WEBVTT - Ukrainian Refugees Cannot Get Into U.S. Easily

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Since the invasion by Russia, about three million Ukrainians have

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>fled their country, the vast majority to European Union countries,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>which allow them to travel visa free. President Biden praised

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the Irish Prime Minister this week for his country's welcome

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to Ukrainians. What Ireland is doing now, what you're doing

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>taking in Ukrainian refugees. Speak so loudly about your principles,

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's amazing, and I want to public recompliment you

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for it. But what about the Ukrainians who want to

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>come to the United States to join family here? The

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration has done nothing to help those refugees get

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>into the country, a process that's far from easy. My

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>guest is Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland and Knight

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and a immigration official in the Obama administration. Clean are

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>many Ukrainians trying to get into the country. Many Ukrainians

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>are trying to get into the United States. I'm getting

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>calls in my law as you know, I'm a private

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>attorney when I'm not on Bloomberg, and I'm getting called

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>all the time from people all over our country. You'd

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be shocked how many people seem to have connections to

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>people in Ukraine and they all want to figure out

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 1>what can be done. And so what's complicated is there

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>are some well meaning pieces of information that are not

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>exactly accurate. So you'll hear in all the United States

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 1>is letting in Ukrainian refugees as we speak. But those

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian refugees are people that have been vetted for many years,

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>who are refugees from the Russian annexation of Primea. So

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not people who are refugees from last week. There

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>are people who are refugees from many years ago. And

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so the problem with saying we will welcome refugees is

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>refugee process could take a year or two years, and

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>then the question is we don't know what the state

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of affairs in Ukraine will be at that point. Maybe

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there will be no refugee issue in Ukraine a year

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>or two from now, and so the question is what,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>if anything, the Biden administration can do now. And so

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>here is where you have a doctrinal issue versus sort

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of what I would call a compacion issue, which is

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>plenty of people are seeking to come here on student visas,

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>now on visitor visa, humanitarian parole applications. And it's just

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna come down to whether the Biden administration provides guidance

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>saying that that's okay to let people come here and

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>say during the duration of the crisis, essentially knowing that

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>hopefully some large segment of those individuals would go back

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>if the war word is subsided. Or are they going

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to take a more doctrinal, dogmatic approach and say, look,

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't come on a visitor visa if you're from

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine because we have no evidence you're gonna come back.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>We can't give you a student visa you're from Ukraine

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>because we have no evidence you're gonna come back, etcetera.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>The more of those pathways that they cut off, the

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>harder it's gonna be. And what you'll see, and you're

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.279
<v Speaker 1>starting to see some batterings of this is actually Ukrainians

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>appearing on the southern border and just applying for asylum

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on the southern border. And if that's the only way

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna let Ukrainians in, that's the way that Ukrainians

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are gonna use if and I repeat, if they have

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>an American family member that's arranging this for them, and

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's usually what you would see if the American family

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>member would say, Okay, fly to Mexico and then we'll

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>work it so that you can apply for asylum at

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>support of entry between the United States and Mexico. Let's

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>say someone calls you up and says, my family's in

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine now or went from Ukraine to Poland. I want

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to get them into this country. Besides flying to Mexico.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>What else can you do? Well, the most compelling legal

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>options in terms of what you would do doctrinally, is

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>something called the humanitarian parole, and you would ask them

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to put together a pocket that you would assist that

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>baking with their information and why they can't say where

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.799
<v Speaker 1>they are and why as a humanitarian nature, the United

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>States should give them a one year parole to sort

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of weather the storm here, and then after that one

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>year they can leave and showing that they have sufficient

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>family ties here, that they have an economic sponsor here

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>who can take care of them while they're here, which

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>would usually be some very close family member with a

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent income, and you would let the chips fall

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>where they may. We're at the beginning stages of this process.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>U s c i S endeavors to give decisions in

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>ninety days of these parole applications, but we'll know in

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks whether U s c i S is

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>treating these claims compassionately or not. And quite frankly, the

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>state of affairs may be completely different in the next

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>few weeks than it is right now. So we don't know.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of this is going to be wait and see,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>but that's the main way, and the U s CIS

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>being the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services leon. What

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>about getting in with a student visa or a tourist visa.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>People can come in very quickly if they could get

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 1>admitted it to a university, but you'd have to find

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>some open embassy of ours. It would either be our

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>embassy in Poland, our embassy in Moldova, embassy in Romania,

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>or if you could even get further with you know,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Germany or wherever you could get to in order to

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>get yourself an appointment for a student visa. But in

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that situation, you're gonna need an adjudicator who's going to

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>not take so seriously the fact that you're from Ukraine

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and might not be able to return because one of

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the criteria for students visa if you have to be

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a person who can show that you would leave the

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>United States after your studies are over. And so the

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>question is are they going to say that Ukraine gives

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>us a facto matter, aren't going to return? So those

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>are the questions that are being wrestled with. And then

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people want to just come on visitor visas,

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which would give you six months of the United States.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's two problems there. One, the embassies all over

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the world have about two year wait time for visitor

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>visa applications because of COVID. But even if you could

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>get yourself in for a visitor visa appointment, will the

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>embassy say you're not gonna truly visit. You're gonna say

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you're never going back, so we're not going to give

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you a visitor visa. And so that's the challenge with

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the visitor visa and the student visa. The Bonding administration

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>has given Ukrainians who are already here temporary protected status,

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>right right, But you can't come here now and get

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>temporary protective status. But for the people who are already

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>here on the first day of the commencement of the

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>how facilities in Ukraine. Those individuals can stay now until

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that temporary protective status is one day taken away. And

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if and when that would ever happen,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>but for the moment, those people, even if their visa

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>has expired, can take advantage of this temporary protective status

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to remain here and work lawfully in the

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>United States. And so bottom line is the Biden administration

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't done anything so far to open our country's doors

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to Ukrainian refugees. Correct, There's been no policy change that

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>has said how it would be easier for a Ukrainian

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to access the United States. They haven't said, hey, apply

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for humanitarian parole if you have a US citizen foused parents, child,

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or sibling. You know, if as an example, and we'll

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>give a one year humanitarian parole. They have an issued

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a memmo like that. They have an issued a memo

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that says here's how you can act that's the refugee

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>program if you're in Poland or in Moldova or Romania.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>They haven't done anything like that. So everybody's just trying

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to figure out a way to kind of go through

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this roof Goldberg divice that is our immigration system to

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>get their body into the US. The problem that happens

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>with all of these issues is if you don't take

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the trouble to plan something out and issue something, then

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>what you will inevitably see with some number of people

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is well, then I'm just going to take the most

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>direct round. I'm appearing at the southern border, and I'm

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>making an asylum play lee, and I want to turn

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>to another immigration topic. Now, migrants have been expelled more

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>than one point six million times under Title forty two,

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>which was introduced in March of to prevent the spread

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of COVID nineteen. However, the Binding Administration now says unaccompanied

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>migrant children trying to enter the United States will not

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>be denied a chance to seek asylum. The same as

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>not true for adults and families traveling with children joining

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>me is Leon Fresco, a partner at Hollandon Knight, just

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>review what the broader policy has been since known as

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>titled Well, at the same time that the COVID national

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>emergency was declared, and the Trump administration was the administration

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that was in power at the time of the COVID

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>national emergency. The administration also decided to at the same

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>time have two different kinds of health related travel bans.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>The first kind of health related travel bans were the

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>very similar types of travel bands that had been put

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>into place because of the the Middle Eastern countries and

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>things of that nature, and that was the travel band

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>authority under I n A Section to twelve F. But

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>then secondly, the administration needed to put a travel ban

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>on the border. Because the I n A Section to

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve F travel bands only covered entry from foreign countries

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of legal immigration, they needed to do something

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that would permit them to expel even asylum speakers from

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And so that's something called Title forty

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>two authority under the US Code, and that's in the

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Public Health section of the Code, is actually not in

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the Immigration section of the Code. And what that says

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is that during an emergency involving a communicable disease, the

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>CDC Director can instruct the Department of Homeland Security to

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>exclude any foreign nationals trying to enter the United States.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And so that's been the state of affairs since March

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of till this day. Leon Why did the CDC come

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>out with this new guidance for migrant children traveling alone. Well,

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>there's been litigation in the DC Circuit, and this litigation

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>actually in disregard for unaccount any children, actually didn't change

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>much practically on the ground. The DC circule litigation is

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>called we Shall, we Shall versus Majorkis, and it's trying

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to offend all of the use of the Title forty

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>two for everyone. It's a southern border. But they did

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>not get a victory in the DC Circuit fully, But

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>what they did get is this understanding that for unaccompanied children,

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a separate statutory regime that's been played for what

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>happens when an unaccompanied child reaches the border, and that

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>statutory regime is that they have to go to the

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Department of Health and Human Services, they have to get inspected,

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they get chops. If they don't have the shops, they

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>then get put into the custody of either a shelter

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or of an adult in the United States who can

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>take custody of that child. And then they're put in

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>removal proceedings while they're in that person of custody, and

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they can win their proceedings, sometimes they don't win,

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and so the idea was you could not operate Title

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>forty two on those other company children because the Congress

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I've said very clearly what it wanted to be done,

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and Title forty two didn't supersede those statutory provisions with

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>regard to what he did for un accompanied children. So

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>then why the CDC announcement. Well, the CDC then solidified

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the guidance from the court, which is to stay, fine,

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to give us an injunction. We're not

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this, So we can move out this part

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of the case by letting you know that we are

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to put on accompany children into Title forty

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>two expulsion. But quite frankly, the administration wasn't doing that

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's very hard. What are you gonna do with

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a seventeen year old or sixteen year old or even

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>god perbided, they're much younger children. If you use this

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Title forty two authority, then you're just expelling them into

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>the middle of Mexico and they have no place to go. No,

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for isn't none of that. And so as a practical matter,

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>this was only being done in the rarest of cases.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But nevertheless, nilence is not going to be done at

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>all personally to this memo. Now, you were talking about

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a case in the d C circuit in March of

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>t there's a conflicting case in Texas just recently tell

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>us about that. So in March fourth, the District Court

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoining the CDC from using this title forty two expulsion

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>authority against unaccompanied children. And their their decision was that

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't adequately explained why they would treat unaccompanied children

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>differently than other people under the CDC order, and so

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that decision was made, and then it was up to

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the CDC to decide what were they going to do.

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Were they going to challenge that in appeal or were

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they just gonna trying to mood out the injunctions? And

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so what the CDC decided to do in conjunction with

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Homeland Securities to say, look, this is

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>such a rare thing that we're using this title forty

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>to authority for unaccompanied children. We're just going to make

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a public health reassessment and say we're not going to

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>be using this title forty to authority to expel unaccompanied

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>children from the United States, but they're still going to

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>use Title forty two to expel migrant adults and families

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with children. Correct, So for migrant adults, such the simplest case,

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>which is that the courts of health still so far

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that you can use this authority for cases involving adults

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>because adults don't pose any issues with regard to children

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>being present. The trickier issue is this litigation as it's

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.239
<v Speaker 1>going to proceed, and what's going to happen with families

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>meaning adults and drin that traveled together, and so far

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the courts offense that that can be used for family

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>because again this becomes the stain problems as the problem

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we face with regard to detaining families, which is that

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>when the court said you couldn't detained families, then that

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>led to a very tricky situation where you have to

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>decide whether to separate families or let them all in.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And so the court don't want to get involved with

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that so far under Title forty two, and what they

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>are instead doing is saying that you can exclude still

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>entire families under Title forty two. So, now is this

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>complicated because the d C Appellate Court said last week

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that officials couldn't expel families to places where they could

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be persecuted or harmed. So correct. So so this is

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>again I'm not are one of those decisions. That's an

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting decision, but it's not a deviation from the practical authority.

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And so what is what do I mean by that?

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>What I mean by that is the Department of Homeland Security,

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at least under the Biden administration, not so much under

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration, but under the Biden administration was already

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>issuing credible fear determinations to try to figure out if

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it was going to expel someone to a country that

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they were going to fear persecution from. As a practical

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>matter of these expulsions are going to be to Mexico.

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>The only time they wouldn't be to Mexico would be

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if someone was coming on a flight and for some

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>reason they were going to be expelled under Title forty two,

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>which would be very very very very rare, or if

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>there was some very quick ability to expel someone after

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>very brief detention back to trill American country. But that's

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>very very rare. And so the real question that they

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>asked is do you fear persecution in Mexico. And only

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>a very small number of people are going to actually

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to articulate claims of why they fear persecution

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico. But nevertheless, what the court has said is

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>if someone is going to say, incredibly show that they

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>fear persecution in Mexico, then you cannot use Title forty

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to authority to expel them to Mexico. And again, this

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is the same theory as the kid, which is that

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a statutory framework in the Statute for what we're

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do with people that fear persecution, and Title

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>forty two again does not supersed that framework. So if

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>someone comes from Mexico and says I fear persecution, they'll

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be given an asylum hearing. No, what they're

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>given is a credible fear screening, and that's a very

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>brief screening by employee of the Department of Homeland Security

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>where they're at I understand, let's say you're from Central America.

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's my question to you. Do you fear that you

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>will be harmed in Mexico on the basis of your

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>raised religion, national origin, political opinion, or social group and

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>if they say no, then they can be expelled into Mexico.

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But if they say yes, then they'll be yes, why

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>do you fear you'll be persecuted in Mexico? And only

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>if they have a credible answer to that can they

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>if they the title forty to authority. Now, that doesn't

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>mean that the bid administration apply Title forty two to everyone.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It actually doesn't. It's very sort of hodgepodge, and that

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on any given day you may see one family get

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>applied and so one doesn't get applied. Adults and it

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>apply and other adults don't get it applied. There's no

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>right or reason to it a lot of times, but

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just the sheer numbers of how many people are getting

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>tited forty two like to then, is why this continues

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to be an esue. Immigration advocates are saying that it

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't about COVID, the Biden administration is just using this

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as a way to curtail immigration. Well, the question is,

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and WoT does that become true? Because that would certainly

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>be true at some point if there is very little

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>concern about COVID. There there are no restrictions anywhere else

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in the state but for the southern border. At that point,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>that argument is onefect iron clad. In the world we

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>lived in, let's say months ago, we were in a

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>very huge state of pendicant concerns or the amicon variant,

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that argument was not very strong. And so the question

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>is when did you get to a point where the

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>court can actually say that the justification for Title forty

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>two is now so flipsy that you're only doing it

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>as a way to a a the immigration Code. And

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when will be there, but I think

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the best proxim will be, Hey, when there's international dribical

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that's taking place where people won't have to do anything

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>related to COVID. At that point, you can't have fital

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>party to anymore. That's Leon Fresco, a partnered Hollandon Knight.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Billionaire Leon Black, the co founder of Apollo Global Management,

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>sued Gazelle Ganiyeva and her lawyers last year, claiming they

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>violated civil racketeering laws by conspiring to destroy him personally

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and professionally. This was after Ganieva had sued Black for defamation,

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>intentional infliction of emotional distress, gender motivated violence, and retaliation

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>at a federal court hearing, none of the seven lawyers

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>present gave the judge an indication that there was a

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>prospect for settling the case. Joining me is Bloomberg Legal

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>reporter Bob Van Voris Bob tell us about these dueling lawsuits.

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Sure Ganieva, who is a former model and a former

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend of Leon Black, claims that he raped her and

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that he defamed her in the press. She's suing over

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in state court. He has countered by filing a suit

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in federal court claiming violations of federal racketeering law. Basically,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>he's claiming that Ganieva conspired with PR representatives and used

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>her lawyers to defame him and to try to ruin

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>his life and his reputation. He claims that the suit

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>is basically concocted by Josh Harris, the person who co

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>founded Apollo Global with Black, in response to being passed

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>over for the role of CEO after him. This is

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>basically an internal coup with and Apollo claims Leon Black,

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and that the entire thing was orchestrated by Josh Harris.

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>The federal case is a defamation lawsuit based on RICO allegations.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>The federal case is RICO a racketeering suit claiming that

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>people conspired to violate federal laws to try to ruin

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>black life, and to to de pay them in the press.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that an unusual claim for private citizen to be making. Well,

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to make civil claims under the Rico Act.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>There are a whole lot of legal hoops that you

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have to jump through. The people on the other side

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>of the suit, Rubenstein, the PR Agency and Josh Harris

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>claimed that this complaint comes nowhere close to stating the

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>things that they have to state to be able to

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>recover against them, so they are moving to dismiss the suit.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Judge the other day ruled in favor of Black. Black

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>has said that Ganiyeva he gave her millions of dollars

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in exchange for her agreement not to talk about their relationship.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Is that involved in any of this? Yeah, that's one

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the claims in the state court lawsuit that basically

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>she violated this contract. He paid her, and she took

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the money and is out there talking dirt about him,

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and he claims that, you know, he ought to recover

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for that as well. So, now, why were there seven

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>attorneys in the hearing in federal court? There were a

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of each representing black In Ganieva. There were others

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in representing the other parties in the lawsuits, including Josh

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Harris and the PR Agency. At one point, the judge

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>asked if there was any prospect of settlement anytime soon,

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:53.959
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know, if you've kind an answer

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>other than slim to none, raise your hand. Everyone said

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there's stone still, and no hand were raised. Blacks lawyer

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>filed a letter with the judge claiming that her team

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>had received WhatsApp messages between Ganieva and a New York

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Times reporter showing that she was working with her lawyer

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>months before Ganieva officially retained him. What does that have

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with anything, Well, it's it's hard to figure

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>out exactly what that has to do anything, if not

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>all that unusual to be talking to lawyers before you

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>formally retain them. Um, but the other side is saying

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the black side is saying, hey, look, uh, you know

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>these lawyers claimed in papers that made a big deal

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>out of being retained at a certain point, But it

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>turns out they appear to have been talking to Ganieva

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>months before that. So if you believe the allegation that

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a conspiracy. The conspiracy goes back further than you know,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>than we knew, and and here's evidence of it. One

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of Ganieva's lawyers said, for now, Black's billions have bought

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>him access to our court system in a way that

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>most people do not have. What was she referring to.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I think she was referring to the suit itself. That

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>he has high priced lawyers pursuing Ganieva in the suit

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that they claim has absolutely no UH basis to be

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>in court and that ought to be dismissed. What's the

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>next step here? The next step the judge in the

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>federal case is going to hear motions to dismiss They've

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>kind a file briefs on that, and the judge will

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>hear arguments and decide whether that case belongs in court

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>at all. The state case is on a separate track

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>that will go forward with discovery, and presumably that will

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>at some point also come to motions where the independants

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the case kicked out. Thanks Bob. That's

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Bob Van Boris, Bloomberg Legal Reporter. And that's it for

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this edition of The bloom A Glaw Show. Remember you

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>can always get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Law Podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and at www dot bloomberg dot com, slash podcast slash Law,

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>week night at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg