WEBVTT - The Hater's Guide To The AI Bubble, Pt, 2

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media Hell, and welcome to Better Offline. I'm your

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 1>host ed Zeitron. Subscribe to the newsletter by the merchandise.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It's all in the notes. And we're on the second

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>installment of our three part Hater's Guide to the AI

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>bubble and the cracks within the generative AI industry and

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>how they're becoming bigger and scarier and the potential economic

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>meltdown course by a collapse in generative AI spending. Well,

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not really general if AI spending. It's literally just

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>fucking GPUs, and I think it might be sooner and

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>likelier than many think. Toward the end of the last episode,

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we talked about one of the inane comparisons we hear

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>between today's nation state size spending on jen ai capital

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>expenditures and the investments that Amazon made when scaling Amazon

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Web Services, which was literally the foundation of Dow Computing

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>at scale. I would say someone's going to email and

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>say I'm wrong, not going to read it, and I

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>had to cut things short because we ran out of time.

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 2>But I want to.

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Continue the conversation because I think it's important to examine

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this comparison thoroughly, if not just to explain why it

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. It's also I want to stop. I want

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to stop hearing it. I want when people say it

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to me, I just want to send them this fucking

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>episode and say leave me alone, buddy boy.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>But but bye.

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>But the first point I want to make in this

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>episode is that generative AI and large language models do

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>not resemble Amazon Web Services or the greater cloud compute boom,

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and generative AI is not infrastructure. Now, some people compare

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>llms and their associated services to Amazon Web Services or

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.279
<v Speaker 1>services like Microsoft Zero or Google Cloud, their giant, multi

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar operations that basically share their server capacity with

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>companies wanting to run stuff on the Internet or within

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>their own within their own systems. A very fudgy way

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of putting. They help make sure that applications work online.

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>These are very very useful services, and by the way,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>people are wrong to make the comparison between them and

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the l lms. As I'll get into now. Amazon Web

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Services when it launched, comprised of things like and forgive

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>me how much I'm going to dilute this, Amazon's Elastic

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Compute Cloud EC two, where you rent space in Amazon

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>service to run applications in the cloud, or Amazon Simple

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Storage S three, which is enterprise level storage for applications

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and storing things, is not just like a simple hard drive.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>It's redundancy, it's making sure it's copied in places, so

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>latency comes down tons of other things. But in simpler terms,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>if you were providing a cloud based service, you used

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazon to both stored a stuff that the service needed

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and the cloud actual cloud based processing. So of compute,

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>so like your compute loads and runs applications, but delivered

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the thousands of millions of people online.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is a huge industry.

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Web services are alone brought in WHEB revenues are

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred billion dollars in twenty twenty four. And

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>while Microsoft and Google don't break out their cloud revenues,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're similarly large parts of their companies, and Microsoft is

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>used as zero and the past to patch over shoddy growth.

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>These services are also selling infrastructure. You aren't just paying

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>for compute, but the ability to access storage and deliver

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>services with low lateent so users have a snappy experiences

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>wherever they are in the world. And I know I

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>just said a snappy experiences. I'm not editing it. The

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>subtle magic of the Internet is that it works at all,

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and a large part of that is the cloud compute

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and oligopoly of the main cloud providers. Having such

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a vast data centers, this is much cheaper than doing

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it yourself, and to a certain point, Jobbox moved away

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>from Amazon Web Services is it at scale, for example,

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but this also allows someone to take care of the

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>maintenance of the hardware and make sure it actually gets

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>your stuff to your customers. You also don't have to

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>worry about spikes and usage because these things are usage based,

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>hence the elastic and you can always add more compute

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to meet demand or just have it in a particular time.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>There is, of course nuance, security specific features, content specific

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>delivery services, data based services. There's nuance behind these clouds.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>You're buying into the infrastructure of the infrastructure provider, and

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason these products are so profitable is that in

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>part you are handing off the problems and responsibility to

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody else. And also, most web applications are not that

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>demanding of cloud compute. They might be at scale expensive

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to provide to millions of people, but Facebook was not

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a super complex, I don't know website depending on thousands

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>or millions of GPUs, and based on the idea, there

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are multiple product categories you can build on top of

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>something like edblys Because ultimately cloud services are about Amazon,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Google running your infrastructure for you. Large language

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>models and their associated services are completely different, despite these

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>companies attempting to prove otherwise. And it starts with a

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>very very simple problem. Why did any of these companies

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>build these giant data centers and why did they fill

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>them full of GPUs? Amazon Web Services was created out

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of necessity. Amazon's infrastructure needs were so great that it

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 1>effectively had to build out the software and hardware necessary

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to deliver a store that sold theoretically everything, the theoretically anywhere,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>handling both the traffic and customers, delivering the software that

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>runs Amazon dot Com quickly and reliably and well, making

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>sure things kept working, making sure they were stable. And

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it didn't need to come up with a reason for

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>people to run web applications. They were already running applications

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>client side on their computers. They realized that doing so

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>at scale would be cool, or they were already doing

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>so in a way that was likely not particularly cost effective.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>And the ways that we're doing so, they were inflexible,

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and they required specially skills and indeed physical infrastructure personnel.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>They were quite expensive. So Amazon Web Services took something

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that people already did and what there was actually a

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>proven demand for, and made it better and scaled it. Eventually,

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Google and Microsoft copied done because that's all they can do.

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And that appears to be the only similarity with generative AI.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>That due to the ridiculous costs of both data centers

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and GPUs necessary to provide these services, it's largely impossible

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for others to enter the market.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>After that, generative AI feels more like a feature of

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>cloud infrastructure rather than the infrastructure itself. AWS and similar

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>medic clouds are versatile, flexible, and multi faceted. Generative AI

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>does what generative AI does well, that's about it. You

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>can run lots of different things in AWS. What are

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the different things you can run using large language models?

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>What are the different use cases and indeed user requirements

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that make this the supposed next big thing. Perhaps the

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>argument is that generator of AI is the next AWS

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>or similar cloud service because you can build the next

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>great companies on the infrastructure of others. The models of

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>say open AI and anthropic and the service of Microsoft. Okay, okay,

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>let's humor this point too. You can build the next

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>great AI startup, and you have to build it on

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the megaclouds because they're the only ones that

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>can afford to build the infrastructure. One inc wincteny small problem.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Companies built on top of large language models don't make

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>much money, and in fact they're almost all deeply unprofitable.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's establish a few flats to get going. I said, flats, flats,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Facts.

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Here are the flats I'm establishing. Outside of one exception,

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>mid Journey, which claimed it was profitable in twenty twenty two,

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>which may not still be the case. I've actually reached

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>out to ask them and they didn't get.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Back to me.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Every single LLM model is company is unprofitable, often wildly so.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Outside of open ai and oropic, in any sphere which

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>makes the AI coding app cursor, there are no large

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>language model companies either building models or services on top

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>of others models that make more than five hundred million

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars in annualized revenue meaning month times twelve. Outside mid

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Journeys two hundred million arr and Iron clouds one hundred

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million arr Also fucking perplexity, there are only

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve generative AI powered companies making one hundred million dollars

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>annualized or eighteen point three million dollars a month in revenue.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>The database then, this is the Information's AI. Generative AI

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>database doesn't have replt, which also announced it hit one

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred million in analyzed revenue. I've included it in my

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>statement of facts. Of these companies, two of them have

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>been acquired, move Works acquired by service Now in March

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five after the company shit the Big Big Time,

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and Windsurf, which was acquired by Google and Cognition in

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>July twenty twenty five and one of the most annoying

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>deals of all time. But for the sake of simplicity,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I've left out companies like Surge, Scale, Cheering, and Together,

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>all of whom run consultancies selling services and training stuff

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>for training models. Otherwise, there are seven companies total that

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>make fifty million dollars or more annual recurring revenue, which

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is four point one six million dollars a month.

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, none of this is to say.

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>That one hundred million dollars isn't a lot of money

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to you and me.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 2>I just want to be clear.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>If you want to give me one hundred million dollars,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll do anything. I'll wink like a pig for you anyway.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But in the world of software as a service or

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>enterprise software, this is jump change HubSpot At revenues are

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>two point six three billion dollars in its twenty twenty

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>four financial year. Three years into this crap, and Generative

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>AI's highest grossing companies outside of open Ai ten billion

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>annualized as of June and Anthropic four billion annualized as July.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't like saying that word. Both of them loose billions

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a year after revenue. There are really three problems here.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Businesses powered by Generative AI do not seem to be popular,

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Those businesses that are remotely popular are deeply unprofitable, and

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>even the less popular generative AI powered businesses are also

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>deeply unprofitable. But I want to start somewhere because I

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>keep hearing about fucking Cursor. Fucking's start with any sphere

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and Cursor and their app Cursor. It's an AI powered

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>coding app and they have five hundred million dollars of

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>annualized revenue.

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Pretty great, right, ha.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>It hit two hundred million dollars in annualized revenue in

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>March and then hit five hundred million in June after

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>raising nine hundred million dollars. That's amazing, ed, ed it's

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>time walk to the garage. ED, it's over for you. Wrong,

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a mirage. Cursor's growth was the result of an

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable business model that it's now had to replace with

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>opaque terms of service, dramatically restricting access to models, and

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>rate limits that effectively stop its users using the product

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at the price point they were used to go to

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Arsnash Cursor on red app Take a look. Take a

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>look at how happy everyone is.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to know one.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>My peers in the media don't seem to have the

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>ability to talk to actual fucking customers. It's ridiculous. This

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>company is circling the drain, and nobody seems to want

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it, despite how big a deal that is.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Also, Curse is horribly unprofitable, and I believe there are

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a sign of things to come in generative AI. A

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks weeks ago, I wrote up the dramatic

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>changes that Cursor made to its service in the middle

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>of June or my premium newsletter and discovered that they

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>timed these changes precisely with Anthropic and open Ai to

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a lesser extent, adding service tiers and priority processing, which

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is tech language for pay us extra if you have

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of customers or face rate limits or service delays.

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Asshole.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>These price ships have also led to companies like replt

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>having to make significant changes to their pricing model that

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>disfavors users. People are finding in really simple terms that

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>what they used to get for twenty bucks is much much, much,

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>much much smaller curse the users hit rate limits. Replit

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>users are hitting rate limits, and even then when they

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>try and do the same things, they're spending way more

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>money if they go pay as you go. It's a

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>complete fast But I'm going to repeat some of this

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff from the premium newsletter because there is a time

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of events that I believe are going to be in

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the big short to AI Boogloo all right. In or

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>around May fifth, twenty twenty five, Cursor closed the nine

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar funding round in a Around May twenty second,

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, Anthropic launched Clawed four Opus and new

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>models with Sona and Opus, both of them kind of

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>well known for coding, and on May thirtieth, twenty twenty five,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>they added service tiers, including priority pricing specifically focused on

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>cash heavy products like Cursor and the cash is when

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you put stuff that you're going to be looking at regularly,

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>take a look at it, and you can use it

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>more readily. Cash is the CAC eight G, by the way,

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is generally something that's for efficiency.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>The idea that you.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Would add a toll onto the cash is fucking disgusting

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and only targeted coding startups. But on May thirtieth, twenty

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Reutter's reported the Anthropics annualized revenue hit three

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, with a key driver being code generation. This

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>translates to around two hundred and fifty million dollars in

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>monthly revenue. June ninth, twenty twenty five, CNBC reported open

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Ai'd hit ten billion dollars in annualized revenue. And yeah,

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>when they said ann your recurring revenue, they meant annualized.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>But the very same day they cut the price of

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>their three model by eighty percent, which competes directly with

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Clawed four Opus by the way, and This was a

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>direct and aggressive attempt to force Anthropic to kind of

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>like make too ether lower prices or compete. It's just

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>shtheads fuckinging around with assholes. But on or around June sixteen,

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, Cursor changed its pricing, added a new

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dollar a month Ultra tier that, in their

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>own words, was made possible by multi year partnerships with

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, Anthropic, Google, an Xai, which translates to multi

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>year commitments to spend which can be amortized as monthly amounts.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>A day later, on June seventeenth, Cursor dramatically changed its

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>offering to it for its twenty dollars a month subscriptions

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to usage base, where one got at least the value

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of their subscription, so a twenty bus a month person

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>would get more than twenty dollars of API course in compute,

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>along with arbitrary rate limits and unlimited access to Cursor's

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>own slow model that its users hey. Then on June eighteenth,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Repler and other vibe coding company that I had previously

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>mentioned announced their effort based pricing increases that were massive.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 2>July first, the Information reported.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>The Anthropic hit four billion dollars of annualized revenue making

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and thirty million dollars a month, an increase

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of eighty three million dollars a month. We'll just under

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent in the space of a month.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Hmm.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Where could that money have come from? In simpler terms,

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Cursor raised nine hundred million dollars and very likely had

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to hand large amounts of that money over to Open

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Air and Anthropic to keep doing business with them, then

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>immediately change the terms of service to make them worse

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for their customers. And as I said at the time,

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is a direct quote from my news there,

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>while some met, no, I can't do the Kevin Ruth's

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>voice and doing my own stuff, pardon me. While some

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>may believe that Open AI and Anthropic hitting annualized revenue

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>milestones is good news, you have to consider how these

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>milestones were hit. Based on my reporting, I believe that

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>both companies are effectively doing steroids, forcing massive infrastructural costs

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>onto big customers as a means of covering the increasing

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>costs of their own models. There is simply no other

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>aid to read this situation. By making these changes, Anthropic

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is intentionally making it harder for its larger costs largest

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>customer to do business. By the way, Cursor is their

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>largest customer, creating the extra revenue by making Cursors product

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>worse by proxy. What's sickening about this particular situation. It

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter if Curs's customers are happy or sad.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>They like open AI's Enterprise Priority Access API Anthropic in

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this case, require a long term commitment which involves a

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>minimum through put of tokens per second as part of

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>their tiered access program. If Curs's customers drop off, both

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Anthropic and open Ai still get their cut, and if

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>curses customers somehow out spend those commitments, they'll either still

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>get rate limited or any sphere willkin cur more costs.

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Why do you care about this?

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, Cursor is the largest and most successful genetive AI

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>company by far. In these aggressive and desperate changes to

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>its products suggest that a that its products are deeply unprofitable,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and b that its current growth was the result of

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>offering a product that it was not the one it

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>would sell in the long term. Cursor misled its customers,

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and its current revenue is as a result, highly unlikely

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to stay at this level. Worse still, two anthropic engineers

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>left from the the Clawed Code team to go and

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>work at Cursor two weeks ago, and they have already

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>come back. This heavily suggests that whatever they saw over

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't compelling enough to make them stay. As I

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>also said, while Cursor may have raised nine hundred million dollars,

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it was really open Aianthropic XAI and Google that got

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that money. At this point, there are no profitable price

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>AI startups, and it's highly unlikely that the new pricing

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>models by both Cursor and Replet are going to help.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 2>These are now the.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>New terms of doing business with the big model companies,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a shakedown where you pay for priority access or tears,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or face indeterminate delays or rate limits. Any start up

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>scaling into an enterprise integration of General AVII, which means

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in this case anything that requires a level of service

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>uptime has to commit to both a minimum amount of

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>months and the throughput of tokens, which means that the

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>price of starting an AI company that gets any kind

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of real market traction just dramatically increased. Well, one could say, oh,

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps you don't need priority access. The need here is

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>something that can be entirely judged by anthropic and open

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>ai in a totally opaque manner. They can and they

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>will throttle companies that are two demanding on their systems.

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It's proven by the fact that they've done this to

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>curse them multiple times. But okay, why does curse them

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>out so much? And it's simple. Generative AI will not

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>get big on selling consumer software without an enterprise SaaS story,

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they're dead And I realize, I know, okay, folks, it's

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a little boring hearing about software as a

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>service despite the fact that it's a huge, several hundred

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar industry. But this is the only place where

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>generative AI can really make money. Companies buying hundreds of

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>thousands of seats or how industries that rely on compute

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>grow and without that growth, they're going nowhere. To give

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you some context, Netflix makes about thirty nine billion dollars

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a year in subscription new from consumers, and Spotify about

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen billion.

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>These are the.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Single most popular consumer software subscriptions in the world, and

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>open ai is fifteen point five million subscribers. Suggest that

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>open ai can't rely on them for the kind of

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>growth that would actually make the company worth three hundred billion.

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Dollars or more.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Cuzer, as it stands, is the one example of a

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>company thriving using GENERATIVEA a software company selling software, and

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it appears its rapid growth was the result of selling

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a product at a massive loss. As it stands today,

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Curs's product is significantly worse and it's ready it's full

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>of people furious at the company for the changes. In

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>simpler terms, Curser was the company that people mentioned to

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>prove that startups could make money by building on top

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>products on top of open AI and Anthropics models. Yet

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the truth is the only way to do so is

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to grow, and grow is to burn tons of money.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>While the tempting argument is to say that Curs's customers

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are addicted and will keep paying, this is clearly not

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the case, nor is it an actual business model. Like

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>people that say this, I've never had a drug addiction,

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>but I know people that do it. It's nothing like software.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Stop making that comparison. It's insulting to the victims of addiction.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, this story showed that open A and Anthropics

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are actually their bigger the biggest threats to their customers

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and will actively rent seek can punish any of their

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>success stories, looking to loose as much as they can from.

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Them before they copy their products.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>To put it bluntly, curses growth story was a fucking lie.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>It reached five hundred million dollars in annulif revenue selling

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a product it can no longer afford to sell and

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>could not afford to sell long term, suggesting material weakness

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in its business and any and all coding startups. It's

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>also remarkable, in the shocking failure of journalism that this

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't in every single article about any sphere. I'm doing

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this part time? Why am I in the asshole here?

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm I don't know, really, though, I do have

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a question. Where are all the consumer AI starts? I'm

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>genuinely serious.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 2>What have you got for me?

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Perplexity Perplexity. Perplexity only has one hundred and fifty million

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the annualized revenue, and they spent one hundred

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and sixty seven percent of their revenue in twenty twenty four,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>or fifty seven million dollars of spending on revenues of

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty four million dollars on computer services from Anthropic, Open

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>AI and Amazon. They lost sixty eight million dollars and

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>worse still, they still have no path to profitability and

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not even making anything new. They're a search engine,

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they have an AI browser. But don't worry. Professional gas

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>bag Alex Heath just did this insane and flumm mixing

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>interview with CEO Aravins Ravinas, who, when asked how it

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>perplexed you would become profitable, appeared to experience what seems

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a stroke like I'm about to read something

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to you and it's gonna sound strange, but this is

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly what was said. Maybe let me give you another example.

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>You want to put an ad on meta Instagram, and

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to look at ads done by similar brands,

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>pull that, study that, or look at AdWords pricing of

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred different keywords and figure out how to price

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>your thing comparatively. These are tasks that could definitely save

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you hours and hours and maybe even give you up

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>an arbitrage over what you could do yourself, because AI

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>is able to do a lot more and at scale.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>If it helps you to make a few million bugs,

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>does it not make sense to spend two thousand dollars

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for that prompt? It does, right, So I think we're

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to monetize in many more interesting

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>ways than chatbots for the browser. I want to be

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>fucking clear about something. Alex seems like a nice guy.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>If someone said that to me, I'd ask them if

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they could smell toast. I'd be like, Aravin, Mate, are

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you okay? How many fingers I'm holding up?

0:19:58.960 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Aravin? You're right?

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Did you hit your head on something? The ceilings don't

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>seem that low in here. But mate, you're just spewing

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>utter fucking nonsense. I've read this paragraph multiple times. I

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>do not know what he's getting at. I think he's

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>suggesting something about how you could ask it to tell

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you what to do with ads.

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the big probably the biggest consumer AI company

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>that isn't open AI, and they speak like they're an

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>insane person or a stupid person. Check out the Business

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Idiot Trilogy for what I think there. I also mentioned

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>them earlier, but I don't I don't want you to

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about AI browsers. Anyone humoring AI browsers

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>is being an imbecile for some reason. They are not

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a business model. How are people going to make money

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>on the browser. Hm hmm, what do these products actually do?

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh? They can poorly automate accepting linked invites. Wow. Wow,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 2>it's like God himself has personally best my computer. A

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>big fucking deal.

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>In any case, it doesn't seem like you can really

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>build a consumer AI startup that makes any real money

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>or approach being a real company other than chat GPT,

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and that's because the GENERATIVEAI software market is small,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with little room for growth and no profits to be seen. Arguably,

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest sign that things are are troubling in the

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>generative AI spaces that we use the term annualized revenue

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>at all, which, as I've mentioned repeatedly, means multiplying a

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>month by twelve and saying that's our annualized baby. The

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>problem with this number is that, well, people cancel things.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>While your June might look great, if ten percent of

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>your subscribers churning a bad month due to a change

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in your terms of service, for example, that's a huge

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>chunk of your annualized revenue gone and likely gone forever.

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But the worst sign is that nobody is saying the

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>monthly figures, mostly because the monthly figures fucking suck. One

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars of anualized revenue is eight point three

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars a month. To give you some scale,

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Web Services hit one hundred and eighty nine million

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars fifteen point seventy five million dollars a month in

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>revenue in two thousand and eight, two years after founding,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>and while it took until twenty fifteen to hit profitability,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it actually hit break even in two thousand and nine,

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>though were invested in cash and growth for a few

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>years later. And I should be clear them doing that

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>justified so many startups burning cash, so many starts like yeah,

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>look at aws. They were investing in growth, which is

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a fair thing for companies to do. But I'm being

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>an asshole. But right now there is not a single

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>generative AI software company that's profitable, and none of them

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 1>are showing the signs of the kind of hypergrowth that

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>previous big software companies had or Cursor technically is the

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>fastest growing software as a service company of all time.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>It got there by basically lying. Cursor is never bringing

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>back the product at the twenty dollars price point that

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they were selling. They're never doing it. The money they

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>earned was earned it's not fraud because they didn't do it.

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess it was deceptive, but it's not really to

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>the it's just fucking lying.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just lying. And who knows what happens to curser now.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, I'm harping on cursor a bit.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>What other software startups are there?

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Glean, Glean, fucking Glean, Glean, everyone loves to talk about.

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Enterprise search company Glean, a company that uses AI to

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>search and generate answers from your company's files and documents.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Fun fact, also Salesforce's own Slack has now blocked them

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>from searching Slack. Just arshole on arsehole violence. In December

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, Glean raised two hundred and sixty million dollars,

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>broadly stating that it had over five hundred and fifty

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in cash with best in class ARR growth.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>A few months later, in February twenty twenty five, Glean

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 1>announced it achieved one hundred million dollars in annual recurring

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>revenue in fourth arter FY twenty five, cementing its position

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of the fastest growing sas startups and reflecting

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a searching demand for AI powered workplace intelligence. In any case,

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>AR could literally mean anything, as it appears to be

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>based on quarters, meaning it could be an average of

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the last three months. I guess anyway. In June twenty

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Glean announced it had raised another funding round,

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>this time raising one hundred and fifty million dollars in

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>It troublingly added that since its last round, it had

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>surpassed one hundred million dollars in AR raw five months

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>into the fucking year. And your revenue is basically the same.

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>That isn't good. That isn't good at all. Also happened

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to that five hundred and fifty million dollars in cash?

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Why did Glean need more? Hey, wait a second, take

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a look at this. Glean announced their raise on June eighteenth,

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, two days after Curses price increase, in

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the same day that Repler announced the similar price act.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 2>It's almost as if the.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Dramatic pricing increase has affected them due to the introduction

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of Anthropic Service TRES and Opening Eyes priority processing.

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 2>But I'm guessing. I know, I'm guessing.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:24.479
<v Speaker 1>But it is kind of where that all of these

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>companies raise money and all announced these things around the

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>same time.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey, that reminds me, I got another problem.

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I got another problem here because I think that there

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is another reason why the cycles kind of keep repeating.

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>You get a company of that grows, and then they

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of go nowhere, because well, the company doesn't really

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to have a total addressable market much bigger than

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million AR and I think it's a little simple.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>It's quite simple.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there really are no unique generative AI companies,

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and building a moat on top of l elms is

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 1>near impossible.

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 2>If you look a man, am I going to get

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 2>some emails about this, but bring them on.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 1>If you look at what GENERATIVEAI companies do, now that

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the following is not a quality barometer, it's probably one

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of the following things. They're either chatbot one, either you

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>ask questions or talk to This includes customer service bots, searching, summarizing,

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>or comparing documents with increased amounts of complexity of documents

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>or quantity of documents to be compared. This includes being

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>able to ask questions of documents. Web search deep research,

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>meaning long form web search that generates a document where

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>some parts of it will inevitably be hallucinated or derived

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>from low quality sources, generating text, images, voice, or in

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>some rare cases video, Using AI to generative AII mean

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to write, edit or maintain code, transcription, translation, or photo

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and video editing. Every single generative AI company that is

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>an open Aireanthropic and honestly kind of those two does

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>one or a few of these things, and I mean

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>every one of them. And it's because every single generative

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>AI company uses large language models, which have inherent limits

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on what they can do. Llms can generate, they can search,

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they can kind of edit, they can sometimes transcribe accurately,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and they can sometimes translate much more well, much less accurately.

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess within weeks of Curses changed to its services,

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and byte Dance release competitors that, for the most part, do.

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Exactly the same thing.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Sure, there's a few differences in how they're designed, but

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>design is not a moat, especially in a high cost,

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>negative profit business were your only way of growing is

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to offer a product you can't sustain. The only other

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>moat you can build is the services you provide, which,

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>when your services are dependent on a large language model,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>are dependent on the model developer, who, in the case

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of open AI and Anthropic, could simply clone your startup,

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>because the only valuable intellectual property is the models, and

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>those models are theirs. You may say, well, nobody else

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>has any ideas either, to which I say, I fully agree.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>My rock com bubble thesis suggests that we're all out

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of hyper growth ideas, and yeah, I think we're out

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>of ideas related to any large language models too. At

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>this point, I think it's fair to ask, are there

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>any good businesses you can build on top of generative

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>AI or large language models. I don't mean ad features

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>related to I mean an AI company that actually sells

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a product that people buy at scale that isn't called chat,

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>GPT or claude. In previous tech booms, companies would make

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>their own models, their own infrastructure, or the things that

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>make them distinct from other companies. But the generative AI

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>boom effectively changes that by making everybody build on stuff

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>on top of somebody else's models, because training your own

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>models is both extremely expensive and requires vast amounts of

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and just pure power. As a result, much of

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this boom is about a few companies, really too, if

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we're honest, getting other companies to try and build functional

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>software for them, and these companies Open ai and Anthropic

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>are their customers weak point in a relationship that veers

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>from symbiotic to parasitic at a moment's notice. I cannot

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>stress enough how bad open ai and Anthropic are for

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>their business customers. Their models are popular, by which I

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>mean their customers customers will expect access to them, meaning

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the open ai and Anthropic can, as they did to Cursor,

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>arbitrarily change pricing, service availability, and functionality based on how

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>they feel that day or whether they need to pump

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>their annualized revenue for investors.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 2>Don't believe me.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Anthropic cut off access to AI coding platform Windsurf because

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it looked like they might get acquired by open Ai.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>They never were. They just harmed that business. They just

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>cut a hole in them. Why because they might touch

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>another business, the most anti competitive shit in the world.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And everyone sat there clapping like a fucking seal. Disgusting

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>even by big tech standards. This fucking sucks, and these

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>companies will do it again. But you know what, Let's

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about the actual uses of generative AI, because the

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>limited number of use cases are because large language models

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>are all really really similar. Because all large language models

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>require more data than anyone who's ever needed, including like

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>four times the amount of data on the Internet. They

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>all basically have to use the same thing, either taken

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>from the Internet or bought from one of the few

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>companies that scale surge during together or whoever. While they

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>can get customized data or do customized training and reinforcement learning,

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>these models are all transformer based and they all function similarly,

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and the only way to make them different is by

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>training them, which doesn't make them that much different, just

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>better things they already do. And good lord, is it

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>so is general IFAI is so ungodly expensive and the

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>training is as well. By the way, they have to

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>pay real humans as well, which they hate doing. And

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>even when they're paying outsourced labor and ken youre at

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>two dollars a pop, they're still losing a ton of money.

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's really crazy, actually, how badly built all of this is.

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And I already mentioned open AI and Anthropics costs as

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>well as perplex The's fifty million dollar bill in a

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>year to Anthropic Amazon and open Ai off of a

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>easily thirty four dollars million dollars in revenue. These companies

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>cost too much to run and their functionality doesn't make

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>enough money to make them make sense. And the problem

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't just the pricing, but how unpredictable it is. As

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Matterscheer wrote for cio Dive last year, generative AI makes

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies lives difficult for the massive spikes

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and costs that from the power users, with few ways

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate those costs. One of the ways that company

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>manages their cloud bills is by having some degree of predictability,

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>which is difficult to do with the constant sleu of

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>new models and demands some new products to go with them,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>especially when send models can and can and do often

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>cost more with subsequent iterations, not necessarily for much return,

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>except if you're a company like a coding company, your

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>customers are going to actually ask you for the new models.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>As a result, it's half AI companies to actually budge in.

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>But ed, What was that? Ed?

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 2>What about agents?

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Aren't they the thing that will eventually make the insane

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>broken calculus behind generative AI actually work?

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 2>What is your accent made? Anyway? Anyway?

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you about agents. The term agent is

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the most egregious acts of fraud I've seen

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in my entire career writing about this crap, and that

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>includes the metavers. When you hear the word agent, you

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>were meant to think of an autonomous AI that can

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>go and do stuff without oversight, replacing someone's job in

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the process. And companies have been pushing the boundaries of

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>good taste and financial crimes in pursuit of them. Most

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>egregious of them as Salesforce's Agent Force, which leads you

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>deploy AI agents at scale. That's a quote, and brings

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>digital labor to every employee, department and business process. Another

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>quote from Salesforce's website. These are two blatant fucking lies.

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Agent Force is a goddamn chatbot program. It's a platform

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for launching chatbots. They can sometimes plug into APIs that

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>allow them to access other information, but they're neither autonomous

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>nor agents by any reasonable definition. Not only does Salesforce

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>not actually sell agents, its own research shows that the

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>agents and agents in general only achieve around fifty eight

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>percent success rate on single step tasks. And I'm going

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to quote the register here. This means tasks that can

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>be completed in the single step without needing follow up

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>actions and more information or multi step tasks, So you know,

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>most tasks they succeed a depressing thirty five percent of

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the time. Last week, open Ai announced its own chat

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>GPT agent that can allegedly go and do tasks on

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a virtual computer. In its own demo, the agent took

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty one minutes or so to spit out a plan

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>for a wedding with destinations of a cander and some

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>suit options, and then showed a pre prepared demo of

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the agent preparing an itinery of how to visit every

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>major league ballpark. And that's baseball for the non Americans

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>out there. In this example's case, agents took twenty three

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>minutes and produced arguably the most confusing map I've seen

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in my life. You can see the map in the

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>newsletter version of this episode. It's hilarious. It missed out

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>every single major ballpark on the East Coast, including Yankee

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Stadium and Femway Park, which are two of the most

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>well known stadiums in sports, and added a bunch of

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>roundom ones and like one in the middle of the

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Gulf of Mexico. What team is that, Sammy the deep

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Water Horizon Devils. Is there a baseball team in North Dakota?

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Clammy?

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Samy. I also should be clear this was a

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>pre prepared example. This is the best they had. I

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>want to see the cutting room footage on this, because

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you best bet that that map looked like straight dogshit,

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>as with every large language model product, And yes, that's

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what this is, even if open ai won't talk about

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what model results are. Extremely variable agents are difficult because

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>tasks are if for coal, even if they can be

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>completed by a human being, that the CEO thinks is stupid.

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>What open ai appears to be doing is using a

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>virtual machine to run scripts that its models trigger regardless

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of how will it works, and it works very very

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>very very poorly and inconsistently. It's also very likely expensive

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to run. In any case, every single company you see

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>using the word agent is trying to mislead you. They're

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>lying gleans ai agents to chatbots with If this, then

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that functions that trigger events using APIs, which means if

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>an event happens, another thing will be triggered, not taking

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>actual actions, because that is not what lms can do.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Service Now's ai agents that allegedly act autonomously and proactively

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on your behalf are despite claiming they go beyond better

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>chatbots still ultimately better chatbots that use APIs to trigger

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.959
<v Speaker 1>different events using if this, then that functions. Sometimes these

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>chatbox can also answer questions that people might have or

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>trigger an event somewhere. Oh right, that's literally the same thing.

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The closest we have to an agent is any kind

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of coding agent, which is they can make a list

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of things that you might do on our software project

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and go and generate code and push stuff to get

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>help when you ask them to. And they can do

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>so autonomously in the sense that you can just let

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>them do what a model that doesn't know anything and

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has no consciousness thinks is right based on its corpus

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of data and the things you can access to. And

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it's about as safe as that sounds. When I say

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>ask them to and go, and I mean that these

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>agents are not intelligent at all. They do not have intelligence,

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and when let run rampant, fuck up everything and create

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of extra work or so. A study found

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that AI coding tools made engineers nineteen percent slower. Nevertheless,

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>none of these products are autonomous agents, and anybody using

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the term agent likely means chat bond. And all of

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this is working because the media keeps repeating everything these

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>companies say. It's a disgrace. We need to stop this.

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I realize we've taken a kind of a scenic route here, though,

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but I know he needed to lay the groundwork, because

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I really am alarmed. According to a UBS report from

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixth of June, the public companies running AI

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 1>services are making absolutely pathetic amounts of money from AI. Microsoft,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 1>according to the UBS, is making annual revenues of somehow

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 1>less than the Information report at two point one billion dollars.

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Service now is making less than two hundred and fifty million,

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Adobe less than one hundred and twenty five million salesforce

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>less than one hundred million now service now said two

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million dollar ACV annual contract value. This

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>may be one of the more honest explanations of revenue

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, putting them in the upper echelons of AI

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>revenue and less. Of course, you think about it for

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a couple of seconds and think, are these all AI

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>specific contracts or perhaps they're in contracts where you've taped

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>AI on to the side.

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 2>It gives a shit. It's also year.

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Long agreements that could churn, and according to Gartner, over

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>forty percent of Agenetic AI products will be canceled by

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty twenty seven. And really, you gotta laugh

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>at Adobe and Salesforce, both of whom to talk such

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a goddamn fuck ton about jenerit of Ai. And yeah,

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I have only made amazed the hundred twenty five million

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in analyzed revenue from it.

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Pathetic crap, dog shit.

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>These aren't futuristic numbers, they're barely product categories, and none

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of this seems to include costs.

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, good grief.

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Look, a lot of what I've been saying is reminiscent

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the previous podcasts, and I've gone over this a lot,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>so I really want to make it clear that the

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>signs are very troubling, and that the things I've warned

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you about the past couple of years are only getting worse,

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and the cliff's coming up things are only getting closer.

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:31.959
<v Speaker 1>When we double off of it, things may get really,

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>really bad, And then the next episode we'll talk about

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 1>how and what that tumble might look like and the

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>noises I'm going to make when it happens.

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for listening to Better Offline, The editor and

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 3>composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matasowski. You

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 3>can check out more of his music and audio projects

0:36:55.360 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 3>at Matasowski dot com, m a Ttoso w s Ki

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 3>dot com. You can email me at easy at Better

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Offline dot com or visit Better Offline dot com to

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 3>find more podcast links and of course, my newsletter. I

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 3>also really recommend you go to chat dot where's youreaed

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 3>dot at to visit the discord, and go to our slash.

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Better Offline to check out I'll Reddit. Thank you so

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 2>much for listening. Better Offline is a production of cool

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Zone Media.

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>For more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.