1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,040 Speaker 1: At a campaign style rally last night in Phoenix, President 2 00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:05,760 Speaker 1: Trump gave an angry defense of his response to the 3 00:00:05,840 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: violence in Charlottesville, blaming the media for distorting his position. 4 00:00:10,080 --> 00:00:13,080 Speaker 1: Trump jumped from topic to topic. He threatened to shut 5 00:00:13,119 --> 00:00:16,800 Speaker 1: down the government over the border wall funding, and strongly 6 00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:21,000 Speaker 1: hinted that he might pardon former Maricopa County, Arizona sheriff 7 00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:25,760 Speaker 1: Joe r Pio, convicted of criminal contempt for intentionally disobeying 8 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:29,800 Speaker 1: a judge's order to stop traffic patrols that targeted immigrants. 9 00:00:31,040 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: Was Sheriff Joe convicted for doing his job? That's what 10 00:00:39,040 --> 00:00:41,400 Speaker 1: he should have had a jury. But you know what, 11 00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:45,480 Speaker 1: I'll make a prediction. I think he's gonna be just fine. Okay. 12 00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:48,960 Speaker 1: Trump said he quote won't do it tonight because he 13 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:52,800 Speaker 1: doesn't want to cause controversy. The five year old r 14 00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:56,160 Speaker 1: Pio became infamous during his twenty four years as sheriff 15 00:00:56,280 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 1: for a litany of misconduct, including aggressive enforcement of immigration 16 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:05,240 Speaker 1: laws by unlawful methods, investigations of his legal and political foes, 17 00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:09,280 Speaker 1: and racial profiling. Joining us as Mark Osler, he's a 18 00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:13,360 Speaker 1: professor at St. Thomas School of Law. Mark tell us 19 00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:18,840 Speaker 1: what our PIOS stands for in the communities he has policed. Yeah, 20 00:01:18,920 --> 00:01:22,919 Speaker 1: he's very controversial, and he's someone that you know, expressly 21 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 1: invited confrontation with the Hispanic community in in the Phoenix area. UM, 22 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:32,920 Speaker 1: and he got it. You know that he um organized 23 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:39,279 Speaker 1: special projects, for example, targeting areas where people were picking 24 00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:42,920 Speaker 1: up day laborers we're going to be uh you know. 25 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:48,440 Speaker 1: And and then of course enforcing Arizona's laws uh regarding 26 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:53,080 Speaker 1: immigration that were later largely struck down. UM. And so 27 00:01:53,320 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 1: he's someone that invited controversy in the same way that 28 00:01:56,160 --> 00:01:59,560 Speaker 1: that Donald Trump has and was divisive in much the 29 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:02,640 Speaker 1: same way. So if he was just if he was 30 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:05,520 Speaker 1: enforcing Arizona's laws, he didn't write the laws and he 31 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:08,480 Speaker 1: didn't strike up How what is the trouble that our 32 00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:12,280 Speaker 1: peo got in? Yeah, Well, you know, the thing about 33 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 1: the thing about law is that what's on the paper 34 00:02:15,760 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 1: is only part of the story. The discretion that police officers, 35 00:02:20,040 --> 00:02:23,080 Speaker 1: those in law enforcement and prosecutors have is often most 36 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:27,360 Speaker 1: of the story. And what what Sheriff Joe got in 37 00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:33,079 Speaker 1: trouble for is um racial profiling. Uh that they they 38 00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:36,520 Speaker 1: adopted tactics that made it clear that they were targeting 39 00:02:36,880 --> 00:02:44,480 Speaker 1: Hispanics and also um broader systemic projects that targeted hispanics. Um, 40 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:47,480 Speaker 1: it really wasn't so much some of the more controversial 41 00:02:47,520 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 1: things that he did, such as the way he ran 42 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:52,600 Speaker 1: the tense City jail and things like that, but had 43 00:02:52,639 --> 00:02:56,920 Speaker 1: to do UM with with racial and ethnic profiling specifically, 44 00:02:57,040 --> 00:03:01,160 Speaker 1: and there was a pretty damning report from the Department 45 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:06,720 Speaker 1: of Justice, uh in twenty back. I think that. And 46 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 1: then you had the contempt. There was an order that 47 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:14,120 Speaker 1: was put in place by the court out there. He 48 00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:15,840 Speaker 1: was held in contempt to that and then held in 49 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:21,440 Speaker 1: criminal contempt just back in July. There's a process for 50 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:26,080 Speaker 1: presidential pardons. Has that been followed in any respect in 51 00:03:26,160 --> 00:03:30,360 Speaker 1: our Pio's case? Um, From what our Pio has said, 52 00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:33,560 Speaker 1: he said that he did not seek a pardon. That 53 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 1: means that he hasn't submitted a petition. The rules are 54 00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:40,200 Speaker 1: are you know, pretty clear about how this is supposed 55 00:03:40,240 --> 00:03:42,360 Speaker 1: to work? Now? Of course, it's a constitutional power of 56 00:03:42,360 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 1: the president, and that means that the president has the 57 00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:50,040 Speaker 1: ability not to follow the rules if he doesn't want to. However, 58 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:55,200 Speaker 1: it does UM, definitely, Mark. This is something different than 59 00:03:55,360 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 1: what we usually see with clemency. Well, what normally would happen. 60 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 1: Let's he had put in a petition for for a pardon. 61 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:05,920 Speaker 1: What what is the process before it actually gets to 62 00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:09,120 Speaker 1: the president. Yeah, the process is pretty extensive that it 63 00:04:09,200 --> 00:04:11,360 Speaker 1: is reviewed by the staff at the Partner Attorney, the 64 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:14,760 Speaker 1: partner Attorney's official at the Department of Justice. Then the 65 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:17,960 Speaker 1: pardoner Attorney looks at it, passes along to the Deputy 66 00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:21,360 Speaker 1: Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General often as a staff 67 00:04:21,400 --> 00:04:24,040 Speaker 1: member that previews it before he or she looks at it. 68 00:04:24,640 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 1: From the deput Attorney General, it doesn't go all the 69 00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:30,240 Speaker 1: way to the Attorney General. It then goes over to 70 00:04:30,279 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 1: the White House to the office of the White House Council. 71 00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:36,239 Speaker 1: It's reviewed by staff there, then goes to the White 72 00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:39,159 Speaker 1: House Council, and then goes to the President finally. So 73 00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:43,480 Speaker 1: there's there's really seven steps potentially a review here. So 74 00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:47,880 Speaker 1: what kind of a message would it send if Trump 75 00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:54,120 Speaker 1: actually did pardon our Pio. Yeah, it's it's significant because 76 00:04:54,520 --> 00:04:57,440 Speaker 1: what we're talking about here, it's not it's not really 77 00:04:57,440 --> 00:05:01,320 Speaker 1: the same as Mark rich or Scooter Toby, where there 78 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:05,039 Speaker 1: were presidents they're helping out someone who is a friend 79 00:05:05,120 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 1: or a supporter or a Uh, an employee in the 80 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:13,680 Speaker 1: case of Libby. Here, it's a statement issue that uh, 81 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:15,960 Speaker 1: you know, it would really be perceived and I think 82 00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 1: correctly as Donald Trump saying, uh, you know, this is 83 00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:23,240 Speaker 1: somebody like me, This is somebody I support. I support 84 00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:26,880 Speaker 1: the values that he expressed in his work. And the 85 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:29,440 Speaker 1: reason that's going to be so controversial in a way 86 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:32,600 Speaker 1: that the statute, you know when he said Confederate statutes 87 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:34,800 Speaker 1: are beautiful things that shouldn't be taken down. Well, there 88 00:05:34,839 --> 00:05:38,919 Speaker 1: we're talking about. Racism has existed a hundred and fifty 89 00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:44,520 Speaker 1: years ago, embedded in an institutive slavery with uh, with 90 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:49,240 Speaker 1: this issue, with this potential pardon, he's dealing with racism 91 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:54,039 Speaker 1: as it exists today, embedded in the mechanism of criminal law. Well, 92 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:58,440 Speaker 1: is our pardons sometimes issued for what seemed to be 93 00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:03,440 Speaker 1: political reasons like this? Sure, yeah, I mean although very 94 00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:07,280 Speaker 1: often when we when we label something a political pardon, 95 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:12,080 Speaker 1: we're really talking about about favoritism. That George H. W. 96 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 1: Bush issued clemency for some of the people who were 97 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:19,279 Speaker 1: involved in Iran contra. Uh, you know, we had Scooter Libby, 98 00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:21,640 Speaker 1: we had Mark Rich, we had you know, we've we've 99 00:06:21,640 --> 00:06:25,920 Speaker 1: had that uh, kind of pardon for a while. UM. 100 00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:28,960 Speaker 1: But what I think is different about this is this 101 00:06:29,160 --> 00:06:32,159 Speaker 1: political in a way that it's making a political statement 102 00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:36,760 Speaker 1: about law enforcement. UM. And Trump's been pretty explicit, especially 103 00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:39,240 Speaker 1: in what we heard in the rally last night, in 104 00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: making it clear that's what he's after. Our PIO is 105 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:47,120 Speaker 1: eighty five years old. He faces six months in jail, 106 00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:49,839 Speaker 1: up to six months in jail, and attorneys who have 107 00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:53,160 Speaker 1: been following the case doubt that someone of his age 108 00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 1: and with no criminal record would actually serve time. Is 109 00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:01,400 Speaker 1: that Is that your or opinion? And what does that 110 00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:04,880 Speaker 1: say about what Trump wants to do in pardoning him? Right? 111 00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:08,000 Speaker 1: I completely agree with that. I can't see a judge 112 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,960 Speaker 1: giving him even the six months or a fraction of that. 113 00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:13,760 Speaker 1: I don't. I don't think that's going to happen to 114 00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:16,480 Speaker 1: a man of his age, and he's lost in election already. 115 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:19,000 Speaker 1: He's you know, there's not the danger of him continuing 116 00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:22,200 Speaker 1: these activities. There's someone new in office who's who's changed 117 00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:28,080 Speaker 1: those policies. UM. But uh, you know that does go 118 00:07:28,200 --> 00:07:31,440 Speaker 1: to given that there really isn't much risk of this 119 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:35,200 Speaker 1: five year old man going to jail. UM, what's the 120 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:37,520 Speaker 1: message that Trump is really sending and I think it 121 00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:40,600 Speaker 1: has to do with issues much deeper than any one person. 122 00:07:40,920 --> 00:07:44,200 Speaker 1: I should say that our Pio told the Associated Press 123 00:07:44,320 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 1: that he wasn't disappointed that Trump didn't pardon him yesterday. 124 00:07:48,920 --> 00:07:51,160 Speaker 1: He said, they've just decided not to do with tonight. 125 00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:53,880 Speaker 1: We'll have to see if and when it occurs in 126 00:07:53,920 --> 00:07:54,560 Speaker 1: the future.