WEBVTT - Is a Funny Boss better for your Workplace? (And other Secrets from Office Culture!) 

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Part Time Genius, the production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I Guess what Will? What's that? Man? Have you seen

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>these nap pods around? The companies have started using in

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>their offices, of course, And actually I feel like I

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>remember from years ago. Did didn't you take a field

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>trip to one of these things? One time I did

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>so Jason English and I heard about these at the

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Empire State Building and so we went to a nap

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>room and got a nap pass and you kind of

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>just lie down in the space age recliner that looks

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like an egg and and rest. It does look like

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>can he. But for some reason, every time I see

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those, it makes me think of pac Man

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and just like eating these people. So there's something about it.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>It makes me a little hesitant to get in one

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of those things. Yeah, but I kind of love that

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they are, these weird little pods and their soundproof and ergonomic,

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and they've got colors that come in to wake you up.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You know. The one time I did it, not only

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>did I feel rested, but I woke up refreshed. So

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I actually looked into them for our office and did

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you know they go for like thirteen grand a pop.

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a little out of our price range, but it

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>did give me thinking about all the ways that the

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>workplace has changed over the years. I mean, there was

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a time not too long ago when sleeping on the

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>job was a fireball offense. But now it's a part

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of employee wellness programs that everywhere from like Nike to

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Google to Ben and Jerry's. So with that kind of

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>change in mind, I thought i'd be fun to take

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a tour through the history of office innovations, from surprising

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>programs adopted in other countries to the rise and fall

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of the office cubicle. Let's dive in. Y Hey, their

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>podcast listeners, Welcome to Part Time Genius. I'm Will Pearson

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's always I'm joined by my good friend Manges

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Ticketer on the other side of that soundproof glass. Look

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at him just polishing that thing. He's polishing this shiny

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>new Employee of the Month blaque. That's our friend and

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>producer Tristan McNeil. I didn't even know we hadn't employed

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in the month program. We we we actually don't mango.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>He gave himself the employee them on the ward. It

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a power move, you know, he's he's

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit into these power moves, and and I

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>think this is because he's now handed over the producing duties.

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course Tristan is still going to be around,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>but these are now going to the wonderful lull Berlante.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So to be fair, I think I'm at least partially

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to blame for this, because last week I told Tristan

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>about this big push to ban Employee of the month programs.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Apparently some HR departments think that the selection criteria is

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>too vague, and as a result of this, companies are

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>left open to being accused of favoritism. So a lot

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of people are pushing to get rid of these things. Yeah,

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and I guess you can see how people might complain

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>when they don't get it, And it kind of makes sense,

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know. I I like how Tristan took it into

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>his own hands and out himself a plaque. But why

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>why don't we stick to some of the more time

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>tested workplace innovations, ones that have already proven themselves to

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>be good ideas And one that I really like are

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>these professional readers who work in Cuban cigar factories. Readers

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>who work in Cuban cigar factories. Yeah, they're called electories,

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and their job is to sit on a raised platform

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>inside a factory and read aloud to the people rolling

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the cigars. There's usually some kind of p a system too,

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>so it isn't just them yelling, but it's it's pretty

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>great and it's a practice that's been going on in

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Cuban factories for over a hundred and fifty years now,

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and the electorias are are still they're just reading two

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>people to this day. Why is this like it's some

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of enrichment or education program or what. Yeah, so

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>this is back in eight six five there was a

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>man named Nicolas as Karate. I'm sure I'm pronouncing that terribly,

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but he was the leader of a political reform movement

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in Havana, and he thought lictors would help in two ways. First,

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they would help relieve the workers of their boredom. You know,

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>cigar roll all day has to be kind of a

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>tedious activity. But more importantly, it would help educate the

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>workers and broaden their minds about local and global issues.

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And the public actually loved the ideas. So just one

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>year after the lectoria has arrived in the factories, the

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Cuban newspaper um Law Aurora report on the program, and

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this is where they wrote. Quote. Today, even in the

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>heart of the workshops and during the hours most suited

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to manual labor, imaginations are busily questioning scientific and philosophical truth.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>They're talking and discussing, They're reading the works of good

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>modern authors and consulting with each other. In short, they

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>are doing what they can to learn and to continue

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>along the path of civilization. So it's kind of hard

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to say exactly what affects those readings had on the workers,

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>but it is worth noting that when Cuba want its

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>independence from Spain, it did so with the help of

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>these cigar workers, and it isn't a stretch to think

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that many of them were inspired by the readings that

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they heard at work. Yeah, not only that, And this

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is something I really don't think most people would know.

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>But q but has one of the highest literacy rates

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world, right, Like, I think it sounds like

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>nine point seven percent of the population, which you know,

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense for a country where factory workers listen

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>to news and books all day long, I guess. But

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm assuming they read books out loud, too,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So so what kind of stuff do these electories read. Yeah,

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>it is a mix. The electoria's typically read in thirty

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>minutes shifts, so one shift might cover the major news

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>stories of the day and another might cover horoscopes or recipes.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>But you're totally right about the books. The real need

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of the programming is the dramatic reading of novels, which happens,

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's when the lector is really good to show off,

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like they act out multiple parts, they use different voices.

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they provide sound effects like their own effects, and

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the workers can't get enough of it. In fact, when

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>they really like what they're hearing, they'll start tapping on

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the table with the knives they use for the cigar

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>cutting and and it's basically their way to show their applause.

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>And I love that they applaud with knives, but it

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't It worries me a little bit and kind of

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder what happens if they don't like a reading. Yeah,

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>it could be dangerous, but actually that knife applause gets

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>used in different ways to write. The factories actually hold

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>auditions for these lectoria's, where each candidate's pronunciation and their

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.679
<v Speaker 1>oratory flair is is scrutinized. I guess their sound effects

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. And and then the workers put the whole

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to a knife vote, and they also get a

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>vote on which texta read. Can you guess what the

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>top novel among these cigar rollers is? I mean, I

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what Harry Potter? Yeah, I mean, that's

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not a bad guess, but it's actually, uh, the Count

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of Monte Cristo. Okay, also Jared Kushner's favorite book. But

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and some lectoria's have even read the book multiple times

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for the same group of workers, Like that's how popular

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it is. But the thing I really like is that

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Electora is basically the voice of the workers in their factory.

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>The workers choose the Electora and they choose the words

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>here she will read. But they also paid the electora's

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>wages themselves, using contributions from their salaries, so in a

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>very real way, the electora's speaks for them. But being

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Electora can extend beyond the daily reading, so sometimes they

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>wind up taking on other jobs, like they announced plays

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>at the company baseball game, they'll perform the eulogy at

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at employee funerals, and they even act as a middleman

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for the workers speaking to management on their behalf. It's

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>really a role as like a community spokesman or like

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>almost like a union leader, as well as being a reader.

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think that intimacy between that relationship is kind

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of why the practice still endures today, even with like TV, smartphones,

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>even podcast I don't know if you've heard those, but

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>these are gonna be big some day. But Lectura kind

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of has the workers back in a way that none

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of those mediums can do exactly. Well. You know, there's

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing I noticed when I was looking through the

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>research that Gabe sent us this week, and is that

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the most effective office innovations tend to be the ones

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that reinforced this feeling of humanity in the workplace. So

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>when you think about these, like for a lot of us,

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this means you know, certain modern office staples like coffee

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>breaks or casual Fridays, but there are also things that

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>like homemade lunch delivery service that they have in Mumbai,

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>which is just can you imagine how much fun that

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>would be? Yeah, the double Wallas the dumble is actually

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>your lunch or lunch container and the wall as the

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>person who delivers it. I mean, it's crazy how old

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this system actually is Apparently it's been in place for

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>them like a hundred and thirty years and there's more

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>than two hundred thousand people in the city that rely

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on it to deliver their lunch each day. But what's

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me is that it's so efficient. So there

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>were some people from Harvard that did a study on this,

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually estimated that for every six million meals

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>they handle, only one actually misses its destination. Like that

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is efficient, way better track record than any food delivery

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>app that I can think of. Yeah, I mean my

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>families from Bombay and I didn't know those numbers. But

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>what's crazier to me is that the system is about

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>as analog as you can get. So each double wall

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is responsible for finding his own customers, also for collecting

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the money from them, and sort of the way it

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>used to work with milkman or paper boys. They're actually

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the one doing the collections. So every day, each double

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Walla bikes to his customers homes one by one, picks

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>up a freshly cooked meal from each one of them,

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and then he takes these meals to their drop off points,

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>where they get grouped with a bunch of other meals

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and sent off to this nearby train station. So from there,

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the home cooked meals travel to a hub where they're

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sorted by location and then finally sent out by bike

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and delivered before lunchtime. And despite all of that, they

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>have that sort of track record. I mean, it's, I guess,

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful organized chaos from everything I've read about. If

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you know apprienently, it takes at least three months of

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>training just to memorize the coding system they use for

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the different lunch boxes. I don't know if you've seen these,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's got like a jumble of colors and letters

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and numbers. But you know, I can't get over how

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>much stress these guys must be under. Like not only

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>do they have to move the lunch boxes from one

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>train to another to get to the destinations, but if

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you've ever tried to just take a train without doing

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the lunch is an India that's its own chore. So

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if a double walla gets confused and and

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this is his connection, that means a whole block where

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the customers might miss their lunches. It's insanity, all right.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So just to clarify on this though, like this system

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>seems to be thriving despite the fact that they're probably

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>cheaper and easier ways to eat lunch at work. And

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, why do you think this is? I mean,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for some people it's a matter of health or hygiene,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like they don't want to eat anything that might get

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>them sick, and getting your dubble from home is is

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a good way to ensure that doesn't happen. But more broadly,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the people goes back to the human component, like,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this isn't food that's been prepared by a stranger. It

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>was freshly cooked by a loved one for you, Which

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is why I think it's such an enduring innovation. All right, Well,

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>now that we've looked at a few workplace trends from abroad,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we should circle back to the US

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>offices and trying to get a sense for how it's

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>evolved over the years. Sure, but before we do that,

0:10:53.920 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. You're listening to part Time

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Genius and we're talking about office innovations that have changed

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>the way we work, sometimes for the better and sometimes

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>for the worst. Is it still an innovation if it

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>actually makes things worse? I think so, Like think about

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>think about the cubicle right, like it's it was super

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>innovative when it came on the scene in the nineteen sixties,

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but plenty of office workers would argue that change was

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not for the better. I mean, I guess that's true,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>but you kind of have to look at the whole history.

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think they're a little bit misunderstood. Like cubicles,

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for all their faults, and of course there are many,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they were still a step up from the office layout

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of yesteryear. So just as an example of this, in

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century, American offices were these small, dingy places,

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>pop bellied stove and a bunch of clerks just kind

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of piled on top of one another, and so it's

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>this cramp, smokey, just not pleasant space ace and there

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>was zero privacy. I know, when I think about that,

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I almost think of like Scrooge's office in the Christmas Carol.

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>It was all exactly like that, Like that was true

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to every single office. And I know you, Mango, so

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I know you're picturing Scrooges office in the Muppet version

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Christmas Carol, and you aren't far off. So

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>by the twentieth century, office spaces had thankfully spread out

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but soon they started to resemble factory floors.

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think of these bulky flat desks set

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>up side by side, and so not only did this

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>arrangement maximize space, but it also made it easy for

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>supervisors to keep an eye on all of their employees.

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So even though offices were bigger than they used to be,

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>personal privacy in this workplace sort of setting it was,

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>it was really nonexistent. It would, you know, It's kind

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of stay this way until the cubicle came along in

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen sixties. Yeah, it's interesting, like we're so

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>used to thinking of cubicles in negative terms, like they're

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>blend or homogeneous, isolating, But that's probably because we pictured

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the alternative as every employe having their own office with

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the door. But cubicle will start to look a lot

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>more liberating when you remember that the status quo of

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the era was almost like a bullpen with everyone just

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>working elbow to elbow. Yeah, that's exactly right, And you know,

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>it's strange to think about the cubicles really were intended

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to bring a bit more humanity and individuality to the workplace,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>or at least that was the goal of Robert Probes,

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>who was the inventor of the cubicle, and Probes was

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the head of research at Herman Miller's furniture company. This

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was in the nineteen fifties and the nineteen sixties, and

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it was during the course of his work that he

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>got depressed about the state of the modern office. So

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>he wrote about this. This was actually from nineteen sixty

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and he said, today's office is a waste land. It

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>SAPs fatality, blocks talent, frustrates accomplishment. It is the daily

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 1>scene of unfulfilled intentions and failed efforts. Such a wonderful idea,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I know you had some strong feelings there, He really did,

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and so it inspired him to get, you know, to

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>work designing the ideal workspace. So he really did have

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>very good in engines here, and using research he collected

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>from design experts, Probes decided on this new, flexible, kind

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of customizable approach, which he dubbed the action office. So

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it consisted of a desk, a space for making phone calls,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a vertical filing system, and these three hinged partitions that

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>could be rearranged as needed to accommodate solo work. Or

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in some cases collaborative work. And to be clear, though,

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the Action Office was not a cubicle like. The idea

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was to provide a mix of walls and desks of

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>various heights so that each workers set up their space

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to match their own needs. And you know, it's kind

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of a smart idea compared to what was out there.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And Proest included these acoustical panels to help block out

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the sound of typing and other people's phone calls,

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and so he even included this adjustable desk so that

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>people could stand while they worked, which you know, he

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>thought it would actually help improve employee blood flow in

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the process. That's kind of amazing that he was that

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of his time with the standing deess and and

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the panels. And I also love the branding the Action Office. Like,

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the main problem was that nobody bought the Action Office.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Designers praised it as ingenious, but for companies and the executives,

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the system was just like too high concept to buy into.

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And so Propes and his team went back to the

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>drawing board and a year later they came out with

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the Action Office too, So, you know, totally different thing here,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was cheaper and simpler, and unlike it's more

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>open minded predecessor, this new design had a very stock

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>model with a fixed desk and you know those humanizing

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>frills like shelves and better site lines that had previously

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>been available as options, but you know, most companies didn't

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>spend on them, and as a result, Prop's vision of

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>this sprawling, productive workspace gave way to his fenced in

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>office space that we really think of now when we

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>think of cubicles. When you talk about it that way,

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like kind of what happened with the mall inventor,

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Like who wanted to create those town squares and then

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it ended up being just this commercial, like like pure

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>commerce place. Yeah, I know, we talked about that not

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>too long ago, and it's basically the same story with Probes.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So other furniture companies started making their own no frills

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>cubicles and offices became these more crowded and impersonal spaces

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>more than they had even before. And just like Ruin

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>with his shopping malls, Probes had to stand by and watches.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>His invention became this new model for that very corporate

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sameness that he'd been trying to get rid of. And

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I pulled this quote from him that shows

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>how disappointed he was in the whole thing. He says,

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not all organizations are intelligent and progressive. Lots are run

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>by crass people. They make little bitty cubicles and stuff

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>people in them. Barren, rat hole places, monolithic insanity. I

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to read this guy's quotes. Just over and

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got more rat whole places. He has not mincing words,

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>very very descriptive. So so probes passed away in the

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>year two ols and it makes you wonder what he

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>would think of the return to the open office layout

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that we've really seen come about in the last twenty

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>years or so. I mean, don't get me wrong about

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty of American employees still work in cubicles, and the

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>industry makes a couple billion dollars in sales every year.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>But open floor plans have become the new normal again,

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's thanks largely to the tech industry and the

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>cubicle you know, could be on its way out at last.

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>It is strange to see that pendulum, right, It just

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>swings from one side to the other and back. But

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>it's also weird that we can't find our way to

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the middle. Like, there's so many studies that show that

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>open offices actually decreased productivity. One study from the Cohen

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown Management Group found that office workers lose between three

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to five hours of productive time every day in an

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>open office. And that's because they're constantly being interrupted in

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>some way by the people around them. And the worst

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>part is that those interruptions aren't even worth the bother

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in most cases. Like, according to a professor of management

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>at n y U, and her name is Ann lar Fiard,

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a quote, many studies show that people have

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>shorter and more superficial conversations in open because they're self

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>conscious about being overheard. You know. It's interesting because I've

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>always heard that the biggest benefit to an open office

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is that the employees, you know, they interact, they collaborate

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>so much more than in a partitioned office, I guess,

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But but I think that benefit make it canceled out

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>if the interactions are mostly hollow, right, Yeah, I think

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the real thing open office plans have going for them

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is that they're way cheaper than going to cubicle route.

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>You can get by with three times less office space

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>if you just use an open floor plan and you

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about fitting in a bunch of big,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>boxy cubes. All right, So open offices are less expensive

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and they can make it seem like your company is

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>really shaking things up, I guess. But you know, on

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>their own, they aren't enough to make workers anymore creative

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>or more productive. So so what kind of innovation would

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>actually do that? I mean, there's got to be something, right. Yeah,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got a few fun options that we can run through.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But let's take another quick break. Welcome back to part

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>time Genius. All right, Mango, you promised this. You're going

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>to give us some picks for the best ways to

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>boost productivity at work, and you can't say nappods again.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got to come up with something. Well, I've got

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>something much better in mind, and it is cheaper, because,

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>according to recent studies, one way to improve your job

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>performance is just by making your coworkers laugh. That actually

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>makes me think of like bosses starting to do impressions

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like they're Michael Scott in the office or something like that,

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious, like whose performance does it actually help

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the joke teller or the person laughing. So that's a

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>really great part about this. It affects both parties, and

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for the person making the jokes, the benefit is a

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>boosting social status. In two thousands, sixteen, researchers at the

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Business School concluded that when an employee makes a

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>coworkers laugh, that person is quote perceived as more competent,

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>more confident, and higher in status. That's just some revolutionary

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>research there. And so what about for the people laughing,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>They actually get something good out of it as well.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>They get stress relief, entertainment, and a stronger sense of

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.959
<v Speaker 1>engagement and collaboration. I mean, this is all studies backed.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the physical changes like for example, laughing

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>increases your intake of oxygen and that turned up to

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the amount of endorphins that your brain releases. Plus laughter

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>can stimulate circulation and relax your muscles, so it's great

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for relieving physical stress, all right. So, just to play

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Devil's advocate on this for for for a second, have

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>there been any studies on whether laughing actually improved productivity

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>because stress relief, endorphins connecting with your coworkers, and it

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that it would make net positive results, I guess,

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just wondering if researchers have actually been able

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to prove this. Yeah, I mean that's fair. I think

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a little tricky just because every company is going

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>to have its own different measures of productivity, so it's

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>not like you'll be able to prove the fact of

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>laughter across the board or anything. But uh, you know,

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I I did read about one study that came out

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of the University of Bristol a few years back where

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the researchers tried to determine if there really was a

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>link between happiness and productivity. And what they did was

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they gathered a bunch of volunteers and split them into

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>two groups, and the first group watched a funny video

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>clip that was meant to make them laugh, and the

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>second group didn't watch anything. And then the members in

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>both groups were given a set of addition problems and

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>charged with solving as many as they could within i

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like ten minutes or something. So in this case,

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>productivity was measured by the number of problems solved correctly,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and as you're probably guessing, you know, the result was

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the employees who laughed at the clip were a full

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>ten percent more productive than the employees who hadn't watched

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the clip, so it's not definitive, but there's still a

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>good reason to think that laughter in the workplace is

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a win for everyone. I mean, it doesn't

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>make sense when you think about in terms of headspace

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and how laughter can know of course, improve your mood. Yeah,

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's actually the same thing that happens with music.

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm thinking about all those studies you see about

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>how listening to music when you work and actually put

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you in a better mood. You know. I was actually

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at that this week because I wasn't sure how

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>much truth there was to that claim. And personally, I'm

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>some sometimes in one camp and sometimes in the other

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>where I feel like music is like great in the

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>background and I'm really humming along, and then sometimes I

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's so distracting. But I mean, I've read

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some of those studies that you mentioned as well, though.

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>What was the verdict. Well, it turns out it kind

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of depends on what you're listening to. So if you're

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to music that you enjoy at work, then you're

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>likely to experience a mood boost of about nine of

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the time, or at least that's according to one expert

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that there was this music therapy professor in Miami name

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Teresa Lessie Yuck, And the reason for that boost is

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>that when you listen to music you like, it activates

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure center in your brain, which of course feels good.

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So by the same token, if you're listening to music

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't stand, then you probably won't get the same results,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense. But now it feels like we're running

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>into the same question you have with the laughter case,

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>like does being in a good mood really make you

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a more productive worker or is that just something we

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of take as a given. Well, like you said,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there probably isn't one single study that could

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>prove all of this, But according to Lessieu, there is

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>evidence that people are more productive when they're in a

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>positive mood. And as you put it, when you're in

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that mood state, you're better at problem solving and thinking creatively.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>You take in more options and don't narrow your focus.

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And that kind of tracks because you know, your pleasure

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>center isn't the only part of the brain that lights

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>up when you listen to good music or when you laugh.

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>The other area that gets stimulated is the specific neural

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>pathway that runs through the limbic system all the way

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>up to the orbital frontal cortex. And as I'm sure

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we all remember, I only remember because I'm looking at

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 1>my notes here to be honest with you, that that's

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the part of the brain that deals with decision making.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, when that part of the brain is stimulated,

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the result is this spike in creativity and problem solving.

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And here's how you can tell that there's truth to this.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So several companies are trying to cash in on these

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>neurological ben fits by creating music that's specifically designed to

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>improve your mood and productivity at work, and it's called

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>streamlined music. It's pay special attention to the key and

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>tempo of songs in order to maximize the effect they

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>have on an employee's limbic system. So the jury is

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>still out on how well the system works, but the

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>takeaway so far is that it really can improve the

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>quote perceived focus, task persistence, precognition, and creative thinking of listeners.

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So if nothing else, at least we've got a good

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>excuse to listen to music in the office. Now, Yeah,

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll go over well if you just tell

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>your boss your head banging and working on your Excel sheets,

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're just stimulating your limbic system, I guess, and

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they won't have any follow up questions to that.

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So speak of being things awkward at work, there's one

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>more unusual innovation we should mention for office workers, and

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a roma therapy. I mean, it's funny because I've

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>seen these office diffusers online, like you just squired a

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of drops of your favorite essential oil into this

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>scent pad thing and then plug it into your US

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>speed port. It is pretty weird, to be honest with you,

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, And initially it sounded like less a way

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to improve the workplace and more like a good way

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to alienate your coworkers. I remember when the Internet was

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just starting and and and people were talking about what

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the future of the Internet would be, and people were

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, having sent through your computer to

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>like enhance the roma of of a food article or

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever would be exciting. And then the response to immediately

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>was that trolls would hack your system and send out

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>fart bombs, and so that's sort of smell vision of

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the internet hasn't come about. But this is a much

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>safer way to make sure you're surrounded by good smells

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and and being more meditative about your work. I guess well,

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking of focus, how about we keep our eye on

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the prize, not not Tristan's employee the month prize, but

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact off prize. Sounds good. M all right, I'm

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with my favorite office perk of all time.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the sixty five ft tall indoor ferris wheel. It's

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 1>permanently housed in the headquarters of Acuity Insurance in Sheboygan, Wisconsin,

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and these lucky employees there get to write it basically

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>whenever they want. And if this all sounds a little

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>bit decadent, keep in mind that the rides primary purpose

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is to serve as a fund centerpiece for fundraising events

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for local charities, so in fact, it's even nicknamed the

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Charity Wheel for that very reason. That's really sweet, but

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it also seems like a good way to sell insurance,

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>like maybe you need some insurance before you hop on

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this giant old ferris wheel. Actually, Acuity has these other

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>unusual perks going forward as well, including a forty five

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>foot tall climbing wall of four hundred foot tall flagpole

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and a dress code that's described as jeens friendly. Yeah,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the last one is a real selling point. But you know,

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for me, probably the coolest park I came across is

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the maternity leave program for employees at a company called

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Vota Phone. They're a UK based telecommunications provider and a

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>few years ago they noticed a troubling pattern in their workforce.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>It seemed that a high number of female employees were

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>leaving the company soon after returning from maturity leave, and

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in nearly two thirds of these cases, the women did

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>so within a year of having their baby, so obviously

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>not an ideal retention rate. Vota Phone decided to change

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>their policy and attempt to combat the problem, and the

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>result is one of the most compassionate maternity leave programs

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world. So women who work at Vota Phone

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>are now entitled at least sixteen weeks of fully paid

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>maternity leave, and it's followed by thirty hour work weeks

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>paid at full salary for six months after they returned

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to work. Actually, speaking of pregnancy, and I know that

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be an age gap and too who

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>knows this fact and who thinks this is really weird?

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But actually getting pregnant used to be a fireable offense

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>in the US, which is just sort of mind boggling.

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It sounds made up, But until the late nineteen seventies,

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>employers were permitted to fire women just because they were expecting,

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and the practice was considered like a cost cutting measure

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>aimed at saving a company money on you know, maternity

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>leave health benefits, and it was pretty pop or two so,

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>according to the Department of Labor, during the mid nineteen sixties,

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>only of first time mothers worked while pregnant, compared to

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a close to seventy today, And the crucial factor behind

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that uptick was the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which finally put

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>an end to this firing practice, and that happened in

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy eight, the year before the two of us

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>were born, thank you. Yeah, And obviously there's so much

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>work to be done on that front to make it

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a truly level playing field. You know, this next one

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is something surprising that I kind of wish I hadn't

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>learned this week. So, you know, all those long running

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>rumors that you hear around the office, but like the

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>one about Tristan winning the pick leading contest at last

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>year's Atlanta County Fair was that one that rumorable? I

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that one's true, but but if you

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do hear an office rumor, there's a good chance it

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is true. Or at least that's what researchers found at

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rochester Institute of Technology and the University of South Australia.

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>According to them, a workplace grapevine is like one big

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>truth detector. Baseless gossa gets dropped fast because one person

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>or another can usually debunk it. But if there's truth

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to a rumor, it tends to persist and all the

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>embellishments and guesswork around it are gradually shaved away. So

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this is what one of the authors behind the study

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>said about it. Quote. In a workplace setting, what we

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>call a stable organizational grapevine, people are very good at

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>figuring out the truth. If you tell me something and

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I work closely with you, I know whether you're a

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>credible source. But even if I'm not so sure, in

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>workplace settings, it's easy to cross check information. So, in

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a weird way, the longer that a rumor is circulated

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>among employees, like the pickle one about Tristan, the more

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>accurate it is. You know, It's weird because it kind

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of feels like a reverse game of telephone, like the

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>message actually gets clear from person to person, which is

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not not what you would think would happen. But alright,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>well here's a quick one. The largest office building in

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the world is actually the Pentagon in Washington, d C.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So even though it's only seven stories tall, the building's

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>unique shape makes it super a along like giving it.

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it has a whopping three point seven million

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>square feet of floor space, So that's three times the

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>square footage of the Empire State Building and room enough

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for more than twenty three thousand employees. That's crazy. So

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>here's what I like. There's one Starbucks in the world

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that will never spell your name wrong on the order,

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the c I A Starbucks also known as Store Number one,

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's apparently the only store of the more than

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty th Starbucks that will never ask for your name,

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's because, thanks to CIA rules, it is not allowed. Well,

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so how did the baristas know what you ordered? I mean,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they're just that good. Like they have to go through

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>intense training and background checks, and then when they finally

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>get the job, they just quickly learned to pair drink

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>orders with faces. I love that and it makes a

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. Yeah, I mean it does. But it

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>also seems like the CIA is smart enough that people

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>could make up fake names, right, Like my father in

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>law just decided that his local Starbucks he'd only be

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>known as wand so when he walks in, everyone greets

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>him as one like he's wanting to tars. But I

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>guess not having to say your name is easier. That's

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty great, all right, Well, I think because of that,

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>both the great fact and the story about your father

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in law, you've earned the trophy for today. So congratulations,

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, and and that is all for

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>today's Part Time Genius, but from Gabe Lowell, Will and me,

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks as always for listening, and I think we'll be

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>back soon with another episode. Part Time Genius is a

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple podcast,

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.