WEBVTT - EVs, Big Pharma, Tech and the Tariff Threat

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Tesla facing some challenges in Europe. I think it's fair

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>to say globally, but just check out what our team

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 2>reported last week. Sales fell for the tenth time in

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the last twelve months in Europe. That was where Elon

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Musk's politicking and a changer of the carmaker's most important

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 2>product had been major hindrances. The company registered six and

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight new cars in the month of February. We

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have the March numbers yet, that's some of the February.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>It's down forty percent from a year ago. This is

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>according to the European Automobile Manufacturers Associate. Tesla's sales plunged

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>forty three percent of the first two months of the year,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>while the Regent saw a thirty one percent rise in

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 2>ev registration. So more people are buying evs, but fewer

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>people are buying Tesla's.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing. That's a huge, huge drop.

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So maybe it's a surprise to people listening who don't

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 2>look at this market every single day, or maybe not

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>surprising given what's happening with Tesla's stock price. Sean Tucker

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 2>is probably not surprised about this. He's editor of Kelly

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 2>blue Book. It's the vehicle valuation and automotive research company.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 2>He argues that Tesla's quote high water mark as an automaker,

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe in the past, that's a hot take. Sean Sean

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 2>joins us from Washington, DC. So Sean back up the

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 2>claim there. Why in your view, could Tesla's best days

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 2>be behind it?

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 4>Because its peak in terms of auto sales was in

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 4>February of twenty twenty three. We weren't able to call

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 4>the peak at the time because we weren't sure that

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 4>the decline would last.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.639
<v Speaker 5>But what we see now is if you look.

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.279
<v Speaker 4>At Tesla's as a percentage of the new cars sold

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty three, they hit four point two nine percent,

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 4>and that's their peak, and in twenty twenty four they

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 4>were back down to three.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Point ninety five, so it was already falling before this

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 5>political controversy began.

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 3>What is the issue?

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Is it political controversy or is it the fact that

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 2>this is a space that a lot of competitors have

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 2>gotten involved in and I think Americans this is not

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>on Americans radar, but byd and show me those vehicles

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 2>blow away anybody who gets behind the wheel.

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 3>How big of an issue is that?

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 4>It's absolutely huge for Tesla. But for a moment, if

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 4>you could imagine if we could take elon Musk out

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 4>of consideration for this, what you would have is a

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 4>company with an aging lineup, you know, the Modelesque, the

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Model X. The platform underneath those was introduced in twenty twelve.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 4>That is ancient by auto industry standards. There's nothing new

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 4>in the pipeline, at least nothing particularly high volume new

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 4>in the pipeline, and sales peaked back in twenty twenty three.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 4>Then you add in the fact that they've got all

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 4>of this new competition and they're not innovating any I

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 4>don't know that they would be doing well without.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 5>The political controversy.

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Stack the political controversy on top of that, and you

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 4>just you have what you see today.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 6>So and I have to counter just because earlier in

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 6>our last hour, we talked with a member of our

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Intelligence team are Tim Craighead, and we've got a

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 6>story out in Bloomberg BusinessWeek about the ten companies to

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 6>watch for good or bad reasons for better for worse,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 6>and Tesla was a company that was singled out for better.

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 6>And basically what they talked about is that several positives

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 6>to look forward to. Orders for Tesla's newly revamped Model

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 6>Wire accelerating notably even in China. Production rates are poised

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 6>to increase quickly. Meantime, the company's battery sales to utilities,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 6>which generate higher margins than autos, appear underappreciated as a

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 6>profit driver.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 3>So that's more of a corporate overview.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 6>But I am curious about the Model Why, and I

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 6>think there's also a subcompact right that could start in

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 6>June widening, you know, kind of Tesla's reach and appeal.

0:03:58.840 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 3>So what would you say to that.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 5>The Model Why refresh is essentially a visual refresh. It's

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 5>basically the same car underneath that it's been since about

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty seventeen, So we kind of question whether that's really

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 5>going to generate much of a sales spike.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, it's their best selling model. I believe it was

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 4>one of the top five best selling models in the

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 4>United States last year. But I don't think there's a

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 4>lot of opportunity for growth with that.

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 5>And then you pile.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Musk's troubles on top of it, and I'd be very

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 4>surprised if you see sales actually increase anywhere outside of China,

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 4>And then in China you've got BYD to contend with.

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 4>As for battery sales, that's a little bit outside of

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 4>our scope, is Kelly Bluebook.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 5>But I wouldn't know that the musk.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Musk is fond of saying these days that Tesla's not

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 4>a car company, And if he's right, and he's got

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.679
<v Speaker 4>significant plans outside of cars, then that changes the equation.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 4>But he needs to be right because as a car company,

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 4>it really sales really peaked a little over two years ago.

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe he's betting it all on the humanoid robot

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and the robo taxi. Where does the robotaxi come into

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>your analysis?

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 4>Many of the Tesla's rivals have attempted to make a

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 4>sort of robotaxi project work. Several of them have gotten

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 4>out of the business when in the last few years,

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 4>it's possible that Tesla has secret sauce that nobody else

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 4>has and will make this profitable, but it's proven to

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 4>be a very difficult business to profit in.

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 2>You're in Washington, d C. I believe you're going to

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 2>start getting weaymos soon in Washington DC. Have you been

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 2>able to ride in one outside of DC?

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 5>I have written in a Zooks, but not a Weymo.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 2>How what was your experience, just as somebody who is

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>in this world day in and day out with a

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 2>driver on the radar, what was your experience without a driver?

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 5>You know? I drive fifty two different cars a year.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 4>As Kelly get a new car wants a week to

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 4>test drive, and I have really come around on the

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 4>concept of self driving cars over time. They may be

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 4>nervous to begin with, but the truth is now I

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 4>look around me in traffic and I see so many

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 4>people tapping on their phones that I would rather driving

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 4>world where at least the car was paying attention.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 3>I love, I completely agree with you.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I Carol knows my trip to San Francisco a few

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 2>months ago, my life was like turned upside down with

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>this just my first experience in a WEEIMO, I think

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>it's fantastic. I wish this stuff was all over because

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 2>these things follow the rules and they're not texting and driving.

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>But realistically, in your view, do you see that world existing?

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 4>It's going to take a lot longer to get there

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 4>than some of these technology companies what have you believe

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 4>there are significant regulatory challenges.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Because right now this is regulated by the states. So

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 5>even if you can make.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 4>The technology work, you'd have to work through fifty sets

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 4>of liability laws and fifty different legislatures.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe start maybe, but not if Elon Musk has his

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 2>way in terms of regulations with Sean Duffy at the

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 2>helm of the Department of Transportation.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 4>Which is one of the more interesting proposals he put

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 4>He's put out there. The other thing I'll put out

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 4>is that when we start to masterself driving cars and

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 4>actually get them functional, you open a whole new questions

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 4>we've never run into before. Mercedes has the most advanced

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 4>system for sale in the United States. It's a legal

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 4>law right now only in Nevada, California, and they have proposed,

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 4>just to give you one example, that the industry adopts

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 4>teal exterior lights as a signal that the self driving

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 4>system is on, because how are police supposed to know

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 4>whether the driver's distracted if it's okay for the driver

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 4>to be distracted.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:17.679
<v Speaker 3>Wait, what was the signal? You said?

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 5>And exterior lights and colored and.

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Teal does that work? Does that exist now?

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Only in testing? And again that would be a legal issue.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 4>You'd have to get fifty states to agree to that.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 4>The point is just to say that even once the

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 4>technology works, we've got a whole public policy system that

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 4>we'd have to work through it a lot of new questions.

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>But that's none of that has to do with the

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Actually a lot of what you're talking about has to

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>do with policy and with sort of the way that

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement looks at this stuff. In your view is

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the tech is the tech there.

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 5>It's getting there.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 4>But Tesla has more significant challenges than most of its

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 4>rivals in that way. Elon Musk is very insistent on

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 4>doing self driving with nothing but cameras, and the systems

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 4>that have surpassed Tesla, like that Mercedes system that's the

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 4>only Level three approved anywhere in America, uses radar cameras

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 4>and leadar If Tesla can't adopt additional technologies like that,

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 4>it's going to take them longer to get an effective

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 4>self triding car, all.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 6>Right, Sean, I just was like, wait a minute, I

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 6>gotta ask you something.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Are you saying.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 6>Mercedes is better than Tesla when it comes to self driving.

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 4>The automotive industry uses a system of five levels to

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 4>describe self driving cars, from level one just your basic

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 4>smart cruise control, up to level five being a car

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 4>with no steering wheel. Almost every automaker has a level

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 4>two system right now, including Tesla, and Mercedes has the

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 4>only Level three system that's approved anywhere in the United States.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 4>What that means is that legally you can look away

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 4>from the roadway while it's working. Some Mercedes has that.

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 4>It's only in Nevada and parts of California right now,

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 4>but there is currently a Mercedes system you can buy

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>that will let you settle back and read a book

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 4>in a car, and Tesla doesn't have anything like that.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 6>I have to say, I am a little bit familiar

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 6>with Mercedes, and just their safety systems are like blown

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 6>away where you can take your hands off the wheel,

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 6>and especially like on a highway.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Not even a brand new car that you're talking about, Yeah,

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 2>experience with right.

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I have one and it's old, it's over ten

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 6>years old. But the safety systems are unbelievable in terms

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 6>of what you can do and how it just tracks

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 6>and just keeps you safe. And what I also do

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 6>wonder Sean that if we're not kind of quite ready

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 6>to just look away and let the car drive, do

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 6>we just continue to see the safety systems get better

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 6>and better on these cars, because I almost feel like

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 6>Cinems amount of highway you know, you put on basically

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 6>cruise control, and these cars are tracking. It almost feels

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 6>like with one another. And in that regard, I feel

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 6>so much safer where my car. If I get distracted,

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 6>it's going to stop the car if I miss the

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 6>car stopping in front of me, And that's pretty amazing.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 4>And those are essentially the same technologies. Yeah, the technologies

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 4>that will ultimately result in so driving cars. The first

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 4>thing they do is give us those safety systems, and

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 4>when all of those safety systems can work together and

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 4>talk to each other, you end up with a self

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 4>driving car. That's also how the industry is going to

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 4>have to get people comfortable with it. Triple A did

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 4>a study, I believe, just a month ago in which

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 4>sixteen percent of Americans said they would get into a

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 4>self driving car. That's the public challenge that they face

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 4>in terms of approval, sixteen percent.

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't, so I don't buy that number. And here's why.

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 2>The only reason I got into it in San Francisco

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even on my radar. And then I met up

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>with a friend who was like, Hey, did you go

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>in the Waimo yet? And I was like no, and

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 2>She's like, Oh, it's so awesome. Just download the app

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and do it. And I did it. And I'm a

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>true believer. I'm converted. And I think it's just like

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>word of mouth, and just because people haven't been around

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 2>this technology means they're going to answer that question a

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>certain way.

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Well maybe right, but I think that as people get

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 4>more accustomed to the safety systems, they get more comfortable

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 4>and more comfortable with the car making certain decisions like that.

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 4>That's how we eventually get to a world where most

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 4>of us are willing to get in.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I was even talking to your point, John, I was

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 2>even talking to the Uber and Lyft drivers about this

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>in the San Francisco Bay area because as you know,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco, you can only do it in San

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Francisco City proper. It's like a very strict border where

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 2>you can do this. And they prefer driving with these

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 2>on the roads because they follow the rules and they

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 2>make good choices. I mean, it's pretty remarkable to see.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five e's during Listen

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>We've been talking about tariffs and we're already seeing companies

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 2>react ahead of this announcement tomorrow. Mercedes Benz considering withdrawing

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 2>its least expensive car from the US. Cocoa and coffee

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 2>futures climbed on heightened supply fears as attention shifts potential

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 2>impacts of a trade war on ag markets. Just a

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>couple of headlines. I deleted some because we want time

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>to get to them all. But there's a lot around.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 6>This, Yeah, and we have a great guest to talk

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 6>all about it, Brad Carson. He does think about tariffs

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 6>on high tech, specifically data centers and other infrastructure use

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 6>that are used in AI tools. He is the co

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 6>founder and president of Americans for Responsible Innovation and their

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 6>mission is to quote help you as policymakers develop a

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 6>thoughtful governance framework for rapidly advancing technologies that protects the

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 6>public from harm while continuing to foster innovation.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 3>He's also a former.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 6>Congressman, serve two terms in the House as a Democrat

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 6>in Oklahoma second District. He's a veteran worked in the

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 6>Obama administration, General Counsel of the Army and Undersecretary of

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 6>the Army, among other roles.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>In other words, we're out of time, Brad. Sorry, you

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 3>come at.

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 6>Things from different perspectives, which is what we always like

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 6>to talk to.

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Brad.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 6>Talk to us about tariffs and how you're thinking about

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 6>them as we get ready for what's to come in

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 6>less than twenty four hours.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 7>Well, great to be with you.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 8>And as you said in our mission statement at ARI,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 8>we want to be thoughtful and tariffs have trade offs,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 8>and when it comes to AI, there are some real

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 8>negative effects possibly of our race to build giant data

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 8>centers necessary for the next generations of AI, because Chinese

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 8>parts as well as parts from Mexico and Canada are

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 8>really essential to that. It's really exponential growth in building

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 8>these kind of massive data centers, so it's going to

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 8>increase the cost probably slow down the progress, and that

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 8>is one of the trade offs that policy makers should

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 8>be thinking about.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Mexico and Canada not usually on our radar when we

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 2>think about the high tech it's usually China, it's usually overseas.

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 7>What is it?

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 8>Well we get Actually we import more IT equipment from

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 8>Mexico at forty three billion dollars a year than we

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 8>do from China or Canada each which are about thirty

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.599
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars a year, and so there's a lot of

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 8>kind of IT equipment coming through all of those nations.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 8>Certainly on the high tech end, you do think of

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 8>China or South Korea, Japan. One of the equipment instruction equipment,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 8>the racks, servers like that could come from China, but

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 8>also from Mexico and Canada. So all of those countries

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 8>will be affected by the tariffs and will certainly affect

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 8>what will be you know, we're talking data center construction

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 8>call us that are fifty sixty billion dollars aspirationally from

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 8>the big companies like Google and Amazon. So these are

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 8>very expensive projects, and the costs could go up three

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 8>to five maybe even more than that.

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 2>Is I'm curious how you look at the US and

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>versus China when it comes to this technology. How would

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 2>you characterize the race, the AI race between these two countries.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Who's winning right now?

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 8>I think the US is winning and we're likely to win.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 8>And I think the gap between the US and China,

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 8>which today might be six to twelve months, is likely

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 8>to grow over time as the various export restrictions which

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 8>we'll keep China from accessing at scale the chips necessary

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 8>to produce the so called frontier models, they begin to

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 8>have more teeth, and so the US is in the lead.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 8>The big labs in the US are where all these

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 8>products are being developed, and we need to make sure

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 8>we keep that lead, and if it's not stolen to espionage,

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 8>cybersecurity protections are critical to US labs so we can

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 8>maintain the technological lead that we will develop in the

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 8>United States.

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 6>Wait, what makes you so confident that the US is

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 6>going to hold that's lead here?

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, the big input into it are, of course chips,

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 8>and the chips are where the export controls will restrict

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 8>China's access to them. And so over time, again there's

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 8>a lot of cheating and kind of subterfuge on those

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 8>but the US is going to dominate that chip market,

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 8>so that's part of it. We have the best engineers

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 8>in the world here, the big labs open AI, Anthropic, Google,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 8>Meta by our US companies, and they're likely to continue

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 8>to be at the very frontier of that. So we

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 8>have the best chips, we have the best engineers, we

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 8>have the best culture in which to develop these kinds

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 8>of things, and so I think unless we really mess

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 8>it up, you should maintain a lead, a lead to

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 8>steal perhaps to match we're unlikely to kind of natively

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 8>develop on their own.

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Brad, you've spent four years in the House serving your constituents.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>You also spent quite a bit of time in Washington

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>during the Obama administration. Are you in touch at all

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 2>with your former colleagues in the House, And if you are,

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>do they get this.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 8>I am in touch with my former colleagues a lot.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 8>I go up there, you know, a couple times a

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 8>month off and to talk to them about AI issues,

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 8>and they're not really I think aware of the effect

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 8>of the tariffs on AI and AI itself is just

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 8>becoming an issue on the Hill. Most congressmen are not

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 8>technically literate. They're not engineers. They're more likely businessmen or lawyers,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 8>teachers perhaps, and so these are very complicated issues. And

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 8>while tariffs I think probably have a lot of people

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 8>agitated on Capitol Hill, the effect of tariffs on AI

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 8>data centers is probably not something that most people are

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 8>yet paying attention to, but they should.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's really kind of interesting because we've talked

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 6>so much about like this tech war between the United

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 6>States and China, and like, listening to your conversation, it

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 6>just feels like you sound like we really don't have

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 6>anything to be worried about.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Is that fair? Am I misreading you?

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 8>I think we have something to be worried about because

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 8>we know that they's we'll try to steal our best

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 8>tech techniques.

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 7>Right, so unless our.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 8>Labs have exquisite cybersecurity, the idea that other nations wouldn't

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 8>steal our best models. We know, for example, that Chinese

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 8>espionage in the defense sector is pervasive.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Righttimes, espionage that goes both ways. Right.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 8>To be fair, absolutely, we have more to lose when

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 8>you when you have the exquisite technology you have a

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 8>lot more to lose by people stealing it, right, they're

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 8>trying to get it from you.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 6>So then do you think something like deep seek in

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 6>your view, I mean from all assessments so far, it

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 6>just sounds like Shohn is figuring this out and maybe

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 6>they can do you know, AI models in a much

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 6>more productive energy efficient, you know, less expensive way. So

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 6>it does sound like there's expertise there as well.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 7>Oh, there's incredible expertise.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 8>You know, universities like ching Wa or Peaking or among

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 8>the best world. Chinese engineering culture is extraordinary. They're turning

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 8>out many more STEM graduates per year than we are.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 8>So I don't underestimate what the Chinese can do. But

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 8>I think most people believe that there would have been

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 8>no Deep Seek without say a chat GPT. They used

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 8>American models to so called distill. You know, they're probably

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 8>hearing things in San Francisco dinner parties that get back

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 8>to China about how to do things techniques. So I

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 8>think America is still the leader, but again we have

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 8>to safeguard it by building data centers, by turning out engineers,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 8>by securing our models that we do develop here, and

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 8>making sure that these export controls, you really do take

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 8>effect so that the Chinese can't import the top Nvidia chips.

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 8>They're so essential to making frontier models, so we have

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 8>to be wary. But except I think we need to

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 8>realize that the US has a lead and that our

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 8>job is to secure it and make sure that nobody

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 8>could catch us.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Brad, I want to take a hard turn here,

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 2>just because we have you on the program. I want

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 2>to tap into your expertise, not just on AI and tariffs,

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>but also on politics. Curious what you you know, because

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 2>you're still in touch with your former colleague in the House,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic Party. According to many polls, I'm going to

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>just cite one here, but this is the March NBC

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 2>News national poll, the Democratic Party reaching all time low

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and popularity That was in the middle of last month.

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>What are Democrats supposed to do right now? What do

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>you think they should do well?

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 7>I think we need to reorient.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 8>I've been advocating for that for some years now that

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 8>we've lost our way, that kind of the progressive message

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 8>no longer resonates with most people, doesn't seem to address

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 8>their most important concerns, and so we do have to

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 8>get back in touch.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 7>With our roots, which is a party of the working.

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 8>Class, and realize that people are struggling to raise their

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 8>families not only economically, but in a culture that many

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 8>of them seem they think is quite poisonous to them.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 8>That there's a massive gap between the elites of this

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 8>country and the rest of the nation, and that the

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 8>Democrats are too.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 7>Often the party of the elite class.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 8>Who could dominate the commanding heights of media sometimes or politics,

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 8>are not enough to win elections. And so those are

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 8>all things we have to do.

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 2>Who's the one person who you think can do that.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 8>I'm hoping that Keen Jeffries can do that, right who's

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 8>the leader in the House, and that he seems to

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 8>be very confident, very able. I hope as he can

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 8>do it, you know, like Pete Buda judge, There'll be

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 8>some interesting people run for president in the next election

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 8>who I think realize the need for.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 7>A new message and hopefully they can offer that.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 6>Hey, just because your background is so cool and interesting

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 6>and you were General Counsel of the Army during the

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 6>Obama administration under Secretary of the Army too, just got

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 6>about thirty forty seconds the alleged or what seemed to

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 6>be was the use of signal and to have a

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 6>chat what seemed to be a breach of security by

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 6>the Trump administration. Any your level of understanding on how

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 6>this all works, What's how bad was that?

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess I want to ask you, and I think

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 3>it was bad.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 8>You can understand it's very easy right to use signal

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 8>as opposed to secure lines. You have to be in

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 8>a skiff or in some other kind of places like that.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 8>It's totally unacceptable. When I was at the highest ranks

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 8>of d D under Secretary of the Defense, even working

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 8>with Ash Carter, there the idea that you would use

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 8>private email or signal. I mean, it was so forbidden

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 8>right that you would certainly have an investigation and likely

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 8>be fired. So it's it was folly for them to

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 8>do that.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 3>All right, listen, run out of time.

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 6>Hopefully we can come back to you because we feel

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 6>like we could really talk.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>They let us go along with you, Brad, They let

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 3>us go along, like can we go more? Can we

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>get more?

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 9>Bred?

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 6>Carson, thank you so much, co founder and president of

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 6>Americans for Responsible Innovation, joining us from Tulsa, Oklahoma.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Former Congressman too, former Congressman.

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 3>We turn out to the healthcare world.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 6>First up, the US Department of Health and Human Services

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 6>started dismissing workers early this morning, carrying out Secretary Robert F.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Kennedy Junior's goal to shrink the agency.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 6>New The layoffs align with a plan to eliminate ten

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 6>thousand employees from the agency's workforce, which will reduce the

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 6>agency staff from eighty two thousand employees to about sixty

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 6>two thousand workers tim.

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 3>So that's quite a haircut.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Meantime, as we continue our focus on tariffs, the President

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 2>is planning to impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals, which could raise prices,

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 2>lead to shortages, and strain healthcare providers. The tariffs, Carol

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 2>would particularly affect generics.

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so there's a lot that we are thinking about watching,

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 6>and so too is our team. We're going to bring

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 6>in two members of our healthcare team Bloomberg News health

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 6>reporter Madison Muller excuse me, along with Bloomberg senior pharmaceutical

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 6>Alisam Fazzelli, both here in studio. So Medisine, let me

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 6>start with you. We are thinking about what's happening in

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 6>Washington and what this all means. How are you guys

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 6>and what Sam to weigh into. But let me start

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 6>with you, Medisine, like, how are you thinking about what's

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.719
<v Speaker 6>happening in Washington and how it impacts the space that

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 6>you report on day in and day out.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean these changes are huge and sweeping, and

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 10>I think we're still grappling with the impacts and who's

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 10>affected and how this is going to affect the industry

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 10>is and the industry is grappling with that right now too.

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 10>I mean we are still like information is trickling in

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 10>still as we're trying to figure out which divisions are

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:40.719
<v Speaker 10>being cut, who's being laid off, exactly what it is

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 10>being impacted, and so that's something that's like the information

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 10>is still actively coming in.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 2>What's the relationship, Madison, with the government, public health people

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 2>who work in the government and then the private sector

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and the development of drugs that ultimately get put into

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 2>the pipeline and approved years later. What do we know

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 2>about that relationship and how one affects the other.

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean their critical they work together in research, in

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 10>drug approvals, drug development, like the government is so important in.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 11>All of that.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 10>Obviously, the FDA, the US Food and Drug Administration, is

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 10>viewed as sort of the gold standard regulatory agency for

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 10>approving medications in the world, and a lot of other

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 10>countries look to the FDA.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 9>The FDA is usually the first to approve drugs.

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 10>Americans are typically the first to get access to new

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 10>innovative medications. It happens more quickly here, and so I think,

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, other countries, other regulators are also looking at

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 10>what's happening in the FDA, you know, in the US

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 10>and at the FDA and thinking how does this impact

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 10>US as well?

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 9>Companies.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 10>We have companies this week that are you know, have

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 10>PADUA dates, that are expecting drug approvals, and that's that

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 10>is a sort of an expected drug approval window. And

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 10>Sam could probably speak to this more, but we we

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 10>sort of use that to to gauge when drug approvals

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 10>are going to happen. We'll see, We'll see what happens

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 10>with those it's kind of all up in the area.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 6>It's just this stuff that we just take for granted, right,

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 6>that it's just going to work, because it's just the

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 6>world that we've lived in, grown up in, and seen

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 6>for multiple generations.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Sam.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 6>I thought about when we were going to have this

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 6>conversation with the two of you. How many times throughout

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 6>COVID we reached out to you and I would listen

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 6>to you early in the morning, you know, with either

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 6>our surveillance team or other teams. But like, how are

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 6>you thinking about what you're seeing happen in government and

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 6>what it might mean for us in terms of healthcare

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 6>in the United States?

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 7>Oh, how long do you have?

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>We got a little bit of time we can hang

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 3>but thinking like, right, these things that we take for granted.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 12>HHS the Health and Human Services which is run by

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 12>RFK Junior. It runs quite a lot of these important institutions,

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 12>or at least decides a budget, et cetera. So the

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 12>CMS centers for Medica services, so that includes Medicaid, Medicare,

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 12>and medicine stepping in any time you fancy, right y, Yeah,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 12>you've got the FDA, which we've just been talking about,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 12>and you've also got the CDC et cetera. So pretty

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 12>much the health of the nation is in the hands

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 12>of this institution and they have to decide whether they

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 12>want to continue to support vaccinations and be, for example,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.239
<v Speaker 12>very positive about saying you got to go and get

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 12>your vaccines and not say but it's a personal choice

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 12>because vaccines.

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 7>Don't save lives.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 12>I've said that this morning also, vaccinations saved lives.

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 7>You've got to get it in the arms.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 12>If only eighty percent of people take you do you

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 12>remember her immunity.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, yeah, termally for measles.

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 12>That's critical, which is why you see these pockets.

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Sam.

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 2>You spend you're here visiting us in New York, which

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 2>we love. You're usually in London, you spend a lot

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 2>of time in France. You have this global view, as

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Madison said, the FDA is the gold standard for approvals.

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 2>Does the world have to look somewhere else? Does it

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>have to look to the NHS? Does it have to

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>look to another regulatory body?

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 12>Now I think I'll come back to you with the

0:26:58.480 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 12>word uncertainty.

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 7>I don't know. I don't think so much.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Is there an institution out there that is akin to.

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:09.239
<v Speaker 12>The European Medicines Agency, the MHRA in the UK, they

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 12>are all great. MHR is one that does its own assessments,

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 12>and the Europeans tend to or at least and maybe

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 12>the UK also tend to rely on the depth of

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 12>work that the FDA does. The FDA gets literally rolls

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 12>up its sleeves and looks at raw data and makes

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 12>its own analysis.

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 7>Then the companies present.

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 3>That is so interesting, So come on back.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 6>In medicine, like I do think about like collaboration right

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 6>on a global scale, what typically happens. I mean, again,

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 6>these are things that I don't think anybody ever thinks about,

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 6>but I'm assuming that there is data sharing.

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Especially when it comes to important medications and so on.

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and I mean even with vaccines like you were

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 10>talking about there, we've seen some back and forth of

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 10>there are global regulators and health experts that meet to

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 10>decide on what the flu vaccines will be for the season.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 10>And we saw some pullback with the US whether or

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 10>not to attend this meeting, which has happened you know,

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 10>every season for I don't know how many years, A

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 10>long time and so yeah, decades, and so it's there

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 10>is so much collaboration that goes into it, and you

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 10>know whether or not the US is going to be

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 10>participating in that going forward is a question right now

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 10>because we don't even know who's left at the agency

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 10>is quite frankly at this point.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 12>So we did have that uncertainty. Yeah, and at least

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 12>a little silver lining is that they did decide. They

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 12>did for line with what the who said. They looked

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 12>at their view and so we now know what we're

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 12>all hopefully going to get for our flu vaccine this

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 12>coming winter. So things do happen, and the FDA, let's

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 12>face it, it's causing major uncertainty. You look at the

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 12>share prices for biotech companies, farmer companies, they're all fully farmer.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 12>On top of it, we've got this Terry Fisher, which

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 12>I'm sure we'll talk about. The interesting thing, of course,

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 12>is that the FDA isn't infallible. They have done things

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 12>that we've all both questioned in the past five to

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 12>ten years. However, it causes uncertainty. We don't know what

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 12>shape this FDA is going to be when it comes

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 12>back to life.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 6>And this is what's just one thing I wanted to

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 6>bring up to be fair, I think there are some

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 6>that would say, with certain drug approvals or certainly for

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 6>testing for people who maybe have no other choices, Like,

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.239
<v Speaker 6>there are things that could be better, and I just

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm assuming that you both would agree that there are

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 6>some improvements that you could make in this department. It

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 6>just feels like things are being done in an uncertain way,

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 6>in an uncomfortable way, that it's not necessarily helpful.

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 10>Right, And I think the part of the problem is,

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 10>I mean, RFK has said and this administration has said

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 10>that obviously these cuts and sort of restructuring is a priority,

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 10>and RFK has laid out restructuring for HHS, but the

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 10>bigger picture of what exactly they're trying to do here

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 10>is not clear, and I don't think that that has

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 10>been communicated to the public, not to us, not to people,

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, staffers at these agencies.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 9>So people are just kind of like, what's going on.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk about the tariff issue in just

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a minute, but I want to get one more question

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:08.479
<v Speaker 2>into both of you before that.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Madison, you forgot what we're supposed to talk about.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know you did, And we're going to get

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 2>back there because I teased it. So we have to Madison.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 2>You went to the JP Morgan Healthcare conference in San

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Francisco middle of January. You came back here and you

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 2>told us there was this optimism about M and A.

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 2>There was optimism despite the fact that URFK was coming in.

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Fast forward to yesterday, Canter Fitzgerald biotech analysts slammed the

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 2>leadership of RFK, calling on the Trump administration to reevaluate

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 2>his role after this top vaccine official stepped down. This

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>is Canter Fitzgerald, this is Howard Lutnix Firm that we're

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about the Commerce secretary. Is that optimism still there?

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 10>I mean that was a really striking comment, and I

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 10>think departure from what we've seen in sort of these

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 10>more like soft commons soft criticism. I think people are

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 10>being really careful with what they're saying publicly, and they're

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 10>not saying that they're not optimistic anymore. But there are

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 10>concerns about what the greater plan is and what's happening

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 10>obviously at HHS, what's happening with tariffs, and I think

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 10>that some of the power and influence that these companies

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 10>and trade organizations and I'm talking about pharmaceutical companies have

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.959
<v Speaker 10>had in the past is being tested, and you know

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 10>they are. They thought that they were going to you know,

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 10>be talking about the Inflation Reduction Act and IRA and

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 10>drug pricing with the administration, and that has not been

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 10>the priority so far. And you know, I think this

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 10>this administration is moving fast and.

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 9>The companies and are sort of scrambling to keep up. Grow.

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm curious what you're hearing from my global companies.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 12>The problem with biotech is is more than just this

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 12>recent issue. Every it's been what four years, every JP

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 12>organ I felt just a little bit of a twinge

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 12>of up to MusM and you come back and things

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 12>fall apart. The reality here is that this is this

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 12>is the peak of uncertainty at the minute. Maybe maybe

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 12>it's the peak of uncertainty. Let's let's see.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's get to tariffs in a couple of minutes

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 2>that we have left Madison. You wrote about it, Sam,

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 2>you were quoted in the piece you've done research, Sam

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 2>on this. Excuse me different, Sam, That's okay, but you

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 2>still study.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm like getting Sam's tomorrow four o'clock. What do we

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 3>have to know about the way generics could be affected

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 3>with this?

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah? So the reason generics are particularly at risk is

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 12>that they have their little margin. They price low, like

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 12>big farmer companies have got a lot of profit, the

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 12>prices are high, they can usually eat the tariffs and

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 12>not put the prices up, where as generics. You know,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 12>the whole point of a generic is that you end

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 12>up getting some of these drugs eventually for cents on

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 12>the dollar per pill, and once you get hit by

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 12>twenty five an increase in your basic cost of goods

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 12>so to you know, your rwal material or your active

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 12>ingredient that goes into it, then it eats your margin,

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 12>so you can't help but pass that price increase on,

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 12>Whereas in the world of large farma, with more expensive,

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 12>more highly valued branded drugs, you can absorb some of that.

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 12>It does get your EPs hit, but nowhere near a

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 12>BMW or a Mercedes bent with having a EPs potential

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 12>forecasts maybe two or three percent, depending on how they're

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 12>calculating their transfer pricing, et cetera. And then something gets

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 12>manufactured in Ireland gets transferred here, so they're exposed, but

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 12>not nowhere near as much as the generics.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I am curious.

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 6>Just one last final question that you know you guys

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 6>are talking to companies, people in the industry, and I

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 6>just think about the stuff that's coming from government.

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Let me ask you first, Sam, I.

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 6>Mean, are people able to even companies able to access

0:33:57.840 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 6>the White House, get to the administration find out what

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 6>going on? Are they getting I know there's a lot

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 6>of uncertainty. Are they getting any information?

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 3>What's coming down?

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 12>Trips to golf courses and I think they've been a

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 12>good few dinners. I think there is communication. The problem

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 12>is you can be communicated, but the direction changes the

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 12>next day, or there is a YF No there isn't

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 12>that if some will be exempted, no, they won't be.

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's very hard to plan. However, all the

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 12>companies are really taking it in this right. Yeah.

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 6>I do get a little nervous about We've talked about

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 6>companies cutting back on like Capex, but you wonder how

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 6>much that might potentially slow down some R and D

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 6>of just not wondering how the system is going to

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 6>work or not work.

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 3>God, this is I think my favorite moment of the day.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you say that to everyone. I will, I don't know,

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 3>I will a problem.

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 6>No, no, oh, I don't say that to everyone, but

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 6>I will tell everyone, you guys, thank you so much.

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 6>I really appreciate the important story, important to the country.

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg News health reporter Madison Muller, along with Bloomberg News

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 6>senior pharmaceutical Analystsam Fazzelli, don't go back to your.

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 12>How long are you staying with us until Thursday?

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we'll get you back.

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 9>Thank god, we're here for tariffs.

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Rock stars, truly, truly, so appreciate it.

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 13>Mac.

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll bet you let me drive. Oh no, no, no no,

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 3>this is not a twenty who's.

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 9>Going to drug alay?

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Please, I'll do travel great, I want to drive.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 12>It's a good question.

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 11>This is the drive to the clothes now plunks for music,

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 11>we'll drive down on Bloomberg Radio.

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 6>All right, everybody just got about eighteen minutes to go

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 6>until we wrap up the trading day on this Tuesday,

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 6>April Fool's Day. First, is it Carols first trading day

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 6>of the second quarter April Fools?

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 3>No, it really is. We're often running.

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Listen as long as it's not the Friday the thirteenth,

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and you make me say that word just decophobia. Yeah,

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 2>then I think we're all good.

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 6>You know Friday, you know, March theteenth, was a Friday

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 6>of twenty twenty.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 3>That was like the last time we had Guess in studio. Yeah,

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.720
<v Speaker 3>well more than five years ago at this point. Lots

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 3>of amazing. Well what.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to make a segue to, like the markets,

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 2>but I just can't do.

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 3>It, So I don't even know. Sometimes you just got

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 3>to go.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, Let's bring in Ross Mayfield, Investment Strategy analyst.

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I had the barred private wealth management. He joins us

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 2>from Louisville, Kentucky, the S and P five hundred today

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of searching for direction, Ross, I want to get

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 2>your take on not just today's trade, but kind of

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 2>how things look in the near future, given the uncertainty

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 2>out of Washington, d C.

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 3>What's on your radar?

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.919
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean you're right, like, if we're looking for

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 13>a catalyst today, you're out of luck because of the

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:57.919
<v Speaker 13>potential that tomorrow could could be. You know, we don't

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 13>know if we'll get the kind of certainty of clarity

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 13>that investors, business owners, consumers are hoping for, but it

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.359
<v Speaker 13>leaves kind of today in the wind a little bit.

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 13>The thing that I'm thinking about mostly is that this

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 13>sell off looks viable to me. Presuming we don't enter

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 13>a recession. I don't think any of the fundamentals suggests

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 13>around the precipice of a recession. But if this uncertainty persists,

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 13>you know, businesses and consumers can only hold out for

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 13>so long, so we could well enter a recession. But

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 13>I don't think any of the fundamentals are suggesting it.

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, what are those fundamentals that you're citing here, Because

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, for every Ross Mayfield, I could go out

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and find somebody who says I'm pulling back Right now,

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm really cautious about what's going on. The consumer sentiment

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 2>data has me concerned.

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it's a good point.

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 13>I wouldn't argue that we're in boom times or anything

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 13>like that, but I think the hard data and the

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 13>soft data are diverging a bit. So you have stuff

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 13>like initial claims for unemployment insurance still hyper low. I mean,

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 13>we're still adding jobs month on month month. You know,

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 13>real income is up, industrial production is up. You know,

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 13>even something like manufacturing PMI today, which wasn't a blowout

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 13>number anything to get overly excited about, also is in

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 13>signaling recession. The soft data, the sentiment data, the CEO

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 13>survey data is miserable.

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.399
<v Speaker 3>But we've seen post COVID that that hard and.

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 13>Soft have diverged at times, and particularly in twenty three

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 13>and twenty four, the hard data went out, the consumer

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 13>sentiment data was not a useful indicator. So I don't

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 13>think that it's nothing. But I want to keep on

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 13>the hard data as well, and if that starts to

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 13>confirm how miserable everyone is, then we can we can

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 13>start to talk about a recession or a real downturn.

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 6>How hard is it to put money to work in

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 6>this environment, especially if it's new money?

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Which do you wait? Do you put it in.

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 6>Cash or cash like investments at this point and just

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 6>kind of wait for some more clarity or what do

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 6>you do?

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 12>No?

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 3>I think I think this is a great time to invest.

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 13>I mean, if you wait for clarity or certainty in

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 13>the market, you know more often than not you're going

0:38:59.320 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 13>to be left behind.

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 7>So we know that.

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 13>Investing in these big spikes embarishedness, whether you look at

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 13>the II or the AII survey have been very good indicators.

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 13>Sentiment is totally flushed here if you look at investing

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 13>at spikes and policy uncertainty, great forward returns from there?

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 13>Could it be choppy? Could it be you know, the

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 13>next couple of weeks or next couple of quarters, even.

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Look look ugly.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, we have a lot to work through on the

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 13>policy front. But if you look at year plus out,

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:28.959
<v Speaker 13>I think this is a great time to put money

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 13>to work, and you know, stocks are on sale.

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 3>All of this wait on whold evaluation can hold on?

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:36.399
<v Speaker 2>How can you say stocks are on sale when pe

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 2>ratios for a lot of people are still you know,

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the in the S and P five hundred pee ratios

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of the companies in there are above

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 2>historical norms.

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 13>Well, if you look at like the S and P

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 13>equal weight, right, so that's like the good representation of

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 13>the average stock. It's pretty much at its ten twelve

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 13>year average. Obviously, some of the big tech companies and

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 13>growth year companies, you know, they have extended valuations, but

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 13>they've had extended valuations for ten, fifteen years, twenty years,

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 13>and it hasn't been a reliable indicator on those types

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 13>of stocks. So you're right, valuations are certainly not the

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 13>things screaming by here. It's more about to me about

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 13>sentiment and uncertainty. But I think relative to the last

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 13>six months. You're obviously look at stocks on sale, and

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 13>presumably if we get the earnings growth that's being forecast

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 13>right now, I think it'll look like a deal a

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 13>year from now.

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 6>All right, So you did say this is a good

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 6>time to invest. How much can you drill down and

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 6>tell us kind of where you would put new money

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:39.919
<v Speaker 6>or just put any money to work.

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I think you look at what kind of

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 13>sector or asset class leadership has been. I mean, I

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 13>know most of our clients just anecdotally are underweight Europe

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 13>and International at this point. I think that that trade

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 13>has plenty of room to run. I think there are

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:04.399
<v Speaker 13>some real structural catalyst there. I'm not willing to go

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 13>all in, but I think that US investors are probably

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 13>way underweight international at this point after fifteen years of disappointment.

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 13>So I think leaning into that, particularly in Europe is

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 13>a good idea. And then leadership in the US. I mean, again,

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 13>this is partially why I'm not inclined to think we're

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 13>on the precipice of a recession. When you see things

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 13>like financials and industrials and energy acting so well. So

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 13>I would lean high quality, and I would stick large

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 13>cap over small cap given the rate backdrop. But I

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 13>would still look to good values in kind of pro

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 13>cyclical sectors that are acting well here. And I think

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.959
<v Speaker 13>those financials are a place where I think really look good,

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 13>not super terrif exposed, still have a regulatory or a

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 13>deregulation tailwind behind them, and then are just doing good

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 13>business right now.

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 7>So that's the kind of stuff.

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I would look for.

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 13>I would lean away from getting too defensive at this

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 13>point in time.

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 3>What doesn't look good, well, tech still.

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 13>Doesn't look very good. I mean it depends on your

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 13>time rise. And this is how we talk to our

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 13>clients about it. It's like, if you have a five

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 13>plus your time rise, and then I would be scooping

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 13>up big tech and AI adjacent names and just riding

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 13>out these these soft patches.

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 3>But if you have a.

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 13>Three to six month time frame, okay, they look broken.

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 3>I just want to make sure.

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:19.879
<v Speaker 2>So Ross, I think, how do you know that those

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 2>big tech companies are going to stay dominant for the

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 2>next three to five years? For me, just the deep

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Seek news earlier this year I think made a lot

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>of people reconsider the sustainability there.

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Definitely.

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 13>It definitely calls into question the hundreds of billions that

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 13>are being spent on AI infrastructure. But I do think

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 13>that these companies are largely very fundamentally sound.

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 11>One.

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 13>So, if you're looking at like the dot com bubble

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 13>comp most of these companies are really.

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Cash rich, low debt, not all the mag seven.

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 13>It's not a monolith by any means. But you have

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 13>these huge companies, You have these wide motes around their

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 13>core businesses, and then they just have so much capital

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 13>to play with, and when there's small starts, they tend

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 13>to just buy them up. So I think that they're

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 13>pretty defensible here. And I you know, again, if I

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 13>had a three to five year plus time horizon, I

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 13>would be grabbing most of these names and not thinking

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 13>twice about it.

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 6>All Right, we're gonna leave it on that note here, Ross,

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much. Ross Mayfield. He is investment strategy

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 6>and Alystoffert Baird Private Wealth Management.

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Joining us from Louisville, Louisville, Louisville, Louisville. Come on, Carol, Kentucky, Louisville.

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 11>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:37.720
<v Speaker 11>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 11>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.720
<v Speaker 11>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 11>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 11>and always on the Bloomberg terminal