WEBVTT - Tech News: The Chatbot Wars are Coming

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tex Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? It is time for

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Tuesday, February seven three and I'm

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>late to the game on talking about this, but here

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, one of the big news stories

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last week was the discovery of

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and subsequent destruction of a Chinese made balloon that drifted

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>across the United States West coast to East coast. US

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>officials say the balloon was a spy vehicle. Chinese officials

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>claim it was for science rather than surveillance. It's all

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a moot point now, because late last week the US

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>military shot down the balloon off the coast of South Carolina.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It's turned into a giant political matter here in the

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>United States because conservatives are arguing that the President was

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>indecisive and delayed too long before taking action. The president

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>says he gave the order to shoot down the balloon

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>as soon as the military deemed it would be safe

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to do so and would have the best chance of

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>retrieving the balloons payload to make sure you know that,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>in fact, this is like an espionage device, and I'm

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sure we're gonna see both major parties here in the

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>United States try to use this event to earn political

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>points with their respective basis, and it's all very exhausting,

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so I ain't gonna give it any more air time.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't object to incorporating politics into tech stories,

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>because the two do have overlap. I mean, one affects

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the other and vice versa, but this is getting to

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a point where he gets so petty. It's just exhausting. However,

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what I will do is plan a future episode about

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>spy balloons and their history, because that's actually really neat stuff.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So we will do that and and avoid the kind

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of weird argumentative politics that we're hearing right now in

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the States. Last week, I also talked about how a

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of publicly traded tech companies here in the US

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>we're holding earnings calls with their investors. On Thursday, we

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>got the Triple A calls, that would be the Amazon,

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet and Apple earnings calls, and I suspected the call

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>showed that these companies are facing some challenges to have

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>investors a little concerned in some cases. Apple reported that

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it had a revenue drop, so not a loss. It

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't operate at a loss, just a drop in revenue.

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But this would be the first revenue drop for Apple

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in more than three years, and investors really don't like

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it when winning streaks are interrupted. Sales were down five

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>percent quarter over well year over year for quarter four

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of two, and that was a larger drop than what

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>analysts had predicted, and the fault was largely laid at

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the fee of China, specifically having manufacturing facilities in China

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>shut down during COVID nineteen outbreaks, and considering the reported

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>conditions of what it's like to work at one of

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>these places, that all feels really gross to me. I

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think China has taken the right approach to handling

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen. But at the same time, it's really hard

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for me to say, ah, man, we weren't able to

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>make as many do dads because the government was trying

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to stop the spread of a highly infectious disease. So

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm saying is that, ultimately I'm glad

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the one who has to make those kinds

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of decisions. Anyway, on top of the falling sales, Apple's

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:42.279
<v Speaker 1>profit fell by thirteen percent. Now again, Apple was still profitable,

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it just wasn't as profitable as it was this time

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. Apple did not indicate that it would be

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>following the big tech trend of laying off thousands of employees, however,

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's good news for Apple employees. Amazon's news was

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>even worse in that the company reported that you one

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>three operating profit might turn out to be a big

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>old goose egg a zero in other words, so no

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>operating profit in the beginning of according to current estimations.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon executives have said that customers have been cutting way

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>back on spending and that was causing a massive hit

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon's revenue, and that even the layoffs and downsizing

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in Amazon is not counteracting that that drop in customer purchases.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we're talking about eighteen thousand jobs cut

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point in Amazon. One area where Amazon is

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>doing okay is in its cloud computing services, where the

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>company actually saw higher revenues than analysts had predicted. But yeah,

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic days of rampant online shopping have all really

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>slowed down as people are being more frugal with their

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>spending during this undefined economic downturn. But I call it

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.679
<v Speaker 1>a recession by an We have Alphabet, the parent company

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of Google and YouTube, and some other companies as well. Overall,

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the companies saw declines in both revenue and profit, which

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 1>again is not a huge surprise because Alphabet draws the

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of its revenue from digital ads, and digital

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>ad spending is down. In fact, according to Alphabet, the

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>ad revenue fell by four percent in general and eight

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>percent on platforms like YouTube and like Amazon. Alphabet has

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>also slashed a lot of jobs twelve thousand in the

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>case of Alphabet, So the call did not present a

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of surprises. None of these did, I would say,

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, kind of confirms stuff that we already either

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>new or suspected. Other tech companies are also cutting back

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>by eliminating more jobs. Dell Technologies recently revealed it will

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>be laying off around five percent of its workforce. That

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>would be more than six thousand, five hundred employees. So why, well,

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we all know why. It's the economic situation that again

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a word for. We just call it challenging.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And while I hate seeing more tech employees face the

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>possibility of being out of a job. I can't say

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really surprised by Dell's move. I mean, we

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>all know that consumers have cut way back on spending

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in general, and that includes buying new computers. People are

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>sticking with their devices longer rather than updating or replacing them,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so the hardware cycle has changed a bit. This impacts

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>companies like Dell big time. On top of that, Dell

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>has seen some other competitors in the consumer PC space

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>gain ground on them and get more competitive. So it's

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not just that Dell is selling fewer PCs. It's also

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that other companies are starting to catch up to Dell

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>or to really be a competitive threat. So it's a

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>double whammy. And Boeing is yet another company in tech

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that has announced it will be holding layoffs. The company

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>said it plans to eliminate around two thousand jobs, primarily

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>into part meants like human resources and finance, and then

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>other departments like engineering and manufacturing are going to be protected.

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Boeing blends to outsource HR and finance roles to a

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>company called Tata Consulting Services that is part of a

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>larger conglomerate that is located in India. But unlike the

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>other companies I mentioned so far, Boeing actually plans to

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>grow its workforce this year. So last year Boeing hired

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on fifteen thousand new employees, so still a net gain

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>even when you consider the two thousand layoffs coming up,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and this year they plan on adding another ten thousand

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year. So really this sounds

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>more like Boeing is putting its eggs in the in

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the products and services basket with engineering and manufacturing, and

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that this move is more about shifting finance and human

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>resources focused parts of the business to outsourced jobs. So

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really more like a reorg than anything else, at

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>least as of right now. Now we're about to enter

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>into the AI slash chat bought part of our episode,

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>because that's been the big news so far in Tree.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So we all know about chat gpt in the various

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>concerns and criticisms and wild experiments that are related to it,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and you likely know that Microsoft had previously invested a

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in the company behind chat GPT called open Ai.

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>At least you would know that if you listen to

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>my episode about open Ai. Also Microsoft is going to

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>invest a lot more in open Ai, up to around

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars according to at least some reports. Well

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>later today, Microsoft is holding a press event. In fact,

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>might have already happened by the time you are listening

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to this podcast. But since it hasn't happened yet as

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>of when I'm writing the darn thing, the best I

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>can do is talk about what people think is going

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to happen. That is that Microsoft is going to make

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>an announcement that it's incorporating chat GPT into being search

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in some way. Now, Google yesterday, in a kind of

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>panicked and rushed way, unveiled its own chat bought called Bard.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We had already heard about Bard, but at the time

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about it was referenced as Apprentice Bard

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>and it was only an internal tool. So Google has

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>now already launched a closed and private beta for a

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>select group of users to experiment with Bard, and plans

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>to open this up further to a lot more people

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the near future in the coming weeks, for example.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So Google also plans a press event that will now

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>happen tomorrow on Wednesday. So it looks like Microsoft and

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Google are facing off in the AI chat bought space,

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly with regard to how it could be interwoven with search. Now,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I've already talked about how this approach could ultimately cause

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of problems online, mainly through cutting off

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>vital Internet traffic to various websites that depend upon search

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>results to get visitors. But yeah, it looks like this

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>fight is coming to us pretty quickly. The two chat

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>bots will be based off different language models open aies

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>g PT or generative pre train transformer is based off

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the transformer model that Google pioneered. Now, in this case,

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>transformer doesn't refer to either a robot in disguise or

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a device that can step voltage up or down. Instead,

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a transformer in this sense is a machine learning model.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Google introduced it in two thousand seventeen, and it's very

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>popular model in machine learning applications. Google's language model is

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>called Language Models for Dialogue Applications or land up. So

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you have GPT on one side and lambda on the other,

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>things do get a little more muddeled. However, Google has

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>invested several hundred million dollars in an AI company called Anthropic,

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>which was founded by some folks who had formerly been

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>researchers at open Ai. So both Microsoft and Google are

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>launching AI powered tools that share some common DNA. I

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>have a been invited to the beta for Google, so

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen what that looks like yet, and the

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft event hasn't happened as the time I'm recording this,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so I can't really comment on what these look like

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>or how they perform. And I am sure that people

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at Google and Microsoft are already aware of the potential

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>dangers this AI could pose to business practices. So I'm

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not talking about, you know, doomsday prophecies about AI destroying

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the world or anything. Instead, I'm talking about AI eliminating

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>an advertising platform that Google has depended upon for most

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of its existence. I'm sure they have contingencies in mind.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know what those happened to be, but

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it should be fascinating to see how this unfolds. Also,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>if it gets good enough, it'll put me out of

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a job. I mean, why would you listen to me

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>when you can just have your tech questions answered by

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 1>a super fast robot unless it's you know, from a

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Southern charm Okay, I I gotta take a break from

0:11:54.760 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>being charming. We will be back after these messages. Okay,

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we're back, and we're actually back with another AI chat

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>bought story. So the United States is not the only

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>country that's obsessed with this idea. By Do, the enormous

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>company in China, announced today that it has been testing

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a chat butt that it calls Ernie bot. There's no

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>word of this chat bot has a roommate that's called

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>bert Bot, but Ernie has been tested internally for some time,

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems, and these tests are scheduled to conclude sometime

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in March. Presumably at that point by Do will unveiled

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the chat bot into some sort of public facing phase

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>where people will get a chance to use it outside

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of by Do itself. Ernie actually is an acronym. It

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>stands for Enhanced Representation through Knowledge integrat SHILT, and it

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it has a lot of the same sort

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of features that we've seen in stuff like chat GPT

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as doll E, in that it is said

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to generate text based on user prompts,

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>so you can ask it questions and it will generate

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a response by drawing information from around you know, its databases,

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and it can also do things like create images based

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on prompts, so you could tell it to create a

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>serene landscape with a windmill next to a river or something,

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and it would do it. I think it will only

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be a matter of time before someone creates a roundtable

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>discussion session with these various chat bots all talking to

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>each other and have them discuss some sort of topic

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>like you know, which Nintendo game is the best, or

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>how to achieve world peace or something like that. It's

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of time. Even if it's done as

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a parody, I expect we'll see it. In fact, I'm

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sure we'll see lots of parodies where people will purposefully

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 1>create fake conversations between these different chat bots for comedic purposes,

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and yet they will not reveal that it's all fake,

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's the world we live in, where you can't

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>tell that something satire because there's no indicator to let

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that, in fact, it is satire. It's just

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>passed off as the truth, so it is, in other words,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a lie. Yeah. I have thoughts about this. Now. I've

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of gaming stories to cover, both of

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>which are a little rough. First up, Meta announced last

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>week that it's going to sunset the VR game Echo

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>VR coming this August. This game will having a relatively

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>small player base, has received critical and popular acclaim, and

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the folks who do play it are said to be

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>really loyal fans, so this announcement came as a disappointment.

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Meta explained that the reason behind the decision is that

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the company wants to create other games and VR experiences,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and maintaining a game requires resources that the company would

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>rather focus on new opportunities. Now that does make sense.

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Any online focused game is going to require ongoing support

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>or it will eventually fail, and considering that the player

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>base is down to the low ten thousands according to

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>The Verge, you can understand why Meta would want to

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>shift to something else that could potentially have a bigger impact.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Even if revenue isn't a concern right now, it's bound

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to be at some point. Unfortunately, this kind of decision

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.119
<v Speaker 1>is also the sort of thing that can discourage adoption

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>because buying into VR is expensive, The equipment is costly,

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's before you even start buying games for it.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you're thinking about getting into VR, but then

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you hear that one of the more praised titles is

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>getting shut down later this year, you might find yourself,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, reviewing the situation, as Vegan would say. John Carmack,

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>who until recently was a consultant for Meta on All

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Things VR, voiced his disappointment with this decision. He said

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that Meta is taking something away from the community and

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that never really goes over very well. And I agree

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>with that. If you want to learn more about this,

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I recommend the article in The Verge titled Here's why

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Meta is shutting down Echo VR. The ViRGE also reports

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon is phasing out fifty three games and it's

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Luna cloud streaming service this month. So it's got this

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>video game streaming service called Luna, and fifty three titles

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to leave in February over different dates. Back

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in December, Luna rotated out another forty titles. Amazon says

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the game strategy is to consistently switch out titles to

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>keep the service fresh. That makes sense to a degree

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to me, but it does mean that gamers might find

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>themselves focusing more on titles that are good for short

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sessions and don't involve long protracted storylines because you never

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>know when that title is gonna go away. There's nothing

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like being halfway through saving the world and then finding

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>out you can't access your game anymore, and what happens

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to a world y'all think of the world. Well, according

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to game Rant, Luna Plus has around a hundred ninety

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>titles on its service, so fifty three games. That means

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at around a little more than a quarter

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of all the the game titles leaving the service this month.

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how popular the services. I'll try to look

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>into it. I'm thinking about doing an episode about the

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>different cloud based gaming services out there and any information

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>we have about how well they're performing. In some cases,

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have any information at all, but we've

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely come a long way since the Uyah. Finally, last

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>week I talked about Nothing Forever. That's the AI generated

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Seinfeld episode simulator that was broadcasting on Twitch. It uses

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>GPT to create the dialogue. Well, they had a real

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>problem recently in that uh, the character Larry, the standing

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for Jerry Seinfeld, was doing his stand up and started

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>spouting off transphobic and homophobic thoughts as part of his

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>stand up routine. This should not have ever happened and

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>twhich banned the channel for fourteen days as a result

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of It turns out the issue was that the GPT

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>model they had been using, which was codenamed Da Vinci,

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>had problems at some point, and the the model just

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 1>stopped creating content, so you just had these empty rooms.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So the team decided to roll back to an earlier

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>version of GPT called CURI, and this one lacked the

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>content moderation blinders that the Da Vinci model had, and

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>so CURI was more lax and allowing problematic content to

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>come through, and that's when we got the transphobic and

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>homophobic content. So the creators say they do plan on

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>coming back. They're going to put more content moderation features

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in place to prevent this sort of thing from happening,

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>because obviously they don't want harmful content to come out

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 1>from their little fun diversion. Uh, And that this was

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just a mistake based upon going to an earlier version

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of this language model. So it was really unfortunate. I'm

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>glad that they're addressing it, and hopefully we don't see

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>anything like this in the future. But it is one

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>of the the downsides to AI that's pulling from across

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the internet to generate its content. All Right, that's it.

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the news for Tuesday, February seven three. Hope you're

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>all well. I'm doing pretty well myself. If you would

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>like to contact me with some future ideas for shows

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that I should do, you can do so on Twitter.

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is tech Stuff hs W,

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>or if you prefer, you can download the I Heart

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Radio apps free to download, spree to use. You can

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>type in tech stuff in a little search bar. It

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>will navigate over to the tech stuff page and there

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll see a little microphone icon. If you click on that,

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you can leave a voice message up to thirty seconds

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in length and request your topic of choice and I'll

0:19:51.400 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio,

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.