WEBVTT - Trump Says Xi Call Yielded Rare Earths Progress, More Talks 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>We also want to figure out what's happening in DC.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>You had a social media post from President Trum talking

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 3>about his readout from the President g and President Trump's call.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I didn't say that right, but anyway, he talked

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 3>about the call that they had together. Tyler Kendall was

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 3>joining us outside the White House.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.599
<v Speaker 2>What did he say? What do we know? Yeah, hey,

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Alex Swell.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 4>President Trump said that the call lasted a little over

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 4>an hour and a half and said that it resulted

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 4>in a quote positive conclusion for both countries. Importantly, he

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 4>said that moving forward, he doesn't think there's going to

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 4>be any questions around rare earth products. As you all know,

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 4>the US had been accusing China of slow walking the

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 4>export licenses when it comes to critical and rare earth

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 4>minerals that really are essential to US supply chains, alleging

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 4>that China had violated the terms reached when they had

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 4>negotiated in Geneva. In fact, I actually caught up with

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 4>the Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Falkender earlier this week, who

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 4>told me that this was the issue that he thought

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 4>would ultimately mean that these leaders were eventually going to

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 4>have to get on the phone and talk about. President

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Trump also said that there would be another round of

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 4>in person talks like we saw in Geneva. He said

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 4>that Treasury Secretary Scott Besson and Ustr Jamis and Greer

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 4>would lead them, as well as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 4>That would be a new addition to the team. He

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 4>was not there at the talks in Geneva, but a

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 4>pretty remarkable development to think about how our reporting has

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 4>really indicated Paul and Alex that China would really much

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 4>prefer for key advisors to iron out the issues before

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 4>putting Jijiping on the phone call. And there were definitely

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 4>some key issues that they needed to talk about today.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 5>But as it relates to those rare earths, the US

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 5>President did not specify whether Beijing had agreed to speed

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 5>export licenses.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 6>Did he?

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 5>Is that something that's just too complex at this point, So.

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 4>We're still waiting further details, we act to put into

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 4>context that the truth social post was rather vague. But

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 4>President Trump himself said that he doesn't think that there

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 4>are going to be questions moving forward here. Of course,

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 4>it's a very complex process and has been something that

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 4>has been the top of mind for the United States

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 4>during these talks and really has become sort of a

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>pressure point moving forward, since we know our analysts at

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Economics tell us that thirty out of fifty minerals

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 4>that are deemed critical to the US come primarily from China,

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 4>So they really do have such a big market share

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to these critical minerals that the US

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 4>ends up relying on.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:48.119
<v Speaker 6>All right, very good.

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate that we're just getting some latest more reporting

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 5>there from Washington, DC as it relates to some of

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 5>those talks, which I guess are inconclusive.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>But I guess it's just good that I think is

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the fact that they literally are talking. Yes, it's probably

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 3>a good thing, right, Yeah, Mari Tyler, thanks a lot.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Kendall, Bloomberg Television watching correspondent, joining us on that call.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us Live

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, we got a slew of economic data that

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.839
<v Speaker 3>came out this morning in jobless claims not great, unit

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 3>labor costs, higher, productivity lower.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>It didn't feel really great.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's get Michael mckei Boomb're going to National Economics and

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Policy correspondent.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 2>How would you describe this data this morning? Not great?

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 2>C plus.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 7>You know, maybe I'd give it a B minus at

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 7>this point, and I'll explain why. But first I did

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 7>want to mention so you were right. You're right about

0:03:55.080 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 7>band aids. This is one of those facts to express anywhere.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 7>But I know somebody who is in the business of

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 7>retailing things like that, and a lot of companies have

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 7>generic brand band aids, and the story is that they

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 7>cannot afford the Chinese made generic band aids anymore. They're

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 7>going to have to raise the price so much that

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 7>they lose the value of having their own brand. So

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 7>this could be a thing you may put your finger on.

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 7>The whole problem with tariffs is can't get generic band

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 7>aids anymore.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Also, generic band aids are bad. That was my point.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm serious, Okay.

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 7>Anyway, Java's claims are bad to forty seven, but it's

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 7>the highest eight months. But the problem is, and unfortunately

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 7>I have only a black and white chart, so we

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 7>can't show it on the color radio. But this is

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 7>the time of year when we start to get into

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 7>seasonal distortions that have gotten worse since COVID the non

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 7>seasonally adjusted job those claims went down and the seasonally

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 7>adjusted went up significantly. And this has been happening for

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 7>a couple of weeks. And then you look at the

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 7>last couple of years and you see the same pattern.

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 7>So is this a message about what's going to happen maybe?

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 7>Or Neil Dudda and I were talking about it and

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 7>he says yes. Or is it just sort of a headfake.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 7>Maybe the auto companies have started retooling earlier because they

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 7>aren't selling as many cars, don't need to make any cars,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 7>they have some space to do it. So that's something

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 7>to keep an eye on. At this point. We've had

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 7>a lot of announcements Disney, Procter, and Gamble today about layoffs.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 7>Although Procter and Gamble said seven thousand over two years,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 7>and they didn't say what country, So we're not sure yet,

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 7>which is part of the reason that you have to

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 7>take this not so much with a big, great assault,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 7>but just say, okay, that's interesting. Let's see what happens

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 7>in the next couple of weeks. Other than that, the

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 7>trade balance is not a surprise. We saw that in

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 7>the advanced trade numbers. Because we stopped buying things from overseas.

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 7>Imports went down fifteen and a half percent, which is

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 7>the biggest fall on record, and the trade balance falls

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 7>by more than half, which is the biggest fall on record.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 7>But I think back to the first quarter where we

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 7>had bad growth figures because we imported so much. This

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 7>is going to have the opposite effect. And then while

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 7>the unit labor costs that Alex mentioned our old news,

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 7>I mean this first quarter news, it does suggest that

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 7>there's higher pressure on prices for companies, and it's part

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 7>of that whole Are we seeing an inflation and stagnation

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 7>thing at the same.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Time, which is kind of what you were talking about yesterday?

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Put yeah, I mean a lot of the notes I

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 5>got from Wall Street economists, I kept seeing stagflation in

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 5>the title, So that's coming back. But if I look

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 5>at today's data, Michael's, you're just explaining it as well

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 5>as yesterday's im data.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 6>I think these.

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.559
<v Speaker 5>Economists are kind of getting it right. They've been telling

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 5>us maybe not the tariffs themselves, but the uncertainty associated

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 5>with teriffs that could lead to slower economic growth of

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 5>that could lead to higher prices. I don't know, it

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 5>feels like that's coming to fruition right now.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's one of the things that FED officials have

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 7>been talking about that companies have been sitting on the sidelines,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 7>not sure what to do, but at some point they're

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 7>going to have to make a decision, and some of

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 7>them may be coming off the sidelines now and just

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 7>going ahead and raising prices in advance of tariffs. Some

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 7>things have gone up in price, but just betting that

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 7>something's going to happen. Part of it because they want

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 7>to protect their margins, and part of it is they're

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 7>probably testing the waters we saw in the last inflation.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 7>When it started, people were raising prices more than their

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 7>costs were going up because they hadn't been able to

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 7>raise prices in years, and so they were taking advantage

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 7>of it and maybe that's a little bit of what

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing now. There have been some studies out recently

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:04.119
<v Speaker 7>that suggests that when Trump announced the tariffs, people raised

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 7>some prices. Then when he put the ninety day hold

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 7>on it, they didn't lower those prices. So businesses are

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 7>maybe not anxious to test whether they lose market share,

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 7>but they're willing to do it if they think that

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 7>things are going to continue in that direction.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, Mike, thanks lot, really appreciate it. Michael mcke Boomer,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Economics and Policy correspond.

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, how speaker Mike Johnson earlier joined Bloomberg to discuss

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 3>key issues such as Elon Musk's vocal disagreement with the

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Big Beautiful Bill and the speaker Johnson's fight to keep

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 3>the forty thousand dollars salt cap and more. Bloomberg asked

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>about the salt cap that he's fighting to maintain. Here's

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>part of that conversation, crossing the.

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 8>Grand canyon on a piece of gentle flaws. Okay, the

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 8>equilibrium that we reached here, it took quite a bit

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 8>of time to get to where we are, and you

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 8>can't load me up on either side. And if you

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 8>go and slash the salt cap that we negotiated carefully

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 8>for over a year, it's going to make it very

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 8>difficult for me to deliver the necessary number of votes.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 5>That was House a speaker Mike Johnson speaking with Bloomberg earlier.

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 6>We're going to get the.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 5>Latest on this big, beautiful tax bill that again pasted

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 5>in House. It is now being negotiated in the Senate.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 6>A couple of sticking points, including that salting.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 5>I thought that was just a Matt Miller issue, but

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 5>apparently it's a big deal for a lot of senators

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of representatives. Nathan Deane joints as senior

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 5>policy analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Nathan, what are the outstanding

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 5>issues that you believe the Senate is grappling with now

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 5>and do you expect them to be resolved?

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 9>So, you know, I think the two big issues that

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 9>are actually going on at the moment in the Senate

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 9>is on the deficit, reduction side this idea, is it

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 9>going to increase the deficit as a result? Are the

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 9>elon musks? And for those members in the Senate Senator

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 9>Mike Lee and Senator Ram Paull and Senator Ron Johnson,

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 9>are they going to continue to push for a bill

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 9>that ultimately tries to decrease the deficit aka, you know,

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 9>probably not put out as much in terms of permanent

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 9>tax cuts. The other thing going on is, you know,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 9>on the how to pay for it is the Medicaid

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 9>work requirements. Because those moderates in the Senate, and you know,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 9>think of Senator Collins and Senator Murkowski are essentially trying

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 9>to push back some of what the House has already done.

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 9>Now we have two polarizing forces trying to push the

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 9>bill in a different direction, sort of challenging for Senator

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 9>John Thune here. So I think what happens is you

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 9>will see these negotiations continue to play out over the

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 9>next week, maybe the next week and a half or

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 9>two weeks, and then you'll get a clear picture of

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 9>where the Senate's going to go. But this bill does

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 9>have to change in order to get enough senators to

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 9>pass over and support it, and approval.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so what does salt really look like? Is it

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be forty thousand? Is it going to be

0:10:58.720 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 3>lower what we think?

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 9>So I think it's going to be either forty thousand

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 9>or slightly lower than that, because I think what's going

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 9>to happen here is, Look, if I'm Representative Lawler, I

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 9>really enjoyed that interview this morning with Speaker Johnson because

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 9>he defended the cap and said, look, we negotiated this,

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 9>and it took a year, and the Salt Caucus in

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 9>the House does have a lot of power. They can say, look,

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 9>we're just not going to vote for it. If you

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 9>want to throw it back down to ten thousand, Senate,

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 9>feel free, I'm not going to vote for it, and

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 9>it's not going to pass. But this idea of it's

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 9>either going to be forty thousand or maybe slightly lower,

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 9>because then the Salt Caucus is in slightly a difficult

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 9>more difficult position because they did get something out of it.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 9>So for those of you of you in New York

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 9>and New Jersey, I think you're going to get something.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.359
<v Speaker 9>It's going to be around forty thousand or maybe.

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Just slightly under that.

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 5>Nathan, you mentioned Elon Musky has come out really harshly

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 5>against this bill and on another other topics. How much

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 5>influence does he have now there is he's no longer

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 5>technically part of the Washington story. So this is one

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 5>of those.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 9>Things where it's starting to brew into an issue. I

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 9>don't think it's an issue just yet. I mean, if

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 9>you looked at Speaker Johnson's interview, he defended what they

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 9>have been doing. And there's a lot of criticism on

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 9>the Congression the CBO at the moment in terms of

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 9>that two point four trillion dollar estimate of increase in

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 9>the deficit. So if you ask the politicians up on

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 9>Capitol Hill, I wouldn't say that there's really much there

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 9>there yet, but it could be coming because, like Elon

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 9>Musk said x yesterday, he's calling for individuals to call

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 9>their senator and call their congressman and say let's not

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 9>support this. And there is a little bit of a

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 9>group coming together. Senator Ran Paul Mike Lee, Ron Johnson.

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 9>You know, that's enough votes that potentially could derail this bill.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 9>So if i'm Senator John Thune, I have to figure

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 9>out how to get some of those individuals on board

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 9>and the answer is, well, maybe these tax cuts are permanent,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 9>maybe they just extended a certain amount of time, or

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 9>maybe this bill shrinks, or maybe the debt ceiling goes

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 9>from a five trillion dollar increase to a two trillion

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 9>dollar increase. There's areas of flexibility here for leadership, and

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 9>I think we're going to see that play out over

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 9>the next few weeks. So we still think this bill

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 9>is going to increase the deficit, but stay tuned because

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 9>it may not be what the CBO just scored yesterday.

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I think I asked you this before, but this is

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 3>obviously what I'm interested in. And that's what happens to

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the energy tax credits, the ITC from

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 3>the IRA and all the companies are kind of waiting

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 3>on tenderhooks for what is going to happen. What's the

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 3>indication that Republican senators are going to step up and

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 3>try and fight for these tax credits.

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 9>So we've heard through the grapevind that you know, there

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 9>are a lot of lobbyists uff on Capitol Hill right

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 9>now really pushing for this, and there are some receptive ears.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 9>Senator Tom Tillis from North Carolina is one of those

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 9>individuals who's really focused on this now. I think you're

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 9>going to start seeing snippets of what the Senate is

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 9>thinking towards the end of this week, maybe the beginning

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 9>of next week in terms of those tax credits. And

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 9>we're telling our clients that, look, the House tax credits

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 9>were somewhat positive and then initially negative on the solar

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 9>industry in particular. And I think you are going to

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 9>see some moderate voices coming through when it comes to

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 9>the Inflation Reduction Act, because at the end of the day,

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be very difficult for some of these Republicans,

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 9>say Senator Tom Till for example, that will vote to

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 9>gut the Inflation Reduction Act when the Inflation Reduction Act

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 9>is bring jobs and plants and you know, other types

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 9>of economic growth to their states. So I do think

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 9>you're going to see a modernization of what DAUS did,

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 9>and I think we'll see some of those details coming

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 9>out early next week.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 5>I got a red headline crossing the Bloomberg Terminal. NATO

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 5>adopts military build up plans as part of new spending goals.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 5>I want some more reporting on that, so some movement

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 5>there across the pond Nathan. President Trump quite successfully kind

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 5>of work the phones in the House to get passage

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 5>of the deal. It's a little bit different in the Senate,

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 5>where you know, these folks have six year terms. Here,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 5>what's the expectation of what kind of influenced President Trump

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 5>can plain in this negotiation?

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 6>In the Senate, you hit it right.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 9>On the head. I mean, obviously, with the House of Representatives,

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 9>they run every two years, and so the idea of

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 9>a primary threat is much more serious to them.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 9>But when it comes to the Senate, I will say

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 9>is is that their primary goal is to make sure

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 9>that the tax extensions or sorry, the tax increases don't

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 9>happen by the end of the year. Senators know they

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 9>have to pass something. The question on the Senate side

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 9>is is that what else are we going to do

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 9>with this? So I think that President Trump will have

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 9>to take a different type of approach in working with

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 9>the Senate. One of those things like, look, this is

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 9>America First policy, and even though only one third of

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 9>the Senate will be running approximately next year, the Republicans

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 9>do want to remain control of both the House and

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 9>the Senate, and failure to adopt something like that could

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 9>put that at risk. So I do think President Trump

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 9>will have a little bit more hands on approach with

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 9>the Senate. Obviously, he's going to have to manage both

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 9>those who want to see the deficit decreased along with

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 9>the moderates who want to see how these paid for

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 9>us decreased. And I think they will be able to

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 9>come up with a solution. It's just going to take

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 9>a lot more work and he's going to have to

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 9>roll up his sleeves to do it, all.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, Nathan, really appreciate it. Thank you very much.

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Nathan Dean joins us from Bloomberg Intelligence. He covers all

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 3>of policy there for Bloomberg Intelligence, that senior policy analy.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 5>When we were down in DC, I did have a

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 5>little free time you were working. I saw some We

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 5>went to Lincoln. I'm one of all the cool stuff.

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 6>I had no even thought of coming. I'm going to

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 6>go with Capitol Hill and see my representatives.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh god, So I got much more inspiration from going

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 5>to the Lincoln Memorial. But you go to Lincoln Memorial,

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 5>you read the Gettysburg Address, and then you read his

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.359
<v Speaker 5>speech for the second inauguration.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 6>It just takes your breath away.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 2>It really does.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 6>It's just amazing.

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Cocklay and Android

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 3>So the news that came out on Tuesday was that

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Meta and Constellation Energy met what they call a virtual

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Purchase power agreement. So it's basically an investment to secure

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 3>clean energy from Constellation. But there are lots of different

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 3>nuances to that, but not the only one out there today.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 3>We also learned that well back in December, Meta Platforms

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>also announced a deal to buy green credits from four

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 3>large US solar energy projects, and the owner of that

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 3>project joins US now. Michael Polski is founder and CEO

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 3>of Inventergy, and in Energy is one of the biggest

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>largest independent power producers in the United States, not gas plans, solar, onshore,

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 3>offshore wind storage as well as transmission. Really has his

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 3>pulse on the market right now. Good to see you, Michael,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 3>thanks for coming in.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 10>Thank you. And we have to add natural guests as well.

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, no, I said that, I said natural, gay I

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 3>did plant so you have all that clean stuff. How

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 3>hard is it to reach these agreements with the hyperscalers

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 2>What are those conversations like?

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 10>You know, obviously you know these are large scale agreements,

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 10>so it's not easy to just walk in and these

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 10>are those big deals. So first of all, we have

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 10>to make sure that both sides so that we agree

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 10>on that. You know, suppliers have sufficient supplies and buyer

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 10>satisfied by requirements is what is also important that certain

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 10>reliability standards are being mad and most importantly, the price

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 10>and has to be appropriate for a buyer to agree

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 10>to buy this.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 5>Another headline crossing the Bloomberg terminal, President g President Trump

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 5>agreed to start new round of talks ASAPTS. According to

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 5>CCTV will bring you continued reporting on that, Michael, is

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 5>the Trump administration making your business, the development of your business,

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 5>the expansion of your business easier, more difficult, no roled impact.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 6>Yet, what have you seen?

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 10>Clearly the administration send very right sign. President announced energy emergency,

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 10>which I believe there is an energy emergency because we

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 10>have to build. There is an increased demand and we

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 10>have to build more supplies and more supplies. We have

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 10>to build if we build like we used to do

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 10>it, it would take too long. So it's really an emergency.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 10>So we tried to In energy, we tried to build

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 10>as much supply as possible. What is also very important,

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 10>not just supply, but transmission. I mean, one of one

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 10>of our biggest developments right now and what we believe

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 10>is critical to meet sort of this emergency is to

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 10>build more transmission lines. I always like to say that,

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 10>you know, if we build more trucks without roads, we're

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 10>not going to deliver goods. So in order for electrons

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 10>to move, we need transmission lines. And if we have

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 10>transmission then we can shorten time to interconnect facility. We

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 10>have to be able to move power from where it's

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 10>produced to where it's used, and I think we can.

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 10>We can really build infrastructure a lot faster here and

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 10>with a lot more impact.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean, to your point, go GOLDMN. Sachs had it

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 3>out today talking about how power is already tight in

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the Northeast. There was a report out yesterday that said

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the development of data centers to the largest US grid

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 3>and PGM is raising costs by almost ten billion because

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 3>we just can't build it out fast enough. What's the

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 3>biggest hurdle to reimagining transmission.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 10>I think, I think there are multiple. One is obviously

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 10>permitting because it takes forever permit and.

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Supposedly that's all going to be fixed. Now has that

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 2>all been fixed?

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 10>I mean it's in a process. Obviously there are there

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 10>are good announcements. We have to see as a business,

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 10>we have to see how it's going to be im implemented,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 10>because implementation is very important. But it's not just permitting.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 10>I think transmission has to be appropriately paid for and

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 10>right now, particularly for a long distance transmission, we don't

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 10>have a methodology in this country how to pay for transmission.

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 10>So there is a lot of you know, intention to

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 10>build and the only really transmission being built the one

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 10>that recovered by utilities or rtos through the rate pay

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 10>You know, the moment you touch something that is not

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 10>typically normal and it's very difficult. So we have to

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 10>really come up with appropriate methodology to value transmission and

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 10>allocate the cost of transmission. I think, in my opinion

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 10>for this administration for Department of Energy, that should be

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 10>really one of the most important tasks to build our infrastructure.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I did read the book here it is.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 5>I didn't read the book The Grid, So it took

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 5>me a whole summer to get through it, and it

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 5>was not an easy read.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 6>But I think I have some understanding of it.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 5>What's your sense overall of the power grid in the

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 5>United States?

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 6>How good is it? How bad is it? How much

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 6>investment does it need?

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 10>You know, obviously you know there are there are a

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 10>lot of discussions about grade right now the world being

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 10>used like antiquated or not reliable, which is which is

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 10>true in many ways because most of our grid has

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 10>been built thirty forty years ago, and there are a

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 10>lot of change since then. I mean, for example, we

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 10>used to have very centralized way of generator electricity from

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 10>very large coal nuclear you know, sometimes gas power plants.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 10>Now we have a lot more decentralized generation. Number one.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 10>Another issue is that we have our weather pattern has changed.

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, if now we have a lot more you

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 10>know in claiming weather, we have ice storms, what we've

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 10>seen in Texas, we have we have floods, we have

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 10>other weather events, which shows that generation itself is susceptible.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 10>We cannot make one hundred percent sort of guaranteed generations.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 10>So how to deal with this we have to create

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 10>connect like I like to call larger geography, so power

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 10>can move from here to there, just like corons. Right,

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 10>if we only go from here to there on one

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 10>road and that's something happened with that road and we

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 10>cannot avoid that, then all the traffic will be stopped

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 10>for days. We can avoid this, so we we have

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 10>to have transmissions.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>So it based on that. You said the sort of

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 2>financing this transmission is key. How would that work? I

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 2>get it for.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>The you know, regulated utilities, but if you want a

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 3>transmission line across multiple states, how could the financing work

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 3>to make sense for an dependent player like you?

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 10>This is a fundamental problem here, right. We know we

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 10>in the United States we talk about the reliability, we

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 10>talk about national security. But for example, we develop in

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 10>large transmission line and which dramatically increase reliability. But then

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 10>you go to the rtos like MISO and ask them

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 10>to value reliability and they just don't value this because

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 10>neither they know how to do it or they simply

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 10>don't want to do it. So this is a fundamental

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 10>problem that you know when you have when you build transmission.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 10>For example, in our case, Grain Belt Express, it's eleven

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 10>billion dollar project. We have to have revenues as in

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 10>order to finance this, and if nobody wants to pay

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 10>for anything, it's really hard. So I think it's it

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 10>should be a priority for the government to really establish

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 10>revenue streams for transmission.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, it was really great to get this perspective. I

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 3>love this conversation. Please come back on. Michael Polski is

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>founder and CEO of in Energy, joining us on the

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 3>issues of here in the United States.

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.