WEBVTT - Tech News: China Tells AI to Tow the Party Line

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are Young. It's time for the tech news for Thursday,

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>April thirteenth, twenty twenty three, and first up, Carl Bode

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of tech Dirt has an article about how telecommunications companies

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>are running into trouble when it comes to accessing the

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>money meant to fund the rip and replace mandate they

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are under all right, So to understand this, we actually

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have to go back a little bit. Several years ago,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>beginning under the Trump administration, the US government demanded that

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>US telecom companies remove and replace any telecom infrastructure components

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that came from the Chinese company Huawei. The main concern

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>is that these components could potentially serve as a way

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>for Huawei and then by extension, the Chinese government, to

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>penetrate US communications networks and spy on US. Essentially, this

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is understandably a concern for one thing. As Boat actually

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>points out, the US has a history of doing this

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>to US telecom companies itself. See also the NSA and

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 1>HECK if we're going to do this to ourselves, doesn't

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it stand to reason that other people will try to

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>do it to us too. Snarkiness aside, and we should

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>still be concerned about our own government, those of us

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. That's where I am, but our

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>own government spying on us should always remain a concern.

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>It's also a concern that foreign governments could try to

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>do similar things by building into components this capacity. So

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the government told companies, hey, if you got any Huawei

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>gear in your infrastructure, you need to ditch and replace

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it with something else. And to that end, the government

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>has authorized around two billion dollars in funds to help

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>companies do this, particularly these smaller telecom companies that don't

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have the same resources as the ginormous telecom companies. But

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>now it appears as though one the money allocated isn't

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>nearly enough to cover the job, and two a lot

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of companies have encountered resistance or at the very least

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and unresponsive government as far as getting hold of those

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>funds goes. Meanwhile, Bode points out the government has sort

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of pivoted to really focus on TikTok rather than Huawei,

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and while TikTok may also pose a risk to some degree.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>By comparison, it's really nothing when you take into account

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the actual infrastructure of the communication system within the United

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>States itself. So I think it's fair to say that

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Bode at least feels leaders are leaning harder on optics

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and easier to sell story than they are in putting

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the work to actually follow through on an earlier mandate.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>On the AI front, China's Cyberspace Administration has published proposed

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>regulations with regard to AI development, and to be specific,

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about generative AI stuff like chat GPT, for example,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm currently working on an episode that will cover

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff like AI and regulations because I feel like, similar

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to what Bode was saying about TikTok in the earlier story,

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of being led to a perspective on AI

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that I think is reductive and also ultimately misleading. Now

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I am not saying that we shouldn't be concerned about

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>generative AI, but I am concerned about generalizing generative AI

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to mean artificial intelligence in total, because I think it

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>misses the big picture and creates opportunities for lots of

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>comes down the road. But anyway, that's for a future

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>episode that's going to take me a long time to

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>put together. Anyway, officials in China are pushing for laws

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that would place tight restrictions on generative AI. Such AI.

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>These regulation state would need to avoid creating statements that

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>undermine or contradict the state itself. Now, some of this

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>comes across as being kind of reasonable, right, like, not

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the upset the state, but that generative AI should have

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>some restriction so that doesn't do stuff like promote terrorism

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>or extremism. That sounds reasonable, though we do have to

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>remember that what China officials define as terrorism and extremism

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>can cover a wide spectrum and can include stuff like

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure the government is doing the right thing here. Anyway,

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it should come as no surprise that China wants to

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>avoid a future in which AI could subvert the state's power,

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>because that's powerful the course for China in general. A

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff in China law. The laws in China

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately kind of lead back to cementing the state's authority.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Now that being said, many of the proposed regulations are

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not that different to what we're hearing in other countries,

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>including the United States. Namely that generative AI should not

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>compromise a person's privacy. That's reasonable. They should respect laws,

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>including those protecting intellectual property. That's something that a lot

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of creators have been calling for. That they should not

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>create discriminatory content. They should not promote things like hate

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>speech and racism, they should not propagate misinformation. All of

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>these are regulations that we're hearing about, or at least

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>proposed regulations. We're hearing about all over the world, not

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>just in China, and I do think that regulations for

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>generative AI are likely a necessary step. You could argue, hey,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we should just leave this up to the companies to

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>build in these protections themselves, but generally speaking, when you

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just leave stuff to an industry, the stuff that comes

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>out is not necessarily the best for the public good. Overall,

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel that a lot of nations can look at

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>China's example, or rather it's proposed example, and use that

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>when thinking about how to frame their regulations. They can

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>sit there and say, well, here are things that we

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>should try and aim for, and here are the things

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that we should try to avoid. Right, so you can

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>take it as both an example of what to do

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and what not to do. There's a line, and maybe

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's a fine line between protecting the public and

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>then protecting the status quo. Also on the subject of

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>AI and a bit about Elon Musk, but trust me,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to be like Tuesday's episode, where

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>more than half the show focused on Musk and Twitter.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Ours Technica and Business Insider have reported that Musk is

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>purchasing around ten thousand GPUs or graphics processing units. In fact,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that he's already done so and spent millions in the process,

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And you might wonder, well, why would you want ten

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand GPUs. That's not entirely clear, but the speculation is

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is part of Musk's plan to create a

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>competing artificial intelligence lab. So y'all might remember that a

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>month or two ago I did an episode about open ai,

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and in that episode I mentioned that Musk was one

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of the founders of open ai, but that he left

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the organization in twenty eighteen. There are different stories about

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>why he left, and it's possible that the truth is

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>either unknown to the public or that the truth is

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>actually a combination of the various stories that are out there.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that's pretty clear is that Musk did

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>not like the direction open Ai was going in. According

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to Ours Technica, one complaint Musk had was that open

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Ai was to quote unquote woke. Now, Originally, when I

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>was framing out this episode, I had a whole lot

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say about that, But honestly, anyone

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>who has listened to me for a while already knows

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>where I would go with that. So I'm going to

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>drop it because there's no need for me to get

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on the soapbox anyway. Musk's move seemingly contradicts his participation

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in signing a letter for AI Research to kind of

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>pump the brakes a bit out of a concern that

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>AI could do more harm than good if we don't

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>create some checks and balances. And for the cynics among you,

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 1>you might say, Aha, Musk was doing this not because

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of his concern that AI is going to go all

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>terminator on us, but because he wanted to put a

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>freeze on the AI industry in general so that he

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>could make up some lost ground because they're getting started

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>late in the game. And I'll leave it to you

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, like what scenario was most likely true.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't know at the end of the day. You know,

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>unless you happen to be one of Musk's closest circle,

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably don't know. But yeah, you know, it's kind

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of fun to speculate. One other quick update on Twitter

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>related stories. NPR, which I mentioned earlier this week, Twitter

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>had previously labeled as state affiliated media, and then after

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>objections were raised, they change that label to government funded

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>has now said sayonara to Twitter. So reportedly National Public

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Radio will halt the use of its fifty two Twitter feeds.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Individual NPR stations, like the local affiliates, may or may

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>not follow suit. A lot of them already have. Also,

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>NPR is not forcing staff to suspend their own personal

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Twitter accounts. They can maintain them if they want to. PBS,

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the public broadcast TV organization here in the United States,

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>has also issued a statement indicating that it will no

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>longer use Twitter. So for people like me, this feels

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty massive blow to Twitter. Now, I recognize

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that my own experience on Twitter is not universal, so

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to fall into the trap of generalizing

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>from my own experience and then just projecting that on everybody. Instead,

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I will say that when I was on Twitter, regularly.

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>There were three main things that drew me there. One,

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter gave me a platform where I could share my thoughts,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>which more often than not were stupid jokes that were

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>not very funny to anyone other than myself, which is

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially the kind of stuff I say on the show

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Two, I could follow celebrities, and that

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>was fun because there were people that I admired in

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>show business, and sometimes they would tweet to other people

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that I also admired in show business, and it was

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like I was eavesdropping on famous people chit

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>chatting with each other, and that was kind of fun.

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And Three, and most importantly, I would go to Twitter

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>because news outlets were using Twitter to post breaking news stories.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.359
<v Speaker 1>So if you just kept Twitter running on in the background,

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it meant that you were keeping up to date with

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the latest news. But for a major media organization to

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>pull out of Twitter, well that takes a swing at

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those foundational pillars for Twitter content. Now, of course,

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I have no clue what the majority of Twitter users

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>use as the reason they go to Twitter, right Like,

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what most people use Twitter for. It's

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible that the vast majority of them don't give

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a fig about the news. And even if other media

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>organizations follow the lead of NPR and PBS, these users

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are not going to bat an eyelash at that, because

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not what they go to Twitter four in the

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>first place. I just think that for folks who are

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>like me, this becomes yet another reason to just ditch Twitter. Okay,

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>we've got more news stories to cover before we get

0:11:51.720 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to those, let's take a quick break. We're back. So

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>morale over at Meta is unsurprisingly on the decline, according

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to various news reports. The company has obviously held a

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of high profile rounds of layoffs, with potentially more

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the future, and according to The Straits Times, those

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>layoffs amount to nearly thirty percent of the company's staff.

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So just imagine. Let's say that you work in a company,

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>or you know, whatever business you work at. Imagine that

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>you're in a room with all of your coworkers and

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you're told that out of every three of them, one

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be laid off. One out of every

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>three employees are going to be laid off, which may

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>or may not include you. And it's all in the

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>name of the Year of efficiency. That's what Zuckerberg has said.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The Straits Times goes on to say that while Zuckerberg

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>has been pushing employees to go back to the office,

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the same is not necessarily true for upper management. A

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of executives have ended up working remotely from other locations,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and so unlike the rank and file of META, they

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>are not required to come in. So you're being coerced

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>or forced to come back to your office. But meanwhile

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing that the leadership are not under the

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>same rules. That also starts to contribute to problems with morale.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>There becomes this very obvious disconnect between what's expected of

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you and what's expected of leadership. Zuckerberg himself is on

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>parental leave, which you know, first of all, parental leave

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is a great benefit. All employees should have access to

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>parental leave. Parental leave is what allows parents to spend

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that time they need with their children in order to

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>make certain that their kids are going to be growing

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>up healthy and safe. And I am fully in favor

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of parental leaf for all employees. And I'm not a parent,

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like I don't have kids and I'm never going to

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>have kids, but I am fully in favor of parental

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>leave because I want those kids to grow up to

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>being well adjusted, productive members of society so they can

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>take care of me when I'm too old to do anything.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So it is in my own self interest to care

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>about the kids. But anyway, I'm not going to throw

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>shade at anybody for taking parental leave, and that includes

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg. I am not going to shame the leader

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of the company who's telling people to go back into

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the office for taking time off if that's if it

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>means that he's spending time with his child is newborn.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's justifiable. However, his absence again adds to

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>morale issues within the company. Employees have said that they

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>felt increased pressure to show that they are working hard

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on projects. You know, a lot of the framing of

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this has been around executive saying that they had more

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>employees than they had work to do, and that a

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of employees we're spending the majority of their time

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not really being productive at all because there wasn't enough

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>work for them to tackle. So part of this was

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about like a reorganization to bring into alignment the

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>workload with the workforce, and that may or may not

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be true. It probably is true to a certain degree,

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and the remaining employees feel that they need to justify

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>their employment right, that they need to make certain that

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they are not doing anything that could potentially put their

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>job at risk in the current economic climate. That is

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>incredibly understandable. But meanwhile top leadership is largely absent from

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Meta HQ. Also, the company has been scaling back on

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>employee benefits like meals and subsidies for ride healing services

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of thing, which again makes sense the

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>companies cutting back on costs, although employees might be asking,

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>are these the costs that make the most sense to

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>cut back on its stuff that affects quality of life.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You have already laid off a third of us. The

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bosses are never around. You know, you're making us come

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>back into the office, but are pulling out some of

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of working in an office. The icing of

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the cake, of course, is that tech companies at large

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are implementing hiring freezes or they're even actively downsizing. So

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the solution for the employees just to

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>hand in their resignation and then go find their dream

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>jobs somewhere else. It is a really bad situation. Potentially

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>made worse by Meta continually emphasizing business strategies that, at

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>least in the near term, are not likely to generate

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>significant revenue, which means that not only are the employees

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more unhappy, that's not going to make

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>shareholders happy either, which in turn will potentially fuel other

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>cutbacks in the future, and it becomes this kind of

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>perpetuating cycle. The state of Arkansas has followed the state

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of Utah's lead in passing a bill that will require

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone under the age of eighteen to get parental consent

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>before they can open a social media account. Rob Thubron

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of tech Spot has a piece about this in which

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>he talks about how the law has some perplexing exceptions,

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>some of which could potentially really undermine the whole law itself. So,

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, Lebron says that some of the amendments to

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>this bill appear to exempt social platforms where users can

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>quote generate short video clips of dancing, voiceovers, or other

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>acts of entertainment in which the primary purpose is not

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>educational or informative end quote. So, first of all, there's

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of content on all of these social platforms, right,

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>some of which is intended to be educational at least

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, or informative. You know, you have the

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>infotainments where it's trying to teach you something, and that

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>same platform may also host content that has nothing to

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do with education or information. It's all about just entertainment, right,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>like making you laugh or creating a scary video or

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be. And with this wording, it makes

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>it sound like a platform like TikTok, for example, would

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially be exempt from the rule because it's a platform

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that allows users to generate short video clips of dancing

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and voiceovers and other kinds of entertainment. So that's weird

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because the government in general is really down on TikTok

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. But based on that wording, it sounds like

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>TikTok would not be subjected to these rules. Potentially, a

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>platform like Instagram or Snapchat would not be subjected to

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that rule. In addition to those other amendments, exempt services

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like email and messaging services as well as video streaming,

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>professional networking, and gaming focused social services. So with those exemptions,

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like okay, so LinkedIn would not be covered

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>by this rule. You could create a LinkedIn account and

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not have to go through age verification. But then that

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes sense. I mean, what thirteen year old

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to build a LinkedIn profile? But then you start

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, well, if gaming focused services are potentially exempt,

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>does that mean that Twitch is exempt from this rule

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, I guess what I'm saying is

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that there sounds like there's a ton of wiggle room

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with these amendments, and it could be that this particular

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>law won't actually do anything but take up space in

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a rule book. So the intent is to make sure

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that children receive some protection, particularly when it comes to

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the practices of data collection and exploitation, and I'm fully

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in agreement with that. I don't think that kids should

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>be necessarily subjected that. I don't think anyone should. Honestly,

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point that the power of our

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>information should be shifted back toward the individual, kind of

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the way the EU tries to do it. I think

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that that needs to be sort of a global rule.

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>It just isn't. But I certainly think that that should

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>apply to children. But I'm not sure that this bill

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>as reported achieves that goal. Maybe I'm wrong anyway. For

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the few social platforms out there, that somehow cannot argue

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>their way out of being subject to this rule. They

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>will have to enlist the services of a third party

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>verification company, which will end up going through steps so

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>that users will have to submit information about themselves to

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>prove their identity and their age before citizens in Arkansas

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to sign up for an account. This

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>does not go It's not retroactive, so existing accounts are

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>grandfathered in. If a fourteen year old already has, say

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook account, that fourteen year old doesn't have to

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>go through this process, but moving forward, knew users would

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>have to, assuming that the platform was subjected to this

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of restriction, and anyone below the age of eighteen

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>will need parental consent before they are allowed to create

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that profile. So yeah, I don't know. We'll have to see.

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't. In full disclosure, I have not read this law.

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I haven't sat down to read the actual language of

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the law itself. I'm not an expert in law either,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>so even if I did read it, I would probably

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>not walk away with a full understanding of it. But yeah,

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it sounds to me like there's some pretty big gaps here,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's potentially a useless law. If it turns out

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that everyone falls under at least one exemption, then the

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>law doesn't apply to anybody, So we'll have to see.

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I do know that the state of Utah's version is

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>far more restrictive than the state of Arkansas, so that's

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a much different story, and other states are currently debating

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>their own version of this kind of law. Again, I

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>do think it's important to have laws in place to

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>protect children. I don't know if age verification is the

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>big one. I guess it's part of it, because you

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>do need to know who needs to be protected, right,

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think there need to be some laws that

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>just are going across the board to protect the privacy

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of children online and to do it better than the

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>way it's been done in the past, because often it

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>feels like the cannon is being pointed in the wrong direction.

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But again, I'm no expert in law, so all I

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>know is that the consequences often end up being unintentionally

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>harmful toward parties that have very little to do with

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the actual problem. All Right, we're gonna take another quick break.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, I've got a couple more stories

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I want to cover. All right, Now, here's some good news. Today,

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Apple posted that the company has set a target to

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>use one hundred percent recycled cobalt by twenty twenty five

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>in Apple design batteries. This follows some other initiatives that

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>also look to increase recycled material content and Apple products.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Apple said that you know, for products that

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have magnets in them, they're going to aim for one

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent recycled rare earth elements by twenty twenty five. Now,

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I've talked in past episodes about how modern electronics require

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>some specific materials, and some of these materials are difficult

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to come by. Some of them rely upon mining operations

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in areas of the world where the mine operations are

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>using what amounts to slave labor. Like it contributes to

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>human misery, it contributes to human trafficking. It also ends

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>up supporting militias that end up creating instability in various regions.

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a really big human rights nightmare in some parts

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the world, and even in the places where that's

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>not an issue, where the human rights piece of the

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>puzzle isn't really relevant, all of these mining operations create

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>environmental problems. So switching to recycled materials is a huge deal.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>It removes the reliance upon new mining operations for those

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>particular components. It drastically reduces e waste, which is a

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>huge deal. It's incredibly frustrating that we've got mountains of

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>defunct or unwanted electronics that either are not being reused

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>so that they continue useful life beyond their initial one

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>or recycled. The recycling process is tricky. It's not the

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>easiest thing in the world to do, and to do

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it in a way where you're actually doing it economically

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and efficiently is hard. So in some ways it's understandable

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's this issue here, but Apple is framing this

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>as part of the company's overall strategy to achieve carbon

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>neutral status by twenty thirty. And I really hope Apple

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>achieves these various goals because it helps deal with some

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>really troubling problems in tech that we don't often talk

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>about because they're they're not always obvious, and that includes

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>e waste, which I've talked about on this show before,

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and I hope to see more companies follow suit. And

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, activist groups and consumers should always keep an

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>eye on companies to pressure them to make these sorts

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>of goals and then to sincerely pursue those goals, not

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>just to say they want to do this, but then

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to follow through. And it may mean that in the

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.719
<v Speaker 1>long run, certain things get more expensive because it's not

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>always you know, economically advantageous to go the recycling route

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>versus mining new materials, but it may do the best

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>public good in the long run, and you have to

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>start balancing these things out at some point. We can't

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>just all continue to live like it's the nineteen eighties.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I lived through the nineteen eighties. We don't really need

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>to go back there, y'all. I mean, the music was dope,

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, new wave, fantastic, but there was a lot

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of other stuff about the eighties that was not good.

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>We now know when Google is going to shut down

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Google Currents, which is yet another Google service that will

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>shuffle off its digital coil and go into the great

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Graveyard of Google products and services. So Google introduced this

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, back in twenty nineteen actually,

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and now we'll shut it down. But it's done that

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with lots of stuff. In fact, if you are to

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>look at a list of things that Google introduced then

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>later shut down it is a very long list. I've

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>done full episodes about it and only covered like ten

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of the various products that Google has abandoned. And

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I also think that probably a lot of y'all are

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar with Currents. So Currents was a collaborative platform. Technically

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it still is. It hasn't been shut down yet. It's

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a collaborative platform for G Suite customers. And the g

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Suite is a suite of productivity services that companies use,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>so kind of like Microsoft Office, it's a cloud based

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>group of services, and it comes out of Google. So

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Currents was kind of a collaborative tool that worked with

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>these various G Suite services and itself, it was kind

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of a replacement for Google Plus. Google Plus was shut

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>down by Google several years ago. At this point, Google

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>introduced Currents in twenty nineteen, like I said, and now

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the company has indicated it will start to shut it

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>down beginning on July fifth. Now we've known that Google

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>was going to phase out Currents for a while. It's

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just that the news now is that we know when

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to start to happen. And that's like I said.

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>The fifth of July. Also, Google already has a kind

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of a replacement in line. It's a service called spaces.

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>This is also pretty much Google's m O. The company

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>will introduce something, it will then evaluate that's something that product,

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>It will scavenge all the most useful features off of

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that product, and then incorporate those features into something else,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>either a new Google product or maybe an existing Google service,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it will kill off whatever the original something

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was so fairthee well Google currents, we didn't even know ye. Finally,

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the state of Colorado has passed the Consumer Right to

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Repair Agricultural Equipment Act this week. It makes Colorado the

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>first state to pass a law giving farmers and independent

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>technicians the legal right to repair equipment agricultural equipment beginning

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>next year. As I have covered on this show, there's

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>been a history of companies such as John Deer. It's

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>not the only one that does it, it's just arguably

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the most famous one to include features on the equipment

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they sell to farmers. That makes it difficult or even impossible,

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for someone to do their own maintenance on equipment that

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they have purchased. Instead, farmers would have to haul their

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>equipment to the closest licensed John deer repair operation for

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>maintenance and repair. So for people who depend on heavy

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>machinery working properly in order to do their jobs, and

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>these are jobs that are on a deadline when it

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to stuff like planting and harvesting while avoiding waste. Right,

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a limited amount of time where you can

0:29:55.080 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>work before you're losing the yield you could have, and

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to contribute to things like food waste

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that's already a huge problem. So this is a big obstacle.

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Right if you are not able to do this maintenance

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.479
<v Speaker 1>and repair work when you need it, and you have

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to take more time out of your operations in order

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to transport a piece of equipment, however many miles it

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>may be to the closest licensed repair center, that's a

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>huge deal. And without the legislative system stepping into force

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.959
<v Speaker 1>companies to allow customers a chance to maintain and repair

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>their equipment, there was very little reason to believe that

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it was ever going to change. The agricultural equipment industry

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>has spent a decent amount of time and money lobbying

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>against this kind of legislation, arguing that as equipment becomes

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>more sophisticated, it can become dangerous or impractical for anyone

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>not licensed to work on the equipment to be able

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to access it. I mean, based on this argument, that

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you can make the dang problem so much worse. But

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>critics have argued that this stance is at best not

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole story. At worst, it's completely insincere, and that

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the real reason behind turning equipment into a black box

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is just to provide an ongoing source of revenue because

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>those repair shops have to pay licensing fees to the

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>company like John Deer in our example, and having a

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>closed off ecosystem creates a lot more revenue streams that

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>all go to you instead of potentially to some independent

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>repair person. So the new law, which takes effect next January,

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>will require manufacturers to provide diagnostic tools and repair manuals

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and similar resources to farmers and independent repair technicians. There

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of exceptions, however, matters relating to security

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>or to emissions are not covered by this new law,

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so farmers will still have to rely on officially licensed

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>technicians for repairs or maintenance that fall under the situations.

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll have to watch to see if the industry

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>tries to categorize pretty much every single problem as falling

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>into one or both of those buckets. And that's it.

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That's all the news I have for you today, Thursday,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>April thirteenth, twenty twenty three. Hope you are all well.

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to reach out to me, you

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>can still do so on Twitter. The handle there is

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff hsw. I will have to get an alternative

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to that, because it's hard to do story after story

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>about problems at Twitter and then still give people a

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handle in order to reach out to me. You

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>can also download the iHeartRadio app. It's free to download,

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's free to use. You can navigate over to tech

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Stuff by putting it in the little search field. It'll

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>have the podcast page pop up. You go into that,

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you'll see a little microphone icon, and if you click

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on that, you can leave a voice message up to

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds in link. Let me know what you'd like

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to hear in a future episode, and I will talk

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an iHeartRadio production.

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.