1
00:00:02,279 --> 00:00:06,240
Speaker 1: Thank you for tuning in. Big show today. A lot

2
00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:09,800
Speaker 1: of really interesting folks to talk to, including our next guest,

3
00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:13,240
Speaker 1: Adam White, a senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

4
00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:15,200
Speaker 1: It's always a pleasure to welcome at him to the show.

5
00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:18,000
Speaker 1: He was also a member of the Biden Supreme Court

6
00:00:18,400 --> 00:00:22,720
Speaker 1: Commission a k the Port Court Packing Commission. At the

7
00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:28,000
Speaker 1: American Enterprise Institute, Adam White focuses on American constitutionalism, the

8
00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:31,200
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, and the administrative state. Can Currently, he co

9
00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:33,360
Speaker 1: directs the sed Boyd and Grace Center for the Study

10
00:00:33,400 --> 00:00:36,960
Speaker 1: of the Administrative State at the nan Scalia School of

11
00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:39,880
Speaker 1: Law at George Mason University. Glad we got you back,

12
00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:42,920
Speaker 1: Mr White. How are you, sir? Great glad, It's it's

13
00:00:42,960 --> 00:00:45,480
Speaker 1: our pleasure to have you. I was just reading your

14
00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:49,920
Speaker 1: your CV as they say, UM, and your specialty in

15
00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:53,120
Speaker 1: studying the administrative state. I imagine you get invited to

16
00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:56,080
Speaker 1: many many cocktail parties, people just dying to hear about

17
00:00:56,080 --> 00:01:00,000
Speaker 1: administrative law. You know they you always think there's a

18
00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:02,160
Speaker 1: way to make lawyers even more boring, and then you

19
00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:06,360
Speaker 1: specialize in administrative law, you just go one level lower. Well,

20
00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:08,560
Speaker 1: I'm glad you took that sarcasm in the spirit it

21
00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:12,080
Speaker 1: was intended, because the the the irony of that is

22
00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:15,720
Speaker 1: that administrative law can have such an enormous effect on

23
00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:18,360
Speaker 1: all of our lives, our business, is, the economy, etcetera.

24
00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:23,479
Speaker 1: For folks who haven't really familiarized themselves with that so

25
00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:28,119
Speaker 1: called fourth branch of government, why is administrative laws so significant? Well,

26
00:01:28,120 --> 00:01:30,680
Speaker 1: it's so significant because in this day in age, and

27
00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:33,720
Speaker 1: for the last many decades, most of our law and

28
00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:36,560
Speaker 1: policy at the federal level really is made in and

29
00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:41,319
Speaker 1: around administrative agencies rather than in Congress. Congress has spent

30
00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:45,160
Speaker 1: decades fun decades delegating broad power discretion to these agencies,

31
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:48,880
Speaker 1: and it's those delegations over time reached a tipping point

32
00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:52,680
Speaker 1: where now Congress has less and less incentive to do

33
00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:55,520
Speaker 1: any more work of its own because the agencies can

34
00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:58,320
Speaker 1: do it, and so Congress instead focuses on things like

35
00:01:58,720 --> 00:02:01,960
Speaker 1: oversight hearings or one on cable news shows or raising

36
00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:04,720
Speaker 1: money or whatever they do, while the agency has become

37
00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:07,440
Speaker 1: the center of gravity in government, and a good example

38
00:02:07,440 --> 00:02:09,880
Speaker 1: of it comes in the aftermath of the of the

39
00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:13,560
Speaker 1: recent Dobbs case overturning Rob Wade, all of us including me,

40
00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:15,640
Speaker 1: We say, you know, this is a good decision because

41
00:02:15,639 --> 00:02:20,119
Speaker 1: it returns these issues properly to the states, but quite frankly,

42
00:02:20,560 --> 00:02:22,760
Speaker 1: first and foremost, it will send these issues to the

43
00:02:22,760 --> 00:02:26,200
Speaker 1: administrative state. You already see the Biden administration talking about

44
00:02:26,240 --> 00:02:28,560
Speaker 1: what the f d A might do, what Health and

45
00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:33,040
Speaker 1: Human Services might do, activists arguing that the federal government

46
00:02:33,040 --> 00:02:36,480
Speaker 1: needs to provide access to abortion on federal lands, on

47
00:02:36,520 --> 00:02:39,360
Speaker 1: federal property, that kind of thing. Those are all administrative

48
00:02:39,400 --> 00:02:42,200
Speaker 1: state issues. But of course it goes much broader than that,

49
00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:44,560
Speaker 1: and we're about to see we expect a big decision

50
00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:46,960
Speaker 1: out of the Supreme Court in a case involving the

51
00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:50,320
Speaker 1: e p A, which is significant for climate policy, but

52
00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:54,320
Speaker 1: it's also significant it could be significant for the administrative

53
00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:56,639
Speaker 1: agencies more broadly. You know, I was just going to

54
00:02:56,720 --> 00:02:59,560
Speaker 1: get into just a little more about the significance of

55
00:02:59,840 --> 00:03:01,840
Speaker 1: the agencies and what they do, but we can we

56
00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:03,880
Speaker 1: can just talk about the cases, because my point was

57
00:03:03,919 --> 00:03:07,560
Speaker 1: merely going to be that these agencies, these bureaucrats, they right,

58
00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:13,880
Speaker 1: they quote unquote pass uh, they adjudicate, and they punish

59
00:03:14,480 --> 00:03:17,760
Speaker 1: violations of law. They're not called law. I guess the

60
00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:20,519
Speaker 1: rules and regulations but if if I get fined or

61
00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:22,040
Speaker 1: I go to jail because I won't pay the fine,

62
00:03:22,040 --> 00:03:24,959
Speaker 1: that sounds like a law to me. It sure does.

63
00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:27,840
Speaker 1: And sometimes even when in theory you have a right

64
00:03:27,880 --> 00:03:30,440
Speaker 1: of judicial review, when the process is all done and

65
00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:32,640
Speaker 1: the court might throw out what the agency has done,

66
00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:36,560
Speaker 1: sometimes the process is the punishment. Sometimes having to endure

67
00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:41,160
Speaker 1: this long and costly administrative process. Whether you're trying to

68
00:03:41,240 --> 00:03:44,880
Speaker 1: develop your land, whether you're a company trying to get

69
00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:48,520
Speaker 1: federal approval of some new product. Um, those things are

70
00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:50,880
Speaker 1: costly and they take time. And I want to be

71
00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:54,280
Speaker 1: very clear, I'm not a nihilist, I'm not a radical libertarian,

72
00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:59,000
Speaker 1: and I'm even pretty sympathetic to, you know, a strong

73
00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:03,720
Speaker 1: federal government on national issues. I believe in all those things.

74
00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:06,320
Speaker 1: But you know, it's summer vacation time. And my dad

75
00:04:06,320 --> 00:04:09,360
Speaker 1: always told me sometimes that the journeys as important as

76
00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:12,880
Speaker 1: the destination. It's important that these issues get funneled through

77
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:19,039
Speaker 1: legislatures rather than through administrative agencies, because the legislatures have

78
00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:23,279
Speaker 1: to deliberate, often have to compromise, have to moderate things,

79
00:04:23,279 --> 00:04:28,040
Speaker 1: whereas administrative agencies are built to move quickly and unilaterally,

80
00:04:28,400 --> 00:04:31,200
Speaker 1: which means they tend to act a bit more sweepingly

81
00:04:31,640 --> 00:04:34,839
Speaker 1: and a lot less moderately. So tell us about these

82
00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:37,320
Speaker 1: cases before the court and what significance they might end

83
00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:40,200
Speaker 1: up having. Sure, Well, this year we've already seen several

84
00:04:40,200 --> 00:04:43,440
Speaker 1: of these cases, UM involving administration. We saw them, of

85
00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:46,440
Speaker 1: course in the OCEHA vaccine mandate case, where the Supreme

86
00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:49,400
Speaker 1: Court held that while OSHA has a lot of power

87
00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:54,360
Speaker 1: to regulate working condition in large companies, they can't use

88
00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:56,760
Speaker 1: that as a point of leverage to create a you know,

89
00:04:56,800 --> 00:05:01,600
Speaker 1: at the facto nationwide vaccine mandate for a all Americans, um.

90
00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:03,880
Speaker 1: And when the Supreme Court reached that decision, they they

91
00:05:05,279 --> 00:05:08,080
Speaker 1: used not necessarily by name, but, as Coresus pointed out

92
00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:10,320
Speaker 1: in a separate opinion, they used what's called the major

93
00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,359
Speaker 1: questions doctrine, which is a legal way of saying that

94
00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:18,280
Speaker 1: the courts are increasingly skeptical of an agency suddenly discovering

95
00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:23,320
Speaker 1: in an old statute really transformative new powers that have

96
00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:26,880
Speaker 1: never been invoked before. So again, OSHA has broad powers,

97
00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:29,839
Speaker 1: but not necessarily powers. So broad is to allow it

98
00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:34,320
Speaker 1: to impose a nationwide vaccine mandate. Whatever you think of vaccines,

99
00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:36,720
Speaker 1: and I have mine, uh, These are the sorts of

100
00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:39,240
Speaker 1: things that need to be handled by legislatures, especially at

101
00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:41,400
Speaker 1: the state level. Now, the next big case is coming

102
00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:43,520
Speaker 1: down the pike for the Supreme Court involves the e

103
00:05:43,640 --> 00:05:46,640
Speaker 1: p A, the e p a's latest suite of greenhouse

104
00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:48,800
Speaker 1: gas regulations. It's a dispute that really goes back to

105
00:05:48,839 --> 00:05:52,880
Speaker 1: the Obama administration and the Trump administration changing the climate rules,

106
00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:56,600
Speaker 1: but Biden administration changing them back. And in a nutshell,

107
00:05:56,640 --> 00:05:59,120
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court has been asked to decide whether the

108
00:05:59,200 --> 00:06:01,880
Speaker 1: e p A really does have power into the Clean

109
00:06:01,920 --> 00:06:06,839
Speaker 1: Air Act to regulate the entire energy and manufacturing economy

110
00:06:07,160 --> 00:06:09,560
Speaker 1: through what's called what the A. Long administration called the

111
00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:13,159
Speaker 1: Clean Power Plan. And uh the Supreme Court might issue

112
00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:15,599
Speaker 1: the case, might decide the case in pretty narrow terms,

113
00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:18,080
Speaker 1: either approve it or disapprove it. But if they do

114
00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:21,800
Speaker 1: disapprove it, we'll all be watching for signals as to

115
00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:27,360
Speaker 1: how narrowly the Court might construe other regulatory statutes. And

116
00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:28,920
Speaker 1: and just one more thing, Joe, I don't mean to

117
00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:33,880
Speaker 1: bladder on, but other cases the courts decided have administrative

118
00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:37,039
Speaker 1: state aspects. Take the New York case New York Rifle

119
00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:41,520
Speaker 1: of the second Amendment case with New York regulating the

120
00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:45,520
Speaker 1: licenses to to carry handguns outside the home. It was

121
00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:47,600
Speaker 1: mostly a Second Amendment case. It had to do with

122
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:50,680
Speaker 1: how the courts evaluate your right to keep their arms.

123
00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:52,520
Speaker 1: At the center of the case and what really troubled

124
00:06:52,520 --> 00:06:54,760
Speaker 1: the justices was the fact that in New York and

125
00:06:54,760 --> 00:06:58,280
Speaker 1: in five other states, the regulator, the one who issues

126
00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:02,440
Speaker 1: these licensees, had pretty much boundless discretion. It wasn't that

127
00:07:02,480 --> 00:07:04,440
Speaker 1: they started had to check the box list and they

128
00:07:04,440 --> 00:07:07,880
Speaker 1: look for certain facts and it can satisfy as an applicant,

129
00:07:07,920 --> 00:07:10,520
Speaker 1: satisfy those facts, you get license. Now, the New York

130
00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:15,040
Speaker 1: statute really left total discretion in the hands of the licenser,

131
00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:18,000
Speaker 1: and that really troubled the justices. So you can see

132
00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:20,200
Speaker 1: these issues seep into other cases that you don't really

133
00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:23,520
Speaker 1: think of it administrative state issues. So, I know, asking

134
00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:27,120
Speaker 1: you to make UH predictions as kind of an iffy

135
00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:29,800
Speaker 1: UH proposition. Adam White's on the line, by the way

136
00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:33,080
Speaker 1: from the American Enterprise Institute. UM, but is is there

137
00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:39,000
Speaker 1: a chance that the Supreme Court will fundamentally say the

138
00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:41,800
Speaker 1: gigantic growth of the power of the administrative state has

139
00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:43,800
Speaker 1: been wrong from the beginning and we're going to roll

140
00:07:43,840 --> 00:07:46,400
Speaker 1: it way back, or is this much more likely to

141
00:07:46,440 --> 00:07:50,320
Speaker 1: be incremental as you say now Rome, Rome wasn't built

142
00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:52,120
Speaker 1: in a day, and it wasn't unbuilt in a day,

143
00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:55,880
Speaker 1: and I'd say we should have a similar expectation here.

144
00:07:56,600 --> 00:07:58,520
Speaker 1: I think for folks like me who are skeptical of

145
00:07:58,520 --> 00:08:01,120
Speaker 1: the administrative state and want to see it UM have

146
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:03,520
Speaker 1: more legal constraints on it. I think the most we

147
00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:06,800
Speaker 1: can hope for is the Supreme Court declaring the e

148
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:10,120
Speaker 1: P A s UH policy here or it's assertion of

149
00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:13,440
Speaker 1: power over climate policy to be an overreach. It might

150
00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:16,880
Speaker 1: leave the door open to more narrow climate regulations, and

151
00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:19,480
Speaker 1: I'd be fine with that, um, but it would I

152
00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:21,560
Speaker 1: think if the Court were to say this is just

153
00:08:21,640 --> 00:08:25,160
Speaker 1: too overbroad, and we are in future cases going to

154
00:08:25,280 --> 00:08:30,760
Speaker 1: continue to be skeptical of agencies suddenly creating new transformative

155
00:08:30,840 --> 00:08:34,240
Speaker 1: programs in old through old old statutes, I think that

156
00:08:34,240 --> 00:08:37,280
Speaker 1: would send a good signal. There's basically two within the

157
00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:40,080
Speaker 1: conservative block on the Court. There's you can think of

158
00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:43,280
Speaker 1: it as two camps. There's some justices I think Thomas

159
00:08:43,280 --> 00:08:46,760
Speaker 1: and Gorsuch are in this camp certainly, who want the

160
00:08:46,880 --> 00:08:49,480
Speaker 1: judges in the Lower courts in the Supreme Court to

161
00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:53,960
Speaker 1: have no deference for administrative agencies and also to be

162
00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:57,680
Speaker 1: willing to strike down statutes as unconstitutional when they delegate

163
00:08:57,720 --> 00:09:01,600
Speaker 1: too much power to an agency. For other justices like

164
00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:07,160
Speaker 1: Chief Justice Roberts Kavanaugh, UM, they've sometimes agreed rhetorically, but

165
00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:09,439
Speaker 1: when push comes to shove, there in a more of

166
00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:12,240
Speaker 1: an amendate. Don't end at camp where they don't necessarily

167
00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:14,800
Speaker 1: want to strike down a lot of statutes is unconstitutional,

168
00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:18,160
Speaker 1: but they do want to put more guard rails on

169
00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:23,440
Speaker 1: the agency process. They want maybe steadier administration. And I

170
00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:26,080
Speaker 1: think there's something to be said for for both camps.

171
00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:28,400
Speaker 1: So I assume that when this ruling comes down, you'll

172
00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:31,439
Speaker 1: be writing about it. I will. I just have a

173
00:09:31,480 --> 00:09:34,480
Speaker 1: new piece out in Commentary magazine on another important case

174
00:09:34,880 --> 00:09:37,080
Speaker 1: in the same vein on out of the Fifth Circuit

175
00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:40,400
Speaker 1: involving the Securities and Exchange Commission, And uh, you know,

176
00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:43,320
Speaker 1: I I keep writing on these things because you know,

177
00:09:43,559 --> 00:09:45,599
Speaker 1: even if Rome isn't built in a day, and you know,

178
00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:48,079
Speaker 1: every little bit helps, all right, Well, we'll absolutely look

179
00:09:48,120 --> 00:09:51,320
Speaker 1: for that after the ruling comes out. One more quick question.

180
00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:54,640
Speaker 1: We've barely we got about two minutes left. Um. I've

181
00:09:54,679 --> 00:09:59,280
Speaker 1: been reading a lot about the shocking left word swing

182
00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:02,920
Speaker 1: of America's law schools and then scally law school. George

183
00:10:02,920 --> 00:10:06,040
Speaker 1: Mason University is not one of those institutions from what

184
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:09,880
Speaker 1: I understand, UM, do you have any thoughts on that topic.

185
00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:14,079
Speaker 1: What have you seen at uh? Well, DC is lausy

186
00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:17,520
Speaker 1: with big name law schools. Um, it's shocking to me

187
00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:20,959
Speaker 1: they've abandoned like the principle of neutrality before the law,

188
00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:24,160
Speaker 1: that sort of thing. There's a few things happening. One

189
00:10:24,280 --> 00:10:27,080
Speaker 1: is on just the campus culture in general, the things

190
00:10:27,080 --> 00:10:31,080
Speaker 1: that students and faculty members face when they voice opinions

191
00:10:31,080 --> 00:10:34,439
Speaker 1: that are unpopular on campus. That's a long standing debate,

192
00:10:34,440 --> 00:10:36,680
Speaker 1: but obviously the last five or ten years has become

193
00:10:36,960 --> 00:10:39,880
Speaker 1: even worse, especially in light of new social media technologies

194
00:10:39,880 --> 00:10:43,040
Speaker 1: and others. And there's just the general leftward tilt of academia,

195
00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:46,280
Speaker 1: and that's also a longstanding issue. UM. But I'd say

196
00:10:46,520 --> 00:10:48,480
Speaker 1: one of the reasons why things seem to be reaching

197
00:10:48,480 --> 00:10:51,800
Speaker 1: an interesting moment, the basic getting so heated is I

198
00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:55,040
Speaker 1: think legal academia, which tends to lean towards the left,

199
00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:57,120
Speaker 1: is coming to grips with the fact that the Supreme

200
00:10:57,120 --> 00:11:00,480
Speaker 1: Court that they study and write about and advocate before. Uh,

201
00:11:00,640 --> 00:11:05,440
Speaker 1: is it facing a generational turn towards textualism towards originalism.

202
00:11:05,480 --> 00:11:09,160
Speaker 1: Imagine starting up your entire career, eager to champion and

203
00:11:09,240 --> 00:11:11,840
Speaker 1: defend the Supreme Court, only to find about halfway through

204
00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:14,360
Speaker 1: your academic career that you no longer agree with the

205
00:11:14,360 --> 00:11:18,200
Speaker 1: Court anymore. Um. I'm lucky not to be in that position. Um,

206
00:11:18,240 --> 00:11:21,120
Speaker 1: but I think it must be challenging for others. Adam White,

207
00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:24,520
Speaker 1: Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, co director of

208
00:11:24,559 --> 00:11:26,080
Speaker 1: the sea Board and Gray Center for the Study of

209
00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:28,760
Speaker 1: the Administrative State at the eminent Scalia Law School at

210
00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:32,040
Speaker 1: George Mason University. Adam, it's always enlightening. Thanks a million,

211
00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:35,120
Speaker 1: look forward to the next time. Likewise, thanks Joe, thank you,