is a

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 7>company that raised at a nine and a half billion

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 7>dollar valuation twenty twenty one, so they are likely to

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 7>be one that is you know, trading down from those

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 7>levels as well. So it's just kind of a reality

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 7>for where we are in the market.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, thanks so much for joining us. I

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate getting your thoughts there. We're getting some IPO

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>filing starting to hit the tape. Maybe get a little

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of a action in the fall here with the

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>IPO market Brand Lynch, head of market insight at Equity

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Zen and again, you like to think maybe we're going

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit of deal activity once everybody comes

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>back from the summer.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, i mean busy Friday, even though even though Klavio

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 4>is not quite as large a company and likely will

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.239
<v Speaker 4>not be quite as large a company when Instacart.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Instacart, you know, it's going to be a pretty

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>big transaction. We're going to have all the big investment banks.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>So this deal is being led by Goldman Sachs, so

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>it'll be certainly a deal that people will pay attention to.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And there are some comps out there, as brand was mentioning,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>so see how that plays out.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape cans are live program Bloomberg

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 9>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're talking about Vinfest. You know what a

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>crazy name that is. Story that is the exact opposite,

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>might be Minnesota mining and manufacturing three m. You're talking

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>industrial heartland, been around forever. I'm looking at this stock

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years, it's down ten percent on

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a compounded annual basis, where the S and P's up

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a little more than ten percent, so really underperformed the market.

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But they're in the news today and we want to

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about three M. We want to talk about industrial America.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>What's happening out there? Brooks Southerland. She covers all that

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so well for us. She's a columns covering.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 5>Industrials and deals for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>She joins us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studio.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So three M, I guess the story today Brooke agrees

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay more than five point five billion dollars over

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>combat earplugs.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 5>Can you give us the background of this story? Sure?

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.239
<v Speaker 10>So threems sold. They were dual ended earplugs to the

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 10>US military through its Arrow Technology subsidiary which it acquired,

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 10>and the idea was that on one side it was

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 10>sort of block out everything, and the other would block

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 10>out sort of immediate near term gunfire sounds that you

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 10>could still hear the person sitting next to you, which

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 10>obviously has a lot of appeal for the US military.

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 10>But the veterans have claimed that these airplugs did not

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 10>in fact work and left them instead with hearing loss

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 10>and tonightis and so this has been sort of a

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 10>mushrooming legal challenge for three M. Veterans were increasingly winning

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 10>bell weather trials at THREEM then made the move last

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 10>summer to put the aerotechnology sublicidiary into bankruptcy as a

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 10>means of sort of speeding up the resolution of those claims. Now,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 10>a judge earlier in June said you can't do that.

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 10>This is not a valid reorganization purpose, and you know,

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 10>the company was appealing that, but it looked like a

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 10>rocky road. We've seen J and J run into legal

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 10>challenges with a similar ploy involving some of those talk

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 10>claims for that company, and so it looks like the

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 10>company three M is instead moving toward a settlement, which

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 10>makes sense. I mean, this was really the only way

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 10>that this probably was going to end for the company.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Now I understand that there are more issues the three

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 4>AM space, But first, is this it for this specific issue?

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Is this likely to kind of settle all the claims

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 4>around the ear plug issue?

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 10>So we don't know a lot of the details, and

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 10>so Bloomberg News has reported on this Sunday that this

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 10>was in the works. It's a tentative deal at this point.

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 10>I think it'll be interesting to see what the actual

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 10>details look like once we get the final paperwork. One

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 10>of the things that's been reported is that this settlement

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 10>would be paid out over five years, which is not

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 10>what Wall Street was expecting. If you think about the

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 10>type of hearing loss we're talking talking about. If you,

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 10>you know, lost your hearing because you were exposed to

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 10>very loud gunfire, this is not something that plays out

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 10>over time that we were sort of waiting to see happen,

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 10>like you would with cancer coins. Okay, so I think

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 10>analysts had been bracing for more sort of an upfront payment,

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 10>So it wo'd be interesting to see what that actually

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 10>looks like. But you know, theoretically, I don't think they

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 10>would be moving forward with something like this unless they

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 10>thought it was really going to put this issue behind them.

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 10>Now there will be sort of ramification down the road.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 10>I do think you have to worry about a dividend

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 10>cut at three M just given the fact that they've

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 10>also separately agreed to a twelve point five up to

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 10>twelve point five billion dollar settlement. Regarding p Fast and

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 10>drinking water, but that is not the end of their

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 10>p Fast liabilities by any stretch. And I think that

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 10>dividend is just going to be under pressure.

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>He Yeah, the dividend you'll looking just about five point

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, So that might be that's some risk there.

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 5>For three M.

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, was this hearing were these hearing aid issues

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just from the left since f Afghanistan in Iraq from

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that time period or is it even before that.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure exactly on the dates of the claims,

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 10>but like I said, this has been sort of a

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 10>mushrooming issue that has you.

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Know, certain of stocks stocks up about three or four percent,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the Marco's thinking maybe it would have

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>been a bigger number.

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 10>Maybe sure, And so you know a lot of analysts

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 10>have been bracing for something in the ten billion dollar range,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 10>and you know, I think the stock is up because

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 10>quite frankly, any progress is good progress for three M

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 10>on its legal issues. You know, the stock has lost

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 10>more than fifty billion dollars in market values since CEO

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 10>mic Roman took over in twenty eighteen. Like you said,

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 10>it's been a serious underperformer, and some of that has

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 10>to do with execution issues, operational hiccups within the company,

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 10>tougher industrial markets, but a lot of it has to

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 10>do with these legal liabilities that have just been hanging

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 10>over the company's head. And they're very open ended and

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 10>nobody could really put a number on it. So the

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 10>fact that we now have a number that we're talking about,

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 10>I think is a relief to shareholders.

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, can you talk to us a little bit about

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 4>these PFEST obligations. There's one twelve plus billion dollars, but

0:22:58.160 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 4>there may be more than that.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 10>Sure, So the settlement that they've agreed to covers claims

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 10>that Pfast polluted drinking water supplies, and that's with US

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 10>public water systems.

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 4>But these are forever chemicals. They exist forever. You ingest

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 4>them somehow and then they're bad.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 10>So three M manufactured them for a range of products

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 10>for years. They stopped making some of the most problematic

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.239
<v Speaker 10>compounds several decades ago, and then more recently have come

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 10>out and said we're getting out of past altogether. But

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 10>so we're talking about legacy manufacturing from years and years back.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 10>So the settlement involves drinking water claims, but then there

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 10>are also potentially liabilities involving state attorney generals, potentially the EPA,

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 10>the military. Then there are also foreign governments to consider

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 10>because three M has factories all over the world. So

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 10>Barclay's analyst, Julian Mitchell has put some of these outstanding

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 10>liabilities at about sixteen billion addition to the twelve point

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 10>five billion that we've been talking about, and that does

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 10>not include any sort of deals with the foreign government.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 8>That's just us.

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 10>One of the biggest budgets is personal injury claims, property

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 10>damage claims. They just brought in a very big lawyer

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 10>or trying to bring in a big lawyer to help

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 10>with some of those claims. He was the one who

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 10>got the big tobacco settlement, and so I think we

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 10>could still see some big, multi billion dollar settlements.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Brooke, you cover a lot of the big industrial companies.

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>A lot of those companies are conglomerates and conglomerates. It

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like in time and time are in favor, some

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of the times are out of favor. I've pitched it

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>both ways. As a banker, you know which way the

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.239
<v Speaker 1>winds are blowing. You have a fascinating column out on that.

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Where are we now with just conglomerates to investors like them,

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>did they not like them? What's going on?

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 10>So it's interesting because we went through a moment during

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 10>the pandemic where all of a sudden, diversity was an

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 10>asset again because it was very helpful to not just

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 10>be an aerospace company, for example, but even beyond that,

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 10>you sort of had different markets were covering at different

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 10>rates as we came out of the pandemic, and you

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 10>actually heard a lot more companies talking about diversity as

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 10>an asset, and that message is not resonating in the

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 10>same way now that we're sort of on the other

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 10>side of that initial robust COVID comeback, and we're sort

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 10>of seeing some market slow down, other markets being more robust,

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 10>and diversity is becoming a liability again. Now there's not

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 10>that many big diversified industrial conglomerates left just because so

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 10>many have done breakups, spinoffs, what have you. Even three

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 10>MS you know is planning to spin off its healthcare

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 10>unit at the end of this year. But there are

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 10>a couple and I think, you know, we may see

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 10>them under more scrutiny.

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Is this a cyclical sort of thing, because are there

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 4>various times, you know, over when you look over periods

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 4>of decades where it helps to be diversified because it

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 4>helps insulate you from some risk, and then all of

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.959
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, you know, the market recovers and activists say

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 4>get rid of your XYZ division.

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 10>It definitely is cyclical, and to your point, you know,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 10>it's one thing to argue that diversity is a liability,

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 10>and then when times get tough and you're just an

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 10>aerospace company, then the numbers don't look so great. But

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, I do think it goes in waves. And

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 10>one of the comments that the industrials always make is

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 10>if you look outside of manufacturing, look at finance, for example,

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 10>some of the big banks are in a wide variety

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 10>of businesses. Look at the tech companies. Amazon will deliver

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 10>goods to your front door, but then they also sell

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 10>cloud computing services, and they own whole foods, and so

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 10>there is you know a number of examples of conglomerate

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 10>out there in the markets. And I think one of

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 10>the ironic things is for all the times that this

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 10>business structure has been pronounced dead, it actually has quite

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 10>a lot of staying power and just reincarnates itself into

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 10>sort of different visions.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 5>What are you working on these days. What's the next

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 5>cool thing coming out of your Bloomberg terminal?

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 10>Oh, well, I mean all kinds of things. But certainly,

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 10>watching this diversity issue and how it plays out, I

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 10>think will be really interesting. And we haven't really seen

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 10>a lot of activists investors in the industrial sector for

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 10>a while. The last big time I can remember somebody

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 10>pushing for changes at an industrial conglomerate was in twenty

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 10>nineteen with D. E. Shaw and Emerson Electrics, So it's really.

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 5>While and Emerson did do something.

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 10>They did break up, although that was not so much

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 10>I don't know how much that was connected to the activist.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 10>They got a new CEO who had a lot of

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 10>energy and a lot of vision for what he wanted

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 10>this company to look like, and I think that was

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 10>sort of more the driving force in that case. But

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 10>we really haven't seen that many activists in industrials, which

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 10>is fascinating, And so I wonder if you know now

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 10>that sort of the pendulum is swinging the other way

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 10>on diversity, if we might diversity of businesses, if we

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 10>might see, you know, some activists come out of the

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 10>woodwork and take a look at these companies. Honeywell, stock

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 10>in particular has been under pressure since they announced a

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 10>CEO change, and I think investors are just sort of

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 10>waiting and watching to see what that new CEO of

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 10>vim Wi Kapor might do with that mix of businesses.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 10>They're sort of the last remaining really big industrial conglomerate

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 10>that has not done a massive spin off. They spent

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 10>off two smaller businesses in twenty eighteen, but we haven't

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 10>seen the kind of full scale breakup we've seen elsewhere.

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>All Right, brook thanks so much for joining us. As always,

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Brooks Subland and Calumnists. She covers industrials and deals for

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion. Joining us here on all things industrial, including

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota mining and manufacturing.

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the Team Cancer Live program, Bloomberg Markets

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Easter and on Bloomberg, the iHeartRadio

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 6>app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on demand

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 6>wherever you get your podcast.

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Our next guest, I would say it just feels like

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>consistently bullish on the state of California. Several weeks ago,

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>we discussed San Francisco, and the numbers bear out a

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>bullish outlook there. Today it's the city of Angels, Los Angeles.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Matt Winker joins us. He is the founder of Bloomberg News.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>He is the editor emeritus right now of Bloomberg News,

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us via zoom Matt. When I think LA, I

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>think Hollywood, because I'm a former media analyst, and Hollywood's

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of on its backside these days with the actors

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>on strike, the writers on strike. Tell us about what

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the numbers show you about the health of the LA economy.

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 11>Always great to be with you, and truth be told,

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 11>it's not just Hollywood actors and screenwriters. At some point

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 11>this year, you've had airports, shuttle drivers, boat captains, crane operators,

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 11>sanitation workers, duty mechanics, custodians, longshoremen which handled, by the way,

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 11>forty percent of US imports from Asia, and nurses and

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 11>school teachers all on strike. However, that pervasive perception of paralysis,

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 11>if you like, is really belied by the reality that

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 11>not only does Los Angeles still work, its ten largest

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 11>publicly traded companies are number one in sales and employee

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 11>growth among the same group of firms based in each

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 11>of the ten most populated US cities now and for

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 11>the foreseeable future. And what are we talking about The

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 11>ten run the gamut from banks, financial services, insurance to

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 11>consumer discretionary staples and industrials healthcare. They're doing better as

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 11>a group than any top ten companies in any of

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 11>the top ten US cities.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Now, does this analysis that you've done here apply to

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 4>having more people work from these firms in LA itself

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 4>or is it just simply that these firms are based

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 4>in LA they're successful. I guess I'm trying to connect

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 4>to the home base of these companies and actually bringing

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 4>benefits back for the city itself.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 11>Okay, so that's a great question, And of course, none

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 11>of this would be meaningful unless, as you query, all

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 11>the people we're talking about are in LA proper and

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 11>we are talking about employee growth within Los Angeles, not

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 11>outside Los Angeles, inside Los Angeles. And there really is

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 11>no city that comes close to this double digit sales

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 11>gain from its top ten firms. San Jose, by the way,

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 11>is the closest firm at ten percent, and LA is

0:30:54.840 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 11>way above that, and way above Chicago, Phoenix, Philadelphia, and Diego.

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 11>They're all distant. Also, rans San Antonio and Dallas are

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 11>going to have average revenue decline. So LA really is

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 11>out front here and employee growth. It's the same story

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 11>all over again. So and you can see that, by

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 11>the way, on the Bloomberg terminal, if you were to

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 11>graph Los Angeles, for example, against the Russell three thousand,

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 11>which is big and small companies alike publicly traded, the

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 11>gap between the two has widened, maybe close to a

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 11>record actually.

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Hey, Matt, if I were to listen to

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the leaders of states like Florida and Texas, I would

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>get a different narrative. It seems like that, Oh, everybody's

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>leaving California the high taxes. That's not pro business. They're

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>coming down here to lower no tax states. What's what

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is the data show you?

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 11>You could fit Florida, maybe a couple of them inside California.

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Yep, without missing a being exactly you could fit you.

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 11>Could probably all of corporate Florida, all of corporate Florida

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 11>inside of LA and not miss abeat. The point is

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 11>that California is huge, all right, Let's be clear about this.

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 11>So there's been a according to the Census, you know,

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 11>three percent decline in population since twenty twenty in Los Angeles.

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 11>Having said that California is thirty nine million people, Okay,

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 11>that's at least ten million more than any other state.

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 11>Texas is number two, and then corporate California dwarfs corporate anywhere,

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 11>Corporate Texas, Corporate New York, corporate Florida. You could fit

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 11>any of those economies comfortably into California without so much

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 11>as a bulge. That's the reality. And you know, look,

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 11>George Orwell said this best. He said, you know, to

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 11>see what is in front of one's nose needs a

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 11>constant struggle. And that's really the reality for California, particularly

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 11>Los Angele is that it's a very diverse city. By

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 11>the way, it's still got the largest manufacturing base that's

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 11>five hundred thousand plus people of any city in the

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 11>United States. So it's not only you know, a place

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 11>where you have if you like Hollywood screenwriters, but you

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 11>also have aerospace going back decades, and that's just a

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 11>bigger footprint than anywhere else.

