Speaker 1: Stay right here for our final news round up and
Speaker 1: Information Overload.
Speaker 2: All Right, News round Up, Information Overload, Our eight hundred
Speaker 2: and ninety four one sean our number if you want
Speaker 2: to be a part of the program, And in a
Speaker 2: second we'll check in with I think the best media
Speaker 2: analyst in the entire country today, and that's our friend
Speaker 2: Joe Conca. First, I want to go to Kevin O'Leary.
Speaker 2: Kevin O'Leary actually did something that very few people in
Speaker 2: the media seem able to do, and that's ask some
Speaker 2: tough questions about Kamala Harris her economic plan. My first
Speaker 2: question is, well, if you're going to fight inflation on
Speaker 2: day one, what have you been doing in the last
Speaker 2: nearly four years? Because her first day what happened to
Speaker 2: be January twentieth, twenty twenty one, It's not January twentieth,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five. The second is, you know, how do
Speaker 2: you explain what would be the largest tax increase in
Speaker 2: the history of the entire world and our country alone.
Speaker 2: How do you explain raising the corporate tax which will
Speaker 2: be passed on to consumers, small business taxes, doubling the
Speaker 2: capital gains tax, taxing unrealized capital gains. Good luck figuring
Speaker 2: that one out, and what it would do to the economy.
Speaker 2: I think it would destroy the economy. And if we
Speaker 2: ever add her renewed deal that she co sponsored in
Speaker 2: the US Senate, which would and she used or eliminate
Speaker 2: the filibuster to pass it, that would be the end
Speaker 2: of capitalism. I say, as we know it, here's Kevin O'Leary.
Speaker 3: And querying about this idea of taxing unrealized capital gains,
Speaker 3: which would basically destroy the economy and change the way
Speaker 3: every investor would invest in chase capital out of the country.
Speaker 2: I've been told this, and don't worry about it.
Speaker 3: Just be happy. There's no way Congress would ever pass that.
Speaker 2: She has to keep.
Speaker 3: Saying that to keep her base happy, to bring people
Speaker 3: out to vote for her.
Speaker 2: But that's not going to happen.
Speaker 3: Don't worry about it, these policymakers that are giving me this,
Speaker 3: Just be happy. Well, maybe I'm going to have to
Speaker 3: get happy, but right now I'm not happy. And I
Speaker 3: really really want some policy. I really do, and I
Speaker 3: think the rest of the market does too, and that
Speaker 3: that comic gives.
Speaker 2: You some idea.
Speaker 3: But how much angst there is out there.
Speaker 2: If they're saying to Kevin O'Leary, though it's not going
Speaker 2: to happen anyway, then why has she stated very publicly
Speaker 2: and loudly that these are the positions that she holds.
Speaker 2: You know, the only thing we've got a little bit
Speaker 2: of information on is her economic policy. And then every
Speaker 2: time she gives a new detail, like for example, when
Speaker 2: she talked about price gauging and went on to explain
Speaker 2: price controls, everybody criticized it. They come back and they say,
Speaker 2: throw a spokesperson. No, never mind, she never really meant that.
Speaker 2: But the biggest I think contributor to the the Harris
Speaker 2: Walls campaign that would come from the mob, the mob
Speaker 2: and the media. And you know the greatest example of
Speaker 2: this David sach saying the media is spreading disinformation on
Speaker 2: a scale that dwarfs whatever Russia would hope to ever
Speaker 2: accomplish in terms of influence of our election. And I
Speaker 2: agree with this statement. They are the biggest contributors to
Speaker 2: the Harris Walls campaign and nothing but an extension of
Speaker 2: the Harris Walls press office.
Speaker 4: Listen, you bring up you bring up these you know,
Speaker 4: these stories about Russian influence or whatever. The real influence
Speaker 4: operation in this country is by the mainstream media. They're
Speaker 4: the ones who are spreading disinformation about the war in
Speaker 4: Ukraine and so many other issues on a scale that
Speaker 4: dwarfs what any of these like handful of podcasters that
Speaker 4: most people have never heard of, can ever hope to accomplish.
