WEBVTT - Detecting Scams Through Critical Thinking

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host job and Strickland.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? You know? Since we're wrapping up my

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>run as host of tech Stuff, I thought it might

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>be a good time to revisit one of the guiding

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>principles of this show, that being critical thinking. I've always

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>said Tech Stuff really has two guiding principles, critical thinking

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and compassion. That only with both of these can you,

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, live an accountable and decent life. You

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>need to have compassion so that you're not a total jerk,

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and you need to have critical thinking so you're not

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>a total dip. And critical thinking is absolutely important in

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>all aspects of life. I like to bring it up

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>within the context of technology because tech is both incredibly

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>complicated and it also touches our lives every single day

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>in hundreds or thousands of ways. And if we don't

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>think critically, we can make some pretty darn huge mistakes,

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>either through incorrect assumptions or because someone has led us astray.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Tech is one of those disciplines that is well suited

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for misunderstanding and for misdirection. Because of that complexity, there's

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff we can do in tech that seems almost magical,

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and the jargon around tech can be really difficult to

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>parts like. That's not to say that all the jargon

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>or the terminology is inherently bad. That's not really the

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>case either. There are lots of terms that are very specific,

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and the reason why we use them is so that

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we communicate clearly what we mean and we avoid ambiguity.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But then there's the flip side of it, where if

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you laiden something down with enough jargon, it becomes indecipherable.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't even understand what's being said. I think the

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimate expression of how jargon can become gibberish is the

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>humorous script for the fictional turbo incabulator. This was a gag.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>This was just a fake thing, a fake piece of technology,

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>with a script that was intentionally made to be comedically

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>dense with jargon meaningless jargon. So I did an episode

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>about this ages ago. But let me do a quick

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>excerpt from that script. So here's how it typically starts.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>And there are multiple versions of this online. By the way,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>if you search turbo incabulator on YouTube. You should come

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>up with quite a few different versions of it, and

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>they are all variations on this same theme. So here

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we go. For a number of years now, Yorick has

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>conceived idea of a transmission that would not only supply

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in verse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors,

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grameters.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Such an instrument is the turboincabulator. Now, basically the only

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>new principle involved is that instead of power being generated

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it is

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>produced by the modial interaction of magneto reluctance and capacitive directants.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>The original machine had a base plate of prefamulated emultes

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that the two sperving bearings were in a direct line

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with a panametric fan. Now the piece goes on from

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>there a little bit longer, and you get the point. Though.

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a send up of those technical manuals that

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>would have so much jargon in them as to become

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>almost meaningless that you can't really parse what is being said,

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and you feel like you have to look up every

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>other word just to try and figure out what the

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>meaning is, and you might ultimately come to the conclusion

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that even the person who wrote it doesn't really know

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what the meaning is. That's the joke, but it's based

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in reality. You know, there are those technical manuals out

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there that are so jargon heavy as to be almost

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a self parody, and this opens up opportunities for people

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>who have underhanded motivations to try and mislead folks in

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to get something out of them, usually money.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>That's typically what it is, is that you have someone

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>who is leaning on ignorance to pull one over on

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a victim. So I've really been thinking again about scam

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>artists and investment schemes. Now that's something that spans well

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 1>beyond the tech sector. It's not just tech that sees

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of things, but I think it's safe to

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>say the tech world is particularly prone to such shenanigans,

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>largely because a clever huckster can convince people that something

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that is implausible or perhaps even impossible, is actually achievable

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>just through the wonders of technology. And again it's easy

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to understand how this could happen, how people could fall

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>for these kinds of things, because consider the technology that

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you interact with on a daily basis. Our computers are

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>phenomenally powerful these days. You can have a computer that

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>has processors in it that allow it to do AI

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>processing on your machine. That is something that was unthinkable

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>only a few years ago. And most of us carry

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a small computer around in our pockets, and you can

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>use that computer to do everything from make a phone

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>call if you're an old fuddy duddy like me, or

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>use it to look stuff up online. Or you can

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>use it to take photos or video. You could even

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>edit those images and those videos and then upload them

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to social platforms. You know, there's a lot of cool

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff you can do with that one device. Or you

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>can jump in a car. Now, your typical modern car

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>has remarkable technology in it, and depending on the car,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it might even be able to drive itself under specific conditions.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>We've also got things like home automation, and then they're

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>scary stuff like targeted advertising. We've got things that can

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>be either cool or scary, depending upon how they are

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>made and what they're supposed to do, like drones and

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of other things that you know. Back when

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, I would have thought belong in

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>science fiction, But today they're commonplace. So we've become used

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to technology being able to do incredible things. So it's

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>understandable that if someone were to come to us with

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary claim about tech, we might be tempted to

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>believe in the dream right from the start. I mean,

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid, I certainly didn't think I

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>would see a day where I would be carrying a

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>computer around with me everywhere I went. So why can't

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we have a device that's the size of a desktop

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>printer that could run more than one hundred medical tests

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on the tiniest drop of blood. That, of course, was

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the point of Thernose, the biotech company that was purporting

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to create a desktop medical analysis machine, one that ultimately

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>could end up being sold to consumers. Not just something

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that would be found in clinics or whatever, but you

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>could own one of these things and you would take

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a very tiny pinprick of blood, and then you could

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>run tests that not only would tell you if there

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>was anything currently wrong with you, but also analyze your

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>blood to look for potential things to look out for

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>down the road, right conditions or diseases that you might

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be prone to developing in the future, so you could

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be on the lookout for that kind of stuff, like

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you could say, hey, you know, you could be pre

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>diabetic or something along those lines. The problem was, of course,

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't work. It certainly didn't work the way

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it was being advertised. Even while it was under development,

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the company Theranose was found out to be using other

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>companies technologies to analyze blood samples. They were taking larger

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>samples of blood than what they were supposed to do,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>because again, it was supposed to be a microdrop of blood,

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but they couldn't get that to work. So they would

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>take larger samples of blood or sometimes small samples, and

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>then they would dilute it with water, hoping that that

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't mess things up too much spoiler alerted mess things

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>up too much. Then they would run those samples through

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>other companies analytic technology, not their own one. They would

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>make it seem like it was in their own technology,

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>but it really wasn't. They never really cracked the code

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on this, and in fact, there were plenty of people

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>who were concerned that it was inherently impossible. That people thought, well,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of course technology should be able to do this, without

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>really taking the time to understand the limitations of the

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>technology they were talking about. And there still stands a

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>question to this day as to whether the founder, Elizabeth Holmes,

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>whether she truly believed in the technology or if she

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>was aware early on that she was running up against

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>a brick wall, but of going because at that point

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>she already had huge amounts of investment behind her. This

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was one of those examples of the fake it till

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you make it strategy, where you come up with an idea,

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you think the idea is really cool, you don't have

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the foggiest notion of how you're going to make that

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>idea reality, but you go ahead and you create a

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>business around it, and you get investment behind it, and

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>then you figure somewhere along the way, we'll figure it out.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll get the smartest people, We'll put them to work

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on this problem. They'll engineer a way out of it

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and will be good. In the case of THERAPNHOS, that

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>just didn't happen. Instead, it was a business built around

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>an ideal, but it was also built around lies and

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>smoke and mirrors, and ultimately it all came crashing down.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what I wanted to talk about.

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why I want to talk about critical thinking, because

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking would have saved a lot of people a

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of money if they had been willing to ask

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the right questions to the right people and to really

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>heed those answers, could have, you know, saved themselves millions

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of dollars of losses. And I don't particularly feel the

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>need to cry over rich people losing some percentage of

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>their mass amount of wealth. It doesn't really bother me

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that much. But when it falls to people who can't

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>afford to lose money, that's where I get really concerned.

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And I also just worry that the complacency, the tendency

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to accept things at a surface level, trickles down economics.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think trickle down properly, but ignorance certainly can.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the opportunity comes in for scam artists,

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>whether they are purposefully attempting to fool victims into handing

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>over large amounts of cash, or they've actually deluded themselves

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>into believing in an unproven technology. The tech world is

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>complex and amazing enough to provide the perfect environment for

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a con. So in this episode, when we come back

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>from this break, we're going to talk about a couple

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of notable examples of cons and scams that have happened

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in and around the tech industry and why critical thinking

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is so very important. But first, let's take a quick

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsors. So a lot of scams,

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>not just in the tech world but elsewhere, follow a

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pattern like the pyramid scheme, or more specifically, the Ponzi scheme.

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>The Ponzi scheme is named after a guy who was

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>named Charles Ponzi scheme. Oh no, I'm sorry, it's just

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Charles Ponzi. He was not the first to come up

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with this particular scheme. By the way, there was a

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>woman who pulled essentially the exact same thing, but you

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>know what, she had the gall to be a woman,

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So obviously we need to name the scheme after a

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>dude who did it years later. That's just me being

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a little snarky, But anyway, the basic concept is you

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 1>convinced people to invest in your business idea and then

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get some sort of insane return on

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>their investment, typically on a very aggressive timeline. So Ponzi,

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, claimed that people who bought into his business

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>proposition would start getting a fifty percent return on their

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>investment within a month and a half, like forty five days.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a crazy amount of return. And the way he

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>would guarantee this, the way he would cover those returns

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because like his business wasn't a business, it was just

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>robbing Peter to pay Paul. Essentially, he would use money

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>from subsequent rounds of investors to show his earlier rounds

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of investors how well the plan was going. So let's

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>break this down with a really simplified explanation of what

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was going on. So let's say that you are a

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>low down, no good crook and you have convinced me

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to put one hundred of my American dollars in our

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>business proposition. And in the meantime, after I have already

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>put one hundred dollars in, you then turn to convince

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>other people to give you money in a subsequent round

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of investments. And forty five days after you hooked me,

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, good news, Johnny boy. Your investment has

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a fifty dollars return on it. Already do you want

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>your payout. Do you want to get your fifty bucks

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and keep your one hundred dollars in as your initial investment.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And what you're counting on is what a lot of

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>people actually would do. I see an opportunity to get

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>filthy rich, Right, I just got fifty dollars back on

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred dollars investment. That's still good. The investment

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is still in the business. The fifty dollars is like

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a dividend being paid out to me. So what I

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>say is, oh, you know what, No, no, no, just

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>hold on to that fifty dollars, reinvest it back into

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the business because I'm thinking, well, now I'm going to

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have one hundred and fifty dollars invested. I'm going to

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>get even more money because the returns are going to

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>keep coming in. Meanwhile, you're looking for your next round

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of investors to help cover the returns of not just me,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>but the people you fooled in investment round number two.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And this goes on and on until it doesn't because

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>these schemes ultimately reach a point where there's just no

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>way to get enough people to join in order to

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>cover everybody who is already bought into the scheme, and

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>folks then might start to worry that something might be

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>up and they might start to try to pull their

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>money out of this business. And then you have to

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out, well do I pay out? And if I

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>do pay out, how much do I pay out? Before

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I need to just pull up stakes, move out of town,

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>change my name, and hide all my wealth away or

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you get nicked by the coppers, you know, and then

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you're put before a judge and then you're fine to

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>timbuck to and back and then thrown in the whoscal

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for good measure. So in the tech space, these pyramid

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>schemes happen fairly regularly, particularly in realms like cryptocurrency. You

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>got blockchain and crypto evangelists out there who will try

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to convince greedy people to pour money into a system

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>only to lock down that money and then run off

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with it. And that's just rampant. It's not I'm not

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>making a wild accusation here. You can actually go to

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the website DFPI, dot CAA, dot gov and just look

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>at their cryptoscam tracker, or you know, just search cryptoscam tracker.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It'll pull it right up. That tracker lists dozens of

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>cases in which victims have been parted from their hard

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>earned assets. The stories are pretty similar. Usually it involves

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>someone being convinced to put a significant amount of money

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>into some sort of crypto scheme, only to have that

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>account locked off. Like usually there are steps to it

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>where first they're told, hey, in order to do anything

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>with this money, you actually need to increase the investment

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>by x amount, So like you might put five thousand

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of assets into an account and it says, well,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we need three thousand dollars more in order to really

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>do anything with it. Then you might start getting notifications

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that hey, you're your account's doing really well, like its

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>increased your wealth by x amount. But you find out

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>when you try to withdraw that you're locked out. And

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>then next thing you know, the website doesn't even exist

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>anymore and someone has made off with your money. This

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>happens a lot in the crypto world, and again it's

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>understandable why con artists are drawn to crypto. You have

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin that's trading at near one hundred thousand dollars per

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>coin these days. I think today it's down to ninety

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>five thousand. It had been flirting with one hundred thousand

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>last week. And it's absolutely true that if you had

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>bought into bitcoin in the very early days and you

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>were able to keep track of your digital wallet and stuff,

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>then you would be wicked wealthy today. Let's say that

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you have bought like a dollar's worth of bitcoin back

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in twenty ten, Holy canoli. You know, bitcoin was a

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>fraction of a dollar back in those days, so you

0:16:55.440 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>would have a huge amount of wealth represented in bitcoin today. Now,

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>set aside all the other stuff about bitcoin that I

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>personally find very concerning, like the environmental impact and the

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>prevalent use of bitcoin to do stuff like launder money

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and fund a legal activities and that kind of thing.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>The fact is bitcoin made a few people very, very wealthy,

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's understandable that people want to jump on some

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 1>other perceived opportunity. And cryptocurrency is complicated enough that a

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>con artist can count on a victim's ignorance to do

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the work for them. The average person

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really understand how cryptocurrency works, whether it's a proof

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of work or proof of stake system. The average person

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>just sees number go up, you know, or sometimes number

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 1>go down. But to the average person, cryptocurrency might as

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>well just be a black box. You put money into

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>it and then a whole lot more money comes out

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>of it. That's an ideal situation to run a scam.

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>People see this as an easy way to increase wealth.

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>They understand that there's risk, but most people don't think

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that the bad stuff's going to happen to them. You know,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>most people don't live their lives that way, and a

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people can't even imagine that a bad outcome

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>will happen. They've seen the evidence of Hey, bitcoin made

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>people into billionaires, why not me? NFTs fall into this

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>category two. Now, that's not to say that NFTs have

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no legitimate use cases. I think that NFTs have

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>potential use cases. The problem is the incredible saturation of

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the market back in like twenty twenty to twenty twenty two,

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>combined with rampant speculation, created a ridiculous bubble that inflated

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so fast and bursts so spectacularly that to this day,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>NFTs are digging out of the hole that was left behind.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, a ton of NFTs that at one point

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>or another were being touted as the next big asset

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>are now worthless, not virtually worthless. They're literally worthless. So

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>let's just talk about NFTs for us a moment to

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>refresh ourselves. So NFT stands for non fungible token. It

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is a digital token. It's built on top of the blockchain,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and purchasing an NFT creates a digital record, and that

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>record proves that you are the owner of this digital asset.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>But that asset is effectively a receipt like it's not

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a specific thing. Like if I bought an NFT that

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>represents a digital photograph, the NFT isn't the photograph. The

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>NFT is a token that represents the photograph. So you

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>could think of it as I've got a certificate that

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>proves on the owner. That's kind of what it is. However,

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>an NFT doesn't mean that you actually control the asset itself,

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>nor does it mean you can prevent someone else from

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>making endless copies of that asset. So if I did

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>buy an NFT that represents a digital photograph, and that

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>photograph is up on the web somewhere, nothing stops people

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>from making copies of that image. They can make them

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 1>all day long. Plus I don't own the copyright to

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that image. Necessarily unless that was part of the NFT agreement. Otherwise,

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I just own a copy of this photo. I don't

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>own the copyright to the photo itself. The original photographer

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or the company representing that photographer owns that. So let's

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>say someone minted an NFT representing a digital copy of

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a novel. If I bought the NFT, would that mean

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually bought the novel itself? Would the novel belong

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to me? Would I have ownership of its IP? No,

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of course not. It would be similar to me going

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>out to a bookstore and buying a hard print copy

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of the book. If I go out and buy the

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>latest Stephen King novel at a bookstore, I don't suddenly

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>own the intellectual property. I just own a copy of

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>a book. That's it. Which is why I, like a

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people, got really confused when a crypto

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>group called Spice dao. DAO actually is an initialism. It

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>stands for a decentralized autonomous organization. That's something else we

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>could talk about as far as the potential for scam dao.

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Not that all DAOs are scams, they're not, but that

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>because they are a little tricky to understand, they are

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a good breeding ground for scams. There's the ignorance you

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>can feed off of. Well. Spice DAO got famous because

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this group pulled together a couple of million dollars from

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>its various members, and their purpose was to buy a

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>copy of a book. It was a book that detailed

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the failed attempt of Alejandro Jodorowski's film adaptation of the

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>science fiction novel Doune, and that production failed spectacularly, and

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this book detailed that failure and the vision of that

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>original adaptation. Well, the DOAO intended to purchase this book

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and then sell NFTs representing parts of the book, essentially

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>slicing the book up into digital segments and selling NFTs

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>representing those segments, and then they were going to to

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>actually burn the physical copy that they had purchased. So

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>their thought was the digital NFTs would be the only

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>remnant of this rare book. But here's the wild and

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>wacky thing. They didn't realize that buying the book only

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>meant that they were buying a physical copy of this book.

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>They wouldn't have the right to do what they were

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.239
<v Speaker 1>planning to do. In fact, they expressly did not have

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the right to reproduce the book in such a way,

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>because that violates copyright and they wouldn't own the copyright,

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So they ended up spending more than one hundred times

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the estimated value of the book in an effort to

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>carry out the scheme that they ultimately couldn't follow through on. Also,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to add insult to injury, you could actually already access

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the contents of that book online for free. So you

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>know that was a huge missed swing right there. Now,

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>that particular whoopsie was due to a misunderstanding of copyright

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>law more than NFT technology. But the hoopla around NFTs

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>fueled the frenzy that led to that goof in the

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>first place. People were so excited about the potential for

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>NFTs to get rich. Most people were just looking at

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as a way to get rich quick. They weren't asking questions,

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>they weren't pausing to say, wait a minute, does this

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>make sense? And if they had, they might have come

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion of, oh, no, this doesn't. This would

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be an enormous waste of our money, and the auction

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>house would be getting way more cash than they were expecting. Again,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily feel hurt by rich people losing or

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>gaining lots of money at the expense of each other.

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>If the rich want to eat each other, that's fine

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>by me. And by the way, this is why I

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>cautioned people not to get swept up in hype for

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>things that surround technology. Like it's good to be excited

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>about stuff and to be passionate about stuff, but you

0:23:55.760 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>have to also temper that with critical thinking. I'll talk

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>about that more in just a moment, but first let's

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. Okay, before the break, I was

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about how you know, passion is good, being excited

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>for stuff is good. It can be a lot of fun,

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but that you should maintain critical thinking in order not

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to get carried away. I think that's really important to

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>remember right now. I mean, it's it's probably not as

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>prevalent as it was a couple of years ago. I

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>think the NFT thing really took a lot of steam

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>out from some other movements, but those movements are still happening.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you encounter stuff like people talking about Web

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>three point zero, I would be cautious. Now, that's not

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to say that some aspect of some version of Web

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>three point zero won't eventually become a really big thing,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe a crucially important thing, But I would be skeptical

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of any grandiose claims around Web three points oh or

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>like something like the metaverse, which is often conflated or

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>presented in conjunction with Web three point zero. I'd be

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>careful about anything like that, especially people who are claiming

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be the future of the Internet

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even the future of computing itself. Be careful

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>around those types of claims. Maybe they're gonna turn out

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to be true. But I feel like a lot of

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>people who really push the narrative on things like metaverse

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or Web three point zho are the same people who

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>have already heavily bought into those ideas. They have sunk

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of their own personal wealth into these ideas,

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and their realization on their investment is entirely dependent upon

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>other people also buying into it, so they have an

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>incentive to get other folks excited about these things, whether

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>or not the things are worthy of being excited about,

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Like there might not be enough there for it to

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>really be, you know, a viable concept, but that's not

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>really important if you're just trying to get people to

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>buy in so you can make your money back. So

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, things like web three point zero and metaverse.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>They are vague, they are poorly defined because no one

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>has really made these things yet. There's been a lot

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of talk around them, and some discussions of some points

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of common threads among the different variations that are presented

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to people, but there's no firm definition for either web

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>three or metaverse, which means you have ambiguity. And when

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you have ambiguity, that's a recipe for confusion and potential deception.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 1>That's when you have to employ that critical thinking. You

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have to ask questions, and if you get non answers,

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like if it starts sounding like a political debate where

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>a candidate has asked a question and then they just

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>spend the next minute not answering that question and talking

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>around it, I say it's best to just get the

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>heck out of that conversation and keep your money safe.

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it means you'll miss out on an opportunity, that

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is a possibility, but I think more often than not,

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it means that the only opportunity you missed out on

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was saying goodbye to your money. So let's talk about

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>some more investment scams that involved the world of tech,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and one of these actually is not an investment scam.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a bookkeeping scam. And it was interesting because

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 1>it was a tech company, a telecommunications company, that was

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>guilty of this. And in part this act was in

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>an effort to not just fool external partners like stakeholders,

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>shareholders that is, but also people within the company itself.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about WorldCom. This was a wild story from

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands. I actually remember when this happened.

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't that long after Enron, which was another huge

0:27:55.160 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>scandal when it came to finances. So, once upon a time,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the telephone system had companies that were in charge of

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>handling long distance phone calls. You remember when that was

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a thing. That's something that a lot of us haven't

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>had to think about for a very long time these days.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But in the early two thousands, world Com was the

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>second largest long distance telephone company in the United States,

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and it became headline news due to a massive accounting scandal,

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was made to look like the company was

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>doing really well, when in fact it was already starting

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to spiral out of control. But they didn't want the

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>outside world to know that they were spiraling. They being

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>certain leaders at world Com and so they came up

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>with a plan to make it appear as though world

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Com was doing quite well when it wasn't, and even

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>folks within the company had no clue about what was

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>actually happening until an internal audit brought up some very

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sticky questions. And when I say that people didn't know

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.719
<v Speaker 1>what was going on, that included people who were engaged

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in the activities themselves of like covering stuff up because

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they were being told by their bosses to do specific things.

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>They didn't understand why they were being told to do it,

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So it was one of those you know, I was

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>only following orders kind of situations where you don't even

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>really understand why you're doing what you're doing and you

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>only find out later that it was part of a

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent scheme. So, leading up to the early two thousands,

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>WorldCom was actually doing pretty darn well. It was leasing

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>phone lines from AT and T for really, you know,

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>cheap prices. Then it was turning around and taking these

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>least phone lines and offering them to customers for really

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>competitive rates. So you know, they're they're charging more than

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they're paying because otherwise you go out of business, right,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But they're not charging a whole lot more, and so

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to scale up and get lots of customers,

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and it worked. They got a lot of cash, which

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they then started to use to acquire other companies at

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a pretty incredible pace. And when you buy up companies,

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you accrue a lot of debt in the process. You

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>typically have to take out loans to do this, and

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>WorldCom was buying lots of companies. Now, keep in mind,

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this is around the same time that we saw lots

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of inflation in the tech sphere because the dot com

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>bubble was inflating. So WorldCom was spending a whole lot

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of money, and arguably it was spending more money than

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>what the acquisitions were actually worth in some cases because

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of that inflation of the dot com bubble. Now, WorldCom's

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 1>finances initially looked pretty darn good, but then you had

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble burst in two thousand and two

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, and very quickly it was clear that

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>WorldCom was over extended. And as a publicly traded company,

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that means it would be in danger of having a

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>massive dip in its stock price, and that would be bad.

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Stakeholders expect a stable and growing company, well on paper.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>That was what seemed to be happening. WorldCom seemed to

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>be doing pretty darn well. But it turned out that

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>paper stuff was just paper. It was just creative accounting,

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>which is another way of saying lying. It was outright falsehoods.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, a group of leaders within WorldCom directed that

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>operating expenses be listed as something else on the books.

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>One term that kept popping up in the books was

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a term called prepaid capacity. And you might say, what

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>was prepaid capacity? What did that mean? Well, it turns

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>out it didn't mean anything. It was essentially code for

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>hide to operating expenses here so that they look like

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>capital expenses. Okay, but what's the difference there. What's the

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>difference between operating expenses and capital expenses? This is something

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that I think a lot of people just don't know,

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>including me, Like I have to look it up every

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>now and then because I'm not a business guy. But

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's actually pretty straightforward. So operating expenses are recurring, short

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>term costs. These are the costs of doing business. So

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that can include stuff like paying rent for office space,

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>paying your utility bills, paying out salaries, that kind of thing.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So you deduct operating expenses from income whenever you're doing taxes,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>so that you can say, like, all right, well we

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>made this much money, but it cost this much to

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>do business, so we have to look at the difference there.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't just tax me on the income. You have

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to take into account how much it cost to run

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the business. Capital expenses are different from operating expenses because

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>capital expenses are investments. So a capital expense represents something

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that is intended to generate revenue for a business in

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the long run. It may be a long term investment,

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>so it still costs money, but you don't count it

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>against income, So your income looks bigger if something is

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a capital expense rather than an operating expense, because you

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>don't deduct the capital expense from the income. And capital

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>expense again represents an investment that's at least ideally going

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay off sometime down the line. So essentially leaders

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>at WorldCom were directing their accountants to classify operating expenses

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>as capital expenses in an effort to make it look

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like the company was actually performing much much better than

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it really was, and they used the term prepaid capacity

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to mask it. And what they were hoping was that

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>no one would bother to ask what exactly prepaid capacity was.

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They were relying on prepaid capacity to be vague enough

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and official sounding enough that people would just accept it

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and move on and not ask any questions. Like, you

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to feel like you're the ignorant one by

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>saying what does this actually mean? It's kind of like

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>an emperor wears no clothes sort of thing. Right, You

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be the one to admit you can't

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>see the meaning of something, because then it makes it

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>seem like you're not as intelligent as everybody else, Right, Like,

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>if you ask a question does this mean, well, that

0:33:57.720 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>shows that you didn't know. And if you didn't know,

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>then that's because you're not Smart's the that's the feeling.

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not true. By the way, not knowing things is

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>not a bad trait. I don't know lots of stuff,

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but I ask questions so that I can learn. Learning

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>and curiosity that's important. And you know, curiosity is all

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about trying to push back the barriers of our ignorance.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So WorldCom leaders were thinking, prepaid capacity, that's going to

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be enough to keep people from asking too many questions.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>But they did not count on the tenacity and integrity

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of Cynthia Cooper. Cynthia Cooper headed up the internal audit

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>department within WorldCom, and she looked into some irregularities in

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the book keeping, largely because of a previous scandal that

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>another whistleblower had brought to company attention before then subsequently

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>getting fired. So Cooper was thinking, I better look into

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here. So Cooper and her team gradually

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>un covered fraud within WorldCom. She discovered that no one

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>actually had a definition for prepaid capacity, like it was

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>appearing on a lot of official records, but no one

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>could tell her what prepaid capacity actually meant. As far

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as anyone could tell it didn't really mean anything, and

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>yet here it was showing up in records again and

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>again and representing billions of dollars in expenditures. Clearly, this

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was a huge, huge deal and she was getting the

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 1>run around. Cooper and her team found enough evidence of

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>wrongdoing that the SEC got involved and investigated world Com. Ultimately,

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of the company was held legally responsible for

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the fraud. He would end up receiving a twenty five

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>year prison sentence. As part of that trial, he would

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>eventually be released early due to declining health, and he

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>would pass away not too long after that happened. As

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for WorldCom, it went into bankruptcy, it emerged under a

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>new name, and ultimately Verizon acquired what had been WorldCom.

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's an example of a company pulling a

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>scam on its own people as well as you know,

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>shareholders in the SEC and relying on jargon to discourage

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>anyone from asking tough questions. Cooper just wasn't putting up

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>with any of that. So again, critical thinking absolutely something

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>you should employ, just like Cooper did. You got to

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you're willing to ask the questions. Those questions.

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe you're not asking a human being, maybe

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you're doing some research and just looking into things. Always

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>take into account where your information is coming from. I

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>recommend not using AI for that kind of stuff because

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't know where it's drawing its information, and may

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be drawing from a very biased source. It's very difficult

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to vet how reliable AI is on any given topic,

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, you may get very different answers if

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you ask the exact same question at different times or

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on different machines. So definitely take into account the quality

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the source when you're asking your questions. But yeah,

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, use that curiosity, ask those questions. It may

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>turn out that the thing you are skeptical of is

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent legit and reliable, and that's great, Like,

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to be upset about that. But it's

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>always good to make sure before you start taking actions

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>that could end up, you know, creating a bit of

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a loss for you, whether it's financial or otherwise. And

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the same goes true for like all aspects of life,

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>as I said earlier, But really, when it comes to tech,

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I think critical thinking is in short supply. That's why

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we see things like misinformation campaigns go viral online. It's

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>why we see people get super hyped about new technologies

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that have yet to actually prove their worth. I would

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>argue that the generative AI craze kind of falls into

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that category that I think a lot of companies jumped

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>way too far into generative AI, way too early before

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>really getting an understanding of what it's capable of and

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>what's limitations are and what applications are. This stuff happens

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. It becomes kind of frustrating because

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>you think shouldn't we have learned these lessons already. I'm

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sure my peers over and stuff you missed in history

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>class have a lot to say about that, because obviously

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>they cover topics about history every single day, and I'm

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>sure they lament the many times where someone has done

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>something really stupid in the past, and we continue to

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do that stupid thing in the present, so and probably

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue into the future. But yeah, let's all remember

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking. It's a skill that you have to practice.

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>You can forget to practice it. Certainly I have done

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that on several occasions. I have to remind myself to

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>practice it. Well. I'm not some expert that just automatically

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 1>applies critical thinking. So don't take this as me speaking

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 1>from some high horse. My horse is low, maybe lower

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>than your horses. Just me being concerned for my listeners

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that they take that lesson to heart.

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Critical thinking and compassion. The two will serve you well

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>if you employ them. That's it for this episode of

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff. We'll be back with more new episodes for

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all of December and into the beginning of January,

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>before we do the handoff with our new hosts, which

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk about them more as we get closer to

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the handoff. But I hope you're all doing well. I

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>hope to be able to share with you lots of

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>other cool and fun things. I've got some potential collaborations

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>coming up with friends of the show, so hopefully we'll

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 1>be able to get those scheduled and recorded in short order,

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>because I look forward to going out with a maybe

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not a bang, but at least maybe a moderate sized boom.

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 1>And until next time, I'll talk to you again, really soon.

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.