WEBVTT - White House Nuclear Energy Push Meets Uncertain Market

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Tom Rowland's Reese, and you're listening to Switched

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast brought to you by B and EF.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>After the Fukushima incident of twenty eleven, attitudes towards nuclear

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>power as a secure energy source shifted, with some nations

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>such as Germany, accelerating the phase out of its nuclear fleet,

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>while the US increased regulations Once in nuclear energy heavyweight,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the US has seen construction of nuclear plants slow to

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a crawl. The country has fallen far behind Russia and

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>China in terms of its technology and equipment being used

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for nuclear power builds around the world. The Trump administration

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>has made no secret of its desire to change this,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and last month issued four executive orders that seek to

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>reinvigorate the US's domestic nuclear power fleet. But is this

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>policy push enough to stimulate a risk averse private sector

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and what forms of nuclear technology are North American companies

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at today? I am joined by B and EF's

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>lead nuclear analyst, Kris Kodoonsky, and we discussed findings from

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>his note, Trump pushes nuclear, but market pull is uncertain.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Which B and EF plants can find at BNEF go

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal or on BNF dot com. All right,

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get to talk about the future of US nuclear

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>energy with Chris.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Chris, welcome to the show.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Tom, it's a pleasure to be back. Yeah.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, it doesn't feel like

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it was that long ago that we had you on

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 2>So why are we speaking today.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's a lot of excitement about nuclear power in

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 3>the media, among governments and larger organizations institutions, and that

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>has been triggered most recently by the May twenty third

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 3>signing by President Trump of four Executive Orders. And the

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>four executive Orders are taking aim at some of the

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>fundamental issues and problems that has led to the US

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>becoming a laggard in nuclear energy construction around the world.

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>And so I'll be very very curious to see what

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>transpires and how the executive orders will be able to

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>work and coexist with Everetts by DOGE to sort of

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 3>cut the government workforce and create an environment where the

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>private sector will rally behind what is left of government

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 3>funding to support this to go ahead and build out

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>nuclear power in the country.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So you recently published a report on this, and the

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>title of the report Trump pushes nuclear but market poll

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is uncertain, which kind of tells maybe, I mean gives

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in a nutshell where you stand on this. I think

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting, and you know, when it comes to Chris,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just a fan who has come lately. I'm

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>familiar with your entire back catalog, so I know that

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in December twenty twenty four you also published a piece

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>called US Nuclear Goals in the Cards or just an Illusion,

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>which was in reference to some targets put in place

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>by the Biden administration. And I also remember that in

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>May twenty twenty you published a piece I've got all

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the receipts here called Trump Administration Aims to make Nuclear

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Greats Again, which, unlike those other two titles, doesn't at

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a slight skepticism on your part on the gap between

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>ambitions and reality. But I'm just going to read from

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the executive's summary, and this is again from May twenty twenty.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>The US nuclear industry has ceded global leadership to Russia

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and China, as evidenced by the underwhelming presence of US

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>vendors participating in global markets. Be in the f questions

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>whether the appropriate strategic elements in place in the nfwg's plan. NFWG,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Sorry's Nuclear Fuel Working Group will materialize

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to US re establish the US as a contender without

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan support and appropriate funding. The nfwg's policy goals represent

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>wishful thinking rather than an executable objectives to restore global leadership.

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So again, although it was in the title definitely have

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>your and I say this, you're someone who is I

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair to say pro nuclear.

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that you are.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Just saying this because you are not in favor of nuclear,

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but you, I think appreciate the challenges and how far

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>behind the US is. So I suppose over the years

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that sort of skepticism on your part. The

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that's interesting though, is now when we look at

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this sort of the pattern is Trump administration Mark one

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>was pro nuclear. The Biden administration for the most part

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>was kind of most of its time, I would say,

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>slightly neutral. It had those tax credits in the IRA

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to support nuclear if the economics weren't working out. But

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>then right at the end there was this ambitious set

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of goals set out for nuclear and then of Trump

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>has come back in and he has come out as

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>being very pro nuclear with these executive orders. So we're

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>starting to see actually a little bit of bipartisanship emerging

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>around nuclear. And yet you're still a bit skeptical maybe

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>about how challenging this is and whether that challenge is

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fully appreciated.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Is that fair?

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I am I being fair to your read on this

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>whole space.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's absolutely correct, and maybe an anecdote can

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 3>illustrate the reasons for my skepticism. Back in twenty ten

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 3>or twenty eleven, before the fu Kushimi event, we had

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 3>a conversation with an SMR developer in the US and

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 3>with the Russians, and the conversation in twenty ten went

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 3>like this. The Russians said, we're going to have a

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>SMR operating north the Arctic Circle by twenty twenty, and

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 3>the US SMR developer said, well, we will have a

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 3>SMR operating in the US by twenty twenty. Come twenty twenty,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>what has happened is that the Russians are operating in

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 3>SMR north of the Arctic Circle in a floating nuclear

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>power plant, a tremendous innovation that has implications for global

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 3>markets in South Asia and in Pacific region, and the

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>US development looks like, well, we might be likely if

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 3>we have something by twenty thirty. So I'm trying to

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 3>look and say, well, what has happened to the US

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 3>industry why we can't deliver where you look at the

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Russians and they are very very aggressive in delivering SMRs

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 3>in remote places, and they're leading global construction, and so

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>I sort of am and wondering what it is that

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 3>has handicapped the US industry so we can't build, And

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 3>there are a whole slew of reasons for doing so.

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 3>But that's why I remain skeptical, because what's really really

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 3>important is not so much policy push but market pull.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Then I use the analogy of pushing a string as

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 3>opposed to pulling a string, And so if we had

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of market pull, if you until the executives

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 3>stood up, raises hands says, I want a nuclear reactor

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 3>that's a very very strong single and we're starting to

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 3>see that from the hyperscalers because they are facing tremendous

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>demands for electricity to power their data centers.

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I want us to explore this idea of market pull,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to it in de course. And also

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we just a moment, will we'll dive into

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the reasons or your assessment of the reasons

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>why the US has sort of fallen behind in this race.

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>One thing I meant to mention, for those of you

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>who are not familiar with the term SMO that sounds

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for small modular reactor. It's a next generation nuclear reactor,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>and as the names just, it's significantly smaller than a

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>conventional nuclear actor and therefore is less restricted by where

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it can be deployed. Before we dive into the reasons

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>why we think that nuclear progress in the US has

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>fallen so far behind, I think that you actually, and

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you laid it out really well in the note you

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>recently published the number of reactors under construction worldwide by

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the country, not of where they're being constructed, but by

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>where the technology comes from. It paints a very stark picture.

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you just really illustrate your point talk us through

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that very quickly.

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 3>So, the country in which the greatest construction effort is

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>going on as China, something like twenty eight twenty nine reactors.

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Of those twenty eight twenty nine reactors for those reactors

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 3>are being built by the Russians. Russia is only building

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 3>four reactors in its own country, but it's also building

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 3>four reactors in Turkey, four reactors in Egypt, two reactors

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 3>in Bangladesh, and four reactors in India. So that brings

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Russia to a total amount of twenty six reactors under

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 3>construction that are Russian designs, and if you compare that

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 3>to the US, there are no nuclear reactors under construction

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>of US design. Now there's an issue here is that

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 3>China is building several CAP one thousands. CAP one thousands

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>are the Chinese version of the AP one thousand that

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 3>is a Westinghouse or US design. Westinghouse will argue that

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 3>is they're part of their design, but we look at

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 3>the components are eighty percent manufactured in China. There are

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 3>certain other modifications and changes that they've done, so we

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 3>characterize that perhaps incorrectly, but I think realistically as as

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 3>a reactor of Chinese design as opposed to US design,

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 3>that will be a debatable point.

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a debatable point, but you know, whatever the actual answer,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's not a right or wrong answer.

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, the picture that emerges is very clear. China

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.479
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest market for nuclear power and a significant

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>proportion of that is being served by Chinese supply chain,

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese developers, and so this puts, like with so many

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>other markets, China in a good position in the future

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to be an exporter of that expertise and know how.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Russia is currently the world's leading exporter of that expertise

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and know how. And the US neither has a thriving

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>domestic market like China which would be a platform to

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>become an exporter, and it is certainly not an exporter today.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is a pretty clear picture and it's hard

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to argue with it. So before we talk about how

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>these executive orders might try and address some of this,

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>before we talk about the demand pool, what in your

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>view has gone wrong here, Like if we go back

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to when you were having that conversation in twenty ten,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>where there was ambitions around small modular reactors, for example,

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>at that point in time, maybe already the US was

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>being to lag, but at least people to be making

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the claims that have a smaller modul reactor. By twenty twenty,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there must have been stakeholders in the US who felt

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the US was in the race, you know, And since

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>then the US are so comprehensively lost.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>So what has gone wrong?

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, let me clarify a few things. I'm there the nuances.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Nuance is a very good word to use with regards

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 3>to the discussion of the nuclear power industry as far

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 3>as development of advanced reactors, by far in the way,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the US is in first place. We have a whole

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 3>slew of advanced reactive technologies that are being developed by

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 3>a wide variety of companies. However, we haven't gotten to

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the point where we are licensing them or building them,

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 3>and that are two necessary steps. And licensing is a

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 3>very challenging process to undergo in the US, and it's

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 3>one of the executive orders that Trump signed on May

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty third was to address NRC reform and but doing

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 3>so it will help speed up the process and reduce

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the risk of these nuclear technologies. We're all new innovative technologies,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 3>most of them coming across the finish line getting licensed

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 3>and then get it constructed and built. So I don't

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 3>want to paint a picture that there's no nuclear leadership

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 3>in the US. There's nuclear leadership as far as developing

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 3>new technologies, but we are certainly laggards in actually building

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 3>UCAR power plants. We have no nuclear reactors under construction

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 3>in North America, never mind in the US all lot.

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So I suppose maybe a more nuanced picture that we

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>could paint is, when it comes to what is happening

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, the US has fallen behind in terms of

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the deployment of nuclear technologies, and a lot of what

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken about in terms of those figures refers to

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>conventional nuclear technologies where Russia is the global exporter of

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>China is the biggest market, and so the US's hopes

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of establishing leadership globally in this space do not hinge

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on I guess what you'd call say, catching up in

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that area. It is making sure that this other great

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>hope of these next generation of technologies is that the

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>US doesn't get in its own way of winning that race,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>which it is well positioned to win.

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 2>Is that maybe the.

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Nuanced take of what the picture currently looks like, and

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe what these executive orders are aiming to address is,

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>let's ensure that the US can capitalize on this sort

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of new generation of technologies that it has led the

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>way in developing.

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 3>A fundamental first step is building advanced reactors in the US,

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 3>whether or not on military basis, on federal land or

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 3>by utilities or with hyperscalar demand pull to go ahead

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and do that. That's the first step. Once we start

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>building nuclear reactors in the US, we can expect interest

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 3>from other markets overseas to follow, and that makes a

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of sense. There are a couple of proposals right

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 3>now to build reactors in Eastern Europe that have not

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>been built in the US, and to me, that strikes

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 3>me as a very risky proposition for the new host

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>country to consider a technology that has yet to be

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 3>built in the US. And I think that.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 2>And these are American technologies.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 3>American technologies or so, and we're starting to see some progress.

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 3>The most exciting development is the General Electric Kitachi nuclear

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 3>power plant that's going to be built in Ontario, Canada

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 3>by Ontario Power Generation. They're going to be four units.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Four days before the executive orders were signed by President Trump,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 3>the Tennessee Value Authority, with large government utility has also

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 3>decided to submit a construction permit for several of the

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 3>same reactors. And that's a very very important key is

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 3>that the key too mass deployment of these nuclear reactors

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 3>is having a significant project pipeline. It's very hard for

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 3>a developer or a vendor of a nuclear power plan

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>to say, give me a couple of billion dollars and

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll build your reactor. It's a much easier line, and

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the financial community is much more receptive. It says, give

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 3>me a couple of billion dollars to build a factory

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 3>with which I can manufacture ten to twenty reactors, and

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 3>here's the project pipeline I have. So General Electric Hitachi,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 3>for example, has four projects now underway, at least in Canada,

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>more in Alberta and Saskatchewan. For in the US at

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the Tennessee Value Authority, some perhaps in Estonia too. The

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 3>General Electric Attachi maybe was a contender for the Great

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 3>British Nuclear Program, although Rolls Royce has seemed to have

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 3>succeeded in taking being nominated first. But that doesn't preclude

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 3>General Electric Katachi for participating in that market. And if

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I was the UK policy makers, I've sort of divide

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 3>allocate eighty twenty percent, give eighty percent to the SMR

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>of Rolls Royce Company and twenty percent to General Electric

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Tiktaci to create some tension in the marketplace so that

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 3>there'll be some cost considerations and that if Rolls Royce

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 3>is too expensive, we have another operation. And finally, in Poland,

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 3>they have talked about building twenty four of these general

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 3>electric katachis. That's a pretty long project pipeline, and they

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 3>can make the long term investment necessary to get from

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 3>a first of a kind cost to end of a

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 3>kind cost as quickly as possible. That's the secret to

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 3>getting a widespread deployment of nuclear power.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean, that's really interesting.

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So Poland is potentially a key market for next generation

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>technologies because they've they've put in place dot ambition, not

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of a gig target, but specifically actual

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>projects under development for these technologies.

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 3>My cousins of Poland present a very complicated picture. They've

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 3>articulated that they have no nuclear power. And Poland is

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the only country that built nuclear power plants and decommissioned

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 3>them without ever operating them in the wake of the

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Chernobyl disaster. Now Poland has said we need six to

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 3>nine gigawatts of nuclear power to reduce our carbon footprint

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 3>because it's largely generating electricity through coal plants. That's very

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 3>very ambitious. There's three potential pathways that have surfaced right

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>now for them to do that. One, they've signed contracts

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 3>with the Westinghouse eight p one thousand for three reactors

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 3>or went to three reactors at a very very high cost.

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 3>They've also looked at the General Electric Katachi and looked

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 3>to build They've announced twenty four projects and finally the

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Koreans wanted to get into the act as well, and

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 3>they're making proposals for a smaller one gigawatt version of

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 3>their reactor at another site. So you have three potential

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 3>solutions to Poland's nuclear ambitions. Perhaps two or three will

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>go through. But it's important to recognize that for Poland,

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 3>building large reactors that are manufactured in the US or

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Korea does not necessarily solve all of their social and

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 3>political problems. You have a large percentage of the population

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>who is reliant on coal and a coal industry that

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 3>you're introducing technologies to reduce their participation in the Polish economy.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 3>So the idea for Poland to sort of develop a

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>technology that they can build locally and create a knowledge

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 3>industry and industry where there is a lot of participation

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 3>from society to support the developing commercialation of lear power

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 3>is very very important. And if they can build a

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of the components in Poland for the long term perspective,

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>that would be much healthier.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>So with thinking about US technologies, this is maybe partly

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the reason, one of the reasons why the plan is

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>so much more robust if it'll relies on the US

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>market first. So let's bring it back to the US.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're going to get to these executive orders

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in a moment, so we painted this picture. US is

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>very well poised in terms of next generation technologies. Maybe,

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and I say this because I read a lot of

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>your research. They're not going to be commercial as soon

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>as some might hope, but they are still you know,

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>one day, these next generation nuclear technology is going to

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be very relevant, and the US is in the lead

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>on those, but has fallen behind when it comes to

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>conventional nuclear technology. And so this is the narrative I'm

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>going with is that, you know, maybe these executive orders

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>will help ensure the success of these new technologies by

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>removing roadblocks. And so I think it is still important

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to understand why the US fell behind in conventional nuclear

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>technology because I'm presuming that some of the challenges faced

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>there could impact the next generation of nuclear technologies and

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>therefore why some of these challenges need to be addressed

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>by these executive orders. So why has the US fallen

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>behind in conventional nuclear technology if you.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Look over the last fifteen years. The Fukushima event in

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty eleven in March of twenty eleven cast a poll

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 3>over the global nuclear power industries and infected countries in

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 3>different ways. Japan ended up reducing their fleet significantly, Germany

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 3>closed their entire fleet and closed them I get the

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>end of twenty twenty three or so, and in the

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 3>US we closed thirteen reactors for a variety of different purposes.

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 3>So you had this poll hanging over the industry globally.

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 3>In some countries were China and Russia paused but realized

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.959
<v Speaker 3>that nuclear has a very big role to play in

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 3>their societies, and so they went forward and recovered more quickly.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 3>In the US, we have a preference for renewables, and

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 3>we had some support for renewables, and so that has

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 3>been a priority in many many ways. And we also

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 3>had very cheap natural gas, and we also have very

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 3>high labor costs that made the prospect of building and

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 3>operating large new your power plants more problematic than it

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 3>was in other parts of the country. Remember this, Our

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>analysis suggests that to build a nuclear power plant in China,

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>they can do it for approximately one fifth cost that

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 3>it costs us to build the last two ap one

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 3>thousands in Georgia. That's a huge delta. So one can understand, well,

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I can build reactors for one fifth of costs in China,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 3>continued doing so, and so in this country where where

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 3>we have this high cost label attached to the nuclear

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 3>power and I don't think we'll go forward unless we

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 3>can somehow address that. And some of the executive orders

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that Trump has signed may address some of those issues.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's let's get onto the main event. Then.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we've done a lot of contextualizing so far.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>But we came here to talk about these executive orders.

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So talk us through these executive orders and what they're

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>intended to accomplish, and you know your view on whether

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>they can accomplish those things.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 3>We sign four nuclear executive orders and their aim is

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.959
<v Speaker 3>to revitalize the nuclear energy industry. And some of the

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 3>issues that we have or the arguments that the Nuclear

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Regulatory Commission, which is the gold standard of regulation of

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 3>nuclear power, has been too constraining to the society, and

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 3>so we're talking about perhaps let's think of a way

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 3>to make the process less expensive, less daunting to the

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 3>companies that are trying to run down that path and

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 3>accomplish that in say twenty four months, as opposed to

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>forty four months that has taken the less licensed application

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 3>to get approved. So that's a very very important thing.

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 3>And we're also talking about leveraging US Department of Energy

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 3>research laboratories to help speed speed that forward. And that

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 3>is something that we could also have. You have a

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of resources available to sponsor and spur research and development.

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>We'll try to adjuss that. And we want to reinvigorate

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>the nuclear industrial base, and so Trump has said, let's

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 3>try to have ten new reactors under construction by twenty

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 3>third and he has set a target for four hundred

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 3>giga wats of capacity, adding an additional three hundred capacity

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>to the existing fleet by twenty to fifty. Those are

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 3>very very ambition plans, more ambitious than the preceding plan.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 3>It's also important that we try to develop and supply

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 3>some of these nuclear power plants to support our military

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 3>basis and also to support the anticipated demand from hyperscalers

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 3>to power the data centers, which is in many ways

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 3>a national security issue. We've seen some progress already. There

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 3>was a discussion about Oklahm, one of the companies that

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 3>is developing an innovative advanced react to technology, was recently

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 3>given the go ahead to move forward for supplying electricity

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 3>very nuclear their five banguwatt reactor to a site Alsaid

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Air Force Base in Alaska, and that has created a

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 3>tremendous amount of enthusiasm for the fact that perhaps the

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 3>environment created by releasing these executive orthors may speed up

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 3>the process for the commercialization of a lot of different

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 3>advanced reactors.

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's this government push on various fronts to unlock

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the potential of US nuclear And yet I know that

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you as someone who maybe appreciates how challenging this is,

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>how long people have been trying, I still sense a

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of skepticism. I mean, just you know, as

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we said before, the title of your note was Trump

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>pushes nuclear, but market pull is uncertain. So the market

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>pull is a really important factor there. We can all

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>about the market pull in a moment, but why is

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it that policy push is not enough? You use this

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>analogy of trying to push a piece of string. Can

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we just explain a little bit more why why that

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be enough? Because in some areas policy push is enough,

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but why not for nuclear.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 3>So if you are a utility executive, the CEO of utility,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 3>you're at the job for seven to eight years and

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 3>your compensation is largely based upon the performance of the

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>utility stock. And so you may a decision, an announcement

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 3>to the world that you are going to build a

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 3>large nuclear power plant. And because we don't have the

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 3>experience and the workflows and the workforce that the Chinese

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 3>have now in building that, Wall Street views this, Oh

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 3>my god, they're going to go and build a nuclear

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 3>power plant. Let's short the stock. Because the Wall Street's view,

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 3>at least some of the bankers that I talked to

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.239
<v Speaker 3>on a regular basis, suggests that every project in the

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 3>US will be first of a kind project, as opposed

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 3>to down the pathway towards the end of a kind.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.239
<v Speaker 3>And that's the case that all the workers who were

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 3>assembled for the Westinghouse AP one thousand project in Georgia,

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 3>there's no second project. They're all dispersed, and so recreating

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 3>that workforce is going to be much more challenging. So

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 3>you're starting at a new site with a large percentage

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 3>of a new workforce, and it's not like a cooker

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 3>cutting approach like the Chinese. The Chinese will build six

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 3>reactors at the same site, so the workforce goes the

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 3>one reactor to the next reactor, the next reactor, and

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 3>each one becomes less and less expensive. And as a

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 3>result of that, they can build reactors in a short

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 3>period of time five years as opposed to ten years,

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 3>and for a one fifth of cost that we can

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 3>over there. So the utility executive is kind of saying, well,

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be the next nuclear power plant

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 3>builder because of the risks to the company by making

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 3>a decision to go ahead and do that. I happen

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 3>to have visited Saudi Arabia at a time when Saudi

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 3>Arabia was considering building nuclear power plants, and the reason

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 3>I visited Saudi Arabia was to understand which company in

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.479
<v Speaker 3>Saudi Arabia could be the host institution to do that,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and the only company that I have discovered in my

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 3>travels there was Saudi Aramco. Saudis are still discussing building

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 3>nuclear power plants, but they always end up discussing them

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 3>without any firm plants. I'm moving forward. So utilities are

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 3>wary of the cost of building a nuclear power plant,

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 3>and so they're standing back and saying I prefer not

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>to be the next one to commit. Let's see if

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 3>some some of the estimates from the US government suggests

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 3>that maybe a thirty percent drop would be an appropriate

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 3>estimate for a new nuclear power plant in the US.

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 3>That takes it from thirty four billion dollars to twenty

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 3>four billion dollars or so. That's a huge cost. The Koreans,

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, are suggesting that they can build

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 3>two large reactors in Czech Republic for eighteen nineteen billion dollars,

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 3>so still significantly less. But in the nuclear industry, price

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.239
<v Speaker 3>because of high interest rates inflation tend to rise, and

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 3>so very infrequently do you see a nuclear project in

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the US or in Western Europe coming less than it's

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>forecast to the cost. It's always higher, and sometimes significantly higher.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 3>The West has a terrible track record of building large

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 3>nuclear power plants. It's interesting the way you describe it.

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 3>You know that utilities would rather someone else goes first.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 3>There's various idioms we could apply to that.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 1>One would be the US nuclear industry faces a bit

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>of a chicken and egg problem. I would prefer to

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>say that you need a critical of projects.

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 3>There are ideas circulating around where there should be some

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 3>sort of mechanism among US utilities to share risk and

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 3>perhaps to form consortiums so that you have access to

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 3>a project that's going through the construction phase, but you're

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 3>not on the hook for the entire cost for doing so,

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 3>and so by sharing that risk, you may have a

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 3>fifteen to twenty percent risk for the cost overrun. But

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 3>by doing so you start the process and perhaps the

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 3>third or fourth project you'll be able to have a

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 3>better higher confidence on what the cost will actually be.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 3>And there's also mechanisms to isolate the cost of the

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 3>nuclear components from the construction cost, so you can offer

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 3>the utility a fixed cost contract for the reactor, pressure

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 3>vessel and associated nuclear commitment, and then put it on

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the utility to manage the construction costs, so that you

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 3>have partially a fixed price contract and a construction contract

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 3>with the utility itself will manage and that will tend

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 3>to sort of take some of the risk way from

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the large deployment risk that is slowing to US utilities

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 3>from buying Nuco. No Nuco's under construction in this country.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's really interesting this idea of the sort

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the high risks of project overruns, and so if

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the project scale, it seems almost you know,

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>from what you're describing, that private sector will inherently struggle

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to make this market happen. And you know, in the

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>US is it is the archetype of capitalism. It is

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>an inherently a country that relies on the private sector

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>for innovation and development, and maybe this technology, because of

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the scale of involved, is not well suited to.

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:41.479
<v Speaker 2>Thrive in that environment.

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Now, obviously, the next generation wave of technologies are not

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>so big in scale, which might mean that it's less challenging.

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>But there are private sector organizations that do have a

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of scale that goes, you know, way beyond utilities.

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We think of utilities as big, but tech companies they

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>are another proposition entirely. And you mentioned and already the

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>demand pull, and you mentioned hyperscalers. Do you think they

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>can help untangle this challenging puzzle? And they certainly have

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>incentives to do so with the need for power for

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>AI and how do the executive orders from Trump sort

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.239
<v Speaker 1>of enable those organizations to play a more leading role

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the development of nuclear in this country.

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 3>So before the Trump executive authors, there was a note

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 3>I wrote and I guess December and November of last

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 3>year reflecting the fact that Amazon had participated in a

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.479
<v Speaker 3>Series A or B or C investment in x Energy.

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>And there is also Google committed to purchase three hundred

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 3>gig ors the capacity of chirostud reactors. So you do

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 3>have hyperscalers, large data center companies coming in saying yes,

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 3>we have an interest in this technology and we're supportive

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 3>of that. But the question has to be is how

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 3>much money are they investing in the company itself versus

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 3>how much are they committing in a power purchase agreement

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 3>for that and so, or how strong is that commitment

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 3>and how quickly can the vendors mobilize the technology. Some

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 3>of these companies have yet to go through the licensing process,

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 3>so there's still licensing risk and construction risk for a

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 3>first of a kind. So the large hyperscalers are circling

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the area looking where to place their bets, and we

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 3>see companies like Amazon being a leader in that effort,

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 3>and I would be curious to see how Meta, Microsoft

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>and Google will sort of follow in placing bets on

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 3>various nuclear companies.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting because it's almost for those large tech companies,

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the opposite challenge that say the utilities face. The

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>utilities don't want to go first, they don't want to

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>move too quickly. They want someone else to do the

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>work to bring the costs down. The problem that the

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>large tech companies face is they need power sooner rather

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>than later. Is this technology ready enough? And maybe they

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>are less averse to investing in first of a kind

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and being the first mover on some of these But

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>actually there's some of these nuclear technology developers are not

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>far enough along in the development process and the process

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of getting licensed to meet their needs. And so do

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you think the executive orders could help address some of

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that of that challenge?

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, the executive officers address the NRC reform, they're creating

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 3>an environment that's uncertain with regards to the tax incentives

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 3>that are going to be available to the advanced nuclear

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 3>power industry. It's something that's in discussion right now even

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 3>as we sit here talking about nuclear power right now.

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 3>But I think the fundamental thing that the Executive Orders

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 3>done is giving government support to the industry, or vocalizing

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 3>government support. How that can be monetized is very very

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 3>important issue. China and Russia are leading the commercialization of

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 3>nuclear power because they have very strong support from the

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 3>top The Russian government is very interested in nuclear, as

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 3>is the Chinese government in very interested in nuclear We

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 3>have not had a significant because of our nature, because

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 3>of our capitalist system, we tend to not have such

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 3>strong from the top down support. Perhaps this is an

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 3>opportunity through the Executive Orders to demonstrate that yes, we

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 3>have it, and we're starting to see some indication of that,

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 3>specifically with the rapid announcement of the fact that Oklow,

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 3>a project that has been languishing for two years, all

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden has been announced that now they had

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the go ahead there that one's selected. So the nukea

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 3>industry moves forward like molasses. Hopefully the Executive Orders will

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 3>create an environment where we move some of the uncertainty

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 3>and gives a clear path we're going forward. What's also helping,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 3>quite frankly, is the fact that there's been such a

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Definius demanded interest in large combined cycle turpins, that the

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 3>backlog for that is now extending to the point that

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 3>perhaps you may not be able to get a guest

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 3>turbine soon enough to meet your requirements. And so if

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 3>you can have a very fast track for an advanced reactor,

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 3>perhaps that might be an option that becomes increasingly more attractive,

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 3>even though the technical readiness is perhaps not there, and

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the technical risk and the regulatory risk still.

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of reminded as we talk about this conversation

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of that famous American movie, The Field of Dreams, which

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>originated the famous phrase, if you build it, they will come.

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen that movie? Yes, so you know what

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:16.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm referring to. It's a good movie. You should check

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 2>it out if you don't know what I'm talking about.

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like this US nuclear renaissance is a

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of a dream right now.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:25.479
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You look at what is possible, and it could be

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>so good for the power section in this country. It

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>could create jobs in the country, and so the government

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is in this position of trying to build the right

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>environment within this framework. As we've mentioned, of a company

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that is inherently driven by the private sector create the

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>right environment so that these projects, these technologies will come.

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So I was saying, it reminds me of the field

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of dreams. I'm left with this thought, if you build it,

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they will come. Maybe that's what these executive orders are

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>part of. And again, this is not a partisan issue.

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>In quite the same way, the previous administration was also

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>very pro nuclear. It seems like successive US governments are

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how to build the right environment

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to allow the US to capsulize on the progress that

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 1>has already made in the next generation of nuclear That

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is my takeaway from all of this. Interesting to see

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>if you think that's a bad way of thinking of

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it or does that make sense to you, Chris.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it makes a tremendous amount of sense. But

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll introduce one final complicating factor. There are five pathways

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>to putting nuclear electrons on the grid. There's large reactors,

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 3>which is problematic in the US because of the big

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 3>deployment risk. There are small reactors that we see moving

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 3>forward in Canada and hopefully in the US. Then you

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 3>have advanced reactors, the reactors that offer some innovation and

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 3>a fast reactor, high temperature gas reactor a molten salt

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 3>reactor that are technologically different and perhaps won't be more

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 3>quest competitive and safer. And then you have the microreactors,

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 3>which are very small reactors can be deployed in the

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 3>back of a truck, and the lorry in an airplane yourself.

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 3>And finally, the biggest confusing factor perhaps is the advent

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 3>of fusion. Okay, so if you are looking to buy

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 3>nuclear electrons, there's a big shopping list, five different pathways,

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 3>different timelines, uncertain courts, different technical readiness lists, different types

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 3>of risks. So it's a very confusing landscape for the

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 3>utilities and hyperscalers to operate in right now. And it's

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be fascinating to see which one of those

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 3>many many companies that are participating will cross the finish

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 3>line generate reactors or respond to your field of dreams.

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 2>If we build it, they will come.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, thinking of the field of dreams. You know,

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in that movie for those you haven't seen it, Kevin

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Costner builds a baseball field and a bunch of ghosts

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of famous baseball players show up and start playing baseball.

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the film ever addresses which of the

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Ghosts one at baseball. But this is a little bit

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like from Kevin Costner's point of view, it didn't matter

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>which of the ghosts one, but for the ghosts, presumably

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>as competitive baseball players, they wanted to have been the

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>one to win. So maybe the government here is Kevin Costner.

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>So long as somebody wins, that's a good outcome. And

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for the ghosts, well, they've got to turn up to

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the field of the dream and compete, but at least

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>they have an opportunity to compete. Chris, this has been,

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as always a fascinating conversation. I hope that there's more

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>development so we have an excuse to bring you on

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>again because I always enjoy talking to you. But thank

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining us today.

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Tavi.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 3>It's always the pleasure.

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with production assistants from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg NIF is a

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed, as investment,

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a vice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>investment or other strategy Bloomberg ANNIF should not be considered

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>of the information contained in

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 2>This recording, and any liability as a result of this

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 2>recording is expressly disclaimed