1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:02,680 Speaker 1: Nathan Sheets joining us right now in studio to talk 2 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:05,120 Speaker 1: a little bit about his assessment of that as well. 3 00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Global chief economists over at City. Nathan. Great to have 4 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,280 Speaker 1: here on set, and when you hear Powell, I'll talk 5 00:00:10,320 --> 00:00:14,040 Speaker 1: about economic conditions and how supportive, at least in his words, 6 00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:17,079 Speaker 1: they are right now of FED policy. And I guess 7 00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:19,360 Speaker 1: the cushion that they have to maybe just sit by 8 00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:20,640 Speaker 1: and see what happens next. 9 00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:24,360 Speaker 2: Yeah. I think the reality here is over the last 10 00:00:24,400 --> 00:00:29,080 Speaker 2: few months, in particular, we have seen a very significant 11 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:33,159 Speaker 2: upward move and longer term interest rates, and with the 12 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:38,040 Speaker 2: FED runs its models when the FED thinks about financial conditions, 13 00:00:38,479 --> 00:00:41,919 Speaker 2: that longer end of the curve really weighs have laid 14 00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:46,120 Speaker 2: in economic outcomes. And I think that that has probably 15 00:00:46,159 --> 00:00:50,440 Speaker 2: given the FED a notch more confidence that the treatment 16 00:00:50,560 --> 00:00:53,720 Speaker 2: that it is prescribed is getting the traction and we'll 17 00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:58,320 Speaker 2: ultimately get the traction that they desire. And in the 18 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:04,000 Speaker 2: press conference today, J. Powell had numerous opportunities to lean 19 00:01:04,040 --> 00:01:08,160 Speaker 2: into a twenty five basis point hike in December and 20 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:11,640 Speaker 2: he did not take them. And I think the conclusion 21 00:01:11,720 --> 00:01:15,440 Speaker 2: now that kind of the maintained path of policy in 22 00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:20,759 Speaker 2: the fed's head, notwithstanding the previous dot plot, is that 23 00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:23,600 Speaker 2: they've done enough and now we're in the world of 24 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 2: higher for longer. 25 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:27,680 Speaker 3: So I guess the focus now really turns the dot plot, 26 00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:29,759 Speaker 3: which and I learned something new here, which is that 27 00:01:29,959 --> 00:01:32,880 Speaker 3: they lose efficacy the longer the time goes. So they 28 00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:35,360 Speaker 3: really matter when their first release, but after the next 29 00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 3: set of data points, they matter less. If the dot 30 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,000 Speaker 3: plots show any adjustment, people are going to look ahead 31 00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:42,200 Speaker 3: right away to the pivot. 32 00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:45,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, very important point. At the December meeting, we will 33 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:48,920 Speaker 2: have new projections, we'll have a new dot plot, and 34 00:01:49,080 --> 00:01:52,000 Speaker 2: at that point the fed's going to have to explicitly 35 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:55,720 Speaker 2: address are we hiking at this meeting now? I guess 36 00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:58,560 Speaker 2: another strategy is to say, well, there's another one out 37 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:02,520 Speaker 2: there someplace, and to allude that maybe in the first 38 00:02:02,520 --> 00:02:05,240 Speaker 2: half the year they'll need to do more. But then 39 00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:08,200 Speaker 2: what about the cuts that they had in in the 40 00:02:08,240 --> 00:02:11,760 Speaker 2: back end of the curves. So this next stop plot, 41 00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:15,200 Speaker 2: I would expect if it goes since they think it will, 42 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:18,200 Speaker 2: that they're going to be holding in December, and then 43 00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:22,880 Speaker 2: maybe that translates into perhaps one less cut in twenty 44 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:24,400 Speaker 2: twenty four. Well, in this. 45 00:02:24,440 --> 00:02:27,040 Speaker 4: Conversation about whether they're going to hike again when we 46 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:29,280 Speaker 4: might start to see those cuts. It is interesting to 47 00:02:29,320 --> 00:02:31,840 Speaker 4: hear Jerome pal say that the Fed is really still 48 00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:34,880 Speaker 4: trying to gain confidence in what the appropriate stance of 49 00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:37,280 Speaker 4: policy is. When you think about the different risks out there, 50 00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:40,160 Speaker 4: the risk of doing too much versus doing too little, 51 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:42,239 Speaker 4: where do you think the bigger one is right now? 52 00:02:42,639 --> 00:02:47,480 Speaker 2: So Pale is struggling with this, with this double reality. 53 00:02:47,520 --> 00:02:52,040 Speaker 2: On the one hand, has he seen progress absolutely? Core 54 00:02:52,160 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 2: PC eighteen months two years ago is running at five 55 00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:58,080 Speaker 2: and a half percent or higher. Now it's running at 56 00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:01,960 Speaker 2: three point seven, and my expectation is in coming months 57 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:06,520 Speaker 2: it's likely to fall somewhat further. But at the same token, 58 00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:12,320 Speaker 2: at the same time, inflation is not back at that 59 00:03:12,440 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 2: two percent level that they desire, and the economy, the 60 00:03:16,639 --> 00:03:20,760 Speaker 2: labor market continue to seem to be pretty strong. So 61 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:25,480 Speaker 2: what he's struggling with here is we see some improvement, 62 00:03:25,560 --> 00:03:29,880 Speaker 2: we see some momentum in the disinflation process. We know 63 00:03:30,040 --> 00:03:34,080 Speaker 2: we're tighter, but have we done enough? And I think 64 00:03:34,520 --> 00:03:36,600 Speaker 2: he's essentially said, well, let's wait. 65 00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 1: And see the flip side of those whether they've done 66 00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:41,360 Speaker 1: too much, And he did address the stress in the 67 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:44,200 Speaker 1: housing sector from eight percent mortgage rates. He also talked 68 00:03:44,200 --> 00:03:46,000 Speaker 1: about some of the stress that you're seeing in business 69 00:03:46,040 --> 00:03:49,040 Speaker 1: investment and refinancing, and that raises a lot of questions 70 00:03:49,080 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 1: about the pace of GDP growth, at least that we 71 00:03:51,520 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 1: saw in the most recent quarter, in the third quarter, 72 00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:56,040 Speaker 1: whether that's an anomaly and we should expect some sort 73 00:03:56,080 --> 00:03:56,920 Speaker 1: of leveling out. 74 00:03:57,320 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 2: My sense is, especially coming off that very strong third quarter, 75 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:06,080 Speaker 2: and given the momentum that I continue to see in 76 00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:09,120 Speaker 2: the labor market in particular, that they are at a 77 00:04:09,200 --> 00:04:11,760 Speaker 2: place where Pale is willing to live with the rest 78 00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:14,920 Speaker 2: at this stage, given where they are, that they've hiked 79 00:04:14,960 --> 00:04:17,680 Speaker 2: too much, and if it does seem like some of 80 00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:21,920 Speaker 2: those some of those pressure points start to manifest themselves, 81 00:04:21,960 --> 00:04:26,080 Speaker 2: then he's got plenty of room to ease policy. And 82 00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:28,479 Speaker 2: I do think that he's ready in the fullness of time, 83 00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:32,880 Speaker 2: if the economy slows more rapidly than he's expecting, I 84 00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:36,480 Speaker 2: think Pale is more than prepared to say, Okay, we've 85 00:04:36,480 --> 00:04:39,480 Speaker 2: done enough, maybe we've done more than enough, and we'll 86 00:04:39,920 --> 00:04:40,960 Speaker 2: start cutting rights. 87 00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:43,200 Speaker 3: How commited do you think that that is to that 88 00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:46,360 Speaker 3: two percent inflation target? Is it enough to trigger a 89 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 3: recession or will three percent or two ish percent be 90 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:53,240 Speaker 3: good enough to signal the all clear if recession is 91 00:04:53,240 --> 00:04:55,200 Speaker 3: the unavoidable alternative. 92 00:04:55,480 --> 00:04:58,960 Speaker 2: This is a huge question that I personally struggle with. 93 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:04,599 Speaker 2: Sense is that j Powell, especially now that we're looking 94 00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:08,240 Speaker 2: at three handle inflation rates, that he doesn't want to 95 00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:12,480 Speaker 2: trigger a recession necessarily to get inflation back down to 96 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:17,520 Speaker 2: two percent as long as the market's reviewing FED policy 97 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:20,880 Speaker 2: is credible. And I think the measure of their credibility 98 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:25,400 Speaker 2: the north star for FED policy through this episode are 99 00:05:25,640 --> 00:05:31,120 Speaker 2: inflation expectations and particularly the longer term inflation expectations. And 100 00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 2: the sad reality here is, yeah, I've seen a little 101 00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:37,000 Speaker 2: bit of nudging up in those, and that is that 102 00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:40,840 Speaker 2: the markets voting every day on how credible the FED is. 103 00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 1: Great. Analysis is always, Nathan, great to catch up with you, 104 00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:46,720 Speaker 1: Nathan Sheets, of course, the chief economists over at City 105 00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:48,880 Speaker 1: helping us parse some of what we heard from Jay 106 00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:49,400 Speaker 1: Powell