1 00:00:01,240 --> 00:00:08,640 Speaker 1: The Around the NFL Podcast has no takeaways. Welcome back 2 00:00:08,680 --> 00:00:11,159 Speaker 1: to another edition of the Around the NFL Podcast. My 3 00:00:11,240 --> 00:00:13,240 Speaker 1: name is Dan Hansis, and I'm joined by a room 4 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:17,200 Speaker 1: filled with some heroes. Chris Westling to my left, Greg 5 00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:20,240 Speaker 1: Rosenthal on my right. What is up? Boys? Don't sound 6 00:00:20,239 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 1: disappointed for some heroes, because we're gonna make up for 7 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:26,160 Speaker 1: Mark Sessler's loss and he's going to enjoy his vacation. 8 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:30,200 Speaker 1: Mark is not a vacation. By the way, I apologize 9 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:32,839 Speaker 1: if I sent a little congested. My young son has 10 00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:37,440 Speaker 1: has caused me to fall ill. It's head cold. Um. 11 00:00:37,479 --> 00:00:42,080 Speaker 1: But Mark is on a staycation, and you know when 12 00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:45,080 Speaker 1: Mark's on a staycation, all bets are off. Who knows 13 00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:46,839 Speaker 1: what he's doing? And I have By the way, I've 14 00:00:46,880 --> 00:00:48,760 Speaker 1: gotten a couple of tweets about Mark while we're on 15 00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:52,319 Speaker 1: the topic that, um, people are intrigued would be one 16 00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 1: word to use by his Instagram feed This from at 17 00:00:56,240 --> 00:00:59,600 Speaker 1: Heath O eight two. What the hell is going on 18 00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:02,360 Speaker 1: in mark Instagram? Please discuss on the next pot. You 19 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 1: guys are great well. First of all, thanks Heath, but 20 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:07,680 Speaker 1: I would say in my and west and Greg, I 21 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:11,360 Speaker 1: don't know how close you follow Mark on Instagram. I 22 00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:13,120 Speaker 1: would say that it's kind of a look into the 23 00:01:13,160 --> 00:01:16,160 Speaker 1: id of Mark Sessler, a little peek behind the curtain. 24 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:20,399 Speaker 1: I haven't been following Instagram closely at all, so uh 25 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:23,479 Speaker 1: it surprises me that people are, you know, have all 26 00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:26,360 Speaker 1: all these strong takes on Mark's Instagram. I would just 27 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:29,039 Speaker 1: say Mark is a man of many talents, and the 28 00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:33,280 Speaker 1: Instagram account is showing off some of that photography talent 29 00:01:33,319 --> 00:01:35,720 Speaker 1: that he's got cooking right, and I think the allusion 30 00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:37,560 Speaker 1: to like what the hell is going on? There's sometimes 31 00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:40,679 Speaker 1: there's pictures of like dolls from the eighteen hundreds, or 32 00:01:40,760 --> 00:01:43,320 Speaker 1: just a dewey meadow or a street in downtown l A. 33 00:01:43,360 --> 00:01:45,920 Speaker 1: It's all over the map. There's a purpose behind what 34 00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:48,240 Speaker 1: he postsled I'm sure there is. It's not for them 35 00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:51,040 Speaker 1: to know, and he keeps it mysterious on purpose. Of course, 36 00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 1: we do not keep it mysterious when it comes to, uh, 37 00:01:53,760 --> 00:01:56,120 Speaker 1: you know, talking about what's going to happen on today's show. 38 00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:59,240 Speaker 1: I'm gonna lay it all out for you here, Hey 39 00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 1: like that TV behind the glass, Thank you, buddy boy. Um. 40 00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:05,800 Speaker 1: We are going to get into some news and we 41 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:09,200 Speaker 1: have some fairly big stuff to get to about major 42 00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:12,679 Speaker 1: change in the rules and uh, the flate gate. I 43 00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:15,400 Speaker 1: would say it's something that it's starting to wind down, 44 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:18,280 Speaker 1: but it's just the next chapter really ultimately, but after 45 00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:20,440 Speaker 1: we get through the news, it's something that a tease 46 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:23,280 Speaker 1: for a bit. Now when we decided downstairs this morning 47 00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:27,280 Speaker 1: that this is the day to do it the Dalton 48 00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 1: Scale around the NFL special, We're gonna really dig in 49 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:34,200 Speaker 1: on the Dalton Scale and really, you know, get to 50 00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:38,520 Speaker 1: the bottom of it and maybe personally speaking, get some 51 00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:41,680 Speaker 1: clarity on you know, what the hell it is. I 52 00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 1: it wouldn't be too confident about that. Three years in 53 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:47,919 Speaker 1: Hansas is just still trying to figure out Queerced Wesseling's 54 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:54,079 Speaker 1: amazing dissection, beautiful in its simplicity, like the best scientific formulas. 55 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:58,400 Speaker 1: It was it decides whether you have a franchise quarterback 56 00:02:58,480 --> 00:03:01,399 Speaker 1: or not. The Dalton scale is under in an existential crisis, 57 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:05,880 Speaker 1: so perfect time to get into it. So yes that 58 00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:07,640 Speaker 1: that will be the rest of the show, will you know, 59 00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:09,359 Speaker 1: getting you know, set us on a nice chunk of 60 00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:11,280 Speaker 1: time to really dig in on the Dalton scale and 61 00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: where all of the starters in the NFL fit in. Uh, 62 00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:18,399 Speaker 1: whether it's franchise quarterback or whether you are a stiff 63 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:22,720 Speaker 1: um TV behind the glass? How are you? Formally? Now, 64 00:03:22,760 --> 00:03:24,519 Speaker 1: I will say, how are you about? What's going on? Guys? 65 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:26,360 Speaker 1: I'm doing well? Had a good as cy bow for 66 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:29,919 Speaker 1: lunch today? What a cybow? You guys? Will you guys 67 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: will get down with the whole aside. Why are you 68 00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 1: telling that? Even the right way to pronounce it? Yeah, 69 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:40,400 Speaker 1: what is it about? Is it meat? No? No, it's 70 00:03:40,440 --> 00:03:44,120 Speaker 1: like a super fruit sup of food. Why are you 71 00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:46,120 Speaker 1: telling us this? Guys? That's what I did. You know 72 00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:48,040 Speaker 1: this was your one chance to get in Mark's good 73 00:03:48,040 --> 00:03:50,680 Speaker 1: graces by talking about a fruit based lunch, and you 74 00:03:50,800 --> 00:03:53,440 Speaker 1: let it go by the board. Maybe that was on purpose. 75 00:03:53,600 --> 00:03:59,880 Speaker 1: I'm just hypnotized by Mark's Instagram right now. Let's this 76 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:06,560 Speaker 1: news podcasts are great radios boring, you know, I love 77 00:04:06,680 --> 00:04:10,120 Speaker 1: disease or I like him. I should say, but we've 78 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,160 Speaker 1: heard that before. We have heard that before. It's a 79 00:04:12,160 --> 00:04:14,520 Speaker 1: good place order because to pull the car in back 80 00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:16,640 Speaker 1: a little bit. Our service of down actually had a 81 00:04:16,720 --> 00:04:21,000 Speaker 1: nice Don drepe of Madman, you know, not for today, 82 00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:24,880 Speaker 1: but you and by the way, you know, when we 83 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:27,920 Speaker 1: were getting ready to roll today we started talking about 84 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:31,160 Speaker 1: mad Men. You said no spoilers, right, no spoilers. I 85 00:04:31,200 --> 00:04:33,400 Speaker 1: shouldn't know the finale was this past I'm just saying it. 86 00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:36,880 Speaker 1: When it comes to a serious finale, especially one of this, 87 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:38,800 Speaker 1: have you even been watching the show at all? I 88 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:42,800 Speaker 1: have you prestige televisions two days? It is two days? 89 00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:45,560 Speaker 1: Is you get twenty four hours? Tops? I haven't kept 90 00:04:45,640 --> 00:04:48,520 Speaker 1: up with this season when the spoiler is in play. 91 00:04:48,640 --> 00:04:52,440 Speaker 1: I watched the first two of the season this past Sunday. 92 00:04:52,600 --> 00:04:59,320 Speaker 1: Spoiler people are creeps. Money rules the world? And uh yeah, 93 00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:01,760 Speaker 1: don Draper getting assassinated. It's not something you would have 94 00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:05,120 Speaker 1: seen coming. But that's say at you because now that's 95 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:09,360 Speaker 1: off the table as a possibility. Okay, take that one 96 00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:12,000 Speaker 1: out of your quiver and Dreper not gunned down? T 97 00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:14,760 Speaker 1: D deduces. All right, here we go. Let's start with 98 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:19,600 Speaker 1: the latest in in deflate Gate. Robert Kraft, speaking at 99 00:05:19,600 --> 00:05:24,039 Speaker 1: the Spring League meeting on Tuesday, called off the dogs. 100 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:27,320 Speaker 1: He told he told a group of reporters in a 101 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:33,080 Speaker 1: six minute um speech or not speech, but six minute address, that, uh, 102 00:05:33,120 --> 00:05:38,080 Speaker 1: the Patriots will not appeal the discipline. Uh connected to 103 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:40,640 Speaker 1: the investigation of the use of underinflated balls in the 104 00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:43,120 Speaker 1: a f C title game, So that one million dollar 105 00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:45,200 Speaker 1: fine and the loss of a loss of a first 106 00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:47,880 Speaker 1: round pick in two thousand sixteen, in a fourth round 107 00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:50,520 Speaker 1: pick in two thousand seventeen, They're just gonna eat it. 108 00:05:50,640 --> 00:05:53,800 Speaker 1: That's what it is, um and Kraft went on to 109 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:57,640 Speaker 1: explain the reason why is that, Uh, you know, there 110 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,560 Speaker 1: should be no no reason why one should be put 111 00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:02,520 Speaker 1: ahead of the other thirty two teams, he said, And 112 00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:05,480 Speaker 1: even though he disagrees with the discipline and the judgment, 113 00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:07,599 Speaker 1: he feels like this has been dragged out way too 114 00:06:07,640 --> 00:06:10,080 Speaker 1: long already and they need to move on. So he says, 115 00:06:10,080 --> 00:06:13,000 Speaker 1: the Patriots are done now. Minutes after Craft gets off 116 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: the stage, you ask, oh, what about Tom Brady? The 117 00:06:15,320 --> 00:06:18,280 Speaker 1: NFL p A releases a tweet explaining that the Tom 118 00:06:18,279 --> 00:06:22,400 Speaker 1: Brady appeal is on and it is not going away 119 00:06:22,480 --> 00:06:25,120 Speaker 1: or as they try to wipe out or significantly reduced 120 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:28,520 Speaker 1: that four game suspension. So the Patriots take their punishment, 121 00:06:29,040 --> 00:06:32,359 Speaker 1: Brady continues his fight. I think it was an easy 122 00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:35,520 Speaker 1: move relatively for Robert Craft to make because he knows 123 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:40,000 Speaker 1: that Tom Brady is going to continue his fight and maybe, 124 00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:43,960 Speaker 1: just maybe this helps their chances of having Tom Brady 125 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:46,799 Speaker 1: listened to by Roger Goodell and having a suspension reduced, 126 00:06:46,839 --> 00:06:49,480 Speaker 1: and ultimately that's what they care about more. They didn't 127 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:52,520 Speaker 1: want to get into some gigantic legal battle with the NFL. 128 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: I agree, and I think it's well set up now. 129 00:06:55,480 --> 00:06:57,240 Speaker 1: Not not that any of us know what direction this 130 00:06:57,279 --> 00:06:59,320 Speaker 1: is gonna go, because I don't think anybody thought that 131 00:06:59,800 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 1: this the plant was going to be this serious in 132 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:04,440 Speaker 1: the first place. That knocked everybody on their asses, but um, 133 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:10,440 Speaker 1: oh sorry, they're buttoxes. Do no need to market but glutes. 134 00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:13,120 Speaker 1: Glutes knocked them on our glutes. We didn't realize what 135 00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:15,320 Speaker 1: this cann happen. But now it seems set up to me. 136 00:07:15,720 --> 00:07:19,240 Speaker 1: All right, Kraft does the NFL solid says, I'm not 137 00:07:19,240 --> 00:07:22,239 Speaker 1: gonna take this to the courts and all that um stuff, 138 00:07:22,520 --> 00:07:24,320 Speaker 1: And now all you need to do, Rock is, you know, 139 00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:26,880 Speaker 1: cut down my quarterback suspension, cut it in half even 140 00:07:26,920 --> 00:07:29,880 Speaker 1: I'll probably take that, and that everybody kind of can 141 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:32,040 Speaker 1: move forward. That's how I see playing out West. Do 142 00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 1: you see an olpel branch coming from the Commissioner's office 143 00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:37,680 Speaker 1: or back channel politics, however you want to phrase it. 144 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:39,720 Speaker 1: I mean That's why it's a little depressing to me 145 00:07:39,920 --> 00:07:42,000 Speaker 1: that this is the way things are done in the world. 146 00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:46,000 Speaker 1: You think that actually a guy might fight for principle 147 00:07:46,080 --> 00:07:49,920 Speaker 1: and then he basically he capitulates, leaves his fan base 148 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:53,960 Speaker 1: hanging high and dry. Fan base. I'm a little bit ambivalent. 149 00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:56,520 Speaker 1: I liked it. He made it a point to say 150 00:07:56,560 --> 00:07:58,920 Speaker 1: that he wants the rhetoric to die down, because that 151 00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:02,280 Speaker 1: was my biggest problem with this whole controversy all along, 152 00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: that the rhetoric, rhetoric was just so far outpacing what 153 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:08,120 Speaker 1: actually happened building. And he alluded to that too. He 154 00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:10,559 Speaker 1: said four months later, I can't believe we're still talking 155 00:08:10,560 --> 00:08:13,480 Speaker 1: about this and it needs to end. And he tried 156 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:15,880 Speaker 1: to make the case he's gonna do what's best for 157 00:08:15,920 --> 00:08:19,200 Speaker 1: the other thirty two owners rather than just thinking about 158 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:22,600 Speaker 1: the Patriots, which is how the NFL model is really built. 159 00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:28,320 Speaker 1: But let's back off calling you know, Mr Kraft, Mr 160 00:08:28,720 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 1: I'm gonna call Mr Raft. Let's back off and let's 161 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:33,400 Speaker 1: calling him a winner today or they wow, what a 162 00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:36,320 Speaker 1: great movie. He really played this great. It's like everyone 163 00:08:36,360 --> 00:08:40,320 Speaker 1: looks bad here. He knows it. The Wells Context Report 164 00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:43,160 Speaker 1: dot Com or whatever is still up. That thing was, 165 00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:45,760 Speaker 1: you know, kind of crazy, and it just came from 166 00:08:45,800 --> 00:08:48,720 Speaker 1: the Patriots just a few days ago. So well, he said, 167 00:08:48,840 --> 00:08:50,800 Speaker 1: it's great to back away from the table. But Big 168 00:08:50,960 --> 00:08:53,560 Speaker 1: even said if even to just because he didn't take 169 00:08:53,559 --> 00:08:56,200 Speaker 1: any questions afterwards. So I think he wanted to cover 170 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:57,880 Speaker 1: himself a little bit on that because it is pretty 171 00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:02,520 Speaker 1: wild that that why that WordPress rambling word press document 172 00:09:02,559 --> 00:09:05,079 Speaker 1: comes out and then you know, five days later or 173 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:07,199 Speaker 1: whatever it is, he says, oh, we're not gonna appeal. 174 00:09:07,679 --> 00:09:09,960 Speaker 1: Uh he So he he said that if if this 175 00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:11,720 Speaker 1: would have been a week ago, I probably would not 176 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:14,320 Speaker 1: have had this opinion about how to move forward. But 177 00:09:14,640 --> 00:09:17,080 Speaker 1: you know, given another week, I've decided to move on. 178 00:09:17,640 --> 00:09:20,640 Speaker 1: Uh yeah, And that's good news forever. And just one 179 00:09:20,679 --> 00:09:24,640 Speaker 1: other bit of information, The Union also formally has requested 180 00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:27,640 Speaker 1: Goodell to recuse himself one of my favorite words in 181 00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:32,200 Speaker 1: legal mumbo jumbo, recuse recuse himself from Tom Brady's appeal. 182 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:35,440 Speaker 1: Because Goodell has the power to heal, to hear his 183 00:09:35,559 --> 00:09:38,319 Speaker 1: own an appeal of his own ruling, which seems a 184 00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:40,040 Speaker 1: little weird and needs to be fixed. I would think 185 00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:42,920 Speaker 1: that by the next CBA, maybe that was partly. That 186 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 1: was a big part of the negotiation, and he gave 187 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:48,200 Speaker 1: up some of that power, but not all. And when 188 00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:50,160 Speaker 1: we were last in the studio, we were debating, and 189 00:09:50,200 --> 00:09:53,120 Speaker 1: no one thought that Goodell would appointed himself, and that's 190 00:09:53,120 --> 00:09:55,520 Speaker 1: exactly what he did. And now he gets to meet 191 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:58,200 Speaker 1: with Brady himself, and now he he does hear it himself, 192 00:09:58,280 --> 00:10:01,240 Speaker 1: and then he slashes Brady's suspension. That's the prediction of 193 00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:05,360 Speaker 1: the union's fault for giving in to that request during 194 00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:06,800 Speaker 1: the last c b A. That was one of the 195 00:10:06,920 --> 00:10:09,240 Speaker 1: few things at the end that they couldn't agree on 196 00:10:09,280 --> 00:10:11,319 Speaker 1: in the union capitulated to that one. I do want 197 00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:12,920 Speaker 1: to one thing about that. And we hear it again 198 00:10:12,960 --> 00:10:15,080 Speaker 1: and again that the union got killed off that last 199 00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:18,559 Speaker 1: c b A. But you know, maybe if they didn't, 200 00:10:18,640 --> 00:10:20,160 Speaker 1: if they didn't back down, there would have been no 201 00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:22,360 Speaker 1: two thousand eleven season. It was headed in a pretty 202 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:24,360 Speaker 1: dark direction. So as a football fan, you know, but 203 00:10:24,400 --> 00:10:27,440 Speaker 1: I don't understand why writers really care whether the union 204 00:10:27,600 --> 00:10:33,000 Speaker 1: is killed right, people really get into that, who oh, yeah, 205 00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:35,559 Speaker 1: they really lost because they only got fifty nine point 206 00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:38,960 Speaker 1: five of the total money instead of eight. It's like 207 00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:41,960 Speaker 1: I'm always rooting for football, right, I don't care about 208 00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:43,880 Speaker 1: the players or the owners. Give me the best product, 209 00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:45,920 Speaker 1: which is why I'm happy with with everything that happened 210 00:10:45,960 --> 00:10:47,440 Speaker 1: with Craft, and if only because we don't have to 211 00:10:47,440 --> 00:10:50,080 Speaker 1: write about this stuff and hopefully it ends faster exactly, 212 00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 1: all right, Moving on to some on the field. A 213 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:55,760 Speaker 1: big change that went down. It was voted through at 214 00:10:55,760 --> 00:10:59,920 Speaker 1: the same meetings Spring league meetings on Tuesday. The NFL 215 00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:04,360 Speaker 1: has moved too, moved extra points to the fifteen yard line. 216 00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:08,440 Speaker 1: Uh for the two thousand fifteen season. Uh. That will 217 00:11:08,440 --> 00:11:12,200 Speaker 1: make it officially a what is that thirty three thirty 218 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:16,719 Speaker 1: three yard extra point attempt? Which is obviously a lot 219 00:11:16,760 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 1: tougher than the seventeen yard attempt. Well, maybe not a 220 00:11:19,280 --> 00:11:23,280 Speaker 1: lot tougher, but it is significantly harder, harder kick than 221 00:11:23,440 --> 00:11:26,840 Speaker 1: the seventeen yard er. Uh. The two point conversion which 222 00:11:26,880 --> 00:11:29,080 Speaker 1: the Eagles had proposed moving that from the two to 223 00:11:29,120 --> 00:11:31,839 Speaker 1: the one that did not happen. However, you now can 224 00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:35,080 Speaker 1: return a two point conversion of fumble recovery or an 225 00:11:35,080 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 1: interception the other way and get two points for the defense. 226 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:41,240 Speaker 1: That's a new rule. So those are the changes. The 227 00:11:41,280 --> 00:11:43,400 Speaker 1: extra point got a little bit tougher and the two 228 00:11:43,440 --> 00:11:46,120 Speaker 1: point conversion, there's a little more risk on the offensive 229 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:50,040 Speaker 1: side of the ball. West has pumped up about this him. 230 00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:53,240 Speaker 1: This excited a break. West, You're gonna be the two 231 00:11:53,280 --> 00:11:56,559 Speaker 1: point conversion rule change beat writer for the rest of 232 00:11:56,600 --> 00:11:59,480 Speaker 1: the season. Tracking all the changes is the first scoring 233 00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:04,800 Speaker 1: change in in the NFL. It's gonna be less extra points. 234 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:07,600 Speaker 1: The extra point was the most pointless or the most 235 00:12:07,679 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 1: useless play in sports, so this is gonna be the 236 00:12:09,800 --> 00:12:13,559 Speaker 1: second most useless. Now, I mean, the best free throw 237 00:12:13,600 --> 00:12:18,120 Speaker 1: shooter in NBA history Larry Bird, No, but close. But 238 00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:22,600 Speaker 1: even if he is, he didn't make. Which is about 239 00:12:23,080 --> 00:12:27,199 Speaker 1: you're going to make? How do you know it could 240 00:12:27,240 --> 00:12:30,120 Speaker 1: be Steve Kerr? I don't know, maybe Steph Curry. Let's 241 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:32,280 Speaker 1: stop down the podcast and find out who best. Keep 242 00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 1: going West keeping. I think the point is, when you're 243 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 1: watching a riveting basketball game, stop in the action to 244 00:12:38,559 --> 00:12:41,320 Speaker 1: watch a guy's shoot free throws is not fun, and 245 00:12:41,800 --> 00:12:44,880 Speaker 1: the NFL extra point is still basically a free throw. Steven, 246 00:12:44,880 --> 00:12:47,920 Speaker 1: how is this a fun off season story? It's It's 247 00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:49,880 Speaker 1: not the biggest deal in the world. It is Steve Nash, 248 00:12:49,920 --> 00:12:53,600 Speaker 1: by the way, I wouldn't have known that's percentage nine 249 00:12:53,840 --> 00:12:56,280 Speaker 1: point four. Okay, so the kickers are going to do 250 00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:59,199 Speaker 1: better than that. It's funny. Nine point four is the 251 00:12:59,280 --> 00:13:03,480 Speaker 1: number because Dean Blandino explained they moved it to the 252 00:13:03,520 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 1: fifteen yard line specifically because that was the cut off 253 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:12,679 Speaker 1: between ninety and they wanted it to be about that. 254 00:13:12,840 --> 00:13:14,800 Speaker 1: The owners felt to it it was too low if 255 00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:18,439 Speaker 1: it got below so half measure. I agree with that. 256 00:13:18,600 --> 00:13:20,760 Speaker 1: If measure, I wish they just moved it back. But 257 00:13:20,840 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 1: anything that involves more two point conversion or adds a 258 00:13:23,920 --> 00:13:28,439 Speaker 1: little more suspense, why not? Is why I don't. I 259 00:13:28,480 --> 00:13:30,400 Speaker 1: don't like it is because it is a half measure, 260 00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:33,120 Speaker 1: because well, all you're really doing ultimate because you didn't 261 00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:36,400 Speaker 1: make the two point conversion anymore enticing. In fact, to me, 262 00:13:36,480 --> 00:13:38,679 Speaker 1: you made it more dangerous by having the defense be 263 00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:41,280 Speaker 1: able to score points off it. And what all we're 264 00:13:41,320 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 1: doing here? That's fun. That'll happen like three times a 265 00:13:43,920 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 1: year and that'll be Can we worry about that in October? Then? Um, 266 00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:51,720 Speaker 1: all we're really setting this up for is the freaking 267 00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:55,560 Speaker 1: kickers to be deciding games on extra points. That was 268 00:13:55,840 --> 00:13:57,480 Speaker 1: That's been my issue this whole time, is like, oh, 269 00:13:57,520 --> 00:13:59,599 Speaker 1: how do we fix the extra point. Don't fix it 270 00:13:59,679 --> 00:14:02,400 Speaker 1: by make the game more important and leaning on the kickers. 271 00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:04,760 Speaker 1: The kickers have enough on their plate. We don't want 272 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 1: them to side of it. I mean, they should get rid. 273 00:14:07,040 --> 00:14:08,720 Speaker 1: They should have moved the two point conversion to the 274 00:14:08,760 --> 00:14:11,960 Speaker 1: one and really made the extra point almost an afterthought 275 00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:14,760 Speaker 1: in my mind. Really go for it and only leave 276 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:16,319 Speaker 1: it to the Joe Filman's of the world to be 277 00:14:16,400 --> 00:14:18,800 Speaker 1: kicking thirty five yard field goals extra points, you know 278 00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:20,880 Speaker 1: what I mean. Instead, what we're gonna have a situation 279 00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:25,000 Speaker 1: is guy's missing extra points and teams losing. The human 280 00:14:25,080 --> 00:14:29,440 Speaker 1: history is is filled with half measures that lead to progress. 281 00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 1: You know, you gotta moves. You gotta move it back 282 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:34,240 Speaker 1: a little bit before you get rid of it. More 283 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:38,480 Speaker 1: filled with the law of unintended unintended consequences. Okay, what's 284 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:41,000 Speaker 1: gonna happen here? You don't know. That's one of the 285 00:14:41,040 --> 00:14:43,320 Speaker 1: thing about the law of unintended conta You don't see 286 00:14:43,320 --> 00:14:45,480 Speaker 1: it ahead of time. This from Pro Football Focus thirty 287 00:14:45,560 --> 00:14:49,680 Speaker 1: to thirty five yard field goal accuracy in fourteen by 288 00:14:49,720 --> 00:14:53,200 Speaker 1: location left hash ninety one point six, center ninety seven 289 00:14:53,200 --> 00:14:57,600 Speaker 1: point six right hash. This is always center. It's gonna 290 00:14:57,640 --> 00:15:00,360 Speaker 1: be the center hash for an extra point of tempts. 291 00:15:00,400 --> 00:15:02,920 Speaker 1: So it's a big no change. It's not gonna be 292 00:15:02,960 --> 00:15:05,840 Speaker 1: a big difference. Teams are gonna go for two like 293 00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:08,400 Speaker 1: four times a year instead it twice, Right, I saw 294 00:15:08,480 --> 00:15:11,880 Speaker 1: something on average most teams around that's that amazed me. 295 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:16,000 Speaker 1: Only about two even less than three two point conversion 296 00:15:16,080 --> 00:15:19,760 Speaker 1: tries every point that this is a non story. Hey, 297 00:15:19,760 --> 00:15:22,240 Speaker 1: one of the most exciting plays that led to the 298 00:15:22,280 --> 00:15:25,000 Speaker 1: Seahawks winning the Super Bowl two point conversion I mean 299 00:15:25,040 --> 00:15:27,360 Speaker 1: making the Super Bowl. I mean that Russell Wilson plays 300 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:29,720 Speaker 1: one of the most underrated plays in NFL history. That's 301 00:15:29,720 --> 00:15:33,200 Speaker 1: the exception rather than the rule. Moving on, there is 302 00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:37,280 Speaker 1: another UH stalwart defensive player on the forty Niners. Moving on, 303 00:15:37,760 --> 00:15:41,920 Speaker 1: defensive tackle Justin Smith has decided to retire. UH. This 304 00:15:42,080 --> 00:15:45,880 Speaker 1: after Smith went through a long period of uh you know, 305 00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:48,160 Speaker 1: questioning whether he wanted to come back. He met with 306 00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:51,280 Speaker 1: the Niners last week and the decision was made that 307 00:15:51,840 --> 00:15:55,920 Speaker 1: after fourteen seasons, seven of which spent with the forty Niners, 308 00:15:55,960 --> 00:15:59,560 Speaker 1: after seven in Cincinnati, five time Pro bowler decides to 309 00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:02,000 Speaker 1: shut it down. And this was his quote. When you 310 00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 1: get on the bald tires. You're on the bald tires. 311 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:07,560 Speaker 1: It was just time for me to move on. Greg 312 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:10,960 Speaker 1: Justin Smith, in your opinion and your estimation, one of 313 00:16:10,960 --> 00:16:15,320 Speaker 1: the unheralded great NFL players since the turn of the century. Yeah, well, 314 00:16:15,360 --> 00:16:18,600 Speaker 1: his career spans that entire time, because he came into 315 00:16:18,600 --> 00:16:21,600 Speaker 1: the league right after two thousand came in. What's going 316 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:26,120 Speaker 1: to happen? You know everyone was didn't you have a 317 00:16:26,120 --> 00:16:28,960 Speaker 1: white two K story? Or that was Mark Sel? What 318 00:16:29,160 --> 00:16:31,160 Speaker 1: was it? When I was working at the law firm, 319 00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:34,480 Speaker 1: I was in charge of UH making sure that all 320 00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:38,560 Speaker 1: of the programs were complicit with kids. There was a 321 00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:43,440 Speaker 1: lot of data. I'm so happy you're here. That was Justin. 322 00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:47,800 Speaker 1: Justin Smith was a very good starter in Cincinnati that 323 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:49,760 Speaker 1: didn't get a lot of love because he played for 324 00:16:49,800 --> 00:16:52,640 Speaker 1: a lousy team. And you know, his specialties don't make 325 00:16:52,760 --> 00:16:54,920 Speaker 1: Sports Center. He's not getting sacks. He was more of 326 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:57,120 Speaker 1: a run stuffer. I think of him as one of 327 00:16:57,160 --> 00:17:00,680 Speaker 1: the pure strongest players of the last routine years. I mean, 328 00:17:00,720 --> 00:17:03,040 Speaker 1: he could pick up guys and move them and when 329 00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:06,400 Speaker 1: he went to San Francisco. To me, he's almost He's 330 00:17:06,440 --> 00:17:09,760 Speaker 1: just as memorable as Patrick Willis as the leader of 331 00:17:09,760 --> 00:17:12,600 Speaker 1: that defense with Harbaugh because he's kind of like he 332 00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:15,840 Speaker 1: was their leader when uh, when I broke up with 333 00:17:15,920 --> 00:17:19,399 Speaker 1: my first girlfriend, my dad had some really good, uh 334 00:17:19,640 --> 00:17:23,119 Speaker 1: advice for me. Timing is everything in life. If I 335 00:17:23,160 --> 00:17:25,240 Speaker 1: had met her when I was thirty, it would have 336 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:27,280 Speaker 1: been much better than meeting or at seventeen or eighteen 337 00:17:27,359 --> 00:17:30,680 Speaker 1: or whatever. So Justin Smith, timing is everything. He came 338 00:17:30,680 --> 00:17:32,680 Speaker 1: in with the Bengals under Dick Lebou when they were 339 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:35,359 Speaker 1: they were still kind of down the rabbit hole as 340 00:17:35,359 --> 00:17:38,680 Speaker 1: a franchise, and just like Greg said, Justin Smith wasn't 341 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:41,800 Speaker 1: get any attention. That coaching staff was also not developing 342 00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:43,919 Speaker 1: players as well as they should have. And I think 343 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:47,040 Speaker 1: it's worth noting that Justin Smith doesn't get a single 344 00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:49,760 Speaker 1: Pro Bowl nod in his what eight years with the 345 00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:52,360 Speaker 1: Bengals and seven years with the Bengals, and then immediately 346 00:17:52,400 --> 00:17:54,719 Speaker 1: gets five in his first six years with the forty niners. 347 00:17:55,040 --> 00:17:56,960 Speaker 1: He could he could be a twelve or thirteen Pro 348 00:17:57,000 --> 00:17:59,480 Speaker 1: Bowl guy, which would be a guy you'd talk about 349 00:17:59,480 --> 00:18:01,840 Speaker 1: for the Hall of Fame. I think he'll be mentioned, 350 00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:04,160 Speaker 1: but I don't think he'll get into that final fifteen 351 00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:06,600 Speaker 1: doesn't seem like or if he came along with the 352 00:18:06,640 --> 00:18:09,719 Speaker 1: Bengals in two thousand ten, right, probably what I had 353 00:18:09,720 --> 00:18:12,720 Speaker 1: a better career, great couple of plays. I remember in 354 00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:15,320 Speaker 1: the two thousand eleven season before we move on, where 355 00:18:15,560 --> 00:18:18,560 Speaker 1: he basically had game saving or game winning plays, and 356 00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:20,479 Speaker 1: there was a lot of talk that he might be 357 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:24,080 Speaker 1: the defensive player of the Year that year. Uh, he 358 00:18:24,160 --> 00:18:26,360 Speaker 1: was really the favorite throughout most of it. It ended 359 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:28,199 Speaker 1: up being through all Suggs kind of beating him at 360 00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:30,080 Speaker 1: the end. I think he finished third in the voting 361 00:18:30,080 --> 00:18:33,199 Speaker 1: in the end. But but a great player. Salutations in 362 00:18:33,200 --> 00:18:35,359 Speaker 1: this forty Niners defense has a lot of note names 363 00:18:35,359 --> 00:18:37,960 Speaker 1: in it we don't know. Yeah, congrats Justin Smith on 364 00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:40,880 Speaker 1: a great career. Hey Wes the y two K compliance, 365 00:18:41,000 --> 00:18:43,440 Speaker 1: he couldn't have been more dismissed when you were when 366 00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:46,199 Speaker 1: you were you do all the work. I assume a 367 00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:48,399 Speaker 1: lot of it was done in December runt work or 368 00:18:48,400 --> 00:18:50,080 Speaker 1: whether it was this, I think it was like a 369 00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:52,760 Speaker 1: year long thing. Jesus. So it wasn't something I was 370 00:18:52,800 --> 00:18:54,400 Speaker 1: doing eight hours a day. It was something I had 371 00:18:54,440 --> 00:18:56,720 Speaker 1: to do in addition to other work. It was just 372 00:18:56,720 --> 00:18:59,240 Speaker 1: like when you have free time make sure you x 373 00:18:59,320 --> 00:19:02,040 Speaker 1: out all these extra zeros or whatever. I don't know. 374 00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:04,080 Speaker 1: So where were you on the p pens scale at 375 00:19:04,119 --> 00:19:08,280 Speaker 1: like eleven fifty eight zero one zero? If if anything 376 00:19:08,280 --> 00:19:09,800 Speaker 1: would have gone wrong, it wouldn't have been my fault. 377 00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:11,520 Speaker 1: I was just doing what I was told. I thought 378 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:13,600 Speaker 1: you were leading the charge. Now I was told that 379 00:19:13,640 --> 00:19:15,800 Speaker 1: this stuff should be exed out or whatever for what. 380 00:19:16,119 --> 00:19:18,600 Speaker 1: Nobody ever knew why Y two K was important. You 381 00:19:18,640 --> 00:19:21,160 Speaker 1: were just told that it could well basically disaster construct 382 00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:23,840 Speaker 1: like the millennials listening right now that we're six or whatever, 383 00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:27,760 Speaker 1: when basically what you were told is that all the 384 00:19:27,760 --> 00:19:30,080 Speaker 1: traffic lights would stop working and everyone would die in 385 00:19:30,080 --> 00:19:32,359 Speaker 1: a car accident at the same time. Yeah, this was 386 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:34,960 Speaker 1: a law firm where I was in charge of records management, 387 00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:38,719 Speaker 1: and they were a little worried about retention policies on 388 00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:41,960 Speaker 1: old files, which in legal terms, you can get a 389 00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:44,280 Speaker 1: lot of trouble if you lose track of your old files, 390 00:19:45,200 --> 00:19:47,439 Speaker 1: estate planning, you know, all this stuff, because people need 391 00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:49,400 Speaker 1: their files to have a whole separate podcast on that. 392 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:51,560 Speaker 1: It would have been great if all of your how 393 00:19:51,560 --> 00:19:55,400 Speaker 1: many brothers six if you all went it became lawyers 394 00:19:55,400 --> 00:19:57,320 Speaker 1: and then opened a firm and be Wesley and Westling 395 00:19:57,359 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 1: and Wesley and Westley and Wesley and Wesley and Westling. 396 00:20:01,400 --> 00:20:06,520 Speaker 1: All right, even we could represent the one. Alright. Moving 397 00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:09,480 Speaker 1: on to Ryan Tannehill, who is a very He was 398 00:20:09,520 --> 00:20:12,320 Speaker 1: already a rich band. Let's face it, it's a nice 399 00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:15,040 Speaker 1: life this Ryan Tannehill has. But now he's even Richard. 400 00:20:15,040 --> 00:20:17,920 Speaker 1: He signs a mega deal with the Dolphins, an extension 401 00:20:17,960 --> 00:20:22,440 Speaker 1: through the season, the team announced on Monday. Six year 402 00:20:22,440 --> 00:20:25,760 Speaker 1: old uh signs a four year deal include seventy seven 403 00:20:25,760 --> 00:20:30,119 Speaker 1: million and new money UM and twenty five million is 404 00:20:30,119 --> 00:20:33,679 Speaker 1: fully guaranteed with I guess million in let's put it 405 00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:35,720 Speaker 1: in air quotes guarantees over the life of the deal, 406 00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:38,320 Speaker 1: but there are some outs for the Dolphins, but fully 407 00:20:38,359 --> 00:20:41,680 Speaker 1: guaranteed four more years to his deal. So Ryan Tannehill 408 00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:46,439 Speaker 1: now getting paid like a star franchise quarterback or in 409 00:20:46,480 --> 00:20:49,639 Speaker 1: that range. Greg. He's getting paid like a mid level, 410 00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:53,199 Speaker 1: mid to upper tier starter, which is I think what 411 00:20:53,320 --> 00:20:55,040 Speaker 1: he is. I don't think he's getting more than that. 412 00:20:55,080 --> 00:20:57,800 Speaker 1: If you look at the deal, he's only getting only 413 00:20:58,080 --> 00:21:00,919 Speaker 1: getting thirty nine million over the next three years. So 414 00:21:00,960 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 1: that's thirteen million dollars a year and at that point 415 00:21:03,720 --> 00:21:05,640 Speaker 1: they can get rid of him, so they're paying him 416 00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:09,119 Speaker 1: like he's Andy Dalton. Basically, yeah, right around Andy Dalton, 417 00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:12,159 Speaker 1: similar to Colin Kaepernick. He got a little more money 418 00:21:12,160 --> 00:21:14,760 Speaker 1: on the back end if if they want to keep him, 419 00:21:14,960 --> 00:21:17,399 Speaker 1: he'll he'll be at a higher salary nineteen million. But 420 00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:19,400 Speaker 1: if you think about it, if he's a top ten 421 00:21:19,480 --> 00:21:24,919 Speaker 1: quarterback in twenty seventeen, that's nineteen million dollars not going 422 00:21:24,960 --> 00:21:26,960 Speaker 1: to be a bad price at all. I like how 423 00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:29,800 Speaker 1: the agent sold this in all the Miami papers today, 424 00:21:29,840 --> 00:21:32,840 Speaker 1: that he's top six or seven and pay ye give 425 00:21:32,840 --> 00:21:36,280 Speaker 1: me a break. And then I love this line. He's 426 00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:38,760 Speaker 1: talking about how great the contract is for taking Hill 427 00:21:38,800 --> 00:21:41,280 Speaker 1: and then he says, I fully believe that we may 428 00:21:41,359 --> 00:21:47,160 Speaker 1: end up regretting this deal one day. I think guy 429 00:21:47,200 --> 00:21:49,359 Speaker 1: has all the ingredients to be an elite player. No, 430 00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:52,879 Speaker 1: your job, mr, Agent, is to get the deal that 431 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:55,280 Speaker 1: takes advantage of those prime years. Or he's supposed to 432 00:21:55,320 --> 00:21:58,520 Speaker 1: be that good. You did a bad job. What's the 433 00:21:58,560 --> 00:22:02,600 Speaker 1: agent saying? I think that dies? Do you think? Ryan Tannehill? 434 00:22:02,920 --> 00:22:06,000 Speaker 1: I know this is you know, talk about speculative. If 435 00:22:06,040 --> 00:22:08,440 Speaker 1: you had to wage your you know your life on it. 436 00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:11,199 Speaker 1: Would you pick Ryan Tannehill as a member of the 437 00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: Miami Dolphins in twenty No, I'm not comfortable waging my life. Well, 438 00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:23,320 Speaker 1: you don't have a choice these things. I keep going 439 00:22:23,400 --> 00:22:25,360 Speaker 1: and I don't think it was a terrible decision lock 440 00:22:25,440 --> 00:22:27,679 Speaker 1: him up, but I maybe would. Ultimately, I might have 441 00:22:27,720 --> 00:22:31,159 Speaker 1: went the Ravens route with Joe Flacker. I know it 442 00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:33,400 Speaker 1: blew up in their face, but you know, boo who 443 00:22:33,440 --> 00:22:35,600 Speaker 1: you want a super Bowl title? Should have kind of 444 00:22:35,640 --> 00:22:37,560 Speaker 1: waited it out and given him another year. See where 445 00:22:37,560 --> 00:22:39,719 Speaker 1: this career is truly progressive. But they decided to just 446 00:22:39,760 --> 00:22:41,720 Speaker 1: go and call in and pay, and at least they 447 00:22:41,720 --> 00:22:44,040 Speaker 1: didn't break the bank. I guess that is the positive. 448 00:22:44,359 --> 00:22:48,439 Speaker 1: When happened last time, Mr t did this well, one 449 00:22:48,480 --> 00:22:53,080 Speaker 1: of the worst, most indefensible signings in NFL. There's more 450 00:22:53,160 --> 00:22:55,720 Speaker 1: to that. Not not defensible in anyway, but there. It 451 00:22:55,840 --> 00:22:59,320 Speaker 1: wasn't quite the same The Peyton Manning sweepstakes somehow bled 452 00:22:59,400 --> 00:23:02,760 Speaker 1: into the Sanchez associations. It was an apology. Yeah, I 453 00:23:02,760 --> 00:23:05,879 Speaker 1: never understood how Mark Sanchez deserves an apology. It was 454 00:23:05,960 --> 00:23:07,960 Speaker 1: it was the beginning of the end uh in so 455 00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:10,000 Speaker 1: many ways for a lot of the guys with the jets. 456 00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:13,880 Speaker 1: But uh, I did you brought up Tannenbaum not on 457 00:23:13,920 --> 00:23:17,159 Speaker 1: the on the dais uh for the press conference that 458 00:23:17,240 --> 00:23:20,399 Speaker 1: we got to enjoy And I'll say enjoy, uh, you know, 459 00:23:20,560 --> 00:23:25,400 Speaker 1: take that with a grain of salt. With h Dennis Hickey, Yeah, 460 00:23:25,440 --> 00:23:28,760 Speaker 1: the hickster we like to call him. Of course, Tannehill 461 00:23:28,880 --> 00:23:33,760 Speaker 1: dead center complete literally like maybe raises his voice about 462 00:23:33,800 --> 00:23:36,520 Speaker 1: at the same level Ivan Drago. There's not much going 463 00:23:36,560 --> 00:23:40,480 Speaker 1: on there. And then to his right, Joey Fildman, the 464 00:23:40,520 --> 00:23:44,520 Speaker 1: coach gets a seat. Remember the Sioux UH signing introductory signing. 465 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:46,320 Speaker 1: He wasn't even on the days they were sitting with 466 00:23:46,320 --> 00:23:48,640 Speaker 1: the journals a couple of pressures in a row where 467 00:23:48,680 --> 00:23:50,920 Speaker 1: he wasn't even on the days. So this time there 468 00:23:50,960 --> 00:23:53,679 Speaker 1: was no Mr t After seeing him today, I can 469 00:23:53,680 --> 00:23:55,320 Speaker 1: see why they leave him out in the cred It was. 470 00:23:55,359 --> 00:23:57,720 Speaker 1: It was the It was the most charisma free press 471 00:23:57,720 --> 00:23:59,920 Speaker 1: conference I ever seen. I tweeted, I did a power 472 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:03,520 Speaker 1: rankings of the charisma from the press comments. I got 473 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:05,800 Speaker 1: Tannehill at one, but that was really by default, just 474 00:24:05,800 --> 00:24:08,240 Speaker 1: because he's a young, handsome man with a lot of 475 00:24:08,240 --> 00:24:10,160 Speaker 1: money and a and a and a gorgeous white feel 476 00:24:10,640 --> 00:24:14,160 Speaker 1: the Staples short or whatever. Number two tape recorder number 477 00:24:14,160 --> 00:24:16,760 Speaker 1: two is my number two because it was white, so 478 00:24:16,800 --> 00:24:18,600 Speaker 1: it had a little h you know, heat to it 479 00:24:18,640 --> 00:24:20,639 Speaker 1: is a little different than the other ones. Three. Hickey 480 00:24:20,760 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 1: Hickster gets third, the Dolphins logo back backdrop that was 481 00:24:24,400 --> 00:24:27,200 Speaker 1: behind them. Fourth. Then they had three mikes for each 482 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:29,399 Speaker 1: of the guys. That's a three way tie. Five, six, seven, 483 00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:33,760 Speaker 1: and then Joey Fibbs. Well, it's a sad scene because 484 00:24:33,800 --> 00:24:37,040 Speaker 1: Tannehill makes Eli Manning looks like Chris Rock. I mean, 485 00:24:38,200 --> 00:24:40,359 Speaker 1: it was not an exciting guy, that wasn't it. The 486 00:24:40,520 --> 00:24:44,280 Speaker 1: two thousand four Titans have more charisma than that entire list. 487 00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:47,439 Speaker 1: It is amazing. There's no way Joe Philman is there 488 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:48,800 Speaker 1: next year. That was the other thing I couldn't get 489 00:24:48,840 --> 00:24:50,840 Speaker 1: out of him. Two things I couldn't get out of 490 00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:55,880 Speaker 1: mind about this contract. Number one, Joe Philman almost benched Tannehill. 491 00:24:57,200 --> 00:25:00,640 Speaker 1: Philipman Philbin Oh, yeah, Philippin, I thought you were saying, 492 00:25:00,640 --> 00:25:04,399 Speaker 1: Philip Joey Phipps. Joey Phipps almost bench Tannehill. And then 493 00:25:04,440 --> 00:25:07,520 Speaker 1: Tannehill called the press conference and announced he was the starter. 494 00:25:08,080 --> 00:25:10,359 Speaker 1: Took it out of hips and give him seventy seven 495 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:13,760 Speaker 1: million of a four years and then you know to 496 00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:15,760 Speaker 1: me that that really jumps out to me, is you 497 00:25:15,800 --> 00:25:19,480 Speaker 1: know what's going on with this organization. It is interesting that, 498 00:25:20,119 --> 00:25:22,840 Speaker 1: like you mentioned so recently, he was on the edge 499 00:25:22,840 --> 00:25:24,960 Speaker 1: of whether he's going to keep that job. He's really 500 00:25:25,000 --> 00:25:28,600 Speaker 1: tied to Bill Laser because his production went up so 501 00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:32,479 Speaker 1: dramatically with this new system, and you weren't sure if 502 00:25:32,520 --> 00:25:35,679 Speaker 1: it was all Tannehill or was it the system, And 503 00:25:35,760 --> 00:25:38,280 Speaker 1: so they need to be wary of the fact if 504 00:25:38,280 --> 00:25:41,040 Speaker 1: you fired Joe Philbin, you're probably firing Bill Laser and 505 00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:44,520 Speaker 1: then Tannehill starting over. That's a problem. I thought about 506 00:25:44,560 --> 00:25:48,639 Speaker 1: this because I've been talking about Tannehill. A large percentage 507 00:25:48,640 --> 00:25:51,480 Speaker 1: of his progress was due to this gimmick offense. The 508 00:25:51,520 --> 00:25:54,000 Speaker 1: Dolphins ran no huddle I believe eight two percent of 509 00:25:54,040 --> 00:25:57,240 Speaker 1: their plays last year, but the league average is over 510 00:25:57,280 --> 00:26:01,080 Speaker 1: six now. So no matter where Tannehill go is, he's 511 00:26:01,119 --> 00:26:02,800 Speaker 1: going to be in an offensive suits him better than 512 00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:05,160 Speaker 1: it would have five or six years ago. Now, one 513 00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:07,679 Speaker 1: last thing is, you know, I'm surprised he gets the 514 00:26:07,680 --> 00:26:11,439 Speaker 1: contract before Andrew Luck, before Russell Wilson. But when I 515 00:26:11,480 --> 00:26:14,159 Speaker 1: watched him during his rookie year. One of my favorite 516 00:26:14,160 --> 00:26:16,040 Speaker 1: things I got to do on the site was watched 517 00:26:16,080 --> 00:26:17,840 Speaker 1: each one of the rookies every snap. I mean, he 518 00:26:17,960 --> 00:26:20,639 Speaker 1: has every raw skill that you could want, and he 519 00:26:20,720 --> 00:26:23,520 Speaker 1: has improved every year. He does not have a good 520 00:26:23,600 --> 00:26:25,920 Speaker 1: deep ball at all. But if we're gonna give Chip 521 00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:28,840 Speaker 1: Kelly so much love for kind of creating an offense, 522 00:26:29,080 --> 00:26:31,639 Speaker 1: I mean, maybe Laser and Tannehill together they could be 523 00:26:31,680 --> 00:26:34,320 Speaker 1: a good thing. Imagine Ryan Tannehill and Chip Kelly's offense. 524 00:26:34,480 --> 00:26:40,600 Speaker 1: Maybe you don't need right now. He's wildly athletic, he's 525 00:26:40,640 --> 00:26:43,520 Speaker 1: pretty smart, he's pretty accurate. I mean, you've got a 526 00:26:43,520 --> 00:26:45,080 Speaker 1: lot of good things going. The other way to look 527 00:26:45,119 --> 00:26:46,639 Speaker 1: at that is he didn't even have as good of 528 00:26:46,640 --> 00:26:48,280 Speaker 1: a year as Nick Foles did two years ago, and 529 00:26:48,400 --> 00:26:50,960 Speaker 1: Nick Foles has already washed out of Philadelphia. How much 530 00:26:50,960 --> 00:26:53,600 Speaker 1: credit do you give to Tannehill versus the offense is 531 00:26:53,600 --> 00:26:56,520 Speaker 1: so quartered, more more talent, and more upside because he 532 00:26:56,520 --> 00:26:58,560 Speaker 1: hasn't played quarterback talent, but he can't go down the 533 00:26:58,560 --> 00:27:02,560 Speaker 1: field whatsoever. I found it telling, even in the highlights 534 00:27:02,560 --> 00:27:05,200 Speaker 1: when they're doing the press conference, everything seemed thinking dunk 535 00:27:05,200 --> 00:27:07,639 Speaker 1: with tannihel it is and it's a totally new team too, 536 00:27:07,640 --> 00:27:09,399 Speaker 1: which is a lot of pressure on him because his 537 00:27:09,600 --> 00:27:12,000 Speaker 1: three of his top four options are new players now, 538 00:27:12,080 --> 00:27:14,600 Speaker 1: so you gotta mix them now. You know, we talked 539 00:27:14,640 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 1: about Ryan Tannill. That's what's happening with the news, by 540 00:27:16,640 --> 00:27:19,680 Speaker 1: the way, we talked about Ryan Tannehill and uh and 541 00:27:19,760 --> 00:27:22,320 Speaker 1: you know, he's an interesting case because heat heat to 542 00:27:22,400 --> 00:27:25,200 Speaker 1: me and I think, um, I think we might all 543 00:27:25,240 --> 00:27:28,040 Speaker 1: be an agreement. He is definitely in that discussion about 544 00:27:28,080 --> 00:27:31,040 Speaker 1: the Dalton scale. And let's talk a little bit at 545 00:27:31,080 --> 00:27:33,479 Speaker 1: first about the the origins of the Dalton scale. Uh. 546 00:27:33,840 --> 00:27:36,800 Speaker 1: Chris Westlingh initially brought this up in the podcast a 547 00:27:36,800 --> 00:27:40,440 Speaker 1: couple of years ago that he believed that, uh Andy 548 00:27:40,480 --> 00:27:42,600 Speaker 1: Dalton was I guess what you would call the prime 549 00:27:42,640 --> 00:27:46,199 Speaker 1: meridian of NFL qbs. And if you were ahead of 550 00:27:46,520 --> 00:27:49,320 Speaker 1: Andy Dalton, well, how about this, West Do you have 551 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:53,520 Speaker 1: maybe a glossary explanation, because you know, famously I don't 552 00:27:53,880 --> 00:27:56,639 Speaker 1: quite grasp this at all. So I'm hoping by the 553 00:27:56,720 --> 00:27:59,840 Speaker 1: end of today's podcast it will be in my brain 554 00:27:59,880 --> 00:28:02,720 Speaker 1: a complete understanding of the Dalton scale. I don't I 555 00:28:02,720 --> 00:28:06,439 Speaker 1: wouldn't hold your breath. Is that a shot at my intelligence? No? 556 00:28:06,640 --> 00:28:09,400 Speaker 1: I used to be, but not anymore. Okay, that's fine, 557 00:28:09,440 --> 00:28:13,400 Speaker 1: that's fine. How about a glassary explanation or glassary term? 558 00:28:13,440 --> 00:28:16,320 Speaker 1: What is the Dalton scale? Andy Dalton stands as the 559 00:28:16,359 --> 00:28:19,560 Speaker 1: prime ridian of NFL quarterbacks. Sorry I stepped on your 560 00:28:19,560 --> 00:28:23,960 Speaker 1: primary new look. Any quarterback ranked above Dalton is a 561 00:28:24,040 --> 00:28:28,480 Speaker 1: viable franchise player. Any quarterback below Dalton is a problem, 562 00:28:28,480 --> 00:28:34,960 Speaker 1: not a solution. Dalton himself is quarterback purgatory personified very good. Basically, 563 00:28:35,200 --> 00:28:37,399 Speaker 1: to me, it always came down to the question, do 564 00:28:37,640 --> 00:28:40,840 Speaker 1: you have a do you need to get a new quarterback? 565 00:28:41,360 --> 00:28:45,840 Speaker 1: The answer is yes, then he's below the Dalton scale. 566 00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:47,760 Speaker 1: If if it's a. But if the answer is no, 567 00:28:48,640 --> 00:28:51,440 Speaker 1: then then you're okay. And if it's Andy Dalton, you 568 00:28:51,560 --> 00:28:54,240 Speaker 1: just you do. You're crazy, keep on going to the 569 00:28:54,240 --> 00:28:58,840 Speaker 1: playoffs and losing on Saturday. All right, So, before before 570 00:28:58,840 --> 00:29:00,600 Speaker 1: we get into we're gonna figure at some of these 571 00:29:00,680 --> 00:29:03,200 Speaker 1: quarterbacks that exist, we're gonna put our focus on the 572 00:29:03,240 --> 00:29:08,080 Speaker 1: quarterbacks that exist in that Dalton scale zone right where 573 00:29:08,120 --> 00:29:09,920 Speaker 1: around where Dalton is and what what side of the 574 00:29:09,960 --> 00:29:12,520 Speaker 1: line they've fallen. So before we get going we're gonna 575 00:29:12,560 --> 00:29:16,160 Speaker 1: throw out ten names, uh that aren't even in the discussion, 576 00:29:16,160 --> 00:29:20,520 Speaker 1: because we're all in agreement, are obvious franchise solutions at 577 00:29:20,520 --> 00:29:23,040 Speaker 1: this stage and are not in this discussion. So in 578 00:29:23,080 --> 00:29:25,640 Speaker 1: alphabetical order. I don't want anyone to think of This 579 00:29:25,720 --> 00:29:29,080 Speaker 1: is not a countdown or power rankings of the best quarterbacks. Okay, 580 00:29:29,440 --> 00:29:32,560 Speaker 1: although I like Europe getting involved, and I mean our 581 00:29:32,600 --> 00:29:36,120 Speaker 1: podcast listeners in Europe, and also the eighties rock band, 582 00:29:36,160 --> 00:29:41,760 Speaker 1: but Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Andrew Luck, Peyton Manning, Philip Rivers, 583 00:29:41,840 --> 00:29:46,600 Speaker 1: Aaron Rodgers, Ben Roethlisberger, Tony Romo, Matt Ryan, and Russell Wilson. 584 00:29:46,600 --> 00:29:53,600 Speaker 1: Those ten quarterbacks we have all agreed are above the 585 00:29:53,600 --> 00:29:55,880 Speaker 1: the Dalton scale, and I know that the goose bumps 586 00:29:55,880 --> 00:29:58,680 Speaker 1: all across the nation. With these quarterbacks, we will not 587 00:29:58,760 --> 00:30:01,800 Speaker 1: be any much closer my list to Andy Dalton, and 588 00:30:01,840 --> 00:30:05,480 Speaker 1: he is I guess on either of yours. Okay, fair enough, Um, 589 00:30:05,680 --> 00:30:07,400 Speaker 1: we can get into that now. On the other side 590 00:30:07,400 --> 00:30:10,520 Speaker 1: of the discussion, some quarterbacks and this one, you guys, 591 00:30:10,600 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 1: stop me if I'm out of bounds. Let's okay, let's 592 00:30:13,800 --> 00:30:18,760 Speaker 1: define our parameters here. First, we're talking about going forward 593 00:30:18,800 --> 00:30:20,960 Speaker 1: with your franchise, not just for the two thousand and 594 00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:24,920 Speaker 1: fifteen season, but going forward. Who do you want as 595 00:30:24,960 --> 00:30:29,200 Speaker 1: your quarterback? Okay, stop me. If any of these guys 596 00:30:29,400 --> 00:30:31,920 Speaker 1: you're like, well, I might want him part of my franchise. 597 00:30:31,960 --> 00:30:37,480 Speaker 1: Matt Castle, e j Manuel, Gino Smith hard pause for 598 00:30:37,520 --> 00:30:40,400 Speaker 1: Greg to defend him. Now, I think Gina Smith has 599 00:30:40,440 --> 00:30:44,560 Speaker 1: the potential to someday be above uh the Dalton on 600 00:30:44,560 --> 00:30:46,560 Speaker 1: the Dalton scale, but he's definitely not right. Would have 601 00:30:46,600 --> 00:30:52,520 Speaker 1: to Ryan Fitzpatrick, Josh McCown, Johnny Manziel, Ryan Mallett, Brian Hoyer, 602 00:30:53,240 --> 00:30:57,280 Speaker 1: Ryan Linley, Uh, all those other guys, Blake Bortles I 603 00:30:57,280 --> 00:31:00,320 Speaker 1: put there unless somebody wants to put Linley low the 604 00:31:00,440 --> 00:31:05,360 Speaker 1: blame Gabbard scale. Uh, Blake Bortles, bords I have way 605 00:31:05,400 --> 00:31:09,560 Speaker 1: above Dalton. Really WHOA All right, well, let me let 606 00:31:09,560 --> 00:31:11,920 Speaker 1: me take him off this little the sad list. But again, 607 00:31:12,160 --> 00:31:14,800 Speaker 1: this is where the existential crisis comes in for the 608 00:31:14,880 --> 00:31:17,200 Speaker 1: Dalton scale. I feel like there has to be an 609 00:31:17,200 --> 00:31:21,120 Speaker 1: offseason scale, in an in season scale. When this started, 610 00:31:21,280 --> 00:31:24,120 Speaker 1: any Dalton was a competitive advantage making two million dollars 611 00:31:24,160 --> 00:31:27,560 Speaker 1: a year. Now he's a competitive disadvantage making million year 612 00:31:27,680 --> 00:31:30,920 Speaker 1: don't worry about the contract. It's but team you have 613 00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:34,200 Speaker 1: to worry about the contract. But either way, he's your 614 00:31:34,360 --> 00:31:38,360 Speaker 1: He's a quarterback that's not getting in the way enough 615 00:31:38,400 --> 00:31:40,920 Speaker 1: of a ten, ten and sixth season. He's basically kind 616 00:31:40,920 --> 00:31:44,560 Speaker 1: of keeping them afloat moving forward. At this point, are 617 00:31:44,560 --> 00:31:48,200 Speaker 1: you confident Blake Bordos will ever be a better than 618 00:31:48,320 --> 00:31:50,840 Speaker 1: average starter? I like Bordles a lot, but I don't 619 00:31:50,880 --> 00:31:54,360 Speaker 1: even know for sure. That's why I'm changing this. There's 620 00:31:54,360 --> 00:31:58,120 Speaker 1: an existential crisis because Blake Bortles isn't a franchise quarterback. 621 00:31:58,200 --> 00:32:00,760 Speaker 1: But at this point, I know what Andy Dalton is 622 00:32:01,360 --> 00:32:02,960 Speaker 1: and I don't want that. I don't want ten and 623 00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:05,280 Speaker 1: six in the first round playoff exit. I'll take my 624 00:32:05,400 --> 00:32:07,720 Speaker 1: chances with whether I saw from Blake Blake Bortles in 625 00:32:07,760 --> 00:32:10,680 Speaker 1: the preseason last year, when he showed difference making potential. 626 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:12,760 Speaker 1: To me, it's more about right now, though, isn't it. 627 00:32:12,760 --> 00:32:15,600 Speaker 1: It's whether right now they're above or But I thought 628 00:32:15,600 --> 00:32:18,040 Speaker 1: we said it was who's going to be your quarterback 629 00:32:18,120 --> 00:32:21,240 Speaker 1: for your franchise going forward? Okay, Just that's why it's 630 00:32:21,240 --> 00:32:23,320 Speaker 1: a different discussion in May than it is in October. 631 00:32:23,400 --> 00:32:25,760 Speaker 1: Just throw some phillups of this fire. On the earlier 632 00:32:25,960 --> 00:32:28,200 Speaker 1: DDF T show Today, Damage Like said that a lot 633 00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:31,080 Speaker 1: of g ms would take Andy Dalton over James Winson 634 00:32:31,120 --> 00:32:35,040 Speaker 1: because Andy Dalton safer. I told him, no chance. Did 635 00:32:35,120 --> 00:32:38,160 Speaker 1: you see the package that the bucks in the title? 636 00:32:40,680 --> 00:32:45,880 Speaker 1: I agree with um okay, yeah, and maybe that famously. 637 00:32:45,880 --> 00:32:50,520 Speaker 1: I struggle famously, Greg. I struggle with the Dalton because 638 00:32:50,520 --> 00:32:53,560 Speaker 1: I've always wondered as as he seems to fade in 639 00:32:53,840 --> 00:32:55,680 Speaker 1: the collect or, at least in this room's view of 640 00:32:55,720 --> 00:32:58,120 Speaker 1: what kind of quarterback he is? What kind of upside 641 00:32:58,360 --> 00:33:00,600 Speaker 1: wouldn't that make more guys in front of him? And 642 00:33:00,600 --> 00:33:03,200 Speaker 1: then all those guys are answers? Is he's still the 643 00:33:03,240 --> 00:33:05,880 Speaker 1: primary idiot? If he starts to regret, I don't think 644 00:33:06,920 --> 00:33:10,080 Speaker 1: I I disagree, because just because he's entrenched in his 645 00:33:10,200 --> 00:33:13,640 Speaker 1: Andy Dalton nous, that's what he was all along. He's 646 00:33:13,680 --> 00:33:17,640 Speaker 1: always been. He's there's a lot better quarterbacks now than 647 00:33:17,680 --> 00:33:19,320 Speaker 1: the World Cup. He's always been that middle of the 648 00:33:19,360 --> 00:33:22,920 Speaker 1: pack guy. I've done the Quarterback Index or whatever where 649 00:33:22,920 --> 00:33:24,720 Speaker 1: I ranked the quarterbacks at the end of the year. 650 00:33:24,800 --> 00:33:27,600 Speaker 1: In two thousand thirteen, he was eighteen. Last year he 651 00:33:27,640 --> 00:33:29,920 Speaker 1: was nineteenth. For what it's worth, which to me feels 652 00:33:29,920 --> 00:33:32,680 Speaker 1: about right. And and so the guys that have proven 653 00:33:32,800 --> 00:33:35,000 Speaker 1: and I'll throw one name out here which we could 654 00:33:35,000 --> 00:33:38,200 Speaker 1: talk about, Teddy Bridgewater. To me, he's already above the 655 00:33:38,280 --> 00:33:40,760 Speaker 1: Dalton scale, but he would be the only one of 656 00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:43,600 Speaker 1: last year's rookies that I would put above there now 657 00:33:43,800 --> 00:33:46,360 Speaker 1: that I would be surprised at this point if he 658 00:33:46,480 --> 00:33:49,520 Speaker 1: does not evolve into a better than average starting quarterback. 659 00:33:49,640 --> 00:33:51,880 Speaker 1: I think you and I are looking at this exercise differently. 660 00:33:51,880 --> 00:33:53,960 Speaker 1: We need to come to an agreement, and we better 661 00:33:54,000 --> 00:33:56,880 Speaker 1: do it because because I threw it out there, we're 662 00:33:56,920 --> 00:33:59,840 Speaker 1: talking about who do you want for your franchise going forward. 663 00:33:59,840 --> 00:34:01,760 Speaker 1: It's seems like you're talking about only for the two 664 00:34:01,760 --> 00:34:05,000 Speaker 1: thousand fifteen I'm talking about basically what they what they've done. 665 00:34:05,040 --> 00:34:07,120 Speaker 1: But I hear you, I would rather have Boarders than Dalton. 666 00:34:08,719 --> 00:34:11,839 Speaker 1: You'd rather take the risk that portals become something rather 667 00:34:11,880 --> 00:34:14,120 Speaker 1: than knowing what you have with Andy Dalton. That's fair. 668 00:34:14,200 --> 00:34:16,960 Speaker 1: Can I explain to people what Andy Dalton is? Right, 669 00:34:17,440 --> 00:34:22,120 Speaker 1: Let's talk about where Andy Alton is in fourteen prime 670 00:34:22,200 --> 00:34:25,280 Speaker 1: time and playoff games. Andy Dalton is the same amount 671 00:34:25,280 --> 00:34:27,520 Speaker 1: of starts as EJ. Manuel has in his career. Andy 672 00:34:27,640 --> 00:34:30,239 Speaker 1: Dalt would have to have three lights out games to 673 00:34:30,400 --> 00:34:36,160 Speaker 1: reach EJ. Manuel's one loss record, completion percentage, touchdown to 674 00:34:36,200 --> 00:34:40,000 Speaker 1: interception ratio, and passer rating in those games. That's how 675 00:34:40,040 --> 00:34:42,600 Speaker 1: bad Andy Dalton has been in games that matter. He's 676 00:34:42,600 --> 00:34:45,279 Speaker 1: a flat track bully, is what cricket players would call 677 00:34:45,560 --> 00:34:50,400 Speaker 1: a guy who feasts on inferior competition. His record thirty 678 00:34:50,440 --> 00:34:54,200 Speaker 1: sixteen and one and all other games besides games basically 679 00:34:54,560 --> 00:34:56,560 Speaker 1: when the when the lights are on him. So to me, 680 00:34:57,640 --> 00:34:59,719 Speaker 1: that's not what I want in a quarterback. Okay, So 681 00:34:59,760 --> 00:35:02,279 Speaker 1: he's guy that puts up solid numbers, he gets his 682 00:35:02,520 --> 00:35:06,560 Speaker 1: or he's on playoff teams. He's already always fall flat 683 00:35:06,600 --> 00:35:09,400 Speaker 1: in the playoffs. Not always his fault this past January. 684 00:35:09,400 --> 00:35:12,120 Speaker 1: You're not gonna hang that uh first round playoff whoss 685 00:35:12,120 --> 00:35:14,040 Speaker 1: on Dalton, but certainly he wasn't good enough to raise 686 00:35:14,080 --> 00:35:16,399 Speaker 1: the team above the issues they were dealing with. Let's 687 00:35:16,520 --> 00:35:18,839 Speaker 1: let's stick with Bortles for one more second, because I 688 00:35:18,920 --> 00:35:22,520 Speaker 1: disagree where Greg You're coming from on that. To me, 689 00:35:22,760 --> 00:35:25,359 Speaker 1: if we're talking about the Dalton scale, you gotta earn 690 00:35:25,400 --> 00:35:27,400 Speaker 1: your way on the other side of that Dalton scale. 691 00:35:27,640 --> 00:35:30,920 Speaker 1: And I didn't think Bortles did anything uh last year 692 00:35:30,960 --> 00:35:32,800 Speaker 1: to show me that he's a guy. And we're again 693 00:35:32,840 --> 00:35:37,400 Speaker 1: we're going off West's glossary of terms here that uh, 694 00:35:37,440 --> 00:35:39,560 Speaker 1: he is on the other side of the primarndy And 695 00:35:39,760 --> 00:35:44,000 Speaker 1: what was the exact wording West? You had any quarterback 696 00:35:44,080 --> 00:35:46,520 Speaker 1: ranked above Dalton is a viable franchise player, and we 697 00:35:46,560 --> 00:35:49,319 Speaker 1: don't know below Dalton is a problem. We don't know 698 00:35:50,200 --> 00:35:53,240 Speaker 1: is a viable franchise I don't like the definition anymore 699 00:35:53,280 --> 00:35:56,880 Speaker 1: because I'm definitely taking here and would be surprised if 700 00:35:56,880 --> 00:35:59,959 Speaker 1: anybody's not taking Bortles over Dalton. Portals to me show 701 00:36:00,000 --> 00:36:03,759 Speaker 1: it enough, just in terms of his traits and if 702 00:36:03,760 --> 00:36:06,759 Speaker 1: you looked at the situation around him, if you put 703 00:36:06,800 --> 00:36:10,920 Speaker 1: Andy Dalton on that Jaguars team, maybe he would have 704 00:36:10,960 --> 00:36:13,040 Speaker 1: been a little better as a rookie. But Bordles showed 705 00:36:13,040 --> 00:36:14,839 Speaker 1: the types of things that you like to see out 706 00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:16,440 Speaker 1: of a young quarterback that you think he can be 707 00:36:16,480 --> 00:36:18,600 Speaker 1: a lot better. And Dalton, on the other hand, even 708 00:36:18,600 --> 00:36:21,360 Speaker 1: though he had that year in two thousand thirteen, people 709 00:36:21,360 --> 00:36:24,160 Speaker 1: think of he was so great. He had yards, thirty 710 00:36:24,160 --> 00:36:28,959 Speaker 1: three touchdowns s his QBR in his first four seasons 711 00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:35,560 Speaker 1: are unbelievably similar forty ninety nine fifty five, so he's 712 00:36:35,600 --> 00:36:38,319 Speaker 1: basically been the same guy all four years. Let me 713 00:36:38,360 --> 00:36:41,400 Speaker 1: explain this in a more simpler way. If your choice 714 00:36:41,440 --> 00:36:44,880 Speaker 1: is between Blake Bortles and Andy Dalton, Bordles carries no 715 00:36:45,000 --> 00:36:48,600 Speaker 1: risk whatsoever because if he flames out, you're not left 716 00:36:48,640 --> 00:36:51,239 Speaker 1: with Andy Dalton, overpaid at fifteen million dollars a year 717 00:36:51,560 --> 00:36:56,520 Speaker 1: and stuck in mediocrity. You know that's there's no downside 718 00:36:56,520 --> 00:36:59,719 Speaker 1: to it, and the downside to whipping on a getting five, 719 00:37:00,239 --> 00:37:02,440 Speaker 1: yeah and get it's fun. Obviously now it is. There 720 00:37:02,480 --> 00:37:04,839 Speaker 1: is guaranteed money, maybe not as much, but then you're 721 00:37:04,880 --> 00:37:07,399 Speaker 1: basically when you with on a pick like that, your 722 00:37:07,400 --> 00:37:10,520 Speaker 1: franchise sticks, isn't mud for years. You have a much 723 00:37:10,560 --> 00:37:14,160 Speaker 1: better chance of building a Super Bowl contender with a 724 00:37:14,239 --> 00:37:17,480 Speaker 1: three million dollar quarterback who has all the tools versus 725 00:37:17,480 --> 00:37:20,839 Speaker 1: a guy like Andy Dalton, who really might stop you 726 00:37:21,040 --> 00:37:24,120 Speaker 1: from signing some of your key players because you've got 727 00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:28,600 Speaker 1: him making a few million dollars more than Carlos. Let's 728 00:37:28,640 --> 00:37:33,759 Speaker 1: not get carried away. He's making sixteen million annually over 729 00:37:33,800 --> 00:37:35,760 Speaker 1: the length of his deal. Let me throw another player 730 00:37:35,800 --> 00:37:39,880 Speaker 1: out there, Sam Bradford, He to me, is right on 731 00:37:39,880 --> 00:37:43,600 Speaker 1: that line where you could go either way. Do you 732 00:37:43,800 --> 00:37:45,960 Speaker 1: see him as a part of the solution or part 733 00:37:45,960 --> 00:37:48,920 Speaker 1: of the problem. I have him five spots ahead of 734 00:37:48,960 --> 00:37:52,080 Speaker 1: Andy Dalton. Now he went for a first round pick 735 00:37:52,120 --> 00:37:54,080 Speaker 1: if he was on the Rams, though, would you feel 736 00:37:54,160 --> 00:37:57,520 Speaker 1: that way? It shouldn't matter what team he's on, You 737 00:37:57,560 --> 00:38:00,200 Speaker 1: know what I mean? It's just Sam brand sure. I 738 00:38:00,239 --> 00:38:02,040 Speaker 1: would say to that is that if someone is smart, 739 00:38:02,040 --> 00:38:04,319 Speaker 1: as Chip Kelly sees value in him, that factors into 740 00:38:04,360 --> 00:38:07,840 Speaker 1: the equation. I have a hard time putting him above 741 00:38:08,360 --> 00:38:11,120 Speaker 1: the Dalton scale right now because I don't really have 742 00:38:11,239 --> 00:38:13,840 Speaker 1: any faith. He hasn't shown much when he has been healthy, 743 00:38:13,840 --> 00:38:15,920 Speaker 1: and I don't have any faith that he will stay healthy. 744 00:38:16,000 --> 00:38:18,640 Speaker 1: So I actually think and Andy Dalton would would have 745 00:38:18,680 --> 00:38:21,480 Speaker 1: the edge there. I agree. I think back to back 746 00:38:21,560 --> 00:38:25,080 Speaker 1: knee injuries and the fact that, as far as I'm concerned, uh, 747 00:38:25,239 --> 00:38:27,480 Speaker 1: Chip Kelly's plan was to flip Bradford all along and 748 00:38:27,520 --> 00:38:30,160 Speaker 1: now he's stuck with him. So I'm sure he believes 749 00:38:30,200 --> 00:38:32,680 Speaker 1: now that he's moving forward, he can turn Bradford into 750 00:38:33,640 --> 00:38:37,120 Speaker 1: a successful quarterback. But at the same time, everyone knows 751 00:38:37,360 --> 00:38:40,200 Speaker 1: what Chip wanted to do uh this month and it 752 00:38:40,200 --> 00:38:41,640 Speaker 1: didn't work out, and now he's going to try to 753 00:38:41,640 --> 00:38:44,400 Speaker 1: make the most of it with Bradford. How about I 754 00:38:44,480 --> 00:38:46,200 Speaker 1: disagree with that? All right, let's here. I don't think 755 00:38:46,239 --> 00:38:48,520 Speaker 1: that was ever like his plan all along with the 756 00:38:48,560 --> 00:38:50,799 Speaker 1: trade Bradford, I don't think I don't agree with it. 757 00:38:50,920 --> 00:38:53,160 Speaker 1: I think the funny thing is I'm putting him below that, 758 00:38:53,200 --> 00:38:55,600 Speaker 1: and yet it wouldn't surprise me if Sam Bradford wins 759 00:38:55,600 --> 00:38:58,120 Speaker 1: Comeback Player of the Year. And I think he's a 760 00:38:58,160 --> 00:39:00,160 Speaker 1: guy that could be on our making the leap list. 761 00:39:00,239 --> 00:39:01,920 Speaker 1: I think he's a guy who's set up to have 762 00:39:02,080 --> 00:39:04,440 Speaker 1: a monster season. But he's someone I feel like I 763 00:39:04,480 --> 00:39:06,319 Speaker 1: need to see it. With Andy Dalton, I've seen it. 764 00:39:06,440 --> 00:39:09,359 Speaker 1: How about Joe Flacco? Now I know Rayvensons. We're gonna 765 00:39:09,400 --> 00:39:12,040 Speaker 1: get some heat, uh for not including him in that 766 00:39:12,080 --> 00:39:14,799 Speaker 1: list of ten that weren't even the discussion. Uh. This 767 00:39:14,880 --> 00:39:17,439 Speaker 1: is a guy that has never missed a game, has 768 00:39:17,480 --> 00:39:20,760 Speaker 1: been as dependable as against maybe not a statistical stud 769 00:39:20,800 --> 00:39:22,799 Speaker 1: for most of his career, but he went on one 770 00:39:22,840 --> 00:39:25,239 Speaker 1: of the best postseason runs ever that culminated with a 771 00:39:25,280 --> 00:39:27,799 Speaker 1: Super Bowl m v P and a Super Bowl win 772 00:39:28,600 --> 00:39:31,520 Speaker 1: over the forty niners, and this past January he was 773 00:39:31,560 --> 00:39:34,480 Speaker 1: a stud at Giulette Stadium when Tote Toe of Peyton 774 00:39:34,480 --> 00:39:36,880 Speaker 1: Manning came out on the losing end, but again showed 775 00:39:36,880 --> 00:39:39,960 Speaker 1: that he's a playoff stud. I think he's absolutely on 776 00:39:40,120 --> 00:39:42,640 Speaker 1: the right side of this discussion. And I don't know 777 00:39:42,640 --> 00:39:44,839 Speaker 1: why would there would be any debate. I don't see 778 00:39:44,840 --> 00:39:47,080 Speaker 1: any debate. I have him as a top ten quarterback 779 00:39:47,400 --> 00:39:49,600 Speaker 1: and ten spots higher than Peyton Manning on my list. 780 00:39:49,719 --> 00:39:51,440 Speaker 1: I thought there was a question mark in one of 781 00:39:51,440 --> 00:39:53,960 Speaker 1: our initials. All right, good, I'm happy to hear no, no, no, 782 00:39:54,040 --> 00:39:56,160 Speaker 1: I just I didn't I was more a question mark. 783 00:39:56,200 --> 00:39:58,959 Speaker 1: Did you guys watch he was eleven on my list? 784 00:39:59,000 --> 00:40:01,120 Speaker 1: I agree it shouldn't be a debate. And he's someone 785 00:40:01,600 --> 00:40:04,440 Speaker 1: that's more impressive when you watch him, really than if 786 00:40:04,440 --> 00:40:06,920 Speaker 1: you just look at the night Colin Okay, Colin Kaepernick 787 00:40:06,920 --> 00:40:09,080 Speaker 1: San Francisco Forta on his quarterback. You know, he was 788 00:40:09,160 --> 00:40:11,120 Speaker 1: in that Super Bowl as well, there that flack it 789 00:40:11,160 --> 00:40:13,160 Speaker 1: was in and he was a stud in that game, 790 00:40:13,200 --> 00:40:15,640 Speaker 1: and he was a stud in that season, and yet 791 00:40:15,680 --> 00:40:18,799 Speaker 1: he's never really been able to take his game up 792 00:40:18,880 --> 00:40:21,680 Speaker 1: since then. In fact, it seems like he's really Plateau. 793 00:40:21,840 --> 00:40:23,840 Speaker 1: And now he's in a weird situation with the Niners 794 00:40:23,840 --> 00:40:28,120 Speaker 1: and Jim tom Sula, Jim Harbaugh has gone, I'm this 795 00:40:28,200 --> 00:40:30,919 Speaker 1: is crazy because remember we all we ever heard about 796 00:40:31,000 --> 00:40:33,040 Speaker 1: was oh my god, that Bengals could have had Colin 797 00:40:33,120 --> 00:40:36,040 Speaker 1: Kaepernick and they ended up with Antie Dalton. And now 798 00:40:36,080 --> 00:40:38,600 Speaker 1: I'm like, maybe it's not that it Wasn't that a 799 00:40:38,680 --> 00:40:41,359 Speaker 1: huge mistake And it's not. It doesn't seem as as 800 00:40:41,360 --> 00:40:43,799 Speaker 1: a backbreaking a mistake anymore as it once did. So 801 00:40:43,840 --> 00:40:45,880 Speaker 1: where are you putting him? I'm gonna put him just 802 00:40:46,040 --> 00:40:48,759 Speaker 1: above Dalton, but it's way closer than it was two 803 00:40:48,840 --> 00:40:53,520 Speaker 1: years ago. It is closer. I I'm still trusting that 804 00:40:53,600 --> 00:40:58,640 Speaker 1: initial flash of excitement with Kaepernick because the just the 805 00:40:59,239 --> 00:41:01,799 Speaker 1: skill set he has was enough to make someone who's 806 00:41:01,800 --> 00:41:04,759 Speaker 1: pretty smart about quarterbacks, Ron Jaworski, say that he's got 807 00:41:04,760 --> 00:41:07,880 Speaker 1: the skills to be the best quarterback ever. That was ridiculous, 808 00:41:07,880 --> 00:41:10,399 Speaker 1: which it was ridiculous, but you knew what he meant, 809 00:41:10,440 --> 00:41:12,520 Speaker 1: which is that this guy is like a if you 810 00:41:12,640 --> 00:41:15,439 Speaker 1: built a robot to play football, it'd be a lot 811 00:41:15,480 --> 00:41:17,959 Speaker 1: like Colin Kaepernick and me Andrew Luck, not Colin kaeper 812 00:41:18,320 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 1: that's fair. One thing. Also with Kaepernick, I could kind 813 00:41:22,120 --> 00:41:24,800 Speaker 1: of see he's in a bit of a career valley 814 00:41:24,840 --> 00:41:26,560 Speaker 1: maybe on some level right now, and I could still 815 00:41:26,600 --> 00:41:29,279 Speaker 1: see getting maybe a little bit worse before it gets better. 816 00:41:30,160 --> 00:41:33,319 Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised if the Tom's Tom seula era 817 00:41:33,400 --> 00:41:37,120 Speaker 1: doesn't last long and either he swept out Kaepernick or 818 00:41:37,239 --> 00:41:39,520 Speaker 1: Tom Seuela swept down and there's another fresh start. I'm 819 00:41:39,520 --> 00:41:41,839 Speaker 1: not giving up on Kaepernick, but I gotta I'm not 820 00:41:42,040 --> 00:41:43,959 Speaker 1: sold that things are gonna get turned around this season. 821 00:41:43,960 --> 00:41:46,960 Speaker 1: I'm putting him solidly above him. But I totally understand 822 00:41:47,000 --> 00:41:50,360 Speaker 1: the debate because West, who do you think played better 823 00:41:51,120 --> 00:41:56,120 Speaker 1: at football in two thousand fourteen? Andy Dalton or Kaepernick Kaepernick. 824 00:41:56,400 --> 00:41:59,759 Speaker 1: It's close, though it was, it was not a good 825 00:41:59,760 --> 00:42:01,840 Speaker 1: doll than year. Now, looking just at the two thousand 826 00:42:01,880 --> 00:42:05,319 Speaker 1: fourteen season, we can to cry small sample size, but 827 00:42:05,760 --> 00:42:09,480 Speaker 1: Colin Kaepernick's playoff he has a QBR over eighty and 828 00:42:09,560 --> 00:42:13,040 Speaker 1: Dalton has QBR under twenty. I mean to me, it's 829 00:42:13,040 --> 00:42:15,040 Speaker 1: not even close. You see what one guy can do 830 00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:16,680 Speaker 1: when the lights are on and the other guy doesn't. 831 00:42:17,080 --> 00:42:21,240 Speaker 1: Eli Manning. Uh again, I'm I'm way on the plus 832 00:42:21,280 --> 00:42:24,319 Speaker 1: side with this. Yeah he's us. Yeah, he's shown us 833 00:42:24,360 --> 00:42:26,000 Speaker 1: twice in the playoffs. He takes his game up and 834 00:42:26,040 --> 00:42:28,320 Speaker 1: Notch West. I know you haven't always been the biggest 835 00:42:28,320 --> 00:42:31,480 Speaker 1: Eli fan, but you know you've said that Odell Beckham 836 00:42:31,560 --> 00:42:33,880 Speaker 1: is a chance to take his career and make it 837 00:42:33,960 --> 00:42:37,719 Speaker 1: a more explosive over years to come. We think he's 838 00:42:37,760 --> 00:42:43,120 Speaker 1: safely above Andy Dalton. Correct. I have Eli Manning in 839 00:42:43,160 --> 00:42:46,880 Speaker 1: the top fifteen and I have Andy Dalton below. So yes, 840 00:42:47,120 --> 00:42:51,000 Speaker 1: what quarter backs that I want to go forward in? 841 00:42:51,080 --> 00:42:53,520 Speaker 1: My friends, you're basically dare you to fund a problem 842 00:42:53,600 --> 00:42:56,080 Speaker 1: with any of these guys? Any Well, how about let's 843 00:42:56,120 --> 00:42:58,600 Speaker 1: I know you gotta live here, should we do? We 844 00:42:58,640 --> 00:43:02,120 Speaker 1: want to hear West's twenty to twenty for sure? Throw 845 00:43:02,160 --> 00:43:06,920 Speaker 1: him out twenty Teddy Bridgewater? Okay, I'm definitely would you 846 00:43:06,960 --> 00:43:09,520 Speaker 1: take Bridgewater over Dalton? Dan? We should give our our 847 00:43:09,640 --> 00:43:17,160 Speaker 1: ruling one Carson Palmer. Carson Palmer, I don't know about that. 848 00:43:17,360 --> 00:43:20,360 Speaker 1: He has been the guy when I do these rankings 849 00:43:20,400 --> 00:43:22,400 Speaker 1: or whatever. Last year it was Palmer got hurt, But 850 00:43:22,520 --> 00:43:25,239 Speaker 1: even during the season, he to me is right at 851 00:43:25,280 --> 00:43:28,160 Speaker 1: the Dalton scale. It's funny because he's the guy Dalton 852 00:43:28,280 --> 00:43:32,640 Speaker 1: replaced thirteen and two in his last fifteen games passer 853 00:43:32,719 --> 00:43:35,960 Speaker 1: rating of nineties seven. Wait, we talked about that hasn't 854 00:43:36,000 --> 00:43:38,520 Speaker 1: been able to win loss stuff is mislead by the way. 855 00:43:38,560 --> 00:43:41,600 Speaker 1: I love it that you're talking about. Carson Palmer was 856 00:43:41,719 --> 00:43:44,600 Speaker 1: talking Carson Balmer, you can't hang it all at the 857 00:43:44,680 --> 00:43:48,320 Speaker 1: quarterback speed. We've We've talked about that the other direction 858 00:43:48,320 --> 00:43:51,120 Speaker 1: before in this very podcast, that it's unfair to to 859 00:43:51,200 --> 00:43:53,680 Speaker 1: take Andy Dalton winning ten games every year and put 860 00:43:53,719 --> 00:43:57,040 Speaker 1: it at his feet. This is well, I think thirteen 861 00:43:57,080 --> 00:43:58,839 Speaker 1: and two is a lot different than tendants. I wish 862 00:43:58,880 --> 00:44:00,960 Speaker 1: I could take a time machine back to two thousand 863 00:44:01,000 --> 00:44:04,120 Speaker 1: and ten or eleven and be like, hey, Wes, Greg 864 00:44:04,200 --> 00:44:09,160 Speaker 1: was right about Hey, Greg was right coaching matters. Carson 865 00:44:09,200 --> 00:44:11,719 Speaker 1: Palmer is excelling under the tutelage of Bruce. How about 866 00:44:11,760 --> 00:44:13,640 Speaker 1: the fact that he's coming off a second a c 867 00:44:13,800 --> 00:44:17,719 Speaker 1: l years old. I still want that over the purgatory, 868 00:44:17,800 --> 00:44:19,839 Speaker 1: that is, and Dalton not just for one season. You're 869 00:44:19,840 --> 00:44:23,720 Speaker 1: looking here's the exactly But like I said, I'm probably 870 00:44:23,719 --> 00:44:26,480 Speaker 1: gonna cut Andy Dalton next year anyway because he's overpaid. 871 00:44:26,520 --> 00:44:29,319 Speaker 1: You're struggling with the contract I'm thinking more just about 872 00:44:29,360 --> 00:44:32,080 Speaker 1: the player and for me, for Palmer. When I asked 873 00:44:32,080 --> 00:44:34,279 Speaker 1: the question, do you still need a quarterback if you 874 00:44:34,320 --> 00:44:36,839 Speaker 1: have Palmer? The answer to me is yes, because he 875 00:44:37,000 --> 00:44:40,719 Speaker 1: can't answer with Dalton, isn't it? Well, then he's not 876 00:44:40,800 --> 00:44:42,880 Speaker 1: the then he See. This is where I always get confused, 877 00:44:43,080 --> 00:44:45,560 Speaker 1: because then the Dalton scale doesn't work because if I 878 00:44:45,560 --> 00:44:48,720 Speaker 1: didn't know the answer, WHOA, but this is your scale. 879 00:44:48,840 --> 00:44:50,759 Speaker 1: I just told you the day I had this epiphany 880 00:44:50,840 --> 00:44:53,600 Speaker 1: that it's got an existential crisis. I was right all along. 881 00:44:54,040 --> 00:44:55,960 Speaker 1: Well it comes to work when he got paid two 882 00:44:56,000 --> 00:44:59,440 Speaker 1: million dollars. Make sense though, right thet see what does 883 00:44:59,520 --> 00:45:02,040 Speaker 1: make sense makes sense If you don't really know which 884 00:45:02,080 --> 00:45:04,600 Speaker 1: side Dalton is on Bengals, you know for sure that 885 00:45:04,600 --> 00:45:06,600 Speaker 1: means there's got to be someone to take his place, 886 00:45:06,920 --> 00:45:09,960 Speaker 1: like Carson Palmer. Maybe Andy Dalton should not be this 887 00:45:10,000 --> 00:45:12,520 Speaker 1: is about anymore? Oh, I like where you're going here. 888 00:45:13,080 --> 00:45:16,799 Speaker 1: It's a Palmer scale. Wow, this is a history being made. 889 00:45:16,960 --> 00:45:21,799 Speaker 1: During the podcast, we give West, we give West an assignment, 890 00:45:21,800 --> 00:45:25,560 Speaker 1: and suddenly he starts searching his soul. Bengals fans that 891 00:45:25,600 --> 00:45:27,600 Speaker 1: are out there, we feel your pain. This is what 892 00:45:27,680 --> 00:45:30,520 Speaker 1: Andy Dalton's doing to us. He's making us crazy. Palmer 893 00:45:30,520 --> 00:45:32,720 Speaker 1: scale has a ring to it. Could be the Palmer 894 00:45:32,760 --> 00:45:36,400 Speaker 1: scale this year? What about the Alex Smith Scale? WHOA, 895 00:45:36,920 --> 00:45:39,680 Speaker 1: that's that is a great name? Is that your next 896 00:45:39,719 --> 00:45:43,200 Speaker 1: on your alright? Alex Smith? Let's Alex Smith is twenty two. 897 00:45:43,280 --> 00:45:45,680 Speaker 1: I docked him about two or three spots just because 898 00:45:45,719 --> 00:45:48,360 Speaker 1: he's so boring to watch and if I was running 899 00:45:48,360 --> 00:45:50,120 Speaker 1: a team, I wouldn't want even watch my own team. 900 00:45:50,160 --> 00:45:55,600 Speaker 1: And a certain NFL media analyst, Elliott Harrison, put him 901 00:45:55,600 --> 00:45:58,600 Speaker 1: in his top ten quarterbacks, which he put up that 902 00:45:58,680 --> 00:46:00,800 Speaker 1: was published on the site. Well, like my quarterbacks to 903 00:46:00,800 --> 00:46:02,399 Speaker 1: be able to throw it more than seven yards down 904 00:46:02,520 --> 00:46:04,239 Speaker 1: or be willing to throw it more than seven yards 905 00:46:04,320 --> 00:46:06,640 Speaker 1: down the field. Can I just say, you know one 906 00:46:06,719 --> 00:46:09,200 Speaker 1: thing in his defense? I mean he's playing in in 907 00:46:09,320 --> 00:46:11,640 Speaker 1: Kansas City, and you know, nobody on the Around the 908 00:46:11,719 --> 00:46:14,520 Speaker 1: NFL podcast gets excited about the Chiefs. Really, what if 909 00:46:14,560 --> 00:46:19,480 Speaker 1: Alex was in a better situation and he's the biggest problem. 910 00:46:19,640 --> 00:46:21,600 Speaker 1: He's the most boring quarterback to watch, But if he 911 00:46:21,640 --> 00:46:24,240 Speaker 1: was playing in Kelly's offense, he would still be boring 912 00:46:24,280 --> 00:46:26,960 Speaker 1: to watch. He's, first of all, he's a good runner. 913 00:46:27,200 --> 00:46:30,200 Speaker 1: He maximizes everything he has. I think usually you give 914 00:46:30,239 --> 00:46:33,600 Speaker 1: people credit for in sports, like they run a totally 915 00:46:33,640 --> 00:46:36,279 Speaker 1: different offense than the rest of the league, and yet 916 00:46:36,320 --> 00:46:39,440 Speaker 1: they're pretty effective with it. So I think he is 917 00:46:39,480 --> 00:46:42,600 Speaker 1: a good case. Though he's one of the smartest NFL quarterbacks. 918 00:46:42,840 --> 00:46:44,759 Speaker 1: I think that part of his game is underrated. He 919 00:46:44,920 --> 00:46:47,920 Speaker 1: just doesn't trust his arm and there are a lot 920 00:46:47,960 --> 00:46:49,560 Speaker 1: of quarterbacks who wouldn't take it, or a lot of 921 00:46:49,560 --> 00:46:51,879 Speaker 1: coaches he wouldn't take him. If we're again going back 922 00:46:51,960 --> 00:46:54,040 Speaker 1: to is that the guy do you think you have 923 00:46:54,040 --> 00:46:55,520 Speaker 1: a quarterback? I don't think you do. I think you 924 00:46:55,560 --> 00:46:58,640 Speaker 1: have a bridge guy, maybe the best bridge guy, Alex Smith. 925 00:46:58,760 --> 00:47:01,160 Speaker 1: Don't see him as an answer. Chiefs fans would take 926 00:47:01,200 --> 00:47:03,880 Speaker 1: this as an insult. Andy Reid certainly would based on 927 00:47:03,920 --> 00:47:07,320 Speaker 1: the contracts he's been given. Andy's Alex Smith. But maybe 928 00:47:07,360 --> 00:47:09,759 Speaker 1: Alex Smith is the guy who's the twenty four. Is 929 00:47:09,800 --> 00:47:13,399 Speaker 1: that where we're at Cutler, Oh, he's a little higher 930 00:47:13,440 --> 00:47:15,480 Speaker 1: than I thought he'd be. That's a couple of spots 931 00:47:15,520 --> 00:47:19,160 Speaker 1: higher than I definitely don't think that's pretty low. It's 932 00:47:19,200 --> 00:47:22,520 Speaker 1: just that Dalton is wildly low. Well, Cutler's is the 933 00:47:22,560 --> 00:47:24,480 Speaker 1: same thing with Alex Smith. If I'm running the team, 934 00:47:24,480 --> 00:47:26,279 Speaker 1: I gotta watch this guy. I gotta hang out with 935 00:47:26,320 --> 00:47:31,960 Speaker 1: this dude. I'm definitely I'm putting Cutler definitely below if 936 00:47:31,960 --> 00:47:34,640 Speaker 1: they think they have their quarterback right exactly that that's 937 00:47:34,640 --> 00:47:39,040 Speaker 1: that hurts me because he picked up his option. They did, 938 00:47:39,080 --> 00:47:42,360 Speaker 1: but I don't. I still don't think it necess million guaranteed. 939 00:47:43,120 --> 00:47:47,000 Speaker 1: Mm hmm. That's tough one. If you if you have 940 00:47:47,120 --> 00:47:50,919 Speaker 1: Ja Cutler, there's a small chance that you can pull 941 00:47:50,960 --> 00:47:52,719 Speaker 1: a Flacco and catch lightning in the bottle in the 942 00:47:52,719 --> 00:47:55,560 Speaker 1: playoffs just by pure physical talent. I don't believe Andy 943 00:47:55,600 --> 00:47:58,920 Speaker 1: Dalton can Bears fans would argue the playoffs every year 944 00:47:58,960 --> 00:48:01,520 Speaker 1: sounds pretty good. Many times his Cutler got him there 945 00:48:01,560 --> 00:48:03,880 Speaker 1: to three. I'm glad Bears fans are now to the 946 00:48:03,880 --> 00:48:06,719 Speaker 1: point where I was four years ago on color Um. 947 00:48:07,200 --> 00:48:09,440 Speaker 1: There's a perfect guy to talk about there. That's a 948 00:48:09,480 --> 00:48:12,120 Speaker 1: tough one. The Cutler scale, well, no, I mean now, 949 00:48:12,160 --> 00:48:15,200 Speaker 1: I don't know. If he's a good guy, he's right 950 00:48:15,280 --> 00:48:17,279 Speaker 1: around it. I would put him under it. He's a 951 00:48:17,280 --> 00:48:20,279 Speaker 1: guy who's for the first time in his career, I 952 00:48:20,280 --> 00:48:24,080 Speaker 1: think he's below the Dalton scale. M How about we 953 00:48:24,120 --> 00:48:26,680 Speaker 1: haven't talked about him, and I would assume he's probably 954 00:48:26,680 --> 00:48:28,239 Speaker 1: ahead of the guy some of these recent guys we 955 00:48:28,320 --> 00:48:31,719 Speaker 1: talked about. But Cam Newton, Oh yeah, I got him 956 00:48:31,760 --> 00:48:35,360 Speaker 1: in the top ten. There was and an internal email 957 00:48:35,400 --> 00:48:37,520 Speaker 1: there was that he was not on the definite list. 958 00:48:37,560 --> 00:48:39,680 Speaker 1: That's why he wasn't one that was just for you guys, 959 00:48:39,680 --> 00:48:41,840 Speaker 1: because I didn't want to assume that you were just 960 00:48:41,920 --> 00:48:44,399 Speaker 1: going with my opinion. But yeah, I would definitely put 961 00:48:44,680 --> 00:48:50,080 Speaker 1: and we agree with Tannehill is definitely above Dalton, right, yeah, Tannehill. Okay, alright, 962 00:48:50,080 --> 00:48:56,120 Speaker 1: how about Matt Stafford. Yeah, he's a he's frustrating. I 963 00:48:56,120 --> 00:48:58,359 Speaker 1: wouldn't have him that high. Okay, This is where this 964 00:48:58,400 --> 00:49:02,680 Speaker 1: discussion gets tricky though, because as yes, he's above Andy Dalton, 965 00:49:02,760 --> 00:49:07,040 Speaker 1: but what a bit is he above Carson Palmer? Oh yeah, 966 00:49:07,360 --> 00:49:10,799 Speaker 1: not by that much. Last year I had him as 967 00:49:11,080 --> 00:49:14,520 Speaker 1: for what it's worth, for two thousand fourteen alone seventeen 968 00:49:14,680 --> 00:49:18,239 Speaker 1: that was right behind Kaepernick and Alex Smith. That's the 969 00:49:18,280 --> 00:49:20,719 Speaker 1: type of year that Matthew Stafford had. He did not 970 00:49:20,800 --> 00:49:23,160 Speaker 1: have a very good two thousand fourteen, but I think 971 00:49:23,160 --> 00:49:25,840 Speaker 1: he's had better years before. It's just frustrating because you 972 00:49:25,880 --> 00:49:30,359 Speaker 1: think he's gonna a lot of stock in two. I'm 973 00:49:30,400 --> 00:49:32,600 Speaker 1: just I'm just using that as my as my rough 974 00:49:32,600 --> 00:49:35,520 Speaker 1: guide to look ahead. To look at the names I have, 975 00:49:35,840 --> 00:49:38,880 Speaker 1: um n A next to Jamis Winston and Marcus Mariota. 976 00:49:38,960 --> 00:49:41,000 Speaker 1: We'll we'll wait and see. I've got them at least 977 00:49:41,000 --> 00:49:44,840 Speaker 1: ten spots higher than Andy Dalton, so without even playing 978 00:49:44,880 --> 00:49:47,360 Speaker 1: there above him. Well, I mean, what do you how 979 00:49:47,400 --> 00:49:50,240 Speaker 1: do you think NFL executives feel about this? They wouldn't 980 00:49:50,239 --> 00:49:52,600 Speaker 1: take three first round picks for I mean, the Bucks 981 00:49:52,600 --> 00:49:55,000 Speaker 1: wouldn't take three first round picks, and other teams were 982 00:49:55,040 --> 00:49:57,720 Speaker 1: offering that. I need to see it before. I wouldn't 983 00:49:57,719 --> 00:50:00,680 Speaker 1: put Mariota above it. I would put Winston. Come on, 984 00:50:00,719 --> 00:50:02,920 Speaker 1: you wouldn't. If you were given a choice to run 985 00:50:02,920 --> 00:50:05,840 Speaker 1: a franchise and it was between Andy Dalton and Marcus Mariotta, 986 00:50:06,280 --> 00:50:08,000 Speaker 1: you would be cursed to go eight and eight the 987 00:50:08,080 --> 00:50:09,480 Speaker 1: rest of your life, and you would deserve it. He 988 00:50:09,719 --> 00:50:13,560 Speaker 1: throws his hands up. I know, when did Greg become 989 00:50:13,640 --> 00:50:17,480 Speaker 1: this hothouse flower? It's more than Dalton scale. It's driving 990 00:50:17,520 --> 00:50:22,319 Speaker 1: it a crazy. I don't know what to today. I 991 00:50:22,360 --> 00:50:25,279 Speaker 1: thought it was an evaluation. How about this? Now I 992 00:50:25,320 --> 00:50:29,080 Speaker 1: have this category fringe slash Dalton. Part of the evaluation 993 00:50:29,200 --> 00:50:32,040 Speaker 1: is projecting quarterbacks into the future. You rather have how 994 00:50:32,080 --> 00:50:36,479 Speaker 1: about Derek Carr? Well, hang on, all right, everybody slow 995 00:50:36,520 --> 00:50:39,040 Speaker 1: down here fringe slash Dalton purgatory. I had Jay Cutler 996 00:50:39,080 --> 00:50:41,080 Speaker 1: on this list, but we moved him out. We talked 997 00:50:41,120 --> 00:50:45,959 Speaker 1: about him already. Derek Carr, Nick Foles and Robert Riven 998 00:50:46,000 --> 00:50:49,760 Speaker 1: the third I have those. Those are the three closest 999 00:50:49,760 --> 00:50:52,759 Speaker 1: guy to Andy Dalton on my list, and they are 1000 00:50:52,800 --> 00:50:55,520 Speaker 1: on yours as well. No, I have them, you know, 1001 00:50:55,760 --> 00:50:59,080 Speaker 1: far behind. Um Oh, okay, I have Derek Carr. I 1002 00:50:59,120 --> 00:51:01,239 Speaker 1: headed Dalton in It kind of pain me to do it. 1003 00:51:02,360 --> 00:51:04,120 Speaker 1: Car was. I mean, if you got to look at 1004 00:51:04,120 --> 00:51:07,520 Speaker 1: some of the stats on the Raiders last year historically 1005 00:51:07,560 --> 00:51:11,520 Speaker 1: inept at moving the football right, you can say, well not, 1006 00:51:12,120 --> 00:51:13,839 Speaker 1: you can't say the same thing, but you can look 1007 00:51:13,840 --> 00:51:17,080 Speaker 1: at some pretty nasty Blake Bortles stats to last year 1008 00:51:17,600 --> 00:51:21,239 Speaker 1: and you have him well ahead of Yeah. I saw 1009 00:51:21,320 --> 00:51:23,879 Speaker 1: more out of portals by a lot, and I would 1010 00:51:23,960 --> 00:51:28,319 Speaker 1: put car behind Dalton on this, But now the whole 1011 00:51:28,360 --> 00:51:33,800 Speaker 1: scale is confused. Now it's problematic because if Dalton passes 1012 00:51:33,880 --> 00:51:36,960 Speaker 1: up the whole scale, if we are in agreeance that 1013 00:51:37,040 --> 00:51:39,280 Speaker 1: he is that far down or even near that area. 1014 00:51:39,560 --> 00:51:44,759 Speaker 1: He's gotta be out, we gotta, we gotta change. I'm in, 1015 00:51:44,880 --> 00:51:48,960 Speaker 1: I'm around. You've got Mariota below him, and I don't 1016 00:51:48,960 --> 00:51:52,120 Speaker 1: believe for a second you would do that, Nick Foles. 1017 00:51:52,760 --> 00:51:55,080 Speaker 1: I have him one spot below Dalton, just because I 1018 00:51:55,120 --> 00:51:58,480 Speaker 1: saw him way too much inaccuracy and bad to me. 1019 00:51:58,600 --> 00:52:01,080 Speaker 1: Going back again to the term this guy the answer 1020 00:52:01,239 --> 00:52:03,719 Speaker 1: or is he the problem? He's not an answer. I'm 1021 00:52:03,760 --> 00:52:05,960 Speaker 1: not ready to say he's absolutely the problem, but I 1022 00:52:06,000 --> 00:52:08,680 Speaker 1: know he's not a long term answer. Yeah, I put him, 1023 00:52:08,719 --> 00:52:14,080 Speaker 1: putting him behind, I'll put Mariota ahead. What And finally 1024 00:52:14,160 --> 00:52:18,000 Speaker 1: r G three and he's there. He's even this time 1025 00:52:18,080 --> 00:52:20,319 Speaker 1: last year, Um, West, I know you were big on 1026 00:52:20,360 --> 00:52:22,120 Speaker 1: a come back here. I was big on a comeback 1027 00:52:22,120 --> 00:52:25,759 Speaker 1: here as sure as hell didn't happened. So now there's 1028 00:52:25,760 --> 00:52:27,560 Speaker 1: a there's a real chance that this guy is just 1029 00:52:27,600 --> 00:52:30,960 Speaker 1: shot and he's never gonna regain that spark. But it's 1030 00:52:30,960 --> 00:52:33,240 Speaker 1: still there in the back of a lot of people's minds. 1031 00:52:33,239 --> 00:52:35,840 Speaker 1: Can he ever get back something? And it's not just 1032 00:52:35,880 --> 00:52:38,719 Speaker 1: physically anymore, there's something mentally up with him too. In 1033 00:52:38,760 --> 00:52:41,400 Speaker 1: my mind, he doesn't have a confidence he once had. Well, 1034 00:52:41,400 --> 00:52:43,800 Speaker 1: this is the point where if we had a you know, 1035 00:52:43,920 --> 00:52:46,799 Speaker 1: big time producer. TD just jumps in right now and 1036 00:52:46,800 --> 00:52:48,959 Speaker 1: he says, I've got a little surprise. I've got Jake 1037 00:52:49,040 --> 00:52:52,720 Speaker 1: Gruden on the phone for you. He's coached Andy Dalton, 1038 00:52:52,840 --> 00:52:55,719 Speaker 1: He's coached r G three. He's gonna tell you at 1039 00:52:55,760 --> 00:52:58,959 Speaker 1: the very least, Frank Caliendo, Well, I have none of those. 1040 00:52:59,000 --> 00:53:01,560 Speaker 1: I did have an RG three. I'll take though. I'm 1041 00:53:01,600 --> 00:53:04,799 Speaker 1: sure that would be just as in week two or 1042 00:53:04,800 --> 00:53:07,000 Speaker 1: week three, whatever week that was where he got injured. 1043 00:53:07,600 --> 00:53:09,920 Speaker 1: A drive a couple of days before you got injured, 1044 00:53:10,239 --> 00:53:12,279 Speaker 1: actually got to look decent. That's telling that you can 1045 00:53:12,280 --> 00:53:16,280 Speaker 1: pick out and then you add a bunch of qualifiers. 1046 00:53:16,320 --> 00:53:20,719 Speaker 1: He actually kind of that. That is damning, not even 1047 00:53:20,760 --> 00:53:24,120 Speaker 1: with faint praise. It's just InCred first couple of plays. 1048 00:53:24,200 --> 00:53:27,440 Speaker 1: Whatever this is, I guess whatever this is the Dalton 1049 00:53:27,520 --> 00:53:31,160 Speaker 1: scale or whatever it is going forward right now, to me, 1050 00:53:31,320 --> 00:53:32,920 Speaker 1: there's no way you can put him on the plus 1051 00:53:32,920 --> 00:53:34,719 Speaker 1: side of this. He's got to earn. His wife got 1052 00:53:34,760 --> 00:53:36,960 Speaker 1: him one spot ahead of Dalton. Do you think he 1053 00:53:37,120 --> 00:53:38,879 Speaker 1: is the answer right now? Well, I no, I don't 1054 00:53:38,920 --> 00:53:43,239 Speaker 1: because I think I've already abandoned that definition. I've got 1055 00:53:43,239 --> 00:53:45,480 Speaker 1: a new definition. This is why I was this is 1056 00:53:45,480 --> 00:53:48,759 Speaker 1: I'm operating under a different thing that basically it's where 1057 00:53:48,800 --> 00:53:51,040 Speaker 1: you're at. Right, then it's not betting on the rest 1058 00:53:51,080 --> 00:53:53,640 Speaker 1: of your right Now, there's no chance r G three's 1059 00:53:53,640 --> 00:53:57,120 Speaker 1: above him. Well, of course, your job is to look 1060 00:53:57,160 --> 00:54:00,160 Speaker 1: at this like a general manager, not like some I'm 1061 00:54:00,200 --> 00:54:02,440 Speaker 1: in a podcast studio. Your job is to say, who 1062 00:54:02,440 --> 00:54:05,719 Speaker 1: do I want for my franchise going forward? Let's put 1063 00:54:05,719 --> 00:54:07,520 Speaker 1: it this way, who would you rather have, Like we 1064 00:54:07,520 --> 00:54:09,560 Speaker 1: would have an al G three in the chance little 1065 00:54:09,640 --> 00:54:11,680 Speaker 1: chance that he has that he's something close to his 1066 00:54:11,760 --> 00:54:13,880 Speaker 1: rookie year, or would you have rather have Dalton? Who 1067 00:54:13,960 --> 00:54:15,920 Speaker 1: you know, I would rather have RG three and a 1068 00:54:16,040 --> 00:54:18,400 Speaker 1: zero point eight chance that he ever comes close to 1069 00:54:18,400 --> 00:54:22,480 Speaker 1: his rookie year. Dalton has a has less of a 1070 00:54:22,560 --> 00:54:25,759 Speaker 1: chance of ever make being any better than after two 1071 00:54:25,880 --> 00:54:29,120 Speaker 1: years of misery. Yes, I believe it. Well, here you're 1072 00:54:29,239 --> 00:54:32,239 Speaker 1: talking about in the vasum like you're just starting a franchise. 1073 00:54:32,360 --> 00:54:35,200 Speaker 1: I'm often thinking of what if I have the Seahawks, 1074 00:54:35,640 --> 00:54:38,160 Speaker 1: because that's the team where you feel like you don't 1075 00:54:38,200 --> 00:54:41,160 Speaker 1: really need a quarterback that badly. And in that case 1076 00:54:41,239 --> 00:54:44,520 Speaker 1: it's like I would rather take my national TV a lot. 1077 00:54:44,560 --> 00:54:49,960 Speaker 1: We're winning playoff games with Dalton. No you're not. Here's 1078 00:54:50,040 --> 00:54:54,040 Speaker 1: my I've got a new definition. So any Dalton now 1079 00:54:54,120 --> 00:54:56,120 Speaker 1: to me, isn't the point of whether you would rather 1080 00:54:56,160 --> 00:54:58,279 Speaker 1: have these guys? To me? The point is more do 1081 00:54:58,440 --> 00:55:02,719 Speaker 1: I want Andy Dalton even my roster or have a 1082 00:55:02,800 --> 00:55:05,040 Speaker 1: fifteen million a year at his salary? Do I even 1083 00:55:05,080 --> 00:55:08,319 Speaker 1: want him on my roster? So in most these situations, 1084 00:55:08,520 --> 00:55:10,480 Speaker 1: I would rather have the other guy on my roster. 1085 00:55:10,560 --> 00:55:13,200 Speaker 1: The Dalton scale is a big sloppy mess in him half, 1086 00:55:13,400 --> 00:55:17,080 Speaker 1: I think just let's change it. Let's change the Palmer, right. 1087 00:55:17,120 --> 00:55:19,160 Speaker 1: I think the real question is do we want Andy 1088 00:55:19,239 --> 00:55:22,959 Speaker 1: Dalton on the Dalton's It always struck me as odd 1089 00:55:23,040 --> 00:55:25,759 Speaker 1: is that we had him as the middle guy when 1090 00:55:25,840 --> 00:55:28,080 Speaker 1: everyone in the room was so against him as being 1091 00:55:28,120 --> 00:55:30,719 Speaker 1: anything close to an answer. We always had him in 1092 00:55:30,760 --> 00:55:33,400 Speaker 1: the middle, but I think they always thought he was 1093 00:55:33,440 --> 00:55:39,560 Speaker 1: a piece of garbage and and when he should clearly 1094 00:55:39,600 --> 00:55:43,640 Speaker 1: be on the other and now like he's he never changed. 1095 00:55:43,680 --> 00:55:46,000 Speaker 1: He's still the same guy. That's the problem. It's four 1096 00:55:46,080 --> 00:55:48,359 Speaker 1: years now and he's probably gotten a little worth. That's 1097 00:55:48,400 --> 00:55:50,720 Speaker 1: why you said he was that guy in the first place. 1098 00:55:50,760 --> 00:55:52,600 Speaker 1: He said that he wasn't going to get better. Well, 1099 00:55:52,640 --> 00:55:56,560 Speaker 1: in fact, he's regressed. Spoiler. This is another spoiler for you, TD. 1100 00:55:56,719 --> 00:55:59,360 Speaker 1: Did you get Caliendo on the line to podcaster of 1101 00:55:59,400 --> 00:56:04,680 Speaker 1: the days at a is Dan Hansas for Scale over 1102 00:56:04,760 --> 00:56:07,760 Speaker 1: the years has been proven correct and we're all winners 1103 00:56:07,760 --> 00:56:12,640 Speaker 1: because you don't get to give one out. However, quick 1104 00:56:12,680 --> 00:56:15,040 Speaker 1: producing note, though, I say keep the Dulton stale. This 1105 00:56:15,080 --> 00:56:17,520 Speaker 1: is part of the show, guys, It's part of the intrigue. 1106 00:56:17,560 --> 00:56:20,240 Speaker 1: Not knowing exactly where he is. I think we're getting 1107 00:56:20,239 --> 00:56:22,480 Speaker 1: We're starting to figure it out. Our listeners can let 1108 00:56:22,560 --> 00:56:25,320 Speaker 1: us know, you know, sent us with a hashtag Doulton 1109 00:56:25,400 --> 00:56:27,480 Speaker 1: Scale what you guys think about this guy. But he's 1110 00:56:27,480 --> 00:56:29,520 Speaker 1: probably regressed, that hasn't gone better. But it's still in 1111 00:56:29,560 --> 00:56:30,880 Speaker 1: the same position where he puts the seam in the 1112 00:56:30,920 --> 00:56:33,560 Speaker 1: playoffs and always loses. He's the perfect guy for this 1113 00:56:33,600 --> 00:56:35,120 Speaker 1: game guy. Also, I think he's going to have a 1114 00:56:35,160 --> 00:56:37,920 Speaker 1: career year in two thousand. All right, now, I'm really confused. 1115 00:56:39,840 --> 00:56:42,640 Speaker 1: It's all about surrounding talent. West is I think this 1116 00:56:42,719 --> 00:56:47,800 Speaker 1: is the effect of West having no sleep like at 1117 00:56:48,280 --> 00:56:50,040 Speaker 1: word long form that is in the middle of an 1118 00:56:50,160 --> 00:56:54,120 Speaker 1: edit process, and he's an emotional powder chick. Well, there's 1119 00:56:54,120 --> 00:56:56,799 Speaker 1: a lot that went into this. I didn't I didn't 1120 00:56:56,800 --> 00:56:58,319 Speaker 1: know if I wanted to bring this up quite yet. 1121 00:56:58,320 --> 00:57:00,960 Speaker 1: But let's say it had a little bit of a 1122 00:57:01,000 --> 00:57:04,440 Speaker 1: cathartic nature in my Bengals fandom. Yeah, we put a 1123 00:57:04,480 --> 00:57:07,360 Speaker 1: pin in that because we will save that for Thursday. 1124 00:57:07,400 --> 00:57:09,799 Speaker 1: We got to talk about that. We're at a time though, 1125 00:57:10,239 --> 00:57:17,520 Speaker 1: well not yet already did it really quick? All right? Um? Yes, 1126 00:57:17,600 --> 00:57:19,960 Speaker 1: Podcast of the Day actually does go to Dan Um. 1127 00:57:20,800 --> 00:57:23,360 Speaker 1: It did more than host today. He was trafficking. He 1128 00:57:23,640 --> 00:57:27,160 Speaker 1: researched Steve Nash tidbit was fun, That Pro football talk 1129 00:57:27,200 --> 00:57:29,960 Speaker 1: tidbit was good. He asked the quintessential question, are we 1130 00:57:29,960 --> 00:57:31,640 Speaker 1: going to have to pull you aside in the serious 1131 00:57:31,640 --> 00:57:33,320 Speaker 1: manner and tell you that this isn't gonna work as 1132 00:57:33,360 --> 00:57:37,720 Speaker 1: a segment. I mean, you're winning. You're winning. That's why 1133 00:57:37,760 --> 00:57:40,120 Speaker 1: you should take this as very serious saying this. I 1134 00:57:40,160 --> 00:57:45,320 Speaker 1: think I don't know that Soldiers. Just with that, I 1135 00:57:45,360 --> 00:57:47,520 Speaker 1: liked it as a segment. You can need to work 1136 00:57:47,520 --> 00:57:51,800 Speaker 1: on your explanations. Why just you know, pick like one thing, 1137 00:57:51,960 --> 00:57:54,520 Speaker 1: just one thing. Maybe yeah, maybe it's a Tighten at 1138 00:57:54,560 --> 00:57:58,160 Speaker 1: the End podcast MTP, bang for the podcast MVP now 1139 00:57:58,280 --> 00:58:01,040 Speaker 1: given a title. I don't know I have because sometimes 1140 00:58:01,040 --> 00:58:03,080 Speaker 1: you're like giving all these reasons and some of them 1141 00:58:03,120 --> 00:58:05,760 Speaker 1: are a little thin sometimes, and I know you, you 1142 00:58:05,840 --> 00:58:08,360 Speaker 1: and Cessler sometimes are odds. If we if we're going 1143 00:58:08,400 --> 00:58:10,480 Speaker 1: like ten shows deep and Cesslor doesn't have the m 1144 00:58:10,520 --> 00:58:14,920 Speaker 1: v P, it's just gonna lead to that's gonna He's 1145 00:58:14,920 --> 00:58:17,080 Speaker 1: gonna be the onening bit. He never wins. Oh, it's 1146 00:58:17,120 --> 00:58:21,720 Speaker 1: like the for Eddie Roosevelt in the Washington National Alright, 1147 00:58:22,720 --> 00:58:25,400 Speaker 1: and I'm back in all right, that's it. Thank you 1148 00:58:25,480 --> 00:58:28,320 Speaker 1: for listening. If if you were able to follow along, congratulations. 1149 00:58:29,120 --> 00:58:31,600 Speaker 1: But we'll be back on Thursday with another show. Greg, 1150 00:58:31,640 --> 00:58:35,280 Speaker 1: You're going on um staycation. Uh No, I'm going to 1151 00:58:35,360 --> 00:58:38,480 Speaker 1: Massachusetts to be with my parents with Bacase, my daughter Elis. 1152 00:58:38,920 --> 00:58:41,800 Speaker 1: We're gonna go. So it's gonna be U the Great 1153 00:58:41,840 --> 00:58:45,200 Speaker 1: Chris Westling and I as well as Colleen wolf Will 1154 00:58:45,200 --> 00:58:47,120 Speaker 1: will rejoin us in the studio. Looking forward to that. 1155 00:58:47,200 --> 00:58:51,120 Speaker 1: So that's Thursday. Uh. This Dan hansis uh signing up 1156 00:58:51,520 --> 00:58:55,200 Speaker 1: for the Great White Tube k compliance Officer and the 1157 00:58:55,280 --> 00:58:58,240 Speaker 1: Boss and of course t D who I love behind 1158 00:58:58,240 --> 00:59:06,960 Speaker 1: the glass until Thursday,