WEBVTT - How We Win the Messaging Game

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to Look a f Daily

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with Meet your Girl Danielle Moody, Recording from the Home Bunker. Folks,

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>I want to start off today by saying I'm really

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>excited about the conversation that i had with Annette shankar Osario.

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>She is the host of a brilliant podcast talking about

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the power of words, talking about the power of messaging.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you have listened to my other podcasts, Democracy Ish,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>then you may be familiar with a Knot, but Anat

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>shankar Osario is the host of Words to Win by

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and she'll tell us in this jam packed two part episode,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>because folks, you know that I talk about messaging all

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the time. I talk about how Democrats are fucking terrible

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at messaging. We are headed into the stretch for the

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections and with a handful of weeks to go.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>My conversation with a NOD is like, do we have

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>what it takes to win? Do people understand the gravity

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the situation that we're in. What works? We know

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that fear and lies work with the far right, but

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>what works to get democrats, progressives and these quote unquote

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>mythical unicorn independence to the polls right for midterms. She

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>tells us that we will need historic turnout the way

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that we had for Biden. Well, we know that that

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>ain't going to happen. Just historically speaking, midterm elections usually

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>do not have the same type of turnout that a

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>presidential election does. And so if we're hoping for those

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers in order to win, then have we already lost.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So this conversation with a Not we went really deep

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and into the nitty gritty. So it is broken up

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>into our first two part episode. So you will hear

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a piece of our conversation today and then you will

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>hear the follow up to that conversation on Tuesday. Folks,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>what I want people to recognize is that the political

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>climate that we're in and how people are feeling has

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>so much to do with policy as it has to

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>do with personality and what it has to do with psychology.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I often talk to you all about the

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that there are times there were days where I

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>find myself in tears. Nothing anymore catastrophic will have happened

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that will signal this shift and emotion, but it is

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just this ever present feeling of overwhelm. I mentioned this

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>because like me. You all have no doubt spent the

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>last several days watching the news and seeing the catastrophic

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>devastation that has happened in Florida because of Hurricane Ian. Well,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to share with you one of the stories

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think gets enough attention. You see, what

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the networks do, dear friends, is that they will go

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and do the same storm coverage, look at the devastation.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>They'll talk to somebody, usually a white person, not usually

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of the time, a white person that has

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>lost everything, and you know, they're thanking God and we

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>could have been worse. And meanwhile, you know they've lost

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>their homes, they've lost you know, their livelihoods. Look, I'll

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>be honest that a lot of the places in Florida

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>are you know, you're showing us coral gables. Well, those

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are multimillion dollar homes, and those are not people's first

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>homes right in a lot of ways. But there are

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks in Florida who live in mobile homes,

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>who are the actual working class. And you know, can't

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 1>just chalk up their loss to you know, somebody's tax

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>right off, right, But I then look at the coverage

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>and again, we only empathize and are trained to empathize

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>with white people and white grief. And I think to

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>myself about the people of Puerto Rico, the island being

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>devastated by a hurricane as well loss of power, you know, infrastructure. Again,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we look at Puerto Rico and we're like, oh, well,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a nice island. Do you know it's part of

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States? And why they don't have fucking infrastructure

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>that allows them to be able to deal with the

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>impacts and the increasing impacts of these hurricanes and are

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>treated as second class citizens in more ways than one.

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Why weren't they given wald to wall coverage. Why didn't

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we look at their suffering and their grief in the

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>same way that we once again are treating Florida, will

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>treat South Carolina and other places. I just don't understand

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>why we can't have shared empathy for everyone, and why

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>white people are the only people that the media wants

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to empathize with. Look, and guys, I'm asking this question.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I know the answer. I know who's in the newsrooms,

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I know who's in the c suites, Right, I know

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer to these questions. But if we don't ask them,

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>then we allow this just to continue to be normalized,

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and it shouldn't be. Why did we have Walde Wall

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the colonizer that died in the UK at

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the same time when brown people in Puerto Rico are

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>desperate and like hanging on for dear life. Why was

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>it okay that Donald Trump went there during Hurricane Maria

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and throughout fucking paper towels and that was acceptable and

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the media covered it as if it was a joke

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to it being fucking cruel. Words matter, And

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>that's why we have this supersized two part episode with

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the Natschenko Osadio because I want us to understand that

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it isn't about just getting into the psychology again like

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the media loves to do with regard to white supremacy,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and we need to understand white grievance. No, I actually

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>don't give a fuck, but I do want to understand

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>why these same people, what gets them to the poles

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and what doesn't, What has them wake up to the

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that climate change is a real thing, right is it?

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>When the water is up to their necks? You know,

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but what I will say and what

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to share with regard to the hurricanes. Is

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this pulled up This article in Axios says Hurricane end's

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>climate warning, and this is what it says. And I

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>want to read to you a piece of this, because again,

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the news is not covering this. What they are covering

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is the damage. What they are covering is how people

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to pick up their lives and then they

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>will move on to the next story by the middle

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of this week. But what we're not talking about is

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>why these storms are intensifying and how this storm jumped

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>from you know, a category three to a category five.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>What we have all learned right in school in earth science.

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Who the fuck knows what they teach now is that

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>when hurricanes hit land, or they hit certain areas, they

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>lose strength. We're accustomed to hurricanes hitting certain areas losing

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>strength than turning into tropical storms and then dissipating. This

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is not what's happening, and I will read you this.

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane forecaster's worst nightmare came true on Wednesday morning, when

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what had been a category three storm Tuesday night suddenly

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>jumped to almost to a category five. Why it matters,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It used to be rare for storms to keep strengthening

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>until landfall, let alone do so rapidly. Now it is not,

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and studies show this is a dangerous sign of climate change.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>The big picture, such an intensity leap was made possible

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>by warm ocean temperatures and abundant atmospheric moisture, both factors

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that climate change enhances. During the past several years, there

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have been multiple storms that rapidly intensified as they neared

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the Gulf Coast and did so through landfall. Previously, tropical

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>storms and hurricanes tended to weaken as they neared the

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>northern Gulf Coast, in particular, falling victim to cooler waters

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>or stronger jet stream winds. But that did not happen

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with Hurricanes Laura or Ida in twenty twenty and in

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, or with Hurricane Michael, which ramped up

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to a Category five storm in

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the Florida Panhandle in twenty eighteen. It's not just the

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>United States that has been suffering the consequences from rapidly

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>intensifying tropical cyclones. Consider an example from halfway around the world,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>which occurred just as Ian was spinning up in the

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Caribbean at the same time in the western tropical Pacific Ocean,

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a storm named Noru began swirling toward the Philippines. It

0:09:56.160 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>took forecasters by surprise when it suddenly strengthened from a

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>robust tropical storm with maximum sustained winds of sixty miles

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>per hour to a category five super typhoon with one

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty mile per hour winds folks, in just

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours. So if you are thinking about this

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>right and news reports and alerts come on and they

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>are warning people going to be having a tropical storm,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it right now has these level winds. This is the

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>difference between you deciding to evacuate and deciding that you

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>can weather the storm. But if what is happening is

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the intensity is growing and forecaster is because of climate change,

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>do not have the ability to provide the necessary in

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>depth level of warning because the storm is changing so rapidly.

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for people's ability to get to safety?

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>News flash, they can't get to safety and fucking tie,

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>so more people are going to die. So the threat level,

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>according to Axios, the danger of a rapid intensification shortly

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>before a landfall is that people will be caught off

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>guard by the stronger storm and get stuck in a

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable spot for storm surge, flooding, damaging winds, or both.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Emergency management officials designed their evacuation plans based on storm

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>intensity and movement. Sudden shifts in either one can render

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>their planning inadequate. A one hundred and fifty five mile

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>per hour Category four storm, which Hurricane Ian became on

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday morning can push a far higher surge inland and

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>bring a catastrophic swath of high winds inland compared to

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred and twenty mile per hour Category three

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>storm that Eden was when most Fuloridians went to sleep

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night. All landfalling storms now contain more dangerous coastal

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>flooding in their arsenals due to human cause sea level rise,

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and they are urging you in this article to read

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>between the fucking lines. The trend seen in the past

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>several years, together with studies of how hurricanes are changing

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in a warming world, point to a key role for

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>human caused climate change. We have made the planet unpredictable

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and unfucking safe. And right now you have a climate denier,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian piece of trash in Ronda Santis as the governor

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of Florida, who is too busy walking the line between

0:12:55.280 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican dictator to recognize that their ignorance around climate change

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is no longer bliss. It is actually fucking catastrophic and

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it is up to the media to connect the dots

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>for the people as to why these things are happening.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This is not an act of God, It is an

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>act of greed, folks. Coming up next, part one of

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with a Nat Schenker Asorio on how we

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>win the messaging game. It's no secret that the news

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is horsepill hard to swallow. Thankfully, there's The Bituation Room

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast hosted by comedian and commentator Francesca free Erantini for

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>a lighter take on the heavy stuff. Each week, the

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Bituation Room brings you progressive comedians, experts, and activists to

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>break down the issues in a way that won't just

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>leave you crying under a weighted blanket. Get The Bituation

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Room on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, and streaming on YouTube

0:13:55.280 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>and Twitch. Hey I'm David slates Political gab Fest. As

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>another election season accelerates, it can be tricky to sort

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>through all the noise and the news. Each week on

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>The gap Fest, John Dickerson, Emily Bathlona and I decipher

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the headlines, break down the races, and tell you what

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>issues really matter. We do not always agree, We definitely

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>do not always agree, but we always deliver thoughtful debate

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and we always have a good time. So subscribe to

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Slates Political Gapfest New episodes every Thursday. Folks. I am

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>very excited to welcome to woke f Daily for the

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>first time, hopefully not the last time. Fellow podcaster and

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>message maker An Shanker o Saudio, who hosts the show

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Words to win By and Folks, if you also happen

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to listen to my other podcasts with my friend washahat Ali,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you might remember our conversation with a Knot because I said,

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>can you just run everything? Because you make it seem

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>so easy and you make it sound so clear what

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it is Democrats should be doing. But but first, before

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we talk about what they should be doing, I actually

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>want to get your thoughts of Joe Biden's winning summer,

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administrations quote unquote winning summer. And you know

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we had passage of you know, major legislation Joe Biden.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>You know there were several things that were past. Some

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, have no teeth, but hey, we you know,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we did it. Anyway. We got some debt relief for students,

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if they'll actually see that because

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Republican governors are fighting against that in our suing the

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration to make sure that young people suffer. And

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>then you had Joe Biden kind of cap off his

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>winning with this Soul of the Nation speech that he

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>gave with the backdrop of Philadelphia. And so I want

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to get your thoughts on how Democrats how the administration

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>spoke about these wins, and then we can talk more

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in depth about your thoughts on the Soul of the

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Nation speech, which again I don't think was given enough

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>air enough time in media and is worth delving into.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for sure. Well, first, thank you for having me.

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to know where even to begin, but I'll

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>start with the accomplishments. So what I will say is

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that it is general life advice, both in relationships and

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in politics, that you cannot argue with people's feelings, which

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is very frustrating if you are a person who watches

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>focus groups, which unfortunately for me I am, so I'm

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>part of a Giant Research collaborative where we do two

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to four focus groups a week and have done that

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>every single week since twenty twenty, which means watching a

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of different kinds of person people, surge voters

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>meaning folks who were new to us in eighteen or twenty,

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>and we obviously we absolutely need returning out and then

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>swing voters, the definition of which is probably pretty clear

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to most people what we mean by that. So what

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we see is that the quote Democrats delivered message A

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take us very far, and it doesn't actually matter

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>what is true in the world. What matters to people

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is their own lived experience. And for the most part,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking in broad strokes, people are feeling down and out.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>They are feeling despondent, they are feeling strapped, They're very

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>very concerned financially, they have more month than check. I'm

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 1>thinking of all the idiosyncratic ways people describe this to us,

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>depending who they are and what focus group it is.

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>And so when you try to sort of argue with

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>people and say the economy is better than ever and

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>things are going great, you know their response back is

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of what planet have you emerged from? And why

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are you talking to me. However, what I will say,

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is really really important, is that when we

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to our voters both surge and swing about the

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>litany of accomplishments we pass. This, we passed, that, we

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>passed this, and really vitally the fact that we held

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>together and that Trump Republicans and I used that phrase

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>very deliberately, Trump Republicans, Maga Republicans. I'm happy to say,

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>why stood in your way at every turn. They wanted

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>to block what our families need and Democrats brought it. Anyway,

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>when we talk to our voters about the passage of

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the bills in the get what that does more than

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>any one bill is it gets at this sort of

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>root idea that voters have that Democrats are do nothing

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and so interestingly, it's more the act of you know,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a canard, right, nothing succeeds like success, and so

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>this idea that we can do things, we do do things,

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we do pass things, we keep moving the ball down

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the field. That is as important a part of the

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>narrative to convey as any one of these specific policies.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So I want to dig into one of the things

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that you just said. I want to ask about how

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Maga Republicans. Trump Republicans are playing right that phrasing, because

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for me, I will say that making that distinction just

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>seems false because I don't know what the group of

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans there are but Trump or Maga Republicans. I don't

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 1>know what other group of Republicans there are other than

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are cheering the rise of fascism in

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Italy and you know, and and and and wanting to

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>shake hands with authoritarians and dictators like Victor Orbon who's

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>welcomed into Sepack and putin right. So I want to

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ask the question about the distinction and how that is

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>playing uh in in these groups. And also, my god,

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry you would send to people all all week long,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>all of these different groups, Mike, I hope you meditate, um,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>but uh the you know, the the other question is, too,

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>does it play better to talk about how Republicans are

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>blocking your ability, blocking Americans ability to make their checks

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>go longer than the month too, in fact, act, you know,

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to keep their head literally above water. Does

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it help to have that narrative or is it we

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>need that narrative about democrats doing and the narrative about

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>why more can't get done. Yeah, so let me try

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to answer. I'll answer the second one first. So, the

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>overarching narrative that we have found working, and this is

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>on the basis not just of that aggregated qualitative research

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the focus groups I reference, but this is part of

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a giant ad and message testing project in which I've

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>been engaged, where at this point we've tested over two

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred digital ads and randomized controlled trials over the summer

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to arrive at an overarching storyline. And that overarching storyline

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I can encapsulate in three words, it is protect our

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>freedoms freedoms intentionally plural. And so what that does is

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Democrats as being here to protect our

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 1>freedoms and Trump Republicans or mac Republicans, and I will

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>explain why as taking away our freedoms from the freedom

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to decide whether and when we have kids, to our

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>freedom from gun violence, to our freedom to earn enough

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and be able to provide for our families. Republicans want

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to take away Trump Republicans want to take away our freedoms.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>By joining together like we did in twenty twenty, we

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>can protect our freedoms. So basically the polarity is actually

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>number one. The topic is freedoms plural because when we

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>use it in that plural form, it unconsciously activates and

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>people are more progressive understanding of freedom, whereas the singular

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>tips more into kind of your classic right wing guns

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>right freedom of religion, which of course just means being

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>able to shove a certain kind of patriarchal, evangelical white

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Christianity at you. So freedoms is a really really powerful

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and effective kind of overarching concept. And then what we're

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>doing is we're saying that they are taking away your freedoms,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>because that activates something that we know in psychology called

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>loss aversion. People are much more motivated to act on

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>behalf of retaining something they perceive to have now versus

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>acting on behalf of a predicted future gain. So all

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of that language taking away freedoms, etc. It's all super deliberate. Now,

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump Republicans are Maca Republicans. What you say is of

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>course absolutely correct. But when we're thinking about the way

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that we label our opposition, we want to evaluate any message,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>any label, anything we're saying along a set of criteria.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So the criteria are it feels credible to the voter.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It feels true and accurate, It feels mobilizing to our base.

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It makes them want to take more action at a

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>minimum voting and you know, GoldStar of volunteering, calling, participating, etcetera.

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>All the things, all the things, and it is persuasive

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to the broadest number of voters that we can actually

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>get recognizing that there are people we cannot and will

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>not ever have on our side. And so what happens

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>is if we say Republicans period, Republicans want to take

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>away your freedoms, or Republicans are blocking XYZ, or Republicans

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>are this or that for our base, and this includes

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to be very very clear and explicit Black voters,

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Latino voters, etc. Which are the predominant part of our base.

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>What they hear in that is, oh, that's just politics

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>as usual. That's where team blue shit talks Team read,

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Team Read does the opposite. There's a reason I don't

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>want to listen to any of that, and I'm not

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>interested in it because we have to remember that our

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>task with our disaffected base meaning not activists, so not you, Danielle,

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:26.959
<v Speaker 1>not me, but people who if they would participate, if

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>they would vote, would vote for us. It's just that

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't vote all the time, and so they are

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>particularly repulsed by what they perceived to be politics as usual, bickering,

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of animosity of it. And right now, especially

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in our battlegrounds. I just got told today by one

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>of our media consultants that voters in Las Vegas, because Nevada,

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of course is a battleground state, are seeing eleven political

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ads an hour on average. So the voters in these

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>battleground states, basically what our canvassers on the doors are

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>telling us is people are like, I don't want to

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>hear negative shit. I do not like, do not with that,

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I cannot with that. So what what calling out all

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Republicans does is it makes people think that we're doing

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it for the same reason that Domino says crappy things

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>about Pizza Hut, like that's just your job, got it, Okay.

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So when we say Trump Republicans or Magarepublicans, it increases

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the credibility, it increases the heat, and people don't feel

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 1>like that's name calling from us. They feel like, well,

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that's an accurate label, that's something that they would say

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>about themselves. With swing voters, what it does is it

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>opens up what we call the permission architecture for people

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>who have formerly voted Republican self identify even as Republican

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>who voted for Joe Biden in twenty twenty, to be

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>able to say I'm still a Republican because my grandpa was,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>or because you know some sort of whatever. I mean

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously to me total bullshit feeling about Ronald Reagan. But

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>it's there, and I can still come with you and

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>be in your coalition because you don't mean me. It

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>gives people an now mm. So here's the thing that

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>troubles me. It's the fact that we still need maybe

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>because you know more than I, which is why I

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>invited you on Who is this swing voter or not?

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Who is this mythical unicorn that still exists in the

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>center that hasn't been pushed to one side by the insurrection,

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been pushed to one side, by the fact that

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the political parties you know, loves their white

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>supremacist oath keeper three percent or Proud Boy Bass and

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't say anything negatively against them, like who are those people? Yeah,

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So first I just want to say there aren't a

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of them. They are like they can't be. There

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>are very very, very very few. But I want to

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>remind folks that politics is a game of millimeters, not

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>even inches. We won Wisconsin by point seven percent in

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, and we lost it by about one percent

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen. So basically, we can't afford to lose anyone.

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>We need all of the people who voted for Joe

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden to come back out. And the thing about mid terms,

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and I promise I haven't forgotten your question, is that

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to remember there is a historical pattern at

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>play here, and that pattern, with the exception of the

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>election after nine to eleven, is that the incumbent party

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:27.719
<v Speaker 1>takes a shellacking because quite simply, the out of power party,

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>their base voters are much more energized than our base.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And yes, we are doing everything in our power, and

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm a there's no that this false diychotomy between are

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we doing turnout are we doing persuasion? That that is

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of nonsense. And by the way, just to

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>dog whistle about do we give a shit about black

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>voters and are we going to talk to them or

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>will we put all our eggs in the white people basket.

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all that little conversation means. Unpacking the what the

0:29:54.080 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>words mean. We have to get everybody back out, and

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we have to recognize that in states like Pennsylvania, like Wisconsin,

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like Arizona, like Georgia, like Texas, if we have a

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>prayer there, it means we can't afford to lose any

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So now your question, there are not a lot of

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>swing voters, but they live in super key places and

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>who are they? They are people who either historically have

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>identified as Republican because a lot of voting behavior, and

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the greatest predictor of adult voting behavior is

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>parental voting behavior. So it's not unlike, you know why

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you have X y Z brand of yogurt in your face.

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It's likely because that's what your parents had. Right, So

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>people's decision making about these things actually is imprinted upon

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>us at a really, really really young age. That doesn't

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>mean nobody changes, that doesn't mean persuasion is impossible. All

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of those things are also true. I'm speaking in the aggregate.

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So those swing voters have some of them have some

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of affiliation or identity as Republicans, but are turned

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>off by and find Trump Republicanism, magaism to be repugnant,

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and so now they're in this totally conflicted place. And

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that place of conflict is this is my identity, this

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is sort of what my parents told me was good

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and right, this is what my church says, this is

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>what my community believes. But I disagree with those terrible

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>things happening. And so the valuation that they're making in

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this midterm is is there such a thing as voting

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for a Republican that is not a vote for maga,

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that is not a vote for Trump. And so we're

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>making the case to them that you just made Danielle. No,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no daylight between the person running the person running,

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>even if it's Brian Camp who wants kudos and plaudits

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>for like nominally, you know, for not being willing to

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>like completely and totally destroy the law and finding votes

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that didn't existed, like congratulations. The bar is so low

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you've hit your head on it. I wish you would

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>pass out, but that doesn't seem to happen. So those

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>swing voters are either folks who are sort of reckoning

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>with their own sense of identity, and we're trying to

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>both make that case that the congressional Republican or the

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>person running for school board, because remember, local races matter two,

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they matter a lot. And so the person running for

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>school board obviously, the person running for Secretary of State

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>unbelievably important. That the people who actually oversee our elections,

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the person running for county commissioner. We want you to

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>understand that, like they're all beyond the pale. So that's

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>one thing that we're trying to do with that voter.

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And then the other thing that we're trying to do

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>with that voter is recognize that people make midterm decisions

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of enthusiasm and on the basis historically

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of how they feel about their pocketbooks. And right now,

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that inflation is obviously a global phenomenon

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and is occurring and existing across the world in super

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>right wing run states, government countries in left wing we're

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on states like you know, Joe Biden is not in

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>charge of the global economy, newsflash. So people don't understand that,

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and all they know is that they're having struggles, and

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so they're thinking, I'm having struggles. I voted this way

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>last time, or Team Blue is in power and I'm

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not feeling great about my life. I'm gonna Gopher team

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>read got it, And so our fundamental task is to

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>change the terms of the election itself away from being

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a referendum on the party in power, which is normally

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>what a midterm election is, to being an actual choice election,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a choice between Trump Republicans who want to take away

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>your freedoms, including your freedom to retire in dignity by

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>stealing your Social Security and Medicare from you, your freedom

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to decide for yourself who governs in your name, by

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>taking away your freedom to vote, your freedom to know

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that when your kids go off to school in the morning,

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see them home at the end of

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the day because some maniac is not going to have

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>massacred them because you're handing out military grade weapons like

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>kanzi bars. So they need to understand this as a

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>choice election and not a referendum on the incumbent party.

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>That's it for part one of my conversation with the

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>fabulous and brilliantly verbos Anat Schenker oh Saudio. We will

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>be back tomorrow with part two of words that we

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>actually need to win by with our friend Anat. That

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is it for me, Today, dear friends on Woke a

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>f as always, Power to the people and to all

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the people power, get woke and stay woke as fuck.