WEBVTT - Tech Stocks, Apple in China, and the Paris Olympics

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 2>From Mahart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and ed Love Love.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Live from London and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, we'll have full market coverage after a wild

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 4>week for techtocs.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Plus Apple losing ground in China. Will break down why.

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 4>And as the Paris Olympics kick off, they raise for

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 4>an onslaught of cyber attacks. But first it's check in

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 4>on these markets. An extraordinary week. In fact, we have

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 4>been down for three straight weeks on the Nasdaq one hundred.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 4>This week we lose about three It is the worst week,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 4>well only since the previous week, since last week, ed,

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 4>but we are training basically at the low since May,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 4>and we've wiped off a ton of market capitalization.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think a big part of the story

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is the Magnificent seven. I think you've already shown this

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal chart this week, Harrow, but it's kind of

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the go to. You know, in the past two sessions

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday Thursday, almost a trillion dollars of market kap are raised,

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and that has a broader impact on markets at an

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>index level, but I think largely Google, which we'll talk

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about later in the program specifically, and volatility in Nvidia.

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>It's still top of mind for so many investors, so

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about it. Joining us for more is Anthony

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Segni and Bini and Mirror Prize. Sorry for Friday, not

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>enough Coffee Financial Chief market Strategist. The market volatility it

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>gets you gets me anti Welcome back to the program.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've framed it in a very specific way.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>We're still micro focused on the MAG seven. Whether it's

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a waiting consider whether it's just a newsflow consideration to

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>someone like you looking at the markets. Is that still

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>truly the case?

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think the next few weeks are

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>all about earnings. We're going to have a big week.

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>If you thought this week was volatile, wait for next week.

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>We have Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Meta, all of these companies

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 2>are reporting. They're about a third of the Nasdaq by

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 2>market cap weight, and so there's going to be a

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of attention on the earnings from these MAG seven names.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 2>And when we get later in August, we're going to

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>see Nvidia, and that's been the big story in the

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>first half of what's been driving the market higher. So

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a little bit of trepidation around earnings season.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I think earnings are going to be fine for the

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>MAG seven, but there's certainly some trepidation if they're going

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to meet kind of the whisper numbers and the expectations

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>that have been set, which are very high. Valuations are

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>very high in these Mag seven names, and I think

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>the market's starting to pay a little bit more attention

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to all the style that didn't keep pace with the

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Mag seven. Financial small cap cyclicals outside at tech, these

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>are the areas that are driving the market right now.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Anthony, have you been one of those who've thought that

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>the valuations have become silly, absurd or have you actually

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 4>thought there was reason for and Video getting to its

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 4>three trillion dollar market cap?

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's fair to question some of the

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>valuations of big tech right now, certainly based on AI

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and some of the payoffs that may take a few

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>more quarters or years to develop, and so I think

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 2>it's right for investors to question some of the valuations.

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>But I also think the secular drivers of artificial intelligence

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 2>are real, and I think they will generate profit for

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>these companies. They're already generating profits for companies like in Nvidia,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 2>in Microsoft, and Alphabet. It's just the question are they

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>meeting elevated expectations right now? And it's normal to see

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 2>over the course of a cycle investors kind of get

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>ahead of where the profits really are. They take those

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>expectations back. Provides an opportunity for investors to look at

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 2>some of these stocks that have really moved higher, maybe

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>at a little bit cheaper price. And so if you

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 2>have a balanced view of both growth and some of

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the cyclical opportunities that have developed, I think you can

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 2>use a pullback in big tech as a means to

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>put more dollars to work.

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And the one reason that we watch Alphabet, the parent

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of Google, so closely is largely because it goes first right,

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and it gives us an indication of how cloud will do,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but also advertising will do, and then that sets us

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>up for this week next week that you use perfectly

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>framed for us. But there is more to the market

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>than just earnings. Are you able to apportion some waiting

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>to how much the market is looking at the rate

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>cycle against what the mag seven do in terms of EPs?

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 5>Growth.

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I think it's a great question.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>And obviously in the first half there was a lot

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 2>of questions about the economy, inflation, interest rates, and so

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of investors piled into big tech because the

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>profits of these companies were very visible. I think what

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing in the second half, or at least at

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the start, is that there's a little bit more clarity

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 2>or certainty about a soft landing. Interest rates look like

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 2>they might come down starting in September from a FED

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>rate cut. Inflation is moderating lower. We saw that in

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the PCE data this morning, and so I think there's

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more confidence in the other four hundred

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and ninety three s and p five hundred companies that

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 2>their profits and their outlooks might actually improve in the

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 2>second half. And so that macro backdrop that was a

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit more uncertain in the first half is starting

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to get clarity in the second half, and I think

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>that's why you're seeing some money rotate out of big

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 2>tech in those magnificent seven names and into some of

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 2>the areas like small caps and financials and industrials and

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 2>which are performing better today. I think investors are starting

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>to give those areas a second.

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Look, Anthony. The reason we love your experience over the

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 4>last couple of decades is because you don't just look

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 4>at certain equities or asset classes, but you look globally

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 4>as well. This rotation has kind of been happening in

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 4>the Japanese names have sold off European chip makers too,

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.239
<v Speaker 4>and I'm interested as to whether or not you're seeing

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 4>some global narratives build as well.

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's a great question. I mean, you're

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 2>certainly seeing normalization in terms of economic growth patterns, inflation,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and interest rates, not only here in the US but

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>in Europe.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 6>In Japan.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Japan will have their FED, their BOJ meeting next week.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>They're talking about actually normalizing policy by hiking rates. In Europe,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 2>You've seen the ECB cut rates in June. They're on

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>pace to cut rates again in September. That's because there's

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 2>this balance between growth and inflation. And think about the

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 2>narrative over the last two years, not only in the

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>US but across the globe of really high inflation, really

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>high growth, and really high interest rates. And what we've

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 2>seen over the last six to twelve months is more

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 2>normalization in inflation, the opportunity to normalize interest rates and

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>a pretty solid economic environment in Europe and in Japan.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>These areas are performing well and could continue to perform

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>well if investors look for that cyclical trade outside of

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 2>big tech, which is really dominating US indices.

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Anthony, It's always great to catch up with you. Happy weekend,

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Anthony segment. Many of America's financial.

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple's losing ground in the China market, with the iPhone

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>officially falling out of the top five in the nation

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>according to new data from IDC. Let's break it all

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>down with Bloomberg Intelligence analysts An Ragrana. That's a very

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting table was showing and there's actually a chart within

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg news story that shows this sort of slide

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in position that Apple has had relatively short term mannerag

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>right and thinking towards the end of twenty twenty three

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>over a six month period. What is the data tell you?

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean a couple of things.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 6>I would say this.

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 7>You know, when it comes to Apple and China, we

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 7>know over the last few years the growth has.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Not been there.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 7>But the comment I will take you back to what

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 7>they said in their last earnings call is they grew

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 7>in China while all third party data providers were saying that,

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 7>you know, China shipments are down. Now there is always

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 7>a timing issue in terms of, you know, when the

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 7>product is shipped out of the warehouse versus when it's activated,

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 7>when it's recognized as revenue. So I think next week's

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 7>earnings is going to be extremely important to see what's

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 7>really going on in China for Apple, and I think,

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 7>because you know, to be fairly blunt, that is the

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 7>most important thing for over the next twelve months for Apple,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 7>far more than you know, anything else.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 8>At this point.

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 4>The way in which the IDC tracks the data, whether

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>it's government, whether it's actually seeing what third parties are

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 4>really up to. We can sort of try and dig

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 4>into the nuance there, Ana Rag, But the overall narrative

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 4>seems to be that Apple loses position and Huawei gains.

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Is that the right one to make?

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 7>Oh yeah, but that's because over the last twelve months

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 7>we have seen a massive upgrade in Huaweve phones. But

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 7>there's a reason for it because Wawe hadn't you know,

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 7>launched a phone for several years, so the people who

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 7>had the older phones were going out to go out

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 7>and refresh that or buy the newer ones, Whereas as

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 7>we know for Apple Life phones, we are seeing an

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 7>elongation in the refresh cycle because the product's been you know,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 7>a far more reliable product as well as it's expensive,

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 7>so people are keeping it longer. So that's really has

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 7>been the biggest issue for Apple for over the last

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 7>I would say two and a half years or so.

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>The domestic Chinese handset makers are a factor here, right,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Ana rag and Blimberg's reported about government policy directing government

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>employees or state backed enterprises to leave the iPhone at home.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you model that at Bloomberg Intelligence, that kind

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of policy perspective.

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and again, as I said, you know, going into

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 7>the last quarter earnings, all of these things were you

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 7>know at Player at that time too. Meanwhile, Apple came

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 7>out and said that they grew in the Greater China region,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 7>and that's why I am more inclined to wait for

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 7>Apple's comments rather than any of the data sources. But

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 7>having said that, I think Apple is going to have

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 7>a bit of a tough time if you see the

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 7>Republican you know, president coming in, because if the China

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 7>rhetoric is going to go up over the next two

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 7>to three years. You know, Apple's going to be right

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 7>in the middle of the US China issue, so I

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 7>think really Apple's not as clear cut at this point

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 7>compared to you know, let's say somebody like an Amazon

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 7>or Microsoft in terms of the visibility over the next

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 7>two to three years.

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Of course, we had that reporting earlier in the week

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 4>that Micron and Apple executives were visiting China of late

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 4>and talking to government officials and Agrana. Great to have

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 4>some time with you, Bloomberg Elligence. We thank you. Meanwhile,

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 4>let's just talk about how politics is affecting China US

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>relationships a bit more. China based Byte Dance is going

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 4>all out in Washington to keep TikTok from being banned,

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 4>with lawyers, lobbyists, and of course the money joining us.

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Now with the details, Mike Shephard, you understand more than

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 4>many the intricacies of US and China relationships, and TikTok

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 4>is just fighting this hard because they have to do

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 4>all They're going to be out.

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 9>This is really existential for TikTok and for byte Dance

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 9>to be able to maintain this kind of access through TikTok.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 9>And it's one hundred and seventy million users to what

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 9>may be the most lucrative advertising market in the world,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 9>and TikTok is not going gently into that good night

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 9>in the face of this law that was passed and

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 9>signed in April. It requires the company the app to

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 9>be sold by byte Dance by January nineteenth, or will

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 9>face a ban on its US operations, and that would

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 9>be devastating to the company and also to US users

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 9>who have really grown to depend on it not only

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 9>as a source of entertainment, but also as a source

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 9>of income and business. There are many small businesses who

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 9>are active on the app as well, and TikTok is

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 9>deploying them too as part of this campaign.

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Mike, there's an issue of language here that I find

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>just crucial that when this law was passed in April,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a divest or ban law, and it just

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>seems like the divest part is just not a talking

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>point for TikTok or the US government at this stage.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 9>I'm glad you brought that up, because when you see,

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 9>for example, Vice President Harris joining TikTok as of yesterday

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 9>to help boost her campaign against President Donald former President

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump, what we are seeing is that there is

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 9>great utility in this app. The app itself is not

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 9>the issue. It really is the ownership. However, we are

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 9>seeing zero movement when it comes to a sale. Bite

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 9>Dan says TikTok is not up for sale. The Chinese

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 9>government has expressed objections to any idea that this crown

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 9>jewel of Bite Dance would be forced to be sold

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 9>by the US government.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Boombergs Mike Shepherd, who leads our coverage of tech and politics,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. A story that Mike just mentioned

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>in the context of TikTok, Vice President Kamala Harris officially

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>joined the app with her first personal account since she

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>began her presidential campaign four days ago. TikTok and other

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:41.239
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms has seen a groundswell of viral memes, images,

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and videos, all featuring the Vice president. Worth noting, President

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden did sign that law into a bill in April,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>forcing Byte Dance to sell the app by January. As

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Michael outlined or faced the prospects being barred from operating

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. This is an astonishing sitch, Cuasian Caroline.

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 4>What's also astonishing is how expensive some of those power

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 4>brookers and lawyers are that they're using fifteen hundred in

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 4>that story an hour. Meanwhile, look, let's just talk China

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more. But in the context of esports.

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 4>The company an Ip kicks off trading on the NASLAC

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 4>co founder and chairman Mario Hoo is going to be

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 4>joining us as Bluemare Technology.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's time for talking tech and first start. The SEC

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is suing short seller Andrew Left and his Citron Capital.

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>The regulators alleging that Left n Stron generated about twenty

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in illegal profits and is accusing him of

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>committing fraud through stock trade, social media posts and research reports.

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>The SEC says Left would allegedally make a recommendation and

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>then capitalize on the resulting movements on prices far different

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>than what he'd recommended. Left had no immediate comment. Plus

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple agrees to AI safeguards. The tech giant is the

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>latest company set to adopt a set of voluntary protections

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for AI crafted by the Biden administration. Apple will join

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Open Ai and Alphabet, as well as Microsoft,

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>committing to testing its AI systems for discriminatory tendency, security flaws,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and national security risks. And shares of TSMC for the

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>most in three months in Taiwan. This is the country's

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>stock market reopened after two days of closures due to

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a typhoon. The stock decline joining a global route in

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks as investors rethink their AI positions. TSMC's Taiwan

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>listing has now fallen more than fourteen percent from its peak.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Carrot and a company not fearful of that volatility is

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Chinese Esports Company and ip it began training today. It

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 4>opened at thirty dollars eleven after pricing the IPO at No.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Nine dollars per share, we're is putting back to about

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 4>that nine dollars level. A please to welcome NMP co

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 4>founder and chairman Mario Ho. Mario, why go public in

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 4>the US?

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, this is the biggest capital markets platform in the

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 8>world for us.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 5>We've always thought that.

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 8>In order for us to truly go global and to

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 8>see partnerships all over the world, we need to be

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 8>at the biggest exchange, and that for US is Nasdaq.

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 4>And so give us the thesis. You're going out to

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 4>the investor base, obviously you're trying to woo them on

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 4>the business model. The business model one is perhaps hard

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 4>for a US consumer to understand, because for US we

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 4>think China regulatory crackdown gaming, but actually esports is something

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.479
<v Speaker 4>very different, well loved national pride.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, esports is well loved national pride everywhere in the world,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 8>every single government, exemplified by the recent news the fact

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 8>that there is going to be an Esports Olympics at

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 8>Saudi Arabia in twenty twenty five. I mean, for US,

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 8>whether it is an investor from China, whether it's an

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 8>investor from the US, so US the business model of

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 8>running esports teams, the excitement that comes out of it,

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 8>can be understood by everyone.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Our game is and esports fans in the audience will

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>know that you're the parent company or holding company behind

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Ninja's in Pajamas in Sweden, ESV five in China. And

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you guys talk a lot about the big market opportunity,

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>right You cite this report that esports globally is going

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a one hundred billion dollar a year market

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>by twenty twenty seven. Your teams do well, but you've

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>booked about nineteen million dollars in prize money. So for

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all the investors watching, how do you make that number

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot bigger.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, prize money is only one part of our business revenue,

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 8>which belongs to the part where we run esport teams.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 5>We also do a lot other than that.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 8>We also do talent management. We have sort of an

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 8>IMG where we sign and manage a lot of esports talent.

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 8>We also do offline events production, very much like the

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 8>Esports Live Nation, and in the future we're going into

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 8>so many different new avenues like esports, hotels, games publishing.

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 8>We're definitely going to be raising the overall revenue pie

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 8>of the company, not just prize money, but that is

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 8>something we care about because our brands are a very,

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 8>very winning brands.

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the impact of having esports at the Saudi

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Arabia Olympics. That's a really interesting global view of this market.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Could you sort of compare and contrast for us the

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>health of esports in the USA against the health of

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>esports in a market like China, for example.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think in terms of monetization and sponsorships, because

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 8>the US has a very well functioned traditional platform for

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 8>traditional sports, I think the esport teams tend.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 4>To do very very well here.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 8>On the other side, in China, for example, you'll see

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 8>a bigger size of following, more people, bigger population, more

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 8>population that follows games and esports. So for esport teams

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 8>in China to rack up a huge following and then

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 8>to monetize that would also be easier. So it's a

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 8>different demographic, but in terms of competitiveness, I think it

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 8>is the same everywhere in the world, And like you said,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 8>Saudi Arabia, I would be very excited to see how

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 8>the US teams pitch against the Chinese teams and of

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 8>course teams from Europe and all the.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 5>World as well.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Maria. What sort of companies are wanting to really get

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 4>in on the esport crescendo, I mean many sort of

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 4>think back to ultimately the collapse of phase over here

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 4>in the US and a larger life celebrities involved, but

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 4>also worrying around the commitment of sponsors. What sort of

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 4>companies are wanting to cral around you and wanting to

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 4>support some of the players that you represent and the

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 4>talent that you're going to be managing.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, first off, I think it is good to have

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 8>a correction in the esports market globally where we're now

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 8>as esports companies are are credited when you're able to

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 8>prove a path to profitability, and that's great. That's for

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 8>the overall health of the esports industry worldwide. For US,

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 8>we have insane sponsorship from all over the world. You

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 8>see companies like Red Bull BYD, China Mobile, Fila Puma,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 8>brands that are targeted to are targeting towards young people

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 8>around the world. Will still find that very attractive to

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 8>be represented by esports teams and have their logos on

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 8>our shirts. Another reason for that is some companies want

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 8>to really youngify or turn their brand younger in terms

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 8>of audience, and for those characterist companies, we're sort of

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 8>a very good partner for them.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Mario Jackson Wang is a huge star mainland China in particular,

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>huge following, and you've kind of tied League of Legends

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>into his following. Will you replicate that strategy with any

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>other celebrity in Europe or in the USA.

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, we're not saying no to that. The success of

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 8>Jackson on his own, but also combining with the gaming

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 8>audience has been something that's taken the market by storm.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 8>So if we're able to if I'm able to form

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 8>a friendship as strong as the one I have with

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 8>Jackson here with somebody with the US celebrity. Absolutely, but

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 8>from business perspective, yes, those are our possibilities that we're

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 8>looking to seek into the US markets.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Mario Ho, co founder, chairman and co CEO of NIP Group,

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Welcome back to Blinbow Technology. Ed Ludlow in San.

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Francisco, Caroline Hyde in London. Let's all quit check on

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 4>these markets because it has been a tumultuous time this week,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 4>to say the very least. But we are up this

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 4>Friday on the NASAK six tens percent, even though we

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 4>have been down for three straight weeks. More broadly on

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 4>the benchmarks and lost. Remember about a trillion dollars worth

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 4>of market cap over in the NASDAT one hundred rotheran

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 4>two thousand gains OUTPERFORMSS again, small caps outshining big tech

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 4>because we see that rotation in place. Bitcoin though a

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 4>little bit of love. Remember we have well previous President

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 4>Trump speaking at the Bitcoin event in Nashville this weekend.

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 4>We'll see what he says for the cryptos SEMA up

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 4>three point five percent as risk assets do better across

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 4>the board. Move on to the individual movie because we

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 4>have got some in play and when you're looking at

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the leaderboard, Charter Communications beats on its earnings. We're up

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 4>some fifteen percent. Extraordinary movements for this particular company. Dordash

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 4>doing well. Of course, we finally get Prop twenty two

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 4>being signed off by the Supreme Court over in California,

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 4>that does well, and some analyst upgrading on the stock.

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 4>We're at more than three percent. Dex Com what a

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 4>wipeout forty one percent unexpected cut to twenty twenty four

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 4>sales forecasts. This is a blood sugar monitoring device maker

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 4>for diabetics. Look, we are starting potentially to see the

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 4>impact of a zepic and some of those similar weight

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 4>loss drugs. The CEO wouldn't say whether really they've been

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 4>impacted by perhaps fewer common type two diabetes necessities coming

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 4>from people as they use that weight loss drug ed

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 4>What are you looking at?

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Glasses in the news and making moves essolaw Loxodica, the

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>world's biggest eyewear maker, said Meta is planning to buy

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a stake in the company, confirmation. The two companies have

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>already been working together for years and presented their first

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>RayBan Meta smart glasses in twenty twenty one. This deal

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>would see the US tech giant further stepping up its

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>pushes in too smart glasses right. Another Meta story metas

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>facing its first EU fine over allegations it abused its

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>dominance in the classified ad market by tying Facebook Marketplace

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to its social network, bringing in Bloomberg, Sam Stalton out

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of Brussels, Sam, A good afternoon to you. Just what'll

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>be through the EU's perspective on this, the sort of

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the angst that the Commission has against what Meta did.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 10>Yes, hello from Brussels, Ed and Caroline, and yes, we

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 10>expect this line to be issued against Meta in the

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 10>coming months. And the European Commission has a number of

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 10>concerns with how the company has tied Facebook Marketplace to

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 10>the Facebook social media network, and what it is set

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 10>to say, as I say, in the coming months, is

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 10>that Facebook shouldn't make access to marketplace obligatory on users

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 10>having a social media account, and it also shouldn't use

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 10>the data from its rivals, And I'm talking about non

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 10>public data belonging to classified ads rivals like eBay or Craigslist, etc.

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 10>To compete against them, because what the Commission has found

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 10>is that over the years, Facebook has actually been a

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 10>space for those types of companies to advertise and promote

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 10>their services, but what Facebook has actually done with that

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 10>data could be problematic in terms of an abuse of dominance.

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 10>So the finest set to come in the coming months.

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 10>We don't exactly know how much it will be, but

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 10>just a reminder, Brussels does have relatively high binding powers

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 10>up to ten percent of global annual revenue, so it

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 10>could be a fairly hefty bill for the Menlo Park

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 10>firm to pay off.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Person saying the claims why the commission are without foundation

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 4>At the moment, Sam and the organization continues to work

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 4>constructively with regulators over the issue. What's the chances that

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 4>they can work constructively here because you know, as a

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 4>user of Facebook marketplace, you can understand why you want

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 4>it tied to the social media platform because you want

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 4>to understand about the buyer that's putting in the interest

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 4>and ultimately here sometimes really hard to sell things through

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 4>these sorts of platforms.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 10>Yes, Caroline, well, indeed, I mean it has been working

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 10>with regulators since this case was first launched in the

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 10>EU in mid twenty twenty one. Facebook did actually try

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 10>to stop this investigation by offering some concessions. It made

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 10>an agreement actually with the UK's Competition authority to stop

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 10>using this non public data to compete against classified ad rivals,

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 10>and that was enough for the UK regulator, but it

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 10>wasn't enough for dgcomp Here at the European Commission in Brussels,

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 10>it wanted more. Metal wasn't prepared to offer more. And

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 10>we're in a situation now where it's basically a standoff,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 10>but it looks like it's heading towards that fine and

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 10>a couple of quite significant behavioral orders as well, which

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 10>we expect to include an order from the European Commission

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 10>for Facebook to create a separate portal that users who

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 10>don't have a Facebook social media account can use to

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 10>access the Facebook marketplace.

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Really appreciate you breaking it all down because it's complex,

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Sam Stolton, go have one awful evening over in Brussels.

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 4>We thank you. Meanwhile, let's talk about another key platform

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 4>on Meta. It's WhatsApp, and it's hit one hundred million

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 4>monthly active users in the United States, growing it's daily

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 4>audience by double digits. Now, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announce

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 4>the new milestone on his WhatsApp channel yesterday. The app

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 4>has a mass billions of users of course worldwide, but

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 4>more US users would improve Meta's effort to build out

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 4>WhatsApp's business for the US market, typically being the most

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 4>lucrative eventually for advertising. Now back to good old anti

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 4>trust DC chat. You know Colm was in San Francisco.

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 4>Well she's been meeting with members of the business and

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 4>VC community. She discussed Well's on hamond and an exclusive interview.

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 4>We bring by so many chang starting with hedults around

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 4>official intelligence, just take a listen.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 11>As a general matter, historically, we've seen that openness and

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 11>open source can be a critical vector of innovation, right.

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 11>I mean, what happens traditionally when you render some of

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 11>these ecosystems more open is that it can lower barriers

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 11>to entry, It can lower costs for entrepreneurs and startups

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 11>and really enable them to innovate much more freely. And

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 11>so we want to make sure that that tradition continues.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 11>We are watching very closely. I think there's still an

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 11>open question around what openness really means in the AI context.

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 11>Our team has been focusing on this idea of open

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 11>weight models, which we think could similarly engender a lot

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 11>of competition and innovation and make it easier for startups

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 11>and entrepreneurs to compete on a level playing field. Of course,

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 11>we need to really closely understand what are any restrictions

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 11>licensing restrictions that are being included here and could those

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 11>be foreclosing competition. More generally, we also need to be

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 11>aware of how there are significant incumbents that may have

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 11>an outsized role to be playing because they have key

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 11>control over the raw material and key inputs. And so

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 11>we need to be aware of the broader potential competition

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 11>issues or bottlenecks or choke points that could emerge in

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 11>ways that could inhibit innovation and inhibit competition. And so

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 11>that's what we're going to be talking with founders and

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 11>vcs and others about today.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 12>I do have to take a moment to talk about

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 12>the presidential election. A number of prominent tech folks have

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 12>endorsed President Trump for a variety of reasons, but I

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 12>have heard specifically multiple tech executives and investors complain about

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 12>how they can't do deals on your watch. Do you

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 12>have any concerns that your agenda has that all alienated

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 12>the tech community or could impact the impact of your

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 12>agenda going forward.

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 11>You know, it's been such an honor to serve and

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 11>then Biden Harris administration, and you know, we're just focused

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 11>on doing our work. What I oftentimes hear from the

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 11>business community, including small businesses, including entrepreneurs, is that they

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 11>want markets to be more open and more fair and

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 11>more competitive, rather than incumbents being able to squash out

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 11>nason competitive threats. I mean, our free enterprise system is

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 11>one where the best ideas are supposed to win, and

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 11>we've historically seen that it's the disruptors and entrepreneurs that

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 11>have been a key vector of innovation. And so our

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 11>job at the FTC when we enforce the antitrust laws

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 11>is to make sure that our markets stay open and

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 11>fair and competitive. And that's something that you know, most

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 11>businesses and most entrepreneurs should really be able to get behind.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>FTC Chair Lina Kahan and Bloomberg's Emily Chang. Coming up,

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll be joined by hillal' zidel, Managing director at Kennett Partners,

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on the firm's brand new fund focused on all things

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>SaaS and all things Europe.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Transatlantic growth equity investor Kennett Partners let's just raise two

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred ninety million dollars for its largest fund to date,

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 4>called Kennet six, which brings the firm's assets under management

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 4>to over one point four billion dollars. Ringing in Heillales Adel,

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 4>managing director at Kennett Partners for more. Is great to

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 4>have some time with you, Heillo, And look, we want

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 4>to understand about the reputation the returns you've already given

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 4>some of your LPs and investors. What kind of companies

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 4>have you backed, what sort of returns have you got?

0:30:57.920 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Hey, thanks so much for having me in the show.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Great to be here. Yeah, So we're investing ken It

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 3>six right now. We have a long track record, not

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the twenty twenty plus years investing in the sector. Now

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.239
<v Speaker 3>focus is on business to business software companies and in

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 3>particular those that have been bootstrapped and you know, getting.

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 6>To a great clothes on Kennet six.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 3>In order to do that, you need to have a

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 3>strong track record, and we're delighted to have that.

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 6>Kennet six is a continuation.

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Of what we've been doing without fire funds, and we're

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 3>really excited about what we're seeing in the market right now.

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, what's the backstory for wanting to focus on SaaS.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 6>The few things. Firstly, you know scalability.

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 3>These companies can scale very rapidly, they have high gross margins, they.

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 6>Are predictable businesses and with incess.

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 3>We focus particularly on business to business companies and really

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 3>those that are mission critical or essential to the underlying customers.

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 3>What we really care about is is this company a

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 3>real problem of their customer. One of the unique aspects

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 3>of our particular strategy is on bootstrapped SALAS companies. That's

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 3>businesses that have been built by the founders without relying

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 3>on external capital. These are companies that are very different

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 3>to the traditional venture capital business of raising large sums

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 3>of money going out spending raising more. The companies we're

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 3>investing in have been built to scale by their founders

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 3>with very limited resources, and that's a strategy that we

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 3>think provides our investors with really compelling risk adjusted returns.

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 4>And also clean cap tables too. I'm interested in sort

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 4>of trying to avoid hype cycles here. HELLU, I'm looking

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 4>at some of the previous investors Cross border solutions. Six

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 4>X at the moment is an AI driven tax and

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 4>transfer pricing solutions. You've got financial automation software platform. I

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:50.959
<v Speaker 4>can imagine a lot of the founders you're now going

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 4>to be looking to have had to in some way

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 4>describe their business as artificial intelligence at its heart. How

0:32:57.760 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 4>do you get out of some of the heady high

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 4>valuations when you start targeting that.

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean that's a super relevant question. I think.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, we came out of a momentum cycle of

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty to twenty twenty two when prices were really high.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, lots of investors were coming in and investing

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 3>in technology. That's corrected. We're now in a more moderate environment,

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and then AI comes along, and you know, it is

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.959
<v Speaker 3>creating another level of level of hype. Our view is that,

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, we need to be investing in good businesses,

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 3>good management teams, good strategies at the right pricing. We

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 3>don't have a fomo style investing. We're not trying to

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 3>find the next unicorn. We're not trying to find you know,

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the next the next big thing. We believe that just

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 3>sticking to you know, rational investing is the right way

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 3>to the right way to know to be.

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 6>Successful in this category.

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 3>You know that being said AI is real, AI is

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 3>in our view, you know, the next platform shift, you know,

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 3>post mobile, post the Internet. But I think we're at

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the particular point in the market where the reality you know,

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 3>needs to catch up a little bit with the hype

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 3>that's out. Then I think you're seeing that in the

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 3>market in general, with you know, huge investment going into infrastructure,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 3>into LMS and limited commercial value CONMUCUALEREV at that point,

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's going to happen, but it's going

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to take time.

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Hello, it's a euro denominated fund and you're in London.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>We've we've got a new government in London.

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 5>Just to explain all of that, please absolutely.

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 3>So we invest in Europe, in the UK and in

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 3>the US, and we're really looking for the best businesses

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>that we can support in their scalely, so you know,

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 3>investing in businesses in the UK. We recently invested, as

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 3>you said earlier, the company called screen Dragon, which is

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 3>a business between the UK and Islands.

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 6>Our objective, you know, with this.

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 3>And many other companies is rarely around expansion, so you know,

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 3>where we're investing in the UK company, we want to

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 3>help build a world class management team around the founders.

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 3>We want to support these companies expanding international and ultimately

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 3>developed strategies that maximize the value going forward.

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 6>I think for us, the key point.

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Is is the business we're investing in serving an international market.

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 6>Here.

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 3>We're not really focused on companies that only serve domestic markets.

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 3>It's much more about can this business scale and serve

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 3>customers multiple multiple geographies.

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Hell els Adelle, managing director at Kennett Partners.

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 13>They're spending over a billion dollars when they're here in Paris,

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 13>so we're seeing really good demand this summer. I think

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 13>Q three is going to be quite strong, and I

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 13>think this event, the Olympics, it's just the ultimate demonstration

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 13>of the power of their ABNB.

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Or we're talking Olympics and just hours ahead of the

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Olympics opening ceremony, trains going to and from Paris were

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 4>hit by an arson attack. Fires set three critical rail

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 4>line nodes, causing delays for eight hundred thousand pus. The

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 4>identity of the attackers is not yet known. Meanwhile, train

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 4>delays are not the only concern. Like the Olympics, cyber

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 4>team is bracing for attacks at this year's games, after

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 4>France was already the target of hacks that shut down

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 4>a film festival last month. In further Olympic news, get this,

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Canadian women's soccer head coach Bev Priestman was removed from

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 4>the team after flying a drone over an opponent's training session.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 4>There had been prior instances of this by the head coach,

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 4>according to the statement from Canada's soccer CEO confirming Prieseman's suspension.

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Ad A lot of news, A lot of news, and

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>back to CrowdStrike. Ninety seven percent of crowdstrikes sensors are

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>now back online after last week's outage, Bloomberg's reported, But

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 1>there are growing concerns that incident like this are.

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Part of a new normal.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It's something I wrote about last week in Tech Daily.

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Pager Duty is a cloud computing company that plays an

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>important role as an early warning system for incidents like this.

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Pager Duty CEO Jen Jennifer de Harder joins us now

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for more. What was that like for you that twenty

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:08.240
<v Speaker 1>four hour, four day period when the outage happened.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 5>We just explained what page of Judy does.

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So you must have been at your desk thinking, okay,

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>we've got something to do here.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 14>Look, I mean, these are the moments that were designed

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 14>and built and prepared for. I'm especially proud of our

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 14>technology and software and operations team because despite our platform

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 14>coming under significant surges in traffic incidents, we saw at

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 14>the peak, we saw nearly two hundred percent spike in

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 14>the number of incidents that are normally processing on the platform,

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 14>over two point six million events, which is, you know,

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 14>significantly higher than what we see in any typical hour,

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 14>and of four hundred and twenty five percent increase in

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 14>the number of incident workflows that our customers were running

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 14>on the platform. So just seeing our technology stand up,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.439
<v Speaker 14>you know, in a very realile and resilient way under

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 14>that kind of pressure makes me very proud of our team,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 14>but also is just a good reminder that the effort

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 14>that we undertake to build operational resilience to prepare for

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 14>these unexpected but really challenging moments, you have to anticipate them.

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 14>You have to invest in the infrastructure, the redundancy, and

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 14>the resilience to deliver when the time.

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Comes, Jennifer, is that's going to happen more?

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 14>It is happening more absolutely. I mean, our customers saw

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 14>nearly a forty five percent increase in customer facing incidents

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 14>just a year on year, we are seeing the number

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 14>of major incidents on the platform increase. These are incidents

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 14>that have material or reasonable business impact, and that's because

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 14>most of consumer engagement with brands financial transactions today are

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 14>taking place on digital apps that are supported by complex

0:38:56.239 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 14>infrastructure technology infrastructure, some of which is a and some

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 14>of which is increasing in its complexity because we're able

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 14>to ship new products and services all the time, every

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 14>day into this ecosystem, and that complexity is going to

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 14>continue to grow with the advent of generative ai.

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Jen I just want to point out to our audience

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>We've made every effort to get George Kurtz, the CrowdStrike CEO,

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on this program on a daily basis, and he's yet

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to do certain. The reason I flagged that is so

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>many IT managers, CSOs, CIO cybersecurity managers watch the program.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 5>They have very specific questions.

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>The chief among them question is you know, is this

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>a preventable event or is this the sort of state

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>of doing business now in the world that we live in.

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think this is a good reminder that anybody

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 14>who is responsible for technology and a business, and every

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 14>business now is a technology business, is responsible for making

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 14>sure they have good practices in place and good controls

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 14>in place around technology change and around the ability to

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 14>respond or roll back when a change does work ineffectively.

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 14>But the reality is human error, technology fread, fragility and

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 14>tech debt, in our aging technology infrastructure, cybersecurity threat etc.

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 14>All of these things create a more dynamic and volatile

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 14>environment for the technology ecosystems we've grown to rely on,

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 14>and that means that we have to make the investments

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 14>in our infrastructure, in modernizing not only our technology but

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 14>the way we operate so when these things do happen,

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 14>and they will, that we can handle them more effectively.

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 14>And one of the reasons that pagere duty is architected

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 14>the way it is is because these events in particular

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 14>are unstructured, they're unpredictable, and yet they're high impact and

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 14>high value. So getting back to recovery of these systems

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 14>is really important. But also this is a tremendous opportunity

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 14>for everybody in industry, not just folks who were.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 6>Affected by the outage last week, of folks that.

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 14>Weren't to double down on investing in infrastructure, on preparing,

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 14>on improving their resilience, on practicing things like chaos engineering,

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 14>tabletop exercises, and also communicating to customers the importance of redundancy,

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:23.720
<v Speaker 14>having multiple systems, failover practices, documentation, even how we onboard people,

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 14>and you know that is one thing I wanted to underscore.

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 14>One of the things we haven't been talking about a

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 14>lot is the people who have been working twenty four

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 14>by seven set systems back online. We talk a lot

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 14>about automation generative AI right now, but the human needs

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 14>to be in the loop.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Well said the people behind this technology, Jeneva Tahata. We

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much, CEO page a GT. How wonderful

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 4>weekend that does it for this edition of Bluebog Technology ED.

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 5>Incredible week incredible show. Check out the pod