WEBVTT - Markets, Ukraine, and the Economy

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's go over to

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Weiss. He is the founder and president of Yield Street. Michael,

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. It's it's FED day.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, here Bloomberg we make a big big deal

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>about it because the markets really care. What are you

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking about? What do you expect to hear from this Fed?

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It's good to be back in good morning. I expect

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to see a little bit of the same when it

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to the FED. I think the market continues to

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think that we have it all figured out, and the

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>FED enjoys showing us that we don't. I expect us

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>to see another raid hike. I think the markets are

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>going to see a choppy day today. I think we're

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>going to see some more volatility. I don't think the

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>FED is done yet. I think they have resilience that

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we have yet to experience. Well, they share better not

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be done because they have five and a quarter percent

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>as the terminal rate on the dot plot. So if

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they finish at four, that's a big miss. I could

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>imagine though, that they don't go much higher than five,

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>because I think they're a little more hawkish on the

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>dot plot than they expect to be in real life. Plus,

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, a lot has changed, right Michael. I mean,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen inflation come down pretty substantially. We are seeing

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation come down. We are seeing the American consumers pocket dinner.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing people pulling out of we we saw Vanguard

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>published a report that the people are having hardship withdrawals

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out of their personal retirement accounts at a level that

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen before. And so the consumer is different.

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Their ability to spend has dramatically decreased, and they don't

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have the same deposits they used to the way how

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>does that affect How does that affect your investments at

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Yield Street, because you have I think a very unique

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:03.559
<v Speaker 1>situation in that UM, if I understand it correctly, you're

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you allow UM kind of retail investors to get in

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>on something that until now had been really the revere

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of institutional clients or the ultra wealthy. Right you you

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>let people into private credit. Correct, the old Street has

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>been making access to alternative investments available for retail investors

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>and credit investors. And what we have been a big

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>proponent of is helping people build a better and more

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>modern portfolio that includes private assets, so private credit, private equity,

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>real estate, and a host of other investments that were

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>usually and historically reserved for the ultra wealthy and the

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>institutional investor and had been incredibly popular. I mean, everybody

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Paul and I talked to in two was like, Man,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>these markets are are too crazy. We're going to run

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for the hills. The only thing we like is either credit.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 1>So how's that turning out? How does that look this year?

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It still continues to look really great. I'll talk to

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit about some of the challenges you

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>could expect in private markets. But for the most part,

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the private markets are holding their own and people continue

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to invest in and continue to see net inflows month

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>over month. People want more stability, They want to get

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>away from the volatility in the public markets. They trust

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the public markets for life, and it has to deliver

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the returns for them that they want it or the stability,

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the private market, for example, in private credit

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>or in real estate debt, you are often able to

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>invest in a sofa based or in a floater I

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>know that's a trigger word for you your last time,

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you pulled the Caddy shock reference. But um,

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if if you're invested in a floating rate product, then

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going to continue to earn more as the ft

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>increases the rate. And so for the most part, the

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>alternative investment lands it has held its own and people

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to invest more nuanced. Where you're seeing a shift

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>over the last twelve months is historically people were really

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>excited over the last number of years about private equity,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about venture about being growth opportunities, so I think of

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>longer duration and limited cash flow but a bigger return

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Over the last number of months, investors

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have shifted that appetite into shorter duration, cash flowing assets,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>more credit based, less long term equity, and they were

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>able to distill access those investments through our platform. And

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>so we've shifted some of the demand as to where

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>we're investing more heavily to cater to what people really want. Hey, Matt,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the extent we do get a recession

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in how concerning you about the private credit business as

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about credit quality, how does that change maybe

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>how you think about that business. I'm very bullish on

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the private credit business as it relates to credit quality. Obviously,

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's much more specific to the strategy. Within private credit.

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>We've mostly been focused on teen year secured or on

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>bridge lending UM that's imagining, but on a lower loan

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to value basis. So when you look at our portfolio

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>or when you look at the partners that we do

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>business with, we feel really good about it. I think

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>where the recession starts to hit UM in a more

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>impactful way. Some of the private investments, for example, take

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of real estate equity. So a lot of the investments

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>they have senior debt that could be on a floating rate.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And so for folks that don't have recaps, that becomes

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a real issue because their cost of debt just skyrocketed.

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Our portfolio has recaps, but they're gonna roll in twenty four,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>l twenty three or early twenty four. And so if

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the forward curve today, you feel comfortable

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>saying Hey, by that time, you're going to be in

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a better place and you'll be fine. People who are

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>dealing with expiring recaps now are going to have a

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of trouble because the cost of that dead is

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be way too expensive. All right, Michael, great stuff.

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Always appreciate checking in with you. Michael Weiss's founder and

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>president of Yield Street talking about the credit markets. Lots

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of eco data, lots of earnings, but also geopolitical issues

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>out there for the markets to take into accouncil. Let's

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>bring on Angela Stent, she's a senior fellow at the

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Brookings Institute in Angela. Before we get to kind of

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia Ukraine and what that means for just geopolitical tensions,

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. The kind of the story that's just kind

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of hitting the tape right now is the Justice Department

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>at President Biden's home in Rohoboth Beach, Delaware looking for

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>more documents. What's going on with these documents for a

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of these senior level folks, Well, I think it

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>shows that we need a better system. When people leave

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>office and I guess it's the last days and everyone's

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>hwying around and packing things up, that clearly mistakes were

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>made us. So I think as a result of all

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of this, and I guess, uh, they've now asked the

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department has asked the you know, all of the

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>former presidents and vice presidents to make sure that they

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have classified documents, that they'll have to have a

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>better way of dealing with it, because clearly the system

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't worked. How is the system working now? I mean,

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the first documents were found November two, just before an election.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Fortunately for the Democrats, they didn't tell anybody until after

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms. But it's been quite a while. They're

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just searching his beach house now. Why, well, I guess

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it takes time for them, you know, their

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>procedures to uh, you know, to to get to all

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the different places you know, where the presidents life is happening. Yeah,

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>they were scheduled. Yeah, I mean, everything's you know, it

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>takes time. But clearly, as I said, the system isn't

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>working properly and we need a better system. It's been

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>three months, by the way, three months. It's I think,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's going on there. I guess the

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>government is busy, busy, busy, And let's switch gears and

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>get to the big issue that we want to discuss

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>with you, that's just kind of Ukraine and Russia. Can

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you give us your thoughts. I mean, we're a year

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>into this, so much suffering by the folks of Ukraine.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us kind of where we are and

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>how this might play out? So we're really, i would say,

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, in a stalemate. The Ukrainians had made

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>some games in September and October, the Russians have pushedback.

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>There's fierce fighting going on still in the town called

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>bah Mood. If you look at pictures of it, it's

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>completely destroyed Um and we expect a new Russian offensive

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>sometime in the spring. We don't know when it's going

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to be um And therefore, you know, the Ukrainians have

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>really been asking for more military assistance from the West.

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So now you have the Germans, after a long debate,

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>saying that they will supply them with Leopard tanks, and

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>other European countries that have these German tanks, which top

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of the line, will also supply by Ukraine. The Biden

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and Registration has said we will send Abram's thanks to Ukraine,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>but they may not get there. Till at least the

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>end of this year, um so. And now, of course

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainians are asking for more fighter jets, so there's

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a big debate going on. So I think at this

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>point the Ukrainians need all the military assistance they can

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>get to push back against this new Russian offenses coming

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>along sometime in the next few months. But this could

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>go on, you know, for a very long time. There

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is no uh sign at the moment that either side

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>is ready to sit down and talk about a peace negotiation.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it could be if you look at what's

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>happened in Afghanistan and Vietnam, this could be something they're

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>engaged in for years, if not decades. Um is it

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>risky with a leader like Putin? I mean, he seems

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>like he has nothing to lose, either wins or he dies.

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So this what's the concern about esca lation. And of

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>course the minute that the announcement was made about the

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>tanks for Russians threatened counter moves. On the other hand,

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to do is just intimidate everybody, the

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians and on all of their supporters to doing nothing

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so that Russia can continue this war and essentially change

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the government in Key of which they still want to

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>do and take over Ukraine. So I think we shouldn't

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>allow ourselves to be too intimidated by Putin, but I

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>think we have to recognize our risks there um, and

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we have to warn the Russians as we're doing, of

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of escalating this any further. Angela, do you

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of the level of support that Mr.

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Putin has within Russia itself of the people for this war. Sure? So.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>The public opinion data that we have from the only

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>independent polling place is that about seventy of the people

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>who are in Russia support this war. Let's keep decent

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of them, uh, support it more enthusiastically, the other maybe

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>less so. So the supporter is still there. As many

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as a million Russians have left Russia, including a couple

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>of hundred thousands of young men who didn't want to

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be mobilized. So those people don't support the war, but

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they're ones who remained they do, or they're indifferent to it.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, of the Russians also say that

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there should be negotiations, but Putin has managed to persuade people,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly those people who only have access to state run

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>media that this is you know, the United States is

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>threatening Russia. This is a Russia a war of Russia

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>against the West, and Russia is going to defeat them. Angela.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we see stories of Putin letting inmates out

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>of prison and putting them on the front lines. I mean,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it looks like they're just they have nothing left. How

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>long can they continue to go here? Well, I mean

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the Russians can still continue to go on for some time.

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>So the the Mercenary Group Wagner, which isn't the regular

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Ministry of Defense troops, they've been recruiting prisoners, murderers, rapists, etcetera,

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and sending them to the front and many of those

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>people are getting killed, but they are you know, they

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>still have quite a lot of people that they can mobilize. Um,

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>they do have ammunition. They're getting stuff from the North Koreans,

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>They're getting drones from the Iranians. So the Russians can

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>continue going. They have a history of enduring uh these things.

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think Putent's calculation is that in the end

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the West will cave, that we will we won't have

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the enthusiasm anymore for supporting Ukraine and that Russia will

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to prevail Angela. I mean, I mean we're

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Angela's a Stent, a senior fellow at the

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Institute. Andrew you literally wrote the book on Mr.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Putin entitled Putin's World, Russia against the West and with

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Rest, and that want to Fletcher School of Law

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and Diplomacy Prize for the best book on US Russian relations.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So how you know Mr Putin's well as anyone? How

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>did he miscalculate so badly? So? I think he was

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>only being given information that his intelligence services knew he

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hear. So he was misinformed about the situation

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. He thought the Ukrainians wouldn't fight back. He

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>was misinformed about the state of the Russian armed forces,

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>which of course have performed much worse than he thought

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they would. And he was misinformed about the West. He

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that the US wouldn't react. He looked at what

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>happened at the withdrawal from Afghanistan um and I think

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>he had two years of COVID isolation where he really

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't meet any foreign leaders. And you know, he just

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>talked to a small group of people who reinforced all

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of his ideas, all of his beliefs in paranoia. So

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it's been a huge miscalculation. Um, and I think it's

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just that he really wasn't given the information that he needed.

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're also a national intelligence officer for Russia

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and your Asia at the National Intelligence Council. You were

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a member of the senior advisory panel for James Traviti's

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Admiral Astrivities, the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe UM, as

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>well as others. What's your take on the relationship between

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Russia and especially Germany. You know, I lived in Berlin

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for the last five years. You've written a book about

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the West German relationship with Russia with the Soviet Union

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>before the fall um angela miracle, and the Germans decided

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to put all their eggs in Vladimir Putin's basket, even

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>though the US administration asked them time and time again

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to reconsider their reliance on that natural guess why do

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you think they did that? And? Um, you know, what's

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>what's the relationship going to look like now? So they

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>had a strong belief for about fifty years that you know,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>if you traded, if you had better economic relations with

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>first of all the Soviet Union and then post Soviet Russia.

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>If you imported that gass, that would somehow translate into

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>better political relationships too. And in fact, you know, fifty

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago the Germans used this kind of economic relationship

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>incentives with the Soviet Union because you know, to try

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and improve the situation with the East Germans. So that

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>was their belief. And then there's all of this historical

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>baggage that comes with it, the feelings of responsibility and

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>guilt for what happened in World War Two. Twenty seven

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>million Soviet citizens died, but of course those are Ukrainians

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as Russians. Um. And there was a lot

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of pressure from the business community on Angela Merkel for instance,

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to continue these natural gas deals. Um. And they have

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>finally woke up on every four last year and realized

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that all of these assumptions were wrong. And that's why

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you had the speech from Chancellor Soaultz just a couple

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of days after the invasion. UM. And I think German

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>policy has changed, you can see that of the provision

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of the but there's still a lot of debate in

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Germany about this. There's still a lot of Germans, all

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the Germans who still think that Germany has this responsible

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ability towards Russia. All right, Angela, great stuff. We wish

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we had more time with you, but will certainly have

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you back as the news warrants. Angela Stent, senior Fellow

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Brookings Institute, giving us the latest on geopolitical issues. Matt,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the FED. It's FED Day. But you

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>know what, you and I we don't know anything. So

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we try to talk to smart people like Vince

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Signarella because he talks to traders and things like that,

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and that is very, very helpful. Well, let's just go

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>right to the Vince talk to traders about what they

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>want the FED to do. Yes, a lot, but let's

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>talk maybe more than what they think the FED is

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>actually going to do. But let's talk to somebody who

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>actually does it. Who actually is in the market. Georgia

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios. Kat Trombone Trombone,

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>ka Bone, ketrim Bone. He's a CEO and head of

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>America's Trading at DWS Group. So George, you're in the market,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You're in the front lines. What do you here? What

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are your traders telling you. What are your clients telling

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>you about what this FEDER reserve is going to do? Well?

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they need to speak hawkish today. Quite frankly,

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be some sort of a power of

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>pushback because the broader market is not believing what the

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Fed is saying. Nuts, right, I mean, look at financial

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>conditions easing, your own financial conditions index and there's a

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>plug yourself, go on. The Bloomberg terminal is actually showing easing.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at dollar weakness, look at multiples extending

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>towards eighteen and beyond, so that those easy conditions POW

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to need to push back against. I can't

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that the market is actually talking about our pricing

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and two rate cuts this year, and I think that

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that has to be a concern. He told you

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are the market. I mean, I look at you, and

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you are the market. You're out there, you're buying and

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>selling all day on behalf of your your clients. What

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think that a trillion dollars and assets under

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>management that ws that's a lot of that's a lot

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of money. That's a lot of money that that's more

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>than like the lotto. That's a lot of money. What

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>do you do? Like, so, what do you think the FED?

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>What's disconnect between the Fed we're gonna be hawkish and

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the market that you trade in every day. That's saying

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe some rate cuts momentum is hard to fight, is

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what it tells you. And it's also painful, uh, staying

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in cash and watching the market begrudgingly participate. I mean,

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the early part of this year, especially in

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>fixed income, there's not been the amount of new issuance

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that you've seen before. That's keeping or forcing spreads to

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of stay in there and get reinvested again. And

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna be a difficult balancing act for

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the for the FED and for PAL. This is not

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the time, you know, to support easy. You talk about

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this at Jackson Hole especially, and this is the moment

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he's going to have to building it in and have

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>a backbone. You know, we haven't talked about for a

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>while now. We're so focused on the terminal rate because

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the market is pricing less, far less than the feds

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>um dot plot shows, and like you said, the markets

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>pricing and cuts in three. We haven't talked about QT

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and it feels like there's already

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a liquidity issue out there. Is QT working. I mean,

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we do see inflation coming down. It's working, but at

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a at a I think where you're coming from, what

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>eight or nine trillions on the balance sheet itself, So

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it's working, it's working at a lag. They're not actively

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>selling either, They're letting the balance sheet roll off. So

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>until I see mortgages actually being sold, I think it

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>continues to exist in the background, and maybe as financial

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>conditions do get tighter, or at least we hope or

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>this Powell hopes from here, how could they possibly get

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>tighter there one year? I guess high is the right

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>word to put it. You know, they haven't been this

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>loose and over twelve months. Correct, They're gonna need to

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>get higher otherwise we're going to have a problem. And

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that the market is actually ready for

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that CPI to either plateau and or creep up a

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And I think that's when you start to

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>get back to the narrative a few months ago about

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a terminal rate existing you know, well into five, call

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it five and a half, or some economists even calling

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>for six. And I think that that will be something

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to watch. By the way, we've already called out basically

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>three Bloomberg functions, right worp w I, r P go

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 1>and then fed space ball go, which shows you the

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. It's really cool. What do you screen for?

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>What do you look when you get to work in

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the morning at DWS and you log in your name,

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely what you have to what do you what do

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>you look at? What's your dashboard look like? Well, I

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>can export my jump pad to you, I think my

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.719
<v Speaker 1>launch pad and you're welcome to take a look at it.

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean it's those and it's it's a

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of other functions around currency. I mean the dollar

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>weakness that you've seen recently is meaningful and also adding

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to that, we need some financial conditions, and obviously we're

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a global asset manager, so certainly where European markets are,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy to see the foot see not one not

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>too far off of all time highs when you think

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>about where we were just six months ago and potentially

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a cold winter and shortages and things alike, and that

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to see those equity markets off is surprising. So it's

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>try to call them outperforming. I mean the CAC and

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the decks, are up nine percent, the IBEX in Madrid

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is up ten and a half percent. Those are NASDAC

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers correct, and one wonders if there's that much more

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>room to go there, um from here, But you know,

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a long year, and I would definitely exercise patient.

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It does seem like everything that everyone forecast to happen

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in three has already happened. By FED first, I think

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>we're already at your retargets. So what do you think

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean these this first month of the year. Is

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that a is this a technical snap back in some

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of these asset classes, or is this the beginning of

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a turnaround. I've been wondering the same thing about equities

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen um, you know tech, we've seen consumer discretionary,

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen telecoms. They've been the best performers. Meanwhile, the

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive UH industries, utilities and real estate, UM, they've been

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst performers. So either this market has some real

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>UH bullish conviction or there's a lot of short covering

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>going on from all the tax haven selling that happened

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last year. And you know a

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>lot about that, right um, And then get back in

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, UM, I think it's a combination of, like

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you said, tax law selling, r S I s being

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>incredibly stretched and technical levels being oversold. You look at

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>any indicator, bull bear indices, you could look lame half

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a dozen. Everything was just incredibly barish and negative. And

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming in this this year to start, um,

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know you're seeing systematic ct A demand. For sure,

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing short covering, a declining VIX, lower than expecting

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>new issue activity and credit and all, and and quite frankly,

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the move index or the rates index, there's another Bloomberg

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>function for you, um, you know, easing quite a bit

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and also not helpful to the FED by the way.

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know within that that narrative, it is creating

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a good updraft here. And I believe very much on

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a technical basis, as you start where you're going to

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>condext in equities eighteen x nineteen x. And this is

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in a year where you know, earning his estimates earning

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>his growth are flat, quite frankly, from from here out,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's not even you know, that's including energy take

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>energy out. The picture gets much more oblique. So you're

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>really paying a premium right now. So we have three

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>more hours right until the Fed. Um, let's wrap it up.

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>What are expect from Jerome Powell today? To walk a

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>tight rope but still after lean hawkish? If you're the Fed,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>this is not what you want to see right now,

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>um at all? And easing of financial conditions with more

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>more room to go as far as disinflation, so they

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have more work to do. They cannot afford to give

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>show any weakness right now. So what are your traders

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>on your desk at DWS. You're down at fifty second Street,

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>third Avenue. Come visit us? Yeah? Absolutely, well you can

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>come visit us because you're so close. What do they

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>do on a day like today? They? What did they

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just calm down until two o'clock? The positioning is light

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>going into this, yeah, right, So you don't want to

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>front run this too much because of expected surprises or

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>or something that can come out of left fields. Get

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>some more coffee, throwing a fat lip, and just chill

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>until two. It's almost as if you have cameras on

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>our desk. That's exactly. Hey, you guys are our global firm,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned thirty seconds, what do you mean what

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>do you take away from China reopening? How does that

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>play into what what you guys are looking at. Sure

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be net positive to both em and global growth,

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and i'd expect pent up demand at least initially to

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>really come to the four. So it is an opportunity.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone's underweight this country. If you look back

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>six months ago to what we're discussing earlier, everyone said

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>get out right now you're seeing a kind of rush

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>back in, and I would just sort of be careful.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>The property sector is still an issue there as well,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>so you you want to you want to certainly consider it,

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but not push all in. Yep, alright, good stuff. George

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>countrom Bone, catrom Bone CEO. That did pretty well. Then

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>catrom Bone, you just say it like it's spelled bone

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>CEO and head of America's trading at DWS, which stands

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for Deutsche Very Papiers Bettylisten, all right, it's the asset

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>management business of Deutsche Bank. They got like almost a

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars assets under management. Georgia's it's a few blocks

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>away from us here on Third Avenue in midtown Manhattan.

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Here's a really really interesting conversation. It's something it's a

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>topic I think about a lot which is water. You

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of it around, but there really

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>isn't and so I love thinking about it, talking about

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the the concept of water, the as an asset or

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>resource and as a business opportunity. Alexander Leukopolis he has

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>a partner a Science Water and Science Capital Management. He

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in a Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studio. Alexander

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>talked to us about water. How do you guys look

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>at water? What is it? What? What are you? What

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? Sir, well, thank you for having me

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 1>in a great question And I get asked that all

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the time because water, in my view is literally everywhere

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>but nowhere. Right. You can talk about water from the drought,

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>from too much water to little water, to blue water

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to greenwater to yellow water. So it's literally very confusing

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of it. Um. And on top of that,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>water fits into everything that we do, from the clothes

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we wear, to what we eat, to what we drink,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that we're s water, we're surrounded by it.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So um, the way we view water is uh to

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>be focused on it and to frankly be focused on

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it and try to actually solve some of the problems

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because when something seen is to be so confusing, it's

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes very hard to actually solve it. And we currently

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>no water is a big problem. Certainly no water is

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>a big problem in the US. So the way we

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>view it is, let's focus on trying to solve some

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the big water issues in the US today, starting

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with the infrastructure. How can you do that as a

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to make money at the same time, Right,

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not a charity or an NGO uh in in

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the sense that you don't want to profit. How do

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you invest in a way that I mean, you want

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to do good for the world, but you want to

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>make money for your clients absolutely, And I think that's

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting about what we do is that we are

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a private sector needs to play a more important role

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in infrastructure, needs to play a more important role in

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>industries like water that are very confusing for UH most

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>for many shareholders to solve on their own, And I

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>think private equity in particularly what we do actually brings

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that together, a lot of those different

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>constituents and actually is a very big problem solver. So

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we're able to make UH strong returns for our investors

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time have impact in a sector

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that is so desperately needed for that to happen. What

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are the big businesses in that sector? Are we talking

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about waste management? Um? Are we talking about sewage? Are

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we talking about purification? What's so in our case, we're

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>talking a few of those. Number one is utilities. In

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the US, we have eighty five thousand plus utilities. Many

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of them are actually private and small, which many people

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>don't understand, and it's a staggering statistics. In the UK,

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>as an example, you have close to thirty and most

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>of European countries, you have less than a hundred in

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>each of those countries. In the US and I repeat,

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>more than eighty five thousand, most of which are private.

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So one of our strategies is rolling up small consolidated

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>water systems and giving these individuals better, cleaner water at

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the right price, um. And that is both profitable and

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>impactful at the same time. So you're using scale to

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>improve the businesses of this incredibly fragmented industry. Right. So,

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>fragmentation and scale and operationally excellence across the board and

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>impact alright. So as a so that's kind of like

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a business ownership framework. Market structure issue. Are there more fundamental?

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>What what is kind of the fundamental water problem in

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the US? Don't have enough of it, don't have it

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in the right places? Great question, and that's not one

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you can answer because water is a very local issue.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Right We we sit here in New York City. We

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>have one of the oldest water treatment plants. It's municipally run,

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's probably got one of the largest tax spaces in

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the world for a water system, and people in New

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>York get could clean water. The problem in New York,

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>as an example, is the is delicious. Is the aging infrastructure? Right?

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>The pipes. There's a pipe that how many pipes have

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>broken on les and fifty nine Street in the last year? Right?

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>That causes destruction. The piping infrastructure is old and degraded.

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>When you go and talk to our friends in l A,

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they have a very different issue. They don't have enough

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>water because the water is not coming from like meat,

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's dropping every day. So the issues with water

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>are very much local and made up of different markets,

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>so is oftentimes very hard to generalize, which again leads

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>me to the thing, which is it's very hard to

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>actually focus on problem. All right. Let me ask a, really,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>as I've owned real estate in California for a long time,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and you sit there and talk about the drought every day.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>In my twenty some odd years, there's only been a

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of years when it hasn't been an official drought. UM.

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And you stand there and I look out at the ocean,

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, can't we isn't there a solution there somewhere?

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Desalination is too hard and costly. Well, desalination in the US,

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's specifically in California, is very costly. People have

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>done it, they've tried to do it, but it's not desalination.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the reality is recycled water. UM. In the

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>US we recycle close to ten percent of our water UM.

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Many many parts that need it desperately. Singapore, as an example,

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is toilet to tap recycled water. They recycle Israel close

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to ninety plus horc. That is, that is an expression

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that in Singapore is sort of utilized. So recycling your

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>water UM, maybe not for consumption sort of drinking, but

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for irrigation, for otherwise not I mean it sounds bad,

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, you just need

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>H two oh right, so you can pull that out

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of whatever you have and you clean it and you

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>clean it better. And now with new technologies have been

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>around for a while. This isn't a technology game. We

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>don't need somebody to you know, it's not like sending

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody to Mars here. These are solutions that have existed technologically.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really putting the puzzle together. Um. And this is

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a great example in California. Yes, you can look at

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the desalination didn't work. Too expensive. You know, you need

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>something that's more uh meaningful. Recycled reuse is another one

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of those, which is why one of other platforms is

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>focusing on recycled reuse, mostly on the West Coast, where

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the issue is the degrading infrastructure. It's the lack of water.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But recycled reuse helped solve that. When when when you

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>look at a city like I don't know, Phoenix for example,

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Vegas in the middle of a desert, does that frustrate

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you to see so much building infrastructure going into places

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>where there is no water and it just makes the

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the situation worse in general for the country. Frustrate you.

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>That's an opportunity for you money. Maybe at this point

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>everything excites me in water because there's so many there's

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.959
<v Speaker 1>so many pockets of inefficiency. You mentioned another one. So

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>when you look at something like Phoenix, that's why you

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>need to up great systems. You need more infrastructure, you

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>need better infrastructure, you need more digital infrastructure, you need

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>more recycled reuse infrastructure. So I think um situations like

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that present opportunities, and they present opportunities for people they

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>can put the puzzle pieces together. And again, starting with

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>your first conversation, why are we as a private capital

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>firm investing this is because we see our value add

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in being able to pull that all together. It's not

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be one technology that solves all the water issues.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to be one politician that waves a

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars into it, which they don't have, nor would

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that even begin to solve it. Nor is it an

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>academic engineer. It's going to be a combination of all

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of the above. And as a private participant, what's exciting

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is to be able to bring all that together, but

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>do it actionably at a local level. So in the

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>U S, So, how has your performance been. I mean

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you went to George and went to M I. T. H.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Then took that to JP Morgan where you learned M

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and A the M and A business. Now you're putting

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it to use to make money. How have you done so? Yeah,

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.479
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't certainly not a straight line. UM. Put it's

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a good use. Because we started at Science Capital, we've

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>been doing mid market investing for a long time UM,

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so we learned sort of how to work with middle

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 1>market companies, which in the water space, as we know,

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly middle market companies UM, including the recent merger

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of the two of the largest players UM just last week.

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's made up of middle market players. So utilize

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that skill set plus the skill set of real asset investing,

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>where we invest sort of in between infrastructure and private equity, utilities,

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>recycled reuse plants. So utilize that framework to then apply

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it to one singular sector, which was water. And the

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about water was it took us many years

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of research to begin to make actionable investments. And I

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think once you have a combination of all that UM,

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the opportunity set and the returns are there.

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Because the market is so inefficient and fragmented, and our

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>value add becomes your local you're just a couple bucks away.

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>That means we're getting this guy back, because I got

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>him a million more questions here, both on just kind

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of the water issue, how to make money, who are

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>investors are? All that kind of good stuff. Alexander Locopolis,

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a partner at Science Water and Science its capital management. Uh,

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about a topic that you know, we don't talk

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>about a lot, but water issues in this country and

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in a global basis really really big issues going forward.

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast. You can always catch

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio