WEBVTT - 11/18/20 HOUR 2- Mike Florio, Chris Mannix

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Howard two on this Wednesday. NBA Draft coming

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>up tonight. Come on in stay a while. Chris Mannock,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>some sports illustrator will be covering the draft. What does

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>he think he's going to happen? Where is LaMelo Ball

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>going to go? I got him going to Golden State.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Golden State takes James Wiseman. But if I'm

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Golden State, I'd take LaMelo Ball eight seven seven three

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>d P show email out of Stpa, Dan Patrick dot com.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence is back practicing wake Duke postpone, Wichita States.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg Marshall has tapped out. They have decided to part ways.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>There some serious allegations attached to him, and somehow he

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>walks away with nearly eight million dollars. Oh, it feels

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like that would violate your contract or your buyout or

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a clause in there if you happen to do

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>something like choke one of your assistant coaches something like that.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that language was in there. If

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you choke one of your assistant coaches, you don't get

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>paid the remainder of your contract. His next contract will

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>probably have that fine print in there. Yestime, if you

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>have players with conduct intrimental to the team or embarrassing

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the league or the organization, how could coaches not be

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a subject to those same type of penalties. He's got

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a contract detrimental to the team and his conduct was

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>detrimental to the team as well. McLevin has a poll question,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are we staying with Ammon cleven? So would you draft

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>LaMelo Ball? I thought it'd be like fifty fifty seventy. Okay,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the minority's top three. Obviously the NBA fields

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>they're going to draft him. Yeah, I would take him.

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I would. I think the upside is can be significant there.

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Anthony Edwards is a very safe pick there.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>James Wiseman is exactly that. He's a wise man. He

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is a very mature kid um by all accounts, and

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is he able to fit in in today's NBA? How

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>would he fit in with Golden State style? But I

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>only saw one game, but it was an entire game.

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw Oregon. I saw Anthony Edwards play one entire game.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Edwards is a very safe pick and looks like

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he could be He's built like James Harden. I don't

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>know if he's going to be a great scorer, but

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a very good two way player. You just don't

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have that rubber stamp man. I know that guy's going

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to be great. If I said I would give you

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the top ten pick, top eight picks of the last

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>six drafts, and I'll take everybody after that, would you

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be more willing to go I want the first eight picks,

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or you get every other pick after that. I'm going

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to take all the other picks after that. Go back

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to that Anthony Bennett draft mclovin. Because Anthony Bennett, I

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>watch you and LV play. I watched them in their

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>conference tournament. I didn't know Anthony Edwards was any good.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>There were times when I would watch or Anthony Bennett

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'd go, I do is that guy supposed to

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>be great? And even in that league, I went, Okay,

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>seems to do a couple of good thing. He didn't

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>do anything great. And then all of a sudden, the

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>cams go they're taking ANT taking Anthony Bennett. I went,

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, what did I miss here? Because I

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>loved Victor Oladipo. In fact, Mannings came on and I said,

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Victor Oladipo in his future in the NBA. Mcleven,

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>do you have that draft? Yes, you're it's so bottom heavy,

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous. Okay. It starts Bennett, then Victor Oladipo, Otto, Porter,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Cody Zeller, Alex Lenn, Cody Zeller, Alex Lynn at All,

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>then my six Ers mid process. Oh. Actually it says

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that New Orleans took New Orleans so well, but I

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like they traded him to the six or somehow.

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Then Ben McLemore, who he was on the Rockets last year.

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised to see we love that guy, remember

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>him coming out of Kansas Kent Tavis called well Pope.

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize he was a top ten pick. He

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>was eight. The Lions, I mean the Tigers, I mean,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>oh my Ben Trey Burke, who the Sixers should have

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>kept his number nine, c J mccllum, ten, Michael Carter.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But if I gave you the first EID picks and

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I got everybody else, Michael Carter, Williams went eleven. He

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>was I think he was Rookie of the Year and

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>he just didn't shoot. Yeah, he couldn't His first game.

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I think he had a triple double. He couldn't shoot.

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Then Yannis fifteen y Yeah, so I had Jannis and

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>c J. McCollum. There's a few other players in there, yes, boy, yeah,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of good players who were drafted after ten.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Steven Adams Oklahoma City. He was drafted twelfth. He's had

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a very nice career. Rudy Gobert was twenty seventh. Dennis

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Schrader seventeen. Shrewder Schrader, Sure, try it again, No, it's

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even have the umlats. Pretty sure it's Shrewderer.

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It's Dennis Shrewder, Denise Shrewder Yet wait wait what was

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the die Harden scene? Shoots? Oh? Oh, I thought it was.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Never mind. Where's the kid from the Peanuts gang? That's Schroeder.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Schroeder played a mean piano. I love Schroder. All right, Uh,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk also Tim Hardaway. Rudy Gobert probably was going on.

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>There's like ten ten guys who are Max Alan Krabb. No, no,

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't put Alan Krab in there. Alan Krab dude

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>made an Oh I know that a lot of guys

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>who have which I we gotta get to ethan On.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>There must be top good picks in the top eight

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of those drafts, right like the last eight years I had.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>None of them are jump into mind, but yeah, you

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>start to wonder, like these are the guys that teams

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that are you know, they miss on the bad teams

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are up there for a reason, and then they whiff

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on these picks and then you never recover from something

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like that where you could have had this. You know,

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine if the Cabs had taken Anthony Bennett when they

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>took him and still be there. You might be building

0:05:55.320 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>around if you took somebody, uh CJ. McCollum throw You know,

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of players and obviously the Greek freak,

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's players that you go, well, you could have

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>build around those, and then you miss when you're up

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that high. Yeah, McLevin, I don't think the six Ers

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>got it right in seventeen when they traded from three

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to one to get Marquel Falls. They did nine that

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>did not go well. Yeah, but one Anthony Davis was

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the number one pick in twenty twelve. Yep, it's pretty

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>good and Karl Anthony Town's fifteen good player, good, solid

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>players DeAndre Aden is he veering towards a bust? Are

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a good player? You're the only one I know I

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>would I would say that he has the key to

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the Phoenix Suns being a great team is going to

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be DeAndre Eighton in my opinion, because it feels like

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>they have a nice starting five. Chris Paul's in there.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>We know what Booker is. I need to know if

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Eighton can go next level? I mean eighteen and eleven,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it. I want to know if and he's

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>only twenty one or twenty two, I want to know

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>if he can go you know, twenty six and twelve,

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know what kind of shots? You know? Can

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>he extend his range a little bit there? But he

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>should be great? You take him number one overall. James

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Harden is one of the more unique stars in all

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the sports. We know he's a great player, but I

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>can't put him into a box or a category because

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not fast. But he can blow by you. He

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>can get his shot. I wouldn't call him ripped, but

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>he seems as strong as anyone covering him. He's a

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ball hog, but he's averaged over eleven assist a game

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>for a season. He's an anomaly in aberration. And now

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he's at a crossroads here because he once out of Houston.

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>He turned down a two year extension worth one hundred

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and three million dollars once to join Kevin Durant in Brooklyn,

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't mean the Rockets are going to cooperate.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But if they do pull off the deal, there's still

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about Harden. Is he going to

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to play hero ball? Is it going to be

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about James Harden? If I'm Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>there is no way I want to be around them.

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I truly believe this that James Harden understands

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I've done everything individually you can do in this game,

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to do something team wise. He wasn't necessarily

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a winner in college Oklahoma City. They had a chance.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>He was the sixth man of the year. You go

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to Houston, you create this phenomenon, you create this must

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 1>see TV style of offense. But after that, it's all done.

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing that James Harden does in a game anymore

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>where you go wow, unless it's something negative where he

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>misses fifteen consecutive three pointers that's it. You've seen him dominate,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You've seen him put up fifty, You've seen him dish

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>out eleven assists. He can get by anybody, get a

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>shot against anybody. I was watching yesterday and actually slowed

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it down. He was being guarded by Anthony Davis. Now,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis is six to eleven and a wingspan that

0:08:55.080 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>probably makes him seven ten. James Harden gets his shot,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>gets his jumper, He creates just enough separation, gets just

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>enough lift, and it's amazing to watch that he can

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>get a shot against the smallest guy, the tallest guy,

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the quickest guy. And now I think he understands what

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>am I and who am I? And what do I

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>want to be? Imagine he wins a championship. We look

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>at James Harden differently. If they adapt the style of

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>offense you saw with Golden State. If James Harden and

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant talk and say, hey, I'll do it, you

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do it, Kyrie, What do you think about this? Moving

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball, passing it four or five times down the floor,

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>get movement in there. And I wonder if James Harden

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is saying, at this stage in my career, do I

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>want to average thirty again, do I want to average

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty two? How about twenty two in a title? How

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>about twenty two and playing meaningful basketball? At some point,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that James harden will or has come to

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that realization. I truly believe that. And it's not that

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>he can't do it. Go back and watch Oklahoma City

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>when he was sixth man. Great off the ball, he

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to have a ball, got the ball score.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you're going to go to Brooklyn, and I

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's happening anytime soon, but if you're

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>going the style of offense I think will be more

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>based on what you saw with Golden State than what

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you saw with the Houston Rockets. Yes time. And where's

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paul and the championship realization? It's all nice to

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>live in Paradise Valley and you're gonna be a mentor

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to these young guys. But where does he think he's

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>going in his last few years in the NBA As

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>far as an he shot at a title? Well, I

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>think if Milwaukee was interested, then you got a shot

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>at a title. Chris Paul knew Oklahoma City's going to rebuild,

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and Phoenix was willing to take him on to give

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a little maturity to that line there. I don't know

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if he went, hey, how do I win a title?

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought Chris Paul, somehow, some way was going to

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>end up with the Lakers. I just thought it would

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be one of those lebron hey and somehow make this work.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I want you to come in, Rondo's gone. I want

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you to come in like That's that's what I thought.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But by going to Phoenix, he may not had another

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>option there, but I thought Milwaukee would have been a

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>great destination for him. Phone calls eight seven seven three

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>d P show email ADDRESSDP at dan Patrick dot com.

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's see Jimmy and Chicago. Hi, Jimmy would sell on

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>your mind today? What's up then? Hey, bunh Yeah good? Yeah.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>If I'm yeah, so if I'm the Wizards, I'm pressing like, yes,

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>but a thousand times to get Westwood. Yes, Yes, that's me.

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Solowly comes to the injury history. I mean John wall

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't even remember the last time I

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>saw him plays, did even play a game? Unless you're

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like I haven't seen him playing like

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>three seasons, um and I've never even I've never even

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>seen the Wizards on national TV, like or DNC your ESPN. UM,

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so I just thought that was funny. Um. And then

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Anthony, the Anthony Edwards player comps to Vince Carter.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>When I heard that, I kind of just gotten offices,

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Like the dude's only six four and I haven't seen

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>an actually play a minute. So I will YouTube and

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 1>later on just a you know, trig his game on him.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>But he is he that athletic? Yes, and yes he

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>can get his shot. He I will say this, Jimmy,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the phone call. He can get a shot,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he can get you a basket. Yeah, mclu. But that

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>nobody's as athletics. No, that's not a fair comparison. I

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>saw the Rigor had Oladipo as a comp who's a

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>little smaller than Vince Carter. He also had Eric Gordon,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and I could see Eric Gordon. Yeah, I could see

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit more. I mean, that's not fair.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>He's just three radically different players though, But he's not

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Vince Carter. Yes, see, not only Vince Carter, but Prime.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>They didn't even say downside of career Vince Carter, Vince Carter, Prime,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Vince Carter. Wow, Jesse and Los Angeles. Hey, Jess, welcome back.

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>What do you have? Hey, good morning, DP, thank you

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>for taking my call today. Ye have a comment on

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Balls and a question for you all right. On

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the bar Ball Seaton is kind of saying he's just

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>constantly putting a target on his kids back. And imagine

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>if you like, if you heard that in your lawns

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of Ball's daughter's mom and you got to go to

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>thanksgiving your Christmas for that clown show. But on the Kings,

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>my sacrament of King's fanhood, the King's mark draft shows,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm going up for killing Hayes about twelve whose player

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>companies as you mentioned, D'Angelo Russell, Gordon Trajis, And it's

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just like if they go that route, it's bye bye

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Deer and Fox Hello, five more years of irrelevance. Like

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not the New York Jets, but is

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>there any hope for this franchise? I thought, I thought,

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for the phone call, Jess. I thought last

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>year my Kings were going to make the playoffs. But

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know Vladie was not good in that job. You

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>got an owner who I don't know if he's a

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>positive or a negative. But you know, you got to

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you gotta have something there. There has to be somebody

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>there that you go I can trust that they're going

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to make the right decision, and they haven't had that

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and some of their draft picks. I liked Aaron Fox,

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know who else are you going to have?

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Buddy Healed once out? Marvin Bagley is average. I thought

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that they could cobble together a lineup that would be

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>competitive on a night in, night out basis, Yeah, mclub.

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You know Bagley's numbers are great on the rare occasion

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>he's on the court. He can't stay on the court

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. Is that well that would be a problem, yeah,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>because but he's another one. It doesn't matter how good

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>your center is. Centers can't win, right. Why do they

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>keep drafting these centers. I don't want to center. I don't.

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean James Wiseman. I don't know how Golden State

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>would use him or whoever's gonna draft him, and he

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>might be a perfect guy for them, but I don't

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>want a center. I can find centers. It's you know,

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>getting guys who are matchup nightmares for you, Guys who

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>do something different. What is the ceiling? There is James

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Wiseman going to be a great shooter. I know Jay

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Billis loves James Wiseman, and I trust Billis when it

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to, you know, sessing talent. And he called me

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a great shooter yesterday, so obviously I think Billis knows talent.

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Shoe in Minnesota, Hey, Shoe Adpy one time, first time,

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>five eleven. It is classic Timberwolves to have the number

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>one pick in this draft of all drafts. My advanced

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube scouting skill of let me to be one hundred

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>percent on Anthony Edwards until you see quotes like when

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>asked when he got into basketball, I'm still not really

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>into it, he says, I love basketball. Yeah, It's what

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I do. Boy, If that doesn't inspire confidence in a

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>potential number one pick, ESPN dot Com read the entire

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>story because this quote is standing out to people that

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you got somebody who doesn't love the sport. I always

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>go back to Ryan Leaf, Ryan Leaf out of Washington State,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>great in the Rose Bowl. I don't think he loved football.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he was good in football, but he didn't

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>say it. You know, Anthony Edwards is a talented player,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but to read the entire article and then tell me

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>if you come away with by that guy doesn't really

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>love playing basketball. He grew up in a tough environment,

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>lost his mom, lost his grandmother, and he's a good kid.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I heard him being interviewed on the Mothership on the

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Jump a couple of days ago, and I really liked him.

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I liked what I heard and how he sounded. And

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why when that quote came out and I went,

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't sound like the guy that I heard on

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Mothership. Sometimes these quotes taken out of context, all

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, it stands out for a little bit

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>more than what it really should. And that was my

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>take on it. I thought, Okay, I'm gonna be fair

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to him. I'm assuming that he does want to play basketball.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Football is one of his great loves, but he's going

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>to be a well compensated basketball player. Yeah, Paul. Do

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you remember that really good wide receiver out of Colorado

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>who ended up playing for the Washington Redskins, Michael Westbrook?

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember he was pretty good for a couple of years now.

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>He did an interview I think it was at the

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>draft or just before the draft, and they asked him

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>about it was it always his dream to play in

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. He goes, no, I've never watched an NFL

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>game before. I've never been to one or watched one

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on TV, because because I just go out and play football.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And I remember everyone was like, whoa, how do you

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you're you're a twenty one years old you never watched

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>an NFL game before? It was It wasn't exactly a

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>red flag, but it was weird to hear someone say

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>he also beat up his teammate too. You remember that,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Davis. So going back at all, Stephen Davis. Yeah,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and no, I don't watch any football, but boy, I

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>love to beat up teammates. I think I read that

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Trevor has barely ever watched this Srevor Lawrence. Yeah, NFL

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>football too. There it is. I mean, he wouldn't say that,

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>but college guys, some stars hate watching NFL football. It's

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the most bizarre thing. Like guys who play. It's like,

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to go home and starr. No, no, no,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I do not. I listened to it growing up. But

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>when I'm done with the show, the last thing I

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>want to hear is somebody else pontificate. I've been enough

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a gas bag for three hours each day.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to listen to somebody else tell me

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>everything that I need to know. I've already done that too. America.

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a break here, we'll talk to Chris Mannox.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.479
<v Speaker 1>He'll join us coming up. I'm sure Mannox will not

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>be all in on my thoughts on LaMelo ball, I'm sure.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And Ricky Rubio his idol just got traded and traded

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Toklhoma city and the Chris Paul deal. Nineteen

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>after the hour. This is the Dan Patrick Show. Sleep number.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Sleep number is so important quality sleep more important than

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>ever as we head into the winter time. That it's

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a natural immunity booster, but also helps with energy and recovery.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And when you have this bed, you get a sleep number.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And there are two beds in one, so you and

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>your significant other will have a sleep number. And that

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is the firmness of the mattress. Because people say, what

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is the sleep number? How do I get the sleep number?

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>You're going to know it when you lie down on

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this mattress. And the people there at sleep number is

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>so helpful if you call them up. You can go online,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>go in store, and they're going to help you understand

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>why this is more than just hey, it's a bad

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a mattress. No, it's more than that. The Sleep

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Number three sixty smart bed gain changing sleep. And right

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>now they have the Ultimate Sleep Number event. You can

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>say fifty percent off on the Sleep Number three sixty

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Limited edition smart bed and for a limited time only

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>at Sleep number stores or sleep number dot com slash Patrick.

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So that Ultimate Sleep Number event is going on, say

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent off on the Sleep Number three sixty Limited

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Edition smart bed. Sleep Number the official sleep wellness partner

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL. Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every weekday

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>morning nine to noon Eastern or six to nine p

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>SIPIC on Fox Sports Radio. Find your local station for

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>The Dan Patrick Show at Fox Sports Radio dot com,

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>or stream us live every day on the iHeartRadio app

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>by searching f s R, or stream us live on

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Peacock app. I don't care what Todd says. I

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>think the phone calls have been good today. I don't

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>know what you have against this audience, but Monday you

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>said the same thing. They need to step it up

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. By the way, don't send your calendars

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in for us to autograph due to COVID. We don't

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>want mail coming in. We did sign two hundred and

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty of the calendars, but people paid extra for those.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Those are going out for Christmas, but we can't do

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it this year. You're going to get the calendars, and

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you ordered them, but we had two hundred

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and fifty that we were going to autograph and that

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>was that was it. So don't send your calendars in.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no guarantee that you'll get them back. And Mario

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>basically said that he didn't want to be responsible for that.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna have a limited group of people working

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>year over the holiday, so we're not even going to

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to get the dose. Just letting you know,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anybody's I mean, this could ruin a

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Christmas PAULI if you get a calendar and then you

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>don't get it back. Yeah, because you said it here,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna sit, Yes, it will. It'll sit in

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Mario's room, his inbox. Chris Mannix Sports Illustrated NBA senior

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>writer ready to cover the NBA draft. Let's get it

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the way mannix your favorite player in the draft.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Five years from now, when we play this SoundBite, you're

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>going to look like a star. I still think that

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>James Wiseman will be the next great big man in

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. Is that important? Sure? I mean, I think

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the value of the big man is still really important.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>It's just the big man has to do a lot

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>more than what he did in the nineties and early

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>two thousands. I mean, if Wiseman can prove that he

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can step out beyond the three point line, which I

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>think he will, he's going to add that to a

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>repertoire that already includes incredible athleticism, defensive instincts that will

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>make him an impact player on that end right of

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the way right away. Look, we can talk about this,

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think Golden State is still fielding offers for

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>that number two overall pick. But if they stay at

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>number two, I believe Wiseman will be in Golden State. Yeah,

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>but if he's that obvious, it's that obviously he's going

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>to be great. Why would Golden State pass on something

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's obvious? Well, I mean because if you have an

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to acquire a player that fits your championship window

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>more closely. You certainly have to lock in on that.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Wiseman is basically going to be off for

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>almost two full seasons by the time he gets back

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>onto the floor. I mean he only played those three

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>games at Memphis last year, So there's going to be

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a considerable learning curve for James Wiseman. If you're in

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Golden State, you're looking at two three years with this

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>group where you could potentially win three championships if you

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>get the right guy. So if you're the Warriors, you

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>have to consider all veteran players available. The problem is,

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really not seeing those type of impact players materialize

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>as trade targets right now. Tommy Shepherd with the Wizards

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>came out in a conference call yesterday and said Bradley

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Beale is not available. Bradley Beale is not going to

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere, and he's been saying that for the better

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the last six months, So it would be

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a big reversal on that part. I don't think Harden's

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in play for Golden State, at least not right now,

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think there's a deal for them that

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>makes sense on Draft night, I like LaMelo Ball I

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>like him. I know that there's other things that come

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>with that, but I do think that ceiling wise, I

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>think with Golden State, that would be the perfect ownership

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 1>management coach star players. And I will say this, his

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>dad is extremely selfish, but his sons are very unselfish

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>when they're on the floor. You might be able to

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>correct that shot a little bit. With Steph and Clay

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>there and Steve Kerr a great shooter as well. I

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>know he doesn't play defense, but defense is an attitude,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think he could. He could be like his brother.

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Tell me why you would not take LaMelo ball? Well.

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I love the playmaking. I think he's going to be

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>spectacular in that area. I don't love his shooting, and

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I certainly don't love his shot. I mean, if you

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>watch that LaMelo shot, it reminds you in some ways

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of Jokim Noah's shot, which was useful during Jokim's career.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>He was a solid He developed into a solid perimeter player.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>But you know, for a point guard and somebody that

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>you need to be a consistent three point threat, I

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to need some significant changes, just like

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>his brother A Lonzo needed some changes to his shot

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>when he came into the NBA. That's like, it's not

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a deal breaker, but it makes it a risky pick

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>at number one. I don't know. I honestly don't know

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>what Minnesota is going to do a number one. I'm

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure they're going to keep that pick. No, if

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Golden State, I look at him because I got

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>a guy who can fit in that system under you

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>come off the bench, but he can absorb the Warrior's way,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that of all the places for him

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to go, that would be the place that I could

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>see him really really benefiting two two things. One, I

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>do think he's still in play for number one. I

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's still possible with Minnesota, which would make

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it extremely uncomfortable with D'Angelo Russell to get shoved out,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially by another ball brother. I mean, that would be

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a tough look for for D'Angelo. I just don't I

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>don't see it in Golden State. Dan, Yeah, maybe, no,

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean long term maybe. But if you're the Warriors,

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are you really thinking long term right now? I mean

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>you've got your star court is just in their early thirties,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Draymond a little bit older. I think you've got to.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got a focus on guys that can

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>help you win right now, and I don't know that. Look,

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>you can potentially play if you dropped Anthony Edwards, you

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>can potentially play with Anthony Edwards, Clay Thompson and Steph Curry.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see a scenario where you could really

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>play Steph LaMelo and Clay Thompson. I agree with that,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but the number of years Dannon would take to get

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>LaMelo on the same page, You're just you're just wasting

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>prime and you're wasting the prime years of your guys.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got to get better right away. He's

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Chris Mannix Sports Illustrated NBA senior writer. The James Harden

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>situation now Russell Westbrook when I saw that maybe the

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Wizards and the Rockets could swap John Wall for Russell Westbrook,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, if I'm Houston, why the hell do

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I want John Wall? Now, if I'm Washington and I

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>got Russell Westbrook, I'd do that in a second if

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Wizards. But if I'm the Rockets, I wouldn't

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>trade anybody right now. I think they have leveraged certainly

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>with Harden. I need another team interested in Harden before

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I make any move there. What do you think? Chris

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>completely agree it would be knee jerk for the Rockets

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to make a deal for James Harden right now. He's

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>under contract for the next three years. And yes, he

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sent some pretty powerful messages to the organization by turning

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>down that two year extensions, as Adrian war Jnowski reported

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>at fifty million dollars per I mean, that's a pretty

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>strong message. And look, he's communicated that he would like

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to play in Brooklyn. So you know, the smoke signals

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>are getting a lot stronger these days from James Harden.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>But that can't be a factor if you're the Houston Rockets.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>You have got to get multiple teams into a bidding war.

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that doesn't happen until mid season. Maybe things have

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to shake out where maybe Washington struggles and Bradley Beal

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>does become available, maybe there's another player we're not talking

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>about that does become available. More importantly, if you're the Rockets,

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to address the Westbrook situation first, Like, you

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>can't do anything with James Harden until you figure out

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>if somebody will take Westbrook and what you will get

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>back for Westbrook. So one of the reasons the Wizards

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>things didn't go anywhere is because my understanding is the

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Wizards were like, we'll talk about a John Wall Russell

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook swap, and the Rockets come back saying, well, we

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>want picks too, Like, no, you're not. We'll take your

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>distressed asset for our distressed asset, but we're not going

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>to start giving you the kind of compensation that you

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gave to Oklahoma City to get him in the first place.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be a tough needle the thread because

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that the market is there for Russell Westbrook.

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people keep pointing at the Knicks. I mean,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks might have been this stupid five years ago,

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think there's dumb anymore. And for everything

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been told out of New York, they're really not

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>interested or focused on Russell Westbrook. Charlotte might, but if

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Wiseman goes number two and Anthony Edwards goes number one,

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte's gonna jump on LaMelo Ball. And if they take

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>LaMelo Ball, that would probably pull them out of the

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>race for Russell Westbrook. So a Charlotte team without a

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>young point guarding the draft might be Houston's best chance

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to make a deal for Westbrook at least the next

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. I mentioned this a couple of minutes ago.

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think James Harden is at the point in his

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.239
<v Speaker 1>career where he can't do anything more individually than he's

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>already done. Team wise. We know he can, and maybe

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he senses that, can we do what Golden State did?

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Can I go with KD. Kyrie and we create that

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>because when he was sixth man in Oklahoma City, Harden

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was wonderful off the ball. And I don't know if

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>he's at the point where, how about I average twenty

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>two and we're actually a factor in winning a championship here.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's part of this that he

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of senses I'm thirty one. Time is sort of

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>running out with me. To be recognized as one of

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the great players of all time. He's always going he's

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the great scores of all time. He'll never

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>be labeled one of the great players of all time.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It'll be great scores of time. And maybe that's starting

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to sink in a little bit. Dan. I think you're

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>dead on with the assessment of kind of who James

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Hardens and Scott Brooks has told me this story a

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of times where you know, Hardened in Oklahoma City

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>was fine coming off the bench, like had no issue playing,

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, third fiddle to Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And every time I kind of repeat this, people will say, oh,

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a lifetime ago. James Harden is a different player.

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't the Alpha, the three time scoring champion, the

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>MVP that he is right now. That's all true, but

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>my understanding of James Harden is that that mindset is

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>still within him. He's not going to go to a team,

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>any team, and demand it be his team, especially not

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a team that, as Kevin Durant on it, a player

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>he's still been close with over the years. People forget

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Dan that James Harden didn't leave Oklahoma City because he

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>needed a bigger role. He left Oklahoma City because they

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't pay him, and that remains one of the great

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>mistakes of the Oklahoma City franchise as you go back

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in history. They wouldn't give him the full max contract

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and Houston would. I'm not I don't have too many doubts. Dan,

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Then if you put James Harden on a team with

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Harden and Kyrie and Kevin Durant, I don't have many

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>doubts that Harden will be able to fit in. Kyrie's

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a different story. I'm not sure how that works with Kyrie,

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think Harden would be fine in that situation

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>because to your point, he values winning. He wants a

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>chance to win. That's why he wants out of Houston,

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's why he's angling for Brooklyn. I like what

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers did with Dennis Shrewder. I think that's a

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sneaky great pick up. He's what twenty seven. You're gonna

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>probably lose Rondo Caldwell, Pope will come back, Anthony Davis

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>will come back. Do the Lakers do anything else here

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the off season or in the draft offseason, Yes,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are going to go bargain shopping with

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>their exceptions to see if there are those players out

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there that want the chasing championship. And we know there

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are players like that every year. The deal was kind

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of their one ship to play because they had Danny

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Green's contract and they had to pick the deal, so

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they kicked the tires on a few situations there where

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they called. They talked to Milwaukee about Eric Bledsoe. This deal, ultimately,

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is better for them because Shrewder is still

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a player on the rise. He's a terrific catch and

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>shoot three point shooter, which really matters when you play

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>off of Lebron James, and he's coming off the best

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>season of his career where he probably should have won

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the NBA six Man of the Year awards. So this

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think is a big time edition because I do

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think they will lose Rondo either the Clippers or somebody

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>else in free agency as he seeks that one more

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>big deal. I also, Dan, I like this deal Proklaoma City,

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and when this deal happened and the deal in Milwaukee

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>happen with Drew Holliday, I'm thinking like it's gonna be

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like May of twenty twenty seven when Sam Presty and

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>David Griffin are the only people in the lottery room.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like the two of them because they just have

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>they have all the picks, like they keep hoarding all

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>these things, and they're gonna wind up with everybody's picked

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and be in the room by themselves in the summer

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty seven. The great Chris Mannox. Thank you, Chris,

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Sports Illustrats, NBA Senior writer, have fun tonight. We'll talk

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to you soon. Ricky Rubio to Oklama City. Yeah, sorry

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about that. Sorry about that new jersey, Sorry about that. Yeah,

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he got a lot of jerseys, Ricky Rubio's name on it.

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Chris. We'll come back. Mike Florio is going

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to join us. This bizarre story of the defensive back,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>former defensive back of the Giants. I thought he might

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be going to jail, and then his agent is going

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to jail, perhaps for extortion, and then the Kansas City

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>chiefs end up picking up the defensive back. I mean

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this is he may end up getting a ring like GE's.

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Just such a bizarre story, and Antonio Brown could be

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in trouble again. He may have violated his contract. Have

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that for you. Coming up with Florio right after this.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>sure to catch us live every weekday morning nine until

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>noon eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio,

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>FSR or stream us live on the Peacock app more

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>phone calls coming up Age seven seven three d P

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>show email address DPA dan Patrick dot com, Twitter handle

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>at NP show. I saw this story, I followed this story.

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I still don't understand this story. And that's why I

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>bring in Mike Floyo from Pro Football Talk Live, the

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>co host with Chris Simms every morning Monday through Friday,

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>preceding this show on Peacock. It's the story of DeAndre Baker,

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:31.439
<v Speaker 1>who played for the Giants, or at least I think

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>he played for the Giants, and now he's with the

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs. He'd got a chance to play for

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl ring. Who would have thought we'd be

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>in this position? Mike so explained to the audience the

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Baker situation. Well, it's funny. You don't understand it.

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>You assume I understand it. I'm not sure anybody understander.

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>A lawyer incident back in May involving DeAndre Baker and

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Quentin Dunbar, where the allegation was that they committed armed

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>robbery at a house party, and as the days and

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>weeks went by, there became a sense that maybe the

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>witnesses slash victims were changing their stories. And maybe people

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>were seeking money, and it all got very confusing and murky,

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's entirely possible that something happened that shouldn't have happened.

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 1>But once the witnesses essentially are disqualified by this financial angle,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and you had a lawyer representing the witnesses slash victims

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>who ended up being arrested for extortion, you know, it's

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>possible something happened that didn't happen, and then somebody saw

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to make some money off of it, and

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the next thing, you know, the whole case falls apart

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>because no one can testify now because everyone's been corrupted

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 1>by this one way or the other. So the end

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>result is Quentin Dunbar never got charged. He's still playing

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and has been playing for the Seahawks. Baker was charged,

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>was cut by the Giants, was reinstated by the league

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>from the Commissioner example list, and now is a member

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Chiefs practice squads. So who knows what ultimately

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>did happen on that evening in May, But the end

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>result is there's no one who can take a witness

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>stand and ultimately provide the kind of evidence that would

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>convict someone beyond a reasonable doubt. So no one's getting charged.

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>No one's going to jail except maybe people who are

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>involved in this scam to turn the situation into a payday.

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But I thought the lawyer is he involved charge with extortion?

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Is the lawyer for these two DeAndre Baker? Is he

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 1>in trouble too? Well, it's the lawyer. This is where

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it gets even weirder. It's the lawyer representing the witnesses

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>slash victims who got charged with extortion. But then the

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>lawyer for Quentin Dunbar was under scrutiny for being involved

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in this effort to pay off witness to see, there's

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a gray area there between paying off witnesses to influence

0:36:55.520 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>testimony and also seeking the money because you're extorting money

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>from these potential criminal defendants and basically everyone ends up

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>being compromised and the only winners in all this are

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the guys who very well may have committed a crime,

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>but it's never going to be proven because you have

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>no one that you can now put on a witness

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>stand that anyone's going to believe because it's all been

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>tainted by the profit motive that pops up when people realize, hey,

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that crime I just reported. Maybe I can

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>change my testimony if somebody's going to give me some

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>money to do so. DeAndre Baker ends up with the

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs on their practice squad. Is he any good? Well,

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he wasn't great last year, but he was

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a first round pick. So somebody saw something in the

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>guy to bring him into the NFL at a fairly

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>high level. And if the Chiefs believe that they can

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>work him into their system. And that's the thing about

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the practice squad that she got sixteen guys because the

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>COVID protocols, you have a spot to burn. Bring him in,

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>see what he has. It's low risk, it's low money.

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you like him, you bring him up to

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the active roster and you put him on the field.

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>If you don't like him, you just sever tize and

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>move on to someone else. So I think it's smart

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>for the Chiefs to do it. And yeah, he now

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>has an opportunity to finish a very difficult and challenging

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>year with a potential Super Bowl appearance. Will the newest

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>allegations against Antonio Brown be enough for the league to

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>step in? First of all, explain what happened and did

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>he violate his contract already? Well, and you've got three

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>different parties that may care about what happened on October fifteen.

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Buccaneers who already have issued a statement

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>making it clear that they don't care. You've got the League,

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got the authorities who have responsibility for

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown's felony probation dating back to the incident in

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>January with the driver of a moving truck. He's on

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>probation for a felony, So one false move and you

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 1>get thrown in jail. So what happened on October fifteen?

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Allegedly he broke a security camera at a gated community

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>he resides at in Florida. He allegedly threw a bike

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>at a security guard shack. The homeowners association decided not

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to press charges, but police concluded there was probable cause

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to find him guilty of misdemeanor criminal mischief. So, from

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the authority's perspective, is that enough to attack his probation.

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>That's one question that hasn't been resolved yet. From the

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 1>league's perspective, this guy's a repeat offender. Is this enough

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>even if he's not charging We've seen guys get suspended

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>without ever being arrested, like Ezekiel Elliott. Is this enough?

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>But there's a separate issue Dan. Under the terms of

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Personal Conduct Policy, if you're involved in an incident,

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>even if you're not arrested, you've got an obligation to

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>tell the league and you can be disciplined separately for that.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And the league yesterday, through its in house media conglomerate,

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>reported that it didn't know about this, so Brown didn't

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>tell them about it when it happened. That could be

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a separate ground for disciplining him based upon his history

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>suspending him. You know, he's still got this open issue

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>arising from the civil lawsuit alleging sexual assault rape that

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the league just kicked the can. They didn't do anything.

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna wait and see what the court does. They

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to take a position one way or the other,

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:08.439
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of ludicrous to me. If you're gonna

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>have an in house justice system, at some point you

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>need to issue a verdict their verdict is, or just

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>wait and see what happens. But if they are motivated

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to go after him, they already have enough just based

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on the fact if it's true, as reported by NFL media,

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't disclose it to the league. So look,

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, Dan, We've seen this

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>time and again over the past ten years. The league

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to do what it wants, when it wants,

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>how it wants, and it has enough cover to do

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>basically whatever it chooses to do in any one case.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So we sit back and we wait and see whatever

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>inclination they may have. If they want to suspend him again,

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:42.439
<v Speaker 1>they can, If they want to look the other way,

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they can, and we just wait and see what happens.

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We're talking to Mike floryal Pro Football Talk Live co host.

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I brought this up when Alex Smith got in the

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>game a couple of weeks ago, and I said to him,

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>do you have your comeback Player of the Year Awards

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>speech ready? And then all of a sudden, I had

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody say, well, you're forgetting about Ben Roethlisberger, and I thought, okay,

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Ben coming back from arms surgery, he's you know, I

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>guess implanted himself in the MVP candidate c race. But

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith came back from nearly dying, nearly losing his

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>leg to throwing for over three hundred yards in a

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>game like I don't I don't know if it matters

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to either one of these players winning Comeback Player of

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the Year award, But it feels like what Alex Smith

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>did is a whole lot different than what Ben Roethlisberger

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>has done, even though Ben has played at a very

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>high level and they're undefeated. Where do you stay well?

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And I agree with you, coming back from near amputation

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and near death is significant and it's unprecedented, and we're

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>always going to have somebody who comes back from an

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>injury and plays well. So I think the fact that

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this one is so different sets it apart. And part

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of the problem is nobody knows what it means to

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be the comeback Player of the Year. Ryan Tannehill won

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it last year. Shrine Williams who works with us at PFT,

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So what did he come back from? Stinking? Does that?

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Does that make you the comeback Player of the Year?

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And what I remember when Matthew Stafford won it, he

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>never was in a position to be coming back. It

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was just a first year he was any good. So

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no definition for it. And I know Peter King,

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>who's got one of the votes, said before Alex Smith

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>even played in a game. All he's got to do

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>is take one snap and he gets my vote, and

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling a lot of the fifty voters

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 1>feel the same way. I'll leave you with this with

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a quick response. If Kyler Murray wins the NFC with

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, dot dot dot MVP, oh without question. If

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>he wins, if well, now, if he's the one seed,

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and he very well could end up taking the Cardinals

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to the one seed. But this guy's going to be

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially and he's on track to be the first player

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in league history to throw for four thousand yards and

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>rush for a thousand yards. Everything he does is exciting.

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I wish more of his games were on a national

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>platform so we could all appreciate how good he is.

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen anyone like him, the combination of speed,

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a jill of the a awareness. It is so fun

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch him, and I can't wait to see him

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night, and I hope that we get to

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>see him more times before the end of the season.

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Great to talk to you, Mike, Thank you. Coming up

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>next hour and we'll talk to the Indiana head coach,

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom Allen. He's got Ohio State coming up this weekend.

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Back after this and The Dan Patrick Show,