WEBVTT - The Democrats Are Folding on the Shutdown 

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:28.244
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, the show about making

0:00:28.244 --> 0:00:31.484
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova, I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:32.684 --> 0:00:35.564
<v Speaker 2>We're at no lack of political news. We're going to

0:00:35.644 --> 0:00:39.204
<v Speaker 2>talk about the elections that were held this last Tuesday,

0:00:40.004 --> 0:00:42.404
<v Speaker 2>the shutdown that it's on its way to being over,

0:00:42.604 --> 0:00:45.604
<v Speaker 2>maybe will be officially super deeper over by the time

0:00:45.684 --> 0:00:50.604
<v Speaker 2>you listener are hearing this episode. Big win for Democrats

0:00:50.604 --> 0:00:52.964
<v Speaker 2>in one case, I'd argue, a big l for Democrats

0:00:53.004 --> 0:00:55.004
<v Speaker 2>and the So we're gonna we're gonna talk all that

0:00:55.084 --> 0:00:57.524
<v Speaker 2>through in kind of an emerged way, I think, which

0:00:57.524 --> 0:00:59.524
<v Speaker 2>is how it feels as they're prossing this in real time.

0:00:59.804 --> 0:01:02.764
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know what does as we often wonder

0:01:02.764 --> 0:01:04.804
<v Speaker 1>on the show, what does this mean for the future

0:01:04.924 --> 0:01:07.884
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party and what they should be thinking

0:01:08.124 --> 0:01:11.884
<v Speaker 1>going forward. So let's get into it. So, yes, full disclosure,

0:01:11.924 --> 0:01:15.324
<v Speaker 1>we are taping us on Monday, November tenth. Lots of

0:01:15.364 --> 0:01:18.364
<v Speaker 1>things happening, Nate that you would probably agree that had

0:01:18.364 --> 0:01:22.044
<v Speaker 1>we been taping this, say on Friday, it would be

0:01:22.124 --> 0:01:25.084
<v Speaker 1>a very and I mean Friday last week, would be

0:01:25.124 --> 0:01:28.164
<v Speaker 1>a very different segment because we'd be talking about it

0:01:28.164 --> 0:01:30.764
<v Speaker 1>in very different terms. In terms of what the democraty

0:01:31.044 --> 0:01:34.484
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party was doing, what its momentum was like, than

0:01:34.524 --> 0:01:37.764
<v Speaker 1>we are after the weekend, when we had ten members

0:01:37.884 --> 0:01:42.204
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate basically capitulate and say, Okay, we don't

0:01:42.244 --> 0:01:43.644
<v Speaker 1>want the shutdown to continue.

0:01:43.884 --> 0:01:47.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look if we've been taping on Friday or Wednesday

0:01:47.404 --> 0:01:49.644
<v Speaker 2>for that matter. I mean, look on my newsletter, I

0:01:49.684 --> 0:01:52.444
<v Speaker 2>called the night a ten out of ten for Democrats.

0:01:52.484 --> 0:01:56.804
<v Speaker 2>They won basically every race that you might expect them

0:01:56.844 --> 0:01:59.604
<v Speaker 2>to win. They win Virginia a Jersey by huge margins.

0:01:59.644 --> 0:02:02.564
<v Speaker 2>They won a bunch of Supreme Court retentions of Pennsylvania,

0:02:02.644 --> 0:02:06.924
<v Speaker 2>They won all the little Kitaly State Senate and dogcatcher races.

0:02:07.364 --> 0:02:09.164
<v Speaker 2>You know, depending on what type of Democrat you are,

0:02:09.484 --> 0:02:12.444
<v Speaker 2>may or may not feel good about the results. In

0:02:12.444 --> 0:02:15.324
<v Speaker 2>New York City, that's a little bit of a different bucket.

0:02:15.364 --> 0:02:19.404
<v Speaker 2>You had a Democrat running against a former Democrat. But

0:02:19.524 --> 0:02:22.564
<v Speaker 2>this was like a ten out of ten night. You know,

0:02:22.604 --> 0:02:26.764
<v Speaker 2>one thing it demonstrated is that President Trump is extremely unpopular.

0:02:26.884 --> 0:02:31.964
<v Speaker 2>In fact, his unpopularity increased during the shutdown. Let me

0:02:32.044 --> 0:02:34.364
<v Speaker 2>qualify that, though, right, What really seemed to trigger an

0:02:34.404 --> 0:02:40.804
<v Speaker 2>increase in Trump's disapproval rating was suspending SNAP benefits, that is,

0:02:40.884 --> 0:02:44.804
<v Speaker 2>the food nutrition program a food stamps. If you look

0:02:44.844 --> 0:02:46.884
<v Speaker 2>carefully at when his approval rating spike, because at first

0:02:46.924 --> 0:02:50.004
<v Speaker 2>in the shutdown it wasn't much affected. Actually in silver

0:02:50.044 --> 0:02:53.444
<v Speaker 2>bulletins tracking it increased marginally, kind of within the margin

0:02:53.524 --> 0:02:57.404
<v Speaker 2>of error. But when he tried to use that as

0:02:57.444 --> 0:03:00.204
<v Speaker 2>a political cudgel and ignored court orders to funded and

0:03:00.244 --> 0:03:02.364
<v Speaker 2>obviously Trump has exercised a lot of discression and what

0:03:02.404 --> 0:03:04.884
<v Speaker 2>things are or are not funded. I mean that effects

0:03:05.484 --> 0:03:09.324
<v Speaker 2>forty three million Americans or something. And you know, that

0:03:09.484 --> 0:03:12.644
<v Speaker 2>combined with having these fancy dinners that Trump is inclined

0:03:12.684 --> 0:03:14.684
<v Speaker 2>to have most presidents, to do with mar A Lago,

0:03:14.764 --> 0:03:20.204
<v Speaker 2>and just a general insensitivity toward how Accoute might feel

0:03:21.364 --> 0:03:23.924
<v Speaker 2>was you know, it seems like really starting to affect

0:03:23.924 --> 0:03:26.444
<v Speaker 2>his numbers. Also, all these issues, both healthcare, which were

0:03:26.444 --> 0:03:30.324
<v Speaker 2>the a sensible six of the shutdown and snapenefits have

0:03:30.364 --> 0:03:33.364
<v Speaker 2>to do with affordability, right in the case of some

0:03:33.444 --> 0:03:37.364
<v Speaker 2>staff recipients, maybe the ability to buy food at all

0:03:37.484 --> 0:03:43.324
<v Speaker 2>or go hungry potentially, you know, between those things and paraffs,

0:03:43.844 --> 0:03:46.244
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, we talk about all the fuck

0:03:46.284 --> 0:03:48.164
<v Speaker 2>ups that Democrats make and we'll talk about them some

0:03:48.204 --> 0:03:52.444
<v Speaker 2>of them today. But like Republicans are not exactly game

0:03:52.524 --> 0:03:55.964
<v Speaker 2>theory optimal political strategists either, or at least or at

0:03:56.044 --> 0:04:00.204
<v Speaker 2>least Trump isn't right, you know, on some level the

0:04:00.284 --> 0:04:04.084
<v Speaker 2>kind of progressive critique the Republics want to cut benefits

0:04:04.084 --> 0:04:05.804
<v Speaker 2>for the poor in order to pay for tax cuts

0:04:05.804 --> 0:04:09.684
<v Speaker 2>for the rich. I mean that's like directionally true for

0:04:09.764 --> 0:04:12.804
<v Speaker 2>a long time. You know, it's true of Trump. But

0:04:13.164 --> 0:04:17.004
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you fuck with people's benefits. And by

0:04:17.004 --> 0:04:19.324
<v Speaker 2>the way, we're in an environment now where Trump likes

0:04:19.324 --> 0:04:23.004
<v Speaker 2>to scariotype Democrats as being poor, the ones who would

0:04:23.084 --> 0:04:27.164
<v Speaker 2>need food stamps. Again, the audience should know, I'm not

0:04:27.244 --> 0:04:32.244
<v Speaker 2>super woke, Right, this often is racially coded messaging. Right,

0:04:32.324 --> 0:04:34.884
<v Speaker 2>you look at the data, then probably a pretty even

0:04:34.884 --> 0:04:38.564
<v Speaker 2>mix of Democratic and Republican groups that are receiving these benefits. Right,

0:04:39.004 --> 0:04:42.644
<v Speaker 2>Trump actually does quite well with poorer white voters. Trump

0:04:42.684 --> 0:04:47.564
<v Speaker 2>also does fairly well with minorities who didn't attend college

0:04:47.604 --> 0:04:50.844
<v Speaker 2>and things like that, and so so that was a

0:04:50.884 --> 0:04:57.044
<v Speaker 2>big political opportunity, yeah for Democrats, and then they just

0:04:57.364 --> 0:04:59.284
<v Speaker 2>they just caved. You know, I'm busted out of my

0:04:59.284 --> 0:05:01.844
<v Speaker 2>poker tournament, and like oh, the shutdowns over, Maybe I'll

0:05:01.844 --> 0:05:05.724
<v Speaker 2>make my flights back and forth around the country. But Maria,

0:05:05.804 --> 0:05:06.364
<v Speaker 2>what do you think.

0:05:06.524 --> 0:05:08.964
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I was looking at a lot of the

0:05:09.044 --> 0:05:12.644
<v Speaker 1>number over kind of the last week, and I noticed

0:05:12.724 --> 0:05:16.684
<v Speaker 1>two things. One kind of when you see the New

0:05:16.764 --> 0:05:19.484
<v Speaker 1>York election, it seems like mcdonnie was able to make

0:05:19.484 --> 0:05:21.764
<v Speaker 1>inroads into a lot of the areas that had gone

0:05:21.964 --> 0:05:26.244
<v Speaker 1>redder in the presidential election and that had gone Trump, right,

0:05:26.284 --> 0:05:29.484
<v Speaker 1>So it seems that he was actually successful in appealing

0:05:29.484 --> 0:05:32.684
<v Speaker 1>to some of that base to vote Democratic, which to

0:05:32.844 --> 0:05:36.244
<v Speaker 1>me spoke of the fact that you know, there were

0:05:36.284 --> 0:05:38.404
<v Speaker 1>people were starting to get fed up, right, some of

0:05:38.444 --> 0:05:42.684
<v Speaker 1>those lower income areas that had been heavily pro Trump

0:05:43.004 --> 0:05:45.284
<v Speaker 1>were starting to kind of feel the pain of everything

0:05:45.324 --> 0:05:48.644
<v Speaker 1>that's been going on. And as you pointed out in

0:05:48.684 --> 0:05:51.084
<v Speaker 1>your newsletter, and I think this is true, some of

0:05:51.124 --> 0:05:54.204
<v Speaker 1>the messaging of the Democrats during the shutdown hadn't really

0:05:54.204 --> 0:05:57.484
<v Speaker 1>been landing, like the Affordable Care Act, right, the healthcare

0:05:57.524 --> 0:06:00.644
<v Speaker 1>It should be landing, right, you should want healthcare. But

0:06:01.284 --> 0:06:05.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, because people are very in the moment and

0:06:05.244 --> 0:06:07.684
<v Speaker 1>they don't always You and I are you know, very

0:06:07.804 --> 0:06:10.684
<v Speaker 1>much online and kind of pay attention to this, but

0:06:10.964 --> 0:06:13.164
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people they're not online and they're not

0:06:13.244 --> 0:06:14.964
<v Speaker 1>really listening, and they're like, I don't know what the

0:06:14.964 --> 0:06:17.644
<v Speaker 1>Affordable Care Act is, you know, like I don't care.

0:06:17.804 --> 0:06:20.444
<v Speaker 1>My payments still seem the same. They don't realize, oh,

0:06:20.484 --> 0:06:23.564
<v Speaker 1>this really might be affecting me. So the messaging wasn't

0:06:23.604 --> 0:06:27.764
<v Speaker 1>exactly landing, but with the combination of you know, tariffs

0:06:27.804 --> 0:06:30.884
<v Speaker 1>finally starting to kind of play out in the pricing,

0:06:31.204 --> 0:06:35.444
<v Speaker 1>and Snap, which does immediately affect you, right, It affects

0:06:35.564 --> 0:06:39.004
<v Speaker 1>your ability to get food, It affects your ability to

0:06:39.124 --> 0:06:43.764
<v Speaker 1>get benefits right now. It's kind of it's a very emotional,

0:06:44.084 --> 0:06:47.524
<v Speaker 1>very kind of visceral experience that caused.

0:06:47.644 --> 0:06:50.124
<v Speaker 2>If you look at Google searches for Snap benefits, they

0:06:50.124 --> 0:06:52.444
<v Speaker 2>have this weird cyclicality based on I don't you know,

0:06:52.484 --> 0:06:54.884
<v Speaker 2>I've not been I'm like Sam some my loft. I

0:06:54.884 --> 0:06:56.964
<v Speaker 2>don't know the timing of when they're released, but you

0:06:57.004 --> 0:07:00.124
<v Speaker 2>can see syclicality that indicates people are searching for information

0:07:00.164 --> 0:07:03.924
<v Speaker 2>about whereas the grocery store can go with with food

0:07:03.924 --> 0:07:06.844
<v Speaker 2>stamps the moment they receive yeah, those benefits and things

0:07:06.884 --> 0:07:10.124
<v Speaker 2>like that, right, and so it's literally eating is about

0:07:10.204 --> 0:07:14.884
<v Speaker 2>the most visceral exactly exactly that one can imagine healthcare

0:07:14.924 --> 0:07:18.084
<v Speaker 2>maybe you know, one absolute degree removed from that. In

0:07:18.084 --> 0:07:21.324
<v Speaker 2>the Suden said, it's hopefully mostly preventative, or IF's not preventive,

0:07:21.324 --> 0:07:23.764
<v Speaker 2>and it's things that you don't realize until you have

0:07:23.804 --> 0:07:24.404
<v Speaker 2>a problem.

0:07:24.604 --> 0:07:28.524
<v Speaker 1>Right, But food is something that we really care about,

0:07:28.604 --> 0:07:32.164
<v Speaker 1>right obviously, and now this was kind of a double

0:07:32.204 --> 0:07:34.844
<v Speaker 1>whammy because food prices are going up. You know, I

0:07:34.844 --> 0:07:37.084
<v Speaker 1>don't care what Trump is saying that the prices are down,

0:07:37.244 --> 0:07:40.244
<v Speaker 1>It's not true. Right, we know that inflation is actually

0:07:40.324 --> 0:07:43.724
<v Speaker 1>hitting kind of that angle, and we know that Snap

0:07:43.724 --> 0:07:46.484
<v Speaker 1>benefits where finally, you know, people didn't know there was

0:07:46.524 --> 0:07:48.524
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty. We also talk a lot on

0:07:48.564 --> 0:07:51.604
<v Speaker 1>the show about how the human mind really doesn't like uncertainty.

0:07:51.804 --> 0:07:54.564
<v Speaker 1>So it's horrible. Can you imagine if you have a

0:07:54.604 --> 0:07:56.564
<v Speaker 1>family to feed and you're in limbo, You're like, I

0:07:56.604 --> 0:07:59.284
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I'm going to get my Snap benefits, right, Like,

0:07:59.484 --> 0:08:02.044
<v Speaker 1>I actually have no idea if they're going to come

0:08:02.084 --> 0:08:04.844
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. I don't know if I'll be able to

0:08:05.524 --> 0:08:08.164
<v Speaker 1>afford my meal. Like, I don't know what's going to happen.

0:08:08.404 --> 0:08:10.564
<v Speaker 1>And it keeps going back and forth, and they release

0:08:10.604 --> 0:08:14.204
<v Speaker 1>funds and they don't release funds, and people, you know,

0:08:14.284 --> 0:08:17.764
<v Speaker 1>this is a moment where you can really appeal to

0:08:17.804 --> 0:08:20.404
<v Speaker 1>people and be like, see, you know, this is actually

0:08:20.644 --> 0:08:23.844
<v Speaker 1>because people also were you know, I think about equally

0:08:23.884 --> 0:08:27.004
<v Speaker 1>blaming and correct me if I'm wrong Democrats and Republicans

0:08:27.044 --> 0:08:29.764
<v Speaker 1>for the shutdown. It wasn't like Republicans were getting all

0:08:29.764 --> 0:08:32.284
<v Speaker 1>the blame. But with the Snap benefits, it's very clear

0:08:32.324 --> 0:08:35.204
<v Speaker 1>that there are people who are saying, hey, you know,

0:08:35.444 --> 0:08:38.124
<v Speaker 1>release the money. We need to pay, we need to

0:08:38.164 --> 0:08:41.084
<v Speaker 1>get money to the families. And you have Trump saying no, right,

0:08:41.164 --> 0:08:43.644
<v Speaker 1>It's actually he's saying, no, I don't want to release

0:08:43.684 --> 0:08:47.364
<v Speaker 1>this money. I don't want the Snap benefits going out. So,

0:08:47.764 --> 0:08:49.364
<v Speaker 1>you know, Nate, who knows what in the world he

0:08:49.444 --> 0:08:51.484
<v Speaker 1>was thinking. But what we do know is that the

0:08:51.484 --> 0:08:52.764
<v Speaker 1>effect of this was felt.

0:08:52.844 --> 0:08:53.084
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:08:53.244 --> 0:08:56.404
<v Speaker 1>The approval ratings were going down, and I think that

0:08:56.484 --> 0:08:59.524
<v Speaker 1>this helped kind of the momentum, the victorious moment of

0:08:59.564 --> 0:09:02.524
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats saying, you know, because this all happened at

0:09:02.524 --> 0:09:04.604
<v Speaker 1>the same time, right, there was this coalition.

0:09:05.124 --> 0:09:08.764
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think Democrats have the problem, the same

0:09:08.764 --> 0:09:11.244
<v Speaker 2>problem that Marie and I do, which is that, you know,

0:09:11.284 --> 0:09:16.244
<v Speaker 2>most people who comment on politics are are fairly privileged, right,

0:09:17.684 --> 0:09:22.084
<v Speaker 2>and in certain ways, it's the privilege to talk about

0:09:22.244 --> 0:09:26.764
<v Speaker 2>abstract concepts like creeping authoritarianism or long term impacts like

0:09:27.084 --> 0:09:31.244
<v Speaker 2>climate change, for example, as opposed to the visceral can

0:09:31.284 --> 0:09:33.444
<v Speaker 2>I eat today? If I get into a car accident,

0:09:33.884 --> 0:09:36.804
<v Speaker 2>do I have insurance to cover my you know, broken

0:09:37.564 --> 0:09:40.124
<v Speaker 2>leg or whatever else? Right, those things are a bit

0:09:40.164 --> 0:09:44.724
<v Speaker 2>more visceral. And I think, you know, one of the

0:09:44.764 --> 0:09:47.804
<v Speaker 2>problems you had with the shutdown is that, like so,

0:09:47.884 --> 0:09:52.604
<v Speaker 2>the a sensible basis for it was healthcare. Right. If

0:09:52.604 --> 0:09:57.004
<v Speaker 2>you look for Google searches for the Affordable Care Act, right,

0:09:57.324 --> 0:09:59.524
<v Speaker 2>they were up a little bit, but they're they're tiny

0:09:59.644 --> 0:10:03.044
<v Speaker 2>as compared to searches for snap benefits or a shutdown,

0:10:03.124 --> 0:10:04.764
<v Speaker 2>or other news stories that came up, like the no

0:10:04.884 --> 0:10:11.724
<v Speaker 2>King's protests or even even the White House renovation, slash destruction,

0:10:11.844 --> 0:10:16.724
<v Speaker 2>construction of the East wing, creation of a new ballroom.

0:10:17.084 --> 0:10:19.324
<v Speaker 2>You know, all those things have a much bigger registry.

0:10:19.364 --> 0:10:22.524
<v Speaker 2>And I think because there are some Democrats like alexandriro

0:10:22.684 --> 0:10:26.484
<v Speaker 2>Kazak Cortez or Bernie Sanders that are very effective on healthcare,

0:10:26.604 --> 0:10:28.404
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Democrats are going TV want to talk

0:10:28.404 --> 0:10:31.084
<v Speaker 2>about these kind of more abstract themes instead. That's kind

0:10:31.124 --> 0:10:33.884
<v Speaker 2>of what the democratic we spelt like the blogosphere, right,

0:10:35.164 --> 0:10:41.804
<v Speaker 2>you know, democratic podcasters, substackers, social media personalities, cable news guests. Right,

0:10:42.124 --> 0:10:44.644
<v Speaker 2>you know, they are usually talking about these abstract things

0:10:44.684 --> 0:10:47.684
<v Speaker 2>democracy and so forth, right and so like, you know,

0:10:47.724 --> 0:10:52.124
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't quite like democrats hearts were rellion the message either.

0:10:52.524 --> 0:10:55.964
<v Speaker 2>And I mean there are a couple of stories by

0:10:56.124 --> 0:11:01.124
<v Speaker 2>democrats cave right. You know. One story involves we're afraid

0:11:01.164 --> 0:11:05.284
<v Speaker 2>about the tangible impact on people and we are the

0:11:05.364 --> 0:11:07.364
<v Speaker 2>kind heart of people. We can't make people suffer for

0:11:07.404 --> 0:11:09.084
<v Speaker 2>this thing. That's not going to work anyway. Right, it's

0:11:09.124 --> 0:11:12.124
<v Speaker 2>once story. You know. Story number two is that ultimately

0:11:12.924 --> 0:11:14.724
<v Speaker 2>that if you listen to Maria and I are read

0:11:14.804 --> 0:11:17.204
<v Speaker 2>by writing a silver bulletin, you know, recognized early on

0:11:17.284 --> 0:11:18.764
<v Speaker 2>that like a lot of this comes down to you,

0:11:18.804 --> 0:11:23.844
<v Speaker 2>are you willing to have Republicans blow up the filibuster? Right?

0:11:23.924 --> 0:11:25.764
<v Speaker 2>If you do that, you don't need any Democratic votes. Right,

0:11:25.804 --> 0:11:29.444
<v Speaker 2>you have majorities in both chambers of Congress, and you know,

0:11:29.604 --> 0:11:31.684
<v Speaker 2>reportedly there were some centators who didn't want to go

0:11:31.724 --> 0:11:35.844
<v Speaker 2>that far. And then they're just kind of general risk aversion,

0:11:36.684 --> 0:11:39.324
<v Speaker 2>you know. So it's kind of the flip. You know.

0:11:39.364 --> 0:11:43.444
<v Speaker 2>On the one hand, the public assumes, perhaps correctly, and

0:11:43.484 --> 0:11:46.684
<v Speaker 2>that it's Republicans who like to not pay for a

0:11:46.724 --> 0:11:52.084
<v Speaker 2>shit that helps working class people and shut government shit down. Right.

0:11:52.124 --> 0:11:56.684
<v Speaker 2>So on the one hand, that might create I don't

0:11:56.724 --> 0:11:59.604
<v Speaker 2>know if you call it a bias, but create like

0:11:59.684 --> 0:12:02.684
<v Speaker 2>kind of the presumption among the public that like, if

0:12:02.724 --> 0:12:05.564
<v Speaker 2>things aren't functioning well in government, then and it's some

0:12:05.604 --> 0:12:08.324
<v Speaker 2>type of policy choice opposed to incompetence or whatever, right,

0:12:08.364 --> 0:12:11.804
<v Speaker 2>then that is a Republican choice, right, and that message

0:12:11.884 --> 0:12:13.884
<v Speaker 2>is pretty hard for them to overcome, especially when Trump

0:12:13.964 --> 0:12:16.444
<v Speaker 2>is saying about things like snap, benefit's no, we don't

0:12:16.444 --> 0:12:19.124
<v Speaker 2>want those right. You know. The other hand, like if

0:12:19.124 --> 0:12:21.244
<v Speaker 2>they're big like softies who are going to like cave

0:12:21.964 --> 0:12:27.284
<v Speaker 2>on everything, then then okay, then that creates a predictable outcome.

0:12:27.324 --> 0:12:30.604
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna cave at some point, and what consequence does

0:12:30.684 --> 0:12:32.884
<v Speaker 2>that have? I mean, Maria, you know, since we've been

0:12:32.924 --> 0:12:38.084
<v Speaker 2>out here playing poker, yea, let's let me go for

0:12:38.164 --> 0:12:42.684
<v Speaker 2>a poker two to oh one kind of more detailed analogy. Right,

0:12:44.684 --> 0:12:47.684
<v Speaker 2>there's times when let's say I'm playing a tough player. Right,

0:12:48.044 --> 0:12:51.564
<v Speaker 2>the tough opponent raises, you know I'm playing you. I'm

0:12:51.604 --> 0:12:55.444
<v Speaker 2>playing you, and I just feel like you're owning me today.

0:12:55.684 --> 0:12:57.764
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, you know, I just got your number today.

0:12:58.764 --> 0:13:01.444
<v Speaker 2>You raise. I'm defending my blind right, and I have

0:13:01.524 --> 0:13:04.324
<v Speaker 2>a hand that I know according to the computers. According

0:13:04.364 --> 0:13:08.764
<v Speaker 2>to game theory, defense right is a is a thin

0:13:08.844 --> 0:13:14.364
<v Speaker 2>defend for example, a king for offsuit or something right.

0:13:15.204 --> 0:13:19.244
<v Speaker 2>And the way that you realize money with that hand is, Yeah,

0:13:19.284 --> 0:13:21.484
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you thought the king or a pair of fos

0:13:21.524 --> 0:13:23.844
<v Speaker 2>a hold on. But it's also stuff like sometimes you're

0:13:23.844 --> 0:13:26.684
<v Speaker 2>supposed to turn it into a bluff. Sometimes you're supposed

0:13:26.684 --> 0:13:30.804
<v Speaker 2>to call down really thin right, someone's supposed to hope

0:13:30.844 --> 0:13:33.524
<v Speaker 2>that Maria is a turn from betting, and like, and

0:13:33.604 --> 0:13:36.124
<v Speaker 2>all those ways to realize the value of the hand

0:13:36.764 --> 0:13:41.124
<v Speaker 2>are difficult and require a lot of skill and discipline

0:13:41.724 --> 0:13:42.644
<v Speaker 2>on every other street.

0:13:42.724 --> 0:13:45.084
<v Speaker 1>Right, yes, And I'm just gonna I'm just gonna caveat

0:13:45.124 --> 0:13:48.564
<v Speaker 1>this because for people who don't play poker, yes to

0:13:48.684 --> 0:13:52.324
<v Speaker 1>kind of one, yes to a one for kind of

0:13:52.684 --> 0:13:54.804
<v Speaker 1>and applying it to kind of the broader political thing

0:13:55.124 --> 0:13:58.844
<v Speaker 1>like big caveat in poker. Just to remind you, you

0:13:58.884 --> 0:14:01.804
<v Speaker 1>do not actually have to have the best hand to win, right.

0:14:01.844 --> 0:14:03.844
<v Speaker 1>It is the only game where you can win with

0:14:04.004 --> 0:14:07.044
<v Speaker 1>the worst hand if you play it correctly, if you

0:14:07.244 --> 0:14:11.204
<v Speaker 1>execute the strategy correctly. And yes, some of it is

0:14:11.324 --> 0:14:14.484
<v Speaker 1>just outright bluffing, but it's also putting your opponent to

0:14:14.564 --> 0:14:17.604
<v Speaker 1>a to a hard kind of test when they might

0:14:17.684 --> 0:14:20.204
<v Speaker 1>have a decent hand but not a great hand. So

0:14:20.284 --> 0:14:24.004
<v Speaker 1>it's all about being able to figure out how do

0:14:24.084 --> 0:14:27.044
<v Speaker 1>I exert pressure correctly? So your King four offsuit. For

0:14:27.044 --> 0:14:28.804
<v Speaker 1>people listening, they're like, wait, I thought that was a

0:14:28.804 --> 0:14:31.324
<v Speaker 1>bad hand. Yes, it is a bad hand. However, there

0:14:31.364 --> 0:14:35.444
<v Speaker 1>are reasons why we might still want to play it

0:14:35.844 --> 0:14:38.484
<v Speaker 1>if we have kind of this future game tree in

0:14:38.604 --> 0:14:41.564
<v Speaker 1>mind and we are confident of our abilities to be

0:14:41.604 --> 0:14:45.404
<v Speaker 1>able to execute that correctly. Please continuate. So you've defended King.

0:14:45.284 --> 0:14:48.564
<v Speaker 2>Four, and now you get a good price from the pot, right,

0:14:48.604 --> 0:14:52.164
<v Speaker 2>you have good pot odds. If let me just you know,

0:14:53.124 --> 0:14:57.124
<v Speaker 2>if you are not willing to make those thin call

0:14:57.324 --> 0:15:01.524
<v Speaker 2>downs and creative bluffs from time to time, then the

0:15:01.564 --> 0:15:07.724
<v Speaker 2>hand is not profitable to defend. Just if everything goes right, yeah, now,

0:15:07.724 --> 0:15:10.364
<v Speaker 2>and then you hit two pair or make trips or

0:15:10.364 --> 0:15:13.284
<v Speaker 2>some weird straight with the four or something. Right, it

0:15:13.484 --> 0:15:15.884
<v Speaker 2>just happened enough just by the time when you have

0:15:15.964 --> 0:15:17.564
<v Speaker 2>a better hammer rear right, you know. In other words,

0:15:17.604 --> 0:15:21.684
<v Speaker 2>if you are not willing to be strategic and exercise

0:15:21.764 --> 0:15:27.164
<v Speaker 2>your options and adapts, circumstances just unfold, right, then just

0:15:27.204 --> 0:15:29.284
<v Speaker 2>don't do it, yeah, because like you're not gonna like,

0:15:29.404 --> 0:15:32.524
<v Speaker 2>you know, this thing about Snap. I mean, people kind

0:15:32.524 --> 0:15:35.284
<v Speaker 2>of mischaracter you know, all these kind of we're partisan

0:15:35.284 --> 0:15:36.924
<v Speaker 2>Democrats who are like we're waiting the checkdown. It's like,

0:15:36.924 --> 0:15:38.404
<v Speaker 2>I don't really think you're wanting to checkdown because at

0:15:38.444 --> 0:15:41.244
<v Speaker 2>first Tripschoo writing didn't really decline at all. We talked

0:15:41.244 --> 0:15:43.524
<v Speaker 2>about it on the show, right, and then Snap when

0:15:43.524 --> 0:15:44.764
<v Speaker 2>there were some of the stuff there was a white

0:15:44.764 --> 0:15:47.244
<v Speaker 2>House and no Kings. But like it seems based on

0:15:47.284 --> 0:15:49.964
<v Speaker 2>the persistence of Google searches for Snap and the persistence

0:15:50.004 --> 0:15:52.084
<v Speaker 2>of that in the dialogue and the discourse and the

0:15:52.084 --> 0:15:54.524
<v Speaker 2>real world impact of it, that like that was a

0:15:54.604 --> 0:15:58.164
<v Speaker 2>real gift to Democrats and you know, about the best

0:15:58.204 --> 0:16:03.524
<v Speaker 2>possible turn of events they could have, and they still cave,

0:16:03.724 --> 0:16:06.164
<v Speaker 2>which means that like their whole strategy was really miss

0:16:06.724 --> 0:16:08.724
<v Speaker 2>gotten in the first place, if something goes well for

0:16:08.804 --> 0:16:12.524
<v Speaker 2>you and you still don't know how to play right

0:16:12.644 --> 0:16:14.444
<v Speaker 2>or still give up, and that means you're already then

0:16:14.484 --> 0:16:15.444
<v Speaker 2>close to having.

0:16:15.404 --> 0:16:18.964
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, imagine, imagine, you know, to continue nate your poker

0:16:19.004 --> 0:16:22.204
<v Speaker 1>analogy since you started it. Imagine that you did decide,

0:16:22.244 --> 0:16:24.564
<v Speaker 1>you know, okay, you know what, I'm going to defend this.

0:16:24.684 --> 0:16:27.084
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure why, but I am. And then

0:16:27.084 --> 0:16:31.924
<v Speaker 1>the flop comes, you know, king three six something like that,

0:16:32.244 --> 0:16:35.404
<v Speaker 1>so you have top pair, and then you know, you check,

0:16:35.484 --> 0:16:38.404
<v Speaker 1>I bet big, you call. Basically you end up folding

0:16:38.444 --> 0:16:41.844
<v Speaker 1>the king anyway, right, and you you end up folding

0:16:41.844 --> 0:16:44.604
<v Speaker 1>the king on a board that doesn't really change at

0:16:44.644 --> 0:16:47.484
<v Speaker 1>all from the flop, and you already or let's just

0:16:47.764 --> 0:16:49.804
<v Speaker 1>let's say you made a pair of fours and there's

0:16:49.804 --> 0:16:53.284
<v Speaker 1>nothing else. Let's just imagine that you actually did well right,

0:16:53.644 --> 0:16:56.564
<v Speaker 1>and your hand became something much more playable than it

0:16:56.644 --> 0:17:00.404
<v Speaker 1>was originally, and yet you still end up bending to

0:17:00.444 --> 0:17:03.484
<v Speaker 1>pressure because you're like, well, Maria's betting so big that

0:17:03.564 --> 0:17:07.524
<v Speaker 1>she probably has a better king, right, she probably has

0:17:07.844 --> 0:17:10.404
<v Speaker 1>you know, an even better kicker. Kicker is the second

0:17:10.404 --> 0:17:12.564
<v Speaker 1>card for people who don't play poker. You know, she

0:17:12.684 --> 0:17:15.484
<v Speaker 1>probably has like King ten or something like that, I'm

0:17:15.524 --> 0:17:17.724
<v Speaker 1>just going to fold just in case. Well, then what

0:17:17.764 --> 0:17:21.004
<v Speaker 1>the fuck were you doing defunding the king for if

0:17:21.004 --> 0:17:24.004
<v Speaker 1>you're either going you know, if you're not actually able

0:17:24.044 --> 0:17:27.084
<v Speaker 1>to navigate those situations. And it seems to me that

0:17:27.644 --> 0:17:31.244
<v Speaker 1>over and over what Democrats have done is have these

0:17:31.284 --> 0:17:34.124
<v Speaker 1>principled positions where they're like, you know, we can't do this,

0:17:34.444 --> 0:17:37.684
<v Speaker 1>and I'm you know, great, you know, I also don't

0:17:37.724 --> 0:17:39.924
<v Speaker 1>think we should be taking away health care from people.

0:17:40.164 --> 0:17:42.164
<v Speaker 1>You know, kudos, this is a great thing to stand

0:17:42.244 --> 0:17:44.324
<v Speaker 1>up for. But then why the hell did you do it.

0:17:44.364 --> 0:17:47.004
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to say, okay, well fine, you can

0:17:47.004 --> 0:17:50.564
<v Speaker 1>take away the health care as long as you you know,

0:17:50.684 --> 0:17:52.564
<v Speaker 1>pay them food benefits right now, well, then why did

0:17:52.564 --> 0:17:54.484
<v Speaker 1>we even get you know, if you didn't even have

0:17:54.524 --> 0:17:57.684
<v Speaker 1>a shutdown, if you capitulate on everything, then we wouldn't

0:17:57.724 --> 0:18:01.244
<v Speaker 1>even be in this snap situation or this airline drama

0:18:01.364 --> 0:18:04.204
<v Speaker 1>or any of this. And the Republicans get everything they

0:18:04.204 --> 0:18:07.524
<v Speaker 1>wanted originally anyway. So it just seems like, you know,

0:18:07.604 --> 0:18:10.524
<v Speaker 1>if you already know that, then why in the world.

0:18:10.724 --> 0:18:15.044
<v Speaker 1>Then it means that your strategy was not principled. Because

0:18:15.244 --> 0:18:19.004
<v Speaker 1>you are stepping back from all of those principles, right

0:18:19.124 --> 0:18:21.244
<v Speaker 1>Like if you were saying we're the nice party that

0:18:21.364 --> 0:18:23.684
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't want people to get hurt, well, you know,

0:18:23.764 --> 0:18:26.124
<v Speaker 1>then sometimes you have to take immediate pain. And it

0:18:26.164 --> 0:18:27.764
<v Speaker 1>seems like they're not able to do that.

0:18:30.604 --> 0:18:32.644
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break.

0:18:49.244 --> 0:18:53.044
<v Speaker 1>So back to kind of this broader question of how

0:18:53.124 --> 0:18:57.084
<v Speaker 1>is the Democratic Party doing now? I'm in a you know,

0:18:57.124 --> 0:19:00.004
<v Speaker 1>as I said last week, it was such an amazing

0:19:00.084 --> 0:19:02.564
<v Speaker 1>moment where you could see an amazing moment if you're

0:19:02.604 --> 0:19:05.084
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat, where you could see all sorts of different

0:19:05.164 --> 0:19:07.604
<v Speaker 1>kinds of candidates when right in different places. It's not

0:19:07.724 --> 0:19:10.844
<v Speaker 1>like the progressives. One, yes, Mamdani won in New York,

0:19:10.884 --> 0:19:14.884
<v Speaker 1>but much more moderate candidates won in you know, New Jersey,

0:19:15.444 --> 0:19:19.084
<v Speaker 1>in other states, and you know, people, it seemed like

0:19:19.444 --> 0:19:22.924
<v Speaker 1>there were people coming together to say, Okay, you know what,

0:19:22.964 --> 0:19:25.764
<v Speaker 1>we're getting fed up and there is some Democratic momentum

0:19:25.804 --> 0:19:28.084
<v Speaker 1>and this might hold through the midterms and if you

0:19:28.084 --> 0:19:31.284
<v Speaker 1>can keep it going, this might have all sorts of

0:19:31.324 --> 0:19:34.564
<v Speaker 1>good things for the party. I think actually Nancy Pelosis

0:19:34.564 --> 0:19:36.684
<v Speaker 1>saying she's not going to run again was also a

0:19:36.724 --> 0:19:38.644
<v Speaker 1>good thing for the party to say, Okay, we need

0:19:38.684 --> 0:19:42.484
<v Speaker 1>some younger blood, we need some of these these people

0:19:42.524 --> 0:19:46.764
<v Speaker 1>who probably shouldn't have been running for reelection already last cycle.

0:19:47.004 --> 0:19:49.044
<v Speaker 1>It's good that they're finally stepping down. There were a

0:19:49.044 --> 0:19:52.604
<v Speaker 1>lot of good things, and now, you know what, it's

0:19:52.684 --> 0:19:55.604
<v Speaker 1>kind of in some ways, Nate, and maybe this is

0:19:55.644 --> 0:19:58.364
<v Speaker 1>a little bit harsh. What they did over the weekend

0:19:58.444 --> 0:20:00.444
<v Speaker 1>seems like a little bit of a fuck you to

0:20:00.524 --> 0:20:02.964
<v Speaker 1>the people who kind of banded together and stood by

0:20:03.004 --> 0:20:05.804
<v Speaker 1>them and said, you know what, we can actually affect

0:20:05.844 --> 0:20:08.164
<v Speaker 1>change and then said, eh, you know what, We're just

0:20:08.204 --> 0:20:11.644
<v Speaker 1>gonna We're just gonna anyway. At least that's what it felt.

0:20:11.444 --> 0:20:16.524
<v Speaker 2>Like to be. Look, we haven't mentioned the chuck of

0:20:16.644 --> 0:20:18.644
<v Speaker 2>Chuck and Nancy Chum.

0:20:20.004 --> 0:20:22.564
<v Speaker 1>He, by the way, was opposed to He was one

0:20:22.604 --> 0:20:25.244
<v Speaker 1>of the voices that was that it was opposed to

0:20:26.084 --> 0:20:26.844
<v Speaker 1>ending the shutdown.

0:20:26.844 --> 0:20:29.844
<v Speaker 2>Correct, he voted against it. But what the party leader

0:20:30.084 --> 0:20:38.884
<v Speaker 2>does is theatrics, right, it's theatrics. And fair enough, Look,

0:20:38.964 --> 0:20:43.084
<v Speaker 2>if he if he couldn't control his caucus after this

0:20:43.244 --> 0:20:45.764
<v Speaker 2>very good turn of events, then he should resign anyway,

0:20:45.804 --> 0:20:47.564
<v Speaker 2>because he has no right.

0:20:48.164 --> 0:20:51.124
<v Speaker 1>So so yes, it either means that he is disingenuous,

0:20:51.164 --> 0:20:54.124
<v Speaker 1>and he was okay with these votes that are ending

0:20:54.124 --> 0:20:56.364
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown, and he just wanted to publicly say no,

0:20:56.484 --> 0:20:59.124
<v Speaker 1>I'm not or it means that he's ineffective. One of

0:20:59.164 --> 0:21:01.604
<v Speaker 1>the two, and either one is not a particularly good thing.

0:21:02.204 --> 0:21:07.004
<v Speaker 2>Remember he didn't shut the government down last March at

0:21:07.004 --> 0:21:13.324
<v Speaker 2>a time when it was a lower boil for democratic disarray.

0:21:13.724 --> 0:21:15.444
<v Speaker 2>I guess. I mean, you know, look, when you're the

0:21:15.444 --> 0:21:18.244
<v Speaker 2>op position party, in some ways, there's never that much

0:21:18.284 --> 0:21:20.644
<v Speaker 2>a rake. You don't really have to do that much. Right,

0:21:20.684 --> 0:21:27.324
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Schumber didn't command any confidence in his caucus. Right,

0:21:27.404 --> 0:21:30.804
<v Speaker 2>He's often very unpopular even among Democrats. A florality of

0:21:30.844 --> 0:21:34.044
<v Speaker 2>Democrats in the recent PW Research poll have a negative

0:21:34.124 --> 0:21:36.444
<v Speaker 2>opinion of Schumer. Right, Like, all these things to me

0:21:37.604 --> 0:21:40.964
<v Speaker 2>suggests he's not tenable as party leader. Like I don't

0:21:41.004 --> 0:21:43.364
<v Speaker 2>understand why. I mean, actually I do kind of you know,

0:21:43.364 --> 0:21:45.044
<v Speaker 2>one reason why you might have someone to replace Schumer's

0:21:45.044 --> 0:21:47.044
<v Speaker 2>because like it's kind of a bad job. It's kind

0:21:47.044 --> 0:21:48.924
<v Speaker 2>of a terrible job. You're going to piss people off

0:21:49.244 --> 0:21:52.444
<v Speaker 2>no matter what. But you know, look, here are in

0:21:52.484 --> 0:21:56.124
<v Speaker 2>my view, kind of the the long term stakes, right,

0:21:56.164 --> 0:21:59.764
<v Speaker 2>which is that do you kind of trigger a a

0:21:59.924 --> 0:22:05.004
<v Speaker 2>mini kind of Tea party movement among Democratic voters, where

0:22:05.644 --> 0:22:09.724
<v Speaker 2>where if they don't do kind of what the activist

0:22:09.844 --> 0:22:14.404
<v Speaker 2>base once right, then they're voting office in primaries.

0:22:14.484 --> 0:22:14.644
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:22:14.764 --> 0:22:17.204
<v Speaker 2>That is a powerful extentive. It's a very powerful for Republicans.

0:22:17.444 --> 0:22:19.484
<v Speaker 2>You know, you always hear stories, oh privately, Republicans are

0:22:19.524 --> 0:22:21.644
<v Speaker 2>very reasonable, but they're terrified at being primary.

0:22:21.764 --> 0:22:21.924
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:22:22.364 --> 0:22:25.124
<v Speaker 2>I kind of halfway by that. I think sometimes it's

0:22:25.204 --> 0:22:28.244
<v Speaker 2>it's spinning through reporters. It's probably mostly true most of

0:22:28.324 --> 0:22:31.364
<v Speaker 2>the time. Right. You know, if Democrats certificate that dynamic

0:22:31.524 --> 0:22:36.404
<v Speaker 2>is it's you know, a that makes leadership even more inflexible.

0:22:36.404 --> 0:22:38.324
<v Speaker 2>If you think the base is smart about its demands,

0:22:38.364 --> 0:22:40.764
<v Speaker 2>then maybe that's fine. Right, I'm not sure. I think

0:22:40.804 --> 0:22:43.804
<v Speaker 2>they're particularly smart, irrational about kind of the kind of

0:22:43.804 --> 0:22:46.484
<v Speaker 2>things they want Congress to do. Right. But also, in effect,

0:22:46.524 --> 0:22:51.964
<v Speaker 2>what type of candidates win. The incumbency advantage is diminishing

0:22:52.764 --> 0:22:56.724
<v Speaker 2>matters less than it once did. At the same time,

0:22:56.804 --> 0:22:59.644
<v Speaker 2>more experienced candidates do tend to win office more often.

0:23:00.564 --> 0:23:02.844
<v Speaker 2>At a big point of controversy in my research, I

0:23:02.924 --> 0:23:05.564
<v Speaker 2>spent a lot of time on this. More moderate candidates,

0:23:05.884 --> 0:23:09.284
<v Speaker 2>on average win office more often, other things being equal,

0:23:09.484 --> 0:23:13.204
<v Speaker 2>all those qualifiers there are important, right. You know you

0:23:13.284 --> 0:23:17.644
<v Speaker 2>have in Maine Graham Platner, who was outsider. Have we

0:23:17.644 --> 0:23:22.524
<v Speaker 2>talked about good old Grammy. I think some of the

0:23:22.604 --> 0:23:28.084
<v Speaker 2>name of the controversial reddit posts and tattoos and tattoosgically

0:23:28.244 --> 0:23:31.564
<v Speaker 2>happens to be associated with the with a certain pancer

0:23:31.644 --> 0:23:36.724
<v Speaker 2>division of the army fully known as the Nazis. You know,

0:23:37.004 --> 0:23:41.324
<v Speaker 2>probably not, you're cover it up. You cover it up.

0:23:42.764 --> 0:23:45.644
<v Speaker 1>After how many years, after twenty years or the years to.

0:23:48.524 --> 0:23:51.804
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent by that he was on some drunk

0:23:51.804 --> 0:23:54.204
<v Speaker 2>and sojourn in Croatia when he got the statoo and

0:23:54.444 --> 0:23:58.164
<v Speaker 2>called crossbones. It kind of looks so cool man. You know,

0:23:58.404 --> 0:24:00.404
<v Speaker 2>if you have it on your body, you're probably gonna

0:24:00.444 --> 0:24:03.724
<v Speaker 2>know what it is. Yes, after years? Yeah, after whatever?

0:24:03.964 --> 0:24:07.724
<v Speaker 1>Yeap. Or this is like the Schumer question. Either you

0:24:07.764 --> 0:24:10.364
<v Speaker 1>know what it is, which says something very important about you,

0:24:10.724 --> 0:24:13.284
<v Speaker 1>or you never bother to figure out what it is,

0:24:13.524 --> 0:24:17.764
<v Speaker 1>which also says something very important about you. And neither

0:24:17.924 --> 0:24:22.044
<v Speaker 1>one is something that you particularly want in somebody who's

0:24:22.084 --> 0:24:23.124
<v Speaker 1>going to be representing you.

0:24:23.364 --> 0:24:26.444
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but like a tart of you know, he's running

0:24:26.444 --> 0:24:30.084
<v Speaker 2>against Janet Mills, who is the two term governor of Maine,

0:24:30.084 --> 0:24:32.004
<v Speaker 2>seventy seven years old. You know, couldn't really be a

0:24:32.004 --> 0:24:35.364
<v Speaker 2>bigger contrast between the kind of old safe establishment choice

0:24:35.884 --> 0:24:39.004
<v Speaker 2>and this new kind of thing right tighter' is like, oh,

0:24:39.044 --> 0:24:40.884
<v Speaker 2>I won't turn into John Fetterman. You're someone who shifts

0:24:40.924 --> 0:24:43.084
<v Speaker 2>their ideology all the time. It's like, well, actually you

0:24:43.204 --> 0:24:47.484
<v Speaker 2>just did you know? So anyway, they hear another he

0:24:47.484 --> 0:24:49.364
<v Speaker 2>would be fun to get a beer with. That much

0:24:49.404 --> 0:24:50.084
<v Speaker 2>seems to be.

0:24:50.244 --> 0:24:52.284
<v Speaker 1>It would be interesting to get a beer with, that's

0:24:52.364 --> 0:24:54.924
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and he could probably drink me under the

0:24:54.964 --> 0:24:59.324
<v Speaker 1>table and get some tattoos as a result. But anyhow,

0:24:59.844 --> 0:25:02.044
<v Speaker 1>I think that what you know, that the broader point

0:25:02.124 --> 0:25:04.524
<v Speaker 1>is like what is yeah, what does the face of

0:25:04.564 --> 0:25:08.124
<v Speaker 1>the party look like? And you know, the moderate candidates

0:25:08.124 --> 0:25:11.044
<v Speaker 1>there is all thing being equal. I think the data

0:25:11.324 --> 0:25:13.964
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it too, and Nate obviously, like you said,

0:25:14.004 --> 0:25:17.204
<v Speaker 1>you've worked with it. That that does make a difference.

0:25:17.284 --> 0:25:19.564
<v Speaker 1>But there is also kind of this I think movement,

0:25:19.844 --> 0:25:23.644
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is inspired by Biden for you know,

0:25:23.804 --> 0:25:28.404
<v Speaker 1>younger candidates right now, because oh yeah, so this in

0:25:28.484 --> 0:25:31.324
<v Speaker 1>main like the fact that she's seventy seven like that

0:25:31.404 --> 0:25:34.404
<v Speaker 1>also plays into it, Right, I think people are fed up.

0:25:34.404 --> 0:25:37.044
<v Speaker 1>They're like, we do we do not want another one

0:25:37.044 --> 0:25:40.884
<v Speaker 1>of these debacle debates, right, we would much rather have

0:25:41.004 --> 0:25:44.284
<v Speaker 1>someone even though experience matters, We would much rather have

0:25:44.324 --> 0:25:48.364
<v Speaker 1>someone who can at least, you know, be vibrant and

0:25:48.924 --> 0:25:51.644
<v Speaker 1>more youthful. And you know, it doesn't always have to

0:25:51.684 --> 0:25:55.004
<v Speaker 1>be a thirty four year old. But let's stop nominating

0:25:55.044 --> 0:25:56.964
<v Speaker 1>people in their late seventies and eighties.

0:25:57.604 --> 0:26:00.764
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I mean there are signs that you know,

0:26:00.844 --> 0:26:03.924
<v Speaker 2>on lots of political issues, there's a a kind of

0:26:03.964 --> 0:26:07.044
<v Speaker 2>divide that cuts about midway through kind of millennials, where

0:26:07.084 --> 0:26:10.844
<v Speaker 2>people who kind of grew up in an age where

0:26:10.884 --> 0:26:14.844
<v Speaker 2>they were on their phones from early childhood. Right, Like,

0:26:14.884 --> 0:26:19.244
<v Speaker 2>that's that's quite different, you know what I mean my age.

0:26:19.244 --> 0:26:21.204
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like, well, you got computers early in

0:26:21.244 --> 0:26:23.564
<v Speaker 2>life and then phones when you were in college, right, Like,

0:26:23.604 --> 0:26:25.484
<v Speaker 2>I think technology is behind a lot of these shifts.

0:26:25.524 --> 0:26:27.524
<v Speaker 2>I mean, probably not that uncommon, but like, look, you've

0:26:27.564 --> 0:26:31.484
<v Speaker 2>had you had Democrats dominate. Ironically, Bernie Sanders is older

0:26:31.484 --> 0:26:34.364
<v Speaker 2>than Hillary Clinton, right, I think older than Joe Biden

0:26:34.404 --> 0:26:36.604
<v Speaker 2>by half a year two if I have that, right,

0:26:37.844 --> 0:26:40.644
<v Speaker 2>And but he was a choice of the youth, right

0:26:40.684 --> 0:26:44.164
<v Speaker 2>you'd go to I went to Rally's in New Hampshire's

0:26:44.204 --> 0:26:48.844
<v Speaker 2>your reporter, and you know, I saw Hillary Clinton speak

0:26:48.844 --> 0:26:51.284
<v Speaker 2>at some college and like she was talking about the

0:26:51.404 --> 0:26:54.604
<v Speaker 2>Vietnam War, and shit, that fucking these college students. This

0:26:54.684 --> 0:26:56.804
<v Speaker 2>is now. I don't care about twelve years ago, don't

0:26:57.124 --> 0:26:58.484
<v Speaker 2>don't know where care about.

0:26:58.324 --> 0:27:00.684
<v Speaker 1>Right, Nay, I mean that was the Vietnam War. I

0:27:00.724 --> 0:27:04.524
<v Speaker 1>recently gave a talk to a financial audience and realized

0:27:04.644 --> 0:27:07.364
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people in the audience not only

0:27:07.844 --> 0:27:11.684
<v Speaker 1>did not go through, but didn't realize basically that there

0:27:11.844 --> 0:27:14.724
<v Speaker 1>was a huge crash in two thousand and eight. So

0:27:14.844 --> 0:27:17.884
<v Speaker 1>like it was I was like, oh my god, you know, right,

0:27:18.604 --> 0:27:22.444
<v Speaker 1>that is how far removed we are from. You know,

0:27:22.484 --> 0:27:25.844
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to people who are in finance and they're like, oh,

0:27:25.924 --> 0:27:28.484
<v Speaker 1>like two thousand and eight crash. You know, that's basically

0:27:28.524 --> 0:27:32.284
<v Speaker 1>like Black Friday, right, It's like the Great Depression. It's

0:27:33.164 --> 0:27:35.484
<v Speaker 1>forever ago, and I don't care and I don't really

0:27:35.524 --> 0:27:38.124
<v Speaker 1>know and what are you even talking about? But that

0:27:38.244 --> 0:27:40.644
<v Speaker 1>is one of those I mean, I'm just pointing that

0:27:40.684 --> 0:27:43.764
<v Speaker 1>out to say people's memory really is short, and we

0:27:43.884 --> 0:27:46.644
<v Speaker 1>are talking to a very new generation, and we do

0:27:46.724 --> 0:27:49.484
<v Speaker 1>need people who know how to appeal to them and

0:27:49.524 --> 0:27:53.884
<v Speaker 1>how to say words that actually resonate. That's important. That's

0:27:53.924 --> 0:27:55.204
<v Speaker 1>part of a politician's job.

0:27:55.964 --> 0:27:58.564
<v Speaker 2>Youth goes a long way, right, Like maybe you want

0:27:58.604 --> 0:28:02.604
<v Speaker 2>more Moneric ha mean, you know Cheryl and Spenberger in

0:28:02.764 --> 0:28:04.644
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey and Virginia. I know how old they are,

0:28:04.684 --> 0:28:07.164
<v Speaker 2>but they're like you know even that some you know,

0:28:07.204 --> 0:28:10.364
<v Speaker 2>even me middle age basically seems to help quite a bit, right,

0:28:10.404 --> 0:28:14.364
<v Speaker 2>and there Josh Shapiro, by the way, you know, he

0:28:14.444 --> 0:28:16.644
<v Speaker 2>was ranting about snappings. That's he understands politics. For you

0:28:16.684 --> 0:28:18.404
<v Speaker 2>what care is like fifty nine or.

0:28:18.764 --> 0:28:21.284
<v Speaker 1>But he seems to But he has youthful energy, right

0:28:21.844 --> 0:28:22.444
<v Speaker 1>he has.

0:28:22.964 --> 0:28:27.284
<v Speaker 2>You know, one could accuse him of borrowing a little

0:28:27.284 --> 0:28:31.404
<v Speaker 2>bit from the Obama cadence. I'm not gonna try to

0:28:31.444 --> 0:28:33.804
<v Speaker 2>imitate it. Maybe that will be a future silver bulletin

0:28:34.524 --> 0:28:37.804
<v Speaker 2>easter egg, right, you know, one might say Josh Shapier,

0:28:37.844 --> 0:28:40.244
<v Speaker 2>but like, but he's extremely effective. And something too is

0:28:40.284 --> 0:28:43.564
<v Speaker 2>like when you have a county who has run for

0:28:43.724 --> 0:28:46.804
<v Speaker 2>and one office before then, depending on how much they

0:28:46.804 --> 0:28:49.884
<v Speaker 2>ever performed relative to the typical numbers in their state

0:28:50.004 --> 0:28:52.324
<v Speaker 2>or district. Right. You know, again, my view is always

0:28:53.364 --> 0:28:55.324
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure. Zilran is a great example of this

0:28:55.404 --> 0:28:59.924
<v Speaker 2>because because he ran, it's kind of another quasi democrat

0:28:59.964 --> 0:29:00.684
<v Speaker 2>former democrat.

0:29:00.844 --> 0:29:00.964
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:29:02.124 --> 0:29:07.804
<v Speaker 2>But like, you know, anybody who performs objectively well relative

0:29:07.844 --> 0:29:12.884
<v Speaker 2>to some reasonable baseline, right, that trump's any abstract arguments

0:29:12.884 --> 0:29:15.644
<v Speaker 2>for me about moderate versus progressive or electrible or not.

0:29:15.764 --> 0:29:20.364
<v Speaker 2>You know, Bernie Sanders until fairly recently actually won by

0:29:20.404 --> 0:29:24.084
<v Speaker 2>wider to Democrats presidential margins in Vermont. That's changed lately,

0:29:24.124 --> 0:29:26.924
<v Speaker 2>but he has a good long run, right. Elizabeth Warren

0:29:27.684 --> 0:29:33.604
<v Speaker 2>underperformed routinely democratic presidential margins. Right. To me, that is

0:29:33.844 --> 0:29:37.444
<v Speaker 2>a difference between a very good politician, so you wanted

0:29:37.524 --> 0:29:40.164
<v Speaker 2>up Bernie right, for him to get socialism so much

0:29:40.164 --> 0:29:43.604
<v Speaker 2>into the mainstream right versus I think a very bad politician. Right,

0:29:43.684 --> 0:29:48.524
<v Speaker 2>maybe not a bad politician, a bad after retail aspects

0:29:48.644 --> 0:29:52.324
<v Speaker 2>of electoral office. I think Elizaeth Warren is surely a

0:29:52.444 --> 0:29:56.604
<v Speaker 2>very smart person, right, an articulate but like but not

0:29:56.804 --> 0:29:59.244
<v Speaker 2>very appealing. And there are lots of gender based and

0:29:59.324 --> 0:30:03.604
<v Speaker 2>other right, But absolutely, that difference is a big one, you.

0:30:03.524 --> 0:30:05.524
<v Speaker 1>Know, it is a big one. And as we talk

0:30:05.564 --> 0:30:07.564
<v Speaker 1>about a lot here, and I think that this is

0:30:07.684 --> 0:30:10.804
<v Speaker 1>really important. You need to when you have objective data points,

0:30:10.844 --> 0:30:13.244
<v Speaker 1>you need to look at them right like because we

0:30:13.364 --> 0:30:17.004
<v Speaker 1>are emotional, like we we want to say, oh, but

0:30:17.004 --> 0:30:19.284
<v Speaker 1>but when you have the objective data, right, when you

0:30:19.324 --> 0:30:22.324
<v Speaker 1>have the electoral performance, when you have the actual numbers

0:30:22.324 --> 0:30:24.204
<v Speaker 1>for who turned out, how did they turn out, who

0:30:24.284 --> 0:30:26.164
<v Speaker 1>did they vote for, what did they say? Look at

0:30:26.164 --> 0:30:28.844
<v Speaker 1>those numbers and do not dismiss them, right like, you

0:30:29.004 --> 0:30:32.684
<v Speaker 1>have data, Stop dismissing data, even if it goes against

0:30:32.724 --> 0:30:35.124
<v Speaker 1>your view of who should be popular and who shouldn't.

0:30:35.444 --> 0:30:38.324
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, I have not been a Bernie

0:30:38.364 --> 0:30:44.644
<v Speaker 1>Sanders fan quite a quite frequently I am at odds

0:30:44.684 --> 0:30:47.124
<v Speaker 1>with Bernie Sanders. But I cannot deny that he is

0:30:47.124 --> 0:30:51.404
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly effective politician, right, and that people who say, oh,

0:30:51.564 --> 0:30:54.884
<v Speaker 1>we should dismiss him don't aren't looking right. If you

0:30:54.924 --> 0:30:56.764
<v Speaker 1>don't like him, it doesn't mean he's not effective.

0:30:57.364 --> 0:30:58.804
<v Speaker 2>Can I make what more poker analogy here?

0:30:58.844 --> 0:31:02.204
<v Speaker 1>I mean yes, absolutely, this is risky business poker away

0:31:03.404 --> 0:31:06.684
<v Speaker 1>premise of the show, this is our show. Note you

0:31:06.724 --> 0:31:08.564
<v Speaker 1>can make a poker analogy.

0:31:09.404 --> 0:31:11.484
<v Speaker 2>Oca players who don't have a long term game plan

0:31:11.564 --> 0:31:13.724
<v Speaker 2>or aren't very experienced. What they do is they just

0:31:14.124 --> 0:31:16.444
<v Speaker 2>they call too much, right, They're not just hitting the action.

0:31:16.564 --> 0:31:18.964
<v Speaker 2>And like that's a theme here too, right, Like you know,

0:31:18.964 --> 0:31:21.684
<v Speaker 2>when Democrats kind of replace Biden, I guess they got

0:31:21.724 --> 0:31:23.844
<v Speaker 2>so bad they couldn't really have any other option, right,

0:31:23.884 --> 0:31:27.204
<v Speaker 2>But like, but you know, the kind of compromise was

0:31:27.884 --> 0:31:31.604
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris and like sometimes and that was not the

0:31:31.644 --> 0:31:35.604
<v Speaker 2>worst decision that Democrats made. Renominating Biden in the first

0:31:35.604 --> 0:31:37.804
<v Speaker 2>place was a bigger disaster than that in the predicate

0:31:37.884 --> 0:31:39.844
<v Speaker 2>to it in a lot of ways. Right, But like,

0:31:40.084 --> 0:31:43.804
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you don't have a a a game plan,

0:31:43.924 --> 0:31:45.604
<v Speaker 2>you wind up calling too much of poker, which means

0:31:45.644 --> 0:31:48.524
<v Speaker 2>the opponent gets to dictate the action all the time,

0:31:48.644 --> 0:31:50.604
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, oh shit, what do I do now?

0:31:50.644 --> 0:31:52.244
<v Speaker 2>What do I do now? What I do now? Right?

0:31:52.684 --> 0:31:55.884
<v Speaker 2>And to take boulder action, a bolder action sometimes means folding.

0:31:56.044 --> 0:31:58.684
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it means turning the patre or something, or turning

0:31:58.724 --> 0:32:01.244
<v Speaker 2>down and oppertun you think it's a losing battle, right

0:32:01.404 --> 0:32:02.684
<v Speaker 2>if you don't have it more of a long term

0:32:02.684 --> 0:32:05.164
<v Speaker 2>game plan. And you know, again, if you look at

0:32:05.204 --> 0:32:09.404
<v Speaker 2>the messaging on the shutdown, some of it is on healthcare,

0:32:09.604 --> 0:32:11.684
<v Speaker 2>some of it is on authoritarianism, some of it's on

0:32:11.764 --> 0:32:14.564
<v Speaker 2>SNAP benefits, some of it's just kind of blame defraying

0:32:14.684 --> 0:32:19.764
<v Speaker 2>or airlines or whatever else. Right, you know, that reflects

0:32:19.764 --> 0:32:26.284
<v Speaker 2>a lack of an actual consensus on what you're fighting for,

0:32:26.444 --> 0:32:30.084
<v Speaker 2>and it's like kind of leadership's job to firm up

0:32:30.124 --> 0:32:34.244
<v Speaker 2>that consensus. I think right to say, look, if we

0:32:34.324 --> 0:32:36.764
<v Speaker 2>do this, we will achieve we'll have a chance of

0:32:36.804 --> 0:32:40.764
<v Speaker 2>achieving objective X. And here are the way it seems

0:32:40.804 --> 0:32:43.084
<v Speaker 2>to go wrong because like nothing here again, nothing in

0:32:43.124 --> 0:32:46.804
<v Speaker 2>the shutdown was really surprising except that kind of Trump

0:32:46.884 --> 0:32:48.844
<v Speaker 2>picked this battle over Snap when there's a lot of

0:32:49.244 --> 0:32:52.764
<v Speaker 2>ability for the president the executive branch to determine what's

0:32:52.764 --> 0:32:55.564
<v Speaker 2>open and what's not right. It picked to fight turned

0:32:55.604 --> 0:32:57.804
<v Speaker 2>back badly for him, and I pressed stilldn'take advantage of that.

0:32:57.804 --> 0:32:59.244
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I've got the shutdown, But do you have any

0:32:59.244 --> 0:33:00.764
<v Speaker 2>any thoughts before we return to New York?

0:33:01.564 --> 0:33:04.004
<v Speaker 1>Now I think we're on the same page here, where

0:33:04.164 --> 0:33:07.964
<v Speaker 1>like this is just a failure, a failure of strategy,

0:33:08.004 --> 0:33:11.204
<v Speaker 1>a failure of long term stetrategic thinking. And to kind

0:33:11.244 --> 0:33:14.404
<v Speaker 1>of close the loop on your poker analogy, Nate. You know,

0:33:14.444 --> 0:33:18.164
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what happens with these passive players is,

0:33:18.444 --> 0:33:21.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, you take the passive route, You kind of

0:33:21.244 --> 0:33:25.404
<v Speaker 1>go the way of inertia, You avoid risks because you

0:33:25.444 --> 0:33:29.484
<v Speaker 1>think that's the actual risk free way of playing. When

0:33:29.524 --> 0:33:32.124
<v Speaker 1>you look down, you realize you don't have chips left. Right,

0:33:32.164 --> 0:33:34.684
<v Speaker 1>you have so few chips because you've put yourself in

0:33:34.724 --> 0:33:37.084
<v Speaker 1>all these positions, and then you're forced to take a

0:33:37.084 --> 0:33:40.684
<v Speaker 1>suboptimal risk. Right. Then you're actually put in a position

0:33:41.004 --> 0:33:43.524
<v Speaker 1>where you are forced to play a hand that you

0:33:43.564 --> 0:33:46.164
<v Speaker 1>don't actually want to play, or take a spot. You

0:33:46.164 --> 0:33:48.124
<v Speaker 1>don't want a spot because otherwise you are going to

0:33:48.124 --> 0:33:51.564
<v Speaker 1>go bust. Right, you have put yourself into a corner

0:33:51.724 --> 0:33:54.204
<v Speaker 1>where you have to actually make an incredibly risky play.

0:33:54.244 --> 0:33:55.884
<v Speaker 1>You have to go all in for your tournament life,

0:33:55.924 --> 0:33:58.004
<v Speaker 1>which is the riskiest thing you can do, and you're

0:33:58.004 --> 0:34:00.364
<v Speaker 1>doing it not on your terms, but on the terms

0:34:00.364 --> 0:34:03.684
<v Speaker 1>that have been dictated basically by the circumstance, because you've

0:34:03.724 --> 0:34:06.644
<v Speaker 1>been so risk averse, and so that risk aversion ends

0:34:06.724 --> 0:34:09.884
<v Speaker 1>up forcing you to take a bad risk, right, a

0:34:09.964 --> 0:34:12.764
<v Speaker 1>suboptimal risk. So it turns out that it's actually not

0:34:12.884 --> 0:34:15.444
<v Speaker 1>the risk free strategy. It turns out that it's the

0:34:15.444 --> 0:34:18.284
<v Speaker 1>strategy that backs you into a corner, that forces you

0:34:18.324 --> 0:34:20.284
<v Speaker 1>to take a risk that you should not be taking

0:34:20.564 --> 0:34:23.404
<v Speaker 1>at a moment where you should not necessarily be taking it.

0:34:23.564 --> 0:34:25.484
<v Speaker 1>You're taking it for the wrong reasons. I think that's

0:34:25.484 --> 0:34:28.844
<v Speaker 1>what got us Kamala Harris right, like, that's what gets

0:34:28.884 --> 0:34:31.844
<v Speaker 1>us into a lot of these situations. And so I

0:34:31.844 --> 0:34:34.884
<v Speaker 1>think that's strategically, whether you're playing poke or playing politics,

0:34:35.124 --> 0:34:38.284
<v Speaker 1>you need to understand what the repercussions are of playing

0:34:38.324 --> 0:34:43.604
<v Speaker 1>that sort of strategy. And we'll be back right after.

0:34:43.404 --> 0:35:03.124
<v Speaker 2>This, Maria, are you prepared for Mayor mom Donnie.

0:35:03.484 --> 0:35:07.604
<v Speaker 1>Well Nate as a part time resident of New York.

0:35:08.084 --> 0:35:10.924
<v Speaker 1>I am very curious to see what Mayor Mum Donnie

0:35:11.164 --> 0:35:14.564
<v Speaker 1>will actually do. I remember you and I talking this

0:35:14.604 --> 0:35:17.844
<v Speaker 1>past summer at Aspen when we were kind of dealing

0:35:17.884 --> 0:35:22.484
<v Speaker 1>with the primaries and you know, seeing the Mom Donnie momentum.

0:35:22.884 --> 0:35:25.644
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to repeat something I said back then, which

0:35:25.644 --> 0:35:28.564
<v Speaker 1>is I'm very curious to see how all of this

0:35:28.724 --> 0:35:33.204
<v Speaker 1>campaigning is going to actually play out in practice, right,

0:35:33.244 --> 0:35:37.644
<v Speaker 1>because campaigning is not governing, and things that you can

0:35:37.804 --> 0:35:42.524
<v Speaker 1>say and do positions, you can take rhetoric that may

0:35:42.604 --> 0:35:46.324
<v Speaker 1>or may not reflect your true point of view. Is

0:35:46.804 --> 0:35:50.684
<v Speaker 1>much easier when you are not yet elected, right, and

0:35:50.764 --> 0:35:53.164
<v Speaker 1>especially when you're new, right, you're a new face. There's

0:35:53.204 --> 0:35:55.364
<v Speaker 1>all this hope, there's all this promise. There, all of

0:35:55.364 --> 0:35:58.884
<v Speaker 1>these things that people project onto you. They see what

0:35:58.964 --> 0:36:02.004
<v Speaker 1>they want to see, kind of, they project their dreams,

0:36:02.004 --> 0:36:04.684
<v Speaker 1>and they think that you can embody them if you

0:36:04.764 --> 0:36:08.604
<v Speaker 1>campaign well, which mum Donnie absolutely did, And so then

0:36:08.684 --> 0:36:12.164
<v Speaker 1>you get into all and there's political reality, right. You

0:36:12.204 --> 0:36:14.724
<v Speaker 1>have to build coalitions, you have to get shit done,

0:36:14.764 --> 0:36:19.204
<v Speaker 1>and you can't just bulldoze your way into the policies

0:36:19.244 --> 0:36:21.484
<v Speaker 1>that you want. You have to realize that, Okay, now

0:36:21.524 --> 0:36:23.324
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have to try to be re elected

0:36:23.364 --> 0:36:25.684
<v Speaker 1>when the time comes, I need to kind of get

0:36:25.684 --> 0:36:29.004
<v Speaker 1>along with all of these different things. And so when

0:36:29.044 --> 0:36:32.204
<v Speaker 1>you are suddenly put in a position where you're governing,

0:36:32.364 --> 0:36:35.244
<v Speaker 1>it's a very different proposition from where you were when

0:36:35.244 --> 0:36:37.884
<v Speaker 1>you were campaigning. So I'm very curious to see how

0:36:37.924 --> 0:36:42.244
<v Speaker 1>he actually does in office because he's largely untested, right,

0:36:42.324 --> 0:36:46.044
<v Speaker 1>he is someone who has not had kind of this position.

0:36:46.804 --> 0:36:49.124
<v Speaker 1>Well obviously he's not been mayor of New York, but

0:36:49.244 --> 0:36:52.124
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been a very similar position in the past.

0:36:52.164 --> 0:36:59.084
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the messaging three terms in Albany.

0:36:59.804 --> 0:37:02.884
<v Speaker 1>No, no, that's that's not what I mean. But you

0:37:02.924 --> 0:37:04.964
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what I mean, And this is what I said,

0:37:05.004 --> 0:37:07.924
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in the back in the summer, where like,

0:37:08.164 --> 0:37:11.924
<v Speaker 1>let's see how it actually plays out. And I would

0:37:11.924 --> 0:37:13.644
<v Speaker 1>love to give him the benefit of the doubt and

0:37:13.724 --> 0:37:16.324
<v Speaker 1>hope that he's going to be effective and that he'll

0:37:16.324 --> 0:37:20.004
<v Speaker 1>step back, hopefully from some of the things that are

0:37:20.524 --> 0:37:22.924
<v Speaker 1>potentially not as great for New York as a whole.

0:37:23.284 --> 0:37:27.164
<v Speaker 1>So I'm cautiously optimistic, but I have no idea. I

0:37:27.204 --> 0:37:29.044
<v Speaker 1>want to see what he does in the first six months,

0:37:29.044 --> 0:37:30.924
<v Speaker 1>in the first year. I want to see how this

0:37:30.964 --> 0:37:35.444
<v Speaker 1>plays out once he gets into office, and I'm going

0:37:35.484 --> 0:37:37.924
<v Speaker 1>to be very open minded and hope for the best.

0:37:38.924 --> 0:37:41.324
<v Speaker 2>Well you can ride the free bust to the communist postery.

0:37:41.444 --> 0:37:45.444
<v Speaker 2>Not just kidding. I've been surprised that how Hoole are eyed.

0:37:45.524 --> 0:37:51.604
<v Speaker 2>Some of my more centrist friends have been against Zora

0:37:51.724 --> 0:37:55.204
<v Speaker 2>and who seems to be like it right, young dude

0:37:55.204 --> 0:37:58.084
<v Speaker 2>who's been a little more forthright in some ways and

0:37:58.124 --> 0:38:01.764
<v Speaker 2>for example apologizing for his like the seventy two versions

0:38:01.764 --> 0:38:04.564
<v Speaker 2>of him saying like defund the police, and again, when

0:38:04.564 --> 0:38:05.844
<v Speaker 2>are we talking to this king? Like, I you know,

0:38:05.924 --> 0:38:09.844
<v Speaker 2>look after let I talked to the Subtec Live with

0:38:10.004 --> 0:38:13.564
<v Speaker 2>Ross Barkin, who's a journalist New York who also interestingly

0:38:14.164 --> 0:38:16.524
<v Speaker 2>had Zoran as his campaign Maager. He ran for office

0:38:16.524 --> 0:38:18.684
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen, right, and you can listen to that. But

0:38:18.764 --> 0:38:22.924
<v Speaker 2>like but Ross was like, yeah, he actually is pretty progressive, right,

0:38:23.044 --> 0:38:24.884
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, look, I mean there were stories about how

0:38:24.924 --> 0:38:27.484
<v Speaker 2>like Zooram when he was running for like class president,

0:38:27.564 --> 0:38:30.844
<v Speaker 2>promised like free fresh squeeze like orange juice every day.

0:38:30.844 --> 0:38:32.484
<v Speaker 2>I think this is literally true. I think he is

0:38:32.484 --> 0:38:35.364
<v Speaker 2>going to be guilty of like having over promised, especially

0:38:35.444 --> 0:38:39.284
<v Speaker 2>because like you know, a lot of his coalition was younger.

0:38:39.284 --> 0:38:42.044
<v Speaker 2>When I turned out to vote a last Tuesday, and

0:38:42.284 --> 0:38:45.404
<v Speaker 2>substantially notably younger electorate people I voted stickers on and

0:38:45.404 --> 0:38:46.884
<v Speaker 2>you typically see in New York and at my polling

0:38:46.924 --> 0:38:50.404
<v Speaker 2>place and things like that, right, and also very notable

0:38:50.444 --> 0:38:52.204
<v Speaker 2>in the data. Right, So it wasn't just wasn't just

0:38:52.244 --> 0:38:56.204
<v Speaker 2>my an general observations from once Maorea, the younger people

0:38:56.204 --> 0:39:00.124
<v Speaker 2>can be fickle. They tend not to tune into, especially

0:39:00.204 --> 0:39:05.004
<v Speaker 2>local politics outside of election years, Right, So in practice,

0:39:05.044 --> 0:39:10.084
<v Speaker 2>the squeaky wheels during fights over a budget, which by

0:39:10.124 --> 0:39:12.044
<v Speaker 2>the way, a lot of it's controlled by Albany, right,

0:39:12.324 --> 0:39:15.764
<v Speaker 2>or fight's over new city policy, right, they're having vocal

0:39:15.764 --> 0:39:18.604
<v Speaker 2>opposition can make your life a lot tougher.

0:39:19.164 --> 0:39:22.044
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I will say that a second time because

0:39:22.084 --> 0:39:25.524
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really important psychological point people in general,

0:39:25.524 --> 0:39:28.724
<v Speaker 1>but younger voters in particular. Younger people in particular are fickle.

0:39:29.124 --> 0:39:29.284
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:39:29.404 --> 0:39:31.964
<v Speaker 1>It's not just things of the moment, but it's also

0:39:32.564 --> 0:39:37.564
<v Speaker 1>especially when you're talking about like delayed gratification before like

0:39:37.724 --> 0:39:41.244
<v Speaker 1>and this happens. You know, brains mature, people mature, like

0:39:41.684 --> 0:39:44.484
<v Speaker 1>as you get older, you understand that change takes time,

0:39:44.564 --> 0:39:48.124
<v Speaker 1>that things kind of don't always happen. But we're I

0:39:48.164 --> 0:39:51.284
<v Speaker 1>think seeing a generation right now that hasn't had to

0:39:51.284 --> 0:39:53.844
<v Speaker 1>delay gratification very often, where you do have kind of

0:39:53.964 --> 0:39:59.044
<v Speaker 1>instant gratification with you know, cell phones and social media

0:39:59.084 --> 0:40:01.564
<v Speaker 1>and all of these things. And so we might see

0:40:01.564 --> 0:40:04.604
<v Speaker 1>a disconnect where you know, you elect someone on these

0:40:04.644 --> 0:40:08.084
<v Speaker 1>hopes and if you know the promises aren't met immediately,

0:40:08.124 --> 0:40:09.764
<v Speaker 1>then there's a backlash and you're like, oh, oh, you're

0:40:09.764 --> 0:40:13.044
<v Speaker 1>betraying us. Right, because they don't understand Wait, no, like

0:40:13.124 --> 0:40:16.644
<v Speaker 1>this takes time, right, things take time. This is not

0:40:17.004 --> 0:40:19.924
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is not a betrayal, and so I

0:40:20.044 --> 0:40:22.764
<v Speaker 1>do wonder how that's going to play out more broadly,

0:40:23.004 --> 0:40:25.644
<v Speaker 1>so Nate too, to kind of wrap up everything here, then,

0:40:26.044 --> 0:40:28.844
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to be looking towards the midterms, what

0:40:29.004 --> 0:40:31.484
<v Speaker 1>do you think kind of are the issues that people

0:40:31.524 --> 0:40:34.204
<v Speaker 1>should be focusing on, because, as you said, like in

0:40:34.244 --> 0:40:37.124
<v Speaker 1>New York, some of these issues like crime, they didn't

0:40:37.164 --> 0:40:39.884
<v Speaker 1>really work as we were looking at the shutdown. Some

0:40:39.964 --> 0:40:42.804
<v Speaker 1>of the things like healthcare, they weren't really working. Kind

0:40:42.804 --> 0:40:45.844
<v Speaker 1>of the let's prevent autocracy, doesn't you know? The no

0:40:46.004 --> 0:40:49.364
<v Speaker 1>King's protests did work because that was a much more

0:40:49.404 --> 0:40:51.964
<v Speaker 1>succinct way of putting it. But in your opinion, what

0:40:52.004 --> 0:40:55.124
<v Speaker 1>are the issues that Democrats should be focusing on going

0:40:55.164 --> 0:40:58.284
<v Speaker 1>into the midterms and how should they play their hand

0:40:58.764 --> 0:41:03.004
<v Speaker 1>now that they've painted themselves into this corner with capitulating

0:41:03.044 --> 0:41:04.284
<v Speaker 1>to the shutdown.

0:41:04.364 --> 0:41:10.284
<v Speaker 2>Maria inflation, inflation, inflation, the youth amis has become by ephemism,

0:41:10.724 --> 0:41:12.884
<v Speaker 2>the term of arts become affordability, which is kind of

0:41:12.964 --> 0:41:15.684
<v Speaker 2>more what's like the winning of Pooh meme where it's

0:41:15.684 --> 0:41:22.124
<v Speaker 2>like there's pooh in a fancy anyway, call it inflation, affordability.

0:41:22.124 --> 0:41:27.644
<v Speaker 2>That's for fucking pretentious bout in college. I prodounce that college.

0:41:27.364 --> 0:41:31.044
<v Speaker 1>Student vod in college East Coast.

0:41:32.524 --> 0:41:36.164
<v Speaker 2>Just call everything inflation. If healthcare is more expensive, inflation,

0:41:36.244 --> 0:41:39.204
<v Speaker 2>If cultures are more expensive, inflation. If Trump takes away

0:41:39.204 --> 0:41:42.004
<v Speaker 2>food stamps, if the stories them later on, inflation, right,

0:41:42.204 --> 0:41:45.164
<v Speaker 2>Just call everything inflation. That's a word that people understand me.

0:41:45.204 --> 0:41:46.964
<v Speaker 2>And affordability is a fine term. I'm not saying it's

0:41:46.964 --> 0:41:49.524
<v Speaker 2>the worst political mussing of all time, but like, but yeah,

0:41:49.764 --> 0:41:54.044
<v Speaker 2>and tariffs and everything else, and generalized anxiety about the economy.

0:41:55.324 --> 0:41:57.964
<v Speaker 1>It's the economy, stupid, Nate. Is that what you're saying?

0:41:58.284 --> 0:42:00.364
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is why I thought some check down the government.

0:42:00.484 --> 0:42:02.324
<v Speaker 2>But you know, but healthcare also gets to affordability, right,

0:42:02.364 --> 0:42:07.044
<v Speaker 2>What these are actually tax credits that help you to

0:42:07.084 --> 0:42:14.244
<v Speaker 2>pay for healthcare. By the way, Obamacare is increasing. The

0:42:14.244 --> 0:42:19.204
<v Speaker 2>preemums are increasing, irregardless or regardless of of these subsidies, right,

0:42:19.244 --> 0:42:21.644
<v Speaker 2>they also are getting more extensive. People will notice that,

0:42:21.844 --> 0:42:25.724
<v Speaker 2>and like Republicans will probably say, hey, look, I'm sure

0:42:25.764 --> 0:42:28.844
<v Speaker 2>trupples say like this proves that Obamacare is is broken.

0:42:28.884 --> 0:42:30.444
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to get into a much of economics

0:42:30.484 --> 0:42:33.124
<v Speaker 2>just late in the episode about like the initial mandate

0:42:33.204 --> 0:42:35.924
<v Speaker 2>and things like that, Right, But the thing is when

0:42:35.924 --> 0:42:37.844
<v Speaker 2>you are the president. I mean, if there's one good

0:42:37.844 --> 0:42:39.804
<v Speaker 2>thing from press from the shutdown and how the pulling

0:42:39.804 --> 0:42:42.524
<v Speaker 2>went down, right, it's like that plus the elections, we're

0:42:42.524 --> 0:42:45.244
<v Speaker 2>evidence that, like, when you are the president in power,

0:42:45.804 --> 0:42:47.484
<v Speaker 2>then you get blamed for a shit and in some

0:42:47.524 --> 0:42:51.484
<v Speaker 2>ways having like a nameless, faceless party makes it even

0:42:51.524 --> 0:42:53.364
<v Speaker 2>harder for you to get blame. That's probably reads I

0:42:53.364 --> 0:42:56.204
<v Speaker 2>think she were. You know, have someone fucking relatively anonymous,

0:42:56.204 --> 0:43:00.004
<v Speaker 2>probably some fucking Chris Murphy or some fuck who works

0:43:00.084 --> 0:43:02.324
<v Speaker 2>like get on meeting the press all the time. I mean,

0:43:02.404 --> 0:43:04.044
<v Speaker 2>like Chris Murphy was better on the shutdown than a

0:43:04.044 --> 0:43:06.444
<v Speaker 2>lot of people. I think I think it was more honest. Right,

0:43:06.484 --> 0:43:08.444
<v Speaker 2>But like, you know, you're gonna have some media horror.

0:43:08.564 --> 0:43:09.964
<v Speaker 2>Is that is that this is going to all be

0:43:10.124 --> 0:43:12.004
<v Speaker 2>edited out by the producer fly.

0:43:13.604 --> 0:43:16.484
<v Speaker 3>And on that and on that fine note, No, I

0:43:16.524 --> 0:43:19.844
<v Speaker 3>actually think I actually think that that's uh You've made.

0:43:19.884 --> 0:43:22.364
<v Speaker 3>You've made several important points that I think we can

0:43:22.764 --> 0:43:25.924
<v Speaker 3>use to sum up simplifying the messaging and making it

0:43:26.044 --> 0:43:28.164
<v Speaker 3>something that is kind of more emotional mor of us

0:43:28.244 --> 0:43:29.524
<v Speaker 3>or all, like you know.

0:43:29.524 --> 0:43:34.604
<v Speaker 1>Inflation, affordability. This affects your pockets right now. It's not

0:43:34.684 --> 0:43:38.924
<v Speaker 1>other people, it's not immigration, it's not it's not things

0:43:39.004 --> 0:43:42.284
<v Speaker 1>that are not affecting me. It's things that are affecting

0:43:42.804 --> 0:43:45.924
<v Speaker 1>my ability to live kind of my ability to live

0:43:45.964 --> 0:43:49.684
<v Speaker 1>the life that I want to live. And I think

0:43:49.724 --> 0:43:53.084
<v Speaker 1>that that is a powerful message obviously for either party,

0:43:53.084 --> 0:43:56.644
<v Speaker 1>but one that the Democrats have kind of had been

0:43:56.684 --> 0:43:58.644
<v Speaker 1>losing sight of for a long time.

0:43:59.124 --> 0:44:02.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, final, it's you know, my final thought here.

0:44:02.084 --> 0:44:05.004
<v Speaker 2>It's been usual to be actually a citizen in the

0:44:05.044 --> 0:44:09.364
<v Speaker 2>city where my vote madderlection Democrats excuse it amount of different.

0:44:09.404 --> 0:44:11.604
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually a republic expliment before in the show, right, Yes,

0:44:11.644 --> 0:44:14.564
<v Speaker 2>but as a citizen of New York in national general elections,

0:44:14.604 --> 0:44:16.924
<v Speaker 2>your vote usually doesn't matter. It's interesting having to kind

0:44:16.924 --> 0:44:19.644
<v Speaker 2>of think through this. If we do a segment how

0:44:19.684 --> 0:44:21.204
<v Speaker 2>I decided to vote, that's a difference. I'm not going

0:44:21.244 --> 0:44:22.644
<v Speaker 2>to I'm not gonna I'm not going to reveal it

0:44:22.644 --> 0:44:26.404
<v Speaker 2>in photo you today audience, right, but like what I

0:44:26.444 --> 0:44:28.524
<v Speaker 2>will say is like if I do an issue matrix

0:44:28.564 --> 0:44:31.724
<v Speaker 2>thing where I'm like, here are the three candidates on

0:44:31.884 --> 0:44:34.204
<v Speaker 2>the seventeen issues in effect in New York, Right, I'm

0:44:34.204 --> 0:44:36.244
<v Speaker 2>not probably wouldn't wind up. Listeners are on, maybe with

0:44:36.284 --> 0:44:39.444
<v Speaker 2>some exceptions right on a few things, but like, that's

0:44:39.484 --> 0:44:42.644
<v Speaker 2>not the only thing that goes into being mayor. Effective

0:44:42.804 --> 0:44:49.444
<v Speaker 2>governance transcends ideology, especially for for city government. Right, It's like,

0:44:49.844 --> 0:44:52.244
<v Speaker 2>does it get done on time? Right? If there's a

0:44:52.284 --> 0:44:56.324
<v Speaker 2>snowstorm high school the next day, is a good communication

0:44:56.564 --> 0:44:58.444
<v Speaker 2>in public emergencies?

0:44:58.564 --> 0:45:02.324
<v Speaker 1>Right, how's everything running? I think that that's sorry. I'm

0:45:02.364 --> 0:45:05.084
<v Speaker 1>just I know we're wrapping up, but this just reminds

0:45:05.084 --> 0:45:08.244
<v Speaker 1>me and I think this is so a propos of

0:45:08.364 --> 0:45:10.604
<v Speaker 1>the town in New Hampshire I'm blanking on its name

0:45:10.844 --> 0:45:15.764
<v Speaker 1>that was very libertarian and kind of wanted to abolish everything,

0:45:16.204 --> 0:45:18.444
<v Speaker 1>and they did and it ended up being taken over

0:45:18.564 --> 0:45:23.564
<v Speaker 1>by bears by just a very funny I think there's

0:45:23.644 --> 0:45:28.244
<v Speaker 1>a it sounds like a children's story, but our wonderful

0:45:28.324 --> 0:45:30.844
<v Speaker 1>producers have just shared that there was a book on

0:45:30.884 --> 0:45:35.244
<v Speaker 1>this called A Libertarian Walks into a Bear and that

0:45:35.284 --> 0:45:40.004
<v Speaker 1>book is about this town of Grafton, New Hampshire. And

0:45:40.444 --> 0:45:43.164
<v Speaker 1>what we can learn from Grafton. But yes, you know,

0:45:43.324 --> 0:45:45.964
<v Speaker 1>does shit get done? How does the government end up

0:45:46.044 --> 0:45:52.644
<v Speaker 1>running the day today is very very important. Let us

0:45:52.644 --> 0:45:54.404
<v Speaker 1>know what you think of the show. Reach out to

0:45:54.524 --> 0:45:59.324
<v Speaker 1>us at Risky Business at pushkin dot FM. Risky Business

0:45:59.364 --> 0:46:01.964
<v Speaker 1>is hosted by me Maria Kanakova and by.

0:46:01.884 --> 0:46:04.644
<v Speaker 2>Me Late Slivery. The show was a cool production of

0:46:04.724 --> 0:46:08.924
<v Speaker 2>Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced by Isaac Carter.

0:46:09.404 --> 0:46:13.284
<v Speaker 2>Our associate producer is Sonya gerwit Lydia, Jean Kott and

0:46:13.364 --> 0:46:16.524
<v Speaker 2>Daphne Chen are our editors, and our executive producer is

0:46:16.604 --> 0:46:19.364
<v Speaker 2>Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Bruger.

0:46:20.244 --> 0:46:22.444
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:46:22.484 --> 0:46:25.164
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:46:25.284 --> 0:46:27.124
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:46:27.164 --> 0:46:29.324
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.