1 00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:11,480 Speaker 1: Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Bell Chierness, Eric, 2 00:00:11,480 --> 00:00:15,080 Speaker 1: come on vacation. I can tell you sound far away. 3 00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:17,639 Speaker 1: It sounds like I'm at the beach. Trade. Yeah, my 4 00:00:17,680 --> 00:00:20,160 Speaker 1: toes are in the sand. You're dedicated. How's it going? 5 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:23,279 Speaker 1: You know? I had to talk to you, and that's 6 00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 1: why I wanted to join, because did you know that 7 00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:27,640 Speaker 1: we're in the midst of a trade war? I did. 8 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:30,280 Speaker 1: I noticed that. Yeah, you can't look at Twitter or 9 00:00:30,440 --> 00:00:33,479 Speaker 1: read the newspaper. Been making headlines. Yeah, it's making headlines 10 00:00:33,520 --> 00:00:36,279 Speaker 1: to say the least. So trade wars. Don't rest for 11 00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:39,239 Speaker 1: your vacation. I guess no, I have to. I have 12 00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:42,080 Speaker 1: to call to talk to you about how investors are 13 00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:44,600 Speaker 1: dealing with this trade war. It's become the theme of 14 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:47,559 Speaker 1: the year. Yeah, that rising rates. Although rates have kind 15 00:00:47,560 --> 00:00:50,560 Speaker 1: of flat flatlined a little bit. Um rates are boring 16 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:54,280 Speaker 1: compared to trade wars. They are, and that's why. But 17 00:00:54,480 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 1: they have moved a lot of flows. But I will say, 18 00:00:56,480 --> 00:00:59,880 Speaker 1: if there's one sort of macro event, it's it's trade wars, 19 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:04,360 Speaker 1: trade tensions. Although let's face it, some of it's probably 20 00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:07,040 Speaker 1: an overreaction in the headlines and from the media, and 21 00:01:07,080 --> 00:01:09,960 Speaker 1: I think this is a great opportunity to not only 22 00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:13,440 Speaker 1: look at something that's happening in real life, talk about 23 00:01:13,480 --> 00:01:16,479 Speaker 1: how investors are reacting to it or how they should 24 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 1: or should not react, and trying to parse out what 25 00:01:18,959 --> 00:01:23,600 Speaker 1: really matters versus what's sort of like the crazy outrage 26 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 1: of the week. And there's no better time to do 27 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:29,399 Speaker 1: this because obviously things have shifted from being rhetoric to 28 00:01:29,959 --> 00:01:33,280 Speaker 1: reality now and we're looking at full on tariffs. So 29 00:01:33,640 --> 00:01:36,120 Speaker 1: to help us understand the trade war, we're joined by 30 00:01:36,120 --> 00:01:39,800 Speaker 1: two guests, Sarah Ponzick, who's on the Cross Asset team 31 00:01:39,840 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 1: here at Bloomberg News, and also John Davy, who's a 32 00:01:43,720 --> 00:01:47,640 Speaker 1: portfolio advisor at Astoria. They're both going to give us 33 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 1: different views on what's happening and also sort of like 34 00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 1: how investors are dealing with it. Yeah, I mean I 35 00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:58,360 Speaker 1: suggest that both of them, because Sarah wrote this article 36 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:02,200 Speaker 1: basically your eid to playing the trade war, and it 37 00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:04,160 Speaker 1: goes over a couple of different things that she's seeing. 38 00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:08,040 Speaker 1: Sarah talks to people, she looks at the data, and 39 00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:10,120 Speaker 1: she writes about it. She can tell us what she's 40 00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:14,639 Speaker 1: seeing and hearing. John literally is putting people's money to 41 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:16,960 Speaker 1: work using e t f s, and he has to 42 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:19,920 Speaker 1: read what Sarah writes and other people and look at 43 00:02:19,919 --> 00:02:22,119 Speaker 1: the news and the twitters and and everything and take 44 00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:24,480 Speaker 1: it all into and decide what to do with real 45 00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:26,760 Speaker 1: money on the line. John has skin in the game, 46 00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:28,120 Speaker 1: so we have the best of both worlds in my 47 00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 1: on this episode of Trilliance, Your Guide to the Trade War, Sarah, John, 48 00:02:37,919 --> 00:02:40,760 Speaker 1: Welcome to Trilliance. Thanks for joining us, Thanks for having me, 49 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:43,960 Speaker 1: Thanks for having us. Uh Sarah, you wrote this article 50 00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:46,639 Speaker 1: that was really really great and Investor's guide to managing 51 00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:51,519 Speaker 1: escalating global trade tensions, so it's a great Bloomberg News 52 00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:54,160 Speaker 1: headline too. Can you give us a sense of of 53 00:02:54,200 --> 00:02:57,120 Speaker 1: what you've been covering and what you've been watching unfold. 54 00:02:57,440 --> 00:02:59,959 Speaker 1: Of course, it's kind of been an evolution in a way, 55 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:02,960 Speaker 1: as you were just discussing. At first it seemed it 56 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:06,280 Speaker 1: was just rhetoric, but now we're actually getting these tariffs, 57 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,359 Speaker 1: so day by day, week by week, it's really starting 58 00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:12,120 Speaker 1: to feel a bit more real. So I have been 59 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:15,600 Speaker 1: talking with money managers for the past couple of months 60 00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:19,280 Speaker 1: as this really has been developing, to see what they're 61 00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:23,520 Speaker 1: doing if they're concerned if they're actually moving money around. 62 00:03:23,720 --> 00:03:26,800 Speaker 1: And for a while, that answer was always no. The 63 00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:29,480 Speaker 1: answer was always no, we're going to reach a negotiation, 64 00:03:29,680 --> 00:03:32,120 Speaker 1: we're going to get a deal. We're standing pat We're 65 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:34,720 Speaker 1: really not doing anything differently right now. But as the 66 00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:38,480 Speaker 1: weeks went on, as as we got further down the timeline, 67 00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:42,800 Speaker 1: all of a sudden, concern started to seep into their 68 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:46,960 Speaker 1: tones of voices, and all of a sudden they started advising, Okay, well, 69 00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:48,760 Speaker 1: if it gets a little further, this is what you 70 00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:50,400 Speaker 1: should do. This is what you should do. And then 71 00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 1: we actually started to see some movement within the flows 72 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 1: and some people actually telling me that they're moving money around. 73 00:03:57,320 --> 00:03:58,880 Speaker 1: So I would say it started off when I would 74 00:03:58,880 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 1: ask them, all right, if this actually develops, if this 75 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:03,360 Speaker 1: actually gets pretty bad, what are you gonna do? But 76 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:05,880 Speaker 1: classic answer was always all right, go to small cap 77 00:04:05,880 --> 00:04:09,000 Speaker 1: stocks because they're more domestically oriented. For in a trade war, 78 00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 1: the U s stands to benefit, so you're better off 79 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:14,280 Speaker 1: if you're in the US. So make America grade again. 