WEBVTT - Don Passman

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to the Bob Left That's Podcast.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is attorney done Passman, who literally wrote

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the book on the music business. Don hey, Pop, thanks

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Okay, now I can see you're in

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>your home, although it looks like you're in the oval

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>office here on the zoom screen. Uh, how has your

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>practice changed since you've been at home. Well, interestingly, I

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>can do what I do pretty seamlessly at home. Um,

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we're set up with computers, I'm set up as zoom.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm set up with uh, you know, phones and so

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>forth and emails, and I can get an awful lot done.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I can access the files in the office. I can

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I can take care of whatever it needs to be done.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It's changed in the sense that obviously there's no touring

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>because everything is shut down. It's changed what the artists

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are doing in terms of what you just physically can

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>do in this environment. Um, things that I at least

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have intuitively thought about, Like, for example, you can't

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>make videos in this environment, so you can't do the

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>same kind of marketing. You can't do personal appearances, you

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>can't do a lot of things that you would normally

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>do to market and promote product. But other than that,

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>people can still record, albeit remotely, and people can still

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>make music, still write music, and uh, there's a lot

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of deals going on. Okay, since so much of the

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>business is closed down, your particular business in work, is

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it any slower or as busy as ever? No, it's

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>busy as ever. I was actually surprised by that and

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe even a little disappointed. Maybe there'll be a slowdown,

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's been extremely busy, and truthfully I like

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that better. It makes the days go by. Okay, So

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you said there are a bunch of deals in the offing.

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>What kind of deals? Um, you know, buying and selling

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of catalogs for example, executive deals people are making, publishing

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>songwright deals. People are still making record deals, management deals,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sponsorship less so now perhaps, but still active. So.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And then there's of course the whole situation with people

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>who made deals during COVID that now aren't working that

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to sort out. Okay, can you address that

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about the deals that aren't working and whether insurance comes

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in and how amenable people are two changes and adjusting. Well,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>people are pretty amenable. I mean everybody recognizes this is

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>something nobody could have contemplated. Um, everybody's businesses is challenged

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>seriously and fundamentally, and I think for the most part,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody has a long term view, which is that you know,

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we can't, we can't. I mean, just to pick an

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>example of tours, because it's the most obvious if everyone

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>got together and if they had the contractual right, which

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 1>not everyone does to get paid during COVID, but they

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>crushed the promoters for the you know, out of business

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>when they have no income coming. Nobody thinks that's the

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do or the long term thing to do.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.119
<v Speaker 1>So things are getting rescheduled, people are working together, people

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>are taking discounts, people are deferring payments to the extent

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they can, and and for the most part it's it's

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>worked out pretty amicably. Okay, Uh, Since you're doing these deals,

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>when are your promoters wanting to start again, whether that

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>happens or not. When are they trying to book for

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not on the front line of that

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>because the agents are. But from the intel that I've gotten,

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>nobody thinks anything is going to happen before summer of uh.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, I think it could be more like the

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>fall or even in it will directly depend on how

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>quickly we have a medical breakthrough. Okay. The other thing is,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have you uh been involved any issues of insurance people

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to claim whether companies are paying off whether you

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>can get this insurance at this time? I have not

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>recently been involved in that because nobody's putting up tours,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're not dealing with the insurance issues. There are

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>issues around whether insurance will cover it. It's very policy dependent. Okay,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>let's you know, let's break down some of the things

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you brought up. You said you're doing a lot of

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>publishing deals. Everyone knows on the inside hypnosis is raising

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the value of catalogs. Uh. Do you think this is

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>causing the action in the buying and selling of publishing catalogs.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's part of it. I think the other

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>part of it is that we're seeing a lot of

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street money looking at publishing as a steady source

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of income with potential upside and uh and Wall Street

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>like steady sources of income as an investment. So we're

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>seeing all kinds of new players come into the marketplace

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>that want to do this, and so there's not a

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of inventory and a lot of hound snapping at

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the door, and I think that's the reason we're seeing

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>such a surge in that. What kind of Wall Street

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>movement have you seen? Um? Well, I don't want to

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>get specific, but a number of investment firms or people

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>backed by investment type firms that are funds you know

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that are that are you know venture capital type funds. Okay,

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>let's talk specifically about Hypnosis Merk's company. He wants to

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>own the publishing entirely, and he's paying a huge multiple. Obviously,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>as an attorney, you listen to what your client wants.

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>But assuming the client didn't have opinion and opinion, what

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>would you say about selling all the rights? I generally

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>advise against it. Historically, everybody who has sold their song

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>has regretted it. If you look back through history to

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>pick an example, Uh, you know, led Zeppelin sold all

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the royalties on their catalog for what was a good

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>deal amount of money at the time, but over history

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>proved to be not such a great deal. Same thing

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with Elvis Preshley. The people that have sold off have

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>generally regretted it. People that sold songs, people that sold

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>publishing companies. You know have seen them go for bigger

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>multiples further down the road. UM. So my general bent

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is there is a saying in the publishing business never

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>sell a song, and my general bent is against that.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, there are a few specific circumstances

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>where it can make sense. There's some tax advantages to selling.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>You can get capital gains rather than ordinary income for

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the money that you get. If your need of money, uh,

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you can sell it in that. But if you're if

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you're able to hang onto it for one thing, tax wise,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>once you die, you get what's called a stepped up basis,

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>which means that your errors will be able to sell

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the catalog for the value at the time of death

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and not pay any tax on the sale. Of course,

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna pay a state tax on it if your

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>state's large enough. Um, but you wouldn't pay any income

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>tax on the sale at that point. And really I

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like to u to keep it through the airs. Now,

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>having said that, in a situation where someone passed away

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and the airs are squabbling with each other or they

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>can't it's too cumbersome to get everybody to agree to

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>license a song or someone. You know, different situations, it

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>does make sense to sell. And by the way, someone

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>who is sophisticated and not going to just squander the money,

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>who wants to sell it and thinks they can make

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a better return than they're publishing is giving them by

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>putting it into different kinds of investments, that can make

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>sense too. But that's rare, and my general band is

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>don't do it. But obviously I have people who want

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and and we we've certainly done a

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of it. Okay, what about some of your clients

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>or people you might be aware of who are cash

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>poor and make most of their money for touring. Uh,

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>if we're down for another up to eighteen months, what

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>options do these people have for income? Yeah, that's that's

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a good question. I mean it depends, of course on

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>who they are. If they have good songwriting or record income,

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where it's going to come from. Possibly there's an endorsement. Uh,

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know some of them have. There's been this situation

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>which I haven't had highans involved in, but I've I've

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>heard about tangentially where people are you know, getting tips

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or trying to you know, some pay per view, although

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that's for charity. That generates some amount

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of money, but nothing like touring would. But generally it's tough.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you don't have income from other sources,

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a rough period of time. Okay,

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about income in the future. There are cases where

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>people have an interest in a record. A well known

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>cases Todd Rundgren produced Bad Out of Hell of the

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>meat Loaf record. Now, in his particular case, he sold

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>all the royalties. I could go down that path. I

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know more about it. But there are people who sold

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>royalties in records because they say it's very difficult to collect.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Is the years go by and never never mind collect

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred cents on the dollar. What do you think

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about that whole situation. I'm not clear why they think

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it would be difficult to collect. I know a number

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of cases where the new regimes come in, Uh they

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>people work gets screwed up. The new people say they're

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>not owed the money, and especially someone who needs the

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>money has a very hard time going through the process

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately even lawsuits in order to collect what

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they deserve. As I say, if you haven't experience that,

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I've not experienced it, but I don't doubt it happens.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, and if it's not for a lot

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of money, it's not going to be worthwhile to file

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the litigation. As I say, there may be situations where

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>selling makes sense. You don't get capital gains on an

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 1>income stream. By the way, if you're a producer getting royalties,

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't sell it for capital gains. You can only

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.359
<v Speaker 1>sell capital gains for an asset, which would be a copyright.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you don't own the copyright and you're

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>only selling your stream as a writer, you don't get

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>capital games for that either. So there's no particular tax

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>advantage to that. It's just a question of uh. And

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want to do a cold financial analysis, how

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>much money will they give me? Now? What can I

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>earn on that money? Uh? Am? I better off doing

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that than keeping it and getting the income as it

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>comes in. You're certainly hedging against it going down over time,

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but you're also losing the benefit if it goes up

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>over time. So these are very fact specific situations and

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to analyze it based on who they are

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and what their needs are. Generally speaking, the people who

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>make all this money, who are performers, are not that

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>good at business. So to what degree if someone does

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>get a lump sum, do you advise them what to

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>do with the money? Well, I don't advise on financial matters.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not my expertise, and I try to stay in

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the lane that I know best and not not get

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Uh, the financial it depends. I mean,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>some artists don't know much about business, but they have

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>smart people around them and they listen to them. And

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>if those people know what they're doing and think it

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>makes sense on a financial basis, and you're not going

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to run out and you know by jets and yachts

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>with the proceeds um, then it might make some sense

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to do it. But it's very very fact dependent. Okay,

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the royalty situation. You make a deal,

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and let's just assume for the sake of discussion, the

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>act actually goes into profits into royalties. What has been

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>your experience with those acts getting paid and getting what

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 1>they deserve? Giving the example of UH high price, attorneys

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>like yourself negotiate the deals, but frequently the people who

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>are doing the splits or someone uneducated in the back room.

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So to what degree if you experienced a problem here

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you could address that. Sure. Uh, it's gotten

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>much better over the time I've been practicing law. It

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>used to be that things were very a sloppy and

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>very difficult. And that was also in the days when

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>royalties were computed with this incredibly complex formula which basically

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>was the answer to how can I give the artist

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a high royalty rate and pay them as little as possible?

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And they go through all these complicated matching nations, and

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, starting maybe eight or ten years ago, they

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>simplified it down to you get a percentage of what

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we get. So and the major labels I find are

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward, and the major publishers pretty straightforward because we

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>audit them regularly to check and you know, we find

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>something or sometimes there's a contractual dispute. Sometimes they're honest mistakes.

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, they're pretty straightforward. And the

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>size of the audits compared to the old days when

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the companies played games are I find, are much smaller.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>There's still significant money and there's still things to argue about, um,

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but but for the most part, I think they try

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. When you get an independent labels, it can

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>be a different story. It just depends on how sophisticicated

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.359
<v Speaker 1>their back room is, or whether they've got somebody doing it. Um.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't find as many people intentionally playing

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>games as we used to, but I do find honest mistakes.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, some of the smaller labels can just

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>be sloppy or maybe have cash flow issues going back

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>to the majors. So forget forgetting someone who's an Internet

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon like Little Nasax. If you're an act and the

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>label wants you and there's no bidding war, all you're

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>saying almost all of the deals or a percentage of net, Well,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they're not a percentage of net directly, they're a percentage

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of the labels receipts. They're closer to a percentage of gross,

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>although there's issues around what gross means, particularly when you

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>come to foreign territories. But it's a percentage of what

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the label receives. Correct. Okay, so let's just talk about

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>domestic money. We sign with one of the three major labels.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>What would be the rain of percentage that you would

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>make a deal for both an established act and a

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>developing act. Yeah, developing act would probably be in the

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to eighteen to twenty percent range, depending on bargaining

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>power UH an established act, and sometimes you can get

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more on streaming. UH. An established act

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>could be in the twenties, and again with a bit

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>more on streaming. When you're getting into really superstar ranges,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you can get into all kinds of different things like

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>shares of profits. And indeed, some of the new artists

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that are hot with bidding wars can get you a

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>share of profits and distribution type deal where they own

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the masters and they just allow the company to distribute

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it for a period of time. Uh. And you know

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of things in between. So let's just assume

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I have for the second numbers, I have deal. What

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>would be taken out of the gross Traditionally, well, under

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>today's formula nothing. Uh, it would just be of the

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>company's gross. And in the United States, that's pretty straightforward.

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's what they would uh. It's what they

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>would get for a c D, what they would get

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>for a download, what they would get for a stream. UH.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Synchronization licenses or generally meaning the right to use this

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>song and a film, or the right to use a

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>song and a commercial. UH. That's that's a different split.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>When you get the foreign percentages. Uh, you know that

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that's when it's a bit more in the the gamesmanship

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>on the on downloads and cd s, it's pretty straightforward

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about what the their affiliates going to get. But when

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you get the streaming, sometimes the companies will take a

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>percentage in France, for example, before they send the money

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>back to the US, and then you only get the

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the US. So one of the things we

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>asked for in streaming deals now is that they have

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to be at source, and the words at source mean

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that that's where the money is generated. So if it's

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>French money, it's it's in France. If it's German money,

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's in Germany without any deductions before it gets back

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to the US and the company pays it to the artists. Now,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in this particular case, unlike in decades past or certainly

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>prior to nineteen seventy, where these companies own their worldwide outlets,

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not licensing to a third party. Is the reduction

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for foreign moneys just a negotiating ploy or do they

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>give some kind of rationalization or they give a rationalization

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that the local company has marketing expenses and that they're

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>putting actually effort and money into it and so forth.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is is that if you have enough cloud,

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get your money its source. Maybe a lower

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>royalty for them, but you can get it as source. Okay,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>let's pull back the lens because we've talked previously that

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, used to be a lot of your time

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>was spent negotiating record deals, but it shifted to a

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>great degree to live business. Can you comment on that please? Yeah,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean in terms of our personal time, you know,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we will as more and more of these deals are

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>done with one single promoter will do it in some

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>ount of work on that promoter deal. But we also

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>tours are very labor intensive. Tours require contracts for things

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't normally think about, like, uh, somebody to build

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the stage, the trucks, the buses, the crew, the band,

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the dancers. I mean, there are all kinds of things

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that go into it, insurance issues. So tours are actually

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of work. Um. But you know, I

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to say that it shifted the majority of

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>what we do. I just say it's just a big

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>part of it. Okay. Uh, So let's assume I make

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>an overall deal with live nation or concerts West. You

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned all those things. Those are the responsibility of the act.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Where does the line between the responsibility the act and

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the promoter lay for life? I'm not sure what you

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>mean by responsibility. Okay, you're talking about hiring people, insurance, etcetera. Okay, No, No,

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the act, the act does all of that that. The

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>promoters deal is just simply we're gonna pay you X

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to show up and do y concerts. I mean, there's

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot more to it than that, obviously, but that's

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the essence of what the contract is. Uh. Every Then,

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the act is responsible for delivering the show. So they're

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>hiring the band, they're hiring the the crew, they're hiring

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the buses, they're hiring the trucks. Okay, and let's just

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>assume the venue is not owned by the promoter and

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>there is an accident, I would assume the act gets

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>sued in addition to the promoter. Yeah, there's an age

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I legal theory. If you're going to throw a party,

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>you invite everybody, So anybody who is anywhere near what

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>happened is going to be sued along with it. Okay, Now,

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's talk about a superstar act might go

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>out with twenty trucks, uh, crew of dozens, etcetera. To

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>what degree are you involved in the micro management? What

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is someone gets five A or

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a a roadie gets, you know, their ankle broken. Do

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>they call the attorney or their layers before it gets

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to you? Um? Both? I mean, yes, there's layers before

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it get to us. But anybody being fired or any

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of injury or insurance issue, we're going to be

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>involved in it as well. Okay, And let's just talk

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>an overall deal with one of those international promoters. Who

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately comes up with the price and who does the negotiation? Um,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's the agent that does the negotiation of the

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>major terms, uh and the prices you know a marketplace mitting.

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, they'll look at their history, they'll project what

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>they think they can do, they'll figure out a percentage

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of it, they'll want to guarantee of a certain amount

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>of it. And it's just part of the back and forth. Okay. Now,

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of superstar is don't have an agent

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>at all. Do you see what do you see the

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>future of the agency business being? Well, I think the

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>agencies bring value. I'm mean, I think they have a

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of knowledge that even I mean, there's a few

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>managers that are perfectly capable of doing everything, but for

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the most part, the agents have a depth of knowledge

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and relationships and knowledge of other deals, knowledge of routing,

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of UH you know, what the marketplace is like

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in different places that I think makes invaluable and particularly

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for managers without that expertise, I think they're an important

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the team. Okay, let's talk because you're on

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the artist team. Uh. In the old days, everybody paid

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>ten percent, but a very successful artist usually does not

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>pay his agent ten percent. What is your experience there

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and what's the negotiation like. Well, if you're bringing in,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a tour that's you know, a hundred million

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars there, it's unlikely they're going to pay ten percent

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>for it. But it's negotiated very specifically in each instance. Uh,

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it can be a very low percentage. It

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>can even in a few cases not so much anymore,

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>be a flat fee. Oh kay. In the old day,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>certainly prior to there were six major UH international companies

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in some very large independence distributed by them. So in

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of getting record deals, how is the landscape change

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as a results of consolidation in the Internet. In terms

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of record deals, well, there are less buyers for obvious reasons.

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are now you know, a number of

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>independents that are also in the marketplace, but in terms

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of majors, there are only three. Uh. And they don't

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>let their labels compete against each other. So if two

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>labels owned by the same major are both wanting the artists,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they will negotiate jointly, or the artists will nick a

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Laine before they do that because they won't outbid each other. Um.

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as long as you get two horses

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in the race, you can still have a spirited bidding. Warm. Now,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in the old days, attorneys were conduits for talent. To

0:21:55.840 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what degree is that still the game? Um? I think

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just still the game to some degree. I mean,

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the attorneys have more knowledge than others because

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we can have more clients. Uh. You know, agents may

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>have more clients, but they're in a one lane. In

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of overall understanding of the industry. Managers can't have

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>as many clients. Some of the big companies obviously do,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm saying individual managers can't and lawyers are much

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>less of a time commitment, so we have more clients

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and we see a lot of deals. So we have

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of quite a bit of knowledge, and

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we have relationships with with people as well. So when

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>someone you know needs to be connected or needs something done,

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we're in a position to do it. Okay, to what

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>did we? Are people knocking on your door wanting to

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>hire you to make a record deal? Um? If you

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about new people in the business or yes? Yes, Oh,

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I get a fair amount of that because of my

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>book All you need to know about the music business.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I get people calling me and while I did that

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>when I was young and starting out, I don't do

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that anymore. But I have a list of lawyers that

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>very much like to do that if they like the music,

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and I give them referrals. So generally speaking, if you

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know someone, you refer it out. Yes, And I

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>referred out if I don't have expertise, because I think

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's important to be clear about where my strengths are

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and clear about where my weaknesses are. So if I

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>if it's an area I don't completely understand, I'll make

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>sure the client gets involved with someone who does and

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what would you deep your areas of expertise in areas

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>where you have less knowledge. Oh, it would be I

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>mean to pick an easy example, something like criminal law.

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But it can also be I started life as a

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>tax lawyer, but my tax expertise is very rusty. Uh,

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and so I'll bring in a tax specialist. Sometimes we

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>need help with some corporate issues if it's an extremely

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>complicated transaction. Um, you know people that want to rent

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>charter planes. That's especially that I and have expertise and

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Okay, So let's assume you have a

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship with someone a manager you've done business before, and

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>they say they want to represent the act to what

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>did you to represent the act? To what degree do

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>you make a judgment based on the qualitability, quality, or

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>saleability of the material? Oh? I have terrible ears. Um,

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>if I like something that's not usually a good sign

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and my track rigor don that isn't terrific. I have

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of partners Jean Solomon, Ethan Schiffer's who haven't

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>had very good years, very good ears, and so I

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>rely on them. But primarily I rely on who the

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>manager is, who's the team is around him? If there's

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>someone at the label that I respect was interested in them,

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:47.479
<v Speaker 1>So I don't make the independent judgment myself. Okay, at

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what stage does it tend to come to you? Does

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a manager say I have a new act, I haven't

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>talked to the labels, don helped me out, or I've

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>already talked to some labels. Now I want you to

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>come in when you come into the process, I'm sure

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>there are million examples of everything, but generally speaking, yeah, well,

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>at this stage, I tend to take more established artists

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>or at least mid level on their way up. We

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>take a few shots with young artists, but can't take

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>very many because our basic philosophy is were a small

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>firm and we try to do great work for a

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>fewer number of people, so I can't take as many

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>shots as I might like. So generally I want to

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>see something going on before I'll get involved. That there's

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a buzz there, there's a lot of interest, they've got

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a few labels bidding um. But we can we can

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>come in at any stage. We can. You know, clients

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>come to us sometimes at the highest level if they're

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>making a change. So it just depends and what kind

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of fee structure do you institute? Generally we charge five percent? Okay,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And how do you know if they're accounting to you accurately?

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>We rely on the business manager, and uh, you know,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to some degree we have knowledge. We know, for example,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>of a certain deal how much they're getting paid on it,

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have a sense of what we should be getting.

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But in general we rely on the business manager. Okay,

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>what about sunset issues? You mean on our fees? Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we are. The way our deals work is that any

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>contracts that we made, we get paid for while we

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>represent them, and then a year after and then it's over. Okay.

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>That's standard. So okay, Uh, you're representing an act. Labels

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>are interested, what's the next step? Um? We would actually

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it would start to solicit offers and say, okay, you're

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>interested in make us a proposal. It depends by the

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>way it depends. Um. If it's a really major act,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll put the proposal together because we'll have a history

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have a pretty good idea and we want

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to press the envelope. If it's a newer act and

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no history to it, will ask the labels to

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>make bids and then we'll start to sort them by

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>stone how they line up. And Okay, now you've zeroed

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in on one label and you would like to make

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a deal with that label. What are the arguments? So

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what are the negotiations end up being when you're cammering

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>out the final deal. Well, we generally start with all

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the major points. How much product is it going to be,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be the advance, what's the royalty rate? Um?

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>The argument used to be a lot about how much

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are you going to pay for use of the songs

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and the records? But that's pretty much becoming irrelevant for

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>reasons I can explain if you're interested why I want

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to explain those. Okay, Um, those are called mechanical royalties,

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And every time a CD is sold you get paid

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of pennies. Every time there's a download,

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you get a certain number of pennies every time every

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>time there's a stream you get a percentage of the

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.959
<v Speaker 1>streaming revenue that gets paid for the songs. Now, this

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>is remember we're talking about two different rights. This is

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a record deal, So what are buying is the right

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to distribute physical recordings, but you also get paid for

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the songwriting, which may or may not even be the artist,

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but you get you get paid as a songwriter, which

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is a separate payment for what you get for the

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>actual master recording. Those are called mechanicals, and it used

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to be a major part of record deals to negotiate

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the mechanicals because you get those moneys right from the

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>get go. The first record that sold, you get paid.

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Whereas on your record deal they take back all the

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>money they've paid you for an advance and for costs,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and you may not get record royalties ever or for years.

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>But mechanical world is you get right from day one.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So that was a big negotiating point. What happened was

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a couple of changes in the copyright law.

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>The first one said that record deals made after a

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>certain date, I don't remember the exact in the In

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the in the nineties, all record all future record deals

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>had to pay a full amount of royalties for uh

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for downloads. And what the companies always tried to do

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is reduce the mechanicals, because that is money they're paying

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>out before they get their money back. And that was

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the argument was how much are they going to reduce it?

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So starting there they said you can't reduce it for

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>downloads not a big deal at the time, because you know,

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>big percent of the market was physical. Then along came streaming,

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>which is now the dominant part of the market, and

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that rate is set by the copyright law and there's

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>no negotiating about it, and it's not even in fact

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>paid by the record companies. It's paid by the digital

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>service providers, the spotifyes and so forth, so that the

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>only thing you're arguing about now is physical product, which

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is dwindling, and so it's becoming much less relevant. Okay,

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>going a little bit deeper, the streaming services, there's only

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred cents and a dollar, and Universal just made

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>their deal with Spotify. Spotify is reducing the percentage of

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>income they're paying the major distributors. But many people on

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the writing side, the songwriting side, believe eve that the

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>percentage that went to songwriters was too low to begin with.

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Is there what's your viewpoint on that and is there

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>any way to claw any of that percentage back? Well, um, yes,

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that's been an argument for quite a bit of time.

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>The argument on the record company side is we're making

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger investment, We have much more risk and

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>much more expense than the songwriters do, and the songwriters

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of course look at it the other way around. Um

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to synchronization licenses, the songwriter, the

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>master and the songwriter publisher are getting the same amount

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of money and they think that should be the model

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on the master's side too, but that we're not likely

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to get there. The percentages are not far off from

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the same ratio that they used to be on physical

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>product on CDs, which was the norm of the industry

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years. UM. So I think it's going

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to be difficult because to claw a bigger percentage, it's

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>got to come from somewhere. It's not likely to come

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>from Spotify. I their rate is set by by the

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>copyright law though, uh and so there's not a lot

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of negotiating around it at this point, and in fact,

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they're getting escalations that goes up over time. Okay, talking

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>about Spotify d cents they've recently in the last few months,

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>especially going deeply into podcasts, Wall Street has reacted very positively,

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>believing there's a lot more profit A can you explain

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to what degree this reduces labels income and how this

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to play out? I don't think podcasts will.

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Now this is just my personal opinion, but I don't

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>think podcasts are going to reduce labels income because I

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's a different audience. I mean, yes, of course,

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we only have so many leisure hours, and how we're

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>going to suspend it, whether it's watching TV or or

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>watching streaming shows on Netflix, or uh, listening to music

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or listening to podcasts. Um. You know, podcasts require you

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually sit in constant trade and listen music. I

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>can have on in the background and so and I

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>can be doing other things at the same time. So

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there is directly competitive as it

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>might seem, but I can understand why they would think

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a good source of income. Okay, but let's be

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>very specific. If there's a hundred cents in the dollar,

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>let's just make numbers round in sixty goes to audio streams.

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't the sixty percent that recording companies would normally get

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>be Aren't they reduced by the amount of time that

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>people spend listening to podcasts. I would think that that's right.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I would think that, you know, and the overall allocation

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of how much it goes to music and how much

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>goes to podcasts. Yes, I think that. I think it

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>would to some degree if they are truly doing it

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on the same basis. Now I'm not you know, I'm

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not directly involved in the Spotify ideals. I don't know

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>if they're based on music streaming or if they're based

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>on a dent of the service and it would take

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast out. But if that is what they're doing,

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.719
<v Speaker 1>then yes, you're right, it would reduce music. Okay, So

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the record deal. The points that

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're negotiating, uh, whether it be historically and how that's

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>changed now, or what you're still negotiating now. Okay, UM,

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I had covered most of the major parts.

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>The other things that are interesting these days are exclusivity. UM.

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>That used to not be as big an issue as

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's become over the last number of years, and the

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is that historically, UM exclusivity was limited

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to basically devices that were delivered to consumers. And the

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>only wrinkle in that one was that they had audio

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>visual devices, which in theory covered at the time video cassettes,

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you were in a movie that was out

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on video cassettes, you could be in breach of your

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>record deal. UM, something that was an easy fix if

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you new enough to ask about it. Now, the exclusivity

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is so broad that it covers anything you do, uh

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in any way communicating to the public. So, whether you're

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on a radio show, a TV show, UM, you're on

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a doing a concert that streamed at festivals, all these

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 1>things fall under the exclusivity and the record company needs

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to either consent and or get paid for it. Okay,

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>into what degree are you experiencing the three sixty deal?

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>The three sixty deals is which if anyone isn't familiar with,

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is where the record companies in the crash of the business. Uh,

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>starting in after UM said we can't make money on

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>traditional sales of music anymore. We're putting a lot of

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>money into making your career. You're making a lot of

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>money outside of records because of what we're doing, So

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>we want to share in your other income besides just records.

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Those are called three sixty rights, and they've become very

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>much the norm and presdent in the industry. Uh. If

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you have enough clout, you can get them cut down

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to small numbers or even get rid of them sometimes. UM.

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But every label, whether it's independent or major. Now once

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>three sixty rights is their initial go round. You can

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>also cut back the areas that they apply to UM.

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So for example, maybe they only apply to uh the

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>songwriting or publishing, or maybe they only apply to uh,

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, touring, UM. But they are very much here

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to stay for the near term. In the long term, well,

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll see. And how do those percentages break down?

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>They're different. Uh, they can be anywhere from the most

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 1>aggressive I've seen. Are some labels trying to take more

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>more in the norm is somewhere in the fifteen to

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty or range. And on touring they try to take

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it on the gross, but a smaller percentage because uh, well,

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>run tour in the beginning of your stay of your

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>career could probably lose money, not make money, and they

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't get paid on the growth of that because they

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>get you'd be losing money and paying your record company.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.919
<v Speaker 1>At a higher level tour, the artist still may only

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 1>gross fifty or sixty percent of of what they're growth, sorry,

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>may only take home fifty or sixty of what they're grossing.

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>And so the record companies, uh you know, want to

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>get paid on the higher number. And more importantly, they

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>don't want people playing games of throwing all these expenses

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 1>into the tour and make it look like they lost

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>money just so they don't have to pay the record company. Okay,

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>is it a straight percentage for all third party activities

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>or does some third party activities have a different rate.

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>It's all negotiable, but yes, they're they're not necessarily the

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>same percentage overall, So you might have You might pay

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>them only uh, you know, five percent on tours or

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 1>five percent of gross on tours. Uh. And you might

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>pay them five or ten percent on publishing, but you

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>pay them on merchandizing. I'm making this up, but they

0:36:56.320 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>can be different percentages, okay. And generally speaking on the

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>touring deals, are they gross or are they net? You

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>mean from there? Yes, they usually try. Sometimes they'll do

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a combination. You know, we want of net, but not

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 1>less than seven and a half percent of gross, or

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll just take a percentage of gross. And now traditionally,

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>although you say it's not that much the case today,

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the record companies have screwed the acts. How does the

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>record company know the accounting to them is accurate? A

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>good question. They all have the ability to audit, come

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in and look at the books. Uh. In my experience,

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't generally do that, although I've seen it happen

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>where they'll come in and make sure that they're getting

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a fair count, and they'll want to they've gotten pretty

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:45.439
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated about touring. They'll want to see budgets, projections. Uh.

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>And they may not let you deduct expenses like your

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>manager or your agent, on the theory that they, you know,

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>if they're getting paid full vote socials the label. Okay,

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to commitments. What kind of commitments are

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you seeing these days in terms of number of albums? Yes, okay, Well,

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting question before we even get to the number of

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>albums or whether or not the deal is going to

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>be based on albums, because albums may or may not

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be the norm in the years to come, likely won't be. Uh.

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So some companies are are are willing to go to

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll give you twelve or fourteen masters as

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.280
<v Speaker 1>opposed to an album. Uh. Some companies are still holding

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>onto albums and want to negotiate it when we get

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there if albums aren't the right way to go. But

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in general speaking, they're gonna want it. For a new artist,

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna want to have the options. Probably they'll commit

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to one album, and what the options for uh, you know,

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>two or three more uh, four more established artists. You know,

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you might limit the entire deal the three uh. And

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact, for newer artists, they're gonna want much more

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>than that. They're going to try and get four or

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>five albums total for part of the deal. Now, it

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>used to be historically no one would uh let anybody

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>go in California under the seven year rule, but there's

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 1>been some leakage there. What do you think about the

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>seven year rule applying to recording commitments today? Well, the

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>record companies did a pretty masterful job of lobbying the

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>California legislature to exempt record deals from the seven year statute.

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Not saying you can't get out of your record deal

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 1>after seven years, because you can, but saying that the

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>record company could sue you for the profits on the

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>undelivered masters, and the profits on the undelivered masters could

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be much more than the artist is going to make

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.879
<v Speaker 1>going to a new company. So in effect, they've got

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the artist to where they can't really terminate under the

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>seven year statute. And to what degree do you have

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>managers coming and saying I want this deal based in

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a state other than California because it advantages to them. Um,

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you mean because of the manager's enforcement of their of

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 1>their contracts. Right, unless there's a New York manager or

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>some sort of connection or the artist and the new

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are on the manager in another state, generally they don't

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>seem to object to that. Um. A few try every

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.760
<v Speaker 1>now and then, but you need some kind of connection

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to where the law that's going to apply. Okay, now

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about advances. Advances. What's the range today? What

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>are the commitments? Well, it's so you know, fact specific

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and dependent on how much heat and what kind of

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 1>genre and uh, you know, how many people are chasing

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it or what's the history. It's really really hard to say.

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can see for you know, for artists

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that have already a significant UM streaming history that's building.

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>You can see multimillion dollar deals for people who have

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>never had a record out before. UM. At the same time,

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're a rock band, you know, you might get

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred thousand because nobody seems to want rock

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>right at the moment, which I personally find said Okay,

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>that big the question. Someone comes to you and the

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>act is not hip hop or pop. To what degree

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>do you say, listen, this is not the major labels expertise,

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they probably don't want it. You're probably best to go

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. You know, that's more of a manager's call

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>than ours. Uh, genuinely, because I don't know that I

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>have the expertise to say that. I think I can

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly say that it's a harder sell at the major labels,

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think the labels still want some rock acts.

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just it depends on an anar guy

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>getting our in our woman getting excited about you. Okay,

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Just going back to an earlier point, reauditing on a

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>three sixty deal. Used to be these record companies had

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>an amazing number of employees. They would buy tickets, they

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>would sponsor stuff. There are many fewer employees. They're much,

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, less tight than they used to be. To

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what degree does this affect the development of the act

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and also affect whether they're able to uh stand up,

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it be an accounting or any other battle with

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the artist. Well, I think that, um, you know, the

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>expert if the record company is genuinely excited about someone

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and can and will really put the resources behind them.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they can still be very very effective. And

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to think I understood the second part about it. Well,

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess you know, if there are ten people working

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>there instead of a thousand, certain balls dropped through and

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and low, that would be make the act angry. That

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>would also mean they're not enough eyes to pay attention

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>on my three sixty deal. Uh. Well, I look, I

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I have not had the personal experience, but I certainly

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>know of artists that just ignore the three sixty and

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>don't pay them. Uh and uh, you know, but it's

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not something I've had a direct experience with. Okay, so

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm a new act, new developing act. What

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>do you tell me about the publishing? Hang onto it,

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>own it, don't sell it. Uh, you know, try to

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>make a deal for somebody to do what we call

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it an administration deal, which means that they will take

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>care of it for a period of time, but you

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>continue to own it and uh and you get it

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>back at the end of the term or a period

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of time after the end of the term. Let's assume

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I make a deal with a major label. What would

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 1>be the admin deal like and would there be in advance, Well,

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be with the label, it would be with

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a publisher or but that the publisher would know that

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a big company behind me, therefore in lockstep, they

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 1>would make a deal with me for the songs. Yeah,

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's again very very dependent. I mean, if you've

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>got you know, a track history of streaming and it's

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>building and you've already got multimillions of streams, you know

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get a much bigger check than if you're

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a brand new artist has never put out product and

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the labels excited about you. Uh, you know, you might

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:47.760
<v Speaker 1>get in the latter situation, you might get a funder

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand and the other you might get, you know, into

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the seven figures. And what would be the ADMD fee

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that would be collected against that. It's directly dependent on

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>how big an advance you want. The bigger advance us

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you want, the bigger the admin fee that the company

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that the publisher is gonna want. Uh, the what they

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>would love to get is of each dollar for an

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:14.479
<v Speaker 1>admin fee, you can get them do as low as

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ten percent, meaning of the artists. But the lower you get,

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the lesson an advance you're going to get because they

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have as much margin. And to how long do

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>these initial publishing admin deals tend to last three years

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>generally something like that, but they can also be based

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on a certain number of songs. In other words, particularly

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if there's an advance they I'll say, you know, we

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>have to have a certain number of songs before you

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>can move the term forward. And they may want options

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>beyond the three years, okay, and their options and the

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 1>options are based on what usually what are the triggers. Well,

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the trigger would be either nothing that it's completely at

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the discretion of the publishing company, or if you can negotiate.

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they can't do it if they haven't earned more

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>than a certain dollar amount during the period. But that

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't always meaningful becus they haven't learned that much. They

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>may not want to they got the option anyway, but

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it's still a good protection to build in for yourself. Now.

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the acts from the late sixties and

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>early seventies had we version clauses because the company's thought

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that these records would ultimately be worth nothing. To what

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>degree are those gotten today? And also the issue of

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>ownership of the underlying copyright. Are you talking about records now,

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are publishing? I'm talking about the record deal, record deal. Uh,

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it is, yes, you're you're quite right. There was a

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>versions because everybody assumed they'd be valueless after ten or

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, and those were easy to get back. Then

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>not so much anymore. The companies the masters are their

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>companies uh, primary assets. So they are much less likely

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to part with them these days if they if they

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>can avoid it, if you have enough cloud, you can

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>make a deal where you own your masters and you

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>basically rent them to them. Uh and uh. And so

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that's still doable, but it can be again, it can

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be a period of time. It would be not a

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 1>short period of time, maybe ten or fifteen years after

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of your term of your deal. Uh. And

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it would be dependent on you being recouped, although we

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>negotiate and ask for the right to if you're unrecouped,

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I say a hundred thousand dollars, we give you a

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars, and then we get the masters back

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>right away after this time period is up. And one

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that has always you know, bothered me is a

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 1>recording costs, a recording cost. If you go into a

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>studio and you pay a dollar, doesn't matter whether you're

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a superstar or you're a new artist. Yet you recoup

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>at different rates. Can that ever change? Well, you're going

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to recoup at your royalty rate. The higher your royalty right,

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 1>the faster you recoup. I guess yeah. I feel before

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you get the royalty rate dollar for dollar, if you

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>spend a hundred thousand dollars making the record, okay, once

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>they got a hundred thousand in however, with a percentage,

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but the superstars should recoup at the same rate when

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:10.359
<v Speaker 1>it comes to costs. Then when we go to pain,

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you should go to your royalty rate. It seems like

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you're doubly screwed as a new act. You're getting a

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lower ROULETI hated, you're recouping even slower. Yes, I mean

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.799
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, that's true, and that's historical as to

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>why it work that way. Um, you can do on

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a on a profit sharing deal, they will still generally

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>try to put some of the costs against the artists

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of the profits, although that's negotiable as well. But but

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>when you do a profit share deal, you also have

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>things charged against you that would not be charged against

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you if you were just recouping um. And that's things

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:49.720
<v Speaker 1>becoming less relevant. But it's things like manufacturing and shipping

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and freight and bad debts and those kinds of things. Again,

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>those are becoming less relevant. But there are some marketing

0:47:57.120 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 1>costs and promotion that might not be charged against you

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>as an artist. Uh So it's not exactly apples to apples,

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but in a profit share deal you can come closer

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to what you're talking about. And let's talk about delivery issues.

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a commitment of twenty masters, the term goes by,

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I've only delivered ten. What tends to happen there? Well,

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the term doesn't these days. The term doesn't end until

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you've delivered it. So the term can't go by before

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>you've done it, because the record companies got stuck with

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that years ago and changed their contracts based on the

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that now they're saying, you know, the termines x

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:38.439
<v Speaker 1>months after delivery of the product for that term. Okay,

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to you originally, I mean I know this,

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:44.720
<v Speaker 1>but for my listeners, you originally from where Dallas, Texas?

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And how many generations is your family in Dallas. Um. Well,

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>let's see, my grandparents on one side were in Dallas.

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>The other ones I think we're in Houston or Galveston. Wow,

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so they why did they end up in uh? Texas? Uh?

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:06.720
<v Speaker 1>The short answer is I'm not sure. Um the because

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I never knew those grandparents who had the chance to

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>talk him. I know that my father's side, you know,

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:15.919
<v Speaker 1>came through Ellis Island, went to New York, drifted down

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to New Orleans and ended up somehow in Galthaston. My

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>mother's side came through one side came through Canada. One

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 1>side games for Kansas City. I don't know the exact

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>story of how they got there, but that's where they were. Okay.

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>You know Texans, and I know people from that area

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 1>attend of a lot of pride in Texas. Do you

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 1>have that pride? Um? I like Texas? I mean, I

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>uh it's It's not a place I would choose to

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 1>live today, but I loved growing up there, and uh

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 1>it has a lot of unique and sort of fun

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>aspects to it. Okay, and your parents did what for

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a living? Uh? My father was a lawyer in Dallas. Uh.

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Interesting guy rep presented abes a pruder the guy who

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>took the Kennedy films and and represented Jacob Rubinstein, who

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>changed his name to Jack Ruby. Let's slow down that

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:17.840
<v Speaker 1>faithful weekend Friday, Kennedy gets shot in Dallas. What was

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it like being in Dallas? Then of course the chapter

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with Jack Ruby. Then of course there's a pruder chapter. Well,

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 1>those are all a bit tied together. I was not

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas. I was in Austin. I was in college

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Texas when Kennedy was shot. Um

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and I went to Dallas the next day it was

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving and uh my, in fact, we went over to

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>abes a Brewer's house the following day because my he

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 1>was He was related. His daughter was married to my

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:50.320
<v Speaker 1>first cousin. So my father on the drive over says,

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>don't talk to Abe about the Kennedy film. He's sick

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:56.879
<v Speaker 1>of it. Everybody's hounding him. Don't say a word. So

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we get there and everybody's sitting in a semicircle and

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Abe striding back and forth with great gusto telling this

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 1>entire story. That's why it always is. And Okay, what

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>about Jack Ruby. Uh, he was a small time guy

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in Texas that years before the Kennedy assassination. My father

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.360
<v Speaker 1>represented him when he changed his name from Jacob Rubinstein

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to Jack Ruby, and I just I think it's a

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty bizarical incidence. Uh. And then once what once he

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>shoots Oswald? As your father involved in any of the representation, No,

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>my dad said he called him uh and wanted him

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to help, but he said, I'm not a criminal lawyer

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and honestly didn't want to get involved. But uh, but

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>he did not have anything further to do with him.

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you and your father believe was Oswald the

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:57.279
<v Speaker 1>lone gunman? Was Ruby acting purely on anger and inspiration,

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know? Uh. My dad's theory was he was a

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:06.440
<v Speaker 1>small time guy and not that connected and probably acting

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>on his own Ruby that is Oswald. I don't think

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:14.280
<v Speaker 1>either of us have any better idea than anybody else. Okay,

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so you're growing up. How many kids in the family?

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Just me? Just you, It's me. My parents got divorced

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>when I was five years old. So, uh, this is

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:26.720
<v Speaker 1>another thing I did not know. Your parents get divorced

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and what are their paths? Well, my dad stayed in Dallas,

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>he had a law firm there, and my mom moved

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to remarried to a disc jockey who had a was

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a colorful personality jock and uh in Dallas, and got

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>a job at kf w B in Los Angeles when

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it was the uh top uh, you know, top forty

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>station and he had the morning drive. So we moved

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to California. And that was how I got to Los Angeles. Okay.

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:56.439
<v Speaker 1>So what was his handle online? That was his name,

0:52:56.600 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Hays. Okay. So you go to school first in Dallas,

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you go to public school or private school? Public school? Okay?

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And at what age do you move to Los Angeles?

0:53:09.480 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I was twelve, okay. Can you moved where in l A,

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 1>North Hollywood? Okay? And how do you end up going

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to college back in Austin Um? When I got out

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of car and when I was getting out of high school,

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I realized I spent more of my life in Texas

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and California, and I thought maybe I'd want to go

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>back and live in Texas. And my mother and my

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:36.720
<v Speaker 1>father and my grandmother, who graduated from college in nineteen seventeen,

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty unusual for a woman, had all gone to the

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>University of Texas, and I thought, Okay, I'll get out

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of l A I'll give it a try. And so

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I went to UT And did you get in state tuition?

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I think I did, actually, because my my father still

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:56.280
<v Speaker 1>live there. Okay, you know Austin has seen as super

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 1>hip today. What was it like when you went to college?

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:01.359
<v Speaker 1>It was a hot and eight degrees from super hit.

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a football team with no African American players

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:09.880
<v Speaker 1>because the coach said he thought it would demoralize his

0:54:10.000 --> 0:54:14.360
<v Speaker 1>boys to uh to put as he put it in. Yeah,

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like it was a pretense, Um. It was.

0:54:18.560 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It was very very football beer. Um. And I was

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not a particularly good fit. I was it was. You

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>might ask why didn't transfer? And the answer was it

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:33.879
<v Speaker 1>never occurred to me? Um. But I didn't really enjoy

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it till my second year when I started a band

0:54:36.400 --> 0:54:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and we had what I believe was the first mixed

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 1>band in UH in Austin history. We had a black

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:46.359
<v Speaker 1>singer and a white band and UH and that when

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we started playing frat parties and we're booked pretty solid.

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Then I had a great time. Okay, A couple of questions.

0:54:53.120 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>When did you start playing music? Um? I started playing

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 1>music when I was young. I played the accordion when

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I was, uh, you know, six or seven years old,

0:55:02.160 --> 0:55:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and I took up the guitar in high school and

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I took up the banjo when I was in law school.

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:11.759
<v Speaker 1>And so I've always loved music. Okay, So when you

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have this band, this is pre Beatles in Austin, Yes,

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 1>And what kind of music are you playing? It was

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:20.880
<v Speaker 1>mostly R and B and it was we were just

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 1>cover bands. We had a couple of original songs, one

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:26.839
<v Speaker 1>of which has become a bit of a cult hit.

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh, I've had collectors called me and I

0:55:30.840 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>want to buy some of the forty five from the era. Um.

0:55:34.560 --> 0:55:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But but for the most part it was a cover band.

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:40.759
<v Speaker 1>So what was the track and what was the band? Oh?

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:43.440
<v Speaker 1>The band was called Oedipus and the Mothers, and the

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>track is how it used to be. And do you

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>have any for I have I think one or two left? Yes?

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Did you? Did you sell any of them to these collectors?

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw one of them because the guy seemed really

0:55:55.800 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 1>hot for it, and sincere about wanting it? So yeah,

0:55:58.760 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And what did you study the UT I majored in history.

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I was going to major in psychology because I was

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 1>enjoying in those classes. So much. But you needed to

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:14.480
<v Speaker 1>take analytical geometry and statistics and I did not. I

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:17.839
<v Speaker 1>took analytical geometry, had no clue what they were talking about,

0:56:17.960 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ended up dropping it. So I minored in psychology, basically

0:56:21.480 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 1>taking every class except those, and majored in history. Okay,

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:28.919
<v Speaker 1>you graduate from UT do you immediately go to law

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 1>school or do you take time off? No? I went.

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I went directly to law school. Less common in those

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>days to take time off than it would be today.

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:38.319
<v Speaker 1>To what degree did you go to law school because

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:41.920
<v Speaker 1>your father was a lawyer? Big part of it. Um.

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I always enjoyed arguing, I

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>always enjoyed logic. I always enjoyed, you know, trying to

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:54.279
<v Speaker 1>understand complex things, make them simple, figure out how to

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 1>what motivates people, and how to move things from one

0:56:57.440 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>side to the other. So it played very much into

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.719
<v Speaker 1>what I was interested in. And your desire was to

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>go to Harvard. Yes, and you know, I'm needless to say,

0:57:07.520 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>there's the one l book, there's you know, there's the

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:13.399
<v Speaker 1>paper Chase. What was your experience at Harvard Law School? Well,

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:17.280
<v Speaker 1>paper Chase was written by one of my classmates. Um,

0:57:17.320 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but I I and I loved it. At Harvard Law School,

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was the most intellectually challenged I've ever

0:57:23.840 --> 0:57:27.080
<v Speaker 1>been in my life. It was a lot of really interesting,

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 1>bright people in my class. I thought the professors, you know,

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 1>some of them were dullards, but for the most part,

0:57:33.080 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we're interesting and engaging. And I was intrigued by the

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 1>subject matter. So I really enjoyed the experience. And you

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:44.520
<v Speaker 1>graduate in what's the plan? Um? The plan was. I

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:49.040
<v Speaker 1>had two offers, one from a I thought I wanted

0:57:49.080 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a tax lawyer originally when I went to

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:55.240
<v Speaker 1>law school because I liked tax and intricate problems and

0:57:55.760 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>um and so. But then after my second year, I

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 1>saw a firm put up a thing that said entertainment

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>law was one of their specialties, and I've never heard

0:58:05.680 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of it, and I thought, oh, that sounds like fun.

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I was thinking about whether I should go

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to an entertainment firm or a tax firm. But I

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>decided to try a tax firm. A firm here and

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I lay called Irell and Manella, which is now mostly litigation,

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but then was a premier tax firm, and I had

0:58:24.000 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 1>an offer from them. So I took a summer clerkship

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 1>with them, and while I was here, I interviewed with

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>several entertainment firms, including the one I worked for now,

0:58:32.600 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I graduated, I had an offer from both

0:58:34.920 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>at an offer from my real and an offer from

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a gang Tire, which is my current firm, and I

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:42.880
<v Speaker 1>went back and forth about it, but I really said,

0:58:43.200 --> 0:58:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, come over here and do tax work and

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start an entertainment area. You can do both.

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You can be part of the beginning of it. And

0:58:49.520 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it sounded intriguing and I ended up going there, and

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 1>as soon as I got there it was not a

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>good experience. They put me into mergers and acquisitions, which

0:58:59.040 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I had no interest and I wasn't doing tax I

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't doing entertainment. And I stayed there about it, and

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>then I took a class at USC on the music business,

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 1>talked by Jay Cooper and Irwin O. Spegel old timer's.

0:59:12.040 --> 0:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh Jay's still around, Irwin isn't um And it was

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so much fun. I thought I'm wasting my time. So

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I went back to gang Tire said, hey, I made

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a mistake, and uh, fortunately they let me switch and

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been there ever since. And how long after how

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:31.640
<v Speaker 1>long did you actually work at IRAL in Manoa? About

0:59:31.680 --> 0:59:38.320
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months? Okay, So you start at gang Tire in

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>what year, nineteen seventy two? Okay, you know there are

0:59:43.560 --> 0:59:47.480
<v Speaker 1>billboards on Sunset, the music businesses burgeoning. Do they immediately

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>put in music or I don't know about gang tied

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 1>or what degree there in other entertainment venues. Yeah, they

0:59:53.880 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Their theory was you should do a bit of everything.

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So I was doing film, I was doing music, and

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they were doing litigation in those days, which I did

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not particularly enjoy, but it was part of the process.

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I ended up, in fact, doing two trials with a

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>senior partner. But I couldn't wait to get out of litigation.

1:00:10.120 --> 1:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. And I was so passionate about music

1:00:13.800 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that they eventually sort of got it and let me

1:00:16.000 --> 1:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>start moving into the music as opposed to the film

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and TV side of it. And who was the boss

1:00:21.720 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of the music in when you did that, Well, Bruce

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Raymer was doing a lot of it, and Payson Wolfe,

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>who was really my mentor, was was doing most of it.

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>When I started out, the firm was representing almost all

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>record companies and publishing companies on the corporate side, and uh,

1:00:40.160 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>my heart was always on the artist side. But it

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>was enormously good training. In those days, they didn't have

1:00:46.880 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as much in house capability, so the larger deals they

1:00:50.000 --> 1:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>would farm out to us and we were So I

1:00:52.400 --> 1:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>got this great training doing really sophisticated deals on behalf

1:00:56.240 --> 1:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of the record label, dealing with all the talent lawyers

1:00:58.800 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in town, and learned a draft and I learned what

1:01:01.400 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody was asking for and it was a fabulous education.

