WEBVTT - Tesla Shares Surge After Blowout Quarter

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple card playing Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Or Melinda sitting in for Alex Steel Paul Swin. You're

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>live here in on OL Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio or

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>streaming live on YouTube as well, So head over to

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 2>YouTube dot com search Bloomberg Podcast. That's where you'll find us.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Earlier today on Surveance, we had Dan Ives from What

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Bush Securities on doing a little victory lap on his

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>bullish tesla call. The stocks up seventeen percent today, the

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 2>most since March of twenty twenty one, on the back

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of some pretty darn good earnings numbers. Let's break it

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>down to Craig Trudell. He's a Global autos editor for

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News. Joins us from Zoom from London on Zoom

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>on that technology there. Hey, Craig, what stood out to you?

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think the stock is up seventeen percent today?

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>What did you see it out of earnings release?

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was really It's really quite a combination,

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>because oftentimes it feels like it's not necessarily the case

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>that you can count on both both earnings and the

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>vision to be positive. In this case, they both both

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 3>were working in Musk's favor. I think the earnings were

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 3>much better than expected. I do think that those expectations

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>came down quite a bit over the last year year

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 3>and a half, but they sort of they did exceed

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>expectations by pretty significant measures. And the profit margins in particular,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 3>or something that everybody keeps a very close eye on

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>their automotive profit margins when you back out the credits

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>that they sell to other automakers for regulatory purposes, those

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 3>in particular, I feel like, are you know, just quarter

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>in and quarter out what everybody looks at? That was

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>a big beat. And then I think Musk was as

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 3>self assured as I've ever heard. He's never won lacking

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 3>in confidence. And for him to throw out, you know,

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty to thirty percent sales increase for next year, I

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 3>think was very surprising to people. After you know, we're

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 3>nine ten months into the year and they've delivered fewer

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 3>vehicles in twenty twenty four than they did in twenty

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty three.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Craig, So when I'm walking around New York City

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 4>ever so often, every so often I will see, to

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 4>my surprise, a cyber truck. What is the leaatest on that?

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 4>What do they say in earnings? What can we expect there?

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they said that it was gross margin positive for

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the first time in the most recent quarter. And so

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 3>we're almost we're roughly a year into the launch of

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that vehicle. So I would I would say that's a

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 3>little on the early side, just relative to how Tesla

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 3>has you know, are done with with the new vehicle

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 3>launches in the past. So so that is another another

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 3>positive I think, you know, in terms of volume, it's

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>it's still quite low relative to the Model Y and

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 3>the Model three. That is still where you see the

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 3>vast majority of of Tesla's deliveries, so much so that

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Tesla has even yet to break out that that vehicle.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>And in terms of you know, quarterly results, and so

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think we have a rough idea of

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 3>how many they've sold. Ironically, based on the recalls that

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the company has had to do with the vehicle. It's

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 3>it's as of the latest recall was, which was just

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 3>a few weeks ago. It was around twenty seven thousand units,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 3>I believe, So, you know, that's that's pretty small for

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>a company that you know, may sell somewhere around one

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>point eight million vehicles this year.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Where is the the focus from the company here in

0:03:58.080 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 2>terms of they've seems like they have a lot of

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>balls in their obviously the car business itself, robotaxis, artificial intelligence.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>What do they what do you think they really want

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>you to focus on? What does Elon want investors to

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>focus on?

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Do you think?

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that's actually really one of the most interesting

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 3>things here. And I think Liam Denning's column for Bloomberg

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Opinion this morning, uh, you know, does a great job

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>of laying out this idea that uh, you know, Musk's

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.799
<v Speaker 3>emphasis has really been on, you know, don't don't bother

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 3>with the here and now, forget uh you know, forget

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 3>that the near term earnings. The sort of big potential

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 3>for this company has to do with, you know, selling

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 3>self driving cars and humanoid robots and and things that uh,

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, we've heard Elon talk about time and time again,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 3>but not actually deliver. Uh. And I think you know,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 3>if if if you're sort of looking at this company

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of class half full. It's it's uh, you know,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm less concerned than I am today about the

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 3>here and now of this company and the earnings power

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla and its current business, and therefore, you know,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>more encouraged that they have, you know, the ability and

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 3>the time and the financial wherewithal to go out and

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>pursue those you know, big stretch goals that Musk has

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>stepped for the company, and you know, depending on who

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 3>you ask, you know may or may not be able

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 3>to actually follow through on his various predictions.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, from an equity perspective, this stock has been all

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 4>over the place this year. I mean we were just

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 4>looking earlier and year to date the stock was in

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 4>the red. Now it seems as though today's games have

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 4>pushed it to drift about eight ten percent higher for

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 4>the year. What's the goal case here? What are people saying,

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 4>how many how much legs do they have to run?

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Can the stock go much further? What's the consensus there?

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 3>You're absolutely right. I mean back in April this was

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>a stock that was down forty three percent for the year,

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 3>and so for them to have, you know, come all

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the way back. They it sold off quite a bit,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, after the Robotaxi unveiling just a few weeks ago,

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.799
<v Speaker 3>and you know, we we've now seen the shares go

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 3>go positive again for the year. We'll see if they

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 3>stay in positive territory. I think, you know, whether whether

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 3>or not the company can can actually grow next year

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 3>with deliveries, I think is really important because even Musk,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>who's you know, sort of perpetually said, you know, next

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 3>year will be our year for autonomy, even he is saying,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 3>you know that that this cyber cab that they showed

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks ago isn't going to be ready

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six, and so we need this company

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 3>to bring you know, more affordable vehicles to market, to

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to make teslas more accessible to to to more consumers

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 3>and get back to when it's you know, growing again,

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 3>to put it to put it, put it simply, and

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think it's still unclear what exactly they

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>have to offer that's going to make make help them

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 3>get there.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Craig, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate getting

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>some of your time and perspective. Craig Trudell, He's a

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>global autos editor for Bloomberg News. He's based in London,

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>joining us via that zoom thing. You know, I think

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>for me, and I think for a lot of investors

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of people that just think about the

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 2>EV business, what is the ultimate demand out there for EV's.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>We had the early adopters, go, We've had the people

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>that just love the technology.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, they've bought their evs.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Now it's about okay, Now I got to service the

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 2>rest of the people the exact one value the people

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 2>they may want cool design.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Get the rest of us on board.

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I'm just not sure how that plays on.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>We've seen some of the existing auto manufacturers, like the

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Volkswagens and Fords kind of.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 6>Pulled back a little bit exactly.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 4>They started to pull back on their development there because

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 4>they weren't really seeing demand as you just mentioned. So

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 4>I think it's really interesting when we think about the

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 4>broader landscape and whether or not they're actually going to

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 4>be able to attract the broader group.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, you got that whole thing about the charging network.

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>You got to you know a lot of people I

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>talked to so say, when the charging network is like

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the gasoline state, network in this country.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 5>That's one I'll think about an EP.

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how that all plays out, but great

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>day for Tesla and Edge shareholders.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Following not getting the deal done? What's going on there?

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Because they need to get people back to work. They

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>need to start cracking out some airplanes and getting some

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 2>cash into the door. Next guest has some thoughts on

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 2>all this whole labor negotiation, unrest issues, workplace issues.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Jessica Kriegel joints.

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 2>It's in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio chief scientists of

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Workplace Culture and the firm is named Culture Partners. So

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>there you go, joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Broker Studio. Thirty five percent seen or thirty percent whatever.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 2>It was seemed pretty good to me, helping out with

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 2>the four to one k's. Then labor comes back with

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>defined pensions. Now my response would be nobody. I'm six

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>years old. I don't know one person with a defined

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 2>benefit pension plan that's nineteen seventies. Can you give us

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts about what's happening between Boeing and their striking workers.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 5>How do you view it?

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 7>I don't know anyone that has a pension anymore these days,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 7>but they've been asking for it since the beginning, and

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 7>it's a non starter. They're not going to get the pensions.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 7>I think Boeing will literally go bankrupt if they have

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 7>to give up those pensions. But they have been asking

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 7>for forty percent since the beginning. Boeing originally offered twenty five.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 7>They said overwhelmingly absolutely not enough. Then they came back

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 7>at thirty percent, which was their quote unquote best and

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 7>final offer, but apparently not because two weeks later they

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 7>came back with thirty five percent. And they've got two

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 7>thirds of the union that is still saying that's not enough,

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 7>a third has been converted, a third did say yeah,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 7>I'll go back to work for that. So they're getting

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 7>closer and they're going to have to bridge that gap.

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 7>I think they'll have to go to forty percent, and

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 7>since they're probably not going to get the pension, they

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 7>might have to go above forty percent. They might have

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 7>to go to forty five percent in order to say

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 7>no pensions. But we'll give you more, and we'll give

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 7>you a bigger signing bonus to make up for all

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 7>the time that they haven't been paid. It's hard right now.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 3>For the union workers.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Jessica, I know that you are of the opinion that

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 4>management has been so focused on their balance sheet that

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 4>they've pretty much forgotten about the workplace culture. What does

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 4>that look like? I mean, how do you kind of

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 4>turn that around? You did say that it seems like

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 4>it's a little bit too late now.

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean CEOs all over the world are focused

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 7>on driving results right now, and some can take that

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 7>so literally to only mean focusing on the financial results.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 7>But as we're seeing with Boeing, this is a classic

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 7>example if you focus so much on the financials and

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 7>not on the hearts and minds of your employees and

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 7>bringing people along for the ride. Culture is really about

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 7>how you think and act. It's not about the buzzwords

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 7>you have on a poster board about your values. Kelly

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 7>Orper did an interview the other day saying we got

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 7>to focus on culture change, and we're doing that right

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 7>now by revisiting our values. I mean, is that really

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 7>going to move the need for the people who feel

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 7>so much resentment, feel like they've lost so much, they

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 7>have to see leaders take the lead on culture change,

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 7>which means pay us what we think we're owed, show

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 7>up on the floor, stop focusing so much on the

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 7>balance seat, and also focus on quality control. Also focus

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 7>on what we as people bring to the organization and

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 7>what we need.

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>High school buddy Mine life long engineer at Boeing in Seattle,

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and he says, hey, you know, he's not a radical dude,

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 2>He's just saying, hey, this is what I think happened.

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>They've management left the c suite, left Seattle twenty years

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 2>ago for Chicago.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 5>Now they're in DC.

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>That felt to a lot of these engineering types who

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>take pride in the work that we lost their support,

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 2>or we lost their support of the engineers drive Boeing

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and they started focusing more on profitability as opposed to

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>the engineering prowess of Boeing.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 5>And that's twenty years ago.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and one could argue they think that's the beginning

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>of perhaps some of these problems that we're now seeing

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty years later, I don't know how you get that back.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 7>Well. I think they've done a good job actually, because

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 7>Kelly Orperg is someone with an engineering background, so they

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 7>have realized they don't need to be encounter at the

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 7>c suite level. They need someone who's been an engineer,

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 7>who understands he's saying, let's get back to the floor.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 7>He bought a house in Seattle. He said, we're going

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 7>back to Seattle. So there is already a shift to

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 7>make up for what that is a well documented complaint

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 7>that the union workers has if you lost the soul

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 7>of this company, and this is a fight for the soul, right.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I always tell people that one of the great drives

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>from an airport to a downtown is in Seattle. You

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 2>get out of your plane in Sea Tech, you get

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>on one over that eye whatever that is, and you

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 2>drive to Seattle.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 5>It's about a forty minute drive in.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 2>On the left of you on the highway for almost

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 2>forty miles is Boeing, and it's airfield after airfre right,

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>and hangar after hangar, and plane after plane, and they're

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 2>taken off and flane. All about that to me is

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Boeing and the fact when senior management left there, it

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 2>seemed like for a lot of people, oh lost to

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 2>heart and soul there.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 4>So, in building off of Paul's earlier question, I'm curious,

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 4>did it seem as though there was a stronger, more

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 4>intense crackdown after all the hiccups that Boeing has seen

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 4>this year, or does this seem like it's kind of

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 4>been a bubbling up point and it's finally bubbling over.

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 4>As to why workers are so unhappy.

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, Boeing has had a lot of very public embarrassments

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 7>right in recent times, and I think the employees are

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 7>saying the executives are not protecting the company's brand and reputation,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 7>so we will We are not okay with the quality control,

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 7>we are not okay with the way that production has

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 7>deteriorated over time, and so we are going to fight

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 7>to do things the right way. Because these are engineers

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 7>who take a lot of value. They love the fact

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 7>that they can produce some of the most high quality

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 7>machines in the world. Right they don't want to create

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 7>garbage material anymore. So they're fighting for it. And I

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 7>think this is something that will get resolved. It will

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 7>absolutely get resolved. They're going to get back to the table.

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 7>Maybe a few more weeks. Some people say we're only

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 7>at the halfway point. Either way, they're going to come together.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 7>Boeing will get back on track. I'm not worried about

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 7>the future of the company.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's pivot a little bit away from Boeing get back

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>to another key issue which I keep raising because I

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 2>just wonder how things revolving. Are people back in the office,

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>what's the new oral? I guess we are when you

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>talk to your clients. Yeah, Are we in a permanent

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 2>hybrid situation?

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean right now. I think twenty twenty five is

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 7>going to be the year of forcing people back into

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 7>the office. Amazon just made an announcement that people have

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 7>to be back five days a week. I think that

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 7>is regressive thinking, if you want my personal opinion, because

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 7>think of the language people use when they talk about

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 7>return to the office. Go back to the office. It's

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 7>going backwards, as if COVID was just a pause and

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 7>now we can press play again and nothing's changed. But

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 7>the reality is culture has changed. If culture is how

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 7>people think and act, we had a major experience that

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 7>evolved our thinking about how we can be productive. And

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 7>I think companies that are forcing people back into the

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 7>office are counting on some people to leave that it's

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 7>a way to do layoffs without doing layoffs, and they're

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 7>relying on activity based manager. It's easy to manage activity

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 7>of your employees if you can see them at the desk.

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 7>The more elevated way of leading a team is to

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 7>manage to outcomes and you don't have to be in

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 7>the office to manage to outcomes. So companies that want

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 7>the competitive edge on attracting talent from all over the nation,

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 7>they're going to allow people to work from home. And

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 7>companies that have a real estate bill that they're worried about,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 7>they're going to force people back into the office.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 4>And I mean our incentives enough as food and all

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the different things enough to lure people back into the office.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Or do you think that a lot of people are

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 4>really hard and fast I want to be removed.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, it depends on the person, right There are some

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 7>people who are just excited to get back into the office.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 7>They want the kombucha Fridays and the Hawaiian shirt Tuesdays

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 7>or whatever it is that people do right now to

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 7>create quote unquote culture. Those are not culture things. Those

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 7>are just perks, they're fun. Ultimately, it's how are we

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 7>making decisions, how are people thinking? How are we committed

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 7>to the mission of the organization? And I can do

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 7>that at home or I can do that in the office.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 7>And I would ask, if you're questioning right now as

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 7>a leader, whether or not you should force people back

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 7>into the office. Is think about what are the results

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 7>we're trying to achieve, What are the shared beliefs within

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 7>our team that are getting in the way of hitting

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 7>those results, and what do we need those beliefs to

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 7>be And is working from home going to help drive

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 7>those correct beliefs that will get us the results or not.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 7>That's really the deeper work of leadership, rather than add

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 7>do we get people in the office three or five

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 7>days a week? So that's that's arbitrary.

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 5>I think that Amazon might be a little bit of

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 5>harbring rym. We might see more companies.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well absolutely. Also, Amazon is not going to have

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 7>trouble replacing people that that don't want right because it's Amazon,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 7>and so there are companies like that that can do

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 7>whatever they want and they'll be able to hire other companies.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 7>They have to be a little bit more strategic about

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 7>how theyre going to attract talent.

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 5>Interesting.

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's just ever evolving, satary evolved a Bloomberg

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>or four.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Days a week. I don't know, you will see. I'm

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 5>fine a week working. Just find for me.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Jessica Krigle, thank you so much for joining us. Jessica Krikles,

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 2>she's a chief scientist of workplace culture at Culture Partners,

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>joining us. Lifer in a Bloomberg interactive studio talking about

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Boeing and just kind of the workplace in general, kind

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of the evolving US workplace.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo card Playing and

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>All Right, it is earnings, fast and furious. I think

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 2>today was probably the busiest day, or will be the

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>busiest day of the week. What's been a busy week,

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and we've heard from pretty much everybody across the board,

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 2>all types of industries. One of the companies is United

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Parcel Service UPS came out with some numbers. The stock

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 2>is up five percent, today, So some pretty good numbers.

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Presumably Lee Claskal is he's right here now to Lee Clascott,

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Senior Transport Logistics and Shipping annols for Bloomberg Intelligence. He

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 2>joins us from our Princeton, New Jersey offices. Hayley talk

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 2>to us about UPS stocks up five percent. So I

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 2>guess the market like what they saw.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, hey, Paul, Yeah, So UPS had a pretty good

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 8>print this morning, and they all so you know, indicated

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 8>that earnings might be a little better than expectations are

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 8>in the fourth quarter.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 6>UPS has been kind of a show me story.

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 8>They've been doing a lot of self help things, but

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 8>a lot of those initiatives really haven't bubbled up to

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 8>the bottom line or the revenue numbers, just given the

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 8>difficult backdrop. And what we saw today was earnings per

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 8>share finally inflected, earnings per share growth finally inflected positively

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 8>after seven quarterly declines. So I see things seem to

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 8>be working for UPS. And you know, we expect earnings

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 8>expectations for the fourth quarter and probably next year to

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 8>move higher on kind of the progress that they've made

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 8>thus far.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.239
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Lee, I mean you mentioned that difficult backdrop. As

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at ups, we're seeing shares down about twelve

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 4>percent year to date. As we're thinking about the future,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how much of a move higher do you

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 4>really anticipate as we're thinking about the year end, should

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 4>investors start to see some gains here?

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, we don't do buy whole cell recommendations of Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 8>but you know, what we can tell you is that

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 8>the company are doing the right things to see their

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 8>margins expand and and you know, our view is that

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 8>margin expansion could be more than than where where the

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 8>market currently is at. And a lot of that has

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 8>to do with a lot of the cost savings that

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 8>they've been able to generate. They've been able to, you know,

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 8>shut down various shifts, sorting shifts, They've been able to

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 8>close some facilities and just do more with the network

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 8>that they have. That and if you fast forward that,

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, maybe you know, volumes could start to improve

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 8>a little more meaningfully from here. You know, they expect

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 8>a better peak season this year, albeit probably not as

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 8>as robust as they were probably planning for three months ago,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 8>but the peak season is expected to grow and the

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 8>reason for you know, them tempering the outlook for the

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 8>peak season is given the fact that the peak season

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 8>is condensed. The peak season, for those don't know, is

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 8>from Black Friday to Christmas Eve. And because of that

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 8>condensed peaks time, you know, a lot of retailers think

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 8>that some consumers might be going to the stores versus

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 8>ordering online.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 6>And making that gamble whether or not you get it

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 6>under the tree in time.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Haylee, we love talking to you for a variety of reason.

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not the least of which is the companies you

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 2>cover lead give us a real sense of how the

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 2>underlying economy is doing, whether it's stuff's being shipped by

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>rail or truck or air cargo. What's GPS telling you

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 2>about kind of underlying activity that they're seeing.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, first and foremost, I love talking to you as well, Paul,

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 8>But you know what I think they're telling us is

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 8>the consumer is doing okay. You know, it's not doom

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 8>and gloom going into to the holiday season.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 6>I think that you know, you are going to see growth.

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 8>Like I said earlier, that growth might be a little

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 8>more tempered, but you know, we are seeing a return

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 8>to kind of seasonality, which is really good because it's

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 8>not just going to impact the parcel providers. It's going

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 8>to impact the truckload providers, you know, like the Knights,

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 8>Swifts and the Warners of the world. It's going to

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 8>impact the intermodial providers like the JB Hunts and the

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 8>hub groups of.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 6>The world, and the railroads as well.

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 8>So, you know what we're hearing about the consumer and

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 8>the fact that B to B volume grew for the

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 8>first time in a long time within their domestic business

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 8>is also telling me, you know that things might be

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 8>might be a little better in twenty twenty five. So

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, we're pretty optimistic that demand should be increasing

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 8>across most of the modes that we cover, and you know,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty five, in our view, is going to be

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 8>a much better year than twenty twenty four was.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 4>And I do know back in about April, I remember

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 4>that it became UPS became USPS's primary air cargo provider.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 4>Is that still a topic of conversation? How much does

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 4>that really add to the business if at all?

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so it is a great business win for them.

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 8>You know, FedEx walked away from it for various reasons

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 8>and UPS decided to pick it up. It's going to

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 8>be consistent volumes at a consistently good margin.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 6>And you know what they're doing is.

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 8>They're really restructuring their overall business. They've been getting out

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 8>of businesses that are a lot more volatile. They just

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 8>sold their freight brokerage business, which was called Coyote to

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 8>r XO and and then that was earlier last month.

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 8>And then in twenty twenty one they sold their less

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 8>than truckload business UPS Freight to TFI and those were

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 8>not great businesses for UPS. And now UPS can really

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 8>focus on being a parcel provider. And to answer your question,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 8>what that US postal service business can also do, It's

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 8>going to build density, and density is the name of

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 8>the game in any transportation company, and so they can

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 8>build off that density with other volumes.

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, Lee, thanks so much for joining us. I'd

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 2>appreciate getting your expertise and all things logistics, railroads, trucks,

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 2>the sea transport, the air transport. Lee covers it all

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 2>and again his transports companies just got to give you

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 2>a real good insight into the strength of the overall

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 2>economy when you can see kind of what types of

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 2>goods are being transported all around the country and the world.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 5>So some good stuff there.

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 5>Thirty R Normal lend us sitting in for Alex still on.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweney, You're live here in on our Bloomberg Interactive

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Broker Studio, streaming video live on what.

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 5>Is that YouTube?

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 2>That's the interesting that thing the internetew dot com. So

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 2>just head over there and search Bloomberg Podcast, Bloomberg News

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Morning Console.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 5>We got to pull out this morning. I'm just gonna

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 5>guess dead heat.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Jody Schneider joined political news director for Bloomberg Television and Radio.

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 2>She joined us in Washington, DC. Jody, what do we

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 2>learn from the latest Bloomberg Morning Console poll.

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, it reconfirms Paul that things are just very very close.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 9>Probably couldn't get any closer. It is that dead heat.

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 9>We've seen some of that during this last year or

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 9>so of the polls we've done with Morning Consult, but

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 9>this one is as close as ever. And of course

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 9>it's the last one before the election, So it matters

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 9>as much as ever we're really seeing, you know, it's

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 9>up maybe a point or half a point in particular states,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 9>but it's forty nine forty nine when you get to

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 9>all the swing states, and we are focused on those

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 9>swing states, the ones where they are going to determine

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 9>who wins the electoral college, which is who wins the presidency.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Definitely, And Jody, as you just said, we are really

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 4>coming up less than two weeks away from the election.

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 4>What are you seeing from those swing states? What has

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 4>really been general consensus of this latest chapter.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think the poll really reflects that that it

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 9>is so close that almost you know, too close to call.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 9>In a number of states. There's some talk about, well,

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 9>one or the other may win the popular vote, but

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 9>that is, you know, almost beside the point. It is

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 9>those swing states where in the past somebody has won

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 9>by twenty thousand votes or forty thousand votes. Hillary Clinton

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 9>lost the blue Wall states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 9>by fewer than eighty thousand votes in twenty sixteen, so

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 9>it really is kind of, you know, down to that

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 9>so called knife's edge in the final days of the campaign,

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 9>and that's why you see the candidates in their running

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 9>mates almost exclusively focusing in those seven swing states, and

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 9>the Democratic candidate so much on those blue wall states.

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 9>She really needs to win there.

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Jody, what are your sources tell you about the timing

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 2>of when we may have some resolution all on the

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 2>actual vote itself. Will we know eleven pm on November fifth,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 2>or will be hours later, days later?

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's the question everybody I know is asking me.

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 9>So that's what everybody wants to know. When are we

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 9>gonna know? And we may well not know that night,

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 9>not only the presidential but the House of Representatives. The

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 9>House is going to be a close race for control

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.239
<v Speaker 9>of the House and it's going to go through New

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 9>York and California, So we may not know that night

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 9>who will control the House will probably know the Senate.

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 9>The presidential we may not know. In twenty twenty, of course,

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 9>we didn't find out till Saturday, but you might recall

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 9>two thousand, where we didn't know until December when it

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 9>went to the Supreme Court. So we may be in

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 9>a situation like that, and you know, the markets may

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 9>not wake up to that uncertainty until it starts happening

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 9>as well, which will be something else for us to

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 9>cover here at Bloomberg.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 4>How exactly are the candidates strategizing in this last stretch

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 4>to mobilize voters.

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so they're really going to those swing states, you know,

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 9>trying to really make their case. They're so called closing arguments.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 9>Kamala Harris is trying to do that in and we

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 9>heard her at a CNN town hall doing this last night,

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 9>sort of saying, I am you know, I have a

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 9>plan for the future, but I have experience with I've

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 9>been the vice president for the past four years, and

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump will be a danger to America. That's her case.

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump's case has been to kind of double down

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 9>on his rhetoric of making people feel that this administration

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 9>has failed them. He's done it on the economy, and

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 9>he's been successful on the economy, including a chosen our

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 9>poll that he is the one people trust more on

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 9>the economy. And he's making the case that to leave

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 9>this with her would be a danger to the future

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 9>of this country. So they're both making arguments based somewhat

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 9>more on that their other, their opponent, would do harmful

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 9>things to the future of America than as much on

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 9>their record. Their closing arguments are kind of mirror images

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 9>of themselves in some ways.

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Jody, turnout, I've been told by the experts is really

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 2>really important here.

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 5>What do we expect turnout to be?

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>And number two, does either party have an advantage in

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>driving turnout?

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so I think turnout is key.

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 10>It's certainly key.

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 9>In those swing states. The other interesting fact, Paul, to

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 9>edit all this is early voting. We're seeing massive early voting.

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 9>I think it's as much as eighteen million or more

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 9>people have already voted, either by mail or in person,

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 9>and we will be seeing a massive amount of that

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 9>in the next week, historic amounts of early voting. Now,

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 9>in the past people said early voting tended to favor Democrats,

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 9>but now the Republicans are pushing it as well, and

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 9>it's becoming more the fabric of people thinking, well, why

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 9>should I wait? Why should I wait till election day?

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 9>So some of these closing arguments really might be falling

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 9>and so called jaffiers because people have already voted. And

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 9>we'll see when we do the historical analysis of this

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 9>campaign how early voting played into it.

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 4>With about thirty seconds or less. Just how important is

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.239
<v Speaker 4>age in this election? Is that playing a factor at all?

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 9>It's playing a factor, but more gender seems to be.

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 9>It really does seem to be a very gender focused election.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 9>The Democrats, you know, winning more women and Donald Trump

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 9>kind of doubling down on the mail vote, both older

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 9>and younger. But it really gender seems to be the

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 9>dividing line here more than age.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Jody, thank you so much for joining us.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate your reporting as always. Jody Schneider. She's political

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 2>news director for Bloomberg Television and Radio. She joins us

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 2>from our newsroom in Washington, d C.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and androyd

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Otto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also and live

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 5>Normal.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Linda is sitting in for Alex Steele Paul Swhen you

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 2>allow here on Bloomberg in nactive broke restview streaming the

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 2>video thing on YouTube, so aheadver YouTube dot com search

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcast. That's where your finest is. John was just

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 2>reporting new home sales give in a little bit better

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 2>than expect it. Let's break it down with an expert.

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 2>We can do that with Bloomberg Intelligence. They got everybody

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>over there, Drew reading, he's a Bloomberg Intelligence US home

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 2>building analyst, Drew.

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 5>What you make of these numbers?

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 6>Here?

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 2>The new home sales seven hundred and thirty eight thousand.

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Consensus was seven hundred and twenty thousand, so a little

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 2>bit better than expected.

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, and not surprised to see a good number in September.

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 11>You have to remember in September we had mortgage rates

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 11>at the lowest level in about a year and a half,

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 11>so they hit as low as six point one. So

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 11>we got the data today and it's already backward looking

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 11>because since the beginning of October rates have shot back up.

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 11>It's about six point nine percent, and if you look

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 11>at the payment on a monthly basis, that's about nine

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 11>percent higher. So what we have heard is things have

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 11>started to slow down. The builders are noting more seasonality,

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 11>so we would expect things to slow down a little

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 11>bit as we get October data.

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 4>So as we think about the FED moving forward, Drew

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 4>and people expecting potential cuts what does this mean for

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 4>home builders when we're thinking about it on a longer scale,

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 4>looking further out.

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, certainly, you know, it's all about affordability, and

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 11>mortgage rates are certainly a key part of that. Our

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 11>expectation was that we would get somewhere in that low

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 11>six percent range that would help spur at a little

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 11>bit of activity. I think you really need to see

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.959
<v Speaker 11>a five handle to see more robust activity. But it's

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 11>important to mind it's not just about rates, it's prices too.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 11>Prices are up more than fifty percent since the beginning

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 11>of twenty twenty. That's really the biggest component. And you know,

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 11>we did an analysis on monthly payments relative income and

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 11>based strictly on that just to show you how how

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 11>to whack the market is. Right now, prices would need

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 11>to fall somewhere about twenty five percent in order for

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 11>monthly payments relative income to fall in line with historical averages.

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 11>So it's a combination of what's happening with prices and

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 11>what's happening with rates.

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Right, and so if we were to see a potential

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 4>uptake in we're to see a flight of existing homes

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to come back on the market. How much competition do

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 4>you think that would actually pose for home builders when

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 4>we're thinking about new properties.

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's a great question. Inventories are up about twenty

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 11>percent compared to last year. At the national level, they're

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 11>still down about twenty percent compared to pre pandemic levels,

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 11>but it's very market specific. You're seeing markets in Texas

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 11>think you know, Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, as

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 11>well as most of the markets across Florida where inventories

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 11>are rising, you know, anywhere from thirty to fifty percent year.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 11>Every year their back above twenty nineteen levels. So the

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 11>competitive dynamic is certainly shifting for builders in those markets,

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 11>particularly in Texas, and I think what you'll ultimately see

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 11>is that builders are going to have to continue to

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 11>lean on incentives. I think it could start to put

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 11>some downward pressure on prices as we move forward. So

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 11>if builders want to clear that speco inventory that they've

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 11>build up over the last year, they're gonna have to

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 11>keep their foot down on the gas pedal in terms

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 11>of their use of sales incentives.

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Drew, thanks for joining us. We appreciate you hopping

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 2>on there. Drew reading home Building analysts Bloomberg Intelligence from Princeton,

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey a little bit better than expected new home sales,

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 2>so we note that.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 2>All right. When I started in the media business on

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street thirty five years ago, my clients were radio companies,

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>TV companies, magazine companies, newspaper companies. Then along came cable television,

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and then seeing the Internet, can You Age?

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Which upended everything.

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Our next guest was the MNA banker for the old media,

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and now he's the lead m and A banker for

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the new media. Terry kwasa JOINTS and he's the founder

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and CEO of Luma Partners. I work with two moons

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 2>ago back on Wall Street when we were banking some

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 2>of those older media companies. Now it's all about Google, Facebook, Snapchat,

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 2>all these kinds of Amazon now major player and digital advertising. Terry,

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us here in our studio.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 2>You are in the biggest best industry I can think of,

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean digital advertising. It has exploded over the last

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 2>ten to fifteen years. You banked the companies that support

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the technology of all those big media companies that we like,

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.919
<v Speaker 2>like Google and Facebook. Talk to us about the state

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of digital advertising today. Is this as strong as it

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 2>it's been over the last several years.

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 10>Look, first of all, you're absolutely right to denote that,

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, this is massive. We're talking about a trillion

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 10>dollars of spend globally. And what's interesting about it is

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 10>that the vast majority of that spend is actually those

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 10>ads are bought programmatically and all that that's just a

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 10>fancy word meaning auction bought in auctions, and so there's

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 10>a lot of technology that requires sort of real time

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 10>assessment and targeting of each particular ad slot that happens

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 10>in milliseconds. So the technology has completely moved to this

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 10>sort of software intermediated world. From a from a business

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 10>model standpoint, the giants that you mentioned there are somewhere

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 10>in the ninety plus percent of their revenue comes from advertising.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 10>Not everyone can be bloomberg, right, I mean, I mean

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 10>so and but but it's beyond just those large platforms

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 10>so media and historically subscription based media like a Bloomberg,

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 10>but also like a Netflix and like a you know,

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 10>Disney that had these sort of B to B models

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 10>in the old TV world that you and I covered

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 10>well decades ago.

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 5>That's all.

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 10>They're all now shifting to advertising in order to garner

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 10>larger audiences and supplement their revenues.

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, obviously, this is ever evolving space. It seems

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 4>like there's something new every single day. How do you

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 4>all stay nimble?

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 10>You're absolutely right, Nora. In fact, I describe this sector

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 10>as having uniquely sorry, having five attributes scale. I mentioned

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 10>at trillion dollars, right, growth, So if you looked at

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 10>the combin and a growth rate of digital advertising, it's

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 10>over twenty percent for twenty years. Name another industry that

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 10>has that characteristic of growth. I'll wait, there is none.

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 10>It has fragmentation. There are thousands of companies across this

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 10>ecosystem that either offer services, media, data, software. It's very,

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:41.280
<v Speaker 10>very complex. That's the fourth item. Tremendous amount of complexity.

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 10>And fifth what you mentioned, Noura, it's dynamic. It just

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 10>keeps changing. If you don't like it. Wait three months,

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 10>it'll be different. Either there will be a new technology,

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 10>or there'll be a new media channel witness TikTok vertical video,

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 10>a short form video, or there'll be a new technology

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 10>policy Google with you know, removing cookies, which is there

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 10>sort of identifier. Or there could be new regulation and

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing a virulent antitrust and privacy legislation from both

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 10>the US government and Europe.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of where I wanted to go.

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Terry and his firm, Luma Partners, they host these leading

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 2>conferences where all these tech people come together.

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 5>And I go to these conferences and.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know anyone, I don't know any company, but

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I just step back and I say, collectively, these are

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 2>the people that put all the ads on the Googles

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 2>of Facebook.

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 5>They figure it out. That's how I think about it.

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about M and A in your business,

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 2>because it's comprised of in the advertising technology space that

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 2>supports all the digital advertising that we all experience every day,

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of M and A. That's where you fit.

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about how that activity has been over

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 2>the last several years.

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 10>So first of all, you're right, your non recognition of

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 10>these people that are really driving the Internet. I mean,

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 10>think about it, right, who gets the headlines? Rupert Murdoch,

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 10>David Zaslov, right, great guys, meaningless as in terms of

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 10>their power and influence over how this all gets made.

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 10>The real people are these people that we don't even know,

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 10>you know, doing sort of B to B advertising technology,

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 10>certainly do so. This sector has gone through a wave

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 10>of new company formation, and there's always new innovation, so

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 10>there's always new companies, but it's direly in need of consolidation.

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 10>That's where I identified this as an opportunity fourteen years

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.879
<v Speaker 10>ago when I formed Luma, and it's completely manifested and has.

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 6>A lot more to go.

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 10>Lately, the last eighteen months or eighteen of the last

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 10>twenty four months, we saw a huge slowdown in NEMENA

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 10>activity at ten year low because you know, the economy,

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 10>all these macro uncertainties. People weren't sure what was going

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 10>to happen with interest rates, with inflation, and so basically

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 10>everyone cut costs, improved their profitability in twenty two and

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 10>twenty three in anticipation for a recession that never came.

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 10>I swear to God, if we get to the end

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 10>of twenty four and there's not a recession. Jerome Powell

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 10>deserves to be on the twenty dollars bill. I mean,

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 10>what an incredible job. And so now everyone is like, wait,

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 10>we haven't done m and A for a couple of years.

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 10>We direly need new technologies and new markets to enter

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 10>and by the way, we've got our ebit done a

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 10>great place right now and we can't and the ad

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 10>market continues to grow. So not only is there not

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 10>a recession, digital ANTSPENT is growing fourteen percent this year

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 10>I'm talking about is the trillion dollar industry growing at

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 10>fourteen percent. Those are large numbers, so every year it

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 10>forms like an industry size of growth. And next year

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 10>forecasted to grow twelve percent. So it turns out you

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 10>can't cut your way to growth. And so they're back

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 10>on the bandwagon and strategic M and A is coming back.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 2>The biggest platforms, as you mentioned before, the Facebook's, the Googles,

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the Amazons of the world. It feels like Washington is

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 2>they got their regulatory sites trained upon them. How does

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that impact kind of everybody else.

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:06.720
<v Speaker 5>In the industry.

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 10>Excellent question. Here is my problem with the DOJ and

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 10>the FTC so Jonathan and Lena, they're well intended policies

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 10>to curb big tech. No one would argue with that

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:25.919
<v Speaker 10>big tech. Look, come on, man, these companies have enormous power,

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 10>so by all means rain them in. However, the effect

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 10>of the well intended legislation was to put a pall

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 10>on all M and A activity. I mean, when they

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 10>blocked the Simon and Schuster deal, it's like it's like, sorry,

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.919
<v Speaker 10>nineteen seventy seven called and they want their antitrust legislation back.

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 10>So it's it's totally ludicrous. They've i think overstepped. And

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 10>the net result is, you know, if you've got a

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 10>half a dozen companies that are omni powerful like at Amazon, Google, Facebook,

0:40:56.640 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 10>you know, and it's it's it's companies numbered seven through

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 10>fifty that you need to be doing M and A

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 10>in order to compete with the top six, and now

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 10>they're foreclosed from doing so. And so actually it's had

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 10>the opposite effect. It's actually increased monopoly power.

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 4>So let's talk AI. I mean, not that big of

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 4>a deal, but I'm curious, how does it actually impact

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 4>your business? Of course, that is something that everyone's been

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 4>watching in terms of AI and how obviously it trickles

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 4>into social media and how we think about the Internet

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 4>and things of that nature. And I'm sure it's very,

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 4>very critical to digital ad.

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 10>So I put AI in the category of shiny new objects, right,

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 10>I mean, and marketing loves the shiny new object. People

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 10>in this industry went crazy for Oh my god, five

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 10>g web three NFTs And you know, I feel there's

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 10>a responsibility, as someone who understands what's going on here

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 10>to call balls and strikes. So I said, this is nonsense,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 10>this is bunk. You're wasting your dollars by all means.

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 10>Marketers spend in those categories for experimental purposes to look

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 10>cool and speak at conferences. But you're just know that

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 10>you're lighting all of that money on fire. Now AI.

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of hype around AI. So wait, are

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 10>we saying this is yet another shiny new object. I

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 10>believe this is one where there's both hype and reality.

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 10>In fact, one could make the argument that digital advertising

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 10>in media is the perfect application for AI because these

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 10>are large language models that do a lot of interesting things,

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 10>but they need huge amounts of data. Well, there is

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 10>no industry with more data in terms of real time

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 10>bidded trillions of AD calls daily in real time. It's

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 10>the perfect application for AI, and we're going to see

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 10>a spectrum from evolution to revolution. I put them in

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 10>three buckets. There's, of course, they're going to improve efficiency

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 10>in and around media data and workflow around how all

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 10>this stuff works because it's complex and AI will improve that.

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 10>Then there is another category around generative AI that's going

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 10>to improve content and the creative of the ads so

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 10>that they become more effective, not just more efficient, but

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 10>more effective. And then there's a third category of who

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 10>knows it could fundamentally change navigation on the web. What

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.919
<v Speaker 10>do I mean by that it's gonna change search because

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 10>search is where you ask questions, whereas AI gives you answers. Right,

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 10>why do we need to manually navigate to websites? If

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 10>the if the publisher can simply publish to the ll M,

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 10>because the interface isn't gonna be manual navigation to a

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 10>www dot you know. Uh, it's just you're just gonna

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 10>ask your AI and a I'll give you the answer.

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 10>So the whole digital media world from a publisher standpoint,

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 10>could be going from uh B two C to B

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 10>two B where the B two B the other the

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 10>last B on B two B is in fact the

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 10>l ll ms of the AI.

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 5>You haven't lost your energy.

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 10>Dude, Oh no, hell no, I'm just getting so.

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 2>I told these people when this guy comes in, you're

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna you're gonna know. Terry Quash, I thank you so

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 2>much for joining us. Tarry Quash is founder and CEO

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 2>of loom of Partners, really focusing on the digital advertising market,

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.800
<v Speaker 2>all the companies that kind of fuel the global digital

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 2>advertising and what's digital advertising.

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 5>It's all the ads that come on your.

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Facebook feed, each Google search, Snapchat, all that kind of stuff.

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Somebody's responsible for that. Terry is certainly one of them.

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 2>The investment banker to the tech world getting an upbeat

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 2>view of digital advertising. Artificial intelligence a big, big player.

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, if you're an advertiser, you want to make

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 2>sure that your ad message gets to the right person,

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the right customer or potential customer, and AI can.

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Certainly help in that. So we'll keep an eye on that.

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 2>So we appreciate getting a few minutes of Terry's presence

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 2>here in our New York studio.

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple Spotify,

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere.

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 6>Else you will get your podcasts.

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every

0:44:56.760 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal, the