WEBVTT - The Story: Ask Lots of Questions w/ Meredith Whittaker

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tuney into tech Stuff. If you don't recognize

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>my voice, my name is Oz Valoshian and I'm here

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>because the inimitable Jonathan Strickland has passed the baton to

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Cara Price and myself to host Tech Stuff. The show

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>will remain your home for all things tech, and all

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the old episodes will remain available in this feed. Thanks

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Welcome to Tech Stuff. I'm Os Valoshian and

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Cara Price.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>And this is the story our weekly episode, dropping each Wednesday,

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>sharing an in depth conversation with a fascinating person in

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>and around tech. This week, Oz tells me he's bringing

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>me a conversation with Meredith Whittaker.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Meredith leads the Signal Foundation, which is a

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit that oversees the encrypted messaging app Signal, beloved by journalists,

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>deal makers, drug dealers, and privacy buffs alike.

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 2>It takes wanting to keep a really really really big

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>secret to get on Signal, but we should also think

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>about everything we say as a really big secret. If

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>you can who has access to all of our information.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent, Well, you don't sometimes know what's a

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>really really big secret until it's too late. Meredith has

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating background. She started at Google back in the

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>day when it famously boasted that don't be Evil slogan,

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and she actually started as a temp in a kind

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of customer service adjacent gig that was despite being a

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley grad in literature and rhetoric. Eventually she worked her

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>way up into leadership, founding Google Open Research Group and

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>then separately founding something called the AI Now Institute at NYU.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And after she left Google, she became head of Signal

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two. But the circumstances of her departure

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>from Google were memorable, to say the least.

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 2>I think it's fair to say that she got on

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone's radar back in twenty eighteen when she led the

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 2>walkouts at Google over the experience of women in tech

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and at Google specifically over things like pay inequality and

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the handling of sexual harassment at the company.

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also Project Maven, which was Google's decision

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to take part in a Department of Defense program to

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>use machine learning and data for battlefield target identification, which

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>was very very controversial internally and which in part is

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what led her to her role today at signal. Merediths

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>won a prize in Germany last year called the Helmut

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt Future Award, where she was honored to quote her

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>commitment to the development of AI technology oriented towards the

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>common good. So we talk about that too, and why

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Meredith fundamentally describes herself as an optimist. But we start

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 1>by geeking out over literature.

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear it.

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So I was reading your bio and one of the

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>things that stuck out to me was your background as

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a English literature and rhetoric major in college. I was

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>also in English major. As I looked at your kind

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of story, there's this arc from arriving at Google as

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a graduate in two thousand and six in the Don't

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Be Evil error, seeing all of these technologies developed, many

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of which went on to be kind of part of

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the foundation of what we now call AI, leading a

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>protest movement and ultimately leaving and it made me think

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of Pilgrim's Progress or a buildings Room.

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 3>Then yeah, I mean, maybe a Jeremiah is more accurate.

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 4>So that was a joke for the four English literature

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 4>majors who are listening. I think for me, I was

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 4>very sincere. I still am very sincere, and I came

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 4>in and took a lot of things at face value,

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 4>in part because I had no idea about tech. I

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 4>was stepping in and I was asking very basic questions.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>You did in two thousand and six.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, well, you know, it wasn't the money occupation

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 4>when I got into Google. It was it was actually,

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 4>it was a fairly lovely environment in some ways because

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the people there were people who had

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 4>a special interest, like nerdy people like myself, but I

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 4>was a book nerd, and they were sort of math

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 4>and science nerds. And suddenly their special interest, their sweet

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>passion that they spent so much time thinking about, was

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 4>also profitable. It was also important for the world. It

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 4>put them in a position of being a meaningful contributor.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 4>And there was a genuineness to that. And we're in

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 4>an era now, of course, where you know, no one's

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 4>mom is saying be a doctor or a lawyer. They're

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 4>saying be an engineer. And so it was, you know,

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.799
<v Speaker 4>it was simply a very different world.

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And what about don't be evil? When was that generation?

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Then?

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>When was that abandoned? Was that part of the kind

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of discourse when you went to Google, that.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Was generated before my time, and it was core to

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 4>the discourse at Google. I think it was removed by

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 4>lawyers in like twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, I don't actually

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 4>remember the date, but look, it's a slogan.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 4>The structure of Google was still up into the right

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 4>forever so profits and growth worthy objective functions. That's the

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 4>sort of perpetual motion machine that Google adhere. However, I

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 4>do think don't Be Evil had some power in that

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 4>it was a touchstone that we all shared where socially

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 4>awkward people are people who might not quite understand how

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 4>to formulate a discomfort could kind of point to it

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 4>and say like, hey, this is making me think that

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 4>we should examine this because we said don't be evil.

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 4>And most of this, you know, throughout Google's history was

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 4>at a time where let's say, the horizons that would

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 4>challenge that were very far in the distance. So you

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 4>could still make a lot of quarterly returns doing a

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of things that were understood and we can debate

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 4>that as as good right, and things like building a

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 4>search engine for the Chinese market that would include surveillance

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 4>functions for the government was not something you even had

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 4>to consider because there was so much low hanging fruit

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 4>in terms of continuing to grow, continuing to profit. And

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 4>so I think that combination of like it was, it

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 4>was sincerely held, and that the actual temptation to do

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 4>the things that really got into that sort of hot

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 4>water potential evil were not on the table at that

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 4>point because there was so much else that could be done.

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 4>And you know, of course, the ratchet turns, the ratchet turns,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 4>the ratchet turns, and then suddenly those horizons are much closer.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 4>The company is swollen by orders of magnitude, and that

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 4>little slogan is quietly removed by a team of lawyers

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 4>who probably bought some summer houses with the fees.

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Did you believe that slogan? And was there a moment

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>along the way where you definitively started not to believe it.

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 4>I liked having that slogan as a tool. Let me

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 4>say that, right.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 3>It was useful. It did work in rooms.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 4>It you know, allowed us to frame debates in a

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 4>way that had at at least as their reference port

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 4>a core and ethical consideration. Like I was young, there

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 4>was about a million different learning curves I was scaling

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 4>at once. Yes, what does it mean to have a

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 4>real job.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 3>I didn't come from this class.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 4>I didn't have familiarity with these cultures or environments because

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 4>I'd literally never been in an environment that looked anything

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 4>like you know what my family still jokingly refers to

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 4>as a business job.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 4>I didn't know what was normal and what was not normal.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 4>So for me, Google was normal, and so I just

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 4>want to be care Like. I don't know if I

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 4>believed it or not. I found it useful and I

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 4>saw it do work in the world, and I liked

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 4>the idea, Like, it sounds great that we're giving people

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 4>ads that match their interests. What could be wrong with

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 4>that We're organizing the world's information. Wow, all of this

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 4>is cool.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Like I was like, Okay, what is tech? What is Google? Hey,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>sit me down and tell me what is information? I

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>was a master at asking the dumbest questions, but sometimes

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 3>they would unlock whole world for me, and then I

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 3>would realize, like, oh, information is just websites. Okay, but

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 3>you can't make a website if you don't have a computer,

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 3>and you have to be able to code HTML markup

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>to do that. Okay, So it's more limited than I thought. Okay,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 3>well what is an index? Oh, it's ranking it. But

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 3>isn't that a value judgment?

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 4>I guess it's not if it's an algorithm, but like

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 4>who makes the algorithm? And so it was butting my

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 4>head up against what are kind of dumb, very basic

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 4>questions and sort of sensing an insufficiency of the responses,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 4>and like, you know, over almost twenty years now, continuing

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 4>that process of trying to, you know, just figure out

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 4>like what are we doing here?

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 3>And how do I understand it? And that was basically

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 3>my education.

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So fust forward, you know, thirteen years from two thousand

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and six to twenty nineteen. How did you get to

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that point where it became impossible for you to stay?

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't have a pat answer, But how did I

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 3>get to that point? Well?

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Again, I was a sincere person and I had done

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot in my career. I had a lot of

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 4>opportunities and then I took them, and you know, I

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 4>built a research group inside of Google.

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I was involved in.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Efforts to spread privacy and security technologies across the tech ecosystem.

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 4>I was a champion for privacy within Google. I had

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 4>built you know, open source measurement infrastructures to help inform

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 4>the net neutrality debate. I had always tried to be

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 4>on the side of doing social good, to.

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Be very bland about it.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I had been able to do very very

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 4>well doing that. And at the point where I became frustrated,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 4>I had already established the AI Now Institute, co founding

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 4>that at NYU, looking at some of the present day

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 4>real term harms and social implications of AI technologies. This

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 4>was twenty sixteen. I had become known through the academic

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 4>world and the technical world, and particularly within Google itself

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 4>as an authority and a speaker and an expert on

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 4>those issues. So talking about some of the harms that

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 4>these technologies could cause, criticizing within, essentially criticizing within. I

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 4>saw myself as a resource, and actually many many people did.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 4>I would be brought in when teams were struggling with things,

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:39.119
<v Speaker 4>I would advise them. I would often give academic lectures

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 4>that went against the party line at Google, but we're

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 4>very well cited, were very empirically documented, and I had

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 4>felt that I was making some headway right.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 3>People were listening to me. I was at the table,

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>so to speak.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 4>And then in twenty seventeen Fall twenty seventeen, and I

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 4>learned about a military contract that Google had secretively signed

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 4>to build for the US drone program. And that was

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 4>at a time and still today, when those systems were

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 4>not purpose built right, they were not safe.

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 3>There were ethical concerns we had. Sergey Brin, the co

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>founder of Google, had made.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Remarks that were very clear in the past about keeping

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 4>away from military contracting. Given Google's business model, it's public interest.

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 4>It serves the world, not just.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>The US business model, meaning that it knows a lot

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>about people. Essentially, yeah that it is.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Ultimately it's a surveillance company. It collects huge amounts of

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 4>data about people, and then it creates models from that

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:45.119
<v Speaker 4>data that it sells to advertisers, and advertisers can leverage

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 4>Google's models and ultimately the surveillance that they're built on

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 4>in order to precision target their message and thus reach

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 4>more customers. And that remains the core of the business model,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 4>that remains the core of the Internet economy.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>And putting that type.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Of information at the service of one or another government

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 4>is in my view, it is dangerous. And the first

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 4>thing I did is I think start a signal thread

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 4>with some people and say what should we do?

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>This was Project Maven. It was to do with helping

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the US government target enemy combatants on the battlefield.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Though well, it was building surveillance and targeting AI for

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 4>the drone program.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And what was the result of me used so talking

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to people on a signal. What happened next?

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, it grew and it grew, and then I

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 4>wrote an open letter. That letter got signed by thousands

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 4>of people. Eventually someone leaked it to the New York Times.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 4>It snowballed, it grew into a movement, and ultimately Google

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.479
<v Speaker 4>dropped that contract. Now you know, these efforts are ongoing.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 4>I want to be clear that this was a fairly

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 4>different time. I think now there's a lot more comfort

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 4>with military technology, but I think those issue shoes have

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 4>yet to be addressed. The issues of the danger of

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 4>yoking the interests of any one country irrespective to a

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 4>massive surveillance apparatus, the types of which we haven't seen

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 4>in human history. That's a real concern, and I think

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 4>that is a concern across political spectrum. We should all

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 4>be concerned about that, and frankly, I think it speaks

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 4>to the need to question that form altogether. The form

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 4>of sort of the surveillance business model and the collection

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:36.239
<v Speaker 4>of massive amounts of information that can be used to harm, control, oppress,

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 4>et cetera.

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>How did you end up finally deciding what's time to leave?

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 4>There's not one answer to that, you know, I realized

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 4>pretty quickly that I had poked a bear. I had

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 4>a huge amount of support inside the company.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 3>I still do. I don't think anyone's saying I'm wrong.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are twenty thousand employees at one point

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>right involved in Yeah, and it's a huge no. I mean,

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the employees are there.

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 4>At that point. I think it was like two hundred thousand. Yeah,

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 4>So it's it's significant.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 3>It was the largest labor action in tech history, which

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 3>speaks not to the militancy of people who work in tech,

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 3>but I think speaks to the fact that this was

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 3>really a rupture of a lot of discomfort that had

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 3>been building for a long time. Right, Like, people.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Who often got into this industry because of their ethical compass,

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 4>because they really, you know, wanted to quote unquote change

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 4>the world, were feeling betrayed and feeling like their hands

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 4>were no longer on the rudder in a way that

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 4>they felt comfortable.

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>With coming up. We discussed why signal broke through the noise,

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>stay with.

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Us, so you poked the bear and it became time

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to leave. I mean, not for nothing. The kind of

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the wedge issues was this use of Google's

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>technology for military purposes. And I think twenty twenty four

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>was the year. I mean, of course we will remember,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the strikes, the drone strikes during the Obama years.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is not per se a new phenomenon, but

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>something about Ukraine and Gaza has really elevated into mainstream

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>consciousness what it means to have autonomous weapon systems.

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think the environment has changed a lot. Look

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 4>on one side, there's a very real argument that I'm

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 4>deeply sympathetic to, like military infrastructure and technology is often outdated.

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 4>They're amortizing yanky old systems that are not up to snuff.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Logistics and processes are threadbare, all of that being true,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 4>and some of the new technologies would make that a

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 4>lot easier. On the other hand, I think we're often

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 4>not looking at these dangers. What does it mean to

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 4>automate this process? What does it mean to predicate kate?

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Many of these technologies on surveillance data on infrastructure that

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 4>is ultimately controlled by a handful of companies based in

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 4>the US. How do we make sure the very real

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 4>dangers of such reliance are actually surfaced and quick fixes

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 4>to bad practices accrued over many, many years of grifty

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 4>military contracting don't come at the expense of, you know,

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 4>civilian life. Don't come at the expense of handing the

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 4>keys to military operations to for profit companies based in

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 4>the US.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And you talked about Project Lavender and your Helmut Schmidt speech,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>which I found fascinating. Why do you think it was

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>important to start there?

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, Lavender, Gospel and Where's Daddy are three systems that

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 4>were revealed to be used in Gaza by the Israeli

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 4>military to identify targets and then, you know, basically kill them.

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 4>I looked at those because they are happening now, and

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 4>because they were the type of danger that the thousands

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 4>of people who were pushing back on Google's role in

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 4>military contracting were raising as a hypothetical, and because I

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 4>think it shows the way that the logics of the

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Obama era drone war have been supercharged and exacerbated by

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 4>the introduction of these automated AI systems. So for folks

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 4>who might not remember, the drone war was the theater

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 4>to use the military term in which the signature strike

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 4>was introduced, and the signature strike was it's killing people

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 4>based on their data fingerprint, not based on any real

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 4>knowledge about who they are, what they've done, or anything

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 4>that would resemble what we think of as evidence. So,

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 4>because someone visited five locations that are flagged as terrorist locations,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 4>because they have family here, because they are in these

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 4>four group chats, whatever it is, I'm making a possible data.

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 4>But you could model what a terrorist looks like in

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 4>any way you want. And then if if my data

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 4>patterns look similar enough to that model, you deem me

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 4>to be a terrorist and you kill me. And you

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 4>know it is exactly the logic of ad targeting.

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 4>I scroll through Instagram. I see an ad for athletic greens.

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Because you know they have my credit card data. You

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 4>buy healthy stuff. You're this age group, you live in

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 4>New York, whatever it is, we assume you will buy

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 4>athletic greens or be likely to click on this ad

0:18:55.240 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 4>and will get paid. It's that but for death and

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 4>the lavender, Where's Daddy? And gospel systems are basically that

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 4>for death supercharged.

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And is it a coincidence the resemblance between how AD

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>targeting works and how these signature strikes on the battlefield

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>or in war work. Was the military inspired in some

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>way by the ad industry or what's the kind of

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>source of the connections.

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be surprised. But then again, you know, it

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 4>wasn't just the ad industry. You know, there was an

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 4>Obama era and kind of a neoliberal faith in data.

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Now there wasn't much of a definition of what data is,

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 4>but the idea that data was more objective, less fallible,

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 4>more scientific. These are almost like mythologized versions of data,

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 4>and that if we relied on the data instead of

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 4>subjective decision making, we would re each determinations that were better,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 4>We would make the right choices. Now, part of my

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 4>background is I came up doing large scale measurement system

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 4>so I was in the business of making data.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. I mean, I just want to pause on that,

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's an interesting way. I've never heard it expressed before.

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But essentially making data equals measuring stuff.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, data is a very rough proxy for a complex reality.

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, So you.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Figure out, like, what's the way we're gonna create those proxies.

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 4>How are we going to measure it? Right, whether we

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 4>measure human emotion, or measure the timing of street lights,

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 4>or measure the temperature in the morning based on a

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 4>thermometer that's calibrated in a certain way. We log all

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 4>of those as become data, right, And of course those

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 4>methodologies are generally created by people with an interest in

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 4>answering a certain set of questions, maybe not another set

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 4>of questions. In the case of Google or another company,

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 4>they were interested in measuring consumer behavior in servis of

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 4>giving advertisers access to a market. This is, in effect,

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 4>like a rough proxy created to answer very particular questions

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 4>by a very particular industry at a very particular historical conjuncture,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 4>and it is then leveraged for all these other things.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 4>And I think shrouding that data construction process in sort

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 4>of scientific language, you know, assuming that like data is

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 4>simply a synonym for objective fact, that's a very convenient

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 4>way of strouding some of those intentions, right, Shrouding the

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 4>distinction between those who get to measure and thus get

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 4>to decide, and those who are measured and are thus

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 4>subject to those decisions.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, twenty twenty four was the year of this

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical of what was raised at Google becoming real in Gaza.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It was also the year that two Nobel Prizes, one

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>in chemistry and one in physics, went to one former

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and one current Google employee, and both in the realm

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of pushing fundamental science forward. So how do you see

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment in an AI and both this kind of

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>enormous hope and something drug discovery and the obvious peril

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in getting people based on their metadata.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think there's a lot of things AI could

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 4>do very well right. Drug discovery is one, it's very interesting,

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 4>and the idea of being able to create drugs for

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 4>things that affect smaller numbers of people thus aren't generally incentivized.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 3>All of that, like, yes, let's leverage what we.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 4>Have to make life as beautiful as possible for as

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 4>many people as possible. Amen, The issue comes down to

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 4>the political economy of AI and what we're actually talking about.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 4>And I think when we look at the AI industry

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 4>right now, and when we look at the technologies that

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 4>the Nobel Prize was awarded for either creating or leveraging,

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 4>we begin to recognize that AI is an incredibly centralized

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 4>set of technologies. It relies on huge amounts of computational resources,

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 4>and then there is data that's required to train these models.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 4>And so the paradigm we're in right now is the

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 4>bigger is better. The more chips, the more compute, the

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 4>more data, and you combine those in whatever architecture and

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 4>you create a model, and then that model is purportedly

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 4>better performing and therefore better, and therefore we're advancing science.

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's a useful argument, I guess for very very

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>large companies whose inherent logic is to grow larger. Right,

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you Amazon or Googo, little Microsoft, you

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what is there to do for growth other than popularizing

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this model of how the progress of AI works?

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean it would be very bad for these companies'

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 4>bottom lines if it turned out that much smaller models

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 4>using much more bespoke data were in fact much better, right,

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Because they've thrown a lot of money behind this. Narratives

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 4>we hear about tech, and the narratives we hear about

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 4>progress are not always born of scientific and I think

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 4>when you look at that, then you have to realize,

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 4>like AI is not a it's not a product of

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 4>scientific innovation that everyone could leverage and these guys just

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 4>figured it out first, right, It's a product of this

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 4>concentration of resources, and in fact, in the early twenty

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 4>tens when the sort of current AI moment took off,

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 4>the algorithms that were animating that boom were created in

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 4>the late nineteen eighties. But what was new were the

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 4>computational resources, the chips and the ability to use them

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 4>in certain ways, and the data and the data is

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 4>that product of this surveillance business model that Google, Meta

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 4>at Alia sort of participated in and had built their

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 4>infrastructures and businesses around. So of course, who has the

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 4>access to those infrastructures, who can meaningfully apply these old

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 4>algorithms and begin to fund research sort of optimizing them,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 4>building new approaches to this big data, big compute AI paradigm.

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 4>It's the same surveillance platform companies, And so all of

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 4>this comes back to the question of like, well, the

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Nobel is awarded for AI this year, don't we want

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 4>better drug discoveries? And it's great, yes, we absolutely do,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 4>but if you look at the market conditions, it's unclear

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 4>how that better drug discovery is actually going to lead

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 4>to better health outcomes, and so who will the customers

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 4>of that AI be?

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 4>Most likely it will be pharmaceutical companies, not altruistic organization.

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 4>It'll be insurance companies who may actually want to limit care. Right,

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 4>So you have a diagnostic algorithm, but it's not used

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that I'm given the care I need,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 4>even if it's expensive early so I live a long life.

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 4>It's used to make sure I'm excluded from the pool

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 4>so that I am.

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 3>Not a cost going forward.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's the lens that we need to

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 4>put on some of this, because the excitement is very warranted.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 4>But in the world we have, it's pretty clear without

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 4>other changes to our systems, that AI, given the cost,

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 4>given the concentrated power, given the fact that these entities

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 4>need to recoup massive investment, is not going to be

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 4>an altruistic resource, but will likely be ramifying the power

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 4>of actors who have already proven themselves pretty problematic in

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 4>terms of fomenting public good so to speak.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we'll hear about Meredith Whitaker's speech upon winning

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 2>the Helmet Schmidt Future Prize and why we should rethink

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 2>our preconceptions about data stayed with us.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Talk about Signal and not for nothing. Was a was

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the first place you went when you learned about Project Maven,

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and is now where you spend a lot more time.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>So for those who don't know what it is and

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>how it works and why it's important, I mean, just

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>tell us a bit about it.

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, you know, Signal is incredible.

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 4>I'm really honored to work here and it's been along

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 4>on the journey and various capacities for a very long time.

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 3>It is the.

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 4>World's largest actually private communications network in an environment as

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 4>we just discussed, where almost every one of our activities,

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 4>digital and increasingly analog are surveilled in one way or

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 4>another by a large tech company, government, or some ad mixture.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 4>So it's incredibly important infrastructure. We hear human rights workers

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 4>rely on signal. Journalists rely on signal to protect their sources.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 4>We have militaries rely on signal to get communications out

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 4>when they're necessary. We have board rooms, you know, most

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 4>bour room chatter, most CEOs I meet use signal religiously.

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Governments use signals. So anywhere where the confidentiality of communications

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 3>is necessary, certainly anywhere where the stakes of privacy are

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 3>life or death. We know that people rely on Signal

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 3>and our core encryption protocol was released in twenty thirteen

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 3>and it has stood the test of time. It is

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 3>now the gold standard across the industry.

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's used by WhatsApp as well.

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, it's used by WhatsApp.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 4>It's used across the tech industry because one of the

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 4>things about encryption is it's very hard to get right.

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 4>It's very easy to get wrong, and so if someone

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 4>gets it right, you want to reuse that. You want

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 4>to use that formula. You don't want to DIY because

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 4>it's almost certain you'll have some small error in there,

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 4>and when we're talking about life or death consequences, you

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 4>can't afford that.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But why if what seven Signal used the same open

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>source code, am I so much safe for using Signal

0:28:59.520 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and WhatsApp?

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Because the Signal protocol is one slice of a very

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 4>large stack, and WhatsApp uses that slice to protect what

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 4>you say. But Signal protects way more than what you say.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 4>We protect who you talk to. We don't have any

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 4>idea who's talking to whom. We don't know your profile name,

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 4>we don't know your profile photo. We don't know your

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 4>contact list, and it goes on and on and on.

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 4>So everything we do we sweat the details in order

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 4>to get as close to collecting as little data as possible.

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Those things that you're describing that Signal doesn't collector are

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the inputs to the signature strikes we were discussing earlier.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Could be? Could be.

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean one of the issues with proprietary technology or

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 4>classified information is we don't totally know, but it's that

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 4>type of information that has been reported and mentioned as

0:29:58.400 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 4>inputs to those strikes.

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you're not the CEO of Signal, you're the

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>president of the Signal Foundation. Can you kind of explain

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>why that is and what it means?

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think in this moment in the tech industry,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 4>that would be dangerous. Although it's not profits that we

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 4>are opposed to, it is the particular incentive structure of

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 4>the tech industry which ultimately you either collect data and

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 4>monetize that you're creating models to sell ads as we discussed,

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 4>or training AI models or selling its data brokers or

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 4>what have you, so surveillance, or you provide sort of

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 4>goods and services to those who do the picks and

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 4>shovels of the surveillance industry. So you can imagine a

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 4>board with a fiduciary duty governing a for profit signal.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 4>At some point that fiduciary duty is going to take

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 4>precedence to the obsessive focus on privacy.

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>So that's really the crux of it.

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 4>And we're in an industry where consumer apps are quote

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 4>unquote free, right there is not a norm of paying

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 4>for these things upfront by the consumer. Is not for

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 4>lack of innovation that we don't have many many more

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 4>signals or signal like products that are focused on democracy,

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 4>focused on privacy, focused on ensuring fundamental rights, focused on

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 4>the public good. It's really because many of those things

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 4>cannot be subject to the surveillance business model and thus

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 4>don't really exist because capitalizing them is such an issue.

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that you know there's a consumer expectation that

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>tech is free, or at least free at the point

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of delivery. You also have heard a piece of Wired

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>recently kind of arguing twenty twenty five might be but

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the end of big tech. But I

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>guess my question is big tech of so successfully kind

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of created this expectation on the consumer side that tech

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>products are free and that essentially I pay for the

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>product by allowing myself to be surveiled. Can there be

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental shift away from the big tech hegemony un

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>lessen until consumers are willing to pay with money rather

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>than data for infrastructure services.

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I absolutely believe there can be. This is

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 3>what we have.

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Thirty years of this, twenty years of this. This is

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 4>hyper novel in terms of human history. This is in

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 4>no way natural. There's you know, there's a longer history

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 4>of the sort of particular regulatory and political environment this

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 4>came out of. We now have the FBI advising people

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 4>not to send SMS messages following a massive hack that

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 4>enabled China and I don't know who else to access

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 4>telephony networks and surveil US citizens, including many high ranking citizens.

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 4>And so we're in a geopolitically volatile moment where the

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 4>lines between nations and jurisdictions and interests are getting a

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 4>bit more brittle, a bit more crisp, and I think

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 4>the imperative of moving away from this centralized surveillance tech

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 4>business model is really becoming clear to almost everyone. And

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 4>that was what animated the piece and wired you know,

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 4>I would say it's more of a wish casting into

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.719
<v Speaker 4>the future than necessarily a prediction of what will happen.

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 3>But insofar as like hope.

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Is an invitation for action, I really think there's a

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 4>lot of creative work that could be done to undo

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 4>that business model. Right, the question is really where do

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 4>the resources come from? And that's a question we can

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 4>begin to answer. Okay, are there endowments, Are there certain

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 4>technologies like signal, like some of the cloud and core

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure that should be more openly governed that really, you know,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 4>the more dependent we are on these infrastructures, the more

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 4>these infrastructures are controlled by you know, a small number

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.720
<v Speaker 4>of actors, the more perilous those single points of failure become.

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 4>And I think the more attentive people are becoming to

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 4>that peril, and the more appetite there is for solutions

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 4>that may not have been on the table even a

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 4>couple of years ago.

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is interesting. I mean I was a talk

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the other day and somebody's talking about cloud computing and

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>how the metaphor kind of suggests that this kind of

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>decentralized model and it's kind of around all of us.

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>But like what cloud computing has actually meant it's this

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>incredible kind of centralization of computational power in the hands

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of basically two nations and ten companies.

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Yep, yeah, exactly, and you know, two nations, but the

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 4>US being dominant there it's Amazon, Microsoft, and Google have

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 4>seventy percent of the global market seven zero insane. So

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 4>that means other nation states are running on Amazon, running

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 4>on Google, right, And there is no way to simply

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 4>create a competitor because you are talking about a form

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 4>that was understood in the utilities context, particularly in telephony,

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 4>as a natural monopoly for a very long time, and

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:16.479
<v Speaker 4>that has you know, ultimately been kind of entered into

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 4>the gravitational pull of these handful of companies. So it's a.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Very big problem.

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 4>But again, it doesn't mean that things like signal don't exist.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Signal exists. Swimming upstream signal is proving that one extremely

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:36.720
<v Speaker 3>innovative technologies can and actually do exist, that even swimming

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>up against stream, we can create something that has set

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 3>the gold standard and proven that yes, there's a ton

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 3>of innovation left to do in tech, in privacy, in

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 3>rights preservation, in creating.

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 4>Tech that actually serves a social need. You know, it

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 4>is popular, and Okay, now let's solve the issue of

0:35:56.239 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 4>this toxic business model to actually foment innovation, to actually

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 4>foment progress, whatever the claims of the marketing on the

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 4>tan of big tech may be.

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and just to close, I've really was taken by

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>your Helmut Schmidt speech and you had a line, make

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>no mistake, I'm optimistic, but my optimism is an invitation

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 1>to analysis in action, not a ticket to complacency. Yes,

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about.

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 4>That, Well, that is true, and I think that was

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 4>me also pushing back a little bit on the idea

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 4>that a grim diagnosis is somehow pessimism, right, uh huh, Like,

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 4>we know it's not great, we know it's not great.

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Along a lot of axis tech is not the only

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 4>one we know things aren't working. But the most dangerous,

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 4>and frankly, the most pessimistic place to be is pushing

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 4>that aside, disavowing that, diluting that analysis in service of

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 4>immediate comfort.

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Stoping to bother to critique because you think there's no point. Essentially,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the ultimes.

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would say that's almost nihilism. I would say

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 4>the pessimism is where we paint a rosy picture so

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 4>we don't have to feel uncomfortable and then base our

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 4>strategy on that rosy picture in a way that is

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 4>wholly insufficient to actually tackle the problem, because we never

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:17.760
<v Speaker 4>scope the problem, because we were unwilling to carry the

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 4>intellectual emotional responsibility of recognizing what we're actually up against.

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think the most optimistic thing we can be

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 4>doing right now is really understanding where we stand, really

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 4>understanding what is the tech industry, how does it function,

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 4>how does money move? And okay, what are the alternatives

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 4>that exist, how do we support them, and how do

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 4>we recognize the power that we have to shift things right?

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 4>But that has to be based on a realistic picture.

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 4>It can't be based on delusion.

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>And part of that, as you know firsthand, coming back

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to the beginning of the conversation, is acting as a collective.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I think no one person is going to do

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 4>this alone ever ever has ever you know, one person

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 4>may have taken credit at some point or another, but ultimately,

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 4>like the Internet was a collective effort, the open source

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 4>Library is you know, every single big tech company that

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 4>has one CEO, it has millions and millions of contributors.

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 4>And so we change this together. The issue is will

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 4>and the issue is resources. The issue is not ideas right.

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 4>We're not waiting for one genius to figure it out.

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 4>We're waiting for a clear map and some space to

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 4>examine it together and share insights and then figure out

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 4>how to push forward to a world where it's you know,

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 4>thousands of interesting projects that are all thinking together about

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 4>creating much better tech and reshaping the industry and its

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:57.879
<v Speaker 4>incentives in order to nurture that.

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Us.

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 2>First of all, Meredith said about fifteen things that I

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 2>would put on a small office couch pillow if I

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 2>knew how to needle point.

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, start with the thing you would love most to

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>put on a needle point.

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 2>A grim diagnosis is not an invitation to pessimism.

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I love that too.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I just think that, especially right now, it's easy and

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 2>right to say that there's a lot to be wary of. Yeah,

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 2>but it also is not an invitation to be weary,

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 2>ad infinitum.

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>No. No, I totally agree with you. I mean, I

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think often if you're critical, you'll called out for being pessimistic.

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>But I thought the way that Meredith reframed that and

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>was basically no, no hold on a second it's optimistic

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to be critical was really fascinating.

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think my favorite line in the whole interview,

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and maybe one of my just favorite lines I've heard

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 2>in reporting on technology ever, is that data is a

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 2>rough proxy for complex reality.

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like you're going to need two pillows or just a.

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Very big one. I actually want to talk about something

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 2>that we've talked about in our production meetings for this

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 2>show is that we don't want this show to be

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 2>all doom and gloom. And you know, when I found

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 2>out that you were interviewing Meredith, I was interested to

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 2>see what she would say outside of a sort of

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 2>technopessimist viewpoint, given that she has been quite critical of

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Google and also of surveillance capitalism. And yet when you

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 2>hear her talk about Signal, I was sort of optimistic

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 2>in terms of, oh, here's a tool that we actually

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 2>have been encouraged by the FBI to use, yes, yet

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 2>still don't use. But here's a tool that is actually

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 2>answering a real fear that a lot of people have

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 2>that Meredith has, of privacy and doing some actionable stuff

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to make us feel more secure.

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, Meredith, ultimately the buck stops with her at signal,

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 1>and like, if you're a product lead or if you're

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>running a company whose main thing is a product, you

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>sure as hell better be optimistic because you're not going

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to get through your day.

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 3>That's right, that's right.

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But but I agree with you. The thing that's really

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>stuck with me was this concept of technology being dual use.

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And Meredith, you know, used this phrase signature strike, which

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it turns out can apply both to serving you with

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 1>an AD to make you want to buy something and

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>using your metadata to make a calculation that you're most

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>probably an enemy combatant or a terrorist and kill you.

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the idea that it's the same

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>basically set of analysis that can apply to shopping or

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>life and death. I don't know, I just I have

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>no sort thinking about that.

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 2>What certainly makes me want to protect that data set

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 2>that's it protects uff today. This episode was produced by

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Victoria Dominguez, Lizzie Jacobs, and Eliza Dennis. It was executive

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 2>produced by me care Price, Oswalashan and Kate Osborne for

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Kaleidoscope and Katrina Norvel for iHeart Podcasts. Our Engineer is

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Bihit Frasier. Al Murdoch wrote our theme song.

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Join us on Friday for tech Stuff's the Weekend tech

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll run through our favorite headlines, talk with our friends

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>at four or four media, and try to tackle a question,

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>when did this become a thing. Please rate and review

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and reach out to us at tech stuff podcast at

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>gmail dot com with your thoughts and feedback. Thank you,