WEBVTT - Oracle to Recreate TikTok’s Algorithm in the US

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast, with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>The US government will not take a stake in TikTok,

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 3>but a deal with US investors is close, with Oracle

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 3>powering the tech as the cloud computing company shuffles its CEOs,

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 3>plus T.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Mobile announcers and changing its leadership too. We sit down

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 4>with the CEO, Mike Siebert and his successor, sereny Go Polan,

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 4>and the.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration plans to raise the H one B application

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 3>fee to one hundred thousand dollars. We'll discuss the implications

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 3>for workers in the tech industry, but for.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Now, we look at the broader market said, and we

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 4>turn a tide. We actually push back into the greens,

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 4>a new record high for announced that one hundred and

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty seventh record hi for the S and P five hundred.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Even though we started today in the red, so sentiment

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 4>whipsawing little as we look ahead to federal reserves speak

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 4>this week, inflation data as well, but the sentiment is

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 4>sourd and crypto We're going to get into that a

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 4>little bit more in the show progresses.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 5>We're down two percent on Bitcoin, even more on e

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 5>What are you looking at?

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm going to Oracle as our big mover and

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 3>our top story being TikTok.

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>We're up three percent in the session, but.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 3>As you can see over the course of last week

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>and this morning session, a lot of movement in Oracle

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 3>that's pushed towards record highs. We now have a better

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 3>understanding from the White House on the proposed technology structure

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 3>for a TikTok deal in the US and the investors

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 3>behind it, and it is Oracle at the harder that.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 3>We also learned this morning that Oracle is going to

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 3>have two new co CEOs and then just a little

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 3>bit of carrow. We're going to get more details on that.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with TikTok. More details are coming out on

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the deal taking shape to sell TikTok to a consortium

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>of American investors. US officials say they're confident China has

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 3>approved the deal, under which Oracle would recreate and then

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>provide security for a new US version of TikTok's algorithm.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloombers.

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Kat Wagner who covers TikTok for US joints. The more

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 3>there have been a lot of headlines this morning. What

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 3>do we need to know about the status of TikTok

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>in the United States?

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think you pointed out the algorithm has been

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 6>a key sort of sticking point in this entire process

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 6>because under US law, byte Dance, the owner of TikTok,

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 6>is not allowed to have any say in the algorithm

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 6>or the technology of this new US version, and Chinese

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 6>law says you can't export this valuable technology. So it

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 6>seems that they figured out some type of workaround where Oracle,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 6>as you mentioned, in this group of US investors will

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 6>license the algorithm from Byteedance for a short time while

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 6>they essentially recreate it and make it a brand new version,

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 6>a brand new algorithm that's US trained, in US controlled,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 6>and then that will be what powers this new US

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 6>version of TikTok. But again, this is all sort of

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 6>a very unique, one of a kind deal, and so

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 6>so while the framework has been announced, we are still

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 6>waiting on formal approvals of this deal from leaders in Beijing.

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and President Trump saying that she has approved the

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 4>TikTok deal. They just have to get it signed, Kirt,

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 4>There's still so many more questions. Indeed, who are the

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 4>US participants, Who are the people who are going to

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 4>control There are new names being thrown in the ring

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>by the President of the course of the weekend.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.839
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so we know about Oracle of course, as being

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 6>sort of the most notable name in this consortium. Silver

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 6>Lake Partners was another that was I believe unveiled today.

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 6>We had previously reported that andreesent Horowitz, the venture capital firm,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 6>we have reported at Bloomberg that they are going to

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 6>be involved, But it sounds like it might still be

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 6>sort of taking shape a little bit here. And you know, Carolina,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 6>as we mentioned this, just because the President says, hey,

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 6>we have a deal and it will be signed. This

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 6>has been such a contentious issue, contentious deal over many

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 6>many years at this point that I think until everyone

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 6>truly signs on the dotted line, we have to assume

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 6>this is still being sort of negotiated and worked out

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 6>in real time. So it seems we're the closest we've

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 6>ever been. But again, until that deal is formally formally signed,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 6>I think we have to assume things are still moving

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 6>a little bit.

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Bluemos, Kat Wagner, we thank you for the latest. Let's

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 4>stick with one of the key players in the TikTok story,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 4>and it's Oracle, because the company has also just announced

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 4>that its promoted Claim mcgork Mike Cecilia to the roles

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 4>of co CEOs, replacing Saffrakatz, who has led the company

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 4>since twenty fourteen and moves onto a board role. Let's

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 4>bring in Bloomberg's Brody Ford, who covers Oracle, and it

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 4>is a big change at the top.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 2>It is right.

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 7>Saffra Katz has been one of the faces of Oracle

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 7>for about a decade now, and folks familiar with Oracle's

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 7>cloud business, which has become so important. Well, no, Claim

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 7>mcgor k has led that unit for a while. The

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 7>fact that he is being elevated in this way maybe

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 7>isn't a shocker. The timing is they were both promoted

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 7>Clay and Mike to president in June. Now all of

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 7>a sudden they're becoming CEOs and so it's been a

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 7>busy couple of months at Oracle.

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>If you speak to anyone that's involved in this massive

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>AI infrastructure build out right now, Clay's name comes up

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 3>quite a lot. I was interested in reading your story

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 3>that they are co CEOs, but the comp is different

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>between the two of them.

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Can you just explain that a bit, Bradie, Right.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 7>They're co CEOs, they have the same title, but one

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 7>of them is going to make one hundred and fifty

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 7>million more in stock awards, and so that doesn't exactly

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 7>sound equal to me.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 7>What we know about Oracle right now is that the

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 7>cloud infrastructure business is set to become their largest business

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 7>by an incredible margin, and so the person who leads

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 7>that unit is about to make significantly more money. Folks

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 7>inside the company describe the dynamic to me as Clay

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 7>is a kind of run through a brick wall to

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 7>get something done engineering leader, whereas Mike Cecilia is more

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 7>of the adult in the room. Any Ways, it mirrors

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 7>a dynamic that Larry Ellison and Saffracats have had for years.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting that Clay has got a board level as well,

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 4>whereas and has for time, whereas perhaps Mike hasn't brody.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 4>It's notable that Suffracatz is still going to be there,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 4>and you also put the context in your story that

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 4>she wasn't always totally behind the pivot towards data center

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 4>is the pivot towards cloud offering.

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely. She was in the earlier days of cloud a

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 7>little skeptical, right. I mean, she came up in the

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 7>era where they were selling databases on prem for you know,

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 7>margins that are some of the highest you can get

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 7>on any product, and then comes data center infrastructure, where

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 7>you're making pretty low gross margins and putting up billions

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 7>at the forefront. She was a little anxious about this,

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 7>and so as Oracle makes that their main business, it's

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 7>not a shocker to me that we see a changing

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 7>of the guard.

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Brady, real quick.

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 3>You broke the story Friday that Oracles netted a deal

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>with Meta, and I think, as you put it on air,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 3>Larry Ellison can't stop winning, right.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, we all know that Oracle had this massive deal

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 7>with open Ai, and the worry was that are they

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 7>going to be a one trick pony? Are they going

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 7>to have really bad customer concentration. We broke on Friday

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 7>that they have another twenty billion deal with Meta seemingly

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 7>coming down the pipeline, and so it shows that Oracle

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 7>is seriously being taken as a provider of this kind

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 7>of AI infrastructure.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 4>And a quick note that I'm now saying Mike Cecilia

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 4>on the board as well as Clay, so both taking

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 4>exciting roles.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 5>We really appreciate it.

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Ed Yeah, management Mayhem Monday, a lot of fun coming up.

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>T Mobile announces a change in leadership as well with

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Mike see if it set to depart the CEO role.

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>We speak with Mike and the successor, Shrini Gopalan, that's

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 3>coming up next.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>You do not want to miss this conversation. This is

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>bloombag Tech.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 4>T Mobile has announced that Mike's SAE it is set

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 4>to transition away from as well as CEO well to

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 4>stem a newly created vice chair management position set to

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 4>take over as CEO November. The first is Strenie Goplan,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Tmobile's current COO, and please to say they welcome us

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 4>here in the studio both for Bloomberg's radio and TV audiences.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Might I start with you, why is now the right

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 4>time for you to hand over the reins in this way?

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 9>Because Serenie's ready. You know, T mobile does it differently.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 9>We believe in thoughtful succession. I recruited Sereni to the

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 9>COO position almost a year ago, and he has killed it,

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 9>and he has an incredibly inspiring vision for the future.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 10>And I also wanted to pick a moment when the company.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 9>Is firing on all cylinders, because I think you should

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 9>do succession amidst success. And so we picked our moment

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 9>because Serenie's ready. He's the person to lead us into

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 9>the future. And the company has put wind in his

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 9>sales so that the team can continue to deliver outsize

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 9>success going forward.

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>And SERENI, Okay, the vision, the exciting vision for the future.

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 4>How much is that about five or how much is

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 4>that about the the real expertise you have in a

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 4>more mature market having built that.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 5>With dewicha telecom.

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 11>Look, when I look back up my career over the

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 11>last thirty years, it feels like I've been preparing for

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 11>this day acause what I've done over the last thirty

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 11>years is really developed some real expertise at driving technology

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 11>driven transformation, whether that's digital data, AI, fiber and networks.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 11>And that's really what the next stage of growth at

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 11>T Mobile is going to be. It's going to be

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 11>about bringing together this incredible culture, brand, everything that Mike's built,

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 11>the great value we stand for together with amazing technology,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 11>making it easy for customers to do stuff, giving them

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 11>a great experience, and America's best network. So there are

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 11>no trade offs. You get all of that together at

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 11>the same time.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 3>At T Mobile, Shaney, I'll start with you if I may.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, in any life cycle of a company, there

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 3>comes a point where it's just more mature, right, there's

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 3>this corporate s curve, And so I think it's a

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 3>really sensible place to start by asking you what you're

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 3>going to do differently from Mike, given that the company

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 3>is in a different stage to what it was over

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the period that might let it look.

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 11>At T Mobile, we don't believe in kind of sitting

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 11>on our hands and kind of waiting to see how

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 11>the industry evolves. We define the industry. We define how

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 11>this goes forward. Mike and the team have already been

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 11>talking a lot about the transformation we want to drive

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 11>about bringing America's best network together with great value, not

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 11>just that taking the technology we have available today across AI,

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 11>across our digital footprint, and building the best experience for

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 11>T Mobile customers. So what you should expect is a

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 11>lot of continuation of changing the industry for the good

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 11>of the customer, and that means a continual transformation. So

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 11>this is not a business that likes sort of sitting

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 11>steady and kind of watching the dividends and growth come in.

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 11>We're there to change the life of our customers, to

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 11>change this industry for the better, and you should expect

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 11>to see a lot more of that.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Mike.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 3>When I was reading up on a shrine ahead of

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>our conversation at Apple a couple of weeks ago, I

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 3>didn't know that this was going to happen. But you know,

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of focuses on his time in Europe.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>How much was that a big factor for you, because

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 3>again it's a different market there in Europe to hear

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 3>in the United States.

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, what was a factor for me was just what

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 9>kind of an executive he is. Streeney is tenacious, he

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 9>is hard charging, he is competitive, he's customer loving, and

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 9>he attracts talent and he's got a vision for the

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 9>future of our company that's exciting. So I've known this

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 9>for years because we've been friends for a long time,

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 9>we've been co workers on the board of directors of

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 9>T Mobile. I've seen how he thinks, and so a

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 9>year ago I convinced him to give all that europe

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 9>stuff up and come to the US as our chief

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 9>operating officer, very much with this day in mind, because

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 9>I knew he was the right person to lead the

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 9>company into the future.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 4>You've been bold, For example, Mike, I think of you

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 4>being the first one to strike that deal with Starling,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 4>to think about director device satellite communication going forward.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Just how is that partnership given you a competitive edge?

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Are you seeing people come on board because of the

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 5>changes you made?

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 8>Well?

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 9>T Mobiles an innovator, you know, not just direct to sell.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 9>With Starlink, we created the home broadband five G category,

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 9>which millions of people benefit from nationwide. We continue, as

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 9>Srina was saying, to redefine what it means to compete

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 9>in this category and then watch while everybody follows. That's

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 9>why we're the world's most successful telecommunications company. So look

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 9>on the on the T satellite. I mean, it's just

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 9>been fantastic. Our dream when I announced that with Elon

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 9>back in twenty twenty two, was to end dead zones,

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 9>the end of dead zones, and today T Mobile customers

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 9>can connect to six hundred satellites, the only one that

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 9>connects your phone automatically if you fall off a terrestrial network,

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 9>but soony for.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Example, on first one or to do list might be

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 4>the boost mobile is going to have potential offering because

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 4>of the new spectrum that Elon Then's got with Starlink.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 4>How do you can consider the future evolution of direct

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 4>to consumer satellite.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 11>When we start off with this vision of putting an

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.719
<v Speaker 11>end to dead zones, right, that's what we were going for.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 11>We're delighted that Starlink has now acquired more spectrum makes

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 11>the service even better. Together, what we want to do

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 11>is live true to that mission of putting an end

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 11>to dead zones. As far as the competitive world is concerned,

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 11>we love competition. We love switching. I mean we've always

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 11>sweed as said this, the more jumpalls the better because

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 11>there's only one place that you can get the best network,

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 11>best value, and best experience. So we love competition. Anything

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 11>that stimulates even more switching is a good thing.

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Shiny.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 3>A lot of questions that we get from the audience director,

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 3>you are about fiber and so I would summarize T

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 3>mobile strategy today little tiny pieces of M and A.

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 3>How are you going to approach that going forward? You're

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 3>just going to build this out yourself.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 11>Look, when we approach a new business, right, we approach

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 11>it with a mix of conviction and humility. We're convinced

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 11>that our brand, the distribution we bring, what we stand for,

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 11>our culture of kind of smashing through customer pain points

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 11>and really attacking incumbents is equally applicable to fiber as

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 11>it was to fixed swiless. We're also humble enough to

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 11>realize that we don't have a set of capabilities like

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 11>local zoning and permitting, and we partner for that. And

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 11>that's the logic for the JVS. The vision for fiber

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 11>is not small. I think we've clearly showed our hand.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 11>We like being first to fiber, we like being a

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 11>pure play fiber player, and we will continue to scale

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 11>that business. On the acquisition questions, we'll see what's available.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 11>We'll take a hard nose look allocate capital well. But

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 11>we do like a pure play fiber business and we

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 11>think there's a lot of scale possible for that.

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 9>And ED just remember that we're the leading broadband growth

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 9>company in America even before the fiber pieces that you're

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 9>now asking about, because five G broadband has become a

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 9>phenomenon and overall, T Mobile has led broadband growth in

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 9>this company, in this country for thirteen quarters in a row.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 11>And in a SMA matter of a few years. We're

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 11>now three years, We're now the fifth largest is Spen

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 11>country from a standing star.

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Hey gents, you make a good double act, but we're

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 3>short on time. So Mike, I'm going to ask my

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 3>final question to you. You're still in the role till November,

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>first critical period of.

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>The year for handset sales.

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>What's the data telling you early about iPhone seventeen. What

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 3>is going to do for T Mobile the behaviors of

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 3>your existing in new customers.

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's only been three days, but we're killing it.

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 9>You know, last year we had an all time record

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 9>new iPhone introduction. This year we're beating that by double digits,

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 9>and not just in terms of activating phones for our customers,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 9>but in terms of switchers, switchers to T Mobile who

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 9>are coming at the moment that they get a new

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 9>iPhone also up double digits this this this weekend. And

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 9>so you know, we've had a great launch, and you know,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 9>a new phone is a great time for Americans to

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 9>ask themselves do they have the right provider switches.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 3>What was the call that Shriney made when we spoke

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>at Apple a couple of weeks ago, Mike Siebert, Tim

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Moo's outgoing CEO, Shriny Gopalan incoming.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Just terrific conversation. Thank you to you.

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Both stock markets push higher, but let's focus on crypto

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 4>because we're actually seeing a draw down significantly. We've seen

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 4>about one and a half billion dollars in bullish wages.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Those bullish bets have iniquidated on Monday, particularly across Eve,

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 4>we saw it falling the hardest, nearly half a billion

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 4>dollars worth of leverage a long positions. We understand pulled

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 4>out of that second largest token, But is this a

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 4>sign of just the changing of the guard. Are we

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 4>questioning some of those theories around digital asset treasuries in particular?

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 5>Now a we just taking some money off the table.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Edd Let's get more on the broader markets, particularly on tech.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Eric Bailey, wealth manager at Stewart Partners, and I find

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 3>what Caroline was outlining there really interesting because right now

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 3>you can either pick out that data set, you can

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 3>say that equity markets continue to push records or hold

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 3>at records. Do you have a summary of what the

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>sentiment in the market is right now.

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 12>Eric, Yeah, thanks having me. Clearly, the risk trade is on.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 12>Investors are taking risk and we've really seen this since

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 12>I would say late July where the growth indexes took

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 12>over value. Right we had that drop in April and

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 12>value was kind of leading the markets, and that's really

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 12>shifted and you've seen growth equity perform extremely well. And

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 12>that's day to day. It keeps going higher. So you

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 12>have the Russell one thousand growth indexes up I think

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 12>over seventeen percent right now. You're to date and of

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 12>late with the news and after earnings, growth is clearly

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 12>you know where investors want to be. They're comfortable taking

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 12>risk right now.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Apple is up four percent in this session and the

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 3>reason that that's notable is that it actually believe it

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 3>or not most of the way through September. Takes it

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 3>into positive territory for twenty twenty five. We talked a

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 3>lot in the middle of the year about the contribution

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 3>of the mag seven names to the market overall, but

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 3>as a moment, time to do that at this part

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 3>of the year.

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of it?

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's impressive, right, you mentioned Apple, I mean that

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 12>stock not long ago was really you know, investors were

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.239
<v Speaker 12>checked out, analysts were negative, people were questioning Apple what

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 12>they were doing. And now, as you said, it's positive

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 12>on the ear just an incredible move. And the MAG

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 12>seven even Tesla I name, that is still down for

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 12>the year, but it's had a very big move here

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 12>the last several weeks. And so the MAG seven is

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 12>clearly leading to markets right now. You're seeing that day after.

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 5>Day, Eric, Eric, should you stay committed to that?

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 13>Then?

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 4>Just the trend has been relentlessly high since April, but

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 4>the valuation story just gets harder and harder to swallow.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 12>I agree.

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 12>As a financial advisor and I have lots of positions

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 12>in these names, it is concerning because the valuations are

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 12>just so high, and you ask, can this momentum continue?

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 12>Our investors is going to continue to buy these names?

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 12>And yeah, I mean, you don't see any science that's

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 12>going to weaken. The trends are so powerfully on the upside.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 12>So I think you hold them. But clearly, you know,

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 12>new money going in, I would be cautious because these

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 12>valuations are so.

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 4>High, and so you perhaps diversify, you don't re up

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 4>your bets. If they've been winning of late, but his

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 4>earning is going to be the tell? Is it going

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 4>to be geopolitics that the tell what ultimately makes us

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 4>question how valuable some of these companies are.

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we'll see. I mean right now, our earnings after

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 12>the second quarters certainly are leading the these names, and

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 12>some of the big announcements right with Oracle, which you

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 12>guys have been talking about all day, clearly tremendous momentum

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.719
<v Speaker 12>with the announcements they've made in AI, and so I

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 12>do think it's earnings that's going to lead them higher.

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 12>As for investors, yeah, I think you got to you

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 12>hold your positions, but you look and see how overweight

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 12>or how how much you know, how large a position

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 12>do I have in these names? And they are you comfortable,

0:19:55.960 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 12>you know, having this bigger risk risk position in your portfolio.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 3>In the context of corporate earnings and tech. You know,

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the signal from certain names is that kind of soft

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 3>data set or hard data set even that the people

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 3>are looking for.

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm putting you on the.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Spot, but we get Micron in the next thirty six hours.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 3>You know, they might tell us something big picture about

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 3>the direction of travel for AI infrastructure is that still

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 3>like the watch item for a lot of desks.

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think the broader, the whole sector of semiconductors,

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 12>which Micron is in, overall us performed well. You have

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 12>seen certain names get hit, but overall the group I

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 12>track the SMAH index, it's done very well. And so yeah,

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 12>Micron is certainly going to be important. And I know

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 12>there was some positive analyst calls I want to say

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 12>today on Micron. So yeah, that's a big name and

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 12>that could shield the market to go higher if they

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 12>have a good result.

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, so we in the course of this conversation we've

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 3>said how remarkable this is, the timing of it, the

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 3>sentiment in the market. Give us the Eric Bailey prediction

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 3>for what happens in the balance of twenty twenty five.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 12>You know, I've been calling for a little bit of

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 12>a pullback and I've been wrong. I expected that at

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 12>the at these valuations we would see some of some

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 12>kind of correction, you know, since that April drop, we

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 12>have just been on a chair. So I do expect

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 12>the markets to get a bumpier, but I don't see

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 12>it being a long term trend. I think any correction,

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 12>buyers will step in and we're going to continue on

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 12>this run. It's going to take a lot to get

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 12>this market to get negative.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 4>I think Bailey from Stuart Partners, appreciate your time today

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 4>and the push forward.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 3>We're thinking very much about the news story on one

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand dollars H one V application fees and in

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the market, I'm looking at Infosis. These are the US

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 3>listed shares of Infos, the Indian technology company. Up modestly

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 3>in this Monday session, but a big drop Friday when

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg first reported that one hundred thousand dollars figure. There's

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of emphasis on the IT and outsourcing names

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 3>out there. There was big downward pressure in Indian listed

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 3>technology names overnight. There's also a big scramble for American

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 3>technology companies to understand how this impacts their ability to

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 3>hire and what it means for existing H one B

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 3>visa holders. For more on the state of H one

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 3>B visas and immigration in the US, he banner ericson

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Immigration Group Partner joins us now. The confusion was when

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 3>this first was confirmed Friday, there wasn't clarity on whether

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 3>it applied to new applicants H one B or existing

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 3>as well. Then over the weekend, the White House clarified

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 3>that it was just new applicants.

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 2>But can we just.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Start by you reflecting on your weekend, the discussions you've

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 3>had with clients in the technology sector, how you've managed

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 3>this process.

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 14>Certainly so you're absolutely right. Initially there was not clarification

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 14>as to whether or not the one hundred thousand dollars

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 14>fee would apply to existing H ONEB visa holders or

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 14>new applicants. There was also confusion about whether or not

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 14>this was a one time fee versus a continuous annual fee,

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 14>And what essentially happened for the first twenty four hours

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 14>following the proclamation was pretty close to chaos. We had

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 14>several clients who are very well known tech companies who

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 14>either contacted H one B employees who happened to be

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 14>outside of the United States at the time the proclamation

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 14>came out, asking them to try their best to come

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 14>back before the one hundred thousand dollars fee took effect.

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 14>And then also we had a lot of companies, not

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 14>just the companies that we work with, but very well

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 14>known companies in the market tell their employees to wait

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.120
<v Speaker 14>before engaging in any international travel until we know more.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 14>There was also instances of international flights that were getting

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 14>ready to take off where several passengers requested to deplane

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 14>specifically because they wanted to avoid their companies being charged

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 14>one hundred thousand dollars fee if they attempted to re

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 14>enter after international trip. So, like I said, the first

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 14>twenty four hours were extremely confusing, and we did the

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 14>best that we could to provide the guidance to that

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 14>the companies need in order to communicate to their employees

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 14>with what very little we knew.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 3>HEBA one hundred thousand dollars is the fee from this

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 3>point on? What is the strategy for America's biggest technology

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 3>companies and also smaller startups? Do you think that it's

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a manageable fee and what is the kind of process

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 3>from here? Do they just slow down hiring in the

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 3>H one B category?

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 14>One hundred thousand dollars fee for an H ONEB visa

0:24:55.400 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 14>petition is not manageable at all for startups, for small businesses,

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 14>even for mid sized businesses. I think that this is

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 14>going to make it extremely difficult, if not nearly impossible,

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 14>for startups, small businesses or mid sized businesses to hire

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 14>the talent that they need in order to be able

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 14>to compete on a global scale. For larger tech companies

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 14>that have more resources, I think that the ability to

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 14>manage a fee of this amount is not going to

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 14>be as difficult as it is for startups. But I

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 14>want everyone to remember that a lot of these extremely

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 14>successful international companies were once themselves startups, and so any

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 14>policy that makes it harder for American startups or small

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 14>businesses to innovate is going to impact our competitiveness down

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 14>the line.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 4>What's been extraordinary for many has been just seeing where

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 4>the outsize impact has had who it's had upon, and

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 4>in particular, it's people coming from India, it's people coming

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 4>from China.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Heber.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 4>The argument coming from the administration is that H one

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 4>B visa process wasn't being used as it should be.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Have you let any evidence of that?

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 14>I have no evidence of that. I think that there

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 14>are quite a few checks and balances built into the

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 14>H and B process as it stands today, and that's

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 14>actually inclusive of several levels of scrutiny as well as

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 14>extensive background checks, and there is prima facia evidence basically,

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 14>in other words, preliminary evidence that has to be submitted

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 14>along with the initial application for an H one B

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 14>visa in order for that application to be successful in

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 14>the first place. And so I haven't seen any evidence

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 14>of misuse. I think that it's a really critical tool

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 14>for our companies, both tech and in various other industries

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 14>in order for them to stay competitive. I also think

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 14>it's important to point out that people normally associate the

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 14>H one B visa with tech companies, which is very true,

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 14>but there's a variety of different industries that rely on

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 14>the H one B visa, including research institutions, universities, and healthcare.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 14>And so this has the potential to really impact a

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 14>lot of different American institutions, assuming that this goes forward

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 14>and is not paused by litigation.

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, we did see that there was an update coming

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 4>from the Administration that potentially doctors would have a carve

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 4>out from one hundred thousand.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 5>Dollars in terms of a fee hibber.

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 4>But let's go back to California, the state that's most

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 4>impacted according to our data, and indeed Texas, New York,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 4>New Jersey the companies that are based there, and then

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 4>we look at the as you say, the industries, professors, scientists,

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 4>technology services, manufacturing, information. These companies, what do they do.

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Do they hire outside of the US to be able

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 4>to make up for the talent shortfall while the training

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 4>goes on in the US, or is there any idea

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 4>that there is enough talent here to satisfy the needs.

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 14>That's one of the concerns resulting from this fee. The

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 14>concern is that a lot of companies would choose to

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 14>either pause hiring, in particular international hiring, but also may

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 14>choose to shift their operations abroad, and that is going

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 14>to have downstream effects for the company as well as

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 14>US workers that work for the company. So that's one

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 14>of the concerns. The other concern, as you mentioned, is

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 14>that there's a variety of different companies that rely on

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 14>the H one B visa, and so there is language

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 14>in the proclamation that cars out exceptions for an individual

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 14>who the government deems is in the national interest of

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 14>the US. However, what we still need to understand is

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 14>the way in which these arguments requesting a national interest

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 14>exception are actually going to be treated and adjudicated. As

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 14>it stands now, the evidentiary standards for successfully making that

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 14>argument are actually quite high. So I don't think that

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 14>the language that cars out an exception is going to

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 14>help any of the concerns that the industry has.

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Heber Bloomberg's reported at length that the expectation is immediate

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 3>legal challenges to this executive order, and they note in

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 3>that reporting that Congress has traditionally set in a legislative

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 3>or qualified way fees and other associated costs. Could you

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>just explain where you stand today, where the precedent is

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to challenge this and any action that you might take

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 3>on behalf of clients to challenge it.

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 14>I think that anybody who's getting ready to make a

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 14>legal challenge to this is going to incorporate a few

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 14>key grounds in their argument. One is that it is

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 14>the responsibility of Congress to make immigration laws set immigration fees. Also,

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 14>the President is basing this proclamation on a law that

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 14>does grant the President brought authority in terms of restricting

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 14>entry of foreign nationals into the United States if there

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 14>is a national security concern or if that individual's entry

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 14>to the US is somehow detrimental to the US.

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 10>However, there has to be.

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 14>Some substantive factual evidence in support of that, which I

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 14>would imagine folks who seek to challenge this proclamation will argue.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Does not exist.

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 14>And so those are the grounds that I'm going to

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 14>be watching out for in terms of the upcoming legal challenges.

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 14>One thing that I do want to note, however, is

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 14>that the recent Supreme Court decision and Trump versus Cossa,

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 14>made it very difficult for a single federal judge to

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 14>issue a nationwide injunction pausing some sort of presidential action

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 14>from taking effect. And so one thing I know that

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 14>I'm going to be watching out for is basically whether

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 14>or not somebody chooses to file a class action lawsuit,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 14>how broad that class is defined, and whether or not

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 14>a federal judge certifies it.

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Hey Manver, incredibly busy. We really thank you for your

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 4>time today. Ericson Immigration Group Now interesting me. Our CEO

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Kathy Wood weighed in on the issue of H one

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 4>B visas and the fees, saying the changes are part

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 4>of a negotiating process, actually predicts that it will actually

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 4>end up being loosened. Just take a listen to what

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 4>you said the TV earlier.

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 13>This is part of President Trump's negotiating process, and I

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 13>think he's negotiating quite intensively. Right now with India. I

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 13>think India would be have the biggest impact here in

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 13>terms of, you know, workers in the United States.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 10>So I think this is a little.

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 13>Bit like tariffs, and it's going to capture all the

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 13>headlines and it's going to really take the oxygen out

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 13>of the room because there's a lot of really good

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 13>fundamental activity happening in the United States relating.

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 15>To policy, well, a lot of that, a lot of

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 15>the innovation, a lot of that Silicon Valley kind of

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 15>goodness really comes from the talent and the labor pool.

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 15>We've been talking about this for quite some time in

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 15>terms of how do you train your engineers. You train

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 15>Americans to do a lot of what Silicon Valley depends

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 15>on foreign workers to do. Does this impact innovation in

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 15>Silicon Valley and doesn't impact megacap stocks tech companies that

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 15>are dependent on this.

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 13>Well, from what we know of this administration, they ultimately

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 13>want to keep students who have been educated in the

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 13>US foreign students that have been educated in the US

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 13>in the US.

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 2>So really do us.

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 13>Think this is part of the negotiation with India and

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 13>UH and that when all is said and done, we're

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 13>probably going to loosen up the H one visa visa program.

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 15>But in the short term, is that going to have

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 15>an impact on tech companies.

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 13>I think what it's going to do is force tech

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 13>companies to do what they're already doing and that has

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 13>become more efficient. And the other thing to note is, uh,

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 13>you know, coding is changing dramatically. The number of coding

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 13>jobs and openings has dropped dramatically. Because of AI, all

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 13>of us can become coders. This is natural language programming.

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 13>Generative AI is prompting chat GBT to get your programs going.

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 13>We can all do that. That's simplifying it. But I

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 13>do think it gives you a sense of the kind

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 13>of productivity that possibilities that are possible, that that will

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 13>impact these tech companies longer term.

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Posy Cappy with their with Bloomberg's Kritty Gupta. Okay, coming up,

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 3>the maker of the Aura ring is set to become

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.959
<v Speaker 3>a eleven billion dollar company with a new Series E

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 3>financing round. We're going to speak to the CEO about

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 3>how the company plans to use that new funding and

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot more that's next.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Aura, the maker of the popular Aura health and fitness

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Ring is closing in on a roughly eleven billion dollar valuation,

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 3>doubling its valuation from last November. That's according to Bloomberg Reporting.

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Citing Bloomberg sources, the company is saying it's sold over

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 3>five and a half million fitness rings in total and

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 3>is on track to double its revenue this year. Or

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 3>A CEO, Tom Hale, joins us here in San Francisco.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's get this out the way. Bloomberg's reported a large

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 3>round eleven billion dollar valuation, a big raise.

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Any comment please.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 16>Well, you know you read the same reports that I do.

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 16>Congratulations on getting a school, but no, I don't have

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 16>any comments on rumors as of yet. But interesting to

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 16>see that that that news is starting to trickle.

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Out and you appreciate why we have to ask. The

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 3>main point is that Aura has some momentum, so you

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 3>actually have shared some not just financial metrics, but operational metrics, right,

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.479
<v Speaker 3>I would call it the installed base of customers has grown.

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Just explain what that data signals to you, Tom, Yeah.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 16>Well, we have shipped five point five million rings in

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 16>the history of the company, but half of those have

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 16>come in the last twelve months. So as we've doubled

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 16>our business. We've doubled the number of people have rings

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 16>just in the last twelve months alone, and we think

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 16>actually that's showing up in our revenue. Obviously, five hundred

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 16>million last year was what we reported. I think this

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 16>year we're going to do a billion dollars in revenue.

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 16>And if we think in twenty twenty six, we're probably

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 16>going to sell our ten millionth ring.

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Tom Between Ed and I, we try to divide and

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 4>conquer and all the wearables and use them. And I'm

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 4>the orering user in the house, So full disclosure. And look,

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 4>we have seen real iterations and changes to the way

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 4>in which some of the data is helping the AI

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 4>agents is something that I'm really noticing the glue host

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 4>monitoring as well. How are you evolving to insually you

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 4>get a bigger demographic.

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 16>Well, you know, one of our core demographics is women,

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 16>and we've been expanding the value that we deliver for women.

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 16>I mean this last year we introduce pregnancy insights, menopause features,

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 16>and we've been continually to push on this idea of

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 16>the fertile window, which is helping women or couples conceive.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 16>So that's one way, but as you think about the

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 16>areas of expansion for us, you know, we think about

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 16>metabolic because the one thing that you do more often

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 16>than sleep that affects your health is eat, and so

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 16>if we can help you build healthy habits around eating,

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 16>that's hugely powerful.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 10>In addition, we're continue to expand in fitness.

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 16>We're looking very much at the ways that sleep and

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 16>can be played to interact with other parts of your

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 16>help to give you a holistic picture of your health.

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 16>And then this fall, of course a very exciting time

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 16>of year. Lots of exciting new things will be coming

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 16>down the pipe.

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 4>What's been so interesting is also who you've been selling to,

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 4>whether it's corporates or also institutions I'm thinking of the

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 4>US military or as large as business custom We understand

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 4>tens of thousands of serve as members using the rings.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 4>You're doing fatigue tracking and doing research. But you also

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 4>got sort of caught in a pr firestorm, shall I say,

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 4>is suddenly there was a lot of well people would say, misinformation,

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.399
<v Speaker 4>fate news around how you've had to integrate with impalenteersone

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 4>use of.

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 5>Fed start and what did you learn from that experience?

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Tom?

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 5>You had to get on TikTok yourself.

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, yes, I think the truth is is that when

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 16>your customers are upset, you absolutely need to listen to them.

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 16>So we take the concerns that were raised incredibly seriously.

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 16>Privacy is a third rail, especially for women, and so

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.280
<v Speaker 16>we took that incredibly seriously. I took to TikTok myself

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 16>to address our customers directly. But let me address the misinformation. Basically,

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 16>there is no scenario under which the consumer system and

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 16>the consumer data would be shared with anyone at Palenteer

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 16>or anyone in the government.

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 10>So that's just not a thing. They are two separate systems.

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 16>And of course the most important thing is that privacy

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 16>is like the most important thing that we do. We're

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 16>focused on your health, and so delivering your health means

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 16>protecting the precious and private information that's so sensitive, and

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 16>so that's just a core thing. It's a commitment. We

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 16>will never never sell your data and we will never

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 16>share your data without your consent. If you want to

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 16>share your data to be part of a scientific study,

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 16>we will absolutely enable that, and we'll give you the

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 16>tools and the power to control it.

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 3>So we've done so much on this program this year

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 3>on the electronics supply chain, you know, even on the

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 3>innovation side, miniaturization of electronics. But I think it's fair

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 3>to ask you how you're exposed to supply chain outside

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 3>of the United States, anything you've done to respond to

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 3>the policies of this administration in that respect.

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 16>You know, President Trump said he was going to raise

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 16>the tariff, so we took him at his word. We

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 16>were well prepared and we manage that quite effectively. We

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 16>don't manufacture in China. In fact, we opened up a

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 16>factory in the US in Mexico to help us manufacture

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 16>and meet that demand, and that turned out to be

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 16>a very foresightful decision. We also manufacture in Eastern Europe,

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 16>and now we'll be opening up a factory in the

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 16>United States in Fort Worth, and that actually will be

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 16>there to service our customers who are in the military.

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 10>There'll be special security.

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 16>And very stringent standards around the data that goes onto

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 16>the ring itself. So it's actually quite an exciting time

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 16>for us from a manufacturing standpoint because we've avoided most

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 16>of the fracasts around tak TARFFS.

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 3>And I have to ask you about some of the

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 3>news of the day in talent.

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 2>H one BBS is what we've discussed.

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 3>But with that footprint in the US you're building, what's

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 3>that look like for you in hiring competitively on engineering

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 3>in particular.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we are investing hugely in the United States.

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 16>In fact, we have about one thousand employees at AURA

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 16>now and over sixty percent of them are actually in

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 16>the US, so we have we're less exposed to that

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 16>kind of H one B risk. And since many of

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 16>our technical talent comes from Finland as well, but they

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 16>reside in Finland, it's less of a concern. That being said,

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 16>I think it's really important maybe for the entire tech

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 16>industry to really look at this and make sure that

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 16>we're solving this problem. I kind of subscribe to Kathy's point.

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 16>I actually think I think we're going to see something

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 16>where this is really a negotiating standard.

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure it's going.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.959
<v Speaker 4>To hold fascinating or a CEO Tom Hale come back soon.

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:03.399
<v Speaker 4>We appreciate it's time now for talking tech and first up.

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Morgan Stanley upgraded ASML to an overweight rating, joining the

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 4>likes of EBS and Research.

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 5>And Bullish on the stock, so shares of the company.

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.439
<v Speaker 4>Have rallied thirty three percent from a September the second

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 4>low and the recent surge has propelled ASML to become

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 4>the biggest listed company in Europe evaluation of three hundred

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 4>seventy nine billion dollars plus shares of Samsung. They also

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 4>jumped after reports say it has one approval from Nvidia

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 4>for the use of its advanced memory chips.

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:28.479
<v Speaker 5>Now the breakthrough by.

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 4>The Korean tech giant clears components for use in AI

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 4>accelerators that are essential to training AI models and would

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 4>allow Samsung to compete with Skhinex and Ali Baba is

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 4>hoping to lure established brands away from Amazon to its

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 4>own Ali Express e commerce site. Now calling to sources,

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Ali Express is rolling out a new initiative to boost

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 4>customers and sales, promising lowing Shivig fees and offering to

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 4>take a lower cut of sales than Amazon.

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Ed Yeah, stick with Amazon.

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Amazon and three executive face off in court today against

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the Federal Trade Commission Regulator alleges Amazon makes it easy

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to enroll in its prime service and unduly difficult to

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 3>cancel in violation of customer protection laws. Let's get to

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Amazon reporter Spenser Sofa, You and I have discussed

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 3>this issue over the last few years. What do we

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 3>need to know about this case and the arguments Amazon's

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 3>going to try and make to defeat it.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, Amazon's looking at potentially finds well into the billions

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 8>of dollars around this, so it has to take this seriously.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 8>You're looking at fines of fifty three thousand dollars per violation,

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, over tens of millions of Prime subscribers, so

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 8>it's a rather big deal. The Federal Trade Commission is

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 8>arguing that Amazon's just made it complicated and deliberately difficult

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 8>for people to cancel Prime if they don't want it,

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 8>And now the Amazon is trying to argue, well, you know,

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 8>there's all kinds of ways that people can cancel and

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 8>all kinds of different flows, and they're really trying to

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 8>make it look like there's a very large number of

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 8>ways people can cancel to try to minimize its exposure

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 8>to this, to any potential any potential violations. Jury selection

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 8>is supposed to start today, Trials expected to drag into October,

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 8>and you know, it is kind of a test case

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 8>around subscriptions and how easy it is to sign up

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:31.879
<v Speaker 8>for things on your phone when you're on the move,

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 8>and how hard it is to cancel Spenser.

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 4>Briefly, the FTC is also looking at such advertising practices

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 4>of Amazon. More broadly, they are in the eye of

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 4>the storm when it comes to regulators a bit.

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's it's an interesting phenomenon because a lot of

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 8>this stuff is kind of holdover from the previous administration,

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 8>and there's been a lot of questions about how Trump's

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 8>FTC will will carry on some of these things. But

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 8>Amazons still feel on the heat, still looking at fresh

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:04.240
<v Speaker 8>allegations on the advertising front and how it sets pricing

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 8>on these on these automated auctions around search advertising that

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 8>you see on the site. And now there's also the

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 8>consumer protection claim, so they're not out of the woods yet,

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 8>even though the administration.

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Has changed Meg'spenser Sofa, setting us straight ahead of that

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 4>unfolding litigation that does it. In this edition of Bloomberg

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Tech though, and we've got to check out the podcast.

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a big way to start that. We check out

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the pod.

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 3>You know where to find it on all the Bloomberg

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 3>platforms and online, Apple, Spotify and iHeart Buckle up.

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 2>So only Monday. This is Bloomberg Tech