WEBVTT - Week 11 ULTIMATE PREVIEW 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>List du dinit Yeah, as welcome your host by Bay

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>from Maryland, your co host by nine from Saint BRETA

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>trick step fall back, your co host at five eleven

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>from all Right, why ladies and gentlemen, your and with

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that we will get you inside of studio thirty four.

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Miss is the BFFs. He's Frank Stamfle Here's Eric Young,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and I am Gregg Sauce Frank. How's it going on?

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Happy Friday to you? Excited always for the Friday show

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>We get to for you the entire week of fantasy football.

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there was a game on last night, Greg,

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but did you did you catch the free UFC Fight Night?

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>What the free UFC Fight Now. Was that was also

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>on Fox? Yeah? Yes, yeah, it came on around Yeah.

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I was able to catch that. Yeah. The main event

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was pretty sick ef it was cool, then it was crazy.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I kind of enjoyed it. Of Miles Garat versus a

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Mason rud Up pretty dope. Yeah. I wonder how you

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>know either one of those world will fair for the

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for the heavyweight title. We'll see how it goes. What's happening, man,

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>another cold day here in Nashville. Um, And Mason Rudolph

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is not a heavyweight obviously, UM. I want to start there,

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>and I want to pose at you, Ey, because you're

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously the combat sports guy. UM in this Obviously we

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>talked about this a lot that football is a physical game.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>It gets crazy, it's wild, it's not siyada, YadA YadA.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But Myles Garrett using his helmet as a weapon is

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>something that you do in your profession, not really what

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Myles Garrett theoretically would do in his profession. What did

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you think of what went down? And what do you

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>think of the NFL's response of suspending Miles Garrett and

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely more Key's pouncing being suspended for three games for

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the retaliation Ms Rudolph simply being fined. What did you

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>think of all this as you watched it go down

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>last night and the NFL's response. Um, I mean the

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that he used the helmet is nonsense. UM. I

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>mean they have to suspend him. It's basically assault with

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a weapon. Um, it's the heat of battle. He lost

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>his mind. I do believe that this kind of thing

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>can happen. Uh, that's not condoning what Myles Garrett did.

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's madness that I mean over nothing. I

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>mean literally nothing. I mean that doesn't matter what he

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>says to I don't I don't know what was said

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>or what happened, but pulling a guy's helmet off and

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to hit him in the head with it is

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously way way too far, And the NFL coming out

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>right away and suspending them is probably the only option

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for them. Yeah. I thought the NFL handle it as

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>ready as they could. Frank coming out right away and

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>being like you're done for the year. Swift, swift movements. No,

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not any thought, not um nothing else. That was after

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>interview people blah blah blah. We all saw it, right,

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we all saw in her own eyes. I didn't need

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>an NFL investigation. This happened Myles Garrett, whose credit came

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>out today and said um and said, yeah, I was wrong.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I apologize to everybody. Blah blah, bah blah, and I

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>will be better as a person. Cool. Yeah, I mean,

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>what else is he going to say? Right? Like e

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Y said, it's it's the heat of the moment. He

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>got caught up there. Obviously there's no excuse for what

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>he did. There's people on Twitter online trying to defend

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>what he did. Oh well, Mason Rudolph kicked him in

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the nuts and and grabbed his face mask. First. I'm

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>not saying that Mason Rudolph is completely innocent here, but obviously,

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Myles Garrett took it to the next level,

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>not just hitting him with his own helmet, but the

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that like he tugged on his helmet and literally

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>lifted him to the ground. We're talking about Myles Garrett,

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>which look, if you've ever seen this guy without pads on,

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a massive, massive human being for him to

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to live. Do you buy your own helmet,

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>rip your own helmet off your head, and then slam

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>you on top of your head with your own helmet.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is massive. That that is just insane,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, just the lifting motion. I mean you could

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>have like broke Mason Rudos's neck. So you know, look,

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we live in New York, Greg, We've seen a lot

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of crazy stuff. We've never seen someone around here getting

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>hit in the head with a helmet. We have it list.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's obviously crazy and I think you know, him

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.239
<v Speaker 1>being suspended for the rest of the season is obviously warranted,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and it would have surprised me if it last into

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>next season as well. Fights in the NFL happened all

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. If him and Mason Rudolph tumble, if Marguie

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Patsy spears him off of them, We're not talking about

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this today, No, none of the ultimately matters. So the

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is Miles Garrett took a step too far. Instead

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we would be talking about is the fact that James

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Conner immediately reinjured his shoulder. Who knows when he'll be back,

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>if he'll be back. That Juju Smith Schuster so fairly

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>concuss last night. We'll see what his deal is. Jonathan

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Johnson left last night's game as well. The Steels are

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>down to James Washington, Jalen Samuel's and nothing. Their quarterback

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>was also nothing. That's exactly right. He look, he threw

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown in four inn exceptions. We previewed this game

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.799
<v Speaker 1>for the fandom hurry up yesterday from a betting perspective,

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Greg and I said, I don't trust I trust Mason

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Rudolf about as far as I can throw him. Again,

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a massive human, a heavy heavyweight, not a heavy weight,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but obviously bigger than me. So I don't think that

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm throwing Mason Rudolph, you know, anywhere quite frankly. But yeah,

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>he was dreadful last night. He was got awful. He

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>was sacked four times. You know, he threw four interceptions.

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>We have we have all these injuries to the Pittsburgh

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Steelers right now, so there's a lot, you know, there's

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on outside of this fight, especially from

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy football perspective, Like this is what I said

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the other day when when I was hosting to show

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what e Y is. This is a time of year

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>where you need to own the handcuffs for your running backs,

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>especially somebody like James Conner who has been banged up

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in and out of the lineup all season long, and

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>then you saw the most dropped list. Janalen Samuel's is

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on it. Let's have us Murray is on it. Like,

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>why are these players being dropped? It doesn't make any sense,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>especially when the running backs ahead of them have already

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>been banged up this year. I mean, Alvin Kamara is one,

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, twitch to his ankle away from What'savius Murray

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>being a top five running back for the rest of

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the season. So this is why we're talking about at

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this point of the season, you have to own the

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>handcuffs for your respective running backs. On the other side,

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>for Cleveland, e y Odell Beckham got off to a

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>really fast start and then was never heard from again.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Essentially right finished with like sixty yards after having almost

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty on that first drive. So the mess continues. It's

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>clear that Jarvis Landry is Baker Mayfield's favorite wide receiver,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>um Odell Beckham. You said it a lot, Frank to

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>take the name off the back of the jersey. So

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens with the wide receivers. And I

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta I gotta throw this out there, Eric Huntless, pretty spry. Yeah,

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Creemon does look good. It's I think it's a surprising

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to everybody. Um, I'm definitely a person that is very

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>surprised by Nick. Nick Chobb is still going to be

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>figured in, but him Hunt, it is going to be

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a factor going forward. Seventeen targets over his first two

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>games with Cleveland that is massacred. We'll come back. I

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>want to just talk a little bit more about Nick

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Chubb and Cream Hunt and then win everything from this

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Sunday here. Lets want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire.

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to learn more

0:08:51.920 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>about all right, well, well, well, bag were on THEFFS

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Frank Snaffle, Eric Young, Greg Souceman hanging out with you

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on a Friday as we get you ready for Week

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>number eleven. Frank before we get and we dive in

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>deep in the week eleven, I want to get in

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to last night we meagued cream on. It looked better, uh,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or looked as good as he has last couple of weeks.

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>He has a major role in this offense. Seventeen targets

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>over the first two games that he's played this year.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb, howday Tina season h with twenty seven carries

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>for over ninety yards rushing. That's great, all right. He

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play on third downs anymore, he doesn't catch passes

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in the backfield anymore. There's one target that he dropped.

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Concerned to you here, Nick Chubb, own you're going down

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the stretch here. I know that you are very concerned.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>As a Chubb owner yourself, I don't actually have one

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>share of Nick Chubb, But personally I'm not really that

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>worried about it because if you look at the upcoming schedule,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a very good one. Yes, they will face the

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers in two weeks time from now, and the

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Steelers are good against the run. But in Week twelve,

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 1>we've got the Miami Dolphins. In Week fourteen, we have

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Bengals, week fifteen, the Arizona Cardinals Week sixteen,

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>which is your Fantasy football championship. Make there the Baltimore Ravens. Yes,

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a tougher matchup, but like three out of

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>his next five matchups here are very very good ones.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So I understand you're worried about Nick Chubb. The thing

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is if you try to trade him now, you're not

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>going to get the top five running back value that

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you would have a month ago if you tried to

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>trade him. So I'm just holding on. He's still seeing

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a massive workload, still has forty seven carries over his

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>last two games with Kareem Hunt back, and the majority

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of these matchups are very good ones. So I'm I'm

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not as worried as you. Right then, that's a very

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>very good thing. So last night during this game, they

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>were talking about oz for you used to make the playoffs, right,

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>both the Steelers and Lebrowns on the outside looking in

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there the begame last night, so it was a playoff

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>chase and have any Steelers playoff tickets? So don't feel

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>very good? Oh sorry, right, not your fault. So your fault,

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben got hurt? When did you before this? Eas? Yes,

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, so one of the teams that are on

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>there toward the bottom of outside looking in right now.

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But the first team that was listened to, Eric the

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Oakland Raiders, their hosts, Cincinnati Bengals. It's a favorable schedule,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they've had one all year. It's a really good spot

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for Derek Carr and company. What do you think of

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders this week? Who do you like? I mean,

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr has been good. I mean, I don't know

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if anyone said that in the last two or three years,

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but Derek Carr has been really good. Um. Tyrone Williams

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is somebody you know. He didn't do much last week,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but I have feeling this could be a really good

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>matchup for him. He's the number one receiver there and

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>has really shown to be a pretty reliable downfield guy

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>for Derek Carr. Um And I mean if you don't

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>have you ever found out about Josh Jacobs yet, then um,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know you haven't been paying attention

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>to Josh Jacobs is a beast. Josh Jacob is a

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>top ten running bag not top five running a first

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>round pick next year. Frank Derek Carr, where does he fall?

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>In your rankings as is as well as the top

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>target here, Tyroll Limbs. So Derek car is a top

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>fifteen quarterback for me, he doesn't make it inside my

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>top twelve. I like this matchup as well. To quote

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>my good buddy e Y here, the Cincinnati Bengals have

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>been rotten this season. On the defensive side of the ball.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>They are thirty second and past defense v away there

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine and run defense v away. And the Raiders

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>offense has been really good. They're averaging six point one

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>yards per play on the season, that is the fourth

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>best in the entire NFL. The offensive line is playing

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>well also, so Derek Carr just outside my top twelve.

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, I don't know how much they're going

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to have to pass in this spot. I like Tyrol

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Williams as a wide receiver three top thirty wide receiver

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for me. Hunter Renfro Deeper Leagues PPR play if you

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>are if you need a buy week replacement Josh Jacobs

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to spend up for him in DFS. Look,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the matchup doesn't get much better than this. The Raiders

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>are huge favorites. Greg. There's just the third time since

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three. The Oakland Raiders are a double digit

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite in a game. Pretty crazy. On the other side,

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for Cincinnati, A J. Green's not gonna play. He's not

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna play the rest of the season. Fraction telling you

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that for six weeks, Tyler Boyd he is going to play?

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Where is he? Tyler Boyd is slightly behind Tyro Williams.

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a few wide receivers this week that admittedly it's

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>tough to figure out because you know, we like the

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>talent of Tyler Boyd. We liked the talent of players

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like um Terry McLarin obviously, but the quarterback play, I mean,

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it worries you so much. What we saw of Ryan

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Finley last week was god awfully threw a pick six

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>against the Ravens. He had a fumble six against the Ravens,

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so I worry about him in that spot. Tyler Boyd

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>did see the most targets last week, and the Raiders

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>do give up a lot of Fantasy points to opposing

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>slot receivers. So to me, the fact that he's still

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing targets and it's a good matchup. I think Tyler

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Boyd is a wide receiver three play, but he's not

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver too that he has been. Like, if

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton were the quarterback this week, Greg, he would

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>likely be a top twenty wide receiver for me. You

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Terry McLarin. I think it's a good place to

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>go next guys. As the Redskins are taken on the

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>New York Jets. McLaurin um had a great match it right,

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Jess Been. I believe the worst team in football over

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the last four weeks, or at least top two, well,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the worst teams of FO all in the last four

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks against opposing fantasy wide receivers. McClaren has They've said,

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Bill Callahan's come out, and so we need to move

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy around. We need to get him the ball.

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins has been unable to do so every time

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>he's been on the field. Are you starting Terry McLaren

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this week? Eric Um, I actually do have to make

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this decision, and I am going to start him. And

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that's just because I mean, at this point, with buys

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and injuries, I don't have much of a choice. I

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>don't feel good about it. I definitely don't feel good

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>as good as I did when case Keenum was the

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback Haskins. His look Frank Rotten, I mean he's been bad.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean just not a good quarterback, not ready. He

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>seems not ready for the NFL, and being on the

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington Redskins is not helping this guy at all. Um

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>McLaren has has looked good, Um, and has looked uh,

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>really really good in the wide receiver when case Keenum

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was in the game. But Dwayne hask Kins has been

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>uh not a good player and not able to get

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>him the ball. And we thought there would be a

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>connection in becature they played together, but there's it doesn't

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>seem to be that way. It's a tough spot here

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for Terry McLaurin. Greg, much like Tyler Boyd. You know,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the player, Terry McLaurin is awesome. I loved this guy

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>for Dynasty, but with Dayne Haskins as his quarterback, obviously

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to be worried here. Now, you're right, Greg,

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Over the past four weeks, the Jets are allowing the

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to opposing wide receivers. But again, the

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>limitations on Terry McLaurin come because of the play of

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins. I expect the Jets to bring a lot

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of blitz, is a lot of pressure towards Dwayne Haskins.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been able to handle that very well so

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>far at the NFL level. And since Bill Bill Callahan

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>has taken over, Washington wants to run the football. Darius

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Guys is back this week, so they have two running

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>backs between guys and a p They've already said that

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna mix both of these guys in. It wouldn't

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>surprise me one bit if we see these guys combined

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>for twenty five to thirty Harry's this week. I still

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they want Haskins throwing the ball all

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that much. Although it is a good matchup so well.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I love the town of McLarin. I think he got

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to downgrade him a little bit. He is a a

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>solid wide receiver three. He's inside my top thirty six.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But I don't feel great about it. If I'm being honest, Greig,

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I I get it, man. It's it's frustrating because McClaren

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>has this amazing matchup, Darius Guys and Asian Peterson have

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in a good spot to succeed. It's just a mess

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in there at Washington because of Dwayne Haskins. Let me

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the other side. We had a revenge game situation.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Crowder facing his old team, Jet's coming off a

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>big win last week. You don't say that often against

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants. How high are you and Crowder?

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm very high on him. I haven't inside my top

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. He's a wide receiver to for me this week.

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg and Washington has actually been a lot better in

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>their secondary, you know, over the past month or so.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, they got off to a really really slow start.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>That defense looked really bad early on in the season.

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But Jamison Crowder has been the go to guy for

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald. The Jets offensive line is so bad that

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald can't wait for these you know, deep routes

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to develop down the field for Robbie Anderson. That's why

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing more targets too, Jamison Crowder to Damarius Thomas

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and to their tight ends. I think, you know, Ryan

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Griffins also a sneaky play this week if you're really

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>desperate at the tight end position. But I'm looking at

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Crowder here, Greg. Since Sam Donald has returned, he leads

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>this team with one of the target chair. He has

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>over eighty yards and back to back games he scored

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown and back to back games. I think he

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>makes it three straight this week in the revenge game

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>against Washington, A right three revenge game situation for Jamison Crowder.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>How how are you on him? Eby? Crowder has had

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>looked pretty decent and uh, I feel like Donald is

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to come around. Uh, the ghosts are starting to

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>dissipate and he's starting to realize that that he is

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty decent quarterback in the NFL. I mean, I think, um,

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>he's still gonna have an overall disappointing season, but these

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>these last few weeks, I think Donald is a guy

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that you could definitely stream. Um this week, I feel

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like this is as good a matchup as any and

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Crowder as a guy that I love. Yeah, I think

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to love Crowder. You have to like McLaurin

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to the matchup really really good for both these guys.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You talk about like the Tyler Boyd section, the moment

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the James and Crowder sectionally go back to Oakland.

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Tyrrell Williams for me, is also in this mix. Uh.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>In a really good matchup against Cincinnati. I think you're

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>all on this wide receiver to wide receiver three cut off.

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Um Crowder certainly higher given how successful he's been of late. Um,

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but they're all kind of similar in that vein. We're

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a break here. When we come back, we're

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get in to the most anticipated game of the weekend.

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's between Houston and Baltimore, Shawn Watson taking

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on Lamar Jackson. What should be a really really fun

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>game and it could cause some fantasy explosion with another

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver that I think is kind of in this

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>mix as well, on this wide receiver to wide receiver

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>three fringe. Hold on, let's talk about its week levit

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>here on the grid. You want the edge, Get on

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the grid. We're back on sportscrits. Even want to be

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>competition with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate on fandel

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and much more. Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily Road dot Com

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>backslash dunk to learn more. Most anticipated game of the

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>week still to come. I mean Baltimore and Houston. We're

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get into that, uh, certainly a few minutes, Frank.

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>We do have breaking news. Yeah, David Montgomery is officially

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>questionable and he is a game time decision for Sunday.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>He tweaked his ankle earlier in the week during Wednesday's practice,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>so if he were not able to go, that means

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>we should see a lot more work from Terrico in here,

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg Yeaco and comming a big spot for Chicago this week.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Dave Montgomery um has obviously been trending as of late,

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but now with him hurting his eggly yesterday, Cohen could

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>mean a spot to succeed. I know it's just happened, Frank,

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>But where would you wind up placing Cohen in your

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>rankings this week? Of course, Cohen and the Bears face

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>off on Silly Night Football against the Los Angeles Ramsdeans,

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna know about Dave Montgomery. That's very very late. Yeah,

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>so you're gonna have to have a contingency plan in place,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think a lot of people who have

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery probably don't have Treko because they went in

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a similar range in drafts. Now, maybe Turrecon was dropped

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in your league and you were able to pick him up.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, you know, you either have to have, you know,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>a Chargers back and Austin Ekeler to pivot off of

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>in case David Montgomery doesn't go, or a Chief's running

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>back if you have a Damian Williams. But ultimately, yeah,

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at Tariko and there and I think he

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>would shoot up to that high end flex type of play. Greg.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think in PPR leagues you can consider him as

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a low end RB two if David Montgomery were out.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.239
<v Speaker 1>But if David Montgomery goes in Tarreco and is more

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of that low end flex like he's been, you know,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>not really someone that I want to rely on. Yeah,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like Terrico And if if Monk doesn't play,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a Bears team that's gonna have

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to utilize that short passing game to be successful against

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. It's a weird game Chicago and Alex I

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really like either team. Um I love the under

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Yeah, I think this game might end

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>ten six. Like, man, I really don't like it. I

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>know it's Jared Goff at home, so they should better,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's facing the Bears defense. It's really tough spot. Um,

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't this game in l A. Yes, that's what I'm saying.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>She got Jared Goff at home facing the Bears defense,

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So is it really again? Yeah, but the Bears secondary

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is now the strength of their defense, right. You know

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about that this for weeks that since

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>a Chiem Hicks has gone down for the for the

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Bears defense, that teams have been able to run on them.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So it should theoretically be a solid spot here for

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley. The Rams also six and a half point favorites,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so they Vegas expects him to be playing with the lead.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And Girley last week actually against the Pittsburgh Steelers saw

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>his highest yards per carry I believe all season, so

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>he ran efficiently, he just didn't see enough work. So

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this should be a solid spot for Girly here, Greg.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, finally sucks that, you know, David Montgomery now

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a game time decision on Sunday Night Football. Those are

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>always really, really tough situations, Eric, who we expected a

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup squeaky wheel situation. Remember last time out, I

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't catch anything and killed fantasy owners Noboddy Cooks again

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>this week. We know, as frank you just mentioned the

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>secondary the toughest part of the Chicago defense. But Cooper

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Cups got to rebound from last week, right, I mean,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we can't get worse, can it. I mean, the Cooper

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Cup is a guy that I owned everywhere, and last

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>week was a massive disappointment. Um Like, look, they're going

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to have down weeks. You just don't expect a player

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of his caliber and his talent in his usage quite frankly,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>all year to put up zero. I mean, that's it's

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just insane that the fact that he played the whole game,

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>wasn't injured and put up zero. That's a very rare thing.

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>So I expect him to bounce back. Obviously, Chicago secondary

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is tough, but Cooper Cup hasn't had trouble getting open

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>except for last week. Apparently hasn't had troubles catching balls

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>except for last week. So I expect him to bounce back.

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, We'll see if he does ultimately bounce back.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me move on now go back to Lamar Jackson

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and versus DeShawn Watson. Really fun game at one pm

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Guys, h Houston and Baltimore battle in the a

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>f C. We've seen the Ravens have two big wins

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in a row, first coming against New England in an

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>awesome game where Lamar Jackson and the Ravens gave the

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>England their first loss of the season, and then they

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>decimated Cincinnati last week. Houston never retast trust them, especially

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in a big spot. How you see this one breaking down? Frank, Yeah,

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be a closer game.

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I know the spread has run around four and a

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>half right now, but I think that, you know, coming

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>off the by I think the Houston Texans are gonna

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>be rested up. We might see will Fuller in this game,

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think that really affects the past catchers here

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Houston Textans, you have to pay attention to

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the news. We haven't got an update yet to find

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>out whether or not will Fuller is going to play.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Everything that I've seen is he's limited. He's questionable for

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>this game. But here's how the target shairs breakdown with

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller in the lineup versus without, it's waited this

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so drink when he is in the lineup. DeAndre Hopkins

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>tent target chair, Duke Johnson nine percent target share, Darren

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Fells nine percent target share. Without will Fuller in the lineup,

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the hops target share goes up to thirty six percent,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson up to fifteen percent, and Darren Fells up

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to percent. So if will Fuller is in there, then

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe have some more realistic projections when it

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>comes to both Duke Johnson and Darren Fells. Here, Greg,

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens secondary has played really well since Marcus Peters

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>came over to this team. The rest of the team

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>has also gotten really healthy in terms of Marlon Humphrey

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and Jimmy Smith in that secondary. So Deshaun Watson obviously

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you're using him, but you know, when it comes to DFS,

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>just keep in mind this secondary for the Ravens is

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>playing a lot better as of late. For Lamar Jackson

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans, they've allowed three plus passing touchdowns and

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>four of their last five games, which means I like

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Brown quite a bit. Greg. I have him as

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty wide receiver. I know that he missed

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>practiced yesterday. He was back today practicing in full. He

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to play this week. Houston eleven the third

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>most Fantasy points to opposing wide receiver's thirteen touchdowns to

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the position. Obviously, we like Mark Andrews as well because

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson basically only targets Hollywood Brown and Mark Andrews.

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this could be a tougher game for mark Ingram.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>He's still an RB two for me, Greg, but I

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>think it could be a little bit of a tougher

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>spot here going up against Houston. More He's Brown. A

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of smart people really like him this week. Eric,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Where does he fall on your rankings? Yeah? Pretty high

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think, I mean the big X factor for

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>me in this game is Deshaun Watson. Um. Lamar Jackson

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>has proven that he is ultra effective at what he does,

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of reinventing the quarterback position game by game here. Um,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>But what I know about Watson is it is it

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter I mean when you score or how far

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you get ahead. He's going to play and he's going

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to go to He's gonna try to win football games,

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>and more often than not he's done that. And I mean,

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that just competes, knows how to win,

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>makes the plays when he needs to. Uh. And that's

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the big X factor here. We'll see if

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Watson can step up certainly the X factor Lamar

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Jackson as well. Um, yeah, Frank, I agree with you

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that Texas wide receiver Sheriff will Fuller's back. There's only

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that we have to watch. Unfortunately, as DeAndre Hopkins and

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller owners that we are absolutely yeah. I mean

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you're still using DeAndre Hopkins. If will Fuller plays, I

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would not throw him right back into you know, I

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>want to see how he performs his first game back.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It could end up being at James Conner situation, you know,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>where he returns and and potentially reinjures himself. So even

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>if will Fuller plays, I would try to get away

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>from him. This week. E Y asked is a really

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>good question yesterday, and that was in the game between

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo and Miami. It was which tight end do you use?

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Dawson Knox or Mike Kasecki. Micasecki was your boy last week.

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I tell you he's not good, he said, But the

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers the numbers, And I said, well, he's not good. No,

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>he's not as proven by made for it the numbers. Frank,

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>who do you like Dawson knocks Mikasecki this week? Well,

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I don't like either. But if I

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>had to choose one, I would go with Mike Kasecki

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>just because I think the usage has been a little

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>bit more consistent. The Dolphins don't have many pass catchers

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>right now. DeVante Parker shout out to e y is

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna do his thing and he's gonna get his targets.

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.239
<v Speaker 1>But outside of Parker, who else are they gonna throw

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball to. It's nobody Alan Hearns and and Jachine

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Grant and there you go. Not a lot of talent

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on this team. I do think that Kaiseki is very talented.

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>The problem is the Buffalo Bills are allowing the fewest

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing tight ends this season. They allowed

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>the fewest fantasy points to opposing tight ends last season.

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>They're very good against tight ends. So I would try

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to get away from both Kasecki and Knox if I can,

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>but I understand some people are going to be caught

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>up here. So if I had to choose one, I

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>would go with Gasecki um not. I don't really want

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to rely on anyone else on the Dolphins side. I

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think Devanta Parker is a borderline wide receiver. Three tough

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>match up against Tredavious White here, Greg, But last time

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they actually faced the Buffalo Bills, DeVante Parker scored against

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Tredavious White. So I'm not as scared off as I

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>would have been, uh without knowing that he performed against

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>him a couple of weeks ago. How about that? Just like,

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>just like that, DeVante Parker in a good spot. We

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>now trust in this trust this guy feel very very good.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Jamilays for John Brown. He's done it all a year long,

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.239
<v Speaker 1>basically scored what three straight games now. I don't think

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he scored last week. Last week was the week where

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>he got back into the PPR realm realm of things,

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>where he had a couple more receptions, had some yards,

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>but he had two touchdowns three stream where he had

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>four seventy four last week though, So it's pretty good. Yeah.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Cole Beasley for me, he's outside of my

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>top thirty six, but he is a viable bi week replacement.

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're desperate for a wide receiver. It

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is a good spot here. The Dolphins give up a

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>ton of fantasy points to slot receivers, and John Brown,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously again wide receiver to for me this week.

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Miami has allowed seven touchdowns to wide receivers over their

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>last five games, Greg, John Brown, along with Michael Thomas,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of the only two wide receivers who have had fifty

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards in every one of their team's games. So

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>John Brown really really consistent. I want the I want

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bills to give Devin Singletary more work in this game.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>The snaps have been there over the past three weeks.

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>He's playing sixty seven percent of the snaps. But feed

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary. Miami thirty in run defense TV away, So

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Singletary is in a good spot. He just

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>needs to work here, Greg. The top waiver wire pick

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>up this past week that was Atlanta Brian Hill. Hill

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>leads the Falcons in the Carolina to take on a

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Panther's rush defense that has been brutalized as of late.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones says, hello, Brian Hill, inside your top twenty,

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>franc He is inside my top twenties, inside my top

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen he's high end r B two again. The Panthers

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>allowing five points over five yards per carry two running

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>backs so far this season. They have a lot of

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ten total touchdowns to running backs over their last three games.

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So all over, Brian Hill in this body had twenty

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>carries last week. I think that he should get at

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>least fifteen touches again here in the spot. You know

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Barner. I don't think they want to rely on him.

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Quadre Allison, their rookie was active last week and they

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>barely gave him any works. So I think this is

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Hill's job. Obviously, you're using Julio Jones and Calvin

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Ridley is an interesting one here because he's playing more naps.

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The targets haven't necessarily been there like we thought they

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>were going to be without Mohammed Sanu now on the team.

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>But Austin Hooper also hurt as well. The Panthers secondary

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is banged up. E y, how much do you like

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley this week? Knowing that you know, uh, Austin

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Hooper had such a big role in this offense and

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>now he is out for the next month. Yeah, I

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>believe that that Calvin Ridley will become UM the wide

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver this week that we all were hoping in the

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>off season that he was going to be was drafted

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead of SNeW was drafted fairly high as a guy

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that was going you know, looked pretty good last year,

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and everyone believed me included that this was going to

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.719
<v Speaker 1>be a breakout season for Calvin Readley. He's got all

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the tools. Uh, now he's got UM. What in fantasy

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is the most important thing is opportunity. Austin Hooper was

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>having an unbelievable year, a year that I don't think

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>many people predicted UM and and Calvin Ridley has taken

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a back seat. So this is the week to show

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>up and say, hey, hey, I'm still a good wide

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver and I can be relied on. We'll see Yeah.

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you want hard hitting Carolina Panthers analysis? Lease start

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>all of them over the right. Let's start, as I guess,

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Falcons. Another battle in the NFC sound

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>will gets you and a whole lot more. We finish

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>up week, Levin up the show up next. I want

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com. And dominate

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>with Daily rodal dot com optimizer and the most accurate

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more. Save ten percent on

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more. All right,

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we only have about fifteen minutes ago a whole lot

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of new, so let's jump right back into it. Frank,

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad once again in the NFC South. We

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:03.719
<v Speaker 1>left one to go to another one. The Tampa Bay

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers are facing off at home against New Orleans Saints.

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas, Drew Brees not in a dome. In a

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>fantastic matchup around the industry. Michael Thomas is the wide

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver one coming off a really good game last week,

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>despite the Saints offense not doing a whole lot of anything.

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that gonna change this week? It's not going to

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>change this week, Greg, Michael Thomas should be in your

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>DFS cash lineups. I don't care how much money he costs.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>The Tampa Bay buck secondary e y has been Rotten,

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so we are going with Michael Thomas. He is on

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>pace to break the single season reception record set by

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Harrison, on pace for a hundred and fifty three catches.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the running backs, here, look, the

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Bucks defense has been really good against the run.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Their first in run defense dv Away. You can't really

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>get away from Kamara, but you should probably get away

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>from Latavius Murray in this spot. And then when it

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:57.479
<v Speaker 1>comes to Drew Brees, I think this is a good

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>bounce back opportunity. Did not show up against the Falcon

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>last week. But again, this Buck secondary is very bad.

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>They're so bad that they cut their former first round

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>pick Vernon Hargraves this week and they're rolling out whoever

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>his backup was. So there's going to be fantasy points

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to be had here. Jared Cook, another one, Greg inside

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>my top six at the tight end position ten targets

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>last week. The Bucks are allowing the second most fantasy

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.239
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing tight ends. Start all your Saints over

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the last four weeks. The Saints have I'm sorry, the

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Bucks haven't even worse than the Cardinals against the tight end.

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook, you saw it last week. He's helping with

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>those ten targets in a fantastic spot this week to

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>pick up some of the leftover targets. Trackwon Smith also

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>played more snaps and Ted Gin played vact more snaps

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in anybody not named Michael Thomas this past week. Of

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers for New Orleans, Trawan Smith a sneaky

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>start this week. The New Orleans Saints on the other side,

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what you're gonna do when it comes to

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>starting Chris Godwin and Mike Evans, Ronald Jones probably as well.

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Can you start o J Howard y Uh? I mean,

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>tight End is a mass um. He could score a

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdown for sure. I mean that's the reality. That's that's uh,

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the analysis going forward and tight Ends because do

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you think he could score a touchdown? Then if you

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>do and you believe that he can, then go ahead

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and start him. I think that this will be a shootout. Uh,

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees Sean Payne, You're gonna come out and be

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>upset from losing indivisional game against uh A rotten rotten

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta defense last week, and uh, they're gonna be mad.

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be. They're gonna be going for it for sure.

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, Moving on here, once again, the Detroit Lions

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>will be without Matthew Stafford as he's been ruled out

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with his back injury. Jeff Driscoll gets to start once again. Frankie,

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>we saw t J. Hockinson show up last week. The

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>industries high once t J. Hockenson once again this week

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>going against Dallas. What say you? Yeah, he should be

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You should be higher on t J. Hockinson this week

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>because the Detroit the Dallas Cowboys defense has been torched

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>by tight ends all season long. They just allowed two

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to Kyle Rudolph last week as well. We just

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>saw t J. Hockenson get seven targets last week with

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Driskol as his quarterback. So the targets are there,

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the matchup is there. I think t J. Hockenson is

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>on that border of being a tight end one this week.

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you need a stream, I would go with Hockinson.

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>E y. If you can use Hackinson over Giseki and

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Dawson Knox, that's something that I would do as well.

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I think if you own Kenny Golladay, you can't really

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>get away from him Jeff Driskol not a great quarterback.

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>We understand that he has a backup quarterback for a reason.

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 1>But we just saw Kenny Golladay score a touchdown last

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 1>week with Jeff Driskol as his quarterback. And then on

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side of things, it's a get right spot

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for Ezekiel Elliott. The Lions have, you know, given up

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a ton of fantasy production to opposing running backs all

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>season long. Here they should be playing with the lead.

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is a get right game for

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott. You gotta start a Marii Cooper the way

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's played so far this season. Dak Prescott, I

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>believe is a top five, top six is quarterback. You

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people are asking me, Greg, well,

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what about the game flow in this game. Well,

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>in order to have a lead, you have to score points,

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>which means that, yes, we still like Dak, we like Cooper,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I like Michael Gallup. And if you're desperate for a

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, I think Randall Cobb is in a really

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>good spot here. I don't even know it's about desperation, dude,

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>because Randall Cobb was placed up everywhere this week. We

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>talked abou him a little bit yesterday and leftover portion

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>of the program, and I think Randall Cobb has found

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>his niche in this Cowboys offense. I like Randall Cobb

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.720
<v Speaker 1>this week. Who would rather have? I think good comparison

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Randall Covers maybe we talked about earlier in the show. Yeah,

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 1>they're similar players. They both played the slot receiver role

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>for their respective teams. I think that the Cowboys offense

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is probably better. It's obviously, you know, more electric, and

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the targets have been more consistent for Cobbies. He had

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>at least eight targets in back to back games here.

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So similar players. But I would take Randall Cobb the

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>way that he's being used and with the offense that

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>he plays for. All Right, Randall Cob and the Dallas

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Frank's Frank's player of choice. Like Ezekie Elliott uh

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in a bounce back spot here against Detroit Lions. Hopefully

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>he can find the end zone. It would be nice,

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>would be very nice. I think this is the week,

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>especially based on being a favorite this big All right,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens there. Minnesota and Denver is or

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>playing this week. Mike Loui was saying how he likes

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the under in this game out of feelings already been

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.359
<v Speaker 1>ruled out. The Minnesota secondary has not been good over

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the last four weeks. In fact, that your bottom five

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the NFL like his fantasy wide receivers over the last

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>four weeks. But Cortland Sutt in a pretty good spot. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings are allowing the most receptions a hundred and

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>forty nine receptions to wide receivers so far this season.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So if Brandon Allen can just be adequate, then Cortland

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Sutton should be able to have a good game here.

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I have Sutton as a high end wide receiver too

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in this spot. Brandon Allen's first game, Cortlon Sutton had

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>eight targets that were represented forty percent of their targets

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>share when it comes to Philip Lindsay and Royce Freeman,

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>tougher spot for these guys obviously. The Vikings allowing just

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>just over four yards per carry to opposing running backs

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this season. They have not allowed a ton of fantasy

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>production to that position so far this year. No offense

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>has been more involved. But honestly, I'd want to see

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>another week out of him. With Brandon Allen before I

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>get him in my lineup. On the other side, obviously

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you're using Dalvin Cook. But you know, the the Minnesota

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are likely going to be in a position where

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they are winning handily in this game, and you know

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos defense has been strong. Chris Harris is going

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to be on Stefen Diggs. Yeah, I don't really love

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the past catchers here when it comes to the Minnesota Vikings.

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>E y, you know what say you? Kyle Ruolph has

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>been scoring touchdowns, but you know the Broncos have only

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed one touchdown to tight ends all season long. Chris

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Harris on Stefon Diggs. I think we see a lot

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of the run game here for the Minnesota Vikings. I

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think that we see much else, to be honest,

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean for me, I mean, I don't don't know

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>why you you wouldn't do that. Devin Cook is looks

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>like going to be going forward one of the top

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>running backs in the entire league. Uh, Rudolph has looked

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>good the last couple of weeks, but Denver has been

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty good against the tight end um. But I think

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that Rudolph could still score a touchdown here. Kirk Cousins

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>has looked like he's really found his stride, and Stefon

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Diggs is a number one. I think, in my opinion,

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a He's a top twelve receiver. Whether he will

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be this week or not, I don't know, but I

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to rely on the run game. Dalvin

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Cook is gonna get a ton of usage, and I

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 1>think also Madison could be a flex player this week. Yeah,

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Digs is definitely a top twelve wide receiver in terms

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of talent, but for me, you know, just going up

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>against Chris Harris, I would have him more as like

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a low end wide receiver to this week. His production

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>has been very inconsistent this year. Greg, That's how I

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>would describe it. For the Indianapolis coach, Jacobe Rissette back

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup, t Y Hilton not so much. He's

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out, were set expected to start, Nick Foles

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:30.800
<v Speaker 1>returns the line of four Jackson Mill And I know

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you think this means big things for d D. Westbrook. Actually,

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm I'm waiting and waiting to see here, Greg,

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know how it's gonna play out. Because

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that d J. Chark is actually a more

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>talented wide receiver than d D. Westbrook. But throughout the

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>preseason it looked like Ded Westbrook was going to be

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy for Nick Foles. And you know Nick Foless

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 1>time with the Philadelphia Eagles, he tended he liked to

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>lean on tight ends slot receivers, which obviously lends itself

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to d D. Westbrook. So I really want to see

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>how this plays out this week. I do have d J.

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Charks still ranked. I have him as a top twenty

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, a wide receiver too for me, just because

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the talent is gonna is obviously there. The

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>targets have been there for d J. Chark. I think

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>just because Nick Foles is the quarterback, I don't think

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to go away from DJ Tark. Ultimately,

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>for me, d D. Westbrook is a wide receiver. Three.

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>While he was healthy, he was starting to see the targets,

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the target should be there once

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 1>again this week when it comes to Nick Foles returning

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>as the quarterback. Here Greg for the Colts, Eric, can

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you start a Zach Pascal this week facing all against Jacksonville? Yeah?

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I think again, I mean Zack Pascal has been getting

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:35.879
<v Speaker 1>it done. And take t Y Hilton being out again.

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>They're getting Jacoby pre set back. So Pascal is a

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 1>guy that could could really show out this week. Actually

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>give me the tight ends, Greggy, give me all the

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Colts tight ends. It looks like Jack Doyle is gonna

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>be good to go. We spoke about Ebron yesterday as well,

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>playing more snaps. Last week saw season high twelve targets.

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>The squeaky wheel gets the oil. That's exactly what happened

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for Eric Ebron last week. I think he builds off

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that this week as well. Gregg, I like both Colts

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>tight ends inside my top twelve. All right, let me

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>move on to the four o'clock games, and let me

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>begin with a rematch from Thursday Night football just a

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:07.800
<v Speaker 1>week or so ago. It was the Arizona Cardinals and

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco forty Niners. Frankie and I were just

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>talking during the break saying, hey, we heard anything about

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Emanuel Sanders and the answers. No, we're still waiting word

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>on Manny Sanders. He could be come down to a

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>game time decision at four o'clock. We don't expect Matt

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Brita or George Kittle to play in this one four Arizona.

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>They've been in the games. They've been in a lot

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>of games this year. This could be another one plus

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half in San Francisco. San Francisco coming

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>off bad game against Seattle Arizona. Yeah, there's a lot

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of points here. I like the Cardinals here as well.

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the running back situation, do not

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>start David Johnson this week. We just got a report

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>before this came out that Kenyan Drake looks to have

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>jumped David Johnson on the depth chart the number one

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>running back. I like Kenyan Drake as a high end

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>flex option in RB three, and we all saw what

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>he did a couple of weeks ago against these this

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco forty Niners defense. So I do like Drake

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>as a flex get away from David Johnson this week.

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>If you end uh, I want to see how this

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>situation plays out with David Johnson heading into this week.

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk three touchdowns last week. I think it's gonna

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit tougher this week. I have him

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 1>more as a low end wide receiver three. He's gonna

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>see Richard Sherman he struggled two weeks ago against the

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>same defense. On the other side. I want to like

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel, but again, we don't know what's going on

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with Emmanuel Sanders right now. If Sanders is out, Deebo

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Samuel is a high end wide receiver. Three. If Sanders plays,

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I think Debo is more of a low end wide receiver. Three. Uh,

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe more of a flex option, you know. If Sanders

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.919
<v Speaker 1>is in the lineup, George Kittle not gonna go here.

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, Ross Dwelly, Welly here, Greg, we're going with

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.919
<v Speaker 1>him against the Cardinals. Cardinals allowing the most fantasy points

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>against opposing tight ends. E y another name. If you

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>need a tight end, I'll take Ross Dwelly, Dawson, Mike

0:42:53.719 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike A. Secki. Let's go fire up Ross Dwelly. I mean,

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I I know that San Francisco has had good play

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>from the tight end position, but uh, Dually is a

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>guy that I mean I had never heard of up

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 1>until last week. Um, I don't think you probably had

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>heard of him from last week. And to be honest,

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 1>is uh like I told you guys before, a lot

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of times, I'm going with my gut and I think Dawson.

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Knox is gonna show up big this week. Ross seven

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 1>targets last week. Greg, Look if you get seven targets

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Arizona Cardinals, you know we're gonna have targets

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinals last week. Who's that? Frank J. Howard?

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>How about that he scored the ghost of O. J.

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Howard's past. Come on, man, if he can do it,

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we're all one last game to get you, Frank,

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and we did it all and that well your CBS

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>game of the week, The New England Patriots in Philadelphia

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>take on the Eagles. I know you and I both

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like Natriots. In fact, is your pick of the week, Frank,

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's my pick in a week,

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do tell the Patriots, you know everybody thinks

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're getting cute. Let's go with the Eagles, their

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>home dogs. This is too many points. Come on, look

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at what just have and against the New England Patriots

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>before the bye when they got blown out against the

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Ravens. This is exactly what Bill Belichick wants you

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to think. Come on, people, have we not seen enough

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>from him over the years. Love Mohammed's new in this spot.

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Last time we saw him fourteen targets against the Baltimore Ravens,

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>ten receptions, eight yards and a touchdown. I like him

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>here against that Eagles secondary as well. Sony Michelle. Look,

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>if you can get away from him this week, I

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.760
<v Speaker 1>think that you probably should. The Eagles have prided themselves

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on their run defense the past couple of years, so

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he's more of a flex option play. He

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>is obviously touchdown dependent. He's not gonna catch a lot

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of passes. James White high end flex play in PPR

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>leagues as well. Obviously you're using Julian Edelman on the

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>other side. Jordan Howard. All of a sudden here Greg

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>very banged up. If I don't know that he's gonna

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to go here, and if he can't, e

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 1>y your boy, Miles Sanders. The Patriots are allowing the

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>third most yards per carry to running backs over the

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>past three weeks. I know that they just signed J. J. I. E.

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:00.080
<v Speaker 1>But he's not up to snuff yet. I think that

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders could be in for a big role here

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this week. Euay, I mean if he doesn't do it

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this week, if Howard doesn't go I mean, what week

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be. We were talking about the

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>other day on the show. I said that I think

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that Miles Sanders is going to be his backfield. This

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is taking longer than I thought it was going to,

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think this week could be the week I'll

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>be starting Miles Sanders in a lot of places. Another

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>tight end, Greggy, if you need one, Dallas Goddard inside

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 1>my top twelve Alston Jeffrey doesn't look like he's gonna

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>go to. Shaun Jackson is placed on I R. Carson

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Wentz needs to throw the ball to somebody. I think

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>those two somebody's are going to be the tight ends

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>here for very young and Frank Standville. My name is

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Gregg Sauce me enjoy week of Levin, good luck, and

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you back here on Monday. Well, I want

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire DUNC on your

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.800
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>projections in NBA DFF, plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more save ten percent on

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Road dot Com backslash dunk to learn more. So, what

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 1>did that happen? What did happens? Here's what you missed

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on the BFFs. Here's a name that's left over. Actually

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>really surprised me. Where he most left over this week?

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one that you, as you said,

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>should he be? It looks like it looks like Matt

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Brina is going to miss the next couple of weeks

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:42.880
<v Speaker 1>um and again they like to run a running back

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:44.800
<v Speaker 1>by committee. It's not just going to be Tevin Coleman.

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Tevin Colemans. He's a few more touches this week,

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:50.240
<v Speaker 1>closer to that twenty touch mark. But he's really been around,

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, twelve to fifteen for the most part this

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>season with the San Francisco forty Niners. They want to

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 1>run the football again. You know, the past couple of weeks,

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo has been throwing in the football a little

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more. We saw him Oneay and Night football. The

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks took away the run game from the forty Niners,

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 1>and they forced Garoppolo to try and beat them, and

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately he couldn't you know, he had some arran throws.

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Obviously some drops by the wide receivers as well. But

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we get back to ground and pound. The

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals are not a great team against the run. They're

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>not a great team against the pass either, But I

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>do think that the forty Niners can have some success

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in the spot here, and with Matt Breeda likely out

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup, I think we get you know, tend

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to twelve maybe maybe even a few more touches in

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that for Raheem Moser, which in my opinion greg makes

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>him a flex play. I have him, you know, right

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>around my top thirty top thirty six running backs this week,

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>which makes him a flex option. All right, fair enough,

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>he flex option. We said this previously with rahee most

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 1>where we thought that Brido was gonna be out. Of course,

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Brita played and Jeff Wilson played and everybody played that weekend.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Now we have an opportunity against Arizona in this matchup.

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully no it's Coleman and hopefully no it's Matt breed

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>up Um going through my waiver whire, here are some

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>other names that stand out so Night Thurs The Night

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Football and getting more into this. Deante Johnson is out

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>there in in quite a few leads, about eighty five

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of leaves right now, John Johnson is someone you

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>consider picking up with fears left over, not really, you know,

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph has not been great. Let's just be honest

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it kindly. Yeah, they've they've relied heavily on their defense,

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're running game and I think James Connor has

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a big game returning tonight as well. Um, and they

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>try to get Juju Smith Schuster involved. They really have

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>four different targets now that they're throwing too, and they're

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>not great targets because again they're coming from Mason Rudolph.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But we've now seen Vance McDonald with back to back

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>games with seven targets. They said after last week's game

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that they want to get Juju Smith Schuster more involved

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 1>once again. And whenever Juju has seen at least seven

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:44.320
<v Speaker 1>targets in a game, he's actually performed quite well. So

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we get back to a little bit more

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Juju tonight. And then last week James Washington had the

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>big game. So now we have four past catchers involved

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in this dealer's offense in you know, and these targets

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>are not really high quality targets because again they're coming

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>from Mason Rudolph. So I don't really want to get

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:03.879
<v Speaker 1>involved with Deonta Johnson and Cleveland. Not to their credit,

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>they've been really tough on wide receivers. They're allowing the

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve fewest fantasy points per game to wide receivers on

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the outside this season, and that is predominantly where Deonta

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson plays. So that's going to be a pass for me.

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Greg