WEBVTT - Interview With Jeff Maggioncalda: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>This week on Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio, I

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have a really interesting guest. His name is Jeff Magian Calda.

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>He is the co founder and CEO of Financial Engines.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 1>A reader and a fan of some of our early

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier podcasts had written in and said, hey, you know

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you should interview you should interview this guy, Jeff Magian

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Calda of Financial Engines. Are you familiar with them? And

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>I said yes, I actually am very familiar with them.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Their public company, uh, they run a hundred plus billion

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets, and Bill Sharp, the Nobel Laureate economist,

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is essentially uh, the founder and the guy who put

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the original idea together. And I said, I would love

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>to interview Jeff. I don't know him. I don't know

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>how to reach him. I don't know his his information

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is in public. How do I how do I find

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this guy? And the reader said, well, I know them.

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me make an introduction. And that was about six

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>months ago. He Jeff lives in Palo Alto. He's on

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast. He's not in New York all that often.

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And when I pinned him in made the offer of Hey,

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you should come on the show. Here's who we've had on,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>here's what it's about. He said, Um, that would be interesting,

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>but I'm I'm rarely in New York. Two weeks ago,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I said, Hey, any chance you're in New York anytime soon.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>He's like, yeah, I'm in New York on on the

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>week of the of the first of the month. Let's

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>let's see what we can schedule. So here we are.

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It was really a fascinating conversation and I think you'll

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy it. So, with no further ado, here is

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Jeff Magian Calda, co founder and former

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Financial Engines. This is Masters in Business with

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. This week on Masters in

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Business on Bloomberg Radio, I have Jeff maggian Calda. He

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is the founding CEO of Financial Engines. Now, you, as

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a lay person, may not have heard of Financial Engines,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's really an interesting company with a fascinating history. Uh.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>They are currently the largest r I A in the country,

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>managing over a hundred billion dollars in assets. They were

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>founded by Nobel Laureate Bill Sharp. Uh, we'll talk a

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Bill later. And Jeff was tapped by

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the three leading investors of the firm, literally right out

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of his Stanford NBA program to take what was then

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a free website offering suggestions for asset allocation models and

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>turn it into the powerhouse that it's become today. Jeff,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you glad to be here. So

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk a little bit about that history, because

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's so amazing. Bill Sharp essentially created a

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>free website. Hey, I developed the capital asset pricing model,

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>eventually winning the Nobel Price for that. And here's the

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>output of that work. You could play with this for

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>your retirement accounts. It's free on the site. How did

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that morph into what's now with publicly traded company? Well so,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>so Bill, he's he's a genius and he is very

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>well meaning. He's always wanted to use the work he's

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>done to help people. Um. He has also been a

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.399
<v Speaker 1>total gear head and sort of hacker since the early days.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>He wrote one of the first compilers for the Basic

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>programming language back in the day, and so he had

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>his own son's sparkstation as which is his own web server.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>At the time, this is the beginning of the internet.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>No one, no one had personal computers in right, and

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>he has like a note on the darknet or something

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and so he thought, you know what, I

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>can write some simulation software and some some optimizers and

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I can make this available because I mean he saw

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>early on that the demographics of the baby boomers, uh,

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and the shift away from defined benefit plans towards four

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>O one case was going to mean a lot of

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>people had a new responsibility to invest, but but really

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't get access to very good advice, so didn't have

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the skills, didn't have access to people who can help

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>them in so many for one case, are under a

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars. Nobody is really going to take that

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>as a as a client. That just doesn't work. So

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so what did he do with that? So he started

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a website and back in the days where they used

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to index popularity, it was actually a pretty popular site.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, among the people using the internet the time,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>which were kind of the more actively technically, it was

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>much more of a crowd. It was very much else.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So his buddy Joe grin Fest, lawyer at the law school,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>former SEC commissioner. Um. He said, Bill, if you really

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>want to make a difference, you gotta start a company.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Bill was not really interested in starting a company. He's like, look,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>I want to do something good for the world. I

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to charge money for it. And Joe said,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want people to really promote the idea and

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>create a good product that people can really use, you

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>got to start a company. So so you're saying Bill Sharp,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>noble laureate, kind of a wonky academic. Is that the description?

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Why does that not surprise? Yeah? Yeah he he uh

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>his his his his pursuit of sort of the intellectual breakthroughs,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and this pursuit of doing good in the world definitely

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>trumps his pursuit for financial gain. Not not uncommon. You

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>look at people like Bob Schiller or Jeremy Siegel, or

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>when when I spoke with Siegel, it was he was

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>amazed that he made any money because that wasn't what

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he ever expected. He expected to just toil away and

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>academic obscurity and have a satisfying life. It sounds like

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Bill is Sharp is similar very much so. So so

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you're tapped. You're literally twenty seven years old, just graduating, Uh,

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Stanford NBA program. What's it like when a couple of

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>heavy hitters like Sharp and Grunfest and who's the third

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Craig Johnson. Craig Johnson also not no lightweight. Um says, hey, kid, come,

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we got an idea for you. How do you how

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do you respond to that? Well? So, so I was

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>at the time, I had I had worked for McKinsey

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>over the summer. I had taken a full time job.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So I my wife had spent the signing bonus on

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>new furniture, and we had two kids. We were weigh

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in debt and the big sum of money comes and

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what did the economists say when you get a windfall,

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the propensity to spend is like one you like, just

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>spend it? And uh. So she did and um and

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the account and uh And I had been approached by

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>our professor at the business school, h. Robert Bergelman. He

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time, I think he still teaches, And he

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>taught a class with Andy Grove, who was at the

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>time the CEO of Intel on kind of strategy and

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>information technology. And they had no cases on the internet.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>And so as an undergrad. I was an English and

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>economics major, so I knew about statistics and quant stuff.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I knew how to write, and they said, would you

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>be a case writer and write a bunch of cases

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on the internet. So I said that would be fun

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to do. I called McKensy. I said, well, you know,

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.039
<v Speaker 1>I'll becoming in January. And then it was during the

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>time that I was writing cases that I got this

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>call from Joe grin Fast, who I had worked with

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>previously at at a litigation consulting firm. And I was like,

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Sharp was my hero. It was amazing because when

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I graduated in he had received the Nobel Prize the

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>year before, and he was my graduation speaker. And I

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just thought this guy was the most amazing guy in

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. And I love the elegance of his model.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought his overall philosophies. I totally bought into it.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, generally speaking, he can't beat the market, so

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>go for a low costs. I thought that was great.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think by the way, that's managed to catch on

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit. It seems to have pretty well among

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the the investing public. So so so I was really

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuck, and I was like, well, I'm kind

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of tied up right now. And and I talked to

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>my wife, who's you know, PhD and evolutionary biology. She's like, Jeff,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to do this. This is a once in

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime thing. You have to do this. We'll figure

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>out the the money and I we'll figure that stuff

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>out later. And uh and so I'll like, you're totally right.

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how often do you get to work not

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>only with the Nobel prisminer, but with like a hero

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of yours? Uh And and so I sort of took

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the plunge, not having any idea what I was gonna do.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ridhults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My guest this week Jeff Magian Calda. He

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is the co founder and former CEO of Financial Engines,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the country's largest r I A, which manages over a

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars in four one K money. And I

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about how you guys moved into that space.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But first, there's this great little story about you playing

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Monopoly with your wife and you decided to let's run

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a million simulations of Monopoly to figure out what the

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>ideal move is for each property and what have you.

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Essentially high frequency trading the monopoly board, a little bit

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of cheating, and your wife, instead of being angry, was actually, oh,

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you should do something. Yeah, how did that about? So?

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>So so Monopoly is a is a really fun game.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It's mostly about trading, but but a lot of it

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the probability is landing on certain spaces,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, it's it's a game with pretty

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>simple rules, right, you roll the dice, you roll doubles,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you go again. But if you do it three times

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and you go to jail and then you pull certain

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>cards advanced to St Charles, blah blah blah blah. They're

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>very simple rules, but it's really hard to get a

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>distribution of the likelihood that you land on any property.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>And so I was like, well, look, the value of

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a property is going to be based on the probability

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that you land on it, plus the rents that you

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>get of something if you have a house or whatever,

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to look at the cost of

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>building those houses. But I just want to know what's

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the probability of landing on every space on on the

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>on the on the board and turns out what computers

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is pretty if you have a game with simple rules,

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>even if it's a very complex set of distributions. At

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the end, you just play the game millions of times

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and you just see like how often did you land there?

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So my wife didn't know I was doing in this.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I had actually create a little cheat sheet and uh,

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I was using it to kind of assess the odds

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that I buy a proper trade of proper collections of properties.

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And it was basically just a sheet that showed the

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>probably beloy of landing on any space. And it turns

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>out certain spaces are way more likely to be landed

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on than other space. So what are the greens the oranges?

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>What are the greens? Are bad? Greens are bad and

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the oranges best the best. Yeah, because people go to

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>jail all the time, and if you play they come around.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right, you end up in jail. You've got ten

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>spots free parking if you play crafts what number comes

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>up the most? Seven? Seven? Right, Well, the other two

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to be six and eight, and those are

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the oranges. So and that basically gets there. Going to

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>jail a lot and rolling anything six to nine is

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty good for the oranges. So so how did that

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>then lead to the idea of, hey, we could run

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>analyzes and come up with the best probability for people's

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>retirement portfolios as opposed to letting them just randomly pick

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever fun manager is hot that much. Well, so it

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>only helped me get the job by convincing Bill Sharp

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I knew something about money Carlo simulation. He had been

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>doing this for the defined benefit pension managers for a

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>long time because they're trying to figure out on the

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>pension side, how much do we have to fund these

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>pensions and how should we invest to have you know,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>certain probability of being able to pay these pensions? When

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>are our people all looking for the greatest return with

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the least amount of risk and just end up in

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the fat part of that car Well, so so that's

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of how you set your portfolio. But then you

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>even have to say how much money are we likely

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to have thirty years from now if we invested a

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>certain way, And that's really about simulating, well, what if

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the markets do well, what if they too poorly? What

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>if interest rates are high or lower? Inflation does this

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>or that, or you know the spread between you know,

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a small cap and and MidCap stocks varies. Sharp described

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it as a thirty variable dimensional analysis. Yeah, and so

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we would. So so he was already doing this for

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>pension funds to kind of get a sense for like

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>how much is this pension gonna be worth twenty years

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>from now, and he wanted to do the same things

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for individual to answer the bay is a question like

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>are you going to have enough money? Well, it's an

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>easy question. It's a pretty hard answer because you don't

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>know what the future holds. It doesn't mean you throw

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>up your hands you say I have I have absolutely

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>no idea. It's a little bit like predicting other things

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that are stochastic or uncertain, where you say, we don't

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have a perfect idea, but we could put a range

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>around it. You know, if you're all in in very

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>very vaulatile stocks, a couple of stocks, it's gonna be

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a very wide range that probably goes down to almost

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>zero in a bankruptcy situation. If you're in money market

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>funds of treasuries, it's gonna be a very tight range.

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>And anywhere in between you're gonna have a higher sort

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of expected outcome, but a bigger range depending on how

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>much risk you having that porfile. So the monopoly thing

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was was was useful because when Bill Sharp said, hey,

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're gonna be doing a lot of simulation

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of optimization. What do you know about that?

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, you have already kind of used it

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to my game previously in life. Although you know, my

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>my wife didn't didn't take kindly when she found out

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that cheat sheet. That's that's great. So so now I'm

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to follow the path of this. So this is

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a free website. And then of eventually Grundfest and Johnson say, Bill,

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? This is a there's a business here.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to do the unpleasant. You don't have

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to do the firing and hiring. Let's get a guy

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>who's never done that to do right. But here your

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>your chairman emeritus. You're the nobel laureate. You're gonna be.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll trot you out when we have big clients that

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>we want to razzle dazzle, and I'm based on your

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>client list, so you don't. Essentially, it's not like individuals

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>come to financial engines and say take my four oh

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>one K. It's companies like Ford and other giant employers

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>who say, we're not gonna play this crazy game. We're

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>just gonna do this simply and and crank uh crank

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>out one of Bill's simulations, and we'll use that for

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>or a couple of options for our clients. So so,

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>but how do you get from A to B? How

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>do you get from a free website run by a

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>quirky Nobel laureate to all right, this is a real

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>business with a hundred billion in assets, a public company

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and generating drives and millions of dollars on revenue. If

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I had boiled down to kind of one thing, I

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>would say hardcore learning and iteration, which which sounds a

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>lot like failure. And you know, if we had given up,

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it would have been failure. But it was kind of

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>close to failure a lot of times. So what were

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the first few What what what are the first few versions

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of this look like? So the first thing we tried

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to do is and I thought it was a pretty

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>decent idea. The Department of labor At just issues from

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>regulations saying that if an employer hired someone who did

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not give specific recommendations, just asset allocation advice, it wouldn't

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>be advice. It would stay on this fiduciary safe harbor

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and they could do without worried being worried that would

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be constituting advice. And and our original thought was, let's

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>be an education company. Let's actually just just give education.

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's not be an advisor, let's not give advice. And

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what kind of sell as an employee benefit? Kind of

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>financial literacy? And so I read up a big business plan.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>This is my big document. I'm excited to go raise money.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I go out to walk to uh To to sand

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Hill Road and all the vcs and they're like, this

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is a stupid idea, and we're not going to fund

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>an education company. Uh. They didn't really say what do

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>They're just like, you know, tell me when you get

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a better idea. And a couple of guys at work,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and there are only five of us, but two of

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the guys are like, yeah, this is so stupid. We

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be just doing education. We should become an investment visor,

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's how you can charge of some percentage and

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>get paid on the assets under management and surreptitiously work

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the education. Yes, and and and what we what we

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>really did have a sense for And so I agree

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with them. I didn't want to kind of take on

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that headache of becoming an advisor, but the fact that

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the matters most people want to know what to do

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and kind of hey, you're getting warmer, you're getting colder.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Study a little bit of this now, they're like, just

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>tell me what I should do, what fund should I buy?

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>What find should I sell? In order to really do

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a good job with that, you gotta be an investment visor.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Rihults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My guest this week is co founder and

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>former CEO Jeff Agian, called of Financial Engines. They are

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the largest r i A in the United States, managing

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred billion dollars in four oh one k money.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And I've described, by the way, whenever I described financial

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>engines to people, because so many people have never heard

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of you. You're not selling into the retail market. You

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>sell essentially into corporate and institutional markets. Financial Engines, I've

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of them. Well, really, they were the

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>original robo advisor. They started doing this before one case

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we started, so it's almost twenty years twenty years old,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and essentially you were using software and algorithms to drive

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>investing decisions, long before all the cool kids started doing

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean there was no JavaScript. I mean

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>web servers were brand new job and didn't even exist yet,

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and so there was a whole different world out there.

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And when we first did this, you it took about

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes to download our software. Uh when Java finally

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>came out and and people were using dial up modems.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of a problem that the technology really

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there yet when we were starting, not not a

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of graphic interface and a lot of interesting

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>web flash before Java, before Flash before all the things

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we take for granted on the internet. Yeah. Yeah, So

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about I don't even know if I could

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>call them your competitors, although they have talked about moving

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>into the four O one case based. There are a

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>dozen or so companies, the probably the two best known

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>or wealth Fronts and Betterment. What are these other robo

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>advisors doing right? What are they getting wrong? It's hard

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to say for sure. I mean, I clearly have a

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of biases because I've been in the industry for

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and obviously we we compete, um, but

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I what I think they're doing right

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is that they recognized a really big need, which is

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that more and more Americans do need help. And there's

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of inefficiency ease, and a lot of conflicts

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of poor quality when it comes to

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>individual Americans getting advice, and so I think there is

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a big need. I think that they are also kind

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of carving up different sorts of spaces. Well Front is

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>going after kind of the the younger millennial, generally tech

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>person who made a lot of money. They're focused a

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>lot on tax loss harvesting, betterment, has a few different

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>distribution channels, including going through r A s not through

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>corporate are big thing. You know has been going through

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>our A. So we last time and I'm not the

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>company anymore, so I just kind of read the press

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>releases and the earnings reports when they come out. But

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>company now has more than a trillion dollars in four

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>win K plans that have hired them and managing over

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifteen billion in a u M, so

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's a pretty big company. It's the largest independent

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>area in the country and a big part of the

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>success has been making it really easy and safe for

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>an individual to say, yeah, I want you to be

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>my advisor. And by going through the workplace, we get

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the trusted introduction from the from the company, keeps acquisition

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>costs low and because we manage your four O OK,

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to sign any paperwork, you don't need

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to move any money, you don't need to figure any

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, yeah, please do this. I think without

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that trust to introduction and not having to move money,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it gets very difficult. So I know our unit economics

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>quite well, and they were very they were very compelling.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a very profitable company. I think it would be

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>really really difficult to do this without a some sort

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of secret sauce on the acquisition side, because acquisition costs

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>are huge to say the least. So let's ask the

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>flip side of of the question. So, what's the role

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of a live human in providing financial advice or financial

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>planning either as an adjunct to or above and beyond

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the al GOO driven allocation strategy? And so so this

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is something that took us a long time to figure out.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>We started as an education software company that didn't work

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. Then we went to advice, but we the

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>tagline was your personal online advice. But this was your

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>personal online advisor. Our whole thing was we didn't want

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>to have our own advisors. They cost too much. You know.

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>We talked to customers and they said, it's great thing

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you're giving me a tool. I don't know how to

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>use the tool. I think I'm gonna misuse the tool.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So he said, well, what if there was an advisor

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you could talk to anytime you want who could actually

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>manage your portfolio for you. Now, actually, what we weren't

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>saying is it's all the same technology. It's a it's

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>an advisor center with Series sixty five license advisors out

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in Phoenix. Their their financial enges employees. But they're just

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>basically using our software in a call center, but talking

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to people and making sure that those people feel comfortable

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>about the decisions that they're making. It's the behavioral side,

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>not the investing, absolutely is. So what we found is

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that at least for baby boomers, where there's a lot

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of the five trillions and four oh win K accounts

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are with people who are older than fifty. I think

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>last time I checked it was sixty seven percent of

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the four K asks are held by people fifty and older.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Give me that number again, sixty seven of four oh

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one k assets. Sure, that would make sense. You warned more.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>As you get older, you can contribute more, absolutely, and

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you start thinking about it more because you're getting close

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to retirement. So when you've saved all your life and

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>now the question is how you gonna invest that money,

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you really want to make sure that you're not screwing

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>something up, and at least for that age, cohort talking

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to someone to make sure, like, you know what I'm

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>saying right, you know what you got the data right?

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure I understand what you're doing.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>There's just an interest in knowing, alright, someone is accountable

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and they know how to use these these tools in

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this technology. So I'm not going to get it wrong.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters and Business on Bloomberg Radio. My

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>special guest this week is former CEO and co founder

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of Financial Engines Jeff Nagian Calda. And you got to

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>work with a hero of yours. You graduate Stanford, the

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>NBA program, what you was at undergrad was alright, so

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>your Stanford undergrad and then you stay so you really

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>like that party. I like and I have two of

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>my three daughters go there. Uh and my wife got

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of degrees and that's where we met. So

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>so Stanford has been uh home away from home for

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you basically, so you should talk to them about their

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in down terrible and could use your your assistance. Um.

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But you go to your graduation for your m b A.

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And the commencement speaker is Bill Sharp, Nobel Laureate, and

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you're entranced. What was it like after that experience to

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>get a phone call essentially from Bill Sharp? Hey, kid,

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I got ah, I have an idea. I'd like to

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>have you helped me build this into a business. Yeah. Well,

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>so he spoke at my undergrad graduation. I was an

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>econ major, but I always thought that he was just

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a magnificent mind. I was like, this guy is super smart,

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and I happened to think he could that he was

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>saying a lot of things that could help people. I

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't ever meet him until he interviewed me, and I

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>was shaking up my boots. I mean, I'm like, I'm

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not worthy, but he was really down to earth. It

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. He wanted to make sure that this is

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that says a lot about Bill Sharp. He quickly said,

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, are you smart enough in terms of the

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>economic stuff, But he really wanted to do you know

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>how to program? I'm like yeah, and and when real

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>programming scripts like you could really you could like like

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>like real programming now literally he wrote in C plus

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>plus and he wrote an assembly, so he this guy

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is like a really serious old school so I couldn't

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. But I was mostly I was mostly programming

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of Pascal and kind of lightweight stuff. I mean,

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really a hacker, but I programmed enough stuff

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to kind of know the basics. And then he said,

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about graphic arts? And I go, uh, well,

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>I used to have a graphic arts business. Because I

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>used to I learned how to use it Adobe Illustrator

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>back in the back. Still it's still around. And he said,

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the most important things about this

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>business is going to be figuring out how to communicate

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>these principles to people so they can understand it. And

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>if you if you're not able to communicate, you know

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have it. It's gonna be tough. So for him,

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of checked the box on the on

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the math and economics, but really Let's make sure we

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>get someone who can solve the hard problem, which is

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>helping people understand it, making it simple, easy to understand

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>visual graphics. Are you know a picture does health is

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>worth a thousand words? And if you can communicate this dry,

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>complicated stuff in a way that makes sense to people,

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you're two thirds of the way that. He was also

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>really clear that Jeff, I don't want to run this business.

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You're going to run it, which means you're gonna deal

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>with the headaches. He didn't say, I want to spend

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>all the time doing the research, and he was involved

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>every day in actually writing the early code, helping us

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with the algorithms. It was amazing, It was amazing, he was.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Was it a little surreal working with that close with

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>someone like him? Tell you what's awesome? Because you're trying

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to recruit a team of finance people and you're like,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 1>how'd you like to sit next to Bill Sharp working

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on something that we think is gonna change the world.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it wasn't hard to hire talent when you've

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>got Bill Sharp there. So let me jump ahead to

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a question, because there was a quote of yours that

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I really liked, and I'm gonna paraphrase it. You mentioned,

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you're building a company, there are three

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>key elements that a CEO has to focus on, strategy, culture,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and hires, and you just basically, uh, touched on on

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the higher side. So before we get the strategy and culture.

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're recruiting from a pool of Stanford and

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>other top schools. You're right there in Silicon Valley. How

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult was it finding the right people and then convincing

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>them to come sit with you and Bill? I mean, honestly,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that hard. I didn't think it was. I mean,

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to say it was really hard. Nowadays it's

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>much harder. There's there's so much money and people. I

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>think we're realizing the value of talent, so much competition,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's a huge competitionists. But the kinds of Bill

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>here we're sitting in Bloomberg, this is testament to how

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to compete for talent. I mean, you have

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to have really compelling reasons for people to join your company.

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You asked me about the food segment. When you walked

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in this food space on the sixth floor, you want

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to hire somebody, they walk by, they're like, Wow, this

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>place is for real. It's just one of those parks

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that people see and say, oh, I think I could

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>play with you guys exactly back in the day though, right,

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So I had raised a lot of money. That was good.

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>The Internet was really just ramping up. I think Netscape

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>went public, it was right at the beginning, and so

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>people were hungry for this, and we had the VC money,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we had a big idea, we had a Nobel Prize winner.

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>We were in Palo Alto, and you wouldn't have been

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that difficult to do it was. It wasn't hard to

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>get the early team on board. And so now let's

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about the other two elements you mentioned, strategy and culture. Yeah.

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Culture is the one that I find fascinating because it's

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>very easy to have a culture go astray. It's very

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 1>easy to lose sight on those core values. How do

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you focus on building a culture at a company? Yeah, well,

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>i'd say I'd say that it starts with the leadership team.

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's easier if you're just like, well, what's

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the personality of the leaders because it's if there's a

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>big mismatch between what you want the culture to be

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>in the in the way they actually act and the

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>leadership team acts, then it's gonna ben it's not authentic

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that people will be like, yeah, that's really that's our culture.

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh um. So a lot of it really comes

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the culture. So the way I usually think about it is,

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, first of all, get the strategy right and

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>and the strategy is really about where do you choose

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to focus your energy in a way that you can

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>win a big opportunity. And if you win, you can

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>keep winning because you have some advantage that that other

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people can't compete away. And I think if you don't,

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>if you don't pick your battles properly, you can execut

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>incredibly well. You have a great team, but you just

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>want to have a valuable business, and it's winning the

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>business that doesn't matter isn't as important as winning the

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>business that does matter, right, And I hear a lot

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of people say, oh, you know, execution beat strategy every day. Well,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say, well, it kind of depends. If you

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.239
<v Speaker 1>have a good strategy, then you're totally right. But if

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you're really executing well on a poor strategy, it doesn't

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>really make much difference. In my view. Is no, you

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>got to get the strategy right, and yes, that's definitely

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not all you got to execute. And how do you

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>execute well? First you get the leadership team in place,

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>because if if you're as a CEO of your people

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't good, you can't go and hire everybody else. I mean,

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got to really get the talent and the tone

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>from the top, starting with that core group is really important.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And then that just reflects across them. That's where the

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>culture come exactly. And then what you do is you

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of say, and of course you want to be

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>explicit about the types of people you're bringing into that

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you can reinforce a certain kind of culture. There's certain

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>people who might have the talent, but they just don't

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>have the personality or sort of the the way you

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>want it to feel working with them and say you say,

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're not really consistent with our culture. You

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>don't say it out loud, but you started your screening

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>people as you interview and you're like, this is this

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna be uh, this is not having you

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>as an exact might not set the kind of tone

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that we want to um. And culture is really tricky,

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>largely because it is such an outgrowth of the earlier people,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and and and the senior people and and so um.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I never I did not get it perfect,

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and with something I was always trying to

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>learn more about, but at least intentionally being aware of

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>what your culture is and your what your culture is

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is what your people basically say that it is you.

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't say, as a CEO, this is my culture.

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You ask your people what's it like to work here?

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>They'll tell you what the culture is. And then if

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you want it to be different, you guys say, well,

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>how do we have to change as leaders to create

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a different environment for the for the company. So you

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>said you made a lot of mistakes you learned on

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the job, but when you look at this company, you

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>were there for a CEO or co founder or I

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you actually had any of the titles

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>other than I. Well, when you're the first employee, you

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>can call yourself what I said, I'll be the president CEO.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But basically, the three co founders or co investors said,

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you get a business model together, you get vcs to invest,

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you can become CEO and let's see where it goes.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>At what point did you realize, hey, this is working

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>this this business model. We're attracting assets, we're winning business,

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>We're heading in the right direction. When did you first

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>get that glimmer? Well, the glimmer kind of came and

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>went and came and went and came and went a

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of times before I really knew, knew and well,

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning, you have to be saying, well, I'm

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>working with Bill Sharp, this is an amazing idea. I

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>love the concept. Let's see what happens. But at what

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>point did you say, Hey, we have a billion dollars,

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we have ten billion, Hey we have like where did?

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>How long did it take from start? I'm asking this

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 1>for my own personal selfish questions because I'm fascinated by this.

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a startup, it's got no real assets other than

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the people in the until actual capital and then at

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>some point down the road it's a multibillion dollar asset manager.

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>How long did it take from it was from A

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to B. We started in nineties six, and I would

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>say that I had a very very strong conviction that

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we were going to be very successful in December of

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four, So eight years that's that's a long time.

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So by two thousand you managing assets at that point,

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>so you still know we're offering the online tool. In

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two, two thousand three, we had like

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a thirty million dollar business. We were cash flow break

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>even by many accounts. You'd say, this company is doing

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. But you know, I was like, we're not

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>growing fast enough and it's just too hard. So Jeff,

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>if people want to find you or your writings, how

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>do they track you down? I would just say, don't

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>worry about my writing, go to Financial Engines, all right,

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the CEO. I I stepped down in January

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of this year of this year, after grooming a successor

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>over the course of two years. Yeah. Well, I and

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I had hired Larry from Fidelity is one of the

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>top guys on the r I A space, and I

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>has been that. He had been there for thirteen years,

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>so he knows financial Engines inside and out. Um, but

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, and by the way, with

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the robo advisors, there's so much advice that is so

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>much better and so much less expensive than what's been

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>out there. I mean, consumers have a huge number of choices.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. I love financial Engines partly because I know

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>how it's built, and you know that's that's what's managing

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>my money right now personally. UM, but a lot of

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of integrity into that. I think there are

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other firms. Vanguard's doing something great. Schwab's

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>got some good portfolios that are being managed at low cost.

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the newer advisors are good. There's just a

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of good advice out there. We've been speaking with

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Nanjian Kalda, the co founder and former CEO of

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Financial Engines. If you enjoy this conversation, be sure check

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>out our podcast extras, where we keep the tape rolling

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and continue chatting about also of fascinating stuff. Be sure

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and check out my daily column on Bloomberg View dot com.

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at rid Halts. I'm Barry rid Halts.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, this is the podcast portion and and that's

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the part of the show where I throw my arms

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>out and say let's uh, let's let's roll up with

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>sleeves and go over the questions we missed and talk about, um,

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>some other interesting stuff. By the way, Jeff, I've been

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>really looking forward to having this conversation because I followed

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>financial engines at least for the past five years or so. UM,

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we never got to talk about when taking them public

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>with that experience was like and we never There's a

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>whole run of stuff we haven't gotten to. So so

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>let's jump right into that. UM first, let's see what

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>questions I missed. We know about that. UM So, the

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>pivot to four on one case, the to running the assets,

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it was two thousand walk that was two thousand four.

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Now it took us. We were working on it a

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>year before we launched it, and we had done it

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was that before or after the customer surveys when they

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>said you guys do it? It was after, so it

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>was like, Wow, there might be a totally new type

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>of business opportunity. And and then we created a little

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>prototype and we did a fake survey. One of our

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>cust o our corporate customers was really great because we

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>needed to figure out what people really sign up for this,

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't want to build it until we knew.

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>And they let us do a survey where basically said

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>do you want to sign up for this? And little

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>tiny print on the back of it said, by the way,

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not yet available. Then they signed up,

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and then we called them and big numbers, and then

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and then we called them back, and we literally called

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.240
<v Speaker 1>each one and said, thank you very much for your interest,

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're working on it and we'll let you know

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>when it's ready. But we already kind of knew from

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big test that people wanted this. And I

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>went to the board. We had about fifteen million dollars left.

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Have that hundred million I talked about. I said, guys,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we let's go all in here. This is it. We've

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.479
<v Speaker 1>got enough evidence that we've shown a prototype. People seem

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to want it. They're responding to sort of direct mail enrollment.

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Our our our corporate distribution partners want their employees to

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>have this. This is it, Let's go. It was It

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>was sort of it was about the company and a

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>freaking work. Sometimes you have to bet the company. Sometimes

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 1>you have to say, hey, what we've been doing isn't

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>generating the revenue, or it's not the business model that

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we think the idea is worthy of. Here's something that

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we can actually monetize in a way that's that's both

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>true to the underlying philosophy and productive as a company. Yeah,

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and and and a big part of it too, is

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we we felt that we've done enough tests to make

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it a smart bet. It wasn't a sure bet, but

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a smart bet because we we've shown the prototype,

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked to customers, We've done this or enrollment test

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to fairit with the acquisition costs would be. So we

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of had a lot of indications that this was

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna work. What was your degree of confidence in that?

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, honestly, it was okay. So this wasn't like, hey,

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.479
<v Speaker 1>we're rolling the dice. Let's let's hope that snake eyes

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't coming up. It's like, hey, this is really based

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>on all the evidence in front of us, based on

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the success of the prior business model, which was so so,

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>based on what our clients are telling us, both the

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>corporate clients and their employees, this looks like really the

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>way to go when nobody else is really yeah. And

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>now what was tough is I had I had a

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>company where we had very low turnover. So the employees

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.479
<v Speaker 1>had been with me and the other senior management team

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for the journey, and after your fourth or fifth pivot,

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they're like yeah, right, yeah, here we go again. And

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>so it was a little bit tough, and I had

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.399
<v Speaker 1>we had an all hands meeting where I said, look, yeah,

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're doing. A lot of people are

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>very enthusiastic. I showed the data. We kind of we went,

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we talked to our customers, etcetera. Listen, if you could

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>sell your employees, you can sell anybody. There were a

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people with their arms crossed, basically saying I'll

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>believe it when I see it. And I said, I said, guys,

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>if you're on the sideline, I'll give you like a

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>week and and no, no fault. I mean, if you

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>decide you don't believe, then you should find something else,

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because this is what we're doing. And I totally get

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>why you wouldn't believe because we tried so many. Things

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that happened were the really five previous significant pivots, the

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>different business there there was. There was There was the

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>education at first, the quick pivot to become an online

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>advisor within the workplace. I raised all that money. We

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>had a big deal with A O. L to go

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 1>B two C. There was this. We were one of

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the first freemium models. You could get your forecast for free,

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>but then pay for advice that didn't work. Uh, then

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we did this uh, this business, which was we called

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the enterprise business, was trying to create a workstation for

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>our as to use. Then we had something we call

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the Advice Server where we were going to sell it

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to the big wirehouses and say, look, here's a servert

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna give automated advice within your firm. And then

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>finally we did manage accounts, and manage accounts was the

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>one was the magic button. That's that's amazing. UM. I'm

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna save the conversation about target date funds and fiduciaries later,

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>but I definitely, uh, I definitely want to come back

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to that. We're done with this question. UM. We briefly

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>touched upon Vanguard before. So there are the non Silicon

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Valley startups like Schwab and Vanguard who are rolling out

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>their own UM robo advisor. Schwab Vanguard is really fascinating

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.720
<v Speaker 1>because they launched it with essentially no fanfare and they

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>took a bunch of older UM advisory accounts and basically said, okay,

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you guys are now I'll go automatic driven. And it

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was five billion, and then it was fifteen billion, and

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 1>now it's like thirty billion plus. UM. I've spoken with them, UM,

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>including Bill McNab was on the show. But that's gonna

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>be a hundred billion dollars and in no time at all,

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. What what are your thoughts so

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>within financial engines, UM, portfolios, what asset classes, what sort

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of UM is it? Vanguard d f A, like, who

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.839
<v Speaker 1>are you? Who you holding in those accounts? Yeah, well,

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>so we're managing the last quarter I think it was

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred fifteen billion. We only use the investments

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that are available in four O wind K plans, so

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be mutual funds and a handful of ets. Well,

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is that the large part of the market,

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not many mutual funds and and no E

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>t f s. They're almost all separately managed accounts. And

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>when you start working with ibm s and forwards, UH

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and hallmarks, you're talking single digit basis points in many cases.

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So here's what's kind of amazing. The meaning you're charging

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 1>us less than a fifth of a percent, less than

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at the economics of that hundred

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>fifteen billion that we're managing, what you find is that

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the underlying fund fee. So that kind of the expense

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>ratio of those funds that we're managing, it's about fifteen

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>basis points considered fairly low, considered low. That's Vanguard territory.

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the cost of our services,

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>after all the A discounts and everything, this is this

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is not the cost of financial engines. Is what the

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>employee actually ends up paying. It's about thirty seven basis points.

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So seven plus fifteen is for the for the whole

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>innch a lot of talk to an advisor retirement planning.

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Not a terrible price at all, and that's actually much

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>cheaper than what we see from a lot of places

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we see. So whenever we we run an st management firm,

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>whenever we look at a four oh one K comes

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in and I'm talking about some pretty big entities that

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>are fairly famous that you would think would have access

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>to whoever they want. We look at these portfolios just

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>festooned with active, high fee funds that have all underperformed

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>their benchmark. And then there's the Custonian fee and the

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>reporting fee and the advisor fee and all in it's

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>three d basis points. It's astonishingly ridiculous and it's a

0:40:56.440 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>terrible drag on long term returns totally. The good news

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is is if you look at the kind of weighted

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>average expense ratio of four O n K assets, given

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that over six of the assets are held in the

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>top point four percent of companies, so the found Fortune

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 1>one thousand, that's where almost over half the assets are.

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Those guys do a really good job of getting nice,

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>well managed, low cost funds um so, so at least

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>on average dollar weighted, most of the four on K

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 1>money is is sort of is sort of good investment options.

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And what you find is the d O L and

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the regulators are really pushing that down market. So it's

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a while till you get to the

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>smaller plans, but there's definitely gonna be a trickled down.

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>And I think Americans need to know if you work

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for a Fortune one thou company, your four o wn

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 1>K options are probably your four o w K plans

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like the best investment. You're getting a match, you're getting

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:53.879
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of advice for very low costs, and your

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>funds are probably the cheapest you're going to see anywhere. Plus,

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so for you guys, what does that mean? You're filled

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with guard or dimensional or fidelity? Like who's in your

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I know it varies from company to company does, but

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bet there's a bias towards a handful of

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it's about half actively managed, half indexed. And if you

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the actively managed guys, they're not very expensive.

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>They're they're they're really good lower cost actively managed funds.

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But what happens is if you have a fund, uh,

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in a lineup of funds that maybe cost fifteen basis points,

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 1>if one cost sev in the scheme of things, it's

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>not it's not going to make the cut. Uh, you

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 1>guys carve that out. Well, they're still is in the plan,

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 1>but we just don't put in any of our portfolios.

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Got it? The differential price is cost too much? Thumb. Also,

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was a great morning Star research note

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure they rude the day they put this out,

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>which is so morning Star came to fame for by

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, their second behind you in terms of managing

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>four oh one k properties. Because everyone thinks they're the

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund expert, but their claim to fame is their

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>five star fund rating system and then one of the

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>researchers put out a piece that said, if you don't

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>know anything about a company of fund, or a mutual fund,

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>or even whatever type of fund it is, if you

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>did nothing else but pick the cheapest funds over the

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>long haul, that's gonna outperform everything else, which sort of

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.919
<v Speaker 1>was a problem because they're selling, hey, our five star

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>rating system is great, and their own research is essentially saying, yeah, yeah,

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the rating system is great, just by the cheapest fund.

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 1>So I I don't blame you guys for saying, hey,

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna put one of these expensive now every

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>now and then. There's an asset class, the actively managed

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>mortgage back um fixed income funds. There are no inexpensive

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>versions of those, and you can't do it passively. You

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have to have some degree of active due to quality

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>concerns and how that turns over. But for just about

0:43:56.840 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>everything else, cheapest is invariably the best, which is really

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:03.399
<v Speaker 1>a difficult message for people to wrap their heads around.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You would think that would be really easy to grasp,

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but people use price as a as a quality signal

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>when it isn't always a quality signal. I totally agree

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>with you, all right, so that's the end of my diatribe.

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's um, let's talk a little bit about your gap year.

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.879
<v Speaker 1>This is your gap year. So you you stepped down

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 1>officially in January after grooming a success sor um and

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that successor is now running the shop. And you said

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do nothing for a year, because you were

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there for what eighteen years? So you said You're just

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna kick back for a year. And I stayed on

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>as an an advisor to the company for six months,

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.879
<v Speaker 1>so that officially finished on June. But you're right. I said,

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take a year and just pull pull,

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>pull back. And you know, a lot of what I

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 1>was interested in doing was a combination of learning and

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>having fun, and so I thought one of the things

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to learn that I just haven't had time

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to learn. I always wanted to sail in the ocean.

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I sailed on lakes as a kid. I wanted to

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 1>sail on the ocean, so I didn't I've been doing

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sailing and getting certified as as a sailor.

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I want to always want to learn, not just how

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to play the piano. I wanted to learn music. I

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>want to say, I learned music like I believed, and

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just super excited into it. I mean, here I

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>am at forty six like learning about the basic patterns

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and structures that underlying music. This is pitch and harmonics

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and residents and rhythmic patterns and things, and so music

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>theory is really interesting. And and now when I listen

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to songs, it's like, oh, you know, there there are

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>some deep patterns that once you kind of understand how

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>these things are built, it's almost like a puzzle that

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you can unlock to say, what's that corporate? What key

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is it? And what's the core progression? What are some

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of the surprises the way there, the way they're breaking

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the rules are are refraining a chorus? And so it's

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like a way, a new way for me at least

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to understand music, which has been really fun. I have

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a book for you. I'm sure you've either read it

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>or heard of it, and if you haven't, I'm gonna

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>rock your world. Good godal escher bach Um. Essentially, it's

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>about the concept of repeating patterns showing up in mathematics,

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>art and music. And it's not just fractals. It's just

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 1>when you look at a box um piano concerto. It's

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a series of and if you've ever heard like kat

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>tun still do something with the you know, the the

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>recording box whereh will play and loop it over and

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>over again. It's the same basic concept in a symphony.

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just explosive. I recall reading that in college and

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:45.760
<v Speaker 1>just pulling my hair on my head, going, it can't

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be just that everything is a pattern? Is that? Is

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that true? Everything is just repeating fractal forever And it

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.000
<v Speaker 1>turns out some things are some things aren't. But if

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 1>you like that idea of of the concept Um Douglas Hofstatter,

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think is the is the I'm pulling these names

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.200
<v Speaker 1>out is a hard years ago. He wrote one other

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>book that I think UM did really well, and I

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>um that I can't access, but this if you like

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. I just remember saying, wow, this

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>book is amazing. Oh yeah. I mean I like to

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 1>understand how things work, and music is such a part

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>of culture. I just I love music too, but I

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>never really understand, like, how does this stuff really work?

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm starting, I'm starting to discover it, and

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I have ideas about how it changes your brain and

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and and how even when you have these patterns, you know,

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what it is I think is is

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the song and also the antecedents of the song, songs

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that sound like that song, the genre that came from

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it primes your brain to expect patterns, and the early

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>part of a song that sets up patterns. And then

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>there's this dance between rewarding you with the familiar, recurring

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pattern but then surprising you by breaking the pattern a

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And there's this there's this dance of like

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>giving you the pattern and then not giving you the

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.959
<v Speaker 1>pattern that I think sucks you winto the music. That's

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating. There was the other book if you like music.

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>David Byrne, former frontman of The Talking has a new

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>book on I think it's called How Music Works or

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and it's he you're these are both

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>right in exactly what you're talking about. So so other

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 1>things that My my wife, you know, when she knew

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that I was going to be stepping down, she said,

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I gotta get you to a Buddhist retreat. Okay, I said, okay,

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>she excuse she's done. These are these silent retreats that

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that one goes on and how long are you silent?

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I was silent for three days and it was you know,

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:37.879
<v Speaker 1>it was it was, it was definitely. You know. My

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 1>view of it is sort of a form of brain management.

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like, can you get your brain in a certain

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:47.880
<v Speaker 1>mode where it's it's not worrying about the past, and

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not worrying about the future. It's just kind of

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>tuned in. And it's not like metaphysical or anything. It's

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>actually quite basic. It's like, can you just be noticing

0:48:57.080 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the things that are happening here, now here and now?

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And what's kind of amazing about it? With some pretty

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:06.800
<v Speaker 1>simple little practices, your brain gets into a different state

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and you do you kind of feel this sense sense

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of freedom and and it creates it sort of creates

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 1>a lightness that that is sometimes hard to find in

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a busy life. You know, there's a tendency, especially in

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>today's between Twitter and email and everything else, that people

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are just playing tennis and hitting the ball back constantly,

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes you have to step back and say, I

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 1>just want to exist and and be a little I

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>hate to turn mindful or mindfulness, but sometimes you can't

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just be. Stimulus response stimulus response. Sometimes you have to

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>let me think about stuff for a minute and not

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>be wrapped up in that world. That sounds like that

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 1>was a fun experience, And that's kind of what I'm

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to do with this whole gap year. It's just

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 1>is have a year filled with experiences that can that

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>can kind of break my brain, like I haven't seen

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>this before. This is a new way to think about

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. This is a new way to think about myself.

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a new way to think about my marriage,

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a new way to think about you know,

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 1>team depression. We're having a lot of problems out in

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Palo Alto with with kids under a lot of pressure,

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>getting depressed and committing suicide. There was just a big

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 1>article in any of the Times, the Worlster Regeneral about

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not the big urban areas, it's small town suburbia

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and rural areas that have seen suicide rate spike. So

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know, this has been happening close to our community,

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and and I wanted to understand because you know, when

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this happens, clearly the community reacts and there are a

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:33.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who say, uh, it's it's this thing,

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's this one thing that's doing it, and it's never

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 1>just one thing. There's never one thing. But then there

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are people say it's kind of everything, which means it's

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.319
<v Speaker 1>almost kind of nothing, because like, what are you gonna

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 1>do about everything? I'm like, no, no, it's not one

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:46.839
<v Speaker 1>thing and it's not everything. There's there's got to be

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some system of effects that are causing this to happen

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 1>at an unusual rate here in this community. And I

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:54.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I have the answer, but I kind

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of developed a model for how to think about it. Right, Well,

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be rational, you have no future

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>in politics, So forget about that. Um so let's talk

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about going public. Yes, alright, that was

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 1>on my list. We didn't get to so oh four

0:51:08.960 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>or five oh six. You're ramping up a Um what

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>point does someone say, hey, we could use some more

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>uh use some more capital. I know, let's let's make

0:51:18.080 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>our vcs happy and take the company uh to Wall Street. Well,

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>at first, the first time people said that was in

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>when we had five thousand dollars of revenue. Uh so

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you would have been worth nine or ten billion dollars exactly.

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:36.919
<v Speaker 1>That's it's all about eyeballs. I raised around. It wasn't

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we didn't go public, but it was gonna get the

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 1>idea was. We raised around in Novembers. Our series is

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 1>eighty five million. We had five hundred thousand dollars of revenue.

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>We were valued at three five million, which at the

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 1>time was a massive valuation. Right now nowadays it's kind

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of like, well that's that's a And we were planning

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on going public within six months, and we didn't. We

0:51:57.239 --> 0:51:59.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a good revenue, we didn't have a good

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>business moment. You were lucky that the dot com crash happened. You.

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 1>We drafted the S one and just never filed it.

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Really we had we had a draft that would have

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 1>been a disaster. It would it would have been we

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we had a draft written in We created another draft

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in November two thousand seven into two thousand eight. So

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 1>your timing is phenomenally freaking precipitate market crash. I was

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, every S one, let me know, let me

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>know the next S one you're doing, so I could

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:27.280
<v Speaker 1>get Then the third time was okay. We had managed accounts,

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we had weather two thousand and eight. Really well, we

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of grew right through it, and we were like,

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>now now we really this is good. You won public.

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 1>So what was the valuation when you went public? You know,

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we were valued at seven are millions something like. Okay,

0:52:44.640 --> 0:52:47.839
<v Speaker 1>so fairly modest. What was the process like going public?

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Who were the underwrite the underwrise Goldman Sachs and then

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a handful of others, but Goldman kind of lad the deal. Um.

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I frankly loved it really well. You had a good

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:00.359
<v Speaker 1>experience across the board in the bell with the New

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>York I did all that stuff, and you know, we

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>had been working on this model with enough pivots that

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>my board was always saying and I didn't really heat

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 1>heat them well enough. Luckily I was prevented from doing it.

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But they're like, you gotta have a predictable business model

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:16.879
<v Speaker 1>before you go public. Gotta I'm like, yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thats okay. Whatever makes sense. Well, predictable, predictable revenue streaming totally,

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>because when we finally went out, we had an incredibly stable,

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>predictable business model. And so I wrote our first kind

0:53:29.239 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of earnings announcement, kind of the quarterly call, in kind

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of almost mad libs format. I wrote the story with

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of blanks, and I said, we're just gonna

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>fill in the blank every quarter. And because this is

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a long term demographic bet this is not zig zags.

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>We're done with our ziggig and zag. And we think

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we found something that should last for quite should create

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:51.799
<v Speaker 1>growth and profitability for many, many years. And so every

0:53:51.880 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>quarter we pop in the new numbers, we tell the

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 1>same story with a little bit of nuance, but not

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot and and and I think that's what a

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>great business can do, is is have periods of sustained, predictable,

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>scalable revenue growth and profitability punctuated by whoop's got a

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:11.680
<v Speaker 1>zig zagagan because the world changes, right, I've meant to

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>ask you before I forgot. I love the name financial engines.

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Who came up with that? I think it was either

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Joe or Bill? It was named before I got there.

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a terrific name. And if if you if

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you hear it, you kind of scratch your head and

0:54:25.680 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>then as you look under the hood, no pun intended you. Oh,

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, this makes perfect sense. This is the engine

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that drives the allocation. And yeah, that makes that makes

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense. Um, I only have you for another ten

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen minutes. So let me get to some of

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 1>my favorite questions that I asked all of my guests. Um,

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is right here. I did the gap question,

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get rid of that. Oh, before we do that,

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to just ask your opinion on on my

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 1>So you've experienced vcs, you know it's like to raise money.

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a pet theory that the current group of

0:55:02.280 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 1>robo advisers have pulled off one of the greatest scams

0:55:06.520 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on vcs ever, because essentially they created this business that

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 1>has there's nothing proprietary, there's nothing unique, there's no barriers

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to entry, and existing players can basically say, yeah, we'll

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:20.439
<v Speaker 1>do the exact same thing. But they've raised a couple

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of hundred million dollars in VC cash in order to

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>generate three or four million dollars a year in revenue,

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and essentially said, all I need is ninety million dollars

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to fund on our I A and I'll charge twenty

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 1>five bases points and if we never go public or

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:38.719
<v Speaker 1>we never get brought out, that's the VC's headache. How

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 1>wildly wrong is that statement? How cynical and incorrect is that? Well?

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So um uh so My view is we raised a

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:53.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million, and you know, every time I did,

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I really believed that even though the last zigg and

0:55:57.360 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>zag didn't quite work, we were going to get the

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:02.360
<v Speaker 1>one and you eventually did and we eventually did, and

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 1>so so it's it's really hard to say and this

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:06.439
<v Speaker 1>is what they was. It's easy to say, oh, yeah,

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the two. There's zigs and zags coming

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:11.839
<v Speaker 1>with these guys and to justify it or not or not.

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I wouldn't totally rule it out. But but

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you but you have to ask yourself a question, which

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:21.120
<v Speaker 1>is how well are you on track to discovering how

0:56:21.160 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to see the big opportunity? And is the big opportunity

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 1>getting bigger or is it receiving or getting more crowded.

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating And when we were there, there just weren't

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 1>many players in the space known was in the four

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:33.279
<v Speaker 1>oh one k. We believe there was a way to

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:35.239
<v Speaker 1>reach a lot of people in assets. We believe that

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:37.279
<v Speaker 1>we could get very long. We had a lot of

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Uh, you had it easier than the

0:56:40.440 --> 0:56:43.879
<v Speaker 1>current crop. It's much harder for them. It's it's more competitive,

0:56:44.160 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>much more difficult, So I wouldn't I wouldn't rule it out,

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's it is not. This business is not easy,

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's only gotten far more difficult with

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the new competition and some of them, what is a

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:58.200
<v Speaker 1>personal capital was just bought by somebody I think black

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Future Advisor, Future Advisor, Black one and and for a number.

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, gee, I would have thought black Rock could

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>have built their own for that, But obviously they saw

0:57:07.239 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>something that that no one else did. And we talked

0:57:09.560 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier about the talent right there. There are a lot

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:14.799
<v Speaker 1>of companies with with so so or non existent business malls,

0:57:14.840 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but with talented people, we've got some pretty good technology

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:19.800
<v Speaker 1>where you know, it might be worth it for a

0:57:19.920 --> 0:57:22.240
<v Speaker 1>year head start to market with the talented team, that

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>might be able to move faster than you could higher

0:57:24.840 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is that phrase? Alright? Let me get to before they

0:57:27.360 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>kick us out of the studios. Let me get to

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 1>some of my favorite questions that we ask everybody. Um, So,

0:57:34.440 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>your early mentors, aside from Nobel laureate Bill Black, Bill

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>uh Sharp, who was your early mentors? You know? Uh?

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Before I started financial engines, I did consulting and I

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was a student and so it's all kind of you know,

0:57:51.800 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 1>do it yourself, be a smart person and try to

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>get the right answer. And that was that. What really

0:57:57.040 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 1>became hard is managing people and figure out how do

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you build and work with a team of people. And

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I had some I had a lot of learning to do.

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I really think my biggest mentor in terms of like

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>who gave me the most advice, it was actually my

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 1>team telling me what I was doing wrong. They're like, look,

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure exactly how to do it the right way,

0:58:14.360 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but I don't like what you're doing. This isn't really

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 1>working for the company for me, And and a lot

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of it for me was like and I started this,

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, look, I have so much to learn.

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take feedback from anywhere I can get it.

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And my team was really candid with me about what

0:58:27.920 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we need to change in the business, what what I

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 1>needed to change in my management style, you know, what

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to change in the product. That's got to

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>be a challenging um way to to start out a company. Yeah,

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if if, I would say if if, if you're an

0:58:40.640 --> 0:58:44.280
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneur and you don't like feedback, then you're in the

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong job. That's that's a that's a fair statement. Let

0:58:47.560 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned a couple of books earlier. What are are

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>some of your favorite nonfiction books? Nonfiction books? You know.

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll just when I recently read is called Sapiens, which

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:01.720
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a history of Homo sapiens. I just

0:59:02.000 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>got that as exult from somebody. It's so funny, it

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is worth reading, and it is it is an epic

0:59:08.160 --> 0:59:10.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of view of literally, how do we compete against

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Homo or gaster and Homo fororensis? I mean, when there

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 1>were multiple Homo species out there, you know, Holmo sapiens

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 1>was only one of a few species nine or seven.

0:59:20.680 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So the book I just finished was called Last ape Standing,

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's the same. Hey, these are the twenty seven

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 1>or twenty nine species that were contemporaries and competitors to

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens. And then and it goes and it goes

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:37.000
<v Speaker 1>through sort of cultivation of fire and technology. It goes

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 1>through the spread of religion, the worle that religious place,

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 1>wonderful treatment of polytheistic religions, monotheistic religions, naturalist religions, and

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 1>then it moves forward to talk a bit about happiness,

0:59:47.840 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 1>which is like was surprising to me, But I think

0:59:49.880 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it really goes like, why are what are we even

0:59:51.880 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to achieve here? And then it kind of goes

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:56.720
<v Speaker 1>through what's the future of the of the of the

0:59:56.760 --> 1:00:00.200
<v Speaker 1>species Homo sapiens, and it talks about cyborgs and are

1:00:00.240 --> 1:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>jacking into people's brains and and there's gonna be some

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff coming. It's is gonna be absolutely wild, so

1:00:12.480 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>not quite dystopian, not quite the negative things we've see

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in some sci fi films, or does it do we

1:00:17.840 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have the potential for that if we're not, you know,

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean what I talked about, what's happening in Palo Alto.

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>When you get kids, you're a teenagers jumping in front

1:00:25.560 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of trains, there's definitely something dystopian going on. And I

1:00:29.560 --> 1:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think the technology. I I predict that in five or

1:00:33.080 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>ten years, we're going to look back on our kids

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and their use of seven screens and social media as

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the most foolish, um hazardous thing that young

1:00:43.720 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>people could be spending that much time doing, just like

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>eating fast food every day or so we'll say, look,

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's gonna be part of our culture. But but

1:00:51.200 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but it could be harmful if use the wrong way

1:00:53.320 --> 1:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>or too much, and so there's got to be more

1:00:55.400 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>guidelines on what's healthy and what's not with the consumption.

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:00.959
<v Speaker 1>My wife's a teacher, and she he says, even about

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the kids who are she goes, they're not cooked yet.

1:01:03.600 --> 1:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>There's still still a work in progress, and you can't

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>expect them to make the best decisions with all these

1:01:09.240 --> 1:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>terrible influences in there, not having the tools to know

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>how to deal with that totally. So, so you're on

1:01:14.440 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the same same So we so we we shut down

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>our WiFi every night from eleven to seven because I

1:01:20.800 --> 1:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know how else to make sure that that my

1:01:23.000 --> 1:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>daughter gets at least has a chance to get eight

1:01:25.240 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>hours of sleep. That that that's pretty interesting. Um, so

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what advice? Speaking of young people? So, what advice would

1:01:31.560 --> 1:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you give to a millennial or a recent college graduate

1:01:34.880 --> 1:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>who was interested in finance, someone just coming out of school? Now,

1:01:38.720 --> 1:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what what would you say to them? I would say,

1:01:42.960 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd say a couple of things. The more generic thing

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd say is, um, the world is changing at a

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>faster and faster rate, and watch out because technology and

1:01:54.600 --> 1:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of machine learning, artificial intelligence is going to totally

1:01:57.280 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>change the landscape. So the best shot you have if

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to become become you know, financially independent, which

1:02:05.440 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just means like be able to put food on the

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>table and have a house. I'm not talking about being

1:02:09.160 --> 1:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>like rich. You're gonna have to have some skills. They're

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to survive lots of twists and turns

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how technology changes the way we create

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>an ad value in society. So your ability to learn

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and keep learning, I say that's the number one thing.

1:02:23.640 --> 1:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Stay agile, stay curious, and make sure that you're always

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:30.439
<v Speaker 1>investing in learning the next thing, because if you stay

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on one thing, the rug's gonna get pulled out from

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>money world will pass you by. With respect to finance,

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd say be very wary before going into asset management,

1:02:40.120 --> 1:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at least in terms of kind of large cap equities.

1:02:42.400 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the game is not the same as it used

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to be and the economics are fundamentally I think the

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>change forever. We we had Mario ga Belly last week,

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he essentially said the same thing. Would not recommend kids

1:02:54.240 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>jump into that unless they really felt they had no choice.

1:02:57.760 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Last question, So you've been an entrepreneur, You've been in

1:03:01.120 --> 1:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the world to finance. You've been doing this for twenty years.

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you know today that you wish you knew

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>when you began twenty years ago? Uh? You know, I

1:03:12.640 --> 1:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>guess partly because I expected to have no idea what

1:03:16.960 --> 1:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I was doing. Uh, and I had to learn a lot.

1:03:19.160 --> 1:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I was I was kind of a blank sheet. I

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a lot of preconceptions. Um. And I think,

1:03:27.200 --> 1:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and I also think to myself, like, what would I

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>do differently if I could do it again? You know,

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I had kids when I was twenty two

1:03:35.920 --> 1:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>because one of the things you said, I think is

1:03:37.960 --> 1:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>really important. If you really want to solve a problem,

1:03:41.640 --> 1:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that the best way to do it is

1:03:43.360 --> 1:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to go deep, deep, deep, like really focus on it

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and bring as much talent to bearn as possible. But

1:03:49.920 --> 1:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you don't solve it right away, and you need

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to pull back and let your mind work on the

1:03:54.520 --> 1:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>problem when you're not specifically thinking about the problem. But

1:03:57.760 --> 1:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think optimal problem solving is the ability to stay

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>focused on a problem and recruit other people to work

1:04:03.720 --> 1:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>on the problem for a period of intense focus, then

1:04:06.400 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>back off of it, then come back to it, then

1:04:09.360 --> 1:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>back off it. And sort of put the pieces together

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of don't always right. There's another book by the way,

1:04:13.600 --> 1:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we're just thinking fast and slow, which which which I love.

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's not the blink your guts right, it's like no,

1:04:21.400 --> 1:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in some things usually where there's an instinct to mate

1:04:24.160 --> 1:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or survive, your instincts are quite good, right that they've

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>done a good job keeping you alive on the savannah.

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>But we're using them for to to borrow the pharmaceutical phrase,

1:04:34.160 --> 1:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it's off label. It's what we're using our brains for

1:04:36.560 --> 1:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is not what they would design for. And so trying

1:04:39.000 --> 1:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to intentionally structure the way you think, I think it's valuable.

1:04:43.240 --> 1:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So so I think I might have gone fast. I'm

1:04:46.640 --> 1:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>happy I had kids because they pulled me back away

1:04:48.520 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>from the problem. Honestly, I kind of wish that I

1:04:52.760 --> 1:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>could have not been so worried about failing all the time.

1:04:58.640 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I would have failed if I weren't so worried

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. But it took it took a lot of

1:05:02.040 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the joy out of it, right. That's fascinating. Jeff, thank

1:05:05.000 --> 1:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you so much for spending so much time with us.

1:05:06.880 --> 1:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this was really fascinating, and it's an aspect

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of of investing in finance that I think most people

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>are not familiar with. UM. For those of you who

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>want more information, you could go to Financial Engines dot com. UM.

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned social you on Twitter at all? I'm actually

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I am not on Twitter, not on Twitter, and so

1:05:27.920 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a whole year of note Twitter. This is

1:05:29.960 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole decade of not Twitter good. I don't know

1:05:31.760 --> 1:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>how long this is gonna last, so we'll see what

1:05:34.040 --> 1:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>happens again. If you enjoy this conversations, be sure and

1:05:37.800 --> 1:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>look up an Inch or down an Inch on iTunes

1:05:40.000 --> 1:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and you could see the rest of our interviews. Check

1:05:43.360 --> 1:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>out my daily blog at Dholtz dot com and on

1:05:46.200 --> 1:05:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg View dot com. I want to thank my head

1:05:49.520 --> 1:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>research Michael bat Nick and my engineer and producer Charlie Volmer.

1:05:55.080 --> 1:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.