WEBVTT - Super Bowl Rematch, Draymond Suspended & Nick’s Picks

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one ninety four, What's Right with Nick Wright?

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>And this episode is brought to you by the McDonald's app.

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I love the McDonald's app, specifically for mc delivery. It's

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>perfect for any situation. Say it's pouring down rain, you

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>don't want to go out to go get a mcdoubel

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>boom MC delivery. Say your team playing and you of

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>course don't want to miss a single second. That's what

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>mcdelivery's for. Let's say it's been a long day. What

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 2>better way to fix that than a delicious quarter pounder

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 2>with cheese and a large fry delivered. Write to you.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.919
<v Speaker 2>I love to order McDelivery when I'm watching a game

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 2>or maybe playing a game with my daughter and don't

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 2>want to leave the house. And now every time you

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>order McDelivery in the McDonald's app, it earns you points

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>towards free food. And who doesn't like free food? So

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>there's always a reason to order in the McDonald's app.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Download the McDonald's app today At participating McDonald's delivery prices

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe higher than at restaurants. Delivery and other fees may apply.

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Copyright twenty twenty three McDonald's. All right, welcome in big

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 2>show for us today. It's our gambling show as promised.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Just like last year, right around week ten, right around Thanksgiving,

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I have turned my season around. I believe I am

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>right at five hundred. I might be one game below

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>five hundred, but regardless, we feel great about where I am.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I am also disappointed in Demonse's teasers, but not for

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the reason that people think. I'm not disappointed that Demonse

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 2>has gotten eight teasers in a row. Wrong. That's not

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 2>what's disappointing. What's disappointing Demonse is that week two you

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 2>got it right, because had you like being one and

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 2>nine just sucks being zero to ten, we could have

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 2>turned it into a bit. We might have gotten some

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 2>like a little internet traction like this sports betting expert

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 2>can't hit a teaser save his life. The win in

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 2>week two is what is right now the fly in

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the ointment. But I haven't looked at it yet. I mean,

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>well at this point, yeah, but it's just not as fun.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>The fact that you have that one win mixed in

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>and the win came early enough.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait, was the last win made it to where no,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you could.

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Still be five hundred. I mean, there's eighteen week regular season,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 2>so all you got to do is go from losing

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>eight in a row to winning eight in a row

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 2>and you'll be right there. And by the way, I

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>haven't looked at the teaser yet this week, but producer

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Danegel said he loves it, and so we'll see. All right,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 2>So let's get to what missed the cut for today's show.

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Lebron passing, Jason Kidding triple doubles. Listen, last year, the

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 2>oldest guy in the league was Janis Haslam, who was

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 2>essentially a coach who didn't play this year. The oldest

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 2>guy in the league is Lebron James, who is still

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 2>unequivocally one of the seven or eight best players in

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the league. I don't even know how to quantify what

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing, but the Lakers did lose. A d had

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>a brutal night. He put up the true Draymond a

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>triple single, which you never want to do. Celtics beat

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the seventy six Ers. The big win for your Celtics, Demanse.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Nice win for them, especially because the Sixers had beaten

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>them the other day and now the Celtics kind of

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>stabilized and they did it without I'll be honest, I

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't watch that game. They did it without Christaps or

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Jail and Brown, right, and so that's an excellent win

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>for them. They're number one of these right now. And

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Travis Kelsey and Taylor Swift's parents are gonna meet at

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Monday night football. Taylor's dad famously an Eagles fan, but

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 2>was wearing a Chief's lanyard at the Buenos Ardes concert

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>along with Travis Kelcey when Taylor ran and leapt into

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>his arms. It's gonna be I mean, it's gonna be

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>something else, you know what. I'll tell you something real quick.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>So your mom, oh wait, gosh, darn it, maybe I

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't hold on, let me wait to talk about this.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not actually a bad thing about your mom. It's

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>about a thing your mom and I are doing that.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I was considering inviting Travis Kelcey to and then it

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 2>occurred to me. I was like, if I invited Travis

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and he actually came, would he would that then mean

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift is going, which actually I think would potentially

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>be as cool as it would be a bad thing.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Like if Taylor Swift goes anywhere, she becomes the center

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 2>of attention and the exact event that I'm thinking of,

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if you would want that, but that's

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 2>where they're at in their relationship. Tomanse, I think these

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 2>two are gonna get married. I really do. I think

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 2>these two are gonna get married. And I think Gabe

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 2>said I think this was off the air, but I'll

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>do it on the air real quick. I think Gabe

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 2>last week was said that he thought this might shorten

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Travis's career because he is well of ascended to a

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>totally new level of fame, wealth, all of these things.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going the other way, which is I really think

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 2>it would appear Taylor Swift loves that her boyfriend is

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 2>this awesome athlete. You know. Kevin Wilde says life is

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>high school, that just life is just high school with adults,

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>and his theory on Taylor Swift Travis Kelcey is the following,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 2>and it's a pretty sharp one. It's that in high school,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift was the band girl, the music girl who

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 2>obviously had you know her because she was pretty. She

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>was a pretty well established musician, very young, had her

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>own area of popularity. But still in high school, the

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>star athletes don't really pay attention to the band kids.

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>And now she is now the star athlete, the homecoming king,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 2>if you will. Is he enamored with her and she

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>is getting to live out all those high school football

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>games that maybe she didn't get to live out when

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.239
<v Speaker 2>she was in high school. So I think he's gonna

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>play forever. Now go ahead.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, No, I was just saying, it's almost like I

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 3>think I was gonna use a bad analogy, so I'm

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 3>going to back out saying like, maybe okay, good body

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 3>as a kid and like liveously through them. But oh yeah, no,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 3>that's I mean that it's it's exactly like it's kind

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 3>of hit or missing.

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not exactly, but I understand what you're saying, like

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 2>in this, in that analogy, it was I mean all

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I kind of not in a bad way

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the way some people do, but I kind of did

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>that with you when it came to your high school

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>basketball career because I loved I know you, I know

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>you weren't no no, no, because usually it kind of has

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>nefarious implications. But I loved high school basketball. It's some

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 2>of the fondest memories of my life. But I wasn't great,

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. I was I was on

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 2>a small school, bad team, and I was like the

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>fifth guy my senior year on that bad team. You

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>went to a giant school and were the best guy,

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and so I got it was super fun for me

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to be able to see you live that out and

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of I don't want to say live vicariously, but

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I got some of the same thrills of seeing you

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 2>do it. Uh what. There was Oh one other thing

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>on this before we get to the actual show that

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I will say, it's always dangerous in the age of

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:13.119
<v Speaker 2>social media when you get to a whole new level

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of fame, and people start going through old tweets, and

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>especially if you've had tweets from when you were in

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 2>high school yourself, and it has been absolutely delightful to

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 2>see that Travis has always been the same, super chill,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 2>fun guy. All these old tweets that the swiftnies are

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>coming about is like him misspelling the word squirrel and

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about feeding a squirrel bread. It's him saying, man,

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the moon looks amazing. I'm just gonna vibe out and

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>watch the moon. It's no misogyny, it's no homophobia, it's

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>no racism. It's not like, oh, Travis Kelcey in ninth

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 2>grade it was super problematic. It's no Travis Kelcey in

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 2>ninth grade was crazy high, just chilling.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 4>And it's just such a delight because he's such a

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 4>good dude that he doesn't have to It really feels

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 4>like right now he is living the best verse, the

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 4>best life he possibly could be.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to Chiefs Eagles.

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, All right, the Eagles are coming to Kansas

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 3>City for a little Super Bowl rematch. Got unfinished business?

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Uh so, if this is a potential Super Bowl rematch,

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 3>should Andy Reid and the Chiefs keep some tricks under

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>their sleeve or should they let it all out?

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, so that's actually a really interesting question, which is

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 2>do you want to keep some things in reserve if

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>you have to play this team again? And the answer

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to that question is, you know, yes and no. I

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 2>for instance, there has been a lot of I'm gonna

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 2>take this kind of bigger picture and then we'll get

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 2>to the Eagles game. A lot of questions about the

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>usage of two Chief players in particular, who were wildly

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>important last year and this year have seen their snaps

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and their opportunities cut. And that's Kadarius Tony and Jeric McKinnon.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 2>And I am of and this is by the way,

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 2>very polarizing within kind of the Chief's community, if you will,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 2>about what's happening. Did McKinnon get old? Is Tony just

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 2>not as good as people thought he was? All these things?

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I am strongly of the belief that the Chiefs know

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>with Tony he cannot stay healthy for an entire season.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>That has been the knock on him his whole pro career.

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 2>And McKinnon is a running back into his thirties. I want,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how old is Jet McKinnon. I'm gonna check

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>for it. I think he's He's thirty two, which for

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>a running back, or thirty one, pardon me for running back,

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>makes him one of the older running backs the league.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Tony's very young, but injury prone. Jeric McKinnon, who had

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the nine touchdown catches as a running back last year.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 2>He's really good. So I believe the Chiefs are not

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 2>necessarily like saving plays, but saving wear and tear on

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 2>those two players specifically. I think that they are really

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>trying to make sure those guys are give them the

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>best chance they have of being healthy going into the

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 2>or going into the stretched run. Now, now, when it

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>comes to playing the Eagles, I wouldn't hold anything reserve

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 2>in reserve, with one exception if by some chance, and

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the odds of this being the case are incredibly low,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>but if by some chance, Steve Spagnolo, the Chiefs defensive coordinator,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>has figured out how to stop the brotherly shove, I

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't show the world that I figured that out yet.

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>If somehow he is actually like they have realized, wait,

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 2>there is a way to stop it. Here's what we do,

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 2>I would keep that in reserve. But other than that

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 2>you try to go win this football game because you

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>are in such an advantageous position for being able to

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 2>get the one seed that the big story from a

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs perspective this weekend was the Chiefs hit a five

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>team parlay on best case scenario losses. So the Dolphins

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't play. They lead the AFC East, but the last

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>time they did play, the Chiefs meet them. But this

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 2>weekend without playing, the AFC North leader Ravens lost, the

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>AFC South leader Jaguars lost, a team that has given

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs some trouble. The Bengals lost, a team that

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people thought was going to this was

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be the year. The Bills they lost and

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>fired their coordinator, and a team that I have no

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>fear of whatsoever, but is in the division and theoretically

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 2>could try to run down the Chiefs for the division title.

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 2>The Chargers they lost. So all of the teams the

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs would have wanted to lose this weekend lost, and

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 2>so their ability to lock up the one seed earlier

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 2>than expected is very possible. Now, if you're going to

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>lose a game, you always want to lose non conference

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 2>games rather than conference games. But beating Philly off the

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 2>buy would send a signal to the rest of the

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 2>league that a lot of the hand ringing about the

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs was overstated. And one other kind of long term

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 2>prediction when you look at the schedule, I think, so

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Week seventeen, second to last week of the year, on

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>New Year's Eve, the Bengals come to Arrowhead, also known

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>if you're a Cincinnati fan as Burrowhead Stadium. I think

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 2>two things are gonna happen in that nationally televised one

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 2>of the games of the year, demanse. I think the

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs will lock up the one seed with a week

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 2>to play, and I think the Bengals will be officially

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>eliminated from the playoffs. I think with a week left.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Because the Bengals, when we'll talk about them in a moment,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 2>they lose tonight, they fall to five and five, they

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>damn they don't have to quite run the table. They

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 2>probably have to go to six and one the rest

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 2>of the way. I think that is going to be

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the final Burrowhead Stadium revenge is the Chiefs not eliminating

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 2>them from the playoffs while locking up the one seed.

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 2>On December thirty, first and Week seventeen. You have a

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>follow up here de Manse.

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh, well, I mean I feel like you kind of

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 3>answered it. But this game Mahomes is obvious. You said

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the Mahomes has never lost to meaningful regular season game.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 3>With everything riding on this one and and being at home,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and you know it being the Eagles, who they played

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 3>in the super Bowl last year, would this be a

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 3>meaningful game?

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, I want to say so. People I think have

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 2>misconstrued what I'm saying by never lost a meaningful regular

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>season game. It's to me it's a very binary question.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Did losing this game cost you anything? And if for

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs, they every single playoff game has been played

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>at Arrowhead, they've either been the one or the two

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>seed every year, you can make the strong argument that

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 2>all of their regular season losses have been relatively speaking,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 2>meaningless because they still achieved everything you can achieve in

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 2>a regular season. If the Chiefs end up losing this

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 2>game and still being the one seed, you can't you

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 2>can't get more than the one seed. So from that perspective,

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I would say I am saying meaningless. From a mojo

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 2>or confidence or belief perspective, if you were to play

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>this team again in the Super Bowl. You could say

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>it's meaningful. There, go ahead, what what were you gonna say?

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>No? I was just gonna say how much is confidence

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 3>worth to you? Because I mean when players like I

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 3>know that after I'm not going to bring it back

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>to Game one of the season anymore. This last time fine,

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 3>But when they lost the Lions, Mahomes had said obviously

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 3>this didn't matter because they won the next game. But

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes is embarrassed. I don't think I've ever heard him

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 3>say anything.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, embarrassed different. Embarrassed is different than not confident. So

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I think confidence matters a lot for certain teams. I

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>think the Bills confidence has been shattered and you're seeing

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 2>it manifest itself in moments such as literally not being

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 2>able to execute a handoff. I mean that fumble they

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 2>have on Monday Night. They lack of confidence in the

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>coaching seft to where they're firing offensive coordinators. I think

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs, because they have had a nearly unprecedented run

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of success, are as confident as any team in the

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>league no matter what happens. And I'll say we're talking confidence,

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll say this much. Let me put it like this,

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I think this game is way more meaningful for Philadelphia

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 2>because if you're Philadelphia and you look at it and

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 2>you say, Okay, we basically never lose when Jalen Hurts plays,

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.239
<v Speaker 2>except for the two times we've played the Chiefs, and

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to get back to the super Bowl, and

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the overwhelming favorite to be in the super Bowl on

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the other side is the Chiefs. So I think from

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 2>a confidence perspective, this game has a hell of a

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>lot more meaning for Philadelphia. All right, next, all.

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Right, so this is the best Thursday night game that

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 3>we've had all year, I assume, So the Ravens, I mean, if.

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 2>You don't count the season opener, that's right. I mean,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 2>the season opener is not a season over the Chiefs Lions.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 2>But oh yeah, but that doesn't really feel like a

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 2>Thursday night game because it's not a short week and

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff. But yes, I agree with certainly the

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 2>best since then.

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 3>But go ahead, So Borrow and the Bengals are facing

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 3>off Lamar and the Ravens. You've always voiced the Cincinnati

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 3>Bengals are the scarier team. So who would you be

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 3>rooting for in this game? Would you be rooting for

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 3>a Ravens win, since he win, because everybody's saying the

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Ravens are the scariest teams of the Chiefs right now.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, so I I'm rooting for Cincinnati purely from a

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I want the Chiefs to be able to lock up

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 2>the one seed as early as possible. And Cincinnati is

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 2>not a real contender for the one seed. The Ravens

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>technically are. And if the Ravens got another af SEE loss,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 2>then the Chiefs would be in just a super advantageous position.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>If the Ravens dropped to four losses all AFC losses,

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City would have a de facto tiebreaker over them.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>They already have the tiebreaker over Miami, they already have

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the tiebreaker over Jacksonville, to where you'd now be in

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 2>a point where if any of those teams had the

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>same record as Kansas City, Kansas City would get the

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 2>one I don't so I get in that regard. I'm

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>somewhat rooting for the Ravens from a kind of more

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 2>pragmatic standpoint. From an emotional standpoint, I didn't. I haven't

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>liked the arrogance that some of the Bengals players and

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 2>fans have exhibited because they beat Patrick Mahomes in overtime

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 2>once and the Borough Stadium stuff has really irritated me.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 2>And if you remember Orlando Brown, he goes from Kansas

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>City to Cincinnati and then I don't know if it

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 2>was Jamar Chase or t Higgins or Tyler Boyd one

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 2>of the receivers like, oh, you know, there's a big

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>rivalry and we one up them. And now all the

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Bengals fans are upset with the Orlando Brown because he

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>hasn't played that well. I like Burrow and Chase a ton.

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 2>I think some of the other guys chirp a little

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 2>a little much for my liking, but that's fine. I also,

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:28.239
<v Speaker 2>I also think it would be really interesting if the

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Bengals and the Bills both missed the playoffs this year,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 2>because it will kind of crystallize how impossible what Kansas

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 2>City is doing has been that these two guys that

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 2>were supposed to be the rivals, they can't even make

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs every year, let alone make multiple Super Bowls,

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 2>let alone you know, host multiple conference championship games. But

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 2>who I'm rooting for is maybe not as important as this.

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the Ravens are gonna win I think the

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Bengals are hanged up. The Ravens are coming off a

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 2>terrible loss because they gave the game away, and I

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>think the Ravens are gonna win now them up, well,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>that would be the concern. That would be that the

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Bengals can't block the Ravens. And obviously that was the

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>case in their first matchup. But the first matchup, Joe

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Burrow's injured, so we kind of throw it out right.

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 2>It was week two. Burrow couldn't move around at all.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Now the Ravens Marlin Humphrey is not expected to play,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 2>so covering Chase is gonna be a problem. But if

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>you can't block him, then covering him is not as

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, not as critical of a

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>piece of the pie. And so here's what I will say.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>I think if the Bengals lose this game, they're done.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I ain't the If you look at Cincinnati, the only

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 2>team they would have a tiebreaker over is Buffalo because

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 2>they would have been swept by the Ravens. They've already

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 2>lost to the Browns once, so their best case scenario

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>within the division would be a three to three divisional

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 2>record if they win all the rest of their games,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 2>all of their losses are AFC losses, and the rest

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>of the way they don't have a single Cupcake on

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the schedule. After tonight, they have the Steelers, They're in Jacksonville.

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 2>They're home for the Colts, which is supposed to be

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the easiest, but the Colts have five wins. They're home

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 2>for the Vikings, which seemed like an easy one, but

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings do have six wins. Then they're at the Steelers,

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 2>at the Chiefs, and home for the Browns. A Browns

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 2>team that year after year beats them up. If they

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 2>fall to five and five Demons, they need to go

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 2>six and one the rest of the way. I don't

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 2>think that's possible, and so I do think the Bengals

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>season is on the line tonight. I like the Ravens.

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>If I were gonna bet it, I'd probably bet the

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Bengals because three and a half is too like. I

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of on the record on this that any of

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>these AFC North matchups where it's more than three points,

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>unless there is something drastic that's happened with a quarterback,

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 2>I just think taking the points as smart. But I

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 2>think the Ravens are I'm sorry the Bengals are in

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 2>real rough shape if they lose tonight, and I think

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>they are gonna lose tonight, And I think Lamar and

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens have a point to make about kind of

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 2>trying that last week.

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Was a fluke.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>The worry for the Ravens is while they have been

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 2>just dynamic and dominant throughout, they have just found a

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 2>way to give games away and having double digit leads

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>and blowing those games, not being able to close out

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 2>the culture early in the year. All of that is concerning.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 2>But I think tonight they win. All right. Next I

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>think the Colts.

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Beat the Ravens last year too for some reason. Maybe

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm wrong, Go ahead. Yeah. So on Tuesday, Draymond Green

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 3>was ejected after putting Gobert in a choke hold for

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 3>grabbing up Klay Thompson. He's hit with a five game suspension.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Uh you joked, I mean the Warriors have been a disaster.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Steph has been the only one hitting shots. And you

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 3>joked that they were cooked earlier. But how exactly cooked

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 3>are they now that all this is unfolded. Okay?

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, the Colts last year beat the Chiefs.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 2>They didn't play the Ravens, but that was the Colts

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 2>biggest shocking when last year was Cobbies. So I don't

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 2>think that I've said that the Warriors this year are cooked.

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.239
<v Speaker 2>What I get I was actually impressed by how they

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>were playing very early in the season.

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I have said sorry for not.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 2>As of late is that the other than Steph, nobody

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 2>is really carrying their weight. And that is still the

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 2>case now.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't wanna make any big picture proclamations about the

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Warriors right now. I think that they have a trade

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to make. I think that they probably will make. I

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 2>don't know what it is, but I don't think this

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be the exact team they go into the

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 2>postseason with. And Steph has been so good, and aside

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 2>from Denver, it doesn't really look like there is a

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 2>team in the West that you can just pencil in

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 2>go ahead.

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Is that trade you're gonna involve Draymond Green? Are you

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 3>talking about like some of the rookies or something on that.

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 2>No, No, no, I don't think they're gonna trade Draymond or Steph.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry Draymond, but Draymond or Clay H. They're obviously

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 2>not gonna trade Steph. But I don't think it gonna

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 2>trade Raymond or Clay. I think I still think it's

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>on the board they trade Chris Paul, and then certainly

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 2>on the board they trade some of the young guys,

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>and you know, Zach Levine's available. There are different pieces

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 2>that will come available throughout the year. This is what

0:25:55.000 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll say about, uh, the Draymond thing. Gobert was correct

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 2>that when Steph doesn't play, he doesn't want to play.

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the fact of the matter is this, over

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 2>the last five years, Draymond has been ejected from four

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 2>of the nearly two hundred games Steph has played. That's

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 2>two percent, and seven of the seventy four games Steph

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 2>hasn't that's ten percent. So in the last thing about

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 2>it like this, in the last five years, Draymond has

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 2>been ejected eleven times. Seven of those games were games

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Steph didn't play. That part's true. What's also true is this,

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Draymond has just in the last three games been thrown

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 2>out of one game, then chirped at Anthony Edwards and

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Edwards lit the Warriors on fire, and then got

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 2>thrown out of another game for attacking Rudy Gobert go

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 2>ahead to mase.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Get him off, Like the juice is not worth the

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 3>squeeze with this guy. Like before you could say that

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 3>he was the glue or he was the galvanizer of

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the team. But dude, you're overstaying you're welcome at this point,

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 3>you're overdoing it. Like you did what you did before,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 3>but now you're just becoming a problem. Like and the

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 3>other thing is like he said that the ruby Gobert

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 3>had his hand around Clay, but like, dude, he said

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 3>he had his hand, he had his arm around my guy.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 3>Draymond had him hemmed up for like fifteen extra seconds

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>after that.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Well that's that, and that listen exactly. There is no

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>defending Draymond on this. His own coach, Steve Kerr, was

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 2>pleading with him to let him go.

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 3>He didn't.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he targeted Gobert because they have a long

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 2>standing beef that you know that he is he they've

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 2>never liked each other. He's clearly been waiting to do that.

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.959
<v Speaker 2>But just in the last two dozen games he's played,

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 2>he stopped on Sabonis's chest he remember in the playoffs

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and got suspended. And if you just think over the

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 2>last thirteen months, of Basketball for punching Jordan Poole in

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the face, for stomping on Sabonis's chest, and for putting

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Rudy Gobert in a ten second choke hold. He got

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 2>suspended for a grand total of six games.

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Like this idea that this is.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Too harsh or anything like that is just an absurdity.

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just totally the And the point that I want

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 2>to make is as Draymond declines as an athlete and

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>is less and less effective, there's gonna be more and

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 2>more of this there just is like and so I

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>your point is the juice is not worth the squeeze.

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I and I do feel like retroactively, people are forgiving

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Draymond more and more for punching Jordan Poole because they're

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>seeing how Jordan Poole is acting with the Wizards, and

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I understand that to a degree, but it's all What's

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 2>also true is that that wreck to their team, that

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 2>ruin they were the offending.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Bad time of the season to do that type of stuff.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, no, they were the defending champs and it

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 2>ruins in their season before it got off the ground.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>And so I just he is going to become more

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 2>and more volatile as as he continues to decline as

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 2>a player. Go ahead and ask them, do.

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 3>You think there's a chance that they did this? Do

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>you think there's a chance that he did this on

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 3>purpose because of the new resting policy and wanted to

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 3>just get kicked out.

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:26.239
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't. I don't think that at all. I

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 2>do think it was especially because he's now suspended for

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>five games. Now. I do think that Clay also is frustrated.

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Clay started this with Jaden McDaniels, who hadn't

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 2>done anything, and so I think right now the Warriors

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 2>are a team that has one all time legendary player

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 2>that is still playing at a super high level and

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 2>two other Hall of famers that are nowhere near that

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>level anymore, and they're st uggling with it. I think

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 2>for Steph, I'm sorry for Clay and for Draymond. It

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 2>is not only is it tough not being close to

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the player you once were, but it might be even

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 2>tougher because Steph still is because the guy who's always

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>been the guy is still and by the way, he's

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the oldest of the three and he's still at this

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>insane level. And for Clay and Draymond. They're not all right,

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 2>let's move on.

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 3>But uh, okay, all right, So yesterday Cleveland announced that

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Deshaun Watson is going to undergo season ending shoulder surgery.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 3>The Browns are still in it, though. There's six and

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 3>three with even with Watson playing poorly, how far do

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 3>you think your MVP Miles Garrett can take the defense

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 3>and the Browns without Deshaun Watson.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So I was shocked yesterday of how many people were

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 2>arguing that the Browns are now cooked because of the injury. Now,

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they obviously can't make the super Bowl, but

0:30:58.000 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think they could make the super Bowl before.

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I still think they're gonna make the playoffs. I mean,

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>they've already banked six wins they still have. I mean,

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>here's their remaining schedule this week home for the Steelers.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Tough one, but about a coin flip game at the Broncos.

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe tougher than we thought a month ago, but absolutely winnable.

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 2>At the Rams. The Rams cannot block the Browns. I

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 2>think that is a Browns win. Home for the Jags,

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna lose that home for the Bears. That's a

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 2>win at the Texans tough one home for the Jets,

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>that's a win, and then at the Bengals the final

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 2>week of the year. I still think the Browns make

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.959
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. And here's the other piece of it. I

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 2>know that Deshaun's final half pre injury, he played really well.

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 2>He was fourteen to fourteen and played well. Over the

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>totality of the season. The Browns are dead last in

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the NFL in passer rating. They're six and three despite DeShawn, PJ.

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Walker and Dorian Thompson Robinson combining for a sixty seven

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 2>passer rating, eight touchdowns and twelve picks and one hundred

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and eighty passing yards per game. Dead last. They have

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 2>gotten worse quarterback play than the Jets, than the Patriots,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 2>than any team. DeShawn this year was averaging one hundred

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and eighty five yards passing per game, had an eighty

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 2>four ratings, seven touchdowns, four picks. In this last game,

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>he was as bad as he's ever been in the

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>first half and then was excellent in the second half.

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 2>There's no denying it. So I think they're gonna be

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 2>okay now. I also think that long term it's a disaster,

0:32:56.240 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and their decision to trade Josh Dobbs before the year

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>and a seventh round pick for a fifth round pick

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 2>goes down as one of the worst misevaluations of a

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 2>guy you have in the building that we've seen recently.

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 2>If they had Josh Dobbs, they'd be fine. But I

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 2>still think this is a playoff team. You got some

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>follow ups there.

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So this Watson injury isn't just about the injury.

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 3>So he obviously has the season ending ending injuries and

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 3>isn't going to be available, but he obviously just got

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 3>that huge contract. What do you think this means for

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 3>player in their contracts and player empowerment for the future.

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, I mean, I think it was pretty clear

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 2>when Joe Burrow and Lamar and Jalen couldn't get fully

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 2>guaranteed deals that this was a one off. And it's

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 2>even more validated that it's a one off by the

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>fact that the Browns so deeply regreted. What is noteworthy

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 2>about it? And I want to listen, there are very

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>few things on the Internet that people say to me

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:02.719
<v Speaker 2>that that irritate me. Oddly, one of the things that

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 2>really irritates me is when folks try to well actually

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 2>me on understanding the salary cap in the NFL, guys,

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 2>I almost can guarantee you, unless you are tweeting from

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 2>an NFL front office, I understand it better than you do.

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 2>And maybe maybe I understand it, maybe you understand it

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 2>as much as I do. But I made the point

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 2>on television yesterday that the bones of the Deshaun Watson contract,

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 2>it was a five year, two hundred and thirty million dollar,

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 2>fully guaranteed deal. So if they had simply spread it

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 2>out all evenly, then it would be a forty six

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 2>million dollars per year cap it. Okay, that's that's what

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 2>it would be. They decided in year one that you know,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:07.919
<v Speaker 2>what we're gonna do is, because he has a pending suspension,

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna pay him basically the league minimum in year one.

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 2>So the game checks that he loses it, doesn't you know,

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 2>he loses as little money as possible. And Browns fans

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 2>came to me and said, that's what every team with

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 2>every contract does. No, they don't. Now, they very often

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 2>in year one have the base salary low because the

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 2>players getting the giant signing bonus checks so they don't matter.

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And then they can spread that out over the course

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of the deal, but making it literally the league minimum

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 2>was a unique move that at the time everyone understood

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 2>was in part to protect him from losing money in

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the suspension. You can call it unethical, you can call

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 2>it immral, you can call it whatever you want. That's

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 2>what they did. But that meant the five year two

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 2>from a cap perspective, essentially turned into a four year

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 2>to twenty. So now that's fifty five million per year

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 2>against their cap. Okay, But then this off season they

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 2>restructured it to give them more cap flexibility this year,

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 2>so his cap hit this season was only twenty million dollars.

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 2>And I understand folks love to add they're like, oh,

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the salary cap is fake. People that don't understand actually

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 2>how the salary cap works. That's what they say. They're like, oh,

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the cap is fake. You can always move money around.

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 2>And as I've said before and I will say again,

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 2>you can, but those bills come due. So I will

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 2>try to explain this as simply as possible for the

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 2>fake gms out there that for some reason think they

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 2>have a better understanding of this stuff than I do. Again,

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm there are a lot of people that talk about

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 2>stuff that actually know what they're talking about, and they

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 2>are maybe less abrasive than I am some of my

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 2>contemporaries in the media. Maybe they have the and more

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 2>power to them, but I cannot stand. I just can't stand.

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Folks that I wouldn't trust to balance a checkbook tell

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 2>me that this is actually how the cap works. It's

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 2>not complicated, guys. They have guaranteed Deshaun Watson two hundred

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 2>and thirty million dollars at some point. That means two

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty million dollars of cap charges are going

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 2>to be applied to the Cleveland Browns. So when two

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 2>years into the deal, last year and this year the

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 2>total cap charges to the Browns have been right at

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty million, that means over the next three years of

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the deal, and then you can add some dummy years,

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 2>two hundred million million dollars must be up against the cap.

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 2>So what does that mean? That means very simply to

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Shaun Watson for the Browns, next year has a cap

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 2>charge of sixty four million dollars, The following year has

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 2>a cap charge of sixty four million dollars. The following

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 2>year has a cap charge of sixty four million dollars. Now,

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 2>if you actually can do math, you might say, wait,

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 2>sixty four plus sixty four plus sixty four, that's only

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 2>one ninety two. You said it was two hundred. Yes,

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 2>and then a year after the contract's over, he has

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 2>a void year where he's not on the team or

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 2>they've given him a contract extension that has a cap

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 2>charge of eight million dollars. The point that I am

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 2>making is this, the Cleveland Browns kept borrowing from future

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland brown years to accommodate the Deshaun Watson contract. They,

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 2>as it turns out, correctly believed this year, we have

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 2>a super Bowl caliber defense. Let's go try to win

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it right now. Unfortunately for them, DeShawn was bad and

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 2>now he's hurt. What that means in practical purposes is this,

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Deshaun Watson, not via cash via cap, is still owed

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 2>two hundred million dollars and only has three years left

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 2>on his deal. That's why each of the next three

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 2>years Deshaun Watson will have the highest cap charge in

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 2>NFL history. And if Browns fans want to come to

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 2>me and say, well, Nick, what they'll do is they'll

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 2>restructure it again. Okay, maybe they will but that bill

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 2>is coming due and your runway to pay that bill

0:39:55.280 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 2>is shortening. And so the too long didn't listen version

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 2>is this was their opportunity and that bill is now

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 2>coming doing spades. And I think the best Browns defense

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 2>were going to have seen this year's and unfortunately for them,

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 2>they had an ineffective quarterback and now an injured quarterback,

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think they are about.

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 3>To be a cycling any in that contract.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 2>So Barnwell, So here's the Barnwell asked that question, which

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 2>was if you basically offered him up for a seventh

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 2>round pick, would someone take it on. So here is

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 2>what I think folks need to understand. He might be

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:50.919
<v Speaker 2>tradeable because when you trade for a player, all you're

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 2>trading for is their the base salary. So if a

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 2>team wanted him, they would owe him only forty six

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 2>time three what's that one thirty eight? They would owe

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 2>him one hundred and thirty eight million, fully guaranteed for

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the next three years. Now, the Browns would still owe

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:14.919
<v Speaker 2>a sixty two million dollars dead cap hit, either all

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 2>next year or spread over the next two years because

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 2>of his signing bonus and his restructuring accelerating onto the cap.

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I do think a team might take a flyer on

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 2>him if they wanted to cut the court. I do

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 2>because forty six million a year for three years is

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 2>not as onerous as what the Browns are looking at.

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think they're They're gonna admit defeat, and

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's what they're gonna do. I will

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 2>tell you this much though, this Browns team with Baker

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 2>Mayfield right now would be a legitimate AFC. Conmit, it

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 2>absolutely would be. All right, last thing.

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 3>All right. Dan Rolovski went on Pat McAfee's show earlier

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 3>this week and said that he's heard that Bill Belichick

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 3>is leaving. Bill Belichick is leaving next year and already

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 3>knows where he's going. Oh, with Belichick leaving New England

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 3>as a loser, proved that Tom Brady was the one,

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, providing for his legacy this whole time.

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean no, I'm not gonna let people do

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the revision. It's history on this. Like the first three

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowls the Patriots won, they were a far better

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:25.879
<v Speaker 2>defense than offense. The last super Bowl the Patriots won,

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 2>they held the Rams, who were the second highest scoring

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 2>team in the league that year to three points. This

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 2>was obviously a great part. Now Belichick has lost his fastball,

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 2>his drafts have been bad as of late.

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 3>People, but the idea.

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:41.800
<v Speaker 2>That the well, I'm maybe people don't like him. That's fine,

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 2>He's probably earned that. But the but the fact of

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the matter is he's the greatest coach of all time,

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 2>was the architect of the greatest dynasty of all time.

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 2>Now I do think he's not going to be on

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots next year. I do think that part's correct.

0:42:56.840 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 2>But the follow up here is, so go ahead and

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 2>ask that.

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, so you're obviously in the business and you

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 3>hear things as well for fans, explain what it means

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 3>to quote unquote hear things.

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that you listen, that usually.

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Means also let me ask it, and how do you

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 3>determine what you can and cannot say on air?

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's all right, So these are complicated questions. The

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 2>hearing things usually means one or two people that I

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of believe know, but I'm not dead certain I

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 2>have said it, so I will I will repeat it

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 2>with the couching of I'm not actually reporting this, like

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that's just you know, it's out there in the ether.

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 2>My only concern when things are the hearing things stuff

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 2>is how much of it is uh snake eating its tail.

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So I said on the air three weeks ago that

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 2>I think what's gonna happen is that the Los Angeles

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Chargers are gonna trade a second round pick for Bill Belichick.

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I had not I have no sourcing on that. I was.

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 2>The sourcing was my brain. I was like, the Chargers

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 2>are probably gonna fire Brandon Staley, but they probably, like

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Kellen Moore, want to keep him. They want someone to

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 2>come in. Belichick will want to go to a team

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 2>with a quarterback to try to get Shula's record. Like

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 2>this seems to make sense. That was I was not

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 2>reporting that at all, and I didn't pretend I was.

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 2>I just said of the teams that might trade for him,

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 2>that Belichick would want to go to you know what,

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:50.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, what's the Venn diagram? I said the Chargers.

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Over the last couple weeks since I said that, more

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and more people are saying that, which and then you

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 2>you have Orlovsky saying on McAfee, you know he's hearing.

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 2>So I always wonder on the hearing things stuff. If

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 2>what sometimes happens is and I'm not saying that's what's

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 2>happening here, what does that mean.

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 3>I was the first one to do is I did that?

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 3>You know? That's I started saying.

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 2>No, that's that's not what I'm saying. If you if

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna make a joke, have it ab one the

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.959
<v Speaker 2>audience understands, and b B one that actually makes sense.

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh I. So the reason I brought that up is

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I wonder at times if what happens is someone throws

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 2>something out there that is just their opinion that gets

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 2>interpreted as a half a report, and then an actual

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 2>someone that might have inside information in the background repeats

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 2>it like oh, well, you know this is out there,

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 2>But then when they say it, it actually becomes a

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 2>little newsy, and then all of a sudden people are

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 2>hearing it. Does that make like the if I were

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 2>to I'll use a different, just kind of fake example.

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 2>If I were to say to so I'm pals with

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Adam Lefko, right, who's on inside the NBA. NBA guy.

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 2>If he and I are talking basketball and he's a

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Big Sixers fan and he says to me, just just chatting,

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 2>He's like yeah, you know, I think the Sixers should

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:49.800
<v Speaker 2>go after and this is I'm making this up entirely.

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:52.919
<v Speaker 2>I think the Sixers should go after Zach Levine, right,

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like, oh, that's interesting, it'd be an interesting fit.

0:46:56.239 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 2>They have the pieces whatever. And then on TV I

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 2>go out and I'm like, you know, one of the

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 2>places to watch Zach Lavine at is Philly. I was

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.760
<v Speaker 2>talking to, you know, an NBA person recently. They really

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 2>liked the fit, right, So I didn't say that everybody.