1:01:05.200 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But my heart was on the artist side. So I

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>set out to build an artist practice. And how long

1:01:12.520 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>did you were you at gang Tied before you started

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>working on the other side. Um, well, it was gradual,

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>because you know, that wasn't most of our business. So

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I had to build the artist thing from scratch. I

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>started doing it pretty quickly, just but that was because

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I just took anybody to walked in the door. Um,

1:01:31.960 --> 1:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I go to be in my showcases, I go to uh,

1:01:34.520 --> 1:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, just ask anybody to send me whatever, because

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to get experience and I wanted to

1:01:40.080 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>start to get into the artist world. So that begs

1:01:43.080 --> 1:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a question, although you're referencing it, to what degree did

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you work trying to get a client base, and how

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>did you actually get a client bass Um slowly was

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the answer. But yes, it was something very intentional and

1:01:55.800 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>something I worked very hard for. It was My theory

1:01:58.880 --> 1:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was is that if I met as many people as

1:02:01.240 --> 1:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>possible that were my age, then when they grew up

1:02:04.080 --> 1:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in the business, I have relationships. I knew that was

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a long term strategy, but I didn't think a bad one.

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>And then I just went out and not as many

1:02:11.760 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>people as I could. I remember you you were speaking

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>once at the Beverly Hills Bar Association, probably ninety or something.

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you consciously take all those speaking gigs to drive

1:02:22.080 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>your business? I did, uh, and that and I like

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>speaking anyway. Um Uh, as a friend of mine says,

1:02:29.280 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll go miles to hear myself speak. So what was

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the turning point? What client pushed you into? Uh? The

1:02:37.480 --> 1:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>story you are now? Um. Probably Heart was the first one,

1:02:42.160 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and then Tina Turner was the second. I think when

1:02:45.160 --> 1:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>when I had both of them, that really changed the game.

1:02:48.960 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And how did you get them? Uh? Different ways? Heart

1:02:52.640 --> 1:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>came through their producer was a client of mine and

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they were looking to make a change, and he got

1:02:57.800 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>me an introduction to him. Uh. Tina came through her manager,

1:03:01.640 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>who I had met on the other side of a deal,

1:03:04.760 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>uh where we were representing, and I got to know

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>him and when he looked to make a change, he

1:03:10.240 --> 1:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>called okay. So this always pigs a question when you're

1:03:14.920 --> 1:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>an attorney, do you look back and say, not specifically

1:03:18.400 --> 1:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>with the act you mentioned, Oh, if I knew what

1:03:20.360 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I do now, I screwed up. Yeah, you know, I

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't. I mean, obviously I made mistakes along the

1:03:26.440 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>way everybody does. I don't know that I would change

1:03:30.080 --> 1:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the overall strategy. It was just frustrating because it took

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Um, and uh, I watched guys my age,

1:03:37.560 --> 1:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, sale passed me and and do better, and

1:03:40.640 --> 1:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that was that was frustrating and a little disconcerting. But

1:03:44.400 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I was I just determined to be

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the tortoise in the race, if not the hair and

1:03:49.560 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it came I think in the time frame that it

1:03:52.560 --> 1:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>should have. But I can't point to any particular thing

1:03:56.560 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think is a major change. And to what

1:03:59.120 --> 1:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>did we do? These acts change attorneys at this point? Yeah,

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the artist. I mean, you know there

1:04:06.000 --> 1:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>are people that change attorneys like they change their sneakers. Uh,

1:04:10.080 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's other people that stick around for years and years.

1:04:13.520 --> 1:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Our philosophy is different from a lot of our competitors.

1:04:16.400 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Were a very small firm. There's only three lawyers doing music. Uh,

1:04:21.160 --> 1:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and do paralegals and uh. We want to be able

1:04:24.760 --> 1:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to give really and you know, hands on service to

1:04:27.720 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a few number of clients. So we're selective about it.

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>We take and one of the things we look for

1:04:32.560 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is someone that we think, uh, you know, is a

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>good person and that we can have a long term

1:04:37.400 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>relationship with. And your name is finally on the door.

1:04:40.600 --> 1:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>How did that happen? Oh? Just maybe just because it

1:04:45.000 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>was time? Okay, So can you tell us a couple

1:04:49.440 --> 1:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of tales from your career? Uh that you know that

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>people would like to hear around the fire. Unfortunately, a

1:04:57.120 --> 1:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of what I talk, you know, I've learned I

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>can't talk about because attorney client privilege. Yeah, exactly. UM,

1:05:05.040 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>so it may be a little too general of a question.

1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>So okay, now you have other interests for someone who's

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>working so hard. First, let's talk about the book. How

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>did you decide to write the book? Well, I was

1:05:17.200 --> 1:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>teaching the class. I told you I took at USC

1:05:20.200 --> 1:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>on the music business. I ended up teaching, and I

1:05:23.920 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>was taught it for about three years, and it dawned

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>on me that I had in my class note outline

1:05:32.480 --> 1:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the outline of a book. And there was only one

1:05:34.960 --> 1:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>book on the music business at the time, called This

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Business of Music, and it was it was a good resource,

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but it was very difficult to read, and even as

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, I had trouble understanding parts of it. And

1:05:49.040 --> 1:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, there's a need for a very

1:05:52.000 --> 1:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>easy to read overview for people who are musicians oriented.

1:05:56.120 --> 1:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Their ears don't like to read. Uh, And you know,

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so I wanted to write something that was simple and

1:06:01.640 --> 1:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>easy to understand. I always wanted to write a book

1:06:04.360 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>all my life. I started and stopped trying to write

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a book and never really finished one. And I thought,

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, here's a chance to put together a bunch

1:06:12.720 --> 1:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of things. And I thought there was a need in

1:06:14.640 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace to do it. So I literally grabbed a

1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>dictaphone I started talking based on it, and uh, you know,

1:06:21.120 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>about a year and a half later, I I had

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I had the book and was it instantly successful. I mean,

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm inside, so I'm viewing this you know a little differently,

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but a book like that has to sell a certain

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>number of copies to be worthwhile. He what was the

1:06:35.040 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>initial was the initial publisher Simon and Schuster. Yeah, it was.

1:06:39.200 --> 1:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a story was I was at dinner at

1:06:42.600 --> 1:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>at an event next to Michael Ovits, who at the

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>time was at the height of his powers, and I

1:06:48.200 --> 1:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>told him, was telling him about the book, and he said, oh,

1:06:50.320 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>let me sell it for you. And I'm not an idiot.

1:06:52.960 --> 1:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>If Michael Evits wants to sell my book, I went sure.

1:06:56.400 --> 1:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>So I sent him the book and a week later

1:06:58.760 --> 1:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I have two offers from uh, from two different publishers

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in New York. So I got on a plane and

1:07:03.600 --> 1:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I went and I met him and Simon and Schuster.

1:07:06.080 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>The editor who wanted it was a twenty seven year

1:07:08.400 --> 1:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>old guy at the time who was in a band

1:07:10.120 --> 1:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>on weekends and completely got the book and it was

1:07:13.760 --> 1:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>very helpful in terms of helping crafted as well. So

1:07:17.840 --> 1:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I went with them, and uh, you know it was.

1:07:21.440 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It didn't happen immediately out of the box. It took

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>time for people to get used to it and uh,

1:07:27.280 --> 1:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and then I did a lot of fublicity around it

1:07:29.680 --> 1:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time. And I thought, you know, it'll be

1:07:32.880 --> 1:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a long, slow build, but it seemed to start to

1:07:35.440 --> 1:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>build and built by word of mouth. And we just

1:07:38.440 --> 1:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>released the tenth edition last year. And how do you

1:07:41.120 --> 1:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>decide to update it? I generally do it about every

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>three years. This one took four years because streaming so

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>up into the business that I had to seriously and

1:07:52.960 --> 1:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>radically rewrite the book, the most extensive rewrite since the

1:07:56.040 --> 1:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>first edition. Really, uh, and because it just I mean,

1:08:00.000 --> 1:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>things you wouldn't think about, like the CD royalties were

1:08:02.600 --> 1:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>first in the chapter on royalties. Well that's obviously almost

1:08:06.240 --> 1:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant now, so they're not first anymore. The whole publishing section,

1:08:11.080 --> 1:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the way the industry was shaped has changed over the

1:08:13.800 --> 1:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>last four years. It's just it's a very radical rewrite.

1:08:17.960 --> 1:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And you have these other interests. You've written novels, you

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>play poker, you have magic. Could cover those a little

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for us, sure. Basically, I'm a serial obsessive and I

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>go to um, you know, I had intensely involved in something,

1:08:34.200 --> 1:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll burn out and move on to something else.

1:08:36.640 --> 1:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And I don't relax by doing nothing. I relaxed by

1:08:39.720 --> 1:08:42.639
<v Speaker 1>doing something very different, but just as intense. I don't

1:08:42.640 --> 1:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>know why. It's just the way I'm wired. So uh.

1:08:45.439 --> 1:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, magic was a hobby since I was a

1:08:47.240 --> 1:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>little kid. I drifted and out of that one UM

1:08:50.320 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Poker I've been playing the last number of years pretty

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>seriously because I enjoy it. And I was in a

1:08:56.040 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>regular dame until COVID hit UM the backgam and I

1:09:01.000 --> 1:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>started recently and uh and took some lessons and I

1:09:05.200 --> 1:09:07.599
<v Speaker 1>found out that was fascinating because it turns out it's

1:09:07.840 --> 1:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>very mathematical, very strategic, and not that I love math

1:09:11.600 --> 1:09:14.519
<v Speaker 1>all that much, but I can enough to understand how

1:09:14.520 --> 1:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it works. Um and you know, and then I just

1:09:17.200 --> 1:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>drift in and out of various other interests. Well, I

1:09:19.920 --> 1:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>know you've written these books, these novels. Uh, do you

1:09:24.640 --> 1:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>has that something that sort of ended because you talk

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about being a serial obsessive. Has your focus changed from that?

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>It comes in and out. Actually, I have another novel

1:09:34.960 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that I finished last year that I'm still editing and

1:09:38.280 --> 1:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>working on. Uh and uh. I I have someone optioned

1:09:42.400 --> 1:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one of my novels for a motion picture, and I

1:09:44.960 --> 1:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>worked on the script for that no idea if it

1:09:47.040 --> 1:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>will actually ever get made. But that was fine. I've

1:09:49.400 --> 1:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>never done a script before, So it just depends I

1:09:53.120 --> 1:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have to go with where the news takes me. And

1:09:55.840 --> 1:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>how bit a magician are you? I'm pretty good. I'm

1:09:58.720 --> 1:10:01.479
<v Speaker 1>a magician member of the Magic Castle, which means you

1:10:01.560 --> 1:10:04.479
<v Speaker 1>have to take a test in order to be admitted.

1:10:05.439 --> 1:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know cards mostly I'm I'm a bit rusty,

1:10:09.439 --> 1:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>but I could still fool you, okay. And how good

1:10:13.080 --> 1:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a poker player are you? I'm pretty good. I play

1:10:16.080 --> 1:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>at pretty high level games. I wouldn't say I'm a

1:10:19.040 --> 1:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>great poker player because the guys that do it full

1:10:22.040 --> 1:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>time in the pros are obviously at a whole different

1:10:25.320 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>level from where I play the game. But I can

1:10:28.080 --> 1:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>hold my own. I can play in a game and uh,

1:10:30.360 --> 1:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and not you know, not be the complete dufus. So

1:10:33.920 --> 1:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what kind of when you say it's serious, what kind

1:10:35.680 --> 1:10:39.479
<v Speaker 1>of players? Oh? I mean, you know, it just depends

1:10:39.479 --> 1:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>on news. In the game. I'll go to I'll go

1:10:41.200 --> 1:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>down to Commerce where they have a the world's largest

1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:46.599
<v Speaker 1>poker room, or I'll go to Vegas and that at

1:10:46.640 --> 1:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the higher games, you're gonna get professionals and you're gonna

1:10:49.080 --> 1:10:52.599
<v Speaker 1>get you know, serious players. Um, but it's it's you know,

1:10:52.640 --> 1:10:54.599
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's just fun. I mean, I'm not gonna

1:10:54.720 --> 1:10:57.599
<v Speaker 1>play with my I'm not gonna lose the house. Okay,

1:10:57.680 --> 1:11:02.479
<v Speaker 1>So what's your biggest loss in your biggest win? Um

1:11:02.560 --> 1:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>M hmmm. I don't know. I mean, you know, I

1:11:05.160 --> 1:11:08.479
<v Speaker 1>don't play gigantic stakes, but I think i've I've lost

1:11:08.520 --> 1:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a few thousand in a session and I have won

1:11:10.800 --> 1:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a few thousand in a session, but somewhere in that range. Okay,

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You've been through a lot of changes. You got in

1:11:18.080 --> 1:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the business, went from vinyl to cassette. I think you

1:11:20.439 --> 1:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>were kind of you know, came in towards the end

1:11:22.800 --> 1:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the eight track. We went to c D, went

1:11:25.200 --> 1:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to streaming, We went to touring being the dominant amount

1:11:28.439 --> 1:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of money. If you look in the crystal ball, what

1:11:30.960 --> 1:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>do you see coming down the line? I think it's

1:11:33.880 --> 1:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna be streaming for quite a while. I mean, I

1:11:36.600 --> 1:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's such a good experience that I'm not sure

1:11:39.760 --> 1:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>what more you could want as as a consumer. The

1:11:42.400 --> 1:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>ability to listen to anything you want, any time you

1:11:44.600 --> 1:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>want it, and the ability to have it curated if

1:11:47.040 --> 1:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to curated. Um, I think that's going to

1:11:50.760 --> 1:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>be the dominant thing for for quite a bit of time,

1:11:53.560 --> 1:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm genuinely don't have I did see streaming coming a

1:11:57.200 --> 1:12:01.519
<v Speaker 1>long time ago, before the technology is there, but I don't.

1:12:01.600 --> 1:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a vision of what's coming next to you. Well,

1:12:04.840 --> 1:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I think streaming is in because he's on demand. So

1:12:08.600 --> 1:12:10.479
<v Speaker 1>that's we come to the end of the game, which

1:12:10.520 --> 1:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is so much of what's happening in you know, we

1:12:13.400 --> 1:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>figured it out in the music business. They're still going

1:12:15.280 --> 1:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>through wrenching transitions in the movie business, television business, etcetera.

1:12:19.840 --> 1:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But I was really asking overall, Okay, used to be

1:12:23.760 --> 1:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the record companies were big banks. You went on tour

1:12:27.160 --> 1:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to promote the record. You've made most of the money

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on the record. Now that has flipped. Okay, used to

1:12:33.240 --> 1:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>be record companies supported you over a period of albums.

1:12:36.880 --> 1:12:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Right now hip hop is dominant on streaming services, not

1:12:40.600 --> 1:12:44.759
<v Speaker 1>necessarily dominant on the road. Do you see any trends

1:12:44.880 --> 1:12:49.519
<v Speaker 1>playing out? I think that, Um, I don't have a

1:12:49.560 --> 1:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>specific trend that I see, except to know that it's

1:12:52.200 --> 1:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>cyclical that I you know, never nothing ever goes in

1:12:55.240 --> 1:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a straight line, and things come in and out of

1:12:57.800 --> 1:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>vogue and in and out of fashion. So I think

1:13:00.360 --> 1:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that will change. I do think that there's something in

1:13:03.120 --> 1:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the live experience that you don't get any other way,

1:13:06.240 --> 1:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and so I think touring will always be around for

1:13:09.840 --> 1:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the right kind of artists that can that can tour.

1:13:12.400 --> 1:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see any any I mean, particularly now

1:13:14.840 --> 1:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>with COVID, it's pretty hard to spot much of anything.

1:13:16.960 --> 1:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see a change in the trend hip hop.

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:21.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it has been nominant for quite a period

1:13:21.560 --> 1:13:24.519
<v Speaker 1>of time. It's just a lot more blatant now. Okay,

1:13:24.640 --> 1:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>used to be the barrier to entry to be in

1:13:26.479 --> 1:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the music business was very high, assuming getting a record deal.

1:13:30.280 --> 1:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Now the barrier to entry is almost non existence. We

1:13:32.800 --> 1:13:36.759
<v Speaker 1>can put anything up on these streaming services. In terms

1:13:36.800 --> 1:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of your viewpoint, it would seem that the development period

1:13:41.479 --> 1:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>would be longer. And what do you say to new

1:13:45.160 --> 1:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>acts today? Well, honestly, I don't have a lot of

1:13:48.880 --> 1:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>interaction with brand new acts. I mean, by the time

1:13:51.600 --> 1:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they get to me, um, they're usually a little bit

1:13:54.120 --> 1:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>farther along. But I think that the thing that I

1:13:57.479 --> 1:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>say in my book all you need to know about

1:13:59.560 --> 1:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the music business is that you've got to build a

1:14:02.120 --> 1:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>bus before you go anywhere, and you've got to do

1:14:04.200 --> 1:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it yourself because nobody's really going to do it for you.

1:14:07.360 --> 1:14:09.519
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be you know, you've got to develop

1:14:09.560 --> 1:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>an online following. You've got to develop a fan base.

1:14:11.840 --> 1:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got to uh, you know, get out and get

1:14:15.240 --> 1:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a story, get some streaming, get some action, get some

1:14:17.800 --> 1:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers on SoundCloud, on the streaming services before you can

1:14:22.439 --> 1:14:24.639
<v Speaker 1>move it to the next level. Well, don I think

1:14:24.680 --> 1:14:26.599
<v Speaker 1>we've come to the end of the feeling we've known.

1:14:27.080 --> 1:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>This has been extremely informative. We also learned more about

1:14:30.960 --> 1:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>who you actually are, where you come from. Thanks so

1:14:33.479 --> 1:14:36.639
<v Speaker 1>much for doing this my pleasure. Thank you about until

1:14:36.680 --> 1:14:38.519
<v Speaker 1>next time. This is Bob left stands