WEBVTT - MLB BETTING UPDATE with Sean Zerillo

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square, presented by Hard rods Bet. We

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>are part of the Volume podcast Network. This is the

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>show that makes the squares sharper and makes the wives

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>guys pay attention.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 2>I am Chad Milman.

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I am joined as always, but my co host, my bff,

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>my companion, my compatre professional better Simon Hunter et O Simon, Chad.

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 3>We are truly in the dog days of summer, my friend.

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 3>We got lists coming out, we got Hormone Derby's, we

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 3>got a little World Cup left, and thank god, two

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 3>weeks from now we get guys back in camp with

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 3>actual football. But until then, I'm enjoying these last few days.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I did notice the other day ESPN put out its

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>top ten quarterbacks list, and so I know, I looked

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>at it and I thought to myself, I don't want

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to digest it. I want to make my own lists

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so I can surprise Simon. What did you think.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Of the home run Derby?

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 4>I loved it.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I did end up going, but didn't go in that

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>We have like a thing called State Side right by

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>the stadium, because I was just I thought, all right,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>I'll be able to get a discount because no joke,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I have a ticket from the last time they were here.

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 4>It was at the Vet.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>I saw almost pousitive, was like Barry Bonds Mark Maguire

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 3>in that home run Derby. It was five bucks and

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 3>we were in the lower bowl. Jesus yeah, and I

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>was looking for just nosebleeders. The cheapest I could fine

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>was nine hundred.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 4>I was like, I'll just I'll just wait, are you

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 4>kidding me?

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Not kidding? Four hundred level? Chad, four hundred level. They

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>were looking for nine hundred, So I was like, all right,

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 3>I'll just I'll watch the State side. And it was electric.

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't know about you.

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 4>I thought it was gonna be a shoreber so uh yeah,

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 4>definitely was fired up.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>And it's it's again in Philadelphia's unique place. It's all

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 3>about where they put these locations. But the fact that

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the fans were so into it, even if the setup

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 3>was stupid by Netflix, because I know TV honestly, wasn't

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>that enjoyable of experience for me.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:02.919
<v Speaker 4>I don't know by other.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 3>People Netflix wise, But overall the atmosphere, I thought it

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 3>was so electric. I really feel like I came through

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>on TV.

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 4>So it was fun.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I really enjoyed that home run and I don't know

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 3>if it's the swings, you know, whatever it was, but yeah,

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>usually I don't I don't really get that far up

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>for it, but I feel like I had to go

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>because it was in my city and end up being

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 3>a pretty cool experience.

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Well look, I think that the best thing about it

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are the Philly fans and how excited they got for

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Schwarber and that Schwarber got to the final round, and

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you know the fact that it took just a monstrous

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>blast for Schwarber to lose.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I loved the atmosphere for it.

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I could like, I don't care that much about the

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>home run derby.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I have found that.

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>More and more my impartial fandom is about atmosphere. Like

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the World Cup. I'm rooting for England because

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I know that the clips on social media if England

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>wins or loses in the finals are going to be

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>at such peak ends of the spectrum, meaning it will

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>be the absolute worst devastation or the high of highs

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>because of England's fraught relationship and tortured relationship with international soccer.

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm rooting for.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm rooting for great, genuine emotional fan moments

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>more than I'm rooting for something on the field.

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't want to. I don't want to.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to expose myself too much because all

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the pandemic come my way. But Chad knows I am

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>losing my mind right about England. I know you've been

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 3>e loving to say a wonderwall after every game.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, oh my god, it's That's what I'm talking about, though,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like or when they're singing Hey Jude, I don't know.

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>To me. This is a magical thing for social media

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is it's power to share the joy of fandom, and

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it does it as well as it does

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>anything else. And it's honestly, it's why I got into

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Phillies, like the Phillies fans rooting for Trey Turner

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>when he was struggling after his first year free agency

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is the exemplar of how social media can inspire fandom,

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and it shares the traditions and what it means to

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>be a fan of these teams globally, and I think

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it inspires more people to be interested in be fans,

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's amazing. I'm being totally I'm totally

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like being sentimental. I am not being typical sort of

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>sarcastic here, like I just think it's it's awesome, So

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I want I want that fandom reaction the.

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 3>COVID part, right memory, Just in COVID, how we just

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 3>we always knew how much we cared about fans, and

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>then being there, yes, lintil Code, you were just like,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 3>oh my god. It It literally makes up I guess

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent same percent of the experience. I don't know

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>how to explain it, but it really does that connection

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 3>watching games with other people, and uh yeah for the

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 3>World Cup. I mean, maybe I'll save it for our

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 3>next show because it's there's just so much chad that

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Americans wouln't understand. Between England and Argentina. I don't really

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 3>know who America's rival would be. I guess in sports,

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 3>I guess Canada. We kind of hate them because of

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 3>hockey and other things like that. But Russia, yeah, Russia

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 3>right right, right, But this this is like next level,

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Like you know, these people have killed each other over.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 4>An island if you want to look into all that.

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, it's Falklands. Yeah, yeah, So.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm old enough to remember the Falkland Island.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 3>You really, Yeah, I don't know how many Americans really

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 3>remember that, but it was It's something I know they

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 3>still hold pretty close to their chest.

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, I Chad knows.

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I am someone that I won't make my feelings too

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>hard on the Germans here, but a lot of Germans

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>after World War Two went Argentina and that's why I

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>as an Englandman, we forever kind of hate Argentine in

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 3>many ways as well. So the dream scenario for this

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>World Cup, but we all know it's a little fixed

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>in so many ways. England, Argentina, Spain, France couldn't ask

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 3>for much more than that, Chad. So between that and

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Homer Derby, like you're saying, it's been a great, great

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 3>fan experience, it feels like these last couple of.

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Weeks we are listen.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm a huge Tottenham Spurs fan, and so

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>because of that, and because of Harry Kane's legacy with Tottenham,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I am all in on England. That in my Anglo

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>file nature and the fact that my wife and I

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>met in London when we were students, I just have

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of affinity for English culture. So we're all

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in on England. We're gonna hopefully be singing Wonderwall after

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the finals on Sunday and certainly after this next match

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>against Argentina. But we were just talking about the home

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>runer every summer. Way back in March, we dove into

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball betting the Major League Baseball season from

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a betting perspective with our old pal Seans from the

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Action Network, one of the sharpest, most obsessive baseball betting

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>minds anywhere, co host of the Wonderful Payoff Pitch podcast.

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>He looks Simon. He looks like an angel for those

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>watching on YouTube. It's only because he's sitting in his

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>backyard because the construction in his house was so loud

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we sent him into the back yard. Shonzillo, Welcome back, buddy.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>You listen, we're going to get to this in the show.

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>You gave out some bets that are trending towards winners,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm thrilled for you. And I don't don't get

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>into him yet because we're going to talk about him

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on the show.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>But well done, Shonzarella.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 5>I enjoyed the Hermer on Derby last night. Really liked

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 5>the new format.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 6>I think they got to stick with that format, Maybe

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 6>get rid of the magenta colored baseballs because that seemed

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 6>to be a little bit difficult for the hitters to

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 6>pick up on, potentially considering nobody homewred on them until

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 6>the final round and then for Jordan Walker if you've

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 6>been able to catch online. So all the extra baseballs,

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 6>all the bonus base balls were supposed to be magenta.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 5>The home run that Jordan Walker hit to end the

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 5>night was white.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 6>So there's a bit of controversy surrounding the fact that

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 6>Jordan Walker was not being fed the correct baseballs during

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 6>his little run in the bonus round. But completely agree,

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 6>love the atmosphere, thought the Philly fans were electric. Them

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 6>booing Contreras and Walker throughout their final rounds against Shober

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 6>was absolutely electrifying. Love the format, just absolutely hated the

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 6>Netflix broadcast seem to have no feel for the rules,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 6>seem to have no feel for the moment. There was

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 6>no leaderboard on the screen telling you how anybody was

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 6>Doing's definitely a lot of kinks to work out on

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 6>the Netflix front. The boxing ring at second base kind

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 6>of matching their cringe energy from the Giants Yankees opening

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 6>day when they had like the trolley carts in the

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 6>subway car out and left and right field. So I

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 6>think Netflix doing a little bit too much on the

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 6>movie production end.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Just leave the game as is.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 6>You don't need to do too much, but give us

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 6>the information that actually helps make the inf event a

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 6>little bit more informative as you're watching it.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of the lovers of the Netflix broadcasts

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>so far in baseball for Giants, Yankees or for home

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>run Derby, So look, they've they got to figure that

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>one out. But listen, we're not talking about broadcasts here.

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about betting. It is the MLB All Star

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Game tonight, annual right of passage, the unofficial midway point

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of a very long baseball season.

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Sean, I'm so glad you're here.

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the actual baseballs, because in the spring

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you told us about differences and variations that could be

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>possible in the balls. You're always on top of the balls.

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball uses over the course of the season

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>different balls. They change the balls.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Catch us up.

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Where is where does the balls stand right now?

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm not going to go around telling people that I'm

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 6>always on top of the balls. We'll find a different

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 6>way to phrase that, But it does seem like we've

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 6>had a change to the baseballs in twenty twenty six,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 6>and that now makes five times I believe in the

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 6>past seven years where we have evidence, we have people

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 6>slicing into the baseballs physically proving that they're different. Now,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 6>Major League Baseball came out a few weeks ago after

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 6>I started putting out articles investigating it further. You know,

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 6>sarahs was kind of the one who initially drove the

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 6>conversation on it, and then I took it a step

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 6>further in terms of my research. But essentially, the balls

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 6>are flying further. You can only explain away about a

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 6>third to a half of the further carry due to weather.

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 6>The biggest difference and the biggest, most obvious like change

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 6>that immediately stands out in dome stadiums, so you can

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 6>filter out most of the weather impact. At dome stadiums.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 6>There is still some of a weather impact as temperatures increase,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 6>the humidity increases, et cetera. But in the past five

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 6>years or so, as the way warms up in dome stadiums,

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 6>you only see an increase in ball flight by about

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 6>a foot and a half. The maximum we've seen in

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 6>any year was three feet. This year it's jumped nine feet,

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 6>and it happened in the middle of the season, at

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 6>about the end of May, right around Memorial Day. The

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 6>ball essentially overnight started flying nine feet further. And you

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 6>can't tell me that the weather warmed up enough to

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 6>have caused a nine foot increase. That would be like

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 6>a thirty degree temperature increase. About fifteen temperatures is equivalent

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 6>to four feet. But what you can track, and I

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 6>talked about this in the preseason, is the drag coefficient data,

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 6>which Major League Baseball makes readily available on baseballsavant dot com. Essentially,

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 6>the range of outcomes of drag this year, and each

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 6>point of drag is worth four feet of ball flight.

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 6>The range of drag this year has fluctuated by as

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 6>many as four points, four tenths of a point, what

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 6>have you. So essentially that's the difference between sixteen feet

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 6>plus or minus from one baseball to the next, and

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 6>it stabilized essentially now in July, below the lowest point

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 6>it hit last year. So the baseballs are obviously different.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 6>Major Leagues Baseball's excuse for this, or their way of

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 6>explaining this away was to say that the oils from

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 6>inside of the baseball had leaked out, had caused some

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 6>sort of yellow staining on the outside of the ball.

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 6>But essentially they're saying that, yes, there's an issue. We

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 6>tested these balls independently. We didn't find anything specific wrong

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 6>with them, and therefore we consider them to be viable

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 6>for play. But what we are seeing is on the field,

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 6>catchers are tossing out way more balls. You know that

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 6>they're being given by the umpire. They're throwing them out

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 6>of play because they don't think the quality is up

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 6>to standards. We know that MLB bought Rawlings in twenty

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 6>nineteen to gain better control over the process of manufacturing

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 6>the balls. Clearly, there's still going to be some variants

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 6>from one ball to the next because they're hands sewn,

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 6>but there's never been this much variance within one particular year.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 6>So the main theories are here. Baseball started the year

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 6>with the baseballs from last year. As the season has

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 6>gone on, they started mixing in more baseballs that were

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 6>meant for this season, and we've seen drag decrease as

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 6>a result, and now kind of settle back in a

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 6>neutral point because we're using all the baseballs that were

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 6>meant for twenty twenty six. But the other main takeaway

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 6>from MLB's statement is the fact that, hey, we realize

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 6>this was a problem. We alerted all these teams in February.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 6>They didn't say whether they alerted sportsbooks in February. They

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 6>didn't notify the public in February. They just started talking

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 6>about it in June. But the other opshot is they

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 6>said that they're going to be cycling in another new

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 6>match of baseballs by the end of this year, if

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 6>not early next year. So we already have a built

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 6>in excuse when MLB does change the baseballs and wants

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 6>to mess with the baseballs in the postseason, which they've

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 6>been caught doing in the past, they've already built an

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 6>excuse that they're going to be changing the baseballs again

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 6>in September. So I don't know how those baseballs are

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 6>going to play. Presumably they will be less bouncy than

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 6>the ones that we're currently seeing in play. But the

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 6>upshot is the balls are traveling about another five feet

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 6>further than you would expect just based upon the weather

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 6>increases as you would go into the season, and as

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 6>a result, the home run rate and run scoring has

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 6>been at its highest level since twenty nineteen.

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Simon, do you know what player who had been slumping

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>terribly went on a Ruthiean tear around the same time.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The baseballs seem to be flying out of ballparks at

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a prodigious rate.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 4>I have no idea.

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>What is it, Phillies, Pete Crow, Armstrong, Sean, how much

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think PCA's explosion had to do with those balls?

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you've seen a change since sort of the

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>balls have started to drift back a little bit.

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't think it's necessarily for PCA specifically, and

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 6>some of the Cubs players specifically. You know you've seen

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 6>Danzeby Swanson go on that crazy run of homers and ribbies.

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 6>They played a lot of games at Wrigley recently with

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 6>totals of twelve and a half thirteen and a half,

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 6>where the wind was blowing out aggressively, the temperatures were

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 6>in the ninety degrees. I would say in July the

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 6>weather's actually been more temperate throughout the country than it

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 6>was in June. I never expected to become a meteorologist,

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 6>or at least an amateur meteorologist in terms of doing

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 6>my job handicapping baseball, but I have to pay attention

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 6>to the temperatures and the weather everywhere on a daily basis.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 6>I think July has been a little bit more temperate

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 6>than June was, but I do think the Cubs at

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 6>home have had a lot of really good offensive weather.

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 5>That is how PCA.

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 6>I also think PCA is just the very streaky player

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 6>who's going to go through a lot of big hot

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 6>streaks and cold streaks throughout his career just because of

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 6>the swing decisions he makes, the lack of end zone

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 6>contact that he can have at times. He has crazy power,

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 6>crazy speed, crazy athleticism, but the bat on ball skills

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 6>are going to fluctuate a little bit, and I think

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 6>that could lead to streakiness. But overall, you know, you

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 6>are seeing home run per fly ball increase, home run

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 6>rates increase, and the way that I can say, hey,

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 6>this isn't validated by the bounce. I shouldn't have said

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 6>the bounciness of the ball, because that's not actually what's happening.

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 6>That was an incorrect phrase that I just used. It's

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 6>not that the balls are bouncy specifically, It's not that

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 6>the balls are bouncy. If they want to make the

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 6>balls bounce here, they would increase the core of the baseball,

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 6>which is like essentially the middle of the baseball, like

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 6>the core of the earth, but it's spelled cor That's

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 6>how bouncy the ball is off of the bat. And

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 6>what that would do if they wanted to make the

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 6>balls jumpier, you would see it show up an exit

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 6>velocity figures. The balls would be coming off of the

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 6>bat hotter, which in turn would make them fly further.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 6>That's not what's happening here. What's happening is the balls

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 6>are being hit just as hard, if not less hard

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 6>than they were in June as compared to May and April,

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 6>but they're flying further in the air. The resistance on

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 6>them as they're carrying in the air is not there

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 6>as much. And I've pulled several examples where balls were

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 6>hit same batted ball, project exit velocity, distance path on

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 6>the field, same weather in those games, and some balls

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 6>from April May in the same temperatures as they were

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 6>in June, we're flying forty feet further, forty five feet

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 6>further in June. And you know, there is some things

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 6>that you have to quantify for like backspin versus front spin.

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 6>There's things that you don't necessarily show up immediately in

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 6>the stackass data that could slightly affect that, but it's

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 6>been too dramatic in terms of the impact. And again

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 6>just reverting to the indoor parks thing in the dome stadiums,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 6>the Ranger Stadium in particular, Global Life Park had become

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 6>over the past couple of years the most pitcher friendly

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 6>environment in baseball. It had gone from being a hitter

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 6>friendly park when they won the World Series all the

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 6>way back to on the level of t Mobile Park

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 6>in Seattle. You know, the run scoring environment in Texas

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 6>for the past two years had basically been fifteen percent

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 6>below the major league average. Right around that time that

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 6>I pointed out that May twenty fifth time, Texas started

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 6>seeing a huge increase in five ball distance the Unders,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 6>which had hit there at like a sixty five percent clip.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 6>Not kidding, it had been like sixty five percent for

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 6>two years. Because the park factor keeps fluctuating so dramatically

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 6>there that the market has not been able to catch

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 6>up to how low it got there, and unders were

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 6>just hitting at a ridiculous clip.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 5>Every total was like a run too high.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 6>Now it's come back and it's become an overpark very aggressively.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 6>Over the past six weeks, it's been one of the

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 6>best over parks in baseball because either the baseballs are different,

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 6>or they turned off the humid or there or a

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 6>combination of both. And that is the other point I

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 6>didn't emphasize earlier. I think there is a possibility, based

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 6>on the fact that I'm seeing different data and different

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 6>ballflight data from different parks. MLB standardized tudors in parks,

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 6>and I believe twenty twenty one, I think there is

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 6>a chance that they allowed some of these teams to

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 6>turn them off in secret. I think that's very much

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 6>a possibility, given how the ball does not seem to

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 6>be getting that extra carry at.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 5>All parks across the board.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 6>Uniformly, it does seem like even in the dome stadiums,

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 6>it's actually flying a little bit further than you would

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 6>expect outdoors. So I do think there's a chance, on

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 6>top of the baseball's being different, that there may have

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 6>been a change in HUT or policy, either from MLB

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 6>or from some of these teams internally, that just said

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 6>we're not going to use the human or like we're

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 6>supposed to and as a result, they're getting increased offense

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 6>in those parks.

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 3>From our last show when you talked without Baseballs, I

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 3>knew a professional group that went out and bought baseballs

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 3>from like twenty twenty five years ago off eBay and

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 3>they cut all of them open and try to look

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 3>at if there's differences from balls right now and then

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 3>home run balls people.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 4>Are catching right now and then selling online. And I

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 4>just be in contact with them.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Their theory about it was kind of interesting about how

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 3>the baseballs have changed in the last twenty five years,

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 3>the inside of them, I should say. But I just

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 3>love that they did it because of our show. It's like,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, they got a couple thousand dollars to burn,

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 3>why not buy these old balls to see if there's

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 3>actually a difference.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, interesting theory.

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 6>Most interesting theory about the steroid era is not that

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 6>it was just guys roiding. It was that guys were

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 6>rooting and they juiced the baseballs, which led to the

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 6>dramatic increase in home runs. The Barry Bond seventy plus

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 6>home run season was probably not just the byproduct of

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 6>Barry Bonds taking all of the HDH known to man

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 6>and having his head swell like three times the size

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 6>that it should. But also that MLB was probably introducing

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 6>juice balls during those seasons, which is why so many

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 6>players were hitting thirty home runs forty home runs, So

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 6>that is that is an interesting thing to look at

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 6>in hindsight, and if they were buying balls from twenty

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 6>five years ago, that does align with the the steroid

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 6>era and when they may have been juicing them, so

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 6>that it's very interesting.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, again, I just love how crazy people are where

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 3>It's like they listen to the show and I was like,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I love the idea of doing that.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, like I was saying, just you came on,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 4>you gave it a.

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Bunch of great stuff. Obviously, you know, we talked about Detroit,

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>the pitching staff, all of it. How are you feeling

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 3>right now with your expectations on bets you made in March?

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, in pretty good positions.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 6>On the awards markets gave out both current Rookie of

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 6>the Year favorites have Dylan Ces at long odds for Alsayong,

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 6>have Gordon Alvarez at long odds for al MVP. I think,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 6>you know, with regards to the Tigers, specifically that you

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 6>bring them up. I've been adamant that the Tigers shouldn't sell.

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 6>The Tiger's got eleven games, ten games below the division

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 6>leader in the AL Central. I think they've closed the

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 6>gap now to four wins at the All Star Break

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 6>Tark School when on the IL came back for them,

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 6>it seems like they're still shopping him. I've maintained that

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 6>the Tigers should not sell, and if they do not sell,

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 6>I think their viable contender in the American League right now.

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 6>The AL Central winner only projects to finish with the

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 6>round eighty three wins. The AL West winner only projects

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 6>to finish with the round eighty four wins. So not

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 6>only is their path back for the Tigers in the division,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 6>there's a path for the Tigers still to get the

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 6>number two seed in the American League behind the AL

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 6>East winner, because, like I say said, either the ALE

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 6>Central winner or the ALE West winner probably ain't get

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 6>more than eighty five wins. So whoever wins that division

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 6>is going to have a very good chance at finishing

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 6>with one of the top two seedson getting a buye.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 6>And as a result, you know, if you're telling me

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 6>you're going into Round two and Trek scoopl is going

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 6>to be starting two out of your five games in

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 6>that series and then three pitching in three out of

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 6>your seven games at a potential ALCS and World Series.

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 6>Tigers remain a very viable contender. I just think they're

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 6>having the inverse season that they had last year. Last year,

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 6>they got out to a huge lead, collapsed it, lost

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 6>the division, ended up beating the team who overtook them

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 6>in the playoffs. This year, I think they started out

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 6>extremely poorly. Everything went wrong, and now they're finally picking

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:42.479
<v Speaker 6>up steam like they did a few years ago. It's

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 6>one of the best second half teams in baseball a

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 6>couple of years ago when they went on a big run.

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 6>But I think they are basically having the inverse season

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 6>that they had last year, and they will be there,

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 6>in my opinion, in the end if they don't sell

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 6>Trek Scooble the team I like from a futures perspective.

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 6>There's not many the team that I still like from

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 6>a futures perspective. For the two teams, the Brewers and

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 6>the Rays, because these are teams who typically do not

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 6>add come trade deadline time, I think they will both

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 6>be adding this year, not only because they've kind of

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 6>alluded to the fact that they would publicate. The Rays

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 6>also have a new ownership group. The Brewers have the

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 6>number one farm system in baseball, and they've just locked

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 6>up two of their top guys, Cooper Pratt and Luis Lara,

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 6>whom they both brought to the big leagues. They also

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 6>have the number one prospect in baseball in Jezus Made,

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 6>So anybody else in that farm system I think is

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 6>fair game for the Brewers to trade, and I think

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 6>they may go out and add pieces. I have some

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 6>concerns right now, slightly because Brandon Woodroff seems like he

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.959
<v Speaker 6>got hurt last week. Jakob Mazerowski seems like he may

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 6>be dealing with some arm soreness. And if you're going

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 6>to be betting on the Brewers to take down the

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 6>Daughters in October.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 5>You need at least three.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 6>You need Maserowski, but you probably need at least two

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 6>of three of Kyle Harrison, Brandon Woodroff, and Logan Henderson

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 6>as well.

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 5>Would love to have.

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 6>All four, but I do think the Brewers are going

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 6>to add at the trade deadline. Just public projection wise,

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 6>The projections do not like them right now. They say

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 6>the Cubs are the value bet in the NL Central

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 6>I have Brewers positions I'm pretty comfortable with. Gave them

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 6>out at eight to one in the NL a few

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 6>weeks ago. I think that is a team though, that

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 6>you may be able to bet come playoff time. Just

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 6>make sure everybody's healthy. The team who I think is

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 6>going to get better in the next couple weeks, definitively

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 6>is the Raise the Rays. Like I said, of a

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 6>new ownership group, they've never been willing to spend in

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 6>their history. They have a deep prospect pool they're willing

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 6>to trade from. And we're probably going to lock out

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 6>next year. It's an unfortunate reality, but we're likelier than

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 6>not to lock out for at least part of the

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty seventh season. And I think any of these

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 6>teams who are in contention are going if I'm going

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 6>to lose a year of prospect development anyway in the

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 6>minor leagues, right If I'm not going to see these

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 6>guys until twenty twenty eight at best, why wouldn't I

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 6>trade them now and catch them in when not, only

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 6>do I not know what they're going to be, but

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 6>losing that year of minor league development next year could

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 6>be absolutely crucial and devastating because we saw it affect

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 6>a lot of prospects during the COVID year. So I

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 6>think the Rays are going to add at the trade deadline.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 6>Right now, I make them about thirteen to one to

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 6>win the World Series, five to one to win the

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 6>Ale Pennant. You can get as high as seventeen to

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 6>one and plus five fifty, respectively. I think with Aaron

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 6>Judge's injury news coming out at some point during this week,

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 6>you'll know whether Judge is going to be back soon,

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 6>whether it's going to be longer until he comes back.

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 6>If it's longer until he comes back, I actually think

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 6>the Yankees are going to be more conservative at the

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 6>trade deadline and not push. If he is going to

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 6>come back sooner, I think the Yankees are going to

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 6>be more aggressive and try to add pieces around him.

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 6>So maybe the timing is the wait for that Aaron

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 6>Judge injury news before you pile on, potentially to the

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 6>raise Ale Pennant and World Series bets. But I think

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 6>this team is going to look a lot better in

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 6>a few weeks than it does right now, and the

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 6>American League is completely wide open. I like whoever comes

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 6>out of the NL between the Braves, the Dodgers, and

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 6>the Brewers, I think, or the Phillies. I think any

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 6>of those teams will be a better option in the

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 6>World Series than whatever the ALE produces. So I'd probably

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 6>be targeting Pennant bets as opposed to the World Series bets.

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 6>But the Rays of the one team I'm really keeping

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 6>a close eye on right now. I've been on them

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 6>all year, thought they were underrated all year, but now

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 6>I'm actually starting to take the more seriously as a

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 6>championship contender.

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's do a quick word from hard Rock and then

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to do an up and a down with Zrilla.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Today's show is brought to you by our presenting sponsor,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet Sports book. If you haven't tried out

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet yet, there's no better time to get

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>in the game than right now.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 2>We're down to the final four.

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>In the world's biggest soccer tournament. By this time next week,

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll be waiting four more years for soccer's biggest stage

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>to return, So don't spend it wishing you were part

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of history. Hard rock Bet is a top redded sportsbook

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>app built to Viva la Copa.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Check out their.

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Promos like no goals, no problem. If you bet on

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a team to win in regulation and the match ends

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>scoreless after ninety plus stoppage time, you'll get back a

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 1>bonus bet up to two hundred and fifty dollars, so

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>when the goals go missing, your bet doesn't. Every match

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>day you can choose your own offer, a profit boost

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to juice your winnings, or a no sweat bet for

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a little extra security. So if you're ready to try

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>your first bet on hard Rock Bet today, sign up

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can score one hundred and fifty dollars in

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>bonus bet. Just place a five dollars bet and if

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it wins, you get not only your winnings, but also

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>an extra one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Download the hard Rock Bet app today and don't let

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Cup's biggest games pass you by Roll with us.

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Go Go with us.

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Hard Rock Bet payable in bonus bets, not a cash

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 1>offer offered by the Semino Tribe of Florida. In Florida,

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>offered by Seminal hard Rock DIGITALLLC and all other states.

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Must be twenty one or over in physically present in Arizona, Colorado,

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, and

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about gambling

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in Florida called one eight three three play wise. In Indiana,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>if you were something you know as a gambling problem

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>and wants help, call one eight hundred and nine with

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it is on Highland, Virginia called one eight hundred my

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>reset gambling problem called one eight hundred gambling in Colorado, Illinois, Michigan,

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, and Tennessee. All right, Sean Chicago White Sox

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>surprise darlings of Major League Baseball. Yeah, Paul Skians struggling.

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I think more than anyone would have expected. Give me

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>your why the White Sox are up?

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 2>And can they maintain?

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And your what's happening with Skiings?

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 2>And will he turn it around?

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? The White Sox.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 6>Chris Getz has done a phenomenal job at making sure

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 6>there's as few weaknesses as possible on a roster. There's

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 6>a lot of ways you can build teams when you're

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 6>trying to go from dregs of Major League Baseball to

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 6>league average being a five hundred team. One of the

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 6>easiest ways to do that is just to make sure

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 6>you don't have bad players. But on top of that,

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 6>their player development has been pretty tremendous because, uh, Colson

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 6>Montgomery was a guy who a lot of people thought

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 6>the swing was not correct. A lot of prospect evaluators

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 6>thought he was going to struggle immensely at the big

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 6>league level because he just couldn't figure out the swing.

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 6>He was really struggling through the early part of last season,

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 6>eventually figured it out, hit twenty one home runs in

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 6>about seventy games, and this year he looks like he's

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 6>maintaining a pretty similar pace in terms of projecting out

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 6>to like a.

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Thirty five or forty homer guy.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 6>Getting Murakami there was obviously the big addition that has

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 6>really propelled them up, but they ended up missing him

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 6>for a large part of this year and still played

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 6>pretty well without him. So I'd say the player development,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 6>the GM all working in concert have done a phenomenal

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 6>job lifting this team from the bottom of the league

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 6>to average. But that said, I think this is an

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 6>average team and in terms of betting them to make

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 6>or miss the playoff right now, it's definitively miss. I

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 6>make them about minus one thirty. You can get them

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 6>an even money to miss the playoffs, So I would

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 6>probably be fading the White Socks at this point forward.

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 6>I don't think they're a team who's going to add

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 6>at the trade dyn line and start giving up prospect

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 6>pieces for a team that is not necessarily a World

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 6>Series contender yet. But obviously like the way they're trending.

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 6>I think once you see Hagen Smith come up to

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 6>this roster, once he's ready, you can start taking this

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 6>team even a little bit more seriously next season, because

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 6>pitching is their biggest need, and he looks like he's

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 6>a potential frontline starter for them if he could figure

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 6>out the command piece. But overall, if I'm betting anything

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 6>on the White Sox right now, it would be to

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.479
<v Speaker 6>miss the playoffs at around even money to minus one twenty.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 5>But this team definitely is the juice. I've watched them

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 5>all year.

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 6>There is some magic there on the South side, and

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 6>I don't necessarily love taking a stand against them at

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 6>this point, but given Detroit's ability to come back in

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 6>that division, Cleveland's ability to.

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 5>Come back in that division.

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 6>The projections love the Minnesota Twins, who are sitting right

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 6>around five hundred, but the Twins we know will not

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 6>be adding at the deadline, given their ownership troubles over

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 6>last offseason the fact that they didn't spend anything in

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 6>free agency. So I think there are three teams who

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 6>could take down the White Sox and eliminate them, and

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 6>as a result, even money looks like a pretty good

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 6>price to bet against them. The Pirates are the opposite.

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 6>The Pirates schemes looks injured. You in the spin rate

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 6>on Skins fourcing fastball is declining in virtually every start,

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 6>which is a pretty big indicator of injury. Bubba Chandler

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 6>has not developed this year. Mitch Keller gets worse in

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 6>the second half of every season, but their lineup is

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 6>a lot better than it has been in previous years.

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 6>Their bullpen is pretty capable. I just don't necessarily see,

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 6>other than Connor Griffin returning from injury, a lot of

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 6>young contributors coming up and helping this Pirates roster. Seth Fernandez,

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 6>who's maybe the top pitching prospect of the minors, seems

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 6>like he's still a couple of years away, so the

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 6>Pirates aren't going to add pieces. The Pirates may have

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 6>a couple of banged up pitchers, but the projections like

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 6>them to make the playoffs right now. I make them

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.959
<v Speaker 6>about plus two fifty, and I think you can get

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 6>them at plus three to fifty. Let me actually just

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 6>pull up that actual number the Pirates. I make them

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 6>plus one ninety and you can get them as high

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 6>as plus two fifties, so they look like the potential

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 6>value about to make the playoffs. The other team, I'd

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 6>point out who stands as the biggest playoff value bet

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 6>right now, and that's the best market. If you're looking

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 6>for markets to dive into that have the biggest edges

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 6>positive and negative. You know teams you want to fade

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 6>from a playoff perspective, and at the no teams you

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 6>want to bet.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 5>The yes on.

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 6>The biggest market four edges right now is make or

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 6>miss playoff bye by far way more than Division or

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 6>World Series. That's where I'd focus my money and attention.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 6>If you're looking to build the portfolio right now, the

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 6>team that shows the biggest edge either yes or no,

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 6>is the orioles to make the playoffs. I make them

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 6>about plus two to eighty five. You can get them

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 6>at four to one. I believe they're sitting just a

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 6>couple of games off of the pace two and a

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 6>half games, two games off the pace in the AL

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 6>wild card race, and that is a team I could

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 6>see surprisingly adding despite the fact that they're sitting below

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 6>five hundred right now. They just have an owner who

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:50.479
<v Speaker 6>wants to be aggressive, who wants to win.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 6>They had the Pete Alonso signing this offseason. Pete seems

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 6>like he's finally heating up a little bit as the

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 6>season has gone along too. But yeah, the Orioles to

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 6>make the Pirates, to make the White Sox to miss,

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 6>and then maybe the Guardians to miss as well.

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 5>I would choose between the Guardians and White Sox.

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 6>But everything else that I show value on is something

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 6>that you have to lay, like minus three hundred or

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 6>higher on. I'm trying to stick in the more reasonable

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 6>plus money price ranges here in terms of analyzing these bets.

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 6>But yeah'd say the biggest the biggest edge if you

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 6>want to talk about the pure biggest edge if you

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 6>want a parlay piece Potter is to miss. I make

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 6>minus six hundred. That's minus three eighty But that was

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 6>a bet I gave out in the preseason. I gave

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 6>out on this show, and I think minus one ten

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 6>minus one fifty, so certainly have gained value there, gain

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 6>Vello and the Ashes to miss the playoffs in pretty

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 6>good position on a lot of these bets. I just

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 6>need by Mariners and Tigers, the Visional tickets to potentially

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 6>come through that would really bring everything together.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Is there any bets like for our listeners to get on, like,

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, player wise, you know Cy Young Awards, anything

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 3>MVP wise that you like next half.

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'd say the biggest value bet in any of

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 6>the awards markets is probably it's probably Bobby Wit to

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 6>win al MVP at about five to one. I make

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 6>him plus three eighty five. This is just going to

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 6>be an interesting vote because Jordon Alvarez is not going

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 6>to be the al war leader, and typically War the

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 6>war leader and vote share correlates at like a seventy

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 6>percent clip. But the one thing I highlighted in terms

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 6>of my preseason analysis, and I gave out Jordon in

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 6>the preseason at thirty five to one I set or

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 6>forty to one.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 5>I highlighted the.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 6>Fact that ops and OPS ranking is the one thing

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 6>that can kind of override wins above replacement. So Wit

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 6>is probably going to finish with eight wins above replacement,

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 6>Jordon closer to six and a half six point three.

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 6>But Jordon is going to have one thousand ops. Wit

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 6>is going to have an eight to fifty ops. Neither

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 6>of them are going to be on winning teams. I

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 6>think if Witt was on a winning team, that may

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 6>be a little bit of a tiebreaker for him, But

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 6>I do think looking at the history of voting, if

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 6>Witt has a two win lead and wins Abu replacement,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 6>he also less injury prone than Jordon. Jordon has been

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 6>very injury prone throughout his career, so over the final

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 6>two and a half months, I'd say he's substantially likelier

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 6>to get hurt than Wit is. So I think Wit

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 6>at five to one would be the value bet among

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 6>all the awards markets right now. The guy who's popped

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 6>up consistently for me though throughout the season is Parker

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 6>Messick to win AL Rookie the Year Again. I gave

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 6>out McGonagall on this show. McGonagall is in a great spot.

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 6>He's currently like minus two fifty in the market. I

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 6>make him minus two sixty, so it's not an actionable bet,

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 6>but I do show value on.

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 5>Him if McGonagall gets hurt at some point.

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 6>The rest of the way, everybody's assuming kind of that

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 6>a Kamoto from the Jays Urmurakami from the White Sox

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 6>is gonna win that award. Messick projects right now as

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 6>the wins above replacement leader behind McGonagall, and I make

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 6>him about twelve to one. You can get him as

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 6>high as thirty to one. So if you want a

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 6>small stab Parker Messick is he's gonna get the innings.

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 6>He threw about one hundred and forty innings between the

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 6>miners and majors last season. He's going to finish around

0:35:58.280 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 6>one to ninety. I think he's one of the best

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 6>pitchers in the American League. He's going to be in

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 6>the AlSi Young Becks as well. He's not going to

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 6>end up winning the award, but he'be he top five

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 6>top six in ALSA Young and I think if McGonagall

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 6>doesn't win AL Rookie, he's probably my favorite candidate, even

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 6>above all the hitters that you have in the al

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 6>JJ Weatherholp. I gave him out in the preseason as

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 6>well at six to one. He's the NL favorite. I

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 6>make him minus two hundred. You can can currently get

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 6>him at minus one fifty five, So weather Hold I

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 6>would lay the juice. He stands to have a big

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 6>WAR lead at the end of the season. He might

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 6>already be the best defender in baseball, which is shocking

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 6>because Bryce Terrang, who plays his position for the Brewers

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 6>in his division, has been one of, if not the

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 6>best defender in baseball for a few years. Weather holp

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 6>same position already maybe has overtaken Bryce Terrang. So as

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 6>a result, even though weather Holt has kind of comparable

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 6>offensive stats the guys like Carson BEng or other hitters

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 6>in the NL, his defensive quality is like boosting him

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 6>up dramatically. And WAR correlates even more strongly to Rookie

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 6>of the Year than it does to MVP. So weather Holt,

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.479
<v Speaker 6>Parker Massik would be my choices. If I'm placing Rookie

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 6>of Year bets right now. Witt would be among the

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 6>ale MVP on LMBP, and then the Sygong Markets I

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 6>think would be the only guy pull the trigger on there.

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 6>Because I like Joe, Ryan and the Ale, but I

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 6>think he's likely to get traded from the Twins, or

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 6>at least likely or to get traded then end up

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 6>still on his team. So yeah, that's where i'd go

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 6>with my money from a player futures perspective at this point,

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 6>and then the Rays would be the team I would

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 6>target from a team perspective.

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Zarrillo, We've gone an entire show haven't mentioned the team

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with the best record in baseball. The Dodgers have sixty

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>one wins, despite injuries to Otani and others. Before the

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>season began, you came on the show and said, this

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>is a team that is built to win in the playoffs.

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>They don't really care about the regular season.

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>And here they are dominating what was supposed to be

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a competitive NL West and crushing in the National League.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Is all this moot because it's the Dodgers World Series

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to win.

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 6>Anyways, Maybe, like I said, I think that there's one

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 6>team in the NL who can take them down.

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 5>It's probably the Brewers.

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 6>Just because the Brewers, by the time they got to

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 6>the playoffs last year, Miserowski wasn't available to start for them.

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 6>They didn't have the pitching quality, the starting pitching quality

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 6>that they have this year. But the Dodgers, to your point,

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 6>have not played their best team and they still have

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 6>the best record in baseball. They have almost they have

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 6>half of their playoff rotation on the il Tyler Glasnow

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 6>and Blake Snell have given them virtually nothing this year.

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 6>Otani is dealing with an injury right now, but again,

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 6>because they have such a big lead in their division,

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 6>there's no lead, no need to push them. He did

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 6>get Injectionery is getting an injection over the All Star break.

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 6>That is something to really keep a close eye on,

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 6>because the Dodgers could shuck down Otani till the playoffs

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 6>if they really needed to. If they felt it was

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.439
<v Speaker 6>necessary to preserve his health for the postseason, they would

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 6>shut him down and that would open the door for

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 6>PCA or Juan Soto to win the nl MVP, and

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 6>the PCA one Sodo debate would be the exact same

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.399
<v Speaker 6>That would actually make it interesting because the PCA one

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 6>soda debate is literally the exact same debate. As Bobby

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 6>witten yord on Sodo has the one thousand plus ops,

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 6>He's going to finish two war behind PCA PCA is

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 6>going to have the eight to fifty ops but have

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 6>the big wins b of a replacement lead on Soto.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 6>But the difference between the NL and the AL is

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 6>that PCA is on a winning team.

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Sodo is not.

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 6>Neither the AL guys are on winning teams. So I

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 6>think the winning team thing might tiebreak for PCA if

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 6>it came down to those two guys. But it's worth

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 6>noting because Otani right now skip the All Star Game

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 6>because he's dealing with an injury. He's getting an injection

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 6>and there's a non zero chance that he could miss

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 6>significant time the rest of the way. He may still

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 6>win a NLMBP even if he doesn't play another game

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 6>this season. That's how good show Heotani is and all

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 6>the stats he's put up to this point. But it

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 6>is worth noting. But yeah, the Dodgers are slow playing

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 6>it for the postseason. They're probably gonna make additions. I

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 6>don't think they'll get Trek Scooble, even though they have

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 6>one of the most loaded firm systems in baseball. They

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 6>just have enough pitching coming back that they may not

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 6>even be their biggest need. They would probably be looking

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 6>up to shure up the bottom of their lineup, maybe

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 6>get a better second basement targeting can tell Marte something

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 6>like that. But yeah, this team's loaded. They haven't even

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 6>played their best team yet. I think the Brewers could

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 6>potentially take them down. I'm not sure who I like

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 6>in the ALE to take them down if it came

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 6>back to the Dodters in the World Series, which it

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 6>is likely to. But yeah, it all could be moot.

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 6>But you know, there's other ways to bet it other

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 6>than just betting into the World Series market. And that's

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 6>why I'd probably recommend betting Ale Pennant odds as opposed

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 6>to taking a team from the ALE to win the

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 6>World Series, because you're gonna have to get past the

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 6>demonic Dodters lineup in rotation.

0:40:56.160 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sean Zarrillo, Great update. Let's continue with our

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>trend pattern of nailing these preseason picks. Simon, We're coming

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.720
<v Speaker 1>back on Thursday. We're bringing back to Bundo to preview

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the World Cup Final and we'll hopefully be talking about

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>England in the finals.

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 2>This has been Sharper Square, part of the.

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Volume podcast Network Walk or listen on YouTube. A Sharper

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Square like the video, Subscribe to the channel, download us

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in Spotify, Apple Pods, wherever you get your pods, Rate review, subscribe,

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>leave us five stars, say whatever you want. Feedback is

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.879
<v Speaker 1>a gifted two Thursday, Love you.

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 5>And hitting the air to Deep Center, mcutch, it to

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 5>the wall and on Jeed Trickle. Now that is well done.

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Oh wow, I got a distance.

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that is a PNC Park signature.

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Play right there.