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Interestingly, Los Angeles is one of those places that's struggling

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 4>with these these empty office or not empty, but much

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 4>more much high office buildings with very high vacancy rates,

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 4>to the point that their owners are sometimes giving the

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 4>keys back to the banks. Do you get any sense

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 4>of how Los Angeles is going to tackle that problem.

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 4>Is it any different than somewhere like San Francisco might

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 4>be trying to tackle that problem.

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, look, it's early days. We're talking about a peer

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 11>really since the pandemic, which was unprecedented in our lifetime,

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 11>So who's to say, you know, what kind of calamity

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 11>this really is. Certainly in the short term it seems so.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 11>But look, one of the people that we have followed

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 11>closely is a thirty three year old co founder and

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 11>chief executive officer of a company called Relativity Space. It's

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 11>an eight year old startup. Made the first three D

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 11>printed rocket to enter space. That's the one hundred and

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.399
<v Speaker 11>ten foot Tehran. One is the largest metal object three

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 11>D printed. Okay, it's right in the backyard of Los Angeles.

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 11>It's actually in Long Beach, but it's close enough, and

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 11>their offices are in Los Angeles. And he'll tell you,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 11>speaking about downtown and everything else, that most of his

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 11>friends are engineered, but he's friends with artists, people in fashion,

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 11>people in other industries. And that's the kind of innovation

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 11>and mentality says that with take to do something as

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 11>crazy as put a million people on Mars and I

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 11>forgot to mention he's from Plano, Texas, right, Okay, he

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 11>loves California. So be careful. You know what the prevailing

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 11>narrative is, because this being Bloomberg, you look at the data, and,

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.919
<v Speaker 11>as our owner likes to say, you know, in God

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:24.959
<v Speaker 11>we trust, but everybody else bring data.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Matt, thanks so much for joining us.

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Winkler, he is the founder of Bloomberg News fascinating

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>column on the great city of Los Angeles and how

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>well it is doing economically.

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 5>At this point, you're listening to the tape.

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 6>Can's our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 6>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 9>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Goldman is offloading a wealth unit to two hundred and

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>forty billion dollar money manager. Shrinana Rojen reported that story.

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 1>He joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio,

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>shre what is Goldman doing here?

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 5>I thought they liked the wealth management business.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 12>Well, they still like the wealth management business. But what

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.439
<v Speaker 12>they're doing here is another strategic flip flop, and we've

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 12>seen a little bit of that over the course of

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 12>the last twelve months. This is an ria investment advisory

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 12>business that purchased in twenty nineteen for seven hundred and

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 12>fifty million dollars. Goldman has a dominant presence when catering

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 12>to the ultra rich, the ultra high net worth individuals.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 12>No one does it better than Goldman. You know, people

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 12>who have twenty five thirty fifty million dollars per account.

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 12>The most affluent market is one where people could have

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 12>a million dollar account on average. One point to one

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 12>point three million dollar account is what they got when

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 12>they purchased United Capital with about twenty two thousand clients.

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 12>Four years in, they've realized that really is not where

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 12>they want to be. It has been a little bit

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 12>of a drag on their profit pre tax margins as well,

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 12>so they've decided to shed that. They're selling it to

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 12>this two hundred and forty billion dollar wealth manager called

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 12>Creative Planning, which is run by a very interesting gentleman

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 12>by the name of Peter Muluk. But for Goldman What

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 12>that means is you refocus your attention on the part

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 12>of the business that you're really good at, which is

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 12>serving the ultra rich. It mirrors some of their stumbles

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 12>with consumer banking, which is something we've spoken about a

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 12>lot over the course of the last year. Again another

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 12>way to expand beyond their core roots and go into

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 12>the retail banking markets. And in many ways, I think

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 12>it's fair to call it an attempt that flopped, and

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 12>they're getting out of much of that through trying to

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 12>sell off its credit cards businesses, trying to sell off

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 12>the installment lender, shutting off its lending platform for consumers.

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.240
<v Speaker 12>All that they've left is that Marcus Savings business, which

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 12>by the way, is very successful, is a big benefit

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 12>to Goldman because it doesn't mind accumulating deposits that way

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 12>because what it has to pay out on that is

0:37:57.920 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 12>less than what it has to pay out when it

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 12>has to raise my from the market, so that they

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 12>will stick with. But pretty much every other vestige of

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 12>their consumer banking for a is either being you know,

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 12>chucked overboard or in the process of being chucked overboard.

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, so this was purchased United Capital. This RII

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 4>was purchased for seven hundred and fifty million dollars back

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 4>in twenty nineteen. Is that where does that seven hundred

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 4>fifty million dollars go.

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 12>That's a good question because when Goldman announced the deal,

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.879
<v Speaker 12>which came a little bit after our story a few

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 12>minutes back, they did confirm the sale of this business,

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 12>they didn't give us a price, so we don't know

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 12>what price this platform fetched. But they do have an

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 12>important line in their press release that says when this

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 12>deal closes, which they expect by the end of the

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 12>fourth quarter, there will be a gain. There will be

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:48.720
<v Speaker 12>an accounting gain. That doesn't necessarily mean that the buyer

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 12>is paying more than seven hundred and fifty million dollars,

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 12>But the way with most of these transactions is you

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 12>buy something, you have some goodwill. That goodwill gets amortized,

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 12>appreciates over the years. Relative to that, I think you

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 12>will see an accounting gain. And I think that's what

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 12>they're signating at rather than necessarily telling us that this

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 12>is something where they will get in excess of seven

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 12>to fifty million.

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Sure, the beginning of this discussion, you characterize this deals

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a flip flop. Investors don't like flip flops. What's

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>going on at the senior ranks of Goldman sacks here

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of flip flopping in terms of what they own,

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>what they don't own, strategies.

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 12>Two ways to look at it. Right, When David Solomon

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 12>took over in October twenty eighteen, there were two key pillars,

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 12>which is, expand the businesses you're really good at, grow earnings.

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 12>There they benefited hugely benefited from that boom in trading

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 12>and deal making set off by the pandemic and every

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 12>other dynamic that continued after that. But the other important

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 12>pillar for David Solomon and his management team was to

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 12>try and improve the stock multiple, try and convince investors

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 12>the stock is worth a lot more that their price

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 12>to book creature, price earnings, whatever fancy technical metric you

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.240
<v Speaker 12>want to throw out there, deserves more. They haven't really

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 12>succeeded in doing that. A lot of book value growth

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 12>because of earning's growth, but not any success in convincing

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.760
<v Speaker 12>investors that you can do the multiple growth. Maybe now

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 12>that they've done a strategy pivot or have done the

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 12>slip flop, there perhaps in the place where they want

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 12>to be, and maybe investors come on board.

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sre, thanks so much for joining us. Glad

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you could join us here in studio. Shri Nana Rogen

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg News. He covers Goldman Sacks. He covers a

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>big investment banks. He is all over Goldman Sachson, including

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the recent changes in strategy.

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape cats are live program Bloomberg

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 9>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Whyant Electric Industries? It stocks up forty three percent? Looks

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like the company saying, hey, wait a minute, maybe we're

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>not so much to blame. Maybe the there's a they're

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>putting out a statement on. Maybe there's some other causes

0:40:58.920 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>as and.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 4>As Billy talking about it still down sixty seven percent

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 4>this year.

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting. So I have to get the latest here.

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's do that with an analyst who covers the bonds.

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Here covers the credit side of the utilities. Jamon Patel.

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior Fixed and Come strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.399
<v Speaker 1>joining us via zoom. Jamie, what do you know about

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happening here with Hawaiian Electric? Quite the turnaround here.

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know.

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 13>What, we're we're really very much in the early days here, right,

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 13>So you're gonna you've had allegations being filed, you've had

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 13>some responses, you've had some findings. But over the next

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 13>you know, weeks, months, as as a pg and Ek

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 13>showed us, this sort of thing can take a really

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 13>long time. There'll be more findings, there'll be more allegations

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 13>and so on. But this latest one seeds to be

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 13>very interesting. Up until we you know this, this particular

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 13>statement that came out from the company, Hawaiian Electric had

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 13>really not mentioned anything about de energizing its lines. In fact,

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 13>it said that it didn't de energize its lines simply

0:41:55.880 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 13>because they were concerned about emergency usage hospitals, et cetera

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 13>that would you know, be damaged obviously if if the

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 13>if the powers turned off. But today they came out

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.399
<v Speaker 13>with a statement saying that the first fire, the one

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 13>that occurred in the morning, had been contained and then

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 13>according to the Maui Department of Fire, it had been extinguished.

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 13>Then the second fire, which was the one that I

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 13>believe created most of the damage, didn't really start to

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 13>about six hours later, and they apparently, or a little

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:27.439
<v Speaker 13>bit more than six hours they had de energized their lines,

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 13>presumably because of the first fire. So at the end

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 13>of the day, it really depends upon the findings that

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 13>come out of the next few weeks and months, what

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 13>the courts decide, uh, and then how that liability is

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 13>is apportioned.

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, So just the Bloomberg reporting here, Hawaii utility source,

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>after pointing blame for the fire at the county Hawaiian

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Electric says power lines de energized before the fire.

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I guess the the interesting bit is there

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 4>there is that they're sort of drawing this line this

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 4>was not a continuation of the first fire, but rather

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 4>a second fire.

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 8>And of course, yeah, exactly exactly.

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 13>I think I think what they you know, what, what

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:11.240
<v Speaker 13>the litigants, maybe not the county so much, but certainly

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 13>the litigants will will try to claim and try.

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 8>To prove is that the first the first fire.

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 13>Had not been extinguished and and had eventually led to

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 13>the second fire. If that's the case, then the question becomes, well,

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 13>is is Maui County, through the Department of Fire liable

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.359
<v Speaker 13>at the end of the day, I you know, and

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 13>and in addition to all this, I think you sort

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 13>of have to kind of take a step back, you

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 13>so you know, what's going to affect the bonds uh,

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 13>and and the equity, which is you know, where where

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 13>we'd started this. The whole question depends upon how much

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 13>the liability is, how much h E is is determined

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 13>to be responsible for, how much of it will they share?

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 9>Uh?

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 13>And then once that's determined, will that be tax deductible

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 13>for the company, because that obviously reduces the overall.

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:00.040
<v Speaker 8>Liability, And then where.

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 13>The the regulators will allow them to recover that liability

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 13>as well as the obviously the restoration costs that they

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 13>have to go through through rates. If they don't, that's

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 13>you know, obviously not good for the bonds and and

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 13>certainly not good for the equity.

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So, Jamie, what has the company done to date to

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe from a balance sheet perspective, to prepare for, you know,

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe some some downside scenarios.

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 13>Well, so far they've they've you know, there's not much

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 13>they can do on the balance sheet side, but they.

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 8>Have tried to shore up their liquidity.

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 13>They drew down the two revolvers that they have, one

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 13>for one hundred and seventy million up at the parent

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 13>and then two hundred million down at the intermediate parent

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 13>Hawaiian Electric Company. So that plus any dividends that may

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 13>come up from American Savings Bank and any cash that

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 13>they have on hand, will hopefully take them through the

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:51.840
<v Speaker 13>restoration period through to the end of the year so

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 13>that they can they can get their power up and

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 13>running to all the all the customers that don't have it.

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.760
<v Speaker 4>At this point, I'm looking at bonds of Hawaiian Electric

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Do in December twenty twenty eight. It looks like they're

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 4>training around eighty six cents on the dollar. How should

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 4>we interpret that, jaymen? How dire are things for the

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 4>company with respect to its credit worthiness?

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 13>So you have to sort of differentiate between the bonds

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:25.280
<v Speaker 13>up at the parent level and then the intermediate holding

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 13>company and down at the utilities the parent level bonds have,

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 13>you know, and this is sort of what differentiates Hawaiian

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 13>Electric from PG and E pgn E had just the

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 13>electric utility as its only subsidiary. Hawaiian Electric has American

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 13>Savings Bank as a separate subsidiary through which they can

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 13>upstream dividends in the normal course of business to continue

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 13>to service their debt. Down at the utility level, you

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 13>don't have that. Everything is purely dependent upon the earnings

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 13>at the utility in terms of the ability to service debt.

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 13>But I think you know, we haven't seen the bonds

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 13>move as much today as certainly not as much as

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 13>the share prices. I think you know two reasons for that.

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 13>One is the liquidity most of these bonds are privately placed,

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 13>don't trade as much as you would expect. But two

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 13>also the junk ratings on the bonds, right, and the

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 13>bonds are going to trade in line with their ratings

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.280
<v Speaker 13>until there is a change those ratings.

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 5>So Jim.

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>And for these utilities, whether it's you know, you know

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the at in California that we saw several years ago

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>or here in Hawaii, there's just a ton of risk

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that these utilities have in a world of climate change

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and more and more fires, some of which are caused

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>by utility lines. Is there any way for them to

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>ensure against that? Or if you're a creditor or you're

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a shareholder. You just have to assume this growing risk

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>going forward.

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 13>So, I you know, most of the transmission assets that

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 13>are owned by utilities, and those are the ones that

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 13>are you know, generally the most susceptible, whether it's to

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 13>hurricanes or to wildfires, are generally not in short, and

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 13>the understanding there is that if they are damaged, regulators

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 13>will allow the utility to recover through increased rates, recovery

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 13>of those assets, and to rebuild those assets. Certainly, that's

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 13>what we saw with Entergen New Orleans when when Katrina hit.

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 13>That's what we saw with CNP and and FP and

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 13>L when when both those were hit by hurricanes. You know,

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 13>it remains to be seen what's gonna happen over here.

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:26.800
<v Speaker 8>At PG and E there wasn't the full recovery.

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 13>Because PGNU was found to be liable to to the

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 13>significant extent. So I think I think utilities are not

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 13>those boring UH investments that that they have traditionally been,

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 13>you know, sort of buying and and put away. I

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 13>think you've got more risk perhaps at at at individual

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 13>utilities then at the holding company to the extent that

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 13>the holding company owns more than one utility. Diversification is

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 13>probably the way to go. You have a utility that's

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 13>operating in one jurisdiction, uh and in in different geographic

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 13>localities as opposed to another. So when you've got multiple utilities,

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 13>you've got a little bit of diversification that helps to

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 13>prevent a hit up at the parent level and for

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 13>the equity.

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's interesting. And is PG and E is that

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 4>the sort of situation that we really should see as

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 4>indicative of how this might play out? Or do you

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 4>think we could see some sort of answer as to

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 4>who's liable, et cetera more quickly. And I'm sorry we

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 4>have only about twenty seconds here.

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 13>So in terms of your question, is are we wondering

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 13>how this is going to play out in relative to

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.760
<v Speaker 13>PG and E. So PG and E's you know, obviously

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 13>you had a much bigger utility. The advantage that PG

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:51.319
<v Speaker 13>and E had as it came out of bankruptcy was

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 13>it shared California primarily with two other solid utilities, investment

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.239
<v Speaker 13>grade utilities. So California was able to set up this

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 13>wildfire farm twenty billion dollars plus, which all of the

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 13>utilities have had to contribute into, and will continue to

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 13>contribute into, and will be at least partially be able

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 13>to recover through rates. That's sort of I don't want

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 13>to use the word subsidizes, but maybe that is the

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 13>one that comes first to mind, subsidized PG and e's

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 13>liabilities with the other two.

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 8>But of course it works all ways.

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Right yep, all right, Jamie, thanks so much for joining us.

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate you getting some of your analysis here today,

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:31.399
<v Speaker 1>big news for Hawaiian Electric jam and Pateel, senior fixed

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>income strategists for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us from Bloomberg Princeton Campus.

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:45.400
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio