WEBVTT - June Q&A (6/1/2017)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Ill that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man, I'm for I've heard so many players say,

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>well I want to be happy. You want to be

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 2>happy for dake Edo state is that woo woom.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And and tie.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the solid verbal, Boys and girls. My

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 2>name is Ty Hildebrand joining me over there. Technically when

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>you're listening to this, he's on his honeymoon. But since

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 2>we're recording, since we're proactive like that, Dan Rubinstein is

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>with us once more, sir, how are you?

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm good. I'm going to give myself some future advice

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and that is great job getting married, Yeah, and good job.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Great honeymoon Yeah great, wet as enjoyed it thoroughly.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, glad to hear it. We we just loved having

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you time. Thank you you and Kate. We're wonderful. Uh

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And right now I'm on my honeymoon and I'll just

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 1>flew it up. Just keep d and keep stretching and

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>get some sun, open the curtains and you know, realize

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this is you live in your best life. And congratulations.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Where are you now? What country?

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>What is today? Ty? Today is Thursday. We're releasing this

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Thursday juune, so I am in Greece. I think you

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>can smell the feta cheese everywhere, and the grape leaves

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and the salty, briny ocean air. It's wonderful.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Tie Well, may this podcast be the Grecian formula for

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>all that ails you and all that concerns you about

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 2>college football. We will be back at some point in

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 2>the next couple of weeks to talk in person again,

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 2>but for the interim, you and I are pre recording

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a Q and A show. We've been trying to do

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>these once a month because people always send in cool questions,

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>and we we try to rotate the non college football theme.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>What did we go with today? Restaurants, restaurant etiquette, specifically,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what to do in certain situations when you find yourself

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>not knowing where to go, not restaurant wise, but once

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you're in the restaurant, when you have to make a

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>life decision, what do I do? We're here to help.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Great questions that came in, very very poignant questions.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Here, a lot of specific ones. I love that, very

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 2>good questions. We'll get into those in a little bit.

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Also a bunch of football questions here. Don't forget you

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 2>can always email us at saliverbo at gmail dot com,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 2>or find us on Facebook or on Twitter. We did

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>have a few questions that referenced this article, and I

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 2>did want to start here before we get into our

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Q and A. But a really cool article that you

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>guys over at Espionation put out here announcing I don't

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>know if it's so much candidacy, a vision, whatever you

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>want to call it, Bill Connolly for College Football Commissioner. Yes,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>it was published on May the twenty second, and he

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>puts forth nine cool ideas for fixing college football or

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 2>his vision for college football as we move forward. So

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>a student athlete bill of rights, modernizing amateurism. What else

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>fixing recruiting, expanding the playoff, bringing back the damn video game,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>and caa series, emotion and relegation. A bunch of interesting

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 2>concepts and visions here that Bill puts forth. I am

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 2>ready to sign my name on the dotted line to

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>get behind this. I'm excited. Was there anything that you

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>saw in here right that you said yes? I either

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>love that, no, I really hate that. What was your

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>reaction to this?

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So my reaction was, because by now everybody should know

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we love Bill c And how deeply he gets into

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>college football. It's almost all positive. There's nothing really negative.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just some of the things I look at as

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>being sort of a little unrealistic. And maybe it's the

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>scheduling thing, which I like the idea as any sports

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>should run, like the way Bill wants college football to run,

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but because of the way, and I'll be specific, like

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he wants pods scheduling, like he always played the same

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>three teams. He wants a bracketbuster in the middle of

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the season to sort of shake things up and we

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>get sort of better matchups because of it. Everything he

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is positioning with his candidacy as for scheduling and as

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for the organization of the sport makes a lot more

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>sense than the way it's constituted now. The only thing

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is when you start scheduling and you start going relegation,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it chips away at the sort of the context you

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>have for Notre Dame, or for Oregon, or for Texts

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>A and M, or for Louisville or for usc whatever.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if you're not all of a sudden playing a

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same teams every year, then you lose

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of context. So it's like Arizona is not

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a rival of Oregon, but every year Oregon plays Arizona,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm flooded with the context and memories that matchup. And

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what it sort of seasons it in a unique

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>way that perhaps a more ambitious, futuristic way of scheduling

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and organizing the sport doesn't if you were One of

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the examples he used was with relegation specifically, like, you know,

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe watching a Virginia game at the end of the

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>season wasn't all that fun for anybody, Virginia fans included,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but if there was relegation on the line, so if

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Virginia was going to have to go down

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and become a group of five school and not an

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>ACC school they were playing against an FCS school or

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>something like that. If Virginia gets relegated, that's such a

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>huge blow to I think Virginia's bottom line, and you

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>start to sort of inflict some wounds into the sport

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that might be unintended in some cases. So that's what

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of jumped out to me that in a perfect world,

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum, all of this pretty much works and

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>would make the sport more fun and higher quality. I

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just don't know that you can unweave a lot of

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the fabric that's it's in place already.

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 2>If you were to start tomorrow day one new college football,

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 2>you could put a lot of this stuff in. The

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>problem now is not that these aren't good ideas. The

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>problem is that there is obviously a contractual obligation on

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 2>so many different fronts to continue the status quo.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Sure, relegation promotion.

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 2>By the way, for those that aren't tracking, it's a

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>lot like they do in English soccer, or really in

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 2>any soccer league where the bottom three or however many

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>teams at the bottom of said league said conference go

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>down to a Tier two league the following year if

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 2>they don't do well enough to continue on in their

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 2>present division. And in some cases, if you're in like

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a Tier two league and you finish in the top two,

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 2>well then maybe you get to bump up and play

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 2>against the big boys the next season.

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Sure, like Bois say, would have been like a Pac

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>ten school, a Pac twelve school, with all the success

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they had by the time time they were killing everybody

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Wacken Mountain West.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Or even like in North Dakota State might have progressively

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>been able to work their way up into a top

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>tier conference. It's an interesting concept. I like the concept.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>My thing with college football has always been the issue

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>is that the football teams are tied to an academic institution.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>If you could somehow find a way to decouple those two,

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I think you'd solve a lot of problems. But we're

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>so far into it now, and obviously the financial stakes

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>are so high that that's never anything we could find

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>a way to do.

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no way. I think the fact that it starts

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Student Athlete Bill of Rights to just sort

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of organize everything in terms of what is availed to

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the players playing college football, especially on a high level,

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense because we came from a

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>sport that was like, Okay, well the Pac ten is

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this, the ACC is doing this, the Big twelve

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>over the Big eight or the SWC whatever. It's to

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>be like these mini sports that just happen to be

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>playing many conferences excuse me, or many regions that happen

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to be doing the same thing. Whereas now everything is

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>so much more nationalized and it seems a lot more homogenous.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>With the TV deals, you know, every conference appears on

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one of two networks. Basically right now, so everybody has

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>access to eyeballs. Everybody is trying to They're hiring each

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>other's coaches. It's a lot less regional than it used

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to be, so centralizing the rights of the players of

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the labor it makes sense whether and Bill brings up

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the points of healthcare of you know, the right to

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>graduate scholarships, you know, guaranteeing undergraduate scholarships, you know, safety guidelines,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>transfer rules that are set in place that everybody has

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to follow, and then the sort of Olympic style amateurism,

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>which is what he is pitching, which basically says, and

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ty correct me if I'm wrong, it's that you have

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the right to earn based on your likeness. And I

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>am all for this, and the you know, the obvious

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>counter argument is, well, and you know, the schools with

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the most money and the boosters with the most money

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>are only are always going to get the best players,

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>which is how it already is. Yeah, it's just how

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it is already. And it would just be a way

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for schools to not have the burden of being creative

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to pay players and to let players go out and

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>seek compensation themselves, which seems reasonable.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, and that becomes then the foundation to actually bring

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>back the video game. As he says here in his

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 2>fourth bullet point, we'll put the link in the show

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>description here so that if you haven't seen it, you

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 2>can go out and check it out. But a lot

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 2>of really good stuff here from Bill. I suspect this

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 2>is something that you and I can discuss throughout the

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>course of the entire offseason, because there is a lot

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 2>of meat here. But I like the fact that he

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>gets into scheduling, both division scheduling and non conference scheduling,

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 2>and talks about how that could be an issue and

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>it could be resolved. He also talks about the games

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>being too long and the adverse effect that has on

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>fans watching the game also taking part in the game.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 2>A lot of really good stuff here, But at least

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>as of now, I support the cause for Bill c

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 2>as College Football Commissioner. And the biggest point perhaps in

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 2>all of this, certainly one of the most controversial points,

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>which we will get into when we get to our

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Q and A here momentarily, is the topic around expanding

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the college football playoff. Yes, so we'll talk about that

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 2>here in a little bit. In the meantime that we

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 2>have two great sponsors that we do need to discuss

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>love before we get into your questions. I've talked about

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Harry's before, Dan, you know I use Harry's. I tried

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>to switch to one of those electric raisers. Didn't do

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>it for me.

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You look marvelous at the wedding tie very well.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that. I appreciate that, but I'm now a

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Harry's guy forevermore. I would urge people to go out

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>there and check out what Harry's has to offer, because

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Father's Day is just around the corner, and you know

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 2>how dads are. Dads are impossible to shop for. You know,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 2>you can only get a dad a tie so many times,

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 2>or you know, a sleeve of golf balls. I don't

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 2>know whatever he's into, but our friends over at Harry's

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 2>they've got a special offer for you and Dad that

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I think everyone's going to love. Go to Harry's dot com,

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>h A R R y s dot com, slash Solid

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and get five bucks off one of their shave sets,

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 2>including a limited edition Father's Day set which comes with

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a storm gray razor handle, a chrome razor standing, foaming

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, shave gel, three replacement blades, and a travel cover.

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 2>The travel cover, by the way, very underrated, and it's

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 2>all packaged in a sleek, giftable box.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Dan, I like Harris. I think Dad will too.

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 2>They're all about a great shave at a fair price,

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and they've got one hundred percent quality guarantee so you

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 2>get a full refund if you are not happy for

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason. It does make the perfect Father's Day gift.

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm giving them away as we speak, so I'm excited

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 2>about it again. The offer is Harry's dot com slash

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Solid Redeem your Special Offer. Fans of the Verbal will

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>get five dollars off one of the shave sets. Limited

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>time only Act now Harry's dot Com slash Solid five

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 2>bucks off support Harry's Support the Solid Verbal. It's so

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>simple and last but not least, we mentioned proper cloth

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>on last week's show, Dan, we did. It's a custom

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 2>fitting dress shirt. Sometimes you buy a shirt off the

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 2>rackets too tight, sleeves are too long, something's off.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>You gotta get it.

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Tails, it's it's pouchy. Yeah, you don't want that. You

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>want to look like your best self. Finding a dress

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>shirt can be hard, especially if you want one that

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 2>fits well. Ordering a custom fitted shirt's never been easier

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 2>thanks to proper Cloth. Go to propercloth dot com. You

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>can easily create a custom shirt size in seconds. All

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>you got to do is answer ten easy questions. It's foolproof.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 2>You don't even need the measuring tape. Dan, you turn

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 2>me onto this. I went out shortly after our last show.

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I ordered one for myself nice, so I'm getting in

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 2>on the fun as well. They have five hundred fabric

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 2>styles to choose from Premium, Italion and my favorite Japanese,

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 2>as well as business and casual styles. They all start

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 2>at eighty five bucks per shirt. Best of all, the

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>guarantee you perfect fit, so if you get one doesn't fit,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 2>let them know they'll remake it free of charge. They

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 2>are the highest rated shirt maker on the Googles at

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 2>least at last check, and I'm sure it hasn't changed

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>in a week. Proper Cloth even GQ calls them their

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>favorite online custom shirt maker. They are the future of

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 2>shirts dands, so stop wearing shirts that don't fit, start

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 2>looking your best in a custom fitted shirt. Go to

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 2>propercloth dot com slash solid today, enter the gift code

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 2>solid Solid and save twenty bucks in your first shirt.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I've just decided that I want to somehow become a

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>judge of the most comfortable shirt contest, because that's what

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you just made it sound like, and I have a

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of thoughts on shirts. Ty, I'm ready to go.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. Congratulations, Skippy, you've got mail. You've got

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>mail on the solid verbal dan as often as we can.

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>And now once a month in the off season here

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 2>as we've got ye that's college football to talk about.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 2>We do our best to pay homage to those of

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>you who write in soliverble at gmail dot com, to

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>those of you who tweet us, who send us comments

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>on the facebooks and beyond. We talk a little bit

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>about college football. We talk a little bit tonight about

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 2>restaurant etiquette. But let's start on the college football side,

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>and let's first go to Augusto HMM. To dovetail nicely

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 2>with our previous discussion about Bill Connolly's proposals his vision

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to try and modernize college football. Augusta writes in and

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 2>says that an eight team playoff would radically change college

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 2>football for the worst. Similar to college basketball, the season

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>would not be as important and games would lose some

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>sense of urgency, It will allow one or more two

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 2>loss teams to get in, and this past year, as

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 2>an example, might have allowed for a three loss team

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 2>to get into the playoff. If two or three losses

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>gets in, urgency of regular season is effectively gone. That's

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 2>from Augusto not so much a question. This is a

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>generally held viewpoint for a lot of people. Yeah, Ty,

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 2>do you agree with this line of thinking that eight

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>dilutes the interests in a college football postseason because it

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>is too many teams? I would argue that eight out

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>of whatever one hundred and thirty is different than sixty

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 2>four out of three hundred, which are sixty eight out

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>of three hundred. The percentages are sort of different in

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 2>college basketball. But do you agree with this line of

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking that the the season would take on less importance

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>with a bigger playoff. I don't think it diminishes the

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 2>significance of those games down the stretch or at any

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>point in the season. If now we've got eight instead

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of four, I just don't buy it. It's not college basketball.

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 2>As you said, we're not picking sixty eight. We're still

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>only picking eight, and so the stakes are still pretty high.

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Unless you're like you know, the number one team, maybe

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 2>you go out and get blown out. All of a sudden,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 2>your candidacy to be part of that expanded playoff is

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 2>somewhat in question. You're still playing for things that matter.

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>The degrees might be a little bit off compared to

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>what we're used to now in a four team playoffs.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 2>So no, I've never really bought into the whole urgency thing.

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So the thing that stands out to me about this

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>argument is on the surface, it seems reasonable, but you

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think about the context of actual college football seasons and

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>what teams go through, and sometimes you get and by

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I mean it feels like every year you get

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>a team like twenty sixteen USC. They come out the gates,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>they look completely overmatched, but then they switch quarterbacks up,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they get into a rhythm, and all of a sudden,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the season, they've won the Rose Bowl,

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>they have a presumptive number one overall NFL draft pick.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is teams can greatly improve and we're

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>adding I think, let's if we go from a four

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>team playoff to an eight team playoff or adding I

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>believe four games. Is that correct? Four total games in

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the playoff sure, so four more football games. I think

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 1>it's okay to make peace with the fact that college

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>football is a TV show. We all sort of like

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we can watch whatever college football game

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we'd like with minimal efforts, and that's because of TV

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>availability and TV money, and it means more good matchups

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year. Twenty sixteen didn't feel

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>like we had a lot of good matchups throughout the

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>year for whatever reason. It was just one of those years.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>But this basically guarantees a matchup like, I don't know,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Penn State playing against Let's see, you had Michigan and

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Penn State being like, you know, five and six last year, right,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so you have you have Penn State against Alabama, or

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you Penn State against Clemson, you have Michigan against Oklahoma,

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case may be. You get more good football

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year with teams that, even

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>if they don't at the end of the year have

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that clear argument that they deserve to be in the

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>national championship conversation, you're still getting a top tier level

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of additional games and entertainment. So I can't look down

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>at eight games as being like a deathknell for the

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 1>sport that only has twelve regular season games annually to

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>begin with, that's all we get twelve regular season games.

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's such a low number that I think people

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>are going to stick with the sports until maybe it

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>goes to sixty eight.

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sixteen I think would be an interesting argument. When

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 2>you get to sixteen, maybe then maybe then this argument.

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Holds a little bit more water. But at eight, eight

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I think is big enough. Even six. NFL's got twelve

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of what thirty two? Yeah, that's a chunk. People still

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>watch games if he gets to six.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 2>If you get to eight, you can effectively if you

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>want to solve the issue about Power five conference champions

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 2>not getting into the playoff. Yeah, and I think from

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 2>my standpoint that that might be the most important argument

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 2>for it. Let's make sure that we have the best

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>from each conference represented in the National Championship playoff, whatever

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 2>system that is. So, next question, Next question, Alan, has

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the national backlash against Lamar Jackson been so intense that

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 2>he has become underrated? Oh my gosh, Okay, is there

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>a backlash against Lamar Jackson that I was.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Not aware of. I don't know that it's backlash as

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>much as it is him flying under the radar because

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of his maybe the last third of twenty sixteen where

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>he did struggle and the way he finished the bowl

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>game wasn't great. He struggled, but also he had a

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly bad offensive line in front of him. You know,

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they lose something like thirty to nine, twenty nine to

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>nine to LSU in the ballgame. They lose their final

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>three games. You know, the Houston game was sort of

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>everybody watch, you know, the Houston defense against Lamar Jackson,

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was sort of a mess for him as well.

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say he is too far underneath the radar

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for somebody who looked like a Heisman winner the first

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>half of the season with how he played against Florida

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>State and Clemson, and I would say he is. He

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>is poised to have another big year. They have have

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the schedule in front of me, Ty, They have North

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Carolina and Clemson two of the first three weeks of

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the season, so he will be able to make a

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>statement early on. Is if he is too far beneath.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 2>The radar, still only a sophomore last season, you got

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>to give him a little bit of a chance to

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>grow on top of that, though he did sputter down

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 2>the stretch, still put up incredible numbers, thirty five hundred

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 2>yards passing. I think I saw that if he were

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 2>a running back, just in terms of pure yardage, he

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>would have been tenth overall, had something like fifteen hunds

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 2>seventy some odd rushing yards, So really a versatile player

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 2>out there. I think backlash is too strong a word,

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 2>but I agree to the extent that all I'm hearing

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 2>so far this young offseason is Sam Darnold. I'm hearing

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot about Josh Rosen coming back. I'm hearing a

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 2>lot about what Jared Stidham can do, what Shane Burschelle

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 2>can do. Sure, what Jake Browning is going to do

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>in another year in the Chris Peterson system, JT.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Barrett and Kevin Wilson system.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 2>What's going to happen at Clemson, what will happen with

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 2>DeAndre Francois taking another step forward at FSU, Brandon Wimbush

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>at Notre Dame. Strangely, it seems like all of those

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 2>are bigger stories than what Lamar Jackson's going to do.

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the reigning Heisman Trophy winner, what he

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 2>is going to do now in another year at Lousville.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 2>So to that degree, I would I would certainly agree

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 2>with you. Alan backlash going a little bit too far

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 2>from me.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're right, t I've I've heard multiple times in

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple Wheel of Fortune studio audiences it's just Wimbush, whim Bush.

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Can't get enough Wimbush iron man football? Yes? Is this

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a person or an entity who knows? Maybe both? Tye?

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Oregon love the two point conversion slash swinging gate under

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Mark Helfrich and fans cringed. If Notre Dame on side

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 2>kicked every kickoff, would Tie have a meltdown?

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Would Dan laugh?

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 2>So this is this is kind of a discombobulated question here. Yeah,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 2>he's drawing reference to the fact that Oregon liked to

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 2>do their little swinging gate thing under Mark helfrinch right,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>and he's effectively asking, if Notre Dame on side kicked

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 2>every kickoff, would Tie have a melt I you know,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I probably not initially because as you and you talk

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>yourself into it, I would talk myself in there. There's

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 2>a lot of mad scientists in me. Sure I would

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 2>probably find some data point to help back up the

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 2>consistent on side kick for a while for a while

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 2>when things went south, then I'd have the meltdown. I

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 2>have to believe you would be your normal, passive, aggressive

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 2>self throughout the entire process. Is that accurate?

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It is? But I do have like an asterisk, I

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>have a caveat okay, and that is if Notre Dame

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>decided to do what I don't remember the name of

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the high school in Arkansas and never punt and have

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that be their thing, like Notre it's Chip Long the

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>new offensive coordinator. Yes, from Memphis. So if you were

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 1>just saying, you know what, this is what we're gonna do.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna give everybody more reps. We're going to play

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>at least four downs on every single drive. And that's

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>just the way it's gonna be. It doesn't matter unless

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're backed up like inside the five or something like that.

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna give ourselves twenty five percent more plays to

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>play with theoretically, and we're gonna see what happens. I

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>would probably secretly and maybe even overtly on this show

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of be happy about it. Wow. Yeah, all right.

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>If the mathematical scales were tipped in favor of Notre

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Dame intentionally, be like you know what, that's kind of cool.

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, Josh writes in most disrespectful head coach when

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 2>it comes to on field tactics, I don't mean dirty,

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean like gonna embarrass you in multiple ways. Good

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 2>question here, So that kind of circumstance, that kind of

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 2>coach that wouldn't be afraid to hang eighty on you.

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 2>The first one that comes to mind is Brett Beelam,

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>because I know he's done it. Yeah, is there anyone

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>else that comes to mind for you?

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Off the top of your head? Harbaugh a little bit,

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>even though he would he puts in his backups. There's

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>an element of just squeezing the life out of somebody

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that I can't help but admire. Chip Kelly did it

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>at Oregon for all Wick Kelly. I was gonna say,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>chip Kelly did it. Urban Meyer has done it. Urban

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Meyer has. I mean you look about look back at

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>at Jim Harbaugh against Pete Carroll. What's your doing? So

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been proven in multiple places. Urban Meyer to

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a lesser extent, but certainly, you know, you don't get

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>to where he is without having that that sort of

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>murdering mentality. I think Tom Herman has it to a

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>certain degree with the trick plays and the tempo. And

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think who else you know, Brett Beelum

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is the great example. I think Bobby Petrino. I like

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the Paul Johnson that's that's the paper clips thing that

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>he is disrespectful in the best way. Yeah right, I

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>like that when when Georgia Tech teams are humming even Navy,

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that's disrespectful to what they what they do to teams

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>when they just can't quite figure out that flex boone

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is they're running. It's great. I love a

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>good sort of not petty, but just driving the point

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>home option coach. That's pure college football.

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Bliss all right, very quickly, Jared writes in, with the

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>addition of Thomas Tyner, Yeah, does Oregon State have the

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 2>best backfield in Pac twelve?

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>So? Thomas Tyner, five star, former five star recruit running

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>back ran for a million yards in high school from Portland,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>went to the University of Oregon, was on the team

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that appeared in the National Championship Game in twenty fourteen.

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think started in twenty thirteen. Took a medical retirement

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>because of nagging injuries. Has decided to come back and

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>play for Oregon State, who also has Ryan Knall, who

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>was really good down the stretch for the Beaves. I

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>still don't think it's the case that they have the

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>best duo backfield because of the unknown quantity of Thomas

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyner and if he'll be in shape and if he'll

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be that same killer instinct. I think what's in Seattle

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is pretty impressive, what's in Eugene is incredibly impressive. And

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I am optimistic about USC's backfield as well. So I

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>think those schools are ahead right now.

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And finally on the football front, Yes, as we

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 2>fade now into some less serious topics. We got this

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 2>email a couple of weeks ago, about four weeks ago,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and the second I saw it, I knew it was

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 2>something we had to do. Okay, This one is from

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Mike tian Dan. I've been listening to your show since

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.479
<v Speaker 2>early two thousand and nine. I tell everyone I can

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 2>about the show. I even finally bought a shirt. He says,

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 2>I've always loved the popa shot style football arcade games,

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 2>but whenever I look to buy one, they were always

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 2>over one thousand dollars. So I decided to spend two

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars and two hundred man hours to build my own.

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 2>My game is complete with field goals, punts, interceptions, sudden death, overtime,

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 2>and one and two player game modes. This is a

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 2>man after my own heart.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Dan, Yeah, of course.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Now for the reason I'm writing in, I was wondering

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 2>if you guys would like the honor of doing an

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 2>intro when our game starts up. Wow, fifteen to thirty

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>seconds of pregame audio, you have complete and total freedom

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 2>to say whatever you want, just know Ohio State stuff.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>As I am a Michigan fan. So Dan, Yeah, I'm

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>taking this all in. So we get to be the voices,

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the introductory voices.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>We get to be the introductory voices, and I think

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 2>we should we should do something on the fly, because

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that's what you and I do best. Okay, So I'm thinking,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>since he's a Michigan fan, we need to welcome people

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 2>to Michigan Stadium m HM, and then we need to

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 2>find some way to call out former Michigan stars, and

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 2>we need to do it in the cheesiest possible way,

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 2>because this is, after all, an arcade game and those

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 2>are typically cheesy introsu So I'm thinking something the effect

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 2>of like, welcome back to Michigan Stadium. Oh, Manningham, do

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>we have a game for you here today? Oh no,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.479
<v Speaker 2>that's where you're going with this, just something very cheesy.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah all right. So first of all, if he can

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>edit this audio, then he can play around with whatever

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>we're about to say, space it around. So welcome. I'm

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>glad I got to be the first voice.

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Ty I was going to say, you need to do

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the serious XM voice that people know and love, maybe

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the John U.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Bacon voice, because he's a No, I can't do that

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to his game. He's spent too much time on this game.

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm going to do the radio voice to

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be like ladies, a gentleman, welcome to this arcade unit.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Tan, this is danon' tye, and we are

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>excited for you to compete.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Michigan Stadium, Oh Manningham, do we have

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>a game for you here today? What in the name

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of Tim Biakabatuca will happen? Is anyone's guess is the

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 2>next Brady Greasy or Gerbach on the field today?

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>It's time to find out? That was really good. Thank you.

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I just made that up to fly, Yeah, scribbling things

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>down on a pad? Here?

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>How about this one? Ryan Mallett's not going to be

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>transferring away from this fun? Does that work? This is

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the game that Braylan Edwards won't drop the ball in.

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to do like a half NBA jam. I

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know where I'm really going with the voice. We

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>could really have fun with this. We can go is

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that Elvis Gerbak? Nobody knows?

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, Mike, tell us what you can do with that.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Let us know if you want us to try again.

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 2>We need to talk about restaurant etiquette here, all right,

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 2>what do you have? You're the restaurant tour? Why don't

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 2>you tell me where you want to go here?

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure you know what restaurant tour means, but

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>let's start with Okay, So this question I asked around

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the office and it got the most responses. Okay, So

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this one is about double dipping. Okay, Oh good one.

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So this comes to us from brother mazone. Shout out

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to the wire. Double dipping with significant others? Only? If not,

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>how close do you have to be? Family? Very good friends?

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't care. I will extend this to just in general, tie,

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what is your stance on double dick at dipping? And

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>if it is a positive did I say double dicking?

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And if it is a positive pro stance? What is

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>your strategy? What is yourthos when it comes to double

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>dipping across all food sizes and types.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 2>If you're with people you don't know, you can't do

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 2>it at all. You can't do it, no, no matter

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the size of food. No, no, no, no, I'm not not

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>a double dipping fan when you're with people that you

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, So if you're with if you're with let's say

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you're with my family out in California and we order

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>kso dip, I wouldn't do it. I would not do it. No,

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't. What about flipping a corner.

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 2>That hey, this is this is where I was going

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 2>to get into the strategy of the double dip?

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, But like, if you're you're not, so you're saving

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>your flipping for close ones. I don't want to.

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be remembered as the double dipper

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 2>if I'm with people that can't disavow me entirely. Right, So,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 2>if I'm with your family, perhaps you know at some

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 2>gathering say a wedding, if I'm with other friends that

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that I don't see as often, No, I'm never gonna

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm never gonna make that. I'm never going to take

0:31:56.320 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that risk and potentially be labeled as a double dipper.

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Have people think that was raised by wolves. What I

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 2>would say is, if I'm with family, that's when I

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 2>think you go modified double dip. You never dip the

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 2>end of the chip back in that you bit off,

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 2>of course not. You got to flip it around to

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 2>a one eighty and then flip that back half of

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the chip. In that case, I've done that multiple times,

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and I would advise it.

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a solid maneuver. I will echo our

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>pal Ryan Nanny, and his counter to this was, so,

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>why would you not double dip a chip in the

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 1>first place? What is it about? What are you worried about,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting into the universe by double dipping and you.

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Know some some germ sure related, uh, you know, some

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>some spittle whatever, yeah, some something something germ related.

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>On a surface as small as a tortilla chip, are

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you not worried that as you bite into one side

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of the tortilla chip that you're not going to get

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>things on the other side of said tortilla chip, not

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>even an inch further down the down the way.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, the counter argument, if you really want to make one,

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 2>is that you're holding the opposite end of the chip

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 2>with your bare hands. Exactly your hands are there when

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 2>you're dipping it into the salsa or exactly right whatever dip.

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I understand where he's coming from, and he's

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 2>not wrong to make that argument, but the optics of

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 2>biting off one end of the chip and then sticking

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 2>it back into the communal dip pool is not something

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>that I generally want to be caught doing.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing, Ty, I live in New York. I

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>live in New York City. I live in a communal pool.

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>This is true, very true. So at a certain point

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we're all just sort of in it together and let's

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>all dip our mazzarella sticks into this communal marinera like.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>That's just how it's working. And if you're I think

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you also have to judge who you're around, if you're

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>around people that you generally generally regard as being hygienic enough,

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with the flip marinera on take a bite

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>with you're Mazzarella with marinera flip and just go at

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it again. Okay, I think it's okay. Where are we

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>going next?

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Next, let's go to Oh. We have a lot of

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>people asking about waiting for food to arrive. Steven wants

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to know if the orders come out at different times.

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you wait for everybody's food to get there or

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>do you just start digging in?

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 2>I think you wait unless the person or persons who

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 2>are waiting for their meals give you consent to just

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 2>go about and meet your meal.

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh, don't wait for me, just go ahead and right.

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>That makes understood the waiting. That makes it okay.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's just one of those like social norms

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 2>that we're that we're kind of programmed to follow. I

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 2>haven't fully understood it for a long time, but I

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>do abide by it, right.

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's rare that somebody else orders food,

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get the food, and it just never shows up.

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>It's generally there than a minute or two. We're there

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to eat. We all understand that we've gone to this

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>restaurant to eat, and you put a club sandwich in

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>front of me, and you asked me to wait it's

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's tricky. The club sandwich, I guess, is a bad example.

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You put in front of me some fajidas, like I

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>am going to consume these fajitas while warm. I'm not

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 1>waiting for your club salad like. That's just not acceptable.

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I will always say when I don't receive my food,

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>of course eat, and I'll say that as soon as

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the plates go down. I don't wait to see for

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that minute or two to see if my food will

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>come before saying that. Upon plates going down, I make

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it clear that I want everybody to eat, because I

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>believe in the golden rule tie do unto others is

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>other to others do unto you.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 2>I also think the cheaper the meal, the less time

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you're required to wait. So if you're going to like

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Chick fil A with friends and you happen to order

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 2>first and find a seat, I think it's fine if

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you decide to just dig into your spicy chicken sandwich.

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, you're absolutely right. I've got a corollary question, though,

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for an actual restaurant, because from Ryan, Yes, if your

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>waiter forgot to put in your and then lied about

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>why it was taking so long, what's the correct level

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of anger. Ooh, so this happened to me like three

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago at a restaurant. I ordered pizza, and pizza

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>cooks pretty quickly. Sure. I was with the solid fiance

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and a friend of hers. I think her friend ordered

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a piece of fish and the solid fiance ordered like

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>roast chicken. Okay, So in back of my head, I'm

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking there's no way my pizza's coming out in a

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of untimely fashion. Pizza took like twenty I kept

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>getting apologies from the waitress. It took twenty twenty five

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>minutes longer, wow, And I got some excuse like, oh, well,

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's from a separate area of the kitchen, and sometimes

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it's always not great communicating. Like I'm looking at it

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 1>like I've worked in a restaurant. I know exactly what happened,

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like my ticket fell or the somehow the order got misplaced,

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't take that long to make pizza. When

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the pizza came out, it was scalding tie. It was

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>right out of the oven. It wasn't sitting around at all.

0:36:56.440 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't say anything at that point to the waitress.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of wanted to, like I was hungry.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 1>My pizza finally came. I ate it. But I saw

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>our friend Peter Schrager in that restaurant, okay, and he

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>tweeted at me that he saw me. That's how good

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of friends we are, right, you guys are very close.

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>We only very close hit each other. Yeah. But I

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the pizza and I posted a picture

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of the pizza, and the restaurant saw the tweets, and

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I had said something about like pizza was amazing, but

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the service was not great. And the place saw it

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, let me know the next time

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>you come in, we'll take care of you. Wow. So

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that's how I dealt with it after the fact, and

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 1>on social media like a grown up, Okay, what would

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you do if like, very clearly your order of you know,

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>your your stickup wuave is clearly I could never say

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that word stick up wave is clearly being cooked at

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the same rate as everybody else's order, but like it

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't show up for ten, fifteen, seventeen minutes.

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess to further illustrate my beta male identity on

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 2>this show, I'd probably just I probably just waited out

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 2>do a lot of eye rolls and inadvertently do my

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 2>part to make the whole table feel sorry for me.

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 2>It depends who you're with, though, right, I don't really

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 2>it depends who you're with. I also don't really have

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 2>an angry streak. You know. Maybe it's different if you've

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 2>got kids. Neither one of us has kids, right, And

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>obviously that ups the ante and makes the situation a

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 2>little bit more stressful. But I'm not usually an angry

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 2>person in general. Sarcastic, cocky, passive, aggressive, I can do that,

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 2>but I would never truly get angry if I just

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 2>had to wait a little bit longer.

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>But what's a little bit, I'd probably just order another drink,

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, See, I think at a

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>certain point, and it's tough because everybody in the back

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of their head is thinking, are they going to spit

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>my meal? Which I don't. Having worked in restaurants and

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>knowing a lot of people who work in restaurants, I

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's the case. I think that's just sort

0:38:55.480 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of a fallacy. Maybe fast food, maybe that's a situation,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>But in a normal restaurant, I don't see that as happening.

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But let's say you and Kate are out at a

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>standard issue you know, American place. You each order burgers.

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, Kate gets a turkey burger and you get

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>like a salmon burger. You get a cheeseburger, you get

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a bacon cheeseburger. So you expect them to be you know,

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>cooked at the same rate. Ish, you know, maybe yours

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>takes a minute longer because you got baked and whatever

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 1>it is. If your burger is coming, Let's say waiter

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>comes over ten minutes after Kate's burger arrives, and it's like, hey,

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna be one, just me another second, Sorry,

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>we got backed up. You might be like, man, ten

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>minutes is a long time, but will you probably let

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it go fifteen to twenty minutes? Yeah, fifteen, once I

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>get to ten, I'm definitely following up with the But

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 1>at what point? Yeah, so what is your follow up?

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Is your follow up something like, listen, hey, getting my ber.

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>You didn't forget about me, did you? But okay, so

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>at what point are you being assertive? At what point

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>are you saying, listen, it's been twenty five minutes. This

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't this isn't okay. If Kate's finished her meal and

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm still waiting for mine. In that case, will you

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>say it's unacceptable.

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's definitely unacceptable. But also, being a server in

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a restaurant is not always the easiest work, right, all right,

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So I'm respectful of the fact that those folks got

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot going on, trying to manage a bunch of

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 2>different things. And I also don't want to be that

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 2>guy in the restaurant who's a jerk. But if she's finished,

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 2>then I think it's time to be a little bit

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 2>more assertive.

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Are you a jerk? Though? If your food hasn't come

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes after even if she's just sort of finishing

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>up and she's not, No, you're not a job You're

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not a jerk.

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 2>But again, I'm just trying to do my best to

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 2>avoid conflict wherever possible.

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But is it conflict? That's my question. It feels like

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>conflict because if the waiter doesn't bring you your meal

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>within twenty minutes of your dining partner when she gets

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>her meals, that point, it's not the waiter having a

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>tough job. It's the waiter being bad at his job.

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree, all right, where are we going next? We

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>got a bunch of other stuff here. I have a

0:40:56.160 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of thoughts on that you do. You're very thoughtful. Okay.

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it necessary? I like this because this is the

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>flip side of the coin we just talked about unacceptable waiting?

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it necessary? This comes to us from diego to

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>apologize to a server when a member of the party

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>acts like an a hole, for example, snapping fingers, overly demanding.

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it necessary to apologize on behalf of somebody who

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is obviously clearly fine with their own terrible behavior. I

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 1>think so? How do you pull off that maneuver?

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not, maybe not overtly, but yeah, if you have

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to pull the server aside and say, hey,

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry about you know, uncle Bob down there.

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I feel like there's nothing that people agree on

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>more than the discomfort everybody feels when one person is

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>just so awful to somebody serving them food. Yeah, right,

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's the worst thing to be around, snapping

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>like heyhn oh, it's awful, It's the worst. I agree,

0:41:55.440 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Should you tip takeout ty? No? Okay, explain

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>your stance. I've looked this up on the internet. Is

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it absolute for you? No, it's not absolute. Okay.

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's more a frame of mind, a

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 2>state of being, to be perfectly honest with you. But

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 2>case in point, there is a great Asian restaurant right

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 2>down the street that the solid wife and I have

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 2>ordered from quite frequently. Drive down there all the time,

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:27.959
<v Speaker 2>pick up something on a Friday night. It's a good meal.

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I've had to look up multiple times on Google, multiple

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 2>times what the standard protocol is for doing takeout. The

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Internet seems to suggest, and I've looked it up multiple

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 2>times because I didn't believe them the first like eight

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that I read it. The Internet would seem to suggest

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 2>that it's okay to go in, to pay the cost,

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 2>to not tip, and to leave. That would not be

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 2>my normal impulse. But the Internet says it, so it

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 2>must be true. Therefore, of course I do my best

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to avoid tip unless I'm feeling rather generous when I

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>go to any takeout place, I believe that is accepted behavior.

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's okay. I think that's a fine way

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to live. My only caveat is so I worked in

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>take out, like at a barbecue restaurant. I was in

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>charge of takeouts, you know, getting the orders together, sending

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>delivery guys off with their orders to deliver. And I

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 1>would say with that experience, when I've been at restaurants

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that have been like very very busy, where it's hectic,

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the phone's ringing, people are you know, waiting for their orders,

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and I get to the restaurant and they're still kind

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and just thoughtful, that's a good first step. And if

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's something like, hey, we're swamped, it'll be like three minutes,

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>It'll be like five minutes. Is that cool? Like obviously

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a choice in the matter, but like

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, giving you the heads up like sure, fine,

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and then they give you the food and it's something like, hey,

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I tossed in a couple extra garlic rolls. Thanks for

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>being so patient. They're doing you a solid. Then yeah. Also,

0:43:57.600 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>if you have like a personal relationship, like you see,

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, regular type of person, like you're going to

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this place once or twice a week, and you know,

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you joke around with the personal they're waiting, there's a

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>baseball game on, you crack a couple jokes together something

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like that. I'll throw you a dollar or two just

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>because it's not making a huge difference, but it's an

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>acknowledgment of like, thanks for doing your job so well.

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I will do that, but with any normalcy, I generally

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:26.959
<v Speaker 1>tend not to but ty if it's a complex order

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's so complex that I feel better about ordering

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in a strange, inconvenient way that I'm actually going to

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>check the order while I'm at the restaurant to make

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>sure they got it right. And you'll do the tip

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 1>and they got it right, like, you know what, thank

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you for being so attentive you throwing a tip? All right?

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, kind of on the heels of that question, Alec

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 2>writes in he says, what are the acceptable circumstances for

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>not leaving a tip?

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'll.

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Kind of expand this out here because we got a

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 2>couple other tipping questions, but not leaving a tip, deciding

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 2>how much tip to leave? What are the factors that

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you consider?

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 1>How the server was just as a human talking to you,

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, paying attention. If it takes forever for them

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to even come over to your table, if it takes

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 1>forever for you to like, if all these things had up,

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:19.319
<v Speaker 1>it takes forever them come over and acknowledge you. It takes

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>forever to come get your drink order, takes forever to

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>bring your drinks, takes forever to take your actual food order,

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>takes forever for the food to come out. You know,

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>no apologies, no explanation. You know, sometimes there's just like

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one server for forty tables, and it's just a mess.

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:37.919
<v Speaker 1>When there's no explanation, when they're dismissive, when they try

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to upsell everybody, and just when they waste your time.

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I won't say that I won't tip them outright, but

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's probably not going to be a great move

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:51.800
<v Speaker 1>from my wallet to yours.

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I've never not left a tip because I don't think

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 2>i've done that either.

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I recognize that it's a chaotic job.

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a hard job. I've never worked in a restaurant,

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 2>but everyone knows someone who has. It's not an easy job.

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot going on. So I respect that the

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 2>floor for me is ten percent. The absolute floor for

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 2>me is ten percent, and that is someone who is

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>not attentive, screws up the order, isn't nice. All of

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:23.720
<v Speaker 2>those factors could contribute to a ten percent tip generally, though,

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent's the average, and if someone's really nice, we'll

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 2>we'll move it up a little bit, throw them a

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 2>few extra bucks if it's someone who's really just enhancing

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the dining experience.

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Ty. This comes to us from Josh, Is it ever

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>okay for two people on a date to sit next

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to each other on the same side of the table?

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Good question. I'm not talking about a dinner date with

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>another couple. This is just two people who choose to

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>sit next to each other, like at a table for four,

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>or like you know, a table that's meant for two

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting across from each other. But then they go to

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the same small side of the table and leave two

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>vacant seats across from them. Wow, that's from Josh. I've

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody has seen this. Yeah, I assume have you done this?

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 1>And how do you feel about it when you see it?

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You know? I have done it? Okay? And the primary

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>reason I've done it under the table stuff. No, okay.

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 2>The primary reason I've done it is because some restaurants

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 2>are very loud, and if you're in a situation where

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to have a conversation but the restaurant's too loud,

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 2>then it behooves you to sit on the same side.

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Never for any like romantic purposes anything like that, right,

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 2>purely for the sake of having a conversation. I feel

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 2>like I've been programmed from such an early age to

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 2>sit on the opposite side to balance out.

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>The table eye contact. Man. Yeah, it just it just

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>feels awkward to me to be on the same side

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. What about sharing a corner, Sharing your corner

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is a little different. Sure, it's a little different.

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you're at a square table, you know, to

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 2>be on adjacent sides of the square I think is fine. Yeah,

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 2>but in the bench scenario, that to me is just

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 2>it's just different. It's beyond the norm. I know some

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 2>people swear, but I'm just not into that thing.

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's where I would say it's acceptable. One under the

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>table stuff aforementioned. Okay, you know, who am I to judge?

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Who am I to judge? Number two? If you are

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 1>someplace that has a view for one person but not

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a view for somebody else. If you're on an outdoor

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>patio that's overlooking.

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 2>The cliffs in the Pacific Ocean, Yeah, why do I

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 2>have to sit with my back to this beautiful view?

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you find a way. It doesn't have to

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>be both of you facing it exactly, but you angle

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on the same side. I think that's

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>totally defensible. Three. I would say if you are in

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a situation where the people watching is pretty like I

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>was in Paris last year with the solid fiance, and

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the tables are actually like those are

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>how the chairs are positioned. There's small tables built for two.

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But you're on a side sidewalk cafe, you're eating like cheese,

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you're drinking wine, whatever it is, and you get to

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 1>look at Paris together. That's unique for me. I don't

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>know if it's unique for you, but that is a

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>unique experience for me, and I felt totally comfortable sitting

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>on the same side at the table and chillin' on

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>a Parisian street. So I think it is acceptable for

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>any of those reasons, but most notably under the tables. Yeah, okay,

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. Let's do two more. Okay, I'm trying to

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:36.839
<v Speaker 1>see what is your personal tip percentage scale based on

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>server slash. What's the least you've ever tipped? We went

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 1>over the second part, but Tyd, what is your personal

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is very personal, it is extremely personal. What

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is your tipping scale? Will you go over twenty, will

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you go under fifteen? If it's not abysmal.

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, I generally go twenty. Twenty is usually

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the starting point. Ten is the floor.

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I have been known to sometimes go above twenty, but

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 1>only what are the circumstances? Yeah, are the What does

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>exceptional means to you? Server has to have a sense

0:50:08.719 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of humor?

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I'm going it comes over who again enhances

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.479
<v Speaker 2>the dining experience overly eager to serve?

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure, and if they've got jokes, then I think the

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>jokes are worth a couple extra bucks. It's usually a

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>joke thing for me.

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 2>Or if they go above and beyond, if they throw

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.760
<v Speaker 2>in something extra, then I'll go above twenty.

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm really easy, tie, I generally go around bed twenty.

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But if a service, I'm a big sauce guy, as

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, So if I order a club sandwich

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:39.359
<v Speaker 1>with the side of barbecue sauce. So if I art

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>o a burger and I want a side of like

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand Islands to at my frizen because that's delicious, and

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they bring me two sides, like, hey, you made a

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>point of saying you like, you know, a side of barbecue.

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So I brought you a couple of them, like, oh,

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm so easy to melt like that tie extra sauce

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>will do it for me every time. Jokes are fine,

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 1>personality is great, really good recommendations. If you don't know

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:01.759
<v Speaker 1>what to order and they're like, no, get the get

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the crispy duck, and it's outstanding that, that's when I

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>might go over.

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I will also add one other scenario here, and this

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 2>works one hundred percent of the time on me. Yeah,

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 2>any instance in which it seems like I'm sticking it

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to the man, like oh, hey, somebody ordered this drink

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:28.359
<v Speaker 2>but they left. You wouldn't be interested in it for free?

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Would you? Absolutely? Oh something with it?

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 2>We accidentally made this extra order of fries. Would you

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:41.799
<v Speaker 2>be interested? Absolutely? Of course, any And it works even

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:44.840
<v Speaker 2>if they're lying. It works on me one hundred percent

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of the time. If I feel like I'm sticking it

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 2>to the.

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Man, you bring me a free dessert. Hey, this one's

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on the house. Oh yeah, place, I'll make up for

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that in the tip. Absolutely one hundred percent. All right,

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>let's close out with the hypothetical tie. We haven't done

0:51:57.000 --> 0:51:58.840
<v Speaker 1>one in a while, and it's sort of related. Sure

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:00.320
<v Speaker 1>do we have the sound or do you want me

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to make it myself. I'd like to hear you make it.

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:07.719
<v Speaker 1>That was beautiful. Okay, that was pretty good. Okay. We

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>came up with this stay in the office. It's related

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to food, it's related to physique tie. Would you rather

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 1>be your fully maximized physical self sounds dirtier than intended?

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather be jacked to the level that you

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>would ideally like to be jacked? Two? So strength, you know,

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>six pack, eight pack, you've got, you know, big muscles,

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lean muscles, whatever, your tan. You know you look exactly

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>physically like you believe you are maxed out. Okay, And

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>no matter what you eat, you will not change physically.

0:52:40.400 --> 0:52:42.359
<v Speaker 1>You want pizza every night for the rest of your life.

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You are still going to look like that tie, that

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 1>ideal tie. But on the inside it will still do

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you a little. It'll still rather at your body. It

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:56.320
<v Speaker 1>will still your cholesterol, your blood pressure, sodium levels, your arteries, whatever.

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So you've got to balance the fact that you know

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get fat and you're look like

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>your ideal self with the fact that you are still

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to do damage to the inside. Okay, or you

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>are forever going to be as you are, and you

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.880
<v Speaker 1>won't have extreme fluctuations. You'll probably be you know, you

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>can gain or lose to five pounds whatever something like that,

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but you're never gonna be your fully realized self. You're

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 1>never gonna be jacked, You're never gonna be ripped, You're

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>never gonna be yoked. You're gonna be as tan as

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you want. And you can't eat whatever you want without

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:31.839
<v Speaker 1>gaining weight. But you can eat whatever you want and

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.319
<v Speaker 1>it will do no damage to you on the inside.

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:37.919
<v Speaker 1>So you can eat as much pizza as you need,

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:43.360
<v Speaker 1>many burritos, as much queso, and your blood pressure remains

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the same. You're not gonna get all that fat. You're

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:47.399
<v Speaker 1>gain a little bit of weight, but nothing extreme. Given

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>your extreme diet, everything will stay the same on the inside.

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 2>See, I'm inclined to say that I'd prefer the fully

0:53:56.560 --> 0:54:00.080
<v Speaker 2>physically maximized version of myself of.

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Live hot, die young.

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Whatever I eat now affects the inside of my body.

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I might not be my fully realized self, but I'm

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 2>used to that situation where you kind of have to

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 2>figure out, Okay.

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Is this good for me? Is this not good for me? Sure?

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:17.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's sort of like everyday life right now, with

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the exception of I don't have.

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.480
<v Speaker 1>To go to the gym nearly's often. So you'd rather

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:26.760
<v Speaker 1>be jacked than have nutritional freedom, I think so, because

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't have nutritional freedom. Now, well, you would have

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.160
<v Speaker 1>nutritional freedom if you look like what you look like,

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you can need whatever you want and it's fine. H

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm used to where I'm at. Now, let's

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>take the fully maximized version of myself and let's just

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>deal with it as best we can. I think I'm

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:45.279
<v Speaker 1>taking number two. Yeah, I think I'm taking option number

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>two because there are just there's so many meals that

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I have are like, well, see, you would be a

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>good person for number two, right, I'm kntent eating like

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:55.479
<v Speaker 1>a bird every day, the same thing day and day out.

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily need the variety and the level of

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sophistication in the palette that you seem to Salads are

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 1>just such bummers. Tie, I'm a Sally guy. I like that.

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I know. I'm okay with it. It's rough you went

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>every day. I think I'm going number two, okay, And

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a weird thing to say out.

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Arry weird thing to close out the show with. Think

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm going number two? Fair enough, there it is, I

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 2>stand by it. On that note, yeah, don't forget to

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 2>check out our good friends over at proper Cloth. Something's

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 2>always off when you try to get a dress shirt. Luckily, now,

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 2>ordering a custom fit shirt has never been easier thanks

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 2>to proper Cloth. They guarantee you perfect fit, meaning that

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 2>if somehow your shirt doesn't fit, they will acquit.

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:43.600
<v Speaker 1>They'll make it for free. Good job. Stop wearing shirts

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that don't fit.

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:48.479
<v Speaker 2>Propercloth dot com slash Solid gift code Solid save twenty

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 2>bucks on your first shirt, Dan Rubinstein, So I got

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:53.120
<v Speaker 2>enjoy the rest of.

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Your week wherever you.

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:57.879
<v Speaker 2>Are, ah Man the Grecian Aiir, the rest of your

0:55:57.920 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 2>trip for that go there and Rubinstein in parts unknown

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 2>for myself, Tie hilden Brandt here and good old us

0:56:04.640 --> 0:56:07.080
<v Speaker 2>of a catch you next week in the Solid there

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 2>once they solid peace. H