WEBVTT - (Radio)

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look a hand

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of the top stories in the coming week from our

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>day Break anchors all around the world. Hand just ahead

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on the program. It's the mother of all economic reports,

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment report coming out on John Tucker in New York.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ryan Turtis in Hong Kong. Two interesting chapters of

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>China's upcoming Communist Party Congress. I'm Caroline him in London

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for the World Aviation Festival in Amsterdam. The CEO is

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>what we're speaking to Bloomberg. I'm Any Morris in Washington.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>This midterm election is unusually hard to hold. That's all

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg eleven three,

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on New York, Bloomberg one, Washington d C, Bloomberg one

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>oh six one Boston, Bloomberg nine sixties, San Francisco, d

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>A B Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one nine and

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot com and via

0:00:55.080 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Hi, everybody, I'm John Tucker, and

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>let's try today's program with a look ahead to the

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>coming jobs report. Joining me for more, Bloomberg reporter Matt

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Bosler Matt in the introduction, I called it the mother

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of all economic reports? Is it still or we are

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:19.279
<v Speaker 1>firmly focused on inflation reports instead of the job's report

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>these days? Well, it's definitely competing a lot more with

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>inflation these days, but I would say it probably still

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is the mother of all economic reports. It's pretty critical

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>over the next several months and into the next year

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for determining the trajectory for the Federal Reserve and therefore

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for financial markets more broadly. Yeah, And a big component

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of that is if the job's market is strong, the

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>wages companies are paying their workers more, and that feeds

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>into the whole inflation picture. Right. That's the thing. We

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>have very high inflation right now. It's it's north of

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, it's the highest in four decades. But a

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of that is presumed to be due to supply

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>chain problems, supply side factors that are expected to dissipate

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and resolve over the next several months and into next year.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So the big question is, once all of that stuff

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.559
<v Speaker 1>goes away, what is sort of the underlying rate of inflation?

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Setting all of that aside, economists and forecasters, policymakers at

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve, for example, tend to think that wage

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>growth is really the underlying factor, uh that determines where

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation is headed. And so wage growth is still very

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>high right now at around six and so set officials

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>are really looking for, you know, that to moderate in

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>order to feel more confident that inflation is going to

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>come all the way back down to two once those

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>supply side facts take care of themselves. Okay, So, how

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>strong is the labor market in the US and are

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>there going to be signs of some cracks in the

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>labor market going forward, especially with this coming report. You know,

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the labor market is just looking incredibly strong right now,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a bit of a puzzle for economists who

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>would have expected to see more softening there as the

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Fed has raised rates over the last six months. You know,

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we just got the latest reading on initial jobless claims

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday. For last week it fell, uh, you know,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>weekly initial claims fell below two hundred thousand again for

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the first time in several months. Are now near the

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>lowest levels of this expansion. Yeah, that was you know,

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that's that's one of these good news bad news scenarios.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You get a really good labor market report and then

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>stocks you know, sort of go off a cliff. So

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 1>it's that's what we're contending with. Explain that to everybody

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>why that happens, Well, I mean, that really speaks to

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>where we're at right now with Federal Reserve policy. You know,

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is looking for the economy to soften. It's

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>not softening, which means they're probably going to be inclined

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to raise interest rates even higher than they're already saying,

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, quite high already. So the question

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is does the Federal Reserve it has a dual mandate,

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, as everybody knows, uh, price control, price pressures,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>easing price pressures, lowering the rate of inflation, and full employment.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So do they have with that dual mandate, do they

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>have to torpedo the labor market to bring prices down?

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a really interesting thing because you know, they're

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>projecting a higher unemployment right next year. They see it

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>rising a four point four at the end of next

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>year from the current levels around three point seven percent,

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and they think that's necessary to bring inflation down. They

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>need to see some softening in the labor market to

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>moderate that wage growth, and then to bring inflation down, So,

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, you kind of scratch your head, is that

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>really consistent with their full employment mandate. What they say

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is that price stability is a precursor to full employment,

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and so that's kind of how they swear that circle

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we need to get inflation down because

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that will set the stage for a healthy labor market

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>over the longer run. Now that's a contexted notion, but

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're saying at the moment. So what's the

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>prediction right now from economist ahead of the release of

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the report. So economists expect the unemployment rate to stay

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>unchanged at three point seven in September from last month.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>The other big number to watch is labor force participation.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That was sixty two point four percent last month, but

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it picked up quite a bit from the month before,

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that we've really been waiting to see

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and hadn't really seen until just last month. If that continues,

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be really important because that's one way

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>that um, you know, some of that labor supply could

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>return and take some pressure off of wages and prices

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>without necessarily having to see um, you know, weaker labor demand. Uh,

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's a big one to watch for sure. Okay,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the Federalserve officials have been tightening, and we have to

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>remind everybody that their policy acts with a lag. So

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is it possible we've already passed the point of where

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the policy starts to take effect. And maybe there's an

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>indication that the Federal Reserve officials have gone too far

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>given how long they've been raising rates. Now, they started

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in March, but they were obviously signaling rate hikes even

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>before then, which worked its way into longer term interest rates.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>We haven't really seen that showing up in the economic

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>data yet. Economists would expect it to start showing up

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>around now. And so the big question going forward is

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>do we start to see that having a fact or

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>is it possible that the economy is just, for whatever

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>reason less sensitive to interest rates then it used to be.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>One big thing that did happen during the pandemic is

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>all of the money that the government pumped into the

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>economy allowed a lot of people to pay down debt.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe, uh, you know, consumers and businesses are

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>just not as interest sensitive as they used to be.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>In that case, the Fed may have to raise rates

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>higher in order to gain traction and and really starts

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>closing down. Matt. Always a pleasure. Thanks for explaining things

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg reporter Matt Bosler. And just to hit on

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>bloom Break Daybreak Weekend, some big weeks coming for China's

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>economy and the political scene. There, I'm John Tucker and

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>busm This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, a global look ahead

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of the top stories from investors in the coming week.

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Tucker in New York. Up later in the

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>program here comes the World Aviation Festival in Amsterdam. But

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>first China's economy and political leadership and focus this coming

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>week and for more, let's head to Hong Kong and

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak Asia host Brian Curtis John. Over the next

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, we'll be taking a close look at

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the Communist Party Congress in China coming up later this month.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>In this segment, we'll focus on two specific areas. One

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a possible overhaul of the Chinese economy and secondly, future leaders,

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>including who might eventually succeed Shijin Ping as Secretary General.

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>We have Premier Lika Chong as well as the economics

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>are Leo Hu PBOC Governor Ye Young and others likely

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to step down early next year. Now that's based on

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>retirement age and term limits for senior officials. New leadership

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>might lead to new direction, though President She himself is

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>expected to secure a third term as party chief. Joining

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.239
<v Speaker 1>us for discussion is Marvin Chen, China and North Asia

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>equity strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence, and Crystal chap who's China

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>assignment reporter on finance at Bloomberg News. So Marvin, let's

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>go to you first. Plenty of big issues to be

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>discussed at the Congress. Confidence is low among both households

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and businesses, and of course there's a certain degree of

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>external attention with with the West. We spoke earlier with

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Leland Miller, CEO at China Beije Book, and he told

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>us China is actually facing increasing risks from deflation. We're

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not in deflation yet, but you know, we're heading into

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the winter. And a lot of people say, oh, this

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>will bring economic stimulus after the Party Congress, it will

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bring an end to COVID zero lockdowns. I don't think

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. And moreover, if you have more COVID

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and more COVID zero lockdowns, You're really going to have

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a problem with the threat of deflation looming. So again

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Leland Miller there China base book. So Marvin, what might

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we expect on COVID policy out of the Congress? Yeah,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Brian. Well, first I just want to emphasize

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Party Congress is largely a political event, so

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't expect any immediately policy changes coming from the Congress,

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but we can get signals on the policy direction in

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>the coming months once the leadership transition is in place.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>For COVID um, you know, cases have been coming down

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in recent weeks and the last major city, chanin Do

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that was under lockdown is now reopening. So the Congress

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>could be an opportune time for the Party to declare

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>small victory and the effectiveness of the current COVID policies.

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But we think the changes will be gradual, perhaps another

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>reduction in the in bound quarantine requirements, and the gradual

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>reduction may be similar to what we saw in Hong Kong,

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but the semi lockdowns when cases rise may still be

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>looming and lasting into two thousand three. Is there a

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>sense that Hong Kong might be an experiment that they're

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>watching to see how it might be applied to China. Yeah, definitely.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, Hong Kong will be closely watched how the

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>reopening of Hong Kong affects cases. But you know, we

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we think that the Hong Kong reopening is uh more

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>significant because they want to keep Hong Kong as a

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>international finance hub. As you mentioned, the party Congress will

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>deal with leadership issues. So I'm just curious. So who

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>might be tapped to become the next premier? Um, well,

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean we we do know that the Ka Chang

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to retire, but you know there's a speculation

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>on a few names. Um, you know, I don't want

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to uh go, and I mean it's hard to speculating guests,

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's Leo Hu's name. Per ups in that circle.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We think Leo ja is reaching the retirement age and

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>he may be may be stepping down, and so no

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>exception made on that. Okay, let's talk a little bit

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>about housing. I know that it's not so much economic policy,

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but this is a this is a story that runs

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>right through society in China. Are we expected to see

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>some measures at least in the next month or two

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to shore up housing. Yeah, there's not going to be

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a quick fix to China's property issues at the moment,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and it'll take some time to restore the market sentiment.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Many of these measures will be uh will vary from

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>city to city and left up to local government discrestion. Okay,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for part two in our discussion, we wanted to talk

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about future leadership. You're we mentioned that

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we know that elites will take up the key leadership positions,

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>but there's another group that will also advance, and these

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>are being called the luckiest generation. They were born back

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen seventies. They missed both the chaotic era

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of Mount ze Dong, particularly towards the end. They got

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>their education and grounding before the troubles of this most

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>recent period. They had a brief window of Internet freedom

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wto membership and all that that meant, as well as

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>global mobility, and those freedoms have now been somewhat restricted

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>by censorship, trade actions and COVID border closure. Let's bring

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in Crystal for a little bit of insight on this

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>wonderful story. So give us one name, Crystal, that you

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>think kind of stands out as the future high flyer.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think arguably the most high profile leader in

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>this cohort of politicians born in the nineteen seventies. Um

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's step the deputy party secretary in Shanghaim. His name

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>is to So he's been known as a right hand

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>man to the current Shanghai Party chief Letia, who is

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a longtime associate of presidency and the financial hub of

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Shanghai is traditionally a springboard to higher office. Seizing pay

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>himself as a former Shaghai party secretary. Many probably the

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>observers have noticed Jugo is one of the most promising

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>younger politicians to sporn in the nineteen seventies. And broadly speaking,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>why is this generation important? So it's likely that Seizing

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>things success so will emerge from this generation. They will

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>rise to power just as he gets very very old.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So current age limits and norms meant that those born

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen sixties will have to retire over the

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>next decade. So that would clear a path for those

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>born in the nineteen seventies to join the Politburo. So

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>the idea and the logic is that they will first

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>join UM the Central Committee this month as alternate members

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>become full members in the next Congress and then right

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Politburo in the Congress. I'm also curious about

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 1>whether or not these leaders will be more globalist in nature.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, might they be looking externally as much as

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>internally for the development of China. One thing that stands

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>out from the shared experience of this cohort of positition

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>s born in the nineteen seventies is that they have

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>witnessed and in fact experienced the benefits of China's startling

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>economic rights. So that gives rise to two arguments. One

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is that because that they have enjoyed the benefits and

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>they have had possibly a more international education, so they

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>will open up China at just potentially the right time.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, we could also argue that because

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you have only experienced the so called good times, it

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is much easier for them to internalize the idea that

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the party enrich our society, and that would um help

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>them to enforce the seaters co. Yeah, so a lot

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to unfold over the next many years. Crystal, thanks

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Chrystal China assignment reporter on

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>finance at Bloomberg News, and Marvin Chen thank you as well.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>China and North Asia, equity strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Brian Curtis along with Doug Chrisner. You can catch us

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>every weekday here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at six

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>am in Hong Kong and six pm on Wall Street.

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>John Brian, thanks a lot. Just ahead on Bloomberg day

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Break Weekend, the High Flying World Aviation Festival in Amsterdam.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Tucker On. This is Bloomberg broadcasting live from

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio in New York. Bloomberg evon

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Freo to Washington, d C, Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>oh six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg NIXT to the

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>country Sirius XM Channel one nine to London d A

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>B Digital Radio, and around the globe the Bloomberg Business

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>app and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Tuckery New York with your love log stories

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the coming week. The World that Idiot

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and festival happens next week in Amsterdam. For more Land,

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Said to London, bringing Bloomberg Daybreak Europe anchor Caroline Hepger,

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>John sawing dollar denominated fuel costs, a chaotic post COVID

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>summer travel season, and sustainable aviation. The airline industry certainly

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>has some challenges. Jo, what I mean now is Bloomberg

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>anchor Guy Johnson, who is off to Amsterdam. Then in

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the coming few days, Well, we hope you're going to

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>be off term. What is the biggest issue then in

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>your view for the industry? Is it production? Is it

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the passenger fuel costs? What do you think? It's all

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of the current It's all of the above. This is

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>an industry that shut down during the pandemic, which was unprecedented.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>It has then had to completely readjust to a summer

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that has been much stronger than anticipated. The capacity has

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>not been there. We've all read the stories about the

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>chaos that has ensued as a result of that. It

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a European problem, it's been a problem over

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, it's been a problem down in Australia.

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>All of the airlines have been suffering from the same issue.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>But then, but the challenge now comes in. As much

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as they've they've ramped up capacity once again to meet

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this demand. But when now we're going into a cost

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of living crisis. A lot of people book their summer

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>leisure trips as they came out of the pandemic. Let

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>me go anywhere. I don't care where, I just want

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to go on holiday. But now energy prices are rising,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>mortgage costs are rising. Are people going to continue to book?

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And if they're not going to book, will business travel

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>make up the game? Yeah? I mean I was really

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just the other day. I don't know whether you've seen

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this the October half term here in the UK where

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>people might go and grab some summer son. Apparently airline

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>ticket prices have gone up something like for travel to

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>places like tenor Reef and elsewhere. Look, you cover all

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the kind of global aviation industry Shindix, what do you

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think the atmosphere is actually going to be like? Then

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of paints a picture and really importantly, who are

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you going to be speaking to for blue bo TV

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and radio? I think it's going to be called So

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're an airline boss, you are, from a d

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>N A point of view, an optimistic person you have

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 1>to be. If you want to run an airline, you

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have got to be an optimistic person. But I would

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>say even the most optimistic airline CEO at the moment,

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably feeling fairly cautious. Um, there's a lot going on.

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of non unknowns that they have to

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with, so so I think there will be certainly

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a note of caution. We're going to be speaking to

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a whole range of carriers from around the world, and

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what's great about these things. Airline CEOs are actually

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>prepared to get on an airplane and come to these

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>kinds of events. So we've got Willie Walsh is going

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to be there. He'll give us the sort of top

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>down picture from my art. That's the industry body. We're

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>being hosted by the new KLM ceo. UM. There are

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>many female CEOs in this industry, so it's great that

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>she is. She is kind of hosting this event effectively

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for us. She's just been in the job for a

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred days. It's gonna be really interesting to get her

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>take Marion Riddler of what is happening with the airline.

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Then we've got some of the big kind of global carriers.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So Tim Clark is going to be there from Emirates,

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>be injurged to get his take. He has a pretty

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>global picture of what is going on quantas is CEO

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Alan Joyce is going to be there, so you're getting

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you're getting the kind of the whole range um and

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think actually I'm quite curious to hear from from

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the long haul carriers because you mentioned tenn

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a Reef. I think that's quite interesting. People are shortening

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the length they're going to be prepared to fly for

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>winter sun and it's going to be interesting. You mentioned

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>tenner Reef. Tenner Reef has quite a good winter sun.

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But normally people will be going to Australia, they'd be

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>going to the Caribbean, they'd be going to quite far

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>flung places to reach that wind sun. My understanding is

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be flying shorter distances to get

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that little that little rare. There you go. You can

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you can tell that I was looking it up on

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>me on the internet, can't you. Well. The October rises

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>are looking like look interesting that you mentioned i Ata

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>and great stuff. Really excited to hear about all the

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>CEOs that you're going to be able to listen to

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on on radio and of course watch on tv UM.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Iata says that they are optimistic that governments will sign

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>up to the target of net zero emissions for the

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sector by twenty fifty. There's a critical meeting coming up

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in Canada de Carbonization, the road to de carbonization for

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>these airline industries. It's really challenging, it is. It is

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge challenge. It is interesting. Easy Jet has just

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>moved away from its offset scheme which didn't work, so

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they're trying all kinds of different things trying to make

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this work. The biggest, the biggest thing that that the

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>industry needs from governments is a policy pledge to make

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>sustainable aviation fuel in quantities, So that needs that needs

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a tax reset to be able to allow that to happen.

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, just over in the United States has started

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>down this down this road. It's going to be intrigued

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to hear from Quantus. They're very keen for the Australian

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>government to to actually step in and deliver significant policy

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>around this kind of area that will allow the sustainable

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>aviation industry to grow. Guy, thanks so much for being

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with us, Wishing you all the best of luck. Will

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be tuning in of course to get all of those

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO interviews from the World Aviation Festival that takes place

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in the coming days in Amsterdam. Thanks so much to

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Guy Johnson. I'm Caroline Hedge in London. You can catch

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak, beginning at six

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>am in London. That's what I am on More Street, John, Caroline,

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot. Just ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, watch

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for more mud slinging as the mid term elections near.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Tucker, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Weekend Global, looking ahead of the top stories for

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>investors in the coming week. I'm John Tucker in New York.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>The mid term election season shifting in the high gear

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this coming week, with the November eighth elections getting closer evermore.

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's head to our Bloomberg ninety one newsroom in Washington

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and Amy Morris, Thank you, John. President Biden has been

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>ramping up the rhetoric as the mid terms near, and

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>he steps up the campaign appearances and other public speeches.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't claim to be a party of law in

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or and call the people to attack the police in

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>January six patriots. Now, as President Biden and other Democrats

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>continue to try to use issues surrounding January six to

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.479
<v Speaker 1>their advantage. Republicans are trying to use a lot of

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>hot button issues as well to their advantage. One of

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the issues they may try to turn to their political

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>advantage the January six riots, including some people who are

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>actually there. We talk about this now, Bloomberg political reporter

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Ryan tigue beckwith Ryan. It is a pleasure as always,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us. All right. So, former

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has not yet announced his bid for the

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>White House, but he has been pushing back at President

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden's claims of success. Uh. Here is the former president

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>now at a rally in Ohio just recently. It's been

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst years for stops in history. How

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are you, for a one case doing not too good?

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>All right? So, Ryan, how powerful an argument is this

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans? Is this something that can maybe move the

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>needle or sway independence? You know, I've never really understood

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump's focus on for one case, because a lot of

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the people who really vote based on the economy don't

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have forewarn case. I think the broader point here is

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>our employment doing doing and so I think that the

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>broader argument there about the economy is is still probably

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Republicans. Uh, you know, on their ledger on

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the positive side, giving them a boost. Um, I think

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's a question, a real open question of how

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>much other issues like abortion may counter the countervailing forces

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>there for Democrats this time around. But I still feel

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>like the economy is just is too uncertain and for

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it to be a boost to Biden at this point.

