WEBVTT - Tech News: Time Crystals

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>and a love of all things tech. And this is

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Thursday, August five, twenty twenty one.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot of it, including some really crazy

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>quantum physics news that I am going to do my

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>best to try and impart unto you, dear listener. But

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.959
<v Speaker 1>let's get started with some Facebook stories, because I just

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>can't seem to go an episode without talking about Facebook.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So one of these stories is likely not going to

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>be a surprise to any of you listeners at all.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's the fact that many law enforcement agencies are

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>crawling on social networking sites to collect images of people

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and use those images for the purposes of facial recognition systems.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>The m Live site, which covers news in Michigan here

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, published an article this morning about this,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>quoting Eric Goldman of the High Tech Law Institute at

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Santa Clara University, and Goldman said that if you have

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a public social networking accounts, such as a Facebook account

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that posts publicly, it stands to reason that a lot

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of different people and organizations have grabbed your photos at

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>some point because they are all publicly available. Publicly available

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>information is you know, public, so anyone can see it.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen numerous groups use software to crawl through

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>enormous platforms to pull down mountains of data for the

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>purposes of identification and analysis, and those are acts that

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>platforms frequently resist for a variety of reasons, like there's

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>an AI platform that has done this that has gotten

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in trouble for it in the past because of that.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I should also add that while I say if you

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>post publicly, that's not even the full picture obviously, right,

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Like let's say you don't even have a Facebook profile,

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>you could be in photos that your friends take, right,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and those photos might be on their their profiles, and

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.839
<v Speaker 1>they might be public which means that those photos can

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>be captured and used for facial recognition purposes. So you

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to be involved in this. You have

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>no say at that point if someone is posting your

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>photo publicly, and it's fair game for a lot of

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>these organizations, at least as far as they're concerned. Now,

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we've also seen that many facial recognition systems have an

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>element of bias in them, with a tendency to be

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>less accurate for people of color. And that might not

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sound you know, terrible, like, oh, it's less accurate, but

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>then you figure that a less accurate system means that

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a person could be inaccurately identified as, say, a

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>person of interest in a legal case, and then you

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>can really see how it does become a problem. Such

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a misidentification can lead in a best case scenario, it

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>can lead to an inconvenience. That's the best case scenario.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Worst case scenario ends up being incredibly harmful and disruptive.

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean that could even include wrongful arrests which have

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>happened as a result of facial recognition software mistakenly identifying

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>someone as someone else. And the fact that this disproportionately

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>harms specific communities, like communities of color. That's a real

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.839
<v Speaker 1>issue now, as the Peace and m Life points out,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>there have been documented cases of police action based off

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>incorrect facial recognition analysis already in Michigan. There's a growing

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>resist to the use of this technology. There's been a

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>lot more pressure on local and federal governments to outlaw

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it's used there's also been pressure on companies to not

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>make that technology available to law enforcement agencies, and this

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>ties in with several other stories that are unfolding around

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the world, many of which tap into this issue of

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>wanting to lean on technology in order to solve a

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>particularly difficult social problem. But the issue is that in

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>some cases the technology isn't necessarily reliable enough to depend upon,

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>So I may have to do a full episode dedicated

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to that concept because there are a lot of different

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>factors and play here. Right, there's a genuine desire to

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>right a social wrong or to prevent a particular social

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>problem from happening. There's a perception that the technology could

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>be the solution to this, and then there's the reality

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of technology that may not be reliable enough for us

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to really leverage it that way, or else we have

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>these exceptions pop up that then affect innocent people in

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>harmful ways. Moving on, The Guardian published an article about

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>how the fossil fuel industry was able to leverage Facebook

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to push climate misinformation. The article cites a group called

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>influence Map, which is based in London, which uncovered this issue.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Influence Maps said that there was an increase in advertising

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>by fossil fuel companies like ex On Mobile in during

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the election season, with the campaign specifically creating a misinformation

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>narrative to shape the conversation around climate change and fossil

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>fuel policies that were meant to address that problem. Further

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>influence MAP alleges that this campaign violated Facebook's own policies

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>with regard to false advertising, and yet Facebook did not

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>remove or label these posts as being misleading, which allowed

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>those views to really take hold within certain communities and Facebook.

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The organization also found something that a lot of people

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>have observed over the years that the messaging around conservation

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, having an impact on climate change really

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was shifting the focus to the individual rather than to

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>companies and industries. In other words, putting the burden of

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>addressing climate change solely on individual people rather than both

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>on people and on corporations. So this is kind of

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the message of turn off the lights after you leave

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a room, like or only you can prevent forest fires

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of approach, rather than place regulations on or otherwise

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>tax companies that are consuming vast amounts of electricity, right

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Like that would be the other message. Uh, we frequently

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>see this kind of personalized approach to messaging, and yeah,

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>we all do have a part to play here. But

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>when that messaging completely ignores how industry contribut mutes to

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a large extent, to climate change issues, then it becomes

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>misinformation because it's purposefully omitting important details. Right. If you

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>don't say, hey, the transportation industry ends up being a

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>massive contributor to carbon emissions and you're instead saying turn

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>off the lights and don't run stuff when you're not

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>using it, then you allow the major contributing factor to

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>go on unhindered, and it then the problem worsens as

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a result. So Facebook has received some pretty critical opposition

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to this trend already and will likely face even more

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny in the future. And it should. I mean, it's

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's cashing those checks, right, The advertising checks are coming

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in and Facebook is cashing them, So it does definitely

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>play a part. Oh and the CNN Business story about

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>influence maps look into Facebook reveals that these fossil fuel

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>ads showed up more than four hundred thirty one million

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>times for US users, in which is not a bad

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>return on investment for nine point six million dollars that

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>was the given amount for that those collective ad campaigns

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>now think about this a super Bowl ad. A commercial

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>during the Super Bowl costs around five million dollars for

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a thirty second spot, and the last Super Bowl had

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>around ninety s point four million people watching it. So

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for a little less than twice the cash, you can

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>get four times the number of views by going through Facebook,

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>which is not a bad deal right. Meanwhile, the petroleum

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>industry companies have spoken out against the Influence Map study,

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>claiming that these companies are spending a great amount of

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>money on limiting carbon emissions and using carbon sequestration strategies

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and such, which you know, could be totally true, but

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change the fact that these companies actively try to

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>undermine climate action. Heck, and x On lobbyists essentially spilled

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the beans on how they do that on video, which

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>then prompted the CEO of x On to apologize for it.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they were sorry that they were caught. And

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we are not yet done with Facebook. We've got one

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>more Facebook story here. Bloomberg reported yesterday that Facebook has

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>disabled the personal Facebook accounts of some researchers from New

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>York University who have been studying political ads on that platform.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook says this group has been using tools like automated

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>tools to scrape Facebook of data, which is going against

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's policy. This is kind of alluding to what I

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was mentioning earlier about facial recognition technologies. You know, Facebook

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't supposed to allow that to happen. Now, the research

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>team saw their project pretty much hamstrung by Facebook. The

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>company deactivated various apps and pages that were associated with

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this research project, in addition to deactivating those personal pages

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of the actual team involved. Now, on the face of it,

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>my danger starts to get up on behalf of the

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>research team. However, I have to admit this story is

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>actually more complicated than that. See back in two thousand nineteen,

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Trade Commission or FTC here in the United

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>States hit Facebook with a fine of five billion dollars

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>as billion with a B, which is a princely sum indeed,

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that fine was that the FTC

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>found that Facebook had not done enough to protect users

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>from developers who were relying on Facebook to collect personal

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>information on a large scale, think of things like Cambridge Analytica.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So Facebook has kind of an obligation to push back

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>against groups that are using automated means to collect data

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>off the platform, even if that group has a seemingly

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>good reason for doing so. Facebook requires groups to see

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>out permission from the company before using those kinds of tools,

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and this group, you could argue, failed to secure permission,

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, Facebook had reached out and given the

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>group a couple of warnings in the past. Now that

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>being said, Facebook is also under a great deal of

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny for how it serves up political ads and how

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it targets people and how it chooses who gets to

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>see what. So, as I said, this is a really

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>complicated issue. The study could call more attention to problems

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook's methods of accepting and serving ads to users,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>which the company would likely want to suppress. It doesn't

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>want those problems to be brought into, you know, harsher light.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But then Facebook also has this obligation under the FTC,

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and that at least gives the company a fairly compelling

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>reason to push back. Though one could imagine that this

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>issue could be solved if Facebook and the research group

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>could just get that permission to the researchers, but I

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>really doubt that Facebook is eager to do that. In

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this particular case, we have more stories to cover. But

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>before we do that, let's take a quick break. Reuters

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>reports that are ransomware attacked targeting more than one thousand

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>organizations last month might be just the beginning of a

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>trend of attacks on service providers. The attack leveraged vulnerabilities

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>in a management software product from a company called CASA,

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>which affected more than fifty managed service provider organizations or

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>m sps. Now, an MSP is a company that other

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>companies rely upon to outsource services of some sort, like

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they could be human resources services or I T services,

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And that means that the MSP represents a really juicy

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>target for hackers because you could attack a specific company.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that you wanted to target I don't know,

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like like, uh, Intel, you want to target Intel, and

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to compromise one of Intel's systems. Well, that's

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a single target. But let's say you go after an

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>MSP which could service dozens or hundreds of clients, and

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Intel happens to be one of them, but it also

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>services all these others. Well, you can disrupt all of

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>those companies by targeting the MSP specifically, right if they

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are providing a service to all these companies and you

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>interrupt it, you've affected not just one organization, but potentially

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of them. This puts immense pressure on the MSP

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>companies to solve the problem quickly, because if all of

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>its customers are depending upon those services, and you've got

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred important clients, you might be answering calls

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all day long because you can't get their widgets to

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>work because of a problem with your product. You have

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 1>a high motivation to fix the issue that might include

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>paying off an exorbitant ransom or worse. The hackers might

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>use the MSPs as a launch point and find a

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>way to use an MSP product to have a supply

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>chain attack and thus infect the MSPs customers as well.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So the MSP becomes the entry point and then all

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of its customers become targets. That multiplies the number of

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>targets that the hackers are able to to actually compromise,

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and potentially multiplies the number of ransoms that they could

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>receive as a result. Reuters states that hacker groups are

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>feverishly researching ways to target MSPs for just that reason,

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>which suggests we should be on the lookout for similar

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>attacks in the future, and it should serve as a

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>warning to all organizations MSP and otherwise to be extra

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>cautious with security. Moving on on, the state of Massachusetts

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is seeing a group called the Massachusetts Coalition for Independent

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Work Lobby to have a special ballot introduced that would

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>create some special exemptions for companies like Uber and Lift

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to be largely excluded from the restrictions and regulations of

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the state's labor laws. And you will be shocked, shocked,

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I tell you to learn that Uber and Lift run

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this special interest group whose name makes it sound like

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a worker advocacy organization. The companies have actually done

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>this before. In fact, they did so successfully in California

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>by introducing a measure called Proposition twenty two, which effectively

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>excluded them and several other gig economy companies from having

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to abide by the laws that govern other businesses in

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the state of California. And it looks like the companies

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to spend a lot of money in Massachusetts

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to fight the same sort of battle there. Whether that

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>were us are not remains to be seen, because generally speaking,

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a growing awareness regarding the company's efforts to avoid

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>things like acknowledging the drivers are in fact employees as

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>opposed to you know, contracted freelancers and so on. But

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to watch to see how this plays out,

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because we have to keep in mind these companies already

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have a track record for selling a political message effectively

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to the public, and they might do it again. And

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>now for the latest of if misogyny in the workplace

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is such a problem, why don't more women come forward? Department, Well,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to you, I submit the story of Ashley Giovic, a

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>program manager at Apple's engineering department. According to the verge,

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yovic found herself put on administrative leave indefinitely. In fact,

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>she actually requested that, but we'll get to that. After

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>she tweeted about how she found Apple to be a

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hostile work environment and one that tolerates sexism within the workplace.

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>She had already gone through internal system ms numerous times

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>in order to address this, so tweeting this out was

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, you know, the fact that she wasn't

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing progress being made within the company. And when you

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>see a company essentially sideline someone after they come forward with,

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, these these issues, that's really one of the

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>reasons why more women don't come forward because they've they've

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>been intimidated. They've seen time and time again that the

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>people who speak out end up getting sidelined. Gil Vic

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>tweeted quote so following raising concerns to hashtag Apple about

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>hashtag sexism, hashtag hostile work environment, and hashtag unsafe work conditions.

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm now on indefinite paid administrative leave per hashtag Apple

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>employee relations while they investigate my concerns. This seems to

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>include me not using Apple's internal back end quote. Giovic

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>also said that the company offered to provide her medical

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>leave rather than address the underlying issues, which is kind

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of like saying, hey, I know Pete in accounting keeps

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>stabbing you, but we've got these band aids so you

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can patch yourself up every time it happens, rather than,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to arrest Pete from accounting. Apple is,

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, just one of dozens of companies currently being

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>called to reckon with its culture, and once again, it

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it's stories like these that feed into that feeling that

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>human resources isn't there to protect the humans who work

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>for the company, but rather to protect the company. Let

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>us now segue over to a moment i'd like to

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>call we live in the future, which can sometimes be

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on inspiring and sometimes terrifying. We'll start with something terrifying.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the Pentagon is making use of an AI application

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to analyze real time information in an effort to predict

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>what the enemy will do next, with the Pentagon claiming

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that the AI can let them see quote days in

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>advance end quote. As a result, makes me think of

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the precogs in Minority Report, except instead of being put

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to use in law enforcement to predict crime, they are

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>being put in military use to predict what the enemy

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to do in any given situation. And it

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>also makes me think of Grand Admiral Thrown in the

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars Extended Universe. He could look at a culture's

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>work of art and figure out what that culture how

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>they would react, you know, to any given situation, which

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty far fetched. But using AI to analyze what's

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>going on within a specific region and then make a

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>strategic decision seems like it's a little bit less fantastical, right.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, you could argue that this is just an

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>extremely much more complicated version of a war game, like

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a simulated war game. The AI is part of the

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Global Information Dominance Experiment or g I d E. And boy,

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that name is kind of scary. Obviously. The goal is

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to predict what an enemy might do in order so

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that we could prepare against that very move, potentially protecting

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the lives of soldiers and civilians in the process and

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>maximizing the effectiveness of an armed presence in any given region.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>We might dissuade someone from doing something. For example, if

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the analysis says, hey, based upon historical data, such and

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>such country is likely to launch a submarine from this

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>port in the next two days, if you build up

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a show of force around that area, then you might

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>dissuade them from doing that. That kind of thing. Well,

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon points out that this is work that people

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>have actually been doing for years by analyzing data in

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>search of patterns and trying to make predictions. But obviously

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>it took a long time in the past, so we

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>are now in an era where we can collect and

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, analyze mountains of information rapidly, so we can

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>find those patterns much more quickly and then act on

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that information. Of course, this requires a very careful design

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>of the algorithm, and it's always possible for an algorithm

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to mistake noise for a meaningful pattern. But that's why

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this initiative is in a testing phase, and it concerns

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>some critics of artificial intelligence in use with, you know,

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>military applications, because they see it as a potential starting

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>point for a slippery slope in which AI ends up

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>not just pointing out possible enemy decisions as a result

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in the world, but then going

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on to potentially making life or death decisions of its own,

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and then potentially even getting to the point where it

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>enacts those decisions without human oversight, because obviously human oversight

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>slows things down. So if you have really powerful AI

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>making all the decisions, and you have at least assumed

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that the AI is infallible, you rely on the AI.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We're always off from that sort of dystopian future, but

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>being wary of that eventuality is probably not a bad idea.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So while you could argue that it's premature to worry

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about that kind of stuff, the counter to that is, well,

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>if we don't bring it, bring it up now, we

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>could see this evolved slowly enough where it happens before

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we were even aware of it. I've got a couple

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more stories to tell, but before we get to that,

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>let's take another break. Okay, it is time, my friends,

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and by time, I mean it's time to talk about

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>time crystals, which full disclosure, I did not even know

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we're a thing before this morning. Apparently, time crystals are

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a phase of matter, kind of like you know how

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>gas is a phase of matter, solids, liquids, plasmas, and

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that the most likely context we would observe such a

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>thing as a time crystal is on the quantum level,

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, they're they're they're very small, like smaller

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 1>than Natman small. Some Google scientists have written a paper

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that still has to go through the pure review process,

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>so we can't just assume that they got everything right.

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But that paper claims that they have found a way

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>to use quantum computers to study time crystals, which is

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the most science fiction sentence I think I

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>could say today. But let's break this down a bit,

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>because that's just words salad, right unless we understand what

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. Quantum computers are very complicated machines that

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>only somewhat resemble classic computers, and they are very delicate

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. They have this tendency toward decoherence, which means

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that your quantum computer kind of breaks down and becomes

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a very low powered classical computer as a result. So

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>with a traditional computer, we talk about information in terms

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.479
<v Speaker 1>of the basic unit of a bit or a binary digit,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>which can either be a zero or a one. Quantum

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>computers are different. They have a cubit as the basic

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>unit of information, and a cubit or a quantum bit

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.959
<v Speaker 1>can kind of sort of be both a zero and

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a one at the same time, and every value in between. Technically,

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a thing called superposition. Uh. There's also the

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>issue of entanglement, but we're not going to get into

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>all that. That would require a full episode by itself.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>But the important thing with quantum computers is that with

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the proper design of algorithms, that is, processes that are

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically engineered to take advantage of these quantum properties, computer

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>scientists could use these quantum computers to solve particularly difficult problems. Now,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a quantum computer would not be much good for your

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 1>classic computer processes, so in other words, you wouldn't want

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>these as a gaming rig so you can play Overwatch

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>on it or something, but quantum computers would be really

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>good at tackling certain subsets of computational problems that would

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>tie up a classical computer for thousands of years or more.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's quantum computers from a very very high level. Alright,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what about time crystals. Well, here we got to talk

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>about entropy. So you can kind of think of entropy

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>as the natural tendency for stuff in the universe to

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of fall apart or more accurately, to go from

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>more ordered two more disordered. So let's say you've got

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a big room and you've subdivided this big room with

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a removable panel, like it completely bisects the room in half,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and the panel has like heavy thermal insulation, and you

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>make one side of that room really hot, and you

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>make the other side of the room that's on the

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>opposite end of this panel, like on the opposite side

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of the panel, you make that side really cold. So

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>you've got effectively two rooms here, right, You've got one

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that's really hot, one is really cold. Then you remove

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the panel. Well what happens, But we would actually see

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>these temperatures mix, right, we would see these the molecules

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>from the cold side and the molecules from the hot

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>side would intermingle, and eventually the room would reach an

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>equilibrium temperature, so you would not have one side of

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the room just stay hot and the other side just

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>stay cold. In other words, that those ordered systems would

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>break down and you would have this entropy take effect

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>unless the room itself was a time crystal. In that case,

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a time crystal can get stuck in two different high

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>energy configurations. So in our example, we would say, all right, well,

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that means hot and cold in this case, and then

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a time crystal would switch back and forth, never actually

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>moving towards equilibrium. So we would have a room that

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>at times would be very hot and that other times

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>would be very cold, or would have hot and cold

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>on specific sides and then hot and cold on opposite sides.

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I can't pretend to really understand this because it

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>flies in the face of the second law of thermodynamics.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.479
<v Speaker 1>But apparently it's a thing, and Google says it can

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>use its quantum computing systems to study time crystals. Further,

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>as it stands, there's no real application for time crystals

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that anyone has proposed, but it wouldn't mean learning more

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>about how our universe works and whether there really is

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a big exception to an otherwise extremely well established rule,

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>that being the second law of the thermodynamics, which again

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>blows my mind. Finally something that doesn't blow my mind

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>nearly as much but still is really cool. Sony introduced

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a new VR technology for the PS five to developers

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>this week. It's kind of a pitch to developers to say,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>we've got this hardware coming out, we want you to

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>make stuff for it. The headsets will have oh LED

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>screens with two thousand by twenty forty resolution per eye,

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty darn incredible. They will also have a

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>degree field of view, which is an improvement over the

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>current ps VR system that's on the market. These systems

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>might also support HDR that's high dynamic range. That is

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a technology that can enable more vibrant colors to be

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>displayed through greater dynamics between those colors and brightness or luminosity.

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The headset is said to also have some haptic feedback

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>built in, That is, systems that provide a tactile or

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>touch based feedback system. So for example, you might feel

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a slight vibration through the headset as you use a

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>controller to move around a virtual environment. The idea being

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that you're kind of tricking your brain into thinking you're

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>actually walking around this virtual space while you are, in

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>reality physically standing still inside your living room, for example,

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully this would cut down on the motion sickness

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>than some folks like me experience when they are using

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>VR sets. There's also talk of technology that will detect

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>where a user is looking while they are wearing the headset,

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>which can be useful because developers could build beefier VR

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>experiences and really lean on this, because anything you're looking

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.719
<v Speaker 1>at directly would need to be distinct and in high resolution,

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's where it would need to really look good.

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But the stuff at the periphery of your vision could

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be a bit more hazy and you wouldn't notice because

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not the way humans focus, right, And that could

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>cut down on the work that the PlayStation five would

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>have to do in order to provide whatever this experience is.

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>That really just means that developers can have a bit

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>more elbow room to really push the hardware to its limit.

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And Sony is reaching out to some big Triple A

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>studios essentially saying, hey, why don't you know, make something

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>really cool for this? So we've seen time and again

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, hardware can be really exciting, but unless

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a strong software library to go with that hardware,

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't tend to have very much staying power. Tends

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to fade into obscurity. And VR has always had an

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>issue when it comes to building out a really diverse,

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>compelling library of experiences. And of course there's a pretty

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>good reason for that. VR tends to be pretty expensive,

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and my guest this new headset is going to be

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>no different. I'm guessing it's going to be a pretty

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>expensive piece of equipment. And when something is expensive, that means,

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>by nature, fewer people can afford to buy the product,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>which means that developers are looking at a smaller pool

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of potential customers. And that means that whatever return they're

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>going to get from selling something that runs on that

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>platform is going to be relatively smaller than it would

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>be for, you know, a more widely adopted platform. So

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're a game studio, you might have yourself saying,

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>so do we pour a hundred million bucks into developing

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this game that is going to target ten of the

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>PS five owners? That's the number I'm just kind of

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>pulling out the air. By the way, or do we

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>instead pour million bucks developing a more traditional style console

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>game and target all of the PS five owners. And

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you can see how this situation becomes a vicious cycle, right,

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Some folks will resist buying into VR because they see

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lack of content, and then developers are reluctant

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to make content because there's a lack of VR owners

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>out there. But maybe this will be the device to

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>really break that open for Sony. Rumor is that the

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>hardware will get a reveal sometime early next year, so

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we won't have to wait too long to learn more.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's it. That's all the news that I have

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>for you guys today, Thursday, August five, twenty twenty one.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope you are all well. I'm on the mend myself,

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so each day is going to get better. That's my hope. Anyway,

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have suggestions for topics I should cover in

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>future episodes of tech Stuff, please reach out to me.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>The best way to do that is on Twitter. The

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is text Stuff h s W

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon, y. Text

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>from I Heart Radio, visit the i heart radio, app,

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.