WEBVTT - Is China the Next Green Superpower?

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, mango, what's that will? I'm not sure if

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you saw this, but earlier this year, the Chinese province

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of Qinghai successfully powered itself for a full week on

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a renewable energy I'm not sure I heard that. So

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I had read about this just a little bit, but

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't remember the scale of it. So they were

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>using solar and wind and hydro power, and they managed

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to provide power to five point six million residents for

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>seven full days. I mean, that's more than the population

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of Los Angeles. It's more than Chicago. It's more than

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix and Philadelphia and San Antonio combined. It's more than

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>San Diego, Dallas, Seattle, and Austin combined. I think we

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>got the idea. It's a lot of people. Yeah, good,

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>because I think I was about to run out of

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>my Citi's there. But you know, but all of this

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>is even more interesting when you consider the images of

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>big cities in China covered in smog. So it got

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>me wondering just how serious China is about moving toward

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy. And there's a bigger question here, you know,

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>are they actually positioned to become the green superpower of

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the future. So that's what we're talking about today. Let's

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>get started. HEIIR podcast listeners, Welcome to Part Time Genius.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Will Pearson and has always I'm joined by my

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>good friend man Guesh Ticketer and on the other side

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of the soundproof glass, I think calculating his carbon footprint

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>as our friend and producer Tristan McNeil. So mego. We're

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about China today and specifically asking the question will

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they become the world's renewable energy superpower? Yeah, and it

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>feels a little strange to be asking that question given

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the reputation China has with its environmental standards. So if

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you've ever been to any big city there or even

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>seen photos, China has had this major air quality problem

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>for decades now. And if you remember back before the

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>two Olympics, I feel like there were so many stories

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese government and how they were like antically

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to plant flowers and trees and trying to pretty

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>everything up. It was almost like they had this messy

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>house and they were rushing to clean before the entire

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>world was dropping in for a visit. Well, I've actually

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>never been, but I feel like anyone I know who's

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>gone just for work or to visit. Briefly, they've returned

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>talking about that air quality in the big cities. Well,

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually visited once when I was in eighth grade,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and I do remember being dusty. But the biggest impression

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>China made on me was that we were in the

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's and it was so fancy. In fact, after we ordered,

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we got kicked out because they were having a wedding

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there away. Yeah, so that's the first thing I remember.

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And and that all the hotels used to give you

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>slippers because it wasn't uncommon for businessmen to just spit

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on the floors, even in the rooms, and these were

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>nice hotels. Maybe we should change the topic of today's episode.

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll just talk about McDonald's and hotels. Remember, that's right,

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>things Mango remembers about China. But I know you did

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>say it was pretty polluted to and you know, it's

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>been surprising when you see reporters talking about China leading

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this green revolution. So so I do want to talk

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about that today. We'll talk about McDonald's another time. So,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I know, like when you mentioned the green revolution thing

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to me, I was so confused. I've read this two

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen New Yorker piece about this artist Kai Goo Chang.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'm butchering his name, but it was all

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>about how he walks this fine line of commenting on

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>environmental issues but doesn't expressly say it because of the government.

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And his pieces are totally crazy, Like he had this giant,

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>rusted out ship that had all these pairs of sick

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>animals on them, like these wand looking zebras and gazelles

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and wolves and whatever on this bizarro Noah's ark, and

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>he flirted it down this big waterway in Shanghai and

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>docted at this major art museum. He also made this

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>super beautiful lake at the museum. It's this piece called

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Silent Ink, and he excavated down into the concrete floors.

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how he got permission, but then he

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>filled the space with this old calligraphy inc which just

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>feels traditional and poetic. But when you're looking at this

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>lake in a room that's basically all black, you get

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the pollution reference, right. And also there was this industrial

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>chimney in the space and he put three baby dolls

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on a swing there and he called an air of Heaven.

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, none of this is very subtle. Wow, And

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I actually I'm curious, like, how did this guy not

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>get arrested. Yeah, I have no idea. I mean, this

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is a clear critique of the environment and China's handling

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of it. But he was also the ardent lighting director

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Beijing Olympics, so he's really respected and now

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he lives in New Jersey. Anyway, Well, I want to

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>give us a really quick overview of the state of

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the environment in China and what they've done in the

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>past couple of decades, you know, just to set the

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>stage for what they've been up to recently. Yeah, I'm

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>happy to do that, and I think it might give

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>us some perspective to highlight a couple numbers. First, let

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>me let me look at these. So there are estimates

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that seven hundred and fifty thousand people or more die

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>prematurely each year because of air and water pollution in China,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and some of those estimates say by as much as

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>five or six years, so it's significant. Yeah, and prepping

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>for today's show, I saw that only about one percent

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the country's city residents are breathing clean air on

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis. Yeah, it's really staggering and that industrial

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>air pollution is what led to cancer becoming the lead

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>cause of death in China. And they've dealt for years

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>now with major issues around soil contamination, contaminated waterways, and

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>lead poisoning, but you know, will mostly be focusing on

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>air quality and to a lesser extent, water quality. And

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>one other number or index that helps put things in

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>perspective is the Air Quality Index, and the US Embassy

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in Beijing began posting that each day, and then that's

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>been going on for several years now. So I've actually

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>seen the air Quality Index before, but can you remind

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>me what the numbers mean? Sure? And so on the index,

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got this rating of a hundred one to a

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty, which would indicate slight pollution than a

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty one, The two hundred means moderate pollution.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got a range that means heavy pollution all

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the way up to three hundred, and then above that

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>from three oh one to five hundred. This means hazardous

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>levels of pollution. So it's probably in your best interest

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to steer clear of a rating in that range, and

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing Beijing's is not that good. Well, it was

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see the way the US described it in

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>their post on the first day Beijing score c coust

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the five hundred more. But that was the first time

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they actually went above five hundred. Again, this is well

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>above the hazardous range. This was in November of two

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten, and the way they described it was just

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>crazy bad. And then they decided to change it to

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>beyond index. I mean, that's pretty bad when you're going

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>beyond index, especially when the top two hundred points on

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the index already represent hazardous well, and they didn't stop there.

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean they were readings in two thousand thirteen that

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>were as high as eight hundreds. Perfect is but not

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>good in this case. And you know, obviously at this

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>point the government had to take it more seriously, or

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>at least paid lip service to taking it more seriously.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 1>So they developed this action plan which would work to

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>reduce pollution over a several year period and invest in renewables.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's when China began investing in renewables. Well, actually

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the investments began growing substantially well before this, and that

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>growth really began in two thousand four, two thousand five,

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and and just to illustrate this growth, So in two

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, China invested about three billion dollars on renewable energy,

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that sounds like a big figure, but that

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>number grew every year after that until two thousand fifteen,

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>when it reached a hundred and three billion. So again,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that's three billion to a hundred and three billings. Wow,

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a massively So let's talk about China's

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>current usage before we break down their plans for the future.

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's start with the fact that, not surprisingly,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>China uses more energy than any other country. And I

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>think we would expect that given their population. And in

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fifteen, China consumed a little over twenty

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of what's known as the world's final total consumption of fuel.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So this would be the combination of oil, natural gas, coal, electricity, biofuels,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and any other sources. Yeah, so this was crazy to me.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I was actually looking at a list of the largest

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>energy uses in the world, and apparently on a per

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>capita basis, China isn't the biggest defender, or even then

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the top ten for that matter, it's Iceland. And that's

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>all misleading because it's a calculation of all sources of energy,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So Iceland's primarily renewable space energy gets counted into this,

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and also having a small population throws off the statistic too.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But what's weird is that the US also comes in

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.559
<v Speaker 1>ahead of China on a para capita energy usage basis. Okay,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>so so let's get back to China. How does their

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>energy usage breakdown? I don't know if I'm ready to

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>get back to China. I still want to talk about Iceland.

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Why are they using so much energy? I know it's renewables.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>We we won't get into that. So all right, Well,

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>coal is still king in China, and while it's been

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>declining in terms of the percentage of the country's energy production,

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it's still accounts for a little over sixty of this production,

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's now maybe seven or eight percent over the

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>past few years. But you know, to say coal is

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>big in China is a huge understatement. I think, trying

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to produce something like forty five percent of the world's

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>coal in two thousand and sixteen. But in addition to that,

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's also the largest importer of coal. So this is

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>just a tremendous amount of coal there. And I know

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the government has been shutting down some coal mines and

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>have talked about restrictions on building new plants. But much

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>like we've heard discussed in the US, there are a

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>ton of people were employed by the coal industry. I

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>think I saw this New York Times figure that had

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it at about four million coal miners. Yeah, so it's

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a ton of jobs. And and actually let's keep

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that number in mind when we talk about the economic

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunity on the renewables front, just to see how it compares.

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if you've ever seen any stories or

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>films about the lives of coal miners and several of

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the rural minds in China, it's an incredibly dangerous job.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And we hear about the dangerous conditions for miners here

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>in the States, but the number of deaths each year

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in Chinese minds are just staggering. And this is despite

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the regulations from the Chinese government, because you know, when

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there's seventeen thousand minds in a country, it's really difficult

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to actually crack down on the illegally operated minds. These

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>have inadequate ventilation, poorly supported tunnels. But that could definitely

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>be its own episode. And I know we're going to

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>focus on the impact of the industry as a whole.

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But actually you were telling me earlier about a statistic

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on CEO two emissions there. Yeah, let me just find

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this because I want to get the numbers right. But

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>one report I was looking at noted then two thousand

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen, China produce just shy of thirty percent of

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the world's total c O two emissions from fuel combustion,

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and that actually makes it the world's biggest polluter. However,

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>they keep coming back to this per capital defense, which

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:15.719
<v Speaker 1>shows they're not at the top of the list when

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>measured per capita. I mean, I remember cheering about this

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>way back in the early OTTs, that there were all

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>these developing countries that thought it was unfair that the

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>US was imposing these environmental restrictions on them, especially at

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a time when they were having their industrial booms. Because

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, countries in the West grew without real concern

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for polluting in their own industrial revolutions and then tapered

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>back once they were like these bustling economies. But I mean,

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really interesting to note that back in China

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>produce less than six percent of the world's CEO two

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>emissions and now it's thirty so it's been this massive increase,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and especially since the early two thousand's when emissions really skyrocket,

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is so six percent to Yeah, that is that is huge. Alright,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So so coal is the biggie here. Well, actually, what

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>about oil? I mean, I know you were looking into

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>their oil usage and are they also the biggest user

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there too? And I know I've seen several stories about

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>how much the auto industry has been growing in China. Yeah,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so car sales have grown tremendously, with twenty four million

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>more people getting cars in two thousand fifteen. And here's

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what's crazy. So the economists noted that China is at

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred twenty vehicles per a thousand people, which

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is around the level of America and the nineteen twenties.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about that figure, it's inevitable that's

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>going to grow significantly in and with that, the demand

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for oil is definitely going to increase as well. But

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>despite that, they still haven't cracked the top ten in

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>oil usage still. I mean, oil provided about of China's

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>energy in two thousand fifteen. All right, well, let's briefly

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about natural gas and nuclear and neither of them

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are currently a significant percentage of China's energy usage. And

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>then we'll talk about China's role in the green revolution. Definitely,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So China actually produces less energy from natural gas than

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it does from renewable sources. But we should note that

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the US is both the largest producer and the largest

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>user of natural gas in the world. Okay, so what

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>about nuclear I mean, the the US is the biggest

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.599
<v Speaker 1>producer there too, right, Definitely, so the US is the

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest producer by a pretty wide margin. It's nearly twice

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>as much the next biggest, and that would be France.

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting way when you look at France,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like how they use it. They produce a whopping seventy

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of its electricity from nuclear power. Yeah, and

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>China produces about three percent of its power from nuclear

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 1>But China appears to be investing more than pretty much

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone else in the space. So just last year they

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>brought on five new reactors, which is the most they've

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>ever brought on in a year, and they're almost a

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>couple dozen more being built right now. In fact, China

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>accounted for pretty much all of the global nuclear power

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>increase in two thousand sixteen. That's huge. All right. Well, well,

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I know we're going to take a break for a

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>quiz in a minute, but before we do, I feel

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>like I can actually hear some of our listeners screaming

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>at their phones or speakers and saying, you know, why

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>did you put nuclear in the no on renewable sources

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of energy? Because nuclear will be very good for air quality,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like we need to address that really quickly. Yeah. So,

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 1>there's this ongoing debate of where to classify nuclear energy,

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and part of the debate just has to do with

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>how exactly you define renewable energy. Yeah, that's right. And technically,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy is a form that's capable of regenerating or

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>replenishing itself indefinitely. So we're typically talking hydro solar, wind, geothermal, biomass.

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, nuclear energy, on the other hand, generally

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>requires uranium for the fission process, and that's where the

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>heat is generated. Then the nuclear plants convert this heat

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>into the electricity using steam. So according to that definition,

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>uranium is this finite resource. Yeah, but those in support

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of classifying it as a renewable resource, they point out

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that one of the main points of focusing on renewable

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>resources is to create cleaner power, and that nuclear power

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>provides this low carbon emission option, so they argue that

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>focus shouldn't be on whether the resources technically finite so

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>much as whether it reduces carbon emissions. But many opponents

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are actually not pointing to its status as of finite

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>resources their main objection. I mean, many of them feel

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that the harmful nuclear waste that's produced in the process

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of creating nuclear energy, that's what's problematic and allowing it

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to be classified as renewable. But either way, it's definitely

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a much cleaner source than coal when it comes to

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions, and this is something China appears to be

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>taking pretty seriously. Well, now that we've got out of

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>our system, why don't we take a quick break for

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a quiz. So I want to be honest about something.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So our guest today, Um certainly has many international connections,

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and that might have been part of the excuse for

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bringing on the show today, but I actually want to

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>admit that the real reason that she's on is she's

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the first person who's written in with the fun fact

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that her older brother is a competitive curler in the

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>state of North Dakota. Have you have you ever met

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's a curler in the state of North Dakota Ango, No,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I haven't. So that's that's that's a big bonus here.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But Jordan Terry, welcome to Part Time Genius. Thanks for

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>having me guys. So, Jordan, where are you joining us

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>from today? I am in Denver, Colorado. Wonderful. I love Denver. Well,

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell us a little bit of what you do there.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Um So, I'm in Denver because I'm studying to get

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>my massive degree in global finance. Um So, we do

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>study a lot about trade and specifically China for sure.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Um But I am also working full time remotely right

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>now UM as an academic director for an intercultural institute

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that has locations all over the world. Um So, I

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>work in terms of managing teachers and supporting academic departments

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>at UM several institutes that have academic programs for locals,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and we work in a lot of areas that have

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>like development needs so that we can receive international students

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>who want to study abroad and also do some volunteering

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>abroad as well. I think that's super cool, that's wonderful.

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I do have to ask though, when you share the

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>fact about your brother being a competitive curler, is that

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>true or were you really just using that to try

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to get on the show. It is true. He's my

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>younger brother actually, um. And so he is a junior

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at North Dakota State University and he decided to go

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>there because he'd be able to continue curling. Um. And

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we're actually hoping for Bago for the Winter Olympics for

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>him and his teammates. So our fingers are crossed. That's amazing.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually saw on TV last night, I think the

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>US curling team was playing the Scottish curling team, which

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is is just amazing that that's a televised event. But uh,

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I also really love that you come from this family

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of athletes, right. Your dad was in the Junior Olympics

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>as a skier. But but you've read Harry Potter every

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>book at least two dozen times? Is that true? That

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is true. I'm not as huge a fan of the movies.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I have seen them all multiple times, um, But I

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>grew up with Harry Potter. I got the first and

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>second books right after they came out, and so in

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the anticipation every year of waiting for the next book

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to come out. I would reread them all over and

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>over again. I say, the first three or four I've

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>read even more than that, and then the last few,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like I do an annual reread of the whole series.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's wonderful. It's a true athlete, just like the

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of the family. That's uh, that's amazing. Alright. Well,

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>as you know, today's episode is asking the question about

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>whether China will become a green superpower, and so we're

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>focused on several alternative energies in this in this episode.

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>But Mango, what what quiz are we putting Jordan to

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the test with today? It's called the Alternative Alternative Energy Quiz?

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, the Alternative Alternative Energy Quiz. We've got five

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>true or false questions for you. Are you ready Jordan's

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess? Okay, here we go. Question number one. In Rotterdam,

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a sustained bill dance club called Club What where

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the electricity for the lights and speakers is generated by

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>footsteps from ravers feet. Is this true or false? That

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>has to be true? Yeah, it is. And the club

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>also features a tapwater bar and toilets that are flushed

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>with rainwater. Wow, alright, She's one for one. Question number two.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand eleven, two artists designed a line of

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>carnivorous furniture based on venus fly traps. Their digital clock

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>catches insects and can be powered for twelve days on

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>eight dead flies. Is this true or false? That is

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>so ridiculous. I could imagine Mango writing that fact, but oh,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's actually true. They also have a lamp powered on

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>insects and a table that feeds on mice and has

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>lights on under it. It's crazy. I have to be

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, Jordan. I I felt for that one

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. As soon as I read that, I was like, Oh,

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a total Mango lie. That is that's too good

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to be through. Alright, one one out of two. The

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>question number three, The Army has developed a line of

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>radios and phones that run on sugar cubes instead of

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>batteries using Splendor. However, will jam up the circuits? True?

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Or faults that? Yeah? You're right, all right. Question number four.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Iceland runs a deep drilling project that's been drilling three

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>miles into the ground to harness energy from super hot magma.

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>True or faults? Um? I don't know. Iceland is a

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty I think Iceland is a pretty sustainable place and

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of drilling doesn't really line up, But that does

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sound like something that could be possible, so true. Yeah,

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I mean Iceland uses a number of these

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>geo thermal wells, but this one should actually be able

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to supply fifty homes with natural energy. Alright, that's awesome.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So Jordan, you're three out of four so far, the

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>last one for the Big Prize. Here we go, question

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>number five. In Australia, dairy armors have been tying special

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>plastic bags two cows backsides to capture their gas, or

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>rather their methane gas. They then sell the energy back

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to the state. Is this true or false? Yeah, you're right.

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are a few scientists working on extracting

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>methane from cow patties, but actually bagging your cow from

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the behind isn't actually a practice. Let's not use that

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>phrase anymore. I think maybe we should avoid that one.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But all right, question so she Uh so Jordan has

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten four out of five? Is that right? Mango? Yeah? Absolutely,

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>and that entitles her to our big prize, which today

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is will be pony expressing her an official part time

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Genius Certificate of Genius which you can put on her

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>fridge or frame for her mother, and will also send

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>her a box of Nerd Candies, which is the official

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>candy of Part Time Genius. Wow. Well, congratulations, Jordan's best

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of luck to you and your job, and best of

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>luck to your brother and his efforts to to go

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of Beijing and the next Olympics. But thank you so

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us today on Part Time Genius. My pleasure. Guys,

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Welcome back to Part Time Genius. So before

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the break, we were looking at the breakdown of China's

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>primary sources of energy. We had coal, oil, nuclear, and

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to a lesser extent, natural gas. So let's talk about

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the investment in renewable energies and this idea that China

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>could become the big superpower because of their investment in

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>green technologies. Yeah. So, as we talked about earlier in

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the show, China's ranked up its investment in renewable energy

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>significantly since two thousand four. They've gone from a total

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of three billion dollars in two thousand four to a

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred and three billion in two thousand fifteen, and now

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and sixteen that number did fall to

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a little below ninety billion, as it did in many

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>locations across the globe, and that's partly because of these

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>populist movements that have been taken hold across the globe.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's like the ones experience in the UK with

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Independence Party and here in the US with Donald Trump.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But even at this level, we're still talking thirty times

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>more than what was spending two thousand four. Yeah, it's

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a huge increase. And the Chinese government officials announced in

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>January that the country plans to spend over three hundred

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and sixty billion dollars on renewable energy through and they've

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>stated goals of having fifteen percent of energy consumption being

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>from renewable sources by and then thirty by, which is crazy.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>But this is the part I'm excited to talk about,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's why China is making these changes, and that

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is what what are their motivations, because there's more involved

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>than just making a cleaner environment. Yeah it's true, you know,

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but the public outcry over deadly urban air pollution has

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>accelerated this push for clean energy. NPR recently had this

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>story on how China's middle class has really been pushing

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>for change, and that the state run paper had a

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>story on three mothers and how they were dealing with pollution.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>One of them kept their kids inside barricaded with multiple

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>air purifiers running. One moved away from the city entirely

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>just for her children's health, and the story was heavily circulated.

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>That is, of course, before the government censored it. There

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was also this two thousand fifteen documentary called Under the Dome.

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.239
<v Speaker 1>It was watched two hundred million times and praised by

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the environmental ministry before that also got pulled by the government.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>And the government is clearly aware of the problem, but

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.239
<v Speaker 1>it's also very clear that it doesn't want to be

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>criticized for it either. Well, it's hard to ignore the

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, National Geographic estimated that more than one million

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>people die each year due to air pollution. So that

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>urban middle classes making noise for a reason. Yeah, but

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>like you were heading at that, you know, the other

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>compelling reason is the economic impact. Is Anton lu who's

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs,

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>told National Geographic quote, it's not just pollution that's driving

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the determined focus on renewable power. Leaders have made clear

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that they view clean energy as a powerful engine for

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>job creation. It's about setting up for manufacturing dominance. China

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>sees green energy as an opportunity where it can become

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a manufacturing monster, the way it has in clothes and

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>toys monster. So I know, I'm just stringing quotes here,

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>which is something my journalism teacher from high school and

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>mrs where he asked me never to do. But this

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is not a good quote from the Financial Times Deputy

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Beijing bureau chief and her name's Lucy Hornsby, and this

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is what she says. Quote. The Chinese point of view

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is that, Okay, everyone's worried about climate change. The western

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>countries are about to plow a whole lot of money

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>into trying to stop it happening. We can supply the

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>manufactured goods, we can supply the wind turbines, we can

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>supply the solar panels. So the whole paris climate change

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>action is viewed as a massive export opportunity for China inc. So,

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can see there this investment is definitely

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>creating jobs. And if you remember that four million coal

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>miners that we were talking about, well, China already claims

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to have three point five million jobs in the clean

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>energy space, which is far more than any other country,

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and the goal is to create ten million jobs in

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>clean energy and that's part of this move to have

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of energy coming from clean energy sources by

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>ten million, that is huge. Well, I think many would

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>see this as the real motivator for China's investment. And

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk in a few minutes about why there's some

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>real skepticism over their desire to actually battle global warming.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But let's get back to where China stands in their

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 1>investments in renewable energy. So which one of these do

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about first? Well, I think we

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>should talk about hydropower, just because I like saying the

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>word hydro d So, China produces more hydro electricity than

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>any other country on Earth, and it's not even close.

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Like Canada comes in second, and they only produce about

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>one third of what China does. And if you want

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate what their investment has done, in nineteen seventy three,

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>China produced about three percent of the world's hydro electric power,

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and the two thousand fifteen it was nearly about a

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>fifth of their electricity comes from hydro power. That's impressive.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>What we should pause for a second though, to note

0:25:59.920 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the country that gets the greatest percentage of its power

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>from hydro electricity. I was looking this up and it's

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>actually Norway. So they get about nineties six pc of

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>their power from hydro Isn't that incredible? It is. I

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like we should send them a certificate of some kind.

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's work on it, and definitely so check your

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>mail Norway sometime in the future. Anyway, let's talk about

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>another one where China has grown its global share tenfold

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>over the past decade, and that's wind power. So just

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.959
<v Speaker 1>a second, I'm going to pull out these stats. So

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they went from producing about two percent of the world's

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>wind power in two thousand five to in two thousand fifteen.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>And the US currently produces a slightly larger percentage at

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but given the level of investment, you have to imagine

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>China is going to be passing the US before too long. Well,

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>when you look at these numbers, I don't think there's

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>any question about that. And here are some recent numbers

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw from earlier this year. China produces almost half

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 1>of the world's wind turbines Goldwin, which is a Chinese

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>company is now the largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world,

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and five of the top ten wind turbine manufacturers of

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the world are in China. I mean, that's just huge.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And according to New York Times, one out of every

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>three turbines in the world is also located in China. So,

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, while the US may have produced slightly more

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>power in recent years from wind, with all the new

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>wind turbines in China, there's something like nine two thousand

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of them, and they have the capacity to generate almost

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>twice as much wind power as the US. So well,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>only three percent of China's power is currently coming from wind,

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that that number doesn't fully reflect the impact they're having

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on the industry and how that sector is positioned for

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>significant growth there. Yeah, and one of the issues they're

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>currently dealing with now is how much of their wind

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>power is being wasted or curtailed as they might say. So,

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what's I mean exactly? Well, curtailman is something that you

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>hear about when wind turbines or solar panels stopped producing

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is happening even though they could produce more,

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, you lose that surplus energy and

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>This often happens if a power grid is overwhelmed and

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>not really appropriately equipped to handle all the energy coming

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>into it. Look at the numbers. In two thousand sixteen,

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>nearly twenty of wind energy was lost because of curtailment.

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's something the government is really trying to tackle

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and they have a plan to get that down to

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.479
<v Speaker 1>about five percent by Okay. So before we move on,

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>we we forgot to name the country that gets the

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>greatest percentage of its power from wind, and that title

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>belongs to Spain at about eighteen So great job, Space. Yeah,

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you might also get a sort of you will get

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a certificate wo stepping up. Okay, all right, so we

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned solar, so why don't we talk about that

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>one next. And this is another one where even though

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they're at about one percent of their electricity generated coming

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>from solar, they're still playing a huge role in the

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>future of this industry. Again, just look at the numbers.

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So China is now producing two thirds of the world's

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>solar panels, and in a five year period they've increased

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>their solar power production tenfold. In two thousand and fifteen,

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they produced eighteen percent of the world solar electricity. And

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw one quote from the New York Times earlier

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>this year, and that said quote Greenpeace estimates that China

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>covered the equivalent of one soccer field every hour with

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>solar panels. Wow, and I know you're a big soccer fans.

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that quote really hit home with you. Yeah,

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but just look at what their investment has done in

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this industry. So six of the top ten solar panel

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers are Chinese companies, and two thirds of the world's

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>solar panels come from China. I mean, they're the ones

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the huge decline in prices, and some estimates

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>has solar panel pricing falling by as much as over

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the past ten years or so. So when you think

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>about it from an environmental perspective, this investment has been

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. But again it's largely driven by economics

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and China wants to own this space. And now there

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>are more than two and a half million people employed

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>by the solar power industry there. That's about ten times

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as many people employed by that industry in the US.

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And China is now home did the largest solar farm

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. And here's how Tom Phillips, he's a reporter

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for The Guardian described it, quote, high on the Tibetan Plateau,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a sea of nearly four million deep blue panels flows

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>towards a spectacular horizon of snow capped mountains, mile after

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>mile of silicon cells tilting skywards from what was once

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a barren, wind swept cattle ranch. The remote seven square

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>kilometers solar farm tops an ever expanding roll call of

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>supersized symbols that underlying China's determination to transform itself from

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>climate villain to green superpower. And that's a cool description.

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But actually, just as a side, now, did you hear

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>about the huge solar panel farm that's actually shaped like

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a giant panda bear? I mean I did see that,

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but I was curious, what was it actually real? Yeah,

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this was pretty widely reported on it and when I

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>saw the image at first, I wondered the same thing,

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and so I turned to the always fascinating Snopes just

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to check this out. And it it turns out the

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>solar panel farm itself is real. But the image that

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was all over the place you might have seen on

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>various websites, that was just an artist rendering and it's

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>not an actual photo. But the farm is apparently two

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>d and five acres, and there are plans to build

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred more of these panda shaped solar farms across

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>China and other countries in Asia. Kind of makes you

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>want to just travel by plane across the country when

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>all of these are there, just to see them. And

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it's totally worth googling just to see the image, even

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>if it's not an actual photo. Yeah. I mean, it's

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to see how Chinese companies are improving their solar

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>technology each year, and they're figuring out how to build

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>these panels cheaper and cheaper, but still maintaining this incredible

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>level of quality. And they're not just selling to the

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>US anymore. I mean, we're we're talking countries like Saudi

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Arabia and India, whether they need to provide panels for

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>extremely dry climates, are incredibly humid ones, they're finding ways

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to produce them well. And this has all happened because

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of this huge government push to get really low interest

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>rate loans too solar panel manufacturers. And I want to

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>say it was something like eighteen billion dollars in loans.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>The government got state owned banks to give to these companies,

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and this was just over a six or seven year period.

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So the focus on investing in these kinds of businesses

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and becoming a leader in them is also connected to

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>mine is Belt and Road initiative, and this is the

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>massive infrastructure investment. China's leading across the historic Silk Road

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and that connects Asia to Europe. They've got nearly seventy

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>countries to join in this effort in some way, and

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the plan is for China to invest about I think

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like a hundred and fifty billion dollars each year

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in infrastructure. So we're talking bridges, roads, railways, power plants, pipelines,

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>things like that. And you know, this is definitely a

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>very different China than we were used to seeing, you know,

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of decades ago. Well, I mean that

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>brings us back to the comment earlier about China's real

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>motivation in this massive investment in green technologies. Yeah, well,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the huge outcry from the urban middle class definitely had

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>an impact, you know, as as as Beth Gardner noted

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in a PC wrote for National Geographic Quote, the results

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes more cosmetic than real. Leaders order temporary factory

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>closures to clear the air ahead of something. You know,

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>these high profile events like international summits, they close factories

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for weeks in November December just so the city won't

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>exceed its annual pollut shin limit. That's crazy. But what

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>seems even more alarming to me is that while coal

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>plant construction is being limited within Chinese borders, Chinese companies

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are actually building coal plants abroad. And when you look

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>at the new coal projects going online over the next

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>decade or so, Chinese companies are responsible for about half

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of them, and countries like India, Vietnam, Mongolia, Iran, Indonesia.

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of these are in countries that haven't historically used

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>coal as an energy source, and they're looking to expand

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in places like Pakistan and Egypt, which aren't currently really

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>cold burning countries. So while we might be celebrating the

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>significant investment in green technologies in China itself, like these

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>new plants in the works would increase the world's capacity

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to burn coal by over well. And I was looking

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>at a figure the other day, so two of the

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>big global banks in China have finance more than forty

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in overseas coal projects over the past couple

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of decades. I think it's pretty clear that China maybe

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to some extent to clean up their own small

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and pollution problem, but I'm not sure how much they

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>care about the real global situation. Yeah, but I still

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like there are a couple of reasons to be optimistic.

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So first, as we talked about earlier, China's massive investment

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>has caused the prices of renewable technologies to drop significantly

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>across the globe, and they'll likely continue to get cheaper.

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a Chinese company currently constructing a solar farm in

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the UAE, and it's going to produce electricity for much

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>less than it costs US companies to produce both solar

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and coal power. Well, and I also saw it's much

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>faster to build a solar or wind farm than it

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is to get a coal fired plan up and running.

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're we're talking a huge difference. It's something

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>like six months versus about ten years. I had no

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>idea it took that long. So another thing is that

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>China is certainly not alone in implementing new policies to

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>restrict coal productions. So take India for example, They're trying

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to get over half their energy from renewable sources by seven,

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's just incredible. You have to think that worldwide

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>momentum is just going to continue. Yeah, and it that

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>is incredible, it's it's also encouraging. Yeah. So there's one

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>more big reason to be optimistic, and that's the fact

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>that investors are much more likely to get behind clean

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>energy projects these days. The World Bank doesn't provide financing

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to overseas coal projects and that's, you know, aside from

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the rare exception because of extreme circumstances, and many Chinese

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>banks are falling in line with this practice. So a

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of analysts think we're just seeing the beginning of

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this tremendous acceleration of renewable adoption around the world. Well,

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>those those definitely seem like reasons to be optimistic. And

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but but I do feel like there's maybe one more

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>reason to be optimistic. Is a fact off time you

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>bet it is? M all right, well, I'll kick us

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>off here. So have you heard about America's first completely

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>solar powered community? Is this seventeen thousand acre town in

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>South Florida, and it's called Babcock Ranch. It's expected to

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>begin accepting residents before the end of the year and

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>The project has taken about a decade or so to

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 1>get together, but it's coming soon. And when you're there,

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll be able to get around by self driving shuttles.

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's pretty interesting to read about. But you better

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>hurry because the town's capacity is only fifty thousand. So

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I've got a solar power fact too. We talked about

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the panda shaped solar panel farm, but there's a hundred

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>square mile floating solar farm in the Anui province. I mean,

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:19.839
<v Speaker 1>like in the air, floating and no, I mean it's

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in water. Their waveproof solar panels, and and they're floating

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on a lake that formed, oddly enough after the collapse

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of a network of coal mines. It's the world's largest

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>floating solar project, and it generates enough power to provide

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>electricity to a significant portion of a city nearby. I

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:37.919
<v Speaker 1>mean the government plans to expand the system to about

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>a dozen other locations, which would then generate the power

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of a commercial nuclear reactor. Did you know that

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason people are speaking up in China

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>about the environment is because of religion. According to the

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, hundreds of millions of people in China

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>have turned to Taoism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam recently, and

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>apparently as concepts like karma and sin have come to

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the forefront, the public has paid more attention to their

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>impact on the environment and the world. People have also

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>used their religions as a reason to speak up. That's

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating. So in two thousand tend the Wall Street

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Journal report on a scientist at Berkeley who determined how

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to trace pollutents back to areas of origin. And this

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is what she found. Apparently twenty nine percent of the

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>pollution in the East Bay traced back to China. I mean,

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the article ended on this smart point though quote. The

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>question now is how much of that twenty nine percent

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>can be attributed to San Francisco's penchant for China made

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>iPhones and iPads. All Right, So we talked earlier about

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the significant growth of the auto market in China, and

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>China is also the leader in electric vehicle sales, with

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly half of all electric vehicles sold in two thousand

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen being in China. Well, I know that's impressive, but

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I've got an even more staggering figure, and

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that there are now two hundred million electric bikes

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in China, which is way more than the six electric

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>cars and three electric buses there. I mean, they're a

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>great option for those who can afford cars but are

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>looking for an easier way to commute. Plus is their

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>mission free. Two hundred million of these things? All right, Well,

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit, a mag you've definitely one up

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to me here, so I'm going to give you the

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Fact Off Trophy today. Congratulations, excellent, and I'm never giving

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it back. All right, all right, hey, guys, thanks so

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>much for listening. Don't forget we love hearing from you.

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Call us any time on Fact hot Line. That's one

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>eight four four pt Genius or email us at part

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Time Genius at how stuff Works dot com. A big

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Jocelyn Sears for her excellent research on this episode.

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>See you next time. Thanks again for listening. Part Time

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Genius is a production of How Stuff Works and wouldn't

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>be possible without several brilliant people who do the important

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>things we couldn't even begin to understand. Tristan McNeil does

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the editing thing. Noel Brown made the theme song and

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>does the mixy mixy sound thing. Jerry Rowland does the

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>exact producer thing. Gay Bluesiers lead researcher with support from

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the Research Army including Austin Thompson, Nolan Brown and Lucas Adams,

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and Eves. Jeff Cook gets the show to your ears.

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Good job, Eves. If you like what you heard, we

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>hope you'll subscribe, And if you really really like what

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>you've heard, maybe you could leave a good review for us.

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we do? We forget Jason? Jason who