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're coming up now on a busy week at

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, shifting gears just a bit. The political

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>world still reverberating from the rollback of abortion rights. If

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy isn't necessarily going to move the needle for everyone,

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>how is the abortion you're going to play out for

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the GOP specifically? Yeah, I mean I think that there

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>was a long for a long time, there was an

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>advantage here for the Republicans in that the status quo

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>was sort of assumed by supporters of abortion rights to be,

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, not changing, and if you're a Republican, you

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>could go out there and campaign on how you're going

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to abortion or you're going to you know, things like

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>partial birth abortion or a parent notifications or things like that,

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.239
<v Speaker 1>where they could kind of find the wedge issues that

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>would sway a number of people. Since the Dobb's decision.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>We really seem like a reversal in the pool. But

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more people who are concerned about this

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>who are abortion right supporters than opponents. And there's a

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who say in the past, what it

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>said that they were pro life, and now we're saying

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I would sort of like the standard

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that there was during reversus a way to be with

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the law. I do think that that is a factor.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much of a factor. I mean,

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be a thing where it cuts into the

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Republican margin, but not enough to prevent Republicans from prevailing

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in the House and picking up some sentences. So it

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>could be a factor but not enough of a factor.

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Or it could completely change the electorate. I mean, we

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>have seen some evidence that voter registriations about young women

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>especially are unusually high. It's a real hard one to pull.

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a real hard nitt term to pull. I don't

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>think we've seen one like this. The other flip side

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of that coin is that maybe people who supported Republicans

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>are who supported Donald Trump before aren't as motivated to

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>go to the polls because abortion perhaps was their wedge issue,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and now it has been resolved, the Supreme Court has

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>had that handed down that decision, right, it does drain

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of the energy there. And I think

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that you saw like Trump was very effectively able to

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>get people back into his corner who were maybe skeptical

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of him. But we're republic against them, We're um anti

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>abortion rights, those folks. We're swayed kind of at the

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>last minute by his argument that like you got to

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>come home, you know, I can quit juststicism the Supreme Court,

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And that was basically to feel that he made with them,

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I can go to the justices and not in like

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>a five four situation, but like feeling a pretty confident

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>six three conservative majority in the screen courts, Like I

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>think that really becomes much less of an effective argument

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>if there are other things that are sort of depressing

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>them or keeping them from wanting to turn out. You

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>would mentioned Ryan that this particular mid term is hard

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to pull. Why is that? What is the perfect storm

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're witnessing that makes this one so unusual? You know,

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>there is just a there. You could do a whole

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>hour on what's up with pulling lately? And the real

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>problem with pulling is not so much figuring out what

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>people think, because we can easily pull and tell you

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what what people think. Um. The problem is whether those

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>are the people who are going to show up to vote,

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's Pulsters have different ways of doing this. Sometimes

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>they will just pull people that they know voted in

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>previous elections. Sometimes they will ask people they do vote.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you know, everyone says yeah, I voted, because

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to say that they're like a bad

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>citizens um. Or you know, they may say you intended

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to vote. You know, if the election were helped today,

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>how would you vote? And the composes are all very inexact,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's also some noise in the data. It appears

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that maybe some Trump supporters have just run so skeptical

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of institutions in general that they don't respond to poll

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>or that they don't tell polsters that they're going to vote,

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>or maybe just that they're off the grid enough that

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get ahold of them and so they're

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>not being captured by that. So we do see that

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some potential here that the pools are understating Republicans

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in sowing Democrats ahead, and some of the Senate races,

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and we may wake up the day after the election

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and find that Republicans actually did quite well in those

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>races that they were cast of movies, like in Georgia

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and Pennsylvania, or you know, it may not be the

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>case when we may find that there's another group of

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.239
<v Speaker 1>people that we've missed, like him, women that were you know,

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>under stampling. So I really take polls with much more

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>solt than your doctor would recommend. Right now, Well, we

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>are talking with Bloomberg political reporter Ryan tigue beckwith about

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the unusual nature of this mid term election. Ryan, lets

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>shift gears a bit to Pennsylvania. Democratic sending candidate John

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Fetterman was at a rally this past week, and he

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>promised to quantify Roe v. Wade if the state sends

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>him to Washington. My name is John feder Woman. His

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Republican opponent, mem and Oz has agreed to release his

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>medical records. He also continues to pressure Federman to release

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>his following that stroke that Federman had back in May.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's medically fit. Holdough, I'm a

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor and I probably should have an opinion on it.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But the fact is that nobody knows because none of

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>us have had access to his medical records, and Frantny

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that's his decision what records he wants to provide. Okay,

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So Ryan, where do we stand on this race and

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking for as far as the two

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of them in the coming weeks? Okay? Now, I am

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>one of those people who will tell you that debate

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>do not matter. M Everyone always gets all excited about

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>debates and makes a big deal about debate um and

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, like most debates doesn't really have an effect.

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a handful of cases that you could point to

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>where they did. This is one of those. I think

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>if if Sedderman and are needing a debate, and Sederman

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is able to put on a pretty normal performance for

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a politician, then I think that that will put to

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>bed the questions about, you know, his stroke and whether

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he needs a further job. If if he has a

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>halting performance or has a moment on stage, or he

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>appears lost or isn't able to parry effectively an attack,

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's medical concerns would really be forefronted

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>by that. So there's a lot of states in the

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>two of them leading at a debate and out of

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a very smart guy and a very quick guy, and

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this would also be an opportunity for him.

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>He's been really flatsported on on social media and some

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.239
<v Speaker 1>of his remarks and interviews and things like that. If

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>he can manage to get through a debate without saying

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>something about crude detas or or no some of the

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>things that he said that where he's started trying to

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>attack betterman and ends up making him sound cool, Uh,

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>then I think that would also could actually move the

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>needle a little bit. It's a very close race, much

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>closer than I think Democrats were hoping it would be

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point, speaking of moving the needle, will immigration issues,

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>border issues move the needle? It seems to be getting

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>more intense by the day. Where's the traction when it

0:30:54.880 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to immigration. I don't it necessarily enough of a

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>crisis to become like an issue for swing voters or

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>depress Democrats on the issue or something like that. And

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there's some reason to believe that that the aspensive focused

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on immigration in vers when it really wasn't an issue.

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Is why Donald Trump did better in among Hispanics than

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>he did in It may be that there's a cost

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to talking about immigration, because the way that Republicans talk

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about it tends to turn off some people. The other

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why this is a weird mid term is that

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like there's like two separate elections going

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on where Republicans are kind of over in this corner

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about immigration and inflation, crime, and Democrats over in

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this corner talking about abortion rights and you know, Biden's

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>record and prescription drug prices and whatnot, and and they're

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the public seems to be kind of in their two

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>universes too, like there's this isn't really a thing where

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there's an issue and you know, here's what I do

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>about it. It's like each has kind of its own

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>set of issues. And I think that's the other thing

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is that it's hard to know which motivating enough to

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>get the turnout. Okay, we're gonna keep watching it with you, Ryan,

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Bloomberg political correspondent Ryan tigue beckwith

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's going on in the nation's capital. For

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>more of our political news coverage, tune into Balance of

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Power with David Weston weekdays at noon Wall Street Time,

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and Sound On with Joe Matthew weekday afternoons at five

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>right here on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Amy Morris and this

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg John. Amy Morris reporting from our Bloomberg ninety

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>one newsroom in Washington. Thanks Tommy, and that does it

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning at five am Wall Street Time for the

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>latest on markets overseas and the news you need to

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>start your day. I'm John Tucker at this is Bloomberg.