WEBVTT - Unseen Realms of the Infinite

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Strange Arrivals is a production of iHeart Radio and Grim

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and Mild from Aaron Mackey. For the best experience, listen

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>with headphones. In the West, we have very limited number

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of words for different states of consciousness. In Eastern thinking

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and religion, there maybe fifty eighty hundred words for different

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>possible states. This phenomenon forces us to think about subtleties,

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we don't like to think about subtleties.

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>High percentage of people will remember until they've had a

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>chance to explore their abductions as dreams. Now, when they

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>call a dream, is it a dream that recollects an abduction?

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it an abduction they're calling a dream? There's all

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of ways that word dream is. There's just an

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>experience that happens at night. You call it a dream

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's the way you were raised to think. If

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you take an abduction experiencer through the night of an experience,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>there is that moment of truth when they realize they

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't really asleep when this happened. As a sort of

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>like you went to bed, and it's very important to go,

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, reconstruct the events of the night, like, Okay,

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what time do you go to bed. You're watching television,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and you went to bed, and then what happened? And

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.839
<v Speaker 1>and then this light came in now, but you didn't

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>say you fell asleep. And that's a moment of truth.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And at that moment, a shift in consciousness occurs. It's

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>not as if they're just like an ordinary waking consciousness.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>One of the people that Bud and I have worked

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>with in New York describes it's as if the aliens

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>come through a screen. They break through like a scrim

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a screen in the theater. It's as if

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they shatter one reality and come into this reality versus

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>not asleep, but they're in another state of consciousness. But

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they're fully present in that state of consciousness. But it's

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a different state of consciousness. So it's a true experience,

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but in another state of consciousness, and we don't have

0:01:54.160 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>language for that. I'm Toby Ball and this is Strange Arrivals,

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Episode five, Unseen Realms of the Infinite. On June thirteenth,

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety two, a conference convened on the campus of

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts, titled the

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Abduction Study Conference. It brought together researchers, experiencers, and a

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>loane skeptic in an attempt to make sense of the

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>apparent alien abduction phenomenon. It's a little hard to picture

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>this now because alien abductions have largely faded from public consciousness,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>but these were prominent people in their respective fields who

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>were looking at what they felt was the very likely

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>reality that people, perhaps millions of people, had been abducted

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>by aliens. What were the consequences, what should be done?

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>The conference was organized by John Mack, who was at Harvard,

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and David Pritchard, a prominent physicist at MIT who had

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>become intrigued by the subject. Pritchard had looked at the

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>ufology landscape in nineteen ninety two and realized that there

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>was quite a bit of research that had been done,

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but almost none of it had been published. An academic conference,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>he thought, was the proper way for these researchers to

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>present their findings and then have discussions about them. It

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>was an attempt at a serious academic look at the phenomenon,

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>but while it was held on the MIT campus, MIT

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>did not actually sponsor the conference. Not surprisingly, the subject

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>was considered controversial. John mac, biographer Ralph Blumenthal. Now MT

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't sponsor this conference, but they gave it a venue

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>because this professor Dave Pritchard was very eminent and he

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted a place to hold a conference. So it attracted

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>atomic scientists, psychologists, psychiatrists, religious scholars, a broad cross section

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of academia and people who were really interested in getting

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it at this mystery, which it was. So four five

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>days in June of nineteen and ninety two they discussed

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>all this. The one professed skeptic was Robert Schaeffer, who

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>had worked with legendary UFO researcher Philip Klass and was

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>himself a leading skeptical voice in ufology. Here he is

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>talking about the conference. They were very serious about this.

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Big conferences like this don't happen all that often. Especially

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this is not a conference that was open to the public.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It's only people who were invited to attend, and actually

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they invited They wanted to make a show of having

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>skeptics there, to show that they were, you know, open,

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>that they were not afraid of septics, because some upologists,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll actually run in in the hole if

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody's going to critically examine their claims as Blumenthal mentions.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>The conference attracted experts in a number of subjects for

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>an interdisciplinary effort at making sense of the reports that

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>were being obtained by UFO abduction researchers like John Mack,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Bud Hopkins, and David Jacobs. The conference featured about one

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred presentations. Several people had more than one presentation as

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the conference organizers tried to create a coherent, comprehensive picture

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of what they believed was happening. In many ways, the

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>conference was at venue for mac and Hopkins and other uipologists.

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>They had been at the forefront of identifying what they

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>saw as an abduction crisis, and this was their opportunity

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to present their findings to a scientific audience. For their response,

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>this included giving presentations on their research methods and on

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>specific cases they felt were especially compelling, say so that

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they had one big new case and a whole bunch

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of other ones. If they thought was so well documented

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and everything, this was going to be like their revelation

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to the world. Look at this great stuff, this great

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>proof that we have. Okay, we could drop this upon

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, we could reveal this, and so that's what

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to do, and of course it didn't

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>turn out the way that they were hoping. This big

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>case was the so called brooklyn Bridge case that involved

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the alleged abduction of a woman identified as Linda Cortill.

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>We looked at this incident in episode ten of the

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>first season of Strange Arrivals. As time passed, the story

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>grew until it became too convoluted and incredible for all

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>but the most committed abduction adherents. In the end, it

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>was a blow to the credibility of the field, but

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>that came after this conference. The conference was also a

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>chance for the u Phoe researchers to present their methods

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and results to a scientific audience. The expectation was that

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the scientists would affirm that their methods were valid, but

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>again the reality was a little different. He had all

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>kinds of psychology, were all kinds of psychologists and physinicists

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and everybody in this conference here, and as they were talking,

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like Bud Opkins and so I talking about these surveys

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that they were doing and such and a whole bunch

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of psychologists, and the audience back saw, right, could you

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't you quantify these the survey that Schaefer is talking

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>about is known as the Roper pole. The Roper pole

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is famous in UFO circles. It sought to determine to

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>some degree the number of people in the US who

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>had been abducted by UFOs. The idea for it came

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from a man named Robert Bigelow, the owner of the

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>discount motel chain, Budget Suites of America, founder of Bigelow Aerospace,

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and a leading figure in funding UFO studies. He provided

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the funds to conduct the survey. The survey was conducted

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>face to face rather than by phone. It asked respondents

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a series of questions which the designers Hopkins Jacobs and

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a sociologist named Rob Westrom thought would identify people who

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>had likely been abducted, even in cases where the respondent

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't remember the experience. And the results that two percent

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the population, or three point seven million Americans, were,

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in Bud Hopkins words, highly likely to be UFO abductees.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>They felt that this number was a conservative estimate. Like

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so much of ufology, the Roper poll seems to mimic

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>science without actually adhering to scientific rigor, and the scientists

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at the conference noticed often the most interesting parts of

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>conference proceedings are the questions and comments that follow presents.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>This conference was no different. After a presentation on the

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Roper Pole, sociologist Robert Hall expressed his reservations about the pole.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but all due respect to Bud Hopkins and

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Dave Jacobs, who have done a lot of things very

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>valuable in this field, I have to say that I

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think this survey was the worst waste of research money

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen, in a terrible, terrible lost opportunity. I

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>think with proper advanced planning, it could have been a

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>very valuable survey, but it does not provide any scientific

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>evidence about the prevalence of these events. After another presentation,

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the poll was again the subject of stern questioning. David

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs protested that he didn't believe that he and others

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>were making any outlandish claims as a result of the poll.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Hypnotherapist Joe Nyman replied, reasonably, I think I don't agree

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>with that, Dave, I think you are making an outlandish claim.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Its specifically stated that these are the number of abductees

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and two and a half percent of the population are abductees.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>They screwed it up completely and Bud Hopkins said, from

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the speaker's platform. He said, well, I'm glad

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys are here. I'm glad you guys are telling

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>me this because you're the experts that we brought you here,

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>so I ducally give us feedback. I don't understand these things.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm just an artist. I don't understand about psychological tasting.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It's there, ken, he says, it were. It was not

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>nearly as solid as they thought it was, as it

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was immediately apparent from having you know, a number of

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>these psychologists of the audience who were not themselves actually

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>into ufology, but who are into psychological past daying down

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>comparisons are various things. Despite these issues, not everyone saw

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the conference as a failure. In fact, people point the

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>conference is making a compelling case for the abduction phenomenon.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Even today again Ralph Blumenthal talking about the conference proceedings.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>They made a record of their discussions. It came out

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.239
<v Speaker 1>in a thick book two years later. It was embargoed

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time, but it remains a very authoritative account

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of the best research of all these scholars. And you

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>know what I like to say is that the so

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>called skeptics and debunkers who pooh pooh this whole notion

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of alien encounters and dismiss it as ridiculous need to

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>do the research, because the research consists of looking at

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>volumes like this Alien Discussions account of the MIT Conference

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to really understand that the strength of the evidence. It's

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>circumstantial evidence, to be sure, but these accounts that are

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>very vivid and coherent and consistent, and you can really

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>challenge these accounts till you know what they really are.

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the skeptics are lazy, they haven't

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>done the work, and they just say this is ridiculous. Well,

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of course it's ridiculous. It makes no sense in our world.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And yet these accounts are so vivid and so consistent

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and so credible when you look at the people from

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>all walks of life are coming out with its, including children,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not only the aerial school children, but children as young

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>as two years old or John mac interviewed who told

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>stories of being taken from their cribs and flown into

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 1>the sky by alien beings. And these kids, you know,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't read books, and they haven't seen movies. This is

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just stories that they've told their parents and told John

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>mack so That was the importance of the MIT conference

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and the research he did. It gave credibility to this

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that once you really go into it, it stands up.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It's very difficult to challenge. What I find really interesting

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>about John Mack is here was an obviously very smart,

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>very accomplished guy. He studied alien abducts, worked with experiencers,

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and came to believe unequivocally that people were being abducted

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in mass numbers. But this was based on the testimony

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of the experiencers. There was no real physical evidence, certainly

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not of the kind you'd expect with the sheer number

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of cases. So how do you resolve this contradiction? After

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the break, strange arrivals will return in a moment. It

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that the tension that lies at the

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>heart of ufology and the alien abduction phenomenon is this.

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>There are thousands and thousands of UFO encounters and far

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>fewer but still numerous tales of an abduction, but to

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this day there is no single piece of the kind

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of evidence one would expect an abundance based on the

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>sheer number of cases. Someone who thinks seriously about UFOs

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>has to confront the question of why this evidence does

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>not exist. John Mack wrestled with this question and arrived

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at an answer that is both strange and not surprising

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>because it reaches back to his preexisting beliefs. We saw

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>how his devotion to environmentalist and peace movements was reflected

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>in the messages the aerial students said they received. In

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>explaining how the phenomenon leaves no physical traces, he looked

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to his beliefs about spirituality and realities not accounted for

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in Western science. This is John Mack being interviewed informally

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on camera by philosopher Terrence McKenna at the nineteen ninety

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>two International Transpersonal Conference in Prague. He mentions the term

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>anima mundi, which refers to the concept that there is

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a connection between all living things in the world, much

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>like a soul in an individual. The world of both

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>spirit with form and spirit without form, or the anima mundi,

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever your language for it, the Great Spirit, the Holy Spirit,

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, it we have lost contact with it.

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>It signals us we don't listen. There are various ways

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that certain people have revelations and experiences. Occasionally, the more

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>advanced spiritual people among us are reconnecting with the spirit.

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But for most of us, the only language that we

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>know now is the language of the material world. So

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's as if the Divinity say, Okay, if that's all

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you understand, I'll give it to you in the material world.

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you physical manipulations. I'll give you reproductive connection.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you cuts, scars, scoop marks. I'll give you

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a burned earth where the UFOs land. And I'll give

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you an experience which is consistent among various people, which

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>empirically everybody agrees that photographs of UFOs. It's showing up

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in the physical world. It may not be of the

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>physical world as we know it, but it communicates in

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the physical world. What is Max saying here, He believes

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that the phenomenon is essentially a non material or spiritual one.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But we have for the most part lost our ability

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to access that world. So it appears to people in

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>strange physical ways to let itself be known. So through

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this experience in the body. Because that's the importing point here.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>This experience is not just information and an intellectual sense.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>They experience these abductions in the body and as several

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>abductees have said to me, we only know the body

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>now as embodied creatures. If you want to reach us,

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to reach us through the body, because that's

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the only language we understand it. So that tells us

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that the creatures are real in this on a sense.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>As we have seen earlier, Mac had taken part in

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>attempts to access a spiritual realm through meditation, taking LSD,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly, through holotropic breathing, a controlled breathing technique

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>intended to cause non normal states. In nineteen ninety four,

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>science writer Jill Nemark interviewed Mac for an article in

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Psychology Today. In it, they discussed Mac's experience with this

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>technique the first time he tried it. Macna only quote

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>reexperienced his mother's death when he was eight months old.

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>He also felt quote my father's grief at the time.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I got more out of one session that I had

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in all my years of analysis. Later in the session,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>he said, I became a Russian father in the sixteenth century,

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a man whose four year old son was decapitated by

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Mongol hordes. Mac found analogs to his conception of the

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon existing in both the material and spiritual realms. He

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>saw the stories of shamans as describing experiences similar to

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>those of abductees. In his book Abduction, he quotes the

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>great Romanian sociologist Murcia Aliada. During his initiation, the shaman

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>learns how to penetrate into other dimensions of reality and

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>maintain himself there. His trials, whatever the nature of them,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>endow him with the sensitivity that can perceive and integrate

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>these new experiences. Through the strangely sharp and senses of

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the shaman, the sacred manifests itself. He would bring the

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>shaman concept to his work with experiencers, making those connections concrete,

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>even if the meaning wasn't always clear to the subject.

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>This is abduction experiencer Elizabeth Anglin, who worked with Mac.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>He listened a lot, and he took a lot of notes,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and then when he wanted to get his opinion, he

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>would say some blah blah blah, Well, you know, I

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think it might be a shamonic thing. Mac would also

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about the phenomenon in terms of what he considered

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the false choice between the real and the not real.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>He wrote, we've got make belief phenomena and we've got reality.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we need a category of phenomena for which

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we have no category. Ralph Blumenthal, Well, he said that

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this phenomenon has a way of penetrating our reality, and

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>when it penetrates, it penetrates with a great deal of vividness.

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing subtle about it. These people who reported these

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>encounters say this was more real to me than reality.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>This was not a dream. John Macrone a book on nightmares.

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>He studied dreams and nightmares, and these people said, look,

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I know the difference between a nightmare and reality. This

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was not a nightmare. So the best he could come

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>up with was that this was some kind of a

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>reality that was penetrating our reality. It was absolutely real,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but not our everyday reality. It was happening in some

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>other dimension, on some other way that he could not explain.

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>But it was absolutely real to the people who encountered it.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>The phenomenon is real, but not from our reality. What

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>does this mean to me? It sounds a little like stubbornness. Sure,

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't prove it's real, but that's because you're only

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>willing to consider our reality. But what reason do we

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>have to believe that there is another reality? We seem

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to be far adrift of science. Just how far adrift

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is clear when this reasoning is applied to topics outside

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the abduction phenomenon. This passage from Jill Nemark's Psychology Today

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>article begins with a quote from Mac. He says, quote,

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I know this sounds like hedging, but we don't know

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in what reality this occurs. False and true memory don't apply.

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>This is powerfully real, But in what reality? I asked

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>him where he felt he belonged in the raging controversy

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>over memory and abuse. Does he think memories of satanic

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>abuse might be happening in an alternate reality? He postulated

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that indeed they might, saying, perhaps those memories are experientially true,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't factually happen in this reality. What does

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>this mean in the fourth dimension or perhaps the sixth dimension?

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, this article was written in nineteen ninety four,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>before the so called Satanic panic had been comprehensive debunked.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>He says about a controversy that is raging within psychology,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>his field of expertise, that is possible that memories of

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>abuse are true but from a different reality. What does

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that mean? What do you do with this idea? People

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>were on trial at the time on charges of abuse

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>stemming from these quote unquote recovered memories. The more I

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>read John Mack, the more I got the sense that

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>he was approaching the topic backwards. He wasn't gathering this

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>testimonial evidence and trying to determine whether it described a

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that was actually physically happening and not just a

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>psychological perception. He assumed that the stories were things that

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>had actually happened, and he was trying to figure out

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 1>how to explain them. And it leads to reasoning like

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this example from Max nineteen ninety four book Passport to

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cosmos, where the following is suggested as necessary to

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>understanding what is going on. An awareness of unseen realities

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Infidel in which the laws of space, time,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>reality as we know them seem not to apply. This

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>can create a dilemma or a mind that would stay

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in the duality of internal external, for the phenomenon appears

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to be both or now one than the other. In fact,

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>mac even puts forward the idea that whatever is behind

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the phenomenon is actually intentionally creating a situation where there

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is enough evidence to convince believers, but not enough to

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 1>win over skeptics. It is as if the agent or

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>intelligence at work here we're parodying, mocking, tricking, and deceiving

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the investigators, providing just enough physical evidence to win over

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>those who are prepared to believe in the phenomenon, but

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>not enough to convince the skeptic. In this apparently frustrating situation,

0:23:55.880 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there may lie a deeper truth and possibility. He goes

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on to say that the phenomenon might be inviting us

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to change our way of looking at things, to expand

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>our consciousness, to do, in other words, what John Mack

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>wants us to do. John Mack died tragically when he

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was hit by a car in London on September twenty seventh,

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four. He was seventy four years old.

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>His final years were marked by two controversies, which I

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>won't go into depth about, but which should be mentioned.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>The first was a critical article in the April twenty fifth,

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety four edition of Time magazine. It featured the

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>revelation that one of Mac's subjects, a woman named Donna Bassett,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>was a debunker. Earlier, she had reported to Mac in

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a session that, among other things, she had been on

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a spacecraft with both John F. Kennedy and Nikita Kruschoff,

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and that she comforted the crying Cruischoff again. Ralph Blumenthal, Yeah,

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>this was a very sad episode, as she wanted to

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>destroy him. She thought he was a cult leader and

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>she'd made the whole thing up. Well, it turns out

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>that she probably did have real alien encounter experiences because

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>she told them to other people before encountering John Mack.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>She had a very strange background herself, and for whatever reason,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>she was determined to bring John Mack down. And Time

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>magazine picked this up and made a big issue of it,

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and it hurt John mac tremendously. It was damaging to him,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, but it did not undermine all the other

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>cases he had dealt with, and it was just a

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>very very sad episode. There was more to the article

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>than Bassett's allegations at general skepticism about his work. One

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>passage reads, psychologists and ethicists do not question max sanity

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>so much as his motives and methodology. They charge that

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>he is misusing the techniques of hypnosis, trying to shape

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the memories of his subjects to suit his vision of

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>an intergalactic future. And very possibly endangering the emotional health

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of his patients in the process. Quote. If this were

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>just an example of some zany new outer limit of

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>how foolish psychology and psychiatry can be in that wrong hands,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>we'd look at it, roll our eyes and walk away,

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>says University of California, Berkeley professor Richard O'she. Quote, but

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the use of his techniques in counseling is substantially harming

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>lots of people. End quote. The second controversy was that

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Harvard launched an unprecedented secret committee to look into Max's research.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Harvard was very uncomfortable with his research and eventually conveying

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a secret committee and inquisition. I call it because that's

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>a word that they used at one to see if

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>he was doing anything wrong inappropriate. And they kept asking

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>him what is his proof, and he kept saying, well,

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I really don't have proof apart from the stories that

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all these people have told. The Harvard committee echoed the

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>concerns of Richard o'she about Max's treatment of his subjects.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Max Lawyer wrote a letter during the inquiry that was

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>made public and quoted in an article in the student

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>newspaper The Harvard Crimson. The letter asserted that a draft

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>of the committee reports stated, quote to communicate in any

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>way whatsoever to a person who has reported a close

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>encounter with an extraterrestrial life form that this experience might

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>well have been real is professionally irresponsible on the part

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of any academic scientific professional person. With this letter, the

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>committee's work became public and was viewed in some quarters

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>as a threat to free inquiry. In the end, the

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>committee quote reaffirmed doctor Mac's academic freedom to study what

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>he wishes and to state his opinions without impediment end quote.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It concluded, quote doctor mac remains a member and good

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>standing of the Harvard Faculty of Medicine. I want to

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 1>come back to the Abduction conference because there was something

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>that emerged from the conference that I think is important

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to remember about John Mack. Western Michigan University professor Michael

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Swords wrote a review of the conference proceedings in a

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven issue of the Journal of Scientific Exploration.

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>He wrote, the conference at MIT split the public unity

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of American researchers into at least two major schools of

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>opinion deeply disagree to this day. Both continue to believe

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that the phenomenon is extraterrestrially based. Hopkins, Jacobs, and others

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>were present to elaborate what some have come to refer

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to as the Dark Marauders view of abductions, but conference

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>co organizer and world known Harvard psychologist John Mack presented

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>an entirely different spin. These experiences are extraterrestrially caused, but

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>are positively transformational for the human spirit. What sticks with

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>me about Mac was his essential optimism. He saw the

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>abduction phenomenon as being a force for what he considered

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to be good in the world, and I think this

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>optimism carried over to the way he interacted with his subjects.

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Richard o'shee and the draft of the

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Committee report that telling your patients that they have

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>had real alien encounters is hugely problematic. But Mac, in

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>contrast with Bud Hopkins, and as we will see, David Jacobs,

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>tried to bolster his subjects again Elizabeth Anglin and Mac.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't poo poo you and say, oh, you poor

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>little victim. He'd be like, you've been working full time,

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you've been going to school full time, and you survived that,

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and you survived that like twice a week for the

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>past how many months? So you know what you are.

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You're a survivor. That's what you are. You're not a victim,

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>You're a survivor. And Hopkins would really sort of and

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>my sense of its time went on was he was

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>really getting off on the victimization of it and saying, oh,

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>these poor victims, these poor victims, these poor victims. But

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>also at the same time you sort of controlling the

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>narrative more than I felt mac ever did, and Jacobs

0:30:49.760 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>was worse, much worse next time on Strange Arrivals. Strange

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Arrivals is a production of iHeartRadio and Grimm and Mild

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from Aaron Manky. This episode was written and hosted by

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Toby Ball and produced by Rima L. Kayali Jesse Funk,

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and Naami Griffin, with executive producers Alexander Williams, Matt Frederick,

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Mankey, and supervising producer Josh Thaine. Learn more

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>about the show at Grimm and Miild dot com, slash

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Strange Arrivals, and find more podcasts from iHeartRadio by visiting

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows,