WEBVTT - U.S. Joins Multinational Insider Trading Crackdown

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>day we bring you insight and analysis into the most

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>important legal news of the day. You can find more

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. Federal prosecutors are

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>investigating an international network of traders suspected of infiltrating banks

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and companies and making tens of millions of dollars by

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>using confidential information to trade ahead of media reports about

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>takeover talks or merger announcements. That's according to Bloomberg sources.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is Peter Handing, a professor at Wayne State

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>University Law School. Peter explain this UH, this network that

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors are looking into, Well, what they're focusing on is

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that they were able to develop different sources inside UH

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>investment banks, including the Wall Street Journal report ordered that

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the governments are looking at UM, someone who was inside

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>City Bank in London. And really what makes this different

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>from the typical insider trading case is that, at least

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>according to the reports, that information was fed to journalists

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>so that then it could get into the media, which

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of course will cause a stock to pop up at

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.639
<v Speaker 1>least somewhat, and that way they don't have to wait

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>for any deal to be completed, because as we know,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily the case that every deal is going

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to be completed, But trading ahead of the media report

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>lets you at least make some money that way. So

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the traders here allegedly did a lot to cover their

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>tracks using burner phones, shell companies, complex financial instruments. How

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>much harder will that make investigating this Well, certainly the

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>most white collar defend aren't very good about using burner phones,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But if they use them in the right way, which

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>was make one phone call and then get rid of it.

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>For those of us UM who watch Breaking bad, then

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>you know that is really going to make it much

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to trace out who their sources are. And

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>using shell companies is especially in the United States, where

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to report who owns the company, then

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a pretty easy way to hide who's behind it. Now,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you prosecutors are able to trace bank transactions and things

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>like that, but the problem is once the money has

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>left the United States or the United Kingdom or even France,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who's also looking at this UM, it's going to be

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>very hard to ever get it back. And if it

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>goes into the banking system and you're not able to

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>trace it, then that money is gone and proving a

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>case is going to be very difficult if you can't

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>follow the money. And so they are having, uh what

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>often happens in these insider trading cases. They're having a

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>lower level member of this syndicate who flipped and and

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that's how this really got going. That's right that there

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>was excuse me, a someone in Serbia was arrested and

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>then extradited to the United States. And you know, as

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>long as you have someone on the inside who can

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>point you in the right direction, that of course can

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>be very helpful. And what we've seen that before, going

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>back a decade with the Raj Raj Ratnam cases, where

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors got cooperating witnesses who would say, look at this trade,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>look at that trade. Um, getting someone on the inside

0:03:55.040 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely invaluable to investigators and prosecutors because is then

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you can try to trace the money, but you can

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>also build your case by looking at well timed trades.

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's really what they're focusing on. Can

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they figure out who the source was and can they

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>show these were very well timed trades. This investigation involves US,

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>UK and French prosecutors operating on parallel tracks. How unusual

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is that and the cooperation among countries certainly. I mean

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it's unusual in the sense that typically the Department of

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Justice just conducts its own investigations. But if you're talking

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>about and international ring, then of course you're going to

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>have to get the cooperation from foreign regulators and foreign prosecutors.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So this one is a little bit unusual in that

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see a lot of information sharing,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't always happen, but here they're going to have

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to try to give each other their information if they

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ever hope to track this down and figure out who

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>was the source inside the different investment banks or there's

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>some talk that gifts were given to people in law

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>firms and places like that, which of course those are

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.559
<v Speaker 1>always good sources of inside information, and so I would

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>expect this will take time. So anybody thinking that we'll

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>see charges in the next month or two, I think

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's mistaken. This is a kind of case that's going

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to take months to develop. But once it is developed

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>them I would expect we will see criminal charges filed.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>UK financial prosecutors did wrap up a trial and got

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>some convictions. A former UBS compliance officer and her friend

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>were sentenced to three years for insider trading after a

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>London trial that featured accounts of lavish champagne fueled nights

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>out of exclusive nightclubs, racking up eight thousand pound bills,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a network of traders who only spoke on burner phones,

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and evidence stashed in a channel bag. I couldn't resist

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>this one. Well, you know that this is almost like

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.119
<v Speaker 1>it's coming out of Billions or you know, some kind

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of television show. But um, in fact, you know the

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>best way to hide yourself is to use a burner

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>phone as long as you get rid of it and

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>do your best not to leave any kind of paper trail. Um.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>The problem is going to be if they did contact

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>people in the media, there could be enough of a

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>paper trail there to build a case. So it's certainly

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting in the Financial Conduct Authority won

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the conviction. Now they got sentenced to three years. Unlikely

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they will serve that full amount of time, but still

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the government might be able to get some cooperation out

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of them. Or the UK government, and that can open

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>up a way to start to develop as so. Peter

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>compare the prosecution of insider trading in the UK to

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution in the US, where we've had so many

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>court rulings about what constitutes insider trading. Is it tougher

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>here than it is there? Certainly it's tougher here than

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it is in the EU. UM In the United States

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to show a breach of fiduciary duty or

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>what's called another duty of trust and confidence. In the

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>EU it is what's called a possession theory. If you

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>possess inside information and trade on it, you're guilty, and

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's probably easier to prove it in the UK

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>or in the EU, and it's going to be in

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Although building a case here showing a

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>breach of fiduciary duty is sometimes not all that difficult

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if you've got an insider who's tipping off. But UM,

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I would expect it's going to be easier in the

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>EU to all the case by just showing that these

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>people had inside information and then traded on it. That's

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a much simpler approach than in the United States. While

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we continue to watch these insider trading trials come to

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the forefront. Thanks so much, Peter. That's Peter Henny. He's

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Wayne State University Law School. Thanks for

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe and

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and on

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This is

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg