WEBVTT - Ep. 785: Another Attack On Our Public Lands

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, ladies and gentlemen, we have a special emergency FOP.

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>This has dedicated to all the listeners out there who

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>stay we should just stay out of politics. Join today

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>by my friend Jeremy Romero, who's a hunter, conservationist and

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>serves with the National Wildlife Federation. And Jeremy is here

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about kind of what I view to be

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like one of the most I do. Like, I'm trying

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to think choose my words carefully here. Cynical, creative, and

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a little bit like of an exploitive.

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Now explain why I'm using these words. A cynical, exploitive

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>public lands bill that has emerged without a lot of

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>fanfare and without a lot of reporting. If you, if

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you follow the news you've been, you've seen that we've

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>suffered another a number of conservation setbacks coming out of

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration where undoing the roleless rule. Okay, that's

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>going on. We had we'd put the Ambler Road, building

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a big industrial corridor into Alaska's Brooks Range that had

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>again temporarily put to bed. Ambler Road is back on

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the table in order to allow a foreign mining company

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to drill and export a bunch of mineral wealth out

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of Alaska and create a two hundred and fifty mile

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>industrial corridor going into one of our last vestiges of wilderness.

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>We have another phenomenal piece of wilderness called the Arctic

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>National Wildlife Refuge. We learned a couple of days ago

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're looking to open up and reissue drilling leases.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>In anwar.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of resource management plans, Bureau of

0:01:53.640 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Land Management resource management plans that just got undone, so Montana, Alaska,

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>North Dakota. So these were management plans that many stakeholders

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>came together. They served a lot of interests of hunters

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and anglers that got thrown out the window. Okay, the

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>aim for everything we're talking about, what we're going to

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a minute, The aim here is to

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to a push by the administration to increase

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>resource extraction and industrialization. If you remember, back before a

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of this stuff started brewing, a lot of this

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff was whispers last June. But last June we saw

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps one of the most direct assaults on public lands,

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and that was Utah Senator Mike Lee's pushed to sell

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>off a few million acres of public lands that got

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>enormous pushback. I would say, like enormous bipartisan pushback. We

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>had seen that happen. Again, what year was it the

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Chaf's one, Jared, I'm sorry, do you remember what year

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Jason Chafis proposal which was remarkably similar.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Twenty seventeen sounds right, yeah, twenty seventeen. I think I

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 2>was right.

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Around twenty seventeen, there was another proposal to sell millions

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of acres of public land that was met with enormous

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan pushback.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>The media.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Seemed to be that the national media seemed to be

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>expo surprised by the fact that Hunter's co laced around

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>pushback on that issue that was by a Utah lawmaker

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>named Jason Chafits Senator Mike Lee. Just in June twenty

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five brought out a new plan to sell off

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>millions of acres that had different sort of code words.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I find that these plans are a lot of this legislation,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get into this in greater detail with Jeremy.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the anti public lands legislation, anti wilderness

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>aarrea legislation will carry like a a it'll carry fashionable buzzwords. Okay,

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So one of Mike Lee's early versions of the sell

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>off was like, was couched in this language around affordable housing.

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But then when you look at the details of the bill,

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it didn't really do much to address affordable housing. Before

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it was in twenty seventeen, it was like extra or

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>excess public lands. We have excess public lands. We're going

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of some of them. The bill we're

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about now. It uses another currently fashionable

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>buzzword in order to accomplish something that really doesn't do

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>much to serve the buzzword that it's being marketed under.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But going back to June, this big sell off push

0:04:55.440 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>was pulled, it was defeated. When that happened, a lot

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of people I know in the conservation space were like,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We're cautious about declaring it a victory. They're like, that

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>was a we want to battle. We didn't win the war.

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>This will come back up very quickly. One might think

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that Senator Lee, like it was kind of a bruising

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on that. One might have thought he might retreat from

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea altogether of kind of weakening protections.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 2>But but but he hasn't.

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>He's he's he has a he's committed to the idea

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>of opening up, of weakening public lands protections, opening up

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>undeveloped lands to development.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>That just that's where he is. That's his commitment. Uh.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at a new bill here that was

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>introduced on October second, and this is the one I

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was saying that just hasn't, like, for whatever reason, hasn't

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>received a bunch of news. And I think it's because

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it's entering an area that's quite clouded with all these

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>other things that I laid out, the role this rule

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Ambler Road and why are resource management plans? So this

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>one's kind of flown a little bit under the radar.

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And I've asked Jeremy Romero to come on. He was

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the one that told me about it. I asked him

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to come on and explain to me and explain to

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>our listeners what the Borderlands Conservation Act is all about.

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And it ain't about conservation. So Jeremy, can you can

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you talk people through what the Borderlands Conservation Act is, like,

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>what is it at face value?

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>And what is it actually about? And then we'll get

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>into some details.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you bet, Steve, Thanks for having me on to

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>talk about this issue. You know, I think you said

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>it brilliantly. It's a it's an attack on public LANs.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, Senator Lee, I think really took a stab

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 3>at at undermining public lands when we went through the

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 3>reconciliation process, and you know, the large effort to sell

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 3>off public lands, and essentially this is this is no different.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 3>So in October, early October, Senator Lee introduced the Borderlands

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Conservation Act with you know, in a nutshell, that bill

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>is focused on border security. Again, you said, and use

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 3>the phrase of kind of these these sexy terms, right,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 3>these terms that are popular in society today, and border

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 3>security is one of those. And this bill is aimed

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 3>at at just that increasing border security along the northern

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and southern borders in the United States, kind of creating

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>these hundred mile buffer zones in the northern and southern

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 3>borders and basically creates and gives Department of Homeland Security

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the authority to manage these roads and an effort to

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 3>strengthen border security. And it does it by a number

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>of different measures that we'll talk about this in this conversation.

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Really those measures, in my opinion, undermined the importance of

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 3>public lands and the protections forwarded to public lands, like

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 3>things like the nineteen sixty nineteen sixty four Wilderness Act.

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which are these points should we jump into first?

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Here?

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's just talk about this hundred mile buffer kind

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 3>of the rationale behind, you know, inventoring these illegal roads

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>and trails.

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I want to hit that because when we

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about one hundred mile buffer, this will impact. You

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>have to appreciate like what we're talking about. So I'm

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell people something obvious here. If we're talking about

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>if you look at a map of the United States

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>and then magined coming in from one hundred miles on

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>all of our borders north and south and Alaska, Okay,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you're taking in wilderness areas in Washington, You're taking in

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>wilderness areas in Idaho, You're taking wilderness area is in Montana.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Jumping eastward from there, where this this grabs hold of

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the boundary waters area. It would come into

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>areas in Maine National Parks, wilderness areas in California, wilderness

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>areas in Arizona, wilderness areas in New Mexico, Big Ben

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>National Park in Texas, Tungus Wilderness Area in Alaska, wrangle

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Saint Elias Park and Preserve in Alaska. So this is

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a I mean this you can one hand go like, oh,

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a one hundred mile buffer, but you need to

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>appreciate what we're talking about when we talk about a

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred mile buffer coming in from our borders, like

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's grabbing onto a huge swaths of land.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's exactly right. And I'll note that the one

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, the one type or the types of land jurisdictions,

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>that this bill is not specific to our tribal land,

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 3>state lands, and private lands. Other than that, it's take

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>can you know, the stroke of a paint brush within

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 3>that hundred mile buffer, And any land that's administered by

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 3>the federal government under d o I and U s

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 3>d A is subject to these measures in this bill.

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 3>So as you mentioned everything, everything administered by d U I,

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 3>by us DA, all those national parks, all those uh

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, forest Service units, all those b l M

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Field offices, wilderness study areas, wilderness like, they are all

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 3>subject to the measures in this bill, all within that

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 3>hunter mile buffer, and those are there's a couple of

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 3>other key points when we get to the wilderness portion

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 3>of this that I'll also I'll make I'll make sure

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 3>to distinguish. But you know, basically within this hunter mile

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 3>buffer on the northern and southern boundaries, UH Department of

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Homeland Security is going to work in coordination with d

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 3>U I and U s d A too, inventory what

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 3>they would consider illegal roads and trails that are been

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 3>that have been created by illegal border crossings. And that's

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 3>important because one, how do we herman if in fact

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 3>a road or a trail is created by illegal border crossing,

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and if these agencies, if these land management agencies determine

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 3>that in fact these roads were created by illegal border crossing,

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 3>then it's providing DHS Department Homeland Security the authority to

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 3>then create and manage these roads as navigable roads for

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the sake of border security. So installing infrastructure technology that

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 3>can monitor border security and illegal border crossings and put

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 3>and prevent those from happening in the future. And so

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 3>it really opens up this can of worms of you know,

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 3>deciding whether or not these roads actually are illegal, and

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 3>whether or not these trails are illegal and if so,

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 3>be able to be managed, and it doesn't really consider

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the impacts to developing these roads. You know, currently a

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of these agencies go through travel management plans where

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 3>they tory the road use system and determine whether or

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 3>not these roads are navigable or innavigable, and create this

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of access plan, this map that you that I

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>that others can then access public plans, and they do

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 3>a pretty meticulous job of being able to lay out

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 3>this footprint of what's considered navigable. Right, you want to

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 3>you want to protect wildlife, you want to you know,

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 3>protect wildlife habitat, there's cultural resource protection when it comes

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 3>to managing these roads, and so allowing for this kind

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 3>of unregulated development of roads really I think puts a

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of important things in the crosshairs along this buffer.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 3>And and like you hinted to you, I mean one

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred mile buffer to me, is is outrageous, right, I

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 3>mean we're talking from the southern the southern border to

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 3>almost Tucson, Arizona. Right. It encapsulates a lot of country

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 3>that they are claiming be important for border security. And

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 3>in my perspective, I think it's a little outrageous to

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 3>think that a hundred mile buffer and all the different

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>types of land jurisdictions and land management UH land jurisdictions

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 3>within that hunter mile buffer are really going to lend

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 3>to increasing border security.

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So I have struggle a little bit just to understand

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>even the logic there that it'd be that if you

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>were to determine if someone were to determine that a

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>road that an illegal road, say on BLM Land and

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>illegal road on BLM Land, or like an unregistered road

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on BLM Land, or an illegal trail on BLM Land,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that they determined to have been utilized by illegal immigrants

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>or for my for for illegal immigration of some part,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that that would then give you justification to go in

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and make it into a road.

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Wilders exactly.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in wilderness and non wilderness. It's it's mind boggling

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 3>to me to to think about how these how the

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 3>mandates in this bill and and those land management agencies,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 3>how they will come to the conclusion saying that these

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 3>trails and these roads were created by illegal border crossing.

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, how how do you determine that? Right?

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 3>That's I think that's kind of the big question I

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>have in my mind is you know, when it comes

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 3>to a trail, for instance, I mean you and I

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 3>hunt a lot where we're in places where you know, livestock,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 3>whether that's a you know, a grazing allotment or what

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 3>have you, or in a lot of areas we tend

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 3>to occupy. You know, if cattle are utilizing a trail

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 3>that they've created, and you know, let's just say there's

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 3>a boot track on there, does that mean that that

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>road was used and created by illegals and now it

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 3>gets to be managed by Department of Homeland Security and

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 3>in a fashion that allows them to access you know,

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 3>these these areas. If a road was created by illegal

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>OHV use, or it was once determined to be navigable

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 3>and has since been deemed innavigable, so it's no longer

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 3>accessible to the public, how do you determine that that

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 3>road was road was created by by illegal border crossing

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and then be able to reopen that road?

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 3>How The question I have next, next to what I

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 3>just pointed out, is then how do you enforce these

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 3>roads to be used for the intent in which the

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 3>bill describes and not for all this extracurricular activity like

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>illegal OHV use. I think there's I think there's a

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 3>bigger question to be had, which is who's gonna who's

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 3>gonna front the cost for developing these roads. I think

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 3>right now, when you look at the deferred maintenance to

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 3>agencies like uh for service in BLM, there's hundreds of

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 3>thousands of miles of roads that are deteriorating because these

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 3>agencies don't have the resources to manage the roads that

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 3>they have considered and deemed to be navigable through these

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 3>travel management plans. And we're asking we're asking these agencies

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 3>to create more roads and take away from roads that

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 3>they've already seemed to be accessible and the management and

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the resources you know that they need to manage those roads.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot to unpack there, and so I think

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of questions, and I think the bill

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 3>doesn't do a great job of defining how these actions

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 3>are going to be conducted. And those are part of

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 3>the part of the many problems I have with the bill.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in a minute, let's get into a little bit

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of the how these bills come up, where they leave

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>so many details up to one's imagination, and that in

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>some ways was attributable to the sinking of the sell

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>off plan, where the sell off plan went through a

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>handful of versions. They had these permutations, and in the

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>end someone realized, and it was pointed out, and this

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>was acknowledged by the office that put it forward. It

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>was pointed out even though this was put together as

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this idea of addressing affordable housing, and the way the

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>bill was written, you couldn't have prevented foreign governments from

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>buying the land. Right, So you wind up in this

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>thing like you're saying it's one thing, but then you're

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>not clarifying with enough level of detail about how it

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>would be determined. I would be able to take it

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>a little more seriously. If someone was talking about a

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>three mile buffer, a five mile buffer, a ten mile buffer,

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd be able to look at it and be like, yeah,

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to at least take this at face value.

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But when you've gotten one hundred miles north of the

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>border with Mexico or one hundred miles south of the

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>border in Idaho, like, at that point, I don't think

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about immigration anymore, and so it opens up

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this question of like, what is it really about. If

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>it was a five mile thing, I'd be like, Okay,

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this is about immigration. One hundred miles is about something

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>entirely different, and we'll get to that in a minute.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But let's get into a couple of these components. One

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of the ways that they're trying to sell this again

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 1>couching it in language that anyone would agree with. This

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>is like a tactic, right. You say, like, oh, border security, Well,

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>who wouldn't want border security? Right, must be a good

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>idea here. They're like, hey, this will help with search

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and rescue. Explain that component.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And it's important to note that the search and

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 3>rescue piece is basically also tied to this amending the

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Wilderness Act.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I'm out of order. Then let's get into

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>amending the Wilderness Act.

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 3>You bet so. A big component of this bill is

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 3>to amend the nineteen six or nineteen sixty nineteen sixty

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 3>four excuse me, Wilderness Preservation Act to allow for the

0:18:54.600 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 3>use of developing roads using motorized mechanized travel of under

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the hospice of search and rescue and border security, so

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 3>basically allowing the things that the Wilderness Act prevents for

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the sake of border security. What's important to note is

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 3>that when it comes to search and rescue in wilderness areas,

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the land use management agencies and local

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement, local search and rescue already have plans in

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 3>place to one prevent more than is intended to when

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 3>it comes to you know, occupying and being in wilderness

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 3>areas to conduct those those search and rescue operations. So

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 3>they can already go in and use motorized mechanized travel

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 3>if it's deemed that they absolutely have to for the

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 3>sake of human life. They have these plans in place,

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 3>and they can go in there and they can fly

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 3>a helicopter, they can take a uh, you know, like

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 3>a gurney that's that's got a wheel on it, they

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 3>can travel in on potentially on four wheelers, or use

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 3>their motorized types of transportation in certain circumstances. These plans

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 3>are already coordinated and developed with those land use management agencies,

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 3>local law enforcement, search and rescue. And so what this

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 3>is trying to do is a you know, amend the

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Wilderness Preservation Act to create those roads, to codify the

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:33.959
<v Speaker 3>use of motorized mechanized operation in wilderness Act, which to

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 3>me is a really slippery slope. And earlier you mentioned

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 3>like how these bills are written and how kind of

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 3>things let's just say fly under the radar may not

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 3>be explicitly defined. This is an important piece because this

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 3>with this section of the bill does not clarify is

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 3>when it talks about amending the wilderness to create roads

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 3>motorized use with you know, for the sake of border security,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 3>it does not explicitly mention that it's with that it's

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>wilderness areas within the hundred mile buffer, right, It's just

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 3>it's just amending the Wilderness Preservation Act. So technically it

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 3>applies to all wilderness areas, you know, aside from those

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 3>within that hundred mile buffer. So in my mind that

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 3>means if you can justify that building roads in wilderness

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 3>areas is for the sake of border security, it can

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 3>be it can be any wilderness in our country.

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Or building roads is helpful for search and rescue apparently exactly. Yeah, okay,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we got into some of the details here. What is

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>your take the earlier I use like a term cynical,

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a little I'm not totally happy with word

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>choice on that. But what you see is again and

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>again you see see these things that they're they're they're

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to couch it as one thing, but what they're

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about is something else. Okay, So here it's taking

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this idea of border security, this idea of search and

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.479
<v Speaker 1>rescue and and and lo and behold, what does it

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>really come down to? It comes down to like weakening

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>protections on wilderness areas and making it easier to.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Develop and do road building.

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh do you like in your view and your analysis

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of this, do you do you feel that that's fair?

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Like it?

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel that there really is I hate to

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>use it, but like, is there like a sort of

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy of sorts of trying to use whatever tools are applicable,

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever national crises we have, affordable housing, border security, whatever

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it is, to try to just do anything to weaken

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>protections on wilderness areas and weakened protections on public lands.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And if that's true, like what is the end game? Like,

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>how does that ultimately get them what they want?

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think, you know, from like the conspiracy perspective,

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 3>it's hard not to think that there's these ulterior motives

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to these types of bills and legislation.

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean we've seen time and time, you know, time

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 3>and time again where individuals like Senator Lee or others

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 3>just don't have the same perspective of public lands that

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you and I or others do, and therefore I think

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 3>their perspective of public LANs is a much more you know,

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.479
<v Speaker 3>let's just call it an asset driven mindset, where they

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>look at public lands and they see different types of

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 3>investments that they can return on these assets, right, different

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 3>types of ways that these lands can be more profitable

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 3>than they already are than just create open spaces where

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 3>we can recreate, where we can hunt, where we can fish.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 3>And in their minds, I don't believe that this is

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 3>something that they enjoy seeing and how public lands are

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 3>used are utilized, and you know, for that reason, I

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 3>think we've seen these assaults on public lands through different

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 3>different efforts, the reconciliation processes that you that you meant earlier.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 3>And so it's hard for me to think that these

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 3>bills when I see them, are just focused on what

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 3>the title of the bill is written as right I have.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>I can't help but think that there's that there's these

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 3>these details, that there's these underlying efforts within within the

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 3>these bills that are aimed at attacking and undermining public

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>lands from multiple perspectives, like getting more access. Therefore you

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 3>can potentially have non you know, you can have more

0:24:55.040 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 3>resource extraction or irresponsible use of public lands. I think

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 3>it's a slippery slope. And I think they're they're recognizing

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 3>that they have to be a little bit craftier, a

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit more creative and how they attack public lands.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, you said it, you said it

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 3>spot on, Like using terms like affordable housing, border security.

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I think terms that maybe hit hit near and dear

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 3>to a lot of Americans, you know, lives and homes.

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Like I do think by trying to create these kind

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 3>of false narratives, by trying to get people on board

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 3>for these ideas that really aren't the root of what

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 3>is intended by these pieces of legislation, I can't help

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I can't help but think there's there's more to it

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 3>than than what we're reading.

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't want to use too hyperbolic of language here,

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>like like I just want to, you know, acknowledge these

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>things are coming from you know, patriotic people who no

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>doubt love their families and love their communities. It's just

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>we're like ideologically opposed an issue. My view is that

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>undeveloped landscapes are of extreme value and will become more

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and more valuable over time, and that preserving them. Conserving

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>them comes at no cost to us. They're still there,

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they will still be there later on. Once as the

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>world gets developed, as the nation gets developed, as our

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>last wildernesses get developed, will burned through an asset and

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>will later regret what we did. And I think that

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some activities hunting, fishing, hiking, those are things

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'm interested in. There are some activities that can

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>go on right now without having adverse impact on these

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>great American assets. So I don't want to when I

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:49.959
<v Speaker 1>use the word conspiracy, I don't want to act like

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>someone's objective in putting this forward, that the objective is

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to be like evil or something. It's just like a

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>different thing. Some people look at undevelop landscape and they

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>see wasted opportunity. I look at undeveloped landscape, and I

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>see an incredible asset in the nation's bank that can

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>bring enjoyment and mental health and physical health to all

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Americans while we hold it. And it might be h

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and I know, like without a doubt to me, will

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be of far more value to future generations than it

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>is to us now. And and in in our in

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>our undeveloped landscapes are at their most valuable state as

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they sit, right, it's like it's an asset. So yeah,

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to put this in terms of of

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>good versus evil. It's like it's like it's an ideological

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>battle with real with real results, like like real things

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 1>are pivoting on this.

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what now?

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>And then you see where people put forward pieces of

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 1>legislation that you know aren't to be taken seriously, like

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>people do it. There's a performative quality to some legislation.

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>When there was talk of giving an example, when some

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>guy put forth legislation that would have put Trump on

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Mount Rushmore, it was performative, right for a lot of

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>people that it was good for a laugh. It sparked

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conversation like is there really room on

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Mount Rushmore? What is Mount Rushmore made of? Where would

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.479
<v Speaker 1>you put it? What's the history of Mount Rushmore? But

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in the end, it was like a performative gesture. It

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>was never something that was meant to be advanced and

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>signed into law.

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, is this is this like making a statement?

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it trying to like advance an idea that future

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>generations might pick up on?

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Like what is this? Is this serious?

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it can very well be serious, and I

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 3>do think it's somewhat performative. I think it's you know,

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Senator Lee and other co sponsors, you know, diping their

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>their toe in the water to do a temperature check

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 3>and see how a bill like this is perceived and

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 3>whether or not it's going to get the support and

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 3>the attention to gain some traction and potentially move forward.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I hope it's it's kind of all smoke no fire

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of the reasons that we've been talking about.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's it's interesting when you look at this

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 3>bill to see who the co sponsors are. And I

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 3>say that because there's only one co sponsor that's occupying

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 3>a state that is relative to the language and this bill,

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 3>and that Senator Cruise out of Texas. You don't see

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 3>other Republican or Democratic senators along these these border states

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 3>that are co sponsoring this bill.

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's funny you mentioned that, because I mean Utahs,

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's well outside of the hundred Senator Lee's state of Utahs,

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it's well outside the buffer. I see your representative from

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Wyoming sits outside of the buffer. But you're right, Senator

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz of Texas is has portions of his state

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in the buffer zone and the very generous buffer zone.

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 3>That's right, And you don't see individuals like Senator Danes,

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Senator she He, Senator Rish, like you know, you know,

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 3>those senators on the northern part of the of the border,

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 3>those people who you would who you would think if

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>this was an issue that was really important, you would

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 3>think that the states that are going to be impacted

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 3>by this legislation would have more of a of a

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 3>perspective on the bill. Maybe that's a maybe that's a sign, right,

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Like maybe that's a sign that this this bill really

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 3>is just kind of an attention seeker and not going

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>to get the traction that or the seriousness that people

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 3>are going to think when they read it. And for

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 3>that reason, like maybe that's why those individuals don't, you know,

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 3>aren't sponsoring the bill. And you know, obviously that's me

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 3>just being you know, rather presumptuous. But I think when

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I when I see the lack of those co sponsors,

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 3>I just have to ask those questions.

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Got it?

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And what do you think will happen? Like what's the

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>next step for a piece of legislation like this? Like

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>remember that remember that cartoon and your little kid, I'm

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just a bill on Capitol.

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Hill Like like what uh, like, what's what's next?

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, it was it was refer to the Committee of

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Energy and Natural Resources. So, amongst all the craziness that's

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 3>happening in DC right now, this bill has to be

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 3>put on the calendar by by E and R, by

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 3>sending E and R. And then once it's there, they

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 3>have to to listen to the bill and they have

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 3>to vote on it to pass it out of committee,

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 3>and then there it goes on its own kind of

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 3>trajectory to potentially being voted on on the Senate floor.

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Has to have a house companion. You know, it still

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 3>has a long route before it's even i would say,

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>remotely considered serious. But the fact that it was introduced

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 3>is serious enough for me to want to talk to.

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 2>You about it.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this will come up under an early and

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>an early person that will get a look at this

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as Senator Heinrich from New Mexico, who has you know,

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who represents landscape within this buffer. He's a big oh,

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a very informed, very dedicated defender of

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>public lands.

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Like, what's his take on this going to be?

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Well? I imagine Senator Heinrich that, as you mentioned as

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a champion for conservation, champion for public lands, somebody who

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 3>you know gets out on hunts and fish fishes on

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 3>our public lands. I think when he sees a bill

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 3>like this, he's gonna ask a lot of questions and

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna pick it apart, kind of as we've been

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 3>picking it apart on this conversation. I don't think a

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 3>bill like this is going to actually, I know a

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 3>bill like this is not going to land well with

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 3>with Senator him Rick. I think it will do a

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 3>brilliant job of asking those important underlying questions of the

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 3>intention and rationale of this bill. And you know, with

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 3>that being said, I hope the result is is the

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 3>bill doesn't move out of committee and is essentially dead

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 3>upon arrival.

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it is, man, it's like a very interesting

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, I didn't know about it, and

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you know we were together right around this time when

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this came out. You're the one that explained it to me,

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that regardless of where it lands, and

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very early to say, it's a very it's

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>an interesting civics lesson and it's an interesting look into

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>how people are. And it's the point I keep making

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>an interesting look at how people could have a historic

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>extra grind, like a career long set of goals. In

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 1>this case, if your career long set of goals is

0:33:55.080 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to reduce protections on public lands and open up developant

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and industrialization of wildlands, that's like the career long goal.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>The way in which you can look for opportunities in

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the national dialogue to be like, oh, that's how I'm

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about my perennial issue, and then the

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation changes and there's like a lot of talk about

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>affordable housing.

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's say that's how.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about my perennial issue, and then

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of talk about illegal immigration. That's how

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about my perennial issue. And it

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>brings to mind this analogy of that the bottle of

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the wine stays the same, but you continue to apply

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a new label onto that wine. And so it's just

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>as it's a fascinating glimpse into the thinking here, I

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hope listeners like give like start paying more attention to

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that in the years that are coming, as we continue

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to have these conversations and thank you Jeremy to come

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>on and explaining this and telling me about it again.

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's, like I said, if nothing else, is

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a great civics lesson for people.

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I uh, I really appreciate you letting me come

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 3>on and talk about the bill. You know, any attack

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 3>on public land is important to me to get out

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 3>there and and and talk about and advocate for public

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 3>lands and the right to hunt and fish and protecting

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.919
<v Speaker 3>these areas for future generations. So we're going to keep,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, our eye on this bill. We're going we're

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 3>going to do our due diligence to to make sure

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 3>a bill like this doesn't doesn't have a future and

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 3>you know in the future, you know, keeping keeping ah,

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, keeping a close eye on legislation that comes

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 3>out and looking at how they are somewhat uh, you know,

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 3>disguised in different ways. And I recommend people do their

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 3>their due diligence and look at look at bills, look

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 3>at legislation, not just for what the title of the

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 3>legislation is, but what the actual action items in legislation are.

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 3>And I encourage you to be active. Reach out to

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 3>you or you know, your congressional members, and you know

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 3>be be an engaged member of society. I think has

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the reconciliation process and the public lands sealoff kind of

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 3>played out, we saw a tremendous amount of support from

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 3>everybody on both sides of the aisle, you know, whether

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 3>you whether you hunt and fished or didn't like it.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 3>We all came together and pushed back on the public

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 3>land sealoff and it was an extraordinary thing to see.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 3>And I just hope that we can continue to have

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 3>those shared visions when it comes to pieces of legislation

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 3>like this. So Steve, again, I think I thank you

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.919
<v Speaker 3>for letting me come on and talk about this bill,

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 3>and we'll just keep tracking, keep tracking it.

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, uh again you're hearing from Jeremy Romero from the

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>National Wildlife Federation, a very avid.

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Hunter angler out of New Mexico. Thank you, thanks again, Jeremy.

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks