WEBVTT - Most of Tesla's Value Lies in Its Expectations, Denning Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>order your first custom shirt today. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. Along with my

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we bring you the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for you and your money,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>whether you at the grocery store or the trading floor.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg P and L Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and at Bloomberg dot com. Tesla reported earnings yesterday after

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the bell and what they delivered up was very pleasing

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to traders, at least initially in after hours, but they've

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of backed away from some of those bets now.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in somebody who knows much more

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>about this than I do, Liam Denning. He is a

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg gad Fly columnist, and you wrote a column that

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>highlighted one number in particular, nine hundred and seventy million dollars.

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the amount of cash the Tesla burned through in

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the last three months of two thousand sixteen. So what

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>was your biggest takeware? Was this your biggest takeaway from

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>from the Tesla earnings? I mean, yeah, that's really the

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>only number that that counts with Tesla any any time.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean the earnings themselves. They were distorted this quarter

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>by the acquisition of Solar City UM. And in any case,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>whether Tesla beats earnings MSS earnings, there is zero correlation

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>between that and what happens to the stock price the

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>next day. I've gone back and checked it. There's none.

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Why because the key issue here is UM is Tesla's

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>cash flow and its ability to realize this ever expanding

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>vision that Elon Musk lays out. If you look at

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>any valuation model for Tesla, most of the value resides

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in what people expect it to be doing. You know,

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>five of our ten years from now, you know, whether

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's producing millions of vehicles or you know, installing solar

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>roofs or building its fifth giga factory. The the constant

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>need for cash necessitates a strong message of growth and transformation.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what I meant when I said,

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, investors take Elon Musk seriously. They don't take

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>him literally, that's a good that's a good distinction to make. Liam.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the f A page because I

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>love it of Tesla, and I note the free cash

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>flow has a wonderful minus sign next to it. As

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned, at least for the year one point

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>four billion. As a matter of fact, how much is

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>there any estimate how much they're going to need? Um? Well,

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's looking like they're gonna need a

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>lot well not a lot of god, but I mean

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are we talking? I mean because obviously you know, Well,

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason that the reason it's interesting also is because

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk of course owns what about of the company,

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So what is what is the most what he wants

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is probably most likely to happen. Well, the way to

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>think about it is this, so, um, you know, revenue

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>cash flow, Yeah, but cash flow from operations in the

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>last quarter was about minus you know, four hundred someone

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>between four hundred and five hundred million UM. Their guidance

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for CAPEX just for the first half of this year

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is somewhere between two and two and a half billion,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So that means net net they're probably going to burn

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>through I would say somewhere between two and a half

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and three and a half billion in the first half

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year. And that kind of makes sense because

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they're about to launch the Model three, which is there

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of mass market ev that's where they try

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and get from producing you know, eight thousand cars a

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>year up to more like five or six thousand. Well,

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>let me just offer this note. This comes from our

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>colleague Corey Johnson, who you know, coming up on a

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets PM, he said. A year ago. Chief executive

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk stated on their Q four earnings call that

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>quotes something I'm personally quite excited about is that we

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>expect to be positive cash flows starting next month and

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>then continuing into Q two and beyond. Well, analysts don't agree.

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the expectation for fiscal year two thousand,

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>seventeen h that was a year ago, all right, Well,

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that didn't didn't come looking at a sort of an

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>expectation among analysts of negative basically a hundred and seventy

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, right, Um, But I would go back to

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the original message, which is that none of it matters,

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>which is right, you know, he can say whatever. He

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>was missed. Sales forecast its original sales guidance for the

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>last three years running, and it's got a market cap

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>which is almost the same as as awards. That will

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>give them the wherewithal to go out and sell more equity,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to raise more money. And as long as they keep

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>pushing out a message of growth and transformation, and as

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>long as enough investors believe in it, then they can

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>keep raising money to keep pushing towards it. Okay, So

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what could happen to disrupt this virtuous chain of events? Okay,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's hard to say specifically, but I think what

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>would have to happen is some sort of real disruption

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to something like the Model three. Now it's looking like

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the guidance for the Model three's production, I mean that

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>looks pretty shaky to me. The numbers that they were

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>putting out last night. We haven't even seen a fully

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>functioning pre production model yet. Doesn't look like we're gonna

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>see one before production is supposed to start in July.

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So if some if there was some real setback to that,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>then I think that might shake people's confidence. I think

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is as time rolls on, we're seeing

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>more competitors like GM for BMW launched their own electric vehicles.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, GM has pretty much beaten Tesla to the

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>punch with the Bolt, which is going to be the

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>main competitor to the Model three. And I think over time,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>although right now Tesla is seen as the force for

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>change in the auto's market, at some point there is

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be the reality of having lots of other

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>competitors who are also able to offset their risk with

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>other cars producing their own electric vehicles. Thank you very much,

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Liam Denning, Bloomberg Gadfly columns. Shares of Tesla data about

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>five and a half percent. I want to turn to

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Krishna Mamani, chief investment officer at Oppenheimer Funds UH, to

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about what are you seeing in

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the bar market specifically. I want to start Krishna with

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>comments that we heard today from US Treasury Secretary Steve

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Minution basically expressing great interest frankly and issuing longer dated

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>US treasuries. This would be the fifty year or possibly

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>even a hundred year UH treasuries. What's what's your feeling

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on this? Do you think this is realistic? I think

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>from a demand perspective, so in any policy change, you

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of focus on whether there will be

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>some buyer for the security. But you're a buyer, right,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a buyer, and I think there are lots of

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>people who are buyers of really long bonds special fuer quality.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So you would buy a fifty year US treasure absolutely,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>because if you if you have really long term liabilities

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking to extinguish and extinguished with really high

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>quality assets, there really isn't a better instrument available. So

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>do you have a sense of what premium you would

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>need for a fifty year treasury over a thirty year

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>treasury or a ten year treasury in order to make

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it worthwhile? So I guess would be that that premium

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is probably smaller than most of us anticipate. And the

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is because the the convexity characteristics which

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is a technical term to say the the the price

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>appreciation and appreciation qualities of really long bonds is very

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>good and from a from a liability extinguishment standpoint, the

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>demand is quite solid. So I think that premium would

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>be much less than what we think uh it would be,

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and much less than what the differences between ten years

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and thirty years today. As much as I would like

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to say that I'm going to be around in fifty years,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I got to say that there are chances that I

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>might not. So why would you buy something that is

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be subject to the vagaries of inflation, global instability? Uh,

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to satisfy a current And I don't mean

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you personally, but I mean to satisfy a current and

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>hole in the portfolio because number one, you can't think

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of anything better to buy. Second, you need to keep

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 1>your job, and no one's gonna fire you for buying

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>us treasuries. You're gonna say, here, I bought them. It

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>matches our liability. But you know, I'm not gonna be

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>around when this thing blows up. So that's that's funny

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that you say that. But you you you have to recognize,

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>uh that while you and I may not be around

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in fifty years, there are pension plans. No, no, no,

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I got I. I understand all that. But I mean,

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're to tell me that you were to buy

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year let's say it's thirty years right now

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>at three percent, you mean to tell me that in

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty years you're not going to take a hit in

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>terms of what it is. Maybe your new customer base

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>wants in terms of a return, because if you're an

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>insurance company, you're matching future liabilities future new customers. Sure, so,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but I today I have some liabilities that I need

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to fund and demonstrate to the accountants that my liability

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is fully funded. So you're limited in what you can exactly. Okay, alright, Well,

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 1>moving moving on to something else that Minution said. He

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>said that he thinks it's completely feasible that the U

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>S should see three percent or even higher growth. That's

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>up from two rate or less. Frankly, now, first of all,

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>do you agree with this assessment? And second of all,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 1>if this is true, what bond is going to get

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>hit hardest? So I I think that's that's really more

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hope than reality in my view. Alright, And so you

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's true in the current environment, The likelihood

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that we get to higher than three percent growth rate

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon, I'm not holding my breath, you know. It's

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not to say that it couldn't happen,

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but for it to happen, a whole lot of policy

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>initiatives have to come into play. And policy initiatives like

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>significantly higher level of fiscal deficit, which I don't think

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>the Republican administration, at least the Republican Congress is really

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>very much in the mood mood to do without that.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The likelihood that we get three percent, in my mind,

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is virtually zero. And yet you do still think that

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>benchmark borrowing costs in the US will rise enough to

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>legitimize or justify uh favoring leverage loans or other floating

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rate debt correct well, so the floating rate debt market

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is really not just about your view on where rates

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are going. That certainly helps, but I think what you

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have to factor in is the fact that floating rate

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>yields are comparable to high yield yields, and therefore the

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the end they are senior. So the downside in loans

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is significantly less than what it is in high yield bonds,

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, I think in the current market environment,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>loans is the best asset class in all of all

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of credit. Having said that, you know the interest rate

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>component of loans is a side benefit rather than the

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>primary driver of the value and loans, thank you very much,

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. Christian Memony is the chief investment officer at

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Oppenheimer funds uh. He is based here in New York

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and joining us in our eleven three OHD studios. Thank

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you very much for being here. P and L is

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by proper Cloth, the leader in men's

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>custom shirts. At proper cloth dot com, ordering custom shirts

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Create your custom shirt size by

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>answering ten easy questions, select from over five d fabrics

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to suit your personal taste. Shirts start from eighty five

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars and are delivered in just two weeks with proper

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Cloths perfect fit guarantee. Remakes are completely free and expert

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>staff are standing by to help. For premium quality, perfect

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fitting shirts, visit proper cloth dot com Custom shirts made smarter.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>When you think of appliances, Lisa Bramwitz, do you think

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>of J. C. Penny? Yes, I do you do? I

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>do well. I'm glad you do because this was a

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>category that they well, they exited at one point and

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>now um they are back in the world of appliances,

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>so you must have a very good memory. Here to

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>tell us more. Craig Johnson, President Customer Growth Partners. They're

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>based in New Canaan, Connecticut. Craig, always a pleasure. Thanks

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>for coming into the studio, tell us about j C.

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Penny and whether there is any way they can offset

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that weak store traffic and also the negative soft apparel

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>trends that a lot of retailers are facing. Well, him

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa, great to be with you all today. Um, yeah,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>j C. Penney has been doing a lot better under

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the still fairly new CEO, Robert Allison. Uh, he came

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>out of out of home Depology, you might recall, and

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>so he knows a lot about major appliances now. Um,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they extualed the major pints is like thirty plus years ago,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but they've always been in small pints is kitchen, the

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>pints as and so forth. Um, and so they're looking

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the things they're looking at to

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>increase the productivity of the store floor. The floor is

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>still jc pnny stores are still way under productive where

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they used to be some years back. And they're working

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet. That helps. They're doing much better on

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that than they used to be. I used to do.

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And um, major plinants is is not gonna be a

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>panacea because for major appliances, I would argue a little

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>bit there at least it's not it's not top of

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>mind for most customers. Most major plants sales are what

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are known as duress sales when the old unit conks out.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>When the old unit conks out, you're probably gonna go

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to Loads, which is number one in market share. Maybe

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Sears Home Depot or best Buy. J. J. Penney just

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't pop up, then Greg just zooming out a little bit.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>This is peak earnings week for the retailers, and it

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>comes at a time when a lot of people are

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>writing off retailers as uh soon to be victims of

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon boom and the online move to shopping. And

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>yet we're seeing Beats Coals this morning beat expectations. We

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>saw Macy's beat expectations earlier this week. Does this point

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to signs of recovery in your opinion? Well, the fact

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that they beat pretty dour expectations doesn't always bode well.

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it's it's maybe a moral victory at

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>most best to have only negative two point comps as

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>calls we boarded they can get right right exactly. But

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I distinguished between the department store sector and the apparel sector,

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>which have been the most troubled, and department stores are

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>mostly apparel and accessory stores mostly for women that you

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>will have a home section and so forth. But it's

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly apparel, and that whole sector is declining. It's so

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>much slower share of market that used to be department

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>sto as a generation ago. Um Uh used to have

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of the retail market. Now it's sounded one

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>point six. So you do the math. That is not

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that is not a good thing. But other parts of

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>retail off price apparel, such as t j X, which

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had fairly decent numbers, Ross and Burlington, which is reported

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in the next you know week ten days, they'll do

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>very very well. Um and and there's been a major

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>rotation to home um, whether it's home improvement or the

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>homeport instance. Players w Wayfair just reported this morning, did

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know very strong numbers not make any money by

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the report of the strong top line tell us about

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go to l brands. I know that the

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>results are already out, so I was just watching to

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about Victoria's secret. Well, I just don't know. I mean,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>here's the stock. It's down at sixth the body works,

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I see good, thank you down six Uh. They don't know.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>They they've got their own stores. Obviously a brand but

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is this the story that is this like

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a business that's going to be around in five years

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in the same format somehow, I think the market for

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>intimatewear or innerwears calling it these days, I suspect that's

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be around for a while. The difference is is

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that Victoria's Secret uh, as apart from Bath and Bodyworks,

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, different little bit of different animals.

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>But for the for Vicky, um, we believe that it's overexpanded.

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It kind of breathed, was breathing its own exhaustumes too much.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And any good retail you have, even if you have

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>a great concept, you don't want to make it so

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>it's totally ubiquitous. So there's one on every corner because

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll you'll overserve the market. And right now the market

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>for for for intimate underwear is uh, it's you know,

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's modestly growing, but it's not rampant. Well and also

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't Victoria's Secret come under some fire for not having

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>big enough sizes for some clients and there was some

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>discussion about should they have should they cater to a

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>larger population. Does that matter to you at all or

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is that sort of just a relevant kind of side show. Well,

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the the size of the average woman has over the

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>last generation has increased, and uh, the full figured woman

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>does have a market, and right now that's a little

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>bit underserved, we believe. And so Victoria's secret, you know,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the image of Victoria's sacred is maybe you know,

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a little thinner, younger, et cetera. But there's a ton

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of women that may need, you know, a little bit

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>larger sizing, and there we believe they're a little bit undeserved. Craig,

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you said that you just returned from a trip to Chicago.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I know you spent a lot of time on the

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>road actually checking out the retail operations. What can you

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>tell about what's going on in the middle of the

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>country in Chicago, Well, he was, you know, we have

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a team of eighteen people. We've been doing this for

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>years across the country. They go about to about ninety

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>major venues um and I like to travel myself and

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>native Chicago's I remember Marshall Fields in its better days,

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and so you remember the chocolate, the mints, I guess

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the Franco mits where which macis. I believe they just

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>sold that the great thing and so um. Retail in

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the country is doing, you know, kind

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of much better than the pundits think because the headlines

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are all around the department store as the well known

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>names and departments are a sector is tanking, it's it's

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a it's a near free fall. Now there's a role

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>for department stores, but they have to rethink and reconceptualize

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>really what they are. But what you see in Chicago,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us, I mean any are there any

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>retail concepts that are new that we need to pay

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>attention to? One of them, just as expanding rapidly is

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a warby Parker, the the the eyeglass maker, and they

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>have I was in their stores on North Rush Street

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's great. Locations like Catty Corner from an urban outfitters,

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of serve a little bit of the

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>same customers and so forth. And so they now have

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of locations physical location. Because this is a

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>retailer that started online. Classes. Yeah, but they started online

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and now they're now they're rapidly going to building out

0:19:59.920 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a store fleet. Craig Johnson, thank you so much for

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Craig, uh, it sounds like they're eighteen people

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>go around secretly shopping for for for their business. I

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>love it. Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners in

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>New Canaan at Connecticut Well pim Fox. We heard quite

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit this morning from US Treasury Secretary UH Steve Minution.

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Now that he has been confirmed, he is making the

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>rounds and giving some sense of what his priorities will

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>be over the next couple of years. I want to

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bring in Salaha Moson, she is a Bloomberg News reporter,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about what we've learned about

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>manutions policies. So, Sala, let's first start with the longer

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>dated US Treasury since this is moving markets and causing

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a quarter into some traders. This is what's causing the

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>yield curve to steep in somewhat today. Um, what exactly

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>did he say about the U s issuing fifty one

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred year treasuries? So the Secretary Minution said that the

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Treasury will explore issuing longer term debt maturities. As you said, Um,

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he said that with rates seen historically low for some

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>time to come, it is time to seriously explore whether

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Treasury should be issuing these bonds. Well, what is the

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>likelihood that this will happen? Who does he have in support?

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are a few members in Congress who

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have asked about this in the last year, uh and

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>including some Democrats, But so far in the Senate there

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been a lot of movement on this. It's not

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>clear that he would actually even need congress um full

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>support to do this, But I think for now it's

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>more just the sake, a question of asking market participants

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and investors what they think and then going from there.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing that I found interesting both today

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as yesterday, there was an article about Treasury

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Manution in the Wall Street Journal where he talked about

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollar policy and that the strong the strong dollar

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is a good reflection on the US over the long term.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>That seemed to go in contradiction to what President Trump

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>had said about the dollar being too strong. He also

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>said today that there is no urgency to brand China

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a currency manipulator. How much is Treasury Secretary Manution in

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sync with President Trump? You know, it's hard to know, um,

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>when something might come out on a tweet and where

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the signaling there might when it might shift, um. But

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have seen some clear signals from Trump

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>himself where he is softening on his views of China. UM.

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>That started after the elections and it's continued as he

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>has become president. UM and Manution is pretty much echoing that.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>But this is new that you know, no announcement will

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>come before April, and that means that they are looking

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>to the traditional mechanisms to investigate whether they should be

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>labeling them now or or how they can start raising

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>any alarms before they would actually formally designate them. It

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>just shows that we're not going to do this haphazardly.

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna look to what existing established mechanisms. We have

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to do this now, Sala. Earlier, President Trump spoke about

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the United states is economic relationship with Mexico, and did

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>he reference that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is in

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Mexico today beginning that relationship. What if you could speak

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what you know about repealing or

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>changing or reforming NAFTA. You know, right now it looks

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like a very strong initiative to start, like a ninety

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>day review of the law has not started. Um, it

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>looks like they're still in the talking mode. Let's connect

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>with all of our counterparts and see what we hear

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>back as the rest of the world kind of starts

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to re adjust to the US's new trade stance. You know.

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>One other aspect of Minutions comments earlier today was his

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>expectations for the growth rate in the US. He said

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that it was completely reasonable to expect a three percent

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>or higher growth rate. Did he give any idea of

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what he thought would push growth to that rate, which

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen for years. Yeah, So he stuck

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to the party line that it is tax cuts and

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>cutting regulations that will unlock this economic growth of at

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>least three percent. Mission did say today on TV and

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a scene LEAs the interview that he doesn't expect that

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to really feed into the economy until the end of

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>next year. But that's why they want to get started

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>on this sooner rather than later, just so that that

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>can start showing up in the economy. Now. Recently, I believe,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was a G twenty meeting, and this

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>was at a time when I believe the Secretary of

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury had just been installed, and I'm wondering if

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>you could just give us the reaction to some of

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>those UH from the Foreign UH Finance chiefs about Stephen

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Manuchition and about the US policy. So the next twenty

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>meeting is in Germany in mid March UM, and what

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we had was a leadership gap at Treasury that was

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>longer than before between administrations, So the Treasure secretary counterparts

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.959
<v Speaker 1>around the world had no one really to pick up

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and call as they heard Trump and his advisors, including Manuchian,

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>making comments about bilateral trade issues and currencies that were

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>moving markets. Um. So as soon as Minuition was installed,

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>we saw that within half a day we had his

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>German counterpart UH talking about saying, you know, be careful

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>how you talk about cutting regulations because they don't want

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a race to the bottom of the very regulations that

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>were put in place two Uh sort of keep another

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis from happening. And then shortly after that we

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 1>heard from Japan's pair also about how Minution should be

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.239
<v Speaker 1>cautious and careful in remarks about the yen. And that

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of comes from Trump's comments that China and Japan

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>are playing in currency markets. Although you know, aside from

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just the big Dodd Frank rollback which some people are expecting,

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary Minution could have a much more direct effect

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on rolling back some of these regulations. Correct, I mean

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>he could potentially direct the Federal Reserve of the o

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>c C or work with f STOCK, uh this Financial

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Stability Committee to potentially ease certain sort of de facto

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>policies that are that are just basically governed by guidance. Right.

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right. He is as treasure Secretary's ahead of f STOCK,

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and so it's up to him if he decides to

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>put some different issues on the backboard burner and re

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>prioritize that is one way to sort of start loosening regulations.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Like what types of things you're talking about, I mean,

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say. Right now. He seems very focused

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on doing anything he can to help small and medium

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>businesses grow investment. They said for a long time that

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>small community banks aren't able to make loans that really

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are a part of a large part of the economy

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and are holding back part of growth according to their

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>base case, because they are kind of weighed down by regulation.

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And if they can loosen that up and make it

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>easier for these smaller banks to operate, then you know

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>that's they're going to aim for. First. I wonder if

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you just give US about twenty seconds on the euro.

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>On the Euro, you know, we did hear from Peter Navarro,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>who is the Trade Council Director at the White House,

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that Germany does have a large trade imbalance with the

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>US and that was kind of, you could say, a

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>soft attack to the on the Euro. Now, we haven't

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>heard a lot on Europe. UM. I know that UM

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in Germany. Merkel is often seen or heard talking about

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>an interview that Trump did many years ago where he

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>says that maybe Mercedes should be pariffed, and you kind

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of wonder if she is now kind of darting to

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.959
<v Speaker 1>gird herself to maybe be a weary of a trade war.

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Well that and uh in a coming election. I want

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to thank you very much, Salleja most Economy Treasury reporter

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News giving us details about the new Treasury

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Stephen. This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. P and L is brought to you by

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>proper Cloth, a leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>smart sized technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>custom shirt has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>com to order your first custom shirt today