WEBVTT - Tech Leaders Approach Trump, Intel Looks for Buyers for Altera Arm

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>The Heart where Innovations, money and power. Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Love Loves.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York. This is Blomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Time is ticking as the government works to avoid shutting

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 3>down as Trump and Musk wield their political power.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 4>This as the big Tech Leader Merry Go Round.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 3>Mara Lago continues with Bezos the latest to try and

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 3>influence Trump's policies and decisions, and the season for Intel

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>deal making. Pe firms are competing for Intel's programmable chip

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>arm Alterra. But let's just get to the broader markets

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 3>in general. Push to twenty twenty five. Should you should

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>be allocating Hillary fresh on police to says with US

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 3>senior Search Analystic clear Bridge with a real focus on

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 3>software And that for me has been the key calling

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>card of December November December was movement from the hardware,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>from the infrastructure into the software and the applications of AI.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Is that going to run on?

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 5>That's right, Thanks Carolin for having me. I think in

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 5>general it should run on. Although I said we've had

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 5>We've come so long in such a short period of

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 5>time this year, with the IDV software in next being

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 5>up forty percent between early August and early December, so

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 5>I think some consolidation of the games we've seen is logical,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 5>and I could see more of that as we move

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 5>through time in the beginning of the year. For a

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 5>few reasons, but I think in general the trend is up,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 5>and I think we've reached an important point of demarcation.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 4>From the space.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's go into those few reasons of why perhaps we're

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 3>going to get a few headwinds rather than tell wins

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 3>at the start. Is it macro policy, is it Trump

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>coming in?

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 5>It's uncertainties of for Macro and Trump, And it's also

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 5>just time tested ellins. Like we're entering the seasonally weaker

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 5>part of the year, companies are likely to guide conservatively

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 5>on their Q four earnings calls, and also with what

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 5>we heard from the Fed this week, the group will

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 5>likely have to adjust to higher interest rates for longer

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 5>and that has an impact on a few factors, including valuation.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Looking at valuation more broadly, there have been the haves

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>and have not some of them been entering big benchmarks.

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I think of Valenteer that has just been such a

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 3>software winner. As people get galvanized by the generative AI opportunities,

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 3>are those valuations too heady? At what point do we

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 3>start to see Ultimately some of the PE ratios look

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty healthy because.

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 4>They're managing to grow their earnings in lockstep.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Such a good question. Volunteer is in somewhat rarefied error.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 5>It's the first name of scale to really capitalize on

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 5>engine AI in a in a large way, and it

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 5>also has the government tailwinds of where it's position, so

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 5>it's doing tremendously well. Its valuation is head and shoulders

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 5>above everyone else's, so I leave that alone. For the

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 5>rest of the space, we are about to see I think,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 5>much better growth than we've seen. The space has been

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 5>digesting a flurry of buy inactivity during COVID, so it's

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 5>been really two years of digestion, and companies have been

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 5>using technology as a source of cost savings. But now

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 5>with the advent of generative AI and especially now agents,

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 5>which I think market and a parodigm shift for the space,

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 5>we're starting to see more investment.

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>That's exciting.

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Palentino just showing how much has run up

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>it's currently trading one hundred and ninety nine times future earnings.

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 3>But let's go to where the oxygen is really being

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 3>sucked out. The rim is all biogentic KI, And again

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I think there must be this question mark for investors

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 3>and onlookers alike of well, show me the money, show

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 3>me the productivity, show me how much this is actually

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna affect my life?

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Because I'm just hearing the words.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Right, we're starting to see it's so early. The salesforce

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 5>is effectively leading this movement. So many people are working

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 5>on it, but they were of the first ones out

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 5>with true urgentic functionality. I think it's been out seven weeks,

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 5>maybe eight weeks.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Have you used it?

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 5>I personally have not used it. I've talked with a

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 5>bunch of customers who have been using it, who have

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 5>been testing it in data, and the feedback is excellent.

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 5>The feedback is really compelling on accuracy, on ease of use,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 5>on the ability to draw together critical enterprise data and

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 5>make some use of it. So I think we're just

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 5>on the cusp of that. We're going to see other

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 5>companies do that. But it makes for a compelling story

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 5>and we can start to dream of a better time

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 5>where growth is better, and part of that growth is

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 5>going to come not just from the engines themselves, but

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 5>from the underlying infrastructure. We're seeing customers take on that

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 5>hard work of improving their data, harmonizing it, getting it

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 5>ready for use, in investments in cloud and underlying infrastructure

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 5>to make that work.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 3>We had Data Bax CEO raising a lot of money

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>in the private markets, and they're all about sort of

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 3>being able to use the data underlying. To that end, though,

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>we're having a lot of the startups talking about genticare

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>trying to get in the space, taking on the stile

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>war's the giants such as sales Force. Are we going

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to see more M and A up activity once again

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 3>everyone's wanted Benny Off to hold off, But more broadly,

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>these software companies are going to get back into M

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 3>and A with perhaps a more friendly administration to it.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 5>Sure, well, yes, no, and yes I think we absolutely do.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 5>I think part of the reason why we've seen that

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 5>rise in software evaluations since the summer is because of

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 5>this friendlier stance. We're likely to see at least on

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 5>large companies buying smaller companies. We'll leave the rest of

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 5>large company administration aside, but there's that we will see

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 5>a lot of startups trying to get in the space,

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 5>and some will be successful. There's always disruption when there's

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 5>a new cycle and new tech wave. But what is

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 5>compelling is that we can see these large companies capitalize

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 5>augment their ports selarios. We're seeing them do that salesforce specifically,

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 5>they are making tuck in acquisitions. Ultimately we probably see

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 5>them do something, but right now they seem so focused

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 5>on what they have at hand that we may not

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 5>see what we've seen traditionally from the company in terms

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 5>of large semine and in fact, the company still has

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 5>a large swath of activists on the board who are

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 5>highly engaged.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 3>And keeping a close eye on the purse strings very

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 3>more broadly. Therefore, when twenty twenty three twenty twenty four

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>was so dominated by one name and Nvidia and everyone

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 3>asking you about the infrastructure to the software names that

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>you really kept an eye on, are we going to

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>see this shift now? Is everyone going to just be

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>more around agents?

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Is it going to be the time of quantum?

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 3>What do you think twenty twenty five is going to

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>be the cocktail party.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 4>Question for you?

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 5>Okay, that's an exciting one and one that will change

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 5>every week.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 4>We have cocktails for more.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 5>We've had this push and pull between semis and software

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 5>the entire time, as investor try to identify the real

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 5>AI beneficiary. In reality, over time they'll both be strong

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 5>beneficiaries in one way or another. The names than that

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 5>group may shift, but I think software is starting its

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.239
<v Speaker 5>period of appreciation of AI wills and agents. As I mentioned,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 5>I think they represent the period of shift from homegrown

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 5>AI or do it yourself AI to do it for

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 5>me AI, and the customers would for prefer the vendors

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 5>do it for them.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Better, faster, cheaper in the end, and so I think

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 5>that's a story that continues, and there are other things

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 5>I like about software. Semis are in the process of

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 5>getting beaten up. There's a lot of debate over whether

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 5>we're going to see the big behemoth million GPU pre

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 5>train models or the smaller models or post test time

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 5>training where the training occurs at the point of inference,

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 5>and that will have financial implications. But in the end,

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 5>we're going to need a lot of semis for what

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 5>we're about to do.

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 4>The demands way eclipses supply. He let me fresh. So

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 4>it's joy to have you in the studio, Senior.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>We such Analystic clear Bridge, but always leave wanting to

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>talk a little bit more. Meanwhile, Intel, let's talk about

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>a chick company on online and shortlisting a number of

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 3>buyout firms for the next round of bidding for a

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>terror that's its unit which specializes in the design of

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 3>low power programmable chips, so at according to sources, let's

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 3>bringing in Murgs Ryan Gold. So how close to the

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 3>nmark are we here? How many serious bids have come

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 3>in and how broad are they?

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 6>Yes, if you think back Caroline too, just before Thanksgiving

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 6>we put out a story that said that they were

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 6>calling for bids. I think just prefacing all of this,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 6>ol Terra is kind of the single biggest topic in

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 6>tech em and a right now for people who specialize

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 6>in semiconductors.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 4>It's taking up a lot of time.

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 6>People are spending a lot of money thinking about how

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 6>to sort of structure their bids. So bids came in

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 6>just after Thanksgiving, and so Intel has now got into

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 6>a period where they've shortlisted. You've got firms like Bain

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 6>who know and tell very well, you've got firms like

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 6>Silver Like who also know Intel very well. And then

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 6>there are others such as Apollo, you know, who are

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 6>also looking Francisco partners, you know, quite experienced semiconductor operators.

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 6>And then just to add a little bit of intrigue

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 6>to the mixed lettice conductor, which does specialize in what

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 6>we call FPGA's the same sort of type of technology

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 6>that Intel is trying to sell here in Old Terror,

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 6>they are also in the mix and also in the second.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Round, but their own market capitalization not that huge, so

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 3>they'd have to partner.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 4>What are some of the options here?

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Does Intel internally want to fully hand over rains here

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 3>or keep.

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Skin in the game.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 6>I think Intel is quite COI on what it really

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 6>wants to do. I think if you look at what

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 6>they've said publicly, they have stated that their plan, even

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 6>pre and postpat is to sell a stake and eventually

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 6>take al Terra public. But I think just when you're

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 6>in the situation that Intel's in, there are options, and

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, options on the table have to be considered.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 6>You have to think about the long term future and

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 6>sustainability of those options. And so I think if something

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 6>is presented to them that they see is compelling, they

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 6>will give good, good credence to it. And I would

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 6>just say there are many sort of proposals on the

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 6>table here. There are multiple paths outlined from different suitors.

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 6>For example, there could be a situation that you know,

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 6>you see a group of private equities for so it's

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 6>come together and take this on and sort of use

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 6>their operational now to kind of transform more terror into

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 6>what they think it should be.

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, a few bankers are going to be busy over

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the firstive period, Ran Gold, We know that you will

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 3>be too, Thanks so much for coming on. Meanwhile, coming up,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 3>time is ticking for the government to avoid a shutdown.

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 4>That says Trump and Musk weigh in.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 3>We're talking how busy politicians are at this particular moment.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Just take a quick look at one particular stock on

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 3>the move as well. I just asked Hillary, look, is

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five is going to be the year we

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 3>talk about quantum Well, it's here, it's now, and it's

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 3>up twenty one percent for this particular stock one name

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>where Craig Hallum is maintaining a buy on this particular company,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>raising the price target to forty five. We've also had yesterday,

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 3>DA Davison also initiating coverage with a by rating we're

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 3>piling in.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:52.599
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg technology.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 3>The House of Representatives could vote on a temporary measure

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 3>to fund the government for a brief period and avert

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 3>a shutdown. That's according to two news networks, Fox News

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 3>NBC citing sources. This after the House, led by Republicans,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 3>rejected a temporary funding plan despite Trumpenino Musk's pressure on

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 3>goped or make us to support it when most Kaylee

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Lines joins us for now from Washington. It feels as

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 3>though everyone's intent on not having a break before the holidays.

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, usually the holiday period and the smell of jet

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 7>fumes is enough to motivate lawmakers to get done when

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 7>they need to get done by the deadline, Caroline. But

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 7>we are getting very close to the wire here, keeping

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 7>in mind that government funding does expire at midnight tonight,

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 7>so we're talking of window here of just under thirteen hours.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 7>And it's not yet clear what exactly planned C will

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 7>be after Plan A failed, in part because Elon Musk

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 7>and Donald Trump wanted to see that initial one hundred

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 7>or one five hundred and forty seven page bill die.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 7>Then the Plan B, a much slim down bill that

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 7>also extended the debt ceiling for two years, failed in

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 7>miserable fashion on the House floor last night, with thirty

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 7>eight Republicans voting against it. So now the question is

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 7>going to be can something get through the House today

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 7>that will avoid us shut down. We are expecting that

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 7>Republicans will be holding a conference meeting just over an

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 7>hour from now at twelve thirty pm Eastern Time, where

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 7>they could be informed of what the plan is next,

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 7>and there have been reporting has been reporting from punch

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 7>Bowl News that they could actually end up just dividing

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 7>the bill that failed last night, so essentially holding separate

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 7>votes on a continuing resolution on the debt sealing measure

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 7>on disaster relief and seeing what can get across the floor.

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Because there's two tug of wars here for those who

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 3>aren't as in the weeds as you are. On the

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 3>one front, it seems as though this is pushed largely

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>by Musk and Trump that we don't want to see

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 3>this pork, this money being given away in terms of

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 3>federal aid. But on the other side is the Republicans

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 3>that are really flinching to the idea of the debt

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 3>ceiling just being put aside for a couple of years,

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 3>which doesn't seem particularly fiscally responsible according to them.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's exactly right, Caroline.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 7>This is a relatively new idea that has at least

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 7>publicly been introduced by Donald Trump in the last several days,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 7>this notion that the debt ceiling either should be extended

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 7>or repealed, lifted entirely permanently before he takes office on

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 7>January twentieth. Now, lomakers I've spoken with, including the Democratic

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 7>Majority Durbin last night, suggested to me that this is

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 7>likely because he knows he wants to get through a

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 7>tax reform package next year, and lifting the debt ceiling

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 7>is an easy way to get that done, or at

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 7>least make that process easier. That said, there are a

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 7>number of conservatives in the House, many representing that part

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 7>of that thirty eight that voted against this measure last night,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 7>that do not want to see the debt ceiling raised

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 7>because they want to see more fiscal responsibility than that.

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 7>So that's really going to be the question as we

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 7>move forward today. Can something that lifts the debt ceiling

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 7>get across the floor. Is it really only something that's

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 7>going to keep the government funded for some period of time.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 7>It could ultimately be shorter than what they were initially planning,

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 7>which was a three month continuing resolution that would kick

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 7>the can down the road to March fourteenth. But Speaker

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 7>Johnson has a very difficult needle to thread here because

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 7>he has to abide by not only what his conference

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 7>wantson is willing to vote for, but what Donald Trump

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 7>and Elon Musk clearly are willing to see across the floor.

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 7>And he has to stand for a speaker election again

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 7>on January third, when one hundred and nineteenth Congress sits.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 7>And there's a very open question at this hour as

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 7>to whether or not, given everything that's gone down in

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 7>the last several days, Speaker Johnson is going to be

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 7>able to keep the gabble.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 4>Katie Lyones, great breakdown. Thank you.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Now we continue to report, of course, on the tech

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 3>titans who have been meeting dining with President elect Trump

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 3>in the last few days. Of course, you know that

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg seemed to kick off the rounds

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of meetings Google co found us Aga Brin on the

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 3>action Amazons Jeff Bezos. The latest list doesn't even include

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the other big tech leaders who are officially working within.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 4>The incoming administration.

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, mosk as the coludo Department of Government Efficiency,

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 3>David Sachs, the AI cryptos are Marc Andreesen as an advisor,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 3>we understand, just to name a few numos. Kurt Wagner

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 3>joins us to discuss the new intersection of tech and

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>politics going into twenty twenty five. Some names that we

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 3>already know very much about, but I'm sure a few

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 3>more trying to line up for a dinner invitation.

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, everyone seems to be making their way

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 8>to mar A Lago. There is a very different feel

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 8>this time around Carolina. As you might recall from twenty sixteen.

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 8>At that point, you know, Trump did hold that sort

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 8>of famous meeting in Trump Tower where all the tech

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 8>executives ended up coming, but it felt more like they

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 8>were almost forced to be there, right and they were

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 8>dealing with their employees back at headquarters, mostly in Silicon Valley,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 8>complaining and protesting and all this stuff. This time it

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 8>feels different. They're going sort of one by one. They're

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 8>having dinner at mar A Lago. They're you know, being

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 8>very friendly. And I think the awkward situation here is

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 8>the Elon Musk of this, all right, because all of

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 8>these people are competitors in some way or another two

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 8>Elon or his companies, and often when they're showing up

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 8>to dinner in some cases like Jeff Bezos from Amazon,

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 8>Elon Musk is at the table, right, and how much

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 8>can you really say to Donald Trump? How much can

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 8>you really accomplish when one of your biggest enemies is

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 8>sitting right there across the table from you.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Certainly space competition fears between Blue Origin and SpaceX cut.

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately, what do you think they will achieve by

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 3>giving small In the case of the absolute balance sheets,

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>they have small amounts towards the inauguration of Trump. And indeed,

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 3>these meetings where they're showing off I think Mark was

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 3>showing off the metaglasses and the latest innovations to President

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 3>elect Trump going forward. How is this sort of dovetailing

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 3>into actually what they want to see from a legislative agenda.

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think everyone sort of is in agreement that

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 8>the best way to stay on Donald Trump's good side

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 8>is to praise him to show up and sort of

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 8>demonstrate that with a public display of affection, right, whether

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 8>that be a million dollar donation to the inaugural fund,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 8>showing up to dinner and making that trek across the

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 8>country to be there in person. And every one of

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 8>these companies want something different. But I think generally, if

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 8>you want a blanket Stata, they don't want him to

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 8>come in hard with regulation around all the technology they're building,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 8>especially with regards to AI. Right, Like the last thing

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 8>Mark Zuckerberg wants, for example, is for the Trump administration

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 8>to some they say, hey, we're going to try to

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 8>hamper this AI growth. We're going to make it very

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 8>difficult for you Mark Zuckerberg, in particularly because you didn't

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 8>show up tomorrow lago and make Trump feel special.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 8>And so I think they are all doing what they

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 8>need to do just to simply be in his good

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 8>graces and hopes that those are relationships because they are

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 8>so important to the incoming president. Those relationships will ultimately help,

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 8>you know, make their road easier over these next four years.

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Many feel akin to Peter tail Now, who's the only

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 3>one really in twenty sixteen, half times a change. Kurt Wagner,

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>It's great to have your Time, Thank you Time now

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 3>for talking tech. First up ten Cent and some related

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 3>stocks is you'll see soaring on Friday after investor enthusiasm

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 3>is taking over on a new gifting function on we

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Chat Now the future will allow yousers to give gifts

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 3>price less than thirteen hundred dollars, excluding jewelry and educational services.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 3>According to a statement, Snacks cosmetics service providers are all

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 3>lightly beneficiaries class sticking with ten Cents, and it's partnering

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 3>with Honor on cloud and AI development.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 4>As as one of China's top.

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Device makers, Honor is among Tencent's higher profile cloud customers.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 3>It will use ten cents big data, analytics and search tools,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 3>along with two companies jointly creating a coding assistant to

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>help Honor software engineers, and Baido extends its decline that

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 3>says investors react to news that Apple is in talks

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 3>to work with ten Cent byte Dance on you guested

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence. This also comes as newspaper reports that byte

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Dance has slashed the price of its new AI model,

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 3>and Honheim Precision Industry, the Taiwan based manufacturer of iPhones

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 3>of course it's known as fox Con too, is putting

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 3>its interest in pursuing Nissan on hold as one negotiations

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 3>for a potential merger with Hondura underway.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 4>It's all according to source.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, karlosh Gohen, who was the architect of the Reno

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Nissan alliance twenty five years ago, said that the tie

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 3>up between Nissan and Honda is a.

0:18:55.760 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 4>Quote desperate move. Here's what he told Bloomberg yesterday.

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 10>They have cash problem, they have investment problems. They're being

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 10>really hammered in the United States. They got practically out

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 10>of Europe, They're being challenged in China, and there is

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 10>no plan in front of it. So I can tell

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 10>you that mean there is panic mode inside MEISA.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 3>In fact, that was colors go speaking earlier today with

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 3>our own MANUSCRANI let's get out to Craig Jurell for

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 3>the latest on the tie up.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 4>And indeed all of it was.

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Catalyzed Craig by Fox Cohn's interest in Nissan and Japan

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 3>racing to ensure that Chainese companies weren't buying up Japanese ones.

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 4>But now is out the game.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think we can't necessarily rule out at this

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 11>point that Fox Khan will completely leave the picture here.

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 11>I think this is a case of you know, real

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 11>genuine interests. You have an executive at Fox KHT who's

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 11>overseeing their ev you know, initiatives who is actually a

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 11>former Nissan executive, which sort of adds to the intrigue.

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 11>You also have a case of just a very you know,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 11>complex deal, and it's very unclear at this juncture what

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 11>exactly is going to happen between Honda and Nissan. If anything,

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 11>you do have a case of a Nissan really needing

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 11>some help and effectively needing a rescue by all accounts,

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 11>likely some role that the Japanese government is playing here

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 11>and trying to kind of nudge these two companies together,

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 11>but real questions about you know, how exactly this is

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 11>going to work out. And also another company in France

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 11>and Reno, who also is going to come into play.

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 11>So watch this space in twenty twenty five.

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I get no respite for you when it comes to

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 3>deal coverage. Craig very briefly China and the week spot

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 3>for both.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, absolutely, I think both of these companies have been

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 11>shrinking in that market. I think there are a questions

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 11>about their long term future there as well as a

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 11>lot of Western companies. You know what exactly is is

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 11>there going to be in terms of room for international

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 11>companies given the desire for from China to really dominate

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 11>this industry and also dominate it's on market.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Crazy down.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 3>We thank you as always, Welcome back to New Meg Technology.

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm Calin Hid in New York. We check in on one.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Key reflection of risk sentiment over the course of this week.

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin at one point on Tuesday exceeding one hundred and

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 3>eight thousand dollars per token, and now we dive down

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 3>to about ninety seven thousand dollars level that we're only

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 3>off about five percent since the trading days on Sunday,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 3>remember the rest of the wicked this trades twenty four

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 3>to seven.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 4>But we are seeing just money come out for the

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 4>first time. In fact, after fifteen.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Straight days of money going into those spot bitcoin ets,

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 3>we had a pause and a record outflow on Thursday,

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 3>six eighty million dollars. People start to digest what higher

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 3>for longer? Just two rate cuts come twenty twenty five

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 3>really does mean for an ultimately record run that we've

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 3>seen for bitcoin since the election of Trump. Now we

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 3>want to just dig into is what some of the

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 3>excibits have been saying our investment management ceo, for example,

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Kathy Wood joining Bloomberg The Close yesterday to discuss her

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 3>outlook for bitcoin in twenty twenty five.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 4>She also talked about her bets on Tesla.

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 3>And how much the incoming Trump administration will impact the

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Tesla story and in particular autonomous driving.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Just take a listen.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 12>I think one of the changes again back to regulation

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 12>is the likelihood that autonomous mobility, so robotaxis are going

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 12>to be regulated not on the state level, so fifty

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 12>different regulators, but on the federal level. After all, autonomous

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 12>vehicles will travel from state to states, so it really

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 12>should be federal legislation. So I think that will speed

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 12>up the move towards autonomous taxi networks. And I do

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 12>believe for that reason, investors analysts are starting to model

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 12>out what that will mean to the Tesla model.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 4>It will take their.

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 12>Gross margins from mid teens right now up into the

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 12>sixties if we are right, because robotaxis and autonomous taxi

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 12>network is a SaaS model. I think the other thing

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 12>that has happened is more and more people are seeing

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 12>videos of the humanoid robot doing all sorts of things

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 12>that we didn't think were possible as the dexterity in

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 12>its hands get so much better.

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Katy, I do want to pivot here and ask

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you about some of the market action, particularly over the

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>last few months, and particularly when it comes to crypto.

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you've seen.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>The big run up in bitcoin above briefly above one

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred grand, now back below that today, but certainly phenomenal

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>run on a year to date base system where it

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>was just a few months ago. Here do you still

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of see bitcoin really hitting some of those lofty

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>milestones that you've talked about before, you know, I mean,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand is still a long way from a million.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I do kind of wonder how much further you think

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>this could actually go.

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 12>Well, what's interesting about bitcoin today, Now that we're going

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 12>to get more regulatory green lights, we're seeing institutional investors

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 12>focus on this new asset class, and as they're learning

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 12>about it, they're saying, wait a minute, this new asset class,

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 12>or this component of a new asset class, Bitcoin is

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 12>going to reach twenty one million units out there, twenty

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 12>one million bitcoin out there at its peak and no

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 12>more from there on, Where are we now, we're all

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 12>ready above nineteen and a half million units, and so

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 12>if institutional investors are looking at this new asset class

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 12>more seriously, and bitcoin is really the first of its

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 12>kind in a new asset class, and we believe the

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 12>biggest opportunity of them all, they must consider an allocation

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 12>and so supply demand. They're doing the arithmetic, and we

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 12>see a million to a million and a half by

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 12>twenty thirty that the probability of that has increased because

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 12>of institutional.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Some fundamentals there from Kathywood of Ook Investment Management. Let's

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 3>stick on Bitcoin, the crypto ecosystem a little bit more

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 3>as we've seen of course it falling from its record

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 3>highs and having impact on some of the smaller coins too,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 3>or following the hoky signals coming from the Fed, Matt

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 3>Hans in the house Bitwise Asset Management Chief investment Officer

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 3>Matt just we saw the fundamental reasons why Kathywood is

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 3>still bullish into twenty twenty five and beyond.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 4>But should anyone be worrying.

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 3>About the sudden weakness that we've seen in the last

0:25:58.760 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>few trading days.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 8>No, it's great to be on I think the weakness

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 8>we've seen over the last few days is a healthy pullback.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 8>If you look at the crypto market big picture, it's

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 8>run up substantially since the election. We saw a lot

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 8>of leverage build up in the system, and this is

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 8>a natural washing out of leverage. There's been about two

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars of forced liquidations over the last two days.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 8>This has happened in crypto since its very earliest period.

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 8>We need to reset the leverage levels and then we'll

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 8>build from there. But the long term drivers are still intact.

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 8>We're still in a strong bull market. I think Kathy

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 8>is right about where this is going. We feel exactly

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 8>the same at bitwise.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you are someone who has seen some highs

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 3>and lows. You understand the volatility and the asset class map,

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 3>but I'm interested in it. Who is coming to your

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 3>asset management company? Oh, we've got some exciting music playing

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>on set that thrilled to hear about what you think

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 3>in terms of institutional money coming now bit wise as way,

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 3>is it still a flood of retail and high net

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 3>worth individuals?

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 4>What are you see in terms of changes?

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really been both so far this year.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 8>But I'm aligned with Kathy and thinking that the institutions

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 8>have now started moving in in size. When you saw

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 8>the fifteen straight days of inflows into the Bitcoin ETF's

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 8>post election, I believe that was institutional capital at bit wise.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 8>Every year we survey professional investors and ask them what's

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 8>keeping them out of the market, and for six straight

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 8>years they said a lack of regulatory clarity.

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, that regulatory.

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 8>Clarity is coming and that's open the floodgates to institutions.

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 8>And I would just say, I think most people underestimate

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 8>the size of this blackrock. Just came out and said

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 8>most people should have one to two percent allocation to bitcoin.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 8>There's one hundred trillion dollars of institutional assets out there.

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 8>Two percent is a lot of investment that still has

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 8>to happen. We're going to start seeing that really come

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 8>in in twenty twenty five.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 4>Into bitcoin still predominantly. How is this going to broaden

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 4>ow map?

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're already seeing it broadened out.

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 8>Actually, a lot of people were worried about the Ethereum ETFs,

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 8>for instance, which launched this summer and had tepid inflows.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 8>But over the last month or so you've seen billions

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 8>of dollars flow into those products. Again, the things that

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 8>have happened in crypto in the past keep happening. Historically,

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 8>most people enter crypto through bitpoint and then they discover

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 8>Ethereum and then they think about Solana. There's no reason

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 8>to assume that the institutions that came into bitpoint won't

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 8>move on to other assets in the future. In fact,

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 8>I think in twenty twenty five you're going to see

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 8>an explosion of interest in index based strategies that give

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 8>diversified exposure to crypto. Of course, something we've been doing

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 8>at bitwise since twenty seventeen when we pioneered that concept.

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 8>I think twenty twenty five is when that sort of

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 8>becomes a mainstream way to allocate to this space, the

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 8>same way it is to stocks and bonds and real

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 8>estate and everything else.

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:52.719
<v Speaker 3>You were talking about how the regulatory picture has going

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 3>to become clearer. We've seen a new AI cryptos are announced.

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>It's someone who's invested in bitwise, David Sacks.

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 4>How much have you been in touch with David? How

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 4>much have you been.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately able to steer the conversation from a bitwise perspective.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, David is a good friend of bit Wise,

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 8>has been an investor for a long period of time.

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 8>The reason it's so important to have someone like David

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 8>Sacks in that position is these two industries are critical

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 8>to America's future, and they've really been constrained and challenged

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 8>by regulatory you know, overreach, regulation by enforcement. I think

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 8>the market probably doesn't understand how fast these industries can

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 8>move if there is regulatory clarity. So you know, bit

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:41.239
<v Speaker 8>wise is involved in Washington. We talked to folks in

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 8>Washington all the time. It's great to have people who

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 8>understand crypto now taking office.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just excited to see what happens from here.

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 3>We went back to something you just said that things

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 3>happen again and again when it comes to crypto. The

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 3>dominance of bitcoin was your pursuit of thought. But what

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>happens again and again is that all boats rise, and

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 3>not all boats are great. And we see meme coins

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 3>coming out thick and fast, being spun up, and there's

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 3>fun and there's exuberance, and there's an air of being

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 3>at the seat of the table at blackjack sometimes and

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not taking that away from the market participants, but

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 3>how much is there a worry that mean coins are

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 3>going to become something that do ultimately hurt those who

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 3>don't understand them enough.

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 4>The trading nature of it.

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 8>All, Yeah, I think that's worth being concerned about. And

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 8>again I think the answer there is better regulatory clarity.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 8>We've sort of taken a hands off approach. We're not

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 8>going to touch this, which isn't the right way to

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 8>help investors. We need reasonable rules that allow crypto to

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 8>thrive but separates the good from the bad. So it's

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 8>absolutely true investors moving into cryptos should be careful. There's

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 8>a big difference between bitcoin and the latest AI driven

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 8>meme coin. Folks need to understand that. So, yeah, we

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 8>worry about this. People need to understand why mean coins exist.

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 8>I agree it's a citing part of the market, but

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 8>it shouldn't be a huge part of your portfolio.

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 3>And let's just talk about the intersection of tradfi as

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 3>people would call it, and crypto and how we're seeing

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 3>a fusing together real world assets is something people talk

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot about ultimately going onto the blockchain of some sort.

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 3>But Matt, there's also new offerings being spun up, whether

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 3>it's in the options market, whether just other ways institutionally

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 3>minded players can access the overall ecosystem. Is that progressing

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 3>and maturing the way you want to see it?

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Absolutely.

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 8>We've been talking about crypto as a new asset class

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 8>for a number of years, and a new asset class

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 8>needs all of those pieces to thrive. It needs options,

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 8>it needs ETFs, it needs ETF options, it needs futures,

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 8>it needs other derivatives. It needs institutional players taking part

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 8>in this ecosystem. We've been checking every box as an industry.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 8>So people who are skeptical that this is going to

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 8>be a major new asset class that stands alongside stock

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 8>and bonds and commodities in real estate, you just need

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 8>to look at that track record. So from my perspective,

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 8>it's been beautiful to see we've made a hugely bored

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 8>in twenty twenty four, and I think that's going to

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 8>accelerate in twenty twenty five.

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Now, Hagen a bit wise Asset Management say well, happy holidays,

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 3>thank you. Coming up, we'll discuss AI agents and how

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 3>they're revolutionizing customer service. Catherine Costarera is with us from Creatio.

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology. The EU has given unconditional approval

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 3>to Invidia to buy the Israeli startup run Ai, which

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 3>developed software for handling AI computing resources and has been

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 3>a closet collaborator with Invidias's twenty twenty and the European

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Commission stated the takeover didn't pose any competition threats despite

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia's position as a quote leading producer of key hardware

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 3>for AI applications used in the EU and beyond. Now,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 3>let's just take a little bit look about the applications

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 3>of AI agent to KI so all you're going to

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 3>hear in twenty twenty five, Let's bring in an expert

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 3>there for Catherine Costerramer, CEO and founder of the no

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 3>code and software automation company Creatio, valued at more than

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 3>one point two billion dollars. You've been raising funds last

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 3>time we spoke, and you're taking on some of the

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 3>heavyweights that are publicly traded Salesforce service now and I'm

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 3>interested as to how the agent force of salesforce is

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 3>something that you've already been doing at Creatio or having

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 3>to play catch upon.

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 9>Hello, Carlian, So, first of all, thank you very much

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 9>for having me. Very excited to be here today and

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 9>very excited to talk about the future of enterprise software.

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 9>I can tell you that I've never been as excited

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 9>about the industry as I am now, even when the

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 9>Internet was developing. Even at that time, I wasn't as

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 9>excited as MTA. Because the CRM and workflow automation software,

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 9>no code platforms that Creation Creato is building is going

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 9>to look completely different than three to five years from now.

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 9>Very exciting times.

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so it looks different because already you've been helping

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 3>basically people who can't code code, but now agents is

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 3>that a co pilot model just makes things even more bespoke.

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Have you not been deploying that already in previous iterations?

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 3>Is now the market is caught onto it?

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, brilliant. So Creata has been AI native. And the

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 9>biggest difference of Creative from you mentioned Salesforce, for example,

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 9>is that we combine in AI command center all different

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 9>patterns of AI. It's obviously generative AI like AI skills,

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 9>it's agentic AI. It would be predictive AI, it would

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 9>be prescriptive AI. So dependent on the use case again

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 9>you mentioned service, it could be sales automation, marketing automation.

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 9>We're going to be doing the particular use cases combining

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 9>all different patterns of AI, and as it is a

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 9>native it's not an additional module on top of it.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 9>It's not like we're announced CREATAI as a step traditional

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 9>module and we charge for it. It's actually quite an opposite.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 9>We're not charging for it. It's the creational platform because

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 9>AI is the central part of the.

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Platform ultimately, with everyone offering some sort of form of

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 3>agent and a lot of it helping with coding. How

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 3>do you fend your territory even if you're saying you

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 3>know you're not having to pay extra for the generative

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 3>AI or new AI applications is in your heart, But

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 3>once others have got that pricing sorted and they're already

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 3>in the rooms of your customers, how do you send

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the territory?

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, brilliant. So, first of all, let's start with saying

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 9>that what creation AI delivers is to a part of

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 9>the equation, if you will. From one end, it's no

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 9>code development, as you exactly correctly said, so with AI

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 9>building the applications on our no code platform. And the

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 9>second part is using AI in the end user use

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 9>cases like marketing, automation, sales, automation, service automation you need.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 9>So the combination of those two this is the biggest

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 9>power that Creation delivers. And again being a native it's

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 9>not a separate module on top of the existing platform.

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 9>It is the platform itself. So the experience of a

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 9>user is completely different. The experience that we're building with

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 9>the user is creating for the user is not the

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:25.720
<v Speaker 9>user learning how to use the software. It's AI creation.

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 9>AI is learning how to collaborate with this particular end

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 9>user of the application. Because as we all know, English

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 9>is the future program and language, and basically the collaboration

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 9>between the user like yourself or myself, who is the

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 9>workflow and CRM software. In the future, it's going to

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 9>be using the natural language, using the natural language, and

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 9>will be asking to create clothes, to create new digital campaigns.

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 9>And it's very simple, very simple interface that is embedded

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 9>in all the other applications that you're.

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Using as well. I'm really interested in adoption ultimately.

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 3>That seems to be a bit of a bottleneck. We're

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 3>hearing of late that there's seen a plateauing of employees

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 3>using the tools that have been invested in by the

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 3>CEOs and the LIGHT because they're worried that they're being

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 3>deemed lazy in some way or they're not getting the

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 3>training that's necessary. But we also know that really to

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 3>see real creativity, you just need to get this into users'

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 3>hands and see how they adopt it.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 4>What have you seen a Creatio? How have people been

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 4>using it?

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 9>And continuing to yes and listen, Thank you very much

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 9>for asking this question. There are two aspects of it.

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 9>So the first aspect is everyone is building and developing

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 9>the new AI skills, and Creation does exactly the same way,

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 9>expanding the library of AI skills, meaning we expand the

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 9>number of use cases that can be covered using AI.

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 9>And again, the future, if you ask me about twenty

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 9>twenty five, the future is that the user can do

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 9>any CRM use case in Creatio AI without actually opening

0:37:55.400 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 9>any other interfaces, just one Creation AI interpace and collaboration

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 9>in English. So building those AI skills, it takes a

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 9>little bit of time, but Creation is definitely in a

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 9>front runner here. But from the other side, let's talk

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 9>about this the pricing part of it, because in a

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:18.760
<v Speaker 9>case of Creation, Creation AI is literally the platform itself.

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 9>So all our users who have the base licenses of Creatio,

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 9>they already have access to creation AI, while in other

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 9>cases with our competitors, they do need to acquire to

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 9>buy additional licenses in order to start this adoption process.

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 9>So partially, I guess again I don't know exactly the

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 9>salesforce numbers, but I would guess that would be partially

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 9>the reason why their adoption is not as fast as

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 9>they would expect to predict.

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 3>And just to clarify, it's not salesforce as numbers, it

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 3>was actually some numbers put out though by Slack that

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 3>we were looking across various different industry groups, across various

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 3>different AI adoptions and different tools.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 4>But it was great to speak with you. Thank you

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 4>for coming on happy holidays.

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Catherine Kostueva, founding CEO of Creatio Teams does union members

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 3>they're striking against Amazon for a second day, just as

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 3>shoppers make their final Christmas purchases. Groups of workers at

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 3>seven facilities in California, New York, and Annoyed Georgia are

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 3>demanding better wages and working conditions. Amazon says it's filed

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 3>unfair labor practices charges against the union as the Teams

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 3>claims a strike expansion is coming, but it makes about

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:36.919
<v Speaker 3>day has been across this story, and Matt, how much

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:38.439
<v Speaker 3>impact is it actually having.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 13>Well, the best we can tell, not a whole lot.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 13>These are seven facilities, and that sounds like a lot,

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 13>but you know, against Amazon's base of something like a

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 13>thousand depots in the US, there's a lot of whigger room.

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 13>They've got to send packages through other facilities, you know,

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 13>especially as the teams have been making noise about a

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 13>potential strike for more than a week now, so they

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 13>had some advance noticed this was coming, and they knew

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 13>which facilities, So I wouldn't expect this to derail their

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 13>operation at all.

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 3>But what about derailing the future path of unionization will broadly, Matt,

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 3>because all of this is about teamsters trying to lure

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 3>over more people to join.

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 4>I see, that's right, and.

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 13>On that front, I think we'll see. But this is

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 13>definitely the biggest action to date targeting Amazon by US

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 13>labor in the United States. You know, there's been union

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 13>drives at specific warehouses before, no one has ever tried

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 13>what the teamsters are doing, which is organizing you know,

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:27.919
<v Speaker 13>across their delivery depots and contract workers and Amazon Blue

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 13>badge employees themselves. So this is a pretty big effort. Amazon,

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 13>for their part, says it's a lot of pr so far,

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 13>but you know, they certainly have the teamsters full attention

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:37.760
<v Speaker 13>now and they're taking it seriously.

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Look, other companies are being affected by strike action at

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the moment as well, Starbucks being one of them. And

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested as to how these leaders of the businesses

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 3>are looking towards the next administration because many workers feel represented,

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 3>but many feel that perhaps some things said by Trump

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and Musk around unions have been pretty averse to them.

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:57.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so I think union union folks are pretty sober

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 13>on the reality of the changing administration.

0:40:59.600 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 13>The National Labor Relations Sport has been a very labor

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 13>friendly body under the Biden administration. That's likely to change

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 13>in the Trump years. But that said, workers have said, listen,

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 13>this is all about developing support on the factory floor,

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 13>you know, among your barista pals, among people packing packages, right,

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 13>and that's not necessarily been a change. It's all about

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 13>what kind of support they can drum up among the workers,

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 13>rather than does DC have their back.

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Matt Day, We thank you Amazon, cha is still training

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 3>higher amid some of the strike action.

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 4>We really appreciate you joining on it now.

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 3>Let's just get back to the markets a little bit

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 3>more broadly now, because it is a volatile day, folks,

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 3>and unsurprisingly so because it's triple witching. What does that

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 3>mean options expiring? It just adds that level of volatility.

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 3>As we come towards the close of the week, we're

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 3>up one point six percent now, and then that's that

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred we were in negative territory to start, trade

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 3>people trying to brush off some of the perhaps over movement,

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 3>over reaction to the FED signaling there'll be but two cuts.

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 4>Coming in twenty twenty five.

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Crypto, though, is still underwater ninety six thousand, well off

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 3>the one hundred and eight thousand level.

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 4>But boy, what a run.

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 3>It has been for twenty twenty four, does it? For

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 3>this edition of Bloomberg Technology, do not forget to check

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 3>out our podcast finding on the terminal as well as

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 3>online on.

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 4>Apple, Spotify, and iHeart. We'll be back in the new year.

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 4>You'll see me across other other programs. This is Bloomberg Technology.