80 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 1: What does that look like from a flow perspective and 81 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:20,680 Speaker 1: a return perspective? So far this year, so from a 82 00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:24,599 Speaker 1: flow perspective, it's actually interesting because one of the largest 83 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:27,279 Speaker 1: small kept et s. I know. Bloomberg Intelligence had a 84 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:30,400 Speaker 1: great deck out recently about this, saying that there were 85 00:04:30,440 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 1: actually outflows from small caps e T s UH in 86 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:38,240 Speaker 1: the past week or so. However, it was still a 87 00:04:38,279 --> 00:04:41,039 Speaker 1: lot less than US equities at large. And if you 88 00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:42,679 Speaker 1: look at the Russell two thousand, I mean, the Russell 89 00:04:42,680 --> 00:04:44,320 Speaker 1: two thousand has just been on a tear this year. 90 00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:47,599 Speaker 1: It's really been outperforming the SMP five hundred and broader 91 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:51,240 Speaker 1: equity markets at large. So we are seeing that, I mean, 92 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:54,240 Speaker 1: we're seeing small caps outperformed, and we are seeing a 93 00:04:54,240 --> 00:04:57,560 Speaker 1: little boost there being a little better uh than larger 94 00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:02,040 Speaker 1: US equity flows. The rustles like an eight percent return 95 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:04,520 Speaker 1: so far this year versus the SMP, which is at 96 00:05:04,560 --> 00:05:08,480 Speaker 1: about two exactly smps like muddling around, moving sideways around 97 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,480 Speaker 1: that number. And then Russell two thousands up eight percent, 98 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:15,160 Speaker 1: So really seeing some strength there relatively. So that's where 99 00:05:15,160 --> 00:05:17,719 Speaker 1: they're going. Eric. When you look at the small cap stuff, 100 00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:21,040 Speaker 1: how are you saying? What are you saying? Ironically, small 101 00:05:21,080 --> 00:05:24,240 Speaker 1: caps appear somewhat like a safe move normally they're the 102 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:26,839 Speaker 1: jumpier ones. But what I will say is in the 103 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:29,920 Speaker 1: second quarter it was unusual that small caps took in 104 00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 1: thirteen billion, that was more than double any other cap size. 105 00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:36,240 Speaker 1: And the note that Sarah's referring to was that for 106 00:05:36,279 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 1: the first time in a long time, they saw a 107 00:05:37,640 --> 00:05:41,920 Speaker 1: week of outflows. And so the question remains is if 108 00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:46,200 Speaker 1: small caps are If small caps stopped getting investors interest 109 00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:49,880 Speaker 1: and attention, it's not good. That's an overall bad sign 110 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:52,960 Speaker 1: because they've been the one sort of equity area to 111 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:56,120 Speaker 1: a be bullish, but be also play that protect from 112 00:05:56,160 --> 00:05:58,839 Speaker 1: the trade war quote unquote. UM So let's bring in 113 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:01,800 Speaker 1: John on this talking small caps. Let's say you're out there, 114 00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:03,800 Speaker 1: you own a small cap eat after you're thinking about 115 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:06,400 Speaker 1: going into it, how would you look at this area 116 00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 1: going forward? Well, I think so if you own small caps, 117 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:11,600 Speaker 1: I think that's a pretty good place, you know, for 118 00:06:11,640 --> 00:06:13,800 Speaker 1: the time being. Um but I'm going to take the 119 00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:16,520 Speaker 1: other side of that trade about how trade wars is 120 00:06:16,560 --> 00:06:19,480 Speaker 1: the reason why the market's hell him off. Trade wars 121 00:06:19,560 --> 00:06:21,880 Speaker 1: is not what's driving the market that. That's my point, 122 00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:24,000 Speaker 1: and that's what we've been arguing, is that you've got 123 00:06:24,040 --> 00:06:25,920 Speaker 1: things like you know, the ft ist hiking rates, You've 124 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:28,760 Speaker 1: got you know, no more qui in the US, uh 125 00:06:28,800 --> 00:06:32,719 Speaker 1: and soon to be stopping in Europe. You've got global growth, 126 00:06:32,720 --> 00:06:34,400 Speaker 1: that's the couple in right. US is up, you know, 127 00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:37,320 Speaker 1: as you said Russell two thousands up eight percent. You've 128 00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:40,799 Speaker 1: got China that's down e M that's you know down, 129 00:06:40,880 --> 00:06:43,719 Speaker 1: you know, fourteen percent year to date. So I think, 130 00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:45,839 Speaker 1: you know, like if you watch the news, you're always 131 00:06:45,839 --> 00:06:47,680 Speaker 1: going to be scared, You're never gonna want to invest. 132 00:06:47,800 --> 00:06:49,840 Speaker 1: I think small caps is a good place to kind of, 133 00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:52,760 Speaker 1: you know, park your money just because you know, I 134 00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 1: think a lot of Trump's policies is beneficial for domestic 135 00:06:56,320 --> 00:06:59,720 Speaker 1: orienting companies. But for us at Astoria, we've been the 136 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 1: pensively positioned in the portfolio for most of this year. 137 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:05,320 Speaker 1: This was a big call that we made earlier in 138 00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:07,520 Speaker 1: the year, uh well at the start of the year. 139 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,080 Speaker 1: So our premise was that, you know, we expected this 140 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: year to have a lot more volatility. We thought that, 141 00:07:13,160 --> 00:07:14,880 Speaker 1: you know, there was a lot more uncertanty this year 142 00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:16,960 Speaker 1: with what the Fed is going to do, so we've 143 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:20,200 Speaker 1: been more defensive in general. So if you own small caps, 144 00:07:20,200 --> 00:07:22,160 Speaker 1: I think that's a good trade for you. I think 145 00:07:22,160 --> 00:07:23,840 Speaker 1: it's been a good investment, and I would I would 146 00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:26,080 Speaker 1: probably hold on to them. And let me jump in 147 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:29,240 Speaker 1: here back to Sarah. In terms of the small cap btfs, 148 00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:32,000 Speaker 1: if you noticed I j r Is in the top ten, 149 00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:34,680 Speaker 1: that's most people know small caps I w M which 150 00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:37,240 Speaker 1: is the I shares the most traded one, or VB 151 00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:39,760 Speaker 1: which is Vanguard, but I j r Is number nine. 152 00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:42,400 Speaker 1: To talk about within the small cap space, what what 153 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:46,120 Speaker 1: kind of ets are seeing the action? So the e 154 00:07:46,200 --> 00:07:49,080 Speaker 1: t s that are seeing the action are the ones 155 00:07:49,120 --> 00:07:51,880 Speaker 1: that are actually being used as more sort of a 156 00:07:51,920 --> 00:07:56,480 Speaker 1: trading vehicle. So if you want to get into the action, 157 00:07:56,560 --> 00:07:58,960 Speaker 1: I mean, we're seeing heavy trading falling. We're seeing people 158 00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:02,080 Speaker 1: wanting to get in and get out, maybe make some 159 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 1: some quick moves using these e t s. And that's 160 00:08:04,600 --> 00:08:06,200 Speaker 1: really how we're saying it play out there. So I 161 00:08:06,440 --> 00:08:09,160 Speaker 1: w M clearly takes the monster of the flow volatility, 162 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:11,600 Speaker 1: that's the one that's been around forever. But it's the 163 00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:14,280 Speaker 1: fee is I believe twenty basis points I'll find out 164 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:17,239 Speaker 1: in two seconds here. But John, in terms of picking 165 00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:19,280 Speaker 1: a small cap ETF, if you're out there listening like 166 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,800 Speaker 1: how do you actually do this? I w MS twenty 167 00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:23,720 Speaker 1: bits and then you've got ones that are ten and 168 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:26,840 Speaker 1: even a little less. Do you prefer going to the 169 00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:30,040 Speaker 1: sort of cheap, low cost Vanguard or I shares Core series, 170 00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 1: or do you like the liquidity of an I w M. 171 00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:36,520 Speaker 1: We I would prefer something like in E E S 172 00:08:36,679 --> 00:08:40,080 Speaker 1: or in I j R. So those are more Yes. 173 00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:42,680 Speaker 1: This is why. Look these E t F strategists, they 174 00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:44,720 Speaker 1: sniff through the whole toolback. That's that's why we have 175 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:47,319 Speaker 1: them on. I don't even know what E S is. 176 00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:52,040 Speaker 1: That's the Wisdentry earnings weighted e t F. So basically, 177 00:08:52,559 --> 00:08:54,960 Speaker 1: first of all, they take like a quality filter, so 178 00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:57,880 Speaker 1: you have to have like four quarters of like positive earnings, 179 00:08:58,559 --> 00:09:01,200 Speaker 1: and then they wait the stock in the index based 180 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 1: on its earnings. So the more earnings you produce as 181 00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:06,360 Speaker 1: a company, the higher the weight. So it's like a 182 00:09:06,440 --> 00:09:09,520 Speaker 1: super higher quality e t F. If you go back, 183 00:09:09,679 --> 00:09:11,600 Speaker 1: you you probably have a terminal up. But if you 184 00:09:11,679 --> 00:09:15,440 Speaker 1: go back E S has completely killed I w M 185 00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:18,560 Speaker 1: since its inception. And you know my point is like, okay, 186 00:09:18,559 --> 00:09:20,880 Speaker 1: E yes, may coos to your thirty five basis points. 187 00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:24,000 Speaker 1: I w M is maybe you know fifteen, but I'm 188 00:09:24,040 --> 00:09:27,360 Speaker 1: sure if you look, I don't know what this is. Yeah, 189 00:09:27,559 --> 00:09:31,480 Speaker 1: E S is up two to I w M sixty four. 190 00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:34,960 Speaker 1: That's seventy eight percentage points difference. It is a little pricier, 191 00:09:35,440 --> 00:09:37,520 Speaker 1: but it's not bad, especially when you're comparing to an 192 00:09:37,520 --> 00:09:40,439 Speaker 1: active fund. It's thirty eight basis points. But you're right, 193 00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:42,840 Speaker 1: it's small caps, but with a little of the edge 194 00:09:42,880 --> 00:09:45,600 Speaker 1: taken off and a little tilt towards that's like a 195 00:09:45,600 --> 00:09:51,360 Speaker 1: toy at the bottom of the cereal box, cracker jack box. 196 00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:57,040 Speaker 1: Are we that old that we remember that I do it? Okay, okay, okay, good, 197 00:09:57,080 --> 00:10:03,200 Speaker 1: all right. Quality usually works over time as like you know, 198 00:10:03,240 --> 00:10:04,800 Speaker 1: as a factor, and we don't have to go into 199 00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:07,400 Speaker 1: like a factor based discussion. But I think people get 200 00:10:07,480 --> 00:10:09,880 Speaker 1: enamored about low costs, and you know, they want to 201 00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:12,240 Speaker 1: buy the cheapest product out there. And I think you 202 00:10:12,280 --> 00:10:13,839 Speaker 1: got to look underneath the hut a little bit when 203 00:10:13,840 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 1: it comes eat just because there's so many products out there. 204 00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:18,240 Speaker 1: So E S is one of those like hidden gems 205 00:10:18,280 --> 00:10:20,320 Speaker 1: if you like small caps, and that's a good point. 206 00:10:20,320 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 1: I mean thirty eight to twenty or ten, that's eighteen 207 00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:26,000 Speaker 1: basis points. If you had picked E S, though, that's 208 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:30,120 Speaker 1: seventy seventy eight hundred basis points, So I agree with you. 209 00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:32,920 Speaker 1: I think though, when you go pure, sort of plain 210 00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:35,680 Speaker 1: vanilla like the smp F have injured, you really should 211 00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:37,960 Speaker 1: look for the lowest cost. But when you go to 212 00:10:38,040 --> 00:10:41,560 Speaker 1: these other areas, you can possibly do your homework a 213 00:10:41,559 --> 00:10:44,840 Speaker 1: little and find a hidden gem. Absolutely, Okay, Sarah, what's 214 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:49,079 Speaker 1: the what's the number two thing that you um focused 215 00:10:49,120 --> 00:10:51,440 Speaker 1: on in this article? So a lot of people started 216 00:10:51,480 --> 00:10:54,640 Speaker 1: talking about if you're worried, get defensive, and John was 217 00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:56,920 Speaker 1: talking about how maybe not even just because of trade, 218 00:10:56,920 --> 00:10:58,959 Speaker 1: but they were starting to shift to a more defensive 219 00:10:58,960 --> 00:11:01,520 Speaker 1: position at the are to the year for even other reasons. 220 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 1: But when they talk about defensive equities, a lot of 221 00:11:04,240 --> 00:11:06,240 Speaker 1: them say, all right, well you look for your toothpaste 222 00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:08,760 Speaker 1: and your diaper companies because it's something bad, worred to happen. 223 00:11:08,800 --> 00:11:11,200 Speaker 1: At least you know that people always need those types 224 00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:14,000 Speaker 1: of products, so go to your consumer staples. And for me, 225 00:11:14,200 --> 00:11:17,040 Speaker 1: I did. I. Well, I was curious because it seems 226 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:19,080 Speaker 1: like there was a shift in tone when we got 227 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:21,520 Speaker 1: to June, so I was really curious what the flows 228 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:24,000 Speaker 1: looked like in June versus the rest of the year, 229 00:11:24,040 --> 00:11:26,760 Speaker 1: and we definitely saw a major shift. So if you 230 00:11:26,760 --> 00:11:31,760 Speaker 1: look at XLP, which is State Streets Consumers Staples sector fund, 231 00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:37,600 Speaker 1: so x LP actually had the most outflows from January 232 00:11:37,760 --> 00:11:40,160 Speaker 1: to May this year. X l P, I mean consumer 233 00:11:40,200 --> 00:11:42,400 Speaker 1: staples as a whole have really just been struggling. So 234 00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:46,240 Speaker 1: they saw seven hundred seventy three million dollars in a 235 00:11:46,400 --> 00:11:50,240 Speaker 1: loss from January to May. However, in June that completely flipped, 236 00:11:50,240 --> 00:11:52,240 Speaker 1: and if you look at the entire suite of those 237 00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:56,000 Speaker 1: sector funds, x LP actually took in the most money 238 00:11:56,320 --> 00:11:58,480 Speaker 1: out of any of them. It saw five hundred eighty 239 00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:01,760 Speaker 1: three million in inflows in June. So I was just curious. 240 00:12:01,960 --> 00:12:04,199 Speaker 1: I was looking through the data, and it did take 241 00:12:04,240 --> 00:12:05,880 Speaker 1: a bit of time, and I was worried maybe I 242 00:12:05,880 --> 00:12:08,240 Speaker 1: would not find anything. But I thought it was really 243 00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:11,360 Speaker 1: interesting that I had noticed that shift in tone from 244 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:13,079 Speaker 1: the rest of the year until June, and people were 245 00:12:13,080 --> 00:12:15,040 Speaker 1: actually starting to say that they were concerned, maybe they 246 00:12:15,080 --> 00:12:17,520 Speaker 1: were going to shift money around, And what do you know, 247 00:12:17,760 --> 00:12:20,839 Speaker 1: XLP went from the worst to the best. Flos XLP, 248 00:12:21,040 --> 00:12:23,360 Speaker 1: by the way, is it really is a boring e 249 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:26,720 Speaker 1: t F. I mean Coca Cola, Colgate, pal mall of 250 00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:30,600 Speaker 1: walmart Um. In terms of the performance by the way, 251 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:33,720 Speaker 1: just so people know, in the past ten years since 252 00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:39,000 Speaker 1: the financial crisis, basically x LPs trailing Tech or XLK 253 00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:43,520 Speaker 1: by a hundred percentage points. Tech is over of the 254 00:12:43,600 --> 00:12:47,600 Speaker 1: SMP five hundred Staples is a mere six eight percent. John, 255 00:12:47,679 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: could we see a whole new regime where XLP becomes 256 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:53,240 Speaker 1: the stud and xl K lags All the holdens you 257 00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:55,480 Speaker 1: mentioned just kind of remind me of Warren Buffett. Just 258 00:12:55,559 --> 00:12:58,240 Speaker 1: as a total aside um, I think what you're gonna 259 00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:00,560 Speaker 1: start to see is people kind of getting more defensive 260 00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:03,040 Speaker 1: in their portfolio given what's going on with all the 261 00:13:03,120 --> 00:13:06,640 Speaker 1: kind of macro news. So, um, here's the other thing, right, 262 00:13:06,679 --> 00:13:09,000 Speaker 1: if you want to market cap weighted index, right or 263 00:13:09,000 --> 00:13:12,280 Speaker 1: in E t F, you are indirectly you know, long tech, right, 264 00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:16,439 Speaker 1: because tech is like of the SMP, and you may 265 00:13:16,440 --> 00:13:19,559 Speaker 1: not know, but you are a tech kind of investor, right, 266 00:13:20,080 --> 00:13:23,040 Speaker 1: And I think now, given everything that's going on the cycle, 267 00:13:23,120 --> 00:13:24,800 Speaker 1: you know now is a decent time to kind of 268 00:13:24,840 --> 00:13:28,600 Speaker 1: get more defensive in in general. As a total aside, 269 00:13:28,679 --> 00:13:31,040 Speaker 1: you know, one E t F that we moved into 270 00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:34,040 Speaker 1: this year is q e MM. So we owned I 271 00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:36,520 Speaker 1: E m G last year. It's the emergent market ETF. 272 00:13:37,000 --> 00:13:40,199 Speaker 1: Five stocks drove fifty of the returns, and I in 273 00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:44,040 Speaker 1: I MG in And this year, you know, we just 274 00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:46,400 Speaker 1: didn't want to make a big bet on five stocks, 275 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:48,920 Speaker 1: you know, five Chinese internet stocks. So this year Q 276 00:13:49,160 --> 00:13:51,600 Speaker 1: E M M a little bit more defensive, and it's 277 00:13:51,640 --> 00:13:54,439 Speaker 1: out performed I m G by like one. It doesn't 278 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:56,079 Speaker 1: sound like huge, but you know, you start to kind 279 00:13:56,080 --> 00:13:58,320 Speaker 1: of get you know, a couple hundred basis points, and 280 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:02,120 Speaker 1: it's out performed on lower volatil lo of autility and 281 00:14:02,160 --> 00:14:05,640 Speaker 1: what were the holdings that that you wanted to access there? 282 00:14:06,760 --> 00:14:09,800 Speaker 1: The holdings are very similar to I MG just doesn't overwait. 283 00:14:09,880 --> 00:14:12,240 Speaker 1: So Samsung may not be like five pcent like it 284 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:14,400 Speaker 1: is an I m G. You know, I may only 285 00:14:14,440 --> 00:14:17,120 Speaker 1: have like a two percent weight. So it's a it's 286 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:20,520 Speaker 1: a little bit lower ball um, more defensive, you know, 287 00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:24,080 Speaker 1: more value and quality stocks. So and John brings up 288 00:14:24,080 --> 00:14:26,760 Speaker 1: a good point. This is sort of the same concept 289 00:14:26,840 --> 00:14:29,280 Speaker 1: as E E S applied to emerging markets, in that 290 00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:32,760 Speaker 1: when you go to emerging markets, most people use what's 291 00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 1: called the market cap weighted e t F. That's E 292 00:14:34,840 --> 00:14:37,640 Speaker 1: E M, I MG, the ones you mentioned and a 293 00:14:37,640 --> 00:14:40,480 Speaker 1: lot of times the top ten holdings can make up 294 00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:43,960 Speaker 1: almost half of the portfolio. At least when I look 295 00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:46,320 Speaker 1: at QWI E m M, the top ten holdings only 296 00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 1: make up six of the portfolio. That's an underrated field, 297 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:53,160 Speaker 1: isn't it percentage of top ten holdings? Yeah? And that 298 00:14:53,280 --> 00:14:55,800 Speaker 1: also comes down to waiting, and when you look at 299 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:57,960 Speaker 1: it the alternative waiting. You could not go the other 300 00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:00,040 Speaker 1: way though, and have an equal weighting, which gives a 301 00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:02,040 Speaker 1: little more volve In this case, you have a quality 302 00:15:02,560 --> 00:15:06,520 Speaker 1: screen on this um. Even though it's less concentrated. The 303 00:15:06,600 --> 00:15:09,200 Speaker 1: quality screen takes that edge off, which doesn't make it 304 00:15:09,280 --> 00:15:12,720 Speaker 1: extra have extra volatility. So it's an interesting pick qu 305 00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:14,920 Speaker 1: e m M. It's the spider product. It's a multi 306 00:15:14,960 --> 00:15:24,600 Speaker 1: factor approach to emerging markets. Okay, John, can we just 307 00:15:24,640 --> 00:15:27,040 Speaker 1: go a little bit more meta about how you as 308 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:30,120 Speaker 1: an investor, how you've been dealing with the trade war 309 00:15:30,160 --> 00:15:34,240 Speaker 1: as a transition from being rhetoric to reality. Sure, Um, 310 00:15:34,280 --> 00:15:37,320 Speaker 1: you know, we're longer term investors, so I think you know, Look, 311 00:15:37,360 --> 00:15:40,760 Speaker 1: Trump's approval ratings keep rallying and keep going up as 312 00:15:40,760 --> 00:15:43,560 Speaker 1: his trade ruter kind of spikes up. So I don't 313 00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:46,520 Speaker 1: think he's going to back down. Per Se, I'll caveat 314 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:48,800 Speaker 1: by saying, you know, we're not experts in trade wars, 315 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:50,880 Speaker 1: so you know, we tend to focus on like data 316 00:15:50,880 --> 00:15:52,960 Speaker 1: and what's going on in economy, and I think there's 317 00:15:53,000 --> 00:15:55,800 Speaker 1: some bigger picture issues that are driving the market. So 318 00:15:55,880 --> 00:15:59,320 Speaker 1: one is, as I mentioned earlier, the FED is hiking rates. Two, 319 00:15:59,400 --> 00:16:01,600 Speaker 1: you've had you know, the couple in you know, from 320 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:03,280 Speaker 1: US and the rest of the world in terms of 321 00:16:03,280 --> 00:16:06,960 Speaker 1: global growth. I think inflation's rise in and you know, 322 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:09,680 Speaker 1: I think that's really what's driving the market. Like you know, yeah, 323 00:16:09,720 --> 00:16:12,800 Speaker 1: the media is gonna talk about whatever is hot for 324 00:16:12,840 --> 00:16:15,680 Speaker 1: that day, but you know there's other big and bigger 325 00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:19,560 Speaker 1: driving forces that are impact and market. So to answer 326 00:16:19,600 --> 00:16:22,200 Speaker 1: your point, Joel, you know we've been increasing cash. So 327 00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:25,560 Speaker 1: cash I think is a really interesting alternative at this 328 00:16:25,600 --> 00:16:28,240 Speaker 1: point in time. Right, the two years yielding like you know, 329 00:16:28,240 --> 00:16:31,840 Speaker 1: two point five percent, so you take on no credit risk, no, 330 00:16:32,240 --> 00:16:34,960 Speaker 1: you know, very little duration risk. So I would much 331 00:16:35,080 --> 00:16:37,600 Speaker 1: rather own like a s h Y. Then let's say 332 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:39,800 Speaker 1: like an h y G, like why take on the 333 00:16:39,800 --> 00:16:42,080 Speaker 1: extra credit risk and the extra duration risk for for 334 00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:45,120 Speaker 1: HIO credit s h Y, which is an a propro 335 00:16:45,280 --> 00:16:47,560 Speaker 1: ticker for something that holds one to three ye treasuries. 336 00:16:47,920 --> 00:16:49,640 Speaker 1: It is shy. It's when you're feeling shy, you go 337 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:52,760 Speaker 1: into this thing and s h V. These are making 338 00:16:52,760 --> 00:16:56,520 Speaker 1: the top ten top twenty flo lists and they're they're boring. Uh. 339 00:16:56,560 --> 00:16:59,120 Speaker 1: These are ultra short term debt, which is used for cash. 340 00:16:59,120 --> 00:17:02,880 Speaker 1: Talk about the amazing inflows into ultra short term debt 341 00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:05,680 Speaker 1: this year. Look, you say they're boring, but the thing 342 00:17:05,800 --> 00:17:09,040 Speaker 1: is they're safe. And if you are worried about anything, 343 00:17:09,080 --> 00:17:11,679 Speaker 1: even if it's a trade war, if you're just worried 344 00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:14,160 Speaker 1: about where we are in the cycle, maybe that's where 345 00:17:14,160 --> 00:17:15,920 Speaker 1: you want to park your money. And that's what we're seeing. 346 00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:19,840 Speaker 1: We are seeing some major flows into short term debt, 347 00:17:19,920 --> 00:17:22,480 Speaker 1: and as well as short term debt, we're also seeing 348 00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:26,800 Speaker 1: some huge inflows into the tenure treasury bond e t 349 00:17:27,040 --> 00:17:29,119 Speaker 1: f s as well so g o VT, which is 350 00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:32,960 Speaker 1: the I shares products. It's the largest US treasury bond 351 00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:37,520 Speaker 1: tracking US treasuries. In June, it took the most cash 352 00:17:37,520 --> 00:17:39,920 Speaker 1: on record, the most that's ever taken in a month. 353 00:17:40,119 --> 00:17:42,800 Speaker 1: It took in about eight hundred seventy million dollars. So 354 00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:45,560 Speaker 1: we're seeing money into short term debt and then of 355 00:17:45,600 --> 00:17:48,360 Speaker 1: course the ten uere as well as getting a lot 356 00:17:48,400 --> 00:17:51,240 Speaker 1: of traction. John As that's g o v T is 357 00:17:51,560 --> 00:17:55,520 Speaker 1: fifteen basis points. As as an investor, when you say cash, right, 358 00:17:55,520 --> 00:17:57,720 Speaker 1: a lot of people think of money market fund. Can 359 00:17:57,760 --> 00:17:59,600 Speaker 1: e t F s like this be used in place 360 00:18:00,119 --> 00:18:02,800 Speaker 1: of a money market fund and like short ultra short 361 00:18:02,880 --> 00:18:05,440 Speaker 1: term treasury et F? Are people starting to do that? 362 00:18:05,760 --> 00:18:07,240 Speaker 1: I think? So? I mean I think if you look 363 00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:11,240 Speaker 1: at g Bill, that's been another kind of big inflow um. 364 00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:13,800 Speaker 1: You know, I think they got like seven million, you know, 365 00:18:13,880 --> 00:18:16,080 Speaker 1: just in the last you know year. If you look 366 00:18:16,119 --> 00:18:20,520 Speaker 1: at JP s T that's a short duration fund from J. P. Morgan, 367 00:18:20,560 --> 00:18:23,439 Speaker 1: they've raised a lot of assets. So, I mean, you know, 368 00:18:23,480 --> 00:18:25,600 Speaker 1: the thing when when you buy a money market fund 369 00:18:25,640 --> 00:18:27,040 Speaker 1: is that you know you buy it at NAV. You 370 00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:30,320 Speaker 1: don't pay bid offer, you don't pay commission cost um. 371 00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:32,520 Speaker 1: You know there's no slippage right when you purchase that, 372 00:18:32,560 --> 00:18:33,960 Speaker 1: Whereas you know when you buy an E t F 373 00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:36,679 Speaker 1: you know there are extra costs, right. That's the thing 374 00:18:36,720 --> 00:18:38,400 Speaker 1: that you know, most people don't realize. So in light 375 00:18:38,440 --> 00:18:41,280 Speaker 1: of you know, the news about Vanguard cutting all e 376 00:18:41,440 --> 00:18:43,800 Speaker 1: t F. You know the seven GTF. Most people don't 377 00:18:43,920 --> 00:18:46,800 Speaker 1: aren't aware that, you know, there are extra costs when 378 00:18:46,800 --> 00:18:49,919 Speaker 1: you purchase an e t F, as I mentioned bid offer, 379 00:18:50,440 --> 00:18:53,359 Speaker 1: you know, there's market impact costs. So I think just 380 00:18:53,640 --> 00:18:56,640 Speaker 1: because people love ets right there like a hot product, 381 00:18:56,680 --> 00:18:59,359 Speaker 1: and you know, now like the end investors starting to 382 00:18:59,359 --> 00:19:02,800 Speaker 1: see on TV that a t s are a good product. 383 00:19:02,880 --> 00:19:06,119 Speaker 1: So I think advisors are increasingly using more things like 384 00:19:06,200 --> 00:19:09,280 Speaker 1: jps T and g BILL or GOV in place of 385 00:19:09,359 --> 00:19:11,880 Speaker 1: let's say a money market fund. And just to follow 386 00:19:11,920 --> 00:19:13,840 Speaker 1: up on the ultra short term deadts, they've taken in 387 00:19:14,040 --> 00:19:19,080 Speaker 1: eighteen billion this year. That's organic growth, and that puts 388 00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:21,919 Speaker 1: them at almost ten percent of all netflows this year. 389 00:19:21,960 --> 00:19:24,080 Speaker 1: They only make up one percent of the assets, So 390 00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:25,800 Speaker 1: a huge year for those et f s. And I 391 00:19:25,840 --> 00:19:29,440 Speaker 1: think going to cash and using a little cash, it's 392 00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:31,600 Speaker 1: hard to argue with that these other ways of trying 393 00:19:31,600 --> 00:19:35,040 Speaker 1: to outthink all this, But you know, cash, nothing wrong 394 00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:36,560 Speaker 1: with that, and that's I think what a lot of 395 00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:40,520 Speaker 1: people are coming to the conclusion of. That's the biggest argument. Well, 396 00:19:40,560 --> 00:19:42,879 Speaker 1: one of the big arguments against equities right is that 397 00:19:42,920 --> 00:19:46,080 Speaker 1: you know, a lot more volatility, extremely late cycle you've 398 00:19:46,080 --> 00:19:49,280 Speaker 1: got trade wars fed hiking rates, and so you know, 399 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:52,960 Speaker 1: two percent it's not a bad investment anymore. And and John, 400 00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:56,760 Speaker 1: what percentage have you sort of shifted into cash over 401 00:19:56,800 --> 00:20:00,280 Speaker 1: the past few months, somewhere between like the five seven 402 00:20:00,600 --> 00:20:03,560 Speaker 1: percent range? I mean, you know it was hard to 403 00:20:03,560 --> 00:20:06,520 Speaker 1: own cash right the last you know, five six years, 404 00:20:06,600 --> 00:20:09,080 Speaker 1: right because mark kept on going up. Whereas you know 405 00:20:09,200 --> 00:20:12,680 Speaker 1: now you know a lot more choppier uh markets, Right, 406 00:20:12,720 --> 00:20:16,160 Speaker 1: so your opportunity costs is uh, you know, it's very 407 00:20:16,160 --> 00:20:17,800 Speaker 1: different now than it was a couple of years ago 408 00:20:17,840 --> 00:20:20,479 Speaker 1: when every single year the market was going up. And 409 00:20:20,520 --> 00:20:23,000 Speaker 1: what do you what do clients come to you asking 410 00:20:23,040 --> 00:20:27,600 Speaker 1: about regarding the trade war? What are the long term 411 00:20:27,640 --> 00:20:30,960 Speaker 1: implications which I think are very very difficult to figure out. 412 00:20:31,320 --> 00:20:33,119 Speaker 1: Here's the thing, right, everyone thinks they're an expert on 413 00:20:33,160 --> 00:20:35,520 Speaker 1: trade wars all of a sudden, right, we're certainly not. 414 00:20:35,880 --> 00:20:39,520 Speaker 1: We're more experts in terms of building a portfolio, doing 415 00:20:39,560 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 1: macwork on research, quantitative research. So we tend to invest 416 00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:45,280 Speaker 1: where there's like a margin of safety. And that's kind 417 00:20:45,280 --> 00:20:47,639 Speaker 1: of what we tell investors is like, Okay, we're investing 418 00:20:47,720 --> 00:20:50,520 Speaker 1: for the long run. It's very hard to pick to 419 00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:53,480 Speaker 1: determine what's going to happen in the short term, and 420 00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:55,960 Speaker 1: you know, trade wars is something that you know is 421 00:20:56,080 --> 00:20:59,200 Speaker 1: very unknown from a long term perspective. Here's the editing, 422 00:20:59,280 --> 00:21:02,400 Speaker 1: Joel Right, China owns over a trillion dollars of US 423 00:21:02,480 --> 00:21:07,360 Speaker 1: government securities. Right, it's about of all outstanding debt. Right. 424 00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:09,760 Speaker 1: So Trump is playing check in with China. And I 425 00:21:09,800 --> 00:21:14,320 Speaker 1: think that's a very very you know, very very difficult 426 00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:17,639 Speaker 1: thing to to figure out, you know, the political posturing 427 00:21:17,920 --> 00:21:20,240 Speaker 1: and what's going to happen. So again, given we're not 428 00:21:20,359 --> 00:21:22,359 Speaker 1: experts in that space, we try and you know, to 429 00:21:22,520 --> 00:21:27,679 Speaker 1: have very diversified portfolios, increased cash, use alternatives, use gold, 430 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:30,440 Speaker 1: and you know that that will help and it has 431 00:21:30,480 --> 00:21:34,480 Speaker 1: helped smooth out our portfolio volatility. Can you speak a 432 00:21:34,480 --> 00:21:37,439 Speaker 1: little bit about what it's like to do a portfolio 433 00:21:37,560 --> 00:21:39,960 Speaker 1: shock test in the midst of all this? What do 434 00:21:39,960 --> 00:21:41,600 Speaker 1: you what do you look for when you guys do that. 435 00:21:42,800 --> 00:21:45,360 Speaker 1: Typically a lot of the software rule will will use 436 00:21:45,440 --> 00:21:48,840 Speaker 1: will say, Okay, what happened with the current portfolio in 437 00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:52,280 Speaker 1: a you know, oh a crisis. What happened during you know, 438 00:21:52,440 --> 00:21:55,840 Speaker 1: shocking interest rates when you know interest rates spiked when 439 00:21:55,920 --> 00:21:58,920 Speaker 1: let's say Bernanky mentioned that he was going to stop quie. 440 00:21:59,000 --> 00:22:01,560 Speaker 1: This was back years ago. What happened to the portfolio 441 00:22:01,640 --> 00:22:04,679 Speaker 1: when the U S. Treasury debt was downgraded? So you know, 442 00:22:04,720 --> 00:22:07,919 Speaker 1: our soft world just play take the current portfolio and 443 00:22:07,960 --> 00:22:11,480 Speaker 1: just kind of identify major draw downs over the last 444 00:22:11,520 --> 00:22:13,840 Speaker 1: you know, ten fifteen years and say, okay, here's how 445 00:22:13,840 --> 00:22:16,879 Speaker 1: the portfolio would have done in those instances. And how 446 00:22:16,960 --> 00:22:19,080 Speaker 1: much of your time is spent looking through the e 447 00:22:19,160 --> 00:22:21,639 Speaker 1: t s to figure out the e S s and 448 00:22:21,680 --> 00:22:24,440 Speaker 1: the q e M M s of the world which 449 00:22:24,440 --> 00:22:27,320 Speaker 1: are perfect fit for you. You know, That's that's really 450 00:22:27,320 --> 00:22:29,600 Speaker 1: where I think we have the most value, is like, okay, 451 00:22:29,640 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 1: looking you know under the hood of these e t s, 452 00:22:32,320 --> 00:22:34,280 Speaker 1: and you do a lot of that is yourself, Eric, 453 00:22:34,359 --> 00:22:37,920 Speaker 1: You have great research, and you know, look, we're saying 454 00:22:37,960 --> 00:22:40,159 Speaker 1: to investors, okay, you know it's great. E t s 455 00:22:40,200 --> 00:22:43,560 Speaker 1: have democratized investments, and they're cheap, and they're basically given 456 00:22:43,600 --> 00:22:45,120 Speaker 1: to you for free, and now you can trade them 457 00:22:45,119 --> 00:22:48,000 Speaker 1: on Vanguard for free. But you know, someone's still got 458 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:50,960 Speaker 1: to do their research and figure out, Okay, is ees 459 00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:53,960 Speaker 1: better than I W M, is q e M better 460 00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:56,760 Speaker 1: than you know, I m G. And our vantage point 461 00:22:56,760 --> 00:22:59,399 Speaker 1: is that there are huge differences in those E T F, 462 00:22:59,560 --> 00:23:04,240 Speaker 1: So portfolio construction is a big value add from from 463 00:23:04,240 --> 00:23:08,119 Speaker 1: our perspective. When you're looking at potential shocks, does the 464 00:23:08,160 --> 00:23:11,200 Speaker 1: trade war or the rhetoric factor in at all? Does 465 00:23:11,240 --> 00:23:14,640 Speaker 1: that come on your radar as a potential shock? Yeah, 466 00:23:14,640 --> 00:23:17,480 Speaker 1: that's an interesting question to know. The software doesn't model 467 00:23:17,560 --> 00:23:20,680 Speaker 1: back in time, Okay, what happened during previous trade wars, 468 00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:23,240 Speaker 1: because as long as I've been working, I don't really 469 00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:25,760 Speaker 1: think we've had a trade war of this magnitude. So 470 00:23:26,560 --> 00:23:28,600 Speaker 1: that's that's a great question. And I think that's why 471 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:30,760 Speaker 1: markets are a lot more volatile Joe, is that you know, 472 00:23:31,040 --> 00:23:35,040 Speaker 1: this is new right. Markets don't like concernty. So everyone 473 00:23:35,119 --> 00:23:37,399 Speaker 1: keeps trying to model for okay, what happens in a 474 00:23:38,160 --> 00:23:41,760 Speaker 1: draw down in two and eight draw down and you 475 00:23:41,760 --> 00:23:46,000 Speaker 1: know two thousand and obviously, you know, no one kind 476 00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:48,000 Speaker 1: of thinks about, you know, kind of trade wars and 477 00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:51,720 Speaker 1: what's happened in history in that respect, especially because I 478 00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:55,239 Speaker 1: mean the dynamics at play here between emerging markets and 479 00:23:55,359 --> 00:23:58,720 Speaker 1: China all that stuff is sort of different than all 480 00:23:58,720 --> 00:24:01,560 Speaker 1: the other dynamics that we've ever had it is. Yeah, 481 00:24:01,800 --> 00:24:04,119 Speaker 1: although I do think that you know, the bigger picture 482 00:24:04,320 --> 00:24:06,240 Speaker 1: that you know, kind of we keep on talking about 483 00:24:06,280 --> 00:24:10,240 Speaker 1: from from a story's perspective, is that you know, the decline, liquidity, 484 00:24:10,359 --> 00:24:13,879 Speaker 1: inflation rise in the FED, behind the curve, global growth, 485 00:24:13,880 --> 00:24:15,720 Speaker 1: the couple, and I mean those are things that have 486 00:24:16,359 --> 00:24:19,760 Speaker 1: that has happened over time, and that's sort of you know, 487 00:24:19,880 --> 00:24:21,480 Speaker 1: kind of what we do in terms of like the 488 00:24:21,520 --> 00:24:24,720 Speaker 1: portfolio stress testing and seeing, okay, what has happened during 489 00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:32,960 Speaker 1: other similar periods from that perspective. Okay, So the last 490 00:24:33,000 --> 00:24:35,679 Speaker 1: thing we want to hit on commodities. Sarah, what what 491 00:24:35,760 --> 00:24:37,440 Speaker 1: did you learn as you were working on this story? 492 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:40,239 Speaker 1: So there's an overarching view and there is sort of 493 00:24:40,280 --> 00:24:44,160 Speaker 1: an argument here, but there's an overarching view that if 494 00:24:44,280 --> 00:24:47,400 Speaker 1: a trade war were to really escalate, that could be inflationary. 495 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:50,720 Speaker 1: So if we do get inflation, where might you want 496 00:24:50,760 --> 00:24:54,280 Speaker 1: to go? And some people say commodities because of prices rise, 497 00:24:54,359 --> 00:24:56,399 Speaker 1: maybe that's the place you want to be. So a 498 00:24:56,400 --> 00:24:59,399 Speaker 1: lot of people are saying maybe commodity related equities or 499 00:24:59,440 --> 00:25:03,600 Speaker 1: commodity related e t s. Sticking with that spider select 500 00:25:03,640 --> 00:25:07,199 Speaker 1: sector suite of funds XL E very similar in the 501 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:09,600 Speaker 1: beginning of the year. Well, for the first couple of 502 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:12,960 Speaker 1: months of the year, from January to May, excellently lost 503 00:25:12,960 --> 00:25:16,720 Speaker 1: about forty four million dollars. However, in June alone it 504 00:25:16,800 --> 00:25:19,159 Speaker 1: took in four nine million dollars. And of course there 505 00:25:19,160 --> 00:25:21,280 Speaker 1: are a lot of other moving parts going on with 506 00:25:21,400 --> 00:25:23,879 Speaker 1: oil and in the energy space right now. But some 507 00:25:23,920 --> 00:25:26,119 Speaker 1: people have said that it's maybe somewhere you want to be, 508 00:25:26,240 --> 00:25:29,120 Speaker 1: but you do also have to be pretty careful because 509 00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:31,280 Speaker 1: a lot of the back and forth that's going on 510 00:25:31,440 --> 00:25:35,960 Speaker 1: is hitting soybeans and hitting other areas of the commodity spectrum. 511 00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:39,199 Speaker 1: And we've seen tons of trading within d b A, 512 00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:42,600 Speaker 1: which is the investco dB Agriculture fund, people getting in 513 00:25:42,640 --> 00:25:44,000 Speaker 1: and out of there trying to figure out where you 514 00:25:44,080 --> 00:25:46,680 Speaker 1: might want to be related to tariffs. Um so yeah, 515 00:25:46,720 --> 00:25:50,240 Speaker 1: I mean, in a general sense commodities if if there's inflation, 516 00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:52,320 Speaker 1: you might want to be there for a bit of 517 00:25:52,320 --> 00:25:54,960 Speaker 1: protection or to position yourself. But there's a chance that 518 00:25:55,080 --> 00:25:59,320 Speaker 1: it might be deflationary as well, or right, there's a 519 00:25:59,320 --> 00:26:02,360 Speaker 1: bit of an arguing ment there. I think, Uh, overall, 520 00:26:02,480 --> 00:26:05,800 Speaker 1: most people I speak with talk about it actually being inflationary, 521 00:26:05,840 --> 00:26:07,720 Speaker 1: but you do hear the other end of it as well, 522 00:26:07,960 --> 00:26:09,880 Speaker 1: And there's a bit of an argument people saying, well, 523 00:26:09,920 --> 00:26:12,120 Speaker 1: it could actually be deflationaries. You have to be careful there, 524 00:26:12,280 --> 00:26:14,560 Speaker 1: which which kind of goes to what John was saying 525 00:26:14,600 --> 00:26:17,200 Speaker 1: earlier of like, we've never really had a trade war 526 00:26:17,280 --> 00:26:19,560 Speaker 1: like this before. You can't model it. Let me just 527 00:26:19,560 --> 00:26:22,200 Speaker 1: break down a couple of things here, because d B A, 528 00:26:22,359 --> 00:26:24,639 Speaker 1: So there's three kind of ways to play commodities with 529 00:26:24,680 --> 00:26:27,639 Speaker 1: E T S. This seems to be clarified. XCEL E, 530 00:26:27,720 --> 00:26:31,040 Speaker 1: which is mentioned earlier, is equities that are in the 531 00:26:31,040 --> 00:26:33,960 Speaker 1: commodities business, so that's going to perform a lot like 532 00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:38,080 Speaker 1: the stock market, but also like oil in that case mixture. 533 00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:42,760 Speaker 1: Then there's ones that hold futures like DBA holds agricultural 534 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:45,920 Speaker 1: futures that will give you pure exposure to those futures, 535 00:26:45,920 --> 00:26:48,960 Speaker 1: but there's some roll costs that retail investors may not 536 00:26:49,040 --> 00:26:52,320 Speaker 1: understand and that can be like a corrosion on the returns. 537 00:26:52,760 --> 00:26:56,040 Speaker 1: Then there's physically back commodities, which is essentially precious metals 538 00:26:56,040 --> 00:26:58,359 Speaker 1: like gold and silver, which store it in a vault. 539 00:26:59,200 --> 00:27:03,000 Speaker 1: Um John on given what Sarah said, what are you 540 00:27:03,040 --> 00:27:06,440 Speaker 1: doing with commodities and what which version of those types 541 00:27:06,480 --> 00:27:09,360 Speaker 1: of ETFs are you moving into. So we like commodities. 542 00:27:09,400 --> 00:27:11,840 Speaker 1: We've said in the beginning of the year that you know, 543 00:27:11,920 --> 00:27:14,680 Speaker 1: we thought on the we thought the inflation would rise, 544 00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:17,120 Speaker 1: and we thought that commodities were really cheap on their 545 00:27:17,119 --> 00:27:21,440 Speaker 1: own um and they're an attractive diversifying the portfolio. Right, 546 00:27:21,480 --> 00:27:23,440 Speaker 1: So it's kind of like it's been marched into its 547 00:27:23,440 --> 00:27:25,960 Speaker 1: own beat. So US equities are a point p cent 548 00:27:26,000 --> 00:27:29,520 Speaker 1: since two thousand nine. Commodities are basically flat, right since 549 00:27:29,600 --> 00:27:34,000 Speaker 1: two thousand nine. So you know, we own the futures 550 00:27:34,040 --> 00:27:36,679 Speaker 1: based e t F, so we own a c O 551 00:27:36,960 --> 00:27:41,680 Speaker 1: M b UM. That's the broad based Bloomberg Commodity Index. 552 00:27:42,160 --> 00:27:45,359 Speaker 1: So it's a third allocated towards energy and oil, a 553 00:27:45,480 --> 00:27:49,600 Speaker 1: third allocated towards agriculture, and a third allocated towards metal. 554 00:27:50,240 --> 00:27:54,000 Speaker 1: Now they've been negatively impacted with the trade wars um Sarah, 555 00:27:54,359 --> 00:27:57,080 Speaker 1: to your point on your article. So you know, year 556 00:27:57,119 --> 00:27:59,679 Speaker 1: to date it's down like I think ninety BIPs. But 557 00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:03,000 Speaker 1: here's the thing, right, the range of volatility for equities 558 00:28:03,040 --> 00:28:05,520 Speaker 1: has been massive this year, right, think about like you know, 559 00:28:05,520 --> 00:28:08,600 Speaker 1: we SMP was up six percent in January, then it 560 00:28:08,720 --> 00:28:12,280 Speaker 1: was down six percent, and we've had these massive swings commodities. 561 00:28:12,440 --> 00:28:14,800 Speaker 1: Although it's down for the year and not up like 562 00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:17,439 Speaker 1: SMP two three percent, as you mentioned, it's had a 563 00:28:17,440 --> 00:28:19,840 Speaker 1: lot less volatility and so that's kind of like it 564 00:28:19,920 --> 00:28:22,960 Speaker 1: works really well in the portfolio to have some commodity allocation. 565 00:28:23,359 --> 00:28:26,600 Speaker 1: So this one's actually holding actual commodity futures. So in 566 00:28:26,640 --> 00:28:28,400 Speaker 1: our traffic light system we do give it a red 567 00:28:28,480 --> 00:28:32,200 Speaker 1: light because to understand holding futures and as they get 568 00:28:32,200 --> 00:28:34,000 Speaker 1: too near expiration you have to buy a new one. 569 00:28:34,320 --> 00:28:37,040 Speaker 1: There can be um extra cost in doing that over 570 00:28:37,119 --> 00:28:39,800 Speaker 1: and over and over. How do you account for that? 571 00:28:40,080 --> 00:28:43,240 Speaker 1: Do you accept what that cost might be? I know, 572 00:28:43,280 --> 00:28:45,200 Speaker 1: and that's not always a cost. Sometimes you gain money 573 00:28:45,240 --> 00:28:47,840 Speaker 1: from the role, but usually it is. How do you 574 00:28:47,840 --> 00:28:50,720 Speaker 1: factor that into your purchase of the e T F. 575 00:28:51,400 --> 00:28:53,600 Speaker 1: It's a great question. So the ironic thing is that 576 00:28:53,640 --> 00:28:55,880 Speaker 1: you know, in the last you know, four or five years, 577 00:28:55,880 --> 00:28:58,960 Speaker 1: you've had a pretty big cost, right, so that erosion 578 00:28:58,960 --> 00:29:01,320 Speaker 1: that you talked about this year, you actually get a 579 00:29:01,320 --> 00:29:03,840 Speaker 1: benefit from role in those futures. So it's kind of 580 00:29:03,880 --> 00:29:06,960 Speaker 1: like a tailwind per se um. But you know, look 581 00:29:06,960 --> 00:29:09,479 Speaker 1: that can change, right and as an investor, like you 582 00:29:09,520 --> 00:29:11,760 Speaker 1: may not know what's going on in the you know, 583 00:29:11,800 --> 00:29:14,840 Speaker 1: the energy oil market and if if the futures are 584 00:29:14,840 --> 00:29:17,800 Speaker 1: working for you are against you. So you know, I 585 00:29:17,800 --> 00:29:21,080 Speaker 1: don't I kind of agree with your traffic light system, 586 00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:24,520 Speaker 1: although you know, temporarily right now it's it's um you know, tailwind. 587 00:29:25,160 --> 00:29:28,360 Speaker 1: So one thing this all brings up, in my opinion, 588 00:29:28,560 --> 00:29:31,360 Speaker 1: is the White House, no matter who's in office, whether 589 00:29:31,360 --> 00:29:34,520 Speaker 1: it's Obama, Trump, Bush, makes a lot of news. And 590 00:29:34,640 --> 00:29:37,600 Speaker 1: it's something that's very easy to rotate all the articles 591 00:29:37,640 --> 00:29:40,440 Speaker 1: around because everybody's watching it and it's got a it 592 00:29:40,480 --> 00:29:43,680 Speaker 1: is a macro influence. But let's face it, like under Obama, 593 00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:47,760 Speaker 1: clean energy did not did awful and that was supposed 594 00:29:47,760 --> 00:29:50,520 Speaker 1: to be the way to play Obama. And then defense 595 00:29:50,520 --> 00:29:52,600 Speaker 1: and banks did really well under Obama. Who would have 596 00:29:52,640 --> 00:29:57,440 Speaker 1: thought that? So is it is it bad investment to actually, 597 00:29:58,080 --> 00:30:01,040 Speaker 1: you know, try to trade or invest a owned who's 598 00:30:01,040 --> 00:30:03,160 Speaker 1: in office and what they're saying and doing. How much 599 00:30:03,200 --> 00:30:09,920 Speaker 1: do you actually take into account? Uh? Earnings most important, 600 00:30:10,080 --> 00:30:12,080 Speaker 1: right because earnings is what drives you know, kind of 601 00:30:12,080 --> 00:30:14,400 Speaker 1: stock prices. I think you have to look at the 602 00:30:14,400 --> 00:30:17,000 Speaker 1: economy of which you know, presidents are impact in that. 603 00:30:17,080 --> 00:30:18,880 Speaker 1: But we tend to look at like what's going on 604 00:30:18,920 --> 00:30:22,200 Speaker 1: with earnings and stocks and that usually drives you know, 605 00:30:22,280 --> 00:30:25,040 Speaker 1: kind of what happened. So, you know, Obama doesn't get 606 00:30:25,160 --> 00:30:27,880 Speaker 1: enough credit, right, But the market did rally over while 607 00:30:27,920 --> 00:30:30,080 Speaker 1: he was in office. Right, People make it see him like, oh, 608 00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:32,800 Speaker 1: you know, Trump's now kind of this bull market, but 609 00:30:32,840 --> 00:30:34,440 Speaker 1: you know, we had a bull market. We had actually 610 00:30:34,440 --> 00:30:36,719 Speaker 1: one of the best bull markets when Obama was in office. 611 00:30:37,320 --> 00:30:41,440 Speaker 1: So and how do you, uh, Sarah juggle this this 612 00:30:41,640 --> 00:30:45,400 Speaker 1: idea of earnings which I'll face it aren't that interesting 613 00:30:45,480 --> 00:30:50,360 Speaker 1: sometimes versus you know, Trump's tweets and and what to 614 00:30:50,640 --> 00:30:53,320 Speaker 1: like kind of put that into the mixture of like articles. 615 00:30:53,400 --> 00:30:55,400 Speaker 1: I mean, earnings are the number one most important and 616 00:30:55,440 --> 00:30:58,280 Speaker 1: that's what have been the bedrock of this bull market 617 00:30:58,280 --> 00:31:00,600 Speaker 1: and the bedrock of what's been holding box up so 618 00:31:00,640 --> 00:31:03,200 Speaker 1: far this year. Every time I talked to an investor 619 00:31:03,240 --> 00:31:05,840 Speaker 1: and I asked them, all, right, well, now maybe are 620 00:31:05,840 --> 00:31:07,400 Speaker 1: you're a little bit worried? What are you thinking? Will 621 00:31:07,440 --> 00:31:10,520 Speaker 1: They keep saying fundamentals are good, Earnings looks good, so 622 00:31:10,920 --> 00:31:13,800 Speaker 1: we should be fine. However, what I will say is 623 00:31:13,840 --> 00:31:16,240 Speaker 1: that we're going to be getting in too earning season, 624 00:31:16,640 --> 00:31:19,000 Speaker 1: and now what it's really going to be about is 625 00:31:19,040 --> 00:31:22,040 Speaker 1: that forward guidance and listening to those calls, listening to 626 00:31:22,080 --> 00:31:24,800 Speaker 1: the executives, because if we hear executives get on those 627 00:31:24,800 --> 00:31:28,040 Speaker 1: calls and start saying that their business might be affected 628 00:31:28,040 --> 00:31:32,280 Speaker 1: by these tariffs, that could actually maybe send us lower. 629 00:31:32,560 --> 00:31:36,320 Speaker 1: But on the other hand, we've been really struggling to 630 00:31:36,560 --> 00:31:39,680 Speaker 1: punch higher. And if we get through earning season and 631 00:31:39,760 --> 00:31:43,400 Speaker 1: no one expresses concern about these tariffs, that could be 632 00:31:43,440 --> 00:31:45,960 Speaker 1: what also ends up getting us higher. So they matter, 633 00:31:46,080 --> 00:31:48,200 Speaker 1: but it's also about that anecdotal evidence and what these 634 00:31:48,240 --> 00:31:51,760 Speaker 1: executives are saying. If ever in doubt, just follow kind 635 00:31:51,800 --> 00:31:53,960 Speaker 1: of what Warren Buffett, you know, last time I check 636 00:31:54,040 --> 00:31:56,600 Speaker 1: to you know, worth eight billion. I mean, he looks 637 00:31:56,600 --> 00:31:59,120 Speaker 1: at earnings, he looks at what's going on with the company, 638 00:31:59,600 --> 00:32:01,560 Speaker 1: you know, really kind of goes deep into like the 639 00:32:01,600 --> 00:32:04,000 Speaker 1: analysis of the stocks that he owns, and he owns 640 00:32:04,440 --> 00:32:07,880 Speaker 1: you know, super high quality stocks, you know, super value 641 00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:10,440 Speaker 1: kind of oriented the company. So that is a great 642 00:32:10,440 --> 00:32:12,160 Speaker 1: way to end it. I think, you know, everything that 643 00:32:12,200 --> 00:32:14,760 Speaker 1: was said here was very really interesting. People do want 644 00:32:14,760 --> 00:32:16,560 Speaker 1: to trade, but ultimately, and we seet the flows a 645 00:32:16,560 --> 00:32:19,400 Speaker 1: lot of flows just go to just plain vanilla allocating, 646 00:32:19,440 --> 00:32:21,920 Speaker 1: but you definitely see a slight shift to defense and 647 00:32:22,080 --> 00:32:25,480 Speaker 1: cash type BTF this year. Guys, thank you so much 648 00:32:25,520 --> 00:32:27,840 Speaker 1: for coming on today, Joel, thank you so much for 649 00:32:27,920 --> 00:32:31,640 Speaker 1: calling in on your family fund vacation. By the way, 650 00:32:31,880 --> 00:32:33,640 Speaker 1: you can only have two of those three things. That's 651 00:32:33,640 --> 00:32:36,400 Speaker 1: what they say, family fund vacation. Pick two, Joel, which 652 00:32:36,400 --> 00:32:40,080 Speaker 1: two are you having? I'm getting the family and the fun. 653 00:32:40,120 --> 00:32:46,360 Speaker 1: I guess because I got you. Well played, sir, all right, John, Sarah, 654 00:32:46,400 --> 00:32:48,560 Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining us Centralia. There's a lot 655 00:32:48,600 --> 00:32:54,600 Speaker 1: of fun. Thank you, Thank you. Thanks for listening to Trillions. 656 00:32:55,080 --> 00:32:57,640 Speaker 1: Until next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, 657 00:32:58,000 --> 00:33:01,960 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, and wherever else you want 658 00:33:01,960 --> 00:33:05,040 Speaker 1: to listen. We'd love to hear from you. We're on Twitter, 659 00:33:05,640 --> 00:33:10,160 Speaker 1: I'm at Joel Webber Show, He's at Eric Faltunas, and 660 00:33:10,240 --> 00:33:13,440 Speaker 1: you can find our guests at Sarah Kanzick. That's p 661 00:33:13,680 --> 00:33:17,120 Speaker 1: O in c z e K and you can find 662 00:33:17,200 --> 00:33:23,200 Speaker 1: John at Astoria Advisors. Trillions is produced by Magnus Hendrickson. 663 00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:28,000 Speaker 1: Francesco Leavy is the head of Bloomberg Podcast. Bye