Speaker 2: We have the Kamala files, the Walls files, both of
Speaker 2: them in their own words, with the most radical positions
Speaker 2: ever taken by anybody to run for this high office
Speaker 2: in the history of this country. Nobody in the media
Speaker 2: ever talks about them. You know, in the one debate,
Speaker 2: only one candidate is fact checked. And you know, forget
Speaker 2: the real disasters that is Springfield, Ohio, Aurora, Colorado. You
Speaker 2: should either front cover of the New York Post today
Speaker 2: about a Venezuelan gang taking over the entire city of
Speaker 2: New York, and that's happening in other towns and cities
Speaker 2: also across the country. You know, don't mention the names
Speaker 2: of Americans that have been murdered and raped and victims
Speaker 2: of violent crime by unvetted Harris Biden illegals, over eleven
Speaker 2: and a half million that we know about. Never talk
Speaker 2: about the high costs associated with the illegal immigration. Forget
Speaker 2: about the people that they have allowed into this country
Speaker 2: would terroritize. Forget about their promise of amnesty, free sex
Speaker 2: change operations, free housing, healthcare, education. You know, forget about
Speaker 2: what everyday Americans are paying at the grocery store, or
Speaker 2: for the price of democracy, as Kamala says, what they
Speaker 2: have to pay to fill up their cars or pay
Speaker 2: for electricity, or the high interest rates preventing so many
Speaker 2: Americans from being able to buy a house. You know,
Speaker 2: forget about our support of the Green New Deal, the
Speaker 2: elimination of private healthcare? Joe Concha, Am I wrong in
Speaker 2: my analysis?
Speaker 5: John? If there's a number above one hundred percent, I
Speaker 5: would give you that. In terms of you being correct,
Speaker 5: I mean the media coverage that we've seen. I remember
Speaker 5: back in two thousand and twelve, MSNBC, I think it
Speaker 5: was Pew to the study that showed that they did
Speaker 5: something like forty four stories on Barack Obama and all
Speaker 5: were positive, and they did seventy nine stories on that
Speaker 5: Romney and all or negative. But he chalked it up
Speaker 5: to MSNBC. He said, I you know, let's just MB
Speaker 5: and then we know who they are. Now it seems
Speaker 5: like everybody's MSNBC. I can't tell the difference between MSNBC
Speaker 5: and ABC that I know. I mean that debate that
Speaker 5: we saw last two weeks ago, now, I guess it's
Speaker 5: been just incredible that Donald Trump gets eleven fact checks
Speaker 5: or follow ups and Kamala Harris gets zero. And there
Speaker 5: wasn't one, not one question on the economy. That's insane.
Speaker 5: Not one question on Joe Biden's health and why did
Speaker 5: you cover it up? Not one question about Kamala Harris's
Speaker 5: time in San Francisco as a prosecutor in that record.
Speaker 5: I mean, these are very germane relevant questions. Of course
Speaker 5: it doesn't get asked. We know why because the head
Speaker 5: of ABC to who's his name, her name is Dana Walden,
Speaker 5: who is probably one of Kamala Harris's closest friend, is
Speaker 5: a closest friend literally to the point where she helped
Speaker 5: set up Kamala Harris with Doug m Hoff, her current husband.
Speaker 5: That debate never ever should have happened. There should have
Speaker 5: been editorial after editorial saying there's a conflict of interest here.
Speaker 5: But I mean it's been like this since day one.
Speaker 5: I mean, let's face remember that new York magazine cover
Speaker 5: Camelot and it's her on top of on top of
Speaker 5: the country, basically, and it declares that she's Camelot. Now,
Speaker 5: I mean that was insane. Time Magazine when they interviewed
Speaker 5: Kamala Harris for a cover story she declined to be
Speaker 5: interviewed for and they went ahead and gave her a
Speaker 5: puff piece. Anyway, any editor worth his salt or her
Speaker 5: salt would have said, unless you're going to give us
Speaker 5: the interview, we're not doing the story. But they went
Speaker 5: ahead and did it anyway. And the fact that the
Speaker 5: media is not demanding that she hold the thing called
Speaker 5: a press conference, which she hasn't done in five and
Speaker 5: a half years, not going back to her first time
Speaker 5: running for president in twenty nineteen, not as vice president,
Speaker 5: and not now. So that sets where we are at
Speaker 5: this point where we just have a media that they're
Speaker 5: all MSNBC now, they've all taken on a activist mode
Speaker 5: and they're doing everything they can to get over the
Speaker 5: finish line. But here's the good news. If you're a
Speaker 5: Trump supporter. Even with all that, you see polls today
Speaker 5: like Emerson College in the Hills showing Donald Trump leading
Speaker 5: in every swing State and other poles showing that he's
Speaker 5: either tied or leading. And you know what tide means.
Speaker 5: Tide means he's probably up four or five points because
Speaker 5: they always undervalue him in polls. So even after the coronation,
Speaker 5: that fix debate all that Donald Trump is still the
Speaker 5: odds on favored to be your next president.
Speaker 2: You really believe that? I mean, I'll be honest, I
Speaker 2: don't think anybody at this point. And I read the
Speaker 2: polls like you do as well. I mean, I saw
Speaker 2: the New York Times Siena poll and you know, they
Speaker 2: had it and dead even race, what was it, forty
Speaker 2: eight forty eight. And now they did a poll of
Speaker 2: three important swing states Arizona, North Carolina, Georgia, and Donald
Speaker 2: Trump is leading in all three of them. And there
Speaker 2: must win states for Donald Trump. There are two poles
Speaker 2: that have him up in Pennsylvania. He's very close in
Speaker 2: Wisconsin and Michigan as well, and Nevada also there. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, fifty forty five in Arizona, forty nine forty
Speaker 2: five in Georgia, forty nine forty seven in North Carolina.
Speaker 2: Wish that wasn't as close, But look at the state
Speaker 2: of Virginia. I'm sure you probably saw the old dominion
Speaker 2: poll that came out and it was forty seven Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris forty six Trump, and that was the University of
Speaker 2: very Well, Washington and not exactly welcome news for the
Speaker 2: Harris campaign. What is your take on that? And I'll
Speaker 2: add one thing to your point. If you go back
Speaker 2: to twenty twenty, the final New York Times poll in Florida,
Speaker 2: they were off by six points. In North Carolina, they
Speaker 2: were off by five points. Pennsylvania, they were off by
Speaker 2: five points, Arizona, they were off by six points. In Wisconsin,
Speaker 2: they were off by whopping ten points in their final
Speaker 2: poll precisely.
Speaker 5: So again, they can't find Trump supporters as easily, and
Speaker 5: therefore he's always underweighted. And he was underweighted as well
Speaker 5: on twenty sixteen. So I always liked these polls. I
Speaker 5: had four or five points because I know that from
Speaker 5: the past. Right. And now, meanwhile, there's one poll Sean
Speaker 5: that came out and I think it's the most important
Speaker 5: poll I've seen of the past three months. We'll call
Speaker 5: it since Biden dropped out, And that is the teamster's
Speaker 5: own internal polling. I know You've talked about this, but
Speaker 5: if Fair's repeating that Donald Trump is basically doubling Kamala Harris,
Speaker 5: and rank and file teamsters support about sixty percent for
Speaker 5: Trump thirty percent for Harris. So I'm thinking, okay, if
Speaker 5: he's getting that kind of support in the teamsters, who
Speaker 5: have a huge presence in Pennsylvania, for example, that can
Speaker 5: make a difference there. That he probably already has rank
Speaker 5: and file support at least a solid majority from United
Speaker 5: ORTO Workers, right, and maybe not a leadership because you
Speaker 5: know they're always going to support the Democrat because the
Speaker 5: money talks, right, But the rank and foul probably under
Speaker 5: the UAW they probably support Trump too. So if er
Speaker 5: goes Michigan, maybe that. I think of restaurant workers and
Speaker 5: no tax on tips in places like Nevada and the
Speaker 5: service industry, and they overwhelmingly support Trump. So I think
Speaker 5: that's why I'm confident that I'm not saying but all right,
Speaker 5: it's over. Of course, not anything can happen in the
Speaker 5: next forty three days, but I think there's some things
Speaker 5: here that really are telling us what the real story
Speaker 5: is in those key states that matter, and if Trump
Speaker 5: wins Pennsylvania, Michigan Invati. Well, this thing is over, and
Speaker 5: not just over but a landside. But again, it's going
Speaker 5: to be very close. I'm sure, but I think he's
Speaker 5: leading more than what we believe right now, all right.
Speaker 2: Quick break more with the only media analyst I trust.
Speaker 2: Joe Conca is with us. Don't forget. Joe's new book
Speaker 2: is out and available and you can get a copy
Speaker 2: of it. It's called Why Today's Democrats Ain't Your Daddy's Donkeys.
Speaker 2: We have it on hannity dot com, Amazon dot com,
Speaker 2: bookstores around the country. As we continue, when.
Speaker 1: Fake news gives you lieslies, the truth.
Speaker 2: Sean Hannity is on right now. So the FBI they
Speaker 2: called house stealing. I've been telling you about this for
Speaker 2: over a year. It is a huge problem problem if
Speaker 2: you own a home, if you own any real estate,
Speaker 2: it is crucial you protect your property and your equity
Speaker 2: from these criminals. Now I've arranged for you, my listeners,
Speaker 2: to have fifty percent off home Title Locks triple lock protection.
Speaker 2: Now you will immediately be protected. You'll get fifty percent
Speaker 2: off when you use the promo code Hannity. That's home
Speaker 2: title Lock dot Com promo code Hannity that's home title
Speaker 2: lock dot com.
Speaker 5: Ry.
Speaker 2: We continue now me to analyst's friend of the program.
Speaker 2: Our friend Joe Conca is with us a lot of
Speaker 2: these polls. If you just go to this date in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, they had Joe Biden up by eight points.
Speaker 2: On election day, they had Joe Biden up fifty one
Speaker 2: forty four. And you saw how close that race was.
Speaker 2: And you know, the NBC October thirty first, twenty twenty
Speaker 2: had had Biden winning by ten points fifty two to
Speaker 2: forty two. The economists, you gov had Biden leading by
Speaker 2: ten points fifty three forty three. You know, Biden, you know,
Speaker 2: won by the thinnest of margin of forty four thousand
Speaker 2: votes in three states out of a record one hundred
Speaker 2: and sixty million votes. I mean, so they can't be
Speaker 2: more wrong. And I do believe that if we've paid
Speaker 2: too much attention to polling and correct me if I'm wrong,
Speaker 2: that we run the risk that they deflate people's feelings
Speaker 2: about the election. And I think they're doing on purpose.
Speaker 2: If you want my personal opinion, perhaps it looks Sean.
Speaker 5: I think it comes down to you always talk about this.
Speaker 5: Elections come down to binary choices. Right. It comes down
Speaker 5: to one question really, and I think in the end,
Speaker 5: even if people some folks are turned off by by
Speaker 5: Donald Trump's personality, I think in the end, they know
Speaker 5: that they had more money in their bank accounts and
Speaker 5: felt more stable in their jobs and felt that wages
Speaker 5: were out pacing inflation because they were under Donald Trump,
Speaker 5: and that that is a big, big factors, the biggest
Speaker 5: probably as far as economy. And they know that they
Speaker 5: feel less safe now as far as crime is concerned
Speaker 5: under this president and this vice president. And obviously the
Speaker 5: border is something that is an issue that even Kamala
Speaker 5: Harris is using Donald Trump's paul in her ads because
Speaker 5: she knows that she's on the wrong side of that,
Speaker 5: so now she's trying to borrow that issue as well
Speaker 5: from him. So on those three big issues, Donald Trump
Speaker 5: said this once in a rally I went to of
Speaker 5: his involved with New Jersey, and I wish you would
Speaker 5: use the line more because it really was effective. He says,
Speaker 5: I think I'm more popular now than I was in
Speaker 5: twenty twenty or twenty sixteen because back then I had
Speaker 5: to tell you what you had to imagine what a
Speaker 5: Killery presidency would look like. Or what a Biden presidency
Speaker 5: would look like. He goes, Now, you don't have to
Speaker 5: imagine anymore. You lived it, and you know what I
Speaker 5: can do, and you've seen what they have done. It's
Speaker 5: your choice as far as whether you want to be
Speaker 5: in a year's twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen before
Speaker 5: the pandemic, or do you want to be twenty one,
Speaker 5: twenty two, twenty three, and twenty four, which most Americans
Speaker 5: tell you this country is going in the wrong direction.
Speaker 5: That's why again, I think everything seems to be in
Speaker 5: his favor, and I don't think joy is a strategy,
Speaker 5: and I don't think all this luck gets you over
Speaker 5: the finish line. At this point, She's not specific about anything,
Speaker 5: and I think people's BS meter is up a spot
Speaker 5: a phony from a mile away, and Kamala Harris, if
Speaker 5: you want to describe her one word, it's sony Well.
Speaker 2: I just think it comes down to the fundamental are
Speaker 2: you better off than you are four years ago? And
Speaker 2: what has she done that has made the country better off?
Speaker 2: Is what has she done that we can point to
Speaker 2: that we could say has been successful for the American people?
Speaker 2: Fair question.
Speaker 5: It never gets asked, yeah, and in experience, right, So
Speaker 5: Kamala Harris has never run a lemonade stand and now
Speaker 5: we expect her to run the US economy again. And
Speaker 5: based on her own record to this point, proudly casting
Speaker 5: the tie breaking vote for the Inflation Reduction Acts did
Speaker 5: not reduce inflation, for example, so or the afghanistanmdger aw
Speaker 5: she was the last one in the room and she
Speaker 5: find off on it. Well, we all know how that went.
Speaker 5: So again she's got a record. Now she's got to
Speaker 5: run on And when she does interviews that Oprah interview,
Speaker 5: people think, oh wow, that went well. No, it did not,
Speaker 5: because if you want to get.
Speaker 2: Into that, that interview was a disaster.
Speaker 5: Oh completely, and just the optics of it. So, okay,
Speaker 5: you want to get independence in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia,
Speaker 5: and North Carolina. So you're going to go to one
Speaker 5: of the richest women on the planet and then bring
Speaker 5: in all these other millionaires, Hollywood elites. And that's what
Speaker 5: the Democrat Party has become, the party of coastal elites
Speaker 5: instead of the party of the working man and women,
Speaker 5: which they used to profess to be for. And meanwhile,
Speaker 5: Donald Trump is seen as the president for the working
Speaker 5: man and woman. So the flip the script has been
Speaker 5: completely flipped at this point and in the States of
Speaker 5: that matter, if that's the perception, then again, Donald Trump
Speaker 5: is looking good.
Speaker 2: Joe Concha. As always, we appreciate you, the best media
Speaker 2: voice out there, the only objective media analyst in the
Speaker 2: entire country. Unfortunately, appreciate you being with us. Joe eight
Speaker 2: hundred and nine four one, Shawn is number if you
Speaker 2: want to be a part of the program. By the way,
Speaker 2: I did forget not on purpose, to mention Joe's new
Speaker 2: best selling book which is out, which I think is
Speaker 2: really really well on, and it is called why Today's
Speaker 2: Democrats Ain't your Daddy's Donkeys. We have a link on
Speaker 2: Hannity dot com, Amazon dot com, and bookstores around the country. Look,
Speaker 2: you know that I believe in the Second Amendment. I'm
Speaker 2: so proud of my association with Henry Repeating Arms because
Speaker 2: they are just a family owned company that produces more
Speaker 2: than two hundred models of rifles, shotguns, revolvers. I love
Speaker 2: every one of them. I own many of them. They're
Speaker 2: all made in America. The quality is so good. They're
Speaker 2: backed by a lifetime guarantee. Their service is second to none.
Speaker 2: I mean they have old school craftsmanship and smooth action.
Speaker 2: It's just top notch. Every Henry I've ever gotten is
Speaker 2: accurate right out of the box. Everyone remains reliable ever since.
Speaker 2: And if you want to learn about Henry repeating arms,
Speaker 2: get their free catalog. They'll send your free dcals and
Speaker 2: a list of dealers where you live, and they have
Speaker 2: a newsletter that you want to be a part of.
Speaker 2: Just go to Henry USA one word dot com. That's
Speaker 2: Henry USA dot com and click on the free catalog
Speaker 2: button in the upper right hand corner. They also support
Speaker 2: causes that are near and deeter conservatives like the military, veterans,
Speaker 2: law enforcement, first responders, children's hospitals, families with sick kids,
Speaker 2: and so much more. Just go to HENRYUSA dot com.
Speaker 2: You'll get a free catalog, free decals, list of dealers
Speaker 2: where you are. That's HENRYUSA dot com. Henry USA one
Speaker 2: word dot com.
Speaker 1: Today Sean Hannity, always concern for our country, always honoring
Speaker 1: our servicemen and servicewomen, and standing up for liberty every day.
Speaker 2: All right, twenty five now till the top of the hour,
Speaker 2: Your calls coming up eight hundred and nine four one
Speaker 2: sean if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 2: I just love the people at the International Fellowship of
Speaker 2: Christians and Jews. They have done more to help tens
Speaker 2: and tens and tens of thousands of displaced Israelis since
Speaker 2: October seventh than any one organization combined. They have been
Speaker 2: on the ground from day one, and they're providing housing
Speaker 2: and food and health care and medicines and bare necessities
Speaker 2: for all the people in Israel that have been displaced,
Speaker 2: as they really are fighting a three front war and
Speaker 2: now more than ever, they've been fighting back against His
Speaker 2: Bolah and you know, we're fighting against you know, people
Speaker 2: in this country. Varial and anti Semitic statements in congress
Speaker 2: college campuses all around the world. It's sad. We're coming
Speaker 2: up to the one year anniversary of October the seventh
Speaker 2: and the IFCJ, the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.
Speaker 2: They're partnering with over two hundred and thirty churches and
Speaker 2: other organizations across the country and they're calling it their
Speaker 2: Flags for Fellowship, and they're planting Israeli flags in remembrance
Speaker 2: of what would be the equivalent of forty thousand dead
Speaker 2: Americans in a day. You can be part of the
Speaker 2: Flags for Fellowship, and the beauty of it is you
Speaker 2: are helping them in their efforts to help all of
Speaker 2: these people that are in desperate need. Now we're looking
Speaker 2: for twelve hundred of my listeners which should be easy
Speaker 2: to find, that could provide one hundred dollars gift because
Speaker 2: they need, like yesterday, emergency food boxes for all these
Speaker 2: displaced families, elderly included in Israel. I mean, there's so
Speaker 2: many people just in northern Israel that have been displaced
Speaker 2: in southern Israel that have been displaced. You can call
Speaker 2: their toll free number and help them out. They need
Speaker 2: it bad. It's triple eight eight eight eight four eight
Speaker 2: eight IFCJ eight eight eight four eight eight four three
Speaker 2: two five online, it's one word support IFCJ dot org.
Speaker 2: That support IFCJ dot org and please help them today.
Speaker 2: Their need is great. All right, eight hundred and nine
Speaker 2: four one. Shawn is on number. If you want to
Speaker 2: be a part of the program. Well, we got another
Speaker 2: cut of Kamala committing yet again to ending fracking ones
Speaker 2: and for all, but of course she wants you to believe, Oh,
Speaker 2: that's not true, because she knows she can't win Pennsylvania,
Speaker 2: stating her true opinion. Listen, I am committed to passing
Speaker 2: a green new deal, creating clean jobs, and finally putting
Speaker 2: an end to fracking once and for all. Mamala, Kamala.
Speaker 2: Just don't give a frash. Mamala Kamala. That's the second one.
Speaker 2: We need a Mamala. Drew Barrymore says that was Jimmy
Speaker 2: Fallon in that particular case. I find it amazing that
Speaker 2: not only are Democrats the Save Act in Congress are
Speaker 2: so against, you know, proof of citizenship for elections. Why
Speaker 2: do you think that is Why wouldn't they Why would
Speaker 2: they be against proof of citizenship? Why would they be
Speaker 2: against voter ID laws? Why do I need a picture
Speaker 2: ID to get into the Democratic National Convention but I
Speaker 2: don't need one to vote like when I lived in
Speaker 2: the state of New York. Why is that?
Speaker 1: Why?
Speaker 2: Tell me explain that rationale to me. Why wouldn't they
Speaker 2: want signature verification and integrity measures and chain of custody controls.
Speaker 2: Why wouldn't they want and demand updated voter roles? Why
Speaker 2: wouldn't they want partisan observers and every pre in the
Speaker 2: country for the benefit of everybody. That means Democrats, Republicans, independent,
Speaker 2: whatever parties are on the ballot. Yet they get to
Speaker 2: watch the voting up close all day, not watching who
Speaker 2: people are voting for, but meaning watching what's going on,
Speaker 2: making sure that everything is done in the right way,
Speaker 2: making sure ballots are safely secured, and watch the vote
Speaker 2: counting all night. Why would they be against proof of
Speaker 2: citizenship voter right Why? The only reason I can think
Speaker 2: of is because they think it benefits them. And if
Speaker 2: walls are so bad, why did I face wall after
Speaker 2: wall after wall, and fence after fence after fence when
Speaker 2: I was at the Democratic National Convention this summer. Just
Speaker 2: interesting food for thought. Got a Washington Post correspondent is
Speaker 2: actually out there, you know, saying that the GOP push
Speaker 2: for citizen votership laws is opposed by Democrats. Yeah, you think,
Speaker 2: But the question is why what.
Speaker 6: Mike Johnson did set himself up for is a failed
Speaker 6: vote this week regarding a six month excent of federal
Speaker 6: fundings that attached this bill that Donald Trump has been pushing,
Speaker 6: which would force voters in voting in federal elections to
Speaker 6: provide some sort of proof of citizenship that failed in
Speaker 6: the House, allowing Johnson to now be able to pivot
Speaker 6: to negotiating with the Senate Democrat led majority. And we
Speaker 6: know that in the Senate there is and actually amongst
Speaker 6: some Republicans as well, there is a proclivity towards supporting
Speaker 6: a three month continuing resolution that would be basically maintaining
Speaker 6: federal funding at the current levels it is, but in
Speaker 6: a clean way with no added provisions. As this citizenship
Speaker 6: bill is deeply opposed by Democrats and would be vetoed
Speaker 6: by the White House.
Speaker 2: Why would they be against proof of citizenship? And if
Speaker 2: you can explain it to me, Paul eight hundred and nine,
Speaker 2: poot one Sean, if you want to be a part
Speaker 2: of the program, let's get to our phones. Let's say
Speaker 2: hi to Marcy Is in mice Pre state of Florida. Marcy,
Speaker 2: how are you glad you called doing good?
Speaker 7: How are you doing today in there?
Speaker 2: Voting? Early voting starting all around the country, Barcie, And
Speaker 2: I hope people are paying attention.
Speaker 7: I do too. I was listening to the radio about
Speaker 7: the Shawancomb's situation, and one of the things that I've
Speaker 7: come to realize. In my town, and I live in Cocoa, Florida,
Speaker 7: it just seems that the law is doing less and less.
Speaker 7: Crime is at an all time high. I'm a landlord
Speaker 7: here and we have rental property, and I've reported serious crimes,
Speaker 7: even as far as a baby dying in critical condition
Speaker 7: in a critical state, and I've had a situation where
Speaker 7: somebody stole about almost three thousand dollars from my ninety
Speaker 7: year old father in law, and there's things that I've reported.
Speaker 7: You know, you have to go through the steps you
Speaker 7: want to report the crime, and then you feel like
Speaker 7: when the law gets to your house, they don't even
Speaker 7: want to take a report. They act like you're bothering them.
Speaker 7: And you know, I'm a TALX payer know that, you know,
Speaker 7: we don't pay a lot of money. I think about
Speaker 7: six hundred and fifty dollars a year goes to the
Speaker 7: police department. But when you feel that you're reporting a
Speaker 7: crime and you're supposed to take the steps necessary, and
Speaker 7: then you feel like they walk away and they're kind
Speaker 7: of like laughing and they don't care. They look at
Speaker 7: you like whatever. You just feel like what's going on
Speaker 7: is the criminal is going to keep be getting away
Speaker 7: with more and more. And I think the reason why
Speaker 7: Sean was probably out there doing what he was doing.
Speaker 7: Maybe he felt like, you know, hey.
Speaker 1: We'll get away with well.
Speaker 2: Make sure when you say Sean, you're you're being very
Speaker 2: specific about what Seawn you're talking about. You talking about
Speaker 2: P Diddy?
Speaker 7: Yes, yes, I was just talking about, you know, his
Speaker 7: situation and just crime at an all time high.
Speaker 2: It's terrid. The only thing I would say down in
Speaker 2: Florida that I would pay very close attention to. And
Speaker 2: I'm speaking from experience. I have found where I live
Speaker 2: in Florida, both the local police and the Sheriff's the
Speaker 2: apartment are the most responsive that I've ever seen in
Speaker 2: my life. And they did, you know, especially under the
Speaker 2: new leadership. Where I used to live in New York
Speaker 2: on Long Island in Nassau County, they did have good
Speaker 2: policing there, although they were unfortunately still subject to some
Speaker 2: New York laws that prevent officers from doing their jobs.
Speaker 2: Such laws don't exist down here in Florida. So I
Speaker 2: would just say, work with your local sheriff's department, work
Speaker 2: with the local police department, and I can tell you
Speaker 2: right now they're under very very you know that they
Speaker 2: have all the freedom they need to enforce laws and
Speaker 2: they're committed to it in Florida, especially on issues like this.
Speaker 7: Yes, well, one of I did ask that. I did
Speaker 7: ask one of the sheriffs. I said, why do you
Speaker 7: think that this isn't going to the State's Attorney's office.
Speaker 7: Why hasn't it made its way? I mean, I can
Speaker 7: remember a day if somebody wrote a bad check for
Speaker 7: thirteen dollars, you were going to jail. Today it's like
Speaker 7: they say, well, having to prove it is one thing,
Speaker 7: and having to find the criminalism. There's just so many
Speaker 7: different things that prevent this from going to the state's
Speaker 7: Attorney's office. Now a lot of people are getting away
Speaker 7: with more and more, and yeah, I'm going to have
Speaker 7: to do something about it. I am a letter writer,
Speaker 7: and I guess I'm gonna have to get out there
Speaker 7: and write some letters. It's coming to that.
Speaker 2: I think you do that, but I would add one
Speaker 2: other thing, And honestly, I think it's very simple, and
Speaker 2: for me, I would go out and I would just
Speaker 2: stop by your local police department, your local sheriff's office,
Speaker 2: and just you know, follow the complaint as appropriate, and
Speaker 2: my experience has been there on it down here in
Speaker 2: a big way, in a really big way. So I'm
Speaker 2: sorry you're going through it. But it's very different than
Speaker 2: what it was like in New York. I can tell
Speaker 2: you that, especially New York City, which I was the
Speaker 2: worst of the worst, not because the cops are bad,
Speaker 2: because they had literally had handcuffs on their ability to
Speaker 2: do their job. Back to our phones, as we say
Speaker 2: hi to speaking of my former stomping grounds Bob in
Speaker 2: Long Island, Bob, how are you? Did you go to
Speaker 2: the Coliseum and Uniondale for the Trump rally or no?
Speaker 8: I did not. However, I must say that my understanding
Speaker 8: is Nassau County has the lowest crime rate in the nation,
Speaker 8: and we've got one of the best commissioners in Writer.
Speaker 8: He did a fabulous job for the Trump rally.
Speaker 2: You're talking about Blake. I think he's done a great
Speaker 2: job for Nasau County.
Speaker 8: Yeah no, when I say Rider, he's the police commissioner
Speaker 8: for Nasau County.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, no, he's also great. Now they've done a
Speaker 2: great job of doing a much better job, and they've
Speaker 2: got some real challenges in both Nasau and Sofa County.
Speaker 2: Especially with the illegal immigration that they've had to deal
Speaker 2: with there too, including gangs.
Speaker 8: Yep, hey, Sean, I wanted to mention Harris has accepted
Speaker 8: the CNN debate offer, and I know Trump is declined. However,
Speaker 8: if Fox were to offer a debate.
Speaker 2: I let me jump the gun they already did.
Speaker 8: Harris said, no, Well, I would put that forward if
Speaker 8: I'm Trump again. Because Kamala is hammering him for rejecting
Speaker 8: the CNN. Trump can simply say, I've already debated on CNN,
Speaker 8: and if you want, as you say, you do another
Speaker 8: debate because the American people deserve that debate. I'm willing
Speaker 8: to meet you at Fox. Put her in a box.
Speaker 8: Let her get the sensive rather than him be defensive
Speaker 8: on the debate issue.
Speaker 2: You know what the problem is is she wants this
Speaker 2: debate one month from today. He wants it on October
Speaker 2: the twenty third. With the amount of voting that will
Speaker 2: take place by the time that debate would ever be held,
Speaker 2: it's hardly worth doing anyway. And she knows that. So
Speaker 2: it's a phony issue. She said, all debate next week
Speaker 2: and after he did two liberal networks, she would be
Speaker 2: willing to go on Fox which she is outright rejected,
Speaker 2: and her campaign is rejected over and over and over again,
Speaker 2: and I guess speak from a position of fact, then
Speaker 2: you know that it's just not going to happen. The
Speaker 2: problem is with any of these liberal networks, in my view,
Speaker 2: and is that they're never going to play Harris or
Speaker 2: ask Harris about her ninety three trillion dollar Green New Deal,
Speaker 2: eliminate the filibuster, or government healthcare for all, no private insurance,
Speaker 2: you know, free housing, healthcare, education, drivers' licenses, path to amnesty,
Speaker 2: and sex change operations for illegals. She's not going to
Speaker 2: ask about. They're not going to ask about the names
Speaker 2: of the people that have been murdered, unvetted Harris Biden,
Speaker 2: the illegals, the people that have been raped and victims
Speaker 2: of violent crime. They're not going to ask about her
Speaker 2: actions in the summer of twenty twenty with the Bell
Speaker 2: Fund and saying that the rioters won't stop and shouldn't stop.
Speaker 2: They're not going to ask about her no fracking. They're
Speaker 2: not going to press her on abortion, they're not going
Speaker 2: to press her on gun confiscation laws. So it's kind
Speaker 2: of pointless and fruitless in my mind, and you know,
Speaker 2: at this point in the campaign, I don't see any
Speaker 2: reason to do it or or want to watch it,
Speaker 2: even because I just know how it's going to end,
Speaker 2: and that is it's another three on one situation. Although
Speaker 2: in fairness to both Dana Bash and who Jake Tapper,
Speaker 2: I thought they were way more fair than David Muir.
Speaker 2: By the way, his ratings are down eight percent since
Speaker 2: that debate on World News tonight and probably going lower.
Speaker 2: Great job, Bob Iger, ABC Disney and ABC News Disney.
Speaker 2: They did a lousy job and Americans have fed up. Anyway,
Speaker 2: my friend appreciate the call. Kentucky. We got Leslie next. Hi, Leslie,
Speaker 2: how are you glad you called?
Speaker 9: I'm Hi Sean. I am hoping that you'll help me
Speaker 9: understand Kamala's policy. She's talking about this opportunity economy, and
Speaker 9: I'm a little bit confused. She's going to give in
Speaker 9: her proposal fifty thousand dollars to small businesses as they
Speaker 9: start up, but it's as a tax credit. So when
Speaker 9: I hear tax credit, what I'm thinking is I must
Speaker 9: owe fifty thousand dollars in tax and then you're gonna,
Speaker 9: you know, not charge the fifty thousand in text that
Speaker 9: I owe is that what you understand.
Speaker 2: My understand is it's basically a Kamala Harris. It's a
Speaker 2: how do I say this? It's incrementalism of the Green
Speaker 2: New Deal, and as as cynical as I am, I
Speaker 2: would say, whether it's loan forgiveness for college loans, or
Speaker 2: you know, twenty five grand for first time home buyers
Speaker 2: or whatever it happens to be, it's it's basically, here,
Speaker 2: vote for me, and I'll give you something of value,
Speaker 2: you know, to illegal immigrants. Her quote earned path the
Speaker 2: citizenship is really amnesty, and that is something of great worth. Oh,
Speaker 2: I hope you'll vote for me, and I hope you'll
Speaker 2: vote for Democrats and perpetuity so to me, you know,
Speaker 2: I think I think for her. Now, if you're a
Speaker 2: supply side to you know, and believe in a supply
Speaker 2: side economics like I do, you know, you would say
Speaker 2: no tax on tips is an incentive, or no tax
Speaker 2: on overtime pay or no tax on social security just
Speaker 2: makes sense. But then coupled with that as energy dominance,
Speaker 2: which would which would bring in huge, you know, trillions
Speaker 2: of dollars ultimately to the economy, lowering tax rates, which
Speaker 2: then incentivizes investment, which creates revenues for the government. Reagan
Speaker 2: doubled revenues by cutting taxes, and Trump did the same.
Speaker 2: And it just as he hit COVID after you know,
Speaker 2: two years in office, which was you know, after three
Speaker 2: years in office. Everything was going swimmingly until then, and
Speaker 2: through no fault of his own, the worst pandemic and
Speaker 2: eat in one hundred years. Anyway, I hope that answers
Speaker 2: your question, Leslie. I wish I had more time for you.
Speaker 2: I love our friends in Kentucky.