WEBVTT - Leading Off July 1st, 2024 (Ep. 853)

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Joey gean man with stance and hands fell another zig

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Crains of Sam Fantasy talking about diamond dreams, chase and

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>players whisper riding their schemes.

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh Welsh breaking it down real so horses howled in

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 2>the Lady whose.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Go talking monsters on the baseball field with it, swinging his.

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Bets and magic shiels Fantasy Baseball in the nine.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 2>Podcast, skin enough fat size.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Question marks and start still lie.

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Dreams of Glory. Member. I welcome in everybody to Fantasy

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Pros MLB. This is Leading Off Live, brought you by

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Bet three sixty five Bet five bucks and you know what,

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>you know what you can get one hundred and fifty

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 3>and bonus bets when you use the promo code leading Off.

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing. Welcome everyone. The Peanists like Jacks. It's me

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Joey p. That's the Welsh, and I've decided Welsh Mondays

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 3>are for the theme song. We start the week off

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 3>right with a little theme song to brighten up your Monday,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>just in case somebody's got a case of the Mondays.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 3>And we got a lot for you today. We got

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 3>some trade talk, We've got James Wood, We've got Garrett

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 3>Cole's performance yesterday. So much to talk about Welsh just

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 3>so damn much.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 1>It is, so there's so much. I like you said,

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got James Wood, We've got the Garrett Cole start.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited to talk about that. And a little

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Rookie of the Year bet that we've been talking about.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Those odds have changed. You know what I actually found

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>out just kind of throwing it out here. I forgot

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I had bet on him preseason, so I actually have

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that bet very loud.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 3>What did you have him at?

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It was actually plus six hundred, It was what it

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>was like a week ago. So I got it around

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>six hundred for mister White Langford. So so much to

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Such an eventful week, by the way, this eventful,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>awesome weekend. We're like, oh, hey, it's Paul Schemes, Garrett Cole,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>James Wood's happening. And then they drop a Monday and

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they're like, here's three games. Dropping three games on a

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>day is asinine. I might be a lawyer in this.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd almost rather just like not have games on a day.

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's just close to the All Star put.

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like, what the hell are we doing here? I

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know. The schedulers got drunk out here. I don't know.

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.839
<v Speaker 3>But let's so James Wood. Look, it's all the James

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>would today. He is going to be promoted. He's gonna

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 3>play against the Mets to day. My buddy Sam's going

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>to the game. He's a huge Nationals fan. Shout out

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 3>to Sam. Hopefully he enjoys the game tonight. Again, short slate,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>So all the bets today, James Wood themed. It's gonna

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 3>be a good time. We want you to get in

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 3>on it. More James Wood in the program. I want

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to start with Garrett Cole because again, this is why

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 3>did not become the Grim Reaper right away. It was

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>a good start for Garrett Cole. Let's not pretend like

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>it was the greatest start ever. He had six strikeouts,

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 3>one run. But I want to give some context here.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 3>This was a Blue Jays lineup that didn't have Bobashett

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 3>in it. This is a Blue Jays lineup that has

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>a four hundred year old Justin Turner, and it's got

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Dalton var Show striking out all over the place, and

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>it's got again. You go through some of the names

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 3>that they were playing Sunday and it looked pretty much

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 3>like a Triple A lineup. So yes, it was good. Yes,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the velocity was better. All of that was positive. So

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 3>I want to take those positives, but I don't want

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 3>to lose the context because I think context does matter,

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 3>because we've seen him be great against these slap nut

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, Triple A squads, Double A squads, and the

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 3>Blue Jays basically threw out a Quad A squad against him.

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Outside of lad Guerrero and Varshow, the rest of his

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 3>team was not good yesterday, but it was a very

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>good start for Garrit Cole compared to the last two

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Welsh You've been waiting all the last twelve hours for this,

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>so go ahead and we let you have your time.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying this Joe dish and it's a little salty.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>This dish is a little salty. I'm going to put

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it back there. Yeah, I mean, what contextualization you put.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>On it there?

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>You're like, wow, yeah, he's hitting like two thirty on

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the season. They got old ass Justin Turner, I don't know.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Blue Jays, Yeah, they're not who they

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>were before, but this is also a team that's like

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like not a major strikeout team. There's phills difficult. Oh no,

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Vlad is one of the hottest players in baseball right

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>now over the last couple of weeks. I mean, it's

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty minimalized take on how you were victory. You

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>were Connor mcgregoring in about your Garrett Cole stuff and

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he goes out and.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>He was although I went to top here because I

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you're Philefa Horowitz, Justin Turner Springer. Is it in two fourteen,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Dalton varsha win a Buck ninety nine, Janson Hitch, Joe

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Buck twenty seven, he's in two twenty seven, Clement and Kirmier.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 3>This is an impressive lineup.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Come on, hey, these are somebody's sons. Joe. You're being

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>very rude. You're being I don't mean.

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay either a good lineup.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>This is. You know what the problem with this is

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is this is a little bit of that like you

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>know where you're like, well, if you take this game out,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in this game out and blah blah blah, and it's like,

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm not doing that. But here's what you wanted

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.679
<v Speaker 1>at of Garrett Cole. You want results when he should

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>get results, they are gonna be tough games. Guess what

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>when he goes up against the Orioles, who just hit

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>like I think they're the third team ever, it'd have

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty home runs in the month of June or a

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>single month. When you go up against the Orioles, you

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>might give up three or four earned runs, you might

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>have a dicey start. But when you go up against

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>teams like the A's, you should dominate them. When we

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>go up against teams like the Blue Jays, who I'll

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>admit a notch above the Rockies and A's, essentially at

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this point you should be good. And guess what he

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>was year over year half a mile per hour up

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on the fastball. That's what we wanted. We wanted to

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>see that he induced twelve whiffs in that start for

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a team that doesn't swing through a whole lot of stuff.

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>He had a twenty nine percent csw that's good. These

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>are all the things that we want out of him.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And only gave up four hard hit balls. That would

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>be the other thing I would point to where you're like, oh,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>there's only four hard hit balls total.

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because George Springer hasn't hit a ball hard most

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of the year. Either is just a turner. But again

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>my point is Jackie, because I was yelling, so Jack,

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say this in a quiet voice. I'm gonna

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 3>do some as Mr. Can you hear that?

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>On that?

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're gonna do a little of.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>This, Jack.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>This lineup was a joke. Kirmeyer, Clement, Danny Janssen, Justin Turner,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 3>George Springer, Horowitz, Horowitz, Spencer Horrowitz, come on, let's go

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 3>iSER Isaac Isaac, Isaiah Kiner, Fileffa. I couldn't even say

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 3>his name, right, I just I can't even say Listen,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 3>it's not a good lineup. It's a good start. Those

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 3>both these things can be true. You are right, yeah, no,

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent right. And I am also right. This

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.679
<v Speaker 3>lineup was a joke. Outside of lad I guess.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I like it. That's fine. It was a good start.

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 3>If it was would you be super impressed if Andrew

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Heaney went out there and had a great start yesterday

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>against them, what would you be here? Like would that

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 3>be the lead today? Like look at Andrew Heiney's six strikeouts?

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And like we talk about Garrett Cole every day because

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you're like Garrett Cole's washed and he's done, And I

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>did say. I never said rather, I've never said, never

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>said I'm pretty sure.

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 3>I said he's a ticking time bomb. I never said

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>he's washed. I never said he's done. Those words never

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 3>came out of my mouth. For more Crossfire, stick with

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.119
<v Speaker 3>us here on Fantasy Cross again.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>All I said, this is the last thing that was

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a critical start, after that one where you were like,

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't tell yourself. I told you, so that was

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a critical start. You weren't talking about how garbage the

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>blue Jay's lineup was last week and what the start was,

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and now because he was successful, it's like, okay, so

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>yues what the next one as critical to get consistency

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with him. But the stuff is still there, the filo

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is there. That's what we want.

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Yay, Garrett Joel, I am not right nor wrong, Yet,

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 3>he says, be an adult, admit you were wrong. I'm

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>not wrong because I said he's a ticking time bomb.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's give it six weeks. If Garrett Cole goes out there,

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I will come on this show. If he finishes the

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>season strong and looks great, I will come on this

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 3>show happily and say I was one hundred percent wrong

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 3>with Garret Cole I got no problem with being wrong.

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I talk about being wrong all the time, not too

0:07:58.240 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>much because I'm not that often.

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 4>But I have no one admits to being more wrong

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 4>than me. Nobody's more wrong than I am. Okay, no,

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 4>but here's the thing. Listen right now.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm also not going to do backflips because he was

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>great against the solutions. The velocity being up is good.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Also good, Aaron Judge. Another home run for me, another

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>home run for him. Wait to go erin Wyatt Langford.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 3>That's the real thing to talk about today. Wyattlangford hit

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>for the cycle yesterday. That number that just two weeks

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>ago was plus twenty five hundred was now plus six

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred going into the weekend. You know what it is

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 3>this morning plus four fifty. So guess who doubled down

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 3>this morning on that? This guy? So he got at

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty five hundred, he's got it plus four fifty. And

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 3>guess what this is gonna be a big, big payday

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 3>if this one works out, because Wyatt Langford, I'm telling

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 3>you right now, I think is the real favorite for

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 3>this am.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually saw a worse number than you. So that's

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I looked last night and Heel has moved

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to plus one thirty and Langford was like two forty

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. So yeah, when we had that

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>debate before, or I mean in admittance, it was like, hey,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>why at Langford is a solid bet for it? Still

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I was there was no chance I was betting on Heel.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But my point was, he has a really good opportunity

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to kind of hold on to that spot if things

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>don't blow up, and if he can maintain that spot. Well,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been a rough couple starts. We still don't know

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the trajectory of it. He comes out of the rotation,

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>he's gone. But that's why you didn't bet him at

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>minus money. I think the next one was Mason Miller

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not doing a closer, especially with the a's, So that

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was why Langford made the most sense if you were

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>making the bet. But also two weeks ago he was

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the buye for me as well. K percentage was super low. Hitting,

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Homer's batting average was way up last month and the

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>month of June, and it's continued on and that buying

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity is gone. It is, it's gone bye bye right now.

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And I will say this very interesting time for prospects

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone is so jaded. Right now you're getting the turnaround

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like Heshton kirstein come back.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Looking as grand slams think for a good.

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Sureio has been incredible over the last we talked about

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>him weeks ago. He said, look, he's walking a little bit,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>he's making better contact. I know the numbers aren't there yet,

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but you can see the comfortability factor starting to settle.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 3>In the same thing with White Langford. I know the

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 3>power hasn't really popped yet, but what you want to

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 3>see is confidence in contact. When you see those two things,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 3>power will follow for these guys. That's just it's like

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 3>touchdown regression at football. You're gonna see those things happen eventually.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 3>You want good performance, you want confidence with these rookies,

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's a really good thing. Langford right now, in

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the month of June closes things out. Two eighty three, three,

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 3>forty seven, four forty six slash eighteen RBI six deals

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 3>in twenty five games. Just two homers. But Welsh, you

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 3>and I both know if he hits five homers in

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 3>each of the last three months or somewhere near there,

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 3>he's winning this award. Yeah and I both know it.

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>If he keeps up at the pace I think he is,

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and the guy I was going to finish with is

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Merrill is the other one I want to throw out.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So you want to talk about the rookie researches. Did

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know since June first, there's only one player that

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>has more homers in baseball than Jackson Merrill, Aaron Judge.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>One. Jackson Merrill is making a vie for the All

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Star Game at this point and a great bet there too.

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So the learning curve at the beginning of the year

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think was way more difficult, and you're seeing guys

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that are stepping in and finding their adjustments. Cheerio Langford

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>cursed out in the short element. It'll be really interesting

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens with James would today and if

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>he experiences any of those or if he just comes

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>out the gates banging. But yeah, I'm I'm fully on board.

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I was buying him. I did a so rare video

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think on White Langford we might not saw it.

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>We did video and the and the trade by so

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>very very handsome.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Man on those videos, Welsh, you know you come off.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Really well on the such dark like mood. I'm like

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, Hey everybody, it was a friend.

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Ose you want to play a little so rare.

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That's my impression. You did my impression that was good.

0:11:59.000 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I do say friendly.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I saw BIZI resigis in the chat, also saying that

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 3>who are we kidting? Joe? You're not going to show

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 3>up in August and take an l Yes, I will.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 3>I will absolutely, In fact, I promise you this. Not

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 3>only will I take an OL, I will record and

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry video in the style of the South Park

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 3>bp A president every time there was an oil spill,

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I'll film a video. I'm so sorry, We're sorry. I

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 3>will do the whole thing. But God help all of you. Now,

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 3>if he comes off and does one of these things

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 3>in July three.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He gra either way we're getting a video, and either

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>way a video is coming. The only problem is is

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of like, if he's like decent, you're gonna be like,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna do the video because he wasn't like great.

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 3>No no no, no no no, great is not even

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 3>what I'm talking about. If he look, if he pitches

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 3>to a five VR, then I'm gonna take a victory

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 3>lap and you will, and you will admit that I

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 3>was right about it. If he if he pitches to

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.599
<v Speaker 3>a three e R and wins games and pitches the

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 3>rest of the season, hard l for me. I'm I'm

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>mad enough. It's fine, I'll take the Well, let's let's go.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 3>Let's see what happens, all right. A lot of strikeout

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 3>performances here. Joe Ryan ten strikeouts for him, Garrett Crochet,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna talk about a little bit. No decision against

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the Rockies, but he was terrific, no walks, eleven strikeout,

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Tosh Bradley another one eleven strikeouts walked to Andrew Heaney,

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 3>who I made fun of earlier, but struck out ten

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday in a win over those Orioles and Pablo

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Lopez on Saturday Welsh nine k's another good start for

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Pablo Love that also unfortunately Tristan McKenzie sent down option

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 3>to Triple A with Gvin Williams coming off the IL

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 3>and mackenzie has not been good. So I know Welsh

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 3>has never been a big mackenzie guy. Let's have some

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 3>fun here. So Gunnar Henderson thirty six game on Bay

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 3>streak is snapped. He was zero for four, struck out

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 3>all four times yesterday boo. But he is going to

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 3>be in the home run Derby. And speaking of the Derby, Welsh,

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 3>did you see they changed the rules again?

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>See what we're doing? I read them and I here

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was the first response.

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I get it.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>When I read it, I was like, just SMI, what

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>do we make this easy? What are all these like?

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 3>I think they did forty.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand it. They said there's like forty pitchers

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and this and that.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Just put a clock on that harder one thing they

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 3>did make easier. So in case you missed it. So

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 3>the home run Derby this year, instead of it being

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 3>single elimination brackets, there's just gonna be like a pool

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and then the top eight guys move on to the

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 3>bracket stage. That's fine. I like that better because the

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 3>whole bract like why should a guy who hits twenty

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 3>home runs it loses to a guy who's twenty one

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 3>not advanced when a guy hits eight. That's how they

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 3>do like they.

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Do it like the high school home run Derby's. It's

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the same way.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, easy, but you're right, this whole like three minutes

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 3>or forty pitches thing.

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And then you get extra time if you hit one,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>four one.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Make it easy, Make it easy? Yeah, why do they

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 3>have to do it?

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Take it easy? You're on third Street.

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Gosman, he's been taking it easy. Like what is

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 3>going on? Talk about checkl and hide this year Kevin

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Gossman against seven runs. Now, I know it's against the Yankees,

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>but Soda wasn't in the lineup four things against the Yanks.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 3>He walk five, struck out seven. He's been all over.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>The more, more Jekyl than Hyde unfortunately.

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree, And this was a guy too. If

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>you recall not healthy going into the season. Remember in

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 3>spring training was was it an elbow or shoulder? I

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 3>can't even remember now.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter it was it was something we should

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>have been more concerned about.

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 3>I was super concerned, and I wasn't. I was full

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Bogman on.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>That, and I should have been a little bit more.

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But he's been a disaster. He's been one of the

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>big focal points in my my Shota like analysis of

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>these two pitch pitchers. But I mean he has just

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>more been blatantly in our faces. Expected era is over

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>five right now, brutally bad, kazered down walks, don't look good.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>He has an eleven point three barrel percentage given up against.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at his pitch mix too, here's

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the problem. I mean, I wish I could show this

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on screen. His splitter is not in the zone. It's

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it's you know. So when you do like a heat map,

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you'll see like blue, that's where some of the pitches go,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it gets the dark red is where that

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is a predominant part of the pitch. The predominant area

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of that splitter is outside of the zone. So what

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? You sit on fastballs and guess what

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>his fastball has been worse. It is dead red middle

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of the zone. It's lost a mile per hour. I'm out.

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Someone in the chat right when we started was like,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>should I get rid of relicst Gosman.

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I can't drop him, but maybe somebody sees him as

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 3>a by low and maybe you can flip him for something.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I might like, I don't know the context of your team.

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Gossman might be dropable. In a ten team, you would

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>be trade him. Yeah, if they trade off, I think

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they could look, but I think his values that are

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>an all time low. They probably don't. If you have

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>if there are good streamable options. You are better streaming

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>than you are dealing with Kevin Gosman rest of year

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because every every underlying metric is telling us a really

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>bad story. Inefficient as far as strikeouts, expected numbers bad.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>He's getting barreled up and he's inefficient. So I'm out.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It could fix, but I don't need to be there.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>You are better streaming unless you're in like a deeper

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>league than that makes it a lot tougher. But even

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve teams, there's probably viable pitchers out there that would

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>make more sense than dealing with Gosman. It's bad, bad.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Tristan mackenzie not the only guy that got sent down,

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 3>Tylord the terrible Tyler McGill gets sent down to Syracuse.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 3>So we're getting bhutto or getting Christian Scott back Welsh, Well.

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say Christian Scott. I think they even said

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Christian Scott was going to be down, you know, just

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to kind of like maintain some innings, but he wasn't

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>done for the year.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Well that's a good thing. Now. What we do like

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 3>to do here on the program is talk a little trade,

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 3>and it's a great time of year where teams are

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 3>realizing if they're in or out. So it's time to

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 3>talk some trades for week fifteen with Joey p and

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 3>the Welsh. So Welsh who is on the board for

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 3>us this week when it comes to making moves.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, I've got call them definitives. I've got

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>three players that I'm involving in trades that I'm gonna

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>give you. But I want to have a public congress

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>station here. So here's going to be the question. So

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>people in the chap can comment, and anyone watching this

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on demand after the fact comment below. Should we be

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>trading Garrett Crochet? I believe Garrett Crochet kind of sits

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in this Louis Heel world conceptually. Everybody feels there's a

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of those guys. It's hey, this guy seems like

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of limited a little bit, and they've performed well.

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Everybody and their mother last month said this is the

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>best time to trade Luise Heel. If you said the

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>same thing about Garrett Crochet, it hasn't paid off because

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>since June first, Garrett Crochet has the seventh best era

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in baseball at one point nine to one. What it

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>ranks doesn't matter, that's elite. This might matter. He has

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>since June first, the best K per nine in baseball

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>at thirteen point thirty eight, the best K percentage at

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven point eight in all of baseball qualified. And

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>this is the craziest one, the best K minus walk percentage,

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So I mean he doesn't walk. It's around like four

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>percent thirty three point eight percent K minus walk percentage.

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>No picture in that period of time has also had

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>a higher war So the what we know that's a

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>bonus here is any trade he has that he you know,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>he goes moves off, it's a bonus for him. So

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you're taking all these amazing numbers, and then if he

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>goes somewhere else, this is amazing here, But then we

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>have the dreaded innings cap here. So I think this

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>is more fascinating. There's been more public talk about Luise

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Heal in that situation, and he has regressed. Garrett Crochet

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>went through his regression if you remember, after like the

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>first month and bounce back. He has been one of

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the best pitchers in all of baseball and can only

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>get better if traded. But the cap is out there.

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So the question is, and I'll ask you, Joe, are

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.239
<v Speaker 1>you trading Garrett Croche knowing that whoever buys is going

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to try to sell you on that they may get

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>their innings limited, And do you want to trade him

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>because you think those innings are going to be capped.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I say this, I think I lean towards keeping him

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>because unlike Heel, it's a bit bigger of a guy.

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 3>You're talking about a guy who's six six two fifty

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 3>versus a guy that's six two five, So in terms

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 3>of frame, I think maybe physically he can push himself

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 3>a little bit further this year than Louis Heel, who

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 3>also Heel has had a lot of injuries in the

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 3>past two throughout his career, like that's been the thing

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of popped up. So it's a little apple

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 3>and oranges. I would also say this, I don't think

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 3>we're at peak value for a Crochet yet. I would

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 3>give it another couple of weeks and if he gets

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 3>dealt to a Yankees, a Baltimore Orioles Los Angeles Dodgers,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 3>then I look and put him out there on the

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 3>block and see if somebody wants to overpay, because if

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 3>you can overpay, then I'm definitely selling right now. I'm

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 3>a hold and for those two reasons frame and the

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.479
<v Speaker 3>other reason is I think the peak value comes when

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>he gets dealt to that definitive contender, and then possibly

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.719
<v Speaker 3>the market overpays, and that's what I'm looking for. I'm

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>not looking for a value on Crochet. I'm looking for

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 3>an overpay for Crochet.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>That's how I The other way to present it to

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the worst case scenario is the trade option is

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>too high, they don't trade him, he stays a wide sock,

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and then he gets shut down. And that's the scenario

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>where you're like, oh, crap, I didn't benefit from it.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of the chat kind of saying

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna stick with it. I for the most part,

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>am gonna also hold on to Crochet in the exact

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>same vein of what I talked about with Luis Heel

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that I just I think they've already kind of they've

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>openly been trying to talk about no big shut down

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>with him. The trade option makes it really valuable. But

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a peak. He has been, i mean,

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>arguably the best pitcher over the last month, but he's

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>facing these big things. And Wonky also said the thing

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that I alluded to. We don't know if a team

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>trades for him, if there will be a cap. We

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>assume there won't be because they're trading for him. So

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious that what everybody has to say Chat looks

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>like most at least in the life Chat are not

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>trading on the hold. Yeah, but what about everybody. I

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think he's watching on demand and.

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I kind of dropped a whole moments below on the

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 3>YouTube channel.

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching, unless it's a big offer, I'm only

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>taking big offers. People have got got to give me

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a big offer if I'm moving off, because I think

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you're better set. So here are three players that are

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>on a trade mind right now. One is Luis Robert

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>another white sock in here, and I think I am

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>trading four. On the year, Roberts got nine homers, three

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases, but he's hitting just two h five so

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that return luster gone since June tenth. Five homers, two

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases, So we've seen a big power output, but

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>his average is still kind of suffered around two seventeen.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>But he's had one of the worst babbitbs in baseball

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in that June tenth period time around two forty four,

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>but he's dropped his k percentage during that time over

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>five percent versus the start of the year. He's walking

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>more and on top of like you know, the luck

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>aspect of the BABBB, there is still a potential for

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge trade and if you're if he's to be

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 1>traded out, I think that again that helps his RBI

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>run opportunities. He's been babbacked a little bit. He's getting better,

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>he's getting his feet under and it's kind of the

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>same like this isn't like the Garrett Cole spring training thing,

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>but he missed significant time and he's starting to show

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>those signs. So I'm trying to buy low on Luis

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Robert right now, where people a little frustrated by seeing

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the overall average. Number two is another player I'm trading for.

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a pitcher trading four red Sox cutter Crawford three

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>point five to four ERA, nine point two nine k

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>per nine and just under three walks per nine. Those

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>are the season totals, but he's just a three to

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>seven record three wins seven losses on the year, which

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have kept his overall ranking on a lot of those

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>stats kind are those sites because it's low. Three wins

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get you a whole lot, But since June tenth,

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>has the tenth best K percentage in baseball thirty two

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>point five percent and the tenth best K minus walk

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>percentage at twenty five percent. Those are great numbers. In

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that same period of time, he's got a three six

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>six ERA and a three Sierra, so even better regressional

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like ERA numbers. The homers are a little bit of

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a problem with him, and there's been some babb luck

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in his favor. I think it's been on one to

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy five in that period of time, but the no

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>wins has kept that value down. It doesn't keep him

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.959
<v Speaker 1>in the top range. I think Cutter Crawford is a

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>great guy to try to target. And then finally, Joe,

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious with what you're gonna have to say about this.

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I am trading away a player and the performance has

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit wonky. Not penguin, but wonky. And

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a name value trade. I

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>am trading away Astros Framber Valdez. He's got a four

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>yeah four eleven ERA six wins and a horrible seven

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>point one seven K per nine and over three walks

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>per nine on the year, so those ratios bad. His

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>sierra over four, his expected era over four underlying his

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>sinker two miles per hour slower this year. And what's

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>even been worse is his curve is out of the zone.

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's primary on the low part of the zone when

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.959
<v Speaker 1>it's good. This year it's been sitting outside of the zone,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is also I think made his change up

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>less effective. His change up is getting hit around two

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>sixty batting average against. So this is I don't like

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the underlying stats. I really don't like anything about it.

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I am trading out name value on Framber Valdez probably

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>rather Ronel Blanco at this point, so trading away Framber.

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>What say you about Framber knowing he's underperformed on the year,

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>great context of a team, you've got the history of him.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Are you pushing back against me.

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 3>On this just a little? Because I believe enough in

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 3>Framber's body of work that I think, like some other teams,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 3>they flip the switch when it's go time, and I

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 3>think Framber's enough for me. Where I look at the

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 3>next three months of the season, I say whatever, rather

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I have Gospan or where I have Framber Valdez. I'd

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.959
<v Speaker 3>rather Framber Valdez, so I'm willing to go in for that.

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Tucker has been out a couple weeks. I'm willing to say, yeah,

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 3>it hasn't been a good first half, or maybe our expectations,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 3>But to me, Framber was always more of a one

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 3>A than a one anyway. So maybe there's even value

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 3>on trading for him, because maybe this's a better version

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 3>now of the stature giving out there a little concerning

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 3>the miles per hour being down, little concerning there's no

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 3>doubt about that. But but I will say I'm probably

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 3>more on the if I can get him on the cheap, yes,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 3>If I'm paying high costs, no, But those are really

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 3>good names and some great conversations too. If you've got questions,

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 3>make sure you go to fanspros dot com. Check out

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 3>all the Bilos sell high articles on there on fanspros

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 3>dot com on the MLB page, and that, my friends

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 3>is talking trades for week fifteen. Let's do a little

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 3>up and down here real fast here Byron Buxton. How

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 3>good has he been recently? Three eighty nine five homers,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 3>two steals or his last fifteen games two to four

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 3>with a three run homer yesterday, Brandon Nimmo three for

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 3>five with a dinger, and Brandon Fott eight strikeouts. That's right,

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 3>go fot go. No decision against the A's, but still

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 3>we'll take it. Three down. Cole Irvin just three and

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 3>two thirds innings, give up five runs. Ranger Suarez not

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a good out and for him six earned run. He

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 3>is starting to come back to earth a little bit,

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 3>which is not surprising. Regressions a hell of a drug.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 3>And shoey Otani oh for five with three strikeouts, but

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 3>that's okay because he pretty much hits a homer every

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 3>other day. Injuries. Both kyleeg Shwarber and Bryce Harper went

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 3>on the il this weekend after Friday's shows. So again,

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 3>if the Phillies are going to struggle, this is the

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 3>time of year you want to struggle in July. You

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 3>get healthy in August and September, and you roll into

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. Casey Miz left the game on Sunday with

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 3>a leg injury. Vlad Guerrero said his right hand was

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 3>sore on Sunday after getting hit by Garrett Cole, but

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 3>he said he's going to be okay.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.719
<v Speaker 1>To play seven. By the way Cole hit him.

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, because his control is so good. He's

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 3>got such a good feel for pitching. He's hitting flat boy.

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 3>You walked right into that.

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I just feel I said, we should feel good that

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he hit him ninety seven.

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 3>It was a little bit. I love this. This is fun.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 3>We're having fun. Mitch Garver got hurt, speaking of right

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 3>risk contusions. Corey Seeger was out with the hand issue

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 3>after getting hit by pitch on SAT. We'll see keep

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 3>an eye on that, but everything seems to be okay.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Elias Diaz is back from the io and Won Soto

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 3>did not play yesterday, but he says he's okay. No

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 3>structural damage. Just some swelling there, Welsh, just a little swelling.

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>It's Monday, a short slate of games, but we've got

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 3>some fun bets for today's best Bets of the Day

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 3>with Joey p and the Welsh. Make sure you go

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 3>over to Bet three sixty five Bet five bucks, get

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifteen bonus bets when you use the

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 3>promo code leading off only at Bet three sixty five.

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Gambling problem called one one hundred Gambler or one one

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 3>hundred bets off in Iowa. Terms and conditions apply. Welsh.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.479
<v Speaker 3>It's James Would day, so all my bets are James

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Wood related. Here we go, James would RBI over point

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 3>five plus two forty. James Wood to hur his first

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 3>home run and his debut against Peterson today against the

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 3>New York Mets over plus eight hundred, let's go, and

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 3>James Wood to get a stolen base over point five

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 3>plus nine hundred. That's some big money to sit there

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 3>and enjoy watching James Wood. You could throw money on

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 3>all three of these things. If all three hit, you're

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 3>super happy. If one of them hit, you're having a

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 3>good day. That's how I look at this, Welsh. I

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 3>love these returns on investment. It's all James Wood all

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 3>the time. What do you have for the people on this? Really?

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Ten tiny stus?

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>What a fun same game parlay that would be too.

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>To just do all of those, you'd be like, that's

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five thousand or some nonsense. I've actually got, well,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'll do this first. It's not my

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite bet of the day, but I did do this.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a James Wood based bet. I was looking kind

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of in the same area. Here's a little trepidation the homer.

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I do like this call. You actually avoided the one.

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to bet that I didn't in its total bases,

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and that would be playing for a double because James

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Wood going up against a lefty. He's a lefty, but

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he has hit really well over three hundred against lefties

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, has as many homers against lefties I believe

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>as righty's, but only has one double against lefties this year.

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So he has had that big power swing, but he

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>has not had any other extra base ability. I mean

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>literally six extra base hits against lefties all year, mainly homers.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't want to play the doubles. I can

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>get down with the homer. He steals bases. I just

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>went with a hit, and actually, guess what, it's actually

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>doable as far as his only is one hit is

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>minus one fifty on the books right now, but I'm

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>parlaying it. So give me James Wood one hit and

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Alvarez one hit plus thirty three, so it's a

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>single hit parlay for both of those guys. I'm down

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>with him getting a hit. Actually, your stolen base one

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is super super sneaky. It is fun. We should free.

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>James Wood doesn't strike out a bunch, gets on base

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>batting average against lefties and righties. That's why any of

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>these bets are fun, So have some with it my

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>other bets. I'm going Houston through the first five money

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>line minus one thirty. That's better than the actual full

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>game money line. So Houston's just got to be up

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>by a run. This is a good matchup. Hunter Brown

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>has been good. Yario Rodriguez eh so minus one thirty

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>first five and this is one the Mets in Houston

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>no run first inning nurfhy minus one reasoning Gore is

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>given up only three earned runs in the first inning

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>all season long, one of the best first run pitchers

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>against the other side, where Washington is the worst first

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>run scoring team in baseball. So Gore shutting down the

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Mets and Washington really not gonna be able to get there.

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I will say one other quick one. I was very

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tempted about this. This is wild the Rockies game. The

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Rockies no run first inning, it's Gomber and just forgetting

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the other person, Gomber, it is plus one twenty plus

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>one twenty if you take the no run first inning

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>minus one sixty that they're gonna score, so I've never

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen that all season long. They are giving

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you plus money that one will not happen minus won sixty.

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>A run has to score. The reason why Austin Gomber

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is the worst pitcher in baseball in the first inning.

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>He's given up twenty three earned runs in the first

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>inning this year. That's crazy. That's why he stinks. He's awful.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But you can get plus money if you want to

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>live risky. There you go, have some fun short slate,

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>best bets of the day. There you go.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Everybody download the betting pros apps. Start betting smarter, not harder. Today.

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, Welsh, let's take a look at the homer

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 3>board after this weekend. Joey p moving up twenty three.

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's go look at elscal at thirty though, oh my god,

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm still seven away from the lead. But still up there, Welsh,

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 3>you did get a home run this weekend, I believe.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 3>And sticking with the theme, my home run call today

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 3>James Wood let's go, Welsh, I'm all in, chips are in.

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait to watch him tonight. Where are you

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:35.239
<v Speaker 3>going for your home run call?

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to do that. Too, but I

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Come do it.

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's just do it just for once. You know, it's

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 3>just picked the same time.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll join you and me, James Wood. Where are you

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>picking three best I was gonna pick Yourdan Alvarez, but

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you me, James Wood, Three best friends anyone's ever had.

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's go there, you go, everybody, make sure you go

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 3>over our discord Fanspros dot com slash chat join that

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>today and don't forget. Also, the cycle will be back

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 3>with another episode this week. And if you are enjoying

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 3>all the shows, please we ask you kindly. If you're

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 3>here a peanut and a cracker jack every day, every

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 3>other day, or even once in a while just listening

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 3>to the shows, please go to Fantasypros dot com slash mlbreview.

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 3>It takes a few seconds to leave a kind review

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 3>of the show five stars or bust. Please we appreciate

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 3>you again. It takes about thirty seconds to do Fantasypros

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 3>dot Com slash mlbreview. And somebody is gonna win in

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Orlando Cabrera, Montro Expos Jersey just for doing that great

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 3>show today. Tomorrow will recap James Wood and everything else

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 3>that'll do it for us, but the story of the

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 3>game goes on for the Welsh. I'm Joey P. Well

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 3>see you next time. Kids.

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, piece of candy. Ooh, piece of candy.

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 2>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 2>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 2>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB