WEBVTT - Amazon Prime Day Sales Record Expected 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, it is

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day today and tomorrow for Amazon. Doesn't mean that

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>much for me, but apparently I am one of the outliers.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>US shoppers will spend twelve billion dollars online in two days. Uh,

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>let's get the skinny on that with Punam Goyle, senior

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>US retail analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. So, Punam, give us

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a sense for Prime Day. It's we're such a weird

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in the past fifteen months have been such a weird

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>time for all of us. Everybody's behavior has been disrupted.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Give us a sense of how important Prime Day is

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to an Amazon, you know, maybe versus last year. Sure,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks Paul. So Prime Days basically very important for Amazon.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's expected in our view, to bring in about twelve

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars and grows merchandise sales. That's built from third

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>party and first party. UM. Now what's interesting here and

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>why it's important is because Amazon Prime Day is when

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon gets to sell more of its own inventory. So

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>if you think about the Amazon business, more than half

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of the business is from third party, but on Amazon

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day, two thirds of the business is Amazon's owned business.

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's why it's so important. It's great for them

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's UM they get to promote some of their

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>own products. The other thing is they get to bring

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on more Prime members. So Prime members today we have

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred million Prime members, with the US having

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of the U S population households each

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>having a Prime member in there, so opportunity to grow.

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>That is where Prime Day helps. Where deals are promoted

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and consumers who are not Prime members can join Prime,

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>which then creates a more stickier customer for them in

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the longer term. And I wonder how much this has

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>grown with Amazon because revenue growth at Amazon has been

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>off the hook. We're talking about a company that made

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>less than two hundred way less than two hundred billion

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in revenue in and they're gonna make about five hundred

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>billion in revenue this year. So have we seen Prime

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Day revenue grow at the same pace. We've actually seen

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it grow much faster than that. So using the same

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>time frame that you just use, prime day sales where

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>two point four billion dollars and we're expecting twelve billion

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this year, so that's a sixfold increase almost. But I'm

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>talking to us about the other side of the equation,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the supply side, getting stuff to people's doors. We keep

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>hearing lots of stories about supply chain disruptions, and boy,

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>when I think about a company that really realizes upon

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a global supply chain, it's Amazon dot Com. What are

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>they telling you about being able to get stuff to

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>people's doors. You know, it hasn't been called out as

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a hiccup yet in order we see it. But what

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I have personally seen and I've heard from people is that,

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one day the two day delivery that

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you're used to expecting, maybe it doesn't come in one

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>day anymore anymore. Some items maybe they take two or

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>three days, but they're still getting them out there. You know,

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>if if anyone can do it, we think it's Amazon.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>They're pretty diversified how they ship. They use carriers, but

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they also have their own trucks and performent networks to

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>help them. So we think Amazon can still you know,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>go past those bottlenecks. We haven't seen, um, those constraints

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>impact them like we have some other companies in retail.

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm not not totally related to this story,

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>but I always wonder how to look at other no no,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>no cars man. Uh the weight they're is getting really

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>long for cars and motorcycles. But you know, a lot

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of times I'll choose Amazon instead of many other online

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>vendors because I want my stuff now. Um, and I'm

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>probably just a horrible person. But I guess other people

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel the same way. Are our other vendors. Are

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>other online sites hurrying up to try and match that? Yeah? Absolutely.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Walmart and Target, I say, are are

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>both playing in the space more aggressively than they ever

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have in the past. They now have programs where you

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>can get same day delivery, whether it's through Walmart Plus

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's to ship through ship it at Target,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so you can get things to your door the same

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>day today in retail across many other larger retailers. But

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>once again, the inventory there may be a little more limited,

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>um than it is on Amazon. Because they don't necessarily

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>have everything that they have available online for seing day

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>delivery or even next day. All Right, it's a great

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>topic because more and more of us well, it touches

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>so many um and a lot more obviously than it

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>did in two thou two thousand nine, um, and it

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's pretty sticky. Punham is a great person

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk to. She's our senior US retail analyst for

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, so she knows all there is to know

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>about this fascinating and growing story um well and hopefully

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>continues to grow because that means the economy does as well.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's the story on Prime Day. Get acquainted with it.

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It's here to stay, Paul and spreading really around the world.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg right now. Let's go to Omar agular

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>ceio of Passive Equity Multi Asset Strategies for Charles Schwab

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Investment Management. He joins us. Omar, thanks so much for

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>joining us. You know, when I think about Charles Schwab,

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I just think of, you know, just the army of

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:40.679
<v Speaker 1>individual investors out there, the retail investors, uh that trade

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>on your platform. What are you hearing most from the average.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>If you have a Charles Schwab investment management client right now, Hily,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>good morning. Um. You know, in general, you know what

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we see um industry wide on in general for retail

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>investors is you know there you know, they're concerned about inflation.

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Inflation seems to be what is top of mind as

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>continued concerns about the all the work that has been

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>done with prices going up, significant amount of imbalances between

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>demand and supply, and in general, you know what would

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>that do to interest rates? I think when we see

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the the data and the volatility around the data, you know,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what comes to investor's head is, well,

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>this is going to affect earnings for companies. Is there's

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be something that affects prices and in general?

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>How is that going to reflect in the volatility of

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>my portfolios? Well you can just tell them, um, you know,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>if we start to see real inflation and the Fed

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>turns hawkish and the dots rise, they can expect to

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>see the ten year yield fall. Well that seems to

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>be what that's crazy, right, That's just insane. That seems

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to be exactly how the market, you know, it seems

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>to be reacting to what what I would probably they

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>say was something that the Federal Reserve tried to put

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>together last week, and in an effort to try to

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>reduce the fears of inflation, they actually created more uncertainty

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>for investors. I think a big significant part of the tone,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the hockey shtone that we all heard from jeron Power

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>last week, you know, translated into more volatility around the

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>timing of the tapering program. And I think the market

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be now more comfortable thinking that the tapering

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>will happen earlier than later, thinking that the Fed will

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive in reacting to any signs of inflation. So

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way that that inflation discussion created a little

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>more volatility in what we may see down the road.

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I guess one of the questions is,

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>if we are going to be in a rising interest

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>rate environment over the next several years, is economic growth

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>our corporate earnings are they strong enough to offset that?

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about that? Well, economic growth and

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth are city to be the for for us,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the catalyst of what may upset a little bit of

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that volatility and inflation components if you actually think about,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the numbers that we expect. Even in the

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, we're gonna, you know, get to the highest

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>possible numbers we have seen in a while. And granted

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that there is a base case effect, we're expecting over

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent year of a year EPs growth in the

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, which is going to be a record. Um.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you put that together with a potential

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of you know, over seven percent of GDP growth in

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>one you know, we're talking about something that I don't

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think we have seen in a long long time. Um.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>The big question in our minds is, you know, at

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>what point we go through that significant moving to the

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>mid cycle and the deceleration of economic growth and earnings

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>growth is something that the market feels comfortable. So whether

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the third quarter of this year or whether it's

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of this year when we're

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that deceleration and how fast that deceleration is.

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>This that steepness of deceleration is what I think is

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be some for us to continue to watch.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>If you had to put your money in one basket

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>or another, would it be value or growth? Well, I

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>think we we continue to tell investors that we have

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to be barbelled, we we this. You know, we are

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>in unprecedented charts, you know, in the business cycle and

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the economic cycles. Again, you know, we have never been

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this situation in any you know, these

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>cycles before. Because in a way, this is not even

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a mid cycle in the traditional sense, because we are reopening.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>We're still in that process of reopening. The global economy

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is not yet fully open, and as such, it is

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>very hard to put a component of saying, well, this

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is now the cyclical trade is done, and therefore we're

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>going to go to the mid cycle, you know, high

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>quality growth. So our our approach right now until we

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>get a little more clarity on the data is, you know,

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the cyclical trade still has some room, but you've got

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to be prepared for the next leg, which is going

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>into the high quality growth. So, you know, again, a

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>long way to tell you the Barbell strategies to be

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the most prudent at the moment. All right, thanks so

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Omar always great to get your inside.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Omar Aguilar c I, O of Passive Equity and multi

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Asset Strategies at Charles Schwab Investment Managers. You know, when

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we started Bloomberg intelligence, Bloomberg's in house research investment research business.

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>We said, we're going to really focus on the data,

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's what Bloomberg does. It has the world class

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>best data, and we'll let the data do the talking.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>In our analysts make lots of great charts and graphs

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>from that data and they tell you what's important. And

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>nobody does that better than Mike McGlone. He's got the

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>best charts, tells fantastic stories that really make you understand

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in his business. Uh. And Mike joins

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>us here because we need to talk about bitcoin. And

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at some charts here and it's not a

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>good chart for XPT. It's off another nine percent today, Mike,

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>So do we start looking at support levels for this

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>type of thing like you do with all the other

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>commodities you follow? Is that important when you look at

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>something like bitcoin. Bitcoin is very technical because it's still

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't understand it, and there's a

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of traders, and a lot of them are young

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and inexperience, and there's a lot of bots trading them.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's so automated. But I look at thirty thousand,

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty good support. It ended last year around twenty

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand. Now we might get a little dip below there,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just to kind of tweak out the last of the

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>speculative accesses. But what I see here is lower prices

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are attracting more the longer term bine hole types. And

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's last week it peaked around forty thousand, So thirty

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to forty thousand. I still thinking should get to the

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand this year. The key thing I'm worried about

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>is what happened last year. Bonnil is collapsing, the stock

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>market declining. It's the macro, and if the stock market

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>goes down and bonnels go down, bitcoin is part of

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that macro. But in the big picture, what the Fed said,

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, kind of tweaking things a little bit.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>The the the Fed squawk of that, to me, is

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>actually good and long term for bitcoin like it is

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>for gold. So you think bitcoin is more of an

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>inflation hedge, Well a, Matt, Well, Well, I mean here's

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing, because if the FED starts to raise rates,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin and gold don't pay any dividends or have any

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of return like that unless you use some funky

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>yield farming strategies so why well, ultimately it will be

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation hedge. But look at gold in the last ten years,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last twenty years, it hasn't been an inflation.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Has has been a deflation. Has been working better with

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>yields collapsing, and gold is kicking him right now finally

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>because yields the thirty year drop alow and to one

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.599
<v Speaker 1>point nine four. Last night I got up and I

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>looked at like, WHOA. So to me, what's happening is

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not inflation. Think of what it's going to take

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Fed. The raised rates. That's a dream right now,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's started that. They're trying to warn us a

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>litit because they remember what happened last time with the

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>taper tantrum. It's just classic Fed. They have to do that.

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>But they're still dreaming of raising rates. And then the

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>key thing is if the stock market doesn't go up,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>deflation is the main problem. You see that most commodities,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>most of them peak crude oil is still a little

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>bit higher here. Copper peaked at ten thousand dollars, But

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I kick in. Bitcoin is is replacing gold in portfolios

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in many cases, but it's not inflation yet. At some

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>point we'll get there. I didn't know when that's what

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna take. But to me, until the stock market,

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>until we get that past that pain, that that period

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>when he had a little bit of an ebbing tide

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and you see, here's who's wearing clothes kind of kicked

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in maybe a little bit last week. Is I fully

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>expect golden bitcoin being the two key asses wearing clothes

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>because there's still that I feel that organic and see

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the organic demand below the market. All right, so we

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>did see. I'm wondering, like for bitcoin, for those that

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>don't fully understand it as a security, what is it

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>most highly correlated with? Do you think? So what should

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>people be looking at to say, gf bon yields go up?

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, bitcoins? I mean, how should I think about? So?

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>How did you know what I'm researching right now on

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the bloom Bird portfolio? Potum, I'm I'm I'm working on

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>what's called port that's our portfolio function that putting bitcoin

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>with the bond market and just taking a US Treasury

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>market portfolio and using bitcoin of ten percent and a

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people here are doing that. Ray Dally as

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>if you mentioned that he'd rather old bitcoin than bonds,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it has zero correlation to most assets. Is a unique

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>thing about it. Now when markets plunge like we did

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>last year, everything has a high correlation to the stock mark,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and that kicked in. You saw that with crude oil,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>saw that with bitcoin. But no, now it's coming back,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what people are doing looking forward. Okay,

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in a gold portfolio, now I have to have a

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>little bitcoin because it's clearly replacing gold unless it fails.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But if that trend continues, But in a in a

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in a in a bond portfolio, it's really a nice compliment.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Say five to ten going forward, zero rates. If we

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>do get inflation at some point, it should kick in.

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you look past performance, very low low correlation,

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really add to volatively in the in the

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>bond portfolio, but it gives you those much better returns.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Now that's past performance looking forward. If it just keeps

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>doing what it has been, which I'm too, I'm not

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>smart at the fair to winning, it might change. It

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>should be a good compliment. And for me that's what's happening.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Every day that goes by that it doesn't fail, it

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>becomes more legitimate. Yeah, is there a material risk that

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin fails. Yeah, well it lessens every day. It's some

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of you have to have I have to reconsider

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that because it's new technology something some kind of technological glitch,

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>some kind of you know, the issue with energy where

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>point out how strong it is. So every time you

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>tryd of throw something at it, you kind of get

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>used to them, like, okay, knocks the price down. Then

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you look around like, actually, that's a positive thing for bitcoin.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's more likely to be beaten than fail, right,

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean that much more likely option is that, uh,

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the market chooses something else like either well that's the thing,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of like to say, okay, in a

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>gold portfolio, you have to have bitcoin, but kind of now,

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have to have a little bit of THEORYM in that,

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>because the THEORYM represents a whole building block of all

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>defy and and decentralized financial and it's all risen. By

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm a little confused. Well it's not that

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm confused, but there there are stories in China that

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>are bad for bitcoin. They're shutting down miners apparently, and

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>they're banning people from accepting it and using it, so

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems like China the government is against bitcoin. On

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, people in China own more bitcoin than

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>people in most other countries, and all of these new

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>unicorn businesses are popping up. I don't know if you

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>read about a group of Morgan Stanley traders that started

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a company called Amber Group, which trades not only trades bitcoin,

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but authors a bunch of other fintech solutions with crypto.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>They have now a billion dollar valuation. Um there's a

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Chinese crypto lender, Babel Finance. They've raised forty million from

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>investors like Sequoia and tiger Um. The list goes on

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and on of these new startups in Hong Kong and

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>on the mainland. Does China love bitcoin? Is it the

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>savior bitcoin? Or do they hate bitcoin? Are they terrified

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of matt What you described as very very short term

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>bullish and long term very I'm sorry, short term barrass

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>very long term bullis China pushing back and being agnostic

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>towards the bitcoin makes a lot of sense. Authoritarian society,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>no free flow cap, do not allow their citizens to

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>have free flow capital and any other currencies outside the

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>currents of the country, and that makes a lot of sense.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It's actually showing how how the strength of how good

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is for countries like US and the rest Western world.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>We have free coal, free flow capital, and discourse where

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you can exchange different currencies. So it's a savior for

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Chinese citizens. So they're trying to hide

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it from the government, but it's also extolling the problem

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese really going backwards the last few years and many

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>people with President Zy this whole concept of trying to

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, eliminate corruption. You know what that means, he's

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>just bringing people who agree with him. So it's to me,

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>what's happening to China is very bullish book for bitcoin.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>In the short term, it's miners have to leave, they

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>have to sell because they're getting a little discombobulated. But

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>they're moving more to more renewable sources, a lot of

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it North America. Gasler in Canada is one of the

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>top attractions right now, and it's all going renewable anyhow

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because of the costs. So I look at what happened

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in China is just that's that's the new Cold War

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and US has already winning organic. All right, Mike, thanks

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>so much, always great check in with you on Bitcoin,

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcgloan there Bloomberg Commodities. We've been talking about inflation

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot recently in the market is trying to get

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a handle on is it good inflation or perhaps something

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>more longer term and if so, how problematic is that

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>for the market. Let's check in with Brian wash He's

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a financial advisor at Walsh and Nicholson Financial Group. Brian,

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>if I'm really concerned about evaluation, I'm sorry, inflation. Should

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I just go out and buy gold as a hedge

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>boarding and thanks for having me? And my answer to

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>that is no. UM. When you actually look at gold

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>when it was supposed to work in inflationary environment UM

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in more recent times, and it hasn't UM. When you

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>look at UM, the the correlation with gold to the

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>equity market that has increased over time. So gold is

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a great buffer when you have a market sell off

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>UM like like we have back in March of last year.

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>But we're talking about inflation and future inflation. It has

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>not provided a great hedging strategy and in fact UM

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we at our firm, we are more inclined to look

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>towards commodities such as sugar and wet UM to hedge

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation as it has proved this year to work much

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>better than gold, so you think commodity is also better

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>than And by the way, speaking of commodities, did you

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>look at oils? Yeah? Thanks for you know, we've been

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at this morning, but it just spiked up here.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>We've got w t I crude oil two dollars an ounce.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a barrel that's up a dollar twenty barrel. It's

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>up almost one percent, So big move up there. Yeah,

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Brent up one and a half percent to seventy fifty barrel,

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so big moves up in commodities. What about equities? UM?

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I wonder Brian, can can you make an argument for

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>equities as good as a good inflation edge? Do you

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have to look at certain industry groups? Yeah? So, I

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>mean right now, there's really nowhere else to go. I mean,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to be in the equity market. You have

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a supportive you have support of UM physical and monetary policy,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>UM fixed income is it gonna give you really anything?

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Right now? So there really is no place else to

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>go other than the equity markets. But if you're looking

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to hedge inflation UM very similar to hedging interest rates.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>You know you need to look at quality companies who

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>have who have a history of increasing their dividends. UM.

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>If you have that and you have higher commodity prices,

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation, higher interest rates, those types of companies will

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fare a lot better. UM. And when you have these

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>high inflationary environments, these high interest rate environments, you need

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to have cash on hand. UM. Now is not the time,

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in our opinion, to be barreling into growth stocks. UM.

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>We think you need to have quality on the balance sheet, UM,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>quality in your portfolio, and and position a wordingly for

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>for higher interest rates and higher inflation. And you know,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>short term, obviously we're seeing what the fintas clung a

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>transitory inflation every move. Um. We believe that it's not transitory.

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>We think we're gonna see it continue um through into

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>three and I think that's when you're gonna start seeing

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>it effect Um the equity markets in a in a bigger,

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>bigger way. Bryan, are you You've you've been in this

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>game a while here, You've got some experience. When you

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>see valuations where they are today, when you see you know,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>meme stock trading, you know kind of the Reddit traders,

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>when you see SPACs exploding in the end of last

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>year beginning of this year. Does that suggest to you

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of froth in this market? I

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>better be a little bit careful. Absolutely, I mean, UM,

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about it. I have people calling me

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>who have never had questions before about investments calling me

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>asking them about a m C and game stop in bitcoin.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So UM, anytime, you know, for me, I see some people, UM,

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, reaching out regarding certain things, Um, you have

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>to start to wonder. And it's across the board. I mean,

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing in this marketplace right now, at least on

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the US side, that is trading uh in any capacity. Um,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's justified everything to me, you know, is is just

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pent up demand, pent up cash that

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>people want to spend. UM. And you know they're they're

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>riding the federal uh FED policy wave right now. And UM,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I I really, I truly believe um that you know,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this year will probably be pretty decent

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>frequity markets. But once two comes around, UM, I think

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see that valuation bubble um start to start

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to dissipate a little bit. But nothing just dissipate, right,

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>not pop I mean, you co founded walshon Nicholson, so

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>you've been through a real bubble. We see big text

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>docs with huge valuations. You don't think this is gonna

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be you know, Like again, well, I think it depends

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on where you're looking. I mean I think, um, you know,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>some companies, um, you know, it's a fair better. I

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>mean I think you know, when you look at Amazon, Google's,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's of the world, Um you know. No, I don't

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna see a pop there. I mean, those

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>are companies that have overtaken our world and overtaken our

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>our you know, the public um interest in general. But

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these smaller UM tech companies with these crazy valuations,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>UM yeah, I do think you're gonna see um, you know,

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>more of a pop there. So I think on the

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.959
<v Speaker 1>on the large end, large cap end of the tech market,

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a distipate distipating um reset versus the

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>small and mid cap end. Is is definitely gonna see

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>some the broad of the down the downtre and there.

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, very cool to get your take. Thanks

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Brian Walsh, financial advisor at

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Walsh and Nicholson talking to us about markets. Thanks for

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Miller three and on Fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio