WEBVTT - FFW Week 14 (Fantasy Playoffs Week 1)

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, human being is your mind board? Do you think

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>about the same things every day? Then listen to the

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>End of the World with Josh Clark, the teen part

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast series that explores whether humans will survive the next

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. It takes you too amazing places, from a

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>black hole as it grows inside the Earth, to the

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>far future where we shed our bodies and uploaded ourselves

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>onto servers. It's an adventure for your mind. All ten

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the End of the World are ready to

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>bench now for free on the I Heart Radio at

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>time Now for Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan, presented

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>by grain Belt Premium and Devanni's your weekly source for

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the nation's best fantasy football speculation and advice. Fantasy Football

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is brought to you by fanball dot Com, town

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Hall Family, Greater Twin Cities, Honda Dealers, Joe Sissors, Hudson

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Ford and by Park Tavern now Wow along with fanball

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, Scott Fish, Matt Harrison, and Brian Johnson. Here's

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the fans, paul In. It is the Fantasy Football Playoffs

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and we are here to get you a win, get

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you to the second round. Hopefully some of you have

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>got a buy weekend. It doesn't even matter. You're just

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to see if you can have a great game

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>when it doesn't matter. Paul Charchy in here my co

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>host today, Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, guys, Hey,

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>how's it going. Good morning. It's going great as a

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, because it's the playoffs. It's winning in now,

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>winning in it's it's it's win and win and continue.

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Can you make it in the Church League? Number one seed? What?

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>You don't want? A bragger? But I don't know. There's

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like some sort of bird noise that we could play

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for something like that. But I know you probably have

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to pull it up. I'll pull it up. Pull it up.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>That's good, that's actually quite good. I've been really practicing

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at home. You know. I as a rule, I don't

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about my teams, and we don't talk about our

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>own teams here. Um. But I followed my own preseason advice,

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>like I banked heavily on chiefs um And and I

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just I loved Sae Kwon Barkley. He was my number

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>two ranked running back in the preseason. You don't always

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>get the one seed in the Church League. You can

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>revel in this one yeah, so I feel good about it.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>But there's no bye week in the charch, oh my gosh,

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and so I gotta play this week and my Chiefs

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have got to have got the tough match up with

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. So uh, there's I could very well be

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>bounced in this one. Speaking of teams that are getting bounced,

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one seed is getting bounced. You know who's gonna bounce them.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Derrick Henry because Derrick Henry is on is on

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>these bottom Derrick Henry is on these bottom seeded teams.

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Mostly they didn't get in right, mostly didn't get in

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>with Henry. But if you did get in, you're a

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>sixth seed or an eight seed, right, and and you're

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in and you're starting Henry. It's it's not a lot

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of them, but it's that's the scenario where it happens.

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>And those guys are going up against one seeds, it's

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna there's gonna be some Derrick Henry bouncing. I don't

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>think anybody had Derrick Henry in their lineup. In fact,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>I looked it up on Fanball for our Thursday through

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Monday slate one. But that's DFS. That's different. But how

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>many people were A in the playoffs, and B had

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing else that they could play. But Derrick Henry going

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 1>up against a Jaguars defense that was really really good

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and gave up zero points last week. There there there's

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>no reason. It was totally unexplicable, but you had you

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>should have played Henry at all. It was. It was

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a sheer desperation play if anybody did play him. But

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I asked for screenshots on Twitter at Paul Charchy and

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>lots I got lots of screenshots of people proving that,

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, showing me the live scoring that that proves

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>they had him. So Derrick Henry was out there. I know.

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm tempted to talk about what to do if you

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>went against him, but mostly people didn't. And you know,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you already know the answer to that to

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>some degree. Anyway, your your high risk, high reward players,

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>pour one out for a good season. Really yeah, right,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you're you're probably you're almost certainly cooked. If you can

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>come back, if you can, if you can beat Derrick Henry,

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that would be awfully impressive one to remember. All right,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's dive into uh dive into the show. You

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>know the bit we're still continuing with take a chance

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on me, because there are still even though it's the playoffs,

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>there are still people that have to find help, especially

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>at the running back position. With everything that's happened, Uh,

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll still have three hot questions, will still lightning round.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna break down fifteen different matchups, beginning with what

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:43.239
<v Speaker 1>should be an epically high scoring game Atlanta at Green

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Bay Scott. I see a ton of points coming in

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>this one, and I think that I think the Packers

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to uh gonna write the ship a little

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>bit here. What do you think? Yeah? I think so too,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>especially especially because that Atlanta team is really bad. It's quarterbacks.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think their second worst than the season. But I'm

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with the Atlanta side. Uh. Matt Ryan's been

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty streaky as of late, but he did face like

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans and New Orleans, Dallas and uh, I think

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the other one was Baltimore. Baltimore and Dallas have been

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough recently, so um he has three hundred plus

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and five of his last seven. His touchdowns all over

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the map. As I was kind of mentioning, But the

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>pack Uh, they have a lot of multiple touchdowns passes

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>to nearly every decent quarterback this year. Right, So I

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>like this a lot from Ryan, and you mentioned the

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>high scoring aspect. I just want to touch on that. Uh.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The line was originally forty eight. It's already up to

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty and a half. It's moving on up. So Julio

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was an obvious a for me. The last two times

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>he faced the Packers were just giant two hundred plus

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and one eight yard games, touchdowns in both uh nine

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>catches eleven, just huge games, so obviously they're Ridley is

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a dart throw for me. He's man since

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>his early season explosion. He's only top scored twice and

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>only top fifty yards twice. In those two games where

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>he hit fifty plus and scored, it took nine targets

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and thirteen targets. I don't know that he gets that

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in this one, but he's kind of a dart throw

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>because it could be a really high scoring affair. A

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>very soft Sea grade on him. Uh C grade on

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Hooper twyna and targets over the last four games is promising.

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's a resulted in two scores, but he's averaging

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>less than forty yards in those games, so a little

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>bit of PPR upside. Every tight end with seven or

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>more targets against the Packers had sixty plus yards. I

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he gets to seven targets. Yeah, dot Hooper,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I had him with a soft Sea grade. I don't

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>love him in this one, but I could be persuaded

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to a bench grade. Honestly, But yeah, tight ends the

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>way they are this year, I give a C grade.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I have Coleman and Edo on the bench, even in

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a high scoring affair. Tevin Coleman has had four yards

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>per carry or less in ten games this year. The

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks fourteen carries for fourteen yards. I was

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>going to mention that it seems like about one point

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>zero yards per carry. Your your math skills are uncanny, right,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even use my calculator. Hey, can you try

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this one, Keto Smith Over the last two games, eleven

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>carries for twenty two yards twice as good? Uh carry

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the one track? Where did you get that advocate so fast?

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And one nine? Oh you're so close? And it's only

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>averaging three point two yards per carry on the season.

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like them much at all. I think this

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a full passing game, so they split

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>just enough for me to bench both on the other sides.

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot of A grades here. I almost

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>want to say Rogers, Adams, and Aaron Jones are so

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>obvious I don't need to mention them. But I'm just

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that Falcons are second worst against fantasy quarterbacks

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this year. Uh. I think that with McCarthy gone, they

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>might want on Rogers might want to on load a bit.

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, He's been so good, scored in four straight

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>games with six touchdowns in those games. Davonte Adams, I mean, yeah,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>those are all A grades. I don't even want to

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>waste my time, on our time on that. So Jimmy Graham,

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a C grade here. Uh. We had concerned,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but when he broke his thumb, he had a kind

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of a matt outing against the Vikings. But last week

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he reeled in eight of eleven targets. Atlanta has allowed

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus two tight ends in three the last five.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think this is what Graham does this week,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>especially in a high schooling affair. I gave him a

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>SE grade. I've got Aaron Jones at running back for

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams at wide receiver. Three, and and Aaron Rodgers

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback three. So you know, I'm fully all those guys.

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I spent like thirty seconds on them. That was almost

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>too much. That was almost too much. I think their

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>auto starts. All right, let's go. Let's go to another

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>guy who's normally an auto start, Andrew Luck, but got

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>shut out last week, and now he gets a good

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Houston secondary. Do you like Andrew Luck going up against Houston?

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Oh, it's me with the Andrew Luck matchup high?

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>How's it? Yeah? Funny? You know it's always you chart.

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Guess what great I gave Andrew Luck this week? Um bench?

0:08:55.280 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I gave him an A grade? What never ever on

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the same page with Andrew Luck. In Week four, Andrew

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Luck had four hundred sixty four yards and four touchdown

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>passes against the Texans defense. Since then, the Texans have

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>faced maybe the best group of quarterbacks ever, Dak Prescott,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Peterman, Blake Bortles, brock Osweiler, case Keenum and then

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>they broke Alex Smith's leg. And then after breaking Alex

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Smith's leg, they gave up three or three and two

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to Marcus Mariota and three seven and one to Baker Mayfield,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrew luck is going to have a good game. He's

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>back to an a start. He's gonna get right back

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.599
<v Speaker 1>on it. Okay, yeah, he's no. You kind of you

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of sold me a little bit. I've I have

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 1>him ranked twelve at the quarterback position. I've got a

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>B grade on QB one though it's QB one all right.

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh t y Hilton, I'm given a B grade two.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>He's top seventy seven yards and four straight and has

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>three games of a hundred and fifteen yards or more

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in his last four meetings with the Texans, with three

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to go along with that. A shoulder injury had

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>him miss practice most of the week. He is a

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>game to time decision, but he did practice on Friday,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>so I think Hilton's gonna go. Eric Ebron he gets

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. He was sick earlier in the week

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and he missed some practice time. He had sixteen targets

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>last week, and it's one of those rare occurrences when

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>two players are splitting a position and one goes down

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that the other player actually gets all of the work.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Eric Ebron is getting everything that Jack Doyle had, and

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Houston is awful versus the tight end bottom eight rankings

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and receptions, yards and scores to the tight end. I

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>love Ebron this week. I do a lot running games

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Though Mac only had eight carries, Hines

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>had four last week against the Jags, and that was

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a Jags team that just got torched by Derrick Henry. Right.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't get it going right and Derrick Henry ken Uh.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So the Colts are on the bench for the running game.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Over on the Texans side, Lamar Miller he gets a

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>C grade. The Colts haven't allowed a running back to

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>top eighty one yard since Week five. That's seven games,

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and in those seven games, only two running backs have

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>scored on the ground, and Miller had an underwhelming forty

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>nine yards in the first meeting on fifteen. Ari's Deshaun

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Watson's getting a B grade. He had his first thirty

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>passing attempt outing since Week five. Charches probably excited about that. Yeah.

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh And the Colts guess what, they faced a very

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>similar schedule of quarterbacks. That's why they look good. It's ridiculous. Kessler, Tannehill, Gabbert, Bortles,

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>car Derek Anderson, and Sam Donald are the last seven

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>they faced. You can't. If I asked you to put

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>such string together the seven worst opposing quarterbacks in the NFL,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you'd have the last seven teams the Colts of face.

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The a f C South got all the bad quarterbacks.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So uh yeah, Watson had three seventy five, two through

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the air and one on the ground in the first meeting,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>so he's a B grade. DeAndre Hopkins easy a last

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>six games against the Colts, he's averaging a hundred and

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>four yards. However, da Marius Thomas and Kiki Cutie, I

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>got them both on the bench. The Colts are top

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>ten in receptions, yards and touchdowns allowed to the wide

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver position. Yeah, because they're facing Sam Donald and playing Gabbard,

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And yeah that's true. They've only allowed a hunt thirty

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>two yards in a score per game. And that's about

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what DeAndre Hopkins should kit in this game. So there's

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not a lot to go around for the rest of

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the guy's son Leavin, Thomas and Cutie on the bench. Alright,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>final matchup of this the opening segment is uh at

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>one that should cause great consternation for Chiefs owners. It

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.599
<v Speaker 1>is the Ravens versus the Chiefs. Let's start on the

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Ravens side. Lamar Jackson gets a B grade. Over the

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>last three starts, he has scored the fourth most Fantasy

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>points among quarterbacks, despite the fact that Lamar Jackson has

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>thrown one touchdown. That tells you the power of rushing

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>when you are an extremely good rushing quarterback like Lamar Jackson.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Um one of these weeks is gonna throw a couple

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns and just post a monster game. And it

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>could be this week considering that seven there's seven touchdowns

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Chiefs defense has allowed over the last two weeks.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So maybe Lamar Jackson throws two here and he ends

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>up doing what he always does on the ground and

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>then monster week coming. But I think he's safely a

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>B grade no matter what, because the rushing almost insures

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty six yards seems like an automatic and I don't

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>know how he falls below a B grade unless they

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely shut down the rushing. Fish and I were pondering

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>who which team might equal Derrick Henry's two thirty eight

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards this week as a team as a team,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and Baltimore was the one that kind of came to

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>be with Jackson and the gust Bush. They could who

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>was Guss I'll take that as my transition. This is

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a B grade averaging twenty rushing attempts per game with

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson in the lineup. Uh, he doesn't catch me passes,

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so he's not gonna help you through the air. But

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. Posing backs of top eighty five rushing

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>yards and five of the last six against the Chiefs.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>So if you figure Gus is gonna go eighty five,

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe a hundred, then now I'll give you another hundred

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>plus ab Lamar Jackson. Then there's there's your Derrick Henry game.

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah maybe that, maybe it comes together there. But there's

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>one other running back to start for the Ravens. There is.

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>There is Tie Montgomery. Yeah, he posted five catches last week.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>And the Chiefs are allowing the most receiving yards to

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>running backs, the most re seeving touchdowns and running backs,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and the third most receptions to running backs. If only

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody would have told you to pick him up like

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>two weeks two weeks ago, and like a prematurely speculatory

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of way. Oh yeah, that was a was a

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact. Everybody else in the passing games on

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the bench Brown, Crabtree, Snead all been a disaster under

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Combined, they have scored combined the three guys,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>they have one touchdown in the last five weeks. So

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not even just Lamar Jackson. That's including a couple

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of games with Joe Flacco in there. Get this, none

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of top fifty eight yards in five weeks either. If

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you had the ability to start all three Baltimore wide

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>receivers as one player, they still would you do it.

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>They would together, they'd have a sea grade. Uh, let's

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>go to the Kansas City side, and this is the

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>area of consternation for fantasy owners. I still have an

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>A grade on Patrick Mahomes. You're going to start Mahomes,

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey and Hill flat out going to start them. I

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>totally get it. But let's just talk about what they're

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>up against. Sense Jimmy Smith's returned from suspension way back

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in Week five. The average quarterback line against the Ravens

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred nine five yards and one point four touchdowns.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>That's half of what we're used to getting from Patrick

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes in any given game. The Ravens secondary doesn't have

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>any glaring areas to exploit their solid every place, so

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, you still have to start my

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>homes and nobody be surprised if he had a three

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>touchdown game here in three yards, but that would be

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a total aberration against the Ravens. Let's go to the

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>other obvious place, Travis Kelsey obvious a. The tight end defense, though,

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>was the only real weakness for the Ravens defense. They've

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>given up five touchdowns in the last six games to

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. Kelsey is the safest play out of the

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>big name guys. Tyreek Hill B grade. This is an

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>excellent Baltimore secondary that's only a lot of four touchdowns

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers since Week two. Allow me to repeat

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that four touchdowns to wide receivers since Week two for

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Rains. That's unbelievable. Uh. Tyreek Hill runs from all

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>over the field, but most commonly from the slot, where

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he'll draw coverage from Ravens cornerback Brandon Carr, who's allowed

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>at least seventy six yards and two of his last

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>four games. So there's an angle there. Uh. We'll give

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill a B grade here. Chris Conley will likely

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>get to start with Watkins hurt, but it's a brutal matchup,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're not gonna go all the way down to

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Chris Connley. Here, let's talk about Spencer Wear. I know

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody ran too the waiver wire to pick him up.

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>He looked Mundane let Us two weeks ago, he looked

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Mundane last week, and then he's got an elite Baltimore

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>run defense here, allowing just sixty five rushing yards per games,

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>second lowest. They're giving up three point four yards per carry,

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>also second lowest. Only one runner is top sixty four

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>yards since Week two against Baltimore. I really should have

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>where on the bench, but I'm giving him a C

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>grade just out of respect for the offense as a

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>whole and the fact that he would likely get any

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>goal line carries were any to become available. I it's

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a tough, tough matchup for Spencer Wear. So look, line

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>short of it is, Chiefs powered you into the playoffs.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no guarantee that you're gonna continue. They could power

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you right out of the Yes we did. Um, we'll

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>take a break when we come back. Plenty more matchups

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to get to, including New England taking on Miami Patriots.

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Inexplicably always struggle in this situation. We'll tell you what

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to expect from Tom Brady, his receivers, and especially the

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>various running backs of the Patriots when we come back.

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Fantasy Football Weekly, presented by green Bell Premium

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>on the fan Take a chance. I mean nine players

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>not normally in your starting line up, many of whom

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>are available on the waiver wire. We begin at the

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position. Scott, we got uh well this week, I

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>got Jamis Winston. I think it's a great matchup for him.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>He has multiple touchdowns in three straight. And the Bucks,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you know this, They have the

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>most passing yards as a team in the end in

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>NFL history through which do you mean? They have the wait,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the defense has yielded the most. No. Buccaneers have passed

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for the most yards him plus Fitzpatrick in NFL history

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>through Wow, I didn't know that they've actually been on

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that street for a few weeks. And they've been. They've

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>benched their starting quarterbacks how many times this year? And

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they're setting the all time NFL record in passing yards combined.

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>They set a record in interceptions to the Saints have

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed the second most passing yards this year allowed to

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks bucks will be thrown from behind. I think so Winston,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's my quarterback, alright, Matt, I've got Baker Mayfield. The

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Panthers defense has absolutely fallen apart over the last five weeks,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>resulting in four losses for their team. They've allowed fourteen

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns in that span and an average of two

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yards per game. And since we through the

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Freddie kitchen sink at Baker Mayfield, he's been pretty decent

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>multiple scores and five of his last six and the

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>sixth was last week when he only threw for one

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdown but Tali three seven yards. I'm going with Josh

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Allen against the Jets. And this is the same Josh

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Allen who is the highest scoring quarterback in Fantasy football

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks. It might have been my

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>tick on list. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. Go ahead,

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>look you earned it. He saw that he has more

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>top five finishes as a fantasy player per week than

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers does this this year. I'm starting him in

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy playoffs. Is my second quarterback and the homes

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen one of my leaks. Get this His two

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty four rushing yards the last two weeks is

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>topped by only four running backs. It's unbelievable when he's

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>bringing on the ground and it's a game against the Jets.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So even if the legs don't help him, help you out,

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the arm will. The Jets are allowed multiple passing touchdowns

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and eight of the last nine games addition by subtraction

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to get Calvin Benjamin off the field. So I like

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen on the ground through the air, he could

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have another game. He could have another top yet another

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in a series of well now to uh games since

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the elbow injury. Coming back from the elbow injury with

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a top performance, let's go to the running back position. Scott,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I need to apologize to our listeners out there because

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I failed you last week. I had it in my

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>notes in the forty Niners matchup to tell you to

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>pick up Jeff Wilson. I did in all my leagues,

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and I I failed our listeners. That's what I did.

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you have It's just a app there's a definition

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of a humble brag. Yeah it really is. You knew it,

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>but you didn't tell anybody failed to tell anybody. Uh,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>but man does he has. He had twenty three touches

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>last week, turned into a hundred and thirty four yards

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>niners a plane from behind a lot. He had eight

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>catches for seventy three. Those eight receptions are the most

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>by San Francisco running back in a game this season,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy. But he's gonna get so much volume

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think he's a great start this week. All right,

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>please go ahead and tweet at Scott Fish twenty four

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a gift of how you feel about this information that

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>he with her holding any information from our listeners this week. Well,

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do it on purpose. Now. Yeah, I've

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>got Justin Jackson. He only had eight carries in one

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>catch last week, but he made it count with eighty

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>two yards total yards and a score against the Steelers.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn said during his Tuesday press conference that Austin

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler has been wearing down and he's an important part

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of the special team. So he's a little tired, and

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you'd also see an increase in Justin Jackson and possibly

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Detre's Newsome this week. Eckler was the clear lead back

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>last week with thirteen carries and eight targets. But I

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>think Jackson is going to be the lead carrier this week.

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals are a packing it in for the season

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as everybody is hurt and they've lost six to the

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>last seven and be really terrible against the running back,

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing the most total yards per game to the running

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>back position. The Chargers could use this as a pseudo

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>rest week for Ekeler, so we could see a ton

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of Justin Jackson. Oh absolutely, I like him a lot.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>This week. I've got Last week, I gave you La

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Blunt and he ended up with like sixty rushing yards,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>did not score. This week, I'm giving you La Garrett

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Blunt again, really going because it worked out so well

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>last week. But here's the thing. If you give me

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>two chances at any take a chance on me, I

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>will come through for you. And so will Garrett Blunt

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this week because he goes up against Arizona. Fast forward

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to Churches chance, Garrett Blood, Carrie and Johnson has been

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>ruled out, so you know Blunt's going to see the

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>majority of the work. It will get the goal line carries.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>He's averaged a respectable four and a half yards per

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>carry the last two weeks without Johnson in the Cardinals, though,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the matchup. The Cardinals give up the

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>most rushing attempts, the third most rushing yards, and the

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>most rushing touchdowns per game in the league. So it's

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>such a juicy matchup. If you take on Blunt against

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>uh I believe they played Minnesota the last week and

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo the week that to be impressive. So he's averaging

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 1>eighteen carries per game when Carrie on Johnson's gone that

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of volume against these Cardinals virtually automatic. Let's go

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.959
<v Speaker 1>to the receiver position, Scott, second week in a row,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with a Buffalo wide receiver. So this

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is really scary for me. But as Charge preaches at

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>training camp about the inside the five numbers, opportunity opportunities

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. Z A. Jones is third in the

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>NFL into his team's target share, putting him in within

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Keenan Now and Kenny Golladay, Travis Kelsey, Kittle,

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Adams Beckham, digs Hill, etcetera. He gets a ton of

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>his team's work. He has three touchdowns in the last

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. The Bill's just released Kelvin Benjamin and Andre Holmes.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna three up like three targets again. And

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>remember just a couple of weeks ago against this same

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins team, four for sixty seven and two touchdowns. Oh yeah,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's going up against buster screen. Yeah that helps

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the busted screen. Let's go, so, j z A Jones,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 1>z A Jones, Matt your receiver. Some people might need

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a little help at the tight end position because it's

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>been a waste land this year. That's why I've got

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Ian Thomas, who takes over for and injured Greg Olsen.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>It's worth noting that Thomas has had at least five

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>targets in each of the last three games that Greg

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Olsen did not start and finish. He caught all five

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of those targets last week for forty six yards. And

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a good matchup for Thomas. The Browns have allowed

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper and Jordan Thomas to score against them in

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the last three games, and big time tight ends like

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey and Jared Cook each scored twice against the

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Browns earlier in the year. So Ian Thomas, if they're

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch some touchdowns, might be him, all right. And

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>my final guy, Trey Kwon Smith. And I know a

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of you have played tray Kwon Smith exactly wrong

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>over the last month. Started him for zero to his

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>zero catch get you didn't start him for the Washington

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>game when he went berserk. Then you start him the

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>next and then you've started him the next week and

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>he gave you zero catches, and then you benched him

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the next week, and it's Thanksgiving and he posts ted

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>catches hundred six yards in a touchdown. So then you

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>put it back in your line up the next week

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and you got zero and got hurt. And so now

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we're back. Tray Kuan Smith is starting against the Buccaneers.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna be all or is it going to

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>be nothing? Tampa's allowed the second most wide receiver touchdowns

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen of them, including touchdowns in every single game this year.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And the guy tray Kuan Smith replaced Ted Kin also

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a straight line speed guy, just like Drake Won Smith

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>scored in this matchup against Tampa in Week one. Tray

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Kuan Smith the ultimate all or nothing guy. That's our

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>final take a chance on me this week. It's like, Ohtown,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady has been ice cold Matt and he has

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>average over the last five weeks, he's averaging less than

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown pass. There's a fish game, so ok I

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was gonna, I was gonna pass it to Fish. Okay,

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Scott averaging less than one touchdown pass per game. He

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>has failed to finish higher than QB in any game

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>for five straight weeks. Tom Brady, do you like him

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>against Miami in Miami? Oh? Man, in Miami. I'm sure

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you already know this, but he's one in four in

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>his last five games, hasn't top two hundred fift yards,

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>only seven touchdowns in those five games in Miami. So

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I had him as a B grade, but as I

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>think about it, I think I'm lowering him down to

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here. Uh he should still do fair, okay,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>just barely startable, but man, yeah, he's been ice cold.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do like his uh, some of his

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>position players, though with no Xavien Howard, I like Josh Gordon.

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Over the last six games, he's averaging eighty yards per

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>game in over nineteen yards per catch, which you can

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>do the math, and that means he's averaging about four

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>catches the game. But with no Zavian Howard, I like

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the matchup I gave him a B. They also gave

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Edlman a B as well in that same span, averaging

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>six catches per game. Uh, but only about seventy yards.

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But in PPR leagues that's getting it done, So I'm

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>giving him a B grade. Gronk also a B grade

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.719
<v Speaker 1>because he's be come very touchdown dependent. Luckily, the Dolphins

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>have allowed seven tight end touchdowns in the last seven weeks,

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>including multiple to Ebron, Jordan Thomas, and Michael Roberts, so

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Gronk might be able to get it done

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone here. Charles Clay was the only

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>bad game in those last seven weeks for against the Dolphins,

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>so B grade there. Sony Michelle, I'm giving him an

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>A grade. He has over twenty touches per game since

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>returning from injury, and before McCoy crap the bad last week.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>The previous five who we argued about our B grade.

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>That the way the previous five running backs to have

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen and more touches top two total yards against the Dolphins,

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that's in the range. For Michelle. I have

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Burkehead on the bench because he only had nine touches

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>last week. What worries me here is White. I still

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>gave him a B grade because he's so PPR dependent.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But without Burkehead he was averaging forty five snaps per game.

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Down he's averages thirty two snaps a game with burke

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Head in as evidence by thirty three last week. Burkehead

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>replaces him, not Michelle. So that's the PPR upside, is

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>why I'd still give him a nice safe PPR floor.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So I barely give him a beat on the dolphin side.

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like anything except from maybe a dart throw

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>on Kenny Stills, because eight percent of Stills receptions have

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>come from Tannehill. He has four out of five touchdowns

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have come from Tannehill. Uh, it's a touchdown. It's almost

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown dependent girl. So yeah, so okay, it's a

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>spin of the wheel or a name from the hat

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But barely a sea grade on Sills. But

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm mentioned everything else, all right. I like that angle. Carolina.

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll take on Cleveland when we come back. We'll talk

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>about Cam Newton, who has thrown exactly two touchdowns and

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>nine of his last ten games, will he throw exactly

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns? Find out when we return. This is Fantasy

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly presented my Green Bell Premium on the Van

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Back Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan, Paul Church

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and Scott Fish Matt Harrison with you. It is yeah, high, Scott,

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I can confirm people are sending me Jeff's now because

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of gifts. Gifts. I giff, Jeff is the peanut butter.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>That's clearly a Jeff pi F. That's fine, So I

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like Giff. I'm fine with. However, Standford graphic interface not

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>graffic file something. Yeah, yeah, correct, Yeah, that's You're exactly right.

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>The guy who invented calls the Jeff, so that's what

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I and then and then he gets to say it's

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>an old CompuServe format. By the way, anyway, Carolina takes

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on Cleveland, Matt and in a statistical anomaly I may

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>never see again, Cam Newton is thrown exactly two touchdowns

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and nine of his last ten games nine times, nine times,

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>nine times. How does that happen? You can't you can't

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>make it happen. It's unbelievable. Well, if you need three

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns from Cam Newton, he will give you two. Well,

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>if you need one, he will give you two. He's

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Leroy Horde of quarterbacks. Maybe he could throw like

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns in any given game, but he's throttling it

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>back and just just stop at the two. That's right.

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to set expectations too high. I gave

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>him an A grade this week. The Browns have faced

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a few running quarterbacks this year. Uh, They've been pretty

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>successful for the most part. Deshaun Watson had the least

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>success with two and one passing and only thirty on

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the ground, but Jeff Driscoll had one fifty five and

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>one through the air and one on the ground against

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the Browns in about a half of play. By the way,

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes had three seventy five and three. Jamis Winston had three.

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>He had a rushing score as well as to go

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>along with fifty five rushing yards. So yeah, Cam's a

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>good start. So is Christian McCaffrey. He's an A grade.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>He's their best receiver. Uh. D J. Moore, I'm giving

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a C grade two. He's the only other receiver I

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>have a starting grade on besides I and Thomas. Who's

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me player? Uh uh? When

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.719
<v Speaker 1>funis returned. It's good that Morris targets didn't dry up.

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>He still had eight. It only converted to four for

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>forty four last week, though more and forty six routes. Well,

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel ran forty one and Devin Funcius only ran

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. Yeah, there's a lot of steam behind Samuel.

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of people think Samuel's become borderline

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>every week starter. Guy end Yeah, I was thinking Samuel's

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for a second, Samuels, Curtis Samuel, Yeah, Moore is the

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>only one I want to start. UH. On the other side,

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb, I'm giving a B grade two UH. Panthers

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>have been pretty good against the run. They have not

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed run at the top one hundred yards since Week two,

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>but they have allowed a rushing touchdown to a back

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in four straight games. And Nick Chubb's getting all the work,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>which means Duke Johnson's on the bench because someone called

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Dontrelle Hilliard had more targets and receptions than Duke last week,

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and he was only good in those two games against

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City in al Ah. That was it. We thought.

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>We all thought Duke could sort of turned the corner.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>He's getting dropped in my leaves understandably, so Baker Mayfield

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance on the quarterback, I'd give

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>him a B grade this week. Jarvis Landry is also

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>getting a B. Last week I told you to start

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver Adam Humphreys against the Panthers. They've all been

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>terrible and slot coverage the whole season. Well, let's talk

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry though. Where this match. Tyler Boyd, Tyler Lockett,

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Juju Sterling Shepherd, Cole Beasley, and Humphries twice all had

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>big days against captain Munterlin. So Landry's a B. Uh.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Callaway kind of a C grade as well. I

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>like him. He'll line up against James Bradberry, who's allowed

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the most yardage in the league to opposing wide receivers.

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh Callaway fumbled at the goal line on a seventy

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>one last last week, so he was really really close

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to a huge, huge day. Uh David Joku also giving

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Two. Good spot for in Joku facing

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Panther's defense that's bottom eight in receptions and yards

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed to touch downs or two tight ends, and they've

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most tight end touchdowns on the season. My

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>previous matchup had an elite offense Kansas City going up

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>against a great defense. This one another elite offense, the

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Rams going up against the great defense Chicago, and this

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>one got flex to the Sunday night game. This is

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>your Sunday Night game, uh, and deservedly so this is

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a this is an epic matchup right now. Todd Gurley,

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously you have to start him, He's an A grade.

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But just know the Bears give up the fewest rushing

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.239
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and the fews yards per carry, so it's it's

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a brutally tough game. He will do all right through

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the air. I think Bears go up the eleventh most

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>receptions per game to the position, and some other dual

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 1>threat runners like David Johnson carry on. Johnson have found

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>ways to get into the end zone. So you're obviously

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna start Todd Gurley. But after that it's all murky. Um.

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about the The fascinating part about this

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>for me is Jared Goff because and I've talked about

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this in past shows. In games in which Todd Gurley

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is held to zero or one touchdowns, which the Bears

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>will probably do, Jared Goff makes up the difference in

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>those Todd Gurley, those modest Todd Gurley games. Jared goff

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>averages three hundred fifty three yards and three touchdown passes.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>The hope is that he can continue to do that. Here,

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got him with a B grade because I don't

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>know that he can get to those numbers against the Bears. Um.

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>The Bears get so much pressure on opposing quarterbacks. But

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 1>he's got a great offensive line in front of him.

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about his receivers. Brandon Cooks with a B

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>grade because he's gonna see a lot of Kyle Fuller.

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Fuller doesn't necessarily the speed to keep up with Cooks,

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's technically very sound, and over the last seven games,

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Fuller has allowed averages of just forty one yards

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and zero point one touchdowns in his coverage over the

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>last seven games. So a tough matchup for Brandon Cooks,

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>whom's normally a lock a, goes down to a beat

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and Robert Woods, who I've I loved last week, slumps

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>down to a C grade. Here he runs out of

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the slot since Cooper Cup's injury. That means he's going

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to see a bunch of Bryce Callahan and it is

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a tricky matchup against the bears best corner Callahan's allowed

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>just one touchdown on the season. He's also given more

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>than twenty three yards in his coverage just once in

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the past six games. He is an absolute shutdown slot corner.

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>And I'm nervous about Robert Woods and Josh Reynolds goes

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>down to the bench. He's had a nice season allowing

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>uh he's had He has had a good season when

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>they've asked him to play, but he doesn't get enough looks.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's safer to just leave him on the

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>bench and a tough matchup. Let's let's go over to

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the bare side. Trek Cohen a grade. In the two games,

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>will Chase Daniel. Cohen was targeted twenty two times, hauling

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a nineteen of them. Uh, Chase Daniel will not be

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>your starter here, but it shows him trending the right way.

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>The Rams have given up touchdowns to backs through the

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 1>air in three the last four games. The Rams run

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>defense isn't great, but shifty backs like Aaron Jones and

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamer have posted strong games against l A in

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season. I love Corto Rick

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>going in this matchup. I think he's my number nine

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>running back overall. He is my number running back. He's

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>my number nine running back. Let's go to the passing game.

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>M r Bisky back as a reminder, from week four

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to week eleven, when he was healthy, Mitch dr Whisky

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was Fantasy football second highest scoring quarterback, and he's got

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of upside against an inconsistent RAMS secondary here.

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I will note though, that it keep to leave his back,

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's a huge change in improvement for the RAMS secondary.

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>In three full games with the keep to leave, the

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Rams allowed averages of just two thirteen passing yards and

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>zero point three passing touchdowns. It's a much better secondary

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>with him. Uh, but it's still still I've gotta be

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>great on Mitch dr Whisky because he was so effective

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and the rushing yards that he brings in as well.

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Is number one receivers Allen Robinson Uh. He hopes to

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>continue a stretch of four touchdowns in Trabisky's last five starts.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.479
<v Speaker 1>It's also worth noting that l A has only allowed

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>one receiver top fifty yards in the four games of

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the keep to leave, so that part working against him still.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson's the main target for Mitch, and I've got

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to be great on him. Taylor Gabriel's got a sneaky

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>good matchup. You gotta pick your spots with Gabriel, but

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I like him here. He'll most frequently match up against

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Peters, arguably most burned quarterback in the cornerback in

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the league. Peters has given up six passing touchdowns in

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>his coverage and a pass a rating of one six.

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So Taylor Gabriel not normally some of you'd want to start,

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think you do here. I've got a C

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>grade on him. Trey Burton has been a disaster, but

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in games with Mitch Drabinsky averages forty two receiving yards

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and half a touchdown per game, and in the past

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>two games without Drabinsky scoreless fourteen yards. Hopefully Drabinsky comes back.

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>It's a little something dumb here. The Rams allowed tight

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>ends to average eighties seven receiving yards, so there is

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.720
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for Trey Burton, who gets a C grade.

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>The last guy that I haven't mentioned and should is

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard. Last week, Howard posted his highest yards per

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>carried since Week six. I liked him a lot going

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>into last week's game, and he finished with an okay game,

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>he passed. He passed the eye test in my mind

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>last week. Straight ahead power backs haven't been very successful

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>overall against the Rams, but they have found the end

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>zone against the Rams. Rashad Penny Jamal Williams have both

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>scored in the past few weeks as straight ahead plotting

0:37:56.719 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>runners like Jordan Howard. A lot there was a meeting matchup,

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot to be said, meaty, meaty. Uh, let's uh.

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to work in one more matchup and then

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll try to get in a call here at New

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Orleans taking on Tampa Bay in what what figures to

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>be a massively highest scoring game. Already told you Trey

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Smith might take a chance on me one receiver.

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Drew Breese in this matchup?

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Fifty five and a half over under highest of the week.

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So so you nailed that one? Uh? Do I need

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what my number one? Right? Breeze and

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas and Alvin Kamara are obvious A starts just

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>about every week regardless of matchup, and this is a

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 1>great matchup anyway. So I am benching killer Keith Kirkwood.

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I know that he's been pretty safe at six point

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>five or so points every week for the last few weeks,

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but I got him on the bench. Trey Kwon was

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 1>your take, hom Dan Arnold, He's hard to trust. Two catches.

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Then he had the forty five yards and a touchdown

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday on the Thanksgiving game. Two catches last week.

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm benching him. Mark Ingram, I'm giving him a B

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>grade because it's a bottom three defense against fantasy running backs,

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and if they get ahead, maybe he gets a few

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>extra touches. The Bucks have allot of whopping hundred and

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight total yards per game to running backs in

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the last three games, including three h yard rushers. Camaron

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was gonna get a lot, but Ingram should be fairly

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>startable with a B grade. On the Tampa Bay side,

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Winston was my take. Hom really like him a lot

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>this week against terrible Saints past defense, and because of that,

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I like Evans. He had a huge game week one,

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>yes with Fitzer Fitzpatrick, but against Lattimore, so I'm not

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>worried about it. If you watch If you watch him play,

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>he can beat just about any corner. So he's just

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Afric Couch. Yeah, A grade there, Godwin. I

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>give a B grade to um. He's he's a real

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>upside shot. Here He's played three games without DeShawn Jackson.

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Here is numbers seven for one eleven and a touchdown

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.879
<v Speaker 1>five for one on one in a touchdown. Those are

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:01.959
<v Speaker 1>massive games. When Jackson doesn't play, y, y, you didn't

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>stay stated overtly. But JACKSON'STPP playing in this game. Yes,

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's out. So also when Jackson's out, Adam Humphreys averages

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>five and a half catches and seventy yards. So I

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>have I have a nice safe four B grade on

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>him as well. Uh, Cameron Bade, I have the on

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the bench. The Saints have only allowed one tight untouchdown

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in the last calendar year, and it's been even longer

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>since weeks seven of last year where break topped fifty yards.

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So I had him on the bench even though Winston's

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback. Uh, and Barber, I'm just benching him. He

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>he's Barber. And the Saints allowed the second fewest runching

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in attempts, and when they do, they're only allowing three

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>point two yards per carry. I don't Zeke's Zeke got

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like sixty one yards against them. I'm not trusting Barber,

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I would either. We had a caller

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.919
<v Speaker 1>on hold who dropped off, but his topic was very good.

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Should teams that have been eliminated from the playoffs be

0:40:56.400 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed to make transactions? Yes? Or no? I have my

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>own opinion, Bell, I'll yield the floor to you guys. First, Well,

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.879
<v Speaker 1>dynasty keeper is obvious. Yes, I don't even think that's

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>up for discussion in redrafts. If you have it, if

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you're in a toilet bowl. By the way, the reason

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not the reason that dynasty and redraft is because

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not fair to let your playoff teams effectively planned

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for next year exactly, continue to make transactions. Well, you can't,

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and you need it more than they do because you're

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not even in the playoffs exactly. Giving an advanta, an

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>extra an advantage to good teams is ridiculous. You either

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>need if you're a redraft, if you're a Dynasty league

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>or an Empire league, and you get you get to

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, either everybody gets locked down on transactions or

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>everybody gets to make trips. It needs to be fair

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>playing field, all right, what about redraft redraft? I'm generally

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in the mode that if you're in a toilet bowl,

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>yes you can absolutely. If you're not, you know, it's

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>up to the commissioner. For me, I I don't care

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>either way, but i'd probably prefer they don't. In redraft,

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're not playing at all anymore, well, and I

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>want to clarify at all, yes, if you have if

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you have anything to play for, including things like high

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>score of the week gets ten bucks, whatever. If you

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have anything to play for, you have to let these

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>teams put the best players they can. If they don't

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.919
<v Speaker 1>have anything to play for in a redraft league, then

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>no transactions. You're out because I don't want you mucking

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>up the works with when you have no reason to go.

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Get Justin Jackson. I don't want you just playing spoiler

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>because you can play spoiler when you have nothing, you

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have no reason to play, you have no opponent, you

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to play for, then you're out. So if

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you've if your if your league gives any reason to play,

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>then everybody gets every Then everybody gets to go. If

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to play to playoff teams are out.

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the phones. Bugsy, Hello, Yes that's you. Yeah,

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>all right, Hey, absolutely great show all year. Thank you

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>guys are awesome. Listen to it prectly when I can

0:42:55.600 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you all right, Listen, I met you quickly. I'm

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>met you ball iviously two years ago. I was a

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>flight attendant on some country airlines and your buddy, you

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>meet a lot of people, but I mean you might remember.

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>But I was getting your bloody Marys and think he

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>came back from Vegas outstanding. I love that does sound like? Yeah? Anyways, Um,

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I dodged the bullet. Okay, I'm five in the Big

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Man Playoffs on five seat against the four. He had

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Derek Henry in our league, he would have got forty

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>seven point four points. Left him on the bench. Yeah,

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he left him on the bench because he's got starting

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>right now. He's got Marlon Mack and uh and that

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>new Gut the Wilson guy, Jeffrey whatever, she started them too,

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and he has had him on the bench, and uh

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it was the other guy. He could still put it

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday Kenyan Drake's anyway. So I dodged a bullet. Um,

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 1>now I need help. My running backs was Alex Collins.

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>He's word, he's gone. I have David Johnson and now

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the other two guys. Um, I have this really gut feeling,

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know how you get it. Sometimes you guys on somebody,

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but you don't really talk to him about them much.

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But Darren Sproles or long story short, I'm um, Raiders

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>got Doug, Doug Martin, Doug Martin, Matt What do you

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>think Martin's way safer? Yeah, Martin's Martin's the safety play,

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think with the sound of his running backs,

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I think all you really need to do is take

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the safety play. So I think I'd go Doug Martin

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in this scenario. MARTINIX. I know there was some concern

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>about his health um at one point about him playing

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in this game, but I'm pretty confident he is going

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to go. If anybody has a chance for a goal

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>line touchdown in that Raiders uh Steelers game, it's gonna

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>be Martin. He's got any but is expected to play

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin. Thank you for holding uh bugsy. I appreciate it. Um, Yeah,

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:41.720
<v Speaker 1>no problem. Hey Christmas bonus. I know it's a dumb question,

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but that's not the lightning round. Um, you wouldn't do.

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I got Lamar Jackson and and Mahomes. You just stay

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with Mahomes right, I would, I would, but it's not.

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not a dumb question. And if you told me

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 1>had had this guy started, uh, your opponent started Derrick Henry,

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we'd be going to Lamar Jackson because of the the upside,

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the freakish upside that he has. I know Patrick Mahomes

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>has freakish upside two. But against the Ravens, I might

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have flipped it over to a different answer when we

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>come back. Plenty more to get to, including matchups like

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the Giants taking on Washington. Eli. We already talked a

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Eli Manning. What about sake Kwon Barkley?

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>What about Washington's offense? Is there anybody left to play?

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And a Mark Sants has led team. We'll tell you

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>when we come back after this. This is Fantasy Football

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Weekly presented by Devan man. Welcome back to the show.

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Our number two a playoff edition and Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Matt Harrison with you as well. I

0:45:55.280 --> 0:46:00.320
<v Speaker 1>am Paul Charchian. Uh. This is the time first segment.

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We like to call three hot questions, and traditionally we

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like to start it right here. Hot question number one.

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, I'm not on the right page, Ken Paul

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>find the right page is hot. Question number one, how

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:19.720
<v Speaker 1>much better will the Packers offense be in the post

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy era, no better, somewhat better, or a lot better? Scott.

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a weird question me for me because how

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>much better? And one of the things is about the same,

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>about the same, how much better? Um I put somewhat better.

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not all on McCarthy. Aaron Rodgers is

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:41.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine in the NFL and completion percentage among quarterbacks

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>with over a hundred attempts. I mean, he's He's thrown

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>into the ground quite a bit as well. But they

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>have some The only tough matchup they have is Chicago. Uh.

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>They have two games against bottom ten past defenses, and

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last four or five games Rodgers in Chicago,

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he's only had one bad game. I've he's gonna have

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>three pretty good games down the stretch here. I think

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with somewhat better. Okay, are you looking

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>at this from a next year standpoint? The rest of

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>this year? Sorry, that was not clear. The rest of

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this year not into perpetuity or yeah, well I was

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a Viking fan. I was rooting for the Packers to

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 1>hold on for Mike McCarthy as um he was a

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>mediocre to bad offensive coordinator in San Francisco who looked

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 1>into two of the top ten quarterbacks in last twenty

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>five years. Great quarterback, maybe the best in the NFL.

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I still think he's gonna be rejuvenated by Joe Philbin,

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe Aaron Rodgers is calling more of the plays now. Frankly,

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>he's got possibly the best wide receiver in the league

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in Davante Adams at well above average running back and

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:46.400
<v Speaker 1>above average offensive line, young but decent depth receivers. I

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna be a lot better going forward. Uh,

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.760
<v Speaker 1>no stoppers in the schedule. I like him a lot.

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go in some intangibles here. If Aaron Rodgers

0:47:55.920 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 1>openly did Aaron Rodgers openly campaigned against Mike mcarthy in

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the media right, talking second guessing his play calling, we

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>need to use Aaron, Aaron Jones more of that kind

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. Imagine what was happening behind closed doors between

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers and Mike McCarthy, right, and ultimately Rogers got

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:18.800
<v Speaker 1>his way. McCarthy's gone. Joe Philbin is a four game

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 1>speed bump, but nothing more. You know the guy who

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>runs that The guy who runs that offense is Aaron Rodgers,

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>not Joe Philban. No chance that Philban is gonna run

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>an offense contrary to rogers wishes. So Rogers is running

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the show, He's going to want to prove that he's

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>right that he was being held back by Mike McCarthy.

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of motivation for Aaron Rodgers,

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>and he might be right by the way, there is

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>a chance he's correct about that. And then three of

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the four remaining matchups are just excellent matchups for him. Falcons, Jets, Lions,

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 1>all elite level matchups. Aaron Rodgers my number three quarterback

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this week, take Randall cob off the injury report for

0:48:56.360 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time all year Packers offense. It's going to

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:07.439
<v Speaker 1>get a lot better. Question number two, how many tight

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>ends should be taken in the first round next year?

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the next year question, Matt, Okay, how many

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 1>tight ends should be taken in the first round next year? Zero? One,

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>two or three? Matt? How many titans will or should should, should,

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 1>should not? Will? How many titans should be taken? So

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we hear at this little radio show we call Fantasy

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly like to get to we have the ability

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:39.879
<v Speaker 1>to cause change in the world, and I think that

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we will do this. Uh if you looked at a

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>mock right now, you'll see probably zero. But I'm on record,

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:50.240
<v Speaker 1>were a pinned tweet on my Twitter account or Travis

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey one one in two thousand, I think first, first

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>player taken. And the difference in having a top two

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end and not having one is the playoffs. Basically

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in many leagues, Earth's has ninety three receptions, Kelsey has

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine. They average nearly two to three more catches

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>per game than George Kittle, who's a lock at tight

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:14.839
<v Speaker 1>end number three. I think two of them should go

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 1>in the first round. Kelsey will get taken first, and

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 1>then Earth's will get taken almost immediately after that because

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of scarcity. So I think it's gonna be two tight

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>ends taken in the first round next year. All right,

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go deeper and I'm gonna say four. I'm

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just kidding, uh No, and I completely agree with that strategy.

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I and I think, as we've seen in the mocks,

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>once one goes, the next to go right away like

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Earth's and Kid will go right after. So I'm gonna

0:50:42.680 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>say saying three, are you saying to I'm gonna go

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 1>with Matt and say too. I think the third comes

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>right around the corner in the second, so I'm gonna

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:51.840
<v Speaker 1>go too. That that's fun. I like that strategy. Not

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>only is Travis Kelsey the number one scoring tight end,

0:50:55.080 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>he's the number four scoring receiver including wide receiver. Right.

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you're one of these people like I could

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 1>never take a tight end in the first round, well,

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:06.319
<v Speaker 1>would you take the number four wide receiver in the

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the first round? Of course you would. Yeah,

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:12.319
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta take Odell Beckham in the first round? Yeah, right,

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So why wouldn't you take Travis Kelsey? How about zach Ertz?

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the ninety three reception second only to Adam Feeling.

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:22.280
<v Speaker 1>His fantasy points make him wide receiver ten right now,

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of course? And Kittle will get Garoppolo back. Yeah, and

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Kittle gets Garoppolo back. That's all. I'll come to him

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. So of course you'd want to draft

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>both of those tight ends where you get massive positional advantages.

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Had this year you decided to slough the tight end

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>position and just gone for the sixth Beth tight end

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and for and you somehow knew the sixth Beth tight

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>end you're sitting at. You've played Austin freaking Hooper all

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>year to get to number six, and most likely you

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>weren't even that good. If you really let the tight

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 1>end position go this year, you were you were in

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the unfortunate position of starting David and Joku as the

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:02.359
<v Speaker 1>number twelve tight end all season streaming right, And it's

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>way worse than that. I mean, that's like, that's your

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>best case scenarios. Really, if you waited to the middle

0:52:06.960 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of the tight end run or the end of the

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>tight end run, I will say, every year it seems

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to be a big three, you do it earlier, you wait,

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 1>this year's worse. Like the gap. Well, let's talk about

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the gap. So if you waited to the middle and

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you were going to wear with Austin Hooper, you were

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>getting outscored by a three to one margin by Kelsey

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and Arts. If you waited all the way down to

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in Joco a four to one margin, that's how big

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you were penalized. Now, so obviously those two guys are

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in should George kit will go in the first round. Well, yes,

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but you won't have to take him there. So because

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you won't need to take Kiddle there because people aren't

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 1>going to because he didn't do it last year, and

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>people can't, you know, come to grips with the concept

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that things might change in the next year. You won't

0:52:53.560 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>have to take Kittle in the first But if I

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>was in a sadity, I would absolutely consider it. But

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 1>you won't have to sleep correct answer for the number

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of tight ends taken in the first round next year

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is too hot. Question number three for the rest of

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the year. Is Derrick Henry and RB one and r

0:53:12.160 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 1>B two a flex or a bench runner? Scott bench

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't, I can't. I mean, I can't trust him.

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I can't trust him after one game. I mean he

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I think I saw the stat that

0:53:24.239 --> 0:53:27.520
<v Speaker 1>he'd never topped sixty five yards this season. Yet I

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 1>might be wrong. Might actually I might be able to

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:31.440
<v Speaker 1>pull it. I'll I'll look, well, you're well, you continue

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to chat. Well, I have barely anything else to say

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I have. I haven't been able to trust him all year.

0:53:36.600 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Why am I going to trust him in my fantasy playoffs? Alright,

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even matter because everybody had him on the

0:53:42.960 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 1>bench already and their teams out of the playoffs. I'm gonna,

0:53:46.200 --> 0:53:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna, I'm gonna league right now where Derrick Henry

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was on a playoff roster and started. Wow. So he

0:53:53.120 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>had not topped fifty seven yards in a game prior

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.919
<v Speaker 1>to this one this year. That's ridiculous. It didn't help

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that that Indy some yard touchdown that he had was

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like the worst tackling I've ever seen by a team

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the history of football. It was. It was so gross.

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 1>The Giants is a good matchup. Washington is not particularly

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup. People will chase stats next week. I won't.

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not fooled. I'm benching him. You know, he scored

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in five of them. He scored uh in five of

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the last seven games. The total yards, by the way,

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>yeah six five total yards. Like he doesn't. He chips

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 1>it nothing through the air. He had a he had

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a thirty three rushing, thirty two receiving. That was his

0:54:30.160 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>best total yard. But because of the touchdowns at five touched,

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>he has scored a touchdown at least in five last

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:38.439
<v Speaker 1>seven games. I don't think he's a bench grade guy

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:40.880
<v Speaker 1>going forward. I still want to touch on him. I

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>still want touchdown and burned to me too many. He goes, yeah,

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys sound like bitter Derrick Henry is he? I

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know him in anything at He goes up against

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the Giants without Snacks Harrison. They've turned into the worst

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 1>run defense in the NFL without Snacks Harrison next week,

0:54:55.360 --> 0:54:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and so I think he's gonna I think Derrick Henry

0:54:57.760 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a B or AC grade from

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>US next week. Then he's got Washington, they've stumped to

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight in running back fantasy points allowed over the

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 1>last month. I think he's gonna get a beer REC

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:12.720
<v Speaker 1>grade there too. Then he gets the Colts. They've sumped

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to twenty seven in fantasy points allowed to running backs

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last that's Week seventeen. Don't play fantasy football.

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Week's seventeen kills. I think he's gonna get a Beer

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>C grade in that one too, although we won't be

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.360
<v Speaker 1>on the air for Week seventeen, but that's the right

0:55:24.440 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 1>grade he'd likely get. Derrick Henry, based if nothing else

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.919
<v Speaker 1>on the touchdown prospects, is going to be an RB

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 1>two in these final three weeks of the season. Many

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks to our decade long sponsored Grainbell Premium, the official

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>beer fantasy football Do not forget to play the free

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>crush Charts challenge at grainbelt dot com. Win two thousand

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars and a trip to Manny's Steakhouse for our winner's

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>banquet in January. Just like last week's winner, Mark Schwab.

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark Schwab will be joining me at Manny's in January.

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Many thanks for our friends at the Brewer, Shawn Ryan,

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Brett Moss, Lee Windinger, and Ted and Jody Marty, the

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>owners of the brewery, and Dave Wilson, the general manager

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at Manny's, who sets up our lavish winner's banquet in January.

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Play along to grain belt dot com. Let's how are

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you doing at time? Let's work in another matchup. I

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:21.279
<v Speaker 1>think our next matchup is Giants against the Washington Redskins.

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:24.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Eli Manning? It just looks like

0:56:24.920 --> 0:56:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a promising game, Matt game A C grade, that's it. Yeah,

0:56:28.719 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought it might be a little higher. Washington has

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom seven and completions and passing yards allowed per game.

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:36.720
<v Speaker 1>ELI put up three, sixteen and one in the first matchup.

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd say the good numbers high two hundreds in a

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>score is about what you're gonna get for Eli. That's

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 1>just a see for me. Uh. Much like my basement

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 1>apartment in college. The floor and the ceiling are way

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:53.319
<v Speaker 1>too close together for Eli um Evan Ingram. He's on

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the bench along with Sterling Shepherd. Sterling's a bit dinged

0:56:57.040 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 1>up with a rib injury that limited him in practice

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this week, and he hasn't topped thirty seven yards in

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:04.680
<v Speaker 1>five games. UH. Ingraham is going to play this week

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:06.799
<v Speaker 1>after missing the last two games, but he hasn't been

0:57:06.840 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 1>healthy or right yet this season and faces a Washington

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 1>defense that's only allowed three scores on the on the

0:57:12.160 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>whole year to the tight end position UH and then

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. A. Beckham is scored topped a hundred and

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:23.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards or both in five of six career meetings

0:57:23.800 --> 0:57:26.360
<v Speaker 1>with Washington, and he torched him in the Week eight matchup.

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Adrian Peterson's the only viable start

0:57:29.720 --> 0:57:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for Washington. He gets a B grade. UH. Mark Sanchez

0:57:33.120 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is in charge of throwing the ball now. That means

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to hand it off and he's facing a

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:40.680
<v Speaker 1>defensive front. That is void of my cousin, Snacks Harrison

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and safety land and Collins ended up on it. Nobody,

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody's ever seen the two of you in the same

0:57:45.520 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>place at the same time, Snacks. It might be the

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:50.920
<v Speaker 1>same person or not the same He's my cousin. Come on, cousin,

0:57:51.000 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 1>okay um, I see the family resemblance. Absolutely, Landon Collins

0:57:55.560 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>was a run stuffing safety. He was put on I

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:01.160
<v Speaker 1>R this week. That's a huge loss. Uh. Giants gave

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 1>up a hundred and thirteen rushing yards to Bears backs

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>last week, one nine to the Phillybacks the week before

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and one oh six to Peyton Barber the week before that.

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Those aren't impressive groups running backs. So Adrian Peterson's a

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 1>solid B. I guess you could give Chris Thompson desperation

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 1>D and PPR. He did return last week and had

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 1>five targets, But he's part of a past of the

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 1>passing game, and I hate the passing game, which is

0:58:24.000 --> 0:58:26.960
<v Speaker 1>all on the bench. Sanchez, through twenty one time spanning

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:29.880
<v Speaker 1>almost a full game last week, managed only one hundred

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 1>passing yards in one interception. The whole passing games dead.

0:58:33.080 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>It's very possible that they throw less than twenty five

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>passing attempts in this game, and the Giants have allowed

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the third fewest passing touchdowns in the league this year.

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Jets take out in the Bills, and there's not a

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 1>lot to talk about in this game. Every Jet has

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>got a bench grade here, Um the whole passing game

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of Sam Donald is on the bench and Isaiah crowles

0:58:50.680 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. He's bouncing between six and twenty one

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>carries and back to back games. You never know what

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get, but you know it won't be overwhelming

0:58:57.400 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. Despite playing from behind most of the season,

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bills have only allowed two players to gain eighty

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:05.400
<v Speaker 1>or more rushing yards all year against them, and Isaiah

0:59:05.440 --> 0:59:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Crawl is not likely to be that guy. And Elijah

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>McGuire is not getting enough use for consideration anyway. In

0:59:10.560 --> 0:59:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a tough matchup. Chris Herndon might be the only other

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Jet you might even be thinking about. The Bills have

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:17.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fewest receiving yards at tight ends period. End

0:59:17.680 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of story. So Chris Herndon's out, So let's go to

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bill side. Josh Allen was might take a chance

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on me quarterback with a B grade. Za Jones was

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fishes take a chance of me wide receiver. I've got

0:59:28.520 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on him as well. Let's talk Lashawn McCoy.

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's he's had exactly one Fantasy relevant game all year one.

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The only game with a touchdown came three games ago,

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but it was against these same Jet Lightning could strike twice.

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 1>The Jets have allowed five hundred fifty seven rushing yards

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to running backs in just the last three weeks. I

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:56.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have my advocus out, but I'm I'm guessing that's

0:59:56.760 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and sixty seventy yards rushing each game,

1:00:02.760 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So Lashawn McCoy is, it's got a

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>C grade here. Let's hope this is gonna be a

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>second Fantasy relevant game of the year. Robert Foster the

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish Special. Do you like him this week? Not

1:00:17.400 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>as much as they three games ago he had a

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred five yards he did two games ago he had

1:00:22.520 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>ninety four yards in a touchdown. It's the last week

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in one catch. It's a big play thing and Josh

1:00:26.840 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Allen's got a big arm, so he's gonna do that.

1:00:28.960 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But the dismissal of Kelvin Benjamin and Andre Holmes frees

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>up some targets. I think Foster's I think this is

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the It's the first time that Robert Foster's every every

1:00:37.600 --> 1:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>down starter, which he will be this game. The Jets

1:00:40.840 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ran twenty nine and yards allowed to wide out receptions

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to white outs. Robert foster sneaky play. Scott, I think

1:00:48.240 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you're getting off the bandwag and just the wrong No, No,

1:00:50.600 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not off the you're off the bandwagon, I admit it.

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's a boomer bust type of guy.

1:00:55.680 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>He has a boomer bust guy. When we come back,

1:00:57.760 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Denver takes on San Francisco. Philip Lindsay has been one

1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of the great stories of the fantasy season. Will it

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>continue against the forty nine ers? Find out when we

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>come back. This is Fantasy Football Weekly presented my Green

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill Premium on the Van Playoff petition and Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charting with you, Matt Harrison, Scott fish Uh, Let's

1:01:26.400 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>jump right back into the matchups. Denver takes on San

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and boy Emmanuel Sanders loss is I think gonna

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>gramifications through that whole offense. They don't have to respect

1:01:36.720 --> 1:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the past anymore. Courtland, Sulland's gonna get number one coverage

1:01:39.720 --> 1:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And I worry frankly about about the

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>whole offense just taking a big step backwards for Denver,

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe even in this matchup against San Francisco. What do

1:01:48.720 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you think it's gonna be really interesting for Lindsay, especially

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because he had faced one of the least stacked boxes

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL out of all the Out of all

1:01:58.080 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>running backs, he had seen the least amount of stack boxes. Ironically,

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Royce Freeman had seen some of the most one of

1:02:05.400 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the highest percentages of stack boxes. You sound like a

1:02:08.080 --> 1:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Freeman truther to me right now. There is not getting

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>enough carries and shut up. Hey, you know me, Yeah,

1:02:16.480 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know me. I watched the games. I know I'm

1:02:19.040 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>all in on Lindsay. He looks so good, he um,

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but on this one I did just give him a

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>B grade because I think the whole offense really suffers

1:02:28.120 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with them out Emmanuel standards to keep those drives alive. Um,

1:02:32.680 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's some a lot to like. Though. The

1:02:35.920 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>four nine ers have allowed hundred total yards or more

1:02:38.040 --> 1:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to running backs every week since Week seven, when the

1:02:41.400 --> 1:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy led Packers failed to do so only because

1:02:44.600 --> 1:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>he gave Jamal Williams and Time Agomer the snaps. If

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he hadn't done that, they probably would have done it too.

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So be great for Lindsay. I have the whole passing game,

1:02:55.000 --> 1:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>even uh, you know Dynasty Darling Dayshawn Hamilton's who takes

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>over the slot for Emmanuel Sanders. I have the whole

1:03:01.800 --> 1:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>passing game except for Sutton on the bench. I think

1:03:05.080 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Sutton's going to take a couple of those targets, but

1:03:07.360 --> 1:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think it's gonna be He's gonna

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be ten plus a game. I don't know that that's

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, but he these matchups for Denver coming up,

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and this one especially, uh, they're all bottom eleven against

1:03:20.360 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>uh deep deep past attempt u scoring for wide receivers,

1:03:25.240 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's really Sutton's game. Sutton can do that

1:03:28.320 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>if he gets seven to ten targets, I think he

1:03:30.680 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>could have a B game here. So that's why I

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like him. On the other side, I'm benching Mullins. He's

1:03:36.080 --> 1:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>had four good games, but the two four games, and

1:03:38.840 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>two of them were great, but one was a blow

1:03:40.880 --> 1:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Both were blowouts. Really one was. One was the Oakland

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>game and the other was blowout behind trailing Seattle. I

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>think this one's gonna be low scoring and close, So

1:03:50.560 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like Mullins or much of the passing game here, Kittle,

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>though obviously uh Pettis. With Goodwin back, I'm tentative to

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>give them both C grades. Um Pettis has two yards

1:04:02.800 --> 1:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and three touches the last two weeks, but that denber

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>secondary Scotts in flux without Chris Harris, right, you've taken

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the best cornerback off the team. Granted he was a

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Pettis runs a fair amount from the slot. I like

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>him a little better than Goodwin here, but I just

1:04:16.520 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>wonder if taking Harris out, if that's just going to

1:04:19.240 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>create a ripple effect of weirdness for the Broncos secondary.

1:04:23.880 --> 1:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly kind of what I had. I had Pettis with.

1:04:26.520 --> 1:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna say we No, I had Pettis with A

1:04:29.240 --> 1:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>being good one at the Sea. I knocked Pettis back

1:04:31.680 --> 1:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to a C, but I put in my matchup here.

1:04:34.160 --> 1:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I like him better than Goodwin. I think he's developed

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a real connection with Mullins over the last couple of weeks,

1:04:39.880 --> 1:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so I give him the edge there. Uh, and Wilson

1:04:42.400 --> 1:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was my take on Yeah, excellent, yeah. Uh. Matt Cincinnati

1:04:47.920 --> 1:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>takes on the Chargers. It's the Bengals are a team

1:04:51.760 --> 1:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in utter and total disarray right now. They're missing offensive lineman,

1:04:54.840 --> 1:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>two starting cornerbacks, um starting quarterback. It's all bad for

1:04:58.760 --> 1:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals right now. Not to mention A J. Green,

1:05:02.360 --> 1:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, oh yeah, a J. Green. Oh yeah. By

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, that guy um Chart, do you have a

1:05:07.800 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sad trombone over there? Because my Jeff Driscoll call of

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>last week. But he's he's so fast, he's the fastest

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff you know, except now for Jeff Wilson Jr. In

1:05:19.000 --> 1:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Uh, Chargers are top ten in passing yards,

1:05:23.480 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns, picks, rushing yards, and rushing touchdowns allowed to quarterbacks.

1:05:27.920 --> 1:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So Driskll is on the bench just barely some C

1:05:31.640 --> 1:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>grades for some other guys. Uh. Tyler Boyd faces awesome

1:05:35.640 --> 1:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>slot corner Desmond King, who's only allowed one touchdown on

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the season. Boyd will suffer because of the Green loss

1:05:41.400 --> 1:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is his numbers have dipped in games without a J.

1:05:44.320 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>John Ross will drop Casey Hayward. So he's on the bench.

1:05:47.680 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>C j Uzoma, I'm giving a slight C two because

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>since Jeff Driscoll started taking snaps, whose Oma leads the

1:05:55.040 --> 1:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>team and targets with seventeen and in about six quarters

1:05:58.440 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of play and includes ten against the Browns and seven

1:06:01.280 --> 1:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>last week against the Broncos. So from a volume standpoint

1:06:04.400 --> 1:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in a game, they should be playing catch up. Whose

1:06:06.520 --> 1:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Elma is the top target? Uh? And then Joe Mixing,

1:06:09.840 --> 1:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm only given him a C grade two. In the

1:06:11.680 --> 1:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks, Mixing and the offense have lost as

1:06:14.600 --> 1:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you said, Dalton Green and tackle Cordy Glenn. Mixing was

1:06:18.120 --> 1:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>also limited and practiced this week with a foot injury,

1:06:20.840 --> 1:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Chargers have not allowed a one yard rusher

1:06:23.600 --> 1:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>since Todd Gurley in Week three. Over on the other side,

1:06:28.240 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon still sitting out this week with a knee injury.

1:06:30.760 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And I talked about how I like Justin Jackson as

1:06:33.080 --> 1:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance to me running back. You know,

1:06:34.840 --> 1:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got I've got him as a borderline A grade.

1:06:38.000 --> 1:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It's still going to get half the words. You know,

1:06:41.800 --> 1:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Eckler was really good for most of the year, and

1:06:44.600 --> 1:06:46.959
<v Speaker 1>granted he didn't look as good as Jackson last week

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>makes just a one game samp. Tired and worn down

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is problematic for me. And it wasn't a workhorse.

1:06:52.760 --> 1:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how tired and worn down he was

1:06:54.360 --> 1:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on eight touches a game. No, but he's been playing

1:06:56.560 --> 1:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>special team snaps the whole season and that kind of thing. So,

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but I covered Actler. I gave him a B as well.

1:07:03.080 --> 1:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen easy A scored a touchdown in four straight

1:07:05.840 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>since complaining publicly about a lack of targets. Bengals are

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>allowing the ninth most wide receiver yards of this season,

1:07:11.480 --> 1:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy three per game. Uh Mike and

1:07:14.680 --> 1:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Tyrrell Williams are both on the bench the brothers Williams.

1:07:18.080 --> 1:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike is touchdown dependent and has had four or fewer

1:07:20.960 --> 1:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>targets in nine straight games, and Tyrrell is in top

1:07:23.360 --> 1:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to fifty yards since the London game in weeks seven.

1:07:26.280 --> 1:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And game script says they'll get up big and slow

1:07:29.240 --> 1:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>down the offense. Philip Rivers. I'm still giving an A

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>grade two. Bengals are allowing two or eighty nine yards

1:07:34.720 --> 1:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>per game through the air. Sitting on a monster game,

1:07:38.600 --> 1:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers, and congratulations to the Rivers family as Mrs

1:07:42.120 --> 1:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Rivers is now pregnant with kid number nine. That's nine times. Wow,

1:07:47.880 --> 1:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of kids. That's a lot of kids.

1:07:51.400 --> 1:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I got a hunch that Mrs Rivers is not is

1:07:55.440 --> 1:07:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a stay at home mom. I don't think. I don't

1:07:57.440 --> 1:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>think she's working along with probably a nan me several nanny. Yes,

1:08:02.840 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a wet nurse. Uh. You just have the wet nurse

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on retainer and you always yes. Uh. De Drey takes

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on Arizona. Will zip through this one quickly because there's

1:08:12.760 --> 1:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not a lot to talk about from either team. La

1:08:14.440 --> 1:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Blunt's my highest rated lion. He was might take

1:08:17.000 --> 1:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me player by running back. Matthew Stafford's

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. His issues include a bad back, the

1:08:23.080 --> 1:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>trade of Golden Tate, Marvin Jones, trip to i R.

1:08:25.960 --> 1:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Two excellent past defenders he faces in this game against Arizona,

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Peterson and Buddha Baker. You put all together and

1:08:31.680 --> 1:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a deeply uphill battle for Stafford. Just a C

1:08:34.840 --> 1:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>grade on Scott On Scott Fish's guy Kenny Golladay. I

1:08:40.040 --> 1:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>can't Peter. I can't imagine Patrick Peterson not shadowing him.

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't Patrick Peterson shadow in the whole game? So

1:08:46.200 --> 1:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, you're basically dead right there. Peterson's only

1:08:48.680 --> 1:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>giving up two touchdowns in his coverage all year. The

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>average game against Patrick Peterson is twenty three yards in

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>his coverage. So I have I have a C grade

1:08:57.880 --> 1:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>most because I was afraid Scott would come over here

1:08:59.560 --> 1:09:04.519
<v Speaker 1>and punch me the face. Then to the Arizona side,

1:09:05.000 --> 1:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the only, uh my, only really positive player here is

1:09:08.520 --> 1:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. The Lions giving up a league worst five

1:09:10.840 --> 1:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>point one yards per carry to opposing backs, although much

1:09:13.439 --> 1:09:16.639
<v Speaker 1>better since Snack Harrison arrived. They've also given a cousin

1:09:16.840 --> 1:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right. They've also given up twenty plus carries to

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>opposing backs three times, and in those games the backs

1:09:21.600 --> 1:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>average hundred thirty rushing yards in a touchdown per game.

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully David Johnson's gonna get the twenty carries I've got

1:09:26.800 --> 1:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to I've got an A grade on David Johnson for

1:09:28.880 --> 1:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this one. Can also be helpful through the air as well,

1:09:32.080 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as you already know. Uh, the only other starting grade

1:09:34.400 --> 1:09:37.519
<v Speaker 1>is is Larry Fitzgerald. He's got a very positive matchup

1:09:37.560 --> 1:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in the slot against Nevin Lawson, and or tease Tabor,

1:09:41.640 --> 1:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's entirely touchdown dependent. He's top fifty yards just once.

1:09:45.240 --> 1:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>In the Josh Rosen era, Larry Fitzgerald, you can start

1:09:49.280 --> 1:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>him and hope for a score on his poultry three

1:09:51.360 --> 1:09:53.639
<v Speaker 1>catches per game. But that's all you're That's all you're

1:09:53.640 --> 1:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>getting from Larry Fitzgerald is that chance for a touchdown.

1:09:56.520 --> 1:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>And Josh Rosen's on the bench. He's strown less for

1:09:58.600 --> 1:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>less than one nine yards and three straight games. Think

1:10:01.880 --> 1:10:05.599
<v Speaker 1>about that, less than one nine yards and three straight games.

1:10:05.600 --> 1:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that in the NFL these days?

1:10:07.360 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>That's like Lamar Jackson. That is bad. Final set of

1:10:11.120 --> 1:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>matchups coming up when we come back, including the Eagles.

1:10:14.439 --> 1:10:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Do you trust Golden Tate? Now find out when we

1:10:17.640 --> 1:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>come back. This is Fantasy Football Weekly presented by Devannies.

1:10:22.960 --> 1:10:48.519
<v Speaker 1>On the final segment of a playoff edition of Fantasy

1:10:48.560 --> 1:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, Paul Archie and Scott Fish Matt Harrison with you.

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got a handful of matchups to knockdown, and then

1:10:55.320 --> 1:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we will get to your calls. Lightning round, including several

1:10:57.840 --> 1:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>people from out of town nice enough to hold a

1:11:00.200 --> 1:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>long time, and I appreciate everybody's patience. Today, Scott Philadelphia

1:11:03.720 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>takes on Dallas. Golden Tate finally looked like the guy

1:11:07.479 --> 1:11:09.519
<v Speaker 1>for the Eagles that he had been for the Lions,

1:11:09.560 --> 1:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>where he was a highly productive fantasy player. Do you

1:11:12.240 --> 1:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think it continues into this game in a tougher matchup

1:11:15.400 --> 1:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>with Dallas? Right and the and the nice thing is

1:11:17.520 --> 1:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he's getting eight targets, eight targets and seven targets last

1:11:20.479 --> 1:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. He's he's getting the targets. I do

1:11:24.080 --> 1:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of think it continues, But the Cowboys have been

1:11:26.320 --> 1:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough lately. They've allowed the second fewest receptions, fourth

1:11:30.000 --> 1:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>fist yards, and third fewest touchdowns to wide receivers. Now

1:11:33.240 --> 1:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. I only gave Tate a C grade.

1:11:35.240 --> 1:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the targets might get him there, though I'm

1:11:37.760 --> 1:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>giving whence you know, the leader of the offense. I'm

1:11:40.160 --> 1:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>giving him a B grade. He had three sixty and

1:11:42.240 --> 1:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>two against the Cowboys in Week ten. These two teams

1:11:45.479 --> 1:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>usually get up for each other, so I think that

1:11:47.320 --> 1:11:49.759
<v Speaker 1>he might be able to overcome how good that Cowboys

1:11:49.840 --> 1:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>d has looked recently, especially against the Saints the other week.

1:11:52.320 --> 1:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Right and Matt Ryan held to a one touchdown game.

1:11:55.040 --> 1:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think Whence gets up for it just just

1:11:58.240 --> 1:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>enough for a B, and I think it spreads in

1:11:59.800 --> 1:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a round a lot. You know Hurts is going to

1:12:01.720 --> 1:12:03.639
<v Speaker 1>get the A grade. He had four teen for one

1:12:04.320 --> 1:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and two against the couples last time. Although you know

1:12:08.520 --> 1:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this is an old John Habermeyer theory, and I think

1:12:10.840 --> 1:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>he's right more often than not when these um when

1:12:14.680 --> 1:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>interdivisional rivals play each other, if one thing, you know,

1:12:18.400 --> 1:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>cause one one guy blew up, the next time they

1:12:21.360 --> 1:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>play the defense place, just to take that that away.

1:12:24.080 --> 1:12:27.759
<v Speaker 1>This is classic Arts too, because and this is different matchup,

1:12:28.240 --> 1:12:31.599
<v Speaker 1>but Art's against Washington for like four years was awesome

1:12:31.840 --> 1:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and then not good. Like against Washington, his December game

1:12:34.880 --> 1:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>against Washington every year was amazing. Uh egilars two inconsistent,

1:12:38.920 --> 1:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>so I have him on the bench. Jeffrey, he has

1:12:42.360 --> 1:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>between thirty and fifty yards and no touchdowns in five

1:12:45.120 --> 1:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>straight since the since the Golden Tape trade. Hal Sean

1:12:48.760 --> 1:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey's average line three and a half catch up thirty

1:12:52.040 --> 1:12:55.599
<v Speaker 1>eight yards scores exactly four tea for one in that span,

1:12:56.080 --> 1:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>these tight ends have outscored him. C J. John Smith,

1:12:59.600 --> 1:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Vance Donald something named fer Sir for Tennessee, Rhett Ellison,

1:13:04.320 --> 1:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Higbee, These these crap tight ends scoring Alshon Jeffrey

1:13:08.439 --> 1:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>since Golden Take came to town. Uh. I gave a

1:13:11.360 --> 1:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>B grade to Josh Adams and I have spoils on

1:13:13.920 --> 1:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the bench. The B grade to Josh Adams is because

1:13:16.160 --> 1:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>he's chocked up twenty plus touches in consecutive games. The

1:13:19.720 --> 1:13:23.599
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry isn't great, but I gotta give him

1:13:23.600 --> 1:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a beyond that amount of opportunity in an in division game.

1:13:27.479 --> 1:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, I give Prescott a C grade. UH.

1:13:31.360 --> 1:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Since Week seven, only Drew Brees has had multiple touchdowns

1:13:35.320 --> 1:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>against Philly or over three hundred yards multiple touchdowns or

1:13:38.720 --> 1:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>over three hundred yards against Philly. That doesn't speak well,

1:13:41.520 --> 1:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But Dak just had two of his best three games

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of the year. The defense is looking a lot better,

1:13:46.520 --> 1:13:48.519
<v Speaker 1>which puts him on the field more, and he's tacking

1:13:48.560 --> 1:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on rushing touchdowns touchdowns. In games in which Dak Prescott averages.

1:13:54.120 --> 1:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>In games on which he gets the rushing touchdown, he's

1:13:56.479 --> 1:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on average, he's quarterback eight. If he does not get

1:14:00.000 --> 1:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you are rushing touchdown, he's quarterback twenty two. And you

1:14:03.800 --> 1:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>want to know who quarterback twenty two is this year.

1:14:07.040 --> 1:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It's Blake Bortles. So if you do not get the

1:14:09.720 --> 1:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdown from Doc, you're starting Blake Bortles. That's how

1:14:13.080 --> 1:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>important it is to get the rushing touchdown. So he's

1:14:15.360 --> 1:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>got to sea hoping for that. He's at five in

1:14:17.520 --> 1:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the last seven games, so you've got to hope for

1:14:20.040 --> 1:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit. But I think he'll, you know,

1:14:21.800 --> 1:14:24.679
<v Speaker 1>be barely startable here. I gave Cooper and Zeke a's

1:14:24.880 --> 1:14:27.479
<v Speaker 1>because Cooper is averaging eight targets per games since joining

1:14:27.520 --> 1:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. He's had seventy five yards and or a

1:14:29.800 --> 1:14:32.599
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in four those five. Eagles are allowing the second

1:14:32.640 --> 1:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>most receptions and second most yards to watch receivers. Zeke's obvious.

1:14:36.160 --> 1:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I need Yeah, that goes without saying. Um.

1:14:39.520 --> 1:14:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of obvious place, Pittsburgh takes on Oakland. It's start

1:14:42.520 --> 1:14:45.719
<v Speaker 1>all your Steelers right and A grades virtually across the board.

1:14:46.120 --> 1:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Virtually across the board. A for Antonio and Juju uh

1:14:50.280 --> 1:14:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Juju is averaging a hundred eight yards per game over

1:14:52.680 --> 1:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>his last four weeks, with half a touchdown per game.

1:14:55.479 --> 1:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben gets an A grade. The home road splits do

1:14:57.960 --> 1:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not exist anymore. The low yardage mark on the road

1:15:01.479 --> 1:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>this year is two hundred seventy yards, and he's thrown

1:15:04.040 --> 1:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at least a touchdown in every game on the road.

1:15:07.160 --> 1:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>He's also had two rushing touchdowns in the last three

1:15:09.840 --> 1:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>road games. It's a little interesting after two straight losses,

1:15:13.040 --> 1:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers are looking at a Raiders defense that it's

1:15:15.200 --> 1:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most passing scorers in the league. Ben's gonna

1:15:18.080 --> 1:15:21.479
<v Speaker 1>get right, Vance McDonald. I'm giving an A grade. Six

1:15:21.640 --> 1:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>different tight ends have scored a touchdown on the Raiders

1:15:24.000 --> 1:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in their last six games. Three different Colts and two

1:15:27.000 --> 1:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>different Chiefs tight ends scored against the Raiders in the

1:15:29.479 --> 1:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks too. As an emergency dart throw. Jesse

1:15:33.200 --> 1:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>James is not a terrible play Jalen Samuel's He's getting

1:15:37.320 --> 1:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a B. I gave Stephen Ridley a C grade. James

1:15:39.880 --> 1:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>conners out this week the Steeler said they're gonna go

1:15:42.200 --> 1:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>running back by committee. I do not believe them. They

1:15:45.240 --> 1:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>never have done that in Mike Tomlin's tenure. Uh, sam

1:15:48.880 --> 1:15:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Ridley sucks. Yeah, let's just be honest. Samuels was

1:15:52.560 --> 1:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a college running back, fullback, wide receiver, and tight end. Yes,

1:15:56.280 --> 1:15:58.599
<v Speaker 1>he has the ability to be involved in the passing game.

1:15:59.080 --> 1:16:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh and that's of a hallmark of the Steelers running

1:16:01.720 --> 1:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>backs in the past. They're usually involved in the passing game.

1:16:04.080 --> 1:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>He caught three balls for twenty and a score last

1:16:06.200 --> 1:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>week along with the two carries he had. Oakland's allowing

1:16:09.320 --> 1:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the most rushing yards per game to running backs a

1:16:11.439 --> 1:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty per game, so Samuel's is a pretty

1:16:13.840 --> 1:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>good start over. On the other side, here's the deal

1:16:16.920 --> 1:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Raiders. Are you chasing the stats from last week?

1:16:20.160 --> 1:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Because Jalen Rashardon Doug Martin Martin both looked good. Derek

1:16:25.200 --> 1:16:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Carr was not a complete embarrassment. He had two eighty

1:16:27.760 --> 1:16:30.479
<v Speaker 1>five and three scores last week against the Chiefs. In fact,

1:16:30.560 --> 1:16:34.639
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't thrown an interception since Week five, seven straight games,

1:16:34.880 --> 1:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and the completion percentage is a very nice six on

1:16:38.160 --> 1:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the season. Jordy Nelson did not retire, had ten catches

1:16:41.920 --> 1:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>for ninety seven yards. Jared Cook had a hundred yards

1:16:45.280 --> 1:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in a score last week. That being said, every one

1:16:47.880 --> 1:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of them is on the bench. The Steelers are a

1:16:49.920 --> 1:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>top twelve defense against passing yards allowed, rushing yards allowed,

1:16:54.479 --> 1:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, receptions for running backs and receiving yards

1:16:57.800 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 1>for running backs, and in their last five games, the

1:17:00.479 --> 1:17:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Steelers rank in the top ten in receiving yards allowed

1:17:03.600 --> 1:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers, tight ends, and touchdowns allowed to both

1:17:07.200 --> 1:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of those positions as well. There's nothing to like here

1:17:09.880 --> 1:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>about a top ten Steelers defense and a mediocre Oakland offense.

1:17:15.880 --> 1:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Final matchup is the Monday night game, Vikings taking on

1:17:19.400 --> 1:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. It's um plenty, it's a meati matchup, and

1:17:24.680 --> 1:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>uh but we will still plenty of time for lightning rounds,

1:17:26.840 --> 1:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so I encourage you. Lines are full now, of course,

1:17:28.920 --> 1:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but I encourage you to dial in when you hear

1:17:30.800 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>people drop. Uh. Wait, let's be at the passing game

1:17:33.320 --> 1:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Vikings. Seahawks secondary is slumped over the past

1:17:37.240 --> 1:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>six games, giving up over the past six averages of

1:17:40.160 --> 1:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>three yards and two touchdowns. And more specifically, the Seahawks

1:17:44.360 --> 1:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>are a lot exactly two passing touchdowns in those six

1:17:46.840 --> 1:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>straight games, all of them to touchdowns. I think Kirk

1:17:49.280 --> 1:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>finds his way to at least two touchdowns here, which

1:17:51.520 --> 1:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>gives them a B grade. Uh. Kirk's receivers have got

1:17:55.760 --> 1:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>positive matchups, and I've got A grades on both digs

1:17:58.520 --> 1:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and Theeling digs Go was primarily up against Seattle cornerback

1:18:02.040 --> 1:18:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Trey Flowers, who got ruined by Dante Pettis last week,

1:18:06.640 --> 1:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and then if when he also sees Shaquille Griffin, he's

1:18:10.040 --> 1:18:11.599
<v Speaker 1>given up a score and each of the last two

1:18:11.760 --> 1:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>no team runs a higher percentage of pass plays in

1:18:13.880 --> 1:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the vikings, and Diggs is the more targeted of the two,

1:18:16.760 --> 1:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>So we'll go with Stephan Diggs in an A grade.

1:18:18.880 --> 1:18:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling will primarily line up against slot cornerback Justin Coleman,

1:18:22.760 --> 1:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>who's just okay um, he's the last three games he's

1:18:27.400 --> 1:18:29.799
<v Speaker 1>he's been good, but this is still a strongly positive

1:18:29.840 --> 1:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Theelan who has scored or topped one yards

1:18:33.120 --> 1:18:36.559
<v Speaker 1>and eleven of twelve starts. Staying with the passing game,

1:18:36.600 --> 1:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got a C grade and Kyle Rudolph. Teams are

1:18:39.000 --> 1:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>targeting their tight ends on just sixteen percent of their

1:18:41.479 --> 1:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>passes against the Seahawks, which does not bode well. Uh.

1:18:44.479 --> 1:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph's best games have come when Feeling and Digs

1:18:47.920 --> 1:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of each scene ten ten or more targets, and Seattle

1:18:51.439 --> 1:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>has given up the six most passes per game over

1:18:54.360 --> 1:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the last three games. So maybe there's just just the

1:18:57.040 --> 1:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>plethora of running game work well or passing game work

1:18:59.439 --> 1:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>will ultimately helped to Routolph. But just to see grade

1:19:01.760 --> 1:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and really preferre you kept him on the bench, let's

1:19:04.000 --> 1:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>go to Let's go to Dalvin Cook. Every Viking fan

1:19:07.000 --> 1:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>wants to see more of Dalvin Cook after last week

1:19:09.120 --> 1:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>when he averaged nine yards to carry. Since Week nine

1:19:11.840 --> 1:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>against the Seahawks, every lead back is top to one

1:19:14.439 --> 1:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and or scored except one. So if the

1:19:18.800 --> 1:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks run defense has not been great, and you know

1:19:21.439 --> 1:19:23.519
<v Speaker 1>after last week, there feels like a mandate to get

1:19:23.560 --> 1:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook much more involved, I've gotta be grade on him.

1:19:26.000 --> 1:19:28.839
<v Speaker 1>I think they will do that here. Latavius Murray's touchdown

1:19:28.880 --> 1:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>dependent will leave him on the bench. Let's go to

1:19:30.640 --> 1:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks side, Russell Wilson. It's for me, the whole

1:19:35.880 --> 1:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>thing depends on Trey Waynes. I've got a B grade

1:19:39.040 --> 1:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>on Wilson right now. I'd i'd consider upgrading him to

1:19:41.640 --> 1:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>A if you told me Trey Waynes was not gonna

1:19:43.320 --> 1:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>go in this matchup and he is not practiced yet.

1:19:45.320 --> 1:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's a Monday nighter, there's still a chance he

1:19:47.760 --> 1:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>practices today and if that happens, that opens up the

1:19:50.960 --> 1:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>door for Waynes potentially to uh to get something done

1:19:54.320 --> 1:19:56.519
<v Speaker 1>in this and get on the field for this matchup.

1:19:56.600 --> 1:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's working his way through the concussion protocol. Now it's

1:20:00.160 --> 1:20:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a tough matchup with the Vikings. Aside from that Rams

1:20:02.800 --> 1:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>meltdown in Week four, the Vikings average game against is

1:20:06.400 --> 1:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just two hundred thirty passing yards and zero point nine

1:20:09.960 --> 1:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns per game. That's it. Four The past five

1:20:13.439 --> 1:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks to face the Vikings haven't even topped one passing yards.

1:20:18.240 --> 1:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>But for his part, Russell Wilson has been terrific, multiple

1:20:21.520 --> 1:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns in every game but one, including three or

1:20:25.080 --> 1:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>more scores, and half of his starts. Now Russell's not

1:20:27.800 --> 1:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>doing anymore is rushing. He has no rushing touchdowns this year.

1:20:30.400 --> 1:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>They don't have design rushing plays. He's got to get

1:20:32.520 --> 1:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>done with his arm in a tough matchup. But again,

1:20:34.280 --> 1:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if Trey Waynes doesn't go, I like him more. And

1:20:36.080 --> 1:20:38.599
<v Speaker 1>that brings us to Tile Lock Tyler Lockett, because that's

1:20:38.640 --> 1:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy that you want. Wayne's on. Thai Locking is

1:20:41.080 --> 1:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the fastest receivers in the league. Wayne is

1:20:43.120 --> 1:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the faster cornerbacks in the league. That's a

1:20:45.680 --> 1:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>perfect one on one matchup for Trey Waynes. Lockett parlays

1:20:50.520 --> 1:20:53.360
<v Speaker 1>these three catches of games into scores better than anybody

1:20:53.400 --> 1:20:56.599
<v Speaker 1>scored in nine different games this year. So if Waynes

1:20:56.680 --> 1:21:00.519
<v Speaker 1>can't go tier Lock it's an A. If Wayne's does go,

1:21:01.000 --> 1:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I dropped Tyler Locket down to a C. Doug Baldwin

1:21:05.160 --> 1:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>may not play after missing practice the last couple of games, UM,

1:21:08.360 --> 1:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and he runs out of the slot and he'll see

1:21:09.880 --> 1:21:13.519
<v Speaker 1>a vastly improved McKenzie Alexander either way. So if Baldwin goes,

1:21:14.080 --> 1:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you maybe a C at best. But I don't know

1:21:16.040 --> 1:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna play, and I think you're safer leaving

1:21:17.880 --> 1:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench. Also, David Moore, I don't think

1:21:21.280 --> 1:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to start in this matchup either. He's only

1:21:23.400 --> 1:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>playable and easy matchups. This is not one of them.

1:21:25.720 --> 1:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the running game. Since Week eight, the

1:21:28.720 --> 1:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have only allowed two runners to score on the

1:21:31.160 --> 1:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>ground um, and they haven't been playing scrubs over that time. Either.

1:21:33.960 --> 1:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>They've held carry On Johnson and Check Jordan Howard, Sony Michelle.

1:21:37.120 --> 1:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>None of them found the end zone or top three

1:21:39.240 --> 1:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>point eight yards per carry. Curse Car. Carson's getting about

1:21:42.800 --> 1:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of the snaps and then the other third

1:21:45.800 --> 1:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>go to Penny and Davis. So you gotta leave on

1:21:47.760 --> 1:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the bench because they're just not getting enough work here

1:21:49.880 --> 1:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and the matchups very difficult. A C grade on Carson,

1:21:53.439 --> 1:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a bench grade on the others. That brings us to

1:21:58.840 --> 1:22:05.719
<v Speaker 1>lightning round. Your calls your toughest question between two players,

1:22:05.960 --> 1:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>one question between two players. We have plenty of time

1:22:09.200 --> 1:22:10.519
<v Speaker 1>to get to a lot of you. I know this

1:22:10.640 --> 1:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is a big week, this is the playoffs. You need

1:22:12.360 --> 1:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to win, and we're here to help. We got to

1:22:14.200 --> 1:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>bring the a game advice here. All all this year,

1:22:17.520 --> 1:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we've been coasting, purposely giving out bad advice, waiting until

1:22:21.400 --> 1:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs to give the good advice. Well, especially to

1:22:23.800 --> 1:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>people from Wisconsin to uh Raw Josh and Philadelphia. Hello,

1:22:28.160 --> 1:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your patience. Josh, Hey, guys, no problem.

1:22:31.320 --> 1:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate the insight all year. Or Winston Scott. I think

1:22:38.560 --> 1:22:43.559
<v Speaker 1>I have Wilson higher. Yeah, Wilson, I'm surprised. I don't.

1:22:43.600 --> 1:22:46.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about that Viking defense. If we break the tie,

1:22:46.600 --> 1:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Winston. Winston was my take so, Yeah,

1:22:50.360 --> 1:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they're really close for me. You know, if you told

1:22:52.920 --> 1:22:55.519
<v Speaker 1>me for sure tray Wains was out, I'm I'm listening

1:22:55.560 --> 1:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Winston side, but we don't know right now,

1:22:57.400 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if we're gonna know by tomorrow

1:22:59.040 --> 1:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>morning when you gotta make that that decision. Josh, We're

1:23:02.120 --> 1:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on Winston to play it safe. Thank you for listening

1:23:05.240 --> 1:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>from Philadelphia. I appreciate that. Tom. Hello, Hello, thanks for

1:23:11.200 --> 1:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>taking my college gentlemen, and I have a total strategy

1:23:14.000 --> 1:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>question to ask a wide receiver. My opponent has Jamie

1:23:17.920 --> 1:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Winston and you're playing Godwin. I have Humphreys that I

1:23:21.760 --> 1:23:25.479
<v Speaker 1>could throw in, or I could avoid that matchup and

1:23:25.640 --> 1:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>play tennis from San Francisco. Which would you prefer to

1:23:29.840 --> 1:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>do to play the receiver against your protos quarterback or

1:23:33.680 --> 1:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>go away from that team and take Let me Tim, Tom,

1:23:37.920 --> 1:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this. If everybody just sort of

1:23:40.000 --> 1:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>plays out to the way they probably play out, do

1:23:42.840 --> 1:23:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you think you're the favorite or are you the underdog?

1:23:47.080 --> 1:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Exactly projected for the same score within two tenths of

1:23:50.680 --> 1:23:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the point and a standard leave Matt, what do you think? Uh?

1:23:55.280 --> 1:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>In that case, I think you go upside and you

1:23:58.160 --> 1:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>cheer against the Bucks hard, So I'd go Pettis and

1:24:01.960 --> 1:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not not play the Humphries angle and just hope that

1:24:05.200 --> 1:24:08.519
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans just rolls. And actually there's supposed to be

1:24:08.600 --> 1:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>some bad weather in that game. There's potentially potential rain

1:24:12.120 --> 1:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and weather concerned. So yeah, I go Pettis. Dave, you're

1:24:15.880 --> 1:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on the fan, Dave? Hello, Yeah, come here all right?

1:24:21.920 --> 1:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>BlackBerry Guy? Hey, full point PPR. Austin Equer, Aaron Jones,

1:24:27.320 --> 1:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, I love even since I'm my top five

1:24:30.080 --> 1:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>this week, so we'll take Aaron Jones um and Blueberry Guy.

1:24:34.479 --> 1:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So Austin, Hello, join Jackson Mixing? That was Justin Jackson

1:24:41.479 --> 1:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>or mixing? I believe. I think Justin Jackson's gotta split

1:24:45.800 --> 1:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just enough and mixing is gonna get all the volume.

1:24:47.960 --> 1:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough matchup, but I'd rather have mixing, all right,

1:24:50.439 --> 1:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and the other way and hello to point PPR. I've

1:24:55.880 --> 1:24:59.519
<v Speaker 1>got Listonmatory or Dare Peterson. Both of them are great,

1:25:00.040 --> 1:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Ko or Adrian. How strongly do you feel in your

1:25:04.320 --> 1:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>your B grade of McCoy church um? Actually feel pretty

1:25:09.000 --> 1:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>good to Chest's defense bad all right? Where where do

1:25:14.000 --> 1:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you have him in your ranks. Um, hang on, this

1:25:17.400 --> 1:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>is close. I'd lean Adrian. I know you'd probably lean McCoy,

1:25:20.800 --> 1:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>but they're really, really tight. I've got Um, I've got

1:25:25.560 --> 1:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Adrian at twenty five, and i've got McCoy at thirty.

1:25:29.560 --> 1:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go Adrian. Okay, Matt, you're next. Hey, guys,

1:25:35.000 --> 1:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting Jack right now, but something's been bugging me

1:25:37.320 --> 1:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all week to replaced him in favor of Jamis. What

1:25:40.240 --> 1:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think I would? Here's the problem. You know,

1:25:42.920 --> 1:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Dad doesn't again, if he doesn't get the rushing score,

1:25:45.040 --> 1:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>he hurts you. So I think I would play. I'd

1:25:47.960 --> 1:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>play Jamis Winston in that one. Mark, You're next? Hi,

1:25:52.160 --> 1:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>um or ppr wow to come to this? For Joe Mixon,

1:25:58.640 --> 1:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm such a trick And he said so boom er bust.

1:26:04.120 --> 1:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's not the safe call. He's not the same.

1:26:08.479 --> 1:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing safe about the Bengals anymore. It depends on

1:26:11.680 --> 1:26:13.599
<v Speaker 1>what you need. Do you need the safety of ten

1:26:13.720 --> 1:26:16.479
<v Speaker 1>points from Joe Mixon or do you need the upside

1:26:17.680 --> 1:26:21.479
<v Speaker 1>from track one? Yeah? I see if our second of

1:26:21.600 --> 1:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>three marks? Hello, oh Hi, Mark, Mark, Standard Lee, Chub

1:26:29.000 --> 1:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>or Lindsay, I'm gonna go Chub but I don't like

1:26:34.120 --> 1:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what the what what it's looking like for the Broncos

1:26:37.200 --> 1:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>offense when when Emmanuel goes down, I think that whole

1:26:39.800 --> 1:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>offense has to run through Lindsay, and I think that

1:26:41.760 --> 1:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they can stack the box against him. I still love Lindsay.

1:26:44.560 --> 1:26:48.599
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't not love Philip Lindsay, Chris Hello, Hight,

1:26:49.160 --> 1:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Drake Smith or Pettist. I'm going to gainst the team

1:26:52.479 --> 1:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>with Barkley, Jones, Savante and David Johnson. Wow, that's a

1:26:58.479 --> 1:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>good See he needs the upside. Yeah, but they both

1:27:01.080 --> 1:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have but they both have good upside in this one. See.

1:27:04.160 --> 1:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I would take Pattis three touchdowns in the last two games.

1:27:07.479 --> 1:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>He gives you plenty of upside without all the risk

1:27:10.000 --> 1:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that comes with Tray Kwon Smith, Brad you are next? Yeah?

1:27:14.600 --> 1:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Four point ppr Z Jones or Allen Robinson. Okay, I

1:27:20.280 --> 1:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like sa Jones far more, even though Chicago should be

1:27:22.840 --> 1:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>playing from behind a little bit and they're gonna need

1:27:24.800 --> 1:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the offense. I like a Jones a lot this week. Mark,

1:27:26.840 --> 1:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>You're on the fan further playoff? Baker, Sorry, say one

1:27:32.400 --> 1:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>more time. Baker may feel a little Okay, that's tight,

1:27:39.280 --> 1:27:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. You take a chance. I mean, guy, Lamar

1:27:41.640 --> 1:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Jackson has been a top five Fantasy quarterback since taking over.

1:27:46.120 --> 1:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I go Lamar. I think they're safety there. Yeah, there

1:27:49.439 --> 1:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is a certain amount of safety with a rushing quarterback

1:27:51.439 --> 1:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>who's downside feels like sixty rushing yards well, and his

1:27:54.960 --> 1:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>matchups a lot better to Dave. You are next? Okay,

1:27:59.200 --> 1:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>standard league, Landry or Tates. I have went starting at quarterback.

1:28:03.960 --> 1:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Landry's got a fantastic matchup and we saw signs of

1:28:06.920 --> 1:28:09.479
<v Speaker 1>life last week. I'm taking Jarvis Landry in this one.

1:28:09.840 --> 1:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Josh your next? Yeah, I need two wide receivers Tyllard

1:28:14.640 --> 1:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Boyd Smith. But yeah, you know it's been the same

1:28:19.800 --> 1:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>rules for three years. Josh, I'm sorry. It's one question

1:28:23.520 --> 1:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>between two guys. Scott you are next. Yeah, standard scoring Kelsey,

1:28:30.880 --> 1:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh geez. Seriously. By the way, we talked earlier in

1:28:35.600 --> 1:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the show about how in the first round those two

1:28:37.840 --> 1:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>guys are gonna go, a lot of people are going

1:28:40.120 --> 1:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to try to take both. Yeah, so I would totally

1:28:43.120 --> 1:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>understand that at the player pool. Ye, absolutely, I guess Kelsey. Yep,

1:28:49.560 --> 1:28:52.439
<v Speaker 1>That's where I'm going, right, go Kelsey to Ravens are

1:28:52.479 --> 1:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>good defense they're great defense. The one weakness with the

1:28:55.520 --> 1:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Ravens tight end. As I mentioned earlier in the show,

1:28:58.160 --> 1:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they've given up tight end touchdowns in five of the

1:29:00.120 --> 1:29:03.799
<v Speaker 1>six weeks. And it's the second meeting against Dallas. Dallas

1:29:03.880 --> 1:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>might just sell out to stoppards Lavell, good morning, good morning.

1:29:09.479 --> 1:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>How are you. I'm good. Don't laugh at my selections,

1:29:14.120 --> 1:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the the unmotivated Matt Stafford or Case Keenum. Oh no, really,

1:29:20.560 --> 1:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you should get down four players really quick and just

1:29:23.439 --> 1:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>just I can't. I can't start Case. I can't start

1:29:31.920 --> 1:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Case this week. No, Emmanuel Sanders Stafford against the Cardinals. Yeah,

1:29:36.439 --> 1:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't do it. I know. Well there's that, but

1:29:40.360 --> 1:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll how about Kenny Golladay? Okay, see your Sutton and

1:29:44.720 --> 1:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>raise you a holiday. Correct obviously, I'm I'm I'm I

1:29:48.680 --> 1:29:50.599
<v Speaker 1>have a team that's a wild card team, so it's

1:29:50.600 --> 1:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>obvious when I have Matt Staffords my quarterback. Bile Vl

1:29:53.400 --> 1:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks for checking in. Appreciate it. Uh if you messed

1:29:56.160 --> 1:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>any part of the show, check out the podcast cafan

1:29:58.200 --> 1:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Fan on demand, also m on iTunes, And thank you

1:30:01.080 --> 1:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for everybody who takes the time to leave ratings and

1:30:04.360 --> 1:30:06.639
<v Speaker 1>reviews that helps everybody around the country find the show

1:30:07.200 --> 1:30:10.559
<v Speaker 1>very important for us. Good luck in the playoffs, everybody.

1:30:10.560 --> 1:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're listening next week because you've advanced to

1:30:15.840 --> 1:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>round number two of your playoffs. Dr then, everybody, bye bye.

1:30:22.960 --> 1:30:24.639
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fair everyone,