Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. So, like many of you,
Speaker 1: I have trouble sleeping. I have insomnia. No matter what
Speaker 1: I tried, it wouldn't work until I met Mike Lindell
Speaker 1: and I got my very own my pillow. It has
Speaker 1: changed my life. What makes my pillows so different is
Speaker 1: my pillows patented adjustable fill. In other words, you can
Speaker 1: adjust the patented fill to your exact individual needs so
Speaker 1: you get the support you need and want to help
Speaker 1: you get to sleep faster and stay a sleep longer.
Speaker 1: Just go to my pillow dot com or called one
Speaker 1: six zero nine zero. Remember used the promo code Hannity.
Speaker 1: When you do, Mike Lindell will give you his best
Speaker 1: off forever by one pillow and get another one absolutely free.
Speaker 1: My pillow made in the US a ten year unconditional
Speaker 1: warranty and it has a sixty day no questions asked
Speaker 1: money back guarantee. You have nothing to lose. So it's
Speaker 1: time for you to start getting the quality of sleep
Speaker 1: that you've been wanting and we need. Just go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com or call eight D zero nine
Speaker 1: zero promo code Hannity, take advantage of Mike's special two
Speaker 1: for one offer my pillow dot Com promo Code Hannity.
Speaker 1: All right, glad you with us right down our toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number. Happy Monday. I hope you all had
Speaker 1: a great weekend. Um, it was great until we had
Speaker 1: another terror attack at least attempt today in New York.
Speaker 1: And we've got some other new information regarding this. This
Speaker 1: is just breaking. The Department of Homeland Security can confirm
Speaker 1: now that the suspect was admitted to the United States
Speaker 1: after presenting a passport displaying in F forty three family
Speaker 1: immigrant visa in twenty eleven. And the suspect is a
Speaker 1: lawful permanent resident from Bangladesh who benefited from the extended
Speaker 1: family chain. Migration keeps coming up again and again and again. Uh.
Speaker 1: And you know, if we get more information on this,
Speaker 1: we will let you know. Look, it's very hard. I
Speaker 1: know that when we play some reports later in the program.
Speaker 1: And I know it's hard if you don't live in
Speaker 1: New York City to understand that this is a city
Speaker 1: that transports largely underground. Now, you wouldn't know it if
Speaker 1: you ever sat in traffic in in the city. Itself.
Speaker 1: You would think, oh, most people must be up here
Speaker 1: because you can't move, you can't budge, And especially during
Speaker 1: the Christmas season, because so many people come to New
Speaker 1: York and they want to see the tree, and they
Speaker 1: want to see the skating rink, and they want to
Speaker 1: stop by Fox News and and what you know, find
Speaker 1: the E I B Building. That was always a fun story.
Speaker 1: Remember James Golden would tell us people would actually come
Speaker 1: to New York in the early days when Rush launch
Speaker 1: to syndicate a show, and they'd be like, when you
Speaker 1: tell this point to where the E I B Building
Speaker 1: is that there really wasn't an E I B building
Speaker 1: except the building that Rushed broadcast from. There was a
Speaker 1: building I know where a broadcast from. It was actually
Speaker 1: too Penn Plaza at the time. Um, which was funny.
Speaker 1: That's very funny. I'll ever tell you this a quick digression.
Speaker 1: So when I first came in nineties six to do Fox,
Speaker 1: I got hired by the X Life over the other
Speaker 1: radio station, and I did eleven to two in the morning,
Speaker 1: and I couldn't believe that rushes lines would ring all
Speaker 1: day and night. And then I would sometimes start welcome
Speaker 1: to the EIB network. This is a whole rush ball
Speaker 1: and I would do it and I put and then kick.
Speaker 1: Carston got really mad at me, and I'm like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I didn't mean any harm. I was just kind of
Speaker 1: having a little fun and I put, Hey, rush megadettos.
Speaker 1: It was hilarious. It was really fun that we did that. Um,
Speaker 1: but with that, Kit put a pretty quick end to
Speaker 1: all that. Uh. And we love Kit and we miss
Speaker 1: him dearly too. He was a great guy anyway. So
Speaker 1: let me not digressive. But you don't understand that the
Speaker 1: whole city is pretty much underground and for a lot
Speaker 1: of people, if you don't live in a city like this,
Speaker 1: you're like trying to understand. So at seven twenty in
Speaker 1: the morning, when something like what happened this morning happens,
Speaker 1: it is total chaos for anybody that's trying to get
Speaker 1: to work on time. We literally hundreds and hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of people are in the varying subways all around
Speaker 1: town trying to get to work. And it happened at
Speaker 1: a very highly trapped in a haidely trafficked area, the
Speaker 1: the subway corridor near Times Square. You've ever been to
Speaker 1: New York, that's where the ball drops on New Year's Eve.
Speaker 1: That's where it looks like Disney at night with all
Speaker 1: the lights up and by. One thing people should do
Speaker 1: is go back when I was a kid growing up
Speaker 1: in Long Island. I would go into New York City occasionally,
Speaker 1: and it's nothing like it was. It used to be bad.
Speaker 1: I mean it was all you know, X rated movies,
Speaker 1: peep shows. It was. It was like a decade in
Speaker 1: sodom and go mora. And the person that cleaned it
Speaker 1: all up was Rudy Giulianni. And it remains clean today,
Speaker 1: not to the extent it was. You still have some
Speaker 1: dangers there, and I want to scare people that are coming,
Speaker 1: but there are a lot of dangerous anyway. So crude
Speaker 1: pipe bomb was strapped to this guy, apparently inspired by
Speaker 1: the Islamic State group isis UM, went off in this
Speaker 1: crowded subway corridor near Times Square. He got injured, three
Speaker 1: others were slightly injured. It snarled this rush hour commuter
Speaker 1: traffic now for hundreds of thousands of people trying to
Speaker 1: get to work. Uh, there is this. There is a
Speaker 1: surveillance camera that captured the man walking casually through the
Speaker 1: crowded passageway when the bomb suddenly went off at seven
Speaker 1: twenty am amid a plume of white smoke, and it
Speaker 1: was clear to show that the man was sprawling on
Speaker 1: the ground and commuters were fleeing in terror. And investigators
Speaker 1: said it was not clear if the bomb was set
Speaker 1: off intentionally or went off prematurely, but by the sounds
Speaker 1: of it, it sounds like it could have been a
Speaker 1: lot worse in every way. Shape Manner informed, so, um,
Speaker 1: it's a little scary. What frustrates me is as somebody
Speaker 1: that believes, you know, anytime we find out, oh, it's
Speaker 1: it's it's related to our immigration policies, chain migration. In
Speaker 1: this particular case, it just makes me say, why would
Speaker 1: anyone oppose making the country safer and vetting people who
Speaker 1: come here and knowing who people are and that you
Speaker 1: just don't get in because my great great great great
Speaker 1: great great great dead uncle uh used to live there
Speaker 1: and it really is that bad. But you now have
Speaker 1: the New York City has been hit by three successful
Speaker 1: terrorist attacks since Comrade the Blasio It's mayor ended the
Speaker 1: terrorist terrorist surveillance program in New York. Now. There was
Speaker 1: a daily mail piece that reminds US that ISIS had
Speaker 1: warned of a Christmas attack on New York City two
Speaker 1: weeks ago, and ISIS issued that attack on New York City,
Speaker 1: complete with a graphic of a Santa terrorist bomber staring
Speaker 1: right in the Times Square Mira coincidence. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Is it always going to be a big target? Absolutely,
Speaker 1: you know, And the s the scariest thing is and
Speaker 1: I think it's something we're gonna have to get a
Speaker 1: hold of. Every single time almost this happens, we find
Speaker 1: out things, and what do we find out. We find
Speaker 1: out that usually the people involved in this have a
Speaker 1: long track record of telegraphing their radical views and we
Speaker 1: don't pick it up. In other words, they're putting it
Speaker 1: all over Twitter, all over Facebook, all over Instagram, all
Speaker 1: over social media, and then we find out, oh, it
Speaker 1: seems like it's so and so new, and was telegraphing
Speaker 1: and sympathies for ISS and al Qaeda and and Hamas
Speaker 1: and all these radical groups. We just never picked up
Speaker 1: on it. And my question is why don't we ever
Speaker 1: pick up on these things? That's something that I think
Speaker 1: needs to be answered. Um, all right, we got a
Speaker 1: lot going on. We have the most corrupt media. I
Speaker 1: think that has ever existed in our lifetime right now.
Speaker 1: And I'm this is not hyperbole on my part, this
Speaker 1: is just factual information. I just have never seen a
Speaker 1: media this corrupt. Later in the program will have Joe
Speaker 1: Concha and he said, the past two weeks where two
Speaker 1: of the worst ever for American political media, all things
Speaker 1: to a rush to be first. Uh. That easily trump
Speaker 1: the priority of being accurate. It's even deeper than that.
Speaker 1: To me, if you had any doubt about media bias,
Speaker 1: look where we are with the media today. You know,
Speaker 1: look at Brian Ross, look at the Deutsche Bank Robert
Speaker 1: Muller's subpoenaing uh information from Deutsche Bank on Trump and
Speaker 1: his family. That means he's getting close. Or if Flynn
Speaker 1: says he lied to the FBI, that means that Flynn
Speaker 1: is flipped. Flynn is gonna flip on Trump and he's
Speaker 1: gonna do something that's just total speculation and the people
Speaker 1: don't know about or Wiki leaks reporting that you know,
Speaker 1: senior Trump campaign officials. Donald Trump himself received an email
Speaker 1: from some unknown sender September the fourth, and and it
Speaker 1: linked to what could have been the unreleased wiki League's documents,
Speaker 1: and then they find out it was September fourteenth, when
Speaker 1: it had already been released. Another hoops, black iron on
Speaker 1: the media's head shouldn't surprise anybody, you know. I think
Speaker 1: what we're looking at here. You have these networks they
Speaker 1: called themselves news outlets. It's beyond an information crisis. They
Speaker 1: are just propaganda arms in an extension of of the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. And it's now at the point that it's
Speaker 1: so agreed, just so transparent, so damaging that the American people.
Speaker 1: You know, now, as the President said over the weekend,
Speaker 1: it's a stain on America. The thing that's missing here
Speaker 1: is a desire to find the truth. You know what,
Speaker 1: we'll talk to Sean Spicer about this tonight. He had
Speaker 1: to deal with all these idiots every day for however long.
Speaker 1: But I've been saying now since two thousand and seven
Speaker 1: that journalism in America is dead. Media is dead. What
Speaker 1: I mean by that is they're so abusively biased, and
Speaker 1: you have the fake news, liberal destroy Trump mainstream media.
Speaker 1: You know, they literally hyper ventilate. It's like effervescence coming
Speaker 1: out of them, bubbling and fizzing like alka seltzer and
Speaker 1: water when they think, I out, we got it right now,
Speaker 1: this is it, And there's a breathless hysteria every time
Speaker 1: they think they've got a little nugget that moves them
Speaker 1: just a hair closer to getting this president out of office.
Speaker 1: That is what they do. That's and forget the facts.
Speaker 1: You know, here's a big story. James Comey had the
Speaker 1: fix in as it relates to Hillary Clinton, and Peter
Speaker 1: Struck had the fix in, and they wrote her exoneration
Speaker 1: on the email server scandal before they ever did an investigation.
Speaker 1: Is that is that? Is that worthy of news? I
Speaker 1: think that's newsworthy. Where's the charges of James Comey or
Speaker 1: the fact of everyone's saying this weekend this is outrageous.
Speaker 1: Look at Hannity, Fox News. They're trying to de legitimize
Speaker 1: the special counsel. All right, Let's let's flip the cards
Speaker 1: for a second. Let's say Hillary's president. Let's say you
Speaker 1: bring in a special counsel and the only of the
Speaker 1: sixteen people he brings in, eight of them are big
Speaker 1: donors to Donald Trump and Republicans and George W. Bush,
Speaker 1: but no owners to Hillary Clinton on the other side
Speaker 1: of it. Then let's figure out that some of the
Speaker 1: people involved in every aspect of the investigation. That would
Speaker 1: be this guy, you know, what's his name, Struck. He
Speaker 1: was involved in interviewing Cheryl Mills Uma Aberdeen. He's the
Speaker 1: one that changed the wording from gross negligent to extreme
Speaker 1: carelessness to get the legal definition out of the exoneration
Speaker 1: of Hillary before the investigation that he co authored with
Speaker 1: his buddy Jim Comey. I mean that to me is
Speaker 1: obstruction of justice. And then he interviews Flynn, and then
Speaker 1: he interviews Hillary. Then he interviews all of Hillary's friends,
Speaker 1: and the only one that gets caught lying to the
Speaker 1: FBI is the Trump guy. Well, that seems a little
Speaker 1: bit odd. And then you hire a guy Andrew Weissman.
Speaker 1: Let's see destroyed destroyed what up to eighty five thousand
Speaker 1: jobs after he falsely went after a company Arthur Anderson,
Speaker 1: accounting eighty five thousand jobs lost by some estimates. And
Speaker 1: then he goes out there and and goes after Merrill
Speaker 1: Lynch in there and Ron Deal and and Merrill Lynch
Speaker 1: employees go to jail for almost a year. And then
Speaker 1: you find out never mind, you have a Supreme Court
Speaker 1: decision in the one case nine zero overturning the obstruction
Speaker 1: of justice. And you got a Fifth Circuit Court of
Speaker 1: Appeals same thing. And you got Wiseman, who withheld exculpatory
Speaker 1: evidence that would have helped the defendants. Who acts that way,
Speaker 1: that's unethical. You've got examples of Andrew Weiseman making up crimes.
Speaker 1: This is Mueller's team, and people saying that, Wow, what
Speaker 1: Hannity's doing is disgusting. You know what it's you know
Speaker 1: what's disgusting. How lazy people in this industry are. You know,
Speaker 1: I was gonna take the Twitter over the weekend and
Speaker 1: really rip a few of these, you know, these people
Speaker 1: that work at Conspiracy Theory TV, MSNBC or Fake New CNN,
Speaker 1: And you know what, I figured, They're not worth Why
Speaker 1: should I have to educate them and do their job
Speaker 1: for them. They are dumb, they are overpaid, they are
Speaker 1: extraordinarily lazy. And if you really get to the heart
Speaker 1: and soul, a lot of these quote Republicans they get
Speaker 1: hired by MSNBC, all they have done is they have
Speaker 1: sold their souls for a paycheck. It doesn't matter how
Speaker 1: extreme their counterparts on their channel are. Just by being
Speaker 1: a little less extreme, they can be called the Republican
Speaker 1: and it's it's just non stomp anyway. One Shawn is
Speaker 1: a toe free telephone number. We're loaded up today, a
Speaker 1: lot of news to get to. We'll talk about the media,
Speaker 1: We'll talk more about the double standard. We're gonna get
Speaker 1: to the bottom of what happened in this case in
Speaker 1: Times Squared today, and uh we have Greg Jarrett and
Speaker 1: Sydney Powell will break down exactly what the media is missing.
Speaker 1: You know, there are not many memories that top the
Speaker 1: excitement waking up Christmas morning. Well, now that we're a
Speaker 1: little bit older, well you can still capture a piece
Speaker 1: of that joy and surprise everyone on your Christmas list
Speaker 1: with peppermint roses to make their home festive and bright.
Speaker 1: Thanks to one flowers dot com and right now, when
Speaker 1: you order twelve peppermint roses, one Flowers will give you
Speaker 1: an extra half dozen roses an a vase absolutely free.
Speaker 1: That's up to off the original price peppermint Christmas roses. Well,
Speaker 1: it's perfect for the holiday surprise on anybody on your list.
Speaker 1: Twelve peppermint roses only plus another half dozen roses an
Speaker 1: a vase for free in an unbelievable deal. When it
Speaker 1: comes to life's most important holiday moments. Trust one eight
Speaker 1: hundred flowers dot com and to order twelve peppermint roses
Speaker 1: plus another half dozen roses and a vase for free
Speaker 1: one eight hundred flowers dot com. Click on the radio
Speaker 1: icon enter my last name Hannity. That's one eight hundred
Speaker 1: flowers dot com. My last name, Hannity. All right, as
Speaker 1: we roll along Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred nine for one, Shawn,
Speaker 1: you know what happened what we told you about Friday?
Speaker 1: Fake news CNN. I mean, you see the breathlessness of
Speaker 1: the coverage every day, the hysteria with any new little factoid,
Speaker 1: and the race to to get it out there, breathlessly
Speaker 1: reporting on a story. Has happened a number of times
Speaker 1: last week where they just utterly and completely and I
Speaker 1: gotta argue it on some level, I think it's just
Speaker 1: anything that they can do to try and make Donald
Speaker 1: Trump look bad and contribute to a negative perception is
Speaker 1: what they're gonna do. I mean, you just look at
Speaker 1: how the media covers them every day. It's seven I
Speaker 1: hate Trump seven stop Trump. You know the names he's
Speaker 1: been called, from liar to I can't even go through
Speaker 1: them all and called every name and then some. And Friday,
Speaker 1: fake news CNN wall to wall breathlessly reporting their next
Speaker 1: nugget that turns out to be a big, fat lie,
Speaker 1: falsely claiming that Donald Trump Junior received an email. The
Speaker 1: email was received on September four. It gave him special
Speaker 1: access to the hack d n C emails that hadn't
Speaker 1: yet been released by Wiki Leaks. One problem as the
Speaker 1: day went on, turned out that, like other news that
Speaker 1: they breathlessly report, they got it wrong. The email that
Speaker 1: was sent I didn't know who the sender was to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Jr. Was actually dated September that's the day
Speaker 1: after Wiki Leaks put out the d n C documents.
Speaker 1: But you have fake news hyping it and hyping it
Speaker 1: and hyping it and hyping it and hyping it as
Speaker 1: as the big smoking gun about Trump Russia collusion, and
Speaker 1: you know it claimed that that they had it, and
Speaker 1: then they didn't. You know, Oh, but they say, but
Speaker 1: two sources verified. Well, maybe you need better sources besides
Speaker 1: whatever democratic hacks you're dealing with on a regular basis
Speaker 1: that are feeding you information. And the same thing happened
Speaker 1: with Brian ross Over at ABC he's no longer allowed
Speaker 1: to cover Trump. I think if you make it that
Speaker 1: nobody that anybody that's unfair to Trump on fake news CNN,
Speaker 1: that they'd go dark because that represent it's their entire lineup.
Speaker 1: I can't think of a single host on that network
Speaker 1: that is pro Trump. The same thing on MSNBC, I
Speaker 1: can't think of. And you know it's funny because they
Speaker 1: go after Fox. I can tell you a ton of
Speaker 1: people on Fox that are not big Trump fans, and
Speaker 1: a ton of them that we have the Christmas party
Speaker 1: later tonight for the Fox News Channel. Chef Smith and
Speaker 1: I are giving the toast together. Uh do you think
Speaker 1: it's symbolic maybe we have different political views? Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think so. I saw Ebony Williams this weekend. I love Ebony,
Speaker 1: I love being chef. We get along great, you know,
Speaker 1: But I just but there are people there that have
Speaker 1: tons of views that differ from mine. Believe me, believe
Speaker 1: believe me. I'll get about it quick break right back
Speaker 1: to the top of the hour. You know. The other
Speaker 1: thing about the sheep news media is this and then
Speaker 1: this is important. It's like one of them reports fake news,
Speaker 1: then they start then they start reporting each other's fake news.
Speaker 1: So as soon as like MSNBC reports something, or in
Speaker 1: the case of CNN on Friday, well then it comes
Speaker 1: MSNBC and they just spread the fake news and joining
Speaker 1: the fun. And then the New York Times and Washington
Speaker 1: Post they don't do their own fact checking. They're just
Speaker 1: a bunch of sheep that follow and it's you can
Speaker 1: see this on unfolding a lot. If you ever look
Speaker 1: at Twitter, which I'm kind of spending less and less
Speaker 1: time on for a lot of different reasons. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's so much hate on there. I mean, it's just
Speaker 1: gotten to the point it used to be fun and
Speaker 1: I love I love starting fights and I love fighting
Speaker 1: I do. But then it's like then you got all
Speaker 1: the trolls out there, and then you got people triggering
Speaker 1: their their bot systems send this. It's just like Hannity
Speaker 1: tweets and this. It's just ridiculous. So anyway, so the
Speaker 1: fake news story from Friday by fake news CNN, then
Speaker 1: it goes out there. Now where's the chief of fake news,
Speaker 1: Jeff Zucker? I wonder if he's proud of his network today.
Speaker 1: By the way, Sucker's name keeps coming up in in
Speaker 1: the sense that he was close to Matt Lower and
Speaker 1: he said, I didn't know anything about this. I didn't
Speaker 1: know anything about this. Well, now NBC is coming under
Speaker 1: heavy fire that they did know, and they knew a lot,
Speaker 1: and they knew a lot for a long period of time,
Speaker 1: and that they didn't do anything when they knew a lot.
Speaker 1: Up to see what happens there, anyway, Zucker sent his
Speaker 1: stenographer Humpty Dumpty out to try to clean up the
Speaker 1: mess this weekend, and instead of profusely apologizing like he
Speaker 1: should have, you know, he tries to use the networks
Speaker 1: complete and utter fake news failure of course, to attack
Speaker 1: Tunnald Trump Donald Trump's fault. It's Fox News his fault.
Speaker 1: They've literally got a team over there of of Humpty
Speaker 1: Dumpty and Humpty Dumpty wannabes that sucked. They actually suck
Speaker 1: up to Humpty Dumpty because their goal in life is
Speaker 1: to be Humpty Dumpty, and Humpty Dumpty in his mind,
Speaker 1: thinks he's a prime time cable host and he deserves
Speaker 1: prime time. You can just see how hard he's working,
Speaker 1: so he thinks the way to get there is to
Speaker 1: be the most pro Jeff Zucker CNN stenographer he can
Speaker 1: be on any given day, and then all his little
Speaker 1: sycophants that work for him, that want to be him, uh,
Speaker 1: that are hoping he gets in prime time too, because
Speaker 1: then they can take his weekend show. And it's these
Speaker 1: people are It's so transparent, it is so obvious. If
Speaker 1: it was Fox News making a mistake, I can tell
Speaker 1: you it would be days and days and days and
Speaker 1: days and weeks and weeks of coverage. It's pretty pathetic,
Speaker 1: even by fake news standards. And then not alone, I
Speaker 1: mean the Washington Post reporter. He was forced to apologize
Speaker 1: this weekend after tweeting out a a misleading photo about
Speaker 1: the crowd since a crowd size at Donald Trump's rally,
Speaker 1: and it turned out the image was taken well before
Speaker 1: the president ever stepped on the stage, and when the
Speaker 1: President actually got on the stage, the place was packed anyway. Uh.
Speaker 1: Then the President tweeted out, I guess the guy's name
Speaker 1: is Day we goal. They have a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: Washington Post people that apparently hate my guts. I don't
Speaker 1: even read it anymore. What was the other guy's name
Speaker 1: that was a studd? No, not not him. Um he's
Speaker 1: a media reporter over there. I forget friends with Humpty Dumpty.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure, but it's like, if you watch these
Speaker 1: guys on social media, will you tweet me and I'll
Speaker 1: tweet you. You retweet me, I'll retweet you. You tweet
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, Eric Pimple, that's guy. That's the one Whimple,
Speaker 1: you know. I love all these media guys and it's hilarious.
Speaker 1: Those that can't in media comment on those that can.
Speaker 1: And this guy, I'd love to see him host the
Speaker 1: TV show one day. That would be highly entertaining, sort
Speaker 1: of like Alec Baldwin hosting a radio show. Alec Baldwin
Speaker 1: really really wanted to host a show. I mean, this
Speaker 1: was serious. So one day there's a buddy of mine
Speaker 1: out in California. He hosts a morning show out there,
Speaker 1: Brian Whitman, and he used to also be at the
Speaker 1: Ex Wife anyway, So one day Brian Whitman brought in
Speaker 1: Alec Baldwin to audition for a talk show. Now, if
Speaker 1: you're remember years ago, Rush did a parody of what
Speaker 1: the Tom Dastionll Show would sound like. This is real,
Speaker 1: this is not make pretend. That's interesting, interesting, No, play
Speaker 1: the whole thing. Um, when we come back. Uh, we
Speaker 1: got some time? Oh great, we're gonna h When can
Speaker 1: we take some calls? I'm whenever we want. Do we
Speaker 1: have calls that are on there? Now? Calls yet? What
Speaker 1: number do people call to get on the air? I mean,
Speaker 1: do we have that number? It's right there, you do.
Speaker 1: I have a cool number in front of me. Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry. That's interesting. Interesting at twelve ten at PhD.
Speaker 1: Of course, any other questions you have, any other comments
Speaker 1: you have, call us um to the what else? H
Speaker 1: call us please at now? Um. If you don't call,
Speaker 1: we're gonna keep reading from the Scientology manual. You might
Speaker 1: not feel it. You might not feel the energy right now,
Speaker 1: you might not feel the swell of what's happening Herebody
Speaker 1: calls you out there? Ivant, no cost, let's spead some
Speaker 1: more about scientology. Is Sean Hannity a scientologist? Alec Baldwin
Speaker 1: posing the big questions tonight? Here? Do we have any
Speaker 1: calls here yet? Ivan? None? Boy, it's just incredible, unbelievable. Well,
Speaker 1: you leave us no choice listeners. That was real. That
Speaker 1: was him. So he does this one show and then
Speaker 1: it bombed. He got so angry walked out of the
Speaker 1: middle of the show because the Great One and I
Speaker 1: called up at the same time and went on the
Speaker 1: air with him, And so he sneaks into this other show. Now,
Speaker 1: apparently Alec Baldwin, Father of the Year, is working on
Speaker 1: his own TV show after quote the success of his podcast.
Speaker 1: I never even knew he had a podcast anyway, He's
Speaker 1: been doing it apparently for isn't NYC Public Radio in
Speaker 1: New York. I don't even know is it anyway? So
Speaker 1: he's got here's the thing with Alec bolder. Here's the thing.
Speaker 1: He's an Emmy winning actor, already hosts ABC television panel
Speaker 1: The Match Game, and is set to expand his relationship
Speaker 1: with ABC and blah blah blah, blah blah blah. All right,
Speaker 1: well we might get some good material out of that
Speaker 1: every week. I'm kind of hoping. Jeff Sessions has spoken out,
Speaker 1: he said the following He said this Friday, the American
Speaker 1: people have a right to be concerned that Obama holdovers
Speaker 1: in the deep State of working against the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: I don't know what to glean from all of this,
Speaker 1: he says. I do feel the frustration, and I do
Speaker 1: think people have the right to be concerned. He said
Speaker 1: he was on with how we car in Boston. But
Speaker 1: often we're not able to do something the very something
Speaker 1: that it the very day something hits the newspapers. We've
Speaker 1: got to work at it a little bit and make
Speaker 1: sure that we know what we're doing. And addressing reports
Speaker 1: of political bias within the Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's Russia
Speaker 1: Gate investigation, all Sessions told car I do feel responsible
Speaker 1: for this department to make sure that there's no double standard.
Speaker 1: Will work to be worthy of the confidence I've been given,
Speaker 1: And the Attorney General said the Justice Department is reviewing
Speaker 1: reports that Associate General Bruce Orr met with Trump dossier
Speaker 1: and author Christopher Steel during the presidential campaign, adding that
Speaker 1: Or could be fired or for that offense. We're gonna
Speaker 1: go back and look at that. It's being looked at,
Speaker 1: and if it requires discipline, it will be carried out. Okay,
Speaker 1: does that mean Comey is gonna be disciplined in some
Speaker 1: way any crime involved with him and Struck putting the
Speaker 1: fix in for Hillary on the email server investigation, And
Speaker 1: we're gonna take it a step further. You know what
Speaker 1: did Robert Muller and and Rosenstein and all these other
Speaker 1: people know about Putin having a network in the United
Speaker 1: States eights and two thousand and nine involved in bribery, extortion, UH, kickbacks,
Speaker 1: and money laundering, and what they did UH in the
Speaker 1: lead up to the siffiest decision by Hillary and Eric
Speaker 1: Holder to give Vladimir Putin of our Urania. We're gonna
Speaker 1: look into that too. And then the money that floated
Speaker 1: into the Clinton Foundation from the very people involved in
Speaker 1: that deal at varying times, We're gonna look into that.
Speaker 1: Are we gonna look into, you know, real collusion as
Speaker 1: it relates to the dossier that Hillary bought and paid for.
Speaker 1: Are we ever gonna find out if a FISA warrant
Speaker 1: was issued based on those Russian propaganda lies. I mean,
Speaker 1: it seems like we're the only ones doing the work here.
Speaker 1: At times, there are others Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett, John Solomon,
Speaker 1: there are a few others of us, you know, banging
Speaker 1: the drum every day here to try and get to
Speaker 1: the truth. It's not happening in the fake news media.
Speaker 1: I can tell you that. I'll tell you another thing.
Speaker 1: They're all going to be proven wrong. They are all
Speaker 1: gonna have to eat their words out of very high
Speaker 1: level just a matter of how much saying how much
Speaker 1: they're going to have to shove in there, but they'll
Speaker 1: be eating their words, all right. Let's get to the phones. Uh,
Speaker 1: let's say hi to Lucy and McKinney Texas. Lucy, Hi,
Speaker 1: how are you? John? Thank you so much for taking
Speaker 1: my call. I had a question for you, and you
Speaker 1: were actually just talking about our attorney general. My question
Speaker 1: is what none of this could have happened if Jeff's
Speaker 1: Sessions had not recused himself. That's correct, This never would
Speaker 1: have happened, right, So what would have How would this
Speaker 1: have manifested itself? Because everything that's being done now is
Speaker 1: all linked back to that um you know, to when
Speaker 1: Attorney General Sessions was being interviewed for his um for
Speaker 1: his position. And I think it was even Al Franken
Speaker 1: that asked him the question that caused him to say
Speaker 1: that several times that he was going to recuse himself.
Speaker 1: So did the left to know that he was going
Speaker 1: to do that? Or I'm just I don't I don't know,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but I will tell you this president
Speaker 1: needs a strong attorney general. He needs a strong attorney
Speaker 1: general at a time where we have what is an
Speaker 1: unprecedented assault on the executive branch in this country. Make
Speaker 1: you have no doubt in your mind. There are people
Speaker 1: working every day and I've told you that the list
Speaker 1: of enemies the president has. Yeah, Jeff Sessions is right.
Speaker 1: The deep state is an enemy of the president. So
Speaker 1: too is the Democratic Party. They want him out tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you that the elections are gonna be
Speaker 1: very important. That's why Republicans showing weakness, not getting an
Speaker 1: agenda done. Oh, it's it's hurting everybody. It's gonna most
Speaker 1: hurt them at the polls, but it could hurt everybody,
Speaker 1: and it could hurt the country and send the country
Speaker 1: into a tailspin. If you want to know the truth,
Speaker 1: you know they're gonna put us through an impeachment hearing
Speaker 1: over nothing. Impeach forty five and peach forty five. Um,
Speaker 1: you know the fact that we're not investigating the real
Speaker 1: things that need to be investigated, the surveillance, the unmasking,
Speaker 1: the leaking of raw intelligence that needs to be leaked,
Speaker 1: the fix in on Hillary that needs to be investigated.
Speaker 1: With James Comey, the relationship with Comey and Rosenstein. Rosenstein
Speaker 1: things Mueller is doing a good job. We got to
Speaker 1: investigate Mueller's team that he's put together a team of
Speaker 1: Hillary lovers and Trump haters, people with questionable ethics and
Speaker 1: failed records. I mean, we gotta look at the uranium
Speaker 1: one deal. Then we got to go back to the
Speaker 1: email server scandal. If we're gonna have equal justice under
Speaker 1: the law, we need a stronger attorney general than ever.
Speaker 1: You know, one of the most pivotal players in the
Speaker 1: Reagan years was Ed Mease, the attorney general. You know,
Speaker 1: in that time, the executive deputy was Mark Levin. People
Speaker 1: may not know that history. They fought every day in
Speaker 1: that office. Should hear some of the stories that I
Speaker 1: know unbelievable. Back to our phones as we say hi
Speaker 1: to Sean is in Sioux City, Iowa. How are you? Hey,
Speaker 1: how's it going with Sean? What's going on? I'm sure
Speaker 1: I'll be out there. Let's see two or three years
Speaker 1: from now, every election we're out there. Hey, that's fine,
Speaker 1: welcome up. You guys are always welcome. He or no problem.
Speaker 1: What's going on? Isn't it funny how kind of the
Speaker 1: clown news network always comes out they say, you know,
Speaker 1: they have this big bombing in that guy only happened long.
Speaker 1: But then they all of a sudden they turned right
Speaker 1: around and they say, oh, President Trump, do you drink?
Speaker 1: And he watches eight hours of TV a day? How
Speaker 1: is it getting work done? Ye? How is that even news?
Speaker 1: I mean is it my noting something? Look? I'm you know,
Speaker 1: they're just pathetic. Um. You know the CNN does reports, Well,
Speaker 1: Trump's gas get one scoop of ice cream and he
Speaker 1: gets two. And that's fake news too. And look at
Speaker 1: this dog. The inner ear of the dog, it's like
Speaker 1: a image of President Trump has an uncanny likeness. Apparently
Speaker 1: the president gets two scoops. You know, everyone or else
Speaker 1: around the table gets one. Uh no word, if there
Speaker 1: were sprinkles at the dessert course, he gets two scoops
Speaker 1: of the no ice cream with his chocolate cream pie
Speaker 1: and the single scoop for everyone else. You know, CNN
Speaker 1: has botched seven times this year in terms of reports,
Speaker 1: and this is supposed to be a news network. You
Speaker 1: think they'd fix their problems. But in their seven blunder
Speaker 1: this year, that report on Friday, Now that's the report
Speaker 1: Donald Trump JUNR. The Trump campaign received advanced access to
Speaker 1: stolen emails that were soon to be published by Wiki Leaks.
Speaker 1: They must be tied into Julian Assan. Who's really tied
Speaker 1: into the Russians? Although Julian Assange told Sean Hannity numerous
Speaker 1: times that it was not Russia that gave him the emails,
Speaker 1: why doesn't Robert Muller, if he's supposed to do Trump
Speaker 1: Russia investigation, why don't they go to the source Julian
Speaker 1: Osange and asked him, you think he would be the
Speaker 1: one person that knows, and he said he has the
Speaker 1: evidence that he'd be willing to share. In his case,
Speaker 1: he wants to be able to leave the Ecuadorian embassy
Speaker 1: in Great Britain. Well maybe if it gets us the
Speaker 1: truth and we get to move on as a country
Speaker 1: and work for the common men and women that need jobs,
Speaker 1: that are in poverty and out of work and food
Speaker 1: stamps on food stamps, it would help anyway. So they
Speaker 1: botched the whole thing. The Daily Caller debunked the story.
Speaker 1: Then they tried to step all over themselves all through
Speaker 1: the day and night and weekend, you know, to say
Speaker 1: we really didn't mess up. It was really Trump. Trump
Speaker 1: is far worse than we are. Let's blame Trump. It's
Speaker 1: always Trump's fault. The dog bites, the beasts things, you're
Speaker 1: feeling sad, it's Trump's fault. You know, I don't get
Speaker 1: credit for one thing. It always bothered me. I spent
Speaker 1: a tiny fraction of what she spent, and we want
Speaker 1: you know, the old days, if you spend less and
Speaker 1: you win, that's a good thing. Oh but here you
Speaker 1: don't get any credit for it. We spent she was
Speaker 1: at what number, two point two billion? I understand two
Speaker 1: point two billion. Do you think do you think those
Speaker 1: consultants made a couple of bucks on that election? Didn't
Speaker 1: he spent twelve point four million or a dacier That
Speaker 1: was a total phony tulp point form madier. Boy So.
Speaker 1: So we spent a tiny fraction think of it, a
Speaker 1: tiny fraction of the money, and we won. But we
Speaker 1: won because of people like you. That's what we're actually correcting.
Speaker 1: A story that we have been reporting throughout the day
Speaker 1: today about an email that was sent to the Trump
Speaker 1: campaign to then candidate Trump Donald Trump Jr. Uh and
Speaker 1: others during the heat of the campaign season. This email
Speaker 1: included a decryption key and also uh in something a
Speaker 1: link to where they could access some of these hacked
Speaker 1: Winking League documents from the Democratic National Committee. Now, we've
Speaker 1: been reporting that this email came on September four, that
Speaker 1: was for some of these documents were publicly available, but
Speaker 1: we have just received obtained a copy of this email.
Speaker 1: Uh and instead we now learned that this uh, this
Speaker 1: email was on September four, So that is ten days
Speaker 1: later than what we originally reported earlier today. And and
Speaker 1: this is appears to has changed the understanding of this
Speaker 1: story because initially it seemed perhaps they were being offered
Speaker 1: access to documents that were not yet publicly available. But
Speaker 1: in this email from an individual named Michael Ericson, they
Speaker 1: do direct the Trump campaign to some publicly available documents,
Speaker 1: hacked documents from wiki licks as well as from the
Speaker 1: former Secretary of State Colin Powell, saying that those documents
Speaker 1: are indeed available. And now our initial reporting on that
Speaker 1: September four date was based on two sources who had
Speaker 1: seen this this email, but that information was incorrect now
Speaker 1: based on the copy of the email that we have
Speaker 1: obtained this afternoon. So so Brooke, it just shows that
Speaker 1: perhaps the initial understanding of what this email was perhaps
Speaker 1: is not as significant as what we know now based
Speaker 1: on this email books. More fake news shouldn't be a shock.
Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity Show eight d nine for one
Speaker 1: Sean is our toll free telephone number. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. I don't think now.
Speaker 1: It's every day pretty much the the fake news industry,
Speaker 1: the destroy Trump media comes out with something wrong the president.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, he didn't spend as much money as the
Speaker 1: Democrats are Hillary Clinton, but it was Hillary's campaign. They
Speaker 1: are the ones that paid Fusion GPS, that paid Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele for the phony, lying Russian propaganda dossier that was
Speaker 1: cited so often in the campaign. It was designed to
Speaker 1: pay for it so they could influence you, the American
Speaker 1: people during the election and the lead up of the election.
Speaker 1: And it's something we need to pay attention to. Greg
Speaker 1: Jarrett has written a column saying Robert Muller and his
Speaker 1: politically biased team of prosecutors need to go. We have
Speaker 1: gone through in great tell who these people are Democratic donors,
Speaker 1: and we learned a lot last week about people like
Speaker 1: Peter Struck, a guy that is sending texts that he
Speaker 1: loves Hillary, hates Donald Trump and Peter Struck is up
Speaker 1: to his eyeballs and everything, the Clinton email server scandal,
Speaker 1: the docier. He's there interviewing Cheryl Mills and Uma Aberdeen
Speaker 1: and Hillary Clinton and General Michael Flynn. And yet he's
Speaker 1: got a built in bias Andrew Weissman, you know, because
Speaker 1: of his tactics and and unethical practices. All tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of people lost their jobs at Anderson Accounting when
Speaker 1: he was involved in that case with Enron. And then
Speaker 1: of course a number of Merrill Lynch executives went to
Speaker 1: jail and two decisions go against him that were massive
Speaker 1: nine zero. The U. S. Supreme Court ruled against him,
Speaker 1: and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals showed he was wrong.
Speaker 1: He has a history of not passing on exculpatory evidence,
Speaker 1: making up laws, and other unethical behavior. Anyway, joining us
Speaker 1: to go through all of this, Greg Jared is with
Speaker 1: US Fox News legal analysts, Sidney Powell, oral appellate attorney,
Speaker 1: former federal prosecutor, author of the book License to Lie.
Speaker 1: Thank you all. Let's start with you. Greg Um. I
Speaker 1: don't even know where to begin here, but between the
Speaker 1: media going off and telling one lie after another breathlessly
Speaker 1: hysterically and then having a pull back day after day.
Speaker 1: And this team that Muller has put together, it's I
Speaker 1: can't believe it's happening in our country. Mueller sabotaged the
Speaker 1: credibility of his own investigation, and he has only himself
Speaker 1: to blame for what might have been a probe that
Speaker 1: was viewed with trust and confidence by the American people.
Speaker 1: But Muller chose to assemble the team of incredibly biased
Speaker 1: people to go after Donald Trump to try to undo
Speaker 1: the election and remove the president. Look, there are plenty
Speaker 1: of qualified, uh skilled lawyers across America who do not
Speaker 1: have a political acts to grind. Muller should have chosen them. Instead,
Speaker 1: he chooses people like Weisseman, who was there celebrating the
Speaker 1: night Hillary Clinton was supposed to win at the Javit
Speaker 1: Center and was defeated. He hires Genie Ray, who once
Speaker 1: represented Hillary Clinton in her email scandal. Uh And then,
Speaker 1: of course Peter Struck. Is Peter Struck the only FBI
Speaker 1: agent in America? How is it possible that this one
Speaker 1: guy was the lead investigator in both the Combing investigation
Speaker 1: of Clinton and the Mueller investigation of Trump? With incredible
Speaker 1: now declared bias. It's there, the evidence is there, and
Speaker 1: he's been kicked off the case. How do we get
Speaker 1: this entirely possible that Struck is the person who presented
Speaker 1: the fiz of warrant to the FIE the court. Have
Speaker 1: we confirmed now that the fies a warrant that they
Speaker 1: used the information that Hillary Clinton and Hillary's d n
Speaker 1: C she was running in According to Donna Brazil, do
Speaker 1: we now know if that dossier for a certainty was
Speaker 1: used to get a warrant against Donald Trump the candidate
Speaker 1: and or Donald Trump the president elect and maybe even
Speaker 1: as president. Do we know if that was used in
Speaker 1: that case? Nobody's seen the vice of warrant application, at
Speaker 1: least nobody that I know of, but I think they've
Speaker 1: admitted to some extent that the dossier formed some sort
Speaker 1: of basis for it. Congressman Jordan's questioning of Christopher Ray
Speaker 1: the other day was very telling, mainly in what Mr
Speaker 1: Ray would not answer. And one thing I'd like to
Speaker 1: point out too, is that Mr Ray was actually Wiseman's
Speaker 1: supposed supervisor in the Department of Justice overseeing the en
Speaker 1: RHN Task Force investigation after two thousand and three, when
Speaker 1: Mr Wiseman sent the four Meryl Lynch executives to prison
Speaker 1: on an indictment that didn't even state a federal offense,
Speaker 1: while he hid the evidence that showed they were innocent.
Speaker 1: You know, I just I just all of them. I'm
Speaker 1: having a hard time because a lot of your book,
Speaker 1: License to Lie, is about Andrew Weisman. It's a chapter
Speaker 1: in verse about how unethical this guy is. Why would
Speaker 1: Robert Muller, knowing this background, choose this individual because he
Speaker 1: likes him and trust him, and that's the kind activity
Speaker 1: he wants conducted in this case. That's the only possible
Speaker 1: reason the book has been ouncedin I didn't write this
Speaker 1: book to help President Trump. I wrote it to sound
Speaker 1: the alarm because of what I've seen as a practicing lawyer.
Speaker 1: I never intended to be an author, So the bottom
Speaker 1: lines all was so egregious I had to write it. Basically,
Speaker 1: You've got Mueller's team covering for Clinton and that means comey,
Speaker 1: you know, writing an exoneration before he investigates the email
Speaker 1: server scandal, and then persecuting every Trump associate with with
Speaker 1: varying standards of intensity. All these guys are thick as thieves.
Speaker 1: They have been together and work together. They've been friends
Speaker 1: and allies and partners. Weissman, rosen Stein, Mueller, Comey. It
Speaker 1: is bewildering to me that the Department of Justice would
Speaker 1: allow this to unfold in Congress needs to take action.
Speaker 1: They need to put a stop to this, and Jeff
Speaker 1: Sessions in particular needs to stand up and stay in
Speaker 1: order to restore integrity. I'm stepping in. I'm going to
Speaker 1: unrecuse myself to reorder this, and then I'll recuse myself again.
Speaker 1: But he needs to replace Mueller and the team of
Speaker 1: partisans that Mueller has put together and replaced them with
Speaker 1: people who are Rosenstein, who made the appointment because of
Speaker 1: the recusal of Jeff Sessions. He said he's he's happy
Speaker 1: with the way Mueller's conducting this investigation. What does that
Speaker 1: tell you? I tell you he's happy with the indictments
Speaker 1: so far and the guilty please. And Rosenstein likely knows
Speaker 1: that these guys are going after the president to undo
Speaker 1: the election, so of course he's tickled pink that it's
Speaker 1: going that way. Sydney, let's talk about the go ahead, Rosenstein, Muller, Wiseman,
Speaker 1: and Comey go back twenty to thirty years together. You
Speaker 1: brought up a case once and that was the Department
Speaker 1: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the first Department New York, Bronx County.
Speaker 1: These and uh, there's a whole background about the Enron
Speaker 1: task force and the Meryl executives and all of the
Speaker 1: people from Anderson Accounting. So maybe five thousand people I
Speaker 1: believe lost their jobs there. What was your involvement in that?
Speaker 1: I was co author of the grievance filed with the
Speaker 1: New York Bar against Andrew Wiseman. Bill Hoads, one of
Speaker 1: the leading legal ethics experts in the country, took the
Speaker 1: laboring oar and filing the grievance, and he did at
Speaker 1: pro bono because we were both so outraged by the
Speaker 1: prosecutorials conduct we saw in the Meryal Lynch case. And
Speaker 1: what was the outcome of that? Oh, you're gonna love
Speaker 1: this Seawan. The Department of Justice was defending Mr Wiseman
Speaker 1: on the grievance because he was Muller's general counsel at
Speaker 1: the FBI at the time. The New York Bar, without
Speaker 1: even telling us, held it for about four months, then
Speaker 1: sent it to Department of Justice Office of Professional responsibility
Speaker 1: to decide the grievance. So the same entity essentially defending Weissman,
Speaker 1: decided that he had committed no wrong. Did you see
Speaker 1: the report this weekend Greg Jared about Fusion GPS trying
Speaker 1: to tie Donald Trump through the dossier and other means
Speaker 1: to this guy Epstein. Uh and this Orgy Island mess.
Speaker 1: Did you see that? I did see it. Yeah. Rowan Scarborough.
Speaker 1: The Washington Times has a piece out on it today. Yeah. Look, um,
Speaker 1: Fusion GPS and and Simpson who helped fund it through
Speaker 1: the Hillary Clinton campaign and the d n C UH
Speaker 1: and Christopher Steele. I mean, all of this violates federal
Speaker 1: criminal statutes. Uh. You know, you cannot give money to
Speaker 1: a foreign national during the course of a political campaign. Uh.
Speaker 1: And and why is it that there isn't a Department
Speaker 1: of Justice investigation into that. I'm hoping that there is
Speaker 1: and they're simply keeping its secret. There's another Department of
Speaker 1: Justice connection to this whole thing too, and that's the
Speaker 1: Deputy Assistant Attorney and Bruce or who was recently demoted
Speaker 1: within the Department of Justice because he had met with
Speaker 1: and has ties the Fusion GPS and that Trump Dostier
Speaker 1: and why he wasn't fired instead of demoted is beyond
Speaker 1: my comprehension it and oh he had his office four
Speaker 1: doors down from Rosenstein. Stay right there. We'll continue, Sydney Powell,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett eight nine for one, Shawn, if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. And as we continue,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett and Sydney Poweller with us. All right, so
Speaker 1: we're both all three of us seem to agree that
Speaker 1: there's nothing but a group of if you talk about
Speaker 1: Bruce or and you talk about Lisa Page, and it's
Speaker 1: Peter Struck and Genie Ray, and you talk about all
Speaker 1: these people and Weissman, uh, straight on down the line.
Speaker 1: You know, I was watching all weekend and the coverage
Speaker 1: seems to be, Oh, the president's defenders are out there
Speaker 1: trying to discredit the special counsel. And my argument, Sydney,
Speaker 1: is they he discredited himself by putting in a team
Speaker 1: of people that are abusively biased. He did. These are
Speaker 1: all people with very strong and deep time to the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign, and there is no way anyone can have
Speaker 1: any confidence in the veracity of what comes out of
Speaker 1: this investigation the way it's headed. Here's what I think happened.
Speaker 1: It led by Peter Struck, the FBI agent who who
Speaker 1: you know, apparently made incredibly disparaging remarks about the president
Speaker 1: and correspondingly supportive comments about Hillary Clinton. He decided that
Speaker 1: if Hillary Clinton were indicted as she should be for
Speaker 1: the email scandal and the Espionage Act, she wouldn't be
Speaker 1: president of Donald Trump would So he and others set
Speaker 1: about conjuring out of there a way to exonerate her.
Speaker 1: And they went about and they accomplished it. It made
Speaker 1: no sense to any lawyer in America, but they did it.
Speaker 1: And then when she didn't once ag hold on to
Speaker 1: the then she didn't win. That now means that we
Speaker 1: didn't have a fair investigation. So it should start again, shouldn't.
Speaker 1: The statue limitations has not run yet, and they need
Speaker 1: to move very quickly to reopen and reexamined the evidence.
Speaker 1: The evidence is there, a fair minded lawyer would say,
Speaker 1: all right, let's give it to a grand jury. So
Speaker 1: when she didn't win on election night, the same people
Speaker 1: then decided, out of retribution and revenge, that they are
Speaker 1: going to do whatever they can to kick Donald Trump
Speaker 1: out of office. And if that means manufacturing crimes where
Speaker 1: crimes don't exist, so be it, and that appears to
Speaker 1: be what they're doing Sydney. There's irrefutable public proof that
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton committed to one thousand one violation, which is
Speaker 1: what they've charged General Flynn with and what they charged
Speaker 1: Mr Papadopoulos with. It's in her testimony to Congress where
Speaker 1: she said there was no classified material on her server.
Speaker 1: I mean their YouTube clips of it that people have tweeted.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's evidence is right there. So there has
Speaker 1: never been a fair investigation of the Clinton situation, and
Speaker 1: there's nothing fair about the investigation that's going on now.
Speaker 1: It's very troubling. I told somebody the other day, it's
Speaker 1: not we're not just playing whacka male. We're playing lack
Speaker 1: of hydra these days. Well, what what do you untangle
Speaker 1: this mess? Greg? Well? I think the only way to
Speaker 1: do it is to have Attorney General Sessions bringing a
Speaker 1: new special counsel and a new team of prosecutors free
Speaker 1: of conflicts of interest, who will conduct a fair and unbiased,
Speaker 1: objective investigation. Justice requires it, and you cannot expect Rod Rosenstein,
Speaker 1: who's already deeply conflicted, to do it. He is the
Speaker 1: acting Attorney General and the Trump Russia investigation. He needs
Speaker 1: to be removed. Mueller needs to be removed. Weissman, Genie Ray,
Speaker 1: Aaron Zebli, Uh, Peter Struck has already been removed. Andrew Weissman,
Speaker 1: all of them need to be been removed from the investigation.
Speaker 1: He should be removed from the FBI. I agree, all right.
Speaker 1: I want to thank you both for helping us go
Speaker 1: where no one else, apparently a media wants to go,
Speaker 1: and that's towards the truth and fighting for equal justice
Speaker 1: under the law. Thank you, Sidney, We are appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Greg We'll see you tonight on Hannity nine Eastern. When
Speaker 1: we come back, we have Patrick Pool, National Correspondent, PJ
Speaker 1: Media Lieutenant retired lieutenant with the n Y p DY
Speaker 1: Bill mcgrarty is with us, and we'll talk about this
Speaker 1: terror attack that took place earlier at Port Authority in
Speaker 1: New York City earlier today and what it means for
Speaker 1: the coming holidays. Eight one, Shaun is a number. We'll
Speaker 1: take a quick break, we'll come back. We'll continue straight
Speaker 1: ahead the New Sean Hannity Show, talking about what's right
Speaker 1: for America, whether renewed commitment to keep you up to
Speaker 1: date on the breaking news stories. The preliminary information from
Speaker 1: police sources and emphasized world my former world preliminary subject
Speaker 1: to change. UH. It is a man in his middle twenties,
Speaker 1: probably possibly from Bangladesh and in the country about seven
Speaker 1: years who supposedly was setting the device off in the
Speaker 1: name of ices. So definitely a terrorist attack, definitely intended.
Speaker 1: As to whether the device malfunctioned or didn't function correctly,
Speaker 1: that will have to be determined. UH. As of the moment,
Speaker 1: he is apparently the only injured person in terms of
Speaker 1: from the event, possibly others from the noise the explosion,
Speaker 1: maybe ear issues. UH. Police have him in custody talking
Speaker 1: with him. Again, this information is all preliminary. UH. There
Speaker 1: will be a significant investigation of the area in question,
Speaker 1: as you might imagine that bomb squad has set up.
Speaker 1: There will be delays down at the Port Authority throughout
Speaker 1: most of the day while they conduct that investigation. It
Speaker 1: wasn't a passageway between the subway system and the port
Speaker 1: Authority between seventh and eighth Avenue. Any evidence that there's
Speaker 1: an uptick and in attempts are clear evidence that we
Speaker 1: had the bombing the night after I left my term.
Speaker 1: As Commissioner Jimmy O'Neill's first night in office, we had
Speaker 1: just of weeks ago the attack along the Hudson, the
Speaker 1: Pike Wick, and then we have had this one. That's
Speaker 1: three attacks, uh, definite terrorist attacks. The pace is quickening.
Speaker 1: As we have been indicating that it would uh that
Speaker 1: New York continues to remain the focus of interest because
Speaker 1: of what is happening right now, the intense publicity that
Speaker 1: anything that happens in New York brings about, and so
Speaker 1: this is something that we can anticipate these attacks are
Speaker 1: going to increase. Let's be clear, as New Yorkers, our
Speaker 1: lives revolved around the subways. When we hear of an
Speaker 1: attack in the subway is incredibly unsettling. And let's be
Speaker 1: also clear, this was an attempted terrorist attack. Thank God,
Speaker 1: the perpetrator did not achieve his ultimate goals. Thank God
Speaker 1: our first responders were there so quickly to address the
Speaker 1: situation to make sure people were safe. Thank God. The
Speaker 1: only injuries that we know at this point we're minor.
Speaker 1: These are the preliminary effects. So just just it just
Speaker 1: happened a couple of hours ago, so you have to
Speaker 1: understand these are preliminary effects. At approximately seven twenty and
Speaker 1: a below ground walkway which connects the I and D
Speaker 1: line at four two and eighth Avenue with the I
Speaker 1: R T line at four two and seven, the next
Speaker 1: shuttle at Times Square and the one two and three.
Speaker 1: Trained police were called to a reported explosion. Responding units
Speaker 1: found an injured seven year old male. We've identified him
Speaker 1: as I k U A k A y E d
Speaker 1: U L l A H. He had burns and wounds
Speaker 1: to his body. Preliminary investigation at the scene indicates this
Speaker 1: mail was wearing an improvised low tech explosive device attached
Speaker 1: to his body. He intentionally detonated that device. Looks like
Speaker 1: there are three other people in the immediate area, also
Speaker 1: stained minor injuries, but Dan I gros gonna talk about that.
Speaker 1: The subject was placed in custody and transported the Bellevue Hospital.
Speaker 1: Immediate police response to the scene included members of the
Speaker 1: Transit Bureau, Emergency Service Division, Bomb Squad, counter Terrorism mt A, Police,
Speaker 1: State Troopers, and the FBI's Joint Terrorist Task Force. In addition,
Speaker 1: the NYPD Strategic Response Group a Critical Response Command were
Speaker 1: assigned to other key transportation hubs and other locations throughout
Speaker 1: the city as a precautionary measurement. This incident was captured
Speaker 1: on transit system video. A further review when interview witnesses
Speaker 1: is underway. A thorough background investigation into a ka edula
Speaker 1: is being conducted by the Joint Terrorist Task Force. We're
Speaker 1: asking anyone who may have any information about this individual
Speaker 1: or incident to call the terror hotline NETS eight NYC.
Speaker 1: Say all right, you heard from Bill Bratton, Comrade Mayor
Speaker 1: the Blasio of New York, James O'Neill, New York City
Speaker 1: Police Commissioner UH and uh also saying the Port Authority
Speaker 1: m or of who he is identifying him, there is
Speaker 1: some background on this there. The destroy Trump media insists
Speaker 1: that today's attack in New York City and the subway
Speaker 1: system was carried out by a lone wolf uh and
Speaker 1: no coordination. How they could jump to these conclusions so fast,
Speaker 1: It's always interesting to me. Uh. Two weeks ago, we
Speaker 1: know that Isis issued a direct threat to New York City,
Speaker 1: complete with a graphic of a Santa Claus terrorist bomber
Speaker 1: staring in a Times Square. And for those that don't
Speaker 1: know the New York geography, the Port Authority subway station
Speaker 1: where the attack took place just a few blocks from
Speaker 1: Times Square as you're leading up to it, and the
Speaker 1: Daily Mail had pointed out that ISIS fanatics shared the
Speaker 1: disturbing propaganda image threatening a Christmas time attack on New
Speaker 1: York City just weeks before this explosion early this morning.
Speaker 1: A little more background, New York City now has been
Speaker 1: hit by three successful terrorist attacks since the Blasio ended
Speaker 1: terrorists surveillance program in New York. Just if anyone's keeping
Speaker 1: count or whether or not there's any connection, but you
Speaker 1: have a crude pipe bomb literally strapped to this guy
Speaker 1: inspired by ISIS went off in a crowded subway. This
Speaker 1: was in a card or near Times Square, injuring that man,
Speaker 1: slightly wounding three others and literally right in the heart
Speaker 1: of midtown traffic, uh and subway traffic, which became a
Speaker 1: big burden for hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers. Bill
Speaker 1: mcguarty's with US retired lieutenant with the m y p D,
Speaker 1: worked ten years in the counter terrorism unit. Patrick pool
Speaker 1: Is with US National Security correspondent for PJA Media. Thank
Speaker 1: you both for being with us. Bill, Let's talk about
Speaker 1: what you're gleaning from today's attack showing again it's not
Speaker 1: to be on the radio with you and Patrick again,
Speaker 1: but it's also said at the same point, and here
Speaker 1: we are listing two months later talking about another attack
Speaker 1: that happened in New York City. And it's my belief,
Speaker 1: or my personal belief, this is as a direct result
Speaker 1: of the policies put in place by this maya that
Speaker 1: we have in charge. Now. I mean, we have a
Speaker 1: person able to build this bomb by himself or if
Speaker 1: maybe coordinated with other people unknown at this time, and
Speaker 1: then walk in rush hour traffic and thank god that
Speaker 1: this bomb was either poorly dish uh, you know, constructed,
Speaker 1: or he didn't detonate it right, and thank god that
Speaker 1: nobody was severely injured. Can be a lot worse. You know,
Speaker 1: they do have, you know, materials out there and years
Speaker 1: ago I actually did a show on it in a
Speaker 1: Hannity and Colmes day on Days and Fox News and
Speaker 1: it's called The Anarchist Cookbook, and it gives you a
Speaker 1: play by play on how to do all of this.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not a surprise Patrick Poole that you
Speaker 1: know people have the information because it's all over the internet.
Speaker 1: If you want to get at it. Shot absolutely. And
Speaker 1: you recall here several years ago one of the Alcada
Speaker 1: magazines put out, you know, how to how to build
Speaker 1: a bomb in your mom's kitchen. Uh So, so this
Speaker 1: information is proliferated out there, and they've grown more instant
Speaker 1: in how they build explosives. You know, as Bill said,
Speaker 1: you know, just thank god that um, you know, the
Speaker 1: recipe or whatever they were using that that it wasn't
Speaker 1: successful because just even watching the video of the incident,
Speaker 1: there could have been a lot of people killed. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, that's the thing now. It raises questions. I'm
Speaker 1: a big believer in the First Amendment and freedom of speech,
Speaker 1: what about people? And the thing that frustrates me is
Speaker 1: we almost always go back after somebody's involved in an
Speaker 1: incident and we can find out that they were telegraphing
Speaker 1: via via social media loudly what their intentions and beliefs are.
Speaker 1: So I don't think there's enough, you know, Lieutenant, I
Speaker 1: don't think there's enough monitoring of social media and the
Speaker 1: lead up to these things. We haven't gotten much yet,
Speaker 1: but we will be getting information about this guy. But
Speaker 1: then it's like, okay, should people be allowed to share
Speaker 1: information on how to build suicide bombs on the Internet
Speaker 1: or is that a violation of free speech? Well, I person,
Speaker 1: we I don't believe they should be able to share
Speaker 1: this information, but if it falls in the realm of
Speaker 1: free speech, then what we have to do is and
Speaker 1: I said, hey, I hate to be cliche about it,
Speaker 1: but you know, the police depointment has not taken a
Speaker 1: proactive stance as it relates to these individuals since the
Speaker 1: blas it was taken office. They've taken a step back.
Speaker 1: They're afraid to do the things that they do. The
Speaker 1: way you need to find these people and Patrick, you
Speaker 1: I guess you can agree with me on this is
Speaker 1: you need sources out there given you information, looking for
Speaker 1: indicators on these people when they change. And you also
Speaker 1: need investigators looking in these chat rooms in these social
Speaker 1: media areas to try to pick up on certain things
Speaker 1: or indicators that are going to lead you to these
Speaker 1: people so you can investigate them. And it's it's it's
Speaker 1: not being done it as aggressively as it should be
Speaker 1: in today's age. And it's said, it really is said.
Speaker 1: I mean I think that if nothing else, I think
Speaker 1: we should be able to monitor and I think as
Speaker 1: a result of monitoring. I mean, this is all public
Speaker 1: what we're talking about, and Facebook and Twitter and Instagram
Speaker 1: and whatever other social media people are using. And I
Speaker 1: think that one, I think there ought to be a
Speaker 1: certain way to mark, you know, those people are identified,
Speaker 1: those people that are involved in talk that seems to
Speaker 1: sympathize with these radical views, and I don't think we
Speaker 1: do enough of it. No, the same as if you
Speaker 1: would open up a regular criminal case on somebody. If
Speaker 1: somebody's actions are doing they're they're acting as if they're
Speaker 1: doing something criminal, you open a case and you investigate.
Speaker 1: It should be the same way that that it should
Speaker 1: be done with them on social media. If there's talking
Speaker 1: about it or indicating that they're they're showing allegiance to
Speaker 1: to ISIS or showing interest in producing these bombs, then
Speaker 1: they should be looked at thoroughly through the Internet and
Speaker 1: physically through human sources. And how many times are we
Speaker 1: going to have to sit back and here we responded,
Speaker 1: We responded to this, We responded to that. We shouldn't
Speaker 1: be responding, because if we respond to these incidents, that
Speaker 1: means we failed at our job of trying to find
Speaker 1: them out before they commit these acts. I think that
Speaker 1: that has to be job one for everybody. Um, and
Speaker 1: you've got to imagine or in certain times of the
Speaker 1: year that you know, the threat is greater than others.
Speaker 1: I am not confident though, you know. The one good
Speaker 1: thing that I was reading today is even our own
Speaker 1: generals now that the handcuffs have been taken off of them.
Speaker 1: You know, remember the rules of engagement by Obama were
Speaker 1: so restricting that you know, literally that have to be
Speaker 1: you know, twenty yards away shooting at your head for
Speaker 1: you to have the ability to defend yourself. But we've
Speaker 1: been able to degrade isis at a at a very
Speaker 1: rapid pace that we've never seen before because we're letting
Speaker 1: the generals and the people on the ground do their
Speaker 1: job instead of managing them from Washington. Oh. Absolutely. And
Speaker 1: what's happening is we're winning on the ground overseas in
Speaker 1: the Middle East. But what's happening now is in this
Speaker 1: this lone wolf term is kind of old because we're
Speaker 1: winning on the battleground, but they are pushing their ideology
Speaker 1: over the Internet, and kids are sitting at home, young
Speaker 1: individuals either playing video games and radicalizing themselves through these
Speaker 1: chat room, social media video games, and they even though
Speaker 1: there's no command and control center that's that's pushing these
Speaker 1: people out, there's still a group that has to be
Speaker 1: you dealt with as a as almost an army of
Speaker 1: individuals radicalizing themselves. Yeah. Uh, Patrick, Well, Bill's old unit
Speaker 1: UM was taking a lot of these proactive measures, and
Speaker 1: in fact, they produced a report on radicalization in two
Speaker 1: thousand and seven, I believe, which ended up getting withdrawn
Speaker 1: because of UM pressure from groups like Council on American
Speaker 1: Relations and and these other groups who didn't want these
Speaker 1: proactive measures taken. And Bill's absolutely right. These these attacks, uh,
Speaker 1: you know last year in New York and New Jersey,
Speaker 1: the Pathway attack here on Halloween, and then today, I
Speaker 1: think that these are reflections of the fact that that
Speaker 1: we've lost the the initiative at the very same moment
Speaker 1: that the tempo of these attacks is increasing rapidly. All right,
Speaker 1: stay right there, we'll take a break. We'll come back
Speaker 1: and retired Lieutenant with the m y p D. Bill
Speaker 1: McGarty's with us also, Patrick Pool, PJ Media is that
Speaker 1: national security correspondent. And as we continue after a terror
Speaker 1: at TAPPA and this guy in the New York City
Speaker 1: subway system at Times Square, the subway station seven. This morning,
Speaker 1: we have Bill mcguarty's with US retired Lieutenant M. Y
Speaker 1: P dear M I p D. Ten years in the
Speaker 1: counter terrorism unit. Patrick Poole, National Security correspondent. There seems
Speaker 1: to be this this lack of desire to take on
Speaker 1: the enemy the way they need to be taken on,
Speaker 1: I mean, Patrick, and I think the answer is if
Speaker 1: we don't get more preemptive, if we don't get more
Speaker 1: engaged earlier, then we're just one by one, these attacks
Speaker 1: are just going to continue, one right after another, and
Speaker 1: it's not gonna stop absolutely. Uh. You know, as you're
Speaker 1: going back to sun Zoo, one of the things you
Speaker 1: have to do, as you have to break the will
Speaker 1: of the enemy. Um. And you know the sons who said,
Speaker 1: you know, these things are one in the temples before
Speaker 1: they even fought. And here, you know, we're we have uh,
Speaker 1: this discourse in our media talking about how how basically
Speaker 1: we're to blame for a lot of this stuff. We've
Speaker 1: brought this on ourselves. Uh. And and it's you know,
Speaker 1: no surprise that in some respects they're winning. Yes, I mean,
Speaker 1: we've we've degraded isis UH in Syria, in Iraq. But
Speaker 1: let's not forget that the precursor to isis al Qaeda
Speaker 1: in Iraq. When George Bush left office, there were thirty
Speaker 1: members UH, and within a few years they had reconstituted
Speaker 1: and taken over a third of the northern part of
Speaker 1: Iraq and major parts of Syria. So I'm a little
Speaker 1: bit cautious about, you know, declaring the war over, as
Speaker 1: some of our generals have done here over the weekend.
Speaker 1: Um I I think we're going to see him adapt
Speaker 1: and they can reconstitute as a conventional force. Again, last word, Lieutenant,
Speaker 1: I think the more that you bring it out and
Speaker 1: on that we need to be proactive and and and
Speaker 1: put the word out there to put pressure on the
Speaker 1: Blasio that the two biggest things that hurt the city
Speaker 1: the most was was the article of the ap article
Speaker 1: that Mattapuzo put out that Patrick talked about. And this
Speaker 1: mayor has definitely did it has this service to this
Speaker 1: city definitely. All right, I want to thank you both
Speaker 1: for being with us. Unbelievable eight d nine one Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. So
Speaker 1: how bad and how corrupt and how dishonest and how
Speaker 1: dangerous is the news media in this country. Well, we'll
Speaker 1: get to that when we come back. Also, your calls
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine one, Shawn Toldfrey telephone number Hannity tonight,
Speaker 1: nine Eastern Sally you about the great show we have
Speaker 1: coming up and much more straight ahead. He's prepared to testify,
Speaker 1: we are told by a confident against President Trump, against
Speaker 1: members of the Trump family and others in the White House.
Speaker 1: He's prepared to testify the President Trump as a today,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump ordered him directed him to make contact with
Speaker 1: the Russians, and David a clarification tonight on something one
Speaker 1: of Flynn's confidence told us and we reported earlier today
Speaker 1: he's had the president asked Flynn to contact Russia during
Speaker 1: the campaign. He's not clarifying that, saying, according to Flynn,
Speaker 1: candidate Trump asked him during the campaign the fine ways
Speaker 1: to repair relations with Russia and other hotspots, and then
Speaker 1: after the election the President elect ask him and told
Speaker 1: him to contact Russia on issues including working together to
Speaker 1: fight isis viginal contact with fugion GPS with from with
Speaker 1: the Republican who asked for confirmed. No, that's not been confirmed.
Speaker 1: So there's been no confirmation from from Fusion GPS show
Speaker 1: US records. No, no, no, that's not been preformed. But
Speaker 1: you didn't. President Trump himself the other day said yes,
Speaker 1: he thinks he knows. The President says he thinks he
Speaker 1: knows who that republic it is. He's not releasing the
Speaker 1: name he's He repeatedly says he thinks he knows. He's
Speaker 1: conferred that the original contact with Fusion GPS was with
Speaker 1: a Republican later after the President got the nomination. All right,
Speaker 1: more fake news. Glad you with us. It is the
Speaker 1: final hour free for all. We'll get to your calls
Speaker 1: at the bottom of this half hour nine four when
Speaker 1: Shawn is our toll free telephone number if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. Joe Kancha, who
Speaker 1: writes for The Hill, he is their media writers, probably
Speaker 1: one of the few media writers in the country that doesn't,
Speaker 1: you know it, doesn't hang out in the same circle
Speaker 1: of of sycophantic UH left wingers that want to be
Speaker 1: part of the destroy Trump UH media cabal. He's not
Speaker 1: in it, and I guess for those reasons, he's probably
Speaker 1: not particularly liked by some of those people. But um,
Speaker 1: he writes in his new column, Media's botched Trump attacks
Speaker 1: are a reckless attempt to undermine the administration, and he
Speaker 1: talks about what happened when the Flint testimony came out
Speaker 1: and they reported that former National Secure the Advisor General
Speaker 1: Michael Flynn was prepared to testify the President Trump all
Speaker 1: a candidate directed him to contact Russian officials. Well, then again,
Speaker 1: the Brian Ross report got retracted. Later in the day,
Speaker 1: a clarification was forthcoming that the direction came when Trump
Speaker 1: was the president elect. A big distinction, which would mean
Speaker 1: he's telling his National security advisor to reach out to
Speaker 1: his counterpart to be in Russia. Smart thing to do.
Speaker 1: And we had the Deutsche Bank debacle by Reuters and Bloomberg,
Speaker 1: both reporting the Special Council had subpoenaed bank information and
Speaker 1: records relating to President Trump and his family members. You know,
Speaker 1: the Wall Street Journal ended up diffusing that bombshell. They
Speaker 1: did a follow up report saying that the subpoenasm fact
Speaker 1: never existed, never happened, and whatever ones were out there
Speaker 1: dealt with people or entities close to Trump, but not
Speaker 1: as reported, A big, big distinction. And then you've got
Speaker 1: fake news CNN reporting that senior Trump campaign officials, including
Speaker 1: Trump himself. On September four, they got an email unknown
Speaker 1: sender and it was giving them a specific link for
Speaker 1: information that hadn't been released on Wiki leaks. Well, they
Speaker 1: had to withdraw that lie as well and say, oh,
Speaker 1: poopsie daisy. It was a lot of oopsie daisy and
Speaker 1: going on out there. Joe conscience with us. You say
Speaker 1: the past two weeks were the worst ever for American
Speaker 1: political media and thanks to a rush to be first, uh,
Speaker 1: that easily trump the priority of being accurate. That is correct.
Speaker 1: We used so much hyperbole in this business. You host
Speaker 1: people all the time. There's a lot of exaggeration and
Speaker 1: there's not you. But I'm just saying in general, we
Speaker 1: we over exaggerate things to draw attention to ourselves. I
Speaker 1: don't like saying things like that, but this was I mean,
Speaker 1: think about it, ABC with Brian Ross he suspended for
Speaker 1: four weeks, Bloomberg and Reuters like you talked about not
Speaker 1: just CNN last week, but somehow CBS and NBC confirmed
Speaker 1: the report. Who did you confirm it with? Probably Sean
Speaker 1: the same source that bought CNN that information went to
Speaker 1: CBS and went to NBC. And that's why I say,
Speaker 1: you gotta burn that source. Okay, But the point is this,
Speaker 1: though there is a certain breathlessness to all of this reporting,
Speaker 1: there's a certain atmosphere that I argue has taken place
Speaker 1: in media today, and that is that you know, every
Speaker 1: time there's a new thing, Trump frush at Trump Prussia,
Speaker 1: Trump pressure. Well, we don't have any evidence of Trump
Speaker 1: Russia collusion, and the man of Ford indictment isn't about
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collusion. Nor is you know, admitting to the
Speaker 1: FBI that you didn't tell the entire truth when they
Speaker 1: interviewed you, and you didn't even know they were interviewing
Speaker 1: you for a legal matter that was post election, right,
Speaker 1: So if we're investigating collusion during the campaign, why is
Speaker 1: everything I'm seeing after President Trump was elected? It's it's
Speaker 1: gone off the rails. But yeah, all these stories have
Speaker 1: three things in common. One they're all based on named sources.
Speaker 1: Two they're all based on Russia. And three And I'm
Speaker 1: gonna I'm gonna feel like a Rick Perry here for
Speaker 1: a second. I'm gonna for at the third. I forgot
Speaker 1: the third. But the point is that, oh that's sorry,
Speaker 1: I got it. I got it, got it back. I
Speaker 1: got it back. It's amazing how the brain works. I
Speaker 1: lost it, I got it, I lost it. Let me
Speaker 1: go back at my computer. Go ahead. What is They're
Speaker 1: all negative towards the Trump administration? I would ask anybody
Speaker 1: out there, can you remember the last time positive information
Speaker 1: was leaked about this administration? Or can you remember the
Speaker 1: last time there were so many negative stories about the
Speaker 1: Obama administration? Everybody got it wrong and it's just a mistake.
Speaker 1: It's it's like I wrote, it's it's a rush to
Speaker 1: be first instead of to be accurate. It's quantity over quality.
Speaker 1: And the problem is outside of Brian Ross, I don't
Speaker 1: see any accountability the CNN reporter. He's a good reporter,
Speaker 1: admittedly he doesn't he hasn't made too many mistakes, but
Speaker 1: you still there's still it's got to be something that
Speaker 1: you do to reprimand in this situation. But they said,
Speaker 1: now he followed our editorial standards. It's what they report,
Speaker 1: and it's also what they don't report that is bias. Um.
Speaker 1: For example, a big narrative this weekend where people like
Speaker 1: me that are we're attacking the Special Council because of
Speaker 1: the Special Council is getting close to getting Donald Trump. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm pointing out and I think any Democrat, if they're
Speaker 1: gonna have any intellectual honesty in their heart, mind and soul,
Speaker 1: would agree with this. And that is that if we
Speaker 1: had a special Counsel and it was a Democratic president
Speaker 1: and the Special Council only, we're only hired Republican donors,
Speaker 1: no Democratic donors to do the investigation. If they hired
Speaker 1: people that had been overturned by the U. S. Supreme
Speaker 1: Court and an obstruction of justice case, that means everybody
Speaker 1: was innocent. Eight thousand people lost their jobs at Arthur Accounting,
Speaker 1: UH Anderson Accounting, and four Meryal executives went to jail
Speaker 1: because a Weisman. It was proven that Weisman also held
Speaker 1: back exculpatory evidence. He's been using and known to use
Speaker 1: tactics that are extremely unethical. Just look at what happened
Speaker 1: to Paul Manaforts, you know, home being rated and his
Speaker 1: wife being frisked and Clinton election. He did he went
Speaker 1: to the Jabbt Center to celebrate with Hillary her great
Speaker 1: oh sorry loss. Yes, shouldn't that be an automatics qualification? Yes,
Speaker 1: it should investigation. So where's the media discussing the things
Speaker 1: that I discuss. Where are they discussing Comey exonerating before
Speaker 1: Comey investigates. Where are they investigating this team that Mueller
Speaker 1: has put together. They're too busy putting out photos of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's rally on Friday night in Florida, which was
Speaker 1: supposed to show an empty arena. And think of the
Speaker 1: logic here, and that was Dave Wiggle from the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: Think of the logic here? Do you really think that
Speaker 1: if Trump held a rally that no one would show up?
Speaker 1: I mean, that's one thing. And too he just throws
Speaker 1: the picture out of there with snark. Everything has to
Speaker 1: come with snark. If you're gonna report something, you want
Speaker 1: to show an empty arena and you get the picture on.
Speaker 1: That's one thing. But Weigel puts out and packed to
Speaker 1: the rafters because, like you said, I don't have a
Speaker 1: lot of friends in this business. I don't. I'm like
Speaker 1: you ever see die Hard to But Bruce Willis and
Speaker 1: he's on the plane, he's fighting John Amos. He was
Speaker 1: from good Times and Amos goes, shame, I have to
Speaker 1: kill you McClain. And I was just starting to like you.
Speaker 1: And then Bruce Willis before throwing him off the plane
Speaker 1: and him landing, and the propeller says, I got enough friends,
Speaker 1: and he kicks in, I got enough friends. I don't
Speaker 1: need to have any friends in his business. And that's
Speaker 1: the problem now that we we have too many people
Speaker 1: here that just want the adelation of their peers instead
Speaker 1: of informing their readers and their viewers. And and that's
Speaker 1: that's a big problem, and it's not gonna go away.
Speaker 1: And well, they want to take down this president. Is
Speaker 1: there any doubt in your mind that they work every
Speaker 1: day and their whole obsession is to take down Donald Trump?
Speaker 1: Not my mind, Uh, it's every I read a lot
Speaker 1: of studies and a lot of polls and a lot
Speaker 1: of analysis. And the bottom line is that Trump supporters
Speaker 1: believe that they agree with him what he said in February,
Speaker 1: that that the press is the enemy of the people.
Speaker 1: Half of voters overall, forget Republicans feel that the press
Speaker 1: is fabricating stories about the administration. Forget misreporting mistakes. They're
Speaker 1: actually making stuff up. And the reason why they believe
Speaker 1: that is because of this complete and utter reliance on
Speaker 1: unnamed sources. And as we saw with the CNN report
Speaker 1: with wicked leaks and Don JR. What happened there is
Speaker 1: exactly why that source needs to be burned because that
Speaker 1: was a political operative or even a lawmaker that was
Speaker 1: in that room when he was testifying before that Democratic
Speaker 1: Intelligence Committee. So if that person is feeding bad at nation,
Speaker 1: he needs to be exposed. I don't care if it's
Speaker 1: a congressman or not. Think of all that they don't
Speaker 1: care about. Think of the fact that the Fourth Amendment
Speaker 1: has been stomped upon and is basically being shredded with
Speaker 1: UH surveillance, not minimizing, unmasking, leaking intelligence. All the information
Speaker 1: they got on General Flynn was obtained illegally. That's point
Speaker 1: number one. Who are the deep state leakers? There was
Speaker 1: a leak a day for the first hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: days of the Trump administration. Then you've got I'd like
Speaker 1: to know why Samantha Powers as a U N ambassador
Speaker 1: whatever leak basically a person a day, or Ben Rhodes
Speaker 1: or Susan Rice or any of the other people. Those
Speaker 1: things need to be investigated. Hillary Clinton was exonerated on
Speaker 1: her email server scandal as a means of helping her
Speaker 1: get elected by James Comey and by Peter Struck. Where
Speaker 1: the investigations into that, you know, or the team that
Speaker 1: we have, you want to look at collusion. I see
Speaker 1: plenty of Russia collusion. That would be the Trump dossier,
Speaker 1: full of Russian lies and propaganda paid for by Hillary
Speaker 1: to influence the election. That's ounds like collusion. To make
Speaker 1: Joe that was complete collusion. I'm surprised that doesn't get more.
Speaker 1: I'm not surprised at it. I feel like I'm the
Speaker 1: only one shouting this from the wilderness, and all I
Speaker 1: get is, well, you're number one in cable news, but
Speaker 1: who cares about the rest of it. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of times Hannity's ahead of the curve and will never
Speaker 1: get credit. David From, he was on a show this
Speaker 1: weekend ironically called reliable sources in this context, and David
Speaker 1: From is a conservative at least that that's how he
Speaker 1: was presented. But he's completely anti Trump. And here's what
Speaker 1: he said. When asked, what advice would you have for
Speaker 1: people that don't trust the media anymore, he says, well,
Speaker 1: this is quoting. The mistakes are precisely the reason people
Speaker 1: should trust the media. Astronomer has made mistakes at all
Speaker 1: the time, because science is a process of discovery of truth.
Speaker 1: Astrologers never make mistakes, or at least they never grown
Speaker 1: up to them because they are offering a close system
Speaker 1: of ideology and propaganda. In other words, you should trust
Speaker 1: the media because they keep presenting false and misleading information.
Speaker 1: That's actually the argument. That's that's not even jumping the shark.
Speaker 1: You're going over the whole ocean with that comment. All right,
Speaker 1: more with Joe Contrapt, media writer for The Hill. One,
Speaker 1: Shawn is our number. There is no way for Donald
Speaker 1: Trump to get two hundred and seventy there. We heard
Speaker 1: that for week after week. What they're doing is the
Speaker 1: fake news. It's called suppression, just like they give the
Speaker 1: fake poles. I call a fake news fake poles. A
Speaker 1: pole came out today on CNN. Such a fake a
Speaker 1: pole came out. They'll have to apologize for that one.
Speaker 1: Another one came out that was through the roof. But
Speaker 1: it wasn't unseeing then. But but I will tell you, look, look,
Speaker 1: we need, honestly, we need some love in the country.
Speaker 1: I'd love to bring both sides together if that's possible.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of hatred out there, but I would
Speaker 1: love to be able to bring both sides together. All right,
Speaker 1: there's the president, you know. I think the funniest moments
Speaker 1: the president has on the campaign trail, or when he's
Speaker 1: out giving a speech and somewhere or whatever rally of
Speaker 1: some kind when he points to all the media in
Speaker 1: the back Joe conscience with us from the hill and
Speaker 1: he goes, you see them, they're all fake news. These
Speaker 1: people have come to hate him. What did you think
Speaker 1: of that rally in Frinday? Do you seem like he
Speaker 1: had a lot of energy, a lot of a lot
Speaker 1: of spunk. It seemed like it was tired. I thought
Speaker 1: it was I love every minute of No. No, that
Speaker 1: that can't be right because on Morning Joe on Friday,
Speaker 1: Steve Schmidt, the former McCain presidential manager, said that the
Speaker 1: president clearly had a physical impairment based on one speech
Speaker 1: about Jerusalem, where or at the end you got a
Speaker 1: little dry mouth and we've all been there, or maybe
Speaker 1: you had a little trouble with his teeth. I don't
Speaker 1: know who cares but to jump that. This is what
Speaker 1: I mean about recklessness and media that you can't just
Speaker 1: sit there in a studio in New York commenting on
Speaker 1: a speech that happened in Washington based on what you
Speaker 1: saw on television and suddenly become My wife's a doctor
Speaker 1: and she went to school for many years to get
Speaker 1: to get to uh, get where she is now. You
Speaker 1: can't sit there in the middle of the studio and say, oh,
Speaker 1: you know what, I just watched that speech and I've
Speaker 1: come to the conclusion that our president has a physical impairment,
Speaker 1: like as if he's like having a stroke. It is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Did Schmidt apologize today, No, Willie on Twitter? No, That's
Speaker 1: the thing. There's never any accountability. And that's why this
Speaker 1: is going to keep happening in over, over and over again,
Speaker 1: because management doesn't do the right thing they should do
Speaker 1: with people that make reckless comments that have no business
Speaker 1: being in the public dialogue. You know, it really is
Speaker 1: sad that I said in two thousand and seven and
Speaker 1: eight when I was vetting Obama. Nobody else would. I said,
Speaker 1: journalism is dead. They never vetted him. Even this campaign year.
Speaker 1: We have eight years of Obama's record. We could go
Speaker 1: over an abysmal failure. I repeated it every day and
Speaker 1: every night. I did because somebody needed to do it.
Speaker 1: Somebody needed to talk about Airs and Dorn and Reverend
Speaker 1: Right in the church at g D America and Olynsky
Speaker 1: and Acorn and Frank Marshall Davis. I don't know. There
Speaker 1: weren't many other people besides me and even some friends
Speaker 1: of mine and said I was probably gonna ruin my
Speaker 1: career because I was going too deep into my vetting
Speaker 1: of Obama. You really have to work in your confidence more.
Speaker 1: We've talked about that about my confidence. It's a matter
Speaker 1: of you know, what's right is right. I mean, we're
Speaker 1: right so often and they're wrong so often, and I'm
Speaker 1: the one that gets beaten up all the time. You
Speaker 1: get beaten up, but you have the most viewers, right,
Speaker 1: so people are listening. Crime are of her? Is that
Speaker 1: what you're saying? Too bad for you? Hannay, Like I'm
Speaker 1: supposed to care. When Bill Clinton left office, he had
Speaker 1: something like a seventy approval rating. And the reason why
Speaker 1: it was because only ABC, NBCCBS, Washington Post, New York
Speaker 1: Times were your options as far as getting news. Fox
Speaker 1: was in his infancy, it was it was still up
Speaker 1: and coming. Uh. Now there's at least a balance where
Speaker 1: you have Fox News and you have online conservative media
Speaker 1: and other voices are being heard. And that's why those
Speaker 1: particular outlets are so successful, because half the American people
Speaker 1: just weren't liking where they're being fed, and now at
Speaker 1: least they have that option. So you say you're not
Speaker 1: being heard, No, you're you're You're being heard completely. You're
Speaker 1: just not being accepted by the rest of the media.
Speaker 1: But the good news is if you're you, not a
Speaker 1: lot of people are accepting the media now either, because
Speaker 1: I remember, I think I've cited the stat for you before.
Speaker 1: Before the election, the Hill compiled all endorsements of the
Speaker 1: two candidates across the country and we narrowed it down
Speaker 1: to fifty nine major papers, and fifty seven went to
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton to to Donald Trump. You know what that
Speaker 1: got or Shawn that got her an acceptance speech. So
Speaker 1: we could talk about the media and how cless they are.
Speaker 1: But the thing is, their influence is one tenth of
Speaker 1: what it used to be because they keep getting things wrong.
Speaker 1: All right, I gotta let you go, Joe cont God, Well,
Speaker 1: why don't we invite you if you're gonna be such
Speaker 1: a crowmudgeon on my show? Now I'm in my forties. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, Joe concha. Thank you eight nine for one,
Speaker 1: Shawn toldfree telephone number. We'll hit the phones when we
Speaker 1: get back. Glad you're with us. All right, If you
Speaker 1: missed the president's speech on Friday night, it was pretty amazing.
Speaker 1: And we're gonna play a few highlights here and and
Speaker 1: I want you to listen to all this, especially in
Speaker 1: light of the media criticism that came out last week
Speaker 1: about the president. Oh he's slurring, Oh he's there, always
Speaker 1: got the early signs of dementia. I can't believe the
Speaker 1: media gets away with this crap. But you decide for yourself.
Speaker 1: We'll play it for you. So tonight we're going to
Speaker 1: speak straight to the American people and cut right through
Speaker 1: the fake news media, right right right through. We're going
Speaker 1: to speak the playing true and really the truth that
Speaker 1: you just want to hear and you have to hear
Speaker 1: they don't want to hear. But and and by the way,
Speaker 1: did you see all the corrections the media has been making,
Speaker 1: the saying sorry we've made They've been doing that all year.
Speaker 1: They never apologized. Maybe that comes with being the president.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know. They've been apologizing left
Speaker 1: and right. They took this fraudster from ABC. They suspended
Speaker 1: him for a month. They should have fired him for
Speaker 1: what he wrote. He drove the stock market down three
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty points in minutes, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: tells you they really liked me, right when you think
Speaker 1: of it. And do you know what he costs people?
Speaker 1: And I said to everybody, getting yourself a lawyer and
Speaker 1: sue ABC News so so and then seeing then apologize
Speaker 1: just a little while ago, they apologized, Oh, thank you,
Speaker 1: seeing then, thank you so much. You should have been
Speaker 1: apologizing for the last two years. Total unemployment is now
Speaker 1: at a seventeen year low. Thank you. That not bad.
Speaker 1: Not bad after ten months. It's only going to get better.
Speaker 1: Listen to this one. This is to me, maybe one
Speaker 1: of the most important because it's all psychological to a
Speaker 1: large extent, and that's what creates greatness. Consumer confidence is
Speaker 1: at a seventeen year high. Think of that. It was
Speaker 1: not like that in your last administration. Economic growth last
Speaker 1: quarter surge to three point you know what, you know
Speaker 1: where it was right when we started. You know where
Speaker 1: it was dingo three point three percent. That it's going
Speaker 1: a lot higher. You know, you stay here, you'll never
Speaker 1: hit three you'll never hit two and a half. You
Speaker 1: figure maybe two point three, two point four. If we
Speaker 1: didn't have the hurricanes last quarter, we would have hit four,
Speaker 1: and everybody back there would have said, that's impossible. The
Speaker 1: stock market is hitting an all time high record for another,
Speaker 1: and think of this, eighty six times since election Day,
Speaker 1: eighty six times it hit a record eighties six guys,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna keep it going. And then you look
Speaker 1: at all of the money you folks are making. A
Speaker 1: I wish I could take ten or fifteen percent, but
Speaker 1: I think you're not gonna do that. You're not gonna
Speaker 1: do them. But it's getting better and better. Your pensions
Speaker 1: are getting bigger and bigger, your pension funds, all of
Speaker 1: those things are happening. Oh, these resistors resist Hillary existed,
Speaker 1: and you know what happens, you lost the election in
Speaker 1: all landslide. But you know what they're really resisting. They're
Speaker 1: resisting the will of the American people. That's what they're resisting. Look,
Speaker 1: it's being proven we have a ricked system. Doesn't happen
Speaker 1: so easy. But this system's gonna be a lot of changes.
Speaker 1: This is a rick This is a rigged system. This
Speaker 1: is a sick system from the inside. And you know,
Speaker 1: there's no country like our country. But we have a
Speaker 1: lot of sickness in some of our institutions, and we're
Speaker 1: working very hard. We've got a lot of them straightened out.
Speaker 1: But we do have, we really do. We have a
Speaker 1: rigged system in this country and we have to change it. Terrible,
Speaker 1: terrible their resisting progress, their resisting change because the only
Speaker 1: thing they really care about is protecting what they've been
Speaker 1: able to do, which is really controlled the country. And
Speaker 1: not to your benefit. By the way, wages starting to
Speaker 1: go up the first time in twenty years, starting to
Speaker 1: go up. That's all gonna happen. You know, I don't
Speaker 1: get credit for one thing. It always bothered me. I
Speaker 1: spent a tiny fraction of what she spent and we
Speaker 1: want you know, the old days, if you spend less
Speaker 1: and you win, that's a good thing. Oh, but here
Speaker 1: you don't get any credit for it. We spent five
Speaker 1: or she was at what number, two point two billion?
Speaker 1: I understand two point two billion. Do you think do
Speaker 1: you think those consultants made a couple of bucks on
Speaker 1: that election? Didn't he spent twelve point four million or
Speaker 1: a dacier there was a total phony fuel point for
Speaker 1: million boy. So, so we spent a tiny fraction, think
Speaker 1: of it, a tiny fraction of the money, and we won.
Speaker 1: But we won because of people like you. I took
Speaker 1: this job on behalf of the forgotten men and women
Speaker 1: of our country. But guess what, they are forgotten. No
Speaker 1: more people came out of areas. You know, they didn't
Speaker 1: think you existed. You know that, right, Remember? And you
Speaker 1: remember the word deplorable. How brilliant was that. I was
Speaker 1: watching her with that speech, and she was reading a
Speaker 1: teleprompter yet and she said deplorable, And I said, huh,
Speaker 1: that's not nice. She's talking about a lot of people.
Speaker 1: Little did I know I was right. That thing blew up.
Speaker 1: That was one of the reasons she lost. And now
Speaker 1: we're all proud. Deplorables were proud, topor very proud. Your
Speaker 1: voice will never ever be do it again. They're all
Speaker 1: gonna be coming after you for every election from now
Speaker 1: on in this country. You will never be ignored again.
Speaker 1: Your dreams are my dreams, your hopes are my hopes,
Speaker 1: and your future is what I'm fighting for each and
Speaker 1: every day. We're just getting sorry, all right, Let's get
Speaker 1: to our busy telephones here as we say, how did Joe?
Speaker 1: He's in Boca Raton in Florida. What's up, Joe? How
Speaker 1: are you glad you called? Sir Hi Sean the pleasure
Speaker 1: to speak to you, and congratulations on your good work
Speaker 1: keeping everybody informed about this terrible coup that they're trying
Speaker 1: to put up put on us. There's no doubt this
Speaker 1: is what they're trying to do, no doubt they want
Speaker 1: to take this president down, no doubt they want to
Speaker 1: overturn a duly elected president and an election. And that
Speaker 1: is that is treason and sedition by doing these things.
Speaker 1: And uh, we need to get Jeff Sessions on or
Speaker 1: to get these people under oath and subpoena and flip
Speaker 1: some of them, same tactic you know that the prosecutor
Speaker 1: would do and get to the root of it and
Speaker 1: make the charge them and get them, get them charged
Speaker 1: with crimes. I believe a lot of crimes were committed.
Speaker 1: I lay them out. The fact that the media ignores
Speaker 1: all that we put out on a daily basis is criminal,
Speaker 1: uh neglect on their part. They literally have no credibility
Speaker 1: left and they get every single thing that they touch
Speaker 1: basically now wrong we live in the world of phony
Speaker 1: NBC and ABC and CBS and fake news, c and
Speaker 1: in conspiracy theories, and there's a lot of us out
Speaker 1: here now that have gotten very very close to truth
Speaker 1: that I'm only telling you because I know more than
Speaker 1: I can say at this point that will validate all
Speaker 1: of the work we have been doing this year and
Speaker 1: last year. And I'm very confident that they are more
Speaker 1: wrong than they ever knew, and that there's no way
Speaker 1: that they can now undo the damage they have done.
Speaker 1: Oh ironic, Sean, that this boomerang is coming back at them, Well,
Speaker 1: it is a great irony, and frankly they deserve it
Speaker 1: to whack them up the side of their head. Exactly.
Speaker 1: All right, my friend, Thank you, Jordan and Valdosta and Georgia. Jordan, Hi,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called? I'm doing just fine.
Speaker 1: So I just wanted to ring in on something that's
Speaker 1: being extremely extremely overlooked here by the media and by
Speaker 1: a lot of people. Um, as a Jewish American, it's
Speaker 1: it's a big stigma to say that you know, you
Speaker 1: are a liberal, or you're you're a Democrat, You're you're
Speaker 1: going with Hilary, or you're going with Obama, which most
Speaker 1: of us do. And and that's that's pretty accurate statement.
Speaker 1: Now these days, we got something really big in history
Speaker 1: that happened with Donald Trump declaring that the embassy is
Speaker 1: finally going to get moved to Jerusalem. This is a
Speaker 1: promise made by Bill Clinton and and it's just been passed.
Speaker 1: The buck has been passed all the way until Donald
Speaker 1: Trump finally followed through. Now you're not hearing a lot
Speaker 1: of it on the CNN or on the MSNBC, mainly
Speaker 1: because they don't they don't want to give the boon
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump that that he's done something significant. But
Speaker 1: so many of the American Jewish population are taking a
Speaker 1: look at this and they're taking stock in in what
Speaker 1: the you know, what what the liberal left has done
Speaker 1: for us, and what the you know what the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party has done for us, and what Donald Trump has
Speaker 1: done for us. You know, I think all across the
Speaker 1: board though that's that's true too, because I know a
Speaker 1: lot of Jewish Americans historically they vote Democratic. Um, I
Speaker 1: don't think there's been a president that has been more brave,
Speaker 1: that has done more for our closest ally in the
Speaker 1: Middle East, Israel, than this president. And what he did, well,
Speaker 1: we will look back through Israel history. This is a
Speaker 1: defining moment like the you know U N partition plan. This,
Speaker 1: this defines that state at this point and Ben Gurion
Speaker 1: becomes the prime minister. Uh, this is a historic thing.
Speaker 1: This president did and so many others promised and wouldn't
Speaker 1: do it, didn't have the courage to do it. But
Speaker 1: that's the same with a lot of his other promises.
Speaker 1: As President's really you know, been clicking them off one
Speaker 1: after another after another, and I feel at times I'm
Speaker 1: the only one that will ever discussed exactly what his
Speaker 1: record is and what his promises were and keep it
Speaker 1: in check, you know, just like Democrats will never face
Speaker 1: the reality of how bad Obama's presidency was. They don't
Speaker 1: have the intellectual, honesty and capacity and the willingness to
Speaker 1: do it. Maybe it's too hard for them to realize
Speaker 1: everything they bought into hope and change and Yes we
Speaker 1: Can was a total failure. Maybe their egos would be
Speaker 1: far too bruised to face that hard truth. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Roseanne is in New Hampshire, Roseanne, how are you? I'm fine?
Speaker 1: How you doing? Love your show? Like? Thank God for you? People.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you thank you. You know, I had
Speaker 1: a quick question. If if the cops broke into my
Speaker 1: house without a warrant and we found we were doing
Speaker 1: something illegal here, they can't use that evidence in acquittal
Speaker 1: law to indict or convict me. If the Fizer warrant
Speaker 1: was issued on a phony dorsier, that should be illegal.
Speaker 1: It's worked basically, you go to to the judge and
Speaker 1: ask for a warrant to so called why a tap?
Speaker 1: If that was based on something phony in illegal, how
Speaker 1: can any any information discovered from that, any evidence, be
Speaker 1: used to convict anyone. It should make this whole Fueler
Speaker 1: investigation null and void. Let me tell you something. This
Speaker 1: investigation needs to be null and void for various reasons.
Speaker 1: Number one, that never was. We've had a year of
Speaker 1: Trump Russian collusion and the only thing we've ever discovered
Speaker 1: is the only person that colluded with Russia was Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: You know, with the help of Fusion, GPS and an
Speaker 1: m I six agent. They're the ones that paid for
Speaker 1: fake phony, Russian salacious lies, and propaganda, all in an
Speaker 1: effort to to swing an election their way. We found
Speaker 1: Russian collusion, We found it, and Hillary bought and paid
Speaker 1: for it, not that anybody seems to care. We also
Speaker 1: found collusion and corruption as it relates to an investigation
Speaker 1: into Hillary are given a pass so that she could
Speaker 1: run on to become the president of the United States,
Speaker 1: where so they thought when they wrote her exoneration, James
Speaker 1: Comey and and Peter Struck and all these other people,
Speaker 1: you know, there was never a real investigation. That's why
Speaker 1: I'd sit there every night and say, Okay, thirty three
Speaker 1: thousand emails deleted, bleach bit, acid wash, breaking up, busting
Speaker 1: up with hammers. Those are crimes, every one of them.
Speaker 1: You know. Putting top secret, classified special access information on
Speaker 1: a mom and pop shop bathroom closet server. Uh, that's
Speaker 1: mishandling classified information. That's a felony. And then destroying classified
Speaker 1: information similarly a felony, and and bleach bit of felony,
Speaker 1: and breaking with Hammer's devices felony. That's called obstruction. And
Speaker 1: that's only the tip of the iceberg with them. You know,
Speaker 1: we've really we have it all. But we have the
Speaker 1: case set and ready to go well, and obsessions doesn't
Speaker 1: come up by the end of January. With some indictments
Speaker 1: are arrest warrants, he should be by it. This is
Speaker 1: this is with the evidence out there, it's it's irreputable, absolutely,
Speaker 1: and they all got to pay the piper. And I
Speaker 1: hope Devan Noonan's gets the the warrant to see if
Speaker 1: Fizer was used, if to with the the illegal document.
Speaker 1: If if that's what they used to get the FIZE warrant,
Speaker 1: If that's the case, we're gonna find out very soon.
Speaker 1: And I believe it very likely was the case, as
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan's made a great case the other day on
Speaker 1: that last week on that anyway, thank you, Rosanne, appreciate
Speaker 1: the call. All Right, that's gonna wrap things up today.
Speaker 1: We got an amazing Hannity tonight. America's information crisis, fake
Speaker 1: news crisis, what the President calls a stain on America.
Speaker 1: We have Sean Spicer is gonna check in. That's my
Speaker 1: opening monologue. Among other things, the terror attack in New York.
Speaker 1: Will get the very latest with it, Henry and Sebastian
Speaker 1: Gorka way in again, we'll have the very latest on
Speaker 1: Mueller's partisan team of Democrats and Trump Paters, Dan Bongino,
Speaker 1: Austin Goulsby. That's tonight. Set your d v R Hannity
Speaker 1: on the Fox News Channel. Thanks for being with us,
Speaker 1: See you tonight at night.