WEBVTT - Here’s How Messy a Russian Bond Default Could Be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe. Did you know that

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a sort of side hobby in the history

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of Russian debt? I thought it was Chinese debt. It's both.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Actually they kind of fit together, um for reasons that

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I could tell you about much later on. But it's

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting topic all around and throughout history. Russian

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>debt has, you know, for at least a couple of times,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of burst into the public consciousness, the first time

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineteen hundreds with the eighteen default on

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Czarist imperial bonds, and then with another I think it

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was a near default in the end on Brady bonds

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>that were issued by Russia. And now we're in another moment,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>moment where it seems like everyone's going to be talking

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about Russian debt yet again, are there other holders of

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>those early who are obscure courts somewhere trying to collect? Uh?

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of investors who throughout the years

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have tried to collect on Czarist imperial debt. Yes, but

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to talk about what's happening right now, which

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>could also lead to a protract protracted series of litigation

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in various courts. But we're recording this on Wednesday, March sixteen,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and it is the day that Russia is supposed to

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be paying about a hundred seventeen million dollars worth of

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>interest on two dollar bonds. And the question is not

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>only is it going to be able to pay those bonds,

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but what happens on other types of bonds? Is it

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>going to pay those out in rubles? Are those going

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to constitute a default? What jurisdiction, could litigation actually happen

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in There are so many questions and swirling around this depth. Well,

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to me, part of the question is like, okay, what

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we think of a country defaulting on its bonds and

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>then it goes in It gets punished by the market

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in some way, it's out of the market for a

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>long time. Investors don't want to touch it. But it

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>feels like in the case of Russia, due to the

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>sanctions and the voluntary sanctions, it's already been cut off

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>from the world. I mean, it's hard to imagine what

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>is the scenario enrich Russia gets more cut off from

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. Part of me is wondering, even if as

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they do pay bonds. How given the cut off of

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, banks and other financial intermediaries, so how literally

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>do you make the payment? Obviously, they're the questions of

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>does Russia even have the hard courrege here of the

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>access after having lost so much access to uh its

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>f X reserves. So there are all kinds of reasons

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>why obviously the default is in question, or the sort

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of question about payments, but also like what does it

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>even mean to default in this environment? Right? And do

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the normal sort of mechanisms of push and pull actually apply.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Um So I'm very pleased to say that we really

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do have the perfect guests to talk about this. We

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to be speaking with Mittu Kulati. He's a

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>professor of law at University of Virginia. He's also been

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>on the show i think a number of times at

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this point and is an all round expert in the

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>topic of sovereign debt. We also have Mark Wedemeyer. He

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is a professor of law at University of North Carolina.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So thank you so much to you both for coming

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>on all thoughts, You're welcome, thanks for having us. So

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should just start with a big picture question,

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>how unusual is the situation that we currently find ourselves

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in when it comes to Russian debt, are there any

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>historic parallels that we can look to? You know, I

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Russia has defaulted on its a couple of times previously,

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>But how much do those historic situations actually apply to

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the current events. It is him think to say that

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there aren't historical precedents, and there probably isn't anything directly

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on point, although maybe Mark will correct me, since he

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>knows bits of this history a lot better than I do.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>But in the last century, in the century prior, where

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there was lots of sovereign debt being issued, most sovereign

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>debt was issued in order to finance wars, and when

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>war would break out, some countries stopped paying because they

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>had to use the money to fight wars, or they

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>stopped paying because some of the investors were located in

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the country that it was fighting against. So many of

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the questions that we are asking today literally today, did

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>come up and were analyzed by the leading international law

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>experts of the time. It's just that it was over

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years ago and today we've all forgotten what

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>those answers were. Now, those of us who are concerned

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>about this are busy dredging up are really old international

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>law books to figure out what happens in this context.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if Mark has at different read

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of this history. No, I think that that's right. I

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the difference here is that we have kind

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of forgotten in the modern world just how much geopolitical

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>tension sometimes companies. Uh, let's assume by the time your

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>listeners here this, there's been a Russian default. We've kind

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of forgotten how much geopolitical tension often is associated with that.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And we've gotten used to thinking about private creditors and

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>their enforcement rights, and what the role of litigation is

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, and so in some ways, what's unique

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about this is the combination of those two things. Explain

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that further. I mean, you know, it's easy to think

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 1>of some of the potential locations. Obviously, there's the sanctions

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, the role of private creditors, their ability ability

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to enforce their payout. I mean, it's inconceivable, I guess,

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>to even imagine what a jurisdiction or what court things

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>would apply at these days with the sanctions. But talk

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit more about how complicated this

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>situation is. From a historical perspective. Well, it's it's it's

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>complicated in all kinds of ways. One of them is

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that you've got, at the one point, this really tempting

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>set of targets Russian assets that are frozen abroad, assets

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>belonging to agents who are maybe acting on behalf of

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Russian government. And yet you know, the reality is

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>nobody who is a creditor of the government is going

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>to be able to find enough assets to sees and

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>to force the sale of and to get their claim

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>paid in full. And this is a game for patient creditors,

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the gamble, as you can be enough of a pain

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>in the butt to a country for long enough that

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it will decide it's better off paying you than it

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is to keep fighting. And you know, recent historical experience

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>suggests the Russians are plenty capable of out waiting even

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the most determined kinds of creditors. So the the question

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is whether you expect to be able to to change

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that calculus in the in the near future. Can I

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>ask Mark a question that my students have been asking me. Mark,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I know you are literally the world's leading expert on

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this concept of veil piercing in the sovereign debt context,

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can creditors, even at a low probability UH estimation, go

0:07:54.920 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>after any of the oligarch assets. My sense from reading

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>your writing is this is not utterly implausible, but I

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't asked you the questions, so I'm asking you here

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it is not utterly implausible. But one way to kind

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of set a baseline here is to recognize that there

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>have been creditors the for the UK shareholders and others

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>who have been doing exactly this thing, going after Russian

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>state owned enterprises, going after individuals for years and years

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and years on this theory that these other people were

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>really the alter egos of the Russian government, and for

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the most part they have struck out. So I guess

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the question I would be asking myself if I were

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a creditor now is whether I think courts are going

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to be more receptive to that argument, both because the

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>tensions between the of the home states of these courts

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Russian government men are so much greater, but

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>also maybe courts are going to be more aware of

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>how the Russian government acts through intermediaries abroad. If you

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>think that courts are suddenly going to get more receptive

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to those arguments, then you know, maybe this seems like

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a much more appealing prospect, but it hasn't had any

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>luck so far. I want to get into a lot

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of these jurisdiction questions, but maybe before we do, we

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>could talk a little bit about what Russian debt actually

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is and how it's structured, because I think the country

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>as a whole has about a hundred fifty billion in

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>foreign currency debt, and that's issued by the government and

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, big companies like gas Prom, But within the

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>subset of bonds actually issued by the Russian sovereign there

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>are different types of debt, and this is something that

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the market is starting. It seems to focus on the

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>difference between certain bonds versus others. And some of these

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bonds have something called, you know, an alternative payment currency

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>event clause, which a lot of people are digging into

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Could you maybe explain to us exactly

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>what that looks like and how normal it is to

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>see those in a sovereign debt. So these clauses are

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are not normal at all. And we looked a lot

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Russian debt, Russian Ukrainian debt at the time

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Crimean invasion two fourteen, and we realized then

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>that some of these terms and that was debt that

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Russia had lent to the the dictator in Ukraine at

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the time in order to prop him up. And we

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>realized then that desponds wild structured as international euro bonds,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have some weird clauses in them, unusual. And you guys

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>know this market, this is a market completely dominated by boilerplate,

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>where it's just cut and paste transactions that don't take

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>more than a few minutes. And we knew then that

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Russia was doing weird things. Now, this alternate payments clause,

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I have only seen it in the recent Russian bonds. Literally,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the bonds issued after the Crimean invasions seem to have

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>a clause in them that anticipates Russia misbehaving and sanctions

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>being increased. I mean, it is astonishing to read the

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>risk disclosures in these bonds. I think there's something like

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight pages. Uh, and Mark can correct me,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight pages talking about all the bad things

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that Putin has done, invade here, you know, take over

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>their human rights violation somewhere else, and telling investors, look,

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know there might be sanctions, and if there are sanctions,

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna pay in rubles. As Mark articulated it to

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>me a couple of days ago, it's as if the

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>investors are, uh, I'm giving putin insurance for doing bad stuff,

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and that the true irony is that many of these

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>investors are the ones who have been running around touting

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>their E. S G. Cred and at the same time

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>they're giving putin insurance to you know, take over Ukraine.

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm I'm probably overstating this, but yes, these clauses

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are very weird, and there are a form of insurance

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>protection for Russian misbehavior. You know, it's interesting to hear

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the nature of these bonds issued after the annexation of Crimea.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the degree to which that incident that

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>hostile uh, that hostile act did not seem to phase uh,

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>so many players across the rest of Europe. And I'm

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking also about a recent episode that we did on

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>natural gas and you think, okay, that could have been

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a moment where say, you know, countries decided, well maybe

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't be some reliant on Russian natural gas. Uh.

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Nothing changed. And now if you're describing kind of the

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>same phenomenon where you say these E s G. Minded

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>investors saw the annexation. Then Russia went on to put

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.599
<v Speaker 1>in these clauses. Can you just can you talk a

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about more what specifically are in these clauses,

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>what do they say, and then what do they mean

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>right now? And I shouldn't know just briefly for those

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>who don't have a terminal looking at terminal, and I

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know about the specifics here, but you know, obviously

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Russian bond prices have been absolutely killed. Dollar bonds that

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>were over a hundred on the dollar at the beginning

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of February now around eleven sends, some more short term

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>euro bonds UH in the thirties. So just for the

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>context here, all types of you know, Russian Russian liabilities

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 1>having been killed. But why don't we talk more specifically

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>about what is in these clauses and what they mean

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 1>for for lenders. Basically, the clauses say that if for

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons beyond Russia's control, I don't know if that's an

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>exact quote, but it's pretty close, if for reasons beyond

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>its control, it can't come up with whatever currency the

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>bond is denominated in, then there's a list of kind

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of heart currencies that it falls back on, and if

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for reasons beyond its control, it can't come up with

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those, then it pays in rubles, and they don't.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't say anything beyond that. And so the question

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>really is for this subset of the Russian bonds, whether

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions regime UH and the inability to access foreign exchange,

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>whether that it constitutes a circumstances outside Russia's control, or

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>whether really the whole thing is within Russia's control, because

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they could just turn the tanks around and presumably the

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sanctions would be lifted. There's something else that's in the

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bonds that's relatively unusual, or I should say there's something

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's lacking in the bonds. Um, it doesn't include a

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>waiver of immunity, I think, or a clause that sort

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of submits to the jurisdiction of foreign courts. Can you

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>explain exactly what that means and how it relates to

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, for instance, if Russia said, um, it can't

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily do this today, but on future payments, if it said, well,

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for reasons outside of our control, we're going to pay

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>these bonds in rubles instead of dollars or euros, and

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>then foreign investors decide, hey, we don't like that. We're

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>going to take Russia to court to argue against this.

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean from a jurisdictional perspective are they

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to do that? So this is

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the perfect follow up question to what Joe asked. So

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you have this clause that, as Mark described, says, you know,

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if for reasons beyond our control, uh, we are unable

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay in dollars franks, uh um euros, we'll pay

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you in brubles. But the contract doesn't say who gets

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to determine beyond control? I mean, does putin get to determine? Oh,

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I've I've decided you can't pay in dollars anymore. So

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's beyond the control of the treasury to pay. And

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>normally when you would have a question like this, the

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>place you would go is you would go to the

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction clause and the bonds to see where do these

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>cases get brought? Where has the sovereign submitted to jurisdiction,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Where has it waived its immunity and these bonds again,

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is unusual again, and it is our fault

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>for not noticing this or paying greater attention to this

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>before the clauses explicitly say we have not submitted to

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction anywhere. And the clauses explicitly say we have not

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>weve sovereign immunity. Now here's the twist, though, I think

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on first reading, if you are not a jurisdiction specialist,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you would think okay. So basically they can't be taken

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>into court anywhere. They have not waved sovereign immunity and

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>they don't submit to jurisdiction anywhere. That is wrong because

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>if you go out and reach investors and sell them

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar bonds or you send them Euro bonds, and you

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>do that in New York or London, even though you

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>say I don't agree to jurisdiction anymore, the courts there

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>can say, hey, you came into our jurisdiction, you sold investor.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Response here we are taking jurisdiction and you're engaged in

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>commercial activity, so we are deeming you to have waves

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>sovereign immunity. So in a sense, Russia might think that

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>they haven't consented to any of these court jurisdiction, but

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be wrong. Can I ask, what

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is the consequence of actually defaulting? So Russia may have

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>means at its disposal to avoid technically defaulting. Okay, doesn't

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>pay in dollars or some other hard currency, but it

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>pays in rubles, so okay, technically it avoids default. But again,

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the context of this very unusual situation,

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what does that even mean Because normally we think about,

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of catastrophic consequences for a country that

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't pay. Uh, it's for creditors. But in this situation,

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Russia is already dramatically cut off in a way that's

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>far worse than what we would expect to see any

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>sovereign debt or experience in the event of a default.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is the hard question. I think that investors

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are faith sing. It's kind of hard to know what

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to make of the Let's assume again that there has

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>been a default by the time the episode airs. Your choices,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I could accelerate the bond and I could decide I'm

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go to court, as me Too says, I

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>can probably convince a court in London or maybe New

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>York to take jurisdiction. But if I do this, I'm

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in it. For the long haul. You know, I'm I'm

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna I've picked my path, and I'm gonna be fighting

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>with the Russian government for god knows how many years

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.239
<v Speaker 1>into the future. Or I can sit around and I

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>can hope that this thing resolves in a way that

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>allows for the resumption of payments. I have to think

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that for most investors, maybe not for the die hard

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>subset who liked the litigation game, but for most investors,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>going to court and accelerating the dead is a pretty

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>unappealing prospect right now. But we'll see it. The longer

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this drags out, the more that calculus might change me too.

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe you have a different view of it. No.

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, my view in some ways, unless Mark you

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way we could start attaching those oligarch assets,

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is that if you're really only chasing the Russian state. Uh,

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>this is difficult, and we could probably take some lessons

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>here from the attempts of jilted investors to chase after

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Russian state for expropriation in the Yukost case. Uh this,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think bond investors haven't really paid very

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>much attention to this, But there's basically, I think it's

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>upwards of sixty billion dollars in claims that for which

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:53.719
<v Speaker 1>jilted investors have received judgments against Russia, and Russia just

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>have no intention of paying, and the markets don't seem

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to have penalized Russia for this uh in the recent past,

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>continuing to believe, oh, maybe they'll behave well with respect

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to the bonds, even though they're behaving so badly with

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>respect to other claims. And you know that. I mean,

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>this is what we all talked to our students about

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>reputational consequences and how the sovereign debt market is. UH,

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it is such a robust reputational market, it might mean,

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the recent experience maybe makes us think

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>that's complete ble. I mean, you sort of touched on

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this um before, But when we talk about going after

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>oligarch's assets, I'm getting flashbacks to you know, Paul Singer

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>seizing at Argentine boat and stuff like that. To what

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>extent could it be possible that the legal industry they're

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>less sympathetic to Russia in this context, or that they

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>harden up their view of Russia and it does become

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>easier to pursue those assets. I mean, to some extent,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen this, right, A lot of things have

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>changed over the past two weeks. Things that we thought

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>were difficult to push through legally seemed to have been

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>done very quickly. And if they're not done purely through

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the law, they've been done through self sanctioning and companies

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and people voluntarily cutting Russia out of the system. So

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, is there the possibility that it begins

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to change? Yes, Now, what I handicap that possibility? Uh? No,

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I I or at least I wouldn't know how to

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>do it. But if you think about some of the

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>recent developments that might be relevant here, they're actually not

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>what one would expect from the usual kind of credit

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>or activity. They're not courts being a little more receptive

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to assets. There are things like the U. S. Government

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>just deciding that it's gonna use bunch of Afghan Central

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank assets to pay some creditors. You know that the

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this is why the geopolitics actually matters quite a lot.

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not clear to me that the real way to

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>get at Alagur assets here is you convince a court

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that they're the alter ego of the Russian government and

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you attach them and you have an execution sale. But

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>governments are coming mighty close to just expropriating assets when

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they feel that that's necessary as part of the sanctions

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>regime and that they've got the political support to do so.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know whether we should expect the

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>wholesale expropriation and redistribution of OI assets, but I do

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think that anybody with a bone of legal realism in

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>their body has to think that courts and other legal

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>actors are going to be more receptive to this kind

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of thing now than they were five years ago or

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>even frankly a month ago. Presumably for the creditors, though

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this sort of more political expropriation as opposed to the

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>court avenue is less appealing in the sense that if

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it just sort of goes through sort of political apparatus,

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is those those assets, aren't that's serily going to be liquidate,

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 1>liquidated to the benefit of creditors. Well maybe and maybe

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>not so. What we've seen recently with the Iranian Central

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Bank assets and the most recently with the Afghan Central

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Bank assets is that the administration, I think, using executive

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>order and then some Congressional Action has said, you know,

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we're we're making these uh wide open, fat and happy

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for a certain subset of claimants to go after. So

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this is this is very different. At the beginning of

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you and Tracy were talking about the analogies

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>or in memories of the eighteen default on the tsars

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Um debts back then and then subsequently, you know, when

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Germany defaults in the Nazi era and the governments were

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>very careful about not doing things to make enable private

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>claimants to seize foreign state assets. Today that's completely changed.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Governments are much more willing to say to private creditors

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>they're not behaving, well, gonna make make it possible for

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you to seize that assets. Now. I'm not sure if

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>President Biden will use that path today to allow Paul

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Singer and his lawyers to go after these assets. But

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look at who's talking in the press today,

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>who is salivating at the possibility of seizing assets, and

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to read between the lines, I think a

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of those actors in the Argentine episode are are

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got their guns ready? If I can just add

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>one quick point, I think that the so there's two

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>things here, at that point in slightly different directions. One is,

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to the extent we're looking at these non traditional ways

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to distribute assets, then financial creditors are going to be

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>competing with other claimants and will maybe not be the

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>most sympathetic of the group. So it certainly wasn't to

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>help financial creditors that off ghun or around in central

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>bank assets were um, we're accessed. The other thing I

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>just want to point out there was one of the

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>reasons why efforts to get at Russian assets failed historically

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in the recent years anyway, is because countries were worried.

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>The Russians explicitly threatened, Hey, if you let private creditors

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>get at our assets, we're gonna do the same thing

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.479
<v Speaker 1>to your assets here, and of course we'll gin up

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>some claims, uh, and you're we're going to expropriate in

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>effect your assets here. Query weather. That kind of threat

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>which was quite effective at getting UH, courts and legislators

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe to back off their willingness to let creditors

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>get at Russian assets. Query Weather. That kind of threat works.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you know you mentioned uh, the sort of types

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that were active in the Argentina situation circling now, and

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I realized we've we've made it about thirty minutes into

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>this podcast without actually mentioning Perry Passu. Uh So maybe

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we should talk about that and how it potentially applies

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to the Russia's situation, because I think you've pointed out

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that there is another way that the Russian bonds are

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird and unique, and that has to do

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>with the way the Perry pass you pause was originally

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>um structured and then it seems to have been revised.

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So could you maybe walk us through what exactly happened

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>there and what Perry pass you is for those who

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Oh, I'm so glad you asked this question.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I love pari passu party. It's my favorite part. Pari passu,

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>which just means in Latin equal or equal step. Is

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>this old obscure clause from over a century ago at least,

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that's basically in every bond contract, And in around two thousand,

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, in an obscure case involving Peru,

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Paul Singers Operation Elliott Associates, they were trying to sue

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Peru for not paying it they had held out from

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>debt restructuring and they came up with this incredibly clever

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>strategy using the clause that basically everybody who had written

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>about it in the literature until then said, you know,

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>there's this weird clause, but we don't know why it's there.

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of old, and so we repeat it. It's

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty it has some Latin. We like Latin. And they said, hey,

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it says in equal step. In equal step means you

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>can't pay some creditors even though those creditors took you know,

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty cents on the dollar, and not pay us. Equal

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.239
<v Speaker 1>means you have to pay us an equal percentage of

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're paying. And they said, since we didn't restructure

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>our debt, you have to. If you're paying them hundred

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of their restructure debt, that means twenty cents on

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, you have to pay us hundred percent of

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>our non restructor debt, which is hundred cents on the dollar.

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And they made a killing against Peru. Everybody thought this

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.959
<v Speaker 1>strategy would never work. You know, my co authors and I,

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>which include Mark, we did interview us with basically every

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>senior sovereign debt lawyer in London and New York, and

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we said aren't you worried about this happening again, this

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy strategy, since you guys haven't changed your clauses. And

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>they said, no, no court in England or New York

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>would ever follow the crazy Brussels strategy. And Elliott Associates

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>ran the same strategy again against Argentina, and this time

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of winning about a hundred million, the two billion.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>And so now that fast forward to today. Basically every

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>international issuer in the sovereign debt market changed their clauses

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to preempt this strategy. And they did this

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>around two thousand and fourteen, I mean time of CRIMEA

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and Mark and I Mark and correct me. I thought

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the end of this story. In fact, many

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>articles were written about this is the end of the story.

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Turns out the Russian bonds have the old parti passu clause,

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the old one that Elliott won on. And I mean,

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't help but think it's either the Russians were

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so arrogant that they thought they would never get sued,

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or somebody goofed. Now there are other goofs in the

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in the specific party pass clause, and we can't tell

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>whether they're intentional or not. But the key point is

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>if I were an institution like Elliott and although they've

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>become more respectable now, I would read this clause and say, hey,

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I can run this again. I don't know what you

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>guys think, but for me, this is so fantastic. Well

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you just on that note. I mean, it does seem

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>like there was a change to the peripass you clause

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>where they deleted the idea that the peripassy would would

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of apply in the future, and it seems like

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they altered the language to suggest that it just applies

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>at one point of time. What does that mean exactly?

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Like it seems like the implication would be that the

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>government could subordinate some investors at a later date. Okay,

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>so you're really getting into the weeds of the subcrivision,

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and I that I'm enjoying sitting back and listening hearing

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Tracy's expertise. Are questions. So normally the Perry Patsu clause

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that nobody understands says the bonds rank and will rank

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>equally with all other debt, and let's not talk about

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>all of them. So again, rank and will rank. So

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a representation at the time the bond is they

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>shoot saying they all rank equally now, and then it

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>says in the future, we will continue to make sure

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>they rank equally. In the Russian clause, it says basically,

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the bonds rank equally. They deleted the words having to

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do with the future the will rank now. I think

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the question for court will be do we read it

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>as the bond just saying they ranked equally at the

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>time of issue, which makes the whole pari passu clause

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>gibberish meaningless because the whole point of the clauses that

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it protects you against future misbehavior by the sovereign. Or

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is the court going to say, oh, that looks like

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a typo. And it also doesn't make sense with they

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>have events of default saying it is an event of

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>default if the bonds no longer ranked pari passu. So

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are these giant inconsistencies in the document

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and the court's going to have to decide. And of

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>course this goes back to the fact that we have

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>no idea which court uh, but a court is going

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to have to decide are these typos or aren't these

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>brilliant strategic moves by the Russians to make sure they

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>never have liability. My guesses and Elliott associates would be

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>able to make a good argument, but again it's not clear. Tracy,

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean you you have pointed out a very crucial

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>portion of this truly obscure clause, the deletion of some

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>two words that that could be valued at a few

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Thinking about going back, I think about the

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Argentina uh Legal Fund and obviously dragged on several years.

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>As we've been talking about. Russia is a unique situation

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's already just in the last few weeks, become

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>so cut off from the world, far more than even

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>we would expect to see from a sovereign debt. Is sure,

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>how much do some of the consequences and legal questions

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that you're talking about intellect in the last few answers?

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>How much do they essentially only become relevant in a

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 1>future world down the down the line, when perhaps under

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a different UH Russian president who knows, but it's hard

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to see them in the existing one. Russia makes an

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>attempt to sort of rejoin the financial world in good

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>standing because obviously in the current moment, you know, no

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>one is going to be buying new Russian dead and

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>basically it's cut off from financially, but there could be

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a point point ten years from now or five years

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from now where a different Russian government wants to become

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the global market. Again, how much do these

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>questions essentially become relevant? Is well, the they're going to

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>have to resolve these legal fights by then in order

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to rejoin the financial system. I mean, I think this

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is not just a great question, it's the question that

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>determines whether going to court and playing the litigation game

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is worthwhile. The Argentina example is a great one because

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it was not just a few years, it was fifteen years.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>The first big chunk of that was spent chasing Argentina's

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>assets around the world and coming up mostly empty handed.

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And then everything came to a head with this pari

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>passue litigation that me too was talking about. But the

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>reason it all worked, the reason it produced a big

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>payout at the end of the day, is because there

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>was a change in government and because Argentina wanted to

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>normalize its financial and commercial relationships with the rest of

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the world. So I guess the question is this, do you,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm an investor, do I think Russia is going

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to want to normalize those relationships, or do I expect

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at Fortress Russia for the next fifteen

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>or twenty years, Because if it's the latter, I can

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have all the enforcement rights in the world that I

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>could have the best written contract that gives me the

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>most potent set of enforcement rights in the world. But

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>unless I get lucky, I'm not going to get paid.

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And one thing's for sure, most investors will not get paid.

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>The only way you get paid is when the country

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to normalize its relations Can we maybe talk a

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Ukrainian debt and what we might expect

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to see there as well, because a lot of the

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>focus has naturally been on Russia. It has a lot

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of issuance. It seems like there's a very big question

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 1>mark over whether or not it's going to be able

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to pay out on what it owes. But Ukraine has

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>issued in the market as well, and also is presumably

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>financially and perhaps operationally strange strained given uh it's fighting

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>against Russia at the moment, So what happens there? In

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>some ways this is the bigger and more interesting question

0:37:52.440 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to me Ukraine has, if I'm not mistaken, almost aboul.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>The amount of sovereign debt that Russia has somewhere in

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the range of nine plus billion dollars worth of debt,

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were already in trouble before the invasion. Right now,

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean now that that they have, by estimates hundred

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars plus in damage to their country, and they're

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>desperately spending their money and defending themselves. It seems for

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that they are going to go into default. But

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there are another couple of complicated questions here. Complicated because

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the relevant law goes back again to two hundred years ago.

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>One of which is, at some point Russia has taken

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>over in its invasion so much of Ukraine that the

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>debt becomes Russian debt, and at that point investors are

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>going to have to sue Russia for the debt. And

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>one other complications in this is what happens to the

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.399
<v Speaker 1>debt that Ukraine is desperately trying to raise right now

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in order to fight the Russians. Does does Russia have

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay that debt as well after it takes over

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine. It's not clear. The old international law actually

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>said that Russia might not have to pay that debt.

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>That strikething as completely antiquated and wrong, But that is

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>what the old law would have said. Ukraine obviously needs

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>money to fight to defend itself right now, and suppose,

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the war comes to an end in Ukraine,

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>sovereignty is intact. Is that debt treated just like any

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>other debt that would be issued in normal times? Are

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities for forgiveness of that debt? Are there other

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>ways that it can raise money beyond debt markets such

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't impose the future financial burden? Is that

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what is the optimal way to fund its defense efforts

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>internationally without creating this huge future burden? So me too

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>may have more developed thoughts on this than I do.

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>My initial reaction, first of all, is that this is

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a relatively happy set of circumstances, and so I only

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>hope that this is the problem we're dealing with down

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the road, going to commercial creditors and asking them for

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 1>concessional treatment to get you back on your feet after

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:40.479
<v Speaker 1>something like this, You know, surely there's going to be

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a restructuring. There would need to be a restructuring, and

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that commercial creditors might be a little

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:51.240
<v Speaker 1>bit more willing to participate than in the normal case.

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't see any way that you

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>even begin to restructure the debt that Ukraine has much

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>less begin the process of rebuilding without massive concessional and

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>official finance. And surely the private sector has a role

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in that. But but I I think it's a relatively

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>small one. Me too. Maybe you have a different view. No,

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are two questions, and Joe, I hope

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not misunderstanding you. I think the two questions are one,

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens now if the bond markets, the private bond

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>markets are reluctant to fund Ukraine? And then the other

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>question is what happens after all of this blows over,

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>assuming Russia doesn't take over all of Ukraine? What happens

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to Ukraine? There? I think? And maybe I'm just echoing

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what Markus saying. I think in both cases, the official sector,

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>meaning mostly Western Europe and the United States, needs to

0:41:55.440 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>step in and provide the support a provide support out

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>because the private markets are going to be reluctant to

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>support Ukraine and be promised to support them after the

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:12.720
<v Speaker 1>fact in the restructuring that is surely not their fault. Yes,

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>they're precarious, but they were they're precarious because of the

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>invasion of of Crimea, and after that invasion, the official

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>sector didn't really say this is not your fault, we're

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna help you in a big way. They made Ukraine

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>deal with the private creditors and Ukraine actually got pretty

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:39.320
<v Speaker 1>harsh treatment in that restructuring after the two thousand fourteen invasion.

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I think this time we need, we need the rest

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of the world needs to do a lot better of

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>visa b Ukraine. But those decisions have not been made.

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:50.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean that this is this has just all been

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>left up in the air, as if nobody's really thinking ahead.

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Met too. I think that's a good place to leave

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.760
<v Speaker 1>an Obviously, there are so many questions around this entire situation.

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be absolutely fascinating to see how it

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 1>all plays out. So thank you to you and Mark

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>as well for coming back on the show. Thanks, thank you,

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having us well, Joe. I found that conversation

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinating and clearly there are a lot of threads

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>to follow. But you know, one kind of crazy thing

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to think about is that I mentioned that nineteen eighteen

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 1>debt when we started. I mean, some people are still

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>holding certificates, you know, stored in their addicts you can

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>buy them off eBay and things like that, and still

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.280
<v Speaker 1>waiting for a payout and thinking it's going to happen.

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And so it's kind of weird to think that maybe

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we're in a similar situation now where people are going

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to be holding onto Russian bonds and waiting for a

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>payout a hundred years from now. Eb the real OTC,

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the original or maybe the original electronic bond marketplace. But no,

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in all seriousness, like that's sort of a century is

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. But it does seem like in

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>many cases for the investors that you know, are looking

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>for a big pay day, the bet is years and

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>years down the road, because it really does seem, uh,

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 1>there's very little prospect of some sort of I think,

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think a lot of people think that

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that as long as the current government is in place

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in Russia that there's going to be some big reproach, approach,

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a mint and reintegration. I mean, there may be some

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 1>dropping of the sanctions after the war, hopefully hopefully positive outcome,

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but it is hard to imagine a complete rollback, right

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and going back to the early status quo, and as such,

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it may be that some of the big big pad

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.359
<v Speaker 1>could be fifteen twenty years, who knows how long, how

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>far into the future totally. But the other thing that

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>this all reminded me of, and I think I've touched

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on this in various works before, but this idea that bonds,

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately they have so many, so much morality and values

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of embedded in them, and they all have a story, right,

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like these bonds were issued because of this, and it

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.439
<v Speaker 1>means I owe money to this person because of that.

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And when the story starts to shift and when the

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>values we attached to that debt start to shift, which

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 1>is arguably what we're seeing with Russia now. You know,

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>three weeks ago, Russia was investment grade and it was

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:25.280
<v Speaker 1>considered obviously not a pristine player on the international stage,

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but acceptable for people to do business with. And that

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>has just completely changed in less than a month. I

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 1>think that's a that's a really good point, and the

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of the sort of our once a new story

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is attached, then perhaps the law follows. And so a

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 1>good example that could be sort of this question of

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, our oligarch assets held abroad, can they be

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>seized and liquidated for the benefit of creditors? And maybe

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that has been very legally difficult to do in the past.

0:45:55.640 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But already, as our guests discussed, in the last few weeks,

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a rethinking of certain Western government to the

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>idea of seizing and liquidating oligarch assets. And as such,

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe what seemed to be an impossible veil to appears

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 1>previously may suddenly be possible. It just changes the environment.

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>This is exactly it. And not just liquidated to satisfy creditors,

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but could they for instance, Mark sort of hinted at this,

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 1>could they be liquidated to fund some sort of you know,

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 1>war aid or compensation for people in Ukraine? And then

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and then again right, and the fascinating question of whether

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Russia itself may be a creditor for debt being currently

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:40.919
<v Speaker 1>incurred by Ukraine's government is a fascinating question. The other

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that I found really striking is this idea that

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>again after the annexation of Crimea, Russia seemed to pay

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>no penalty. In fact that even that it's stipulated in

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it put in this new language about possible sanctions, and

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>yet it was still considered the bonds were trading strongly.

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>This idea that after this incident that almost nothing fundamentally

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>changed is incredibly striking and almost maybe shameful. Sever Yeah, um, well,

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we could talk about this for another

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>four hours, but shall we leave it there? Let's leave

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it there, all right? This has been another episode of

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joey Isn't All.

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Big

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks to our producers Magnus Hendrickson and Colm Tipton. Followed

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francisca Levi at Francesca Today

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts and Bloomberg under

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the handle and podcasts. Thanks for listening,