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't say everybody. A lot of people know that

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 2>I have a relationship with the guy who runs the Sixers,

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Daryl Morey. They could hear me say that. Assume that

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 2>when I said, you know, I got you know, I

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 2>was talking to NBA person. They like the fit, That's

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 2>who I'm talking about. And then all of a sudden,

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 2>there it's like, hey, hearing Zach Levine connected to the Sixers,

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 2>when in reality it would have just been because a

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 2>Sixers fan who's a buddy of mine said he liked

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the fit and he's so that. So the that is

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the difference between you know, I'm hearing such and such,

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and you got to know who's saying it. If Jay Glazer,

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 2>who doesn't report many things but as a near perfect

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 2>hit rate, says he's hearing things, it probably means he's

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:10.320
<v Speaker 2>hearing it from an actual decision maker. If I say it,

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:16.399
<v Speaker 2>it could Demonse could have mentioned it. Who knows, Like, well,

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 2>that did happen. That did happen in a very roundabout way.

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 2>I was on TV and we were talking. We were

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 2>playing the Jordan Poole Highlight, and I just said in passing,

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 2>I was like, yeah, and I can't believe some people

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 2>thought this guy could average thirty a game. And while

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 2>it's like nobody thought he could average thirty a game.

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 2>And I said, no, some of our colleagues did. I

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 2>can't even remember who, but I heard it, and then

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I realized that who was Demanse?

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Wait, so yeah, either way. She said earlier that you

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't get my joke. I got the joke, you just

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 3>didn't get it. It's cool, it's fine.

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, you you got the joke. You told the joke.

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Wait, but the fans also got the joke. It wasn't

0:48:59.040 --> 0:48:59.279
<v Speaker 3>just me.

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh the chattel.

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 3>There's like eight folks in the chat saying that they

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 3>got the joke. Soldier boy said that he was the

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 3>first rapper to do this, that and the third, and

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:12.759
<v Speaker 3>he's like, not the first, and that's just his bit,

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 3>and you like had like a start to a soldier boy.

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 2>But I wasn't saying, Okay, you weren't.

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Saying you were the first one to do something. You

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 3>were saying you were the first one to say something.

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 2>And then they But so the I what I do

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 2>think the Belichick Chargers thing was not a thing people

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 2>were talking about three weeks ago when I kind of

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 2>threw out as a possibility. On first things first, I

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 2>am not claiming that that is why people are now

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:43.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about it, though I do think that a month

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 2>ago it wasn't really out there in the ether. And

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I just kind of put put it together because there

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 2>are not a lot of places that I think are

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:55.399
<v Speaker 2>going to fire their coach that also Belichick would want

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to go to that have a quarterback. But the Chargers do,

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:05.759
<v Speaker 2>all right? Do our gambling show next, What's Right? All right?

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in What's Driving Nick Right? Episode one ninety four.

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And the holidays are upon us, and I know everyone

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 2>will start thinking of what gifts to buy their significant others.

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I know I have. Well, I'm excited to share a

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 2>great holiday gift idea with you. Light Box light Box

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Lab grown diamonds proudly grown from one hundred percent renewable

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 2>wind energy at the light Box Lab in Portland, Oreent.

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Not only that, but they're very simply priced. Light Boxes

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Lab grown diamond jewelry ranges from classic studs, more of

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the Moment, tennis bracelet's drop, earrings, and so much more.

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I know my wife would like any of those. Light

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Box Lab grown diamonds are perfect for family, friends, or

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:45.399
<v Speaker 2>even yourself. Make it easy for yourself and get everyone

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 2>something special with a discount code we have for you.

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Shop now at lightboxjewelry dot com and use promo code

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 2>nick right for ten percent off site wide. That's Lightboxjewelry

0:50:56.480 --> 0:51:00.080
<v Speaker 2>dot com promo code nick right for ten percent off

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:04.880
<v Speaker 2>site wide. All right, now are week eleven picks coming

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 2>off our best week of the year three one and one. Listen,

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 2>we have not been dynamite this year, but as I said,

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 2>hovering right around five hundred and Luki there fifty games

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 2>in twenty four to twenty five and one. Now that's

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:24.359
<v Speaker 2>still minus three point five units, but only a game

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 2>below five hundred, and this was right around where we

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:31.279
<v Speaker 2>were last year when we got red hot. So the

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 2>picks last week. Jacksonville plus three was obviously a disaster.

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:39.280
<v Speaker 2>They got annihilated. But the other ones Cleveland plus six,

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 2>they went outright, Houston plus seven, they went out right,

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Detroit minus three. That's a push against the Chargers, so

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 2>be it. And Dallas minus sixteen and a half against

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the Giants went exactly how I told you it was

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 2>going to go. Now, once again, I got a little

0:51:56.840 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 2>unlucky in that. For I did that my three picks

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 2>on TV, which I pick from here, and I had

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 2>five picks to choose from, I included the one loss.

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:10.919
<v Speaker 2>So that's unfortunate. So instead of going three and oh

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 2>or two oho and one on television, I went just

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 2>two and one. But we're twenty four to twenty five

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 2>and one on the year. Demondse what's my first pick

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of the week.

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Your first pick of the week is Pittsburgh plus one

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 3>at Cleveland. Now you can get it out plus one

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 3>and a half. Okay, So Pittsburgh plus.

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 2>One and a half. Uh So the Cleveland is starting

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Dorian Thompson Robinson, a fifth round rookie who I be. Listen,

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:42.400
<v Speaker 2>he only started one game this year, and that was

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the game Deshaun Watson pulled himself out of a couple

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:48.240
<v Speaker 2>hours for kickoff. He was terrible, but I'm not gonna

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:50.359
<v Speaker 2>hold that against him. He didn't get the full week

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 2>of practice and he didn't know he was gonna start.

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I thought Dorian Thompson Robinson was excellent in the preseason,

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 2>and I think he'll be okay. I just don't know

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 2>if he'll be okay this week. I also maybe I'm

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:06.439
<v Speaker 2>the only one I respect what the Steelers have done.

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I know that they probably from a metrics and a

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 2>stats standpoint, they shouldn't be six and three, but they are.

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 2>I picked them before the year to win that division.

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I still think they're live to do that. I think

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:24.240
<v Speaker 2>that the offense has, I don't want to say gotten better,

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 2>but shown a few signs of life over the last

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks since Matt Canada moved down from the

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:35.640
<v Speaker 2>booth to the sideline. And right now, I told you

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 2>AFC North teams getting points. I said it more than

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 2>three and a half is an almost must bet. I'm

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 2>not betting the Thursday night game tonight, but I know

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 2>this is only one and a half. I just like

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh in this spot. AFC North Division games underdogs are

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 2>sixty nine, forty six and three against the spread in

0:53:56.719 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 2>the last decade and tomlin is a doll has been

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the most profitable plays in the NFL over

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the last five years. So I like Pittsburgh. I think

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:08.760
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna win out right, go ahead, Demansey.

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of years, this is going to be the second

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 3>lowest NFL over under in the last ten years, so

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:17.439
<v Speaker 3>a lot of defense being played on a scoring.

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Really hold on what's the total in the total in

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:21.239
<v Speaker 2>this game's thirty three?

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that that kind of sounds about right. Uh.

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:27.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's considering what both.

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Cos that's not the a thirty three point NFL over

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 2>not under is. And I'm looking right now at see

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 2>thirty two and a half in some spots, that's crazy.

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:42.479
<v Speaker 2>Thirty two and a half for Saints Brown's last year,

0:54:43.120 --> 0:54:46.400
<v Speaker 2>and uh, in thirty three or thirty two and a

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 2>half this week, that's wild. I didn't realize that that is,

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 2>but that and again you're not getting a lot of points,

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 2>but give me a point and a half if they

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:57.480
<v Speaker 2>lose seventeen sixteen. I guess what Vegas and that by

0:54:57.480 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the way, if it's a thirty three point total and

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:02.480
<v Speaker 2>it's point point and a half spread, that's what Vegas

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 2>is saying. This is a seventeen to sixteen Cleveland win,

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Next next you've got Jacksonville minus six and a half

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 3>versus Tennessee.

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Jags at home bounce back spot after getting blown

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 2>out by the Demons. Doesn't like it. He's making a

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 2>very unattractive face about it. I don't think you want

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 2>that on for the YouTube audience. Pout and the one

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 2>of the mistakes some gamblers make is in a positive

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 2>or negative direction overreacting to what we saw last one

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 2>week ago. I understand the Jags couldn't block the Niners.

0:55:42.560 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 2>The Niners looked like a machine and the Jags looked terrible.

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 2>The Jags that here's a good stat from our producers.

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Teams good teams teams above five hundred who scored less

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:57.560
<v Speaker 2>than fourteen points in the previous week over the last

0:55:57.600 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 2>decade are one oh one and seventy seven against the

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:04.360
<v Speaker 2>spread in the last in the last decade. Why because

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:08.520
<v Speaker 2>people overreact to them. This should Jacksonville at home against Tennessee.

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Should be laying more than a touchdown. They're laying six

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:17.239
<v Speaker 2>and a half. I understand Vrabel getting points. Typically he's

0:56:17.280 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 2>not quite Tomlin, but he's in that realm. I just

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:24.319
<v Speaker 2>don't like this Tennessee team at all. Jacksonville needs this game,

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 2>especially with Houston coming on hot for the division, and

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 2>that's a losable game next week against Houston. The Jags

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 2>are not losing three straight. They are a good team.

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Their losses this year have come to the Chiefs, the

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Texans and the Niners, two excellent teams.

0:56:41.680 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Question, I gonna win by seven?

0:56:45.520 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think they will. I think they actually

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 2>win by double digits. I like the Jags minus six

0:56:50.080 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Next Seahawks minus one at the Rams.

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:59.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, all of the trends on this are.

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 3>For me.

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 2>McVeigh owns Pete Carroll, which I understand has been a problem.

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Gino is a favorite. Is not good. This is a

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:16.160
<v Speaker 2>very straightforward one. I think the Rams right now are

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 2>actually slightly overvalued. They're obviously, and we talk about this

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:24.080
<v Speaker 2>every week. They obviously are not gonna have home field

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:28.440
<v Speaker 2>advantage in any of these games, and the Rams coming

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 2>into the year, people thought this could be one of

0:57:31.440 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the worst teams in football. They threw everyone off the

0:57:34.520 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 2>scent because in Week one against Seattle they blew them

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 2>out and people are like, oh, maybe the Rams are

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna be legit. They're not. Since then, their wins have

0:57:44.400 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 2>come in overtime against the Colts and against the Cardinals,

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 2>who were at the time maybe the worst team in football.

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams have a brutal offensive line. I

0:57:56.720 --> 0:58:02.880
<v Speaker 2>think Seattle is a good team that has real trouble

0:58:02.920 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 2>with the best teams in the league. They lost to

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals, they got blown out by the Ravens. I

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think they're gonna have trouble with the Rams here.

0:58:11.440 --> 0:58:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind laying the points, especially because I think

0:58:14.480 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 2>it'll probably be at least fifty to fifty Seahawks fans there,

0:58:18.720 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think the Rams are in a rough spot

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 2>moving forward the rest of the year. When you look

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:27.440
<v Speaker 2>at what the Rams have on their schedule after the

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals game, it's hard to fight. They have the Cardinals

0:58:31.160 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 2>and the Giants. Aside from that, I don't know if

0:58:33.320 --> 0:58:36.080
<v Speaker 2>they have another win on their schedule. I like Seattle,

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:38.600
<v Speaker 2>but I shouldn't say bounce back spot because they won

0:58:38.680 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 2>last week into the Commanders. But I like Seattle. I'm

0:58:41.280 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 2>only laying a point. I'll take Seattle minus one.

0:58:44.520 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 3>You've got my blessing on that one.

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 2>You like that one? Okay, good, I'm glad to hear it.

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Next Minnesota plus two and a half at Denver.

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think people are right now overvaluing Denver and

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 2>undervaluing Minnesota. Minnesota's coached very well by Kevin O'Connell, Josh

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Dobbs has played well, and Denver Man Buffalo did everything

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:13.480
<v Speaker 2>they could to lose that game, and Denver still almost

0:59:13.520 --> 0:59:17.480
<v Speaker 2>gave it to him. Denver still tried to give it

0:59:17.560 --> 0:59:21.280
<v Speaker 2>right back to him. I think the it's very interesting

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 2>watching Sean Payton call plays for this Denver team because

0:59:25.440 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 2>even though Russ has some of his numbers are shockingly good,

0:59:29.720 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Sean Payton clearly doesn't trust him and is trying to

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:36.439
<v Speaker 2>coach around the quarterback and the play calling. I don't

0:59:36.440 --> 0:59:39.960
<v Speaker 2>think that will work against Minnesota. I think Minnesota is

0:59:39.960 --> 0:59:42.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be able to take care of the football. Minnesota

0:59:42.600 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 2>is in a spot where they are you know, they

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:49.600
<v Speaker 2>can't obviously lock up a playoff spot, but because it

0:59:49.680 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 2>is so hard to find a third wild card team

0:59:53.200 --> 0:59:56.440
<v Speaker 2>in the NFC other than Minnesota. They're in a really

0:59:56.480 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 2>strong position. They also maybe are tricking themselves in the

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:03.760
<v Speaker 2>thinking they could run down Detroit in the division. Minnesota

1:00:04.320 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 2>is gonna win this game, outright. I like Minnesota. I'm

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 2>really surprised by this line. I guess it's Josh Dobbs

1:00:12.320 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Speaker 2>on the roads against a defense that's played well the

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>last month, and credit at defense. It has played well.

1:00:17.400 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>It's played really well since giving up those seventy points.

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Played well against the Chiefs twice, played well against Josh Allen.

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I just think Minnesota is a better team than the

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Denver Broncos, and I anger right now. Denver on a

1:00:30.240 --> 1:00:33.520
<v Speaker 2>short week after an emotional win, is primed for a

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 2>bit of a letdown spot after a couple emotional wins,

1:00:36.480 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I should say, beating the Chiefs and beating the Bills.

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I like Minnesota plus the two and a half, all right, last.

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 3>One, I think that's gonna be a good game. Last one.

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:47.480
<v Speaker 3>You got Kansas City minus two and a half at

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Philly or verse Philly? Sorry at home? Yeah?

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>At home? Yeah. I don't care about the Mahomes against

1:00:56.480 --> 1:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>the spread numbers because He's almost always such a huge favorite.

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It's so rare to be able to get the Chiefs

1:01:04.480 --> 1:01:08.440
<v Speaker 2>laying less than a field goal. When you have that opportunity,

1:01:08.960 --> 1:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's almost a must bet. If you remember,

1:01:11.760 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>they were underdogs in the AFC Championship Game against Cincinnati

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:18.160
<v Speaker 2>despite it being at Arrowhead because of mahomes injury. They

1:01:18.160 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>were underdogs in the Super Bowl. I think the Chiefs

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid off a bye is about as good as

1:01:25.280 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>it gets in this league.

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I understand the Eagles are also off a bye, but

1:01:30.680 --> 1:01:36.400
<v Speaker 2>mahomes Is unwavering confidence that the offense is going to

1:01:36.440 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>get it going is incredibly encouraging.

1:01:42.480 --> 1:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Say it again, Oh you need.

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Just I mean, I think the Chiefs defense is

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>excellent and Mahomes absolutely It does not seem like false

1:01:54.880 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>bravado that the Chiefs are going to get it going

1:01:59.440 --> 1:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>on the same.

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>We don't have it figured out like that's obviously. I

1:02:04.200 --> 1:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>feel like that's the stands he's gonna no.

1:02:05.720 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 2>But I just I just believe I I those are

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:11.800
<v Speaker 2>You're right. He wouldn't say it, He wouldn't say the

1:02:11.840 --> 1:02:15.440
<v Speaker 2>other that he didn't have confidence, But I believe him

1:02:15.480 --> 1:02:17.640
<v Speaker 2>and the way he has said it, and the way

1:02:17.720 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>he has conducted him the way he conducted himself after

1:02:21.080 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins win when the offense didn't play well and

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:29.320
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs won, he seemed more confident than had they

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 2>won thirty five thirty two because I think he believes

1:02:33.400 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>correctly the offense will get it figured out and that

1:02:36.400 --> 1:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs defense just dominated what had been the highest scoring

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 2>offense in the league. And so the Chiefs are at

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:45.960
<v Speaker 2>home laying less than a field goal off a bye

1:02:46.240 --> 1:02:49.360
<v Speaker 2>against an Eagles team that while their record is excellent

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:51.920
<v Speaker 2>and I have massive respect for the Eagles the Eagles,

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:54.959
<v Speaker 2>it's not like they have looked like a flawless team

1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>up to this point in the season. This is to

1:02:57.160 --> 1:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>me a great spot for the Chiefs to remind everyone

1:03:00.160 --> 1:03:02.919
<v Speaker 2>they're still the best team in the NFL. Hands down,

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>all lay the two and a half with Kansas City.

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>So the picks for the week Pittsburgh plus one and

1:03:07.760 --> 1:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>a half at Cleveland, Jacksonville minus six and a half

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:14.480
<v Speaker 2>against Tennessee Seattle minus one in Arizona, Minnesota minus or

1:03:14.480 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>plus two and a half at Denver, and the Chiefs

1:03:16.760 --> 1:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>minus two and a half against Philly. All Right, Demons

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:22.440
<v Speaker 2>what's your teaser this week? Pal? Last week we know

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>another two and one teaser. The jag screwed you. Sorry

1:03:26.520 --> 1:03:28.800
<v Speaker 2>about that, Pal. What's the teaser this week?

1:03:30.440 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we lost last week's obviously. This week is

1:03:34.480 --> 1:03:36.760
<v Speaker 3>a three teams seven and a half point teaser. We're

1:03:36.800 --> 1:03:39.800
<v Speaker 3>teasing the Cowboys from minus ten and a half to

1:03:39.920 --> 1:03:43.200
<v Speaker 3>minus three Panthers at Carolina.

1:03:43.520 --> 1:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I like that.

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:46.600
<v Speaker 3>We're teasing the Steelers from plus one and a half

1:03:46.640 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 3>to plus nine versus the love It the Browns. And

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:54.120
<v Speaker 3>then we're teasing the Detroit Lions from minus seven and

1:03:54.200 --> 1:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>a half to just pick them versus the Bears, and

1:03:58.120 --> 1:03:59.400
<v Speaker 3>the Lion's I'm gonna lose that.

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Game, demonsay, this is an A plus teaser. I'm gonna

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>show my confidence in you by betting a full unit

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>of my own on it. You're gonna win this week?

1:04:10.520 --> 1:04:12.920
<v Speaker 3>This week, I appreciate. I'm surprised you're not saying anything

1:04:12.960 --> 1:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>about the Detroit leg.

1:04:15.480 --> 1:04:19.040
<v Speaker 2>No, you got it through all the key numbers. It's fine. Hey,

1:04:19.120 --> 1:04:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the that now, I the the only argument would be,

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>would you want to do a seven point teaser to

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:29.880
<v Speaker 2>get a little more value on your money? So get

1:04:29.920 --> 1:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh plus eight and a half and Detroit from a

1:04:33.000 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 2>pick them to plus half points the same thing. The

1:04:35.160 --> 1:04:38.840
<v Speaker 2>problem there is then you don't get Dallas to the

1:04:38.920 --> 1:04:42.240
<v Speaker 2>three at least now. Somehow Dallas only wins by three.

1:04:42.400 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's the right numbers. I think it's

1:04:45.560 --> 1:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>an a triple plus. I think it's gonna win. Take

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:50.040
<v Speaker 2>quick break, answer some of your questions in the chat

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:56.520
<v Speaker 2>What's Right? All right? Welcome back in What's Try with

1:04:56.560 --> 1:04:58.600
<v Speaker 2>thick Right? Episode one ninety four. This episode of What

1:04:58.680 --> 1:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Trick is brought to you by the mcdonaldnald's app. I

1:05:00.680 --> 1:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>love the McDonald's app for McDelivery. It's perfect for every situation.

1:05:04.720 --> 1:05:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's say it's poor and rain, don't want to go

1:05:06.280 --> 1:05:09.600
<v Speaker 2>out get your delicious mcdouble MC delivery. Let's say your

1:05:09.600 --> 1:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>team's playing you don't want to miss a single snap

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:14.439
<v Speaker 2>mc delivery. Let's say it's been a long day. Better

1:05:14.440 --> 1:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>way to fix that and get a delicious quarter pounder

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:19.160
<v Speaker 2>with cheese and a large fry delivered right to your door.

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I loved order McDelivery when I'm watching a game or

1:05:22.200 --> 1:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>hanging out with my family, and now every time you

1:05:24.440 --> 1:05:27.160
<v Speaker 2>order McDelivery and the McDonald's app. It earns you points

1:05:27.160 --> 1:05:29.720
<v Speaker 2>towards free food. Who doesn't like free food? So there's

1:05:29.720 --> 1:05:32.479
<v Speaker 2>always a reason to order in the McDonald's app Donald

1:05:32.640 --> 1:05:35.640
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's app today. At participating McDonald's delivery, prices may be

1:05:35.760 --> 1:05:38.240
<v Speaker 2>higher than at restaurants delivery and other fees may apply.

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Copyright twenty twenty three. McDonald's. All right, demonsey, we got

1:05:42.560 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to get out of here, so let's let's answer Matthew

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Flowers question and then get moving.

1:05:47.320 --> 1:05:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Nick, right, what would happen in this game to make

1:05:49.200 --> 1:05:52.240
<v Speaker 3>you lose confidence in the Chiefs short of injury to

1:05:52.400 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 3>star players?

1:05:54.480 --> 1:05:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Nothing, I look nothing, the.

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Mahomes on three picks against that bad secondary.

1:06:04.200 --> 1:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>No, folks, folks want me. Here's the thing. It'd be

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:15.040
<v Speaker 2>one thing if my Chiefs, if my level of confidence

1:06:15.040 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>for the Chiefs was irrational, But people, and if you

1:06:20.480 --> 1:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>wanted to call it irrational going into last season, when

1:06:23.920 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes had just played that terrible second half against the

1:06:26.680 --> 1:06:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Bengals and the Chiefs traded Tyreek Hill, so be it.

1:06:30.400 --> 1:06:30.880
<v Speaker 3>You could have.

1:06:31.360 --> 1:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>But when they're coming off winning a super Bowl, when

1:06:33.560 --> 1:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes was playing on one leg, and when you're seeing

1:06:37.400 --> 1:06:41.360
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the alleged contenders in the AFC. Self immolate.

1:06:41.880 --> 1:06:45.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why you would believe that I would

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>have anything other than full complete confidence that this is

1:06:50.040 --> 1:06:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the best team in football. All right, great job everybody.

1:06:52.880 --> 1:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I gotta go, We gotta get to television. Have a

1:06:55.440 --> 1:06:58.600
<v Speaker 2>wonderful weekend. We will talk to you guys at three

1:06:58.640 --> 1:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>o'clock today on first things first, what's right