WEBVTT - Apple Will Add 20,000 US Jobs Amid Threat from Trump Tariffs 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Here's a really special treat. Sitting next to me in

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>studio in New York, Mark German, Bloomberg Chief correspondent on

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Global Technology. I worked here for thirteen years, and I

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>don't think I've ever seen you in person. You're usually

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 2>on the West Coast, but like you're real.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 3>He's forty here last week as well, So I don't

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 3>know what's happening.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 4>My goodness, I was off last week.

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So obviously we're talking about this news that Apple

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 2>is going to add about twenty thousand US jobs. To

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>your understanding, how did this come about from Apple?

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So during the first Trump administration, Tim Cook other companies,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 5>we're obviously very worried about tariffs, right, and so their

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 5>strategy was we can try to make a deal here.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 5>What does Trump want? Trump wants his supporters to know

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 5>or see that he's bringing jobs back to the US,

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 5>bringing money back to the US, bringing manufacturing back to

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 5>the US. Apple doesn't want tariffs on the phone, and

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 5>it wants to keep as much phone manufacturing in China

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 5>as possible. We don't have to get into the reasons

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 5>why there's a ton of them. Okay, So you have

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 5>these two sides, right, there is a universe in which

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 5>both parties can get exactly what they want.

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 6>It's like a trade.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 5>Right, And so you saw that strategy in full form

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 5>this morning. Trump for months, obviously the Secondministration, has been

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 5>talking again about bringing back jobs, has been talking again

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 5>about moving things to the US, has been talking again

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 5>about extra tariffs some goods from China. So Apple comes

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 5>out with the press release this morning. We're investing five

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 5>hundred billion dollars in the US over the next four years, which,

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 5>by the way, that's Trump's term, right, he just started. Okay,

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 5>twenty thousand new jobs AI server manufacturing, Fox con in Houston,

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 5>doubling our manufacturing fund from five billion to ten billion,

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 5>setting up a manufacturing academy like a school in Detroit.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 5>So you ask yourself, what's really going on here. They

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 5>want Trump to know that they're investing heavily in the US.

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 5>And since we're doing that. We don't want tariffs, and

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 5>so the spin to Trump is that we're doing this

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 5>because of you. The reality is somewhere in the middle.

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 5>The reality is that Apple has been investing as part

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 5>of its business operations in the US from the very beginning.

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 5>The reality is in twenty twenty one, Apple announced the

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 5>four hundred and thirty billion dollar investment in the US.

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 5>The reality is that Apple hires four thousand R and

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 5>D employees a year in the US. Anyways, what's actually

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 5>new here? To be fair to both Trump and Apple,

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 5>there is a bit of an acceleration. So their typical

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 5>spend on the twenty twenty one US investment plan eighty

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 5>six billion dollars annually. Okay, the new plan one hundred

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 5>and twenty five billion dollars a year annually. So you're

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 5>getting a forty billion dollar Trump under Trump, and you're

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 5>moving from four thousand people on the R and D

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 5>side hired annually to five thousand people. So incremental, sure,

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 5>but definitely an acceleration.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, one minute, is there a quid pro quote here?

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you think Apple actually already has a deal with

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 3>President Trump that they will be exempt from tariffs?

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 4>No, okay, But.

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Tim Cook went to Donald Trump's office last week and

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 5>presented this to him, said, we're going to do this

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 5>because of you, man. Oh and by the way, we

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 5>don't want to pay tariffs. And Trump knows that Trump

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 5>doesn't care about giving Apple or a Prieve on teriff.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 5>He's happy to do it. And he's happy to do

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 5>it and tell people that he did it. Because Tim

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Cook is investing half a trillion dollars during his presidency.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 5>He can go back to his supporters, his base, he

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 5>can go back to Congress, he can go back to

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 5>the world and tell them that the world's biggest technology company,

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 5>the most famous company in the world, is investing half

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 5>a trillion dollars. It's biggest investment commitment ever, right because

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 5>of me and for Trump, that's awesome. Yep. And for

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 5>Tim Cook, not having to pay tariffs is awesome. And

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 5>I think that's good enough to get some sort of

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 5>tariff for prieve. And by the way, let's say Trump

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 5>doesn't give them a tiff for prieve. Who cares? Right,

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 5>I was doing this anyways, if I'm Tim.

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Cook, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten Am Eastern on Apple Cocklay and

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Alex Steel here alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Radio Happening right now in Hollywood, Florida. Is the BEMO

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Metals Conference and Metals and Mining Conference. I used to

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 2>go back in my day when I was covering gold.

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 2>It's really cool you get to talk about metals, and

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 2>we're lucky enough to talk now to Kathleen Quirk, President

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 2>and CEO of Freeport Macmaar and Copper and Gold. Kathleen,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 2>it's a sincere pleasure. If I take a look at

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>your stock versus the copper price, you usually track each

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>other in the last couple of months. That hasn't been

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the case. Is that a demand issue? Is that a

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 2>supply issue? How do you explain that.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 7>Alex is good to be with you and you need

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 7>to come back to Hollywood.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 8>This is a great conference.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 7>In terms of the stock price and the copper price,

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 7>we've seen somewhat of a disconnect in recent weeks. I

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 7>think there's some concern in the market about China and

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 7>about the trajectory of copper prices as we go forward.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 7>So there's some risks that people are discounting the current

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 7>copper price, but as we look at the situation and

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 7>look at copper demand going forward, Copper, as you know,

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 7>is the metal when it comes to electrification, and we're

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 7>looking ahead at all of the build out that needs

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 7>to take place and energy infrastructure, not just in the

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 7>US but around the globe. China has already been doing it,

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 7>but we're starting to see it taking place in the

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 7>US and other places. It's very copper intensive, and we

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 7>see a situation where demand for copper is going to

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 7>be faced with a secular uplift of opportunity for growth

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 7>and copper unrelated to cyclical drivers. So we're actually we're

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 7>actually really bullish about where copper is today and what

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 7>the likelihood for increases are for the future.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Kathleen, I think so far every S and P five

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 3>hundred CEO on their conference call has been asked about

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>tariffs and the impact on their business. What will a

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 3>rising tariff regime potentially mean for your business.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 7>We're following it very closely. We're looking at it trying

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 7>to understand exactly what degree of terraff will be imposed.

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 7>No one exactly knows what it will be, although companies

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 7>are preparing for it. Freeport operates all over the world,

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 7>but we have a significant operation, significant presence in the US,

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 7>and actually we're integrated in the US. We not only

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 7>have minds that produce copper, but we also have a

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 7>smelter that processes our copper. So we don't have a

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 7>need as a company to import copper from other countries.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 7>Copper is imported into the US because there's not enough

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 7>current current supply of copper to meet the demand. But

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 7>from a micro standpoint, as we look at what the

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 7>market is pricing in for the impact of tariffs, actually

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 7>the US price of copper, when you look at where

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 7>US commodity prices are today and copper prices are today,

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 7>the US price is something on the order of twenty

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 7>five cents per pound higher than copper that's priced on

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 7>international markets. So actually, for Freeport, we're actually receiving for

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 7>the copper that we sell in the US, we're actually

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 7>receiving a premium to copper that we sell out of

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 7>say South America or out of Indonesia. So it's actually

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 7>right now in the short term a benefit for Freeport

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 7>several hundred million dollars a year potentially. But the thing

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 7>that we're watching, and the thing as we've talked to

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 7>investors and other business leaders, is the impact the potential

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 7>impact of tariffs on global growth. China is a big

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 7>consumer of copper consumes, likely above fifty percent five zero

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 7>percent of the market, and so an all our trade

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 7>war could impact global growth. It could impact copper prices,

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 7>it could impact you know, say manifest it self through

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 7>a strong dollar, which also impacts commodity prices.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 8>So we're watching those macro issues.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 7>But in terms of the on the ground today we

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 7>are getting a premium for the copper that we sell

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 7>in the US.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 2>We have about thirty seconds and then you have to

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 2>run to an investor meeting. So in twenty seconds, what

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>do you think the copper price is going.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 4>To do this year?

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>If we take a look at the lme are we

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 2>looking at ten twelve thousand?

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's very difficult.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 7>We're not in the business of predicting short term prices,

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 7>alex as.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 8>You probably know.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 7>We're in the business to control our costs, to invest

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 7>wisely and prudently. We have a very positive long term

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 7>outlook for comp upper. It just you can't replace copper

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 7>today for four hours a pound. We need higher prices

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 7>in the future in order to invest in the business

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 7>and generate the growth and demand, growth and supply to

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 7>meet the expected growth in demand. So we're very positive

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 7>on the long term, but the short term is difficult

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 7>to assess.

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, Kathleen, we appreciate it. Please come back when

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>we all have more time. We'd love to break down

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>some more stuff with you. Kathleen Quirk as President and

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Freeport Macarin, Copper and Gold.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Otto

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Alex deal here alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 2>We bring you all the top news in business, economics

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and finance through our lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence folks.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 2>They cover two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>industries world. We go now for a broader view. Victoria

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Fernandez is chief market strategistic Crossroad to global investments, and

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 2>she joins us now from Houston, Victoria. By the dip

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 2>has been the norm, then there's been chattering that by

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the dip won't last and that we're on borrowed time

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 2>for that. Where do you stand on that?

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think it depends alex on the size of

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 9>the dip that we're looking at. When we have small

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 9>pullbacks that happen just in regular volatility due to the

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 9>uncertainty around whether it's going to be fed policy or

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 9>whether it's fiscal policy, and those are going to be

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 9>things where I'm not sure you want to jump in

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 9>and start buying a lot of names.

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 4>But I do think that as we.

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 9>Go through the first half of this year, we probably

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 9>will have a chance as there will be a more

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 9>significant pullback. I'm not saying we're going into recession by

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 9>any means, but I do think you're going to see

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 9>things start to pull back, probably led by maybe weaker earnings.

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 9>As we get the first quarter earnings of this year,

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 9>we see those slow down, We see the labor market.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Slow down, consumer spending slow down.

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 9>That I think then is going to be your opportunity

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 9>to go in and find those areas within the market

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 9>where you have seen sectors start to struggle and maybe

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 9>form a trough and on their way back to have

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 9>up upside trends. That's where you'll want to go in

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 9>and start buying.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>So, Victoria, you mentioned earnings were about little more than

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent of the way through the fourth quarter earnings there.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 3>What are your takeaways from those earnings and maybe from

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the guidance.

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so you know, Paul, surprisingly, earnings have been really

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 9>good for the fourth quarter. I mean we're looking at

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 9>what fifteen percent earnings growth, five percent revenue growth. I

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 9>think energy is really the only sector where we have

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 9>seen negative growth as as a whole for the.

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Sector, So really strong there.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 9>And I thought we would have start to seen some

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 9>of the effects of the higher rates that we had

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 9>throughout twenty twenty four. I thought we would see some

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 9>of the effects of the labor market weakenings start there.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 9>But maybe it's getting pushed in to the first quarter

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 9>earnings as tariff concerns pulled forward a lot of elements

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 9>into the fourth quarter of twenty twenty four. So strong earnings,

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 9>and I think that's why you saw probably the S

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 9>and P hit a high last week because that animal

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 9>spirit is still running due to the earnings and that

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 9>support to the economy, but that's probably going to start

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 9>fading away. We saw it at the end of last week.

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 9>I think we'll see some more of that over the

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 9>coming weeks.

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and speaking of this is from Bloomberg Intelligence, just

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about earnings. Apparently companies that guided high on profit

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>and sales have outperformed the S and P by six

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 2>point seven percent within a day of posting results, the

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>most since twenty twenty. I found that to be really interesting.

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I had noticed the dispariting effect there, So victoria though

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 2>despite earnings, we have seen rotation into European equities. Do

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 2>we think that that actually continues or the US exceptionalism

0:13:58.280 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 2>theme rains.

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm not surprised that we've seen this switch.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I know all morning long, we've had the

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 9>conversation around valuation, right, and if it's still something that

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 9>people are looking at, clients aren't asking about it. You've

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 9>talked with Bob Dall, my CEO Mike Wilson earlier this

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 9>morning talking about that. But valuations in Europe are much

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 9>lower than what we're seeing in the markets here. So

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 9>I think as investors say, where can I get maybe

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 9>a bigger bang for my buck, and you're looking at

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 9>that valuation number makes sense, especially in the financials. Financials

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.359
<v Speaker 9>are doing well globally, so it gives you an opportunity

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 9>to get in there. And you also have to start

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 9>thinking from an FX perspective what that's going.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 4>To look like.

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 9>Are you going to see continued rate cuts from the

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 9>ECB and what does that mean for the euro and

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 9>what kind of carry trade we're looking there? Obviously the

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 9>yen carry trade people are starting to watch once again.

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 9>So I think there's a lot of different factors, but

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 9>it wouldn't hurt to kind of dip your toe a

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 9>little bit internationally though, I still think globally you'll see

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 9>the US over time.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Continue to be the strongest economy.

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm glad you you brought up international investing. Is

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm just looking at an email I got from Torston

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Slocket from Apollo this morning talking about the market capitalization

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>with how the gap between the US and the rest

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>of the developed world is widening, so that concentration in

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 3>the US equity markets rerolled through the rest of the

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 3>world is just getting more and more. To what extent

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 3>is that a concern.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, concentration is always a concern for US, Paul, because

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 9>you don't want to, you know, to use the old phrase,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 9>you don't want to put all your eggs in one basket.

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 9>What we're starting to see in the US is some

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 9>of those elements where all that concentration was those Max

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 9>seven names. You're starting to see pullbacks in those names,

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 9>and hopefully we will see things broaden out.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 4>But it really hasn't been as strong as a lot

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 4>of people thought it would be.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 9>When you're looking at the other four hundred and ninety three,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you look the SMP making it's high last week,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 9>but the advanced decline line for the New York Stock

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 9>Exchange did.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Not meet it and go to a highlight.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 9>That we're still only seeing about fifty three percent of

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 9>the SMP above it's fifty day moving average, So we're

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 9>not seeing that broadening out that we like to see

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 9>for a sustainable move higher in the markets.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Will continue to watch that.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 9>But we really want to see that concentration start to

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 9>diminish a little bit and have more of a widespread

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 9>uptrend in these names.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Does any of that include say, small and midcaps.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 10>Well, we would hope so right small and midcaps is

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 10>really kind of what will tell us, Yes, we have

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 10>found our footing, we're feeling better, we like what's going on.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 9>But look, we've seen yields move lower even though inflation

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 9>expectations have moved higher. So to me, that's saying, okay, wait,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 9>these are growth concerns that we have right now. If

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 9>growth and the concern over a lack of growth is

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 9>what's pulling yields down, that's not going to be great

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 9>for small and midcaps. And we also have to look

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 9>at the fact that you know, we're hanging in around

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 9>that four forty four to fifty level on the US tenure.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 9>We've got about a third of all corporate debt in

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 9>the US small, mid and large cap coming due over

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 9>the next five years. That's going to be a concern

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 9>for those small and midcaps when it comes to refinancing.

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 9>So we'll have to see what happens there. But for

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 9>right now, I think we continue to wait on some

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 9>of those small cap names until they get some better

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 9>footing and we see the economy on its way back up.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Victoria thirty seconds. What's the fixed income call here?

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, look, we've been doing Barbell strategies in our fixed

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 9>income portfolio. Is really wanting to capture some of the

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 9>higher yields on the shorter end. As we think the

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 9>Fed stays higher longer, that keeps those short rates higher,

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 9>and we have seen inflation push the longer end up

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 9>as well, although over the last.

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Couple weeks there's been a flattening.

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 9>So I think maybe lock in a little bit of

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 9>these rates on the longer end, take advantage of the

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 9>short end, and we'll let the belly of the curve

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 9>adjust to the volatility that we've seen.

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Victoria, thank you so much for joining us. Always appreciate

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 3>getting a few minutes of your time. Victoria Frenendez, chief

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 3>market strategist for cross Mark, a global investment She's based

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 3>down there in Houston, Texas.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Musk Federal work or Order divides Trump Administration. Elon Musk

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>demanded that over two million federal employees submit five bullet

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>points accounting for the past week, but he's getting some

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 3>pushback from some of the folks that lead these departments,

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 3>like the FBI, like the Secretary of Defense. Let's check

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 3>in with Max Chaffckin. He covers all this stuff. He

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 3>does all the Elon Musk stuff for Bloomberg News. Is

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 3>this kind of the first cracks I'm actually from Elon

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 3>Musk with his and his heavy handed dog, I'd.

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 6>Say it's the most significant cracks that we've seen. You know,

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 6>we've seen like little maybe micro fissures or something before.

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 6>But in terms of you have Musk over the weekend

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 6>for sending this email out or having this email sent

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 6>be sent out, and then tweeting essentially NonStop about how

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 6>important it is, how easy it is, how anyone who

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 6>doesn't respond, you know, doesn't deserve their job. Meanwhile, as

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 6>you said, important parts of the federal government either saying

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 6>publicly or semi publicly, like in an all staff memo,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 6>that they should not respond to these emails. That is

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 6>significant and that I think you really see first of all,

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 6>the extent to which you know there are probably going

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 6>to be limits to what Elon Musk can do no

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 6>matter what Donald Trump says. And also, as you see

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 6>these sort of stronger personalities, people like Cash Bettel, the

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 6>new director of the FBI, get into their positions. They

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 6>are also going to be power centers, and they are

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 6>going to potentially push back or even challenge Elon Musk

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 6>oft times.

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 2>We wouldn't it all just take President Trump to call

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 2>up the naysayers and be like, no, what Elon says goes.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 6>It's not totally clear what Trump wants here, although Trump

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 6>did did do a truth social message essentially saying I

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 6>want Elon Musk to be even more aggressive exactly, and

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 6>Musk has taken that as permission, but Trump has not

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 6>explicitly endorsed this. Uh. My sense is anyway, that that

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 6>Trump wants Elon to be the bulldog here, right, and and.

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps also take the heat at the same time exactly.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 6>Maybe maybe you know, move the Overton window or whatever,

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 6>make some of make some of these more extreme uh measures,

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 6>extreme reforms, uh you know, attacks on the quote unquote

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 6>administrative state, as conservatives call it, more palatable, more politically palatable.

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 6>While while as he said, Alex not attracting the heat himself,

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 6>allowing Musk uh and also his cabinet appointees to sort

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 6>of fight it out even in public. Max.

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 3>In addition to being a Bloomberg BusinessWeek senior reporter, you're

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 3>also the co host of Elon Inc. The podcast about

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Elon the people you talk to with this podcast. Is

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 3>there any kind of consensus about how long Elon Musk

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and President Trump will co exist peacefully before maybe these

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 3>two large egos kind of start butting heads and it

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 3>may blow up to some extent.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 6>You know, early on in the Trump presidency, you saw

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 6>people who were who had sort of covered Trump, were

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 6>close to Trump world, more skeptical about Musk. Right, see

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 6>the fact that Trump has over the years had these

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 6>people who kind of come into the center of his world,

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 6>often these business figures who briefly have a run and

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 6>are then forced out or end up in public disputes.

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, Anthony Scaramucci, the short lived Press secretary, being

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 6>kind of the most famous example of this. I have been,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 6>I'd say more optimistic that Elon Musk and down Trump

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 6>will last. And that's partly because Elon Musk has showed

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 6>and it showed again and again that as you know,

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 6>as much as we think of Musk as having this

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 6>big ego, he has been willing to kind of play

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 6>second fiddle to Trump. We saw those that kind of

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 6>relationship on the Sean Hannity Show last week where he

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 6>had Trump kind of cutting in at times, essentially telling Elan,

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 6>I'll speak for you. So so he has been more

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 6>willing than usual to sort of, you know, play play

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 6>second fiddle to Trump, to embrace Trump kind of fully

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 6>rather than trying to create a distance. And then the

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 6>other thing is Musk has real leverage over Trump, more

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 6>leverage than any of these other business guys have. He

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 6>is he was the biggest donor to the in the

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty four cycle and is a potential mega donor

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 6>in the midterm. So if as Trump looks to kind

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 6>of rein in contain influence a Congress that is potentially

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 6>going to be very difficult to influence, Musk is probably

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 6>the most important set that he has because Musk can say, hey,

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 6>if you don't support this nominee, if you don't support

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 6>this budget, I am going to primary you, And that

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 6>is going to be a credible threat. And we've seen

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 6>Musk do that already. I think we're going to see

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 6>him do more of that.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 2>And just to the point we were talking about it,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 2>in the newsroom earlier that like, all the negative vibes

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 2>are on Musk right now, not Trump, even if they

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>believe the same thing.

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 9>That's like a really lovely foil.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, yes, I think I think you're right, and I

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 6>think that Trump has you know, it's hard to know

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 6>like what he's doing. What's you know, definitely strategy and

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 6>what are just tactics or whatever. But it does seem

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 6>like one of the results of this approach is that

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 6>Musk is becoming more unpopular for some of these things,

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 6>and Trump is kind of not necessarily touched by it,

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 6>right He's people are mad at Musk for sending these

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 6>aggressive emails, or for firing federal workers, or for you know,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 6>defunding charities that they know about, They're not necessarily taking

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 6>it out on Trump. I guess the risk here for

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 6>Trump is that he becomes like must become just so controversial. Yes,

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 6>And he's also just as we saw during the appearance

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 6>at Seapack, you know, he's potentially erratic. He potentially on

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 6>any given day, any given hour, he can make himself

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 6>the story. And again, once you start getting to more

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 6>tense things, for instance, negotiations of the budget that are

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 6>coming or in Ukraine or whatever. You can imagine that

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 6>stuff creating lots of risk and problems for Trump.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, Max, really appreciate it, really wonderful stuff. Max

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>sat Chafkin, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, Senior reporter, co host of Elon Inc.

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 4>Podcast.

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.719
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal