1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:07,040
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

2
00:00:08,200 --> 00:00:11,920
Speaker 2: You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

3
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:14,440
Speaker 2: Tim Stenoveek on Bloomberg Radio.

4
00:00:15,320 --> 00:00:18,239
Speaker 3: Well, the dollar fell, long dated bond yields rose, and

5
00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:21,439
Speaker 3: stocks wavered as President Trump's push to remove FED Governor

6
00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:26,120
Speaker 3: Lisa Cook fueld, concerns about central make independence and inflation risks.

7
00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:29,640
Speaker 3: It's not just that, though, it's also in Vidia Tomorrow.

8
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:32,760
Speaker 3: We've been saying there's a lot riding on that report.

9
00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:35,200
Speaker 3: It's the world's biggest stock. It makes up three percent

10
00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:37,839
Speaker 3: of the global market cap of all public companies. Will

11
00:00:37,880 --> 00:00:40,919
Speaker 3: bring those numbers to you as soon as they cross tomorrow.

12
00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:43,840
Speaker 3: This is the backdrop for our conversation with Ben Inker.

13
00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:47,599
Speaker 3: He's the co head of Asset Allocation Portfolio Manager at GMO.

14
00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:50,919
Speaker 3: It's the Boston based asset manager co founded by Jammy Grantham,

15
00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:54,840
Speaker 3: with seventy billion dollars in assets under management. Ben looks

16
00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:58,760
Speaker 3: closely at megacap concentration, so yeah, in Nvidia certainly on

17
00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:01,400
Speaker 3: his radar. He joins us from Boston. Ben, we're going

18
00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:03,640
Speaker 3: to talk about the mag seven in the US and

19
00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:05,760
Speaker 3: the context of the rest of the world. But First,

20
00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:07,800
Speaker 3: the threat of FED independence. What we were just talking

21
00:01:07,800 --> 00:01:10,640
Speaker 3: about with Endo Current who covers the global economy, the

22
00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:14,240
Speaker 3: President saying he will fire FED Governor Lisa Cook if

23
00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:18,160
Speaker 3: he is successful. Does it change your view of US markets?

24
00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:23,320
Speaker 2: It probably doesn't change my view all that much because

25
00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:27,639
Speaker 2: we're pretty skeptical of at least the US stock market

26
00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:32,039
Speaker 2: these days. It would have It would create some more

27
00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:38,199
Speaker 2: concerns for US about US bonds and create more concern

28
00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:41,360
Speaker 2: about the US dollar because I think if the President

29
00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:46,920
Speaker 2: is successful in bullying the Federal Reserve into lowering interest

30
00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:51,400
Speaker 2: rates more than the economy warrants, the two places that

31
00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:54,560
Speaker 2: that comes out are long term bonds and the dollar.

32
00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:58,280
Speaker 2: And the dollar, by virtue of being quite over value today,

33
00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:00,800
Speaker 2: could fall really quite hard.

34
00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:04,680
Speaker 3: Do the president's attacks on the Federal Reserve confirm your skepticism?

35
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:08,160
Speaker 3: Does it essentially give you evidence that saying, hey, we

36
00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:10,600
Speaker 3: are right in our call to be skeptical of US

37
00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:11,720
Speaker 3: equities right now.

38
00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:15,200
Speaker 2: Well, we do think it is part of one of

39
00:02:15,240 --> 00:02:18,840
Speaker 2: the key problems for US companies right now. The US

40
00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:20,799
Speaker 2: stock market is trading at a big premium to the

41
00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:22,560
Speaker 2: rest of the world. That is an issue. The US

42
00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:25,320
Speaker 2: dollar is very overvalued. That is an issue. But the

43
00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:27,880
Speaker 2: other thing we really worry about for the US is

44
00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:32,960
Speaker 2: the US is facing a series of supply shocks that

45
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:35,160
Speaker 2: the rest of the world is not. So we've got

46
00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:39,320
Speaker 2: the tariffs, which increase inflation and decrease economic activity. We've

47
00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:45,400
Speaker 2: got the move against immigrants, which tends to do the same,

48
00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:49,200
Speaker 2: and then we've got this uncertainty problem where we have

49
00:02:49,240 --> 00:02:55,120
Speaker 2: an administration that makes its decisions apparently by tweet, and

50
00:02:55,160 --> 00:02:57,320
Speaker 2: where you really don't know week to week what is

51
00:02:57,360 --> 00:02:59,320
Speaker 2: going to happen, and that makes it very difficult for

52
00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:03,600
Speaker 2: USA businesses to make good long term investment decisions. This

53
00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:08,320
Speaker 2: is part and parcel of that problem. So while I

54
00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:13,520
Speaker 2: certainly hope the administration does not succeed in pushing a

55
00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:17,480
Speaker 2: Thud governor off of the board on the basis of

56
00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:20,680
Speaker 2: a criminal referral, because you can have a criminal referral

57
00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:24,280
Speaker 2: on just about anyone for just about no reason at all,

58
00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:27,480
Speaker 2: So I hope it doesn't happen. If it does, it's

59
00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:31,280
Speaker 2: another sign of policy uncertainty in a country that is

60
00:03:31,360 --> 00:03:32,720
Speaker 2: suddenly a wash in it.

61
00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:37,320
Speaker 1: And we know that you are a skeptic of US

62
00:03:37,360 --> 00:03:40,400
Speaker 1: equities because of their high valuations, but the Magnificent Six

63
00:03:40,440 --> 00:03:44,240
Speaker 1: dominate US equity performance. What breaks their momentum and what

64
00:03:44,320 --> 00:03:46,200
Speaker 1: will you replace them with if they falter?

65
00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:50,320
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean to be clear, we are quite skeptical

66
00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:53,640
Speaker 2: of the fact that the average US company trades at

67
00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:55,560
Speaker 2: a big premium to the average company in the rest

68
00:03:55,560 --> 00:03:58,600
Speaker 2: of the world. The Magnificent Six, which is the Magnificent

69
00:03:58,680 --> 00:04:01,600
Speaker 2: seven x Tesla, because Tesla is not only a very

70
00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:04,640
Speaker 2: different company, it's also a much much more expensive company

71
00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:09,840
Speaker 2: than the rest. The Magnificent Six have been extraordinary in

72
00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:13,760
Speaker 2: their ability to continue to grow at a scale where

73
00:04:13,760 --> 00:04:17,400
Speaker 2: other companies in the past have really hit limits to growth.

74
00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:20,520
Speaker 2: Now they're trading around thirty times earnings on average. That

75
00:04:20,800 --> 00:04:24,240
Speaker 2: Lord knows, that's not cheap. If they can maintain their

76
00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:30,599
Speaker 2: past levels of growth, it's still a perfectly reasonable valuation

77
00:04:30,760 --> 00:04:34,640
Speaker 2: for them. The question is can they maintain it. We're

78
00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:37,920
Speaker 2: not honestly sure. One of the things that is very

79
00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:40,880
Speaker 2: different from the past is they have hugely ramped up

80
00:04:40,960 --> 00:04:45,960
Speaker 2: their aggregate capex. These were always very capital life businesses,

81
00:04:46,040 --> 00:04:50,080
Speaker 2: had wonderful free cash flow, and today they are investing

82
00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:54,160
Speaker 2: in aggregate hundreds of billions of dollars in property, plant,

83
00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:57,640
Speaker 2: and equipment, and it's a huge bet that they are

84
00:04:57,640 --> 00:04:59,040
Speaker 2: going to be able to make a lot of money

85
00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:02,160
Speaker 2: out of AI. Will that come true, I don't know

86
00:05:02,760 --> 00:05:05,680
Speaker 2: If it does not. It is one of the most

87
00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:11,120
Speaker 2: you know, economically meaningful bets we've ever seen from the

88
00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:14,560
Speaker 2: stock market and could be a real problem for them.

89
00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:17,839
Speaker 1: Why do you think US premium has persisted despite stronger

90
00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:18,880
Speaker 1: growth overseas?

91
00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:23,040
Speaker 2: You know, it's it's funny. I think some of it

92
00:05:23,120 --> 00:05:26,360
Speaker 2: is the reflected the reflected glow of the MAG six.

93
00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:30,719
Speaker 2: Because of the MAG six, the aggregate S and P

94
00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:35,680
Speaker 2: has done better fundamentally right now, That fundamental out performance

95
00:05:35,760 --> 00:05:37,920
Speaker 2: is a piece of it. The dollar has been a

96
00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:41,600
Speaker 2: big source of the outperformance because the dollar has appreciated

97
00:05:41,640 --> 00:05:43,920
Speaker 2: by a lot over the last decade versus every other

98
00:05:43,960 --> 00:05:47,000
Speaker 2: currency on the planet. And then the valuation in the

99
00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:49,920
Speaker 2: US over the last decade has really expanded relative to

100
00:05:49,960 --> 00:05:52,040
Speaker 2: the rest of the world. But there is this base

101
00:05:52,160 --> 00:05:56,880
Speaker 2: of sort of fundamental outperformance, all of which is owed

102
00:05:57,080 --> 00:06:02,040
Speaker 2: to the MAG six. So the Magi have been amazing

103
00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:06,760
Speaker 2: over the last decade. They're expensive, but they're amazing. The

104
00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:10,760
Speaker 2: rest of the US has not been amazing, but has

105
00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:17,360
Speaker 2: still captured some of the glow because they've been more

106
00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:22,159
Speaker 2: associated with the MAG six than companies outside the US,

107
00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:27,040
Speaker 2: and that I just don't see how it's sustainable because

108
00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:28,839
Speaker 2: those companies are going to have to do a lot

109
00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:32,279
Speaker 2: better than they have in the past to justify their valuations.

110
00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:34,880
Speaker 3: We're speaking with a Ben Ankor, co head of Acid

111
00:06:34,920 --> 00:06:39,560
Speaker 3: Allocation portfolio manager at GMO. Of course, the co founded

112
00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:44,040
Speaker 3: firm by Jammy Grantham seventy billion dollars in assets under management,

113
00:06:44,839 --> 00:06:47,840
Speaker 3: been on the valuation side when it comes to the

114
00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:51,680
Speaker 3: MAG six. I know you've talked about US stocks being

115
00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:57,680
Speaker 3: more highly valued than international stocks, and if we look

116
00:06:57,680 --> 00:07:00,320
Speaker 3: at stocks in the US, obviously that's based on where

117
00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:02,560
Speaker 3: investors think they're going to go. You said it could

118
00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:05,120
Speaker 3: be justified if they continue their growth rate as the

119
00:07:05,120 --> 00:07:08,200
Speaker 3: way they've been growing in recent years. What would you say, though,

120
00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:10,400
Speaker 3: to someone who says, well, the US is a unique

121
00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:15,880
Speaker 3: environment from a regulatory perspective, from an economic power perspective,

122
00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:20,920
Speaker 3: from an international relations perspective, and there is this premium

123
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:24,480
Speaker 3: in the US because well, we have a regulatory environment

124
00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:28,640
Speaker 3: that allows for that. That essentially says, okay, well that

125
00:07:28,840 --> 00:07:31,320
Speaker 3: is justified that the rest of the world doesn't have,

126
00:07:31,400 --> 00:07:35,040
Speaker 3: and indeed, we haven't seen outperformance of the rest of

127
00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:37,880
Speaker 3: the world save for the first few months of this year.

128
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:41,239
Speaker 3: We'll see what the future brings. But isn't the doesn't

129
00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:43,080
Speaker 3: the US deserve to have a premium on it based

130
00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:43,800
Speaker 3: on those factors.

131
00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:48,520
Speaker 2: Look, if the US deserves to have a premium, it

132
00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:50,640
Speaker 2: would be on the basis of having a higher return

133
00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:52,440
Speaker 2: on capital than we have in the rest of the world.

134
00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:55,360
Speaker 2: There are plenty of countries where there are not a

135
00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:58,640
Speaker 2: lot of regulations over what companies do. Most of the

136
00:07:58,680 --> 00:08:01,520
Speaker 2: emerging world doesn't have that much any regulations. The return

137
00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:05,320
Speaker 2: on capital isn't necessarily that brilliant. They aren't wonderful places

138
00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:09,280
Speaker 2: to operate. The US has been a good place for

139
00:08:09,400 --> 00:08:12,720
Speaker 2: businesses to operate. One we are a very big market. Two,

140
00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:16,200
Speaker 2: we have had a regulatory system that is very rules based,

141
00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:20,680
Speaker 2: very kind of slow to change, And it has been

142
00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:23,280
Speaker 2: a good base to try to sell to the rest

143
00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:27,200
Speaker 2: of the world. All of that is under threat right now.

144
00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:30,840
Speaker 2: The US is not such a brilliant place to be

145
00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:33,000
Speaker 2: as a base for the rest of the world because

146
00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:37,400
Speaker 2: things like steel and aluminum costs a lot more in

147
00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:40,360
Speaker 2: the US than they do anywhere else on earth, because

148
00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:43,520
Speaker 2: we have the big the big tariffs on them. From

149
00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:49,439
Speaker 2: a regulatory perspective, while the biggest you know, the biggest

150
00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:54,560
Speaker 2: victims might be companies providing wind power or looking to

151
00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:58,600
Speaker 2: do so. We today operate in a world where the

152
00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:04,240
Speaker 2: regulatory environment is much less predictable, and unfortunately, we also

153
00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:07,360
Speaker 2: now operate in an environment where it is pretty clear

154
00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:10,120
Speaker 2: that the way you want to get ahead, at least

155
00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:12,880
Speaker 2: as a very large cap company, is getting in the

156
00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:16,480
Speaker 2: good graces of the government, which is a very different

157
00:09:16,559 --> 00:09:20,960
Speaker 2: game than we have had for the last eighty years

158
00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:25,560
Speaker 2: in the US, and that you know, that pushes towards

159
00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:30,280
Speaker 2: rent seeking behavior, it pushes towards corrupt behavior. It is

160
00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:33,440
Speaker 2: not a situation where you would say, aha, these are

161
00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:35,439
Speaker 2: the companies that should be training in a premium for

162
00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:37,679
Speaker 2: the rest of the world. That is more like what

163
00:09:37,720 --> 00:09:41,640
Speaker 2: we have seen in countries like Russia or China, where

164
00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:44,240
Speaker 2: in general people have said, oh, well, if you're going

165
00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:48,319
Speaker 2: to invest there, you better have a discount to make

166
00:09:48,400 --> 00:09:49,679
Speaker 2: up for the fact that you don't know what the

167
00:09:49,720 --> 00:09:53,200
Speaker 2: government is going to do. And the incentives for companies

168
00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:56,559
Speaker 2: are not necessarily profit maximizing for shareholders.

169
00:09:56,679 --> 00:09:59,839
Speaker 3: You know, speaking of Washington, and we're going to have

170
00:09:59,880 --> 00:10:03,120
Speaker 3: more questions on this. The President is having a cabinet

171
00:10:03,120 --> 00:10:06,200
Speaker 3: meeting right now. We're monitoring it. If he does start

172
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:08,560
Speaker 3: to take questions, we will bring you those questions and

173
00:10:08,679 --> 00:10:11,199
Speaker 3: answers as soon as we get them. Check out live

174
00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:14,559
Speaker 3: go on the Bloomberg terminal to see that right now.

175
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:18,120
Speaker 3: Then on that the idea of the US government taking

176
00:10:18,160 --> 00:10:20,880
Speaker 3: a stake in these companies, as you mentioned, it does

177
00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:23,320
Speaker 3: concern you. We did hear from Howard Lutnik earlier on

178
00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:26,280
Speaker 3: CNBC who said the idea of taking a stake in

179
00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:30,160
Speaker 3: a defense company such as Lockheed Martin for example, could

180
00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:32,520
Speaker 3: be talked about at a certain point in the future.

181
00:10:32,520 --> 00:10:36,600
Speaker 3: What's the warning that you have for US involvement US

182
00:10:36,720 --> 00:10:38,640
Speaker 3: government involvement in private enterprise.

183
00:10:40,280 --> 00:10:42,920
Speaker 2: Well, you know, the basic problem is as the government

184
00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:48,640
Speaker 2: gets more involved in private enterprise, the needs of shareholders

185
00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:54,120
Speaker 2: take a back seat. And that isn't obviously, you know,

186
00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:57,840
Speaker 2: that isn't necessarily the absolute worst thing in the world.

187
00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:00,480
Speaker 2: But we do see, and we have seen time and

188
00:11:00,559 --> 00:11:05,880
Speaker 2: time again, where businesses are more answerable to the government

189
00:11:05,960 --> 00:11:09,640
Speaker 2: than they are to their standard owners. You get less

190
00:11:09,679 --> 00:11:13,600
Speaker 2: good business decisions. Now. On the other hand, if you

191
00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:16,640
Speaker 2: are a defense contractor, it may well be in your

192
00:11:16,720 --> 00:11:19,839
Speaker 2: interest to have the government take a stake, because if

193
00:11:19,880 --> 00:11:22,160
Speaker 2: you are one where the government has not taken a stake,

194
00:11:22,559 --> 00:11:25,400
Speaker 2: maybe you're less likely to win the next competition.

195
00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:27,559
Speaker 3: Ben, speaking of the President, we got to leave it there.

196
00:11:27,679 --> 00:11:31,200
Speaker 3: Ben Inker, co head of Acid Allocation portfolio manager at

197
00:11:31,400 --> 00:11:32,439
Speaker 3: GMO