1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,400 Speaker 1: Well. Minneapolis Faded president Neil Kashgary said he was actually 2 00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:06,120 Speaker 1: happy to see how chair J. Pale's Jackson the whole 3 00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: speech was received by markets. Of course, Micuts received that 4 00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:13,080 Speaker 1: speech by selling off pretty heavily on Friday afternoon, joining 5 00:00:13,160 --> 00:00:17,440 Speaker 1: us to discuss. Now we have Jonathan levin Bloomberg's market columnists, 6 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:21,720 Speaker 1: so Cash Gary happy that he saw global shares fall. 7 00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:23,880 Speaker 1: It does sound brutal, but he does. He have a 8 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:26,680 Speaker 1: point when it comes to markets doubting the foods commitment. 9 00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:29,880 Speaker 1: They're good to be with you, Paul. What I thought 10 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:32,520 Speaker 1: was interesting about this is just, you know, to to 11 00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:35,120 Speaker 1: see a central bank or actually saying the quiet part 12 00:00:35,159 --> 00:00:38,599 Speaker 1: out loud. You know, I think that in reality, this 13 00:00:38,680 --> 00:00:41,520 Speaker 1: is just how monetary policy works, and we all kind 14 00:00:41,520 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 1: of understand this. This is where the this don't fight 15 00:00:44,800 --> 00:00:48,240 Speaker 1: the Fed mantra comes from. And central Marcus talk a 16 00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:52,199 Speaker 1: lot about the importance of financial conditions. It's essentially a 17 00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:56,480 Speaker 1: euphemism for we need to raise borrowing costs and make 18 00:00:56,520 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: you feel poor in order to rein in him. For Asian, 19 00:01:00,840 --> 00:01:04,640 Speaker 1: it's just rare to to see an active central banker 20 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:08,039 Speaker 1: say so as bluntly as as Cash Carry did. In 21 00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:10,840 Speaker 1: this interview with odd Lots, Is it something that we 22 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:13,160 Speaker 1: want to hear? Do we want, you know, twelve people 23 00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:15,959 Speaker 1: in a room telling our markets what they should be doing. 24 00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:19,960 Speaker 1: I know that sounds, you know, like it's criticize criticizing him, 25 00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:24,680 Speaker 1: but you you often don't hear FED officials talking actively 26 00:01:24,720 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 1: about the level of the dollar or the level of markets, 27 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:31,480 Speaker 1: and and that, Yeah, I I think it's sort of 28 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:35,240 Speaker 1: just reflects where we are, at least in US markets. Right. 29 00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:39,080 Speaker 1: So over the summer, coming off of the July the 30 00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:42,680 Speaker 1: July lows, there was this sort of I've called it, 31 00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:45,720 Speaker 1: sort of a vapid summer rally that wasn't really based 32 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:49,120 Speaker 1: based on much of anything but a lack of real 33 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:53,680 Speaker 1: fundamental news. And that summer rally ended up achieving the 34 00:01:53,760 --> 00:01:56,200 Speaker 1: opposite of what the FED is trying to do. Right. 35 00:01:56,280 --> 00:02:00,360 Speaker 1: It loosened up, Uh, it loosened up financial can editions 36 00:02:00,400 --> 00:02:01,960 Speaker 1: a little bit. We're going to see if that has 37 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 1: any consequences actual inflation numbers going forward. But as j Pal, 38 00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:12,560 Speaker 1: the FECh chair made clear in Jackson Hole on Friday, 39 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:17,560 Speaker 1: you know, they are committed to this, to this fight. 40 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:20,560 Speaker 1: And I think that j Pal's message in a slightly 41 00:02:20,600 --> 00:02:25,640 Speaker 1: more opaque, opaque fashion than what kash Gary just told us. Uh, 42 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:30,560 Speaker 1: you know, j Pale was coming out guns ablazing and saying, listen, 43 00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:35,560 Speaker 1: we're doing this, We're serious about this. And I think 44 00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:41,000 Speaker 1: that that he chose that format specifically because he perceived 45 00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:44,920 Speaker 1: that that markets weren't getting the picture. Yeah, the famous 46 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 1: saying is don't fight the fit. But to some degree 47 00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 1: did the FIT bring this upon itself? Because we've seen 48 00:02:51,040 --> 00:02:54,119 Speaker 1: in the past a reaction to type of tantrums, more 49 00:02:54,200 --> 00:02:58,640 Speaker 1: recently the FIT cold inflation transitory. The market doubted that 50 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 1: the market was proven right. So can we pack some 51 00:03:02,639 --> 00:03:05,760 Speaker 1: of the blame for this at the FIDGS door. Yeah, 52 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:08,200 Speaker 1: I mean, obviously this is a this is a different FED, 53 00:03:08,320 --> 00:03:12,000 Speaker 1: but but uh, you know, a long time FED watchers 54 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:15,280 Speaker 1: grew up sort of reading the tea leaves. This, you know, 55 00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 1: for a long time, this was one of the most 56 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:19,840 Speaker 1: opaque institutions in the world, one of the most opaque 57 00:03:19,880 --> 00:03:21,840 Speaker 1: and one of the most powerful, and a lot of 58 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:24,800 Speaker 1: people earned a living just you know, trying to read 59 00:03:24,880 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 1: read the tea leaves. And it's kind of shocking, maybe 60 00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:33,360 Speaker 1: even hard to understand that with this particular FED, at 61 00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:36,160 Speaker 1: least in my humble opinion, there are no tea he 62 00:03:36,320 --> 00:03:39,160 Speaker 1: leaves to read. They're they're sort of telling it as 63 00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:42,720 Speaker 1: it is, and it has taken the market some adjusting 64 00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 1: to say, hey, maybe they aren't playing three dimensional chess. 65 00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:49,040 Speaker 1: Maybe they're just telling us what they're gonna do and 66 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:52,320 Speaker 1: we should listen. Yeah, I mean, I absolutely get that, 67 00:03:52,480 --> 00:03:55,200 Speaker 1: and you know, just trying to explain more than thinking 68 00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 1: behind the first question is that you know, there's millions 69 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:02,240 Speaker 1: of Asians distilled down into what markets are doing. If 70 00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:06,240 Speaker 1: if the market thinks that companies can handle one cost 71 00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:10,040 Speaker 1: input interest rates or one cost input, right, If if 72 00:04:10,040 --> 00:04:13,600 Speaker 1: companies can handle that and their earnings are not, let's say, 73 00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:16,640 Speaker 1: hit hard, then who's to say that the market at 74 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 1: any given time is right or wrong. Market is what 75 00:04:19,760 --> 00:04:24,480 Speaker 1: it is. Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, obviously, an 76 00:04:24,480 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 1: element of this is is p S and an element 77 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:29,560 Speaker 1: of this, at least in the stock market, is what 78 00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:34,680 Speaker 1: people's earnings expectations are going to be. You know, I've 79 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:37,480 Speaker 1: been I've been of the opinion that p is we're 80 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:40,479 Speaker 1: a little rich for an extras rate environment that that 81 00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:45,440 Speaker 1: looks like this anyway. But the broader picture is that 82 00:04:45,520 --> 00:04:49,520 Speaker 1: there is significant earnings risk going forward. I don't think 83 00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:53,920 Speaker 1: that that earnings risk is going to manifest itself right away, 84 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:56,119 Speaker 1: you know. I think a lot of people took heart 85 00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:59,240 Speaker 1: in the in the fact that the latest quarters numbers 86 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:02,359 Speaker 1: out of the out of US, we're actually fairly strong. 87 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:06,520 Speaker 1: You might call them resilient or whatever. But this this 88 00:05:06,600 --> 00:05:09,520 Speaker 1: is a process that takes time. People typically talk about 89 00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:12,960 Speaker 1: a monetary policy lag of eighteen to twenty four months 90 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:16,040 Speaker 1: for the FEDS sort of wrecking ball to to do 91 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:19,720 Speaker 1: its thing, if you will. And uh so, you know, 92 00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:23,279 Speaker 1: there's there's significant risk there. What is happening now in 93 00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:28,440 Speaker 1: US markets is that, uh, you know, the job market 94 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:32,480 Speaker 1: remains remains strong, people are starting to spend down those 95 00:05:32,480 --> 00:05:35,919 Speaker 1: pandemic savings. They're starting to turn to the credit cards 96 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:39,920 Speaker 1: and so forth, and that, you know, that creates a 97 00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:43,120 Speaker 1: bit of a runway for consumption in the in the US, 98 00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:46,240 Speaker 1: And that that being the case, it could really take 99 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:51,160 Speaker 1: you know, several quarters, well into three until we can 100 00:05:51,240 --> 00:05:55,560 Speaker 1: really assess the earning situation and say the FED did 101 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:58,680 Speaker 1: its thing and it didn't do too much damage. Yeah, 102 00:05:58,680 --> 00:06:03,239 Speaker 1: it shapes up as really interesting next six months, for sure. Jonathan, 103 00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:05,960 Speaker 1: thanks very much for being with us. Jonathan Levin new 104 00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:07,440 Speaker 1: is Bloomberg Market columnist,