WEBVTT - What’s Next for Apple?

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello, everyone,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette, and

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as he typically does, and because

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't get rid of him and the senior writer,

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland, I working here no more. That's a colorful

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>introduction to our topic. Yeah, we're gonna talk about what's

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>next for Apple, what's coming up for Apple now that

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs has resigned. And for those of you who

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>somehow managed to avoid the news on August twenty, yeah,

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you managed to do it. But

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>then on augustn Steve Jobs sent a letter to the

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple's Board of Directors handing in his resignation as see

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>EO of Apple, although he did suggest or request that

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>he'd be allowed to remain chairman of the board. And

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>he also suggested that the CEOO, the Chief Operating Officer,

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook, be named the new CEO of Apple and

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>uh and the board took both of those actions. So

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, so Jobs is still he's still with Apple.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>The way that the News covered this, it sounded like

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Jobs had not only left Apple, but that he was

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>gone forever, and that it was almost like eulogies were

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>being written. And as far as we know, as far

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>as we know, the reason for Jobs stepping down he

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 1>said he was no longer able to fulfill his duties

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>as CEO, which uh he actually I can read the

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>verbatim the way that he worded this. I have always said,

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>if there ever came a day when I could no

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple's chief executive,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately,

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that day has come. I hereby resigned as chief executive

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of Apple. So the assumption is that Steve jobs health

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>has taken such a poor turn that he just feels

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that it is not he's not capable of fulfilling that role,

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and he has been on medical leave or he was

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 1>on medical leave since January and and so yeah. But

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, though, that that is speculation. He did

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not directly say that. I mean, it's you could say that,

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you could say it's a safe bet, but it's not

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the whole story and we should not jump to conclusions.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And before we go any further, and we have done

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>an episode about Steve Jobs and his work at Apple.

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It was an earlier episode. We actually did an episode

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>about Steve Jobs, and we did an episode about Bill Gates.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Because these two men were both visionary, They were both

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>leaders in in the personal computer revolution. Yeah, they both

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>were dropouts of college and they age, They both are

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>incredibly wealthy. They both have very strong personalities and very

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>specific ideas of where things need to be. Um, they

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of similarities, there are a lot of

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>differences as well. Anyway, we did a podcast about Steve

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Jobs back then that if you are really curious about

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the man, I suggest you listen to. We're going to

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>cover some of that probably again in this conversation, because

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it's necessary to really understand why people are reacting in

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>such a strong way to this news. And um, and

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>some of it, you could probably say, is to an

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>over emphasis on the importance of the news. Not to

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>belittle Steve Jobs or to say that his contributions haven't

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>been enormous to Apple's success. They clearly have been, but

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to turn around and say Apple's doomed is a little reactionary.

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I would go so far as to say

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it might even be a lot reaction. I didn't want

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 1>to react too strongly to how reactionary it might be,

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>because then we have a positive feedback reactionary loop open.

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I think that the top is still spinning.

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's check our inception. Yes, okay, so we're still a

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dream within a dream at least one level down. Um,

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>did you hear what Eric Schmitt recently said about Steve Jobs? Yes?

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>This is this is pretty phenomenal. Alright, so Eric Schmitt,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>former CEO of Google, still with Google. So here's what

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he said. Uh that you probably thought you heard but

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize you had not right, it's really early. Well,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chris, at this point it's just us. See

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan's talking. Just agree with what he says. It's easier.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Apparently there's a drinking game. So down right, congratulations. I

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hope you guys are being safe out there. Um. No,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Eric Schmitt said recently that Steve Jobs was probably the

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>best CEO in fifty or a hundred years, and I

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>really hadn't heard that. It's you know, that's that's huge praise.

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>And you've got to remember Google and Apple do not

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>have necessarily the most friendly of relationships with one another.

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>They used to be. Yeah, we used to be on

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the board of directors for Apple as well as the

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>board of directors for Google. He was on both at

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the same time, and in fact stepped down from Apple

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>because of some worries that this was sort of a

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>collusion or perhaps monopolization of of two fields or really

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>one field, just two different approaches to it. Yeah. Yeah,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's pretty high praise. I mean, there have

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of really impressive CEOs of all kinds

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of companies, not just tech companies, but I mean just

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the people who might be considered uh,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs as peers out there, Larry Ellison and yeah,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean just famous tech personality and not just tech either,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>because the thing about Jobs is that, you know, Jobs

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely left his mark on Apple. I mean Apple, Apple's

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>culture and Apple's products are the way they are in

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>large part due to Steve Jobs. Not to say that

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the other people at Apple haven't made enormous contributions, fundamental

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>contributions to the company's success. They have, but Steve Jobs

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is he It's hard to imagine Apple as it is

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>today without Steve Jobs in that picture, because he and

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the company are almost synonymous. And so I would compare

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs with some other famous leaders who also the

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>company in some cases literally was synonymous, for example, Walt Disney,

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>because Walt Disney had a reputation for having a very

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>clear vision of where he wanted his company to go

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and what he wanted to accomplish, and he also had

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a reputation for not wanting to compromise on that vision,

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever it takes to make that vision a reality,

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and he was had a reputation for being a taskmaster.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>That working for Disney was incredibly rewarding professionally, but it

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was also really rough. I mean it was it meant

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that you were working harder than you had ever worked before,

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and you were expected to contribute that level all the time. Well,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot can be said about Steve Jobs that is

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>almost identical to that, right So, and in fact, you know,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you even have Jobs as a relationship with Disney goes

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>even further because Jobs sits on the board for Disney

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and also was the head of Pixar, So you know

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Pixar is also now a Disney company. So the relationship

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond just the superficial where you can say Disney

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and Jobs are like this because of I mean, the

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>two merged in a way which is, you know interesting.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that Jobs is um becoming synonymous with Apple

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is in part to two things which are oddly um

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at odds with one another. Um, which is, you know,

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>he co founded the company and then he was essentially

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>forced out of the company. Yeah, that's that's we should

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>probably address that a little bit. Um. Yeah, I mean,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the he his strong personality hasn't always served him well, well,

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't made the best impression on other very influential people.

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So so back in the early days of Apple, and

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking the mid eighties here, uh, Steve Jobs had

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>his his behavior. He he clearly was a genius. I mean,

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's already obvious that he was a genius, that the

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>man was a visionary. But he also had a very uh, well,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the best word to use, strong personality, you'll say,

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and and again a desire to attain a vision without compromise,

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>which you know that can rub some people the way.

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, his inexperience with business lead the Apple's

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>board of directors to choose a different person to act

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>as president and CEO, and that person was John Scully. Yeah,

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Scully actually came from a completely different field. Yes, he

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>came from pepsi Um and uh, a lot of people didn't.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like that because they thought, well, you know,

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a completely different change, and you know it's

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not somebody who is intimately tech and he didn't

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily share the vision that that Apple's founders had when

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>they created the company. So then you're asking, well, it

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>can you even call Apple the same company that it

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was when it started, because now you've got, uh, someone

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>who's coming from this from a totally different angle in charge.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, eventually Jobs left Apple. You know, you could

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>argue whether or not Apple fired him or Jobs resigned.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of essentially Scully kept pushing, pushing Jobs further

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and further to the edge of the company. I think

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they ran them off. Yeah. Yeah, essentially it's almost like

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>if I'm nasty enough, they'll go away sort of thing. Um,

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that's oversimplifying it, but essentially that's what's happened. And then

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>so Jobs leaves the company, and then he goes off

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and does his own thing. Meanwhile, Scully's tenure at Apple

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is not the best thing for that company. It's the

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>company starts to have some serious issues over the next decade. Yeah,

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it had. It had supply problems. UM. They were known

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for creating multiple computers with hard to Basically we're using

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a numbering system. At that point, UM they had and

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and the numbering system. It wasn't clear necessarily what computer

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>was what UM. The differences between the pro and consumer

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>computers was confusing, and they and Scully started to do

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>something that Jobs absolutely refused to do. Well, there was

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>one more thing before I was going to add that

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>simply that they were also known for quality problems, which

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is not something that a lot of people associate with

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Apple in two thousand eleven, but at the time there

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>were no Yeah, they were known for releasing lemons, complete lines.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>You know the UM you know this particular model number

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>five thirty stinks. Don't ever buy this computer because it's

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>just a terrible, terrible design. Well, the the other thing

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that Scully did that Jobs definitely did not approve of

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was essentially approving clones of Apple devices other manufacturers to

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to use um TO to incorporate Apple's technology

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>into into their own machines. That's not something Jobs was

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>ever interested in. And UH. It was what enabled Windows

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to become as big as it was was IBM's decision

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to allow clones of its machines, so it had there

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>was precedence for this move, but it ended up not

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>being the right idea for Apple. And in nine the

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>company Apple, the company decided to purchase a company called Next,

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>which was Steve Jobs's company. It was a company that

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was dedicated to creating uh new computer systems specifically for

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>educational purposes, not just educational purposes, but that was like

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the main focus. Yeah, I was aimed at that market. Now,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>there were other competitors that I mean basically people analysts

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>were saying at the time that Apple was doomed. Um.

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, Michael Dell actually was famous in his proclamation

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that Apple should be uh sold off and the proceeds

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>be redistributed to its stockholders because it was in such

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>bad shape. Um. Wired magazine had a famous cover and

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>UH in which they were talking about Apple's problems and

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>what should be done, if anything, to save the company,

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>if anything could save the company, and um, it was

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty widely own and they had an operating system that

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was languishing the next version of its operating sy Some

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>people kept saying, when is this thing coming out? It

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like it's ever coming out, and they said,

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>well they're There are rumors going around that Apple was

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>looking to buy Next or some other companies, one of

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>which was buh B as in b operated Um had

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a computer called the b Box, which was a was

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>pretty innovative for its time and at four processors and

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>was led by a former Apple executive named Jean Luis Gassa,

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>who also has a strong personality, and a lot of

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.599
<v Speaker 1>people thought it was down to be versus Next, or

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at least a lot of people that I was reading

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>about at the time because I was actually following this.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And Apple decided to acquire Next outright, and they sort

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of acquired Steve Jobs along with it. A lot of

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>people thought that Apple was more interested in Steve than

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>was the Next operating system, although Next operating System did

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>play a fundamental role in what would become the new

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>version of mac OS. But yes, so Steve Jobs comes

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>back to Apple and before too long becomes the new

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>president and CEO of Apple, and at that point Jobs

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>started to to undo some of the changes that Scully

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>had made during his tenure. He completely remained Apple, I

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>would go so far as to see and it took

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>some years before Apple really started to see he some

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>big success because at this point, really, and you could

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>argue still today, Mac max just consisted of a very

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>tiny portion of the personal computer market. They just really

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't make a huge dent. It was mainly PCs, so

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Windows based machines, and then there was a tiny slice

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of Apple products. But also, I mean, just in just

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to put it in perspective, at that point, Windows was out,

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was coming out. I mean, Windows was really hitting its

0:14:55.080 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>stride in making inroads to the desktop in businesses all

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Yeah, it was essentially the business operating system.

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>It was much more polished than Windows three point x um,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>much more polished it was. It was a huge leap

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>forward for Windows. So I mean Apple had that was

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the wrong time, the exact wrong time for Apple to

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>be stinking it up. So job starts making changes. But

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not really until about two thousand one that the

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>next huge thing happens that really pushes Apple forward, and

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the introduction of the iPod and MP three players

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>existed before the iPod came out. It's not that the

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>iPod was a new idea, but the iPod had an

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>elegant design compared to the other MP three players that

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>were out on the market at that time. And Steve

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Jobs is, uh, he's many things. He's a visionary, he's

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a powerful leader, but he's also incredibly um good at

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>marketing and and getting a message across and getting you

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to believe then buy into that message. You could walk

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>into an Apple keynote completely skeptical and walk out thinking

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta get to an Apple store. Now, well, there

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>weren't any Apple stores in two thousands, and an Apple

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:17.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't make anything other than computers and operating systems. UM.

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Actually it did make other software, which it spun off,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>actually spun off a division of itself called Claris, which

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>made all kinds of other software. I mean, they were

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>into They even had their own work suite UM, and

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they had some other stuff they did. They did have

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the Newton, which was a p d A and the

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the Image, which wasn't an educational device that people kind

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of wish they still made for a while. I just

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think of the Simpsons with the Newton. Yeah, make a note,

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Beat up Martin, eat up Martha. But yeah. Handwriting recognition

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was well known for noting, um, that will get somebody

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>who really loves their Newton, who still uses their Newton?

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Who who can will? Even the creators of the Newton

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 1>admit that the handwriting software was not quite ready it was.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>That was one of those things where the company was

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>pushing for it before the the hardware and software were

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>fully baked Apple, fully baked pie Pie. So so, Steve

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Jobs introduced a new scheme in which they would create

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a consumer line of portables and desktops, and a and

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>an educational line which was sort of off to the side,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the pro line of of portables and desktops.

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Then you had the iPod, and then in two thousand

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>seven you had the iPhone, and in two thousand ten

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the iPad. In fact, way back when the iPod was

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>coming out, Jobs had already predicted something that has come true,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>which is that the digital lifestyle would be one where

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>we would have a lot of digital devices and the

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>personal computer would become more of a synchronous zation hub

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and less of a of a focus on your computing time. Essentially,

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he predicted the post PC era. And you could argue,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and we have argued, that we are in a post

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>PC era. It's not that the PC has gone away.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not that it's not important. It's just that we

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>are using other devices to interact with the Internet and

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to do just basic computing that have nothing that that

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>do not resemble desktops or laptops. It's more we get

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>our information from more places than just our PC, right,

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and more frequently than we do with our PCs in general.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I sit in front of a PCL day,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>so I get a lot of my information from my PC.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise I no longer feel like, you know, I

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>still carry that experience with me when I walk away

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>from the PC because I have a smartphone. And so, yeah,

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>what Jobs was saying has come true. Uh he also

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>uh he also was really good again at at selling

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>these ideas like like the iPad AD. I was famously

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>skeptical about how the iPad would do in the market

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>because I was thinking of the old tablet computers, and

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.239
<v Speaker 1>tablet computers have been around for a while and they

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>just never took off the consumer market, and I was thinking,

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>how the heck is Jobs going to convince people that

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they need a device that historically no one has wanted,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>right And I know I'm exaggerating by saying no one,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but for the sake of argument, I recently had a

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Wilson Tang from c NET and he gave

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>me his perspective of what he thought one day when

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it was after the iPad had been announced, but before

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he had he had purchased one, and it really makes

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. He said. He was on the

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>subway in New York and he was looking around and

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>he saw that someone was reading a book, and someone

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>else was reading a newspaper, and someone was playing a

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>game on a device, and someone's listening to an MP

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>three player. And they thought, wait a minute, that's what

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this is for. That's what this iPad is for. It's not, ah,

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not that it's taking it's creating a new

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>space or whatever, but it's it's it's almost like, it's

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>not that it's replacing smartphones. It's not that it's replacing

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>m P three players or video game controllers. It's that

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's doing all of these things at the same time,

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's replacing paper. It's replacing books and newspapers in

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the sense that you can then consume them on this

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>one device and you don't have a larger form factor

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to deal with when you're done with the

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever the thing is, whether it's a book or a newspaper,

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to throw it away or file it

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>away or or you know, put it on a bookshelf.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You just you can get another file and look at that.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And when you think about in that perspective, uh, it

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>really that's exactly what Steve Jobs did. He showed that

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>this is how you could use this device and how

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it would give you a lot more flexibility in the

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>way you consume media and play games and all of

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>these sort of ideas. And uh and I just did

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>not see that. I didn't see it until Jobs took

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the stage and explained it to me. And that's one

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of the things that you gotta argue about Jobs is

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that he really is a visionary, when he really is

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a kind of person who gets an idea and can

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>see it and the value in it before anyone else does.

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>And then he can, even more amazingly than that, convince

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>you to agree with his point of view. But you know,

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the day before you never would have considered it the

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>day after. You can't imagine it any other way. It's

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the reality distortion field. Yes, that often we'd call it

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the reality distortion field. That you know, it's magical. I

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna love it. Right. One more thing too,

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but one more thing that hasn't been around for ages,

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but he was famous for leaving the most compelling, most

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>wow factor element out of a product release until the

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>very last minute when he was on stage. One more thing.

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.239
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like the Columbo One more thing. It's

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>when he drops the hammer and you and you get

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that like he figured it out. He knew the game

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>before you even knew you were playing. It's the kicker. Yeah, yeah,

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that's um. That's the thing too. Because I would not

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have imagined that people would tune in to a

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:21.719
<v Speaker 1>computer companies product announcements for entertainment. Yes, you have. You

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have people taking time off of work to log into

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a systems to watch either to watch the keynote live

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>or to watch some tech journalists covering the keynote live.

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you have live blogs that blog line

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>by line what's being said on stage, and people are

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just furiously refreshing their pages to see what the next

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>thing is that is. I mean, how many other companies

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>have that Google? Maybe? Well, they and and this is

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that other companies have realized that

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple was doing well with Steve Jobs's help. Um, and

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>people like Google have done that with and and more

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and more. You see tech news outlets like see net

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>going to Google I oh and talking about the next

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>version of Android and telling you what the new thing is. Um.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw it somewhat with Palm with the web os

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. It didn't really pan out well for them.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But but you have to have someone when you're doing this.

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to have someone who's charismatic. And Steve Jobs

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>showed the tech industry, look, you guys, we can make

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>products that make people sit up and take notice. You

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>just got to show them the right way, right, Yeah,

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>he can. You can do this. You can. You can

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>introduce a totally revolutionary product that no one had any

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>desire for the day before it. I had no knowledge

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of it, and just you can create the market for that. Yeah, exactly.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You could put that in front of somebody and not

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>say anything, and that person may find it compelling or

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they may just walk away. But if you show them

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>why it's compelling, then you've got them. You hooked them,

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and and you gotta agree. I mean, the iPad sales

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a loan show that that's true. But I wanted to

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about Steve's personal style a little bit.

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Not not the way he dressed Turtle, the mock turtle

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>neck and genus. No, No, not that I wanted to

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>talk about sort of. Steve Jobs has a reputation for

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>being very outspoken and very critical, to the point where

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>some people would call it like just devastating criticism that

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, he did not hold back, and he wouldn't.

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't. It wouldn't just be a criticism of your work.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>It would He would direct insults to people who worked

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>for him, And there's been a lot of talk about

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>that about how he was kind of a a super

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>tough boss. But I've actually read some some interesting reports

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 1>that said that really his reasoning for that wasn't to

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>convince people to do things his way. He wasn't setting

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>out to belittle someone in order to get them to

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>become a yes man, right, because that's the that's the

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>popular view is that Steve Jobs has an iron will

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is why it has to be done this way. Know,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing was he was testing people, and

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>he would test them by two ways. One he would

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>try and say that their ideas had no merit in

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>an in an attempt to have them defend those ideas.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 1>And if the person could defend his or her idea

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>passionately and intelligently, then Steve Jobs would say, you know this,

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this employee really believes in this, and this is something

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.479
<v Speaker 1>I need to pay attention to and you know. So

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of a way of separating really interesting

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>ideas that had real merit out from the noise. So

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it was separating the signal from the noise in that sense.

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>It's just doing it in a really abrasive way. And

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that he was testing was by telling

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>uh an engineer that this is not the best you

0:25:55.119 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>can do. You're reinforcing a kind of insecurity that runs

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>through most engineers, which is I could have made something

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>better than this if I had really tried. You're reinforcing

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that idea. And so then the engineer goes back and

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>even if they really did put forth their full effort before,

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>somehow they scrape down and they get a little bit

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>more and they push themselves even harder. Now, the danger

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of this, of course, is that you can burn out

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>people pretty quickly. It's it's tough to be in that environment.

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, there are a lot of Apple employees

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>who said, you know, I did the best work of

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>my life for Steve Jobs, but you know, after a while,

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that just takes a psychological toll, and Steve Jobs wouldn't.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not that he would never praise people. He would

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>heap praise on people for a good job, but then

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that same person might get chewed out the next day

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if Steve Jobs sees something that he thought was not

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>up to the right standard. So you would have this

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>day where you don't when you go into work, you

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're gonna get, you know, carried around

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the office on everyone's shoulders are thrown out into the

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>parking lot and just you had no way of knowing.

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And that is a very stressful environment. It was also

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly productive environment because we saw some of the

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>most amazing products come out of Apple because of this culture.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just I know that I personally would not want

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>to work in a place with that culture. It would

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I I wouldn't last. I don't have that kind of Yeah,

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that kind of personality. It wouldn't I would,

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I would crumble. And maybe that just means that that's

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>just proof that I don't fit there, right, it's not.

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's not saying that I'm a bad person or

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that Apple is a bad company. It's just a bad fit.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And so now there's the question of with Jobs resigning,

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is that culture still going to be there. Is there

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>still going to be someone testing employees and pushing them harder?

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And will it be done the same way or will

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it Will they try a different approach? Will will Tim

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Cook who will now be the CEO, Will he find

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a different way to encourage employees than Steve Jobs. Now

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we should say that Tim Cook also has a reputation

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>for having a very specific approach to things. He's not

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>known as a visionary, but he is known as someone

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>who can take a system and make it far more

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>efficient and manageable. He's a great manager. In fact, he's

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason why Apple has a lot of deals with

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>various other companies like It's. It's the relationships formed between

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple and these companies those were overseen by Tim Cook.

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And he was just really good at getting that stuff

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to work. He can run a company very well, but

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>he does not have a reputation for being a risk

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>taker like Steve Jobs was and a visionary like Steve

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Jobs was. So that's where the question of well, now

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that Steve Jobs is gone, does this mean that Apple

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to like? Will Apple's future mean that we'll

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>still get good products? We just won't get this is

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>going to change everything type products because the iPhone was

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>billed as the device that would change everything, and then

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a way it kind of did, at least in the

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>smartphone market because before the iPhone there was no real

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer smartphone out there. Well, Apple is no longer Apple Computer.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>It is Apple Incorporated at this point, and I think

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that shows the company's intended direction. I think it's also

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>important to note um that Apple is not Steve Jobs.

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>If it were Steve by himself, he would never have

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>been able to take Apple where it is now. Yeah,

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and it because it would be a one person operation.

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And again because Steve Jobs use this way to challenge

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>people and to get them to defend their ideas and

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 1>then incorporate those ideas. You know, you could say that yes,

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs doesn't wanna, doesn't want to to end up

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>giving in or giving giving way to anyone else. But

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the truth is he just wanted to make sure the

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>best ideas were incorporated. And if it had just been

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>his own ideas, it would be a very different company today.

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it might not even exist today. He might

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>not have been able to to recover from the situation

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple was in when he came on as CEO. But yeah,

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>they're they're I mean, the company wouldn't be where it

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is today without people like Tim Cook. But people like

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan I've yes, who is a brilliant designer. He's the

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>fellow who really gives Apple products the look that they have. Yeah,

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was. He was behind some of the

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>company's most iconic UH devices, like the original iMac, like

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the iPod um, and many many other devices in those lines.

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know the that the design factor. I mean,

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>these are the things that Apple's UH opponents complain about. Oh,

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just interested in having the thing that looks cool.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Well there's That's part of Apple's appeal is that it

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>does look cool. It's part of very important, it's part

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of why Apple is claud its way back in the

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Market's part of why Apples competitors are now concerned about

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>design um and jobs also had a reputation of being

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>very specific, like if something was even just a hair off,

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he would jump on that and say, this is not right,

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we have to fix it. So, you know, those people

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for the moment are still there. And I don't think

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>there's anything you know, if you're an Apple fan, I

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's anything for you to worry about in

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the immediate future. Well, yeah, I think for the next

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>few years. The product plans are made. Yes, yeah, for

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>at least three to five years. I mean, the Apple's

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>got its product plans laid out. It's it's not like

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>these companies are just a few months ahead of whenever

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they announced something. You've got to know that when something

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is being announced that chances are there's at least two

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>generations of that device in some form of uh production

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>or planning at at the time when the one's launching.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So when we see the iPhone five launch, iPhone six

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and seven are at least in a good planning stage

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>or being lost somewhere. Yeah, I can't believe twice that's happened.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Now we're recording this just after the news broke. If

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't remember the iPhone four, there's a prototype iPhone

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>four that got lost or quote unquote loss. So it

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>may have been left in a bar and may have

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>found itself freed from someone's pocket. The details are not

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>entirely clear. What is known is that, of course, the

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>person who found it then sold the iPhone to a

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>online news source that I'm not even gonna name because

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sick of them anyway, But anyway, so I

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think of that as a very unethical thing and I'm

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>going to leave it at that. So at anyway, you

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hear this story and you're like, wow, that's terrible control

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of your products. And then it happened again. Yeah, But

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't know right now as the recording of this

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>podcast the nature of the device that was lost. We

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>know it was a prototype, or at least it was

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>an early build of a device, but we don't know

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if it's an iPhone five or maybe like the iPhone four.

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>S Now, we don't know what the yes, so we

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>don't as of the recording of this podcast, we're not

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>sure exactly what it is. But it is weird that

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>almost and it was almost a year like between the

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>two incidents, like it was a little more than a year,

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but not by much when they happened. This actually happened

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>back in July, but it wasn't until what was it

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>August thirty one when the news broke or September one?

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the Yeah, I was, I was

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>out of town, so it was hard for me to follow.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, what was funny was I was out of

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>town and someone came up to me and they said,

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about the whole iPhone bar thing?

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And I said, why are you talking to me about that?

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>That happened a year and a half ago. I think, no, no,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it happened yesterday. Wait what again? Deja vu? But yeah,

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that's what happens when Steve Jobs leaves.

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It's if he was there, it would you know, he

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>probably would have said never again, and then he leaves,

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and then again happens except that that, except that it

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>happened in July, not in that part of the story

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of falls apart when you look at the facts.

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But when the facts ever gotten in the way of

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a good story for me exactly now, Um, I don't

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's any crisis in the near future for Apple. UM,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to have to find a new spokesperson.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook, while he is a an excellent uh choice

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for someone to run a company like Apple, is not

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the showman that Steve Jobs was. So they're gonna need

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to find somebody else to carry on that part of things,

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna have to Jonathan I have tends to

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be a very quiet and private person, so although I've

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>seen him incorporated in in presentations, though it's usually in

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a very like kind of a cute way. Like when

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they launched the iPhone, he was one of the people

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that Steve Jobs called and he was wandering the actual

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 1>floor at the keynote and talking Tuesday. He was using

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a flip phone, I think, but Steve Jobs, of course

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>was on the iPhone. Right. Well, they're they're going to

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>need to find the next visionary within the company, yes,

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>or next visionaries to come up with the you know,

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>new products, new ideas. UM. But that's true of any company,

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and they may very well have those people right then

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and right there, because again it's not like Steve Jobs

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wakes up in the morning sketches out something on a

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper. And walks and make this happen and

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>then goes and eats an intern. That's not what happens. Um,

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are teams of people working on vegetarians. Okay,

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, eats a tofu intern. Uh, it's that's that's

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>not the way this works. So there are people. There

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>are brilliant designers who are working at Apple. It's just that,

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, those ideas were all sort of focused through

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs, and we're wondering if without that out the lens,

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>that is Steve Jobs, what's it gonna look like in

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>about five six years. I suspect that Apple will remain

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a strong player specifically in the mobile device market UM

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>PCs and desks and laptops and everything or desktops and laptops.

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.280
<v Speaker 1>They'll they'll still be playing in that field as well.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But we are seeing that whole post PC era descend

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>on us. So I suspect we'll still see innovation from

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>those areas. Uh, they just might not be they might

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>not have the same feel to them as the Steve

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Jobs era did, but that that doesn't mean that they

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they won't be compelling or they won't be successes. And

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a long time before the

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>post Steve Jobs era manifests itself. It might be it

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>might be a decade before we even start seeing a

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hint of that, because he really did leave a very

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>strong stamp on that company, and then as part of

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the board of directors, that stamp will probably continue for

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>a few years. Yes, he could still be quite the

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>visionary and help guide the company in his role as chairman.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>He's just not going to be their data day and

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, it may well be that hopefully what this

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is the best possible choice for Steve Jobs for his

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>health and that he will he will have his health

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>will improve and he'll live a good long time and

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>have a healthy life. So that, you know, that's really

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing when you really get down to it,

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 1>is that, I mean, we don't wish him any harm

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at all, and if it means that stepping back is

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.879
<v Speaker 1>going to help him, then by all means I hope

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that that turns out to be the case. Um. It's

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I always think of Steve Jobs as one

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of those people who, because he's so guarded about his

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>personal life, we mostly know him from his professional life.

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So to us, Steve jobs is Apple, So it's hard

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>for us to imagine him not doing that because to

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>us that that looks like that's the driving force in

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>his life. But who knows, you know, maybe that maybe

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that is a uh, you know, a big factor. But

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe he finds other elements in his life to be

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>far more compelling and we just don't know about it

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>because he keeps that personal, which is fine. There's no

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>reason to object to that, um, because he's he shouldn't

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 1>be treated just as a celebrity anyway. Fascinating man. We

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>really are expecting some interesting developments with Apple over the

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.439
<v Speaker 1>next few years, and it may be quite a few

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 1>before we can start definitively to say, oh, well here

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>we go, here's the new direction. Um, But we'll keep

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>our eyes open because you know, Apple is a huge

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>player and technology and I don't see that changing anytime

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>real soon. So if you guys have any topics he

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>would like us to tackle anything, you'd like us to

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to kind of wrap our minds around, whether it's a

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>philosophical matter sort of like this one, or if it's

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a really technical thing like you just want us to

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>explain how toasters work. Let us know, you get host toast.

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>You can let us know on Facebook and Twitter are handled.

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>There is text stuff HS, double you or shoot us

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>an email. That address is tech stuff at how stuff

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>works dot com and Chris and I will talk to

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Be sure to check out our

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.280
<v Speaker 1>new video podcast, Stuff from the Future. Join how Stuff

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Work staff as we explore the most promising and perplexing

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>possibilities of tomorrow. The How Stuff Works iPhone app has arrived.

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Download it today on iTunes, brought to you by the

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you