WEBVTT - The Microsoft Tay Debacle

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says I texted

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>you on a Monday, but you did not get my

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>text until Tuesday because of a network problem. I'm Jonathan

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick. Did that problem have to

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>do with the tubes? Yes, yes, I can't believe I

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>made a tubes joke. No, I take it back. I'm sorry.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. You've been a radio and the radio is forever. No, no, no, no,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. Easy jokes beneath me. We're going to talk

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>about chat bots today. Yeah, we've talked about chat bots before, right,

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about them in a couple of different episodes.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about chat bots, we talked about AI, We've

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about touring tests, we've talked about machine learning. All

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of those topics are going to play a part in

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>our discussion today. And speaking of easy jokes that are

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>beneath us, we are talking specifically today about tay tweets. Yes,

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft ta uh yeah, Tay Tay. We we we hardly

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>knew ye. In fact, I doubt anyone really knew. Ye.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't find out about Tay until Tay was already gone.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I found out about Tay while TAY was still active,

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but I never messaged Tay. And the only reason I

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>found out about Tay was because I had been invited

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a guest on a show called Tech News Today,

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was one of the news items that they covered.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And I had been very busy in our day to

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>day work and had not followed along. So when I

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>when I heard about it, it it was before all the

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>craziness unfolded. And we'll get into what the craziness was.

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, though, even at ground like square one,

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me like TAY was probably not the

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>most thought out project Microsoft has ever launched. And I'm

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>including Microsoft Bob in that. Yeah, that's a that's a

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>sick burn for those who know what Microsoft Bob was. Okay,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>tell me more, all right, Well now that we we

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>got our little rascals reference all the way. So, according

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to Microsoft, Tay is quote an artificial intelligent chatbot developed

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>by Microsoft Technology and Research and BING teams to experiment

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>with and conduct research on conversational understanding. UM, I know

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>some people would probably start to argue with the word

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>intelligent that was in that description based upon some of

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the things that were happening with t Now, that description

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exactly capture what the public saw of Tape because

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the public facing incarnation of ta was specifically a Twitter account. Well,

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Twitter account was the primary one. Yeah, she or it.

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I get very confused about referring to AI because they're robots.

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Robots don't have genders. But Tay was impersonating a nineteen

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>year old girl, so our woman. Yeah. Also when when

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>at what age is an AI a woman? I don't

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>know yet? An AI no longer the longer a girl

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>type of thing. She was a young adult AI. Okay,

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>while I continue to go through this this oddly misplaced

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>feeling of cultural shame, Yes, she was also on group

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>me and Kick and Kick So what are what are

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you even talking? So group me, Lauren and I know

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>all about group me. Yeah, we happen to use group

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>me while we were in Austin for south By Southwest.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So group me is essentially like a very contained version

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter. It's it's a collection of cell phone numbers, essentially,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so that you can send a message to the group

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>me which includes multiple people. Everyone receives that message and

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone can respond to it. Yeah, it's a fancy group

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>messaging system that also has a little bit of capacity

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to look like cute stuff, like you can up a

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>picture and um immediately place meme style text on it. Yeah,

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it used to be that it was just group texting.

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So when I started seeing the pictures popping up with

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>all the memes, I immediately went into old man mode

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and got really confused. Kick is also an instant messaging platform. Uh,

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's based off the BlackBerry Messenger platform, So it's all.

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Three of these are different ways to send out messages

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to typically groups of people, not not like a one

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on one thing necessarily, although I think Kick can can

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>sometimes fall into that category. But um, honestly, before we

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>even get into two, more of the weirdness here. From

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the get go, I felt odd about the idea of

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>framing an AI within the context of not only a

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>gender but an age, kind of like you were saying, Lauren,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I I most of the time when I think of AI,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>unless you're specifically trying to create something that's going to

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>pass a touring test and therefore fool someone into thinking

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an actual first I was gonna say, this sounds

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>like some Eugene kind of trickery. Yeah, and we'll talk

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>about goosetman in a minute to Unless you're doing that,

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 1>there's not really I don't see a purpose to giving

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>a gender and age to an AI other than maybe

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some studies perhaps that suggest humans are more likely

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to have a natural interaction with someone that they can

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of categorize in some way. And I

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that, if that research even exists. That's

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just me taking wild shots in the dark. Um, but

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I personally thought I would be very reticent to send

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a message to an entity that had been more or

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>less identified as a nineteen year old female, even just

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to see how it was working, because I'm a forty

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 1>year old man, and I don't think sending messages to

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to an entity that's less than half my age, like

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it just feels inappropriate from the from the start to me,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>even though I know it's not a person in right,

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it all exactly made me feel kind of squidgy. It well, sure,

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just putting putting a strange basis from from our

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>point of view, perhaps, I mean, and and the boat

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>was supposedly geared towards people I think eighteen to twenty four.

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So so it wasn't meant for me in the first place,

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't designed by people who are eighteen to

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. It's fairly I think it was designed by

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>people closer to my age, and that that is one

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the many problems that Tay has. So yes, slightly

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>odd thing, but perhaps a conversation for another day. Yeah, So,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, Tay, like you said, eighteen to twenty

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>four year olds, that was the target demographic because Microsoft

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>had identified that as the demographic that most frequently uses

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>mobile based social media things like social messengers and um

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's really where they were looking to kind of

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>increase this ability for AI to understand conversational English things,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>things that go beyond very simple, uh prescribed commands. Okay,

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>so in practice, what does this look like? What exactly

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was Ta doing? So in practice, you would send Tay

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a message on one of these platforms, either Group Me,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Kick or Twitter, and then t would respond to you.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>If it was on Twitter and things were particularly busy,

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Tay would tell you to send a direct message because

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>otherwise we just get kind of lost in the crush. Obviously,

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>if you unleash something like this to the world at

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>large and you let it be known that it's out there,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get a huge response, right, especially from Twitter,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>so mostly consisting of mischief and I'm sure we'll talk

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>about that some mortally. Yeah. So, uh yeah, this was

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was exactly the case. So they released

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it to try and see what would happen, how Tay

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>would start to incorporate different types of language in her replies,

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>how she would be able to interpret different things that

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>were said to her. They started with a baseline where

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had essentially mined a ton of publicly available data.

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So my guess is would be public tweets would probably

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>be a big one. Right. They identify the demographic that

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at, they mine the sort of communication that

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>these uh, these folks that are within that demographic tend

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to send, and he used as the model for Tay's communication,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the idea was to build upon that. Uh So,

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we mentioned Goostman, uh talking about the fact

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we've got this context of a nineteen

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>year old female persona for Tay with Eugene Goostman, that

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was one of the AI programs that quote unquote passed

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the Turing test. We talked about this in a previous

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>episode in which uh it was a an AI that

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>was mimicking a thirteen year old Ukrainian boy, a non

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>native English speaker, and that meant that the people who

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>were uh interviewing this entity over a over a computer, uh,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>they were aware that they were supposedly talking to a

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>human boy thirteen years old, non native English speaker, limited

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>exposure to things like pop culture that would have come

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>before he was born. So in other words, it checked

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>people's expectations of what this particular uh AI would be

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>capable of doing. Sure, and similarly, I think the part

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of the concept for Tay was probably that you have

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>certain expectations for how a nineteen year old woman is

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>going to behave on Twitter, and it probably involves the

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>use of of emojis and um uh not full grammatical sentences,

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>no capital letters whatsoever. Certainly um certain truncating of of

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and ideas, a certain inquisitiveness probably are the stereotypes

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>of that sort of age group. It was to a point,

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and to be fair, I've only looked at sampling of

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the things he has said. It was to

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a point where I thought, I thought it was venturing

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on the border of parody, right. I was starting to

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>feel like it was, Um, maybe someone my age is

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>preconception of what a person would how a person would

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>constantly be communicating. Uh. And again that could just be

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>my own bias going into it, because there were a

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of things where I'm looking at it and I'm thinking,

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there are many people who do communicate this way,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but it feels weird to have built something specifically to

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>communicate in this way. Not that I necessarily thought that

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>she would need to speak in full sentences with perfect grammar,

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but just it. It almost felt like someone outside of

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that group trying to create language in a in a

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in a like like like a lame dad trying to

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>sound like a cool dad and teenager. Yeah, that's pretty much.

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of how I felt. Now again, I'm not

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not twenty years old anymore, so maybe I'm just

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>totally out of touch and it was fine for people

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>who are of that age and they didn't see anything

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>different about it. No, Nowadays, twenty year olds love linguistic

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>interlopers from the older generation oh is that a trend.

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's how That's how I was when I was twinty.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we gen xers, we we appreciated a good

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, talk about interloping, interloping, interlocution, inter interlocular. They

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>love it almost as much as they love being talked

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>down to about economics. Yeah. Yeah, So anyway, getting back

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to what Microsoft was trying to do, Microsoft's blog actually,

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of outlined what Tay was meant to do.

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>TA is designed to engage and entertain people where they

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>connect with each other online through casual and playful conversation.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>The more you chat with Tay, the smarter she gets,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>so the experience can be more personalized for you. So

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>she was supposed to learn. It's kind of like in

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a terminator too, where you know the terminator has his

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>brain is a learning computer. The more he interacts with humans,

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the more he learns how to be one. Right. So

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>that's what it is to say, Asta Leavista baby right,

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and in the end he could even learn to love maybe.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But let's say, let's say you sort of took a

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>page from the Edward for a Long Book, uh in

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Terminator two, in which he teaches him how to say

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>rude phrases to people. And you tried this out with

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>something like ta you could get some very sad and

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>very funny results. Right, And if you get enough of them,

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you can have so much of an influence that it

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>starts to really change how how TAY starts to behave

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>towards everyone. Right, Like, you know, the the beautiful thing

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>about using something like Twitter for machine learning is that

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you have an enormous wealth of data at your disposal. Yeah.

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>The problem is when people are aware of it, and

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they are the ones supplying the data, and they can

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>make that data whatever they want. They can purposefully misdirect

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>your efforts to go in a direction they think is hilarious. Yeah,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's investing in quantity rather than quality. Yeah. And and

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, I mean this this relationship was a

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>little weird from the get go. Microsoft was using Tay

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to look at things like you would have a little

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>profile and t would recognize stuff on your profile like

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>whatever your handle or nickname was, your gender, uh, your

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite food, your zip code um, and uh, you know

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>your relationship status, which I think is also a little

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>creepy for why does an AI need to know if

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm single or not single. That seems a little like

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>like messages you would get from an artificially intelligent chat

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like you know, hang in there or whatever it may be.

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Seems a little weird. Maybe, you know, maybe Tay is

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>particularly interested in relationship counseling is a possible career. Now

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>she needs to really work on her delivery skills. Then,

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>because Tay started getting a little out of hand, So

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>let's let's before we really talk about what went right

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the chaos, ya, let's talk about what ideally would have

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>happened had had things played out the way Microsoft seems

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to have intended it. Well, you said, you said it

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that she was supposed to be learning from a massive

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>store of data, which is natural conversation on the Internet,

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and so that was supposed to be something that the

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>computer program could analyze and say, Okay, I'm getting a

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>very generalized picture of how people talk, right, and how

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they talk to each other and in response to specific

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>phrases and questions and and other little bits of linguistic cues. Yeah,

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and which is not inherently a bad idea, no, no,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and and and going further than that, how different thoughts

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>can be expressed or or the same thought rather can

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>be expressed in very different ways, which is very useful

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to incorporate that kind of conversation understanding

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in a digital assistant. Oh yeah, yeah, that's that's like

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem in in in language and machine language and

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>language learning, because you because the kind of conversation that

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we have where we've said this a lot of times

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on the show before, but where we can say one

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>thing and and if not dozens, then hundreds or thousands

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of different ways and have another human understand them as

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>long as they're conversational and the same language. Uh. That's

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that's real hard for computers. It's what you call not easy, right.

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's why usually we have to conform to the

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>limitations of machines. Right. We have to be able to

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>express our commands in a way that machines understand, which

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>might not come naturally to us. And as we get

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>better and better with machines understanding conversation, we have to

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>do less work. Right. We don't have to accommodate the machines.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>They just understand us. That's the goal. So that's what

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to have happen, or at least what Microsoft

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have happen. It's not what Twitter wanted to

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>have happen, or you know, the other folks who are

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>using kick or group me. Um, what they wanted to

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>do was to perhaps exercise a little bit of control

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and power over something and direct it for their own amusement.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So you could do things would say that weren't particularly

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, malicious or mischievous, Like you could ask

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>her to tell you a joke or tell you a story.

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>She would play games with you. She would create memes

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like we were talking about with group me. She could

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>do memes with pictures. Yeah, so you could actually have

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>these kind of interactions. But you could do other stuff too, um,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like you could make her say things, like you could

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>tell her to repeat stuff. Now before, let's talk a

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit about some of the phrases she would use

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on her own. Here's here's a couple of sample tweets

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>she sent out. Um. This is sort of the way

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Tay's baseline worked before she got corrupted. I guess it's

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>probably the best way of putting it. Uh OMG totes

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>exhausted swagulated too hard today, HBU, which I assume is

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>how about you Laurence nodding yes, So it's not. I

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>mean it could be. That's my favorite question to ask people.

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Another one was damn t b H. I was kind

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>of distracted, you got me. I'm like, okay, I can

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>these are I can see these these tweets. I see

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>where it's coming from. Uh. You know that's kind of

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the baseline again, sort of the the way t would

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>react to two people just trying out TA sending messages

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to her normally. Uh, but then came all the trolls,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>all the people who think it's hilarious to mess with

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a system that they have some input into. So uh,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>one thing they would do is make TA repeat stuff.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the lot of the tweets you've

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>probably seen, if you've followed the story of Microsoft TA

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>saying horrible, horrible racist, the very worst things are probably

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>things that someone had repeat back. Yeah, you can imagine

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:05.239
<v Speaker 1>generally approving of Hitler. This the Godwin's law was was

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was fulfilled almost immediately. Um So yeah, making her repeat

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff back was easy. You didn't she didn't necessarily quote

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>unquote understand it. She was responding to a command, which

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>was to say this thing that I'm telling you to

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>say This is very similar to a program I used

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to have as a kid, um and it was very

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>similar to Eliza, one of the early chatbots. So there

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was a sound card for old PCs called sound Blaster,

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and one of the pieces of software that came with

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>sound Blaster was this program called Doctor Spaces. So Dr

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Spatso was essentially Eliza, except he talked like this, you know,

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and you could ask Dr Space the questions. He would

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>try to psychoanalyze you, so he would answer everything with

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>his own question. But you could also make him say stuff,

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>so he would say say and then you put things

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in quotation marks. He'd say whatever you wanted him to say,

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and much amuse and into it. Yes, because I was

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a kid and I just thought it was funny to

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>make my computers say really rude things, mostly just mild

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>curse words. Because I was a pretty boring kid. You

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the imagination to make him approve of Hitler. Yeah,

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I gotta admit I never made Dr Spazzo's

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>out like a Nazi sympathizer. It never occurred to me

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as a kid. Kids today, man, they are miles ahead

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of me. Uh So that's that's what we started to

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>see we saw people starting to have her repeat stuff,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and not only was she repeating it, she was starting

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to learn. So she would start to respond to people

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and incorporate some of the stuff that she had been

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>told to repeat over and over again. Not consistently either.

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes she would make one statement to a person where

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>she'd essentially equate something like feminism with being the most

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>evil concept in the world, and then she would send

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>another message to someone else where she she'd say something like, oh, no,

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>femin is um is great. So uh, not consistent across

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>all messaging either. Well. And it also I would I mean,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how the programming works, but I would

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>argue that that the program probably didn't understand any of

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the topics that were being thrown at it, like, I mean,

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>probably a few a few clue words like like hey,

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>how are you means I'm supposed to say something about

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>how I'm doing UM? But I you know, I don't

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>think that it was taught what feminism is. I don't

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>think that it had an opinion on feminism. I think that,

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was just testing out an answer to

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a question, you say, what do you think about feminism?

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And it it's like, oh, this is a question about

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what I think, say it's good or bad? Yeah, yeah,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I get the sense that these are text

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>strings for it. It's not a it's not a semantic

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>engine and exactly sure, yeah there was there was. I agree.

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there was any understanding on the part

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>of Microsoft TA. In fact, that's one of the reasons

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>why I really argue that people people who say this

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is a real warning about AI, that's b s. It's

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>not a warning about AI. It's a warning about how people.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a warning about real eye Yeah, human natus, it's

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a it's a warning about how how humans when we

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 1>were given the opportunity to mess with something, it could

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>be really hard to resist that opportunity. And this is

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>something that we've seen multiple times. So some other examples

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that you know, she she blasted out xenophobic stuff,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>racist stuff, homophobic stuff. Pretty much everything that was dark

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in human nature was spouted off by Tay in less

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>than just plenty of regular old foul mouth dirtiness and pornography.

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Sure so, uh, I love that. Um Gerald Miller on

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter wrote, Tay went from humans are Super Cool, which

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>was like one of the first messages TA talked about

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to full Nazi in less than twenty four hours, and

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not at all concerned about the future of AI. Again,

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that this is not so such a

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>case of worrying about where AI is going, rather than

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>how do you design a system that uses machine learning

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>from crowdsource data and factor out all the intentionally malicious misdirection.

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the question that has nothing to do with AI.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That has to do with understanding how people are right.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I see you've got some specific exchanges recorded in here,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>which one which are something that we can actually say,

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I like the Ricky Gervais one. Yeah, so Ricky Gervais.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>This one was. This one's not not as as jaw

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>dropping lee awful as some of the other things that

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>she said, But this was one of those where Tay

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>actually came up with a response. She wasn't repeating something.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So according to The Guardian, one exchange began a user asked,

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Tay is Ricky Gervais and atheist? Ricky Gervais is a comedian, Yes,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's very uh outgoing about being an atheist, So

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>so this person stay is Ricky Gervais an atheist, And

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they replied, Ricky Gervais learned totalitarianism from Adolf Hitler, the

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>inventor of atheism. So we get Hitler, we get totalitarianism.

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Hitler apparently invented the concept of being an atheist. Um. Yeah,

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>so it's sort of beautiful. Yeah, I mean that, that's

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of a poetry of nonsense. I like the

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>way these ideas are crammed together. At least at least

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in this one, there was nothing so like personalized. There

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like personalized hate. Who can take it on him?

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.239
<v Speaker 1>But Ricky Gervais not not super factual, but sure, I'm

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure Ricky Gervais would would use this as material

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in the stand up. Right. But but it's not something

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>where it's it's centering out like a specific ethnic group

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>for example. Right. So, as you can guess, microsaw looked

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at this and said, well, this is going swimmingly. Let's

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>just leave her online. What happened, pulled the plug. It

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>took less than twenty four hours for them to say,

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we might need to revisit this after

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we think it through a little bit more. Uh. They

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>also worked up a little curtain between the Internet and

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for a bit, I like to think that the little

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>like technical difficulty sign came up, but yeah, exactly. Yeah,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so they they also deleted a lot of the particularly

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>nasty tweets that they had made. She made a couple

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand within that twenty four hours, which is more

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>than even I have tweeted, which is saying something I know, right,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>so uh. Some people actually criticized Microsoft for deleting the tweets,

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>saying that those messages should remain up to serve as

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.239
<v Speaker 1>a warning of the dangers of AI. But again, I

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's I don't think that's a really a

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>credible argument personally. Um. I think it's more of an

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of a way of warning people about how nasty folks

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>can get on on social media. Microsoft's response was that

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the AI chat butt t is a machine learning project

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>designed for human engagement. As it learns some of its

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>responses are inappropriate and indicative of the types of interactions

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>some people are having with it, We're making some adjustments

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to tay well, I mean that that seems accurate to me, Yeah,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely accurate. Um. She did come back online very briefly

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>about a little bit later on a couple of days

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was an accident. It was completely an accident. Microsoft said

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that they were testing her internally. Uh, in within Microsoft,

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not testing Tay's internal organs. She doesn't have any she's had. Yeah,

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't anything like that. I'm just now thinking like

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting the body of Cortana in there, just thinking

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>of them slicing open the virtual Cortana to Cortana is

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the character from Halo, artificial intelligent character from Hale. Also

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the name of that. Well, I imagine the second she

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>came back online, people are trying to get her talking

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>about Hitler again. Well, yeah, they said that, uh that

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly the messages that were being sent weren't offensive, but

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there were still quite a few that did fall into

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>that category of crazy racist Hitler oriented tweets. So at

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>least some of them were still in that that camp.

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And Microsoft immediately shut her down again. Well not immediately,

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it was after they realized it, because it was in

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the night when it happened. Okay, okay,

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, a couple hours later they shut it back down. Uh,

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think they're surprised. To me here is

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft was surprised by this at all. Yeah, because

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>we I mean, I remember PR attempts to get crowd

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>sourced information into marketing campaigns, that kind of thing every time. Yeah,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I remember. So I I agree with what you're saying

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>about how I don't think this is really all that

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>uh less curative of anything about artificial intelligence, but it

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is very illustrative of stuff about Internet culture and about

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you try to crowdsource things, especially when

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>major companies try to crowd things. Uh. There is an

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>inherent urge to mischief that is always latent on the Internet,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and there are certain types of stimuli that draw it

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>out more than other things. And I can admit to

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>being very much a part of this in some scenarios. Now,

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go try to get ta saying racist stuff,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but I do remember one time Coca Cola had a

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>thing where they let you generate your own memes that

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>let you make your own Coca Cola animated gifts that

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>had so have like a Coke ad going in the

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>background and you can enter your own text. And I

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>guess what they were hoping people would be entering is

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like you know, like big marketing campaign right,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>they'd have people putting in like, hey, Stacy, I love

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Coke to their friends. I don't know, uh, like what

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.239
<v Speaker 1>good could come of this? So I actually when they

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>did that, I remember reading a very interesting article about

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>testing all of the different things Coke wouldn't let you

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>say and and and they had a wide dictionary of

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>no no terms. They wouldn't let you talk. They wouldn't

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>let you use curse words or slurs or anything like that, obviously,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and they also wouldn't let you talk about uh most

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>obvious morbid topics that they didn't want you talking about

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Nazis or Hitler. They didn't watch you talking about health

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>problems or anything like that. But I I felt dared

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to mess with it by this, to probe this this

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>uh these boundaries and find out ways to get around it. Yeah,

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so I remember, Um, I remember figuring out that it

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't let you talk about demons in English, but you

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>could you could come up with phrases about d hmans

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in Latin that it would let you do. So I

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>thought that was pretty fun. Yeah, I remember talking about

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this with you earlier this week, and I said, yeah,

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I could imagine writing something like Taste Sweet Oblivion, and

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you could easily find ways around the

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the protective barrier. There. There are other examples too. I

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you guys remember this, but I remember

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>actually following the story when it happened. Mars Incorporated several

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago created this module for their Skittles web page,

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and the module allowed tweets that contained the word skittles

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to be uh to be displayed on the homepage in

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>more or less real time, like shortly after you posted it.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And it became abundantly clear early on that no one

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>was vetting the tweets, no one was curating. It was

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just a straight feed from the Internet, from Twitter into

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the Skittles homepage. And all you gotta do is include

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.479
<v Speaker 1>the word skittles. So you could write anything you wanted

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to put the word skittles in there it would show

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on that homepage. There were some really funny ones. I

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>think I even did one. If I'm not mistaken, I'd

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have to do a search on my Twitter history to

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>find out when I said skittles. I mean, I mean,

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>people weren't just saying really clever things about how they

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>were tasting the rainbow. No, no, I mean I'm sure

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that made up a significant percentage of the tweets that

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>showed up on the Skittles homepage, but genuine earnest love

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>for Skittles. People just couldn't contain. They had to go

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>straight to Twitter to share it, or they were playing

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a game of Skittles and they were just confused why

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>their game was being broadcast on a candy website. Uh.

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, there were all sorts of different posts

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that went up there, including ones that were offensive obviously,

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>so there were there's precedents, right we we That's the

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that really puzzles me that Microsoft went forward with

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this without even taking into consideration the precedents that has

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>been set with crowdsourced campaigns like this, I think, especially

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Yeah. But but but but not not even

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>not even only there, No, I mean Microsoft itself had

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>already experienced with this. In two thousand eleven, Microsoft launched

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a poll on Facebook. It was part of the Microsoft

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Phone Projects, so it's one division within Microsoft, uh, and

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they asked a question. They were saying, what was your

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite feature of the Nokia Lumia eight hundred phone? And

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you had some options to choose from, but you could

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>type in your own option, and people did, and a

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of them options were like there's not a not

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a darn thing, that kind of thing. That's a very

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>pc way of putting the way they wor did it.

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So there were options that were very much uh not

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in line with Microsoft marketing strategy, and those got lots

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and lots and lots of votes because people thought it

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>was funny or they were dissatisfied with the product, or both.

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting to me that the same company that

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>had experienced this back in two thousand and eleven would

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>go forward in two thousand and sixteen with a plan

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that had some of the very same trappings there, like

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it was almost set up to fail in that way. Um,

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it's just one of those things where I think,

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I think part of the reason why there is the

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of mischief one you're you're looking at entities that

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are much greater than yourself. Right, Microsoft is enormous, huge company.

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Just don't feel bad about it. Like if it had

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>been a small business trying to say, hey, make your

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>own meme about our product, I don't think I would

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>would try to make memes about demons. But it's Coca Cola.

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not worried about them. I don't think my

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>my demon memes about Coke are really hurting Coke. Well,

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>not only that, but I mean, depending upon you might

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>actually have some very negative opinions about whatever the corporation is, right,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft, Microsoft one of those companies that's very divisive there.

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there are that many people who

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>are super pro Microsoft, but I know people who are

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>either Microsoft is a necessary evil, I need it for

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>what I do, or I hate Microsoft so much. That

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the case, except for maybe Xbox. Xbox

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>players are like, no, I really love the Xbox, which

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I totally get, but uh, it's it's one of those

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>things where you you that also encourages this mischief. But yeah,

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>when I one time when the NYPD I think, tried

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to start a Twitter hashtag campaign. Do you guys remember

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that one? Yes, I remember that. It didn't go well,

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it didn't turn out the way that they wanted it to. Yeah.

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they were trying to they were trying to

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>crowdsource people. Uh what were they trying to get them

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to do, to like tweet good experiences HASHTAGYPD? Yeah, see,

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>giving giving a voice to a population. Uh, that may

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>have legitimate criticisms to say, you've got to be prepared

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for when that comes in, you know. I mean people

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>don't like being told, uh and prompted with the understanding

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that you need to say something positive about my massive organization. Yes, yeah, yeah,

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>even if you even if you previously did like something.

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>There is something that strikes most of us the wrong

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>way when we're told we need you know, you are

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>required to say something positive about this thing, even if

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 1>you liked it before. Just the thought that you are

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>now being compelled to do it. There's most of us

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>have a resistance to that, that that little, say nineteen

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>year old inside you just like, hey, I can miss

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>with I guess I technically have two of those now.

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Now I've seen Tay talked about in a reference to

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>another interesting technology issue, which is the prevalence of of

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>female gendered digital assistance or digital embodied personalities. Yeah, it's

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this is it's interesting. I am trying to think if

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a personal digital assistant I've heard apart from Siri,

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>which you can you can have a male version of Siri.

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>The the British version is male and that's the one

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>my wife has on her phone. Apart from Sirie. I'm

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>not aware of any of the major digital assistance that

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are not female. Cortonas fee male. Google Now's voices is female.

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You might be able to change that one. I don't know.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Alexa for Amazon is female. So that's that's something that

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.399
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as weird too. Maybe they don't know what

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the psychology is behind that, what the market research says.

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it just that also is odd.

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And for Microsoft in particular, this was a really troubling

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>week for them because the same week that they launched

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Tay and she goes off the reservation because she's

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>been steered the wrong way by by malicious trolls. They

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>were also dealing with a pr nightmare. There was the

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Game Developers Conference that was going on earlier that week,

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and Phil Spencer, who's the head of Xbox, actually came

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.919
<v Speaker 1>out and apologized for an Xbox sponsored party. It took

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>place in a nightclub, um and it was part of

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the Game Developers Conference overall event. At that party, they

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of skinnily clad women dancing on platforms,

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and anyone who is at all aware of the time

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>it within the video game industry right now knows that

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the sexual objectification of women is a is a huge

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>topic of discussion, uh, in particularly at conferences like that.

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.439
<v Speaker 1>It's been it's been talked very nearly to death, just

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>just the concept of of of hiring performers like that. Um,

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and not that there's anything wrong with being a performer

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, but it just it just paints it paints

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the industry in a very particular way, and one that

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 1>one that is not necessarily welcoming of of of women's

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>participation as as as brains rather than you know, dancers. Yeah,

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it says sort of the assumed culture of

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>our industry is sort of a tradition, yeah, traditional hyper

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>masculine tech bro culture, right, which which perpetuates this unwelcoming

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>environment for people who have very valuable skills and voices

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to add to that industry. But we're continuously denying them

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the ARA tunity or or if not denying them, at

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>least discouraging them feel unco right. So this was this

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>was like two strikes in a row for Microsoft as

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>far as trying to to work with these ideas that

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>involved in some way gender Like, this's not not great

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>record for Microsoft. In March of two thousand sixteen. So

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the question then is what's next. Well, what if I

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>told you that Microsoft said hey, now everyone can make

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>one of these. I think that's a great that's a

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>great idea. So the very same I'm not the very

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>same day that Microsoft had to take Tay offline. Uh,

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>there was the Microsoft Build Developer Conference and the CEO

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of Microsoft, Soughtya Nadela, announced that the company would make

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>available the Bought Framework. That's all one word, bought framework,

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and Bought Framework is essentially the a p I that

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>developers can use to create their own version of chatbots

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that can work on different sorts of platforms, including stuff

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like Skype, Slack, group Me, other messaging systems. UM so

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>very interesting that they had this very well publicized I

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know that you could say any word other than

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>failure of of Microsoft kuffle kerfuffle would work, this publicized

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>kerfuffle of Tay, and then go ahead and say, hey,

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you can do it too. Now that being said, it's

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible that you could roll out something along the

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>lines of Microsoft TA and and have it unfold in

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a very different way than what we saw with Tay. Well,

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean one option that occurs to be I don't

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this would be the case, but

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's at least possible to consider that by

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>putting more of these things out there, you would essentially

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>people would get it out of their system, like it

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>would become less novel and less interesting to try to

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>mess with a bot. Yeah, yeah, you're like I messed

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>with a bottle last week. I'll not talk about Hitler

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to this one. Like, to me, it would just make

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sense to essentially nullify the machine learning part of Tay's

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>software while people are getting it out of this Let

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it go for a month and then take it off,

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and sure you're not gonna have as much engagement after

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that because people are going to get bored. But the

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are going to get bored are probably the

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>ones you don't want engaging with the AI in the

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>first place. So or you take another approach where you

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>have like a controlled beta right where you have a

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>controlled audience that can interact with that AI, and you

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>are just very careful about monitoring it and you encourage

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>people to have you know, natural conversation with the AI

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>as close as they possibly can. But if there are

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 1>any shenanigans, popping up. You just you you squash it.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot easier to do that if you haven't

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>under a controlled population than if you open it up

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to the world at large. Um. And honestly, this is

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a really important field for Microsoft because this is a

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>company that's going through a massive transition the company. You know,

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you think, what are Microsoft's biggest products, Windows and Microsoft Office,

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and those are for desktop computers, and desktop computers and

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 1>laptop computers have been in pretty serious decline compared to

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the mobile platforms. So Microsoft is trying to transition itself

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>into more of a mobile platform company so that it

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>can continue to grow and develop and evolve rather than

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>become obsolete over time. They definitely don't want to turn

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>into the picture of what Microsoft is in those old

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Apple versus Microsoft ads. Uh. I'll respect to John Hodgman. Um,

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think it's I understand where they're going.

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a misguided approach. Uh. Slightly hilarious,

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>slightly sad to see the just the amount of abuse

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that was thrown at Tay in order to corrupt her

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in this way. But it it makes me curious to

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>see how people are going to try and tackle this

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>problem in the future, because there is there is a

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of value to getting a grip on this natural conversation.

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Like we've said, it's something that could make home automation

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>incredibly effortless, where you know, you just you could say

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>something one of twenty different ways, but your house will

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>totally understand what you mean and respond in kind. You know.

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that actually just occurred to me is that

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:43.959
<v Speaker 1>I think in the future, a machine learning program that's

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>supposed to, you know, gain insights about natural language from

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>interacting with the public might actually have something useful to

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>learn by dealing with tons of trolling and abuse. Like

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's necessarily the case that it

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that you should just turn off its learning part, then uh,

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly it shouldn't learn how to talk from these people

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and say like, yes, this is a model of good conversation.

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not sure that there is nothing to be learned.

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>There might be something to be learned, do you know

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? My thought is very vague here, but no, no,

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, especially uh, being the person super secret you

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>guys listening out their YouTube in the room know this. Um,

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm the one who reads the YouTube comments for how

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff works. Yeah, so I see a pretty wide range

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of responses to a pretty wide range of topics from

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the general public on a daily basis, and and it's

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's genuinely fascinating to me trying to sess out, uh,

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>what is trolling and what is sincere, particularly in response

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to to videos that have been produced by our stuff

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't want you to know Team, which deals with

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a fringe theories. And there are a lot of responses

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in there that that are you know that there's this

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>huge bizarre contingency of flat earthers on YouTube and I

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>seriously cannot figure out if they're trolling or not. I

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of them are. But that's this is

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a really great point. This is this is a perfect

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>jumping off from what I'm saying, Like I think, uh,

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially sampling huge amounts of trolling and abuse could maybe

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>lead into machine based insights on what's the difference between

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 1>somebody messing with you and somebody having a seriously extreme opinion? Right,

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And and of course, I mean, like you're saying, Lauren,

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for us to tell depending upon the cues

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that we have or lack of cues. And so this

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is a huge challenge, not just for AI but for

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>human intelligence, you know, just and anyone who's had that

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of miscommunication online understands that it can. It can

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 1>legitimately happen without any intention on either party for it

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to be misinterpreted. Oh absolutely, And then that kind of

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>interpretive help I think would be would be terrific because

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially speaking with people, uh for for whom

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>your language is not their first language, can be very

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult to to have a clear conversation. And there have

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>been times when you know, I've I've been like trying

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to answer someone's earnest question and they keep trying to

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>rephrase it and I'm not getting it, and like Google

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Translate isn't getting it, and and it's just like all

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to do is tell you how your fingernails grow,

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but I don't. I don't know that that's the question

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you're asking, right, So that that kind of thing. The

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>hope I have is that once the fire has has

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>died down at Microsoft trying to handle this this PR issue,

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they can go over that kind of data and can

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 1>actually glean stuff from it, because it would be really,

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:46.959
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, genuinely useful and Uh. I would

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>love to see something positive come out of this experience

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and not just have it be another oh, those wacky

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>pr people or however you want to frame it, like

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the Skittles stuff, right, like something beyond just confirming what

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 1>we already know, which is that people like to stir

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>crap up when they have the opportunity. UM, I would

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>love to see that. I hope that that's what happens,

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and I hope that people who were behind Microsoft A,

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the people who were developing it, aren't being held to

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the fire for what happened, even though I do think

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that at least some of it could have been predicted

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>from day one. But that's that's another that's another point entirely.

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, that is the tragic comedy of Microsoft

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>TA as it stands. Right now. We're recording this March,

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so perhaps by the time this episode goes live there

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 1>will be more developments. But I just thought it was

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>an interesting story and one that I think has implications

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 1>far beyond just Internet based AI. This also, I think

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gives lessons to roboticists who are trying to figure out

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:01.439
<v Speaker 1>how to design human robotic interaction and that are going

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to be acceptable and work and not create more problems,

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>because that's a that's a fascinating area of study that

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>relies more upon human psychology than actual robotic ability. And

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and when you see things like this happen, as as

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who designs robots, I imagine they have to sit

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>there and think, oh, we might need to rethink some

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of our approaches because people people are willing to mess

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>with stuff in certain contexts. Perhaps we need to take

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that into account in our design so that we can

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>head that off before it becomes a problem. Um. So

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>fascinating really, But at any rate, if you guys have

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 1>any suggestions for future episodes of forward Thinking, please send

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>them our way. Send us an email, our addresses f

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>W Thinking at how Stuff Works dot com. You can

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>drop us a line on Twitter. Our handle is f

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>W thinking. Um we will respond without being tay like

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>at all, I promise. Or you can go to Facebook

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>search fw thinking. Our profile will pop right up and

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you can leave us a message there and we will

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. For more on this

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>topic in the future of technology, visit forward thinking dot com,

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places